JUL 2 2 1991SECTIO^l

RESPONSE OF WEST LAKE QUARRY AND MATERIAL COMPANY

TO

CERCLA 104(e) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

40056050SUPERFUND RECORDS

VOLUME III OF IV

x-i, (Jwrtkugdt**• *„ *L (£w LsJci &

<tCElVt

| JUL 2 2 1991SAFE SECTW

I• RESPONSE OF WEST LAKE QUARRY AND MATERIAL COMPANY

II CERCLA 104(e) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

III VOLUME III OF IV

IIIIII JULY 18, 1991

Iii

NUREG-1308Rev. 1

Radioactive Material in the* West Lake LandfillL \ : " •LI Summary Report

LL

U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission -

1 Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU • .•:.. -. - • . ,.:,,. •-;•

»»**«\•U

00/1I4-O

1111111111111111111

1

i

Radioactive Material in tWest Lake Landfill

Summary Report

Manuscript Completed: February 1988Date Published: June 1988

Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear SafetyOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555

/c\• %sS& /*> ^p i••»••

NUREG-1308Rev. 1

he

i

IBWersiKTOfr<lB AUG 81988 & \

WASTE MANAGEMENTPROGRAM

i [ i

1

i

•

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

ABSTRACT

The West Lake Landfill is located near the city of St. Louis in Bridgeton, St.Louis County, Missouri. The site has been used,since 1962 for disposing of mu-nicipal refuse,>industrial solid and liquid wastes, and construction demolitiondebris.

This report summarizes the circumstances of the radioactive material in theWest Lake Landfill. The radioactive material resulted from the processing ofuranium ores and the subsequent sale by the AEC{of processing residues. Pri-mary emphasis is on the radiological environmental aspects as they relate topotential disposition of the material. It is concluded that remedial actionis called for.

iii

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

CONTENTS

ABSTRACT1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE . .

456789

Location1 ....History j . ...Ownership ....Contaminated AreasTopography ....Geology .....Hydrology ....Demography ....

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEYS

External Gamma ...........Surface Soil Analysis . . . . . . .Subsurface Soil Analysis . . . . . .Nonradiological Analysis . . . . . .Background Radioactivity MeasurementAirborne Radioactivity Analysis ..Vegetation Analysis . . . . . . . .Water Analysis . . . . . . . . . . .

ESTIMATION OF RADIOACTIVITY INVENTORY .APPLICABILITY OF THE BRANCH TECHNICAL POSITIONREMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES EXAMINED ,FACTORS CONTRIBUTING UNCERTAINTY . .SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pageiii13

33355567

88999101010

111213131416

1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

This report summarizes the circumstances of the radioactive material in theWest Lake Landfill (Figure 1), in particular, [the radiological environmentalaspects as they relate to potential disposition of the material.

The West Lake Landfill, Inc. property is a 200 acre tract in Bridgeton,St. Louis County, Missouri, on the outskirts of the city of St. Louis. It isabout 4 miles West of St. Louis' Lambert Field! International Airport, near theintersection of interstate highways 1-70 and 1-270. Limestone was quarriedthere from 1939 to 1987. Also on the property is an industrial complex whereconcrete ingredients are measured and combined', and where asphalt aggregate isprepared. Since 1962, portions of the property have been used as landfills fordisposing of municipal refuse, industrial solid and liquid wastes, and construc-tion demolition debris. In 1973, soil contaminated with radioactive materialwas placed in a landfill there.

iThe radioactive material originated with uranium-ore-processing residues whichhad been stored at Lambert Airport by the U.S.{Atomic Energy Commission (AEC),and which were sold in early 1966 to the Continental Mining and Milling Company,of Chicago, Illinois. The AEC's invitation to bid listed the following residuesfor purchase: 74,000 tons of Belgian Congo pitchblende raffinate containingabout 113 tons of uranium; 32,500 tons of Colorado raffinate containing about48 tons of uranium; and 8700 tons of leached barium sulfate containing about 7tons of uranium. The material was moved from the airport during 1966 to nearby9200 Latty Avenue, Hazelwood, Missouri. In January 1967, the Commercial Dis-count Corporation of Chicago took possession of the residues to remove moistureand to ship the residues to the Cotter Corporation facilities in Canon City,Colorado. In December 1969, the remaining material was sold to the Cotter Cor-poration. In the following four years, the residues, with the principalexception of the 8700 tons of leached barium sulfate, were shipped to CanonCity.1

In April 1974, Region III representatives of NRC's Office of Inspection andEnforcement visited the Cotter Corporation's Latty Avenue site to check onthe progress of the decommissioning activitiesIbeing performed there. Thisinspection disclosed that in 1973 Cotter Corporation had disposed of approxi-mately 8700 tons of leached barium sulfate residues mixed with 39,000 tons oftop soil at a local landfill.1 j

By letter dated June 2, 1976, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources(MDNR) forwarded to the NRC's Region III office newspaper articles which allegedthat only 9000 tons of waste had been moved from the Latty Avenue site ratherthan 40,000 tons and that it was moved to the West Lake Landfill rather than tothe St. Louis Landfill No. 1. Region III personnel investigated the allegationsand found that 43,000 tons of waste and soil had been removed from the LattyAvenue site and had been dumped at the West Lalce Landfill in Bridgeton, andthat the waste was covered with only about 3 feet of soil.1

Discussion with the West Lake Landfill operators indicated that all of thematerial from Latty Avenue had been disposed ol in one area; however, an aerial

Figure 1 Location of West Lake Landfill

survey of the site Identified two areas of contamination. The second contami-nated area Is Identified as Area 1 In Figure 2.2 Subsequently, the NRC spon-sored other studies that were directed at determining the radiological status ofthe landfill. An extensive survey was initiated in November 1980 by the Radia-tion Management Corporation (RMC) under contract to the NRC. The findings werepublished in May 1982 in NUREG/CR-2722, "Radiological Survey of the West LakeLandfill, St. Louis County, Missouri."4 in March 1983, the NRC through OakRidge Associated Universities (ORAL)) contracted with the University of Missouri-Columbia (UMC), Department of Civil Engineering, to describe the environmentalcharacteristics of the site, conduct an engineering evaluation, and proposepossible remedial measures for dealing with the radioactive waste at the WestLake Landfill. In May 1986, ORAU sampled water from wells on and close to thelandfill to determine if the radioactive jnaterjial had migrated into the ground-water. A report is being prepared detailing the results of the investigationsconducted by UMC and ORAU.2

Information from all these sources and from NRC site visits forms the basisfor this report.

2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE

Location

The 200-acre West Lake Landfill site is situated on the southwest side ofSt. Charles Rock Road in Bridgeton, St. Louis jCounty, Missouri (Figure I).2It is about 16 miles northwest of the downtown area of the city of St. Louis,and about 4 miles west of Lambert Field International Airport (Figure 1). Itis approximately 1.2 miles from the Missouri River.

History

The West Lake Landfill has been used since 1962 for the disposal of municipalrefuse, Industrie? solid and liquid wastes, and construction demolition debris.Between 1939 and the spring of 1987, limestone was quarried there. Landfilloperations filled in some of the excavated pitjs from the quarry operations.Also on the property is an active industrial complex in which concrete ingre-dients are measured and combined before mixing ("batching"), and asphaltaggregate is prepared.

The unregulated landfill, in which the radioactive material was placed in 1973,was closed in 1974 by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR).Also in 1974, under an MDNR permit, a newer sanitary landfill was opened andnow operates in an adjacent area on the West liake Landfill property. The newerlandfill is protected from groundwater contact. The bottom of the new landfillis lined with clay, and a leachate collection system has been installed. Leach-ate is pumped to a treatment system consisting of a lime precipitation unit fol-lowed in series by an aerated lagoon and two unaerated lagoons. The final lagooneffluent is discharged into St. Louis Metropolitan Sewer District sewers.2

Ownership

Since 1939, the West Lake Landfill has been owned by West Lake Landfill, Inc.,of 13570 St. Charles Rock Road, Bridgeton, Missouri.

MISSOURI RIVERFLOODPLAIN '

LEGEND— — — Landfill Boundary

Berm

O Monitoring Well

Laachata CollectionWellRa 226 exceeds 5pCi/g

Sole in0 60 100 ISO 200

GROUNDWATERGRADIENT

WEST LAKELANDFILL

OS2

051HISTORICAL EDGE OF

ALLUVIAL VALLEY

Figure 2 Site Details

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Contaminated Areas

Radioactive contamination at the West Lakeseparate soil bodies (Figure 2).

Landfill has been identified in two

The northern area (referred to as Area 2) covers about 13 acres3 and lies above16 to 20 feet of landfill debris. The contaminated soil forms a more or lesscontinuous layer from 2 to 15 feet in thickness and consists of approximately130,000 cubic yards of soil. Some of this contaminated soil is near or at thesurface, particularly along the face of the northwestern bertn. Beneath thelandfill debris, the soil profile consists of 3 to 7 feet of floodplain topsoil overlying; 30 to 50 feet of sand and gravel alluvium.

The southern area of contamination (Area 1) covers about 3 acres3 and containsroughly 20,000 cubic yards of contaminated soijl. This body of soil is locatedeast of the landfill's main office at a depth of about 3 to 5 feet and is lo-cated over a former quarry pit which was filleil in with debris. The depth ofdebris beneath the contaminated soil is unknown but is estimated to be 50 to65 feet. Limestone bedrock underlies the landfill debris.2

Topography

About 75 percent of the landfill site is located on the floodplain of theMissouri River (Figure 2) at about 440 feet above mean sea level (msl). Thesite topography is subject to change because of the types of activities (e.g.,landfill ing and quarrying) performed there. However, the areas containing theradioactive waste have their surface at about 470 feet (msl). The surface runoffin the area around the landfill follows several surface drains and ditches thatrun in a northwest direction and drain into the Missouri River.2

Geology

Bedrock beneath the West Lake Landfill consists of limestone that extends down-ward to an elevation of 190 feet msl. The limestone is dense, bedded, andexcept for intermittent layers that consist of(abundant chert nodules, fairlypure. The Warsaw Formation, which lies directly beneath the limestone, is madeup of approximately 40 feet of slightly calcareous, dense shale; this gradesinto shaley limestone toward the middle of the formation. Bedrock beneath thesite dips at an angle of 0.5° to the northeast, Five miles east of the site,the attitude of the bedrock is reversed by the Florissant Dome.2

Since groundwater moving through carbonate rocks often creates channels forrapid water flow, the possibility of this occurring in the West Lake Landfillarea was considered. Brief observation of the quarry walls at the landfillsuggests that some of the limestone has dissolved. In a letter to West LakeLandfill, Inc., the Missouri Department of Natural Resources stated that thefact that grouting was necessary in the quarry area to block water inflow sug-gests that the limestone 1s at least somewhat solution weathered.4 However,in the draft UMC report, the opinion is expressed that the solution activityhas apparently been limited to minor widening of joints and bedding planes nearthe bedrock surface, and that, at depth and when undisturbed, the limestone isfairly impervious.2 It is not clear whether the views represented by thesestatements are in conflict.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Soil material in the area may be divided into two categories: Missouri Riveralluvium and upland loessal soil. This demarcation is shown as the historicaledge of the alluvial valley in Figure 2. The division is made on the basis ofsoil composition, depositional history, and physical properties. The West LakeLandfill lies over this transition zone.2

Hydrologyi

Groundwater flows in the area surrounding the West Lake site through two aqui-fers: the Missouri River alluvium and the shallow limestone bedrock. Althoughthe limestone is fairly impervious and groundwater flows in most areas from thebedrock into the alluvium, contamination of water in the bedrock aquifer ispossible. The base of the limestone aquifer is formed by the relatively imper-meable Warsaw shale at an elevation of about 190, feet (msl). This shale layerhas been reached, but not disturbed, by quarrying operations. Therefore, theWarsaw shale acts as an aquiclude, making contamination of the deeper limestoneunlikely. ]

The deep Missouri River alluvium, which is under about 10 feet of more-recentalluvium, acts as a single aquifer of very high permeability. This aquifer isrelatively homogeneous in a downstream direction' and decreases in permeabilitynear the valley walls.

The water table of the Missouri River floodplain1 is generally within 10 feet ofthe ground surface, but at many points it is even shallower. At any one time,the water levels and flow directions are influenced by both the river stage andthe amount of water entering the floodplain from adjacent upland areas.

Water levels recorded between November 1983 and March 1984 in monitoring wellsat the landfill, indicate a groundwater gradient of 0.005 flowing in a N 30°Wdirection beneath the northern portion of the landfill. This represents thelikely direction of leachate migration from the landfill.

Since no other recharge sources exist above the level of the floodplain, theonly water available to leach the landfill debris is that resulting from rain-fall infiltrating the landfill surface. Because the underlying alluvialaquifer is highly permeable, there will be littlje "mounding" of water beneaththe landfill. Also, the northern portion of the landfill has a level surface,and thus it is likely that at least half of the rainfall infiltrates the sur-face. The remaining rainfall is lost to evapotranspiration and (to a lesserdegree) surface runoff.2

No public water supplies are drawn from the alluvial aquifer near the West LakeLandfill. It is believed that only one private [well in the vicinity of thelandfill is used as a drinking-water supply. This well is 1.4 miles N 35°W ofthe Butler-type building on the West Lake Landfill.

Because of the extremely low slope of the Missouri River floodplain surface,rain falling on the plain itself generally infiltrates the soil rather thanrunning off the surface. The only streams present on the floodplain are thosethat originate in upland areas. Drainage patterns on the plain have been rad-ically altered by flood control measures taken to protect Earth City and bydrainage of swamps and marshes. Because of the relationship that exists

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

between river level and groundwater level in portions of the floodplain nearthe river, streams may either lose flow (at low stage) or gain flow (at highstage).

The present channel of the Missouri River lies just under 2 miles west andnorthwest of the landfill. The Missouri River stage at St. Charles (mile 28)is zero for a water level of 413.7 feet (msl).i Average discharge of theMissouri River is 77,338 cubic feet per second.

Water supplies are drawn from the Missouri River at mile 29 for the city ofSt. Charles, and the intake is located on the\north bank of the river. Anotherintake at mile 20.5 is for the St. Louis Waterj Company's North County plant.The city of St. Louis takes water from the Mississippi River, which is joinedby the Missouri River downstream from the landfill. The intake structures forSt. Louis are on the east bank of the river, so that the water drawn is derivedfrom the upper Mississippi.2

Demography

Two small residential communities are presentSpanish Lake Village consists of about 90 homes and is located 0.9 mile southof the landfill, and a small trailer court lies across St. Charles Rock Road,

near the West Lake Landfill:

0.9 mile southeast of the site. Subdivisionsto 2 miles east and southeast of the landfill

are presently being developed 1in the hills above the floodplain.

Ten or more houses lie east of the landfill, scattered along Taussig Road. Thecity of St. Charles is located north of the Missouri River, more than 2 milesfrom the landfill.2

Population density on the floodplain is generally less than 26 persons per squaremile, but the daytime population (including factory workers) is much greater thanthe number of full-time residents. Earth City Industrial Park is located on thefloodplain 0.9 to 1.2 miles northwest of the landfill. The Ralston-Purina \facilities are located 0.2 mile northeast of ihe Butler-type building at thelandfill. Considering that land in this area is relatively inexpensive and thatmuch of it is zoned for manufacturing, industrial development on the floodplainwill likely increase.2

3 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEYS

From August 1980 through the summer of 1981, the Radiation Management Corpora-tion (RMC), under contract to the NRC, performed an onsite evaluation of theWest Lake Landfill3 to define the radiological conditions at the landfill. Theresults were utilized in performing this determination regarding whether ornot remedial actions should be taken.

The area to be surveyed was divided into 33-foot grid blocks and included thefollowing measurements:

(1) external gamma exposure rates 3.3 feet above the ground surface andbeta-gamma count rates 0.4 inch above the surface;

(2) radionuclide concentrations in surface soils;

(3) radionuclide concentrations in subsurface deposits;

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

(4) total ("gross") activity and radionuclide concentrations in surface andsubsurface water samples;

(5) radon flux emanating from surfaces;

(6) airborne radioactivity; and

(7) total activity in vegetation.

External Gamma

The two areas of elevated external (gamma) radiation levels, as they existed inNovember 1980 at the time of the preliminary RMC site survey, both containedplaces where levels exceeded 100 uR per hour at 3.3 feet. In Area 2, gammalevels as high as 3000 to 4000 uR per hour were detected. The total areas ex-ceeding 20 |jR per hour were about 2 acres in Area 1 and 9 acres in Area 2.3(The criterion of 20 uR per hour is derived from the NRC's Branch TechnicalPosition, 46 FR 52061, October 23, 1981, which aims at exposure rates lessthan 10 uR per hour above background levels; background radiation was taken tobe 10 uR per hour also.)

i

External gamma levels were measured in May and July of 1981. These levels weresignificantly smaller than the November 1980 values, especially in Area 1,because approximately 4 feet of sanitary fil\ had been added to the entire area,and an equal amount of construction fill was added to most of Area 2. As aresult, only a few thousand square feet in Area 1 exceed 20 uR per hour. InArea 2, the total area exceeding 20 uR per hour decreased by about 10 percent,and the highest levels were about 1600 uR per hour near the Butler-typebuilding.3

Surface Soil Analysis

A total of 61 surface soil samples were gathered and analyzed on site for gammaactivity. Concentrations of U-238, Ra-226, Ra-223, Pb-211, and Pb-212 weredetermined for each sample. In all soil samples, only uranium and/or thoriumdecay chain nuclides and K-40 were detected. Offsite background samples wereon the order of 2 pCi per gram for Ra-226. Onsite samples ranged from about 1to 21,000 pCi Ra-226 per gram and from less than 10 to 2100 pCi U-238 per gram.In samples in which elevated levels of Ra-226 were detected, the concentrations ofU-238 were generally one-half to one-tenth of those of Ra-226. In cases ofelevated sample activity, daughter products of both U-238 and U-235 werefound.3

In general, surface activity was limited to Area 2, as indicated by the surfacebeta-gamma measurements. Only two small regions in Area 1 showed surface con-tamination; both were near the access road across from the site offices.

In addition to onsite gamma analyses, 12 samples were submitted to RMC's rad'io-chemical laboratories for thorium and uranium radiochemical determinations.The results of these measurements (Table 4 of NUREG/CR-2722) show that all sam-ples contained high levels of Th-230. The ratio of Th-230 to Ra-226 (inferredfrom Bi-214) generally ranges from 4:1 to 40:1.

8

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Subsurface Soil Analysis

Subsurface contamination was assessed by extensive "logging" of holes drilledthrough the landfill. Several holes were drilled in areas known to contain con-tamination, then additional holes were drilled at intervals in all directionsuntil no further contamination was detected. A total of 43 holes were drilled(11 in Area 1 and 32 in Area 2), including 2 offsite wells for monitoring water.All holes were drilled with a 6-inch auger and were lined with 4-inch PVC(polyvinyl chloride) casing.3

Each hole was scanned with a 2-inch Nal(Tl) detector and rate meter system foran initial indication of the location of subsurface contamination. On the basisof the initial scans, 19 holes were selected for detailed ganuna logging usingthe intrinsic germanium (IG) detector and multiple channel analyzer. Concentra-tions of Ra-226, as determined by the IG system, ranged from less than 1 pCi pergram to 22,000'pCi per gram.3

It was determined that the subsurface deposits extended beyond areas in whichsurface radiation measurements exceeded the reference level of 20 uR per hour..The lateral extent of material exceeding 5 pCi Ra-226 per gram, includingboth surface and buried materials, is shown on Figure 2. The total differencein areas is about 5 acres.

i

The surface elevations vary by about 20 feet/ and the highest elevations occurat locations of more recent fill. Contaminated soil (>5 pCi Ra-226 per gram)is found from the surface to depths as great as 20 feet below the surface. Ingeneral, the contamination appears to be a continuous single layer ranging from2 to 15 feet thick and covering 16 acres.3

Nonradiological Analysis

Six composite samples were submitted to RMC's Environmental Chemistry Labora-tory for priority pollutant analysis. Five samples were taken from auger holes(one from Area 1 and four from Area 2) and the sixth was taken from sludge fromthe West Lake Landfill leachate treatment plant. The analysis shows organicsolvents present in the Area 2 samples. Positive results were reported for 25listed organic compounds. Chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc were thepredominant elemental priority pollutants detected. The analysis of thesample from the leachate treatment sludge showed that it had smaller pollutantconcentrations than the samples from the auger holes.3

Chemical analyses of material from the radioactive layer from both areas werealso performed by RMC's laboratory. In most cases, elevated levels of bariumand lead were found.

Background Radioactivity Measurement

Several offsite locations (within a few miles of the West Lake Landfill) wereselected for reference background measurements. Background values were allwithin the normal range. The gamma exposure rates were 8 and 10.6 uR per hour.;Radium-226 concentrations in soil were 2.5 and 2.6 pCi per gram. Radon fluxfrom the ground surface was 0.50 and 0.58 pCi per square meter-second; workinglevel values were 0.0011, 0.0017, and 0.005 WL.3

III1IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Airborne Radioactivity Analysis

Both gaseous and particulate airborne radioactivity were sampled and analyzedduring this study. Since it was known that the buried material consisted par-tially or totally of uranium ore residues, the sampling program concentrated onmeasuring radon'and its daughters in the air. Two methods were used: the firstwas a scintillation flask (accumulator) method for radon gas, and the secondwas analysis of filter paper activity for particulate daughters. A series ofgrab samples using the accumulator method were taken between May and August of1981. A total of 111 samples from 32 locations were collected. Measurableradon flux levels ranged from 0.2 pCi per square meter-second in low backgroundareas to 865 pCi per square meter-second in areas of surface contamination.3

At three locations, measurements were repeated over a period of 2 months. Sig-nificant fluctuations were observed at two locations. The fact that these fluc-tuations were real and not measurement artifacts was later confirmed by dupli-cate charcoal canister samples.

A set of 10-minute, high-volume, particulate, air samples was taken to determineboth short-lived radon daughter concentrations and long-lived gross alpha activ-ity. The highest levels (0.031 WL) were detected in November 1980, near andinside the Butler-type building. These two samples approximately equal NRC's10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, alternate concentration limit of one-thirtieth WLfor unrestricted areas. In addition to the routine 10-minute samples, five20-minute, high-volume, air samples were taken" and counted immediately on the IGgamma spectroscopy system to detect the presence of Rn-219 daughters. Allsamples were taken near surface contamination. Concentrations of Rn-219daughters ranged from 6 x 10-11 to 9 x 10-10 uCi per cubic centimeter.3

Vegetation Analysis

Vegetation samples collected by RMC included weed samples from onsite locationsand farm crop samples (winter wheat) near the northwest boundary of the land-fill. This location was chosen because water could run off from the fill ontothe farm field. No elevated activities were found in these samples.3

Water Analysis

A total of 37 water samples were taken by RMC and analyzed for gross alpha andbeta activity. Four samples were taken in the fall of 1980 and the remainderin the spring and summer of 1981. One sample was equal to the U.S. Environmen-tal Protection Agency (EPA) gross-alpha-activity standard for drinking water of15 pCi per liter and that was a sample of standing water near the Butler-typebuilding. Several samples, including all the leachate treatment plant samples,exceeded the EPA drinking water action level'for gross beta activity. Subse-quent isotopic analyses indicated that the beta activity could be attributed toK-40. None of the offsite samples exceeded either EPA standard.3

In 1981, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources collected 41 water samplesthat RMC analyzed for radioactivity. Of these samples, 5 were background, 10were onsite surface water, 10 were shallow groundwater standing in boreholes,and 16 were landfill leachate. From these data, background activity is esti-mated as 1.5 pCi gross alpha activity per liter and 30 pCi gross beta activityper liter. One groundwater sample was at 15 pCi gross alpha per liter, and one

10

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

surface water sample was 45 pCi per liter. Most of the leachate samples wereabove 50 pCi beta per liter.3

In addition, groundwater samples in 11 perimeter monitoring wells at the WestLake Landfill were taken by the Reitz and Jens Engineering firm on November 15, 1983,and by University of Missouri at Columbia (UMC) personnel on March 21, 1984.In both sampling times, one well, but not the same one, exceeded the EPA'sdrinking water standard of 15 pCi per liter (18.2 pCi per liter in 1983 and 20.5pCi per liter in 1984). On May 7 and 8, 1986, Oak Ridge Associated Universities(ORAU) personnel took water samples from 44 perimeter wells;.only one (by OldSt. Charles Rock Road) with 17 pCi alpha activity per liter exceeded the drinkingwater standard.2

The operators of the landfill, West Lake Landfill, Inc., have an ongoing hydro-geologic investigation of the site, which also involves analyses of monitoringwell samples for radioactivity and for priority pollutants.^

4 ESTIMATION OF RADIOACTIVITY INVENTORYi

Soil sample analyses have shown that the radioactive material in Areas 1 and 2of the landfill consists almost entirely of natural uranium and its radioactivedecay products.

The analyses of soil samples indicate that the naturally occurring U-238 toTh-230 to Ra-226 equilibrium has been altered and that the ratio of Ra-226 toU-238 is on the order of 2:1 to 10:1; the ratio of Th-230 to Ra-226 generallyranges from 4:1 to about 40:1. These ratios are in accord with the historyof the radionuclide deposits in the West Lake Landfill, i.e., that they camefrom the processing of uranium ores. The indicator radionuclides for assess-ment of the radiological impacts of the material are therefore U-238, Th-230,and Ra-226.

Using the RMC data and averaging the auger hole measurements over the volumesof radioactive material found in Areas 1 and 2, a mean concentration of 90 pCiper gram was calculated for Ra-226.2 For the ratio of Th-230 to Ra-226, theRMC data3 range from 4:1 to 40:1; data from samples taken in 1984 along theterm range up to almost 70:I.5 A further consideration is that the materialcame from Cotter Corporation's Latty Avenue site (later sold to Futura Coatings,Inc.). Measurements at the Latty Avenue site are variously reported as up to180:I6 and about 300:I.7 Some material of that nature might have been trans-ferred along with the barium sulfate residues. To ensure conservatism in esti-mating the long-term in-growth of Ra-226, the NRC staff used a ratio of 100:1to estimate the Th-230 activity. Similarly, the Ra-226:U-238 ratio rangesfrom 2:1 to 10:1. This ratio is less critical to the radiological aspect ofthe site and has been estimated to be 5:1 for purposes of calculation.

Using the Th-230:Ra-226 ratio of 100:1, the Th-230 activity is 9000 pCi pergram. If the U-238 concentration (as well as U-234 which would be similarlyseparated from the ore) is a factor of 5 less than Ra-226, this implies about18 pCi U-238 per gram. The total mass of radioactive material in the land-fill was estimated by visually integrating the volume of radioactive materialfrom graphs and multiplying by an average soil density, resulting in1.5 x 1011 grams (150,000 metric tons) of contaminated soil.

11

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

These numbers indicate that there are about 14 Ci of Ra-226 contained with itsdecay products in the radioactive material in the landfill. The material alsocontains about 3 Ci each of U-238 and U-234, and about 1400 Ci of Th-230.These estimates indicate the order of magnitude of the quantities to be dealtwith, although the estimate for Th-230 is regarded as conservatively large.

5 APPLICABILITY OF THE BRANCH TECHNICAL POSITION

The NRC has established a Branch Technical Position (BTP) which identifies fiveacceptable options for disposal or onsite storage of wastes containing lowlevels of uranium and thorium (46 FR 52061, October 23, 1981).8

The concentrations permitted under each disposal option are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Summary of maximum soil concentrations permittedunder disposal options

Source: 46 Federal Register 52061

Disposal options

Kind of material 1* 2b 3C 4d

Natural thorium (Th-232 + Th-228) 10 50 - 500with daughters present and inequilibrium. (pCi/g)

Natural uranium (U-238 + U-234) 10 - 40 200with daughters present and inequilibrium. (pCi/g)

aBased on EPA uranium mill tailings cleanup standards.Concentrations based on limiting individual doses to170 mrem per year.Concentration based on limiting equivalent exposure to 0.02WL or less.Concentrations based on limiting individual intruder dosesto 500 mrem per year and, in cases of natural uranium, lim-iting exposure to Rn-222 and other airborne alpha emittersto 0.02 WL or less.

Options 1-4 provide methods under 10 CFR 20.302, for onsite disposal ofslightly contaminated materials, e.g., soil, if the concentrations of radio-activity are small enough and other circumstances are satisfactory. The fifthoption consists of onsite storage pending availability of an appropriatedisposal method.

The material present in the West Lake Landfill is a form of natural uranium withdaughters, although the daughters are not now in equilibrium. As mentioned in

12

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Section 4, the average concentration of Ra-226 in the West Lake Landfill wastesis about 90 pCi per gram, which (considered by itself) falls into Option 4 ofthe BTP since Option 4 criteria are controlled by the Ra-226 content in thewastes (i.e.,200 pCi of U-238 plus U-234 per gram would be accompanied by100 pCi of Ra-226 per gram). However, because of the large ratio of Th-230radioactivity,to that of Ra-226, the radioactive decay of the Th-230 will in-crease the concentration of its decay product Ra-226 until these two radionu-clides are again in equilibrium. Assuming the ratio of activities of 100:1 usedabove, the Ra-226 activity will increase by a factor of five over the next100 years, by a factor of nine 200 years from now, and by a factor of thirty-five 1000 years from now. All radionuclides in the decay chain after Ra-226(and thus the Rn-222 gas flux) will also be increased by similar multiples.Therefore, the long-term Ra-226 concentration will exceed the Option 4 criteria.Under these conditions, onsite disposal, if possible, will likely requiremoving the material to a carefully designed and constructed "disposal cell."

6 REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES EXAMINED

The evaluation performed by staff of the University of Missouri at Columbiaaddresses six potential remedial action alternatives, including that of leav-ing the radioactive material as it is, designated Option A.2 Option D isthe option of excavating the material and shipping it to another site fordisposal. Options B, C, E, and F address different approaches to stabilizingthe material on the West Lake Landfill site, "primarily as temporary remedialactions. Options B, C, and F leave most of the radioactive material where itis but include a variety of measures to contain it and its radon releases andgamma emissions. Option E addresses the approach of constructing an onsiteearthen cell, similar to a disposal cell, and moving the radioactive materialinto it. Under Option F, the radioactive material would be left in place andseparate slurry walls would be built downgradient of Areas 1 and 2 to con-strain groundwater motion. The estimated costs of Options B through F rangefrom about $370,000 (Option B) to about $5,500,000 (Option F) in 1984 dollars.The estimate for Option D is about $2,500,000, but this does not include thecost of transporting the material to another site and disposing of it there; inthe staff's judgment, this could increase the cost by as much as a factor of ten.

Further studies are necessary to determine the most practical approach todisposal of this material.

7 FACTORS CONTRIBUTING UNCERTAINTY

The presence in the landfill of other substances listed as hazardous by theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency raises issues of whether the waste ismixed waste (i.e., both radioactive and chemically hazardous), and whetherthe landfill must also be disturbed to provide for proper containment of thechemical wastes.

The manner of placing the 43,000 tons of contaminated soil in the landfillcaused it to be mixed with additional soil and other material, so that now anappreciably larger amount is involved. If it must be moved, it is not certainwhether the amount requiring disposal elsewhere is as little as 60,000 tonsor even more than 150,000 tons.

13

Because the controlling radionuclide (Th-230) has no characteristics that makeit easy to measure quantitatively in place, as can be done for the Ra-226 withits decay products, the large but variable ratio of Th-230 to Ra-226 and itsdecay products makes the delineation of cleanup more difficult. When the ratiois so large (20:1 or more), even a small concentration of Ra-226 in 1988 im-plies such a large concentration later that it will be necessary to employ moredifficult measurement techniques to confirm that the cleanup has beensatisfactory.

Any possibility of disposal on site will depend on adequate isolation of thewaste from the environment, especially for protection of the groundwater. Itis unclear whether the area's groundwater can be protected from onsite disposalat a reasonable cost. This matter will require additional investigation.

8 SUMMARY

In 1973, radioactively contaminated soil amounting to approximately 43,000 tonswas deposited,'in the West Lake Landfill near St. Louis, Missouri. The materialoriginated with decontamination efforts at the Cotter Corporation's Latty Avenueplant. Disposal in the West Lake Landfill was not authorized by the NRC. Stateofficials were not notified of this disposal in 1973 because the landfill wasnot regulated1by the State at the time.

In the period 1980-1981, Radiation Management Corporation (RMC) of Chicago,Illinois, under contract to the NRC, performed a detailed radiological surveyof the West Lake Landfill. This survey showed that the radioactive contaminantsare in two areas. The northern area (Area 2) covers about 13 acres. Theradioactive debris forms a layer 2 to 15 feet thick, exposed in only a smallarea on the landfill surface and along the bertn on the northwest face of thelandfill. The southern area (Area 1) contains a relatively minor fraction ofthe debris covering approximately 3 acres with most of the contaminated soilburied with about 3 feet of clean soil and sanitary fill.

The RMC survey showed that the radioactivity is from the naturally occurringU-238 and U-235 series with Th-230 and Ra-226 as the radionuclides that dom-inate radiological impact. The survey data indicate that the average Ra-226concentration;in the radioactive wastes is about 90 pCi per gram; the staffestimates the average Th-230 concentration to be about 9000 pCi per gram.Since Ra-226 has been depleted with respect to its parent Th-230, Ra-226 ac-tivity will increase in time (for example, over the next 200 years, Ra-226activity will increase ninefold over the present level). This increase inRa-226 must be considered in evaluating the long-term hazard posed by thisradioactive material.

In addition to RMC's radiological survey, soil and water samples were collectedand analyzed by others, including ORAU, UMC, and MDNR. Occasionally a sample ofwater from a monitoring well exceeds slightly the ERA drinking water standard of15 pCi gross alpha per liter. Sample analyses for priority pollutants (non-radioactive hazardous substances) show a number of listed pollutants are present.The landfill operators are also conducting a hydrogeological investigation.

From the RMC, UMC, and ORAU surveys conducted at the West Lake Landfill sitethe staff has made the following findings:

14

(1) There Is a large quantity (on the order of 150,000 tons) of soil contami-nated with long-lived radioactive material in the West Lake Landfill.Almost all the radioactivity consists of natural uranium and its radio-active decay products.3

(2) Based on the radiological surveys, the radioactive wastes as presentlystored at the West Lake Landfill do not satisfy the conditions forOptions: 1-4 of the NRC's Branch Technical Position (BTP) regarding thedisposal of radioactive wastes containing uranium or thorium residues.8

(3) A dominant factor for the future is that the average activity concentrationof Th-230 is much larger than that of its decay product Ra-226, indicatinga significant increase in the radiological hazards in the years andcenturies to come.

(4) Some of the radioactive material on the northwestern face of the berm hasno protective cover of soil to prevent the spread of contamination andattenuate radiation.

(5) Slightly more than 8 acres of the site exceed 20 uR per hour; the highestreading of 1600 uR per hour occurs near the Butler-type building.

(6) Radon and daughters were measured at 0,031 WL in and around the Butler-typebuilding. This exceeds the BTP value of 0.02 WL.

(7) Based on monitoring-we11 sample analyses, some low-level contamination ofthe groundwater is occurring, indicating that the groundwater in thevicinity is not adequately protected by the present disposition of thewastes. *

(8) Although these radiological conditions indicate that remedial action isneeded, it is unlikely that anyone has received significant radiationexposures from the existing situation.

(9) Sampling results show that chemically hazardous materials have been dis-posed of adjacent to or possibly mixed with the radioactive material.3It is possible that part of the radioactive material has become "mixed"waste.

From these findings and the information developed to date, the NRC staff con-cludes: (1) measures must be taken to establish adequate permanent control ofthe radioactive waste and to mitigate the potential long-term adverse impactsfrom its existing temporary storage conditions and (2) the information devel-oped to date is inadequate for a technological determination of several impor-tant issues, i.e., whether mixed wastes are involved, and whether onsite dis-posal is practical technologically, and, if so, under what alternative methods.

As indicated by the estimates developed by UMC, remedial action will be costly.Further, the investigations to develop the necessary information to resolvemajor questions and to provide a sound basis for evaluation of the feasibilityof disposal alternatives may also be costly. Therefore, it is necessary todetermine the way to accomplish the further studies and remedial actions thatare needed.

15

III1IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

9 REFERENCES i1U.S. NucleariRegulatory Commission, Office of Inspection and Enforcement,Region III, "IE Investigation Report No. 76-01," January 4, 1977.

2S.K. Banerji, W.H. Miller, J.T. O'Connor, L.S. Uhazy, "Site Characterizationand Remedial,Action Concepts for the West Lake Landfill," University ofMissouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211 (in preparation).

3Radiation Management Corporation, "Radiological Survey of the West Lake Land-fill, St. Louis County, Missouri," NUREG/CR-2722, U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission, May 1982.

4N.A. DiPasquale, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, letter datedOctober 9, 1987, to W. E. Whitaker, President, West Lake Landfill, Inc.,re: Hydrogeologic Investigation, West Lake Landfill, Primary Phase Report,Received November 4, 1986.

5A.J. Boerner,, "Survey for Berm Erosion, West Lake Landfill, St. Louis County,Missouri," Oak Ridge Associated Universities, April 6, 1984.

6L.W. Cole, "'Radiological Evaluation of Decontamination Debris Located at theFutura Coatings Company Facility," Oak Ridqe Associated Universities,September 1981.

7L.W. Cole, "Preliminary Radiological Survey of Proposed Street Right-of-Wayat Futura Coatings, Inc., 9200 Latty Avenue, Hazelwood, Missouri," Oak RidgeAssociated Universities, December 1981.

8U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Uranium Fuel Licensing Branch, BranchTechnical Position, "Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium or Uranium WasteFrom Past Operations," Federal Register. Vol. 46, pages 52061-52063,October 23, 1981.

16

MtC MUM m i U*. *UCLlA« •IOULATO*V

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA SHEETSEE INSTRUCTIONS ON TH| REVERSE

NMCM 11021201.1207

: 0*3.

NUREG-1308, Rev. 1

2. TlTLf ANOIUITITLI *. LtAVf (LANK

Radioactive Material in the West Lake LandfillSummary Report 4 OATf Mt»OHT COM'LCTfO

AUTHORISI February 1988• OATI MPOM ISSUED

JuneVIA*

19881. M"> OKMING OMGANIZA1 101 NAMt AND MAILING ADDNIU // I. MOIICT/TAMmOMK UMIT MUMMR

Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear SafetyOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC i 20555

10. SPONSORING ORGANIZATION NAME AMD MAILING AODRIU //MMk/« iu. trw or WORT

Same as 7. above. Summary ReportD nmoo COVIMIO n

I) SUWLfMtNTARVMOTES |

Pertains to Docket No. 40-8801tl. AtSTMACT WOO mom ft 'nil

The West Lake Landfill is located near the city of St. Louis in Bridgeton, St. LouisCounty, Missouri. The site has been used since 1962 for disposing of municipal refuse,industrial solid and liquid wastes, and construction demolition debris. This reportsummarizes the circumstances of the radioactive material in the West Lake Landfill.The radioactive material resulted from the processing of uranium ores and the subsequentsale by the Atomic Energy Commission .of the processing residues. Primary emphasis ison the radiological environmental aspects as they relate to potential disposition ofthe material. It is concluded that remedial action is called for.

14 DOCUMENT ANALYSIS - • KCrWOMDS/DISCHirTOMS

radioactive wastecontaminatedgroundwaterhydrology

6 lOI*Tim«S/OflN.|NDID TIRMS

environmentalradiologicalanalysisconcentration

It AVAILAOLITV;(TATIMfNT .

UnlimitedU UCUItTTCLAtH'ICATlQM

UnclassifiedITna meal

Unclassified

tl

•U. S.COVtNNICIlT PKINTIMC Off JCt 11988-202-292 >8011«

SITE CHARACTERIZATION ANDREMEDIAL ACTION CONCEPT FORTHE WEST LAKE LANDFILL'

Docket No. 40-6801

Manuscript Completed: July 1969Date Published: ' July.1969

Office of Nuclear, Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555

I- : i^AMM---•;* • : .

"}& ';-%':;

14-E

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

PREFACE

This report has as its basis a characterization of the West Lake Landfill siteand evaluation of some potential remedial measures performed primarily byS. K. Banerji, W. H. Miller, J. T. O'Connor and L. S. Uhazy of the Universityof Missouri-Columbia. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission received the firstand second drafts,1 then titled "Engineering Evaluation of Options for Dispositionof Radioactively Contaminated Residues Presently in the West Lake Landfill, St.Louis County, Missouri," in 1984; thus most of the information in this reportdates from 1983-1984. However, some more recent data, principally water samplingresults, have been added. Waste disposal and other industrial activities havecontinued on the 200 acre site, as have activities in the vicinity, resultingin changes in details of topography, roads, etc. To provide a more completeview of the radioactive material in the landfill, use has been made of figuresfrom the report titled "Radiological Survey of the West Lake Landfill, St. LouisCounty, Missouri," NUREG/CR-2722, May 1982.

The remedial action concepts in this report are those proposed by the contractor.Judgments expressed in this report about these concepts are in general those of

i

the contractor, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Nuclear Regu-latory Commission. For example, the cost estimates for these concepts arebased on radium-226 concentrations whereas the long-term issue is dependentupon the thorium-230 concentrations.

Although some of its information has not been updated since 1984, this report isbeing released so as to make its collected information available to interestedparties.

m

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

ABSTRACT

iThe West Lake Landfill is near the city of St. Louis in Bridgeton, St. LouisCounty, Missouri. In addition to municipal refuse, industrial wastes and demo-lition debris, about 43,000 tons of soil contaminated with uranium and its radio-active decay products were placed there in 1973. After learning of the radioac-tive material in the landfill, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (MRC) hada survey of the site's radioactivity performed and, 4n 1983, contracted, throughOak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), with the University of Missouri-Columbia (UMC)lto characterize the environment of the site, conduct an engineer-ing evaluation; and propose remedial measures. This report presents a descrip-tion of the results of the UMC work, providing the environmental characteristicsof the site, the extent and characteristics of the radioactive material there,some considerations with regard to potential disposal of the material, and someconcepts for remedial measures.

III

II

I CONTENTS

•

• PREFACE.......................................................... ii i

• ABSTRACT.......;.................................................. v

SUMMARY.......................................................... ix

I 1 INTRODUCTION................................................ 1-1

• 2 SITE DESCRIPTION..............v............................. 2-1

" 2.1 Location............................................... 2-12.2 Zoning................................................. 2-1

• 2.3 History................................................ 2-2• 2.4 Ownership.............................................. 2-2

2.5 Contaminated Areas..................................... 2-2

1 2.6 Topography............................................. 2-32.7 Geology................................................ 2-32.8 Hydrology.............................................. 2-6

1 2.9 Meteorology............................................ 2-102.10 Ecology................................................ 2-112.11 Demographics........................................... 2-14

• 3 RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SITE................... '3-1

3.1 Radiological Surveillance.............................. 3-1

1 3.2 Survey Results......................................... 3-23.3 Estimation of Radioactivity Inventory.................. 3-7

• 4 APPLICABILITY OF THE BRANCH TECHNICAL POSITION.............. 4-1

5 REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS.................. 5-1

1 5.1 Option A: No Remedial Action.......................... 5-15.2 Option B: Stabilization on Site With Restricted

Land Use............................................... 5-2

1 5.3 Option C: Extending the Landfill Off Site............. 5-45.4 Option D: Removing Radioactive Soil and Relocating

It..................................................... 5-5

1 5.5 Option E: Excavation and Temporary Onsite Storage ina Trench............................................... 5-6

5.6 Option F: Construction of a Slurry Wall to Prevent_ Offsite Leachate Migration............................. 5-8

™ 6 REFERENCES.................................................. 6-1

VI

IIIII

t

IIIIIIIIIIIIII

CONTENTS (Continued)

FIGURES

Page

1.1 Location of West Lake Landfill......................... 1-22.1 Land use around West Lake Landfill site................ 2-162.2 Zoning plan of West Lake area (June 1984).............. 2-172.3 Site topography and extent of contamination............ 2-182.4 Bedrock stratigraphy................................... 2-192.5. Location of monitoring wells........................... 2-202.6 Soil profile of river alluvium......................... 2-212.7 Cross-section of Missouri River alluvial valley ....... 2-222.8 Soijl profile of upland loessal soil.................... 2-232.9 Surface hydrology of West Lake area.................... 2-242.10 Average monthly precipitation at Lambert Field

International Airport.................................. 2-252.11 Wind distribution for West Lake area................... 2-263.1 External gamma radiation levels (November 1980)........ 3-93.2 Location of surface soil samples, Area 1............... 3-103.3 Location of surface soil samples, Area 2............... 3-113.4 Location of auger holes, Area I........................ 3-123.5 Location of auger holes, Area 2........................ 3-133.6 Auger hole elevations and location of contamination

within each hole....................................... .3-143.7 Cross-section B-B showing subsurface deposits in

Area 1................................................. 3-153.8 Cross-section E-E showing subsurface deposits in

Area 2................................................. 3-163.9 Rn-222 flux measurements at three locations in Area 2

(1981)................................................. 3-17

TABLES

3.1 RMC radionuclide analyses of water samples from theWest Lake site taken by MDNR in 1981................... 3-18

3.2 Radiological quality of water in perimeter monitoringwells of West Lake Landfill (concentrations reportedin pCi/1).............................................. 3-20

3.3 Radionuclide concentrations in well water samples:May 7-8, 1986.......................................... 3-21

3.4 Radionuclide concentrations in Latty Avenue compositesamples................................................ 3-26

4.1 Summary of maximum soil concentrations permitted underdisposal options.......................................... 4-2

5.1 Itemized cost of remedial action, Option B................ 5-105.2 Itemized cost of remedial action, Option C................ 5-115.3 Itemized cost of remedial action, Option 0................ 5-12

vn

. 15*

st^v'"-N .,.") >:-i _,. , •4 ••'•£^3

;:;-';. ' w••*(:;v.^*^,.r;- '_ - ' - ' -f{': '"' "- •'-'j-jt'i-''1'*''?'-'- ••'.^^••- :- '^ • ."' • ' '-? ' r^4-4t ^-J' .•. .'?!-• - ^K f 1 ?- * -fij :»'-•»£. .s.-v :'^ .-^-fr^-..-'• i*-,,i-• .b':: i-vvJi -rtsS,! . : • • • .'v-rH-: *"j..ji?-.iii|*«?? ;-\B :^n-=7-.»- •••.'T*fe'"-'-"v>.f,-tT^-'-r4*" ' •• •'-•«&; ':i'-slir^"rf'': ••' "• • ' - • • • • t - " • • ; •-•*.•'.''. •:; 'j"f'-:- i r -T-"j. :-:«V:T^. .^J-.f^if,,.^^:,:. : , y:; , •-- :'" ' k , . , - ,^

^',>-v-j : --*.*._ -: S« .

^^•-i

jfa ,t'*V

-^W-- •..;*"

frT-Sei-s ^soo

9'Sfr 'S

I

I

I

I

I

IIIIIIIIIIIII

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

SUMMARY

In 1973, approximately 7900 metric tons (mt) (8700 short tons) of radioactive!./contaminated barium sulfate (BaS04) residues were mixed with about 35,000 mt(39,000 t) of soil, and the entire volume was placed in the West Lake Landfillin St. Louis County, Missouri. This material resulted from decontaminationefforts at the Cotter Corporation's. Latty Avenue plant where the material hadbeen stored. Disposal in the West Lake Landfill was not authorized by theNuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and was contrary to the disposal locationindicated in the NRC records. State officials were not notified of this dis-posal since the landfill was not regulated by the State at the time. Althoughthe contamination does not present an immediate health hazard, authorities havebeen concerned about whether this material poses a long-term health hazard toworkers and residents of the area and what, if any, remedial action is necessary.

In 1980-81, Radiation Management Corporation (RMC) of Chicago, Illinois,performed a detailed radiological survey of the West Lake Landfill under con-tract to the NRC (NUREG/CR-2722). This survey was performed to determine theextent of radiological contamination. Before this survey, little was knownabout the location or activity of radionuclide-bearing soils in the landfill.This survey showed that the radioactive contaminants are in two areas. The •northern area (Area 2) covers about 13 acres. The radioactive debris forms alayer 2 to 15 feet thick, exposed in only a small area on the landfill surfaceand along the berm on the northwest face of the landfill. The southern area(Area 1) contains a relatively minor fraction of the debris covering approxi-mately 3 acres with most of the contaminated soil buried with about 3 feet ofclean soil and sanitary fill.

The RMC survey showed that the radioactivity is from the naturally occurringU-238 and U-235 series with Th-230 and Ra-226 as the radionuclides that dominateradiological impact. The survey data indicate that the average Ra-226 concen-tration in the radioactive wastes is about 90 pCi per gram; the average Th-230

IX

IIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIII

concentration is estimated to be about 9000 pCi per gram. Since Ra-226 hasbeen depleted with respect to its parent Th-230, Ra-226 activity will increasein time (for ;example, over the next 200 years, Ra-226 activity will increaseninefold over the present level). This increase in Ra-226 must be consideredin evaluating the long-term hazard posed by this radioactive material.

In addition to RMC's radiological survey, toil «nd water samples were collectedand analyzed by others, including Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), andthe University of Missouri-Columbia (UMC). "Occasionally a cample of water from•a monitoring well exceeds slightly the EPA drinking water standard of 15 pCigross alpha per liter. Sample analyses for priority pollutants (non-radioactivehazardous substances) show a number of listed pollutants are present.

iOn the basis of radiological surveillance conducted by RHC, UMC, and ORAU, the

ifollowing areas of concern have been identified:

(1) Radioactive soil is eroding from the northwestern face of the berm, and isbeing transported off site.

(2) Radon gas had been observed to accumulate to an unacceptable levelin the Butler-type building on site. This building has since been removed.

(3) Some degree of radiological contamination has been found in the wellsthat monitor the perimeter.

(4) Surface exposure rates over much of the contaminated areas are greaterthan 20 uR/hr.

In March 1983, the NRC through ORAU, contracted with UMC to conduct anengineering evaluation of the site and propose possible remedial measures forNRC's consideration for dealing with the radioactive waste at the West LakeLandfill. The following six remedial options were proposed and «valuated inthis study.

o Option A - No remedial actiono Option B - Stabilization onsite with restricted land use

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

o Option C - Extending the landfill offsite with restricted land useo Option D - Removal and relocation of the contaminated material to an

authorized disposal siteo Option E - Excavation and temporary onsite storage in a trencho Option F - Construction of a slurry wall to prevent leachate from

migrating off site

It is noted that some of the above alternatives for remedial action wereinitially evaluated with the objective of permanent disposal of the waste atthe site.

XI

iiiiiiiiiii•

iiiijj

1 INTRODUCTION

The West Lake Landfill is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, 6 km (3.7miles) west of Lambert Field International Airport (Figure 1.1) and southwestof St. Charles Rock Road in Bridgeton, Missouri. The site has been used since1962 for disposing of municipal refuse, industrial solid and liquid wastes, andconstruction demolition debris. In addition, the landfill is an active Indus-trial complex on which concrete ingredients are measured and combined beforemixing ("batching"), and asphalt aggregate is prepared. Limestone ceased to bequarried in the spring of 1987.

In 1973, 7900 metric tons [(mt) (8700 short tons)] of radioactively contaminatedbarium sulfate (BaS04) residues from uranium and radium processing were mixedwith an estimated 35,000 mt (39,000 tons) of soil and deposited in the West LakeLandfill. Previously, this material was located at the Cotter .Corporation'sLatty Avenue facility in Hazelwood, Missouri, and was removed during decontam-ination work. It is not known what levels of contamination were already inthe soil before the barium sulfate residues were mixed into it. Disposal in theWest Lake Landfill was unauthorized and contrary to the disposal locationindicated in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) records.

Subsequently, the NRC sponsored studies that were directed at determining theradiological status of the landfill. In 1978, an aerial radiological surveyrevealed two areas within the landfill where the gamma radiation levels indi-cated radioactive material had been deposited. A Bore extensive survey wasinitiated in November 1980 by the Radiation Management Corporation (RMC) undercontract to the NRC.

In March 1983, the NRC through Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) con-tracted with the University of Missouri-Columbia Department of Civil Engineeringto describe the environmental characteristics of the site, conduct an engineeringevaluation, and propose possible remedial measures for dealing with the radio-active waste at the West Lake Landfill. In May 1986, ORAU sampled water from

1-1

tt».*m

I5e

sw

Co

IDUO

01

O)

<MI

I ' ,'• . f X fe..',, ''• wells on and close to the, landfill to determine if the radioactive_ migrated into the groundwater.

Information from;*!! these sources forms the basis for this report.

r " •' :

1 . :

I1

' * .- V- • '.

!"."".. '• - '• '

','• .-; ... ...

. * :

•» - ' -- •

• • ' •••'• •1 I >.'-;.. :'"1 ' X ; ,• - • . .'-M

! • ; . " • . , - '

1 . ' ;:/. l,,.*:-:.\ ' ' '1i •••&.1 -^1 - • *. - !**.

-. - . "- ^ "-.-&-21.- .-'•JIP*--; .i

.. . J- i• •;<"/•$ ;"?i ll

i • " ':v; ;K|- • ••••S:! <t »i-

•

• ' . -«-vf l; ,.. ..":. r.*lJfex&-. ,..a--i S',-J.Vi 'r '.-*:--. -JJ

' M " '' ' ' i.' B ST |j

-$- ,- - ti .'j-. •_ • -^! '; -- • •"-' --' '''L: <*i,''~ '"'"r -

• ' • , - , - a"J" : ''V* . : '''' • ' - . - .• ' • ' . - ' • . . - • ; % - • .

-• '^ ... • •.• "*• ..

g!; ; ;; ;;f - V;:.. ,. 'r';-; iK^ ' >T - • ;.^ '•'"'tS'"*'1: : ;'Vit."? '• '-i- "*'--'.. -.-v:., - j;• -;t,'f >-. jiifcji ;':5.' -" v!j .-",.-,. ^ -•_ £v '••:-/-' -.;-.••.- ' ;

1 , ,3

1 , ,,:, -'...--";

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

2 SITE DESCRIPTION

This chapter presents a historical and environmental description of the West LakeLandfill site located in St. Louis County, Missouri.

2.1 Location

IThe 81-hectare (ha) (200-acre) West. Lake Landfill property is situated betweenthe St. Charles Rock Road and the Old St. Charles Rock Road in Bridgeton,Missouri. The southeastern and northwestern parts of the landfill abut farm-land. Several commercial and industrial facilities are located near the land-fill (Figure 2.1). The nearest residential area is a trailer park locatedapproximately 1 km (0.6 mile) to the southeast. A major portion of the land-fill (roughly the northern three-fourths of the site) is located on thefloodplain, approximately 2 km (1.2 miles) from the Missouri River.

The zoning plan obtained from the Bridgeton Planning and Zoning Department forproperties on and adjacent to the landfill is shown in Figure 2.2. A portionof the landfill, including site Area 1, is zoned M-l, which is designated forlight manufacturing; the northwest part of the landfill, including Area 2, iszoned as single-family residential (R-l). This R-l zoning indicates the use towhich the land was originally intended. However, the landfill was extended overthe land zoned R-l, and the zoning plan was simply not changed to reflect thenew usage. Other discrepancies between land use and zoning are found in thenearby Earth City Industrial Park (William Canney, Safety Supervisor of WestLake Landfill, Inc., personal communication, March 1984). The land acrossSt. Charles Rock Road is zoned for light and heavy manufacturing. Theremainder of the property surrounding the landfill is zoned residential andbusiness.

2-1

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

2.3 History

The West Lake Landfill was started In 1962 for the disposal of municipal andindustrial solid wastes, and to fill in the excavated pits from the quarryoperations that had been performed at the site since 1939 (Canney, personalcommunication, March 1984). In 1974, the landfill was closed by the MissouriDepartment of Natural Resources (MDNR) (Karen, 1976). A new sanitary landfill,in an area of the West Lake Landfill property which is protected from ground-water contact, now operates under an MDNR permit.

