return to innocence or vaccine against atheism

8/12/2019 Return to Innocence or Vaccine against atheism

1/94

DMITRI [email protected]

Estonian Physical SocietyLaane 9-51, Tartu 50605, Estonia

Return to Innocenceor Vaccine against atheism.


2/94

Have You seen lm NeverEnding Story? There is enemy - noth-ingness. The atheism is nothing, because in its core is absence of HolyTrinity, thus - nothingness. If weighed on a balance, they are noth-ing; together they are only a breath (Psalm 62:9). You are like Don

Quixote, are ghting the nothing, arguing with it? The Angels arecrying out loud! You can not win, because there is nothing to ght.Your only option is to write Repent now! and that is all You can.Nothing is atheist and, thus, atheist can not hear You. If the man isnot atheist, then he can repent the sins. Therefore the title of the bookis not Cure of Atheism, but only Vaccine. The beloved RichardDawkins is not atheist, he is 50% theist (cf the nal battle in videoExpelled: No Intelligence Allowed). Atheist can not repent, Atheistis nothing (cf Psalm 62:9), nothing does not exist (see below), thus,there are no atheists. They all are theists, our missing brothers andbeloved sisters. The arguments of reason can not reach semi-theists,because mind is severe damaged. The cure is giving them the exactBible quotes. Let God speak, you are not wiser, than He: Heaven and

earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. (Matthew24:35).

Contents

1. Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. 1.1 The beauty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2. Jesus I know, and Paul I know about, but who are you? Acts 19 . . . . . . . . . . . 5List of rejections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93. Battle with satan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104. Truth exists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155. Life is like fairy-tale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .186. Our free will and Gods omniscience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217. Dangers of doing science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

. 7.1 Correcting methodological naturalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

1


3/94

8. My proofs of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26. 8.1 Vacuum mystery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269. Universe of the Bible . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28. 9.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

. 9.2 On Calculus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

. 9.3 On Virtual Big Bang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

. 9.4 Neverwas history. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

. 9.5 Supporting the Biblical Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33

. 9.6 Speeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

. 9.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

. 9.8 Using the Biblical model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

. 9.8.1 Virtual Big Bang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

. 9.9 Where are Heavens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3910. An alternative to 5-sigma selection rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4111. Proton is like God? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4412. Observer i s needed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4613. Life of numbers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

14. We all have the power (song Life is Life) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5115. All knowledge is faith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5116. One can be proving God. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5717. The Orthodox Faith is the true religion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6118. Me on Black Holes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6219. Evolut ion into nonsense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .632 0 . H o l y I c o n s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 8

21. Problem of two parallels intersection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6922. On logic and omniscience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6923. Law of conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7124. Talking to people . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7225. And more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83The Bib l iography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85

2


4/94

1 Preface

Morning. Sun is under horizon, is leaving the America. In that hour I decided towrite a book. Bestseller book. I have experience as writer: the LAP Academic

publisher ordered mine book. The sense of beauty. Mine goal is to submit tothe reader the sense of beauty within poor words of this paper. What do wewant: beauty, truth, feeling to be at home, justice. The world. It must has theauthor, because the book has the author.

There is good and there is evil. I was told on a date with beautiful lady:

You must choose.What to choose? - I wondered - am I loving You or not?

Not that, but You must choose. - was the strange answer.

The good or evil. One can not be partly good and partly evil; like a picturein Google, where angel lustfully hugs the demon. The good rejects evil like acidthe rusty metal. There is always one choice. Evil or Good. Atheists chose Evil.satan is the Commander of evil forces.

What is evil? The evil is the persecution of God. Who is God? He is good.The making compromises with own conscience, is THE TICKET TO HELL.The mistakes we make, are subject of confession, matter of regrets. In such waywe show God, that we hate the evil.

After the shame named The God Delusion the book glorifying God is bestwelcome. It must become the bestseller as our redemption after the feast of fools called God Delusion. It will be our Return to Innocence the title of

present bestseller. It is bestseller in the future, otherwise we have no future afterreleasing totally hellish well-selling book God Delusion. Full of hatered. It issimply ill, it is illogical: in one part Richard Dawkins argues, that no-one is re-sponsible for anything. Another part tells, that the believers are responsible foreverything. Also Dawkins argues, that atheists made no harm whatsoever. Buthistory proves, that atheistic Soviet Union has killed many innocent Christians,especially the Orthodox priests.

At least Richard is believer, that matter exists. Be strong, Richard, ght for

3


5/94

that! The tendency is to refute the matter also. Orthodox Christians dogma, iswhat material world exists. We share that with dear Richard. Go, Richard, go!Dear Lord Jesus, please show mercy on Richards soul! Dear Guardian Angel,please pray for Richard Dawkins! Richard, your admiration of Nature and

Science comes from grace of Holy Trinity. Otherwise two rustproof electrodesin pleasure center of the brain for certain give you unimaginable pleasure: justpush the button. Be grateful to Holy Trinity, do not bite the hand, which isfeeding you. Hereby the fjh1616 user asked plenty of questions, among: If godis real, why am I an atheist? Me: Luke 11:52-54, it is your criminal use of FreeWill the gift from Holy Trinity. Do not bite!

To atheist B.B.: it is Your faith, that all people are mindless, as writtenin a mindless sick book. But it is satanic lie. Thus, all good people have mind.Why it is true? The Verity by denition is Jesus Christ, the Son of Father God.Jesus is saying, that mind exists. Thus, it is true, that good people are withmind. The boy in video I Declare War on Atheists is good. Thus, he has themind and Free Will.

Here midst physics and spiritual is neutral area X . I wrote a book about

this area (there is a movie Stalker about the area). And Bruce Anomaly (be-low) in that area. My proof of God is not a rejection of faith or its destruction,because all knowledge is faith. That you understand in the course of reading.There is your quest for knowledge. Almost all theists say: we have evidences.However I have derived the solid proofs in glory of God. But be not temptedby the cold rationality down, brother. There must be enough room for faith. Itis our beauty - the faith; we, Orthodox Christians, are the keepers of true faith.

As a great scholar M.Lomonosov said, the God gave us many great books:Holy Scriptures (Bible and writings of Holy Fathers) and Nature. St. Basilthe Great once said, that the Lord has given us two wonderful books, theseare Scripture and the book of the Universe, the very World in which we live(azbyka.ru). You can read the Bible still and always the ultimate bestseller.For many holy martyrs the Holy Scriptures were sufficient for salvation. Andfor me and for you are sufficient. But if you nd a piece of your time, preciousto eternity, I perch you in what I read in the book of Nature. I read with an

4


6/94

eye to the Bible. The Lord has written another book besides the Bible, anddid everything right. The book of Nature is vital, it is our task in our humannature. Yes nature is beautiful, very good (Genesis 1:31). Human is thebunch midst the material and the spiritual. So our home is in the Stalker

area X . Maximus the Confessor has uttered: man is created to bring all creationto God (predanie.ru).

While reading the Bible without the help of the Holy Spirit and consultationswith Holy Fathers, the person makes false conclusions. Analogously, whilestudying Nature the person makes mistakes in the methods and interpretations.Especially if he started with the book of Nature, but never seriously read theBible. You know that Nature in Greek language sounds like Physics. Andin the Greek text of the Bible it is found thirteen times!! (rusbible.ru). Thesecond book Nature is kindly advertised in many places of the First Book;for example, the rst chapter of Genesis and the chapter 43 of the Sirach.Without even mentioning the word Physics. Observations from high tower of magnicent starry sky led heart of St. Barbara http: // youtu.be/3KzzpvJICJcinto the unimaginable delight: she saw between the lines of the Nature Book

the Spirit of the author.

1.1 The beauty

There is no Gravity force in General Relativity, so a body on the ground dohave non-zero acceleration result of acting of the ground on free motion of thebody. Just like the cosmonaut in starting rocket does not move, however hasthe acceleration (even in perception of the Guardian Angel in the cabin). But

the Newtonian force of Gravity in the [15] exactly equals the case of GeneralRelativity. This is divine miracle, which is embedded in the beautiful creation,And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.Genesis 1:31.

A space-station. Rocket A starts with acceleration g gets velocity v, thenies for L, then slowing down with acceleration g, turns back and accelerates tov and ies back to station, having the g in the end. You had Special Relativity.Now clock from station gets to Earth (radius R) and gets back. All takes the

5


7/94

same time as the rocket A travel. You had General Relativity. The time dilationin Special Relativity is different from that in General Relativity. Moreover, theLorentz contraction of the rocket is different from a kind of contraction atthe Earth. Moreover, the case L 0 is physically totally different from L = 0one. However dilations are different. All that changes if velocity is cosmic, s.c.escape velocity ( v2 = 2 g R the character at the R). That is clear sign. Thecosmic velocity, our quest for Heavens is embedded in the nature.

