result validation

28
Result validation

Upload: field

Post on 26-Feb-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Result validation. Exercise 1. You’ve done an analysis to the best of your ability using the correct procedure. Is your answer correct? p ossibly, hopefully you can’t ever be sure that the answer is correct because the sample is an unknown - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Result validation

Result validation

Page 2: Result validation

Exercise 1

• You’ve done an analysis to the best of your ability using the correct procedure. Is your answer correct?

• possibly, hopefully• you can’t ever be sure that the answer is correct because the sample is an

unknown• all you can do is provide evidence that the answer “should” be correct• calibration • blanks • controls• spikes • retesting

Page 3: Result validation

Calibration

• standards provide a day-to-day measure of an instrument response• allow you to determine concentration• do not necessarily provide a measurement of the ongoing performance of

the instrument• also means the running of special standards which do not relate to sample

analysis, but to instrument performance• also known as Performance Qualification

Page 4: Result validation

Blanks

• “samples” with no analyte• field blanks – to check on contamination from the collection procedure• transport blanks – kept in the transport vehicle at the site• container blanks – prepared at the laboratory from a container which is

identical to those used for field collection• matrix blanks – materials of similar matrix to the samples• reagent blanks – some analytical methods require a number of sample

treatment steps involving addition of different chemicalsExample 1• 10 mL of conc. HCl added to river water sample (25 ug/L Pb)• the solution made up to 100 mL with ultra-pure water• acid contains 0.1 mg/L (0.00001 %w/v) of lead • the additional lead from the acid is 10 mL x 0.1 mg/L ÷ 100 mL = 10 ug/L• the reagent has added about 40% error to the answer

Page 5: Result validation

Exercise 2

How can blanks be used?• a zero (eg spectro std) (only if a low value)• an early sample to check level

• if high – find a different source of the reagent

Page 6: Result validation

Controls

• sources of error other than contamination: • matrix interference• method error• instrument malfunction• operator error

• for certain sample types, it is possible to have standard samples, known as controls or certified reference materials (CRM)• samples of the same matrix, which have known levels of the analytes• purchased or prepared in the laboratory.

• taken through the same procedure as the normal sample• the result compared with the “true value”• used to judge the accuracy of the real samples

Page 7: Result validation

Example 2

• standard sample of flour known to contain 450 mg/kg of sodium• analysed together with “real” samples of flour• found to contain 425 mg/kg

• standard sample is reading 5.6% low [(425-450)/450], • reasonable to assume that their results are similarly low• you would not simply subtract 5.6% from their results!!

Page 8: Result validation

Spikes (recovery checks)

• the addition of a known amount of analyte (known as a spike) to the sample, which is then analysed as normal

• increase in concentration compared to how much in sample and how much was added

• if a procedure works perfectly, then 100% of the added analyte will be recovered

• e.g. sample contains 5 mg of analyte, added spike contains 5 mg, so spiked sample should contain 10• if not, then the value for the sample is wrong

• 90-110% recovery generally considered OK

Page 9: Result validation

• the percent recovered is a measure of how accurate the answer for your sample is

• if 50% of the added analyte is recovered, it suggest that 50% of the analyte in the sample is being missed as well

• you don’t then adjust the sample answer accordingly, just report both results.

• recovery check process is similar in performance to standard addition• done for totally different reasons• standard addition is done to determine the sample concentration• an analytical procedure

• recovery check requires that you know the concentration in the sample • a check on the analytical procedure

Page 10: Result validation

Retesting

• analysing a duplicate sample placed in the batch • re-running a calibration standard after a certain number of samples (known

as a re-slope)• checks for instrumental drift

• analysing the sample by an alternative method• another person (or laboratory) analysing the sample

Page 11: Result validation

The equation itself

• SPS is amount found in spiked sample• S is amount found in sample• SP is amount added as spike• found means in analysis, added means as standard• amount can refer to mass, volume or concentration.• the final calculation is easy• getting the three numbers to plug into the equation is not easy,• it is easy to put the wrong number in when there are so many numbers to

choose from

SP

SSPSx100RC%

Page 12: Result validation

Two basic rules & something to remember

• All three values must be in exactly the same unit, eg mg, g/L, %w/w

• All three values must be from the same stage of the analysis, eg the original sample, the first solution, the analysed solution

• there is no one way to do these, just one correct answer

• 1 mL of 1000 mg/L contains 1 mg of analyte

Page 13: Result validation

Example 4

Sample 2 mg/LSpike 2 mL of 50 mg/LSpiked sample 2.9 mg/LProcedure 20 mL to 100 mL

20 mL sample of river water is diluted to 100 mL found to contain an average of 2 mg/L of Na another 20 mL aliquot spiked with 2 mL of 50 mg/L

Na, made up to 100 mL found to contain 2.9 mg/L

Page 14: Result validation

Example 4

• the best unit to choose is mg/L• the only one in common• this procedure has only two stages: • the original river water• the diluted solution which is analysed