This new part of the landfill was opened in 1974. The bottom is lined withclay and a leachate collection system has been installed. Leachate is pumpedto a treatment system consisting of a lime precipitation unit followed inseries by an aerated lagoon and two unaerated lagoons. The final lagooneffluent is discharged into St. Louis Metropolitan Sewer District sewers.

The quarrying operation ceased in the spring of 1987 because not enough "goodrock" was left at the site.

2.4 Ownership

The West Lake Landfill was owned from 1939 until 1988 by West Lake Landfill,Inc., of 13570 St. Charles Rock Road, Bridgeton, Missouri. Most of thelandfill was sold in 1988 to Laidlaw Industries, Inc. The two areas whichcontain the radioactive material were retained by West Lake Properties as theprincipal properties of a subsidiary named Rock Road Industries, Inc.

2.5 Contaminated Areas

Radioactive contamination at the West Lake Landfill has been identified in twoseparate soil bodies (Figure 2.3). Comparisons of radionuclide quantities andof the activity ratios between radionuclides not in secular equilibrium, indicatethat the radioactive contamination in the separate soil bodies was derived fromthe same source, i.e., the Cotter Corporation's former Latty Avenue facilityin Hazelwood, Missouri (NRC, NUREG/CR-2722).

2-2

The northern area (referred to as Area 2) of contamination shown on Figure 2.3 4*covers an area of 5.2 ha (13 acres) and lies above 5 to 6 m (16-20 ft) of land-fill debris. The contaminated soil forms a more or less continuous layer from1 to 4 m (3 to 13 ft) in thickness, and amounts to approximately 100,000 m3

(130,000 yd3). Some of this contaminated soil is near or at the surface,particularly along the face of the northwestern berm. Beneath the landfilldebris, the soil profile consists of 1 to 2 m (3 to 7 ft) of floodplain topsoil overlying 10 to 15 m (33 to 50 ft) of sand and gravel alluvium.

The southern area of contamination (referred to as Area 1) shown on Figure 2.3covers approximately 1.1 ha (3 acres) and contains roughly 15,000 m3

(20,000 yd3) of contaminated soil. This body of soil is located east of thelandfill's main office at a depth of about 1 m (3 to 5 ft), and is located over aformer quarry;pit, which was filled in with debris. The depth of debris beneaththe contaminated soil is unknown, but is estimated to be 15 to 20 m (50 to 65 ft).Limestone bedrock underlies the landfill debris.

2.6 Topography

About 75% of the landfill site is located on the floodplain of the MissouriRiver. The site topography is subject to change because of the types of activ-ities (e.g., landfilling and quarrying) performed there. Figure 2.3 shows acontour map of the site as of July 1986. The surface runoff follows severalsurface drains and ditches which run in a northwest direction and drain intoithe Missouri River.

2.7 Geology

2.7.1 Bedrock

Bedrock beneath the West Lake Landfill consists of Mississippi an age limestoneof the Heramacean Series of the St. Louis and Salem formations, which extendsdownward to an elevation of 58 m (190 ft) mean sea level (msl) (Figure 2.4).*

*Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and LandSurvey, Rolla, Missouri, Well Log Files.

2-3

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

The limestone is dense, bedded, and fairly pure except for intermittent layerswhich consist of abundant chert nodules. The Warsaw formation—also ofMississippian age—lies directly beneath the limestone. The Warsaw is made upof approximately 12 ra (38 ft) of slightly calcareous, dense shale; this gradesinto shaley limestone toward the middle of the formation (Figure 2.4) (Spreng,1961). Bedrock beneath the site dips at an angle of 0.5° to the northeast.Eight kilometers (5 miles) east of the site, the attitude of the bedrock isreversed by the Florissant Dome; the bedrock dips radially outward from theapex of this dome at a low angle (Martin, 1966).

Since karst (solution) activity often occurs in carbonate rocks, the possibil-ity of its occurrence in the West Lake Landfill area was considered. Briefobservation of the quarry walls at the landfill suggests that some solution ofthe limestone has occurred, but this solution activity has apparently beenlimited (see Section 2.8.1) to minor widening of joints and bedding planes nearthe bedrock surface. Although karst activity within the limestone is relativelyminor, the upper surface of the bedrock is irregular and pitted as a result ofsolution (Lutzen and Rockaway, 1971). This alteration of the bedrock surfaceis greatest beneath the Missouri River floodplain.

2.7.2 Soils

Soil material in this area may be divided into two categories: Missouri Riveralluvium and upland loessal soil. This demarcation is shown as the historicaledge of the alluvial valley in Figure 2.5. The division is made on the basis ofsoil composition, depositional history, and physical properties. Because theWest Lake Landfill lies over this transition zone, the surface material at thesite varies considerably from southeast to northwest.

The Missouri River alluvium (Figure 2.6) ranges in thickness from 12 m (40 ft)beneath the landfill site to more than 30 m (100 ft) at mid-valley (Figure 2.7).The upper 3 m (10 ft) of the soil profile consists of organic silts and clays,that have been deposited by the Missouri River during floods.* Below this

*Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey,Rolla, Missouri, Well Log Files.

2-4

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

surface layer, the soil becomes sandy and grades to gravel at depths greaterthan 5 to 10 m (16 to 33 ft). Because of the effects of channel scour, whichcontinues to grade the sediment after its initial deposition, the alluvium isfairly homogeneous in a .horizontal direction and becomes progressively coarserwith depth (Gobdfield, 1965). At the edges of the floodplain, the alluvium isnot as well graded, and a large amount of fine material is present in the deepersand and gravel.

The upland loessal soil (Figure 2.8) is generally thinner than the floodplainsoil, being usually less than 12 m (39 ft) thick, and was deposited during theage of Pleistocene glaciation. The:loess consists of silt-sized particles thatwere transported by wind and deposited as a blanket over much of Missouri andIllinois. On the hills near the West Lake Landfill, the loess layer may be asmuch as 24 m (79 ft) thick. It consists of 6 to 9 m (20 to 30 ft) of fairlypure silt (Peo'ria loess) overlying 6 to 15 m (20 to 49 ft) of clay silt (Roxanaloess) (Lutzen and Rockaway, 1971). This loess forms the hills to the southeastof the landfill, but it has long ago been removed from the landfill site andmost of the surrounding valleys by erosion. The upper 1 m (3 ft) of the loesshas been altered to form a thin soil profile. It should be noted that loess hasa vertical permeability which is far greater than its horizontal permeability(Freeze and Cherry, 1979). The total permeability of loess is greatly increasedby disturbance. The individual silt grains are generally quite angular, andtherefore may ;not be effectively compacted by the methods commonly used to con-solidate clay. The technique most effective in the compaction of loess wouldemploy vibration beneath a surcharge. A relict soil profile from 5 to 10 m(16 to 33 ft) thick lies beneath the loess and directly on top of the bedrock.This soil was formed as a residuum before Pleistocene glaciation and was sub-sequently covered by the loess blanket. This soil is a highly consolidatedclay containing abundant chert fragments (Lutzen and Rockaway, 1971). Inaddition to the natural geologic properties of the landfill, human disturbanceof the soil must also be considered since material within the landfill itselfcan either limit or facilitate migration of leachate to the Missouri Riveralluvial aquifer.

In order to prevent downward movement of leachate, it is now a common practiceto place a layer of compacted clay beneath sanitary landfills. Newer portions

2-5

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

of the landfill (constructed since 1974) have 2 to 3 m (7 to 10 ft) of clay atthe base and around the sides. Waste is covered every day with 15 cm (6 in.)of compacted soil; the cover soil presently used is loess (of soil classifica-tions CL and A4) taken from southeast of the landfill (Reitz and Jens, 1983a).If not properly compacted, this material may have a permeability of 0.0001 cm/sec(0.00004 in./sec) or more. It is not known what procedures for compaction, ifany, were used at the landfill before 1974 since the site was unregulated indesign as well as in materials which were accepted for disposal. 4t Is be-lieved, however, that there is no liner present beneath the northwestern por-tion of the landfill, and that sanitary (and, possibly, some hazardous) materialwas placed directly on the original ground surface. Since waste was period-ically covered with soil to minimize rodent and odor problems, the landfillprobably consists of discrete layers of waste separated by thin soil layers.Both areas containing radioactive material are in these presumably unlined g^above-ground portions of the landfill.

2.8 Hydrology

2.8.1 Subsurface HydrologyI

Groundwater flow in the area surrounding the West Lake site is through twoaquifers: the Missouri River alluvium and the shallow limestone bedrock. Thebase of the limestone aquifer is formed by the relatively impermeable Warsawshale at an elevation of about 58 m (190 ft) msl (Figure 2.4). This shalelayer has been reached, but not disturbed, by quarrying operations. Therefore,the Warsaw shale acts as an aquiclude, making contamination of the deeper lime-stone very unlikely. The Mississippi an limestone beds have very low inter-granular permeability in an undisturbed state (Miller, 1977). However, astrong leachate enters the quarry pit at an elevation of about 67 m (220 ft)msl (pt. A on Figure 2.5). This leachate is migrating vertically through morethan 30 m (98 ft) of limestone. Explosive detonations associated with quarryingoperations will tend to cause fractures to propagate in the quarry wall. Thesefractures have probably extended less than 10 m (33 ft) into the rock from thequarry face. Beyond this, the rock probably remains undisturbed. Thesefractures will tend to increase inflow to the quarry pit and allow leachate topercolate downward through the fractured zone. Thus, leachate inflow to the

2-6

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

quarry pit Is not evidence of large-scale contamination of the limestoneaquifer. The^nly other mechanism by which leachate could travel rapidlythrough the limestone is by transport through solution channels. ' Landfill con-sultants and quarry operators maintain that the limestone is fairly intact(Canney, personal communication, September 1983), and superficial observationof the quarry walls seems to support this conclusion. Since the limestone isfairly impervious, and groundwater flows in most areas from the bedrock into *,the alluvium, contamination of water in the bedrock aquifer does not appearlikely.

The water table of the Missouri River floodplain is generally within 3 m (10 ft)of the ground|surface, but at many points it is even shallower. At any onetime, the water levels and flow directions are influenced by both the riverstage and the amount of water entering the floodplain from adjacent uplandareas. A high river stage tends to shift the groundwater gradient to thenorth, in a direction that more closely parallels the Missouri River. Localrainfall will !shift the groundwater gradient to the west, toward the river andalong the fall of the ground surface. This is inferred from water levelsmeasured in monitoring wells at the West Lake site. The fact that groundwaterlevels commonly fluctuate more than does the Missouri River level, indicatesthat upland-derived recharge exerts a great deal of influence over groundwaterflow at the West Lake site. This influence decreases toward the river.

The deep Missouri River alluvium acts as a single aquifer of very high per-meability. This aquifer is relatively homogeneous in a downstream direction,and decreases in permeability near the valley walls. The deeper alluvium iscovered by 2 to 4 m (7 to 13 ft) of organic silts and clays that may locallycontain a large fraction of sand-sized particles. Water levels recorded betweenNovember 1983 and March 1984 in monitoring wells at West Lake9" indicate agroundwater gradient of 0.005 flowing in a N 30°W direction beneath the northernportion of the landfill. This represents the likely direction of any possibleleachate migration from the landfill (Figure 2.5).

*Data supplied by Reitz and Jens engineering firm, St.Louis, 1984.

2-7

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

The alluvial aquifer recharges from upland areas from three sources: seepagefrom loess and bedrock bordering the valley, channel underflow of upland streamsentering the valley, and seepage losses from streams as they cross the flood-plain. Of these sources, streams and their underflow represent the main sourceof upland recharge to the alluvial aquifer. Streams entering the floodplainraise the water table in a fan-shaped pattern radiating outward from their pointof entrance to the plain. In areas where streams are not present, the waterslopes downward from the hills, steeply at first and then gently to the leveliof the free water surface in the Missouri River channel. The situations de-scribed above do not take into account the effect of variations in permeabilityof the shallow soil layer. Aerial photography of the site indicates that a• ifilled backchannel (oxbow lake) type of soil deposit is present along the south-west boundary of the landfill (USDA, 1953). This deposit is probably com-posed of fine-grained material to the depth of the former channel (6 to 10 m)(20 to 33 ft). This deposit may tend to hamper communication between shallowgroundwater on opposite sides of the deposit.

Since no other recharge sources exist above the level of the floodplain, theonly water available to leach the landfill debris is that resulting from rain-fall infiltrating the landfill surface. Because the underlying alluvral aqui-fer is highly permeable, there will be little "mounding" of water beneath thelandfill. Because the northern portion of the landfill has a level surface itis likely that at least half of the rainfall infiltrates the surface. Theremaining rainfall is lost to evapotranspiration and (to a lesser degree) sur-face runoff. Due to the height of the berm, temporary impoundment of surfacerunoff is a common occurrence.

No public water supplies are drawn from the alluvial aquifer near the West LakeLandfill. It is believed that only one private well (Figure 2.9) in the vicin-ity of the landfill is used as a drinking water supply. This well is 2.2 km(1.4 miles) N 35°W of the former Butler-type Building location on the West LakeLandfill. In 1981, analysis showed water in this well to be fairly hard (naturalorigins) but otherwise of good quality (Long, 1981).

Water in the Missouri River alluvium is hard and usually contains a highconcentration of iron and manganese (Miller, 1977). The amount of dissolved

2-8

IIIIIIII

IIIIIIIIII

solids present in the water of the alluvial aquifer varies greatly; purityincreases toward mid-valley where groundwater velocity is greatest. A watersample from a well in the alluvium 3 km (1.9 miles) north of the landfill hada total dissolved solids content of 510 mg/liter and total hardness as CaC03of 415 ing/liter. Water in the limestone bedrock generally has a hardnessgreater than 180 mg/liter as CaC03 equivalent (Emmett and Jeffery, 1968). Totaldissolved solids range from 311 to 970 mg/liter. Water in the limestone aquifermay contain a large amount of sulfate of natural origin (Miller, 1977).

2.8.2 Surface Hydrologyl

Because of the1 extremely low slope of the Missouri River flood plain surface,precipitation 'falling on the plain itself generally infiltrates the soil ratherthan running off the surface. The only streams present on the floodplain arethose that originate in upland areas. Drainage patterns on the plain(Figure 2.9) have been radically altered by flood control measures taken toprotect Earth City (Figure 2.1) and by drainage of swamps and marshes. Beforethese alterations, Creve Coeur Creek passed just south of the landfill, anddrained a fairly large area. It has since been redirected to discharge intothe Missouri River upstream (south) of St. Charles (Figure 2.9). The'oldchannel still carries some water, and empties into the Missouri River 45.2 km(28 miles) upstream from the confluence with the Mississippi River. Near thelandfill, this stream is usually dry. As it crosses the flood plain, the creekpasses through shallow lakes which provide a more or less continuous flow tothe Missouri River throughout the year. A second stream, Cowmire Creek, crossesthe floodplain east of the site. This stream flows northward and joins a back-water portion of the Missouri River at kilometer 35.4 (22 miles). Because ofthe relationship which exists between river level and groundwater level in por-tions of the floodplain near the river, these streams may either lose flow (atlow stage) or gain flow (at high stage).

The present channel of the Missouri River lies about 3 km (2 miles) west andnorthwest of the landfill. Early land surveys of this area indicate that200 years ago the channel was located several hundred meters to the east (towardthe landfill) of its present course (Reitz and Jens, 1983b). The Missouri Riverhas a surface slope of about 0.00018 (Long, 1981). River stage at St. Charles

2-9

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

[kilometer 45.2 (mile 28)] is zero for a water level of 126.1 m (413.7 ft) msl(Reitz and Jens, 1983a). Average discharge of the Missouri River is 2190 mVs(77,300 ftVs), with a maximum flow of 2850 mVs (101,000 ftVs) for the periodof April through July, and a minimum flow of 1140 m3/s (40,300 ftVs) in Januaryand December (Miller, 1977). Some average properties of Missouri River waterfor the period 1951-1970 were: alkalinity = 150 mg/liter as CaC03 equivalent;hardness = 209 mg/liter as CaC03 equivalent; pH = 8.1; and turbidity = 694 JTU(Jackson turbidity unit).

Water supplies are drawn from the Missouri River at kilometer 46.6 (mile 29)for the city of St. Charles, and the intake is located on the north bank of theriver. Another intake at kilometer 33 (mile 20.5) is for the St. Louis WaterCompany's North County plant (Reitz and Jens, 1983a).

The city of St. Louis takes water from the Mississippi -River, which joins theMissouri River downstream from the landfill. In this segment of the river, thetwo flow-streams have not completely mixed and the water derived from theMissouri River is still flowing as a stream along the west bank of theMississippi River channel*. The intake structures for St. Louis are on theeast bank of the river so that the water drawn is derived from the upperMississippi.

2.9 Meteorology

The climate of the West Lake area is typical of the midwestern United States,in that there are four distinct seasons. Winters are generally not too severeand summers are hot with high humidity. First frosts usually occur in October;and freezing temperatures generally do not persist past March. Rainfall is :greatest in the warmer months, (about one-quarter of the annual precipitationoccurs in May and June) (Figure 2.10) (NRC, 1981). In July and August, thunder-storms are common, and are often accompanied by short periods of heavy rainfall.Average annual precipitation is 897 mm (35.3 in.), which includes the averageannual snowfall of 437 mm (17.2 inches snow). Average relative humidity is 68%,

*Ned Harvey, 'hydrologist with the USGS, telephone communication, August 1983.

2-10

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

and humidities over 80% are common during the summer. Wind during the period ofDecember through April is generally from the northwest; winds blow mainly fromthe south throughout the remainder of the year. A compilation of hourly windobservations shows that although the wind resultant is fairly consistent on amonthly basis, the wind actually shifts a good deal and is very well distri-buted in all directions (Figure 2.11) (NRC, 1981; U.S. Department of Commerce,1960).

Meteorological data used is from Lambert Field International Airport which is6 km (3.7 miles) east of the West Lake site. Temperature and precipitationdata are also representative of West Lake. However, because of differences intopography between Lambert Field and the site, the actual wind directions atWest Lake may be slightly skewed in a NE-SW direction parallel to the MissouriRiver valley.

2.10 EcologyI

The West Lake Landfill is biologically and ecologically diverse. Rather than asingle ecological system (e.g., a prairie), it is a mosaic of small habitatsassociated with

(1) moist bottomland and farmland adjacent to the perimeter berm

(2) poor quality drier soils on the upper exterior and interior slopesof the berm

(3) an irregular waste ground surface associated with the inactive portion ofthe landfill

(4) aquatic ecosystems present In 7ow spots on the waste ground surface

Generally, the natural systems which are present are limited by operations inthe active portion of the landfill and form a corridor along the perimeter bermfrom near well! site 75.*fF-i-gure 2.5), on the Old St. Charles Rock Road, clockwiseto the main entrance to the landfill near well site 68, along St. Charles Rock

2-11

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Road. The following observation and descriptions demonstrate the biologicalvariety of these sites.

The flora of the perimeter berm extending from the southwest clockwise to thearea of the main entrance to the landfill present a series of contrasts. Alongthe Old St. Charles Rock Road, the bottom and lower slope of the berm is heavilyinfluenced by the nearby mature silver maple (Acer saccharinum). boxelder(Acer negundo), oak (Quercus), sycamore (Platanus). green ash (Fraximuspennsylvanica), and eastern cottonwood (Populus del toides) trees associatedwith the old channel of Creve Coeur Creek. At the corner, between wells 59 and60 (Figure 2.5), large silver maple and boxelder trees form a dense stand in themoist soils at the base of the berm. The density of these trees declines onthis slope extending toward the north (well 61) and the Butler-type Buildingcorner. The extension of this slope toward the northwest is dominated by adense willow-like thicket in which a few eastern cottonwoods and a hawthorntree have established. From this northwest corner of the landfill to theeastern limit of the trees between the landfill and St. Charles Rock Road (well65), the exterior slope of the berm is dominated by dense stands of small andlarge eastern cottonwoods. This latter occurrence reflects the influence ofthe well-established eastern cottonwoods and sycamores associated with the per-manent pond just north of this site (Figure 2.9). The ground cover alongthese exterior slopes consists of grasses, forbs, plants common to disturbedareas, seedling cottonwoods, and shrubs. A well-manicured grass groundcovercontinues from the limit of the trees to the area around the main entrance ofthe landfill and well 68. This vegetation contributes to the partial stabi-lization of the steep exterior slopes.

The somewhat drier top and the short, interior slope of the berm, colonized byprairie grasses such as bluestem (Andropogon), blends into the irregular sur-face of the inactive portion of the landfill. Depressions in this surfaceallow water to collect and tall grasses, foxtail, and plants characteristicof disturbed areas [e.g., ragweed (Ambrosia), mullein (Verbascum). pokeweed(Phytolacca). cinquefoil (Potentilla). sunflower (Helianthus). and plantain(Plantago)] are replaced by characteristic wetland species [e.g., algae(Spirogyra). cattails (Typha), sedges (Carex), and smartweed (Polygonium)].Young eastern cottonwoods are established at several of these wet sites.

2-12

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Generally, the surface vegetation of the inactive landfill gives way to barrenwaste ground around the Butler-type Building location and the barren terrainassociated with recent landfill activities.

Animals were observed associated with these habitats. Cottontail rabbits(Sylvilagus) were encountered most frequently and their fecal pellets were ob-served on the landfill. Density of fecal material was particularly heavy inthe thickets on the exterior slopes of the perimeter berm. In this regard,coyote (Cam's.latrans) feces containing rabbit fur were observed. Small mammals(rodents) were not seen but could certainly be present in these areas. Largeungulates also were not sighted, but tracks and feces of white-tailed deer indi-cate that they utilize the landfill.

The only birds observed were a crow (Coryus), several robins (Turdus), and white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys). This certainly does not reflect theextent to which birds utilize these habitats, for observations were made earlyin the spring. It is readily apparent that returning migratory passerines wouldutilize the surface vegetation and berm thickets for nesting, cover, and feedlater in the season. It is also possible that waterfowl could utilize the perma-nent ponds on the landfill and adjacent to St. Charles Rock Road. Twelve scaup(Aythya) and mallards (Anas) were observed on the lagoon which serves as partof the landfill waste water treatment facility.

Small puddles contained characteristic aquatic invertebrates and at least twospecies of amphibians. Casual examination of these shallow waters revealedthree genera of snails (Physa. Lymnaea, Helisoma). an isopod (Asnellus).cyclopoid copepods, and cladocerans. Aquatic insect larvae were not observed;however, this does not rule out their presence. The sighting of a bullfrogtadpole (Rana catesbeiana) and audition of spring peepers (Hyla). indicatesthese ponds are utilized as breeding sites. No fish were observed in thesepuddles on the landfill surface; however, a dead gizzard shad (Dorsoma cepedianum)was seen in the pond adjacent to St. Charles Rock Road. The only reptilesseen were the water snake (Nerodia) and the garter snake (Thamnophis).

Although the northwest inactive portion of the landfill is posted with "NoTrespassing" signs, it was evident that humans do encroach on these habitats.

2-13

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Fishing tackle was found tangled In power lines and trees, and spent small-gauge shotgun shells were found on the landfill surface and berms.

2.11 Demographics

The West Lake Landfill is located in the northwestern portion of the city ofBridgeton, in St. Louis County, Missouri. Earth City Industrial Park is locatedon the floodplain 1.5 to 2 km (0.9 to 1.2 miles) northwest of the landfill.Population density on the floodplain is generally less than 10 persons persquare kilometer (26 persons per square mile); and the daytime population(including factory workers) is much greater tfian the number of full-time resi-dents.

Major highways in the area include Interstate 70 (1-70) and Interstate 270(1-270), which meet south of the landfill at Natural Bridge Junction (Fig-ure 1.1). The Earth City Expressway and St. Charles Rock Road lie, respectively,west and east of the landfill. The Norfolk and Western Railroad passes about1 km (0.6 mile) from the northern portion of the landfill (Figure 1.1). LambertField International Airport is located 6 km (3.7 miles) east of the West LakeLandfill.

In addition to factories at Earth City, plants are operated by Ralston-Purina:and Hussman Refrigeration across St. Charles Rock Road. The employees of •these two plants probably comprise the largest group of individuals in closeproximity to the contaminated areas for significant periods of time. TheRalston-Purina facilities are located 0.4 km (0.2 mile) northeast of theButler-type Building location at the landfill. Considering that land in thisarea is relatively inexpensive and that much of it is zoned for manufacturing,industrial development on the floodplain will likely increase in the future.

Two small residential communities are present near the West Lake Landfill.Spanish Lake Village consists of about 90 homes and is located 1.5 km (0.9 mile)south of the landfill, and a small trailer court lies across St. Charles Rock;Road, 1.5 km (0.9 mile) southeast of tl-- site (Figure 2.1). Subdivisions arepresently being developed 2 to 3 km (1.2 to 1.9 miles) east and southeast of thelandfill in! the hills above the floodplain. Ten or more houses lie east of the

2-14

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

landfill scattered along Taussig Road. The city| of St. Charles is locatednorth of the Missouri River at a distance greater than 3 km (1.9 miles) fromthe landfill, :

Areas south of the West Lake Landfill are zoned residential; areas on theother sides are zoned for manufacturing and business (Figure 2.2). Most ofthe landfill is zoned for light manufacturing (M-l). However, approximately0.3 km2 (0.12:mi2) of the northern portion of the landfill is zoned for residen-tial use; this includes the contaminated area around the Butler-type Buildingsite. The field northwest of the landfill between Old St. Charles Rock Roadand St. Charles Rock Road is under cultivation. • Trends indicate that thepopulation of this area will increase, but the land will probably be usedprimarily for .industrial facilities.

2-15

EARTH CityINDUSTRIAL PARK

Figure 2.1 Land use around West Lake Landfill site

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

ZOHItKt COOl.

RBM

LIQINO:N

Zonmf •oundaryUndfia '•mindwv

Figure 2.2 Zoning plan of West Lake area (June 1984)

2-17

to

ST. CHARLES ROCK ROAD

WATER tEVEL430*6 '

LANDFILLELEV. IX4707/86

LEGEND

DEXTENT OFRADIOIOGICAI.CONTAMINATION

Figure 2.3 Site topography andextent of contaroination.

<Qcn

ron>a.-jonU1r*1

<Q

OlTJ

s s a s s i S S S I1 I | |

s g § S s s g § § g g § i § 1 ?1 1 1

^^^^^j

Warsaw

||'l|ll'|l|J|.|ll|||'|trl|Ylll l ' lMH

1 I ISalem Ls.

™

o S 8 °i S " =3 O fu M01 TJ 5 S

52.S-? g-«

—

• - -

.

-— -

lUi .-J.I '

• ||l -'il' '

•o to <ny

1

N

^

-

S

s

I*

>"

-

« a=:er-|

•~ 5?. o IB 4 3 r+ 9r» » g. 5- o 5 g a

«.? -•

• 1

1 1 1St. Louis Ls. .

•_

—0

Da > » »

1-—

—

S

HM

•••

V

S

=:3- = a«(r-}

A *1 rt" ** ^* 3 ^~ ®

3 3 1. § S< «a

3"

|c52-C8A »»

M

F

Formation

C00«0

2.03 W_ 05 3.£•0™ SS|o

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

MISSOURI RIVERFLOOOPLAIN

LEGEND:

—— — Undfill Boundary

Barm

O Monitoring Wall

LMchata CollectionWall

GROUNDWATERGRADIENT

87O

WEST LAKELANDFILL

ISTORICALALLUVIAL VALLEY

O90

80

fe.

O52

061

Figure 2.5 Location of monitoring wells

2-20

Overallpermaabilityincreases

Soilcomposition

Thicknessmeters(feet)

Description

2 - 3(6.6 • 10)

o • ' . * • « 'o.'.'•• I

. 0

o ,

o • ' o

6-27(20 - 89)

Silt: clayey atsurface, sandyat depth

Silty sand

Sand with somegravel

Sandy gravel

Limestonebedrock

Figure 2.6 Soil profile of fiver alluvium

2-21

rs>roho

ELEVATION

(ml Kit NORTHWEST

ISO

140

130

120

110H

100-

90 J

SOUTHEAST

WEST LAKELANDFILL460-fi MISSOURI

RIVER MISSOURI RIVER FLOOD PLAIN——————-———————————-

SHALLOW FLOOD PLAIN ALLUVIUM

(Sand and Gravel!

LIMESTONEBEDROCK

300

Figure 2.7 Cross-section of Missouri River alluvial valley

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

£

ifiill •S§2

Soilcomposition

/_ / x ' '•4—'-r- *—s -T- S--/^

r^uTT.+>•

r-r&.

Thicknessmeters(feet)

2 - 3(6.6 • 10)

6 - 9(20-30)

6- 15(20 - 50)

5- 10(17 - 33)

Description

Organic siltsand clays(topsoil)

Peoria loess,silt

Roxana loess,silty-clay

Well-consolidatedclay residium

Limestonebedrock

Figure 2.8 Soil profile of upland loessal soil

2-23

Sol* 1:24.000

LEGEND:MM Slwvcttng WMW

—'•^ P*f«nnM Sin

CITY OFST. CHARLES

100m

rs»

Figure 2.9 Surface hydrology of West Lake area

120-

Figure 2.10 Average monthly precipitation at Lambert FieldInternational Airport

2-25

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

NNW NNE

NW NE4.25m/»

WNW4.92m/«

w 4.34m/• 4.07m/»

wsw

6.3% \4>5%/ 3.2%

0.04m/«6.2% I (calm) | 3.9%

3.8%

sw

ssw

ENE

ESE

•Hi;hd;|ro is^fpr-,Lambert Field International Airport,^e'^l!|!||'ri. and's^hpws the! percentage of'hourly:p.|i.s^^|j8||:ach direction along with the ave'rage

'H ^ pgectionj for example: wind blew jfrom4||t*the time at an average speed of 3.76 m/s.

tfn for West Lake area

2-26

3 RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SITE

3.1 Radiological Surveillance

Approximately 43,000 mt (47,000 tons) of contaminated soil were reported to havei

I been disposed of in the landfill. A fly-over radiological survey performed for.the NRC in 1978 identified two areas of contamination at the West Lake Landfill.

I Subsequently, from August 1980 through the summer of 1981, the RadiationManagement Corporation (RMC), under-contract to the NRC, performed an onsite

• evaluation of the West Lake Landfill (NRC, NUREG/CR-2722). The purpose of thissurvey was to clearly define the radiological conditions at the landfill. The

• results were to be utilized in performing an engineering evaluation to determineif remedial actions should and could be taken.

B The area to be: surveyed was divided into 10-m (33-ft) grid blocks and included_ the following measurements:

(1) external gamma exposure rates 1m (3.3 ft) above the surfaces and beta-• gamma count rates 1 cm (0.4 in.) above surfaces

I (2) radionuclide concentrations in surface soils

• (3) radionuclide concentrations in subsurface deposits

I| (5) radon flux emanating from surfaces

| (6) airborne radioactivity

I (7) gross activity in vegetation

II

(4) gross activity and radionuclide concentrations in surface and subsurfacewater samples

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

3.2 Survey Results

External Gamma

Figure 3.1 snows the two areas of elevated external radiation levels as theyexisted in November I960, at the time of the preliminary RMC site survey. Ascan be seen, both areas contained locations where levels exceeded 100 uR/hr at1 m (3.3 ft): In Area 2, gamma levels as high as 3000 to 4000 uR/hr weredetected. The total areas exceeding 20 uR/hr were about 1.2 ha (3 acres) inArea 1 and 3.6 ha (9 acres) in Area 2.

External gamma levels measured in May and July of 1981 decreased significantly,especially in Area 1, because approximately 1.2 n (4 ft) of sanitary fill wasadded to the entire area and an equal amount of construction fill was added tomost of Area 2. As a result, only a few hundred square meters (a few thousandsquare feet) in Area 1 exceed 20 uR/hr. In Area 2, the total area exceeding20 uR/hr decreased by about 10%, and the highest levels were about 1600 uR/hr,near the location of the Butler-type building.

Surface Soil Analyses

A total of 61 surface soil samples were gathered and analyzed on site for gammaactivity. Samples were normally stored 10 to 14 days to allow ingrowth of radiumdaughters. Concentrations of U-238, Ra-226 (from Pb-214 and Bi-214), Ra-223,Pb-211, and Pb-212 were determined for each sample. Surface soil samples arelocated in Figures 3.2 and 3.3.

In all soil samples, only uranium and/or thorium decay chain nucTides and K-40were detected. Offsite background samples were on the order of 2 pCi/g Ra-226.Onsite samples ranged from about 1 to 21,000 pCi/g Ra-226, and front less than10 to 2100 pCi/g U-238. In those cases where elevated levels of Ra-226 weredetected, the concentrations of U-238 were generally anywhere from a factor of2 to 10 lower. In cases of elevated sample activity, daughter products of bothU-238 and U-235 were found.

3-2

IIn general, surface activity was limited to Area 2, as indicated by surface

I beta-gamma measurements. Only two small regions! in Area 1 showed contamination;both were near the access road across from the site offices.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

In addition to onsite gamma analyses, 12 samples!were submitted to RMC's radio-chemical laboratories for thorium and uranium radiochemical determinations. Thei i

results show all samples contain high levels of fh-230. The ratio of Th-230 toRa-226 (Bi-214i) is about 20 to 1.

Subsurface Soil Analysis

Subsurface contamination was assessed by extensively "logging" holes drilledthrough the landfill. Several holes were drilled in areas known to contain con-tamination, then additional holes were drilled at intervals in all directionsuntil no further contamination was encountered. A total of 43 holes wereidrilled, 11 iniArea 1 and, in Area 2, 32 including 2 nearby offsite wells forimonitoring water. All holes were drilled with a'S-in. auger and lined with 4-in.PVC (polyvinyl chloride) casing. The location of these auger holes is shown inFigures 3.4 and 3.5.

•

Each hole was scanned with an Nal(Tl) detector and rate meter system for aninitial indication of the location of subsurface contamination. On the basisof the initial;scans, 19 holes were selected for detailed gamma logging usingthe intrinsic germanium (IG) detector and multiple channel analyzer.

The results of, the Nal(Tl) counts and IG analyses show concentrations of Bi-214,as determined by the IG system, ranged from less than 1 to 19,000 pCi/g. Forthose holes where both Nal(Tl) counts and IG counts were made, a good correla-tion between gross Nal(Tl) counts and Ra-226 concentrations, as determined byin situ analysis of the daughter Bi-214 by the IG system, was found.

It was determined that the subsurface deposits extended beyond areas where sur-face radiation measurements exceeded 5 pCi/g. The approximate area of subsurfacecontamination compared to the area of elevated surface radiation levels shows atotal difference in areas of 2 ha (5 acres).

3-3

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

The variations of contamination with depth for Areas 1 and 2 are shown inFigure 3.6. As can be seen, the surface elevations vary by about 6 m (20 ft),and the highest elevations occur at locations of fresh fill. Contamination(>5 pCi/g Ra-226) in several areas is found to! extend from the surface toappreciable depths, about 6 m (20 ft) below the surface in two cases. Ingeneral, the subsurface contamination appears to be a continuous single layer,ranging from 0.6 to 4.6 m (2 to 15 ft) thick, located between elevations of 139to 144 m (455 to 480 ft) and covering 6.5 ha (16 acres) total area.

In Figures 3.7 and 3.8, representations of the subsurface deposits are providedon the basis of auger hole measurements. These representations are consistentwith the operating history of the site, which suggests that the contaminatedmaterial was moved onto the site and spread as cover over fill material. Thus,one would expect a fairly continuous, thin layer of contamination, as indicatedby survey results.

Nonradiological Analysis

Six composite samples were submitted to RMC's (Environmental Chemistry Labora-tory for priority pollutant analysis. Five samples were taken from auger holes(one from Area 1 and four from Area 2) and the sixth from the West Lake leachatetreatment plant sludge. The results indicate a significant presence oforganic solvents in Area 2 samples. The results of the leachate sludgeanalysis were not as high as any of the soil samples.

A chemical analysis of radioactive material from both areas was also performedby RMC's laboratory. Results show elevated levels of barium and lead in mostcases.

Background Radioactivity Measurement

Various offsite locations were selected for reference background neasurements.The results of these measurements were within the normal range.

3-4

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Airborne Radioactivity Analyses

Both gaseous and particulate airborne radioactivity were sampled and analyzedduring this study. Since it was known that the buried material consisted par-tially or totally of uranium ore residues, the sampling program concentrated onneasuring radon and its daughters in the air. Two methods were used: the firstwas a scintillation flask method for radon gas and the second was analysis offilter paper activity for particulate daughters.

A series of grab samples using the accumulator method were taken between Mayand August of 1981. A total of 111 samples from! 32 locations was collected.Measurable radon flux levels ranged from 0.2 pCi/m2s in low background areas

i '

to 865 pCi/m2s in areas of surface contamination1.

At three locations, repetitive measurements were made over a period of 2 months.These results are plotted in Figure 3.9. As can; be seen, significant fluctua-tions were observed at two locations. The fact that these fluctuations werereal and not measurement artifacts was later confirmed by duplicate charcoalcanister samples, as described below.

' •

A total of 35 charcoal canister samples was gathered at 19 locations over a3-month period. The results show levels ranging from 0.3 pCi/m2s to 613pCi/m2s. On 24 different occasions, the charcoal canisters and accumulatorwere placed in essentially the same locations, at the same time, for duplicatesampling. The results of this side-by-side study show generally goodcorrelation between the two methods.

A set of 10-minute high-volume particulate air samples was taken to determineboth short-lived radon daughter concentrations and long-lived gross alphaactivity. The highest levels were detected in November 1980, near and insidethe Butler-type building which has since been removed. These two samplesapproximately equal NRC's 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, alternate concentrationlimit of one-thirtieth WL for unrestricted areas.

In addition to the routine 10-minute samples, five 20-minute high-volume airsamples were taken and counted immediately on the IG gamma spectroscopy system

3-5

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

to detect the presence of Rn-219 daughters. All samples were taken near sur-i I

face contamination. In addition to Rn-222 daughter gamma activities, Rn-219daughters were detected by measuring the low-abundance gamma rays of Pb-211.Concentrations of Rn-219 daughters ranged from!6 x 10-11 to 9 x 10-10 uCi/cc.

Vegetation Analysis

Vegetation samples included weed samples from onsite locations and farm cropsamples (winder wheat) near the northwest boundary of the landfill. This loca-tion was chosen because runoff from the fill onto the farm field was possible.No elevated activities were found in these samples. **

Water Analyses

A total of 37 water samples was taken: 4 in the fall of 1980, and the remainderin the spring and summer of 1981. One sample was equal to the U.S. Environmen-tal Protection Agency (ERA) gross alpha activity standard for drinking water of15 pCi/liter and that was a sample of standing!water near the Butler-typebuilding. Several samples, including all the leachate treatment plant samples,exceeded the EPA drinking water screening level for gross beta which wouldrequire isotopic analyses. Subsequent isotopic analyses indicated that thebeta activity could be attributed to K-40. None of the offsite samples *,exceeded either EPA standard or screening level.

In 1981, MONR collected 41 water samples which RMC analyzed for radioactivity(Table 3.1). Of these samples, 5 were background, 10 were onsite surfacewater, 10 were shallow groundwater standing in boreholes, and 16 were landfillleachate. From these data, background activity is estimated as 1.2 pCi/litergross alpha and 27 pCi/liter gross beta. Results in Table 3.1 show thegross alpha in two water samples exceeded or equaled 15 pCi/1; the gross beta inten water samples exceeded 50 pCi/1. Most of the gross beta activity comes fromnaturally occurring K-40 as determined from subsequent isotopic analysis.

In addition, groundwater samples in perimeter monitoring wells at the WestLake Landfill were taken by UMC personnel and ORAU 1n 1983, 1984, and 1986.The well locations are shown in Figure 2.5 and! the results are presented in

3-6

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Tables 3.2 and 3.3. Results in Table 3.2 show the gross alpha in two water samplesslightly exceeded 15 pCi/1; the gross beta were all below 50 pCi/1 in all watersamples. Table 3.3 shows analyses were below 15 pCi/1 for gross alpha and 50 pCi/1for gross beta for all the wells.

3.3 Estimation of Radioactivity Inventory

'In examining the RMC report for bore hole samples (Table 3.3), it is noted thati

the naturally ioccurring U-238 to Th-230 to Ra-226 equilibrium has been disturbed.The RMC report (NRC, NUREG/CR-2722) indicates that the ratio of Ra-226 to U-238is on the order of 2:1 to 10:1. Thi:s observation 1s consistent with the historyof the radionuclide deposits in the West Lake Landfill, i.e., that they camefrom the processing of uranium ores to extract the uranium content and that theradioactive material at West Lake came from the former Cotter Corporationfacility on Latty Avenue (presently occupied by iFutura Coatings Company) inHazelwood, Missouri. This location contains contamination from ore processingresidues from which uranium had been previously separated, leaving the daughtersbehind at relatively higher concentrations. Additionally, it is noted in theRMC report that the ratio of Th-230 to Ra-226 is on the order of 5:1 to 50:1.This indicates that radium has also been removed. Other data are available inthe Latty Avenue site study (Cole, 1981). Table 3.4 presents the radionuclideconcentrations in Latty Avenue composite samples1.

Using the RMC data and averaging the auger hole measurements over the two volumesof radioactive material found in Areas 1 and 2, a mean concentration of 90 pCi/gwas calculated for Ra-226. Also, the ratios of Th-230 to Ra-226 were esta-blished since the level of Th-230 will determine the increase of Ra-226 withtime. Although the ratio of Th-230 to Ra-226 ranged from 5:1 to 150:1, most ofthe data were in the 30:1 to 50:1 range. To ensure conservatism in estimatingthe long-term effects of Ra-226, a ratio of 100:1 was used for all furthercalculations.

Using the Th-230: Ra-226 ratio of 100:1, the Th-230 activity is 9000 pCi pergram. If the U-238 concentration (as well as U-234 which would be similarlyseparated from the ore) is a factor of 5 less than Ra-226, this implies about18 pCi U-238 per gram. The total mass of radioactive material (having Ra-226

3-7

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

concentrations of 5 pCi/g or more) in the landfill was estimated by visuallyintegrating the volume of radioactive material jfrom graphs and multiplying byan average soil density, resulting in 1.5 x 101!1 grams (150,000 metric tons) ofcontaminated soil. These numbers indicate that there are about 14 Ci of Ra-226contained with its decay products in the radioactive material in the landfill.The material also contains about 3 Ci each of U-238 and U-234, and about 1400 Ci

i i

of Th-230. These estimates indicate the order lof magnitude of the quantitiesto be dealt with, although the estimate for Th-230 is regarded as conservativelylarge.

3-8

ST. CHARLES ROCK ROAD

OJi

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 3, p. 27.

Figure 3.1 External gamma radiation levels (November 1980)

I»-»o

I I I INJ I I IOA OB OC OD OE OF OG OH Ol OJ OK

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 7, p. 31.

Figure 3.2 Location of surface soil samples, Area 1

u>

OB .OC .OO .

t

or -

OH •.*

01 .

OJ -ON .

01 .OM .ON .OO .

OP00 .OM .

OS .

OT .OU .

0V .

OW .

OK .OV .

O» .Ob.

Oc •CM-O»-Ol .

09

S O o o o o ° O r > o o o 2 9 ? o o o o o o o £ o o o o o o o o o o o'osn o o 9 o o o oi O O O u 5 i i . o i 2 " « . j 2 z o o . a a M » - 3 > g x > - M » n o « » 2 « / r ^ < i J B H E c a f r o

PK

"5 IN

I

s_, ft

13

14It. 16

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 8, p. 32.

Figure 3.3 Location of surface soil samples, Area 2

.«*>

l-»rs>

Note: Line B-B indicates cross-sectional areashown in Figure 3.7.

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 9, p. 33.

Figure 3.4 Location of auger holes, Area 1

tuI

Mote: Line E-E indicates cross-sectional area shown inFigure 3.8.

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 10, p. 34.

Figure 3.5 Location of auger holes. Area 2

CJI

490'

480

470"

460-

440'

430*

A A

_D

I ^

BOTTOM OF AREA 2 F.LL

A AA A A A A

I]

AA

LEGEND:A TOP

D >6pCl/g

O >100pCI/g

1 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 6 2 1 7 2 1 3 0 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 0 • 7 4 6 1 3 3 4 2 0 3 3 C l 9 3 B 4 0 3 9 4 2 1 2 l 2 4 2 S 2 i 2 7 2 B 2 9 3 S 3 7 M 4 1

AUGER HOLE NUMBER

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 14, p. 38.

Figure 3.6 Auger hole elevations and location of contamination within each hole

490'—

i*-•in

Notes: (1) B-B is defined in Figure 3.4.(2) The blackened areas indicate the estimated extent

ofLcontamination exceeding-5 pGi/g Ra-226, basedon surface and auger hole measurements.

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 16, p. 39.

= 5pCi/gRa-226

Figure 3.7 Cross-section B-B showing subsurface deposits in Area 1

at

420-—

LEGEND:

• = > SpCi/gRa-226

14 = H,0 WELL

Notes: (1) E-E is defined in Figure 3.^(2) The blackened areas indicate ~th~e estimated extent

of contamination exceeding 5 pCi/g Ra-226, basedon surface and auger hole measurements.

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 19, p. 42.

Figure 3.8 Cross-section E-E showing subsurface deposits in Area 2

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

800

700

600

O 500x

2 400OOK

300

200

100

BASE 4.

5/1 5/10 5/20 5/30 6/10DATE

Source: NUREG/CR-2722, Figure 20, p. 43.

Figure 3.9 Rn-222 flux measurements at three locations in Area 2 (1981)

3-17

i

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Table 3.1 RMC radionuclide analyses of water samplesfrom the West Lake site taken by MDNRin 1981

Sample #I

700170027003701970257028<7029;70307031

Type ofsample*

SSSSSSSSS

Gross alpha (pjCi/1)

3.118.001.561.911.5645.2<0.640.521.43

Gross beta

22.523.49.8830.036.587.8<1.3435.126.3

(pCi/1)

70047021702770327033

7009701070117012701770187020702623

BBBBB

GGGGGGGGGG

1.041.561.04<0.051.04

4.502.603.127.100.526.768.84<2.015.02.9

19.729.132.526.329.0

22.315.210.616.633.636.130.138.941.07.6

See footnote at end of table.

3-18

Table 3.1 (Continued)

Sampl

7013701470157016702270237024703470357036

14

I

Type ofe # sample* Gross alpha (pCi/1)

L <3.0L <3.0L <3.0L <3.0L 3.45L <3.0L <3.0L <3.0L <3.0L <3.0L 7.3L <3.0

Type ofSample ft sample* Ra-226 (pCi/1)

7014701570i670227028

*S =B =G =L =

L <1.6L 3.9L <1.6L 2.4S 1.6

surface sampleoff site, backgroundgroundwater from boreholesleachate

Gross beta (pCi/1)

1.3013010398.910712286.710.384.569.68026

K-40 (pCi/1)

13813698.9104124

,•

3-19

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Table 3.2 Radiological quality of water in perimeter monitoring wells ofWest Lake Landfill (concentration's reported in pCi/1)

Well *

1859606162636566676850***

Ra-226-<3--<3

<3<3<3<3<3

Gross alpha*.3.2--2.8-12.44.35 -:18.25

Gross beta*i-9.9--7.4--33.16.95.318.87.7

Gross alpha**

12.5-20.52.73.52.25.7---1.3

Gross beta**

12.5-20.813.98.57.06.3---8.1

*Samples taken November 15, 1983.**Samples taken March 21, 1984, by UMC personnel, analyzed by EnvironmentalHealth Lab of St. Louis County Health Department, Clayton, Missouri.

***Well #50 used as background.

3-20

Table 3.3 Radionuclide concentrations in well water samples: May 7-8, 1986

Radionuclide

Gross alpha;^ - .

Gross tfeta '

Ra-226 '

Ra-228j|;;>. ' • . , . "W&>. 7l •

U-totaljfe'

Th-228V"

Th-230t

Th-232

Depth to wateri (m)

Concentrations (pCi/1)

Well 50a Well 51 Well 52 Well 53 Well 54

2 r\ 1*9 1O It MM,_2 ..-.. — i.2. - — - l-.y 11 4.4

7.S 4.4 7.5 16 14

_J> .. .. o.4

1.7

22

0.5

0.9

0.3 —

5.0 3.8 3.2 3.3 15.5

Well 55 Well 56

4 8 5 - 7"T • V *J • t

14 12

0.2

0.3

8.9

0.3

0.9

0.8

11.5 11.5

Table 3.3 (Continued)

ro

Radlonuclide

Gross alpha.

Gross e a';"j~' "'" "" '' •

Ra-22ipV^V^Ra-22fflL ; .••*:

u-totfl^ir-;Th-22ff '."'tf.vTh-232'*

Depth to water (m)

Well "58 V-

5-8

0.3"

2,9

13

0.6

1:5

0.7

14.0

Well 59

11

46

0.3

0.5

25

0.5

0.2

0. 1

Notdetermi ned

Concentrations (pCi/1)

Well 60 Well 61

14 3.3

19 14

2. 5

1.6

19

0.5

4.4

0.1

3.5 4.5

.

Well 62 Well 65 Well 66

5.6 3.5 1.8

10 7.4 9.9

0.8

0.6 i2.3

0.8

1.2

0.6

4.2 1.9 1.9

Table 3.3 (Continued)

„ ; F i,, ,- Concentrations (pCi/1)

Radionii .ifle; 1^ •6%;; •* -- Well 68 Well 72 Well 73••J.iB1j jj3KJs ,,- iJJT . v . ;'' •'''Vi^-rr-!' • • - • *.. '-;.. ' i X re

GrOSS *l fp*'' " , , ' s Vr? :: .,. ;/' '-I1-:;,. °'9 ' . . • • • . . 5

Gross. ,|fflfr ''-^ '--^^^^*-^ --1-9-^. - *-6 • 7-7

Ra-226'!^fc ' ' - ;v' ^Cf ^'&-" - ' . ' " ' ''',.-•'.• •' ' 0.3. . . . ' t"J^-v^ -i:i-. ,.'•''•;.' '"*>"•»*.>-..' '.':t!' - - - • 1 - : • • <:'" • ' •

f' ; ., •-••••• ' , =/ ^, .. 0.9' • '•• • !!.-•&>• :'5--, ~

U-tota1^,T\.:i •:••••-:,,,. • .:'^Mj^^"f ''• :•• ;•. -. . >,.. , 3. 1

Th-228 -. "•§' «v -. v-^-0^'.'.'"-^ • - . - ' • 1.7

^ Th-230 ;./•'- ^.9 1 ;/ 6.7f s j • • - • ' • • - . . ' .•;• ".•'?$.'* •••"-'"

w Th-232 », ,i -°-,2 ' J °-2

' i. .• ••'.."•if ' • ,.Depth to water 0«) -^5v 4.4 10.0 8.4

Well 75 Well 76

11 O. D

22 6.9

-,

._

16

0.6

12

0.2 — .

7.6 13.8

Well 80

0.4

3.2

—

'--

2.2

0.3

0.0

0.1

5.3

Table 3.3 (Continued)

' ',.'• ' , . ± •

Radlrihuclide" A> Well 81.--• • • -V -i -r •• j/n-j,/1 • •• :- S^T

.JT ij^Twf'ftt'i*'' .ij p P1 Jr-. - f-f - .• _ . •_ . •

Gross beta^ ,-/- 16\ - ^ '..yV,.-.. ' " ' • • - . • " . . • '

Ra~228Sj|A '" fli'4v •"Of- r. 1

Th-22W 0.9* ' -'v.

Th-23fe 0.3

Depth to waiter (m) 4.8

Concentrations (pCi/1)

Well 82

17

47

0.3

0.4

13

0.4

1.8

0.3

5.1

Well 83

9.0

18

3.4

4.6

1.6

0.2

0.4

1.0

3.9

Well 84

13

27

1.7

5.8

9.0

0.6

1.3

1.1

7.0

Well 87 Well 88 Well 89

1,5 11 3.7

7.2 18 9.1

2.3

0.2

3.0

1.1

1. 5

4.0

9.4 8.6 7.5..-"V < '•.''".

Table 3.3 (Continued)

GJ

ro

Concentrations (pCi/1)

Well -92 Well 93

jB& ga j J, _rHasTiWia-*. ir-«' ' v .PI.*-, . r •11 •*1.0

,v% A -0-8

p|6;-jPiguFe 2.5 for we^^ Ibx/ation.

femidii-eaiesi analysis noit 'performed.»• yi*a\'A*1' • > - , - • , '• ^ ' ': • - . • . - ' r-"t i

7.4,

22

1.6

1.4

6.0

Well 94

1,6

9.9

"Jl . . , '". •••""'%;--•.• •1;:T:." ~v 0.5 •.• . ' • ' • • • ? • : . . ' " - V . • . V " • , . -i .- > • • • - • ' -;^A' , ' -o.iST !', . -.• , ••'• • • • '•»• ..-'. . - . • • • • "

j.' -_ ',, . , . . . -»i '. .; ' : : r,^ . . .,,

W : •• ••-•" .,. ;'-. ' '°-4

iSwtb^Wate'r • {mi) S'A$-r . 13.1m--'-i ' •'.> •. • ' '" V \ .. •

0.8

0.7

1.6*£'

4.7 2.1

Table 3.4 Radionuclide concentrations in Latty Avenue composite samples

Concentrations (pCi/gm)

Sample

Composite

Composite

Average

U-235

l,.^' 1-3.6

2|j|4.4

$®:<4*

±0.3**

±0.3

± 0.2

U-2-3B— --

82 ± 8

62 ± 15

72 ± 9

Th-232*

2.3 ± 0.6

1.5 ± 0.5

1.9 ± 0.4

Th-230

8770 ±

8950 1

8860 ±

- .......

100

370

190

Th-228

2.1 ± 0.5

2.0 ± 0.5

2.1 ± 0.3

.Da-226

64 t 1

50 ± 1

57 ± 1

Ra-228

2.3 i 0.6

1.5 ± 0.5

1.9 ± 0.4

Pa-231

114 ± 2

117 ± 8

116 ± 4

Ac-227

205 ± 2

NotPerformed

205 ± 2

"Based on Ra>228 and assumption of secular equilibrium of thorium decay series.**Errors are 2o based only on counting statistics.

Source: Table 2 (Cole, 1981).

roen

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

4 APPLICABILITY OF THE BRANCH TECHNICAL POSITION

The NRC has established a Branch Technical Position (BTP) which identifiesfive acceptable options for disposal or onsite storage of wastes containinglow levels of,uranium and thorium (46 FR 52061, October 23, 1981). Options 1-4provide methods under 10 CFR 20.302, for onsite disposal of slightly contain-inated materials, e.g., soil, if the concentrations of radioactivity are smallenough and other circumstances are satisfactory. The fifth option consists ofonsite storage pending availability of an appropriate disposal method. Table4.1 shows the Vadionuclide concentrations specified for the disposal options.

The material present in the West Lake Landfill is a form of natural uraniumwith daughters, although the daughters are not now in equilibrium. Asmentioned above, the average concentration of Ra-226 in the West Lake Landfillwastes is about 90 pCi per gram, which (considered by itself) falls intoOption 4 of the BTP since Option 4 criteria are controlled by the Ra-226content in the wastes (i.e., 200 pCi of U-238 plus U-234 per gram would beaccompanied by 100 pCi of Ra-226 per gram). However, because of the largeratio of Th-230 radioactivity to that of Ra-226, the radioactive decay of theTh-230 will increase the concentration of its decay product Ra-226 untilthese two radionuclides are again in equilibrium. Assuming the ratio ofactivities of 100:1 used above, the Ra-226 activity will increase by a factorof five over the next 100 years, by a factor of nine 200 years from now, andby a factor of thirty-five 1000 years from now. All radionuclides in thedecay chain after Ra-226 (and thus the Rn-222 gas flux) will also be increasedby similar multiples. Therefore, the long-term Ra-226 concentration will Jc.exceed the Option 4 criteria.

4-1

111111111

Table 4.1 Summary of maximum soil concentrations permittedunder disposal options

! Source: 46 Federal Register 52061

Disposal options

Kind of material la 2b 3C 4d

Natural thorium (Th-232 + Th-228) 10 50 - 500with daughters present and inequilibrium. (pCi/g)

Natural uranium (U-238 + U-234) .; 10 - 40 200with daughters present and inequilibrium. (pCi/g)

aBased on 'ERA uranium mill tailings cleanup standards.