Karl Schwarzschild gave the solution of the Black Hole called Schwarzschildmetric. In my article of reviewed journal JCRSCI horizon is an insuperablebarrier for earthly life. As a shield the edge of the Universe is shielded from oury. That word Schwarz-schild in German means black shield. Next in theSchwarzschild solution (the most famous and historically leading) the Coulombforce has the same form with a Newtonian force one in slightly curved regionof space. Though Id like to follow their calculations. Two coincidences. Andcoincidences in Gods world it is Beauty (see Genesis 1)

1) Fibonacci numbers with the golden ratio are written in nature (cf. video:Intelligent Design: Waking Up To Creation). 2) She: study the cytology...

The Large-scale structure of the universe, is like a single cell cytoskeleton.

2 Jesus I know, and Paul I know about, but who are you? Acts 19

My large and impressive CV You nd in my rst (Spiritual and physical) book[10]. I received an excellent education, which was crowned with a gold medaland red diploma (cum laude). But I was like everyone else. Not wise. I

wrote as like under dictation the articles for Phys.Rev.E and EPJB. Then I havediscovered another source, from which I drink and eat now. You know, What isthe source. This true education was crowned with article (Dmitri S Martila, OnNaked Singularities of Spacetime Curvature, JCRSCI, 2012) in peer reviewed,official journal. There I thanked my mystical Supervisor, calling Him theembodiment of Truth.

University of Tartu, Laboratory of Field Physics: since March 2004 was

researcher and lector, dismissed some time after confessing the Orthodox faith in

6


8/94

Jesus Christ. Diplomas for hard work for the benet of the Church, EstonianOrthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate (2008, 2010). Acknowledgement forcontributing to the campaign, Family and Tradition Protection Center (2013).You may read my papers in Physical Review, preprints archive viXra and

other places.So I have got goldmedal. Materialist would say: it is not goldmedal, it

is only gilded. But he is not right before God! See me with gold in video:http: // u.to/D3lkBQ. Perhaps I am not worthy, and I am unhealable schizophrenic.But even such a man can be inside Gods Plan: And he stripped off his clothesalso, and prophesied before Samuel in like manner, and lay down naked all thatday and all that night. Wherefore they say, Is Saul also among the prophets?(1 Samuel 19:24 KJV).

Inside my head and heart are connected physics, mathematics, and faith inthe Lord Jesus Christ. Here is a photo, where Im between two racks: the rightof me Orthodox books, Cross, Holy icons, and the lamp icon. Left abstractsand books about physics. Im not ashamed or embarrassed on any of this. Hereis a hybrid, a crazy mutant of XXI century. But I hope that with Gods

help, bearing fruits.

7


9/94


10/94


11/94

List of rejections

Section rejected: Universe of the Bible. Reject-or I is Creation ResearchSociety Quart. Reason stated: poor English. Reject-or II is The Review of

Metaphysics with no response. Reject-or III is The Journal of TheologicalStudies with response: the article is unlikely to be accepted. Reject-or IV isJournal of Creation with reason in my perception: schizophrenia and poorEnglish. Me: To my brothers and sisters of meant to be very kind journal. Imean only good for you. In afterlife the survived souls will come to one tableand will discuss issues of my paper Universe of the Bible. Without any of the current satanic hostility. Please, be more kind to people. Please make kind

Science, not evil one like they do in Phys.Rev. If You reject the paper, pleasedo not say: paper is rejected, but write: dear author, what can you say aboutthat? Perhaps we are wrong and you are right before our Lord Jesus the TrueWisdom.

10


12/94

3 Battle with satan

G.N.: The evidence for God is well documented but the most compelling ev-idence is the fact that mans constant search for meaning and transcendence

has dominated all human history. Man cannot live consistently and happilywithin an utterly meaningless, materialistic worldview. Me: From perspec-tive of Truth, Who is Jesus Christ, the atheists is trained organization of sa-tanic ghters, they all are not well-meaning (cf http: // youtu.be/VnIH4gomOqc,http: // youtu.be/jCvQfr t-e8). Thus, you better to share such deep pearls withaudience meant for them, read: Matthew 7:6.

K. E.: hahahaha, You Athiest cant handle the truth!:) Me: In a more kind

world You do not handle the Truth, the Truth handles You. But the peopledo not like, that the Truth handles them completely. Because the satan willbe very mad. His followers, the vast majority of scientic community, will takefrom You the job. To be follower of satan is enough to reject the promisingpaper without a reason. However the reason is there. It is pleasing the dark,destructive forces. The people do not trust the God, so they very weakly ghtthe satan, making compromises with him; time after time offering him thediscouraged hearts of innocent writers.

Next to a man are Guardian Angel and demon tempter. With both kissing isimpossible. Whom do you kiss? Angel will lead you to the Cross. The temptercan lead to the top of the world. But the wily can only destroy others anddestroy himself. The demon on worlds top will push you in the back. Andfrom the top of the world the way is only one: down, down into hell and Lake

of Fire.To Love Jesus, rst one needs is to believe Him. Atheists do not believe

Him. Thus, they do not like Him. If you became believer will you be with Lifeor with satan? He: According to your beliefs. Also, life is never in absolutes,Everything depends on your point of view. Me: Just play like a child does, thatyou have repented and understand, that repent and life mean accordingto Orthodox Christianity. So, do you love Jesus now? Or the real hate is too

strong to love Him even in a play? He: As of now, I cannot conclusively prove

11


13/94

anything but my own existence(I think, therefore I am), so to me, My knownuniverse is my mind, in which I am all, God and Insignicant being. Me: Soyou are King of my castle (the song). So, the king can not play? Wake upat 6 and say: Jesus, I like You, thank You for my surviving through the night!

Then at 9 say: Jesus, I like You, thank You for my surviving through the day!Please, give me good night sleep. Repeat this cycle during all your life. And atthe edge of afterlife say: Dear Jesus, please take my soul into better place.So this will be the great play! Can the king do that? Yes, he can. The onlyreason You reject this play is satanic hate to real Jesus. Thus, Jesus Christ isalive!

Atheist: Faith is crutches for the lame. Me: You are not happy havinglames alive. What do you suggest, slaughter all the lames? See then, take careof your feet. And in fact: revolution devours its own children (J. Danton).You write about it, for you a lame is like a splinter in the brain. Be silent in arag. satan invented atheism. You follow atheism. So you follow satan. satanis the deceiver. So you are lying, that you are happy with the lames on theplanet. The history of persecutions (especially in atheistic Soviet Union) has

clear showed it.The Richard Dawkins in Expelled: No intelligence allowed said, that life

was created. You all agree? Yes, you do. So why now (Richard Dawkins In-terviews Creationist Wendy Wright http: // youtu.be / -AS6rQtiEh8) he is sucha jerk-like actor? Evolution, Evolution... He is making commercial, the bookGod D. must be sold out! In Wendy video Richard hates the Darwinianprinciples of life. Thus, remained are divine ones.

Atheist: prove a god exists! Me: What is existence? Do my thought andfeeling called God exist? Yes. You can not wipe out all Christians. Thus,You will not be fully happy, ever.

Atheist: If God doesnt know what lust feels like, then He isnt all-knowing.Me: It is enough to know, that is good to know. God is all-good-knowing. HaveYou ever read between lines?

VampiricDarkDragon: God knows all. Some people go to hell. Is hell meant

12


14/94

for some people? Me: Is the prison in Your town meant for You? Yes? Thengo right in there! Why You worry? You got Your atheism. Not happy? Tryingto make theists unhappy too? Criminal.

He: What is the best evidence... of < atheistic > evolution? Me: It is really

simple: satan tells so. Let us all hate satan, missing brothers in Christ!While an atheist is alive, does God warn him about Lake of Fire? Yes,

through us here. He rejected the warning? There is no-one to pray for him,after he goes into afterlife? Then he will certainly burn! It is the perfect justice.Atheist: We have not denied God. We do not believe in God. We deny yourclaims that he exists. Me: You denied all our proposals to repent, to acceptthe faith in true God. The true is by denition of true-ness. Thus, You deniedfaith in God. Thus, shortly, You denied God.

Atheist: God is not good, because He punishes. Me: Who is better then,concept of Holy Trinity or satan? There is no third option. The Lord Jesus istruly good, but You are rebel, damned satanic rebel. Thus, You lie, that Jesusis satanic evil. Repent now!

He: Atheism is not scientic, its merely lack of a belief in a god or gods.

