result and discusson jar test
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Result and Discusson Jar Test
1/8
RESULT
JAR/BEAKER RPM FeCl (III) DOSE, (mg/L) APPEARANCE FLOCCULATION
A 80 0 (mg/L) No changes in color Presence
B 80 2 (mg/L) No changes in color Presence
C 80 4 (mg/L) No changes in color Presence
D 80 6 (mg/L) No changes in color Presence
E 80 8 (mg/L) No changes in color Presence
F 80 9 (mg/L) No changes in color Presence
TABLE 1: Physical Observation of Wastewater during Jar Test at 80 RPM.
-
8/10/2019 Result and Discusson Jar Test
2/8
PHYSICAL OBSERVATION OF JAR/BEAKER A
TIME INTERVALS RPM FeCl (III) DOSE, (mg/L) APPEARANCE FLOCCULATION
5 20 0 (mg/L) No changes Presence
10 20 0 (mg/L) No changes Presence
15 20 0 (mg/L) No changes Presence
20 20 0 (mg/L) No changes Presence
25 20 0 (mg/L) No changes Presence
30 20 0 (mg/L) No changes Presence
PHYSICAL OBSERVATION OF JAR/BEAKER B
TIME INTERVALS RPM FeCl (III) DOSE, (mg/L) APPEARANCE FLOCCULATION
5 20 2 (mg/L) Clear Light yellow Presence
10 20 2 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
15 20 2 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
20 20 2 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
25 20 2 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
30 20 2 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
TABLE 2: Physical observation of jar/beaker A and B for 30 minutes at 20 RPM.
-
8/10/2019 Result and Discusson Jar Test
3/8
PHYSICAL OBSERVATION OF JAR/BEAKER C
TIME INTERVALS RPM FeCl (III) DOSE, (mg/L) APPEARANCE FLOCCULATION
5 20 4 (mg/L) Clear Yellowish Presence
10 20 4 (mg/L) Clear Yellowish Presence
15 20 4 (mg/L) Clear Yellowish Presence
20 20 4 (mg/L) Clear Yellowish Presence
25 20 4 (mg/L) Clear Yellowish Presence
30 20 4 (mg/L) Clear Yellowish Presence
PHYSICAL OBSERVATION OF JAR/BEAKER D
TIME INTERVALS RPM FeCl (III) DOSE, (mg/L) APPEARANCE FLOCCULATION
5 20 6 (mg/L) Clear Light yellow Presence
10 20 6 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
15 20 6 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
20 20 6 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
25 20 6 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
30 20 6 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
TABLE 3: Physical observation of jar/beaker C and D for 30 minutes at 20 RPM.
-
8/10/2019 Result and Discusson Jar Test
4/8
PHYSICAL OBSERVATION OF JAR/BEAKER E
TIME INTERVALS RPM FeCl (III) DOSE, (mg/L) APPEARANCE FLOCCULATION
5 20 8 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
10 20 8 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
15 20 8 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
20 20 8 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
25 20 8 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
30 20 8 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
PHYSICAL OBSERVATION OF JAR/BEAKER F
TIME INTERVALS RPM FeCl (III) DOSE, (mg/L) APPEARANCE FLOCCULATION
5 20 10 (mg/L) Clear Presence
10 20 10 (mg/L) Clear Presence
15 20 10 (mg/L) Clear Presence
20 20 10 (mg/L) Clear Presence
25 20 10 (mg/L) Clear Presence
30 20 10 (mg/L) Clear Presence
TABLE 4: Physical observation of jar/beaker E and F for 30 minutes at 20 RPM
-
8/10/2019 Result and Discusson Jar Test
5/8
JAR/BEAKER RPM FeCl (III) DOSE, (mg/L) APPEARANCE FLOCCULATION
A 0 0 (mg/L) No changes Presence
B 0 2 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
C 0 4 (mg/L) Clear Yellow Presence
D 0 6 (mg/L) Clear Yellow Presence
E 0 8 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
F 0 10 (mg/L) Clear Light Yellow Presence
TABLE 5: Physical observation on all jar/beaker after 15 minutes.
-
8/10/2019 Result and Discusson Jar Test
6/8
TABLE 6: Rate of Turbidity based on various dose of FeCl(III).
GRAPH 1: Graph of Turbidity against FeCl (III) Dose.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 2 4 6 8 10
TURBIDITY (NTU)
FeCl (III) DOSE (mg/L)
GRAPH OF TURBIDITY (NTU) AGAINST FeCl (III) DOSE (mg/L)
JAR A B C D E F
TURBIDITY (NTU) 8.78 7.82 9.04 10.2 10.2 11.5
FeCl(III) DOSE
(mg/L)
0 2 4 6 8 10
-
8/10/2019 Result and Discusson Jar Test
7/8
DISCUSSION
Table1 shows the observation of the wastewater after 1 minute mixing using jar
test. Each beaker is labeled A, B, C, D, E, and F contains different dose of coagulants
respectively. After 1 minute of mixing at 80 RPM using jar test, there is no change in color
of wastewater. It is clear yellow due to addition of coagulant FeCl (III) just like before
stirring. However, a little flocculation can be seen after the stirring. The coagulation
process is not too obvious due to short period of stirring, so more time is needed to more
coagulant and flocculants as the end of process.
For beaker A, it is made as control which means no coagulant FeCl (III) is added
for the test. It shows no change in appearance throughout 30 minutes of stirring process at
20 RPM. However, there is flocculants like sedimentation in the beaker after the process.
It is assumed that the sedimentation is actually the fine sands presence in the wastewater.
Its mass makes it sinks at the bottom of the beaker.
Beaker B, C, D, E, and F contains 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 mg/L dose of coagulant FeCl (III)
respectively. Their appearances change gradually throughout the 30 minutes of stirring
process at 20 RPM with presence of small amount of flocculants at the end of process.
When the stirring end at the 30 minutes of intervals the beakers are left for 15 minutes to
let full settlement of flocculants as depicted in table 5.
From the turbidity test, graph 1 is obtained. The graph shows the turbidity reaches
the lowest value when the coagulant FeCl (III) dose is 2 mg/L. This is the optimum FeCl
(III) dosage. The wastewater sample taken for this test is from Berkelah, a recreational
water area near Kuantan, Pahang. According to Malaysian Interim National Water Quality
Standard (INWQS), water for recreational use body contact can be classified under Class
IIB.
Consequently, INWSQSs standard level of turbidity for Class IIB water is 50
NTU. Overall turbidity values of wastewater in beakers A, B, C, D, E, and F tested in this
experiment are not exceeding the maximum permissible level of turbidity recommended
by INWSQS. Hence, Berkelahswater is safe for daily normal usage.
-
8/10/2019 Result and Discusson Jar Test
8/8
REFERENCE
http://www.wepa-db.net/policies/law/malaysia/eq_surface.htm