Concentrations based on limiting individual intruder doses to170 mrem|per year.

Concentration based on limiting equivalent exposure to 0.02 WL or

Concentrations based on limiting individual intruder doses to 500

less

mremper year 'and, in cases of natural uranium, limiting exposure to Rn-222

1111111111

and its decay product airborne alpha emitters to 0.02 WL or less.

1

4-2

,.•

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

5 REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS

The radioactive Material as it presently exists does not pose an imediate *.health hazard for Individuals living or working in the area of the landfill.However, there 1s a long-term potential for the radioactive material to pose ahealth problem. Therefore, this section discusses six (A-F) possible coursesof action, of which all but A and D are considered temporary. Option A. inwhich no remedial action 1s proposed, 1s unacceptable because theconcentrations of radionuclides in the landfill will become too high^ Option AIs described for comparison purposes only. Costs are based on the Oodge Guideto Public Works and Heavy Construction, 1984. 1

5.1 Option A: No Remedial Action

Under Option A, no remedial work would be done on the West Lake site. The land-fill and the radioactive soil would be left in their present condition. Thecontaminated areas would be available for demolition fill emplacement and finalclosure. It is not certain how much additional fill would be emplaced. Fillingwould be followed by normal landfill closure operations.

Normal closure procedures consist of applying at least 0.61 m (2 ft) of com-pacted final cover. A 0.3-m (1 ft) layer of topsoil would be placed over thecover and upgraded to support vegetation. Establishment of a vegetative coverwould require seeding, liming, and fertilization. Surface seeps of leachatewould be eliminated. Maintenance of the monitoring wells would be required toallow continued sampling by MDNR, should MDNR require such action. The publicwould be discouraged from entering the site. After closure, a detailed descrip-tion of the site would be filed with the County Recorder of Deeds. This de-scription would include: a legal description of the site, types and locationof wastes present, depth of fill, and description of any environmental controlor monitoring systems requiring future maintenance (MDNR, January 1963). MDNRregulations also specifically prohibit excavation or disruption of the closedlandfill without written approval of MDNR; no time frame is stated with thisregulation; (MDNR, 1975).

5-1

111

There would be no further cost under this option since no remedial actions wouldbe taken; i.e., costs are normal landfill costs.

5.2 Option B: Stabilization on Site With Restricted Land Use"

Two areas in1 the landfill contain radioactive material. Therefore, the work

11111111111

required for this option is described separately fortheless, restrictions would be imposed on the use of

each area. Never-land within each area.

This would discourage future activities on these areas which might exposeindividuals to radioactivity. No additional landfill would be permitted to bedeposited on either area. •'•

Area 1

It is believed that a total of 2 to 3 m (7 to 10 ft)to most of Area 1 since the 1981 land survey by RMC.the radiation environment of the site. MeasurementsUniversities (ORAU) personnel in March 1984 (Berger)small area exceeded the exposure rate of 20 uR/hr at

of soil has been addedThis cover has alteredby Oak Ridge Associatedshowed that only a very1 m. By extending the

cover_20 m (66 ftl outward in all directions from the area showing an/unaccept-able surface exposure rate, the shallow wastes likely to give high rates ofradon emanation will also be covered. The amount of radioactive debris inArea 1 is relatively minor compared with that present in Area 2. Therefore, a

_£p-n rnvor nf 1 ^ m (5 ft^ TS rnnciriereri adequate tn

rates and radon emanation. After the soil cover istopsoil^0.3 m (1 ft) thick would be emplaced, seeded

1

Area 2

reduce surface exposurein place, a layer of, and mulched.

Vegetation over Area 2 as well as on the slope of the berm would be cleared and

11111

placed in the demolition portion of the landfill orBrush should not be left in place and covered sinceof the soil cap. Grass should be mowed, and may be

disposed of as is convenient.this may reduce the integrityleft In place.

The berm on the northwest portion of the landfill which contains an estimated7,500 m3 (9,800 yd3) of contaminated soil would be excavated and redeposited in

5-2

™ layers in a secure portion of the landfill. The actual amount can be determined• by survey during implementation of the work.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

All equipment and materials now stored over Area 2 would be removed to otherportions of the site or disposed of as is convenient to the owners. Gravelpiles found oh Area 2 should be removed to other portions of the site afterhaving been surveyed to ensure that contaminants have not been mixed with thegravel. However, the lower 10 to 15 cm (4 to 6 in.) of rock should be left inplace and covered with the soil cap, since this gravel may have become mixedwith contaminated soil.

Such stabilization would place the contaminated soil well below the surface andwould prevent radioactive materials from eroding as can now occur along sectionsof the berm. 'Stabilization would require emplacement of a soil cover of 48,000 m3

(63,000 yd3) to give a final slope of 3:1 with 1.5 m (5 ft) of soil at the topof the berm. At least 1.5 m (5 ft) of soil cover would be used, as this muchsoil will be required to reduce radon gas exhalation. The final slope of 3:1on the berm would be shallow enough to prevent failure and, after the cover isemplaced, it should be further covered with at least 0.3 m (1 ft) of topsoiland seeded with native grasses to prevent erosion. The slope would be directedradially outward from the center of the cap. An interceptor ditch would beprovided around the cap to channel runoff and prevent gullies from being cutinto the stabilized cover. The cover soil presently used in the landfill ingoperations may be used to stabilize the berm. This soil is a clay silt (loess)excavated near the West Lake Landfill site.

The portion of Area 2 to be covered by the soil cap includes that portion ofthe landfill identified in the RMC survey as having surface exposure ratesgreater than 20 pR/hr at 1 m (3.3 ft) above ground level, along with thoseareas in which auger holes revealed radium-bearing soil within 1 m of the sur-face. The shallow contaminants may be sufficiently shielded to produce lowsurface exposure rates; however, these shallow deposits will still produceradon emanations greater than the desired level of 20 pCi/m2s. Therefore, thesoil cover must be extended over these areas of shallow contamination.

5-3

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

The cover soil used should be capable of compaction to a permeability of lessthan 10-7 cra/s in order to keep radon release and soil leaching as low as pos-sible. This value is based on common practices used for sealing of hazardouswaste landfills. Because accurately measuring permeability of this magnitudeis difficult, the value of 10-7 cra/s should be used only as a target cri-terion which should, if possible, be bettered. If laboratory testing of thecover soil presently used at the West Lake Landfill indicates that this perme-ability can be achieved, this soil would be acceptable for use as the soil cap.Otherwise, clay soil would have to be imported from off the site to be used inconstructing the soil cap.

i

The overall estimated cost for the required work under Option B is approximately$360,000 (Table 5.1) and would require about 2 months to complete. Costs of thisoption may be higher if the total quantity of contaminated material to be movedis higher than the estimated quantity.

5.3 Option C: Extending the Landfill Off Site

Soil eroding on the northwest berm of Area 2 is carrying contaminated soil offthe landfill property onto an adjacent cultivated field. A contributing factorto the erosion is the steepness of the berm. It would, therefore, toe desirableto lessen the slope's steepness by extending the berm onto the adjacent field.This option would require the acquisition of approximately 2 ha (5 acres) ofland not owned by the landfill company.

In this option, Area 1 would be treated the same as in Option B. The contamin-ated portion of the northwestern berm of Area 2 would not be disturbed. Insteadthe existing; berm would be extended 13 to 16 m (42 to 52 ft) onto the adjacentfield. This would require an additional solid volume of approximately 20,200 m3

(26,400 yd3) to give a final slope of 3:1 with 1.5 m (5 ft) of soil on top ofthe berm. As in Option B, this cover should receive an additional 0.3 m (1 ft)of topsoil and be seeded with native grasses to prevent erosion.

This option will require the relocation of three transmission poles. All othernecessary work for Option C is as described for Option B.

.5-4

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

The overall estimated cost for required work under Option C is approximately$470,000 (Table 5.2) and would require about 2 months to complete. The extentof work required under this option is well defined.

5.4 Option D: Removing Radioactive Soil and Relocating It

This option would involve excavating and removing all contaminated soil anddebris from the West Lake Landfill and relocating it to an authorized disposalfacility.

Vegetation over Areas 1 and 2 would 'be cleared and placed in the demolitionportion of the West Lake Landfill.

All equipment stored on the two contaminated areas would be removed to anotherportion of the site. Gravel piles in Area 2 should be removed. The lower 10 to15 cm (4 to 6 in.) of rock should be left in place to be disposed of with othercontaminated materials, since this gravel may have become mixed with contaminatedsoil at the surface.

The areas known to contain radioactive contamination at levels above the actioncriteria (20 pR/hr at 1 m) would be excavated initially. Next, the excavatedarea would be surveyed to determine the extent of contamination remaining. Ex-cavation would continue until unacceptable levels of contamination have beenremoved. Immediately after excavation, the soil would be placed in 208-liter(55 gal) approved drums (or other approved containers) for transport. Contain-ment in the drums will prevent the spread of dust and loose soil duringtransport.

Some of the nonradiological hazardous material known to be present in thelandfill could present a serious danger to workers should they excavate intothis material. Proper precautions should, therefore, be taken as the work isbeing performed.

Estimated costs under Option 0 would be $2,500,000 (Table 5.3). Transportingthe contaminated soil to another site and emplacing the material there wouldsignificantly,add to the cost. This option could be completed in about

5-5

III11IIIIIIIIIIIIII

3 months, providing that a suitable disposal facility were available to receivethe contaminated waste.

5.5 Option E: Excavation and Temporary Onsite Storage in a Trench

Under this option, as much radioactive soil would be excavated as in Option Dand would be placed in a specially prepared trench on the West Lake site butwould not be placed in drums. This trench would become a temporary repositoryfor the radioactive soil. The trench would be surrounded by an impervious clayliner to minimize leachate production and transport into the groundwater system.The cap should give acceptable rates of surface exposure and acceptable ratesof radon gas release.

As under Option 0,, surface vegetation, machinery, and piles of crushed rockwould be removed from the surface of areas to be excavated. Design of thetrench is based upon the "secure landfill concept" (Shuster and Wagner, 1980)with three primary functions: eliminate direct gamma-ray exposure at the groundsurface, reduce radon emanation, and prevent leaching of radionuclides to thegroundwater system.

The excavated area would be cut to a maximum elevation of 140 m (460 ft) mslover the area to be covered by the trench. The base of the trench would coveran area 120 x 120 m (394 x 394 ft) and would have a negligible slope. Low spotswould be filled with borrow soil* compacted to at least 90% of its standardProctor density (SPO). Once the base for the trench has been leveled to afinal elevation of about 140 m (460 ft) msl, a blanket of borrow soil at least1.5 m (5 ft) thick compacted to at least 90% SPD would be emplaced. Specifica-tion of compaction of this underlayer is based on the requirement of avoidingsubsidence which could cause the clay liner to crack and fail. A clay linerwould be placed above the underlayer. The liner would be 0.5 m (1.6 ft) thickand would nave a permeability less than 10-8 cm/s (4 x 10-9 in./s). Animpermeable plastic liner could also be used.

*Borrow soil refers to a clayey-silt loess (Soil Conservation Service type CL)excavated; southeast of the site for use as daily cover in the landfill ingoperation.

5-6

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Sides of the trench would be built at a 3:1 slope up to the level of the surround-ing undisturbed landfill surface, about 143 m (470 ft) msl. The walls wouldconsist of an underlayer and liner as described for the base. A layer ofcrusher-run limestone 0.5 m (1.6 ft) thick would be placed on top of the linerto allow leachate buildup in the trench to be monitored and to facilitate pump-ing should leachate buildup become a problem.

After the base and walls of the trench have been built, the previously exca-vated debris would be placed in the trench. Then the remaining radioactivedebris would be excavated and placed in the trench. As excavation proceeds, itwill become apparent how much volume the trench must have to contain all thecontaminated soil. At this point, the walls of the trench would be raised toan appropriate level. Excavation and filling can then proceed until the workis complete. The final thickness of debris is expected to be from 4 to 6 m(13 to 20 ft).

A cover, as described below, would be placed over the debris. A 1 m (3 ft)layer of borrow soil compacted to 90% SPO will be placed over the debris. Aclay liner 0.5 m (1.6 ft) thick of permeability less than 10-8 cm/s (4 x10-9 in./s) would be placed over the borrow soil blanket. A 0.5-m (l.-6-ft) layerof crusher-run limestone would be placed over the clay layer to preventinfiltration water from building up over the liner. A cover soil layer ofaverage thickness about 2 m (7 ft) would be placed over the rock layer.

The cover soil would be compacted and built with a surface slope of from 2% to ,4% to minimize erosion. Three-tenths of a meter (1 ft) of top soil would beplaced over the cover layer and would be seeded and mulched to establish a vege-tative cover.

Once the trench has been prepared to accept the soil, workers may begin toexcavate contaminated soil. As under Option C, an initial excavation wouldremove the area of known contamination, and a cleanup phase would remove allsoil containing radionuclide concentrations above an action level of 15 pCi/gRa-226. As soon as the soil has been excavated, it would be hauled to thetrench and emplaced. The contaminated soil should be sufficiently compacted to

5-7

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

prevent settling, to maintain the integrity of the soil cap. As fill is beingemplaced, the pipe for a monitoring well would be extended upward from the baseof the gravel underdrain. This well should be designed in a manner that wouldallow future installation of a pump for drawing off leachate should this becomenecessary.

i

Costs for Option E would be approximately $2,150,000 (Table 5.4). The estimatedcosts vary somewhat, since the exact limits of excavation cannot be defined untilwork begins. This work would require approximately 4 aonths to complete.

5.6 Option F: Construction of a Slurry Wall to Prevent Offsite LeachateMigration

Under Option F, radioactive soil would be left in place at the West Lake site.The wastes would be stabilized by means of a soil cover (as under Option B) anda downgradeent slurry wall would be built around the contaminated soil. Theslurry wall would be intended to keep leachate from migrating off site. Thisremedial action would be somewhat more effective than Option B in reducing thepotential for groundwater contamination. However, costs incurred would besubstantially higher than those for Option B or C. Benefits would be'nearlyidentical to those derived by the soil cover and berm stabilization alone; thesole advantage of Option F over Option B or C would be greater protection to »groundwater in the Missouri River alluvium.

Vegetation, machinery, and piles of crushed rock would have to be removed asdescribed for Option B. A slurry wall would be constructed by excavating atrench [approximately 1 m (3.3 ft) wide] to the depth of bedrock. This trenchwould be bored out in the presence of a mud weighted with bentonite (clay) tokeep the walls from collapsing and to keep groundwater from intruding into thetrench. The trench would be excavated in sections 6 to 8 m (20 to 26 ft) long.Once a section of trench has been excavated, concrete would be poured by tremieinto the trench to displace the slurry. The final slurry walls would eachconsist of a concrete slab about 1m (3.3 ft) thick extending to bedrock andpartially-encircling the bodies of radioactive soil in both Areas 1 and 2. Atotal of approximately 1300 linear meters (4,300 ft) of wall would be con-structed to depths varying from 5 to 15 m (16 to 50 ft).

5-8

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

After each of the slurry walls had been emplaced, fill would be added along theface of the berm to stabilize the slope. Finally, a soil cover would be placedover the contaminated areas. The berm would be stabilized and the soil coverwould be placed as outlined for Option B.

Costs of work required for Option F would be approximately 45,600,000(Table 5.5). The exact amount of slurry wall cannot be determined until workIs begun; therefore, this cost will be highly variable. Since the walls shouldextend to bedrock, the depth of soil and landfill debris will govern the depthof the required wall. Slight errors in estimating the depth of alluvium couldresult in large errors in the cost estimate. It is estimated that it wouldtake 6 to 8 months to complete this option.

5-9

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Table 5.1 Itemized cost of remedial action, Option B

Item Quantity Unit price Cost Reference

Clearing and grubbing 2.9 ha

Remove Shuman Building

Excavate contani natedsoil and redepositit at a secure site

Emplace soil cover

Bury clean rubble

Seed and mulch coveriSubtotal

Contingency @ 10%

.Engineering and legalfees @ 5%Estimated total cost

$1850/ha

7500 m3 $10/m3

48,000:m3 $4.64/m3

225 m3 . $12.50/m3

3.3 ha $2165/ha

$ 5,365 *

$ 6,200 **

$ 75,000 t

$222,720

$ 2,812

$ 7.145$319,242

31,924

15,962

$360,000

t

t*

,tt

*Dodge Guide to Public Works and Heavy Construction, 1984.**Ford, Bacon and Davis Utah, Inc., "Engineering Evaluation of the Latty

Avenue Site, Hazelwood, Missouri," NRC Contract No. NRC-02-77-197, 1978.(This Butler-type building has already been removed.)

tBased on best estimated cost.ttAdjusted for deletion of building removal.

5-10

1111111111111111111

Table 5.2 Itemized cost of remedial action, Option

Item : Quantity

Clearing and grubbing 2.9 ha

Remove Shuman Building

Relocate power 3transmission poles

Stablize b'erm (fill) 20,200 m3

Emplace soil cover 48,000 m3

Bury clean rubble 225 m3

Seed and mulch cover 3.3 haSubtotal

Contingency @ 10%

Engineering and legalfees @ 5%

Land acquisition 2 haEstimated total cost

*Dodge Guide to Public Works and

Unit price Cost

$1850/ha $ 5,365

$ 6,200

$2060 $ 6,180

$6.70/m3 $135,340

$4.64/m3 $222,720

$12.50/m3 $ 2,812

$2165/ha $ 7,145$385,762

38,576

19,290

$15,500/ha 31,000$470,000

Heavy Construction, 1984.

C

Reference

*

**

t

t

t

t

*

•/

**Ford, Bacon and Davis Utah, Inc., "Engineering Evaluation of the LattyAvenue Site, Hazelwood, Missouri," NRC Contract No. NRC-02- 77-197, 1978(This Butler-type building has already been removed.)

tBased on best estimated cost.)

5-11

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Table 5.3 Itemized cost of remedial action, Option D

Item Quantity Unit price Cost Reference

Clearing and grubbing

Remove Shuman Building

Bury clean rubble

Excavate contaminated soilI

Site decontamination

Packing waste for transportation

Subtotal

Contingency @ 10%

Engineering and legalfees @ 5%Estimated total cost

2.9 ha $1850/ha

230 m3 $12.5/m3

70,000 m3 $5.25/m3

27,600 m3 $1.4/m2

70,000 m3 $25/m3

$ 5,365 *

$ 6,200 **

$ 2,875 t

$ 367,500 t.tt

$ 38,640 ***

$1,750,000 t

$2,170,580

217,058

108.529

$2,500,000***

*Dodge Guide to Public Works and Heavy Construction, 1984.^ i« MMMIB • ^ ••B j

**Ford, Bacon and Davis Utah, Inc., "Engineering Evaluation of the LattyAvenue Site, Hazelwood, Missouri," NRC Contract No. NRC-02-77-197, 1978.(This Butler-type building has already been removed.)

***No costs have been included here for moving the waste, for emplacing it andfor disposal facility users fees.

tBased upon best estimate.ttEstimated quantity of soil having Ra-226 concentrations of 15 pCi/g or more.

5-12

1111111111111111111

Table 5.4 Itemized cost of remedial action, Option E

Item Quantity Unit price

Prepare secure trench 80,000 m3 $9/m3

Clearing and grubbing 2.9 ha $l,850/ha

Remove Shuman building

Bury clean rubble 230 ro3 $12.5/m3

Excavate contaminated 70,000 m3 $5.25/m3soil ;

Site decontamination 27,600 m3. $1.40/m3

Emplace contaminated 70,000 m3 $10.3/m3soil

Monitoring well — —i

Seed and mulch cover 0.08 ha $2,165/haSubtotal

Contingency @ 10%

Engineering and legalfees @ 5%

Estimated total cost

* Dodge Guide to Public Works and Heavy Construction,**Ford, Bacon and Davis Utah, Inc., "Engineering Eva!Avenue Site, Hazelwood, Missouri," NRC Contract No.(This Butler- type building has already been removed

t Based on best estimate.

• i5-13

Cost Reference

$ 720,000 *

$ 5,365 *

$ 6,200 **

$ 2,875 *

$ 367,500 *

$ 38,640 t

$ 722,200 *

$ 6,000 *

$ 200 t$1,868,980

186,900..•

93,450

$2,150,000

1984.uation of the tattyNRC-02-77-197, 1978..)

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Table 5.5 Itemized cost of remedial action, Option F

Item

Clearing and; grubbing

Remove Shuman building

Relocate powertransmission poles

Construct slurry wall

Stabilize berm

Emplace soil cap

Bury clean rubble

Seed and mulch coverSubtotal :

Contingency @ 10%i

Engineering and legalfees @ 5%

Quantity

2.9 ha

7 poles

11,000 m2

20,200 m3

48,000 m3.

225 m3

3.3 ha

Land acquisition 2 hai

Estimated total cost

*Dodge Guide to Public Works and Heavy

Unit price

$l,850/ha

$2, 060/@

$402/m2

$6.70/m3

$4. 64/m3

$12.5/m3

$2,165/ha

$15,500/ha

Construction,

Cost

$ 5,365

$ 6,200

$ 14,420

$4,422,000

$ 135,340

$ 222,720

$ 2,812

$ 7,145$4,816,002

481,600

240,800

31,000$5,600,000

1984.

Reference

*

**

t

*

t

t

t*

•

**Ford, Bacon and Oavis Utah, Inc., "Engineering Evaluation of the LattyAvenue Site, Hazelwood, Missouri," NRC Contract No. NRC-02-77-197, 1978.(This Butler-type building has already been removed.)

tBased on best estimate.

5-14

11111111111111

•

6 REFERENCES'

Berger, James D. , Survey of WestMarch 6, 1984.

Lake Site by Oak Ridge Associated Universities,

Cole, L. W. . Radiological Evaluation of Decontamination Debris Located at thet

Futura Coatings Company FacilitySeptember 1981.

Dodge Guide to Public Works andr

Emmett, L. F. , and Jeffery, H. G

, Oak Ridge Associated Universities,

Heavy Construction, 1984.

. , Reconnaisance of the Groundwater Resourcesof the Missouri River Alluvium Between St. Charles and Jefferson City, Missouri,Hydrol. Inv. Atlas Ha-315, U. S.

Ford, Bacon and Davis Utah, Inc.Site, Hazelwood, Missouri, NRC

i

Salt Lake City, Utah, 1978.

Freeze, R. A., and John Cherry,N. J., 1979.

Geological Survey, Washington, D. C. , 1968.

, Engineering Evaluation of the Latty AvenueContract No. NRC-02-77-197,

Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Goodfield, A. G. . Pleistocene and Surficial Geology of St. Louis and theAdjacent St. Louis County, Missouri, University of Illinois, Ph.D. thesis,1965.

Karch, Kenneth M. , Director, Division of Environmental Quality, Missouri

11111

Department of Natural Resources, letter dated June 2, 1976, toJames G. Keppler, Regional Director, NRC, June 2, 1976.

j

1

6-1

ILong, James H., Director, Laboratory Services Program, Report. Missouri

I Department of Natural Resources, November 5, 1981.

_

Lutzen, Edwin E., Rockaway, John D., Jr., Engineering Geology of St. LouisCounty, Missouri. Missouri Geology SurveyGeological Series No. 4, Rolla, MO, 1971.

• County. Missouri. Missouri Geology Survey and Water Resources, Engineering

IMartin, James A., and Jack S. Wells, Guidebook to Middle Ordivician and

| .Mississippian Strata. St. Louis and St. Charles Counties. Missouri GeologicalSurvey, Report of Investigation #34, 1966.

IMiller, D. E. , "Water", The Resources of St. Charles County, Missouri.

• Land, Water, and Minerals, Wallace B. Howe and L. D. Fellows, eds. , MissouriGeological Survey, Rolla, MO., 1977, pp. 31-82.

I• Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources, Technical Bulletin concerning landfill

closure, January 1983.

__ , Divisio'n of Environmental Quality, "The Missouri Solid Waste ManagementLaw, Rules, and Regulations," Jefferson City, Missouri, 1975.

I Reitz and Gens, Engineering Firm, Letter to Mr. Curtis Doe, Staff Engineer,Missouri Department of Natural Resources, June 20, 1983a.

_ , Letter to John Doyle, Chief, Waste Management Program (MNDR), June 20,• 1983b.

I Shuster, Edward R. , and "Louis E. Wagner, "The Role of the Secure Landfill inHazardous Waste Management," in Toxic and Hazardous Waste Disposal, Vol. 4,Robert B. Pojasek, ed. , Ann Arbor Science Publishers, 1980.

II

6-2

I

ISpreng, Alfred C., "Mississippian System", The Stratigraphic Succession in

I Missouri. John W. Koenig, ed., Missouri Survey and Water Resources, Vol. XL,2nd series, 1961, p. 49-78.

• U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Aerial Photograph• No. TQ-2K, Frame 51, 1953.

_ U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Environmental Data Service, Climatological Data, Vol.I 66, No. 13, 1960.

I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Environmental Impact Appraisal Relatedto Further Decontamination Action at the Latty Avenue Site," Docket No.

• 40-8035 (draft report), 1981.

I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-2722, "Radiological Survey ofthe West Lake Landfill St. Louis County, Missouri," May 1982.

I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Disposal or Onsite Storageof Thorium or Uranium Wastes From Past Operations, Branch Technical Position"

I 46 FR 52061, October 23, 1981.

IIIIIII

6-3

I

In" _.s THE^ ENERGY MEASUREMENTS GROUP K!"!!3IE

II

U ; ; 2 < t .

EGG-1183-1721 . UCG!Jii[£ifUC-41 OHHE UNIIEDSJATES

I SEPTEMBER 1979 DEPARTMENT Of ENERGY_, __.-. ................._ . ........ . . . . — .. - ..--.-

II ~ i "

I "Jw

I

I

I

I ' •? ,-. • j . • • • • • . , . •.. . , - . - : - . . . . ... .... ... . . . . . . ... ..

I' . • ' , « f . ,

'"' ' • •'• -. : -v .,,-;>., 1

\ .•«

i V

AN AERIAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE AREA SURROUNDING THE

UD TV/O ADDITIONAL SITES

ST. LOUIS. MISSOURI DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 1977 l/l/(0|/j

H-F

I

I

I

I

•

I

I

I

VJDEC 2 01979 EGG-1183-1721

September 1979

• • • - - . . . - u t

AN AERIAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE AREA SURROUNDING THE

' MALLINCKRGDT NUCLEARI MARYLAND HSBGHT3 FACILITY

AND

| ITJO ADDITIONAL SITESST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

I DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 1977

L K. HiltonProject Scientist

c %"•• '**'•

<*''

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION

'T. P. Stuart, Manager

• Remote Sensing Sciences Department

This Document is UNCLASSIFIED

I G. P. StobieClassification Officer

• This work was performed by EG&G for the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission through an EAOtransfer of funds to Contract No. DE-ACO8-76NVO1183 with the United States Department of Enersy.

ABSTRACT

An aerial radiological survey to measure terrestrial gamma radiation was carried out over the MallinckrodtNuclear Maryland Heights Facility during October 1977.

At the same time the following properties were also surveyed: a parcel near 9200 West Latty Avenue, whichincluded a portion of St. Louis International Airport; and land used by West Lake Landfill, Inc.. which is 8 kmnorthwest of the airport.

Gamma ray data were collected by flying parallel lines 60 m apart. The total area surveyed over the threesites was 7.4 km2.

Processed data indicated that detected radioisotopes and their associated gamma ray exposure rates wereconsistent with those expected from normal background emitters, except at certain locations described inthis report.

Average exposure rates 1 m above the ground, as calculated from aerial data, are presented in the form ofan isopleth map. No ground sample data were taken at the time of the aerial survey.

IIIIII

IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

CONTENTS

Abstract 3

Sections

1.0 Introduction 7

2.0 Survey Area History and Location 7

3.0 Survey Method and Airborne Equipment

4.0 Data Processing Methods 7

5.0 Discussion and Results 11

5.1 Mallinckrodt Nuclear Facility 13

5.2 Latty Avenue and Airport 15

5.3 West Lake Landfill 17

Figures

1 Flight Lines: Mallinckrodt Nuclear 6

2 Flight Lines: Latty Avenue 8

3 Flight Lines: West Lake Landfill 9

4 Hughes H-500 Helicopter Containing the REDAR System 10

5 Mobile Computer Processing Laboratory 11

6 Gross Count Rate Isopleths - Aerial Data —Mallinckrodt Nuclear Site 12

7 Background-Subtracted Energy Spectrum: Mallinckrodt Nuclear Site 13

8 Exposure Rate Isopleths: Latty Avenue 14

9 Background-Subtracted Energy Spectrum: Latty Avenue 15

10 Exposure Rate Isopleths: West Lake Landfill 1611 Background-Subtracted Energy Spectrum: West Lake Landfill 17

References 19

I1

I

s \

IIII

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The United States Department of Energy (OOE)maintains an aerial surveillance operation calledthe Aerial Measuring System (AMS).' AMS isoperated for DOE by EG&G. This continuingnationwide program, started in 1958. involvessurveys to monitor radiation levels in and aroundfacilities producing, utilizing, or storingradioactive materials. The purpose of the surveyis to document, at a given point in time, thelocation of all areas containing gamma emittingradioactivity (visible at the surface), and to aidlocal personnel in evaluating the magnitude andspatial extent of any radioactive contaminantsreleased into the environment. At the request ofDOE, or other federal and/or state agencies (suchas the United States Nuclear RegulatoryCommission), AMS is deployed for various aerialsurvey operations.

AMS was utilized during the period 22-28October 1977 to radiometrically survey an area1.6 km2 centered on the Mallinckrodt NuclearMaryland Heights Facility. Also surveyed was anarea 3.2 km2 surrounding 9200 West LattyAvenue, which included a portion of the St. LouisInternational Airport A third site surveyed was a2.6 km2 area centered on property operated byWest Lake Landfill. Inc.. 8 km northwest of theairport.

The St. Louis International Airport was the surveybase of operation.

2.0 SURVEY AREA HISTORYAND LOCATION

The Mallinckrodt Nuclear Maryland HeightsFacility is located at 2703 Wagoner Place, St.Louis, Missour i . This plant rece ivesradioisotopes from various vendors and convertsthem to radio pharmaceutical materials. Radio-isotopes which they handle include 13II, w'Tc.•"Mo, «Se. and "Fe. Mallinckrodt Nuclear is aDivision of Mallinckrodt, Inc. (formerly,Mallinckrodt Chemical Works). Mallinckrodt. Inc.acquired the Maryland Heights facility from•Nuclear Consultants. Inc. in 1965.

It is reported in an ORNL report2 and a NRCreport' that during the period 1942 through thelate 1950's Mallinckrodt Chemical Works of St.Louis processed uranium ore. Some of the ore

residues and processed wastes were stored onthe airport property.

In early 19GG these ore residues and uranium-bearing processed wastes were moved from theairport property by the Continental Mining andMilling Company of Chicago. Illinois to the LattyAvenue site.

In January, 1967 the Commercial DiscountCorporation of Chicago, Illinois purchased theresidues; much of the material was then dried andshipped to the Cotter Corporation facilities inCanon City, Colorado. The source materialremaining at the Latty Avenue site was sold to theCotter Corporation in December. 1969. Recordsindicate that residues remaining on the site at thattime included 74,000 tons of Belgian Congopitchblende raffinate containing about 113 tonsof uranium; 32,500 tons of Colorado raffinatecontaining about 48 tons of uranium: and 8.700tons of leached barium sulfate containina about 7tons of uranium. During the period Augustthrough November. 1970 Cotter Corporationdried some of the remaining residues andshipped them to their mill in Canon City,Colorado. By December, 1970 an estimated10.000 tons of Colorado raffinate and 8.700 tonsof leached barium sulfate remained at the LatlyAvenue site.

In April, 1974 a NRC inspector was informed thatthe remaining Colorado raffinate had beenshipped in mid-1973 to Canon City withoutoryir.g ana (hat the leached barium sulfate'hadbeen transported to a landfill area in St. Louis'County. A reported 12 to 18 inches of topsoil hadbeen stripped from the Latty Avenue site: thissupposedly had been removed with the leachedbarium sulfate. However, analyses of soilsamples taken during a NRC investigation of theLatty Avenue site in 1976 indicated the presenceof uranium- and thorium-bearing residues.

The West Lake Landfill property is located off St.Charles Rock Road near Taussig Road,approximately 8 km northwest of the airport.

3.0 SURVEY METHOD ANDAIRBORNE EQUIPMENT

An enlarged aerial photo of each site was used tolay out the survey flight lines (Figures 1. 2. and3). The navigator visually directed the aircraft

'Formerly Aerial Measuring Systom (ARMS).

8

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

> *X tot tMt 1«en gflpp fEET

•'• ' i i " ' i I •• tM 2BQ 309 400 ECO «0 NCTEfM

Figure 2. FLIGHT LINES: LATTY AVENUC

g1

lo

a

..__.

\\

10

IIIIIIIIIIIIII

along the programmed flight lines on thephotograph. The survey pattern consisted ofparallel lines at 60m intervals. Flight altitude was60 m.

A Hughes H-500 helicopter was utilized for thesurvey (Figure 4). The H-500 carried a crew oftwo: pilot and navigator. The helicopteremployed a lightweight version of the Radiationand Environmental Data Acquisition andRecorder system (REDAR). Two pods weremounted on the sides of the helicopter: each podcontained ten 12.7 cm diameter by 5.1 cm heightNal(TI) detectors. Gamma ray signals from the20 detectors were summed and routed throughan anaiog-to-digital converter and a piilso-heightanalyzer. Gamma spectra were accumulated in3-second intervals and recorded on 1/2 inchmagnetic tape.

This helicopter position was established with twosystems: a Trisponder/202A Microwave HangingSystem (MRS), and an AL-101 radioaltimeter. The trisponder master station

mounted in the helicopter interrogated tworemote transceivers mounted on towers outsid.the survey area. By measuring the round trippropagation time between the master and remotostations, the master computed the distance toeach. These distances were recorded onmagnetic tape each second; in subsequentcomputer processing these were converted toposition coordinates.

The radio altimeter similarly measured the timelag for the return of a pulsed signal and convertedthis to aircraft altitude. For altitudes up to 150 m.the accuracy was ± 6.6 m or ± 2%, whichever isgreater. These data were also recorded onmagnetic tape so that any variations in gammasignal strength caused by altitude fluctuationcould be accurately compensated.

The detectors and electronic systems whichaccumulate and record the data are describedonly briefly here. They are described inconsiderable detail in a previous report.1

Flflurtt HUGHES H~SOO HELICOPTER CONTAINING THE

I 11

Ij

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

4.0 DATA PROCESSING

Data processing was done with the Radiation andEnvironmental Data Analyzer and Computersystem (REDAC). This is a computer analysislaboratory mounted in a mobile van (Figure 5).

REDAC consists primarily of two Cipher Datatape drives, a Data General NOVA 840 computer,two Calcomp plotters, and a Tektronics CRTdisplay screen. The computer has a 32 k-wordcore memory and an additional 1.2 x lO^-worddisc memory. An extensive collection ofsoftware routines is available for data processing.

The gross count data were corrected for systemdead time and altitude deviation. Corrections tothe gross count rates were also made forcontributions from radon, aircraft background,

and cosmic rays. Flights over the Missouri Riverwere used for this purpose.

The corrected gross count rates were convertedto exposure rates at 1 m altitude, with the factor

^1024 counts per second (cps) per ^/R/h obtainedfrom calibration data over a Nevada test range.

5.0 DISCUSSION AND RESULTSAnalysis of the radiological data taken over thearea surrounding each of the sites discussed inthis report indicates that the terrestrial/adioisotopes and associated gamma rayexposure rates were consistent with the naturalbackground normally found within areas having asimilar geological basis. These backgroundexposure rates were in the 8-11 pR/h range,including 3.7 //R/h due to cosmic rays.