Me: may it be not lack of a belief in a god, but strongest protest againstexistence of God? He: Its not a protest either. Is not collecting stamps aprotest against collecting stamps? Me: Stamps-hater is not blaring around,saying in every discussion Folks, ladies and gentlemen, I am not collectingstamps! Be like me. Throw the stamps out the society. But the atheists dothat to God. Thus, they are protesting against God. Some uses God given FreeWill as weapon against God, against His desires, Feelings and plans. Behind

that army of atheists is satan. An atheist likely converts into satanist. djbare9:atheists cannot hate on a god not proven to exist, our problem is not with god,its with his followers. Me: In this sentence You admit, that He exists. It issomething demonic: I have problem with Bens followers. However the Bendoes not exist. Logically, if there is no Ben, then there is no Bens possession.Thus, there is no Bens followers. Orthodox Christians (we) are followers of God. We exist. Thus, God exists also; like the Ben, if last has at least onefollower. djbare9: I should have said followers of the idea. Me: Thus, the

13


15/94

idea of God exists. Very clever answer, where from You dig such cleverness?In any way, You are true to atheism, like I was true to communism in USSR.So, You never accept following formulation: God exists as idea. Am I right?djbare9: 3700 gods exist as an idea. Me: all the gods of the nations are idols:

but the LORD made the heavens Psalm 96:5 KJV. Thus, Bible agrees, thatgods do exist and describes them. A (wo)man shall choose the God to follow.There is Jesus Christ, who warns us about the Judgement Day. N.G.: problemis with the religions followers. Me: So atheists have problem with Religion, notwith God. So stop criticize Him! Otherwise every observer will make conclusion,that God exists.

Robots can be overloaded http://youtu.be/sLywJd5x3AE! We have suchability, we are humans. Try this on Hawking: How consistent atheist talks?!God is idea (verb to be spoils the purity of atheism). Theres idea of God(thus, God is author of idea). Theres idea about God (thus, there is God andsinners have got idea to crucify Him). Thus, it is madness for atheist to thinkand talk. Do not kill yourself: confess this atheistic sin in Orthodox Church.See video Hurts - Wonderful life Lyrics. They say: God is in the soul of

human, but the church is the bureaucratic machine. Me: the same they say inthe Samaritan village to banish Christ! Read Luke 9:53.

The proof: There are no mistakes in vast Bible text. Humans are makingmistakes. The Orthodox God does not (the Catholic god made some mistakeswhile witch burning). Thus, Orthodox God wrote Bible. Proof of satan: heis in New Testament. The Book wrote God, Orthodox God does not lie, thussatan exists. At least satan exists as idea and word. Man, I am writing to save

You, so forgive me in-logical-ness in the ways God through me tries to saveYou.

XENoVAR: Can you give me any observable evidence for God. Me: here are52 089 comments and number growing (2000 comments a day)http://youtu.be/U0u3-2CGOMQ. Too much credit for non-existence! I evenfear, that YouTube hard drive (the server) will collapse. It is very strong evi-dence, that God exists. J.M.: About a quarter of those are mine. Me: You saidit, missing brother in Christ! The Atheism probes and proves the Orthodox

14


16/94

God! Rate of comments is 2000 a day during rst 4 weeks on Gods matter,waaaay too much credit for non-existence, dont You think? Please, stop criti-cizing the God. Believers in God certainly know more of God, than unbelievers.Imagine sick someone says: I do not believe that the Africa exists, I never was

there, I never smelled it. But Africa is like shit.He: You think that there is no difference in believing observable/provable

facts and believing in your faith? Me: Yes, we use same word believing.What is fact? What says Wikipedia? To have observable/provable facts,one need to trust own eyes, own mind and certainly do not consider yourself asoulless Darwinistic-deterministic robot. In last case You would not have caughtany facts, the all facts would have got Your Constructor, Who constructed arobot-You. In fact, You can not be called You, if You are the soulless robot.He: Dont let religion blind you from logic. Me: Let me guess, Your favoritecharacter in Star Track is never smiling Mister Spock or the Robot Data,when he is without emotional microchip. Before deciding to become atheist,You, dear, shall know, what Russian mean to live without the King in Yourhead. who the hell said that atheists are robots? The Steven Hawking is

deadly outspoken, it is the frontier of so called progressive thinking. But thehealthy alternative exists: become soulfull member of the Orthodox Church -the wonderful Body of Jesus Christ on Earth.

He: How about you let them nish. Me: these pseudo-experts all will benished, if they wont repent till great pass over or if the Orthodox God - ourTrue Ruler becomes too angry to keep them on Earth. Reading these commentsagainst such great video Evolution Vs. God, is easy to loose hope for atheists

and say a rhyme: they have Fell The well.Atheist: the godless world is ultimate knowledge. Me: Did You go to the

home of God and did not nd Him there? Not. You have not gone into afterlifeyet. There is Jesus Christ sitting His Father right hand. Then You will actuallysee Him and realize, that the huge mistake was done and which you missed torepent.

15


17/94

4 Truth exists

Indeed, the opposite statement truth does not exists is either lie or truth.In both ways the statement is wrong. All that does not exist can be refuted.

The truth can not be refuted. Hence, there is truth. A.M.: The intellect cannot invent, what does not exist in the Universe. Truth can not be invented.Hence, there is no truth. Me: If invisible cat lays in a chair, latter wouldseem empty. It seems empty. Hence, there is an invisible cat (storyteller andtheologian, anonymous Orthodox C.S. Lewis). i.d.: What nonsense. Fromthis statement it appears that there is only truth, and everything else no.Then why should we look for truth? Me: If I tell you I have pink elephant

in the bathroom. You will not enter my apartment, I will not let a stranger.But God sees my bathroom, knows that there is no elephant. We need God,because I will not let You into my bathroom, but He is omnipresent. But thefact, that I wrote this sentence: I have a pink elephant in the bathroom, isundeniable. Written sentence exists; then the existence of the statement is true,but not the subject of the utterance. So, there is only the Truth. If you do notneed to look for Truth, then He is found, He found us, He is always there andeverywhere: Welcome to the Kingdom of Heaven.

And if you do not recognize God, you have no foundation in truth. Then anyproof (of what and whom whatsoever) does not exist for you. What is calledinsanity. The fools are out of our way!

My statement God is Verity is either true or false, isnt it? Yes it is. Thus,the Verity in this regard exists. Thus, there is Verity. It is major step towards

believing the Jesus: I am Verity. Read John 18:37, 3 John 1:8, Psalm 22:3,Psalm 90:4, Romans 1:17-32, John 8:32. Let us go further, my potential brotherin Christ! Is true, that God by denition is Creator, the our Father. Thus, Heis origin of everything. He is director of all destinies. Thus, He is true meaningof all. Thus, He is Truth of all there is. He is Verity and Judge of all Thingsand Lifeforms. Accept wisdom and spit on stupid satan and go into the happyafterlife, missing brother in Christ! Me: God is Verity. D.H.: You havent

dened verity. You havent proven that your arbitrary deity exists. Me: Thus,

16


18/94

looking at Biblical Truth God is Verity you see: Uhjhjh is Yjhoykh. Areyou as atheists, completely crazy or partly dismantled in hidden mill of satan?I am enemy of satan. You feel, like I am Your enemy. Thus, You are notsatans enemy. Atheist: There arent any gods which appear to exist. Me:

If gods do not exist, the looking at word gods your defected (by satan)brain reads: uhi9. The Holy Trinity is basis and power-source of everyonessanity. Without Him atheists are truly insane, they often go amok and killinnocent people. Like Russian Communists have done. The Holy Trinity is alsothe source of Love. You know, what love means? It means to put people into jails, into closed mental clinics, to make painful surgery. To save the plant,one must cut the dead parts of it. The demons have taken from God the basisof knowledge, but left the Love. Why? To know how to kill people. You areblinded? No problem, just pray: The true God, please guide me to the TrueReligion!.

Who tells, what is true? They say, that 1 = 2 is false. But I would say, thatit is true and pay billions to people. Thus, in the end, all they say that 1 = 2is true. Just for huge money.

Atheist: Prove him rst, the one, who created everything. Me: proofs arebased on belief in the Verity. God is the Verity (read the Gospel!). In God youdo not believe. Do not believe in the Verity. So, do not believe in any proof of whatsoever. Full satanic madhouse, so atheists cut innocent people. Andsatans helpers say: we do not believe in the innocence. And how can theyknow what innocence is, if satans helpers have crucied Innocent Jesus Christwith the wicked? Read Mark 15:28.

Atheist: Is there, however, still a contradiction in the order of when the rstwoman was created? Me: There are no contradictions whatsoever in atheisticworldview: atheism does not believe in Verity. If atheists were seeing contra-dictions, then they were seeing also the difference between good and evil. Inthe True sense.

He: Absolute true knowledge is not there in science. Me: Knowledge is thereonly when science is not the false science, latter is divorced from Theology.I personally went to physics, to nd the Truth in all things. Adam and Eve

17


19/94

rushed to the tree of knowledge, as I understand. But it was necessary eat fromthe Tree of Life rst. Him they not tasted. Knowledge without Love it isHiroshima, it is yperite poison, it is genetically modied food, it is tobacco,etc.

Atheist: can you tell us which was created rst, Man or the Animals? Haveyou read Genesis 2:18-20? Me: Repent and Read Genesis 1: there is cleartimetable, the schedule of works. Your doubts are in fact satanic attacks onVerity. This crazy rebel-ness prove for one, who knows the true proofs, thatatheists are not well-meaning and are taught into crazyness in hidden satansmill: the Darwinistic school.

