retail outlook 2016 - results before reports | boxwood€¦ · · 2016-10-19environment •...
TRANSCRIPT
2
Key factors impacting Retailers & Consumer Goods companies 20161. UK’s referendum on EU membership
3. Low commodity prices
2. FX rates
4. Continuing global uncertainties
• The UK’s leave vote is creating high market
volatility and is weakening both business and
consumer confidence.
• Initial impact will be predominantly focussed on fx
rates with Sterling weakening
• Long-term volatility depends on future
governments plan and exit negotiations with the
EU
• Sterling has already reached 31 year low against USD.
This will specifically impact non-food retailers due to
their high-dependency on USD buying
• The US has began the long haul back to a more
normal interest rate policy at the end of last year
which has strengthened the USD
• A number of currencies in key Export markets have
lost significant value over recent years
e.g. Russian Rouble
• Commodity prices have fallen significantly, with oil at
$120 per barrel in 2012 - now at around $40.
• Positive for consumers and business customers in the
UK, but large oil companies will continue to struggle as
their cashflow withers.
• Demand for other commodities is low, especially for
industrial commodities, which is why prices
may stay persistently low.
• China will continue to decelerate with a predicted 6.8%
growth in 2016 (IMF), dragging emerging markets down
and slowing growth in rich nations.
• Brazil and Russia’s recessions will continue with both
economies to continue shrinking slowly in 2016.
• Eurozone debt crisis may also impact the economy,
however it is showing slow signs of recovery
• Economic growth in the Middle East and
North Africa (MENA) is stagnating.
Source: IMF
3
Brexit presents both challenge and opportunity What’s going on:
• The UK will begin to exit the EU in April 2017
• UK participation in the European Single Market is undecided
• The pound continues to fall against the dollar, with an expectation towards parity
• Unforseen FX hedging costs• Personnel costs may rise -
• National living wage will likely raise costs
• Businesses will be expected to invest in and train its staff
• Restriction in migration may result in higher labour cost
• Sourcing international design talent might be impacted
• A pricing policy decision will need to be made to pass on or absorb costs
• Potential for longer inventory times and customs hassles
• If exporting to Europe could incur costs e.g. customs warehousing
• Data privacy and sharing laws will need to be reviewed (e.g. Denmark)
Challenges
• Lower tariffs - no longer paying
external EU tariffs on clothes
• Positive exposure to €/$ if trading
overseas
• Business models that are more
efficient or relies on less staff are likely
to be more successful in the current
environment
• Sourcing locally could offer cost
savings, though first need to consider
our competitive position
• Originally tariff-free sources of product
will have to change (e.g. Turkey), but
Bangladesh, India and China are still
relatively lower cost options
• Potentially positive impact on the
share price (inverse to dollar/pound)
Opportunities
Source: interview with KPMG BRC Expert Mark Essex
4
Economic and retail outlook by region: Europe
Germany1.2% (GDP)1.2% (retail sales)
UK1.5% (GDP)
1.9% (retail sales)
France1.4% (GDP)
1.0% (retail sales)
Italy1.1% (GDP)
0.9% (retail sales)
Russia1.1% (GDP)
0.0% (retail sales)
Spain1.9% (GDP)
2.5% (retail sales)Turkey
3.7% (GDP)1.4% (retail sales)
Sweden2.2% (GDP)
1.5% (retail sales)
Netherlands1.5% (GDP)
0.8% (retail sales)
Switzerland1.6% (GDP)
0.6% (retail sales)
GDP growth forecast 2016f-2020f (CAGR) [real]
Total retail sales growth forecast 2016f-2020f (CAGR) [real]Source: Euromonitor, KPMG Boxwood analysis
5
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
% o
f re
tail
sale
s
Western Europe
Store-based retailing Non-store retailing
European Retail Outlook
12% non-store
retailing
