restorationofeutrophiclakeusing ... · ol" olp" olpc lakewater ph* 8.2 8.2 8.3* 8.0...
TRANSCRIPT
Restoration of eutrophic lake using dolomite to immobilize the phosphorus in the water column and sediments
Presenter: Boris Constantin
April 26-‐28 2016, Montreal SUSTREM 2016
Presentation plan
• Introduction
• Project goal and objectives
• Material and methods
• Results and discussion
• Conclusion and perspectives
• Questions
2
Introduction: Eutrophication
3
Anthropogenic eutrophication Natural eutrophication
Ten years Thousands of years
Oligotrophic Oligotrophic
Eutrophic Mesotrophic
• Change in the algal population to harmful invasive species; • Loss of recreational uses; • General reduction in biodiversity…
3
Introduction: Eutrophication
4
Source : MDDELCC
• Phosphorus: nutrient involving eutrophication with N
Sources : exogenous and endogenous • Chlorophyll a: a pigment present in all photosynthetic organisms Indicator of algal biomass suspended in water • Transparency: diminishes as the quantity of algae in the lake increases
4
Introduction: Contextualization and problematics
5
Lake Saint-‐Augustin
Advanced state of eutrophication
Problematics Drastic changes since the 20th century; Internal contamination through sediments.
5
6
Introduction: Transporting of sediment phosphorus towards the water column
P accu
mulation ov
er time
Recent sediments 900 to 1522 mg of P/kg
Old sediments 400 to 900 mg of P/kg
Lake Saint-‐Augustin Roberge & Piennitz 2002
Important parameters in the salting out of P • Potential of oxidation-‐reduction
• pH
hypoxic
Acid pH Basic pH
P release related to calcium
P release related to iron
6
Introduction: Lake Saint-‐Augustin Restoration
! In 2007, the city of Québec, in collaboration with Laval University, implemented a pilot project.
! A new project has been implemented: absorption of dissolved phosphorus and active recovery of sediments with dolomite.
7
1. Coagulation of phosphorus dissolved with alum (aluminum sulfate) and active recovery of sediments by limestone (calcite);
2. Sediment sludging.
7
Introduction: Solution examined
8
Principles • Contamination retention; • Physical isolation of contaminants; • Bioturbation reduction.
Dolomite • Good P absorption capacity; • Non toxic for aquatic species
and the environment; • Easily available material at a
reasonable price. CaMg(CO3)2 Carbonated sedimentary rock
• Powder = 12 μm • Crushed = 1.25 to 5 mm
8
Goal and objectives
EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DOLOMITE BASED RESTORATION METHOD
! Conducting small scale column tests to simulate treatment by dolomite
! Ensure regular follow-‐up of phosphorus in the water column
! Assess phosphorus removal (dissolved and total amounts) in the water column
9
9
Material and methods
" Field activities
" Characterization of lake water
" Laboratory water column tests
10
10
Material and methods Field activities
Sampling points localization
11
The lake water has been sampled at 3 depths: • Surface • Mid-‐depth • Bottom
Based on previous studies, the 2 points should have different P concentrations in the sediments.
11
Material and methods Field activities
Field measurements
12
WTW field multimeter • pH: Sentix sensor • Conductivity: TetraCon sensor • Oxygen: FDO sensor
YSI sensor Turbidity measurement
Secchi Disk Transparency measurement
12
Material and methods Characterization of lake water
! Alkalinity ! Calorimetric titration
! Dissolved metals ! Heated atomic absorption spectroscopy
! Chlorophyll a ! Acetone extraction and measurement using spectrophotometry
! Suspended matter ! Gravimetric method: filtration and filter weight difference
! Soluble phosphorus ! Ascorbic acid method with spectrophotometry
! Total phosphorus ! Ammonium persulfate digestion and spectrophotometry
13
After adequate treatments:
13
Method and material Column tests
14
25 cm of sediments Unaltered sample
25 cm of water
Oxic conditions
Hypoxic conditions
De-‐ionized water
Lake water
Lake water + Dolomite powder
Lake water + Dolomite powder + Crushed dolomite
= 24 / sampling point
! Column preparation
14
Method and material Column tests
15
25 cm of sediments Unaltered sample
25 cm of water
! Column preparation
15
! Column preparation
16
Method and material Column tests
Oxic condition Hypoxic condition
# Permanent bubbling
# 3H/day
Bottle of N2
16
Method and material Column tests
! Sampling schedule and parameters analyzed
17
Days Analyses
0 Regular + Metals + Alkalinity
1 Regular
2 Regular
4 Regular + Metals + Alkalinity
8 Regular
12 Regular
20 Regular
24 Regular
28 Regular + Metals + Alkalinity
32 Regular + Metals + Alkalinity
Regular analyses: • Potential oxidation-‐reduction; • pH; • Dissolved O2; • Conductivity; • Turbidity; • Soluble P; • Total P.