Do you believe that there are normal people, who do not know whether theyare awake or not? No, they are crazy, according to Psalm 52:2. With mindresuscitated, they would realize that in the dream do not know how you endedup in some place. And if you go somewhere, you can not go back: everythinghas changed. This applies to Indian follies. The continuousness of spacetimesays, that we are not part of a computer game (The Matrix). The spacetimedoes not consist of computer bits [16]. Arguments. In Matrix absurdity

any body B is collection of spacetime mathematical points of exactly zerovolume. Between points is nothing there, thus all points coincide into singleone: volume of body B is zero. 1) If in fact the spacetime is discrete (granular),the movement of a point is discrete. So the point would suffer action of innite acceleration (as shaking when riding on the angular wheels). So, itwill ruin the point. Hence, the spacetime is not discrete. 2) Motion of a point:at one oclock (we consider Greenwich time) it is in Jerusalem, after then it

does not exist, at two oclock it is in Moscow, then it does not exist, it is atthree in Tartu, then it does not exist... Total is: there is no point, because itexists exactly zero seconds. In every city it pops out the nihility and thendisappeared back at once. Down with the philosophy of absurdism, read Fr.Seram Rose http: // youtu.be/cASVM-lrp3o If time is continuous, the motionof point : at one oclock it is in Jerusalem, it is there until two oclock, andat two oclock it is in Moscow and so on. Conclusions: A) one point, but itis two: at two oclock it is in Jerusalem and in Moscow. Innite velocity of

18


20/94

matter? Absurd. B) The area occupied by the point in Jerusalem is exactlyzero. So the point is nowhere. Absurd. 3) Physicist Jacob D. Bekensteinproposed a method for detecting spacetime foam, i.e. spacetime peculiarity atPlanck scale: arXiv:1211.3816. But his proposition, even in theory refutes the

foam (I feel so).Truth does not pass the Popper criterion, which reads: scientic theory must

be falsiable. So the worse for the criterion of Popper. Either we manage todisprove a lie, or it will do God. Atheism is not seeking the truth, hence there isthis Popper criterion; which may have been snapped from context of Popperstalk.

For some people all around is information. There is information about God.Thus, the God exists. But s.c. false information is out there too. It is notthe information, because it is false. Thus, around is information mixed withmistakes and satanic lies.

5 Life is like fairy-tale

Facts are

Virgin gave birth.

Demons are afraid of the Cross. Do not look for reasons outside of theGospel, do not look for causes in psychology and fantasies.

our free Will and Gods omniscience.Thus the life with God is like fairytale. God says and that happens.So how does it works? Stop for a moment to adjust and tune the formulas,

while describing nature. They certainly do not t the demonic UFO-s! Letslook at this spiritual and material world. Creator created different kind of macrosystems: stars, volcanoes , comets , planets , quasars... And all of them,all the processes in them, satisfy the law of conservation of energy; and action

19


21/94

function is minimal (without spiritual intervention). You might think that theselaws do not dene the behavior of the systems, but systems only describable bythese laws. But okay, God made a system in which is the law of conservation of energy. But we can also make an arrangement in which this law is not satised!

But it is impossible to us: numerous ideas for perpetual motion machines arenot true, in spite of all our creativity. Hence, there is a word of God, that is: allthe systems (even not invented yet) are describable by the energy conservationlaw. An exception: a spiritual intervention.

Here are the natural numbers in mathematics. If no Gods word, you can notnd the relationships, extra bells and whistles such as Fermats Theorem andworking hypotheses.

How is arranged the Nature? Perhaps by record in the Book of Life: Natureis arranged. And every scientist can verify this.

We are impetuously curious: what is inside the electron? And I came torealize, that we live as if in a fairy tale. And storyteller has to use his brain,so we would consider his Story very logical not nonsense in short. Usedto be just a ower. So we invented the microscope: it is necessary to add a

paragraph in the Book of Life The cells. Then we came up with an electronmicroscope: storyteller added to the Book of Life that we must see. That areatoms. Now we made Large Hadron Collider... And the story may soon becomequite confusing. We really dig too deep.

He: evolutionists have gave you so much evidence, and you dont bother tolook into them, and believe in fairytails you believed in since you where a child.Me: There is nothing wrong with a good Fairytale. I show it to You, dear

missing brother: even if there was no Narnia and I saw Narnia only in dream,I still will seek the passage to Narnia and die trying, this seeking and trying isbetter, than darkness and hopeless of Your underground country (cf apologistClive Staples Lewis, The Chronicles of Narnia). We live in Fairytale (cf apologistGilbert Keith Chesterton, the Orthodoxy). The authors of fairytales are people,thus only ill persons are living in them (visit with presents a mental hospital,like I did). But if the author of fairytale is God, then we live in fairytale. Thus,

20


22/94


23/94

into the stairs, but because of roundness they t into the plane of the road. Onequality did not impede other. Just like the electron, which I call now: wave-lyparticle.

6 Our free will and Gods omniscience

We are ying through spacetime (cf Psalm 89:10). And Jesus Christ is withus, like He promised (see Matthew 28:20). He is like one of us, what if Godwas one of us (the song, however lled with licentiousness). But He is alsooutside the time, thus knowing the History in detail (see Matthew 26:34). HereI call History as Gods omniscience of our (and His) past, present and future.

He knows our and own actions, before they happened. He is doing an action,what supposed to happen (see Matthew 26:24), not because He cant refuse,but because He is Holy: does not make mistakes, does not regret (see John19:30). The ood-time repentance (see Genesis 6:6) is perhaps expressionof His strong emotion (He is lustless, but not emotionless). But what if Hedecide to change the History? Then He risks. Indeed, if He would kill Kolja,who otherwise becomes bandit and kills Gena, who otherwise becomes worlddictator. The God doesnt know, about Genas dictatorship. He just knowsthe future, in which Gena was killed by Koljas stray bullet inside motherswomb. Now, removing the Kolja, God is unleashing the Gena. God risks HisRevelation and us, if He changes the History. But sometimes He does that (assome stories tell). So perhaps that is why He allows to live ones, who will go tohell (see Matthew 13:29,30). Can God change His Revelations, can He change

the past, if the future was changed? No, because He is among us not in the past,but in present, for real. And we live and make free decisions not in the past,but now, in present. So He doesnt allow to change the past, He is Protectorof Chronology, see section 8.

God is actively involved in the events of daily life, his grace sancties everyyear all waters (the Great Feast of the Holy Theophany). Otherwise, the worldwould have collapsed completely.

Free will is a persons ability to violate the laws of nature, not to live after

22


24/94

the rudiments of the world (we do small miracles, like quitting smoking). Thus,the atheistic materialism is a satanic lie.

The laws of nature God spoked out willingly. Behavior of items display theselaws. So, God invites us follow His words too. They thought, that the nature

is so constructed, that the Earth is at. But this law has collapsed, whenwas discovered round Earth. But God always knew that the Earth was round.Without the word God scientic research is meaningless (as life itself in therepresentation of atheistic materialism). Extracting a law from behavior of asystem we do not know whether law is true, and they say that any rule has anexception. Because of the quantum uncertainty principle, knowing the cause,it is impossible to know exactly the effect (only the probability of a particularoutcome). This violates the law of causation at the micro level. Incrediblypowerful computer, even in principle can not see the future. But God bydenition - sees any point in spacetime. Therefore He perfectly sees all fourdimensional world.

So, in the time stream we violate the laws. But history is written clearly,with all of these disorders. Last also belong to history. To change history

document does not allow the just God (see paragraph 8).

7 Dangers of doing science

The Atom Bomb. Hiroshima. But atoms consists of quarks. Can we makeQuark Bomb? No, because there is no individual quarks. But these talksabout super-weapons of pre-ood people? Only one detail: they used spells,

the contact with fallen angels. Our free will is violation of nature laws. So thefree will of fallen angels is much more dramatic violation of them. Therefore,trying not to do magic, we can do science: study the laws in nature thematerialized will of the true God. Hereby our achievments, got by terrorists,wont do much harm, because we can not make the Quark Bomb. You mayargue, that the treasure chest of nature is bottomless. But, actually, it hasbottom. And it only seems provide innite possibilities, because mostly we shall

correct mistakes in knowledge we already gained. And mistakes are certainly

23


25/94

there, as prime example: Black Hole Hawking temperature in two abstracts of [13] is different. But must be the same, because it is his most famous discovery.Have the World gone with true one? As next example: all scientists usedsolution of dust collapse almost century, but it was wrong [14]. And my own

paper: the unreal coordinate singularity of black hole surface is actually real[15].

Outstanding person and a successful scientist Rudolf Peierls also noticederrors [7]; I have not got the unappreciated his work, so I can not agree withhim. Honest work on the errors, as I understand, has not begun. You postponeeverything until the Second Coming? But God speaks: Matthew 25:26.

