revamp of emergency units

1
857 Revamp of emergency units Too many emergency units in France have too few doctors, and the system is clogged up by too many patients. In 1990 the country had 566 emergency units in 524 public hospitals. There is approximately one public hospital receiving emergency patients per 141000 inhabitants, or one emergency unit per 105 000 inhabitants. 1 : French citizen out of 8 visits such a unit each year and 2345 000 of them are admitted to hospital after their visit (a rate of admission of 32-2%). A report presented last week to the Ministers of Health and Social Affairs by the Commission for the Restructuring of the Emergency Units says that the lack of organisation of these units v and the way they are used are such that it is a miracle that mishaps have not occurred more frequently or been more serious. The commission is presided over by Prof Adolphe Steg (Hopital Necker, Paris), who in 1989 prepared a report on emergency units for the Economics and Social Council. : The commission notes not only the rise in numbers of patients attending emerg- ency units (eg, a 300% increase in Stras- bourg hospitals over the past 10 years) but also the point that at least 70% of cases seen are not emergencies. Part of the reason seems to be the non-availability of general practitioners (in Normandy, 75% of non- hospital doctors allocate under 5 % of their working hours to emergencies) and partly = to the way patients see emergency units as a v supermarket for tests and X-rays. The commission notes that emergency doctors trained in the specialty to DES (Diplome d’Etude de Specialite) level are found only in university hospitals. The bulk of the work is done by FFI (Faisont Fonction d’Interne) students acting as interns; they do 50-63% of the night shifts but only 23% of them have the ability to do so. The final decision in surgical emergencies was taken IY them in 37 % of the cases, and 60%, of the patients have no other medical contact than he FFI or the resident (medical student). A urvey of 207 hospitals in 1992 revealed that 0% of the emergency units operate with- mt a senior doctor, and that 68% of them iave a medical team of fewer than 5. Yet vacancies in emergency units do not attract applicants because, according to the report, lectors perceive that the units are not a sufficiently stimulating medical environ- nent, that they lack access to technical facilities, and that a "critical mass" of action does not take place in many of these units. The system has not collapsed only because of help from anaesthesia and intensive-care units and because existing staff know how to seek out such help. : Steg and his colleagues propose a re- grouping of emergency units, as allowed by a 1975 law. There should be only one unit per 300 000 inhabitants and units should be either reception units, with at least 5 senior doctors trained to do highly specialised and complex procedures, or screening units, with fewer senior doctors to undertake most of the other medical work, including outpatient consultations. In addition, the public would be taught not to rush to the nearest hospital but to dial "15" formedical advice. The "15" centres already exist in some French regions and would have to be = extended to all regions. : Other recommendations include moni- toring of the activity of emergency units (using indicators such as number of visits, rate of admission, length of visits, number of medical and surgical procedures); that units be an independent department whose budget should be individualised; and that they have adequate numbers of permanent staff. Money will be required to finance the : restructuring. After that, the commission recommends that units receive negotiated sums to meet specified objectives. The restructuring, says Steg, should not be bureaucratic; there should be flexibility for units to adapt to their needs. : Jean-Michel Bader Green light for Swiss national health insurance The approval by some 80% of Swiss in a nationwide referendum (Sept 25-26) of a SwFrlO (4.65) daily charge payable by all hospital patients irrespective of whatever health insurance they may have has given the green light for the introduction of a uniform system throughout the country. Discussion of draft legislation to this end began in parliament on Sept 30. The annual maximum payable by an individual under the new SwFrlO charge is SwFr500, pend- ing parliamentary approval of global compulsory sickness insurance, bringing Switzerland into line with most other West European countries. Meanwhile the SwFrlO charge will, it is hoped, put a brake on rising and widely varying premiums as charged by the country’s 200 or so main insurance funds. Application of the decree on curbing rising health costs, approved by parliament last October, had been held up pending the outcome of the referendum. About 98% of the 6-8 million population are covered, in part or wholly, by the funds, most of which receive state subsidies. From 1985 to last year, health costs went up by more than 45%. With varying coverage percent- age, an estimated 30% of overall family health expenditure is not refunded by insurance. The legislation being drafted is expected to institute a basic standard premium for all, irrespective of age or sex (the trend has been for women to pay more) and to include an equalisation fund, as approved by parlia- ment in 1991, for sharing out risks between the insurance funds. Parliament hopes to have the new scheme operative in 1995. : The national referendum also approved legislation with an entirely direct bearing on health-this provides for stricter control over gun sales. Alan McGregor Financing residential care for the elderly The German government has for several months been trying, but without success, to find a means of financing health care for the elderly. The latest plan proposes that all workers and employees be legally obliged to give up either 2 days of their paid holidays or accept a 20% pay cut on all 9 German public holidays. : This proposal was made after the pre- : vious plan-under which employees would not have received pay for the first 2 days of illness (see Lancet July 10, p 107)-had failed to win approval. Neither the unions nor the employers nor the Social Democrat Party which enjoys a majority in the Council of the Federal States ("Bun- desrat") said they would accept this law. Since the Bundesrat must approve the plan before it can become law, their vote counts. And the Bundesrat has already indicated that it would not accept the new plan either. The unions are threatening to strike in protest at this "involuntary, government- imposed pay cut". They are angry that the proposed law would mean that workers and employees would carry the whole financial burden of the new insurance. The Christian Democrat/Liberal government is nevertheless determined to push ahead with their plan. Annette Tuffs Penalty fees and league tables Since April this year the pressure on UK health authorities to reduce waiting lists has intensified. Previously the government’s Patient’s Charter put a time limit of 2 years on the waiting time for an operation; since April this deadline has been reduced to 18 months. A new scheme by the Department of Health to ensure that the Charter’s committments are adhered to involves "clawing back" money from a regional health authority if a patient is not treated within the set time limit. The money that is reclaimed comes not from the regional