r"~M

.S

f i

^TuFigure 5. MOBILE COMPUTER

1^" 3A

PROCESSING LABORATORY

12

«JF

———i———i———i* IW

1.I1TEBLABU

A

BC

" 5_

~~~rCH1JK

LMNO

-"p -•oRsTUVW

cnsfr-.r 3 «: t..- wftn

(• a:• t • .

" }t• li

4 »

• 6 :- 14

M •.

i : ' t1 \

~- 4 : .51

• .V. .• i: •• 1 4 •

4 . 1» .

9 ?66 • 316 • SO •

:j-10'

•51 — _

IV~"O-10-10*10-'a-T?'10"1?'

If

•9I01

10-\y1C"icr10"ttC

'Numbed are idjurea to • M OeteCIortrilem Levels <co>t ' R n«vt »r.nOMiing ••io> 0^« !o P.IW p.> -O

Ground level iti.eiil.ng t^r'Ounct me

^__^_^_^_^_^_____<^

c5

-< Ol

? on -D11o O2«

s o

3o

0 0P> 0

§mato

COUNTS PER CHANNEL10 6 COUNTS FULL SCALE

8

n2n

n

» «• >i -r _ * * •• *^ * •'Is *°§?is:^'i~i^'»(Q(O«>^. — (B1-« 3 B- 3 *8 S ' 5' 3- «g | § S S ' ^«

Ifflfil^llsK- 5T« z 5S|8?&S|fwwC < / > _ Q , J 5. 3" — 3 1Q

SL5'noQ.

3 - " ; f { f l = ; 0 3 ( i >

•n £ » 2. 5 o 'O ~ CD * to (1)5 "> S[ O CT -•

^k •*

2-0

o0>u>W w o

O' 3

(D

Ǥ

_ O

14

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

GROSS COUNTCONVERSION SCALE

GAMMA -EXPOSURE RATE

1m LEVEL

d*ucubto fwia-oi.m tliitudi «no

lo m» 1 m .IndudM IT^Vhr cnmie tuition.

200 M) 400 HO MO METCftl

Figure 8. EXPOSURE M TE ISOPLE THS: LATTYA VENUE

I 5.2 Latty Avenue and Airport

t ujure 8 presents the exposure rate isoplethssuperimposed on an aerial photograph of thesite. Figure 9 is a background-subtracted energyspectrum of the radiation characteristics of bothareas of increased activity. Radiation from 2MBiaccounts for all the major photopeaks observed.

This isopleth map (Figure 8) is based on grosscounts (integral counts in the energy region

between .05 MeV and 3 MeV). The factor used toconvert these counts to the exposure rate at the 1m level was determined from measurements at acalibration site containing a typical mix ofnaturally occurring radionuclidcs. Since thespectrum shown in Figure 9 is different from atypical natural spectrum, the conversion factormay be in error. The isopleths, which representground level exposure rates for distributedsources, are consistent with sources whoselateral dimensions are a few hundred feet.

1.0

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

+.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 e.s 3.0

ENERGY CMEV)Figure 9. BACKGROUND-SUBTRACTED ENERGY SPECTRUM: LATTY AVENUE

This spectrum ol gamma radiation was characteristic ol the areas ol increased activity at Latty Avenue and the airport asthown in Figure &

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

5.3 West Lake LandfillFigure 10 presents the exposure rate isoplelhssuperimposed on an aerial photograph of thesite. Figure 11 is a background-subtracted

1.0

energy spectrum of the radiation characteristic cboth areas of increased activity. Radiation froi2"Bi accounts for all the major photopeakobserved.

4.0 4.5 1.0 1.5 2.0ENERGY CMEV)

2.5 3.0

FIgur* 11. BACKGROUND-SUBTRACTED ENERGY SPECTRUM: WEST LAKE LANDFILLPhotopoaks shown here characterize both areas ol enhanced activity in Figure 10.

IIIIIIIIII

19

REFERENCES

1. Boyns, P. K. July 1976. The Aerial Radiological Measuring System (ARMS): Systems, Procedures,and Sensitivity (1976). Report No. EGG-1163-1691. Las Vegas. NV: EG&G.

2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. September 1977. Radiological Survey ol the Properly at9200 Larty Avenue, Haietwood, Missouri, Jnlerim Report. Oak Ridge, TN.

3. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Office of Inspection and Enforcement. 20 October 1976.Investigation Report No. 76-01. Glen Ellyn, IL.

DISTRIBUTION

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

1

I

I

NRC

8. H. Weiss (15)

DOE/OES

L J. Deal (5)

DOE/MA

R. E. Lounsbury (1)

DOE/TIC

T. B. Abernathy (2)

DOE/NV

H. F. Hahn, EMO (1)D. G. Jackson (3)J. A. Koch (1)R. R. Loux (1)J. K. Magruder (1)R. B. Purcell (2)

H&N

W. E. Anderson (1)

LBL

H. A. Wollenberg (1)

EG&G

H. M. Borella, SBO (2)J. F. Doyle. LVAO (1)W.A. Frankhauser. WAMD (3)L A. Franks, SBO (1)L K. Hilton. LVAO (1)H. A. Lamonds. SBO (1)R. L. Lynn. SBO (1)T. G. Maguire, WAMD (1)R. A. Mohr. SBO (1)L. G. Sasso. LVAO (1)G. R. Shipman. WAMD (1)G. P. Stobie, LVAO (1)E. J. Story, LVAO (1)T. P. Stuart, LVAO (1)W.J. Tipton, LVAO (1)G.G. Widner. LVAO (1)

LIBRARIES

AMO (50)Las Vegas (1)Santa Barbara (2)

MALLINCKRODT NUCLEAR MARYLAND HEIGHTSFACILITY

AND TWO ADDITIONAL SITESST. LOUIS. MISSOURI

EGG-1183-1721DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 1977

DATE OF REPORT. SEPTEMBER 1979

X111111111111111111I

&EPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITETENTATIVE DISPOSITION

File this form in the regional Hazardous Waste LOJSystemTHazardous Waste Enforcement Task Force

FIECION SITE N U M B E R

VTT MnnnTQQnoQ??File and submit • copy to: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Site Trucking(EN-335*. 401 U St.. SV; Washington. DC 20460.

I. SITE IDENTIFICATIONA. S I T E M A U £

Westlake LandfillC. C I T Y

Bridgeton

H. STREET

13570 St.0. STATE

Mo.

Charles Rock Rd.E. ZIP CODE

63044II. T E N T A T I V E DISPOSITION

Indicate the recommended sclionfs) and aeencyfies) that should be Involved by marking 'Ti' In the approoriale boxes.

R E C O M M E N D A T I O NM

A. NO A C T I O N N E E D E D - NO H A Z A R D

B. I N V E S T I G A T I V E ACTIONtSl NEEDED (11 r". eomp/»t« S.eHon III.)

C. R E M E D I A L ACTION N E E D E D r// r**. compl*« Section IV.)

E N F O R C E M E N T A C T I O N N E E D E DO. b« primarily manfftdtiy ih* EPA or

(II )••«, tpfdlr In Parr £ whelhmr Ih* c*mm milllh» Star* anrf what typt of •n/ore«n»nr action

A A I C X * E P A

';":.

X

ACTION AGENCYI T A T C L O C A L • P H I V A T C

• . '•'••'• . . • • . ' • ' • • " -''^-_ "-.

E: R A T I O N A L E FOR D I S P O S I T I O N

Dioxin has not been discovered at this site in any of the sampling efforts, nor does then

appear to be a problem with any of the 'standard* hazardous wastes. There is strong

evidence of radioactive components above acceptable limits in the landfill. No ofj-site

migration of these components is apparent. Strategy for this site is uncertain, ij*F . I N D I C A T E T H E E S T I M A T E D D A T E O F F I N A L DISPOSITION

(mo., dmy, At yr.)

H . P R E P A R E R I N F O R M A T I O N

1. N A M E

Steven Kinser

G. IF A CASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS NECESSARY. I N D I C A T E THEE S T S M A T E D D A T E ON WHICH THE PLAN W I L L BE D E V E L O P E D(cio., d»r. a, r'.)

1. TELEPHONE N U M B E R

913-236-2856i. o» T c fmo.. d*r, * r'-) .11-06-85

111. I N V E S T I G A T I V E ACTIVITY N E E D E DA. I D E N T I F Y A D D I T I O N A L I N F O R M A T I O N N E E D E D TO ACHIEVE A F I N A L DISPOSITION.

See Above.4

8. PROPOSED I N V E S T I G A T I V E ACTIVITY (D*l*H*il Inlomfllon)

i . M E T H O D FOR O B T A I N I N GN E E D E D A D D I T I O N A L INFO.a . T V P E O F J I T E I N S P E C T I O N

I I I

III

1111

b. T v » E OF M O N I T O R I N G

I I I

• "'

C. T T f f. Of 3 A M P I . I M C

'• 1

2 . S C H E O U L E DD A T E OFACTION

(mo.dfr.oi ft)

^RECTf ^

3. TO BCP E R F O R M E D BY(EPA. Con-

trmctor. Stmim, arc.)

/

4.ESTIMATEDM A N H O U R S

S. R E M A R K S

i

cpJPERFUNC"

.r.\; 7 'i9^--sUV '

SITE LOC-

WoM onvJf».~ 1:070-4 (10-7?) Continue On R«nr««

• ^ Page 1 of 2MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOuKCL

* - DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY• LABORATORY SERVICES PROGRAM

I REPORT OF SAMPLE ANALYSIS" m LANDFILL MONITORING PROJECT

T

| HAME OF FACILITY West LakeSAMPLES COLLECTED BY Mffr* Mrv-nTn

• ' NOTE:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION1 DATE COLLECTED• SAMPLE NUMBER

I pH UnitsSpecific Cond. (unhos/cm

€ 25° C)

lligrams per literBOD

I CODNH.. as NHOJ+N02 as N

^Total P•Total Sulfide

.TOC

•

Total CyanideHon-Filterable Residue (SS)Filterable Residue (TDS) '

^Alkalinity as CaC03•Fluoride ^^Chloride j.£0 V^ulfatehardness as CaCO^ (Ca, Mg, Fe,™ Zn, Mn)Potassium/ Dissolved

•ftodium, DissolvedKalciun, DissolvedHagnesium/ Dissolved

1Icrograms per liter•adniuu. Dissolved 10•hromium, DissolvedCopper/ Dissolved•ron/ Dissolved / jog/1 1?> "^lead/ Dissolved T°^1 ^^

Manganese/ Dissolved $0 ***Mercury/ Dissolved•ickel, DissolvedZinc', Dissolved , ay /IArsenic / Dissolved —•- ••liver, Dissolved _.• ^Quantity not sufficient \^-• ^^ ^*± * ft » ~. . \ _ ^ J^ A •*• » •

Well #4120-1-5080-7418

6.34000

»

X J?29.60.31J.OO0.07

63 !l^.0.01

1262744690

0.17

22002450

22.3265-42993

7.2

52.08

4670CtfS*220

9.72 -

0.4

LandfillDATE(S)

Veil #4020-1-5050-7419

6.72450

-•^12 '25 ."5O-.09

-tf.0.05O.D3

-£0.137.6

^0.012625J9

• 500

" 7.07277591

7.633.826643

"-

0.6

52.82

3

2320

^.203.50

10-1-80

Sahn Farmhouse Well20-1-5050-7420

6.72000

* :

..... . . . . . . . . .££ .

* ———— ~ 90.9^"0.150.47

- 0.03-<^0.1

67.3^.0.01

300496J60 .

———— .... 0.61"2.0

- —— - ————— 44399 •

6.96.212223

0.2

^•23.23

2

770oits*

0.05

ren_ro/c_c

| ~ Page 2 of 2MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

• D I V I S I O N O F ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYLABORATORY SERVICES PROGRAM

1 REPORT OF SAMPLE ANALYSISLANDFILL MONITORING PROJECT

1 NAME OF FACILITY West Lake LandfillSAMPLES COLLECTED BY vike Lincoln

1 NOTE:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

1 DATE COLLECTEDSAMPLE NUMBER

(H Unitspecific Cond. (umhos/cm

S 25<> C)

JBLligrams per literBOD

KODmii. as N

NOvhN02 as N

Kotal Poral Sulfide

TOC

Kotal Cyanide 'on-Filterable Residue (SS)

Filterable Residue (IDS)Alkalinity as CaCO-jVluorideChloride '•ulfate|ardness as CaCOj (Ca, Mg, Fe,

Zn, Mn)

Etassium , Dissolveddium/ DissolvedIcium, Dissolved .

Magnesium, Dissolved '|icrograms per liter

Kdmium, Dissolvedromium/ Dissolved

Copper, Dissolved•ron, Dissolved, ntg/1lead. DissolvedManganese , Dissolvedtrcury , Dissolved

ckel , DissolvedZinc , Dissolved , mg/1»senlc , Dissolved

Iver, DissolvedQuantity not sufficient

Fox Fish Market Well10-1-8080-7421

6.6950

_

:.4L 124.3

0.37«£. 0.05

0.21

^ 0.118.0

'll492396

0.427.0' •"'63

394

3.818.4110

29

0.2

44.18

2290CITS*

0.02

0.2

'

DATE(S) 10-1-80

Shallow Well 9 Bob's Auto Parts10-1-8080-7422

6.61900• • ,

-<=• 2212.10.23

^.0.056.43

^.0.135.7

^. 0.0138

918580

0.22112

84'623

10.354.5187

38' . • • i

;0.7 ;J • -• :

18.67

4 j

790 'CKS* i

-e 201.39

0.3A i i

"•$& /1V' 'Of

••• f *•-.' s**,

' •* • '

04^--<vS$yt%m^•'.rft/:'-'- ^{JC^X^^"^•Jf'<S''ft*3. ' yJ^^^ 'RW'

III

1II'

Eaport of Radionuclide Analysis ofWater Sample

Public Vater SupplyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(To be filled out by public water fupply)

PUS NameAddressCity

D?t>t7Date5#str/e0

State.

/ /^- ///*'/

// JJ* lf*-/6JM4.>(Mo.) (Day) (Year)

Zip Code,

(To be filled out by laboratory)Dept. of Community Health & Medical Care

Lab Running Sample Environ. Health LaboratoriesAddress and City 801 S. Brentvood Blvd.v Clav^on. Mo. 63105Lab ID No, . QQ260 Analyst Staff

1 ContaminantName

"CToss Alpha ParticleActivity (5pc./

dlum - 22?

Gross Beta ParticleActivity (SOpc./l

Tritium

•Strontium • 90Iodine • 131Cesium • 134

AnalysisResult

0. T

Analysis,Pate

YrSo

Analysis,Method

I This form must accompany the radionuclide cubitainer to the laboratory. The publicwater supply will be notified by the Water Supply Wild Office, U.S. B?A of theresults of the radionuclide examinations t

<II

I

I lItReport of Radionuclide Analysis of

Water SamplePublic Vater Supply

U.S. environmental Protection Agency

(To be filled out by public water eupply) t,

PVS Name• Address• City

Date 30

State.(Mo.) (Day)

Coda

(To be filled out by

Lab Running Sample ,Addresa and CityLab ID No.

>ep!!°olf^Coniirunity Health & Medical CareEnviron. Health Laboratories801 S. Brentwood Blvd^ ""

"Clayton. Mo. 63105 Analyat

ContaminantName

AnalysisResult

Analysis AnalysisMethod

Gross Alpha Particle(5pc./l

Radium - 226_Radium - 228

Gross Seta ParticleActivity (50pc./i

TritiumStrontium • 90Iodine -131Cesium

~sf>

I toDay Yr

r/z.

This form must accompany the radionuclide cubitainer to the laboratory. The publicwater supply will be notified by the Water Supply Field. Off ice, U,8, t?A of theresults of the radionuclide ejxamiaationi.

1 /j /•' ; - /«j4 f)n/«' ' . • -p /.*7 // |ly /f i •

Page 1 of 3' j. *r "** «| IfifSyftki DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURC. .

#//ISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

1.

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

JAl\]p, \/LABORATORY SERVICES

cOljn ,.tL-,.D UASTF

PROGRAM

U*u£»fi¥r D REPORT OF SAMPLE ANALYSISfBOGR4lf LANDFILL MONITORING PROJECT

NAME OF FACILITY West Lakes LandfillSAMPLES COLLECTED BY Randy CravfordNOTE:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONDATE COLLECTEDSAMPLE NUMBER

pH UnitsSpecific Cond. (unhos/cm

@ 25° C)

Milligrams per literBODCODNH. as NN03+N02 as N•Total PKB ASTotal SulfideTOCTotal CyanideNon-Filterable Residue (SS)Filterable Residue (TDS)Alkalinity as CaCOjFluorideChlorideSulfateHardness as CaCC>3 (Ca, Mg, Fe,

Zn, Mn)PotassiumSodiumCalciumMagnesiumTemperature

Micrograras per literBarium/ Dissolved Cadmium, DissolvedChromium, DissolvedCopper/ DissolvedIron/ DissolvedLead/ DissolvedSeleniun:/ DissolvedManganese/ DissolvedMercury/ DissolvedNickelZinc/ -Dissolved

-Arsenic, DissolvedSilver, Dissolved

*No unfiltered sample

Soring #110-29-8080-7125

6.6500

1664.40.840.540.210.34

25.8

So Result*No Result*

<25

0.426.579

370

6000.323

15022

1000< 0.1

7001

£0.2

DATE(S) 10-29-80

Slough on B.W. edge (grab)10-29-8080-7126

7.5745

4.413.80.040.080.07

^ 0.04

Z. 1

9366425

0.3657.8

56244

9°C

200 Total0.1 Total4.1 Total4.1 Total240 Total2 Total

4 5 Total70 Total

40.1 Total

14 Total45 Total

4. 0.1 Total

Page 2 of 3I - MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURC^.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY- LABORATORY SERVICES PROGRAM

_ ; REPORT OF SAMPLE ANALYSIS• LANDFILL MONITORING PROJECT

I NAME OF FACILITY Vest Lakes LandfillSAMPLES COLLECTED BY Randv Crawford, DATE(S)NOTE:

1 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

DATE COLLECTEDJ SAMPLE NUMBER

pH Units

•Specific Cond. (umhos/cme 25° o

1 Milligrams per literBODCOD

I NK- as NN03+N02 as N•Total PKBAS

1 Total SulfideTOCTotal Cyanide

_ Hon-Filterable Residue (SS)• Filterable Residue (TDS)

Alkalinity as CaC03

I FluorideChlorideSulfateHardness as CaC03 (Ca, Mg, Fe,

• Zn, Mn)• Potassium

Sodium

1 CalciumMagnesiumtemperature

1 Micrograms per liter• Barium

Cadaiun

1 ChromiumCopperIron

_ Lead• Seleniun| Manganese

Mercury_ Miclcel• Zinc* -Arsenic

Silver

10-30-80

Soring 92 Slack Diamond Lake (grab)

10-30-8080-7127

7.21100

637.80.220.980.370.06

33.0.15452

6844.25

0.2542.1159465

12°C

700 Dissolved1.0 Dissolved2 Dissolved

11 Dissolved400 Dissolved3 Dissolved5 Dissolved

600 Dissolved4.0.1 Dissolved

1310 Dissolved2 Dissolved

4.0.2 Dissolved

LSP-69/5-5-SO

10-30-8080-7128

7.54000

>444845108

*- 0.051.0

0.07

302

2420641000

0.5435529

718

14°C

300 Total0.2 Total12 Total1 Total

3200 Total4-1 Total*>5 Total500 Total

4.0.1 Total

238 Total5 Total

4.0.1 Total

Page 3 of 3

•MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURC.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYLABORATORY SERVICES PROGRAM

1REPORT OF SAMPLE ANALYSIS

• LANDFILL MONITORING PROJECT

NAME OF FACILITY West Lake Landfill• SAMPLES COLLECTED BY Randp Craw ford DATE(S)

•NOTE:

1 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

DATE COLLECTEDm SAMPLE NUMBER1• pH Units

Specific Cond. (umhos/cm• <§ 25° C)

Milligrams per liter

I BODCODNH. as N

|N03+N02 as N•Total PMBASTotal Sulfide

I TOCTotal CyanideNon-Filterable Residue (SS)

•

Filterable Residue (TDS)ColorAlkalinity as CaC03Fluoride

•ChlorideSulfaceHardness as CaC03 (Ca, Mg, Fe,

I Zn, Mn)PotassiumSodiumCalcium

•MagnesiumTemperature

rcrograms per literBarium, DissolvedCadmium, DissolvedChromium, Dissolved

•Copper, DissolvedIron, DissolvedLead, DissolvedSelenium, Dissolved

• Manganese, Dissolved| Mercury, Dissolved

Nickel

I Zinc, 'Dissolved-Arsenic, DissolvedSilver, Dissolved

^Instrument Failure

Boring #3 Boring #410-30-80 10-30-8080-7129 80-7130

7.0 6.71100

7 1735.1 42.20.11 0.230.22 0.060.16 0.060.07 0.06

10-30-80

Boring 85 (Along St. CharlesRock Road)

10-31-8080-7131

6.71200

916.90.020.360.100.15

Ho Result* Ho Result* No Result**

8496 7310392 2040

4.25 4.25

0.32 0.2016.4 10.2

78 37585 747

15°C 15° c

500 4000.8 1.35.6 611 7

1200 10004 23 £ 5

1100 44004.0.1 4.0.1

550 198J 2

£0.2 4.0.2

1 LSP-6Z/S-5-80

896120

4-25

0.1714.3141577

18°C

2000.944

4002

3004.0.1

1324.5

40.2

I LABOKATUKX SEKVi'Jtb fKUGXAttReport of Sample Analysis Sample No.

•Method 624

Volatile Organics

• . . CAS No. COMPOUND SAKE

•AMLE DESCRIPTION:Vestlake Landfill leachate discharge

•to Fish Pot Creek

|ate Collected: 12-14-83Collected By: Virgil Wi'esnerIffiliation: SLRO

Method: ;

jfPA. Method No. 624

1Remarks:•Analyzed 1/5/84. Sample exceeded holding

time by 8 days .

1•L - The recovery of a spike in the

sample was not wi'thin the controllimits.

JA — Not AnalyzedNR - No Result - see Remarks

t - A standard was not run and ameasurable (near MDL) peak was notfound at the expected retention time.

•I - Tentative Identification has been™ nade through a library search. An

authentic standard has ni^been run.• The esp. conic, is baa£d/on jresponse

f proved: lyY^H^f' n(r- tr-rTT"* '*~^\JaSes'H. Long, Director \

/Laboratory Services ProgramN

Vave Bedan, Waste Management Program — JBill Price, Public Drinking Water Program

1

107-02-8107-13-171-43-274-83-975-27-4

75-25-256-23-51C 8-90-775-00-3110-75-8

67-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-02

75-35-4540-59-978-87-510061-01-510061-02-6

100-41-475-09-279-34-5127-18-471-55-6

79-00-579-01-675-69-4108-88-375-01-4

Page

AcroleinAcrylonitrileBenzeneBromome thaneBromodichlorome thane

BromoformCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzene 'Chloroe thane2-Chloroethylvinyl ether

ChloroformChloroce thaneDib romo chloroce thane1, 1-Di chloroe thane1,2-Dichlo roe thane

1, 1-Dichloroethenetrans- 1 , 2-Di chloroe thene1,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 , 3-Dichloropropenetrans-1, 3-Dichloropropene

EthylbenzeneMethylene chloride1, 1, 2, 2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroe thene1, 1, 1-Tzi chloroe thane

1, 1,2-Tri chloroe thaneTri chloroe theneTrichlorofluorome thaneTolueneVinyl chloride

83-9803

RESULTS

NA. NA

26<27<3.2

<2.8<3.1<2 .4•<27<8.3

<2 9<1U<2 . 8

11<2.0

<? P5.3

<1 5NA

<•> s

<? fi15

<2. ?<2.6<•*.?

<1 ^

*1 fl

130<3L

,/

•LABORATORY StKViCtb fKOC/KAM

Reporc of Sample Analysis Sample No.

I Method 624Volatile Organics

1 CAS NO. CO:<POUJ:D NAI-EPAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

Fish Pot Creek below Sulphur Spring• Road Bridge 1000 feet

Race Collected: 12-14-83Collected By: Virgil Wiesner•affiliation: SLRO

^fethod:

EPA Method No. 624 :

•te parks:Analyzed 1/5/84. No detectable

1 contamination was found. Sampleexceeded holding time by 8 days.

KL - The recovery of a spike In thesample was not wi'thin the control

t limits.A - Not Analyzed

NR - No Result - see RemarkspID - A standard vas not run and a

measurable (near KDL) peak was notfound at the expected retention time.

fl - Tentative Identification has beenmade thseu^h a library search. An

I a u t h c n ic standard has not/treen run.The esi . cone, is bap€d on responserelate to/an interaal ybtandard.

"—**x>*"">\ 1 />f ^^4"^ ^^^•ipp roved: $Afi{AJ )^X •*zrQr7/*~&^• ^^James H. Long, DirecjttTr V

/^ Laboratory Service^Program

tis t ribSi tio^xave Bedan, Waste Management Program

Jill Price, Public Drinking Water Program

107-02-8107-13-171-43-274-83-975-27-4

75-25-256-23-51C 8-90-775-00-3110-75-8

67-66-374-87-3124-48-175-34-3107-06-02

75-35-4540-59-978-87-510061-01-510061-02-6

100-41-475-09-279-34-5127-18-471-55-6

79-00-579-01-675-69-4108-88-375-01-4

^-'

Page

AcroleinAcrylonitrileBenzeneBrococe thaneBromodichlorome thane

BromoformCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzene *Chloroethane2-Chloroethylvinyl ether

ChloroformChlorone thaneDib roco chlorome thane1, 1-Dichloroe thane1, 2-Dichloroe thane

1, 1-Dichloroethenetrans-l,2-Dichloroethene1,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 , 3-Di chlorop ropenetrans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene

EthylbenzeneKethylene chloride1, 1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethene1, 1, 1-Tri chloroethane

1, 1,2-Tri chloroethaneTrl ch lo roe th eneTrichlorofluorome thaneTolueneVinyl chloride

83-9804

RESLTTU5/1

NA- NA

<1.8<27<3.2

<2.8<3.1<2.4<27<8.3

<2.9<24<2.8<2.0.<2.0

<2.P<3.2<1.S

NA<?.S

<? . f i<">.A<1.1

, <7 4<•?.?

<7 ?<-\ n

M A<fi S<")L

_L.°f_JL_^/

11

1

9 MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

/ LABORATORY SERVICES PROGRAM

S REPORT OF SAMPLE ANALYSIS' LANDFILL MONITORING PROJECT

NAME OF FACILITY Westlakes Landfill

Page 1 of 1

Appendix A

| SAMPLES COLLECTED BY Steve Berendzen DATE(S) 6-16-81

1

1=

i

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

WOTF»yn^^rf

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONDATE COLLECTEDSAMPLE NUMBER

pH UnitsSpecific Cond. (umhos/cm

6 25° C)Milligrams per literCCDNH3 as NK03 + N02 as N .Total PhosphorusFilterable Residue (TDS)

FluorideChlorideSulfateHardness as CaC03 (Ca,Mg)

SodiumCalcium 'Magnesium

Kicrograms per literArsenicBariumBoronCadmiumChromium

CobaltCopperIronLeadManganese

MercurySeleniumSilverZinc

Well 0346-16-8181-7835

7.1

600

560.120.050.24613

0.14490430

1699'44-

<5100

<1009

< 20

< 10x 5 "'~'28,000^ 5 —970

No result<5< 1

11,000

3&j£"Well 0356-16-8181-7836

7.2

730

"• ' •951.42

<0.050.41740

0.543

<. 10630

1917050

13320

<1008

<20

<10<55,500

<52000

No result<5< 14,500

3 3Wen #386-16-8181-7833

- 6.5

620

No result0.900.090.42602

0.27.986480

1212044

<5260590.

< 2<20

<10<5220

<5430

No result<5

<10

08/0Well 0396-17-8181-7834

6.9

660

450.280.050.27782

0.244210530

2013050

<5120

<1006

<20

<10-8 — •"---.

v 16 ,000 ,<5670

Log Error<5< 11,500

III™

IIIIIIIIIIII

I

'

EXHIBIT 14-1 (Interim Report on the Proposed Ground Hater SamplingProgram for the Primary Phase of the Hydrogeologic Investigation,West Lake Landfill, St. Louis County, Missouri, October 1985

•prepared by Burns and McDonnell, Kansas City, Missouri) will beproduced at such time as it is located by Respondent.

IIII EXHIBIT 14-J (Hydrogeologic Investigation - West Lake Landfill

Preliminary Phase Report, dated January 1985 prepared by Burns andMcDonnell, Kansas City, Missouri) will be produced at such time as

• it is located by Respondent.

IIIIIIIIIiiii- rn oon

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

DUPLICATE

ST. LOUIS COUNTYDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH & MEDICAL CAREDIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH

June 1, 1976 »»276Date Number

O P E R A T I N G P E R M I T

This permit to operate the equipment/process(es)described below is granted to:

____________West Lake QuarryName

____________13570 St. Charles Rock RoadLocation of Equipment

Such operation to be pursuant to the conditions setout in Operating Permit Application No. :

Equipment/Process(es)

#1 Asphalt Batching Plant

Cyclone Collector

Model: 270 & 370

99.8* Efficiency

Stack/Vent Identification

DirectorAir FolluMon Control Branch

(This Pemit to be visibly affixed or placed in .accordance with Section 612.120 St. Louis County AirPollution Control Code.) Ten Dollar ($10.00) fee paid.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

ST. LOUIS COUNTYDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH & MEDICAL CAREDIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH

August 7. 1979 04559Date Number

O P E R A T I N G P E R M I T

This permit to operate the equipment/process(es)described below is granted to:

__________Westlake Quarry & Material___________Name

__________St. Charles Rock Road & Tanggig Rr»adLocation of Equipment

Such operation to be pursuant to the conditions setout in Operating Permit Application No.:______2691

Equipment/Process(es)______________________

___________Dust Suppression System___________

___________Make; Johnson-March_____________

___________600 tons/hour___________________

Stack/Vent Identification

N/A

istajgrt DirectorAir Pollution Control Branch

(This Permit to be visibly affixed or placed inaccordance with Section 61?. 120 St. Louir, County AirPollution Control Code.) Ten Dollar (510.00) fee paid,

0019

IIIIIIIIII

II

I

ST. LOUIS COUNTYDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH & MEDICAL CAREDIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SECTION

August 1 0 . 1 9 8 7 Q G 5 5 8 3Date Number

OPERATING PERMIT

This permit to operate the equipment/process(es) describedbelow is granted to:

_________West Lake Quarry________________________________Name

________13500 St. CHarles Rock Rd._________________Location of Equipment

Such operation to be pursuant to the conditions set out inOperating Permit Application No.___6887____________

Equipment/Process (es ) _

Mineral Storage Silo

Asphalt Plant til

Baghouse-AOQ SCFM

Enforceable Permit Conditions

Stack/Vent Identification

oades,' Program ManagerBlaine J.Air Poll

(This permit to be visibly affixe or placed in accordancewith Section 612.120 St. Louis County Air Pollution Con-trol Code.) Fee paid $ _____

0010

_ STATE OF MISSOURI• '•

I

I

I

I

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESMISSOURI CLEAN WATER COMMISSION

AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE• UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE• ELIMINATION SYSTEM

In compliance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public Law 92-500, 92nd Congress, (hereinafter, theI Act) as amended, and the Missouri Clean Water Law, (Chapter 644 R.S. Mo. Cum. Supp. 19R6, hereinafter, the Law).

Permit No. MO-0108634 Applicant No. MO-0108634

I Owner West Lake Quarry and Material Company

Owner's Address: 12976 st- Charles Rock Road, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044

• Facility Name: West Lake Quarry and Material Company

Facility Address: 13570 St. Charles Rock Road, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044

Legal Description: U ' S - SurveY 131/ (NW 1/4, SW 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 31 projected), T46N,

I R5E, St. Louis CountyReceivin<> Stream & Basin: Unnamed tributary to Missouri River(10300200-04-00) (Missouri River and Eastern Tributaries Basin)

_ is authorized to discharge from the facility described herein, in accordance with the effluent l imitations and• monitoring requirements as set forth herein:

FACILITY DESCRIPTIONOutfall #001 - Limestone Quarry

Storm water runoff.Design flow is 700 gallons per minute/occurrence.

III

This permit only authorizes wastewater discharges under the NatiorpPolmfcHit Discharge Elimination System: itI does not apply to other regulated areas. This permit may be appealed! in accordance with Section 644.051.6 of the• ' 'Law.

December 30. 1988Kliective Dme Freci^AL^-BTurmer. Ph.D.

DicmorJp^partmeht of Natural Resources

October 31, 1993_ Kxpinuion I X i U 1 Permit Administrator tor Missouri Clean Watci) Commission

I ———

A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS HAGE NUMBER 2 of 3PERMIT NUMBER MO-0108634

The permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) with serial number(s) as specified in the application for this permit. The finaleffluent limitations shall become effective upon issuance and remain ineffect until expiration of the permit. Such discharges shall be controlled, limited, and monitored by the permittee as specified below:

OUTFALL NUMBERAND EFFLUENTPARAMETER(S)

Outfall #001

Flovj-m3/Day

Settleable Solids

Non-Filterable ResiiTotal Suspended So

pH - Units

* Monitoring requi

** pH is measured iof 6.0-9.0.

UNITS

MGD

ml/l/hr

ue mg/1ids)

SU

ement onl

\ pH units

MONITORING REPORTS SHALL SE SUBMITTHERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOA

FINAL EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

DAILYMAXIMUM

*

1.0

45

**

F

and is not

WEEKLYAVERAGE

to be avera<

rpn quarterlyTING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN

MONTHLYAVERAGE

*

30

**

ed. The pH

; THE FIRST REPCOTHER THAN TRA

MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

MEASUREMENT SAMPLEFREQUENCY TYPE

each occurrence estimateof total

once/each graboccurrence

once/each graboccurrence

once/each graboccurrence

is limited to the range

IRT is nuF 4-28-89CE AMOUNTS.

B. STANDARD CONDITIONSIN ADDITION TO SPECIFIEDSTANDARD CONDITIONS DfFULLY SET FORTH HEREIN

CONDITIONS STATED HEREIN, THIS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO THE A1TEr Ortober 1 19 _8Q Af

TArwpp Part IsID HEREBY INCORPORATED AS THOUGH

I

MO 780-0010 (4-87)

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Page 3 of 3Permit No. MO-0108634

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

1. Within one year of the issuance date of this permit, the permittee shall submit a.completed CMC 105 Form C. All required analytical results shall be submitted.

2. This permit may be modified, or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to comply withany applicable effluent standard or limitation issued or approved under Sections301(b)(2) (C), and (D), 304(b)(2) and 307(a)(2) of the Clean Water Act, if theeffluent standard or limitation so issued or approved:

(a) Contains different conditions or is otherwise more stringent than any effluentlimitation in the permit; or

(b) Controls any pollutant not limited in the permit.

The permit as modified or reissued under this paragraph shall also contain any otherrequirements of the Act then applicable.

3. Permittee shall insure that leachate and storm water runoff from the adjacentLaidlaw, Inc. Landfill shall not be discharged through Outfall #001.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

EXHIBITS 19-A THROUGH 19-WWW

MINUTES OF CORPORATE DIRECTORS' MEETINGS

Produced simultaneous with, and attached separately to, the104(e) Response of West Lake Quarry and Material Company are copiesof minutes of corporate directors' meetings. Respondent herebyasserts a confidentiality claim with respect to these minutes,pursuant to §§104(e)(7)(E) and (F) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.§§9604(e)(7)(E) and (F), Section 3007(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.§6927(b), and 40 C.F.R. 2.203(b). Following is a listing of allthe minutes, together with the dates covered by each, respectively.

18-A: Minutes of Special Meeting of Directors of West LakeQuarry and Material Company, August 1, 1966

19-B: Minutes of Special Joint Meeting of The Board ofDirectors and Shareholders of West Lake Quarry andMaterial Company, June 30, 1971

19-C: Minutes of Special Meeting of Board of Directors of WestLake Quarry and Material Company, Inc., July 1, 1972

19-D: Minutes of Special Meeting of Board of Directors of WestLake Quarry and Material Company, Inc., December 28, 1972

19-E: Minutes of Special Meeting of Board of Directors of WestLake Quarry and Material Company, Inc., May 1, 1974

19-F: Minutes of Special Meeting of Board of Directors of WestLake Quarry and Material Company, Inc., March 18, 1975

19-G: Minutes of Special Meeting of Board of Directors of WestLake Quarry and Material Company, Inc., March 16, 1976

19-H: Minutes of Special Meeting of Board of Directors of WestLake Quarry and Material Company, Inc., March 15, 1977

19-1: Minutes of Special Meeting of Board of Directors of WestLake Quarry and Material Company, Inc., September 14,1977

19-J: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of The Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, January 28, 1986

19-K: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, March 25, 1986

19-L: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, April 29, 1986

19-M: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, June 24, 1986

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

19-N: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, July 29, 1986

19-O: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, August 26, 1986

19-P: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, September 23, 1986

19-Q: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, October 28, 1986

19-R: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, November 25, 1986

19-S: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, January 27, 1987

19-T: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, February 24, 1987

19-U: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, March 26, 1987

19-V: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, April 30, 1987

19-W: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, June 2, 1987

19-X: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, June 30, 1987

19-Y: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, August 5, 1987

19-Z: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, September 4, 1987

19-AA: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, October 2, 1987

19-BB: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, October 2, 1987

19-CC: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, November 24, 1987

19-DD: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWestlake Quarry and Material Company, December 30, 1987

19-EE: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWest Lake Quarry and Material Company, January 28, 1988

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

19-FF: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWest Lake Quarry and Material Company, March 4, 1988

19-GG: Unanimous Consent of Directors of West Lake Quarry andMaterial Company in Lieu of Annual Meeting of Board ofDirectors, March 16, 1988

19-HH: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors ofWest Lake Companies, April 8, 1988

19-11: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, April 28, 1988

19-JJ: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, June 2, 1988

19-KK: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, July 8, 1988

19-LL: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, August 19, 1988

19-MM: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, September 29, 1988

19-NN: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, November 4, 1988

19-OO: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, November 17, 1988

19-PP: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, December 21, 1988

19-QQ: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, February 6, 1989

19-RR: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, February 22, 1989

19-SS: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, March 22, 1989

19-TT: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, April 26, 1989

19-UU: Statement of Unanimous Written Consent of Directors ofWest Lake Quarry and Material Company in Lieu of Meetingof Board of Directors, May 25, 1989

19-W: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, May 30, 1989

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

19-WW: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, June 23, 1989

19-XX: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, July 26, 1989

19-YY: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, September 8, 1989

19-ZZ: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, September 22, 1989

19-AAA: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, October 25, 1989

19-BBB: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, December 8, 1989

19-CCC: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, January 2, 1990

19-DDD: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, January 25, 1990

19-EEE: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, February 28, 1990

19-FFF: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, March 28, 1990

19-GGG: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, April 20, 1990

19-HHH: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, May 29, 1990

19-111: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, June 29, 1990

19-JJJ: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, August 14, 1990

19-KKK: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, September 24, 1990

19-LLL: Minutes, Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, October 19, 1990

19-MMM: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, October 31, 1990

19-NNN: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, November 28, 1990

II 19-OOO: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of The

West Lake Companies, December 20, 1990

_ 19-PPP: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of The• West Lake Companies, January 31, 1991

19-QQQ: Certified Copy of Corporate Resolution of West Lake• Quarry and Material Company, February 28, 1991

19-RRR: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of The• West Lake Companies, March 6, 1991

19-SSS: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, March 27, 1991

• 19-TTT: Minutes, Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, April 22, 1991

| 19-UUU: Minutes, Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, April 23, 1991

1 19-VW: Certified Copy of Corporate Resolution of West LakeQuarry and Material Company, April 30, 1991

1 19-WWW: Minutes, Monthly Meeting of the Board of Directors of TheWest Lake Companies, June 5, 1991

IIIIIIII

II

I1

PHASE H INVESTIGATION FINAL REPORT

U.S. REAL ESTATE DIVISIONFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES

EARTH CITY, MISSOURI

DAMES & MOORED&M Job No. 19943-002-045

June 26, 1990

Exhibrt-

A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

11701 BORMAN DRIVE. SUITE 340. ST. LOUIS. MISSOURI 63146(314)993-4599 FAX NO. (314)993-4895

II DAMES &. MOORE

IJune 14, 1990

I•

Mr. John BasilicoUnited States Real EstateFord Financial Group

1 13517 Lake Front DriveEarth City, MO 63045-1414

I KE: Phase H Site InvestigationFflrth fitv Pffmprtv Aiiia*

• Dear Mr. Basilico:

I Enclosed for your information are two (2) copies of the Phase n Site Investigation final™ report for the above referenced property.

I Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this report in any way, please do nothesitate to contact Ms. Linda Black or myself.

• Very truly yours,

_ DAMES &. MOORE• A Professional Limited Partnership

Earth City Property Adjacent to West Lake LandfillDames & Moore Job No.: 19943-002-045

i " F. Ya/da, P.E.ier (Ltd.)

jj Managing Principal

Igfv/kenEnclosure

OFfi-'E? WOl

PHASE H INVESTIGATION REPORT

U.S. REAL ESTATE DIVISIONFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES

EARTH CITY, MISSOURI

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

II

I

ji

II

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.1 Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.2 Project History Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.3 Scope of Work Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2.0 OVERLAND GAMMA SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.1 Field Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . 42.2 Investigation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

3.0 SOIL SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.1 Field Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2 Investigation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

4.0 SEDIMENT SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74.1 Field Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74.2 Investigation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

5.0 SOIL BORINGS/DOWNHOLE GAMMA LOGGING . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.1 Field Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.2 Investigation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

6.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96.1 Monitoring Well Isolation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96.2 Sample Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106.3 Investigative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

7.0 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117.1 Radiological Investigations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117.2 Inorganic and Organic Chemical Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TJST OF TABLES

Table 1 - Overland Gamma Radiation Survey MeasurementsTable 2 - Volumes & Preservatives - Soil & Sediment SamplesTable 3 - Soil Samples - Organic & Inorganic Data SummaryTable 4 - Soil Samples - Radiologic Data SummaryTable 5 - Sediment Samples - Organic & Inorganic Data SummaryTable 6 - Sediment Samples - Radiologic Data SummaryTable 7 - Downhole Gamma Radiation MeasurementsTable 8 - Volumes and Preservative - Water SamplesTable 9 - Water Samples Organic and Inorganic Data SummaryTable 10 - Water Samples Radiological Data SummaryTable 11 - Sample Reanalysis Data

APPENDICES

Appendix A - Certificates of CalibrationAppendix B - Chain-of-Custody RecordsAppendix C - Laboratory Analytical DataAppendix D - Soil Boring LogsAppendix E - Well Construction DiagramsAppendix F - Groundwater Field Measurements

iD&M Job No. 19943-002-045

June 14, 1990

•'•1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

In April, 1990, Ford Financial Services Group, U.S. Real Estate authorized Dames &Moore to proceed with a Phase n Site Investigation to further document pre-transactionconditions at property adjacent to a proposed National Priorities List (NPL) site. This reportpresents a summary of the field techniques employed during this investigation and conclusionsbased upon analytical results from collected samples.

1.1 Executive Summary

The Phase n Site Investigation involved a more in-depth investigation of organic,inorganic, and radiological contamination of the Ford Property that is believed to be related tothe adjacent West Lake Landfill. Upon review and evaluation of all information obtained fromthis investigation, several concluding remarks can be made which best summarize this effort.

First, the gamma radiation survey conducted on surface soils in areas north and west ofthe West Lake Landfill (i.e., areas which receive a large amount of surface runoff from thelandfill) indicated that there is no significant surface radiological contamination present.Radiological contamination present within the landfill, therefore, does not appear to havecontributed any significant contamination due to surface runoff to the 23 acres surveyed.

Second, in addition to the surface soil survey just described which required the use ofa direct-reading meter, surface soil samples where also collected from 0-12 inches in depth fromproperty locations adjacent to the landfill and submitted for more in depth chemical andradiological analysis. Soil samples were collected in locations where contamination wassuspected from the Phase I effort and in locations where contamination might reasonably beexpected. Although very low levels (parts per billion) of organic contamination were providedin the analytical report for the two soil sample composites, these values were actually below theanalytical limit of detection and are, consequently, not significant. Of all the soil samplescollected (a total of 20), only the samples collected from the two (2) locations where radiologicalcontamination had been indicated from the Phase I investigation had radiological contamination(i.e., the biased samples). No further surface radiological contamination beyond these biasedlocations is evident based upon this information and the gamma radiation survey.

Third, sediment/soil samples were collected and analyzed from four (4) locations wherechemical or radiological contamination might reasonably be expected to have migrated from thelandfill via surface water. As with the soil samples, only low level organic chemicalcontamination was indicated which is likewise believed to be attributed to the sampling techniqueand not to actual soil contamination. Radiological contamination is also not evident in thesesamples.

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 26, 1990

II

I

Fourth, subsurface soil conditions were also surveyed radiologically down to groundwaterin several locations to the north and west of the landfill. Gamma radiation and volatile organicswere measured in soil borings down to groundwater using a GM-type survey meter and aphotoionization detector, respectively. Neither radiological contamination nor chemicalcontamination of any type was evident.

Fifth, groundwater was sampled and analyzed chemically and radiologically by installingmonitoring wells in the same soil borings that were mentioned previously. Low level (part perbillion) concentrations of some organic chemicals were detected in several of the groundwatersamples. Several of these, however, are believed to be attributable to background contaminationfrom the laboratory, and as such, do not represent a significant environmental concern. Twosemi-volatile BNAs (chrysene and Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate) were, however, also detected invery low levels (1-27 ppb) in four (4) of the well samples. Other chemical contaminants testedfor in the groundwater (i.e., metals, cyanide) were not present in sufficient concentration torepresent a significant environmental concern. Although radiologically speaking there wereconflicting results from the two laboratories used, there does not in any case appear to besignificant groundwater contamination. The one parameter that was tested and found to besomewhat elevated in some of the water samples (gross alpha) is of secondary importance sincethe sum of the individual components that typically comprise this parameter failed to confirmthe gross alpha totals.

With the exception of two (2) biased locations adjacent to the West Lake Landfill whereradiological contamination is evident (Bl and B2), it is unlikely that the results provided fromthis investigation can be interpreted as evidence that the radioactive material resident in the WestLake Landfill has migrated to Earth City property.

1.2 Project History Summary

In December, 1989, Ford retained Dames & Moore to prepare an assessment of theradiologic conditions at their properties in Earth City, Missouri, as part of a pre-divestirure duediligence effort. The scope of the Phase I effort was primarily to respond to concerns raised bythe proximity of the West Lake Landfill, located immediately to the east of the property underreview (Figure 1). On October 23, 1989, the landfill was proposed for addition to the NationalPriorities List under CERCLA, due to improper acceptance during the early 1970's of radiologicmaterials primarily from the Department of Energy's Latty Avenue operations.

Upon completion of a review of available information, and a limited sampling effort,Dames & Moore concluded that the data suggests that significant off-site migration of radioactivecontaminants from the landfill via groundwater has not occurred. However, it wasrecommended that surface contamination attributable to landfill runoff be further characterized.

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 26, 1990

I* i

i

This Phase n Investigation has been developed to document more extensively fieldconditions by means of additional soil and water sampling for an expanded set of parameters,believed to be more representative of potential landfill contents.

1.3 flcnpe of Work Summary

The services performed during this Phase II investigation included the following fiveelements:

o Overland Gamma Survey - Gamma radiation levels were measured at onecentimeter and one (1) meter above the ground surface to ascertain whetheradditional areas of surface radioactive contamination exist;

o Surface Soil Sampling - Discrete and composite soil samples were collected inthe two known "hot spots", in random areas, and in one background location;

o Sediment Sampling - Discrete sediment samples were collected from drainageareas likely to be influenced by runoff from the landfill;

o Soil Borings/Downhole Gamma Logging - Seven soil borings were advanced to15-25 feet depths. Cuttings were screened for organic vapors and for radiationlevels. Gamma radiation levels were also measured and recorded inside theborehole, advancing in six-inch increments to the water table; and

o Ground water Sampling - Monitoring wells were installed at each of the borings.Samples were collected for laboratory analysis for organic, inorganic, andradiologic parameters.

2.0 OVERLAND GAMMA SURVEY

Between April 9 and 13,1990, Dames & Moore personnel conducted an overland gammaradiation survey of 23 acres adjacent to the landfill which had not previously been surveyed.These measurements would indicate areas, if any, where radiation levels were elevated aboveambient background.

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

I

IIIII

2.1 fjeld Investigation

The overland gamma survey covered the areas shown on Figure 2. The area to the northof the landfill, and to a lesser extent, along Old St. Charles Rock Road were surveyed to assesspotential migration of radiologic materials via surface routes. Areas adjacent to the recentlyexcavated drainage ditch/lake were surveyed to assess the levels of radiation in the materialdredged from the ditch, which may have intercepted potentially contaminated groundwater.

The gamma radiation survey was set up using a 10 x 10 meter survey grid to maintainreproducibility and accuracy. Each section was first marked with stakes, using the S66 48'41"£ line, road coordinates, and chain-link fence which delineates the landfill, as the three primaryreference lines. Section grid lines were established 90 degrees from the reference lines at 10meter intervals. Three grids were established - the largest encompassed the area north of thelandfill and covered approximately eight (8) acres. The second was established to the west ofOld St. Charles Rock Road in an area of disturbed soils recently excavated from a nearbydrainage ditch/lake. The third was also established west of Old St. Charles Rock Road andparalleled nearly the entire Ford/West Lake common boundary over an area of soils excavatedfrom the nearby drainage ditch/lake.

Two calibrated Bicron microrem radiation survey meters were used for radiation levelmeasurements at each intersection of the grid at one centimeter and one meter above the groundsurface. These instruments use a tissue-equivalent plastic scintillator as the detection mediumto provide accurate dose rate information relative to biologic tissue. An instrument operabilitycheck, which included a battery, background and source check was performed daily prior to useand several times during use, to assure property instrument operation while performing thesurvey. Both survey instruments were calibrated by the manufacturer and certificates ofcalibration are attached as Appendix A.

2.2 Investigation Results

Gamma radiation levels measured during the survey of the property are tabulated in Table1. A map of the grid points is attached as Figure 3. Background radiation measurements wererecorded from several areas off-site and in ambient areas located on-site. The averagebackground dose rate for the two instruments in these areas ranged from three (3) to six (6)microrem per hour which corresponds with levels identified by ORNL in a study titled "StateBackground Radiation Levels 1975-1979" (report dTM-7343) which gives levels for the East St.Louis area of between four (4) and eight(8) microrem per hour. All measurements made on theproperty represented actual instrument readings without background data subtraction. Raw datatabulated in Table 1, represent readings obtained at each survey point one meter and onecentimeter above ground surface. The primary reference point for each grid is indicated onTable 1 and the site map (Figure 3) as point 0,0. All tables give the survey point locations

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

i3f£ur-ct--

on their position relative to the reference point within the data matrix.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for site cleanup and managementof residual uranium and thorium (40 CFR 192, Subparts B & E) require that the exposure ratemeasured at a distance of one meter above the ground surface be less than 20 microrems perhour above background. In the case of the present survey, results did not exceed twice themeasured background rate in any of the areas surveyed.

Contaminants located within the West Lake Landfill did not appear to influence thesurface gamma radiation readings over the 23 acres surveyed. Although some fluctuations werepresent in the data, elevated gamma radiation readings within three times the averagebackground measurement are not considered to be of consequence unless a systematic increaseis noted. Site-wide trends were not readily apparent from the collected data.

i3.0 SOIL SAMPLING

Surface soil samples were collected at several locations to characterize existing soilconditions in areas of the site adjacent to the landfill where contamination is suspected, andwhere contamination might reasonably be expected.

3.1 Field Investigation

Two composite soil samples (COMP-1 and COMP-2) were collected from the areasindicated on Figure 4 (shown as Cl and C2). It is believed that the soils dredged from the ditchalong Old St. Charles Rock Road has been spread over these areas. These soils were thereforesampled to indicate whether any contaminants may have settled out from surface waters carriedin the ditch. Each samples was collected from six points in the area shown, and submitted foranalysis for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), semi-volatiles, pesticides, PCBs, herbicides,metals, and cyanide, as well as radiological parameters.

Six unbiased soil samples (UB1-UB6) were collected at the locations shown on Figure4. These areas were distributed along the general perimeter of the landfill to provideinformation regarding existing soil conditions. Each sample was collected at 0-6 inch depths andsubmitted for radiological analysis.

Biased soil samples were collected at two locations (Bl and B2) as shown on figure 4,which were identified during Phase I as having elevated gamma radiation levels. Samples Bl A,BIB, B2A, and B2B were collected at 0-6 inch depths. Samples B1C and B2C were collectedat 6-12 inch depths. All six samples were analyzed for several radiological parameters.

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

.

Samples were collected manually using either a stainless steel trowel or a stainless steelhand auger. Sampling equipment was decontaminated with Alconox detergent wash and adistilled water rinse between each sample.

Samples requiring radiological analysis were placed in plastic bags provided by thelaboratory. Organic and inorganic samples were placed in jars provided by the laboratory (Table2) Organic and inorganic samples were placed in an iced cooler. All samples were shippedto the respective laboratories via overnight delivery accompanied by Dames & Moore chain-of-custody records (Appendix B).

3.2 Investigation Results

A summary of organic and inorganic data is presented in Table 3. For nearly allparameters, there are no indications that samples COMP1 and COMP2 vary significantly fromthe background sample BKG.

Exceptions of note are the results of analyses for semi-volatile compounds. No semi-volatiles are indicated in the background sample, however, two compounds were detected inCOMF1 and six compounds were detected in COMP 2. The semi-volatile compounds detectedin the composite samples have been attributed to the sampling technique, which involved mixingthe composite inside a plastic zip-lock bag. The background sample was collected directly intosample jars without contact with a bag.

A summary of the radiological data for soil samples is presented in Tables 4A, 4B, 4C,and 4D. All values are reported in units of picocuries per gram of sample plus or minus theerror associated with the analysis at a 95 percent confidence level (+ 2 sigma). All soil sampleswere analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta content and the specific nuclides uranium-234,235/236, 238; thorium-230,232; potassium-40; cesium-137 and radium-226, 228. Valuesreported as less than (<) a specific value, are considered below the analytical instrument's lowerlimit of detection. Table 4A shows that the analytical results reported for unbiased samples UBlthrough UB6 are indistinguishable from the background sample collected at the same depth aswell as background samples analyzed for the Phase I investigation. Biased samples collected inthe two areas identified as above background in the Phase I investigation, show, as expected,elevated gross alpha and gross beta.

