responsibility in a high-accountability system: leading schools in england daniel muijs, university...
TRANSCRIPT
Responsibility in a high-accountability system: leading schools in England
Daniel Muijs, University of Southampton
A hotbed of reform• An era of rapid policy change and strong government
intervention
• Dual policy direction since 1988:
– Greater autonomy for schools (especially from local authorities)
– Increasingly strong central accountability mechanisms
• Current trends:
– Academies and Free schools
– Tightening up of Ofsted inspections and performance standards
Current trends
3
• Academies and Free schools
• Tightening up of Ofsted inspections and performance standards
• System leadership and executive headships
The role of the head teacher• Long tradition of strong head teacher leadership
• Hierarchical school structures
• More recent:
– School-based management
– Emphasis on role of head teacher in school improvement
– National training programmes
4
Role of the head teacher• Central and broad
• Issues of
– Head teacher capacity
– Recruitment to headship
– Distraction from key instructional leadership roles under SBM
5
Responses to these issues• Leadership development
• Distributed and delegated leadership
• School Business Management
• Networking and collaboration
6
Leadership development• Strong emphasis with development of NPQH
• NPQH regularly reformed, now more collaborative model
• Based on view that leadership is learned
• Limited evidence of impact
7
Distributed and delegated leadership• Relatively strong research evidence
• Encouraged by National College and other (quasi) governmental organisations
• In practise, differential uptake in schools
• Sometimes strong central leadership may be more appropriate model
• Common half-way house: extended leadership teams
8
School business managers• Central theorem:
– Head teachers should concentrate on instructional leadership
– Head teachers not necessarily best skilled at business management
• Therefore, SBM’s appointed in many schools
• Increased specialised training provision for SBM’s
• Positive evidence for this model, though does not work in all circumstances
9
Leading networks• Increasing prevalence of school networks and
Federations of schools
• System leadership – interdependence between schools
• Evidence of positive impacts
• New roles for head teachers:
– Horizontal leadership
– Network leadership
– Executive headships
10
Conclusion• Leading under pressure:
– Strong accountability + strong autonomy + rapid system change
• Some creative solutions have emerged
• More needed:
– Policy support
– Creative use of capacity of HE, private providers and schools themselves
– Chains of schools
11