Day 4: addition of dolomite powder Day 8: addition of crushed dolomite
17
Results and discussion Characterization of the lakewater column
18
Point 1
[P]dissolved < 10 ppb [P]total = 27.3 ppb Conductivity = 719 μS/cm
19.3°C 103%
19.3°C 105%
18.3°C 73%
[P]dissolved < 10 ppb [P]total = 26.4 ppb Conductivity = 716 μS/cm
[P]dissolved < 10 ppb [P]total < 10 ppb Conductivity= 638 μS/cm
Point 2
23.6°C 91%
22.3°C 82%
22.1°C 53%
[P]dissolved = 20.7 ppb [P]total = 115.5 ppb Conductivity= 746 μS/cm
[P]dissolved = 21.9 ppb [P]total = 139.7 ppb Conductivity = 691 μS/cm
[P]dissolved = 31.3 ppb [P]total = 231.8 ppb Conductivity = 574 μS/cm
10 cm
265 cm
500 cm 235 cm
125 cm
15 cm
Spectrophotometer: P detection limit = 10 ppb % = % in dissolved
O2
18
Results and discussion Tests during incubation
19
• pH • Conductivity • Alkalinity • Soluble
phosphorus • Total phosphorus
19
Abbreviations
Contents of incubation core Oxic Hypoxic
De-‐ionized water O-‐N A-‐N
Lake water O-‐L A-‐L
Lake water + Dolomite powder O-‐LP A-‐LP
Lake water + Dolomite powder + Crushed dolomite
O-‐LPC A-‐LPC
20
20
! Point 1 : Dissolved phosphorus
21
OXIC HYPOXIC
Results and discussion Tests during incubation
Final concentrations
ON OL OLP OLPC
[P]dissolved (ppb) < 10 < 10 17 15
Final concentrations
AN AL ALP ALPC
[P]dissolved (ppb) 25 240 70 < 10
Spectrophotometer: P detection limit = 10 ppb
21
22
[P]total (ppb)
Day 4 Final day
O-‐N 9 18
O-‐L 23 26
O-‐LP 102 44
O-‐LPC 94 47
[P]total (ppb)
Day 4 Final day
A-‐N 21 62
A-‐L 24 338
A-‐LP 83 127
A-‐LPC 147 28
! Point 1: Total phosphorus
OXIC HYPOXIC
Results and discussion Tests during incubation
Eutrophication threshold [P]total set by the MDDELCC: 30 ppb
22
! Point 1: average values
Results and discussion Tests during incubation
OL OLP OLPC Lake water
pH 8.4 8.0 8.3 7.9
Conductivity (μS/cm) 811 823 799 679
Alkalinity (mg/L of CaCO3) 149 132 137 113
AL ALP ALPC Lake water
pH 7.8 8.2 8.2 7.9
Conductivity (μS/cm) 766 822 774 679
Alkalinity (mg/L of CaCO3) 146 164 155 113
The addition of dolomite did not affect these parameters
23
! Point 2 : Dissolved phosphorus
24
OXIC HYPOXIC
Results and discussion Tests during incubation
Final concentrations
ON OL OLP OLPC
[P]dissolved (ppb) 14 13 26 < 10
Final concentrations
AN AL ALP ALPC
[P]dissolved (ppb) 362 677 151 < 10
Spectrophotometer: P detection limit = 10 ppb
24
! Point 2: Total phosphorus
25
Results and discussion Tests during incubation
[P]total (ppb)
Day 4 Final day
O-‐N 24 60
O-‐L 30 44
O-‐LP 60 38
O-‐LPC 68 23
[P]total (ppb)
Day 4 Final day
A-‐N 166 565
A-‐L 140 879
A-‐LP 175 246
A-‐LPC 155 25
OXIC HYPOXIC
Eutrophication threshold [P]total set by the MDDELCC: 30 ppb
25
! Point 2: average values
Results and discussion Tests during incubation
The addition of dolomite did not affect these parameters
OL OLP OLPC Lake water
pH 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.0
Conductivity (μS/cm) 622 629 624 670
Alkalinity (mg/L of CaCO3) 150 148 155 142
AL ALP ALPC Lake water
pH 7.1 7.4 8.2 8.0
Conductivity (μS/cm) 631 720 717 670
Alkalinity (mg/L of CaCO3) 157 218 179 142
26
! Total phosphorus: Percentage removed*
27
Results and discussion Tests during incubation
Oxic Hypoxic
Point 1 Point 2 Point 1 Point 2
LP 57% 37% -‐ 53% -‐ 40%
LPC 50% 66% 81% 84%
*Percentage removed calculated between day 4 and the final day of incubation
27
Conclusion and perspectives
$ There is more P salted-‐out in hypoxic conditions
$ The best removal was obtained from the cores that received powdered and crushed dolomite in a hypoxic condition
$ Dolomite has good potential to retain contaminants $ Without the addition of crushed dolomite: the P concentrations
increase $ With the addition of crushed dolomite: the P concentrations are
stabilized $ With an adequate dosage, dolomite may bring the [P]total under
the eutrophication threshold
$ Larger scale tests (in situ) to confirm dolomite’s potential
28
28
Thank you for your attention
29