For area 1 (Table 4B) gross alpha and gross beta for biased samples are elevated byfactors of 55 and 10.6 respectively, while for Area 2 (Table 4C) levels are elevated by factorsof 200 and 31, respectively. Similarly, elevated levels of uranium-234 and 238 are reported at6.5 and 6 times background (Table 4B) and factors of 13.3 and 8.1, respectively (Table 4C).Thorium-230 values in sample B1A and BIB average over 400 times background, while B2Aand B2B average over 900 times background. Thorium-232 however averaged only 3 times and

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

6 times background for areas 1 and 2, respectively. Ra-226 concentrations in the biased soilsamples analyzed from areas 1 and 2 averaged 31 and 34 times background respectively. Theabove results refer only to the data reported for the 0-6" sample depth. The reportedconcentrations for the above mentioned nuclides in the 6-12" depth are equally elevated for thearea 1 sample but are somewhat lower for the area 2 sample.

Composite soil sample results reported in Table 4D are indistinguishable frombackground.

4.0 SEDIMENT SAMPLING

Sediment samples were collected at four locations at the site to characterize existingconditions in areas where contamination might reasonably be expected to have migrated viasurface water.

4.1 Field Investigation

Four sediment samples (S1-S4) were collected at the locations shown on Figure 5.Samples SI and S2 were collected from the bottom of the drainage ditch which runs along OldSt. Charles Rock Road. These samples were analyzed for several radiological parameters.

I

•Sample S3 was collected from the bottom of a ponded area near St. Charles Rock Road.

Sample S4 was collected from beneath the outlet of a surface water drain which originates at thebase of the landfill berm, and emerges from the embankment of Old St. Charles Rock Road.

• Both samples were analyzed for organic and inorganic as well as radiological parameters.

| Samples were collected using either a stainless steel trowel or a stainless steel handI auger. Sampling equipment was decontaminated with Alconox detergent wash and a distilled™ water rinse between each sample.

IIIIIII

Radiological samples were placed in plastic bags provided by the laboratory. Organicand inorganic samples were placed in jars provided by the laboratory (Table 2). Organic andinorganic samples were placed in an iced cooler. All samples were shipped to the respectivelaboratories via overnight delivery accompanied by Dames & Moore chain-of-custody records(Appendix B).

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

4.2 Investigation Results

A summary of organic and inorganic data is presented in Table 5, as a comparison withbackground soil sample BKG. For nearly all parameters, there are no indications that samplesS3 and S4 vary significantly from the background sample. Mercury was detected only in sampleS4, at 0.18 ppm only slightly above the reported detection limits.

Semi-volatile analytical results are similar to the soil samples, where several compoundswere detected. Again, this is attributed to the sampling technique which involved mixing of thecomposite sample inside of a plastic zip-lock bag. The background sample was collected directlyinto sample jars without contact with a bag.

A summary of the radiological data is presented in Table 6. Review of this table showsthat, for the radiological parameters specified, all data is indistinguishable from backgroundexcept for the gross alpha value of sample S4 which is reported as 6.6 times background. Uponreanalysis of this sample by ITC, however, a much lower gross alpha value was obtained. Forreasons explained in Section 7.1.3 of this report, the second analysis, which indicated a grossalpha level of 19.3 +. 8.6, is considered to be more valid.

5.0 SOIL BORINGS/DOWNHOLE GAMMA LOGGING

Soil borings were advanced at seven (7) locations at the site to observe and assesssubsurface soil conditions to the depth of the groundwater table. Additionally, gamma radiationwas measured inside each borehole to provide vertical profiles of radiation levels.

5.1 Field Investigation

Soil borings were advanced to the groundwater table at seven locations shown on Figure6, using an ATV-mounted hollow-stem auger drill rig. Samples were retrieved using a 3-inchdiameter continuous sampler. Downhole drilling equipment was decontaminated between boringsby pressure washing with water.

Geological observations made of the retrieved soils were maintained on Soil Boring Logspresented in Appendix D. Retrieved soils were field screened for VOCs with a photo-ionizationdetector, and for radiation levels with a G-M type survey meter.

Gamma radiation levels were measured inside the auger stem using an Eberline ESP-2ratemeter and shielded SPA-3 scintillation detector. The detector was advanced in six-inchincrements to depths approaching groundwater. Gamma logging measurements are shown inTables 7-101 through 7-107, with graphical presentations in Figures 7-101 through 7-107.

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

4

5.2 Investigation Results

Borings depths ranged from 15 to 25 feet depending on the depth to groundwater. Soiltypes varied from silty to sandy silt, typically becoming coarser with depth. Some stiff silt orclay was noted. No volatile compounds were detected at any depth in any boring. Radiationlevels were consistent with background levels.

All gamma logging data was consistent with background levels.

6.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING

Groundwater monitoring wells were installed in each of the seven (7) soil borings at thelocations shown on Figure 6. Well construction details are described in Section 6.1 anddiagramed in Appendix E. Ten samples were collected for laboratory analysis according to thetechniques discussed in Section 6.2. Analytical results are discussed in Section 6.3.

\

m:-.{*3

6.1 Monitoring Well Installation

As described in Section 5.0, soil borings were advanced by hollow stem auger. Uponcompletion of each boring, a 10-foot length of 2-inch diameter 0.010 slotted PVC well screenwas placed to the bottom of the boring. PVC riser pipe was extended above the ground surface.A sand Miter-pack was placed about the well screen as the auger flights were gradually removedfrom the borehole, typically to 2-feet above the top of the screened interval. A 1.5 - 2 feet thickbentonite pellet seal was placed above the sand pack. In wells MW101 and MW102, a cementslurry with a bentonite additive was placed from the top of the seal to a few feet below groundsurface. At all wells, a cement-aggregate mixture was placed to the ground surface to securethe steel well protector, and to form a small concrete pad to deflect surface water away fromthe well. The PVC riser was fitted with a PVC screw cap and a padlock was placed on the steelprotector. Well construction diagrams are shown in Appendix E.

Efforts by drilling contractor Brotcke to develop MW104 on April 12 using a tank ofcompressed nitrogen to drive an air-lift system were not successful. On Friday, April 13, 1990,personnel returned to develop the wells using an air compressor to drive water from the well.Purging efforts were continued for 30 minutes at each of the four wells (MW101, MW102,MW103, and MW104). The three remaining wells were not accessible due to wet groundconditions, and were developed by bailing.

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

6.2 Sample Collection

>~i

I;i

i.i

Groundwater sampling was conducted by Dames & Moore personnel on April 17 and 18,1990. The following procedure was used at each well.

The depth to water from the top of the PVC casing was recorded to the nearest 1/16"using a chalked steel-tape. Standing water was purged from the well using a disposablepolyethylene bailer (Voss Technologies). After removing one well volume, field measurementsof temperature, pH and specific conductivity were made using a calibrated Hydac meter(Cambridge Scientific Industries) outfitted with an Orion pH probe. Field measurements weretaken following each subsequent well-volume purged until three successive sets of measurementsfell within the following ranges:

Temperature: +/- 0.5° CpH: +/-0.1pHunitConductivity: +/- micromhos

Typically, four (4) or five (5) well volumes were sufficient to accomplish stabilization.Field measurements are summarized in Appendix F. Based on contaminant levels during soilboring activities, purged water was discharged to the ground surface.

Upon stabilization, water samples were collected for laboratory analysis. Table 8 showsthe volumes collected and preservations used to constitute one sample.

Samples were shipped via Federal Express to the appropriate laboratories for analysis(MW109 was hand delivered to Envirodyne), under Dames & Moore chain-of-custodyprocedures (Appendix 8). Organic and inorganic samples were shipped in iced coolers. Eachday, all VOA sample vials were placed in the same cooler, and were accompanied duringshipment by trip blanks (TR-1 and TR-2).

6.3 Investigative Results

Data from organic and inorganic analyses are summarized in Table 9. Data packagesfrom Southwest Laboratories and Envirodyne Engineers are provided in Appendix C. Data fromthe radiological analyses are summarized in Table 10. Data packages from ITC and CEP areprovided in Appendix B.

A review of the organic and inorganic data indicated that pesticides, PCBs, herbicides,and cyanide were not detected. Several VOCs were identified near or below detection levels.Methylene chloride was detected at low levels (1-26 ppb) in all samples analyzed by Southwest.Similarly, acetone was detected (3-17 ppb) in most samples. Both compounds were detected in

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

10

I

the Southwest QA/QC method blank, and are frequent laboratory contaminants. The absenceof these compounds in the Envirodyne analysis of MW109 (duplicate of both MW102 andMW108), reinforces the interpretation that the methylene chloride and acetone results are notaccurate. Low levels of 1-1 dichloroethane are indicated in well MW102 and MW109 (3 ppband 6 ppb, respectively). Toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene were indicated in well MW103in low levels also.

Two BNA (binuclear aromatic) compounds, chrysene and bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate,were also indicated in low levels in four (4) of the monitoring wells. Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was present in MW102, MW105, MW106, and MW109D while chrysene was presentonly in MW102.

Several metals were detected at low levels as well. Copper and zinc were consistentlyindicated in samples analyzed by Southwest. Antimony and nickel were also indicated inapproximately half of the samples by Southwest. EEI/TCT reported the presence of arsenic,mercury, selenium, and silver in the two samples which they had analyzed (MW109 andMW109D). While there is a wide disparity in the metals results presented by the twolaboratories, none of the actual reported quantities are at significant levels to be of concern.

Results of radiological analyses for groundwater samples collected during the Phase IIinvestigation are reported in Tables 10A through 10D. Due to the propensity of groundwatersamples collected from wells to contain filterable soil particulates which can skew results, allsamples were analyzed as raw unflltered water and as filtered water using a 0.45 micron filtermedium. All results are reported as picocuries per liter of sample plus or minus the 2 sigmaassociated error. Numbers reported as less than (<) the reported value are below the limit ofdetectability for the given nuclide and analytical method. All results reported for filteredsamples are indistinguishable from background data as represented by the off-site well waterresults of Table 2 in the Phase I report. Further, the filtered data would easily meet all existingradiological limits established for drinking water by the EPA (40 CFR 141). Of the unfllteredresults four samples (MW-103U, MW-105U, MW-106U, and MW-107U) would not meet theEPA gross alpha criteria of 15 pCi/1 for drinking water, but would meet all other establishedlimits. However, since raw unflltered groundwater would not be acceptable as drinking water,this comparison serves no purpose.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

7.1 Radiological Investigations

7.1.1 Overland Gamma Survey

The results of the overland gamma survey discussed in Section 2 of this report clearlyshow that all areas surveyed were indistinguishable from ambient radiation levels associated with

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

11

nearby off-site locations. This conclusion is further supported by the results of the unbiased andcomposite soil sample analyses which were also indistinguishable from background radionuclideconcentrations for the Phase H investigation area.

7.1.2 Soil

As discussed above, all unbiased and composite soil samples collected randomly withinthe 23 acres area of investigation, were found to have radionuclide concentrations similar tothose measured for samples representing ambient (background) conditions collected for thepresent study, and those collected as background samples for the Phase I investigation. Withregard to the two biased samples (Bl and B2) where contamination is evident, refer to Section7.1.5 for details.

7.1.3 Sediment

Comparison of sediment samples to background soil samples collected for Phase I andn shows that all sediment results reported are less than or equal to the corresponding backgroundconcentration with the exception of the gross alpha result reported for sample S4. This samplewas subjected to reanalysis of only the gross alpha parameter by PTC and the result reported toDames & Moore, shown in Table 11, was 19.3 ± 8.6. The original S4 gross alpha value wasnot confirmed by the reanalysis. This makes the initial analytical result a highly suspect datapoint, in that, several of the individual nuclides analyzed are alpha emitters, namely U-234,235/236, 238, thorium-230 and 232 and radium-226. These nuclides are by far the mostabundant alpha emitters in nature and therefore their sum should represent the majority of thegross alpha activity present. Because the sum of the individual nuclides is only 7.2 pCi/g, andthe analytical techniques used to measure the individual nuclides is more precise than the grossalpha measurement, especially for a medium such as soil, the gross alpha measurement must beconsidered of secondary importance. Further, naturally occurring nuclides which are decayproducts of the marker nuclides may add to the gross alpha concentration, but are consideredto be in equilibrium with their parent nuclide and therefore would not add significantly to theabove calculated alpha contributions of the individual nuclides.

7.1.4 Groundwater

As discussed in Section 6.3, groundwater samples were analyzed as unfiltered and filteredto provide information on the quantity of filterable, and therefore undissolved particulates,resident in the samples. All results reported in Tables 10A through 10D for filtered sampleseasily meet EPA drinking water standards for gross alpha (15 pCi/1), gross beta (50 pCi/1) andradium-226 + 228 of 5 pCi/1. Further, all unfiltered samples meet these criteria except for the

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

12

gross alpha values reported for sample MW103-U, 17.2; MW105-U, 16.9; MW106-U, 101; andMW107-U, 202 pCi/1. The gross alpha values reported for these unfUtered samples are also ofsecondary importance since the sum of the individual nuclide concentrations fail to confirm thegross alpha values (see Section 7.1.3).

Groundwater sample MW102 was also subjected to quality assurance checks having asample duplicate analyzed and a sample split analyzed by an independent laboratory. The resultsof both tests confirm the results of the original analysis as reported by IT Corporation. Mostvalues for all tests were reported as below the limit of detection.

7.1.5 Biased Soil Samples

To provide additional characterization of the two limited hot spot areas identified duringthe Phase I study, the survey team was directed to resurvey the original areas, reidentify thelocation providing the highest gamma radiation level and remove 2-6" soil samples to a totaldepth of 12" to provide preliminary characterization of the nuclides present. These data arereported in Tables 4B and 4C.

For Area 1 (Tables 4B) the major nuclides identified as significantly above backgroundare Th-230, Ra-226, U-234, and U-238. These results are confirmed in the sample duplicateanalyzed by ITC and in the sample split analyzed by CEP except for Th-230. The discrepancyin the results is due to the differences in analytical techniques used by the two laboratories.Selected analytical results reported for original samples in Table 4B were reanalyzed with resultsshown in Table n. The reanalysis confirmed the original test results.

For Area 2 (Table 4C), the analytical parameters and major nuclides identified as presentin concentrations more than 3 times background were gross alpha, gross beta, Th-230, U-234,U-238, and Ra-226.

Again for sample B2A, as for B1A, the duplicate of the original sample analyzed by ITCconfirmed the initial results. The split sample with CEP again did not identify Th-230 in similarquantities, nor were gross alpha and gross beta results reported by CEP similar to the ITC data.Both laboratory technique and measurement capability differences are responsible for thesediscrepancies. Regardless of the CEP results, any regulatory bodies which would govern clean-up of the area would consider the highest reported results for regulatory purposes and thereforethe CEP data splits would become meaningless. Further, this round of soil sampling would onlyserve to establish the highest potential concentration of nuclides in the area based on surfacegamma radiation results. Further area characterization would be required to determine thevertical and horizontal extent of the contamination before clean-up activities could proceed. Dueto the elevated levels of uranium-234 and 238 as well as radius-226 in these biased samples itis likely that this material originated from the West Lake Landfill property and found its way

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

13

to the present location via surface water erosion.

pnfel

I«.

7.2 Inorganic and Organic Chemical Investigation

During the course of the Phase n investigation of the Earth City property, severaldifferent classes of both organic and inorganic contaminants were tested for in adjacent surfacesoils, groundwater, and drainage ditch bottom sediment. Organic contaminants tested forincluded total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), semi-volatile organics, pesticides, PCBs,herbicides, and volatile organics (VOCs). Inorganic contaminants tested for included metals andcyanide.

• Zy* -^•m 7.2.1 TPH

Surface soil composite samples (2) collected from areas adjacent to the West lake.Landfill had TPH levels below background. Sediment samples (2) collected from the bottomof a ponded area near the St. Charles Rock Road and from beneath the outlet of a landfillsurface water drain, likewise had TPH levels below background.

7.2.2 Semi-volatiles

Low level concentrations (10-50 ppb) of several semi-volatile organic compounds weredetected in both surface composite soil samples. Their presence is attributed to the samplingtechnique, which involved mixing the composite inside a plastic zip-lock bag. Plastic bags ofthis type often contain residual low level semi-volatiles. The sediment samples likewisecontained low level semi-volatiles (10-19 ppb) which can be attributed to sampling technique.

Two semi-volatile BNAs, chrysene and bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate were detected in levelsnear or below detection limits in one and three monitoring wells, respectively, and do notrepresent a significant environmental concern..

:&l'":?.=:ii--.' -i- ' --%&2«r;£:.--••.••••!:>$&£$ y-::WH^ -•

7.2.3 Pesticides, PCBs, Herbicides, Cyanide

^v?r. There were no detectable levels of any of these contaminants in any of the three sampling.media. *&ft

^^;-.KsfSsaLK".- •

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

14

t

t

7.2.4 VOCs

Volatile organics were tested for only in the eleven (11) groundwater samples. Two (2)VOCs, methylene chloride and acetone, were present in low concentrations in virtually allgroundwater samples tested. These samples were analyzed by Southwest Laboratory and bothof these VOC components, which are frequent laboratory contaminants, were detected inSouthwest's QA/QC method blank. Consequently, this provides further evidence that the resultsfor these contaminants are due to background contamination from the laboratory environmentand as such, are not valid.

7.2.5 Metals

For both the soil sample composites (2) and the sediment samples (2), all metals detecteddo not vary significantly from background levels. Groundwater samples were analyzed by twoseparate laboratories: Southwest Laboratory and EEI/TCT. Low concentrations of copper, zinc,antimony, and nickel were detected by Southwest while EEI/TCT detected very low levels ofarsenic, mercury, selenium, and silver. None of the levels detected represent a significantenvironmental concern.

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

15

Table 1A

SURVEYLOCATIONS

(E&U) WO U1*********

UZ U3 U4***-*************

W5 W6 W7 W8 W9*************************

SUMMARY OF GAMMA RADIATION FIELD MEASUREMENTSFOR FORD.EARTH CITY RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY

EARTH CITY, MISSOURI

NORTHERN GRID j

(READINGS ARE IN MICROREM/HOUR AT 1 METER, AND 1 CM ABOVE GROUND SURFACE)

U10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19 |W20 U21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28 W29 W30 W31 W32 W33 W34 W35 U36 W37 W38 W39 W40 W41 W42it**-*****************************************************

(N&S)NO 5,6N1 5,5N2 7,7N3 5,6N4 S/BN5N6H7n iN8N9N10N11

6,67,65,55,65,5S/B

7,77.76,77,66,65,66,6C/RS/O

5,55,66,75,55,56,55,55,55,55,55,5S/B

5,66,67.76,67,75,65,55,56,56,66,5S/B

6,67,66,65,66,75,55,55,55,55,55,5S/B

7,76,67,76,77,67,66,65,55,65,54,5S/B

7,77,78,87,76,76 75,85,56,75,55,5S/B

6,68,78,87.77.6•5 46.66,75,55,6.5,5S/B

6,77,68,87.75,7ft •>6,56 0,0

5,56,65,5S/B

5,57,76,67,76,6A 77,8

I a o0,05,66,67,6S/B

5,67,68,76,67,88 77,77,66,76,57,6S/B

8,86,66,77,77,86 A7,76,77,76,66 7S/B

6,76,77,76,66,77 76,66.66,65,6S AS/B

6,66,68,87,77,87 77.86,77,77.7•5 «»S/B

7,66,76,77.77,7A 66,58 7,'7,78,77 AS/B

7,77.67.86,76,6R 85,56,66,65,6S 6S/B

6,77,67,67,76,5A 76,57,67,76.76 7S/B

8,86.67,88,87.76 A5.67,76,76,76 6S/B

7.76,56,76,76.57 78.85,77,87,6A AS/B

6,76,68,8'6,87,77 7;7,75,65,55,6A 6'S/B

6,67,76 A6,77,86,67,77,78,65.66,6S/B

7,78,88 ft7,77,77,77,87 0,86,67,76,7S/B

5,57,75,57,85,57,76,77,76.75,65.5S/B

6,77,87,77,87.86,77,77,76,55,56,6S/B

7,77.6A A7,67,85,57,76.78,76,66,7S/B

6,75.7A 76,77,77,67,66,67,77,76,6S/B

6,76.78,77,78,78,86,67,67,66,67,7S/B

6,77.87,75,67,67,77,67,67,77,65,6S/B

7,77,66,67,86,77,76,57,77,76,56,7S/B

6,77,67,76,75,56,66,67.77.66,66,7S/B

6,67,77,66,58,76,67,67,75,56,75,5S/B

665676

Io666S.

7665

1\66'B

6,75,76,56,77.76.55.57,77,76,66,7S/B

5,57,78,76,77,67,66,65,55,67,66,6S/B

6,66,76.65,67,76,67,7

6,57,75,5S/B

•-_.'.6,76,56.67,66,55,57,6

6,66,66,6S/B

6,78.86.75,66,66,57,77,66,67,66,6S/B

6,67.68.86.66,77,87,77.76,57,66,6S/B

6,57,66,77,76,57.66.77.76,67,75,5S/B

5,77,65,55.65,56,67,76,56.65.65,5S/B

6,76,76,76,55,55,56,75,56,55.57.6S/B

7.65.57,67,77,75,66,55,55,65,55,5S/B

* S/B = Survey Boundary

Table IB

SUMMARY OF GAMMA RADIATION FIELD MEASUREMENTSFOR FORD, EARTH CITY RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY

EARTH CITY, MISSOURI

NORTHWEST GRID

MICROREM/HOUR AT 1 METER, AND 1 CM ABOVE GROUND SURFACE

11111

(E&W) UO U12 W25 W50 U60A************************************'

W70 U80 W90>***«••*•**••••*•••••**

(N&S)S17516S15SHS13S12S11510S9S8S756SSS4S3S2S1SONON1N2N3N4N5N6N7N8N9moN11N12N13NK

PHASE IARJ

5,65.65,55.65.76.66.56,66,55,56,77,76,75.66,6S/B

SURVEYa

6.77,67,76,77.76.88.66,67,86.68.77.77.76.78,6S/B

LAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOON

LAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOON

PHASE :ARI

7.66,67,75.76,66.57.77.76,67.77.75.65.55,57,7S/B

SURVEY*

6,56,57,76.75.56.55.56,66,77.76.56.67,86,77,7S/B

6,55.5

6,76.66.65,55,55,56,67.66,77.87.65,66.57,65,68,67,67.77,66,66,57,76.87,66.67.77.65.56,67,6S/B

6.67.7

5,56,56,67.76.66,66,66,66.67.67,77.77.77.66,56.76,66.77,66,77,85.56.65,66.55.67.77.85.56,6S/B

5,56.6

6,65.55,65.55.56,75,66.76.66.66,75.65,57.76.7S/flS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/B

S/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/B

II1111I1iiii1iiiiii

Table 1CSUMMARY OF GAMMA RADIATION FIELD MEASUREMENTS

FOR FORD, EARTH CITY RADIOLOGICAL SURVEYEARTH CITY. MISSOURI

WESTERN GRID

MICROREM/HOUR AT 1 METER, AND 1 CM ABOVE GROUND SURFACE

(E&W) WO W15 W25 W36 U46*»•»•*•»****•••*•••»•«•*»*•••••••»••*•«••»»*••*•••«•(N&S)NON1N2N3N4N5N6N7N8N9N10N11N12N13NUN15N16N17N18N19N20N21N22N23N24N25N26N27N28N29N30N31N32N33N34N35N36N37N38N39N40N41N42N43N44N45N46N47N48N49N50N51N5ZNS3N54N55

5,55,55,56,66,65,56,55,55,65,55,56,65,5«,54,45,66,66,56,66,65,65,65,56,55,65,56,55,54,44,56,55,55,65,55,44,44,45,54,45,46,65,64,54,55,55,54,55,55,56,55,56,66,56,55,45,5

6.56,56.66,56,67,66,55,56.57,66.67.66,66,67,77,66,56.67,68,76.56.56.67.78,75,56,67,76.65,56,66,67,67,66.67,76.67,65,56.67.65,55,55.56,56,66,76,66,76,66,55.56,55,57,76.6

LAGOONLAGXNLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOONLAGOON

5,56,75.57,66,55.55,57,77,85,65,76.77,77,65,66,65,65,57,66,77,65,65.65.55,55,55,58,77.66,67,67,66.66.67,76,67,76,66,78,67,76.67.66.67.87,66,56.76,57,76.57,77,77,67,75.5

7,66,56,77.75.57,68,77,67,76,77,86,75,55,65,56,57,66.55.55,55,67,86,66,77,66,67,76.67.77.66.77,67,76,75,57,75.56,75,56,75,66,65,56,75,57,66,66.57,76,56,67,66,67.65,55,6

S/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/8S/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/BS/B

S/8 S/B S/B S/B S/B

III11I1IIII

Table 2Volumes & PreservativesSoil i Sediment Samples

Parameters

TPHSemivolatilesPesticidesHerbicidesMetalsCyanide

Radiologic

No.

11

1

1

Size

100 ml500 ml

200 ml

500 gram

Type

glassglass

polyethylene

plastic bag

Preserv

nonenone

none

none

Table 3Organic & Inorganic Data Summary

Soil Samples

parameterTPHTPH - Misc

SemivolatilesBenzole Acid2-MethylnaphthalenePhenanthreneDi-n-butylphthalateFluoranthrenePyreneButylbenzylphthalateBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalatePesticides/PCBsHerbicidesMetalsArsenicLeadMercurySeleniumThallium ;

Antimony 1BerylliumCadmiumChromiumCopperNickelSilverZinc_Cyanide

Unitsmg/kgmg/kg

ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

mg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgug/kg

BKG

ND

14.9

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

5.8

17.4

ND

ND

ND

6.9

ND

1.1

14.5

24.0

18.0

ND

61.6

ND

COMP1

ND

5.1

ND

ND

ND

ND

30

30

ND

ND

ND

ND

5.89

13.6

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

18.1

22.8

18.3

ND

62.4

ND

COMP2

ND

5.1

30

10

30

50

50

30

ND

ND

ND

ND

7.41

15.9

ND

ND

ND

7.4

ND

ND

15.5

25.0

19.2

ND

57.4

ND

Table 4ARadiologic DataUnbiased Soil Sables

Parameter

Type

Depth

Laboratory

Gross Alpha

Cross Beta

UraniuB-234

Uranfin Z35/Z36

Uranius 238

ThoriuB 230

Thoriua-232

Potass i UK-40

Cesiui-137

Radiua-226

Raditn-228

Units

pci/gpci/gpci/gPCi/g

pCi/g

pCi/gpcl/gPCi/gPCi/gPCi/gpci/g

BKGBackground

0-6"

ITC

33.0 V- 11.4

27.9 */• 9.6

1.1 */- 0.3

< 0.6

1.1 +/- 0.3

3.6 +/- 0.6

1.5 */- 0.3

18.1 V 2.9

< 0.2

1.1 V 0.1

1.3 V 0.2

UB1

Investigative

0-6"

ITC

23.6 V 9.9

23.5 V 8.5

1.3 V- 0.3

<0.6

1.0 V- 0.2

2.5 */• 0.5

1.0 V 0.3

9.9 +/- 1.4

0.3 +/- 0.05

1.0 V 0.1

1.1 */- 0.1

UB2

investigative

0-6"

ITC

26.0 «/- 10.1

30.0 */- 11.1

1.2 */- 0.3

<0.6

1.2 +/- 0.3

1.8 V- 0.4

1.2 +/- 0.3

11.7 +/- 1.6

0.3 */- 0.06

1.2 */- 0.1

1.2 V- 0.2

UB3

investigative

0-6"

ITC

25.8 */- 10.1

31.1 */- 10.9

0.9 */- 0.2

<0.6

0.9 */• 0.2

2.2 +/- 0.5

1.2 +/- 0.3

U.6 V 1.9

0.2 */- 0.06

1.2 +/- 0.1

1.2 */- 0.2

UB4

investigative

0-6"

ITC

20.0 V- 8.5

29.0 »/- 9.9

1.0 */- 0.2

<0.6

0.7 */- 0.2

2.1 +/- 0.4

1.1 «/- 0.3

17.7 */- 2.9

<0.2

1.1 */- 0.1

1.4 */- 0.2

UB5

investigative

0-6"

ITC

18.3 V- 8.3

25.6 V- 9.7

1.3*/- 0.3

<0.6

1.0 */- 0.2

3.0 */- 0.7

1.6 */- 0.4

18.6 */- 3.0

<0.2

1.1 */- 0.1

1.6 */- 0.2

UB6

investigative

0-6"

ITC

27.5 */• 9.9

25.1 V- 8.0

1.2 »/- 0.3

<0.6

1.2 */- 0.3

2.5 */- 0.5

1.2 */- 0.3

19.7 V- 3.2

0.2 +/• 0.05

1.2 +/- 0.1

1.5 V- 0.2

Table 48Radiologic Data Suanry

Area B1 Biased Soil Sables

Parameter

Type

Depth

Laboratory

Gross Alpha

Cross Beta

UraniuM-234

UraniiM 235/236

Uraniun 238

ThoriiM 230

Thoriut-232

Potassiui-40

Cesiu»-137

Radius 226

RadiuB-228

Ulits

pcf/gpci/gpCi/gpci/gpci/gpci/gpci/gpCi/gpCI/gpCi/gpci/g

BKG

Background

0-6"

ITC

33.0 +/- 11.4

27.9 V 9.6

1.1 */• 0.3

< 0.6

1.1 V- 0.3

3.6 V 0.6

1.5 */- 0.3

18.1 +/- 2.9

< 0.2

1.1 */- 0.1

1.3+/- 0.2

B1A

investigative

0-6"

ITC

1650 */- 340

313 */- 66

7.9*/- 1.0

<0.6

6.9 */- 0.9

1580 */• 370

5.1 V- 1.6

12.4 V- 2.2

<0.2

39.5 */- 3.3

1.0 */- 0.3

B1A

split of B1A

0-6"

CEP

44.6 */- 1.8

21.2 */- 0.6

4.2 +/- 0.5

0.6 +/- 0.2

1.6+/- 0.3

<0.2

1.0 +/- 0.2

11.1 »/- 1.4

0.1 */- 0.1

41.4 */- 0.4

<0.1

BIB

oVpl. of B1A

0-6"

ITC

1980 +/- 400

304 */- 64

6.3 +/- 1.1

<0.6

6.3 */- 1.1

1390 »/- 270

4.1 */- 1.1

6.8 +/- 1.5

<0.2

29.6 */- 4.5

1.0 +/- 0.3

B1C

investigative

6-12"

ITC

1810 +/- 370

274 */- 58

7.4 +/- 1.0

<0.6

7.0 */- 1.0

1430 +/- 360

6.7 */- 2.2

11.6 */- 2.0

0.3 */- 0.1

24.0 */- 3.7

1.3 */- 0.3

Table ACRadtologic Data

Area B2 Biased Soil Samples

Parameter

Type

Depth

Laboratory

Gross Alpha

Gross -Beta

Uraniua- 234

Uranium 235/236

UraniiM 238

Thoriua 230

Thoriua-232

Potass IUB-40

Cesiua-137

Radiua-226

Radii.- 228

Units

pCf/g

pci/gpci/gpci/gpc»/gpci/gpci/apci/gpci/gpci/gpci/g

KG

Background

0-6"

ITC

33.0 */- 11.*

27.9 V 9.6

1.1 */- 0.3

< 0.6

1.1 +/- 0.3

3.6 V 0.6

1.5 */- 0.3

18.1 */- 2.9

< 0.2

1.1 */- 0.1

1.3 */- 0.2

B2A

Investigative

0-6"

ITC

7810 */- 1570

969 */• 197

18.0 V- 2.4

2.1 */- 0.4

11.4 */- 1.6

3720 */- 780

4.5 +/- 1.3

9.4 +/- 1.8

<0.2

15.1 */- 1.9

1.3 */- 0.4

B2A

split of B2A

0-6"

CEP

199 »/- 2.4

34.5 V 0.5

14.4 +/- 0.8

0.2 */- 0.1

2.4 */- 0.3

<0.2

1.3 »/- 0.5

9.2 +/- 3.3

<0.1

132 */- 8.0

150 */- 38

B2B

(tupl. of B2A

0-6"

ITC

5560 */ 1120

776 */- 159

11.3 V- 1.5

<0.6

6.5 */- 0.9

2820 +/- 580

13.1 */- 3.0

9.2 +/- 1.7

<0.2

59.3 V 4.7

1.2 */- 0.3

B2C

investigative

6-12"

ITC

1080 */- 220

149 +/- 35

2.0 +/- 0.3

0.7 +/- 0.2

2.1 */- 0.4

574 »/- 113

1.2+/- 0.5

9.5 */- 1.6

<0.2

9.9 +/- 1.6

1.0 */- 0.2

Table 40ladiotagic DataComposite Soil Samples

Parameter

Type

Depth

laboratory

Gross Alpha

Gross Beta

Uraniua-23*

liraniua 235/236

UranitM 238

Thoriua 230

Thortua-Z32

Pot ass liar- 40

Cesiua-137

Radiiav-226

Radiua-228

Units

pCi/g

pcl/gpci/apCJ/gPCI/9

pci/gPCi/g

PCi/g

pc«/gpc</gpCi/g

BKG

Background

0-6"

ITC

33.0 #/- 11.*

27.9 */- 9.6

1.1 */- 0.3

< 0.6

1.1 +/- 0.3

3.6 +/- 0.6

1.5 */- 0.3

1B.1 */- 2.9

< 0.2

1.1 V- 0.1

1.3 +/- 0.2

COMP1

Investigative

0-6"

ITC

15.0 »/- 7.1

25.5 */- 10.1

1.0 */- 0.3

<0.6

1.0 */- 0.3

2.2 V 0.5

1.3 »/- 0.3

10.1 */- 1.*

<0.2

1.1 */- 0.1

1.2 */- 0.2

COHP2

investigative

0-6"

ITC

18.4 +/- 8.2

21.8 */- 9.8

1.0 V 0.2

<0.6

0.8 +/- 0.2

2.4 */- 0.4

1.2 */• 0.3

18.2 +/- 2.9

<0.2

1.2 V- 0.1

1.3 V 0.2

Table 5Organic 6 Inorganic Data summary

Sediment samples

•..f'&Si-

?-;§t,s*-:~7-.

Jpil™.- 1 fv. ''jfc ''sitV'tSJ'1'.

4 ^ffifc-i1-.

parameterTPHTPH - WiseSemivolatilesBenzole Acid2 -Methy Inapht ha 1 enePhenanthreneDi-n-butylphthalateFluoranthrenePyreneButylbenzylphthalateBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalatePesticides/PCBsHerbicidesMetalsArsenicLeadMercurySeleniumThalliumAntimonyBerylliumCadmiumChromiumCopperNickelSilverZinc.gTanide

Unitsmg/kgmg/kg

ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

mg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgug/kg

BKG

ND

14.9

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

5.8

17.4

ND

ND

ND

6.9

ND

1.1

14.5

24.0

18.0

ND

61.6

ND

83

ND

12.0

35

ND

30

10

40

50

ND

ND

ND

ND

2.12

12.4

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

5.5

15.2

9.7

ND

32.8

ND

84

ND

6.3

140

ND

40

100

ND

30

50

190

ND

ND

5.6

17.8

0.18

ND

ND

6.7

ND

ND

13.1

23.0

16.3

ND

56.8

ND

Table 6ladlotogic Data Suaaary

Sediwnt Samples

Paraaeter

Type

Depth

LaboratoryGross Alpha

Gross Beta

UraniurZM

Uraniua 235/236

Uranlua 238

Thoritai 230

Thoriue-232

Potassiua-40

Cesiua-137

Radii«-226

Radii*- 228

Units

uci/apcl/gpc«/apci/gpci/gpci/gPCJ/9

pCi/g

pci/gpCi/gpC«/9

BXfiBackgroind

0-6"

ITC

33.0 V- 11.4

27.9 V 9.6

1.1 V- 0.3

< 0.6

1.1 */- 0.3

3.6 */- 0.6

1.5 V 0.3

18.1 +/- 2.9

< 0.2

1.1 V- 0.1

1.3 V- 0.2

S1

investigative

0-6"

ITC

32.1 */- 11.8

26.7 */- 11.0

-1.0 */.- 0.3

<0.6

0.9 +/- 0.2

1.3 */- 0.3

1.0 */- 0.3

17.7 V 3.0

<0.2

1.2 V 0.2

1.2 V 0.3

S2

investigative

0-6"

ITC

17.4 */- 7.7

25.7 */• 9.1

1.0 »/- 0.3

<0.6

1.1 */- 0.3

2.3 */- 0.«

1.2 +/- 0.3

5.1 «/- 1.0

.07 */• .03

1.2V 0.1

1.3 +/- 0.2

S3

investigative

0-6"

ITC

23.2 */- 9.1

17.9 */- 7.6

0.7 */- 0.2

<0.6

0.8 */- 0.2

2.6 +1- 0.4

0.7 */- 0.2

10.2 */• 1.4

<0.2

0.8 +/- 0.1

0.6 +/- 0.1

S4

investigative

0-18"

ITC

219 */• 50

27.3 */ 9.4

1.1 V 0.3

<0.6

0.6 */- 0.2

2.4 +/- 0.5

1.1 */- 0.3

10.9 V- 1.5

<0.2

1.2 */- 0.1

1.3 */- 0.2

I

I

I

I

&?£:'>;•;&:;

i

TABLE 7

FORD (EARTH CITY). PHASE II PROPERTY EVALUATIONDOtMHOLE GMMA LOGGING RESULTS

DEPTH(6* INTERVALS)

6 A12 B18 C24 D30 E36 F42 G48 H54 I60 J66 K72 L73 M84 N90 096 P102 0108 R114 S120 T126 U132 V138 U144 X150 Y156 Z162 AA168 AS174 AC

UNITS1

CUTS/HIMCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MINCNTS/MIN

WELLMI-101

36004000400040004200400040003600340040004000

, 380037003700350036003400340032003500340034003500360034003300

WATER

UELLMl- 102

4000420042004200430042004200390037003800400037003700370038003700370037003600330032003000300030003000300031003100

WATER

UELLMI-103

400040004000400032004000400040004000400040004000400040004000-310034004000400036003700340036003600WATER

UELLMl- 104

390042004400440045004700450040003300400040004300430043004000400040004000330036003900390037003700WATER

UELLMI-105

370036003800400040004000400043004000350036003800380037003800400040004000330036003900390037003700WATER

UELLMl- 106

3800380038004400440040004000400040003200420044004400440042004000420040004000

WATER

UELLMl- 107

36004000360038003800]6002I800MOOJ1400:;aoo:i8oo'.000..000•1200;ooo42004000

UATER

Readings are in gross courts per Minute without background subtracted.

"•t****** ff*-* •

' '

•

Table 8Volumes i Preservatives

Water Samples

IIIIi

;3p>v'-; £-!;U-:

•? ® k

parameters

VOAsSemivolatilesPesticides/PCBsHerbicidesMetalsCyanideRadiologic(Filtered)Radiologic(Unfiltered)

No.

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Size40 ml2 liter1 liter1 liter250 ml500 ml4 liter

4 liter

Type

glassamber glassamber glassamber glasspolyethylenepolyethyleneplastic

plastic

Preserv

HC1nonenonenoneHNO,NaOH

HN03

HN03

Table?Organic ft Inorganic Data

Uater Saaples

PARAMETER

TypeLaboratory

VOCs (selected)

Methytene Chloride

Acetone

1-1 Dichloroethane

1-1 Dichloroethene

Toluene

Ethyl Benzene

Xylene

Soivolatlles (selected)

Di-ethylphthalate

Bis(2-ethylhexyl )phthalate

Chrysene

Pesticides/PCBs

Herbicides

Metals (selected)

Antimony

Arsenicrnrv r

Mercury

Nickel

Selenium

Silver

Zinc

Cyanide

UNITS

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

Ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

Ppb

ppb

PPb

ppbppm

HU-101

inv

SU

18 B

5 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

152

ND

ND

ND

ND

102

ND

MU-102

inv

SU

16 B

ND

3 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

2 JB

1 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

326

ND

13.8

ND

ND

52.8

ND

MU-103

inv

SU

26 B

17 B

ND

ND

8

2 J

10

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

34.5

ND

43

ND

ND

ND

ND

34.1

ND

NU-104

inv

SW

1 JB

5 JB

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

131

ND

ND

ND

ND

40.7

ND

Ml- 105

inv

SU

18 B

6 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

2 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

73

ND

ND

ND

ND

489

ND

HU-106

inv

SU

19 B

4 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

27

ND

ND

ND

44.7

ND

80

ND

ND

ND

ND

56.4

ND

MW-107

inv

SU- .

16 B

3 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

33.1

ND

62

ND

10.9

ND

ND

43

ND

MW-108

102

_SU

15 B

ND

ND

3 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NO

34.5

ND

81

ND

14

ND

ND

44.5

ND

MU-109

102

EEI

ND

ND

6

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

3.1

ND

0.48

ND

1.3

1.1

ND

ND

HU-109D

102

EEI

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

14

ND

ND

ND

ND

2.5

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

MI-110

rinse

SU

16 B

4 JB

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

8 J

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

102

ND

ND

ND

ND

40.5

ND

Table 10*tadlotogic Data

Water Sample*

Parameter

Type

Laboratory

Gross Alpha

Cross Beta

Uraniua-234

Uraniua 235/236

Uranfua 238

Thoriua 230

Thorium- 232

PotassiuB-40

Cesiua-137

Radius 226

Radius 228

Units

PCi/l

PCi/l

PCI/l

PCi/l

pCi/l

pC«/l

pCI/l

PCI/1

PCi/l

pCI/l

pCJ/l

MHOI-UinvestigativeUnfittered

ITC

< 10.0

24.1 */- 8.4

9.1 */• 1.8

1.4 */- 0.6

8.6 */- 1.7

1.0 +/- 0.4

< 1.0

<130

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

MU101-F

Investigative

Filtered

ITC

< 7.7

9.5 V 6.3

1.3 */- 0.3

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

<160

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

MU102-U

investigative

Unfiltered

ITC

< B.I

7.1 */- 5.5

1.4 V 0.4

< 1.0

1.3 */- 0.4

< 1.0

< 1.0

<140

< 20

< 1.0

« 3.0

NU102-F

investigative

Filtered

ITC

< 2.3

< 8.4

2.4 V 0.6

< 1.0

1.6 */- 0.5

< 1.0

< 1.0

<180

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

NU103-U

investigative

Unfiltered

ITC

17.2 V 9.6

23.4 */- 10.1

1.3 */- 0.2

< 1.0

1.2 »/- 0.2

1.2 +/- 0.5

< 1.0

<150

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

NU103-F

invest! gat ivo

Filtered

ITC

< 7.0

<13.4

5.1 +/• 0.9

< 1.0

3.6 +/• 0.7

1.6 */- 0.5

< 1.0

<180

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

Table 10BMdiologic Data

Water Samples

Parameter

Type

Laboratory

Gross Alpha

Cross Beta

Uraniua-234

Uraniua 235/236

Uraniiai 238

Thoriua 230

Thorfia-232

PotassiuB-40

Cesiua-137

Radtua-226

Radiua-228

units

pCi/l

pCi/l

pCI/l

PCi/l

pci/lPCi/l

PCi/l

PCi/l

PCi/l

PCi/l

pCi/l

M/104-uinvestigative

Unfiltered

ITC

11.* */- 7.*

18.7 */- 7.*

3.8 +/- 0.7

< 1.0

2.7 +/- 0.6

2.0 */- 0.6

1.5 */- 0-6

<KO

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

NM1M-F

investigative

Filtered

ITC

< 2.0

< B.3

2.0 */- 0.5

< 1.0

1.1 +/- 0.4

< 1.0

< 1.0

104 +/- 60

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

NW105-U

investigative

Unfiltered

ITC

16.9 +/- 8.3

14.5 +/- 9.1

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

145 +/- 74

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

MW105-F

investigative

Filtered

ITC

« 10.1

7.32 »/- 5.6

1.3 */- 0.3

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

<140

•c 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

MU106-U

"investigative

Unfiltered

ITC

101 V 23

29.5 */• 12.2

2.2 */- 0.5

< 1.0

1.4 +/• 0.4

4.5 */- 1.2

6.1 */- 1.5

283 */- 114

< 20

1.4 */- 0.3

< 3.0

MU106-F

investigative-

Filtered

ITC

< 10.2

< 16.0

3.8 »/- 0.6

< 1.0

2.7 */- 0.5

< 1.0

< 1.0

<140

< 20

1.1 +/- 0.3

< 3.0

Table 10CRadfologic Data

Water Sables

Parameter

Type

Laboratory

Gross Alpha

Gross Beta

Uraniua-234

Urantua 235/236

Urantua Z38

Thorium 230

Thoriua-232

Potassiua-40

Ces<ua-137

Radiua-226

RadiiM-228

Units

PCI/1

PC«/1

pci/lPCI/1

PCI/1

PCI/1

PCI/1

PCI/1

PCI/1

PCI/1

PCI/1

NU107-U

investigative

Unfiltered

ITC

202 +/- 36

17.7 V- 11.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

« 1.0

<160

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

MW107-F

investigative

Filtered

ITC

< 10

< 9.3

1.6 V 0.4

< 1.0

1.2 V 0.3

< 1.0

< 1.0

<180

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

NU108-U

A43l. NU102-U

Unfiltered

ITC

< 7.5

< 10.3

2.2 V- 0.5

< 1.0

1.7 »/- 0.4

1.6 V 0.6

< 1.0

<190

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

HU108-F

diOl. HU102-F

Fiitered

ITC

< 10.6

< 8.4

3.6 */- 0.6

< 1.0

2.9 */- 0.5

< 1.0

< 1.0

<150

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

NU109-U

split NW102-U

unfiitered

CEP

< 2.0

7 +/- 3

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 5

11.0 V- 0.8

1.5 +/- 1.0

< 1

MU109-F

split NU102-F

Filtered

CEP

< 2.0

< 3

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 0.6

< 5

< 2

< 0.6

< 1

1 • " ' • ' • "V- ' '0^V : "•' '""f-

Table 100•••dialogic Oat*

Water Sautes

1Parameter

TMM

Laboratory

Gross Alpha

Gross Beta

Uranium 234

Uranfia 23S/Z36

Uraniua Z38

Tboriua 230

Thorium 233

PotassiuB-40

Cesium 137

Radiua-226

Radius- 228

Units

PCI/1

pCi/l

PCi/l

PCI/1

PCi/l

pCi/l

pCi/t

pci/lPCi/l

PC1/I

pCi/l

NdlO-U

rinse

UnfUtered

ITC

< 1.0

< 4.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

<100

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

KU110-F

rinseFiltered

ITC

< 1.0

< 4.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

< 1.0

<190

< 20

< 1.0

< 3.0

WAT

soil rinse

ITC

— • _

TABLE 11

SAMPLE REANALYSIS DATA

Sample ID

S4

81A

B2A

MW106-U

Type

SedimentSoil

Soil

Groundwater

Parameter(s)Reanalyzed

Gross alphaGross alphaGross betaThorium-230Gross alphaGross betaThorium-230Radium-226Radium-228Gross alpha

Date

5/25/905/25/905/25/906/07/905/25/905/25/906/07/905/25/905/25/905/25/90

Results ± 2G (units)

19.3 ± 8.6 (pCi/g)

1140 -1- 240(pCi/g)250 ± 53 (pCi/g)1750 ± 360 (pCi/g)4100 + 830 (pCi/g)627 ± 129 (pCi/g)

3530 ± 970 (pCi/g)89.5±4.7(pCi/g)< 1.16 (pCi/g)307 ± 133 (pCi/g)

D&M Job No. 19943-002-045June 14, 1990

West Lake Landfill

FORD PROPERTY

WEST LAKE LANDFILL - FIGURE 1SITE LAYOUT MAP

LANDFILLED RADIOACTIVE^MATERIAL U.S. REAL ESTATE

EARTH CITY, MISSOURI

Dames & MooreJob No. 19943-002

West Lake Landfill

- FIGURE 2

AREA OF OVERLAND GAMMA SURVEY

U.S. REAL ESTATE

EARTH CITY, MISSOURI

Job No. 19943-002 Dames & Moore

zoo *oo 800 FT

FIGURE 3

GAMMA SURVEY GRID OVERLAYS

U.S. REAL ESTATEEARTH CITY, MISSOURI

Job No. 19943-00:? Dames & Moore

\V

FIGURE 4

SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS

Q SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS U.S. REAL ESTATEEARTH CITY, MISSOURI

Job No. 19943-002 Dames & Moore

West Lake Landfill

• SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS

FIGURE 5

SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS

U.S. REAL ESTATEEARTH CITY, MISSOURI

Job No. 19943-002 Dames & Moore

West Lake Landfill

V

BORING/ MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

FIGURESSOIL BORING/ GROUNDWATER

MONITORING WELL LOCATIONSU.S. REAL ESTATE

EARTH CITY, MISSOURI

Job No. 19943-002 Dames & Moore

CC'*'f;i-Cl.= Oit-MA LCO

X :0i

• ]>

FIGURE 7-101 FIGURE 7-102

9 "000 -

CO*NHCi.= GAi.t u i.CG

a n < « w

!• tterVTMG

FIGURE 7-103

DCWNHCL: '.CG

0 » « U -00 <73

FIGURE 7-104

FIGURE 7

DOWNHOLE GAMMA RADIATION PLOTS

U.S. REAL ESTATE

EARTH CITY, MISSOURI

Job No. 19943-OOS: Dames & Moor'

I4-I

-I11J1JJ1It

IIII

APPENDIX ACertificates of Calibration

ii CORPORATION

12345 KINSMAN ROAD. NEWBURY. OHIO 44065(216) 564-2251 telex 980474

CERTIFICATE OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION

iIDAMES & MOORE

CUSTOMER:-micro rem A880N

INSTRUMENT MODEL.- SERIAL *

CALIBRATION DATA

1DrB-rp

jj

RANGEi

X1000

X100

X10

XI

XO.l

EXPOSURE RATE;

160 mR/h

16 mR/h

.1,6 mR/h

160 uR/h,

: 16 uR/h

INST. READING

160

16

1.6

160

16

EXPOSURE RATE

40 mR/h

4 mR/h

400 uR/h

40 uR/h

i!

INST. READINGi

i1

40 i\i4 1

400i1

40tIJl THE Cs-137 1 Ci SOURCE USED FOR THIS CALIBRATION HAS A CERTIFICATEiiii

STATING ITS TRACEABILITY TO N.B.S. (N.I.S.T.) STANDARDS.

jl* INSTRUMENT CALIBRATED WITH A CS-137 GAMMA SOURCE USING A CONVERSION-' FACTOR OF 1 urera/h

1 uR/h

OTHER CALIBRATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.f A / ^ , i

CALIBRATED BY: '-* MKl^frfc k -^ -DATE:-

Irj>m

1I

JCRON CORPORATION

iCUSTOMER:-

12345 KINSMAN ROAD. NEWBURY. OHIO 44065(216) 564-2251 telex 980474

CERTIFICATE OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION

DAMES & MOOREQ* --u-a-

micro rem A882NINSTRUMENT MODEL:- SERIAL * --i CALIBRATION DATA

RANGI EXPOSURE RATEilNST. READING! EXPOSURE RATEIINST. READING!

X1000 •160 mR/h 160 40 mR/h 40

>I1I1IIi

X100

X10

XI

XO.l

16 mR/h

1.6 mR/h

; 160 uR/h

16 uR/h

1.6

160

16

4 mR/h

400 uR/h

40 uR/h

3.9

400

i1

40

"I THE Cs-137 1 Ci SOURCE USED FOR THIS CALIBRATION HAS A CERTIFICATEJ STATING ITS TRACEABILITY TO N.B.S. (N.I.S.T.) STANDARDS.

•I * INSTRUMENT CALIBRATED WITH A CS-137 GAMMA SOURCE USING A CONVERSION} FACTOR OF 1 urero/h

1 uR/h

OTHER CALIBRATIONS AVAILABLE ,«PON REQUEST.

CALIBRATED BY:- = -DATE-.-

1

APPENDIX BChain-of-Custody Records

O

DAMES & MOORE CMAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDSninpln Sourco & Cllonl 7~?)j£E> CJJ> /?^/^£ £5~7fl s ^Projoc l T l l l o &&f-~?/-S' <^ ( ~T^

Dald

•

4,

.Tlmo

v-^

/

SampleJ.D.. No. .-.'

S/5 ^

J 35/C (£•£-

oB-/og-a{jQ~ 3

tjs~ yfjg-rvg-G

^~^

^~^R e l i n q u i s h e d by l Data

• ( S i g n a t u r e ) .<^~^) / ^1 >Tt/f ///. ./XV'f Jt—(/f-\ '(I*-lie 1 1 nqul ahed byl Dote

( S i g n a t u r e )

Re 1 ( \v\\ii sited byl Date( S i g n a t u r e )

Tlmo

Tina

Tina

StunplaTypo

5*d,-^*A^Se^/.S /JSX?,/

s*>,:( -c^^pSo/ 1 c^p.30 f 1

^tf. (^| 0 1 1

g "d 1 I

^Oi I

5<r: (

\ ^

Mo. of••-• Conlnlnors"

11

1 '1/1

1

(1

1.. f

/

^ —— "N

^ • \ ^^~^

Hccclvcd byl(Signature)

Kccclvci l byl• (S igna ture)

l \<:cclvcd byl( .Sign/ i t l i re)

Date

Dntc

Data

Tine

Time

Time

Jol> No. /^^y3 -O01

Sampllno Silo

.

:sA CL*- fc><-L £</5oj ^j

•av/t8<^HI Co'31

ia«^/^5o5-y^/o fjc w

f '7c//o/^w^———^ ^^~

^^ \ ^ '

lie 1 1 n<|iil otied byl(S lR i i a t i i r n )

He 1 lu<j i i l olicd byl(Signature)

lie 1 1 i i<( i i l olied byt( S i g n a t u r e )

Date

Date

Date

Flold Personnel . (Signature) .

Demarks

0-£ "o~C •:• .0-C

O^Q"n-e:o-c . .

.

*

\^_'

Tina Received byl Date . Tine(Signacura)

Tine Received byl Dute Tine(Signature)

Tine Rece ived byi Dote T i m e(Signature)

- J ..J

O

DAMES & MOORE Cl IAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD

Snmpla Sotirco & Cllenl T^-oj^t) (_)£ &-* ( ^5"/?f2>Projocl Tlllo 0^fL &£

Dald

^

•

/

4—I\_

.Tlrno

//

//

SnmpleI.D. No. •

T 7 / _ / S

KI-B

&I-C-S2-AS -I?B5-Cftk£rU/A-T^.^

/ . \\\\ '

^~

Ilellnqulilied byl Da to Tlno• (Signature) /'"""; — ~> x/ ?-> -1 A •///•• <~-'oc\

del 1 nquieiied byl Date Tina(Signature)

He 1 1 ivpil elicd by i Data Tina( S l g nature)

SnmnloTypo

Soil

**:(

Jo: 1

Jo>l

Sv.'t

so: 1*oi 1cJ tv

X/

//

No. olConlnlnors

//

f ;

//

/

/

/

^\• \

\\

. VReceived byi(Signature)

Received byl(Signature)

F^cclvcd byi(Signature)

Date

Date

Data

Time

Time

time

Job No. /?<?Y3 ~OQ Z

Snmpilno Silo

/Ir t 1•

L

Art-* £

-h-. —————«!/ •

^ __ _^

X^ ^/

//

^^^ •

Ite 1 lin|ul olicd byl Date(Slguatura)

Uc 1 lit(]u lotted byl Data(Signature)

Re 1 1 ni|ii( nlicd byl Date(SI gnatiire)

Flold Personnel. (Signature) .•

Remarks

O-&G-£

<*-/£0-C0-C '£-/£ • • •<Z-/?

X/

V /t

'Tim a deceived byl Date . Tine

* ** •

Time Received byl Date Tine(Signature)

Tine Received byl Dote Time(Signature)

*.v1o.v 7'

DAMES & MOORE Cl IAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDSample Source & Cllenl f^/t-J? O^ &c^ £.&~feT5e~t ' rojocl Title <?ix7I O' £7

Dnlq

V//Z.

/

/

•/ -

\^

.

.Tlmo

/

/_x

SampleI.D. No. V

ftkc-5V33

C'cJ^p ^Co' p f

/"\/ \

/ 1/ . 1

\^

•

del Inqulalied byl Data Tlaa• (Signature) /

~~r^ / /> 7 / V//2 ^3°T)-/^/^ Y''(fr 1 1 nqnl alierl byl Dnte Tlroo

(Signature)

Re 1 I «v|ul nlicil by I Dnte Tina(S igna tu re )

SnmploTypo

So,' ]

Sjedi;^^^,-^d

SO,' (

Sd,1 /

\ y^~~ — *^

No. olContnlnnrs

33^ \

3-}

//

//

//

riccelved hyi Dnta

Ilccclvcd dyl Dntn(SIgnntiirc)

*

t\«!cclvcd Uyt Dnln(Slgnnture)

Time

Time

Time 1

Job No./ "7^^~00~i_

Snmpllno Silo

•

^~~X\\• \ •\\ .^^ — -^

•

Field Personnel. (Signature) .-•

Ramnrks

-7- P// 5ft*t/ K fejf fh(, . Mt f C~AO* *,

t/ ..

/

//

//

f

-llellni)iiloltcd liyl Unta Tln« Received byt Date . Tine

(Sittiincuca) (Signature)| •

tc 1 lti<|iil nltcd byl Dnte Time Received byl Date Tine(filgiintnre) • . (Signature)

In 1 Impil nlietl l>y i llnte Tlreo Hocclved byl Dote Time(Mgnnture) (Signature)

r"

Pur?t^

f 3 -DAMES & MOORE Cl IAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD

•

f

Snmplo Soufco & CHenl 'J^tfft-E? CJ 5 j&z*^ ds/*^*-

Projocl TMIe £kV7V C<' 6^ -j^^t^o- £T

On id

_— — —

•

.Tlmo

1

1

\

\\

SnmploI.D. No. '.

£ /Aft2,j\

/

/

\ /xy •

He 1 1 IK] u( • hed byl Data Tlmo(SlanaMjrs) y

(UrTi nqul sited byl Date Tlmo(Signature)

He 1 1 ivjul elicil by | Date Tina( S igna tu re )

SnmploTypo

<T/5//

sof f

^^ —/

/

No. olCoiilnlnnrs

/

/

— -^X\\\

\

necolved byl Date(Signature)

deceived byl Date(Signature)

fi<:cclvcd byl Data(Signature)

Timet

Tlmr

Time

Job No. / ^^yCJ- OOJ.

Snmpllnq Silo

•

/^ /x^ ,^^ .

•

He 1 1 mi ill nlioil l>y ;(Signature)i

Hr 1 1 nqul alicd byl(Signature)

He 1 1 in|til nlicd byl(Signature)

1 Date

Date

Date

I T• j

Hold Porsbnnel. (Signature) .•

flcmsrns

o~^r-dJ-C*- •' •

)

/ . •

./. .

//

/' :

t

'

«a i\cccivea oyi Ua te . Time(Signature)

Tine Received byl Date Time(Signature)

Time Itccclved byl Date Tine(Signature)

-r/r or c u ,I I . !•gfcj Hta-j •b-J rth—' •hh-* •!§—•' •d-^-

DAMES & MOORE Cl IAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD

Sample Source & ClientProjocl Tllle

Dale

r

k )

•

R e l

-~> .

.Time

Cd-'f5I3'<5t(:oa/coo1~<X>

<?'oe>

SampleI.D. No.

/7}(jO f&^U-/Y\(jU lO5r

/fauj Jo& t£-/nc*j /O6 F/woo /o7 LL/n (*-<> /oi F

•

I n q u l a l i e d by l

(I«rl1 nqut shed byl( S i g n a t u r e )

Ke 1 1 ivpil sited byi( S i g n a t u r e )

Date

Date

Date

Time

Tin"

Time

SampleTypo

L*J*fjUf

,1

IV

No. olContainers

/l(

/1\

Received byi(Signature)

Hccelvci! iiyi(Signature)

K ^ c c l v c d by l(Signature)

Data

Date

Data

Time

Time

Job No.

<' .Sarnpllno-Sllfl —

U 5S |

1111

L

.

'

R e l i n q u i s h e d byl(Signature)

I tel lnqii lahed byi(S igna ture)

Rol 1 nqul ohed byl(S igna ture)

Date

Date

Date

Field Personnel. (Signature)

RemarksA 1 O ^ >

r~lAc. ISi^J "T^' P^v't/i— »-LA-y

f(.scosc.^ uj/ . • .

T)c^rc( Dooio^cr^r^fKov^

l^j Xf?>- // A f *i' \ .

a .

9

Tine Received byi Date Time(Signature)

Tine Received byi Dote Time(Signature)

Time dece ived by: Do te Tine(S igna tu re )

DAMES & MOORE Cl lAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD

f

Sample Source & Cllenl t-fZrefProjocl Tllle

Dale

V-/7

•

\

-b\J

t-s^ i'L £ .' £1.Time

<?.-&&

f.^6

10- '00/ ()• QO

/o:~&(Of 3013-30JS'30/y 30/Y-'3o/

/

^

SampleI.O. No.

fllUJllO U.

Altcj » ; o FWHJIOZOLMtAjfoZ F/Mto/ovarib j IcfrF/Wto toS^M<j^>(o?>Ffl/\ Co fo^ L*~-fr\(jLJlO*lF

~v^/ \A^txJf of F~woo i o ( CL

el inqulalied byl Data Time(Signature) /

Relinquished byt Date Time(Signature)

H e l l tvjul shed(S igna tu re ]

by: Date Time

Somf/loType

UJ^6^

——— j ————

=1=/

/

No. olContainers

(

\

^^^~-^

received byl(Signature)

Received byt(Signature)

Received byt(Signature)

Data

Date

Date

Time

Time

Time

Job No.

Sampling Silo

\/ ••

Relinquished byt(Slgnatura)

Relinquished byl(SlRlinture)

Re 1 litqiil nhed byl(Slgnatttra)

Data

Data

Date

Field Personnel, (Signature)

Remarks

'"D /: /0 . Q A f ,

J- • •* /

"*h • / G> ( k

T\-/v\ Rjfe/r* w• f, . • ' '

'

^ _ x

V /" \~^—^ ^—

t

Tlmo Received byl Date Time(Signature)

Time Received byl Date Time(Signature)

Time Received by: Dote Time(Signature)

DAMES & MOORE Cl IAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD

Sample Source & Client ^pc^v c( £-'£..<^-\ £V <?*-Prolocl Tit le l^/*? VJ-^O"D

Dald

Yfc*>|1

/

/I

•

//

LX

.Tlmo

P'3o1

JI,")-*/5

\ J

/""/

SnmpleI.D. No. '.

/v\c^>IO I11/I

/nu^tos

A\V_^^

Re 1 inqtil ilied byl Data Tloa• (Signature) //

Rellnqulalied byl Date Tlaa(Signature)

Re 1 1 ivpil alicd byl Date Time( S ignature)

SnmploTypo

LO^fvCl

i

^^

//

No. olConlnlnors

c) : c(Oi(Q/ - ^^

c3 - / ^i - ^00.^

( - ,0 S2>.*i.(r5 ->f6Mt.<?i , "\ c?

[ (r ^-\

D - / J?C7~ ' •**

/ - Z$x>.<\JL.. (- • a c2',/o(

__ ^ ' .

\V

.Job No.

iSSBlM-n c //Uic«

A r),(.eAM&w/•//CO?

I-/-C* f

(\ <"MO*

A /'U jz-/u, ^v//•/flJO?

^..^ ^ .

•

Field Personnel. (Signature) •

Remarks

\lc>fa**.^.'.>J.tl*S

l^^/ [.&>*>+<fr^fe&<^/(J *

/Rc.-k^s

LJ>OA • •^s-e^i.V^/'^s/ rJ? /^5^

^Vjj.-f^s-

_— ---"" -----

V

-Received byl Data Tine Relinquished byi Data Time Received byl D a t e . Time(Signature) ' (Signature) (Signature)

Received byl Date Time He 11 nqul alteJ byl Date Tine Received byl Date Time(Signature) (Signature) • (Signature)

f \ .>cclvcd byl Data Tine Re 1 1 nqul abed byl Date Time Received byl Date Tlmo(Signature) • (Signature) (Signature)

•Sr I-J

DAMES & MOORE CIIAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDSample Source & ClientProject Ti t le

Dale

V-fe-7

*'—

\[/

-f-{ /

.Time

> // -<x>1/I

J<froo<r;e>o

iI

*A^—^

/ I(

SampleI.D. No.

yflldj /.£>£•/1

W/lAG-J /07

vTF- (

^,/

/^

Relinquished byt Date Tine• (Signature)

iie i inqui ihed byt Date Tine(Signature)

R e t(

l iv{ulehcJ byi Date TineS i g n a t u r e )

SampleType

L. ^^<J^•

1I1

xl—^

{ ^

No. olContainers

3 " */o*,f{ 2J?

o) - / .£I - <2&.<u?( • 3-r^tV3,. V^,uc7

/ - Tie^- (^/ tto^.t[ ^) TZ'.^c^'/ - Vfr?c,f

-^"^"^^^^ I

\

Received byi(Signature)

Received byt(Signature)

kucclvcd byt(Signature)

Date

Date

Date

Tine

Tine

Tine

Job No.

Sampling Site

1-iC //\S,l<,

A. t:\tfA>CV-/

f-f^. )0 ?l-te'f

ii f-'ii </tfl\L,l .

A )s, Off/y/oo?/ f C f

^ _^^^^^Relinquished byi Data

(Signature)

Rellnqulalied byi Data(Signature)

Rel inqu ished byi Date(Signature)

Field Personnel. (Signature)

Remarks

L^Ofi

<C,.»A/\.-O < • / « * ( * *K<?r( / //L??1"'

~1 ( V

/K£LTf>/ S

OOA • •^^\:^^(. A'(f> *IwJ^ / f&^-t

Ci^ ' ''MQ t/s

C V^A_^\

9

Tin* Received byi Date Tine(Signature)

Tine Received byi Date Tine(Signature)

Tine Received byi Date Tine(Signature)

I_.J

,DAMES & MOORE Cl IAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD

/

Samplo Source & Cllonl ]^r J>

Project Title

Dale

-t_]

U

/•

^Rel

.Time

7 '(JO

/&'<&/a- 3o/3 30/</. 3&

//

1/

SomploI.D. No.

./IUJ//D

/*160/,oa/n^fof/^\ 6O (O 3,1/1 OU (O^f

T/?-&

/\11\\ /^x •

1 rvj ul a lied bylSignature)

Rel inqulahtd byl(Signature)

Rel liv^ulalictl by:Signature)

Data

Date

Date

Time

5%

Tina

Tina

SamploType

CO'fcl

I/

/./I

/^^/

//

No. ofConlnlnnrs

77-)2

-7^

v X

^Received byl Data(Signature)

Received byl Date(Signature)

Kticclvcd by: Data(Signature)

Tine

Tine

Time

Job No. f^^y3 'OO^.

Sampling Silo

\-\ ——— 7^

A XV — "^

•

flel Inqulalied byl Data(Signature)

llcllnqulalied byl Data(Slghnture)

Rcl ln<|iil olied byl Date(Signature)

Field Personnel. (Signature)

Remarks

Oot, <5^: p^^f l^^ A^J-/ \ ' *

——, ——— :( >{>£- • •

" \\ S~\

\ / \\^^ ^

t

Tlma Received byl Date . Tine(Signature)

Tine Received byl Date Tine(Signature)

Tine Received byl Date Tine(Signature)

I I I_ I , If /••

I I I I I I i . . J

'••TV

DAMES & MOORE CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDSample Source & ClientProject Title

Dale

if-l?

4

•

L

V

.Time

U-oo

!-41

//

SampleI.D. No.

ML>/£>9

/ \

,-\-A

\>^—

Relinquished byi Date

HH !"»•;! shed by: Date(Signature)

Re 1 1 ivj nlehcil byt Date(Signal are)

Time

i ma

Tina

SampleType

f^•*w-* * L- *• f

//

//

/s

No. olContainers

"7- --

x^ \/ \

/ \' \

\\\

Received byt(Signature)

Wlr V L iL*t"^ *-"*\|'yiA*77 v*Ar Ift'S- )Received byi(Signature)

*

Received byt(Signature)

Date

Tiato

Data

Tine

Tine

Tine

Job No. /*/<?c/~3 -OO ~L

Sampling Site

- • -— . — —————— - — _^

/

///