W European Consumer Spending W Europe Channel Overview
STORE VS NON-STORE Online Category split
Source: Euromonitor; WeAreSocial; Adyen
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
USD
bn
RETAIL CHANNEL
2010-2020 CAGR
Supermarket 1%
Internet 12%
Leisure & personal -0%
Direct 2%
Hypermarket 1%Health & BeautyHome & garden -0%
Discounters 3%
Vending 0%
Electronics & appliances
0%
Mixed 1%
0%
Home shopping -8%
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
USD
per
cap
ita
Consumer spending
Consumer spend Retail spend
7
Disruptors
Poundland
B&M
ALDI
Cdiscount
Uber
Amazon
Argos
Asos
Hello Fresh
Zappos.com
Thread.com
Warby Parker
Build A Bear
Workshop
Niketown
Hamleys
ValueConvenience
Experience
8
Designer glasses
without the designer
price tag
Redefining food
shopping
A personal stylist on
your phone
1
Warby Parker
2
Hello Fresh
3
Thread.com
10
Retail macro trendsFulfilmentConvenience
Connected homeBusiness model Artificial intelligence
Internationalisation
Omni-channel
Innovation
Consumer power
Discounters
12
Both Aldi and Lidl have grown consistently
36,293
51,898
29,349
48,986
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
€m
n
Year
Retail Value RSP
Aldi Lidl
+3.6%
+5.3%
Source: Euromonitor
1,000
3,000
5,000
7,000
9,000
Num
ber
of
outlets
Year
Number of outlets
Aldi Lidl
8016
8462
Western Europe market
Compound Annual Growth Rates notedWestern Europe market
13
Discounters continue to threaten the multiples market position
Discounters gain significant market share, predominantly from AsdaMarket shares: UK Retailers (2013-2015)
Asda’s low price proposition is under threat from the discounters
‘The Grocer 33’ basket comparison: UK Retailers (2014-2015)
Asda market share declines to 16.4% below Sainsbury (16.5%)
for first time in 3 years
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Mar
-13
Jun-
13
Sep-
13
Dec
-13
Mar
-14
Jun-
14
Sep-
14
Dec
-14
Mar
-15
Jun-
15
Mar
ket S
hare
(%)
Tesco Asda JS Morrisons Aldi Lidl
Source: Kantar 12 week market shares (March 2013 – July 2015)
Source: The Grocer 33 (Average basket price: 15/08/14, 7/11/14, 5/12/14, 13/3/15, 8/5/15, 2/7/15,
24/7/15)
66.96
61.0257.66 56.45
54.23
47.1844.27
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Avera
ge b
asket com
parison (
£)
15
Case study: Trader Joe’s
15
• Founded in in 1958 in California, this chain is owned by ALDI
since 1979
• Over 450 stores in the US located
• Phenomenal growth: sales up from $2.1bn in 2003 to $9.4bn in
2014
• For the last three years named by consumers as their overall
favourite store (survey by Market Force Information)
TJ is targeting different customer segments: from cost-conscious to
cool college kids to trendy well-heeled urbanites
What’s unique
• Elevate food shopping from a chore to a cultural experience
• Focus on gourmet, organic, natural, MSG free products, mostly
private label
• Quirky fashionable products at a Walmart’s price point, many of
which you won’t see anywhere else (80% of stock is own label)
• Friendly ‘neighbourhood store’ type customer service
• Competing on price is not the only option – TJ is an example of how a chain with many characteristics of a discounter can position themselves
differently and target different customer segments
• Some of the Trader Joe's-branded products are already in Aldi stores in Europe – when will they be in Croatia?
World’s leading private label organic supermarket
Value Proposition
“Trader Joe’s doesn’t pick up on trends — it sets
them”
A Trader Joe’s buyer
High Sales Density
• Standardised store layout with most locations about 1,100m2
• Low SKU count (4,000) – they don’t carry all the necessities
• Whenever possible, Trader Joe’s purchases directly from the
manufacturers
• Small stores rely on timely distribution and don’t have large back
rooms
• Good pay and employee culture help maintain customer service and
low employee turnover (4%)
Operating Model
Trader Joe’s
stores
operate at
one of the
highest sales
density levels
in the US –
over $1,750
per sq. f.