7.1 Correcting methodological naturalism

A scientist like grim death tries to isolate his laboratory by ignoring thespiritual forces. The current method says: even believer enters laboratory aspretended atheist [19]. But psychics can not pretend for long [19], so it is causeof metaphysical naturalism (atheism [19]). Atheists have most high suiciderate [19]. So the corrected method must be writing in every paper: Believers

among us were asked to pray in their homes and communities. The signal of Higgs boson has mass 126 Gev. Believers were asked to be thankfull in their homes and communities. In such way the laboratory is isolated from spiritual wickedness in high places (Ephesians 6:12 KJV) . Being ashamed of God is sinagainst rst commandment. The Scientic World is in guilt. So recognizing theachievments of God is truely the Return to Innocence. This is title of presentbook. See also my paper [18].

The science will not be the search for naturalistic explanations of naturalphenomena. The science in general shall be innocent investigation of all (whatis outside and inside) by all innocent methods, if they are necessary. BesidesPhysics there are Mathematics, Philosophy, Art, Theology, Oratory, Medicine,Grammar,... The Physics cant work without curing scientists (Medicine), with-out representations of results (Art, Oratory, Informatics, Grammar), withoutcalculating results (Mathematics, Informatics), without developing general ap-proaches (Philosophy) and the Sociology, Ethics, Linguistics, Psychology help

24


26/94

for cooperation. Then why they ashamed of God, at least in the papers? Theyare mad: Atom Bomb, Hiroshima and ultimate goal Quark Bomb. The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. (Psalm 53:1). Not all, the creationalscientists (beaten Young-Earth Creationists) admit Theology. And the ob-

jectivity simply means, that your result is (or will be) useful or beautiful foranother person (not for every one, of course).

Atheist: The objective is not dependent on subjective by denition. Me: Iam surprised to hear from you about the objectivity (in atheism is no Truth bydenition). We are subjects. Object is God. Perhaps you say, that a communityis the object? Then how Hitlers Germany has arranged Holocaust? All whatis commonly accepted, but originated in humanism, is subjective. As examplethe discovery of the Higgs boson. Who sanctied apparatus, who held a prayerservice against evil spirits? So again it is subjectivity: cursed demons perhapsstaged all of these signals (more than ve sigma).

Let the science be, be as there is existence called Holy Trinity; be not onlythe Physics; be in general the good desire to understand, learn, accept as factor just feel all of the good.

The world in which quantum physics is not complete without a live observeris spiritual and material. Creation of a Spiritual: Einstein said, that reallywants to believe, that the moon is there even, when Einstein was not looking atit. And spirituality is above the materiality. If the journal N. had elementaryLove to us and Faith in Verity, it would have opened to look in at least onemanuscript sent to them from the man in the street. Look within OrthodoxChristianity themes spiritual look, spiritual person, spiritual beauty, the

Google might help.The Orthodox martyr, Fr Daniil Sysoev writes in [6]: Scripture is not a

textbook on astronomy and geology, but without it all the sciences are a lie,that destroys the soul. Revelation should not replace the researches of scien-tists, but serve as the worldview foundation for them. How much better would develop medicine, if most scientists would not believe in evolutionary stories about rudiment organs! How less suffering would be in the world, if the Nazis and the Communists did not believe in the evolution! Science must return to his

25


27/94

master the Theology, from which it ed during the Renaissance; if humanity wants to survive on this fallen planet. True the word of the Ultimate Wise, that the Earth shakes when a servant... displaces her mistress (Proverbs 30:21-23 NIV). The science, this servant, imagines himself as a god, and not our

business to kneel before this naked king. On the contrary, we must learn todistinguish between, what is a genuine discovery of science, from a humanistic and evolutionary nonsense .

People made Science, different people are making different science. Thus,there are bad and good sciences. Science based on Creationism is Gods one,science based on Darwinian Evolution is satans one and lead people to self-extinction. My science has proven our Hope, it is the study of the Shroud of Turin the material print of Jesus miraculous resurrection. Also scientic in-vestigations of the Holy Fire; the Lanciano Miracle; the chrism coming fromthe icons; appearance of icon copy on kiot glass and other miracles. He: directme to... creation science papers... in reputable peer reviewed scientic jour-nals. Me: Reputable, which ones? Reputable by Creationists or DarwinianEvolutionists? There are two Sciences, each one has own journals. The Nature

is not our journal. Choose the Gods side in this war. Not any article in Nature(and other God-rejected journals) is useless for us. We use their results. Seelm Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.

Physics is different, by the people. Here I prove it. News: fell the meteoritewith strange composition. The reaction of scientists on the Truth: God madethe composition of the meteorite as He wanted and might quipped with it.

metaphysical naturalism: there are no miracles!methodological naturalism: miracles do not consider,

Creationism: Miracles explore,Brahmanism: there is no world to begin with! Thus, there was no meteorite!

26


28/94

8 My proofs of God

Einsteins theory allows even from ordinary materials, to make a time ma-chine to travel back in time (my not appreciated calculations, as well as a time

machine of Mr. Ori). Then the confusion, the mess must to occur (e.g., Grand-father Paradox) unravels the God Himself: breaks the time machine before itsrst start, and punishes the presumptuous ones.

Right here was rigorously proved, that the right understanding of God isabsolutely necessary in Physics: Read section 5 in [10].

8.1 Vacuum mystery

This is my paper published in [17]. Is known, that any material (air, wood,cosmic void, etc) at absolute zero of temperature is vacuum. Indeed the con-dition with lowest energy is called so. Nevertheless the compounds of vacuumhave the zero-point vibrations. Therefore, vacuum has huge energy (even incosmic void). Its scientic mystery, why such high energies dont affect theUniverse.

I have another opinion, but perhaps the solution is following. Suppose wehave vacuum substances A and B. The A has more energy, than B. Let A touchB. Thus, energy of B must increase. Therefore grows the temperature of B. Butthat is impossible, because temperature of A is absolute zero, therefore the Acan not warm anything. Ive got a contradiction, thus A doesnt inuences theB. Theres no interaction at all. Parts of vacuum dont interact with each othernot through any of interaction kind (not gravitationally, not electromagnetically,

not weakly, and not strongly). Such disintegrated energy can not inuence theparameters of Universe.

Naturally, before the World appears was only God (see also, Genesis 1,2). If inside the God somehow quantumly on itself appears the planet, then it quicklycools down and disintegrates into vacuum pieces. For example, a rose in liquidhydrogen is incredibly brittle. Solution of the disintegration problem: to supplyobject with external energy (then the temperature wont decrease).

So appeared our Universe, and Ive got proof: we are not alone. Someone

27


29/94

(and not somewhat) is giving us energy to live (in all senses).With what temperature you can compare the hells re? Hardly its a billion

degrees. There is always grater number. Only impressive choice is absolutezero. In hell theres no communication between sinners. In vacuum also no

interconnection. Thus, theres analogy between hell and vacuum. Withoutinterconnection is also no light in vacuum. Biblical descriptions sound fearsome:total darkness, darkness outside (outside our Universe, may I say). In vacuumis no live - only death, lifelessness.

In hell is re, but is the darkness. You can not give the ashlight signalin a vacuum substance. Quote: using refrigeration one lowers the tempera-ture of the medium, through which the light passes, to near absolute zero... ishard greatly to slow down the light it requires extremely low temperatures(Baygelou... to 57 meters per second) Jim Wilson, Igry so svetom, Popul-yarnaya mekhanika 7(21), 2004, www.popularmechanics.ru.

When we turn away from God, then we ourselves are cutting the ow of thelive energy. We are cooling down - becoming vacuum.

28


30/94


31/94

to think what we have done wrong with our current time.Also correcting the use of language is over my head and wallet. Shall we

stop doing Creation Science till Jesus Christ returns and we will really serveeach other? And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all

(Mark 10:44). I am like cripple in language, but perhaps very good with ideas.In fact, Im the cripple. You are very good with Grammar and style. Why notwe come together in this fallen world? Creation scientists at The Institute forCreation Research denied helping us (me and even famous Kent Hovind, whoput his words for me). Busy, hurry.

Creational work previously done on Biblical Pi is discussed in the summarybelow, but I ask the reader to follow me successively through the text to developcomplete understanding. Besides the Sections devoted to the molten sea, thereare Section 9.3 and Section 9.6. I disarm Big Bang through its virtualizationin Section 9.3. This is just the Omphalos hypothesis [25, 26] written in a moreattractive manner for creationists because many depart along side tracks, asit written in Wikipedia. One of these divergent tracks is the changeable chypothesis. I criticize it in Section 9.6.

9.2 On Calculus

Let us draw a circle in the closed Friedmann universe [27]. The idea is to assumesquared interval ds2 = c2dt2 + R2(d 2 + sin 2 (d2 + sin 2 d2)). Scale factorR expands with time t. We get the perimeter of the circle L = 2R 0 sin =30 cubit and diameter 2 a = 2R0 = 10 cubit, where metric spatial coordinate = / 6 and scale factor R0 = 30/ cubit . The 30 and 10 are in 1 Kings 7:23.

The molten sea was observed in Solomons temple. The diameter of theobservable universe is 2 a = 28.3 Gpc [28]. Thus, one cubit symbolizes 2.83Gpcand, therefore, at the present time R = R0 27.1Gpc.