/(/ X"'~"

/

k /^—^

.

'

Rel Inqul olied byt(Signature)

Re 1 Inqul shed byt(Signature)

Relinquished byt(Signature)

Date

Date

Date

Field Personnel. (Signature)

Remarks

OCX'. :feM ,*<:>„/. /G>3tj^^j.

_Le.t£/2<^-//s^/O*

.

-

«

Time Received byi Date Time(Signature)

Time Received byi Dote Time(Signature)

Tine Received byt Date Tine(Signature)

DAMES & MOORE C1IA1N-OF-CUSTODY RECORDSample Source & Client f-£>^</

Project Title £TttSft C"V 6^

Onto

H-n•i-f?

< ———

•

/(

1

.Time

I/.&O//.•ov

- — — — - — _

^^

• ——— . -' •

SnmploI.D. No.

Muj/o<=tu.fy]k) 1 ' &*? F— T---I ———

__^

^ -"

^——— ——— ——

Rel Inqulalted byl

;i. 1 i r^.ji =i: = J «;••;

(Signature)

Re 1 1 ixjtil alicil byl(S ignature)

Data

Date

Tine

T • — _.I A UltJ

Tlma

SampleTypo

i J<£t,CX-Jrt LA

_— — -^

_ —— - — —

No. olContainers

(

t

———— —— ————

___— . —— -r— ——— "

^ ——— — —

Received byl Date(Signature)

(Signature)

Received tiyl Dote(Signature)

Tine

t line

Time

Job No. f*f*? */3 ' Oo"2.

Sampling Site

— —— —— —

________ —— —— -

•

•

Re 1 liu|iil olied byl(Signature)

i«c 1 1 iu|iii niieo iiyi(Signature)

DC 1 1 nrpil olied byl(Signature)

Data

I'aca

Pate

Field Personnel. (Signature)

Remarks

•&• ' £V<fVd/ovV.J>AA.( ^ . • » • •

— — -^^) • »

^^^—— " " . .

.

— ____ _____

^

Tina Received byl Date Time(Signature)

Tine Received byi Dace Tine(Signature)

Tine Received byt Dote Time(Signature)

IJIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

APPENDIX CLaboratory Analytical Data

• ' •• ' ita 'roJ -L~4 — i

Dames1 1701Saint

Attn:

WorkP O S

Test

Gross AlphaGross BetaCesium-137Potassium-40Radium-226

Radium-228Thorium-228Thorium-230

^ H MM MM III MM MM 1HH ••• ^HH ••• ^BH •§• MMI ••§• BII ^M- ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^™ • B ••• • H ^^H ^BH i M |H ^^H ^1' * l_*(Jltl»l*Ult> IOI* t^llWII'LJIIIIICtltL,<Jl t" «JtlL4UILJI 1, ItlCi. n i . , i . .n .JI.I.J . . ! « » . . " . «• < ^^

^^. 1 ' t. J t Jl l/v LK.ILi 1 •Ljtiiii.til i/ . iv</ I'/ILI.. ii .1 1 1 1 . : >l i, ; OUT OF WTA'i u ' *O/ fcitti-m OH • HAK • EiQU-9tJ££-£l£!HEi^^ .'

?< Moore Date Received: 04/18/9OBorman Drive. Suite 340 Date Repor ted: 05/09/90Louis. MO 63146 Work Order: 9O-O4-333

Category :Dave Purington

ID: "Environmental uflHES 4 MOORE•

MAY H 1990HU109U MW109FIIW1U7U uwiu/r ST. wins. MISSOURI

04/17/90 11:00 04/17/90 11:00<2 C2

pCi/l iter7+/-3 C3

pCi/liter1 1 . 0 0 . 8 C2

pCi/literC5 . <5

pCi/literI.5+/-1.0 CO. 6

pCi/literCl <1

pCi/literCO. 6 CO 6

pCi/literCO. 6 CO. 6

pCi/liter

I •— I _ I -^— IOoncrolt* forHI I. L1I.IX loU'O I ¥ hiilMtiJ l-f 'ow Ml:vl, i, M/S-i l I.' OUT OF STATE r> 1O/B4B-B1 BB • f AM-

• I .,•

"»" i ClonCPolu to i" t=.n\/ifLji iiuc:i i i,«-»i • • »-»««t»*«tiJt §. ii«w. ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^H

PageReceived:Test

Thnrium-232Uraniuirr234Uranium-235Uranium-238

204/18/90

Units

pCi/liter

pCi/liter

pCi/liter

pCi/liter

CEP, Inc. REPORT05/09/90 16:18:30

MW109U- - - - - - - -

04/17/90 11:00CO. 6CO. 6

CO. 6

CO. 6

Certified BIJ:

MW109F

04/17/90 11:00CO. 6<0. 6

CO. 6

<0. 6

<^f^

Work Order # 90-04-353Continued From Above

.

111

Pafe 1Received: 04/13/90

REPORT DAHES & NXJRE ,

rTRSLO,

TO 11701 BORHAN DRIVESUITE 340

Rl<« REP05/1B/90 19:17:24

REPORT Wort Order I SO-04-04V

PREPARED n/RADIOLDCICAL SCIENCES LAB.BY 1550 BEAR CREEK ROAD_____

ST. LOUIS, HO 63146ATTEN DAVID PURINCTON

OAK RIDCL TN 37831

ATTEN ERSXiERTIFIEDBY

PHDJE 615-482-9707CLIENT DAHE5 5T

COMPANY DAHES & KODREFACILITY ST. LOUIS. HO

SAMPLES J.CONTACT JIH DIUJffD

MEWED TO CORRECT UNITS AND RESULTS. U-ISO AND TH-230 A'flTH-232 IEIE ALSO ADDED TO COMPLETE REPORT

UDRK ID HATER SAMPLETAKEN _________'TR/ws _____;_TYPE___________

p.a i _______INVOICE under separate cover

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONfiiUAT________

TEST CODES and NAICS used on this reportCALPHA CROSS ALPHA________CBETA CROSS BETA__________

CAmA SPEC_________RA226 RA-226RA228 RA-22BTH22B TH-228TH230 TH-230TK232 TH-232U234 0-234U235 U-235/236U238 U-238

T. WUlb, uilSSOURl

I1••»

JIIiiiiiiiiiiiiIi

Paje 2Rtciivttf: 04/13/90

ITRSL Oak Ridft REPORTRiiolts b| Snail

Hork Orttr I SO-04-0 19

SATFLE IDUAT FRACTION OJA TEST CODE K__ WE CAMA SPECDate V TiiTCallictirf MtlTJ^T ——Caitjorg

WITS iCi/1URTN 09/18/90

GAftMSPEC RESULT 2-SIGflA OTIQ

VERIFIED BY KDF

RESULT 2-5IGHA

K-40CS-137 <2.0E+1

CROSSGROSS BETARA-226RA-228U-234U-235/236U-238TH-230TH-232

2.27E+14.92E+0 2. ITE^O2.16E+0 0.&3E-K)<i. B8E+01.02EM 0.20E+1<1.0E+0

l.BOE-K)O.B7E+1

C.OE+0

IJI1JIJIII

Received: 04/13/90ITRSL Oak Ridie REPORT

05/18/9019:17:24Work Order t SO-04-04?

REPORT DAHE5 & MOORETO 11701 BORMAN DRIVE

PREPARED rr/RADIDLD8ICAL SCIENCES LABBY 1550 BEAR CREEK ROAD

SUITE 340 OAK RIDCEi TN 37831ST. LOUIS. HO &314A

ATTEN DAVID PURINCTDN ATTENERSXORTIFIED BY

PtOE 615-4ffi 7Q7CLIENT DAHE5 5T

COMPANY DAMES It MOOREFACILITY ST. LOUIS. HO

SAtfLESJ.CONTACT JIM DILLARO

UORX ID HATER SAffLETAKEN___________"TRANS ___________"TYPE__________"

P. 0. I __________"INVOICE under teparate cover

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION01 UAI______

AMENDED TO CORRECT UNITS AND RESULTS. U-ISO AND TH-230 AHDTH-222 ]fSE «_SO ADDED TO COMPLETE REPORT

TEST CODES and NAMES used on this retortCALPHA CROSS ALPHA ________CBETA CROSS BETA

CAHW SPECRA226 RA-226RA228 RA-228TH228 TH-22STH230 TH-230TH232 TH-232U234 U-234U235 U-235/236U238 U-238

» » M - - 1SSO

iiiiiJii•r»

I

1

I

I

I—. M

I

I

I

I

I

I

Paje 2Rictivttf: 04/13/90

»m£ ID HAT

ITRSL Oak Ridje REPORTRitalti k| SMI!I

Work Order I SO-04-049

FRACTION OJA TEST CODE _3__ IWE JAWASPECDati & TiitCoIlicttd 04/lg79T~

UNITS tCi/1WIN 09/18/90

GAWASPEC RESLT 2-SIGHA OT>£R

VERIFIED BY KDF

K-40CS-137 <ZC£+1

CROSSCROSS BETA 4.92E+0RA-226RA-228U-234U-235/236U-238TH-230

RESULT 2-SIGHA

Z27E+1 0.36E+12.17E+0

ZlfiE+0 0.63E+0<A.B8E+01.02E+1 0.20E+1<1. OE+0&6SE-H) l.BOE+06.01EH O.B7E+1

TH-232

IPa|t 1Received: 04/18/90

DAMESUOORE

ITRSL Oik Ridoelidat REP03/18/90 15:27:40

REPORT Work Order I SO-04-W3

REPORT__________TO 11701 BORHAN DRIVE

SUITE 340

PREPMO n/RADIOLDCICAL SCIENCES LAB.BY 1550 BEAR CREEK ROAD_____

OM RIDGE, TN 37831ST. LOUIS. HP &3146

ATTEN DAVID PIRINCTOH

CLIENT DAMES STCOf ANY DAMES fc MOOREFACILITY ST. LOUIS. HO

ATTENERSPtOC 615-482-9707

SAMPLES 12

/CERTIFIED BYCOHTACT JIM DII1ARD

UDRK ID UATER SAKPLES ,TAKEN___________TRANS___________TYPE___________

P.O. I________:INVOICE under separate cover

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION'01 HU110U _________02HM110F _________030405 HU108U0&HM1Q8F07 HU103U08 HH103F

10 HH104Fn12 mioiu

TEST CODES and MAKES u»d en this reportCALPHA CROSS ttPHA_________CBETA CROSS BETA______K__ CAH1A SPECRA22A RA-22ARA22B RA-22B

TH-22STH22BTH230 TH-230THZ2 TH-232U234 ( 234IB35IJ238 U-23S

m*

J1"* S-2t2^/ ^? \r V^ / ^/ V? /

|l |:a ^*^

j

2 8S 2^ a

gf39

a

giil

2«=»

*

a ssS sa a is

llllll

E

> » » " ' ' ' I ' I f f ! | I~T I

Pijt 3Rtctivtd: 04/18/90

ITRSL Oik RidffRtiults k|

REPORT Work Order I 30-04-0*5

SAMPLE ID NI102U FRACTION 03A TEST CODE CS NAME CANNA SPEC-. Date fc Tit* Collected 04/17/90 Catcaori NA

J1

1

1

1

1

1

UNITS iCi/1«TN 09/18/90

CAMSASPEC RESULT 2-SICHA OTHER

K-40 <1.4E+2 GROSS ALPHACS-137 <2.0E+1 GROSS BETA

RA-226RA-228U-234U-235/23AU-238TH-230TH-232

• <

VERIFIED BY RDJv

r

RESULT 2-SICHA

<B.08E+07.09E+0 5.46E+0a.oe+oa.oe+o1.42E+0 0.39E-K)<1.C€+01.30E+0 0.3BE-H)aoE+oaoE+o

•

SAMPLE ID NU102F FRACHGN 04A TEST CODE CS NAME CANW SPECDate It Tite Collected 04/17/90 Cateoora NA

J

1•

J

1

1;I

UNITS DCi/1URTN 09/18/90

GAMM SPEC ' RESULT 2-SI6M OTHER

K-40 <1.8E+2 GROSS ALPHACS-137 C2.0E+1 GROSS BETA

RA-22&RA-22BU-234U-235/236U-238TH-230TH-232

VERIFIED BY RDJ

RESULT 2-SICNA

<2.2£«0<B.43E+0

a.oe+oi43£+0 0.57E+0

1.57E+0 0.45E+0aoE*oa.oe+o

Page 4Received: 04/16/90

SWFLE

ITRSL Oak Rid|e REPORTRitultt k| Saaple

Uork Ordir I SO-04-063

FRACTION 05A TEST CODE CS__ MAJg JAJKA SPECDati fc TiS~ColIicttd 04/177W~ JJA.

WITS BCi/1URTN OS/18/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

fitfttt SPEC RESULT 2-SISHA OTI£R RESULT 2-SIGKA

K-40CS-137

C.9E+2 CROSS ALPHA C7.50E+0CROSS BETARA-22ARA-22BU-234U-239/236U-238TH-230TH-232

<1.0E-K)G.OE+02.20E40O.OE-H)1.67E+01.57E+0<1.0E40

0.47E-K)

0.40E+00.61E-K)

SAWL£ ID HW108F _ 06A TEST CODE CS__ NAfC CAHHA SPECDatt & Tit*~Collectid 04/177W~ — HA

UNITS DCi/lURTN 05/18/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

CAWA SPEC RESULT 2-SICHA OTJO RESULT 2-SICHA

"1

K-40CS-137

<1.5E+2<2.flE+l

CROSS ALPHA <CROSS BETA <B.36E+0

<1.0E-K)a.oe+o3.57E40a.OE-K)

RA-22ARA-228U-234U-23S/236U-238TH-230TH-232

0.62E-K)

2.93E-K) O.ME-K)a.OE+0aOE-K)

Page 5Received: 04/18/90

SAHPLE IDHH103U

I7RSL Oat RitfieResults kf

REPORT Wort Qtitr I S0-04-06!i

FRACTION 07A TEST CODE CS__ NAME CAHHA SPECDate I TiiTCollecte*4 04/l7790~—————Catejorg JJA_

UNITS iCi/1URTN 05/18/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

CANMSPEC RESULT 2-5IB1A OT>O RESULT 2-SICHA

K-40CS-137

<1.5E+2 CRtSS ALPHA 1.72E+1 0.96E+1MOSS BETA Z34E+1 1.01E+1RA-22& <1.0E-H)RA-228 G.OE-K)U-234 1.2£+1 0.19E+1U-235/236 O.OE-K)U-238 1.23E+1TH-230TH-232

0.19E+11.22E+0 0.52E+0<1.0E+0

SA»l£ ID HU103F FRACTION 08A TEST CODE CS__ NANE CAH1A SPECDate I Ti5-Collecte< M/lTTW Cateaora NA

UNITS DCi/1MRTN OS/18/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

CAWA SPEC RESULT 2-SI6M ODO RESULT 2-siem

K-40CS-137

<l.BE+2

U-238TH-230TH-232

<1.0E+0

CROSS ALPHA C7.00E-K)GROSS BETA <1.34E+1RA-22ARA-228U-234U-23S/236

s.ioe+oa.oe-K)3.5SE-H)1.57E+0

0.85E+0

0.66E+00.4SE-K)

fsI

-

I 1

\A

5 Z•y S

l

o o o ooo

ira

ddOI>J

Bi

ft

sf

25Q

5'• -5S

I C N ol oi F , L

s

1 ) 1 / 1 ^^T i1i i

IJJ9me __

Page 7Riciivri: 04/18/90

SAH7LE ID HttOIF

WITS DCi/1WTN 05/18/90

1TRSL Oak Ridft REPORTRttults k| Saaili

Work Order I SO-04-06J

FRACTION HA TEST CODE 6S__ NAME WHA SPECDati Ir TiiTtollecttd 04/17790"" Caitgorg

VERIFIED BY RDJ

6AWA SPEC RESULT 2-SICHA OTHER RESULT 2-SIGHA

K-40CS-137 <2.0E+1

CROSS ALPHA <7.7E«0GROSS BETA 9.52E+0RA-2Z6 <1.CE+0RA-228 a.OE+0U-234 1.26E+0U-225/236 O.OE+0U-238 <1. OE-H)TH-230 <1.0E-H)TH-232 <

6.Z7E-K)

0.31E40

J

SAffLE ID HU101U

UNITS oCi/1WIN OS/18/90

FRACTION 12A TEST CODE CS__ NAHE 6AHKA SPECDate I Ti« Collected Q4/17/TO Utejor;

VERIFIED BY RDJ

CAmASPEC RESULT 2-SIB1A OTHER RESULT 2-SI6HA

MOCS-137

<1.3E+2<2.0E+1

TH-232

<1.0E+0

CROSS ALPttt <1.0EHCROSS BETA 2.41E+1RA-226RA-228U-234U-23S/236U-238TH-230

9.06E+01.37E+0R64E+01.02E+0<1.0E*0

0.84E+1

1.73E400.58E+01.69E-H)0.36E-K)

III\

page 1 ITR5L Oak Rid» REPORT Wort Order t SO-04-064Received: 04/17/90 03/18/90 16:11:46

REPORT DAHES & MOORE PREPARED IT/RADIOLOCICAL SCIENCES LAB.TO 11701 BORHAN DRIVE!

SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, HO &314A

ATTEN DAVID PURINCTQN ,

CLIENT DATES ST SAfPLES iCOMPANY DAMES I MOORE i

BY 1550 BEAR CREEK ROAD /^T^ ifi flOAK RIDGE, TN 37831 6sJ*^l&4-^f

/£RTIFIED BYATTEN ERS /PtOC 615-482-9707 CONTACT JIN DILUAD

ii

FACILITY ST. LOUIS, MO

UORK ID UATER SAMPLES

ASNDED TO INCLUDE U-ISO, TH-230 AND TH-232 ON ALL FRACTIOfiAND TO CORRECT CROSS ALPHA AND CROSS BETA RESULTS FOR 05A.

TAKEN iTRANSTYPE

P.O. 1 ;INVOICE under separate cover

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION01 HH105U_________

.-, 02 HM105F03HH106U

05 HM107U6

TEST CODES and NAMES used on this reportCALPHA CROSS ALPHA________CBETA CROSS BETA_________6S__ CAftW SPEC________RA22A RA-226RA228 RA-228TK229TH230 Ttt-230TK232 TH-232U234 0-234U235 IK233/236U238 U-238

1I1

Page 2 ITRSL Oat Ridge REPORT Wort Order I SO-04-064Received: 04/17/90 Results bg Sample

W105U FRACTICM 01A TEST CODE CS NAME CAfflA SPECDate & TiM Collected 04/1WW Cateeon NA

UNITS pCi/1WTN 03/18/90

CAmA SPEC RESULT

K-40 L45E-V2CS-137 <2.0E-H

2-SICMA OTHER

0.74E+2 GROSS ALPHAGROSS BETARA-22&RA-228U-234U-233/236U-238TH-230TH-232

VERIFIED BY KDF

RESULT 2-SICMA

1.69E+1 0.83E+11.45E+1 0.91E^1<1.0E+0<3.0£+0<1.0E+0<1.0E+0<1.0E-H)aoe+oaoe+o

—™ SAffLE ID miOSF___________ FRAHION 02A TEST CEDE 6S__ NAME CAtfIA SPEC————————————— Date i TiieHollicted 04/l57W~ —————

UNITS pCi/L VERIFIED BY KDFWIN OS/18/90

CAffiA SPEC RESU.T 2-SICHA OTKR RESULT 2-SIGHA

K-40 <1.4E+2 GROSS ALPHACS-137 <2.0E*1 GROSS BETA 7.32EH) 5.ME+0

RA-22& O.OE^ORA-22B CLQE+QU-234 1.33E+0 0.33E+0

! U-235/23& <1.0E+0U-238 a.OE+0TH-230 aOE+0TH-232 aoe+o

1i Page 3

Received: 04/17/90

SAMPLE IOHH10&U

ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORTResults Ig Staple

Uork Order t SO-04-QM

FRACTION 03A TEST CODE 03__ NAME CAmA SPECDate It Tiiicolleeted 04/16/90 Category

UNITS oCi/IURTN 03/18/90

VERIFIED BY KDF

CAHNA SPEC RESULT 2-5ICHA OTHER RESULT 2-5IGHA

K-40 2,821+2 1.14E+2 CROSS ALPHA 1.01E+2CS-137 <a.OE+l CROSS BETA 2.95E+1

RA-226RA-22BU-234U-233/236U-238TH-230TH-232

1.41E+0Q.OE+02.1BE+0aoE+o1.37E+04.45E+06.12E-K)

0.23E+21.22E+10.29E-H)

0.49E+0

0.38E+01.16E+01.45E-K)

SAWLE ID HUlOtf FRACTION 04A TEST CODE CS__ NANI W*A SPECDate I TiiTColIectei1 04/l57 T" ————tattqorq tv>

UNITS oCi/1URTN 03/18/90

VERIFIED BY KDF

CANHA SPEC RESULT 2-SICHA OTIO RESULT 2-SICrtt

K-40CS-137

<1. 4E+2<2.0E+1

CROSS ALPHA <1.02E+1CROSS BETARA-226RA-228U-234U-233/236U-238TH-230TH-232

L05E+0a.oe+o181E+0C.OE+O2.63E-K)<1.0E+0

0.2SE-K)

0.63E-K)

0.49E-K)

IiI1i

Page 4Received:

SAJFLE ID

04/17/90

NU107U

WITS pCi/1WTN OS/18/90

ITRSL Oak RidaeResults k|

, FRACTION 05ADate I Tite Col

REPORTSaiylt

TEST CODE 6Slected 04/1579C~~

VERIFIED

Work Order 1 SO-04-064

NAME CAmA SPECtattaora

BY KDF

NA

Wttt SPEC RESULT 2-SIGtlA OTKR RESULT 2-SICrtA

K-40CS-137

<1.SE>2<2.0Efl

SWf LE ID W107F

UNITS nCi/1WTN 03/18/90

GROSS ALPHA 2.35E^1GROSS BETA 1.77E+1RA-22iRA-228U-234U-235/236U-238TH-230TH-232 a.OE+0

1.10E+1

G.OE+0a.OE+0

1. OE+0

FRACTION O&ADate t TiiTti

TEST CODECS__ HME CAMA SPECollected 0 4 / 1 5 7 9 0 ^ — — — — —tategoryw

VERIFIED BY KDF

GAWASPEC RESULT 2-SIWW OTHER RESULT 2-SIB1A

K-40CS-137

<1.8E+2<ZOE+1

CRtJSS ALPHA <GROSS BETA <RA-226 <1.0E+0RA-228 aOE+0U-234 L59E+0 0.39E-H)U-233/23& C.OE+0U-238 1.24€+0 0.34E+0TO-230 aOE-KJTH-232 <

111ii1i1i

Page iReceived: 04/13/90

REPORT DAttS & MORE

ITORL OAK RIME REPORT05/31/90 15:57:35

Hark Order I 50-03-179Work Not Complete

TO 11701 BORMAN DRIVESUITE 340

PREPARED IT/RADIOLOCICAL SCIENCES LAB.BY 1350 BEAR CREEK ROAD

OAK RIDCE. TN 37B31ST. LOUIS. HO &314& BY

ATTEN DAVID PURINCTON ATTENERSPHONE 615-4K-9707

CLIENT DAMES STCOf ANY DAHES * HOORE

SAIPLES 3CONTACT

FACILITY ST. LOUIS. HO• SAH»LE5 Bl-A AMD B2-A MILL BE REPORTED AT A LATER [ATE.

WORK ID SOIL SAffLESTAKEN _______TRAMS _______

TYPE _______P. 0. I _______INVOICE under separate cover

SAffLE IDENTIFICATION01 B2-A_________.02 54__________03 Bl-A

TEST COOES and NATES used on this reportCALPHt CTOSS ALPHA_______CBETA CROSS BETA_________RA226 RA-226RA22B RA-22B___________SPEC SPECIAL FDRH FOR REPORTINCTH229 TH-228 __________TH230 TH-230_________TH232 TH-232___________

i

iilii

DAMES & MOOR£

JUN 04 1990ST. LOUIS.

.JIPagf 2Received: 04/13/90

SWPLE ID

ITORL OAK RIDGERtwltt k|

REPORT Work Order I SO-tt-179

FRACTION OJA TEST CODE SPEC NMC SPECIAL FTJRH FOR REPORTINGD«ti t TiitColltctid Q4/lg7W~ Cation HA __

PARATETER RESULT 2-SIGHA ERROR UNITS

GROSS ALPHA 4.10E+3 0.83E+3 pCi/gGROSS BETA &.Z7E+2 1.29E+2RA-22A 8.95E+1 0.47E+1RA-229 0.1£*0 pCi/sTH-ISO f

SMTLE ID S4 FRACTION 02A TEST CODE SPEC HME SPECIAL FORH FOR REPDRTINCDitt I TiiTCollicti* 04/127W~ Cjitiora tU

••

I PARAMETER

CROSS

RESULT 2-5IGHA ERROR UNITS

1.9S+1 O.B6E+1 pCi/g

Pa|i 3Rtctivtd: 04/13/90

SMTH. IPB1-A

ITDRL OAK RIDGERctulti k|

REPORT Uork Order I SO-05-17?

FRACTION 03A TEST CODE SPEC HV€ SPECIAL FORK FOR REPJ.TINC127W~Dtti V TiStolUcttd 04/1! C*t»|OT|

PARAJCTER RESULT 2-SIGtM ERROR UNITS

CROSS ALPHAGROSS BETATH-ISO

1.14E+3 0.24E+32.30E+2 0.33E+2§

Ki/g

Received: 04/17/90ITORL OAK RIME REPORT

05/31/9013:96:12ttork Order t SQ-OJ-180

REPORT DAFS t MOOSETO 117D1 BORHAH DRIVE

PREPARED rr/RAPIOLDCICAL SCIENCES LAB.BY 1590 BEAR CHEEK ROAD_____

SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, m &314A

ATTEH DAVID PURINCTDN

OJSffDAgS 5TBArBtHOORE

FACILITY ST. LOUIS. Ml

SAIfLESJ.

OAK RIDCE, TN 37831

ATTEN ERSPHIC &15-482-9707

/CERTIFIED BY"" ONTACT JIHDILLARIi

URK IDUATERSAffLETAKEN_______TRANS _______TYPE_______

P.O. I _______DMJICE vnttr inaratt covtr

SATPLE IDEKTIFICAnON01 m 10MJ___________

TEST CODES and WES used on tbis reportCALPHA CROSS ALPHA_________SPEC SPECIAL FORM FOR REPORTING

IPaie 2 ITDRL OAK RIME REPORT Work Order I SO-OMBO

-_ Received: 04/17/90 Results If.

SAIflE ID m IQJU ________ FRACTION 01A TEST CODE SPEC JWC SPECIAL FORtl FCR REPOBTINC—————————————— Data 4 TiiTColl«ett< (U/lSTWT" —— Cateiori MA —— __

PARACTER RESULT 2-5IGMA ERROR UNITS

CROSS ALPHA 107E+2 1.33E+2 pCi/1

1 TCT - St. Lduis fonneriy Envlrodync Engineers. Inc.Consulting Engineers. Scientists and Analytical Services

1908 Innerbelt Business Center DriveSL Louis. Missouri 63114-5700

(314) 426-0880Fax. (314) 426-4212

REPORT OP ANALYSIS

CLIENT: Mr. Dave PuringtonDames t Moore11960 tteatlina Ind.. DriveSuite 155St. Louis,

PROJ. 1: 3500-00385

PARAMETER

AHTXMOtrrARSENICBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERLEADMERCURYHICXELSILVERSELENIUMTHALLIUMZINC

PARAMETER

CYANIDE

MO 63146

UNITS

(UG/L)(UG/L)(UG/L)(UG/L)(UG/L)(UG/L)(UG/L)(UC/L)(UG/L)(UG/L)(UG/L)(UC/L)(UG/L)

UNITS

(UG/L)

MW109

< 243.1

< 3< 3< 10< 14< 730.48< 151.11.3

<1.0< 16

MW109

< 5

..»

REPORT DAZE! May 10, 1990SAMPLE ANALYZED t One water aaopli analyzed

for the parameterslilted below.

I

DATE RECEIVED: April 18, 1990P.O. »<

MW109DUPLICATE

< 242.5

< 3< 3< 10< 14< 73 •

-< 15<1.0<1.0<1.0< 16

ROTEs Sea reverse aide for -STANDARD CLAUSES.-

APPROVED!

disk 87/tob.jA- <

Lisa A. 'Xoohy, Prograa Coordina<:or

Twin City Testing CorporationAiranurotm* [HIHl 9™* <*

DAMES & MDOR€

MAY i-i 199057. LOUIS. MISSOURI

JJfI

Page 2 REPORT OP AHALYSZS

CLZZMT: Mr. Dave PuringtonDaaaa i Moore

PROJ. It 3SOO-0038S

REPORT OAZB:DAZE RECEIVEDI

P.O. «i

Mar 10, 1990April 18, 1990

IfII

1—"•

III

I

^ PARAMETER

LIHDAHZHBPTACBLOR .BZPTACULOR ZPOXZDBENDOSOLFAN IDZELDRZNEHDOSOLTAH II4,4'-DDTETORIH ALDEHYDEKETHOZYCHLORalpha-BHCbeta-BHCdolta-BHCganBa-CBLORDANEalpha-CKLORDANE4,4'-DDEEHDRIN4,4'-ODDEHDOSOLFAN SOL7ATEERDRIN KBTONBAROCXOR-1016AROOOR-1260AROCLOR-1221AROCLOR-1232AROCLOR>1242AROCLOR-1254AftOCiOR-1243ALDRXKT01APHBHB

PARAMETER

2,4-DSZLVZZ

DKTZCT10HOHZTS LIMITS BLANK

MW109KW109 DUPLICATE

(OG/L)(DG/t)(UC/L)(OG/L)(DG/L)(DG/L)(DG/L)(OG/L)(OG/L)(OC/L)(DG/L)(OG/L)(OG/L)(DG/L)(DG/L)(DG/L)(OG/L)(DG/L)(OG/L)(DG/L)(OG/L)(DG/L)(OG/L)(DG/L)(DG/L)(DG/L)(DG/L)(OG/L)

OETECTIOHCHITS LIMITS

(DG/J.) 0.745(DG/L) 0.197

0.002P. 0030.0040.0050.0060.0100.0150.0240.0(30.0020.0050.0010.0030.0030.0060.0160.0110.0220.0190.0470.1870.1070.0830.0440.0540.0940.0030.205

BLANK

<0.745<0.197

<0.002<0.003<0.004<O.OOS<0.006<0.010<0.015<0.024<0.063<0.002<0.005<0.001<0.003<0.003<0.006<0.016<0.011<0.022<0.019<0.047<0.187<0.107<0.083<0.044<O.OS4<O.C94<0.003<0.205

NW109

<0.745<0.197

<0.002X0.003<0.004<0.005<O.OOS<0.010<0.015<0.024<0.063<0.002<0.005<o.ooi<0.003<0.003<0.006<0.016<0.011<0.022<0.019<0.047<0.187<0.107<0.083<0.044<0.054<0.094<0.003<0.205

MW109DOPLZCAIB

<0.745<0.197

<0.002<0.003<0.004<0.005<0.006<0.010<0.01S<0.024<0.063<0.002<0.005<0.001<0.003<0.003<0.006<0.016<0.011<0.022<0.019<0.047<0.187<0.107<0.083<0.044<0.054<0.094<0.003<0.205

Page 3 REPORT OP ANALYSIS

CLIENT: Hr. Dave Puriag-tonDames i Moora

REPORT DAISIDAIS RBCEIVBDI

May 10, 1990April 18, 1990

PROJ. »i 3500-00385 P.O. »:

VOLATILE COMPOUNDS

ACROLBINACRYLONITRZLBBENZENEBROMODICHLOROHETHANBBROMOFORMBROMOMBTHANE

CARBON TETRACHLORXDBCBZOROBENZENE

CHLOROBTHANE2-CHLOROETBYL VINYL ETHERCHLOROFORMCHLOROKETHANE

DIBROMOCHLOROKETRANE1.1-DICHLORETHANE1.2-DICHLOROETHANE1.1-DICRLOROeTHENETOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 'CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROFENEETHYL BENZENEKETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHAJnrTETRACKLOROBTHYLENE •TOLUENE1.1.1-TRZCHLOROETHANE1.1.2-TRZCHLOROBTHANETRZCHLOROETHENEVINYL CHLORIDE

DETECTIONLIMIT(UG/L)

1001005551055

10S510SS5555555SSS5S510

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNONDNDNDNDNDSDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDRD

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND6

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDRD

iI

SURROGATE COMPOUNDS

1,2-DICHLOROETHANE-D4TOLUENB-DBP-BPB

RCVRY

94101

98

I

11IIt=

IIIIII

k •>_

II

L ~—

I* fc»

I

!

^!

I

I

Page 4 R8PORT OP ANALYSIS

CLIENT i Mr. Dave PuringtonDamea t Hooro

PROJ. It 3500-00385

REPORT DATS I Mar 10, 1990DATE RECEIVED. April 18, 1990

P.O. It

DETECTION

ACID COMPOUNDS

2-CHLOROPHENOL2 , 4-DZCHLOROPHEHOL2 , 4-DIMBTHYLPHBNOL2 , 4-DZNZTROPEBNOL2-HZTROPBZNOL4-HITROPHENOLPZNTACSLOROPHENOLPBBHOL2,4, fi-TRZCELOROFHBHOL2-METHYL-4 , 6-DIHZTROPHENOL4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL

SURROGATE COMPOUNDS

2-FLUOROPHENOLPHEHOL-d62,4, C-TRZBROMOPXENOL

LIMIT(DG/L)

1010105010SOSO10105010

BLANK(DC/L)

NDNDNDNDHDNDHDHDHDRDHD

RCVRY

4834S3

HW109(UG/L)

HDHDHDNDNDHDHDHDHDHDND-

RCVRY

4»2»7»

MW109DUP

(UG/L)

HDHDHDHDRDHDHDHDHDRDHD

RCVRY

2«!•2»

tBelow QC limitB

BASE NEUTRALCOMPOUNDS

ACBNAPHTHENBACENAPHTBYLENBANTHRACENE 'BZHZZDZHBBEMZ(A)ANTHRACENEBENZO(B,X)FLDORAHTHENEBEHZO(GBZ)PZRTL2NBBEHZO(A)PTRBNBBZS (2—CELOROBTHOZT) MBTHIUJEBZS(2-CZLOROEIHYL)BTEBRBIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPTL)BTHBRBIS (2-BTBTLBEX7L) PHTBALATE

DETECTIONLZMZT(UG/L)

101010SO1010101010101010

BLANK(UG/L)

RDNDNDHDHDNDHDHDHDRDHD< DL

MH109(UG/L)

HDHDNDHDHDHDNDNDNDHDHDHD

MH109DUP

(UG/L)

RDRDRDHDHDRDNDRDHDRDHD14

Page 5 REPORT Of ANALYSIS

CLIENT « Mr. Dave PuringtonDanes ft Moora

PROJ. It 3500-00385

REPORT DAXBl May 10, 1990DATS RBCBXVBDl April 18, 1990

P.O. tl

DETECTIONBASS NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS

COHTD.

4— BROHOPHENYL PHZHYX ETH3IRBUTYL BENZYL PHTEALATE2-CHLORONAPHTHALZNZ4-CHLOROPHEHTL PHZNYL ETHERCHRYSZNEDZBEHZO(A, H) ANTHRACENEDZ-H-BOTYL PHTHALATE1 , 2-DZCHLOROBENZZNZ1 , 3-DZCHLOROBZNZZNE1 , 4-DICHLOROBENZZNE3,3' -DZCHLOROBBNZZDZNZDZ2TRTL PHTHALATEDZHZTHYL PHTHALATB2 , 4-DZNZTROTOLUZNB2 , 6-DZNZTROTOLUZNEDZ-N-OCTYL PHTHALATB ,1 , 2-DIPHBNYLHYDRAZINBDZ-H-PROPYLNZTROSAMZNZnOORAHTHENBrLOOREHRHEXACHLOROB2NZZNBHEXACHLOROBUTADZZBBHZXACHLOROCYCLOPBNTADZZOTBEXACHLOROBTHANEZHDBNO ( 1 , 2 , 3-CD ) PYREHBZSOPBORONBHAPHTHALZNEHZTR08ENZZHBH-HITROSODIHETHYLAMIHBH-HZTROSODZPHZHTLAMZNBPBENABTHRZNBPYRZNB1,2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENB

SURROGATE COMPOOHDS

HZTROBEHZZRB-d52-7LDOROBZPHZNYLTZRPHZNYL-dl4

LZMZT(UG/L)

101010101010101010102010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010

BLANK(UG/L)

HDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDNDHDHDHDHDNDHDHDHDNDHDHDBDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHD

RCVRY

796279

KW109(UG/L)

HDHDHDHD .HDHDHDHDHDHDHDND.HDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDKDB»HDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHD

RCVRY

5748S3

MW109 ,DOT

(UG/L)

HDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDNDHDRDHDHDHDNDHDHDHDNDHDHDHDHDHDHDNDRDHDHDHDBDHDHD

RCVRY

817184

'41

X0h30

no o oa- o r-j>x x i-0 •<! T^- -. Ox \ !T ITS OC O O "

•c -a I- =«II QJ II t.> -j -a a-I U U !T51 13 Q qju a. -w!U TJ J* fla: '2: s- 'J

•311 a< Z4J -^n •?

:3 a

IIII

N

at

5|7

3 o

dl

cn

If)71.0X; a

) i

.il

0)

= -001 t

ru -0>

• •4

i- aa c•u• E -O r] in0 6 -S U 3

O O

•n ^ i>•II O CC !-. .-•n r- i

3Q.

'U

•01= rjc co o

> TC :>

UJ ff.

— Q G

i. ao

I I00

CO

« S3

f a • t^ • *—i- * — - —•

. P.O. LJOX LJ:J;D I * Sui ii.a He, Mow Muxicu «.l /'. it it.-.' OUT OF STATE BOO/ t>*»ti-cJ1 tlt» •

Page 2 CEP, Inc. REPORT Work Order ftdeceived: 04/16/90 Results fay BaiTiSAIfH ID BJA____________ FRACTION OIA TEST CODE AB_S_ NAME Gro55_AMa/Je.ta_

Date & Tune Collected 04/12/90____ Category SOIL

T y p e of= A n a l y s i s De tec t ion RESULTLimit \id/q

Gross A l p h a O 3 14. 6-t-/-l..Q

Gross Hcta 0. 1 gi.2-<-/'-0.6

All results reported in:

UN ITS ______pCi / Q.r.vim

SAMPLE ID B1A ___ ____ FRACTION OIA TEST CODE CS1375 NAME Cesium-137Date fc Tune Collected 04/12/90____ Category SOIL

Type of A n a l y s i s D e t e c t i o n L i m i t RESULTpC i / qr a.n

Cesium-137 O.I O. 14 + /-O. O6

A l l r e s u l t s r e p o r t e d i n :

UNITS _____pCi/qram

I H.LJ.

Paqe 3Received: 04/16/90SAMPLE ID B1A

CEP, Inc. REPORTResults by Sample

Work Order ft 90-04-263

FRACTION OJA TEST CODE ISOUJ NAME Isotopic UraniumDate & lime Collected 04/12/90____ Category SOU..

Type of Ana lys is

Urani uin-234Uranium-235Urani uin-238

DC tec t i onLimit pCi /c j

O. OliO. O50. 05

All results report in:

UNITS ______pCi/gvciin

RESULT

4 2+/-0. 5O. 6 + /-0. 21. 6+/-0. 3

SAMPLE ID fllA FRACTION 01A TEST CODE K 40 5 NAME Potas5iuin-4QDate & Time Collected 04/12/90 Category SOIL

Type of Analysis RESULT

Potassium-40 1^1 +/-1.4

All r e s u11 s r e p o r t e d in:

UN i TS

> 1'iiyiJiJjnM lli:il ^hj M'i! ill u Hi In' ri'|ii'mlnrnil win illy nr in |i.nl Im ;»|VIM li'.ii»| .mil/in in hrr |im |insi''. nui'rmu i,ii|ii,iliulMH in r.iiiinitr.liiin wilhlim 11,11111; wiiluml s|ii:f:iiil |k:i MU'.-JIUI .11

f'~~~ ' " i i II... I

f-i.LJ liJ(— IX LjUtU I * tidi il.ej |-tj. l^uw Mi J / M I :n I I / : it l> :

Page 4 CEP, Inc. REPORT Work Order ft 90-04-263Received: 04/16/90 Results by SampleSAMPLE ID BiA ____________ FRACTION QIA TEST CODE R.2628S NAME Radiunr226/22B ______

Date & Time Collected 04/12/90 ____ Category SOIL

Type of Analysis Detection RESULTL i m i t pCi/y

Radium-226 O. i, 41. 4 + /-O. 4

Radium-228 O 1 ________<Q. 1

All results report in:

UNITS ______pCi/nram

SAMPLE ID BIA FRACTION OIA TEST CODE TH2305 NAME Thorium-230Date l( Time Collected 04/12/90____ Category SOIL

Type of Analysis . Detection Limit RESULTpCi/gram

Thorium-230 O O5 ________<O. 5

All results r e p o r t e d in:

UNITS _____nCi/qrani

t_,OiM CJ. UOX taL I ft hiui il.ii !-«_!. Nuw Mi;-i. 11 LI /:i I )>.! OUT OF STATE BQO/ti4t)-21 Uti • FAX - iaUtj-Utlti-

Page 5Received: 04/16/90SAMPLE ID B1A

CEP, Inc. REPORTResults by Sample

Work Order H 90-04-263

FRACTION (HA TEST CODE IH2325 NAME Thoriuin-232Date ?/. Time Collected 04/12/90 Category SOIL

Type of Analysis

Thorium-232

Detection L i m i tpC i/gram

O. OS

RESULT

O. 96>/-Q. IB

All results reported in:

UNITS p C i / q r a m

SAMPLE ID B2A FRACTION 02A TEST CODE AB_S_Date ?< Tiine Collected 04/12/90

NAME Gross Aloha/BetaCategory SOIL

Type of Analysis De tec I; ionLimit pCi/g

Gross A l p h a

Gross Beta

O 3

O. 1

All results r e p o r t e d in:

UNITS ______nCi/gram

RESULT

199. 1+/-2. 4

___34. 5+/-Q. 5

l_«t-»l I

H.LI. LJ I >• t-nii ii.ri l - i j . lvU:w I vi.:-11 11 I I / : .1 i. • our u* t.T AT t UUU/ £3-4ta-c£'l Ufa* • t-Mx-

Page 6Received: 04/16/90SAMPLE JD B2A

CEP, Inc. REPORTResults by Sample

Work Order tt 90-04-263

FRACTION 02A TEST CODE CS1I/5 NAME Cesium-137Date & Time Collected 04/12/90____ Category SOIL.

Type of Analysis

Cesium-137

Detect ion L i m i tpCi /grarn

0. J

RESULT

<0. 1

All results reported in:

UHITS ____B.£.L/.ar 3 !L>

SAMPLE ID B2A FRACTION 02A TEST CODE lSCiy_S NAME Isotopic UraniumDate & Time Collected 04/12/90____ Category SOIL

Type of Analysis

Uranium-234Uranium-235Uranium-238

Dttec t i onL i in i t [i C i / g

O 05O. OSO. 05

All results report ire

UNITS _______pC

RESULT

. 4-I-/-O.. 8

2. 4 + /-O. 3

P.l'J. l.ll JX l3ldt>'l • SLJ.JI lL.il ht:. IMUW l/li.:.--ll .11 I I /'- il ' « • ? OUT OF tiTATt MCH-I,/ I t»«_l • i-<

Page 7Received: 04/16/90SAMPLE ID B2A

CEP, Inc. REPORTResults by Sample

_ FRACTION 02A_ TEST CODE KJQJ NAMEDate & Time Collected 04/12/90

Work Order It 90-04-263

Category SOIL

Type of Analysis RESULT

Potass!um-4O 9. £•«•/-3.

All results r e p o r t e d in:

UNITS pC i/gram

SAMPLE ID B2A FRACTION Q2A TEST CODE R2628S NAME Radiurc-226/228Date ft Time Collected 04/12/90 Category SOIL

Type of A n a l y s i s

Radium-226

Rad ium-228

Detec t ionL i m i t p C i / g

O. 6

O. 1

All results r e p o r t in:

UN IT5 _______pCi/grain

RESULT

132+/-B

15O+/-3B

uji jjij /1 IT i iMM;(jH i

> | "|»i?.i_v^ nui'i" uur '.Hjii'tlin i; IH~ in ruMiiitrluui wild mil• n;iiiii! williiml '.|i*:i cif |M-I inr.- iim n. ' i it .1.-)

. P.LJ. ULJX Ljid'J I «• S..H il..i 1-tJ. NiJW MII^II :n tl /: il I. ' OUT OF STATE UOO / ti<4 ti-ii 1 tit* • FAX- t>Ut>-±*Uc£-±4c!fci tJ

Page 8 CEP, Inc. REPORT Work Order ft 90-04-263Received: 04/16/90 Results by SampleSAMPLE II) B2A FRACTION 02A TEST CODE TH2305 NAME Thorium-230

Date & Time Collected 04/12/90____ Category SOIL

Type of Analysis D e t e c t i o n Limit RESULTpC i/gram

Thorium-230 0.O5 _____

All results reported in:

UNITS p C i / q r a n i

SAMPLE ID B2A FRACTION 02A TEST CODE TH2325 NAME Thorium-232Date & Time Collected 04/12/90____ Category SOIL

Type of A n a l y s i s D e t e c t i o n L i m i t RESULTpCi/gram

Thorium-232 O. OS 1. 3+/-O. 5

All results reported in:

UN ITS _____pCl/qram

Page IReceived: 04/13/90

ITRSL Oat Ridge REPORT05/15/W 15:53:05

aork Order I SO-04-048

II

REPORT DAfES tt MORETO 11701 BDRHAN WIVE

SUITE 340

PREPARED IT/RADIOLDCICAL SCIENCES LAP.BY 1550 BEAR CTEEK ROAD

OAK RIDCE. TN 37B31_____/ST. LOUIS. HP am.

ATTEN DAVID PURINCTON

CLIEHT DAHE3 5TCOPANY DAfES It MOOREFACILITY ST. LOUIS. HP

ATTEN ESSPHOte 615-482-9707

SAKPLS 19

BYCONTACT JIM IILLARD

ID SOIL SAMPLESTAKEN _______TRANS _______TYPE _______

P. 0. t _______INVOICE under sesarate C3vgr_

SOTLE IDENTIFICATION01 SI__________.02 S2__________ "•JJ 3J

05 Cl_•Ji C2_•:/ UB-I0° UB-310 U3-4• • UB-512 UB-613 Bl-A14 Bl-9S5 B1-:lii B2-A17B2-319 B5-C19 BK5

RA-2S6RA-22S

TEST CCEE5 and NAMES used on this reportCROSS ftLPHA________CROSS SETA_________

SPEC

TH-SScTV-230TH-232

U-225/226

0^3=3 '0 O^SiT 'I 2::-HiC*3!r-C W537 Ox-HiC^3s: '0 C*-3iC 'I E2-P.

1-20'?> 92/53-ft Z-3KT c-33fc'9 £:-33t-SW'S I-aTS'6 tS-fl 9r39rO 0*362'I , B32-VH1*316'0 \+a£1 V13CS3QBC 0*321'0 C^33T'I 9cc-V»>3iZ '0 1*2W '1 VndTV SSOtt CH-3;& -C CH-32I 'S Ol-X

iTfe3S criiD WSIr-2 iTi=3S :3cS V*WS

Oa/SI/SO Ml£/?35 SilK'i

•f. ru.3T.- -[ T"7-H1t v ^^J • wv i Ll i

&+3E '0 C-*333 "I C2-HIi-30t c T-3frB 'E E2-fl

(r-333'0 C*aIO'T r^-fi 0*3?i'C C-*33T'I 53i-VH1-201 'I 5*2/9 '2 VISE £3085 I-3S T> iSI-SOI*33ri 1*312'E VHtTR 5S288 1+33:'0 I*2ZI'l' Oh-X

WS13-3 1TIS3J! a-UC WSIS-Z iT£3l!

06/SI/SO Klffi3H3 AE GIs'IH3/»

ii/2i/t(i pa^jsncj asri 5:2iE «*«• 3Wfc' 55 33D2 iSai ViG KOIlWtJ IS CI I

Bi'S-tO—Cs t JSD^L WK i!:Ji3i SSpTiJ J|?2 TScil

i

t

f"

_ff Page 2Received: 04/13/90

ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORTResults by Saaple

Work Order » SO-04-048

SArPLE ID S3 FRACTION Q3A TEST CODE CS__ NAffi CAM1A SPECDate it Ti«e Colleettd 04/l2/?0 ' Category

UNITS BCi/gURTN 05/15/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

GAttIA SPEC RESULT 2-SI6HA OTHER RESULT 2-SICMA

R-40CS-137RA-226RA-228

1.02E+1<2.0E-17.B2E-15.86E-1

0. 14E+1

O.S4E-11.02E-1

CROSS ALPHACROSS BETAU-234U-235/236U-223TH-230TH-232

2.32E+11.79E+17.46E-1C6. OE-l7.82E-12.55E-M)7. 05E-1

0. 91E+10. 76E+11.91E-1

1. 96E-10.44E-H)1. 81E-1

SMPLE ID S4 RACTION 04A TEST CODE 5SDats i TiaTC-llectao 04/lgTTT

NAffi 6AT!t1A SPEC

UNITSURTN 05/15/90

VERIFIQ BY ER5

CAMKA SPEC RE5JLT 2-SICM OTCEH RESULT 2-SICMA

R-40CS-137RA-226RA-228

1.09E+1<0.21.1BE-K)1.2i£-H]

0.1S+1

0.11W0.16E4)

CROSS ALPHACROSS BETAU-234U-23S/236U-23STH-230TH-232

2.19E+22.73E+1

6.38E-1

1.08E+0

0.50E+20.94E+10.28E+0

2, ICE-10.49E-H)0.29E+0

Page 3Received: 04/13/90

ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORTResults bg Saaple

Work Order t SO-04-04IJ

SAHPLE ID ClDate I Tiae Collected 04/12/90 Cateaora

"P UNITS DCi/o.._ IRTN 05/15/90

-f"fc GAKtIA SPEC RESULT 2-SIC.1A OTHER

K-40 1. Q1E+1 0. 14E+1 CROSS ALPHA— « CS-137 <2.0E-1 CROSS BETA

• RA-226 1.06E+0 0.11E-K) U-234-• RA-223 1.22E+0 0.16E+0 U-235/236

1 -• 0-228"• TH-220Jj TH-222

il

VERIFIED BY RDJ

RESULT

1. 50E+12. 55E+19. 51E-1<6. OE-19. 51E-1Z22ETO1.3ZE+0

SATfLE ID C2 RACTICN OtA TEST C3CE GS

i Date & Tiae Collect

UNITS pCi/gURTN 05/15/90

r . CAM1A SPEC RESULT 2-SICHA OTHES

L. K-40 1.8ZE+1 0.29E+1 CROSS ALPHACS-137 C2.0E-1 CROSS BETA

r ' RA-226 1. 1SE+0 0. 12E+0 U-234•L RA-228 1.29E-H) 0. 18E+0 U-235/236

U-238, . ' TH-230i TH-222

L.

L. —

L ^

2-3IC.1A

0. 71E+11. 01E+12. 80E-1

2.80E-10. 45E-K)0.32E-K)

MAKE CAWIA SPECBO 04/12770 Citeaoru

VERIFIED BY RDJ

RESULT

1.34E+12.1EE+11.02E-K)<6.0E-17. 65E-12.37E*01.22E-K)

2-SICMA

0.82E^10.98E+10.24E-K)

2. 01E-10.43E-H)0. 27E-KJ

Page 4Received: 04/13/90

SA»LE IDUB-1

1TR5L Dak Ridge REPORTResults by Staple

Work Order t SO-04-048

FRACTION 07A TEST CODE CS__ NAME CAHMSPECDate & Tiae Collected 04/12/90 ""Category

UNITS oCi/aHRTN 05/15/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

GAW1A SPEC RESULT 2-SIM1A (me RESULT 2-SIGHA

K-40CS-137RA-Z25RA-223

9. 91E+02.97E-11. OEfrO1. 11E-K)

1.36E+00. 55E-1MOW0.14E+0

CROSS ALPHAGROSS SETAU-224U-225/226U-2STH-220TH-222

2.36E+12. 35E+11.27E-K)C6.0E-11.04E+02.53E+09. 85E-1

0.99E+10. BSE+t0. 25E-K)

0.22E-M30. 5GE-H52. 68E-1

Stf1Pl£ ID UD-2 FRACTION OCA TEST CODE OSDate i Tiae Coilsctjd

NAME CAfMA SPECwtegor-j

UNITS nCi/gURTN 05/15/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

6AW1A SPEC RESULT 2-SI«tt OTHES RESULT 2-SICHA

K-40CS-137RA-22iRA-22S

1.17E+13. 05E-11. 15E+01.22E+0

0. 16E+10.59E-10. 11E+00.15E+0

GROSS ALPHAGROSS BETAU-234U-235/236U-238TH-230TH-222

2.60E+1100E-H1.22E+0<6. OE-11.22E-K)1.83E+01. 16E+0

1. OlE+l1. 11E+10.25E-K)

0.25E-H)0. 43E+00.33E-H3

II•

I!•

i

Page 5Received: 04/13/90

SAMPLE ID UB-3

ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORTResults by Sacple

Wort Order I 50-04-048

UNITS oCi/gWRTN 05/15/90

FRACTION 09A TEST CODE OS__ NAME CAHHA SPECDate It Ti« Collected 04/12/90 Category

VERIFIED BY RDJ

WJWA SPEC RESULT 2-SICKA OTHER RESULT 2-SIK1A

K-40CS-137RA-224RA-228

1. 46E+12.43E-11. 16E+01.22E+0

0. 1SE+10.5SE-10. 11E-K)0. UE-H)

MOSS ALPHAMOSS BETAU-234U-235/226U-23BTH-220TH-232

2.5EE+13. 11E+19. 10E-1<4.CE-19.24E-12.23E+01.1BE-K)

1.01E+11.09E+11. 9BE-1

2.00E-10.46E-K)0. 30E+0

— SAWLE ID UB-4 NAKE WW«A SPECDa« & Tjae Collected 04/!2/Ti) Cateaoru

UNITS pCi/a _ VERIFIED BY RDJWTN 05/15/90

GAKrlA SPEC

K-40CS-137RA-226RA-228

RESULT

1.77E+1<2.0E-11.07E-K)l.3!Z^O

2-SIR1A OTHE3

0.29E+1 GROSS ALPHAGROSS BETA

0. 12E+0 U-2340.20E+0 U-235/236

U-238TH-230TH-232

RESULT

ZOOE+iZ90E+19. 52E-1C6.0E-17.38E-!2.11E-H]1.07E-K)

2-SIW1A

0. 85E+10.99E+12. HE-1

1.82E-10.42E-K)0.27E-KJ

]J]]

IIIII

Page &Received: 04/13/90

SAMPLE IDUB-5

ITHEL Oak Ridge REPORTResults bif Saeple

Work Order * S(H)4-048

FRACTION 11A TEST CODE CS NAHE CAMA SPECDate 1 Tiae Collected 04/12/90 Cateooru

WITS oCi/oNRTN 05/15/90

CAW1A SPEC RESULT

K-4Q 1. 86E+1CS-137 <2. OE-1RA-226 1. I4E+0RA-228 1. 55E+0

SARPLE ID U3-6

2-SI&.1A OTHER

0.30E+1 CROSS AifHACROSS BETA

0. 12E+0 1 2340.22E+0 U-235/226

1 238TH-230TH-232

VWIFIED BY RDJ

r

RESULT 2-SISKA

1. B2E+1 0. 83E+12. 56E+1 0. 97E411. 27E-KJ 0. 26E-H3O.OE-I9.71E-1 117E-13.06EM5 0.65E+01. WE+0 0. 42E-K)

FRACTION 12A TEST COEE OS MAKE CA1H1A SPECfeta & Tiae Collected C4nz>'?'J uwaoru

UNITS pCi/qURTN 05/15/90

CAHKA SPEC RESULT

R-40 1. 97E+1CS-137 1 13E-1RA-2W 1.23E+0RA-22S 1. 52E+0

2-siKiA one0.32E-H CROSS ALPHA0. 54E-1 CROSS BETA0. 14E+0 U-2340.21E-K) U-235/234

U-238TH-230TH-232

VERIFIED BY RDJ

RESULT 2-SIGMA

2.75E+1 0.99E+12. 51E+1 0. BOE+11.19E-K) 0.27E-H)C6.0E-11. 16E+0 0. 2iE-K)Z 52E-K) 0. 52E^J1.23E+0 0.32E-K)

I1'l1'l

1•'I

1'l'l'l11111

rage 7 IThReceived: 04/13/90

SAfFLE ID Bl-A

WITS oCi/gWRTN 05/15/90

GAN1A SPEC RESULT

K-40 1.24E+1CS-137 <2.0E-1RA-226 3. 95E+1RA-228 9. 59E-1

sAHPLE ID B 1-3

UNITS pCi/qWRTN 05/15/90'

GAMMA SPEC RESULT

K-40 6. 78E+0CS-137 <2.0E-1RA-22A 2. 96E+1RA-228 '9. 55E-1

ISL Dak Ridge HIResults by Sup

FRACTION ISA TESDate 4 Tiae Collect

SPORTle

T CODECSed 04/1277!

Work Order t 50-04-04B

W£ CAHHA SPECF~ Cateaoru

VERIFIED BY ROJ

2-SIGtlA OT>e

0.22E+1 GROSS ALPHAGROSS BETA

0. 32E-H U-2343. 40E-1 U-235/23i

U-238TH-220TH-222

FRACTID?< 14A TESCat: & Tiae Collsc:

RESULT

1.65E+33. 13E+27. 91E-K)C6. OE-16. 90E+01. 5EE^25. 0?E-K)

T CODE 53ed 04/127?

2-SICftt

0. 34E+30. 66E+21.03E+0

0.92E-K)0.37E+31. 59E-K)

NAME GAMMA Erttj taieaoru

VERIFIED BY RDJ

2-sicnA one1. 45E-HD GROSS ALPHA

GROSS BETA0. 45E+1 U-234i97E-l U-235/236

U-238TH-230m-232

RESULT

1.98E+33.04E+26.33E+0<4.C€-l6. 33E-K)1.39E+34. 11W

2-SIGMA

0.4CE+30.64E+2l.WE-H)

1.06E-K)0.27E+31.12E-K)

111111111

»

rage 8 ITRSL Cak RidgeReceived: 04/13/90 Results by

£AM>LE ID Bl-C FRACTION ISA

REPORT Uork Order t 50-04-048Sanple

TEST CODE 5S NAME GAMMA SPECDate & Tiae Collected 04/12/90 Ca tenon

UNITS pCi/aKRTN 05/15/50

6ATC1A SPEC RESULT

K-40 1. 16E+1CS-137 3.21E-1RA-226 2. 40E+1RA-223 1.25E-H3

2-SIGHA OTHER

VERIFIED BY RDJ

RESULT 2-SIGMA

0.20E+1 GROSS ALPHA 1.81E+3 0.37E+30.90E-1 CROSS BETA 2.74E+2 0.5SE+20.37E-*-! U-234 7. 44E-H) 1. 04E-H)0.2i£+0 y-235/236 <6.0E-i

U-233TH-230TH-232

7. OCE+0 0. 99E-K31. 43E+3 0. 34E+36. 69E-KJ 2. 15E-H)

SAKPLE 12 B2-A FRACTION !6A TEST CODE GSDate b TiiTCallectsd C4/jg7

NAME gAKKA SPEC

UNITS pCi/qWRTN 05/15/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

WWW SPEC RESULT 2-SIK1A OTrE? RESULT 2-SIGMA

K-40 9.4QE+0 1.8X40CS-137 <2. QE+1RA-22i 1.51E+1 0. WE+lRA-22S 1.25E40

GROSS ALPHAGROSS BETAU-234U-235/236U-228TH-230TH-222

7. B1E+39.69E+21.80E+12.13E-K)1.14E+13.72E+34.52E+0

1.57E+31.97E+20.24E+10.44E-K)0.14E+10.7EE+31.31E-K)

II

i

rage 8 ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORT Uork Order I SO-04-048Received: 04/13/90 Results by Sanple

SAWLE ID Bl-C_____________ FRACTION ISA TEST CODE CS__ NAME GAHHA SPECDate & Tiae Collected 04/12/90 ___, Category

UNITS pCi/o VERIFIED BY RDJWJTN 05/15/90

SAKHA SPEC RESULT 2-SIGJ1A OTHER RESULT 2-SICflA

K-40 1.16E+1 0.20E+1 CROSS ALPHA 1.81E+3 0.37E+3CS-137 3.21E-1 0.90E-1 CROSS BETA 2.74E+2 0.56E+2RA-226 2..40E+1 O.STEt'l U-234 7.44E-K) 1.04E-K)RA-229 1.25E-K3 0.2SE-K) U-235/236 <6.QE-i

U-233 7. OCE-K) 0.99E-K)TH-230 1.43E+3 0.3£E-^3TK-232 6.69E+C

SATPLE 13 B2-A_____________ FP.ACTICN !6A TEST CODE GS__ HAKE CAMMA SPEC—————————————— Date 8. TiaTCollected C4/!g?

UNITS PCi /o VERIFIED BY RDJURTN 05/15/90

CAW1A SPEC RESU.T 2-SIW1A (TOO RESULT 2-SIGMA

K-40CS-137RA-226RA-22B

9.40E-K)<2.0E+11. 51E+11.25E-K)

1.8X40

0. 19E+10.36E-HJ

CROSS ALPHAGROSS BETAU-234U-235/236U-228TH-230TH-222

7. B1E+39. 69E+21. 80E+12.13E-K)1. 14E+13.72E+34. 32E+0

1.57E+31.97E+20. 2«+l0.44E-H)0. IfiE+l0. 7EE+31.31EtO

JPage 9Received: 04/13/90

SAMPLE ID B2-3

I

ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORTResults by Suple

FRACTION 17A TEST CODE CS__Date & Tiae Collected 04/12/90

Work Order 1 SO-04-048

NAHESAfflA SPEC

UNITS oCi/q05/15/90

VERIFIED BY RDJ

Category

GAMMA SPEC RESULT 2-SIWA CTHEH RESULT 2-SIWA

1i

III

I

I

K-40CS-137RA-226RA-22B

9. IBEi-O 1. 72E-H)<2. OE-15.1.

93E+116E<-0

0.0.

47E+131E+0

CROSS ALPHAGROSS BETAU-234U-235/236U-238TH-220TH-232

5. 54E+37. 76E+21. 12E+1C6. OE-ie. 5SE+02.82E+31. 31E-M

1.1.0.

0.0.0.

12E+359E+215E+1

92E-K)SEE-H32CE-^1

SWPLE ID 32-C FRACTION ISA TEST CODE 33Date i Tiae Collected Q4/127T

NATS G&NA SPEC

IUNITS oCi/qWTN 05/15/90

CAWW SPEC RESULT 2-SIG«A OTHER

VERIFIED BY RDJ

category

RESULT 2-SISMA

IK-40CS-137RA-226RA-22B

9.53E+0<2.0E-19.88E-K)9. 90E!-1

1.61E+0

1.59E-KJ1.72E-1

CROSS ALPHACROSS BETAU-234U-235/226U-238TH-230TH-232

1.08E+31. 49E+21.98E+06. 61E-12.14E+05. 74E-»-21.16E+0

0.22E-V30.3EE+20.33E+01.62E-10.35E+01. 13E+20. 49E-K)

II

*•*

Ir i

I Page 10received: 04/13/90

5AWLE IDBKG___

UNITS oCi/oWR7N 05/15/90

ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORTResults DIJ Saaple

Uork Order 8 SO-04-G48

FRACTION 19A TEST CODE SS__ N/VE BAHHA SPECDate & Tine Collected 04/12/90 ___, Category

VERIFIED BY RDJ

CAittA SPEC RESULT 2-SIGfW OTffi? RESULT 2-SIftlA

IIIIIIIIIiiiii

K-40CS-137RA-22iRA-22B

1. 31E+1<2. OE-11.09E*0

0. 29E+1 CROSS ALPHA 3. 30E+1CROSS SETA 2. 79E+1

0. 12E+0 U-234 1. 12E-H)0. 1EE+0 U-225/234 <6.CE-1

U-239 1. 11E+0TR-230 3.5SH)TH-222 1

1. 14E+10. 96E+10. 31E-K)

0. 31E+00.61E-H)0.

SOUTHWEST LABORATORYOF OKLAHOMA, INC.

May 7, 1990

David PuringtonDAMES & MOORE11701 Borman Drive, Suite 340St. Louis, Missouri 63146

Project: 19943 - 002; Ford Earth City

Dear Mr. Purington:

Enclosed are the analytical results for your samples receivedin our laboratory on April 17, 1990, for the above captionedproject.

All the samples were originally extracted on April 17, 1990.The acid surrogates were outside QC limits for sample MW105,MW106 and MW107. These samples were re-extracted on April 26,1990 and re-analyzed on May 1, 1990. The acid surrogates alsodid not meet the recovery criteria for sample MW105 and MW106.This indicated a matrix effect. We have reported the data fromthe reanalyses for these three sampls.

Per your request we have preformed a matrix spike and duplicatefor the following samples;

MW101 (cyanide), MW105 (metals)

Additional Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicates will followwith the completion of the remaining portion of this project.

If, in your review, you should have any questions or requireadditional information, please call.

Sincerely,

DAMES & MOORE

M R Y 0 8 1 9 S O

ST. LOUIS, MISSOUA

Randy StaggsProject Manager

RS/j 1

Enclosures

1700 WEST ALBANY. SUITE C • BROKEN ARROW. OK 74012(918)251-2858 • FAX (918) 251-2599

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

tENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: 23S8.01M

DATE: 05-07-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO ft 2338.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90

J PROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORSAMPLE ID: MW101

"• DET.J^AMETER LIMIT

1MTAL CYANIDE

OTAL METALS

flsENICJfADHRCURY•LENIUMJiALLIUM•NTIMONY

•RYLLIUMDMIUM

XROMIUM«PPERCKELLVER

!INC

0 . 02

10.03.00.25.010.030 05.05.<)5.D10.010.010.010.0

D EARTH

UNIT

mg/L

ug/Luq/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

CITY

DATERESULTS ANALYZED

ND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND152NDND102

04-27-90

05-02-90OS-ol-9004-25-9005-o2-90OS-ol-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

r

METHODREFERENCE

SM

EF'AEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPA

412D

206 . 2^*r-Q *•%*-•_• 7 . .1

245.1270 . 2279.2200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7II

I

"PA = *EPA600/4-79-020, MARCH 1985>D = NOT DETECTED ABOVE DUANTITATION LIMIToM = STANDARD METHOD, 16TH EDITION

I

I1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

IJ1I1I1i1Iiii

ENT: DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 2338.01H11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO # 2388.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-B150, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW101

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERBICIDES___________LIMIT________ RESULTS

2,4-D 1.0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 857.

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATItJN= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I1700 W. Albany . Sutor "C" . Bn?*en /4/rotv, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

JLKNT: DAMES 4 MOORE REPORT: 2388.01PV 11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340

' ST. LOUIS, tlO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

I

I

I

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO ft 2388.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-01-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: MW101

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCS'5 DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 ' NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN O.i ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II , 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE . 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDDETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1242 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.0 ND

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 94*

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTt DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OJb1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 6314AATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO » 2388.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW84A-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MU101

REPORT: 2388.01V

DATE: 05-07-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

OROltETHANEMOMETHANE

CHLORIDEOROETHANE

CHLORIDE

ISON DISULFIDE-DICHLOROETHENE._j*-DICHLOROETHANE' ^NS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE,J.OROFORMilH-DICHLOROETHANE'^-BUTANONE«,1-TRICHLOROETHANE

SON TETRACHLORIDE'VINYL ACETATE* MODICHLOROMETHANE

DET.LIMIT RESULTS

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

185

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

BJ

VOLATILES

1,1,2,2-TET.RACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLORCETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

DET.

555555551051010555555

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

• QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

,IDLUENE-d8(88-110) 97?.' BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) 93* l,2-DICHLOROETHANE.-d4(76-114) 97'

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF CIC LIMITS

I

I

AX1

I1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

IS 4 MOORE'7T» BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340J3UIS, MO 63146

<Ji DAVID PURINGTON

MATRIX: WATER2388.01

IOD REF.: SU846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGY|o"JfcT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITY

ID: MW101

3LATILESDET. RESULTSLIMIT (UQ/L)

5 -CHLOROETH YL ) ETHERrOROFHENOL

.-DICHLOROBENZENEalCHLOROBENZENE._ L ALCOHOL

i-DICHLOROBENZENE•*«HYLPHENOLsJ-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER'~THYLPHENOL

RQSO-DI-n-PRDPYLAMIhlE:XMHLOROETHAME

i>HORONE

JROPHENOLIMETHYLPHENOL

~:oic ACID

1-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANEICHLOROPHENOL

J-TRICHLOROBENZENEHALENEOROANILINE

._ HLOROBUTADIENEHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL

•-•HYLNAPHTHALENEtxBHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE-^6-TRICHLOROPHENOL

||-TRICHLOROPHENOL:CmORONAPHTHALENErfcOT

Ii

HYLPHTHALATEpHTHYLENEROANILINE

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: 2388.01B

DATE: 05-07-90

DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :

04-17-9004-17-9004-26-90

SEMIVOLATILE5

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-BROHOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACIiLORGBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOU, 2,3-CD) PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET. RESULTSLIMIT (uo/L)

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

BENZENE-d5(35-114)L-d5 (10-94)

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

55:: 2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116) 513 TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 63?63:: 2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100) 43!: 2,4,6-TRIBROMOPHENOL(10-123) 60:

-M NOT DETECTED ABOVE 9UANTITATION LIMIT• ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF C1UAHTITATION

•-= ANALYTZ DETECTED IN BLANK A3 WELL AS SAMPLE• SURROGATE riECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

^L l_7 vy \-J JL A JL T Y JLJ U X • jr^ • ' V_/ JLVtA JL \_/ A V X Vx JL V^r *> ' JJ^

• 7700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012

1V.IENT: DAMES & MOORE1- 11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340"• ST. LOUIS, MO 63146_• ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

1 SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO # 2388.02

JLJL v^ X > JL^AA JLA. i V^»

. 918-251-2858

REPORT: 2388. 02M

DATE: 05-07-90

j« DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90| PROJECT: 19943 -

SAMPLE ID: MW105

'1"ARAMETER

TWAL CYANIDE

i|TAL METALS

£RSENICIEAD

*^^B ' n i R vSH_ENIUM"iHALLIUM^BTIMONYi^RYLLIUMLCADMIUM

IttROMIUMItBPPER1 NICKEL"TJLVER..|NC

002 ; FORD

DET.LIMIT

0 . 02

10.03.00.25.010.030 . 05.05.05.010.010 . 010.010.0

EARTH

UNIT

mg/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

CITY

RESULTS

ND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND73NDND489

DATEANALYZED

04-27-90

05-02-9005-01-9004-25-9005-02-9005-01-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

t

METHODREFERENCE

SM 412D

EPA 206.2EPA 239.2EPA 245.1EPA 270.2EPA 279.2EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7

SEPA60.0/4-79-020, MARCH 1985NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITSTANDARD METHOD, 16TH EDITION

I

wm

I

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, iJ700 PK /fco/yT . Su/fe "C" . Broten Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

:NT: DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 2388.02H11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO tt 2388.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SWS46-S150, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW105

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERBICIDES____________LIMIT____________RESULTS

2 , 4-D 1. 0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

GA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98)- 91.2%

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT-J = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATICN

1: = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA,7700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 2388.02P11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO » 2388.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-01-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: MU105

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCB'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 ' NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN 0.1 ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 ' 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1242 , 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.0 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 65::

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF OUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* - SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

MN

I

I^VDWIVAJLV^IVX \jr1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 918-251-2858

DAMES & tlOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAHPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO tt 2338.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: HU105

REPORT: 2388.02V

DATE: 05-07-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

JTILES

IROMETHANEOMETHANECHLORIDE

ROETHANEYLENE CHLORIDEONE

JRBON DISULFIDEr?»DICHLOROETHENE

DET.LlfllT RESULTS

DET.

lANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENEJROFORM

.—•DICHLORQETHANE

1-TRICHLOROETHANEON TETRACHLORIDEL ACETATE

HOMODICHLOROMETHANE

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

136

BJ

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

VOLATILES

1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLORO'PROPANETRANS-1, 3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1, 3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

555555551051010555555

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

JENE-d8O8-110) 103': BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) l,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114)

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION

ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

II

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

JES 4 MOORE/OBBORMAN DRIVE. SUITE 340. V no 63146

DAVID PURINGTON

MATRIX: WATER2388.02REF.: SU346-8270, EPA METHODOLOGYF: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYID: MW105

3LATILE5

:S -CMLOROETHYL) ETHER-£™ORCPHENOL3-DICHLOROBENZENE•iCHLOROBENZENE

ALCOHOL^-DICHLOROBENZENE^•HYLPHENOL?!SJ§-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHERJ1ETHYLPHENOL«ROSG-DI-n-PROPYLAHINE

HLOROETHAK1EBENZENE

3PHORQNERQPHENOLinETHYLPHENaL

ACIDJB2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE,<JDICHLOROPHENOLj:,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE

SHALENEOROANILINEHLOROBUTADIENE

~:HLORO-3-!1ETHYLPHENOLJJTHYLNAPHTHALENEEMCHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE-4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL

15-TRICHLOROPHENOLLORONAPHTHALENETROANILINE

"flETHYLPHTHALATE-WAPHTHYLENE-WITROANILINE

DET. RESULTSLIMIT (UQ/L)

i>-D

I1ET

[TOT~3FH

:t

101010101C)10101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: 2388.02B

DATE: 05-07-90

DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-26-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-01-90

SEMIVOLATILES

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-OINITROTOLUEME2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAHINE(1)4-BROMOPHEWYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOd, 2,3-CD) PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET. RESULTSLIHIT (uq/L)

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ni-NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

I|OBENZENE-d5(35-114) 87:OL-d5 (10-94) 17:

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116)2-FLUOROPHEWOL (21-100)

74T; TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 85:5::* 2f4,6-TRIBROnOPHENOL(K-123) 10

I - MOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LII1IT- rsrTiiATpn -JAIIIIT. rflMCENTRATIOW DELOU LIMIT OF QUANTITATICN

7700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

^ wt

i

(MlENT: DAMES & MOORE] • 11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 3401 ST. LOUIS, MO 63146• ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

•»

1' SAMPLE MATRIX a WATERSWLO tt 2388.03

REPORT: 2388. 03M

DATE: 05-07-90

DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90, _ PROJECT: 19943 -'• SAMPLE ID: MW106

ARAMETER_«]TAL CYANIDE

-TOTAL METALS

"MlSENIC^KADMERCURY

-ttLENIUMGALLIUM

'"ANTIMONY«RYLLIUMDMIUM

_ ROMIUMCOPPER

-•ICKELPILVER""ZINC11

002 ; FORD

DET.LIMIT

0.01

10.03.00.25.01 0 . 030 0

5.010.010.010.010.0

EARTH

UNIT

mg/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Luq/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

CITY

RESULTS

ND

NDNDNDNDND44.7NDNDND30NDND56.4

r

DATEANALYZED

04-27-90

05-02-9005-01-9004-25-9005-02-9005-01-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

METHODREFERENCE

SM 412D

EPA 206.2EPA 239.2EPA 245.1EPA 270.2EPA 279.2EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7

I

I

i

= #EPA600/4-79-020, MARCH 1985= NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMIT= STANDARD METHOD, 16TH EDITION

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

CENT: DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 2388.03H11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO ft 2388.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW346-8150, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW106

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERBICIDES ,_________LIMIT_________RESULTS

2,4-D 1.0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 91.77.

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

ILX I '

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C1 . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

IU.BNT: DAMES 4 MOORE REPORT: 2388.03P11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, HO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO » 2388.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-01-90METHOD REFERENCE: 5W846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: MU106

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCB'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 • NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN 0.1 ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN : 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE. 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE ' 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 ' 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 \ 0.5 NDAROCHLDR-1242 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.0 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

i DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 70?:

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK A3 WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

l4

VJT1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

JJJ1I

:NT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 43146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO H 2338.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW106