• Which stage do these mg/L numbers belong to?• S : 2 – diluted• SP: 50 – neither (it is a standard in another bottle)• SPS: 2.9 – diluted

Page 15: Result validation

Example 4

• simplest to work out what the mg/L of SP in the diluted solution is• use the dilution equation C1V1 = C2V2.• 50 x 2 = ? x 100• SP = 1 mg/L

%90129.2100%

xRC

Page 16: Result validation

Example 4

• less obvious approach – mass • S: 20 mL of 10 mg/L = 0.2 mg• SPS: 100 mL of 2.9 mg/L = 0.29• SP: 2 mL of 50 mg/L = 0.05

• why even consider this way?• each of the three values has to be worked out• the “mass in the sample portion” method works regardless of the type of

sample (solid or liquid) and whether there are any dilutions

Page 17: Result validation

Example 5

• potato chips contain 5.0%w/w of Na• 1 g sample is spiked with 5 mL of 5000 mg/L Na• dissolved in 500 mL• contains 140 mg/L of Na

S 5.0 %w/w

SP 5 mL of 5000 mg/L

SPS 140 mg/L

Procedure 1 g, 500 mL

Page 18: Result validation

Example 5

Approach 1 – concentration based• Use mg/L as the common unit - SPS is already done

• For S, how many mg are in 1 g of 5%w/w? The conc. in 500 mL?• 5g/100g means 0.05 g/1 g or 50 mg• dissolved in 500 mL => 100 mg/L

• For SP, what is the final concentration? • 5000 mg/L x 5 mL = ? x 500 mL• ? = 50 mg/L

%8050

100140x100RC%

Page 19: Result validation

Example 5

Approach 2 – mass based• Use mg – all 3 have to be worked out

• SPS: 500 mL of 140 mg/L = 70 mg

• S: done in Approach 1: 50 mg

• SP: 5 mL of 5000 mg/L = 25 mg

%8025

5070x100RC%

Page 20: Result validation

Exercise 3(a)

• 10 mL of sample (known concentration 100 mg/L) is spiked with 0.5 mL of 1000 mg/L and diluted to 250 mL. This solution, when analysed, has a concentration of 6.1 mg/L.

Sample 100 mg/LSpike 500 uL of 1000 mg/LSpiked sample

6.1 mg/L

Procedure 10 mL, 250 mL

Page 21: Result validation

Exercise 3(a)

Approach 1 – diluted soln, mg/L• SPS already known: 6.1• S: 10 mL of 100 mg/L to 250 mL of 4• SP: 0.5 mL of 1000 mg/L to 250 mL of 2

%105241.6x100RC%

Page 22: Result validation

Exercise 3(a)

Approach 2 – mass, mg• S: 10 mL of 100 mg/L is 1 mg• SP: 0.5 mL of 1000 mg/L is 0.5 mg• SPS: 250 mL of 6.1 mg/L is 1.525 mg

%1055.01525.1x100RC%

Page 23: Result validation

Exercise 3(b)

• 5 g of sample (known concentration 50 mg/kg) is spiked with 5 mL of 50 mg/L, and made to 100 mL. The concentration of this solution is 4.4 mg/L.

Sample 50 mg/kgSpike 5 mL of 50 mg/LSpiked sample

4.4 mg/L

Procedure 5 g, 100 mL

Page 24: Result validation

Exercise 8(b)

Approach 1 – soln, mg/L• SPS already known: 4.4• S: 5 g of 50 mg/kg is 0.25 mg, in 100 mL is 2.5 • SP: 5 mL of 50 mg/L to 100 mL of 2.5

%765.25.24.4100%

xRC

Page 25: Result validation

Exercise 8(b)

Approach 2 – mass, mg• S only known from calcs in #1: 0.25• SPS: 100 mL of 4.4 mg/L is 0.44• SP: 5 mL of 40 mg/L is 0.25

%7625.025.044.0100%

xRC

Page 26: Result validation

Exercise 3(c)

• The concentration in the beer is found to be 52 mg/L. A 50 mL aliquot of the beer is spiked with 2 mL of 1000 mg/L Na, made up to 100 mL and this solution found to contain 47 mg/L Na.

Sample 50 mg/LSpike 2 mL of 1000 mg/LSpiked sample

40 mg/L

Procedure 50 mL to 100 mL

Page 27: Result validation

Exercise 8(c)

Approach 1 – analysed soln, mg/L• SPS already known: 47• S: 50 mL of 52 diluted to 100 mL of 26 • SP: 2 mL of 1000 mg/L to 100 mL of 20

%10520

2647x100RC%

Page 28: Result validation

Exercise 8(c)

Approach 2 – mass, mg• S: 50 mL of 52 mg/L: 2.6• SPS: 100 mL of 47 mg/L is 4.7• SP: 2 mL of 1000 mg/L is 2

%1052

6.27.4x100RC%