There is help coming from WMAP specialists. They have great biblicalnames. But I still do not know: Is topology scale d in [24] our geometricalR? However, these specialists distinguish geometry and topology. Their paperpossibly constrained R0, but my model survived: 27 .1Gpc > 24 Gpc. The newpaper [28] restricts for at universe d > 27.9 Gpc, but we have not a at, but

30


32/94

a closed universe. Today in 2013 I made the conclusions: the topology scale dand geometry scale R0 are unrelated; and that there are serious hints in favorof nite Universe.

9.3 On Virtual Big Bang

Possibly the height of molten sea is the time as c t, perpendicular to the atmap of the universe - the surface of the sea, just like we draw it in Penrosediagrams. I am using the molten sea as an analogy to build a model of theUniverse. I am making it clear that this idea is not necessarily implied by thetext, but is the authors analogy. In 1 Kings 7:23, the height of molten seaequals its radius, just like it would be in an unexpanded universe (as written inWikipedia). It was unnecessary to show expansion in the sea because sciencewas capable of revealing it. Thereby, Big Bang was unreal, virtual. God doesnot violate us. Jesus Christ remained on Cross. I stand at the door, and knock(Revelation 3:20 KJV).

His Wish must have somehow created the universe at coordinate time t 5508 BC (see squared interval above). The brim, as well as water surface, has

same height - the same coordinate time everywhere! God chooses one way to cre-ate, which is polite, non-aggressive (conference Creational Science Today held4 May 2011 in the Holy Aleksievskaya desert http: // youtu.be / 5wOlQgcEhY)to eye, and really free (go out and look at the majestic sky!). This is my answerto the false history criticism in [25, 26].

So there was no Big Bang, but God the Father created expansion and reliclight (microwave background radiation) as if the Big Bang acually happened. In

my opinion, this virtual Big Bang is part of Gods creation plan realized in 5508BC, which thus shall be further studied [25, 26]. Without this knowledge, wewould not know that the universe is nite (we are putting a ne point on this),and the visible part is not the entire Universe (WMAP, Ref.[28]). Only thenecessary things would be surrounding you in connement in a mental hospital.But we are free, thanks to Jesus Christ (cf John 6:56), so we have unnecessarythings as well, like the hidden parts of the universe, which angels can onlyobserve and admire. But if you will Orthodoxically, fundamentally, follow the

31


33/94

Church - this ship through a cruel world - you will also be like the angels (cf Mark 12:25).

Any nearby galaxy is gravitational lens and shall cast a shadow [33]. Paradoxwithin shadows could be another one of Gods cues, that there is articial virtual

history [25, 26]. God is like Painter, Who paints very good (Genesis 1:31) evenbizarre dark matter, which is thoughtfully remoted from us: [34] and Nine Signsare like paintings in the sky: http: // kp.ru / daily/ 25735.5/ 2725392. In [32], it iswritten: cosmic microwave radiation is supposed... to be lensed by foregroundgalaxies-but it isnt. This miracle is described in [4]. Later the papers [5]unconvincingly (less than needed 5 sigma) show, that miracle has disappeared.Might it be temporal miracle?

God created already cosmic rays of ultrahigh energies in ight at 5508 B.C.Therefore we can not determine their sources. Another miracle.

Four of Gods Nine Signs: light pattern of the DNA helix (sign 1), questionmark ? (sign 2), accent mark ! (sign 3), and innity sign 4. I havethem interpreted that way: Dear Human (sign 1), See, I have set before theethis day life and good, and death and evil Deuteronomy 30:15 KJV (sign 2)

choose life Deuteronomy 30:19 KJV (sign 3), the power of an endless lifeHebrews 7:16 (sign 4).

9.4 Neverwas history

The world was created 5508 B.C. The God has immediately succeded and ev-erything started working. Because of His innite wisdom and omnipotence,there is no failed attempts. So to the innitely ne details (because there is nograin space) the present and future were established in 5508. But the presentand the future does not happen without the past. After all, many of the lawsof physics are reversible: if there appeared ying Earth, then it ew not outthe Sun, if Adam would calculate its virtual path prior to 5508. Otherwisewere be no (real) circular orbit around the Sun. The past is virtual, is GodsPlan of creation. The Plan, but not the Creation. So the time prior 5508is virtual, neverwas time. As an engineer draws a drawing of the building

32


34/94

up to the smallest details, and then starts pouring the concrete. You say, thatEarth ying out of the Sun is absurd? The Soul Doctors prescribed spoon of absurdity is also in the Big Bang. Where are the relic neutrinos (the blastshards)?

At the time of the Creation the world must be natural not to scare people.To get the natural pattern at the moment of Creation, He must rst has a Plan of Creation. How to get it? How to draw a picture? Too many degrees of freedom:a blank canvas contains potentially endless possibilities, although the informa-tion elements are only 12 elementary particles (six quarks and six leptons) plusthe interaction bosons. As an analogy, consider the equation for the growth of fractals and let the computer go. The powerful machine almost immediatelygives the virtual result. Then move it to a real canvas, but not mechanically:add ber of the Soul, His zest http: // pogoda.mail.ru/article.html?id=39455.Pass the World through His redaction http: // kp.ru/daily/25735.5/2725392. Cre-ated world is full of wonders, as the signatures of the Creator. Pulsating objectappears much older than phenomenon, which gave him lifehttp: // www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=673104

The Neverwas history is not real? Then what is reality? In physical theoriesare s.c. virtual movements, which never happen in nature (Wikipedia Vari-ational Principles). The Bible is true. Genesis is true and there is no wordabout the Big Bang. God the Father created the old young world. As scien-tists have produced young, but old Dolly the sheep. How could the plantsappear before the Sun? Fight the disproved hypothesis, which is still deadly,the Darwinian macroevolution!

The harvest truly is great, but the labourers are few (Luke 10:2 KJV). Alas,it is not grace Pushkin century. Now gay writhes on gay and men put eyes onme. Shameful statistics: there is hardly one accredited doctor of physics, whois preaching the date 5508 of Creation. In Fr. Daniil Sysoevs HexaemeronAgainst Evolution (the compiler is killed) is one such weakness, that leads meinto despair. It is at the end of the book. Yes, the Quotes of Great Minds arestrong. But most of these great minds are dead. All, without exception, citedin defense of Hexaemeron (date 5508) the Greats are born in the nineteenth

33


35/94

century. In Pushkins century! Who are the modern apologists, defendersof 5508? I am still not convinced, that the accredited PhD-s are in Godslittle ock. Why? It is impossible to have piece inside and outside on thisacid-like planet; and if one makes the compromises, the Gods image looses

the Gods grace, thus, surrounds to satan. Outside are very few ghters forYoung Earth Creationism, more fewer are with PhD (especially grim pictureis in physics), but they are in piece with satan: they are still not OrthodoxChristians. The Hexaemeron can be proved: http: // www.halos.com, Robert V.Gentry (Wikipedia, see also on CreationWiki).

Where the shit ows from, i.e. who is lying? 1) The dead AcademicAltukhov Yuri Petrovich is Darwinist (Russian Wikipedia), 2) Academic Y.P.Altukhov is Creationist: very solid Russian movie The hypothesis of the cen-tury! http: // youtu.be/IHGE63EMiwA. For whom the Wikipedia (?) officiallylies and why? For whom, for what horned ideology Wikipedia works? Such theobvious grin of evil! The Viktor Tsoi is right: if there is darkness, then mustbe light.

9.5 Supporting the Biblical Model

Let us read further: Below the rim, gourds encircled it-ten to a cubit. Thegourds were cast in two rows in one piece with the Sea (1 Kings 7:24 NIV).Outside the visible universe is a large, strange area with a ball ornament (seeBarness Note http: // bible.cc). I read there: twice (2x) 10-cubit-row. So I havetwo numbers on the Journey to the Edge of the World: the distance to thespecial point is a + 10 = 15 cubit, and the distance to the most distant point

is 2x 15 = 30 cubit. In our FLRW metric, the circle of maximum perimeter isR0/ 2 = 15 cubit away, and the most distant point is R0 = 30 cubit, which isin perfect harmony with Bible verse.

Let us read 1 Kings 7:25. The twelve living beings are the Church of 12Apostles. The Church holds the universe, being its fundament and (common)sense. They turn their faces to the pagans and bring the Gospel to all sites.They go in the Spirit of the Trinity (Holy Spirit) because they are by Three.

The sea is also described in 2 Chronicles 4:2-6, where I can see a cue for

34


36/94

the virtual part of the universe history (the height of the sea is larger than theactual thickness of it).

When Jesus Christ returns in glory, something will happen to spacetime (thestars will fall from the sky, and the powers of the universe will be shaken Mark

13:25 GWT). Our sea is a symbol of current spacetime. So, logically, there wasno more sea (Revelation 21:1 KJV). Because no eye has seen, no ear has heard,and no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love him (1Corinthians 2:9 NLT).