Upload: jean-michel-bader

Post on 19-Nov-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

857

Revamp of emergencyunits

Too many emergency units in France have

too few doctors, and the system is cloggedup by too many patients. In 1990 thecountry had 566 emergency units in 524public hospitals. There is approximatelyone public hospital receiving emergencypatients per 141000 inhabitants, or oneemergency unit per 105 000 inhabitants. 1 :French citizen out of 8 visits such a uniteach year and 2345 000 of them areadmitted to hospital after their visit (a rateof admission of 32-2%). A report presentedlast week to the Ministers of Health andSocial Affairs by the Commission for theRestructuring of the Emergency Units saysthat the lack of organisation of these units v

and the way they are used are such that it is amiracle that mishaps have not occurredmore frequently or been more serious. Thecommission is presided over by ProfAdolphe Steg (Hopital Necker, Paris), whoin 1989 prepared a report on emergencyunits for the Economics and SocialCouncil. :The commission notes not only the rise

in numbers of patients attending emerg-ency units (eg, a 300% increase in Stras-bourg hospitals over the past 10 years) butalso the point that at least 70% of cases seenare not emergencies. Part of the reasonseems to be the non-availability of generalpractitioners (in Normandy, 75% of non-hospital doctors allocate under 5 % of theirworking hours to emergencies) and partly =

to the way patients see emergency units as a v

supermarket for tests and X-rays. Thecommission notes that emergency doctorstrained in the specialty to DES (Diplomed’Etude de Specialite) level are found onlyin university hospitals. The bulk of thework is done by FFI (Faisont Fonctiond’Interne) students acting as interns; theydo 50-63% of the night shifts but only 23%of them have the ability to do so. The finaldecision in surgical emergencies was taken

IY them in 37 % of the cases, and 60%, of the patients have no other medical contact thanhe FFI or the resident (medical student). A urvey of 207 hospitals in 1992 revealed that0% of the emergency units operate with-mt a senior doctor, and that 68% of themiave a medical team of fewer than 5. Yetvacancies in emergency units do not attractapplicants because, according to the report,lectors perceive that the units are not asufficiently stimulating medical environ-nent, that they lack access to technicalfacilities, and that a "critical mass" ofaction does not take place in many of theseunits. The system has not collapsed onlybecause of help from anaesthesia andintensive-care units and because existingstaff know how to seek out such help. :