REPORT: 2388.03V

DATE: 05-07-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

ATILES

CMOROMETHANE2BMOMETHANE

:NYL CHLORIDE•aLORCETMANEWHYLENE CHLORIDE" E

DET.LIMIT RESULTS

«BON DI3ULFIDE-DICHLOROETHENE-DICHLOROETHANE

JANS-1 , 2-DICHLOROETHENE

§OROFORM-DICHLOROETHANE

j-SUTANONE

11,1-TRICMLOROETHANERBON TETRACHLORIDENYL ACETATE

JOMODICHLOROMETHANE

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

194

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

BJ

VOLATILES

1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1.2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROFErJETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHAME1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-r,3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

DET.LI!!!! RESULTS

555555551051C1C555555

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

•• QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

~3LUENE-d8(38-110) 97* . BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(36-115) 94?: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANIi-d4(76-114) 10331 NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, IMC.1700 W. Albany'. Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

4 HOOREBORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340DUIS, HO 63146DAVID PURINGTQN

MATRIX: WATERH 2388.03

REF.: SU846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGY:T: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYID: HW106

3LATILES

-CHLOROETHYDETHERLCROPHENOL

ICHLOROBENZZNEICHLOROBENZENE

YL ALCOHOLICHLOROBENZENE

i1«HYLFHENOL.SH-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER

THYLPHENOLROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINE

:X«HLOROETHANE'"jOBENZENE,.||ORONE•KiB'ROPHEHOL

REPORT: 2338.03B

DATE: 05-07-90

JpIC ACID.SK-CHLOROETHOXY ) METHANEWICHLOROPHENOL"ja-TRICHLOROBENZENE.-•THALENECB.OROANILINE•^•CHLOROBUTADIENE

ORO-3-METHYLPHENOLHYLNAPHTHALENE

:XStHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE^i-TRICHLOROPHENOL

.-•s-TRICHLOROPHENOL•OW-ORONAPHTHALENETTROANILINE«HYLPHTHALATE

PHTHYLENE-61J.TROANILINE

tC

Y._ I-

DET.LIMIT

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

RESULTS(ua/L)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :

04-17-9004-26-9005-01-90

SEHIVOLATILES

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2.6-DINITROTOLUENGDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-MITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-HETHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(l)4-BROnOPHEh4YL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLORQBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET. RESULTSLIMIT

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

27NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

I

I

I

QA/jC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

OBEMZEME-d5(35-114) 87?: 2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-il6) 73:.' TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 76',OL-a5 (10-94) 25:: 2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100) '8::* 2,4,,6-TRIBROMOFHi:NOL( 10-123) \^'

NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMIT__= ESTIMATED VALUE: CGNCEMTRATION oELQW LIMIT OF QIJANTITATION^ ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK A3 WELL A3 SAMPLEm ^URROG^T- xi-icnvERr QIIT^IDI: OF oc LIMITS

11

•*_IENT:

1

1^

1-

1

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, IIS U.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012

\

DAMES «< MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO # 2388.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90PROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW107

DET.ARAMETER LIMIT UNIT RESULTS

. 918-251-2858

REPORT: 23138. 04M

DATE: OS-07-90

, '

DATE METHODANALYZED REFERENCE

AL CYANIDE

AL METALS

A.RSENIC»CURYEN I UM

'HALLIUMtlMONYYLLIUM

.CADMIUM

0.01 mg/L ND

NICKEL'ULVERJ|NC

4iijND

I

I

i

A = #EPA600/4-79-02C, MARCH 1985NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITSTANDARD METHOD, 16TH EDITION

04-27-90 SM 412D

10.03.00 . 25.010.030 . 05.05.05.010.010.010.010.0

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lua/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

NDNDNDNDND33 . 1NDNDND6210.9ND43.0

05-02-9005-01-9004-25-9005-02-9005-01-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

EPAEPAEPAEFAEFAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPA

206.2'"JTQ ^*>w'T m +-

245.1270 . 2279.2200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7

•SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

CIT1ENT: DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 23B8.04H-1 11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340• ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90

"• ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO * 2388.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8150, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW107

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERBICIDES___________LL.MIJ___________RESULTS

2,4-D 1.0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 897.

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATIQN LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITAT10N= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF OC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA,7700 W. Albar^. Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

tNT: DAMES 4 MOORE REPORT: 2388.04P11701 BORI1AN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO » 2388.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: MW107

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCB'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAIIMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 ' NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 NDENDOSULFAN I , 0.05 NDDIELDRIN ' 0.1 ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1242 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.0 ND

BA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 68*

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE G1UANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF G1C LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

:NT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO » 2388.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MU107

REPORT: 2388.04V

DATE: 05-07-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

'-1LATILE5

.OROMETHANEiiSOMOMETHAME

IYL CHLORIDE

BET.LIMIT RESULTS

'1F.THYLENE CHLORIDE•JETONE_BlBON DISULFIDE1^-DICHLOROETHENEJ-.1-DICHLOROETHANE

iNS-l,2-DICHLOROETHENEOROFORM-DICHLOROETHANEIUTANONE,1-TRICHLOROETHANEBON TETRACHLORIDE

fYL ACETATEMODICHLOROMETHANE

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

16 BJ

ND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

DET.VOLATILES LI11IT RESULTS

1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 5 ND1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 5 NDTRANS-1,3-DICHLOROFROFENE 5 NDTRICHLOROETHENE 5 NDDIBR0110CHLOROMETHANE 5 ND1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 5 NDBENZENE 5 NDCIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 5 ND2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHER 10 NDBROMOFORM 5 ND2-HEXANONE 10 ND4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 10 NDTETRACHLOROETHENE 5 NDTOLUENE 5 NDCHLOROBENZENE 5 NDETHYLBENZENE 5 NDSTYRENE 5 NDTOTAL XYLENE3 5 ND

tQA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

UENE-d8(38-110) 96?: BROMOFLUOROBENZENE (86-115) l,2-DICHLOROETHANE>d4(76-114)

1 = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIP1ATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOU LIMIT OF G1UANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE

* - SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITSII

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, JLIML;.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

4 MOOREBORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340

MO 63146DAVID PURINGTON

E MATRIX: WATER0 H 2338.04

D REF.: SW846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGY19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITY

PLE ID: MU107

IVOLATILES

-CHLQROETHYL)ETHER"tHLOROPHENOLj|DICHLOROBENZENE.TB-DICHLOROBENZENE

IZYL ALCOHOLDICHLOROBENZENETHYLPHENOL2-CHLOROI30PROPYL)ETHER

ETHYLPHENOLTROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINEiCHLOROETHANE

SOBENZENEHORONETROPHENQL

,4-DIMETHYLPHENOLIZOIC ACID(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE'-DICHLOROPHENOL

J,4-TRICHLOROBENZENEHTHALENEHLOROANILINE

iXACHLOROBUTADIENElHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL :

i^ETHYLNAPHTHALENEHEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENEa ,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL

,5-TRICHL'OROPHENOLHLORONAPHTHALENE

SITROANILINEETHYLPHTHALATENAPHTHYLENE

irNITROANILINE^-N

I1I

DET. RESULTSLIMIT (UQ/L)

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: 2388.04B

DATE: 05-07-90

DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-26-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-01-90

SEMIVOLATILES

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2.4-DINITROTOLUENE2.6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLFHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINEd)4-BROI1QPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROFHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET.. RESULTSLinn105050101010101010505010101010101010101010201010101010101010101C

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

TROBENZENE-d5(35-114) B2'<iNOL-d5 (10-94) 59:-:

aA/QC_SURR.QGATE_RECOVERIES

-FLUOROPIPHENYL(43-116) 63":-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100) -2??:

TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 99"2,4,6-TRIBROMOF:'HENOL(10-123) 51?

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANAI.YTE DETECTED IN BLANK A3 UELL AS SAMPLE•?UR*Ot^TE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF tlC LIMITS

JLAUUKA1UKIJ700 W. ,4/fronv . Su/fe "C" . flroten /I/row, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: 2388.05V

DATE: 05-07-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO * 2388.05DATE SUBMITTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: TR-1

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

DET.LIMIT RESULTS VOLATILES

OMETHAMERCM3METHANENYL CHLORIE'E

OETHANE_ LEHE CHLORIDE

— TONEJjjLON DISULFIDETWJICHLOROETKENE

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

2 JNDNDNDNDND

6 BNDNDNDNDNDND

QA/QC

1.1,2 , 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLORQPROPANETRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLQROETHENEDIBRQMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLORQETHANEBENZENECI3-1 , 3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DET.LIHIT RESULTS

ftNS-l,2-DICHLOROETHENErrBROFORM

,BDICHLOROETHANE•TJUTANONE

Ul-TRICHLOROETHANEA«ON TETRACHLORIDE1NYL ACETATE

IMODICHLOROMETHANE

-.UENE-d8(83-110) 97* BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) 93* l,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114)

555555551051010555555

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

•jn» NOT DETECTED ABOVE G1UANTITATION LIMIT1 = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION

-•= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE:•= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF C!C LIMITS

i1

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.7700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

DAMES & MOORE11701 Borman DriveSt. Louis. Missouri 63149

ANALYTICAL REPORT

REPORT: G2705

REPORT DATE: 05/03/90

SWLO IDENTIFICATION

[SAMPLE NO.:DATE RECEIVED:

2388.01 - 2388.0504/17/90

(DESCRIPTIONMETHOD BLANK(METHOD BLANKMETHOD BLANKMETHOD BLANKMETHOD BLANK•METHOD BLANKMETHOD BLANK'METHOD BLANK

IBLANKBLANKBLANK(BLANKIBLANKBLANKJLANKIBLANK

SPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKE

-MATRIX SPIKEiTIX SPIKE

VTRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE

^MATRIX SPIKE-•MATRIX SPIKE"MATRIX SPIKE-MATRIX SPIKE

IDUPLICATE_DUPLICATEJUPLICATE

UPLICATEDUPLICATE

-^DUPLICATEIMPLICATE^DUPLCATE

04/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/90

04/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/9004/25/90

MW105MW105MW105MW105MW105MW105MW105MW105

MW101MW101MW101MW101MW101MW101MW101MW101

QA/QC

PARAMETER

ANTIMONYBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERNICKELSILVERZINC

ANTIMONYBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERNICKELSILVERZINC

ANTIMONYBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERNICKELSILVERZINC

ANTIMONYBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERNICKELSILVERZINC

RESULTS

3055510101010

102%100%115%98%104%99%86%110%

102%100%115%98%107%99%86%110%

0%0%0%0%17%0%0%24%

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

RECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERY

RECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERY

RPDRPDRPDRPDRPDRPDRPDRPD

I

1

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, JJNC.7700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

| DAMES & MOORE•- 11701 Bonnan Drive•at. Louis. Missouri 63149

ANALYTICAL REPORT

REPORT: G2705.2

REPORT DATE: 05/03/90

JsWLO IDENTIFICATION

SAMPLE N O . : 2388.01 - 2388.05)ATE RECEIVED: 04/17/90

DESCRIPTION

[THOD BLANK 04/30/90METHOD BLANK 05/01/90

•-•METHOD BLANK 05/02/90(METHOD BLANK 05/01/90~) METHOD BLANK 04/27/90

1BLANK- BLANK

i BLANK

1BLANKBLANKBLANK_!JBLANK

SPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKESPIKE

'MATRIX SPIKE•-•MARTIX SPIKE_"MATRIX SPIKE

MATRIX SPIKE.-•MATRIX SPIKE'—, DUPLICATE1 DUPLICATE'"•DUPLICATE._ DUPLICATE_DUPLICATE

04/30/9004/30/9005/01/9005/01/9005/02/9005/02/9005/01/9005/01/90

MW101MW107MW107MW107MWlOl'

MW101Mwioe:MW101MW106MW101

04,PARAMETER

ARSENICLEADSELENIUMTHALLIUMTOTAL CYANIDE

ARSENICARSENICLEADLEADSELENIUMSELENIUMTHALLIUMTHALLIUM

ARSENICLEADSELENIUMTHALLIUMTOTAL CYANIDE

ARSENICLEADSELENIUMTHALLIUMTOTAL CYANIDE

RESULTS

103510.01

101%81%99%98%98%88%98%95%

96%64%70%110%104%

0%0%0%0%0%

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lmg/L

RECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERY

RECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERY

RPDRPDRPDRPDRPD

Ii

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

11tiI

.IENT: DAMES 8. MOORE REPORT: G2705.;11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO # METHOD BLANKDATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8150, EF'A METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERJBIC IDES___________LIMIT_______ RESULTS

2,4-D 1.0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2.,4,5-T (10-98) 81.7V.

D = NOT DETECTED ABOVE DUANTITATION LIMIT• ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF OUANTITATION- ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C1 . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

LlENT: DAMES ft MOORE REPORT: G2705.411701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-07-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: UATERSULO tt METHOD BLANKDATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-01-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCB'S DETECTION LIMIT

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 ' NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN 0.1 ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 0.5 ' NDAROCHLOR-1242 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 ; 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.0 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 135*

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE C1UANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONF = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF G1C LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-2S1-285&'

.IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO tt METHOD BLANKDATE ANALYZED ; 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

REPORT: G2705.5

DATE: 05-07-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

3LATILE5

IHLOROMETHANE"KOMOMETHANEJlNYL CHLORIDE

IHLOROETHANETHYLENE CHLORIDEETONE

CARBON DISULFIDEJ.1-DICHLOROETHENE•,1-DICHLOROETHANES,'ANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE

HLOROFORM,2-DICHLOROETHANE-BUTANONE,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE

ION TETRACHLORIDEINYL ACETATE^OMODICHLOROMETHANE

DET.LIMIT RESJJLIS

DET.

I.

101010105105555551055105

10

NDNDNDND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

VOLAIILES

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRAN3-1,3-DICHLOROPROPGNETRICHLOROETHENEDIHROI1GCHLOROMETHANC1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1, 3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

555555551051010555555

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

OA/QC SURROGATE_^ECOVERIES

DLUENE-d8(88-110) 100* BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) 86:; 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114)

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" • Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

JES 4 MOORE01 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340

w. LOUIS, MO 63146JN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: G2705.6

DATE: 05-07-90

MATRIX: WATER'~ILO tt METHOD BLANK

4HOD REF.: SW846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGYJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITY

-.tlPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :

3gHlVOLATILES

-•NOL'M (2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER—CHLOROPHENOL•-DICHLOROBENZENE

lJ-DICHLOR03ENZENE25NZYL ALCOHOL^-DICHLOROBENZENE

-•ETHYLPHENOL-M (2-CHLCROISOPROPYL)ETHER1~-nETHYLPHENQL

f lTROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAI1INEACHLOROETHANE

-ITRODEMZENEfllPHORONE

iMuTRQPHENOL274-DIMETHYLPHENOL'iNZOIC ACIDM (2-CHLOROETHOXY )I1ETHANEiP»-DICHLOROPHENOL-2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENEJI'HTHALENEWHLOROANILINEiJEXACHLOROBUTADIENE

J~~ HLORO-3-METHYLPHENOLETHYLNAPHTHALENEACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE

'— 4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL^,5-TRICHLOROPHENOLAHLORONAPHTHALENEi^NITROANILINE

f ETHYLPHTHALATENAPHTHYLENE

3-NITROANILINE

DET.LIHIT

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

RESULT(UQ/L)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

SEHIVOLATILE5

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUOREME4-NITROANILINE4,A-DINITRO. 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-EiROIIOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLQRQFHENQLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENE .DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)FERYLENE

04-17-9004-26-90

r

DET.,LIHXT

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

RESULTS(uq/L)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

I QA/QC SURROGATE_RECOVERIE5

rROBENZENE-d5(35-114) 62?: 2-FLUORO&IFHENYL(43-116) 55* TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 7?:INOL-d5 (10-94) 83'.'. 2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100) 59* 2,4,6-TRIBROMOPHENOL(10-123) 65:

ii

NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF C1C LIMITS

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

,MES & MOORE«01 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340LOUIS, HO 63146N: DAVID PURINGTON

tPLE MATRIX: WATER0 » METHOD BLANK

,_:THOD REF.: su846-8270,' JECT: 19943 - 002;

PLE ID: METHOD BLANK

REPORT: G2705.7

DATE: 05-07-90

I*IVOLATILES

(2-CHLOROETHYDETHERHLOROPHENOL

3-DICHLOROBENZENEW-DICHLOROBENZENE»ZYL ALCOHOL^-DICHLOROBENZENErriDETHYLPHENOL

(2-CHLOROI30PROPYL)ETHER1ETHYLFHENOLHITROSO-DI-n-PROPYI_A!1INE(ACHLOROETHANEFROBENZENEOPHORONENJITROPHENOLl-DIMETHYLPHENOLMZOIC AC I-D3(2-CHLORCETHGXY)METHANE-DICHLOROPHENOL,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE

uPHTHALENEHLOROANILINEACHLOROBUTADIENECHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOLETHYLNAPHTHALENEACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,6-TRICHLORQPHENOL

4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOLHLORONAPHTHALENEilTROANILINEMETHYLPHTHALATENAPHTHYLENEITROANILINE

A METHODOLOGYEARTH CITY

DET.LIHIT

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

QA

RESULTS(uo/L)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND iNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

l

i/QC SURRC

DATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-26-90

r

SEHIVQLATILES

ACENAPHTHENE2.4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE ( 1 )4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO( A) ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K) FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H.,I)PERYLENE

IGATE RECOVERIES

DET.LIMIT.

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

RESULTS(UQ/L)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

I

ITROBENZENE-d5(35-114) 78*NOL-d5 (10-94) 90:

2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116) 69:: TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 8?:2-FLUOROF'HENOL (21-100) 64?; 2,4,6-TRIBROMCPHENOL( 10-123) 7?:

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION- ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORYOF OKLAHOMA, INC.

May 8, 1990

David PuringtonDAMES & MOORE11701 Borman Drive, Suite 340St. Louis, Missouri 63146

Project: 19943 - 002;

Dear Mr. Purington:

Ford Earth City

Enclosed are the analytical results for your samples receivedin our laboratory on April 18, 1990, for. the above captionedproject.

Sample MW110 was originally extracted on April 19, 1990. TheQC/MS analysis indicated that the surrogates did not meet theQC criteria. Hence, this sample was re-extracted on April 24,1990, and later re-analysed. The data was reported for the re-analysed sample.

Per your request we have preformed a matrix spike and duplicatefor the following samples; MW102 (semi-volatile), MW108(Herbicides), MW110 (Pesticides), MW104 (Volatile)

If, in your review, you should have any questions or requireadditional information, please call.

.L«

.L«

I

Sincerely,

Randy StaggsProject Manager

RS/jl

MOORE

09 1990

Enclosures

1700 WEST ALBANY. SUITE C • BROKEN ARROW, OK 74012(918)251^2858 • FAX (918) 251-2599

I ** 1 J •.• 1-aVfaJ M r

DAMES & MOORE Cl IAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDSample Source & Clienl ^L

Job No.

Field Personnel. (Signature)

SampleI.D. No.

SampleType No. o(

Containers Sampllng Site Remarks

7 , f7

\\\ \

\

Data

a^Tine R e l l n q u l olied byl

(Signature)Data Tin* Received byt

(Signature)Date Tine

nel 1 n q ulahed \>yi(Signature)

Date Tina Rece ived l iyt(Signature)

Tine I te l lnnulahed byi(Signature)

Data Tine Received byi(Signature)

Date Tine

1e 1 1 iw]ul el icJ by t( S i g n a t u r e )

Uata Tina K u c c l v c i t b y l(S ignature)

Date Tlae nel l iu |u la l ied by I(Signature)

Date Time Received byl(Signature)

Date Tine

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, JLISC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

:LIENTI DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINBTON

REPORT: 2397.01M

DATE: 05-07-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO # 2397.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90PROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW110

-P(PARAMETER

JfOTAL CYANIDE

yOTAL METALS'•ARSENICJLEAD

--*ERCURYKELENIUM"iTHALLIUMANTIMONY•ERYLLIUM-^CADMIUMICHROMIUM"KOPPER•NICKEL

, JSILVER•-KINC

DET.LIMIT

0.01

10.03.00.25.010.030 . 05.05.05.010.010.010.010.0

UNIT

mg/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

RESULTS

ND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND102NDND40.5

DATEANALYZED

04-27-90

05-02-9005-01-9005-01-9005-02-9005-01-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

METHODREFERENCE

SM 412D

EPA 206.2EPA 239.2EPA 245.1EPA 270.2EPA 279.2EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7

IPA = *EPA600/4-79-020, MARCH 1985JD « NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITSM = STANDARD METHOD, 16TH EDITION

III

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-285&

CLIENTi DAMES * MOORE REPORT: 2397.01H1170i BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 03-08-90ATTNl DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX I WATERSWLO « 2397,01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8150, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW110

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERBICIDES________LIMIT___________RESULTS

2,4-D 1.0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 89.47.

II1

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

:i_IENT: DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 2397.01P11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, HO .63146 DATE: 05-08-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO H 2397.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-19-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCES SW846-80BO, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: MW110

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCS'5 DETECTION LIHIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 - NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN 0.1 ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLQR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.1 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1242 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.1 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.1 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 100*

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

ICLIENTi DAMES 4 MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO » 2397.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW110

REPORTl 2397.01V

DATE: 05-08-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

tOLATILES

HLOROMETHANE'•?BROMOMETHANE

_ i/INYL CHLORIDE"•3HLOROETHANE.TlETHYLENE CHLORIDEJACETONE

•KARBON DISULFIDE•l,l-DICHLOROETHENE

--jl.l-DICHLOROETHANEJp-RANS-l,2-DICHLOROETHENEjf HLOROFORM^.-1,2-DICHLOROETHANEJ2-BUTANONE••1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE•CARBON TETRACHLORIDE"TVINYL ACETATEJfcROMODICHLOROtlETHANE

DET.LIMIT RESULTS

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

16 B4 JB

NDNDNDNDNT)NDNDNDNDNDND

VOLATILES

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

DET.Linn RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

III

Ii

OA/BC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

i _ f c TOLUENE-d8(88-110) 96* BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) 92* 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114) 100*

IND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT

1= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION

B = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITSu.

J

fTJ.o

SOUTHWEST JABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

!

S & HOORE1 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340LOUIS, HO 63146

DAVID PURINGTON

i-LE MATRIX: WATERft 2397.01

?OD REF.: SW846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGYECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYLE ID: MW110

tVOLATILES

2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHERIHLOROPHENOLDICHLOROBENZENEDICHLOROBENZENE

JZYL ALCOHOLDICHLOROBENZENETHYLPHENOL

^2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER1ETHYLPHENOLTROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAIIINECHLOROETHANEROBENZENEHORONETROPHENOL

T-DIMETHYLPHENOLOIC ACID

|(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANEDICHLOROPHENOL

%4-TRICHLOROBENZENETHALENELOROANILINE

:ACHLOROBUTADIENELORO-3-METHYLPHENOLTHYLNAPHTHALENE

ACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL

,_-. .LORONAPHTHALENEI^ITROANILINE

^ETHYLPHTHALATE*<BNAPHTHYLENE~~jMITROANILINE

DET. RESULTSLIHIT (UQ/L)

1

2020202020202020202020202020202010020202020202020202020100201002020100

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: 2397.01B

DATE: 05-08-90

DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-24-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-25-90

SEHIVOLATILE5

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO -2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZOCA)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBEKIZO(K) FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOd, 2,3-CD) PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DET. RESULTSLIHIT (UQ/L)

20100100202020202020100100202020202020202020204020202020202020202020

NDNDNDNDNDND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

*ROBENZENE-d5(35-114)'»NOL-d5 (10-94)

2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116)2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100)

62* TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 83*18** 2,4,6-TRIBROMOPHENOL( 10-123) 21'/.

|= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF GC LIMITS

5UU1HVYHM J^ABUKATUKY UJb2700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken /I/row, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

I ;LIENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURIN6TON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO ft 2397.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90PROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTHSAMPLE ID: MW102

>ARAMETER.JJOTAL CYANIDE

QTAL METALS

ARSENIC(LEAD

-^MERCURYKELENIUMTHALLIUMJANTIMONYTBERYLLIUMJKADMIUM(CHROMIUMTjCOPPER•JICKELTSILVERJZINC

DET.LIMIT

0.01

10.03.00.25.010.030 . 05.05.05.010.010.010.010.0

UNIT

mg/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

CITY

RESULTS

ND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND32613.8ND52.8

REPORT: 2397. 02M

DATE: 05-07-90

r

DATEANALYZED

04-27-90

05-02-9005-01-9004-25-9005-02-9005-01-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

METHODREFERENCE

SM 412D

EPA 206.2EPA 239.2EPA 245.1EPA 270.2EPA 279.2EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7

3M

= #EPA600/4-79-020, MARCH 19B5= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= STANDARD METHOD, 16TH EDITION

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C* . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 91&-251-2B58

jI

1,1

ILIENT: DAMES 8c MOORE REPORT: 2397.02H11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 0'3-08-90ATTNi DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO # 2397.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-B150, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW102

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERBICIDES___________LIMIT___________RESULTS

2,4-D 1.0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 93.77.

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

IH

I

I

I

I

I

IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO « 2397.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-19-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90

REPORT: 2397. 02P

DATE: 05-08-90

METHODSAMPLE

REFERENCE:ID: MU102

SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGY

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCB'5

ALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCDELTA-BHCGAflMA-BHC(LINDANE)HEPTACHLORALDRINHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDEENDOSULFAN IDIELDRIN4,4-DDEENDRINENDOSULFAN II4,4-DDDENDOSULFAN SULFATE4,4-DDTMETHOXYCHLORENDRIN KETONEALPHA-CHLORDANEGAMMA-CHLORDANETOXAPHENEAROCHLOR-1016AROCHLOR-1221AROCHLOR-1232AROCHLOR-1242AROCHLOR-1248AROCHLOR-1254AROCHLOR-1260

DETECTION LIHIT

0.050.050.050.050.050.05 .0.050.050.00.1000.10.10.50.10.50.51.00.50.50.50.50.51.01.0

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 83*

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF G1C LIMITS

SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

.IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO tt 2397.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW102

REPORT: 2397.02V

DATE: 05-08-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

70LATILE5

_1LOROMETHANE.-3ROMOMETHANE

JUNYL CHLORIDE"»LOROETHANE

TCTHYLENE CHLORIDE"JlCETONE.-•ARSON DISULFIDE

•,1-DICHLOROETHENE•-^1,1-DICHLOROETHANE

JRANS-1,2-DICHLDROETHENEHLOROFORM

._ ,2-DICHLOROETHANE<-BUTANONE

,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANEARBON TETRACHLORIDE

ilNYL ACETATEROMODICHLOROMETHANE

DET.LIHIT RESULTS

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

NDNDND

'NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

VOLATILES

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLORQPROPENETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRftCHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

DliT.LIMIT RESULTS

5355555B

10

101.0

>55

5

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

IiQA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

OLUENE-d8(88-110) 98* BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) 94* l,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114) 100*

<D = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT«J * ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION

f = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

i11

SOUTHV^ST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.7700 W. Albany . Suite "C". Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

(S & MOORE1 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340LOUIS, MO 631464: DAVID PURINGTON

>LE MATRIX; WATER,0 tt 2397.02

••ADD REF.: SU846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGYJlECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITY

1PLE ID: MW102

REPORT: 2397.02B

DATE: 05-08-90

iVOLATILES

•JOLIm2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER~~:HLOROPHENOL

f DICHLOROBENZENEDICHLOROBENZENE

~JZYL ALCOHOL^-DICHLOROBENZENE•ETHYLPHENOL^( 2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER

1ETHYLPHENOL

f lTROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINEACHLOROETHANE

"fROBENZENE

IPHORONEITROPHENOL

-4-DIMETHYLPHENOL

COIC ACID2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE

^ DICHLOROPHENOLS., 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE

VHTHALENEVHLOROANILINE

ACHLOROBUTADIENEHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOLETHYLNAPHTHALENE.ACHLOROCYCLDPENTADIENE

JA,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL»,5-TRICHLOROPHENOLftHLORONAPHTHALENE

SITROANILINEETHYLPHTHALATENAPHTHYLENE

NITROANILINEIIi

DET.uan:LO1010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

RESULTS(uq/Li

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND;ND;NDND

NDNDNDNDND

DATEDATEDATE

SUBMITTED:EXTRACTED:ANALYZED :

04-18-9004-19-9004-24-90

SEHIVOLATILE5

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO.2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZOdOFLUQRANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

TROBENZEHE-d5(35-114) 71%ENOL-d5 (10-94) 49*

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIESI

2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116) 68*2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100) 35S

DET.

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

RESULTSfuq/L)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

21

JBJ

NDNDNDNDNDNDND

TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141)2,4,6-TRI3ROnOF'HENOL(10-123)

60::34*

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

III

SOUTHWEST IABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.7700 W. Albany . Suite "C* . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO * 2397.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90PROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW10S

REPORT: 2397.03M

DATE: 05-07-90

^RAMETER

TOTAL CYANIDE

4TAL METALS

1SEN 1CADRCURY

SELENIUMJALLIUMTIMONYRYLLIUM

SDMIUMRCMIUMPPER

iCKELLVERNC

aa•*A = BEPA600/4-79-020,

DET.LIMIT

0.01

10.03.00.25.010.030 '. 05.05.05.010.010.010,.010.0

MARCH 1985RD = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION-y\ = STANDARD METHOD,

1

1

1

1

16TH EDITION

i .

UNIT

mg/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

LIMIT

RESULTS

ND

NDNDNDNDND34.5NDNDND8114.0ND44.5

DATEANALYZED

04-27-90

05-02-9005-01-9004-25-9005-02-9005-01-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

METHODREFERENCE

SM 412D

EPA 206.2EPA 239.2EPA 245.1EPA 270.2EPA 279.2EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7

J SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKJ^HUMA,1700 W. Albany . Suite "C • Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

tLIENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: 2397.03H

DATE: 015-08-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO tt 2397.03DATE SUBMITTED IDATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED:METHOD REFERENCE:

04-1S-9004-27-9005-02-90SW846-B150, EPA METHODOLOGY

PROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW108

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Bil.ion

HERBICIDESDET.LIMIT RESULTS

2 < 4-Q2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)

1.00.2

NDND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 87.97.

* =

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST,LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 91&-251-2858

LIENT: DAPIES & MOORE REPORT: 2397.03P11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, HO 63146 DATE: 03-08-90ATTNi DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX I WATERSWLO « 2397.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-19-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: MU108

I

1i

1

ii

i

II

III

II

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCB'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 . NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN 0.1 ND4,4-DDE ' 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221AROCHLOR-1232AROCHLOR-1242AROCHLOR-1248AROCHLOR-1254AROCHLOR-1260

0.5 ND0.5 ND0.5 ND0.5 ND1.0 ND1.0 ND

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 82*

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST IABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, J.JNC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

.IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO « 2397.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8240, EPAPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTHSAMPLE ID: MW108

REPORT: 2397.03V

DATE: 05-08-90

METHODOLOGYCITY

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

/OLATILESI

1HLOROMETHANEROMOMETHANE

VINYL CHLORIDEWHLOROETHANE.•ETHYLENE CHLORIDE

pCETONE

CARBON DISULFIDE,1-DICHLOROETHENE,1-DICHLOROETHANE

J-RANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENEMHLOROFORM-M,2-DICHLOROETHANEJ2-BUTANONE»,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANEEARBON TETRACHLORIDE~VINYL ACETATE

JROMODICHLOROMETHANE

DET.LIMIT RESULTS

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

15NDND

3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

B

J

VOLATILES

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-153-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

E€T.L.IHIT

1051010555555

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

rOLUENE-d8(88-110) 100* BROMOFLUORQBENZENE(86-115) , 95* l,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114) 103*

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION

|

B

*'~i

I

I

I

LIMITBELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION

= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

J| S MOORE.7§l BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340--LOUIS, MO 63146• DAVID PURINGTON

U3PLE MATRIX: WATER» 2397.03D REF.: SU846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGY

•<07ECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYE ID: MU108

^IVOLATILES

IS(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER^.OROPHENOL

J)ICHLOROBENZENE.^DICHLOROBENZENE

YL ALCOHOLICHLOROBENZENEHYLPHENOL

DET.LXHIT

1010101010101010

LS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER 10•THYLPHENOL

^|TROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINECXACHLOROETHANEiOBENZENE•HORONE

^OTTROPHENOL^J-DIMETHYLPHENOLJOIC ACID

2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE,4-DICHLOROPHENOL

J4-TRICHLOROBENZENETHALENE

-CHLOROANILINE

XCHLOROBUTADIENELORO-3-METHYLPHENOLTHYLNAPHTHALENE

-:XACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE

16-TRICHLOROPHENOL5-TRICHLOROPHENOL

-CHLORONAPHTHALENE

ITROANILINETHYLPHTHALATEAPHTHYLENE

r^TROANILINE

.fcoBENZENE-d5(35-114) 7£HENOL-d5 (10-94) 4:

101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

RESULTS(uo/Ll

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: 2397.03B

DATE: 05-08-90

DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED

04-18-9004-19-9004-24-90

SEHIVOLATILES

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBEKIZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOd, 2,3-CD) PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

QA/OC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116)2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100)

DET. RESULTSLIMIT (go/Li

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 65':2,4,6-TRIBROnOPKENOL( 10-123) 23::

u =

INOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF G1C LIMITS

SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

;ENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: 2o97.04M

DATE: 05-07-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO tt 2397.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90PROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW103

?AMETERDET.LIMIT UNIT RESULTS

DATEANALYZED

METHODREFERENCE

3TAL CYANIDE

TAL METALS

SENICDCURY

JLENIUMALLIUMTIMONY

BERYLLIUMJDMIUMROMIUMPPER

•^ICKEL• LVER

0.01 mg/L ND 04-27-90 SM 412D

10.03.00.25.010.030.05.05.05.010.010.010.010.0

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

NDNDNDNDND34.5NDNDND43NDND34.1

05-02-9005-01-9004-25-9005-02-9005-01-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

EPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPAEPA

206.2239.2245.1270 . 2279.2200.7200 . 7200.7200 . 7200 . 7200 . 7200.7200.7

ND =#EPA600/4-79-020, MARCH 1985NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITSTANDARD METHOD, 16TH EDITION

I4

I«

1a

III

4

I

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-221-2858

IENT: DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 2397.04H11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-08-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO * 2397.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: OS-03-90METHOD REFERENCE: SWS46-81SO, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002j FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW103

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERBICIDES___________LIMIT___________RESULTS

2,4-D 1.0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

GA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,S-T (10-98) 84.3%

4D = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE:; CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION

IB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

[lENT: DAMES 4 MOORE REPORT: 2397.04P11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-08-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO « 2397.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-19-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-B080, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: MU103

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCS'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 ' NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN 0.1 ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.1 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1242 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.1 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.1 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 61*

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ » ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE'DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST .JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA,7700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

iNT: DANES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340

> ST. LOUIS, tlO 63146ATTNJ DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO « 2397.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-20-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8240, ERA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MU103

REPORT: 2397.04V

DATE: 05-08-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

VJ3LATILE5

JoROMETHANEBRQMOMETHANE

JYL CHLORIDEOROETHANEHYLENE CHLORIDE

STONESON DISULFIDE-DICHLOROETHENE

1,1-DICHLOROETHANE":<lANS-l ,2-DICHLOROETHENE.•.OROFORM1^-DICHLOROETHANE

S" "UTANONE,1-TRICHLOROETHANEBON TETRACHLORIDE

f!YL ACETATEMODICHLQROMETHANE

DET.LIMIT

1010101051055555511055105

RESULTS VOLATILE5

NDNDNDND

2617

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

BB

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

DET.UBII

555555551051010535555

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

8• ND

ND10

1J

i1i

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES .

UENE-d8(88-110) 99* BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) 942 l,2-DICHLOROETHAME-d4(76-114) 93*

* NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF OUANTITATION» ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST IABORATORY OF OKIAHUMA, j• 1700 W. Albany . Suite "C~ . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

1,4 MOORE7« BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340.GUIS, MO 63146

DAVID PURINGTON

LE MATRIX: WATERtt 2397.04

t)D REF.: SU846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGY;CT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITY

»LE ID: MW103

JOLATILE5,

2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHERILOROPHENOL

ICHLOROBENZENEICHLOROBENZENE

|ZYL ALCOHOL,DICHLOROBENZENEITHYLPHENOL2-CHLOROISOPROPYDETHER

[ETHYLPHENOLTROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINECHLOROETHANE

iOBENZENEHORONETROPHENOL

-DIMETHYLPHENOL;oic ACID2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANEDICHLOROPHENOL4-TRICHLOROBENZENEITHALENEILOROANILINE

ACHLOROBUTADIENELORO-3-METHYLPHENOLTHYLNAPHTHALENE

'ACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL

IHLORONAPHTHALENEIITROANILINEETHYLPHTHALATE

^NAPHTHYLENE•MITROANILINE . .

DET. RESULTSLIMIT (UQ/L1

m1

?•WL

: Hi

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

NDNONDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: 2397.04B

DATE: 05-08-90

DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :

04-18-9004-19-'?004-24-'?0

SEHIVOLATILE5

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-BROrtOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET. RESULTSLIHIT (uo/L)

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

rROBENZENE-d5(35-114)•NOL-d5 (10-94)

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116) 75'i TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141)2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100) 34* 2,45<6-TRIBROHOPHENOL( 10-123)

81*30;:

NOT DETECTED ABOVE C1UANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF G1C LIMITS

II

SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340

-• ST. LOUIS, MO 63146• ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

§ SAMPLE MATRIX: WATER« SWLO # 2397.05

DATE: 05-07-90

— DATE SUBMITTED: 04-1B-90-• PROJECT: 19943 -• SAMPLE ID: MW104•

^^'ARAMETER

^JTAL CYANIDE

J"* TAL METALSSEN 1C"lEADJRCURY~«LENIUMTHALLIUM•JTIMONY-^RYLLIUMCADMIUM

~*^IROMIUM.MlPPERmCKEL*«ILVER•INC

002; FORD

DET.LIMIT

0.01

10.03.00.25.010.030 . 05.05.05.010.010.010.010.0

EARTH

UNIT

mg/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

CITY

RESULTS

ND

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND131NDND40.7

DATEANALYZED

04-27-90

05-02-9005-01-9004-25-9005-02-9005-01-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-9004-25-90

i

METHODREFERENCE

SM 412D

EPA 206.2EPA 239.2EPA 245.1EPA 270.2EPA 279.2EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7EPA 200.7

8EPA600/4-79-020, MARCH 1985NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITSTANDARD METHOD, 16TH EDITION

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, 1JNU.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2358

•4I IENT: DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 2397.05H

11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 . DATE: 05-08-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO # 2397.05DATE SUBMITTED: 04-1B-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: OS-03-90METHOD REFERENCE: SWB46-ai50, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW104

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion

DET.HERBICIDES___________LIMIT_______ RESULTS

2,4-D 1.0 ND2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 0.2 ND

QA/GC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 79.6V.

[ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATXONIB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

ILIENT: DAMES & MOORE REPORT: 2397.05P11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146 DATE: 05-08-90

I ATTNJ DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATER

I SWLO » 2397.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-19-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90

I METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYI SAMPLE ID: MU104

I

In

I1ii1iii

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCB'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAflMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 ' NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN 0.1 ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1242 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.0 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 54Ti

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I*

I,NT:

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

DANES & nOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, PIO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: 2397.05V

DATE: 05-08-90

SAMPLE MATRIX:SWLO « 2397.05DATE SUBMITTED:DATE ANALYZED

WATER

04-18-9004-18-90

METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW104

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

DET.LIMIT RESULTS

CHLOROMETHANE'^DMOMETHANE•YL CHLORIDE

CWOROETHANEi?£THYLENE CHLORIDEJTONE

BON DISULFIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHENE"Tk-DICHLOROETHANEJwS-l ,2-DICHLOROETHENECHLOROFORM

X* --DICHLOROETHANEUTANONE,1-TRICHLOROETHANE

CARBON TETRACHLORIDEACETATE

MODICHLOROMETHANE

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

1 JB5 JB

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

11

DET.VOLATILE5 LIHIT

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 5TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 5TRICHLOROETHENE 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 5BENZENE 5CIS-1, 3-DICHLOROPROPENE 52-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHER 10BROMOFORM 52-HEXANONE 104-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 10TETRACHLOROETHENE 5TOLUENE 5CHLOROBENZENE 5ETHYLBENZENE 5STYRENE 5TOTAL XYLENES 5

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

flA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

LUENE-d8(88-110) 103* BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) l,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114)

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT

1 = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE

* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I

I

I

ISOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

cM & HOORE<M BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE_OUIS, MO 63146

DAVID PURINGTON

340

ttt

iJici

WATERMATRIX:2397.05REF.: SU846-8270, ERA METHODOLOGY

ICT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITY".E ID: MU104

'"VOLATILE5

-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER.OROPHENOLJICHLOROBENZENEICHLOROBENZENE

Ifl. ALCOHOL

IICHLOROBENZENEHYLPHENOL

-Ci-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHERJHYLPHENOL

-«ROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINE<!RHLOROETHANE

J" BENZENEORONEROPHENOL

^-DIMETHYLPHENOLg)IC ACIDSK-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE4HJICHLOROPHENOL

:-TRICHLOROBENZENEHALENEOROANILINE

^HLOROBUTADIENE,J-ORO-3-METHYLPHENOLIWHYLNAPHTHALENE_X£CHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE

-TRICHLOROPHENOL'-TRICHLOROPHENOLORONAPHTHALENE

TROANILINEHYLPHTHALATEPHTHYLENE

U;TROANILINE

•t u t

tom.c

iif

OBENZENE-d5(35-114)15 (10-94)

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

RESULTSCug/LJ

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: 2397.05B

DATE: 05-08-90

DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-19-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-24-90

SEHIVOLATILES

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLORQPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOd, 2,3-CD) PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(B,H,I)PERYLENE

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116)2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100)

DET. RESULTSLIHIT (uo/Ll

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

TERPHENYL-dl4 C[33-141) 75:1,4,6-TRIBROf10PHE:NOL( 10-123) 40?

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.7700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

.IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX; WATERSULO tt 2397.06DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002} FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: TR-2

REPORT: 2397.06V

DATE: 05-08-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

gfQLATILES

T:HLOROMETHANE•'•JBROMOMETHANE

_ B/INYL CHLORIDE"^HLOROETHANEJ1ETHYLENE CHLORIDEtCETONE

ARBON DISULFIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHENE

"fil, 1-DICHLOROETHANE•rRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENEHCHLOROFORPJ<-l,2-DICHLOROETHANE•2-BUTANONE

- «1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDE

INYL ACETATEIBROMODICHLOROMETHANE

DET.LIMIT RESULTS

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

18 BJB

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

1_ B

Iiii

VOLATILES

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1, 3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLQROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

I»ET.LIMIT RESULTS

»!J'5555551051010555555

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

TOLUENE-d8(88-110) BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) 973 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114) 1063

NDJB*

« NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION

ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

ANALYTICAL REPORT

DATES & MOORE~~£L701 Borman DriveJ. Louis, Missouri 63149

ii

,0 IDENTIFICATION

iMPLE NO. :TE RECEIVED:

2397.01 - 2397.0604/18/90

REPORT: G2704

REPORT DATE: 05/03/90

lDESCRIPTION

"HE1THOD BLANK 05/01/90THOD BLANK 05/01/90

_§LANK SPIKE"lLANK SPIKEBLANK SPIKE"•LANK SPIKE

05/01/9005/01/9005/01/9005/01/90

PARAMETER

LEADTHALLIUM

LEADLEADTHALLIUMTHALLIUM

RESULTS

<3

99%98%98%95%

ug/Lug/L

RECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERYRECOVERY

1

1

1

I

I

I

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

1CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE

11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

1 SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO * 2397.03 (MS/MSD)SAMPLE IDs MW108 (MS/MSD)

REPORT: G2704.2

DATE i 013-08-90

1111i,4-D

,4,5-TP

i1 ——2,4-D2,4,5-TP

HERBICIDE MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX

SPIKE ADDED AMT.(ug/L) SMP.

166.7(SILVEX) 16.7

AMT. FOUNDMSD <ug/L)

124.8(SILVEX) 14.3

SPIKE DUPLICATE RESULTS

FOUND(ug/L)

00

MSDPERCENTRECOVERY

74.985.6

MSAMT. FOUND PERCENTMS (ug/L) RECOVERY

129.5 77.714.8 83.6

RECOVERY PERCENTDIFFERENCE

3.73.4

I1II1

1SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

:LIENT: DARES & MOORE REPORT: G2704.311701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, HO 63146 DATE: 03-08-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO « METHOD BLANKDATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-19-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: BLANK