9.6 Speeds

I use the mainstream paradigm, stating that the speed of light is a fundamentalconstant (see [29]). Even if many saw changes in c, it might be long-termsupernatural provocation. Our Church is a commune of ghters not againstesh and blood, but against... spiritual wickedness in high places (Ephesians6:12 KJV). Do not watch broadcasted UFO-hypnosis in literally high places.Through this c = const faith, the Large Scale Universe as Gods creation isdeeply studyable. It is human tuned (see also Birges reason in [29]). Because

the c is maximal velocity of material body, than the c relates traveled spaceto time. So even space perturbation (gravitational wave) cannot cover morespace than it allows lightspeed. See also [30] and media report with criticshttp: // www.aip.org / enews/ physnews / 2003/ split / 620-1.html.

I turn to Holy Trinity in my scientic proofs about nature. But one can takeand the intermediate agencies the Holy angels, the Holy humans. After all,the saints are the true sanes, the angels in the esh; they stoop the graceof Heaven to Earth. The gift of creativity is given to humans. Yes, the writercreates information. The Bill Gates is father of his computers, hereby theHoly Trinity is origin and owner of Bill. The writer is not just summarizingthe materials: otherwise a robot could do it. But online robot-translator doesnot understand a thing, it mostly outputs a stupidities! The divine spark (giftof creativity) is no in the translator. He: In the end, the observed is akind of integration of sensory signals, and you can hardly move away from it;

35


37/94

and despite all the efforts to build an abstract representations, at their corealways lies the sensation. Me: I see no problem. It is known, that the humanbrain is designed and works much more complicated, than the entire universedoes. Therefore, we, with the help of Our Lord, are objective metewand of the

reality. Through our sensors. After all, for us and for our sake is set up andne-tuned universe, not for mystical aliens.

V.S.: How many feelings a healthy human has?http: // mistermigell.ru/post180673530/. F.M. Kanarev http: // kanarev.inauka.ru.Misconception: ve. Reality: at least nine. Me: How powerful is the holy rulerof nature (cf. Luke 16:1)! V.S.: Vision, hearing, taste, smell, touch thisis, what we know from school. We add to these ve the four: termotseptsiya(feeling of warmth), ekvibriotseptsiya (sense of balance), nociception (feelingof pain) and proprioception (understanding where are parts of our body, evenwhen we do not feel and do not see them. Close your eyes and shake leg you will still know, where is your foot).

Let me note that the creational paper [29] does not include Gods name.But with Him, Holy One, all questions (conference Creational Science To-

day http: // youtu.be / 5wOlQgcEhY) are solvable! Remember these phrases:it is Gods Will, it is Gods Plan, it is what God allowed. Because is written:Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest(Matthew 11:28 KJV). The head and heart do not rest in mainstream jour-nals. They do not mention God. They worship and respect nothing! Thereis description of nothing in Wikipedia and in lm The Never Ending Story(http: // youtu.be / KCAK0D7mPQ0, http: // youtu.be / CrG-lsrXKRM). Our closed

universe also has no boundaries (like world in the lm) but will pass.

9.7 Summary

The often difficult to understand (some of the Critics and Apologetics inhttp: // www.tektonics.org / lp/ piwrong.html) numbers in 1 Kings 7:23 can occurin a closed Friedmann Universe, where the perimeter devided by diameter isalways less than . Following simple cues, like arranged guides, I have got ascale factor of 27.1 Gpc. This universe is round (in an abstract four-dimensional

36


38/94

euclidean room) like the surface of an imagined ball (Section 9.5), which has aradius of 27.1 Gpc. So the most remote point (one on opposite site) is 27.1 Gpc 278 billion light years away from us.

The current state of creation science shall be the described Biblical Model of

Universe until someone constrains out the scale of 27.1 Gpc. But, because themost severe constraint cannot reach 28 Gpc, (read [24]), the line of terminationwill be always on the very edge of the Biblical Model. In case 27.1 Gpc iswrong, I will take the next possible number between 27.1 Gpc and 28 Gpc (butthe current Biblical model would be disproved). Why? Take into account thatGod is not forcing us into a Biblical World. So, as I can accept, He left theBiblical Model in balancing between proof and disproof.

There is a rational explanation of rational , see illustration in [31]. However,the beings must hold the Sea, 2 Chronicles 4:15. So the Author of Bible, God,gives man the freedom to accept or reject my paper. As written above, it wasunnecessary to show the expansion of space. But King Solomon qualitativelydid it anyway. Look at picture [31] and read: the brim thereof was wrought likethe brim of a cup, with owers of lilies (1 Kings 7:26 KJV). Hereby, horizontal

expansion is accelerated in time. Latter is the height of the molten sea. Theyear 2011 has Nobel Prize for the accelerated expansion... It was always in theBible! As it was once (and still is, by the Flat Earth Society) a disputed factthat the Earth is a terrestrial globe (Verse 3 Ezra 11:32 you nd in Russianhttp: // rusbible.ru / sinodal / 3ezd.html).

One is too sure, that the technical construction of sea was not supernatural,as [31] implies. But the very description in 1 Kings 7:23 denitely guides our

mind towards asking questions or takes someone like me to the horizons of curved spacetime. Verily, this is certainly part of the miracle.

Look at the graphic in http: // www.astronet.ru / db/ msg/ 1174484/ node5.htmland elevate the start by the vertical line - ination expansion at the rstmoment after Virtual Big Bang. You get a prole of a (horizontally lying) cupor lily, exactly as the Bible verse says. The 30 cubits line in 1 Kings 7:23denitely separates the virtual (13.75 billion years < t < 5508 BC) and real

37


39/94


40/94

Figure 1: Picture from internet. My numerical blue line (3) more perfectly matches the experimental points.Analytic solution (1) has k = 0 and is without dark energy. It matches the m = 1 line of Ref.[35]. Line (2) isthe thick line m = 0 .3, k = 0 from Ref.[35].

Possibly. Take k = 1. The line (2) is not perfect: entire 4 points are out of standart range. But curve (3) with R0 = 27.1 Gpc lefts only one point out.

Note, that allready 1 .5x27.1 Gpc is bad match: 3 points out. This line iscloser to line (2). Taking higher the R0 we get even more closer to line (2). If you take k = 0 then solutions are at line (2), hereby my eye can not distinguishlines of different R0. If k = 1 solution is higher then line (2), so the highermismatch than the line (2).

But the used set of parameters violates Einstein equations at present time.But if to replace with 1 .3 percent higher value, then Einstein equations aresatiesed and the solution is betwean (2) and (3) lines, so still having bettermatch, than line (2). Hereby case 5x 27 .1 Gpc closely resembles line (2), beingpartly higher than it.

9.8.1 Virtual Big Bang

Lets nd the moment of virtual ination. In Biblical model the edge of observ-

able Universe has = / 6. This corresponds to parameter t 14.0995 billion39


41/94

years (here is taken t = 0 for today), scale factor R(t) 53 Mpc and maximumcosmological redshift z m 512. The singularity has t 14.101 (it is allmostthe 1/H 0).

Indeed, the Wikipedia tells, that the redshift of relict photons is in the order

of thousand, however found Ia supernovas have z < 2 some quasars have z 6.Of course, not all relict light is hitting telescope right now, so the sphere of relict lights origin is really the observable Universe.

Taking not the Biblical model: R0 = 20x27.1Gpc we get 0.02611,singularity has t = 13.8992, the relict light has t = 13.8982, the R(t) 799 Mpc and z m 677.

In these two models ( R0 = 27.1 Gpc and R0 = 20 x 27.1 Gpc) the relict light isat million years after singularity, however in Wikipedia it is allmost half millionyears.

Still undisproved, but scientically disprovable (falsiable) Biblical modeltells us, that Bible is true historical document. So the nature was created 5508BC. We can study nature, thus, getting glance into Creators mind. But studybefore 5508 BC is look directly into Gods mind.

9.9 Where are Heavens?

In section 9.1 was showed, that there are no parallel universes. Then, there arethe Biblical Heavens, there are the treasures of the hail (Job 38:22)? Onecould consider the reality as mathematical structure: elements m1, m2, m3,....are things from material world we know. Elements s1, s2, s3,... are things fromHeaven. The inuence is denoted as +. The energy-impulse conservationlaw tells, that allways m1 + m2 = m3, so the material world without actionof Heavens is closed, isolated laboratory (see section 7.1). Believers know, thatthere is reaction s1 + m1 =?, but what is product of it? We could write on theleft the m2, i.e. produced one we see in material world (e.g., Son of God wasborn). Or we can write s2, i.e. the result is seen in the Heaven (the prophetIlia was taken alive). Mathematician would say, that could exist reactionss1 + s2 = s3 and s1 + s2 = m1. There is my favorite song Heaven Is A

40


42/94


43/94

10 An alternative to 5-sigma selection rule

Such rule says: event, which probability to happen is less than d := one ina million, has not happened yet [36]. Contrexample: how was probable your

birth? Some of your relatives could have chosen wrong girl to marry. Its likerandom numbers (very long ones) generator. The probability, that among justseven billions of it is your code is very small. But it has happened.