Steg and his colleagues propose a re-grouping of emergency units, as allowed bya 1975 law. There should be only one unitper 300 000 inhabitants and units should beeither reception units, with at least 5 seniordoctors trained to do highly specialised andcomplex procedures, or screening units,with fewer senior doctors to undertakemost of the other medical work, includingoutpatient consultations. In addition, thepublic would be taught not to rush to thenearest hospital but to dial "15" formedicaladvice. The "15" centres already exist insome French regions and would have to be =

extended to all regions. :Other recommendations include moni-

toring of the activity of emergency units(using indicators such as number of visits,rate of admission, length of visits, numberof medical and surgical procedures); thatunits be an independent department whosebudget should be individualised; and thatthey have adequate numbers of permanentstaff. Money will be required to finance the :restructuring. After that, the commissionrecommends that units receive negotiatedsums to meet specified objectives. Therestructuring, says Steg, should not bebureaucratic; there should be flexibility forunits to adapt to their needs. :

Jean-Michel Bader

Green light for Swissnational health insurance

The approval by some 80% of Swiss in anationwide referendum (Sept 25-26) of aSwFrlO (4.65) daily charge payable by allhospital patients irrespective of whateverhealth insurance they may have has giventhe green light for the introduction of auniform system throughout the country.Discussion of draft legislation to this endbegan in parliament on Sept 30. The annualmaximum payable by an individual underthe new SwFrlO charge is SwFr500, pend-ing parliamentary approval of globalcompulsory sickness insurance, bringingSwitzerland into line with most other West

European countries. Meanwhile the

SwFrlO charge will, it is hoped, put a brakeon rising and widely varying premiums ascharged by the country’s 200 or so maininsurance funds.

Application of the decree on curbingrising health costs, approved by parliamentlast October, had been held up pending theoutcome of the referendum. About 98% ofthe 6-8 million population are covered, inpart or wholly, by the funds, most ofwhich receive state subsidies. From 1985 tolast year, health costs went up by morethan 45%. With varying coverage percent-age, an estimated 30% of overall familyhealth expenditure is not refunded byinsurance.The legislation being drafted is expected

to institute a basic standard premium forall, irrespective of age or sex (the trend hasbeen for women to pay more) and to includean equalisation fund, as approved by parlia-ment in 1991, for sharing out risks betweenthe insurance funds. Parliament hopes tohave the new scheme operative in 1995.

: The national referendum also approvedlegislation with an entirely direct bearingon health-this provides for stricter controlover gun sales.

Alan McGregor

Financing residential carefor the elderly

The German government has for severalmonths been trying, but without success, tofind a means of financing health care for theelderly. The latest plan proposes that allworkers and employees be legally obligedto give up either 2 days of their paidholidays or accept a 20% pay cut on all 9German public holidays. :This proposal was made after the pre- :

vious plan-under which employees wouldnot have received pay for the first 2 days ofillness (see Lancet July 10, p 107)-hadfailed to win approval. Neither the unions

nor the employers nor the Social DemocratParty which enjoys a majority in theCouncil of the Federal States ("Bun-desrat") said they would accept this law.Since the Bundesrat must approve the planbefore it can become law, their vote counts.And the Bundesrat has already indicatedthat it would not accept the new plan either.The unions are threatening to strike in

protest at this "involuntary, government-imposed pay cut". They are angry that theproposed law would mean that workers andemployees would carry the whole financialburden of the new insurance. TheChristian Democrat/Liberal government isnevertheless determined to push aheadwith their plan.

Annette Tuffs

Penalty fees and leaguetables

Since April this year the pressure on UKhealth authorities to reduce waiting lists hasintensified. Previously the government’sPatient’s Charter put a time limit of 2 yearson the waiting time for an operation; sinceApril this deadline has been reduced to 18months. A new scheme by the Departmentof Health to ensure that the Charter’scommittments are adhered to involves

"clawing back" money from a regionalhealth authority if a patient is not treated

within the set time limit. The money that isreclaimed comes not from the regional