17
Case study: Mercadona
• Spain’s leading grocery retailer operating
supermarkets predominantly located in or
the edge of town centres
• A benchmark for retail productivity in Spain
– sales per employee up by 62% between
2004 and 2012
• Sales: €18.2bn, growth of 20% between
2010 and 2014 while overall Spanish
household consumption contracted by 2%
• 1,576 stores, with plans to open a further
200 stores by 2018“Mercadona wants to control its supplies totally,
to dictate what they produce, when and how.”
Javier Alfonso, author of “Mercadona, a success story”
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Sales (€m
ex.VAT)15,055 16,284 17,422 17,849 18,163
Operating
profit560 641 656 660 675
Outlet
numbers1,310 1,356 1,411 1,467 1,521
Sales area
(‘000 sqm)1,680 1,769 1,851 1,894 1,919
Sales per
outlet
(€’000)
11,698 12,216 12,597 12,404 12,157
Sales per
sqm (€)9,123 9,443 9,625 9,532 9,527
18
Case study: Mercadona continuedValue Proposition
• Mid-market offering with excellent quality
to price ratio
• Up to 8,000 branded and private label
lines; private label accounts for over 20%
of Spain’s private label sales by volume
• Everyday Low Prices policy with stable
prices and low promotion share
• Customer is at the top of the company’s
organizational pyramid - high standards of
customer service and constant
dialogue with the customer
Operating Model
• Integrated supplier model - close relationship
with a group of suppliers that exclusively
produce for Mercadona, often in exchange for
Mercadona’s investment.
• Tight control over costs across the supply
chain, e.g. working with suppliers to eliminate
the glossy finish on some packaging
• Innovation over imitation of popular brands -
Mercadona has its own laboratories where
they invite customers to showcase and test
their products
• High employee morale and low turnover
boosted by high job security (90% permanent
contracts) and above average pay
• Total control over supply chain and customer centricity allowed Mercadona to become the
market leader with over 20% market share
• Mercadona has successfully withstood the economic downturn and competition from discounters
– will it last in the online age?
20
The Connected Home
Automation &
control
•Temperature
•Lighting
•Blinds
•Garden
Security &
monitoring
• Cameras
• Monitoring
Energy
management
• Intelligent
thermostats
• Consumption
management
Entertainment
&
communication
• Access in and
out of home
Wellness
•Heath
monitoring
•Assisted living
Lifestyle
automation
• Making
shopping
easier
“Home” encompasses both the fabric and environment of the dwelling and the well being of people. The
connected home is no different. The connected home offers a huge spectrum of benefits, spanning the
provision of protection, convenience and environmental improvements to its inhabitants as well as delivering
entertainment, wellness and lifestyle benefits. These are available whether the occupants are In or away
from the house.
21
The Connected Home: the 5 ‘Cs’
Customer
• Loyalty + trust
• Complex sales
• Tech service
• Relationship
management
• Insight +
Analytics
$400-700bn market by 2019 | Growth of 50-60% annually over the next 5 years | 25bn connected devices by 2020
Connectivity
• Infrastructure
• ID management
• Social
• Platform +
Automation
• Geofencing +
triggers
• Provider
management
Cloud
• Storage
capability
• Access quality
• Security
• Cross platform
integration
Content
• Delivery channel
• Media
development
• Learning +
curation
• Provider
management
Kit
• Media and social
tech
• Beacons +
controls
• Ambient
computing
• Non-media tech
• White goods
• Wearables
22
Robotics in the value chain
Strategy &
PropositionAttract Buy SellSupply Relate
Support (Finance, Property, HR, IT, Partners)
Robots are talking
to us!
30% of Amazon
marketplace sales
are priced by
algorithms!
• A robot in the
board of
directors!
• Bring back
production
thanks to
robotics!
• Robots are
replacing
warehouse
workers!
• Self-driving
trucks have
arrived!
Robots
entertain me in
the shop!
An algorithm is telling
me to replace failing
parts!
I’ve been hired
by an
algorithm!
KPMG UK LLP
15 Canada Square
London
E14 5GL
United Kingdom
Paul Martin
UK Head of Retail, KPMG UK LLP+44 7551 152088
DisclaimerThe information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the
circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and
timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is
received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information
without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.