I hope, You heard about Schr odingers Cat in Quantum Mechanics. It isunlogical situation, when the imaginary cat is both dead and alive. Cat is inlimbo state as one wrote. It has the wave function. An observation collapsesthis function and thus, one observes not limbo but dead or alive cat (when

opens the imaginary box).Same limbo is with life from lifeless matter. But I have opened the box. I

have calculated, that the probability of life in Metagalaxy (observable Universe)is less than u := 10 in minus 437. The atheistic most hope for extraterrestiallife after discoveries of Genetics (http: // youtu.be / WDuu1VxqxKg) would havebeen amoebas. The u is slightly better, than 1 / 250! (the 250! is factorial of minimum number of proteins). The zero is not excluded, because fairy thingsmust be for non-zero probability, e.g. lightning, that not destroyes swimmingorganical-blocks but like a fairy glue reconnects them over and over to getworking thing. The extraterrestial life was in closed box: in limbo of real andunreal. I have opened the box by tossing a coin into the air. I called it sideshead and nut. There must be at least 1449 nuts in a row. But the headdropped rst. Date: 10.September.2012, morning. The experiment is closed for

all times: extraterrestial observable Universe is sterile. Another tester wouldviolate the trueness of experiment. I, Dmitri, asked Jesus Christ to bless myaction on behalf of all mankind.

A critic might say: to open the box one need study planet after planet untilone nds the life. If there is no life, as one can conclude from silence of Genesis,one need to check all planets in seen and unseen Universe to open the box. Butmy box is box of conviction . And it was open 10 september 2012. To develope

this tactic take a normal event. Outcome A has probability 0.6, outcome B

42


44/94

has 0.4. Either outcome must not harm eternal life and salvation of me andothers. Thus, to open the box of conviction I can toss a coin (the numberof times depends of probability to be collapsed and outcomes of tossing). ButI can stay in limbo, if its needed for my research. When the event realizes

and it is against my conviction, then nothing dramatic happens. In case of extraterrestial sterility you can either stay in limbo and search for organismson Mars, Jupiter of Milky Way. Or once and for all bury the idea and followthe conviction. You dont need and can not toss a coin, because I did this foryou. If you can not decide which university to go, then please pray, go to Afonmountain, ask a saint. But you can not toss a coin, because you dont knowprobability of happiness in the end of each of two paths. And God is not anautomat. Tossing a coin I see in Bible (Acts 1:24-26), but they are saint peopleguided by Holy Spirit, so it was necessary to do it. Another example: Higgsboson is in limbo, with probability one in billion (or so) it doesnt exist. I think,nobody was brave enough to toss a coin, so the world prefer stay in limbo orblindly ignore the opposite talking about articial 5 sigma rule. If they followedtheir own rule, they would kill the idea of extraterrestial life u d.

The News: 1) On the surface of Mars the life can not and has not existed:Bethany L. Ehlmann, John F. Mustard, Scott L. Murchie, Nature 479, 53-60(2011). 2) The administration of U.S. President released an official statementabout contacts with aliens and extraterrestrial life in generalhttp: // beta.novoteka.ru / ?s=politics#nnn15156641. The statement said thatthe U.S. government has no information about the existence of intelligent lifebeyond Earth, and also did not x no conrm contact with extraterrestrial

civilizations. Specially emphasized that no secret information on this issueexists - there is no reason to hide a thing like that from the world.

From DiscussionLets go back to the event at September 10, 2012, morning. For the collapseof a probability of 10437 only rst head was needed in 1449 attempts, andfor the collapse probability 0.5 the head was needed in very rst attempt.And it has happened, September 10, 2012, for all the people. Nobody else canreplicate this unique experience. Many do not know me, but after the September

43


45/94

10, 2012, the scientic belief of all people is: Metagalaxy sterile. Alternative:kingdom of doubts, the limbo, without any conviction. In short, even if theprobability of spontaneous generation would be 50 percent, then it has nothappened anywhere else in the Metagalaxy. Experiments of Louis Pasteur and

Miller (for almost 50 years) demonstrated that the probability of spontaneouszing is much smaller than 1. As I have shown, it is less than 10 437. Well,really, take your watch and wipe it off into the powder. Then shake powder,beat it with discharges.... How to nd the probability that in a few thousandyears (lasted after the Hexaemeron) we get the clock, ticking and showing thecorrect local time? My calculations are easier: get only 250 pieces on the linein order. This is factorial of 250. Only one combination will work. I appliedthe Stirling formula. How many attempts are to get this Frankenstein alive?In every square meter of surface (of Earth-like planet), every second, during13 billion virtual years, happens one virtual try. The number of planets in theMetagalaxy is about one planet per star. It would be strange if the amoebaappeared earlier than the Creation year 5508 B.C. Where they would swarm?

Atheist: What is the probability to meet a dinosaur at the door? Exactly

one half. Because either I meet him or not. Me: It is not probabilities, butdescription of events. One still need to calculate the probabilities of thesetwo events. Is needed the statistics for such events, which must happen oftenenough.

He: perhaps probability to make the alive Frankenstein tends to zero, butexact zero is excluded! Knowledge is not sufficient to accurately determine thezero! Me: probability depends on ones faith, knowledge and belief. Blind

evolutionist never meets a living dinosaur. And if he meets, he rather believesin own schizophrenia. Therefore, the probability of spontaneous zing is zero forFr Daniil Sysoev, who is the Ortodox Martyr.

He: Zero is excluded! Me: Let us forget for a while about probabilities:let it be perfect luck. What specic, detailed, natural mechanisms lead togetting a living cell? With helix DNA, cytoplasm,... Given: primeval soup inwhich are all the necessary material for the cell, but not combined. Material ismixed at random. Have lightning, heaps of lightnings. What is the angle, the

44


46/94

power and the shape of the discharge barrel of rst lightning? One lightningis not enough? Even so perfectly chosen one? Well, describe me lightningnumber 2. When it must strike and where? No one can give even numberone. The weakest lightning discharge is much more than 220 volts. For sure,

such currents will not connect the two protein but will destroy them. And stillit is necessary to form the proteins from the periodic table, but note: usingnatural, rough means. Hence, the scientic probability of spontaneous zing isexactly zero. You can add the following: science does not know any way to getFrankenstein alive. Hence, the scientic probability is absent. Synonymous of absence is zero as being customary said. Therefore, the scientic probability iszero. Atheistic model: world without the Creator exact zero probability,because such model the science (no matter how puffed) can not invent. Thus,the probability of the opposite model world with God is exactly: 100 0 =100 %.

He: do not be angry on amoebae from Alpha Centauri: they just do not knowwhat you told fortunes on them using banknotes. Me: the telling fortunes isdeal with the evil spirits. God will punish for it. The die is repeatedly used by

priests (read Bible and election of Patriarch Tikhon), but with the holy faith inthe miraculous intervention of God. And what do I have? I am talking aboutcollapse of the wave function, the random number generator, without referencesto the spiritual realm.

We truly are the crown of creation. This knowledge puts on us theresponsibility for life in the universe. We are called to bury war tomahawk,condemn and curse abortions. My house is not on the edge, but in the center,

in the epicenter. I wondered, why the war sniper tracks so hard the victim,spends so much time on a simple soldier. Yes, because on the one living soldierholds the worth of practically innite number of star systems.

11 Proton is like God?

Gods brushstrokes (in gorgeous pristine natural scenes) show the fact of the

Trinity for a careful look. The little book of the Martyr Fr. Daniil Sysoev In

45


47/94

simple words about the mystery of the Trinity, Moscow, 2011 has examples,including the trefoil (shamrock).

Perhaps protons self-decay time is innite long. The three quarks in pro-ton cant be removed away from each other, because are no isolated quarks.

This is similar to the mystery of Holy Trinity. The quarks inside proton havethe strong interaction charges called colors. And they are just three (seeWikipedia). As in the basis of the usual color. Proton surprised the scientists,that did not break up until now. They lost waiting enthusiasm, because thereis no action. In proton are three quarks of three different colors, but of thetwo natures ( u and d) as the Godman. Here I cross oneself with three ngerstogether, and two ngers down. Created a fairy tale, I felt as quarks in theproton communicate: all-connecting power of love and the knowledge, that theother is always there, no matter what happens; that from any hole You willbe dragged out. One for all and all for one.

The proof, that God must be Holy Trinity.In the book [11], page 118 the conditioned realities (CR) are arranged in acircle: R1 = f (R2), R2 = g(R3), R3 = s(R1). As any single of them, for

example R1 = f (g(s(R1))) = R1 depends only on himself, then each of thethree is Unconditional Reality (i.e. is the God as by denition in the book[11]). But since dependencies f , g, s are still there, the whole Trinity is oneGod. This analogy is not talking about the origin, because the Son is from theFather, and the Spirit is from the Father, but the Spirit does not originate fromthe Son. The analogy speaks about relationships.

Suppose logical operation P(n) takes two logical states: true and false. If is

true, that n = 1 then n3 = 1 is true and vice versa. That

return to innocence or vaccine against atheism

Documents