reu 2013 report 3

16
REU 2013 Report 3 Alla Petrakova

Upload: brandy

Post on 12-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Alla Petrakova. REU 2013 Report 3. Last week recap. Trajectory Clustering TRACLUS UCF Motion Pattern Algorithm. Quality of Clusters. Attempt to find a Generally Accepted Quantiative Measure. Approaches to Evaluating Quality of Clusters. qualitative. quantitative. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REU 2013 Report 3

REU 2013 Report 3Alla Petrakova

Page 2: REU 2013 Report 3

Last week recap

Trajectory Clustering TRACLUS UCF Motion Pattern Algorithm

Page 3: REU 2013 Report 3

Quality of ClustersAttempt to find a Generally Accepted Quantiative Measure

Page 4: REU 2013 Report 3

Approaches to Evaluating Quality of Clusters

QUALITATIVE

Ground truth Visual inspection Synthetic datasets Comparison to

another algorithm

QUANTITATIVE

Correct Clustering Rate

Sum of Squared Error Accuracy Measure

± Error or Noise Penalty

Page 5: REU 2013 Report 3

SSE

J. gil Lee and J. Han. Trajectory clustering: A partition-and-group framework. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), Beijing, China, pages 593–604, 2007. Cited by 357

Page 6: REU 2013 Report 3

Sum of Squared Error

N denotes the set of all noise line segments.

Page 7: REU 2013 Report 3

Correct Clustering Rate

B. Morris and M. Trivedi, “Learning Trajectory Patterns by Clustering: Experimental Studies and Comparative Evaluation,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 312- 319, June 2009.

Page 8: REU 2013 Report 3

Correct Clustering Rate

Find one-to-one mapping between the ground truth and clustering labels which maximized the number of matches.

where N is the total number of trajectories and pc denotes the total number of trajectories matched to the c-th cluster.

Page 9: REU 2013 Report 3

Accuracy Measure

IN – total number of clusters bi = the number of labeled

trajectories that are most frequent in a given cluster

Bi = the total number of trajectories in a cluster

Page 10: REU 2013 Report 3

Testing

Page 11: REU 2013 Report 3

Vehicle Motion Patterns

Dataset:

Page 12: REU 2013 Report 3

TRACLUS results

Page 13: REU 2013 Report 3

UCF Motion Pattern results

Page 14: REU 2013 Report 3

Australian Sign Language Dataset

Used in Following Papers:

M. Vlachos, G. Kollios, and D. Gunopulos, “Discovering Similar Multidimensional Trajectories,” Proc. Int’l Conf. Data Eng., pp. 673- 684, 2002. (cited by 631)

Lei Chen, M. Tamer Özsu, and Vincent Oria. 2005. Robust and fast similarity search for moving object trajectories. In Proc. of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD int’l conf. on Management of data (SIGMOD '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 491-502. DOI=10.1145/1066157.1066213 (Cited by 395)

A. Naftel and S. Khalid, “Motion Trajectory Learning in the DFT- Coefficient Feature Space,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Computer Vision Systems, pp. 47-47, Jan. 2006. (cited by 26)

W. Hu, X. Li, G. Tian, S. Maybank, and Z. Zhang, ” An Incremental DPMM-Based Method for Trajectory Clustering, Modeling, and Retrieval”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, VOL. 35, NO. 5, MAY 2013

Tsumoto, S., Hirano, S.: Detection of risk factors using trajectory mining. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 36(3), 403–425 (2011) (cited by 15)

Page 15: REU 2013 Report 3

Australian Sign Language Dataset

Page 16: REU 2013 Report 3

ASL Testing

No meaningful results Separating out individual trajectories