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCS'5 DETECTION LIHIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 0.05 NDBETA-BHC 0.05 NDDELTA-BHC 0.05 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR 0.05 NDALDRIN 0.05 NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 0.05 ' NDENDOSULFAN I 0.05 NDDIELDRIN 0.1 ND4,4-DDE 0.1 NDENDRIN 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN II 0.1 ND4,4-DDD 0.1 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.1 ND4,4-DDT 0.1 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 0.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 0.1 NDALPHA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 0.5 NDTOXAPHENE 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1016 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1221 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1232 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1242 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1248 0.5 NDAROCHLOR-1254 1.0 NDAROCHLOR-1260 1.0 ND

QA/OC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-154) 95*

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

-JJ 1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

,IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVE PURINGTON

REPORT: Gi2704.4

DATE: 05-08-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO ft 2397^01 (MS/MSD)DATE SUBMITTED: 04-1B-90PROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: MW110 (MS/MSD)

PESTICIDE MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RESULTS

SPIKE ADDED(ug/L)

AMT. FOUND (SAMPLE)(ug/L)

AMT. FOUND (MS)(ug/L)

MSPERCENTRECOVERY

*MMA-BHCIEPTACHLOR.DRIN

JIELDRINPNDRIN1,4'-DOT

0.400.400. 40,00,00

1.00

000000

0.450.440.43,20,30

1.30

112.57.110.07.107. 57.120.07.130.07.130.07.

1AMMA-BHCIEPTACHLORiLDRIN>IELDRIN:NDRIN*.4 '-DOT

AMT. FOUND (MSD)(ug/L)

0.400.410.381.101.101.20

MSDPERCENTRECOVERY

100.07.102.57.95.07.110.07.110.07.120 . 07.

RELATIVEPERCENT

DIFFERENCE

11.617.7.1'/7.12 . 37.8 . 77.16.77.8 . OA\

1

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA,1700 W, Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

.IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO ft METHOD BLANKDATE ANALYZED s 04-18-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

REPORT: G2704.3

DATE: 05-08-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

g)LATILE5

"jfLOROMETHANE-KOMOMETHANE"NYL CHLORIDE

4LOROETHANETHYLENE CHLORIDEETONE

J'ARBON DISULFIDE,1-DICHLOROETHENE,1-DICHLOROETHANE

TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENECHLOROFORM-•,2-DICHLORQETHANE"-BUTANONE

i,l,l-TRICHLOROETHANEARBON TETRACHLORIDEINYL ACETATE

^JROMODICHLOROMETHANE

DET.LIMIT RESULTS

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

103 J

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

11iiii

VOLATILE5

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLORQBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DET.L3.HIT RESULTS

55555555105101055c

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

OLUENE-d8(88-110) 100* BROMOFLUOROBEN2ENE(86-115) B6X l,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114) 95*

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

IENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

JIs*

I<••

-Ifm

I

"BlLATILES

LADUKAlUJtX Ur wrvi^vj-JLvyiTxnL, JLL,7700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

REPORT: G2704.6

DATE: 05-08-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSULO H METHOD BLANKDATE ANALYZED : 04-20-90METHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8240, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/L OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

DET.LIHIT RESULTS

CHLOROMETHANE-^OMOMETHANE•iNYL CHLORIDE

"•CHLOROETHANE•ETHYLENE CHLORIDEBCETONE

O.CARBON DISULFIDE

(,1-DICHLOROETHENE,1-DICHLOROETHANERANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE

"•CHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE

-BUTANONEna 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANEHARBON TETRACHLORIDE

-JlNYL ACETATEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE

101010105105555551055105

NDNDNDND

4 J4 J

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

VOLATILE5

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANETRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHENEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEBENZENECIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHERBROMOFORM2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENESTYRENETOTAL XYLENES

DI:T.L:miT RESULTS555555551051010

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

1 BA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

(•QLUENE-d8(88-110) 99* BROMOFLUOROBENZENE(86-115) 94% l,2-DICHLOROETHANE-d4(76-114) 97*

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

JLAJBUKAJLUKI Ur7700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 918-251-2858

DANES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, HO 63146ATTN: DAVE PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO » 2397.05 (MS/USD)DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90SAMPLE ID: MU104 (MS/MSD)

REPORT: G2704.7

DATE: 05-08-90

MATER VOLATILE MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY

'OUND

SPIKE SAMPLEADDED CONCENTRATION(UQ/L) (UQ/L)

USCONCENTRATION

nsPERCENTRECOVERY

QCLIMITS

RECOVERY

1—1-DIC•CHLO

TflJZENE

-DICHLOROETHENECHLOROETHENE

TOLUENE"lOROBENZENE

1COMPOUND

50 0 5850 0 5450 0 '6050 0 5750 0 54

SPIKE MSD MSBADDED CONCENTRATION PERCENTCua/U____(uo/U RECOVERY

116108120114108

6171767675

- 145- 120- 127- 125- 130

PERCENTRPD

QC LIMITSRPD REC.

-J-DICHLOROETHENETRICHLOROETHENE

:ENE.UENE.OROBEKIZENE

5050505050

5654575654

102108114112108

40

14 61 -14 71 -11 76 -13 76 -13 75 -

145120127125130

M.UES OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

1SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklaiioma 74012 . 918-251-2858

4 MOORE7(| BORtlAN DRIVE, SUITE 340-JLOUIS, PIO 63146

DAVID PURINGTON

MATRIX: WATERtt METHOD BLANKID REF.: SW846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGY

3JICT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITY~]LE ID: METHOD BLANK1••SVOLATILES

t"iL(

1

1LSR-CHLOROETHYL)ETHERAOROPHENOL

ICHLOROBENZENE4BICHLOROBENZENE%-!YL ALCOHOLj|ICHLOROBENZENEMBHYLPHENOLSI2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER

llHYLPHENOL-.•^ROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINE:xHHLOROETHANE

JBENZENEORONEROPHENOL

-^rDIMETHYLPHENOL«IC ACID

:S«-CHLDROETHOXY) METHANE,4™ICHLOROPHENOL"1^-TRICHLOROBENZENE.JTHALENE-GW.OROANILINEru2CHLOROBUTADIENE

JlORO-3-METHYLPHENOL-WHYLNAPHTHALENEiiiACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE

:-TRICHLOROPHENOL-TRICHLOROPHENOLORONAPHTHALENE

.TROANILINEHYLPHTHALATEPHTHYLENE

-W-URO ANILINE

DET.LIHIT

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

RESULTS(UQ/L1

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: G2704.8

DATE: 05-08-90

DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :

04-19-9004-23-90

SEHIVQLATILES

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZOWFLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOU, 2,3-CD) PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET. RESULTSLIHIT (UQ/L1

1050501010101010105050101010101010101010102010101010101010101010

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

12NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

_ QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

JoBENZENE-d5(35-114) 78* 2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116) 69* TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141) 94*4CTOL-d5 (10-94) 88* 2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100) 69* 2,4,6-TRIBROMOPHENOL(10-123) 81*

:* NOT DETECTED ABOVE G1UANTITATION LIMIT_= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF G1UANTITATION

J~" ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF G1C LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA,1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

*•*i

I11

4 MOOREBORP1AN DRIVE, SUITE 340

LOUIS, HO 63146DAVID PURINGTON

»LE MATRIX: WATER|Q tt METHOD BLANK|OD REF.: SU846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGYJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITY

IPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

tVOLATILES

2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHERHLOROPHENOL

DICHLOROBENZENEDICHLOROBENZENE

IZYL ALCOHOLDICHLOROBENZENETHYLPHENOL

'(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHERTHYLPHENOLTROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAHINECHLOROETHANE

ROBENZENEIPHORONEITROPHENOL-DIMETHYLPHENOLIZOIC ACID(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE-DICHLOROPHENOL,4-TRICHLOROBENZENEHTHALENEHLOROANILINEACHLOROBUTADIENEHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOLETHYLNAPHTHALENE:ACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL;HLORONAPHTHALENEITROANILINEETHYLPHTHALATENAPHTHYLENE

iNITROANILINE

DET.LIMIT

101010101010101010101010101010105010101010101010101010501050101050

RESULTS(uo/L)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNONDNONDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: G2704.9

DATE: 05-08-90

DATE EXTRACTED: 04-24-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-25-90

SEHIVOLATILE5

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO.2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINEU)4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOd, 2,3-CD) PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET,, RESULTS(UQ/Ll

105050101010101010505010101010101010101010201010101010101010101C

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

TROBENZENE-d5(35-114)ENOL-d5 (10-94)

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

60?'. 2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(43-116) 58:;37:; 2-FLUOROPHENOL (21-100) 41S

TERPHENYL-dl4 (33-141)2,4,6-TRIBROMOPHENOL (10-123)

80::

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTISATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOU LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF C1C LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, 1IN(J.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-28^8

CENT: DAMES 4 MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVE, SUITE 340ST. LOUIS, MO 63146ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: G2704.10

DATE: 05-08-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: WATERSWLO H 2397.02 (tIS/tlSD)DATE SUBMITTED: 04-18-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-19-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-24-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-S270, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: 19943 - 002; FORD EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: NW102 (MS/MSD)

SOIL 5EHIVOLATILE MATRIX SPIKE/HATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY

11POUND

NOL- '-CHLOROPHENOL

Jp-DICHLOROBENZENE•JITROSC-ai-n-PROPYLAMINE-72,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE

~~T:HLORO-3-ttETHYLPHENOLMNAPHTHENEWITROPHENOL

2-DINITROTOLUENETACHLOROPHENOLENE

1--TIPOUND

:'KNOL_2=pLOROPHENOL

*-DICHLOROBENZENEWlTROSO-di-n-PROPYLAMINE172.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE

2HLORO-3-METHYLPHENOLNAPHTHENEITROPHENOL

-^4-DINITROTOLUENE•JTACHLOROPHENOL-PENE

SPIKEADDED

(uo/Li

200200100100100200100200100200100

SPIKEADDED

(ua/Ka)

200200100100100200100200100200100

SAMPLECONCENTRATION

(ua/L)

00000000000

USDCONCENTRATION

(ua/Ka)

123116765070119771888611779

MS MSCONCENTRATION PERCENT

(ua/L) RECOVERY

115120675668122781799010478

HSDPERCENTRECOVERY

6258765070607794*865879

PERCENTRPD

73121132144111

5860675668617890*905278

QCRPD

3550273823331950474736

QCLIMITS

RECOVERY

2625284138263111281735

- 90- 102- 104- 126- 107- 103- 137- 114- 89- 109- 142

LIHITSRECOVERY

2625284138263111281735

- 90- 102- 104- 126- 107- 103- 137- 114- 89- 109- 142I1

LUES OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORYOF OKLAHOMA, INC.

ItI

May 3, 1990

Dave PuringtonDAME3 * MOORE11701 corman DriveSt. Louis. MO 63146

Project: Earth City

Dear Mr. Purington:

Enclosed are the analytical results for your samplesreceived in cur laboratory en April 13. 1990, fcr the abave-captioned project.

If, in your review, you should have any questions or rsquireadditional information, please call.

Sincerely,

Randy StaggsProject Manager

RS/lk

Enclosures

MAY 04 1S90ST. LOUIS. UISSOU5U

1700 WEST ALBANY. SUITE C • BROKEN ARROW. OK 74012(918)251-2858 • FAX (918) 251-2599

1 - 7 73-DAMES & MOORE Cl IAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD

Samplo Source A Client f^^.J> (j£ 'Btm^ fc^~~fcfcc~Projoct Tl l lo (?ixTi O'^-j

Dolo

V/;L

//

•/

I\\

.Tlmo

//

^/

SnmploI.D. No. v

j$kG-sV33

C|*C?A\p ^

do^p 1

/^

/ \/ 1

/ . \

\

«

R e l l n q u l a l i c d byi Data Time• (S igna tu re ) /

l\^{ f? X> / »tfel I n q u l i l ted byi Date Tina

(Signature)

Rcl l ivjulal icd byi Data Tina( S i g n a t u r e )

SnmploTypo

S6, »

5^ , *W-Sc^.'/^^vf

5^0.' /fed. /

V /"^" —

No. olContainers

333 :3"}

/xx/

/ :\/

I tecolved byi( / t C Signature)

deceived byi(Signature)

(S igna tu r e )

Date

Data

Data

Time

Tlwc

Time

Jot) No./ *?*?<f3~-o O~i_

Sompllno Silo

•

- — x\\\ •\\ ."^ — -^

*

Flold Porsonnol. (S ignature) .••

Remarks

-7 p// 5r.*«; • Qjf //u(> M* I vT**^* V •

^ / • •.

/ •/

/./

s/

*

'Itel Inqi i le l ied byi Date Time Received byi D a t e . Tine

(Signature) (Signature)

llcl l i iq i i l ohcd byi Date Tine deceived byi Date Time(Signature) • . . (Signature)

ltcl 1 n q t i l olicd byi Date Time deceived byi Date T ime(S igna tu re ) (S igna tu re )

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2358

tCLIENT: DAMES & MOORE

11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63149ATTN: DAVE PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO tt 2371.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: 8KB

REPORT: 2371.01MT

DATE: 05-03-90

fi>

PARAMETER

TOTAL CYANIDES

TOTAL METALS

ARSENICLEADMERCURYSELENIUMTHALLIUMANTIMONYBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERNICKELSILVERZINC

DET.LIMIT

1

20000611122*n^

2

.0

.0

.6

.1

.4

.4

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

UNIT

ug/Kg

mg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kg

DATERESULTS ANALYZED

ND

5.3017.4

• NDNDND6.9ND1.114.524.018.0ND61.6

04-27-90

04-25-9004-19-9004-18-9004-24-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

METHODREFERENCE

SM

SWSWswSWSWswswswswswswswsw

412D

7060742174717740784160106010601060106010601060106010

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITTEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTE, EPA PUBLICATION #SWS46,THIRD EDITION,, NOVEMBER 1986STANDARD METHODS FOR THE EXAMINATION OF WATER AND WASTEIWATER,16TH EDITION, 1985

Ii1iIII

SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE. INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # 2371.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: BKG

REPORT: 2371.01T

DATE: 05-03-90

ARAMETERDET.LIMIT UNIT RESULTS

DATEEXTRACTED

DATEANALYZED

METHODREFERENCE

rDTflL EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONSf• GASOLINE1IESELfcEROSENEJP-4

INAPTHAJUNKER c/#6 FUEL OIL1I5CELLANEOUS (1)

0oo0o

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg

NDNDNDNDNDND14.9

04-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

04-20-9004-20-9004-20-9004-20-9004-20-9004-20-9004-20-90

GC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FID

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

NAPHTHALENE 1027.

ANALYSIS SHOWS MISCELLANEOUS PEAKS WHICH CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED ASANY SPECIFIC PATTERN. THE RESPONSE FACTOR FOR DIESEL WAS USED.NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITCOMPOUND FOUND IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLEESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONUNABLE TO OUANTITATE DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE

111

SOUTHWEST,LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.7700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC. REPORT: 2371.01H

1 11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149 DATE: 05-03-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

i41

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # 2371.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYMETHOD REFERENCE: SWS46-8130, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: EKG

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billion

I1

DET.ER3ICIDES___________________LIMIT____UNIT ________RESULTS

,4-D 80.0 ug/Kg ND,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 10.0 ug/Kg ND

IIuHIrtc

•QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 94.27.

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.T T 1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 91&-2S1-285S

ILIENT: DAI1ES & MOORE, INC. REPORT: 2371.01P11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149 . DATE: 05-03-90ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO H 2371.01DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-B080, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: BKG

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCB'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHC 17.2 NDBETA-BHC 17.2 NDGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE) 17.2 NDDELTA-BHC 17.2 NDHEPTACHLOR 17.2 NDALDRIN 17.2 NDHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 17.2 NDENDOSULFAN I 17.2 ND4,4-DDE 17.2 NDDIELDRIN 34.5 NDENDRIN 34.5 NDENDOSULFAN II 34.5 ND4,4-DDD 34.5 NDENDOSULFAN SULFATE 34.5 ND4,4-DDT 34.5 NDENDRIN KETONE 34.5 NDMETHOXYCHLOR 172.4 ND .ALPHA-CHLORDANE 172.4 NDGAMMA-CHLORDANE 172.4 NDTOXAPHENE 344.8 NDAROCHLOR-1221 172.4 NDAROCHLOR-1232 172.4 NDAROCHLOR-1242 172.4 NDAROCHLOR-1016 . 172.4 NDAROCHLOR-1248 172.4 NDAROCHLOR-1254 344.8 NDAROCHLOR-1260 344.8 ND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-150) 89?:

ND = MOT DETECTED ABOVE C1UANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOU LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS '

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

4 MOORE, INC.)1 BORMAN DRIVE|LOUIS, MO 63149

DAVID PURINGTON

?LE MATRIX: SOILtt 2371.01

40D REF.: SU846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGY|JECT: EARTH CITYFM.E ID: BKG

REPORT: 2371.01B

DATE: 05-03-90

IVOLATILES"NOL,(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER

ILOROPHENOL-DICHLOROBENZENE

-DICHLQROBENZENEIZYL ALCOHOLI-DICHLOROBENZENEIETHYLPHENOL(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER

IETHYLPHENOLIITROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINE

_:ACHLOROETHANE

iROBENZENEPHORONEITROPHENOL

—j-DIMETHYLPHENOLJZOIC ACID(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE-DICHLOROPHENOL,4-TRICHLOROBENZENEHTHALENEIHLOROANILINE

'•""iACHLOROBUTADIENE•JHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL

, •METHYLNAPHTHALENE-SfACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE

J»,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL•*»,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL

JCHLORONAPHTHALENE"]>IITROANILINE•ilETHYLPHTHALATE•ENAPHTHYLENE

'IITROANILINE

DET. RESULTSLIMIT (up/Kg)

6606606606606606606606606606606606606606606606603200660660660660660660660660660660320066032006606603200

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDKIDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :

04-13-9004-17-9004-26-90

SEHIVOLATILES

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRQ -2-flETHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(l)4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOC1,2,3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZCA,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET.. RESULTSLIH::T6603200320066066066066066066032003200660660660660660660660660660660132066066066C660660660660660660660

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

kTRODENZENE-d5(23-120) 73":|iENOL-d5 (24-113) 85":

I-QA/OC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

-FLUOROBIPHENYL(30-115) 79::-FLUOROPHENOL (25-121) 69T;

TERPHEhJYL-dl4 (18-137)2,4,6-TRIBROHOPHENOL( 19-122)

= MOT DETECTED ABOVE C1UANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL A3 SAMPLE

OUTSIDE OF GC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-285^

CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63149ATTN: DAVE PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # 2371.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: S4

DET.

REPORT: 2371.02MT

DATE: 05-03-90

PARAMETER LIMIT UNIT RESULTSDATEANALYZED

METHOD

TOTAL CYANIDES

TOTAL METALS

ARSENICLEADMERCURYSELENIUMTHALLIUMANTIMONYBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERNICKELSILVERZINC

1.0 ug/Kg

2.00.60.10.40.46.01.01.01.02.02.02.02.0

mg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kg

ND

5.6017.8O.iSNDND6.7NDND13.123.016.3ND56. 8

04-27-90 SM 412D

04-25-9004-19-9004-18-9004-24-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

SW 7060SW 7421SW 7471SW 7740SW 7841SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010

NDSW

SM

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMIT= TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTE, EPA PUBLICATION #SW846,THIRD EDITION, NOVEMBER 1986

= STANDARD METHODS POR THE EXAMINATION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER,16TH EDITION, 1985

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

tLIENT: DAMES ft MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # 2371.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: S4

REPORT: 2371.02T

DATE: 05-03-90

f ARAMETER

"TOTAL EXTRACTABLE

EASOLINE^DIESEL

[.EROSENEMjP-4^BJ £ P' T j.j £»"fUNKER C/*6 FUELMISCELLANEOUS d)

DET.LIMIT UNIT RESULTS

DATEEXTRACTED

DATEANALYZED

METHODREFERENCE

HYDROCARBONS

1 . 01 . 01 . 01 . 01 . 0

OIL 1,01 . 0

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg

NDNDNDNDNDND6.3

04-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

. 04-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

04-20-9004-20-9004-20-9004-20-9004-20-9004—20—9004-20-90

GC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FID

iIIri-ft'

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

NAPHTHALENE 100V.

ANALYSIS SHOWS MISCELLANEOUS PEAKS WHICH CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED ASANY SPECIFIC PATTERN. THE RESPONSE FACTOR FOR DIESEL WAS USED.NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITCOMPOUND FOUND IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLEESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF OUANTITATIDNUNABLE TO OUANTITATE DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE

_1| SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.• 1700 W, Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC.••U 11701 BORMAN DRIVE• ST. LOUIS, MO 63149"• ATTN: DAVID PURINGTQN

SAMPLE MATRIX; SOILSWLO # 2371.02DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYMETHOD REFERENCE: SWa46-B130f EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: S4

REPORT: 2371.02H

DATE: 05-03-90

1-tRESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billion

DET.LIMIT UNIT RESULTS

«2,4-D•,4,5-TP (SILVEX)

80.010.0

ug/Kgug/Kg

NDND

_i^

§.-Xif

I

. « —

•MD

IIII

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 92.3V.

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATICINANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF C1C LIMITS

OF1700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

INC.

llENT: DAMES 4 MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURIMGTON

4

REPORT: 2371.02P

DATE: 05-03-90

SAMPLE MATRIX:SULO » 2371.02DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :METHOD REFERENCE

SOIL

04-13-9004-17-9005-02-90SW846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGY

PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: S4

I

i4Iiiiliiii

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCS'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

ALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE)DELTA-BHCHEPTACHLORALDRINHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDEENDOSULFAN I4,4-DDEDIELDRINENDRINENDOSULFAN II4,4-DDDENDOSULFAN SULFATE4,4-DDTENDRIN KETONEMETHOXYCHLORALPHA-CHLORDANEGAMMA-CHLORDANETOXAPHENEAROCHLOR-1221AROCHLOR-1232AROCHLOR-1242AROCHLOR-1016AROCHLQR-1248AROCHLOR-1254AROCHLOR-1260

23.623.623.623.6^T /i.O • O

23.647.47.47.47.47.47.247.2236.0236.0236.0472.0236.0236.0236.0236.0236.0472.0472.0

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ND,1B*

BA/6C SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE '(24-150)

NOT DETECTED ABOVE C1UANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION &ELOU LlhlT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL A3 SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF G1C LIMITS

SOUTHWEST IABORATORY OF1700 W. Albany . Suite "C* • Broken Arrow, Oklahoma

II

a 4 MOORE, INC.1 BORMAN DRIVELOUIS, MO 63149

DAVID PURINGTON

1PLE MATRIX: SOIL« tt 2371.02OD REF.: SU846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGYECT: EARTH CITY

ID: 54

IJ.IVOLATILES

—IVIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER

tHLOROPHENOL-DICHLOROBENZEIME-DICHLOROBENZENE

8-'ZYL ALCOHOL-DICHLOROBENZENEETHYLPHENOL

rS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER 660•ETHYLPHEMOL

— (lITROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMlNE-:XACHLOROETHANE

- JROBENZENE-PHORONE^IITROPHENOL

-DIMETHYLPHEHOLZOIC A C I D(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE

,4-DICHLOROPHENOL

J,4-TRICHLOROBENZENEHTHALENE

-LHLOROANILINE-gCACHLOROBUTADIENE

KHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL•ilETHYLNAPHTHALENEE)<ACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE

,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL

T^CHLORONAPHTHALENE-J^IITRQANILINE

•flETHYLPHTHALATEWENAPHTHYLENEiMITROANILINEI11i

DET.LIMIT

6606606606606606606606606606606606606606606606603200660660660660660660660660660660320066032006606603200

RESULTS(ua/Ka)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

140 . JNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

OKLAHOMA, INC.74012 . 918-251-2858

REPORT: 2371.02B

D#TE: 05-03-90

DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:

ANALYZED :

SEHIVOLATILES

ACENAPHTHEN2,4-DINITRO:'HENOL4-NITROPHENJLDIBENZOFURA2,4-DINITRO2,6-DINITRODIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHEFLUORENE4-NITROANIL4,6-DINITRON-NITROSODI4-BROMOFHEK

OLUENEOLUENE

vJYL-PHENYLETHER

INE2-METHYLPHENOL•HENYLAMINE(l)L-PHENYLETHER

HEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENCLPHENANTHREhEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLRHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZYl3,3-DICHLOF

DI-N-OCTYL

PHTHALATEOBENZIDINE

BENZQ(A)ANrHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYl.HEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENE

PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLIJORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENO(l,2l3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZ(A,HBENZO(G,H,

)ANTHRACENEDPERYLENE

QA/5C SURROGATE RECOVERIES

ROBENZEME-d5(23-120)MOL-dS (24-113)

83:: 2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(30-115)96:: 2-FLUOROPHENOL (25-121)

04-13-9004-17-9004-26-90

r

DET.LU13!

6603200320066066066066066066032003200660660660660660660660660660660132066066C660660660660660660660660

RESULTS(ua/Ka)

NDNDNDNDNDND

65 JNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

40 JND

100 JND

30 J50 JNDND

190 JNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

88::80:;

TERPHENYL-dl4 (13-137) Q&-2,4,6-TRIBROMOPHENOL(19-l22) 10;

= MOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION3 ANALYTE DETECTED IN 5I.AMK AS WELL AS SAMPLE3 SURROGATE RECOVER OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST JABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-28.58•

•— u

I^J CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE

•

• 11701 BORMAN DRIVE-1 ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63149•! ATTN: DAVE PURINGTON

' ^ SAMPLE MATRIX:_| SWLO # 2371.03

^ M* DATE SUBMITTED:, • PROJECT: EARTH

"1 SAMPLE ID: S3

^ •-i PARAMETER

V f TOTAL CYANIDES

J"j TOTAL METALS

• ARSENIC" ~]LEAD,-lJ MERCURY•SELENIUM

- -, THALLIUMB| ANTIMONY

~ •BJ BERYLLIUMA CADMIUMPCHROMIUM

COPPERNICKEL

^--i SILVER•JZINC

iJ• 1

^* ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE

SOIL

04-13-90CITY

DET.LIMIT UNIT

1.0 ug/Kg

2.0 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg0 . 4 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg6.0 mg/kg1.0 mg/kg1.0 mg/kg1.0 mg/kg2.0 mg/kg2.0 mg/kg2.0 mg/kg2.0 mg/kg

QUANTITATION LIMIT"ISW = TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WAS•J THIRD EDITION, NOVEMBER 1986• SM s STANDARD METHODS FOR THE EXAMINATION' — 1 16TH EDITION, 1985r?

REPORT:

DATE:

i

DATERESULTS ANALYZED

ND 04-27-90

2.12 04-25-9012.4 04-19-90

- ND 04-18-90ND 04-24-90ND 04-19-90ND 04-19-90ND 04-19-90ND 04-19-905.5 04-19-9015.2 04-19-909.7 04-19-90ND 04-19-9032.8 04-19-90

2371. 03MT

05-03-90

METHODREFERENCE

SM 412D

SW 7060SW 7421SW 7471SW 7740SW 7841SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010

'E, EPA PUBLICATION #SW846,

)F WATER AND WASTEWATER ,

SOUTHWESTXABORATORY QF OKLAHOMA. INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

[CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO * 2371.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: S3

REPORT: 2371.03T

DATE: 05-03-90

IJPARAMETERDET.LIMIT UNIT RESULTS

DATEEXTRACTED

DATE;ANALYZED

METHODREFERENCE

iTDTAL EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS

GASOLINE 1.0DIESEL 1.0[KEROSENE i.o'JP-4 1NAPTHA 1

IBUNKER C/tt& FUEL OIL 1.0MISCELLANEOUS (1) 1.0

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmq / Kgmg/Kg

NDNDNDNDNDND12.0

04-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

04-04-04-04-04-04-04-

11-90:i-90•1-90il-9021-90'.1-90•1-90

GC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FID

QA/QC SURROGATE

NAPHTHALENE

(1) = ANALYSIS SHOWS MISCELLANEOUS PEAKS WH]ANY SPECIFIC PATTERN. THE RESPONSE

|ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= COMPOUND FOUND IN BLANK AS WELL AS= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW= UNABLE TO QUANTITATE DUE TO MATRIX IN

RECOVERY

1007.

CH CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED ASFACTOR FOR DIESEL WAS USED.

SAMPLELIMIT OF QUANTITATIONERFERENCE

J SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # 2371.03DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90PROJECT: EARTH CITY

1i1iiI

METHOD REFERENCE:SAMPLE ID: S3

SW846-8150, EPA ME

REPORT

DATE

2371. 03H

05-03-90

HODCLOGY

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Pe

^RBICIDES

DET.L I M I T UNIT

Bi l l ion

RESULTS

I

1

iii

,4,5-TP ( S I L V E X )80.010.0

ug/Kgug/Kg

NDND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-93)

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW L= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SA!= SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I

91.97.

MIT OF QUANTITATI ONRLE

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC1700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

DAMES 4 MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: 2371.03P

DflTE: 05-03-90

SAMPLE MATRIX:SULO » 2371.03DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :METHOD REFERENCE

SOXL

04-13-9004-17-9005-02-90SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGY

PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: S3

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billion

PESTICIDES/PCB'S

ALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE)DELTA-BHCHEPTACHLORALDRINHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDEENDOSULFAN I4,4-DDEDIELDRINENDRINENDOSULFAN II4,4-DDDENDOSULFAN SULFATE4,4-DDTENDRIN KETONEHETHOXYCHLORALPHA-CHLORDANEGAMMA-CHLORDANETOXAPHENEAROCHLOR-1221AROCHLOR-1232AROCHLOR-1242AROCHLOR-1016AROCHLOR-1248AROCHLOR-1254AROCHLOR-1260

(PPB)

DETECTION LIMIT

19.019.019.019.019.019.019.019,019.038.038.033.038.038.038.038.0190.2190.2190.2380.5190.. 2190.2190.2190.2190.2380.5380.5

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-150)

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAfPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF G1C LIMITS

fSOUTHWESTXABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

ES 4 MOORE, INC..'01 BORMAN DRIVE

il. LOUIS, MO 63149I: DAVID PURINGTON

I

[•MPLE MATRIX: SOIL0 » 2371.03

rafcjHOD REF.: SU846-B270, EPA METHODOLOGYjKjECT: EARTH CITYi"lPLE ID: S3

lillVOLATILES

J:NOL|S (2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHERkHLOROPHENOL}-DICHLOROBENZENEi-DICHLOROBENZENE

INZYL ALCOHOL:-DICHLOROBENZENE1ETHYLPHENOL

|S(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER[1ETHYLPHENOLslITROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAHINE

IXACHLOROETHANEFROBENZENE3PHORONEJITROPHENOL

|4-DIMETHYLPHENOLMZOIC ACIDi (2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE

[4-DICHLOROPHENOL¥,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE

"HTHALENE:HLOROANILINE

EPORT: 2371.03B

ATE: 05-03-90

DATE SUBMITTED: 04-i:i-905ATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-2A-90

:HLORO-3-METHYLPHEMOLllETHYLNAPHTHALENEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE1,6-TRICHLOROPHENOLU5-TRICHLOROPHENOL

FCHLORONAPHTHALENEiNITROANILINEIMETHYLPHTHALATE3ENAPHTHYLENE-NITROANILINE

DET.LIMIT

6606606606606606606606606606606606606606606606603200660660660660660660660660660660320066032006606603200

RESULTS(UQ/KQ)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

33 JNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

SEMIVOLATI

ACENAPHTHE2,4-DINITR4-NITROPHEDIBENZOFUR2,4-DINITR2,6-DINITRDIETHYLPHT4-CHLOROPHFLUORENE

LES

MEDPHENOLMOLANDTOLUENEDTOLUENErIALATEENYL-PHENYLETHER

4-NITROANILINE4,6-DINITRO 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE( 1 )4-BROMOPHEHEXACHLOROPENTACHLORPHENANTHREANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLFLUORANTHEPYRENEBUTYLBENZY3,3-DICHLOBENZO(A)ANBIS(2-ETHYCHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL

slYL-PHENYLETHER3ENZENEDPHENOLME

^HTHALATEME

.PHTHALATE\OBENZIDINErHRACENEJHEXYDPHTHALATE

PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYINDENO(1,2DIBENZ(A,HBENZO(G,H,

3ENE,3-CD) PYRENE) ANTHRACENEDPERYLENE

DET. RESULTSIjriJLI (UQ/KQ)

66032003200660660660660660660320032006606606606606606606606606606601320660660660660660660660660660660

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

30ND

104050

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

J

JJJ

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

IIBEhl2ENE-d5(23-120) 70': 2-FLUOROBIPHENYLC30-115)5 (24-113) 833 2-FLUOROPHENOL (25-121)

- NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION

DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE'E RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

712 TERPHENYL-dl4 (13-137) 90:67:-: 2,4,6-TRIBROMOF'HENOL( 19-122) 79:

SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OjF OKLAHOMA, INC1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

OF

iiiii

CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63149ATTN: DAVE PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # 2371.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: COMP. 2

PARAMETERDET.LIMIT UNIT

REPORT: 2371.04MT

DATE: 05-03-90

RESULTSDATEANALYZED

METHODREFERENCE

I1J

TOTAL CYANIDES

TOTAL METALS

ARSENICLEADMERCURYSELENIUMTHALLIUMANTIMONYBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERNICKELSILVERZINC

1.0 ug/Kg

2.00.60.10.40.46.01.01.01.02.02.02.02.0

mg / k gmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kg

ND

7.4115.9NDNDND7.4NDND15.525.019.2ND57.4

04-27-90 SM 412D

04-25-9004-19-9004-18-9004-24-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

SW 7060SW 7421SW 7471SW 7740SW 7341SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010

nniiun

NDSW

SM

NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMITTEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTETHIRD EDITION, NOVEMBER 1986STANDARD METHODS FOR THE EXAMINATION16TH EDITION, 19S5

, EPA PUBLICATION #SW846,

OF WATER AND WASTEWATER,

1

44I41-41

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY O|F OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-2S1-285B

CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # 2371.04DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: COMP. 2

ARAMETERDET.LIMIT UNIT

IIGASOLINEIESEL

KEROSENE-4

NAPTHALINKER C/#6 FUEL OIL

t-IISCELLANGOUS (1)

1111111

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg / Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg

REPORT: 2371.04T

DATE: 05-03-90

OTAL EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS

RESULTSDATE DATE METHODEXTRACTED ANAL.Y ZED REFERENCE

NDNDNDNDNDND5.1

04-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

04-04-04-04-04-04-04-

:i-90:i-90:i-90:i-90:i-9o:i-9o:i-9o

GC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FID

V

I--ID

n

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

NAPHTHALENE 957.

1) = ANALYSIS SHOWS MISCELLANEOUS PEAKS WHICH CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED ASANY SPECIFIC PATTERN. THE RESPONSE FACTOR FOR DIESEL WAS USED.NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMITCOMPOUND FOUND IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE

= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW= UNABLE TO QUANTITATE DUE TO MATRIX

LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONTERFERENCE

II

SOUTHWEST.LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.7700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

IENT: DAhES & MOORE, INC.

11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

iSAMPLE MATRIX:SWLO # 2371.04DATE SUBMITTEDDATE EXTRACTEDDATE ANALYZED:

SOIL

04-13-9004-27-9005-02-90

PROJECT: EARTH CITYMETHOD REFERENCE: SW846-8150, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: COMP. 2

REPORT: 2371.04H

DATE: 05-03-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts P

BICIDE5DET.LIMIT UNIT

2,4-D(SILVEX)

80.010.0

ug/Kgug/Kg

1111*17it

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVER

2,4,5-T (10-98)

r Billion

RESULTS

NDND

8.27.

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

i1i

SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C* . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2853

LIENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX:SULO H 2371.04DATE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :METHOD REFERENCE

SOIL

04-13-9004-17-9005-02-90SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGY

PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: COMPn 2

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billion (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCS'S DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS

REPORT: 2371.04P

DATE: 05-03-90

ALFHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE)DELTA-BHCHEPTACHLORALDRINHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDEENDOSULFAN I4,4-DDEDIELDRINENDRINENDOSULFAN II4,4-DDDENDOSULFAN SULFATE4,4-DDTENDRIN KETONEMETHOXYCHLORALPHA-CHLORDANEGAMMA-CHLORDANETOXAPHENEAROCHLOR-1221AROCHLOR-1232AROCHLOR-1242AROCHLOR-1016AROCHLOR-1248AROCHLOR-1254AROCHLOR-1260

21.721.721.721.721.721.721.721.721.743.443.443.443.4 '43.443.443.4217.1217.1217.1434.2217.1217.1217.1217.1217.1434.2434.2

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ND =

B =* =

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-150) 79*

NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATICNANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLESURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF C1C LIMITS

SOUTHWEST JLABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

S * MOORE, INC.1 BORMAN DRIVE'LOUIS, MO 63149

DAVID PURINGTON

MATRIX: SOILtt 2371.04

REF.: SW846-8270, EPA METHODOLOGY<*ECT: EARTH CITY3PLE ID: COMP. 2

ZHIVOLATILESDET.LIMIT

RESULTS(uq/Kg)

-CHLOROETHYDETHER

JLOROPHENOLDICHLOROBENZENEDICHLOROBENZENE

ALCOHOL•DICHLOROBENZENETHYLPHENOL

'(2-CHLOROI30PROPYL) ETHER

2THYLPHENOLTROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINECHLOROETHANE

iIIROBENZENE•PHORONE

r JlTROPHENOL[ ,4-DIMETHYLFHENOL

JZOIC ACID, •(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANEf ^-DICHLOROPHENOL

,4-TRICHLOROBENZENEHTHALENE

rBHLOROANILINEII.EXACHLOROBUTADIENE

HLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL .£THYLNAPHTHALENEACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE

[,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL[,5-TRICHLOROPHENOLJHLORONAPHTHALENE

^ITROANILINEETHYLPHTHALATE•NAPHTHYLENE

"^ITROANILINE

I•£X#i

6606606606606606606606606606606606606606606606603200660660660660660660660660660660.320066032006606603200

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

30 JNDNDNDNDNDNDND

10 JNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: 2371.04B

DATE: 05-03-90

DAiTE SUBMITTED:DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :

04-13-9004-17-0004-26-'>0

SEMIVOLATILE5

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITROPJHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFURAI^I2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPHTHALATE4-CHLOROPHEHYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANIL::NE4,6-DINITRO -11ETHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(1)4-BROMCPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBI:NZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHENANTHREN:ANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLFHTHALATEFLUORANTHEN:PYRENEBUTYLBENZYL^HTHALATE3,3-DICHLORbBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(K)FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYR'ENEINDENOd, 2,Is-CD) PYRENEDI BENZ( A, H)| ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE

DET. RESULTSLIMIT (uq/Ko)

66032003200660660660660660660320032006606606606606606606606606606601320660660660660660660660660660660

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

30ND

505030

NDNDNDNDNDNDND

J

JJJ

QA/OC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

pOBENZENE-d5(23-120)-NOL-d5 (24-113)

74:, 2-FLUOROBIPHENYL(30-115)2-FLUOROPHENOL (25-121) 70

TERPHENYL-dl4 (13-137) 8?:2,4,6-TRIBROMOPHENOL(19-122) 91?

'= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATIOM LIMIT= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF GIUANTITATION|= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK A3 WELL AS SAMPLE|-- SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST,LABORATORY Ol| OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858•1

'•CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE^ 11701 BORMAN DRIVEJ ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63149• ATTN: DAVE PURINBTON

"1 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL• SWLO * 2371.05• DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90-• PROJECT: EARTH CITY_J SAMPLE ID: COMP . 1

* DET.PARAMETER LIMIT UNIT

•TOTAL CYANIDES 1.0 ug/Kg

•TOTAL METALS

-ARSENIC 2.0 mg/kg— JLEAD 0.6 mg/kg"•MERCURY 0.1 mg/kg"SELENIUM 0.4 mg/kg"JTHALLIUM 0.4 mg/kg••ANTIMONY 6.0 mg/kg•BERYLLIUM i.o mg/kg-—CADMIUM 1.0 mg/kg•JCHROMIUM 1.0 mg/kg(COPPER 2.0 mg/kg^NICKEL 2.0 mg/kg-SILVER 2.0 mg/kg-PZINC 2.0 mg/kg

III-ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT

f'SW = TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WAS!THIRD EDITION, NOVEMBER 1986

__SM = STANDARD METHODS FOR THE EXAMINATION C» 16TH EDITION, 1965

1

I

REPORT:

DATE:

DATERESULTS ANALYZED

ND 04-27-90

5.89 04-25-9013.6 04-19-90'ND 04-18-90ND 04-24-90ND 04-19-90ND 04-19-90ND 04-19-90ND 04-19-9018.1 04-19-9022.8 04-19-9018.3 04-19-90ND 04-19-9062.4 04-19-90

E, EPA PUBLICATION

2371. 05MT

05-03-90

f

METHODREFERENCE

SM 412D

SW 7060SW 7421SW 7471SW 7740SW 7B41SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010SW 6010

*SW846,

F WATER AND WASTEWATER,

I SOUTHWESTXABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC1700 W. Albany . Suite "C1 . Broken Arrow, Oklah ima 74012 . 918-251-2858

J».CLIENT;

I

I

DAMES *< MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # 2371.05DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: COMP. 1

RAMETER•DET.LIMIT UNIT RESULTS

REPORT: 2371.05T

DATE: 015-03-90

DATEEXTRACTED

DATEANALYZED

METHODREFERENCE

ITfiL EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS

J3ASOLINEiMESEL

-MROSENEJP--4

iPTHA1111 ,11

0ooo

NKER C/*6 FUEL OIL 1.0SCELLANEQUS (1) 1.0

mg/Kgmg/Kgmg / Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg

NDNDNDNDNDND5.1

4III»(I3

I

I

J

04-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-9004-19-90

04-21-9004-21-9004-21-9004-21-9004-21-9004-21-9004-21-90

GC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FIDGC/FID

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

NAPHTHALENE 957.

1) = ANALYSIS SHOWS MISCELLANEOUS PEAK'S WHICH CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED ASANY SPECIFIC PATTERN. THE RESPONSE FACTOR FOR DIESEL WAS USED.

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMIT= COMPOUND FOUND IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMP= ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATION= UNABLE TO QUANTITATE DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE

LE

SOUTHWEST JABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

1llENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC.

11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO ft 2371.05DATE SUBMITTEDDATE EXTRACTEDDATE ANALYZED:

REPORT: 2371.05H

DATE: 05-03-90

04-13-9004-27-9005-02-90

PROJECT: EARTH CITYMETHOD REFERENCE: SWS46-8150, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: COMP. 1

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billion

iERBICIDES DET.LIMIT UNIT

ii

i

RESULTS

,4-D,4,5-TP (SILVEX)

3 0.010.0

ug/Kgug/Kg

NDND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 99.47.

'ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF C1C LIMITS

ifi

SOUTHWEST ORATORY OF

ii1j

1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

ENT: DAMES 4 MOORE, INC.11701 BORNAN DRIVEST. LOUIS. MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

1iI

OKLAHOMA, INC.

REPORT: 2371.05P

DATE: 05-03-90

SAMPLE MATRIX:SULO ft 2371.05DATE SUBMITTED!DATE EXTRACTED:DATE ANALYZED :

SOIL

04-13-9004-17-9005-02-90

METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGYPROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: COUP. 1

RESULTS REPORTED IN uq/Kg CR Parts Per Billior (PPB)

PESTICIDES/PCS'5

ALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE)DELTA-BHCHEFTACHLORALDRINHEFTACHLOR EPQXIDEEND03ULFAN I4,4-DDEDIELDRINENDRINENDOSULFAN II4,4-DDDENDOSULFAN SULFATE4,4-DDTENDRIN KETONEMETHOXYCHLORALPHA-CHLORDANEGAMMA-CHLORDANETOXAPHENEAROCHLOR-1221AROCHLOR-1232AROCHLOR-1242AROCHLOR-1016AROCHLOR-1248AROCHLOR-1254AROCHLOR-1260

DETECTION LIH

21.

21.21.21."M*_i •21.21.42.342.342.342.342.3

42.3211.6211.6211.6423.3211.6211.6211.6211.6211.6423.3423.3

OA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-150)

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF QUANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE•* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE Or G1C LIMITS

I-I

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.'1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

'ES 4 MOORE, INC.01 BORMAN DRIVE

LOUIS, MO 63149N: DAVID PURINGTON

«»PLE MATRIX: SOIL• 0 ft 2371.05•/HOD REF.: SU846-82730JECT: EARTH CITY'~>LE ID: COMP. 1

REPORT: 2371.05BIDATE: 05-03-90

"•IIVOLATILES

JENOL,IS (2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER• iHLOROPHENOL

- ' Rs-DICHLOROBENZENE™4-DICHLOROBENZENE"vIZYL ALCOHOL•.2-DICHLOROBENZENE•METHYLPHENOL•=fi(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER• InETHYLPHENOL

-^NITROSO-DI-n-PROPYLAMINEiEXACHLOROETHANE

JTJTROBENZENE•JDPHORONE•-NITROPHENOL

—i-4-DIMETHYLPHENOL• NZOIC A C I D•T3(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE?A4-DICHLOROPHENOL• 2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE

-•nPHTHALENE"-CHLOROANILINE•JJTXACHLOROBUTADIENE•cHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL•^METHYLNAPHTHALENE

—USXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE

14,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL

2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE•"•NITROANILINE•-METHYLPHTHALATE"CZNAPHTHYLENE_f*NITROANILINE

|»iTROBENZEME-d5(23-120) 721?HENCL-d5 (24-113) 84?

A METHODOLOGY

DET. RESULTSLIHIT (ug/Kg)

6606606606606606606606606606606606606606606606603200660660660660660660660660660660320066032006606603200

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

SEHIVOLAT1

ACENAPHTHE

DATE SUBMITTED: 04-13-90DATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-26-90

i

[.ES

:NE2,4-DINITROPHENOL4-NITROPHENOLDIBENZOFUR'AN2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITROTOLUENEDIETHYLPH-4-CHLOROPfFLUORENE4-NITROAN]4,6-DINITF

HALATEENYL-PHENYLETHER

LINE0 2-METHYLPHENOL

N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE(l)4-BROMOPHEHEXACHLORt

:NYL-PHENYLETHERIBENZENE

PENTACHLOIjtOPHENOLPHENANTMRENEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENEBUTYLBENZ3,3-DICHLBENZO(A)ABIS(2-ETHCHRYSENE

fLPHTHALATE3ROBENZIDINENlTHRACENEITLHEXYL) PHTHALATE

DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATEBENZO(B)F|LUORANTHENEBENZO(K) FLUORANTHENEBENZO(A)PYRENEINDENOd,DIBENZ(A,IBENZO(G,h

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVM

2, 3-CD) PYRENEH) ANTHRACENE,I)PERYLENE

RIES

DET.Llfill

660320032006606606606606606603200320066066066066066066066066066066013206606oO6oO6oO6606606606SO660660

RESULTS(ug/Kg)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

30 J30 J

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

2-FLUOROBIFHENYL(30-1152-FLUOROPHENOL (25-121

F7D =

I-1:JOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATIQN LIMITESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT CF QAMALYTE DETECTED IN 3LANK AS UELL AS SAMPLE•3Ur<RUGA7E RECOVERY OUTRIDE OF GC LIMITS

67'TERPHENYL-dl4 (18-137) 84:2,4,6-TRIBROMOPHENOL(19-122) 89:

ANTITA'ION

Ji11l1l-.

3J1i

SOUTHWEST LABI7700 W. Albany . Suite

DAMES & MOORE11701 Borman DriveSt. Louis. Missouri 63149

SWLO IDENTIFICATION

SAMPLE NO. : 2371.01 -DATE RECEIVED: 04/13/90

DESCRIPTION

METHOD BLANK 04/19/90METHOD BLANK 04/19/90METHOD BLANK 04/19/90METHOD BLANK 04/19/90METHOD BLANK 04/19/90METHOD BLANK 04/19/90METHOD BLANK 04/19/90METHOD BLANK 04/19/90

JRATORY OF <"C" . Broken Arrow, Oklri

\

ANALYTICAL RI

2371.05

QA/QC

PARAMETER

ANTIMONYBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCHROMIUMCOPPERNICKELSILVERZINC

L)KLA±1(JMA,1INC.oma 74012 . 918-251-2858

TORT

REPORT: G2698

REPORT DATE: 04/30/90

RESULTS

<6 mg/Kg<1 mg/Kg<1 mg/Kg<1 mg/Kg<2 mg/Kff<2 mg/Kg<2 mg/Kg<2 mg/Kg

II

SOUTHWEST .LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" • Broken Arrow, Ok

I

I

I

I

CLIENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO # METHOD BLANKDATE EXTRACTED: 04-27-90DATE ANALYZED: 05-02-90PROJECT: EARTH CITYMETHOD REFERENCE: SWS46-S150, EPA METHODOLOGYSAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

lahoma 74012 . 918-251-2853

REPORT: 62698.1

DATE: 05-03-90

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billion

"HERBICIDESDET.LIMIT UNIT

•2,4-D-2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)

80.010.0

RESULTS

ug/Kgug/K 3

I

I

I

i

NDND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERY

2,4,5-T (10-98) 45.2V.

tND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE OUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW IB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS S£* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

I

I

1

.IMIT OF OUANTITATIONiMPLE

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-2858

.IENT: DAMES & MOORE, INC.11701 BORMAN DRIVEST. LOUIS, no 63149ATTN: DAVID PURINGTON

REPORT: G2698.3

DATE: 05-03-90

SAMPLE MATRIX: SOILSWLO tt METHOD BLANKDATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 05-02-90METHOD REFERENCE: SU846-8080, EPA METHODOLOGPROJECT: EARTH CITYSAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK

RESULTS REPORTED IN ug/Kg OR Parts Per Billio

PESTICIDES/PCB'S DETECTION LIB

ALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHC(LINDANE)DELTA-BHCHEPTACHLORALDRINHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDEEMDOSULFAN I4,4-DDEDIELDRINENDRINENDOSULFAN II4,4-DDDENDOSULFAN SULFATE4,4-DDTENDRIN KETONEMETHOXYCHLORALPHA-CHLORDANEGAMMA-CHLORDANETOXAPHENEAROCHLOR-1221AROCHLOR-1232AROCHLOR-1242AROCHLOR-1016AROCHLOR-1248AROCHLOR-1254AROCHLOR-1260

16.016.016.016.016.016.016.016.016.0

.32.032.032.032.0160.0160.0160.0320.0160.0160.0160.0160.0160.0320.0320.0

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE (24-150)

(PPB)

I RESULTS

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDMDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

24:

ND = NOT DETECTED ABOVE QUANTITATION LIMITJ = ESTIMATED VALUE: CONCENTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF G1UANTITATIONB = ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAI'PLE* = SURROGATE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA, INC.1700 W. Albany . Suite "C" . Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 . 918-251-285,3

f£S & MOORE, INC.01 BORMAN DRIVELOUIS, MO 63149

~7N: DAVID PURINGTON

1PLE MATRIX: SOIL.0 ft METHOD BLANKHOD REF.: SU846-8270, ERA METHODOLOGY

EJECT: EARTH CITY1PLE ID: METHOD BLANK

lVOLATILESDET. RESULTSLIMIT (up/Kg)

i ( 2-CHLOROETHYL ) ETHER^HLORCPHENOL_3-DICHLORCBENZENEW-DICHLOROBENZENE%JZYL ALCOHOL~2-DICHLOROBENZENE

I1ETHYLPHENOL5 ( 2-CHLOROISOPROP YL ) ETHER

•-1ETHYLPHENOL

f \IITRCSO-DI -n-PROPYLAfllNE<ACHLOROETHANE

^TROEENZENE" pPHCRONEBJITROPHENOL•4-DI11ETHYLPHENOL

"^NZC 1C ACID»3 ( 2-CHLOROETHOXY ) I1ETHANEl-DICHLOROPHENOL

^,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE. JHTHALENE

••CHLOROANILINEtXACHLOROBUTADIENE'~:HLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL•,-IETHYLNAF'HTHALENE•XACHLQROCYCLQPENTADIENE__4 , 6-TRICHLOROPHENOL• »,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL•CHLORONAPHTHALENE

_tPN

1ETHYLPHTHALATENAPHTHYLENENITRQANILINE

660660660660660660660660660660660660660660660660320066066066066066066066066066066032006603200660660

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

REPORT: G2698.4

ATE: 05-03-90

IJIATE EXTRACTED: 04-17-90DATE ANALYZED : 04-26-90

,ESSEHIVQLATI

ACENAPHTHENE2,4-DINITRhpHENOL4-NITROFHENOLDIBENZOFURJW2,4-DINITROTOLUENE2,6-DINITR!]TOLL)ENEDIETHYLPHT^LATE4-CHLOROPHINYL-PHENYLETHERFLUORENE4-NITROANI.INE4,6-DINITRD 2-METHYLPHENOLN-NITROSODlPHENYLAMINEd)4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHERHEXACHLOROBENZENEPENTACHLOROPHENOLPHEMANTHREjNEANTHRACENEDI-N-BUTYL|PHTHALATEFLUORANTHENEPYRENE IBUTYLBENZYJLPHTHALATE3,3-DICHLqROBENZIDINEBENZO(A)ANTHRACENEBIS(2-ETHt LHEXYL)PHTHALATECHRYSENEDI-N-OCTYL

DET. RESULTSLIflll (UQ/KQ)

BENZO(B)FLBENZO(K)Fl

PHTHALATEUORANTHENEUORANTHENERENE

INDENO(1,::,3-CD)PYRENEDIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENEBENZO(G,H DPERYLENE

66032003200660660660660660660320032006606606606636606606606606606601320660660660660660660660660660660

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNiDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

QA/QC SURROGATE RECOVERIES

•ROBENZENE-d5(23-120) 65»NOL-d5 (24-113) 76:

-FLUOROBIPHENYL(30-115)-FLUOROPHENOL (25-121)

= NOT DETECTED ABOVE QIJANTITATION LIMIT= £3T[MATED VALUE: CQWCZNTRATION BELOW LIMIT OF= ANALYTE DETECTED IN BLANK AS WELL AS SAMPLE

RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF QC LIMITS

64'62'

TERPHENYL-dl4 (12-137) 65J2,4,6-TRIBROMOF'HENOL(19-122) 63:

I1jjIAPPENDIX D

Soil Boring Logs

sii"iIi

uames & nnopreLOCATION OF BORING

DATUM ELEVATION

JOB NO.

DRILLING-f -METHOD:

LOCATION

3VV .JCf/

SAMPLING M •THOO:

3"

WATER LEVE

TIME

DATE

CASING DEPTH

M(

BORING N'O

SHEET

DRILLING

START

TIME

DATE

FINISH

TIME

DATE

SA

MP

LTY

PE Si cc m£o0)2

laz

oz-.181

SURFACE CONDITIONS

CS

A*

y*

20

0

1

2 -

3 -

4 -

6 -

7

8

9

/ O

1

2

3

4

I S

6

9

ZoJL

S/'/c'

t~t,-nll ' n

.s,7i

r. //..

to

— IT

Vt'ci r 5i'/C

LOCATION OF BORING

DATUM ELEVATION

JOB NO CUCNT LOCATION

OR.LUNG .ETHOO:¥SAMPLING I METHOD:

WATER LEVEL

TIME

DATE

CASING DEPTH

IONS:

BORING NO

SHEET

£ Of

DRILUNG

START

TIME

DATE

FINISH

TIME

DATE

SA

MP

TY

P

DE

PTH

OC

AS

ING

NU

MB

ER

OF

RING

S zfct u&"•oz SO

ILG

RA

PH

SURFACE CONDITI

—*• Q

?o S f>\ c)

ii

uames & MooreLOCATION OF BORING

DATUM

a>H.

ELEVATION

JOB NO.

DRILLING METHOD

SAMPLING MITHOD

CLIENT LOCATION

WATER LEVE.

TIME

DATE

CASING DEPTH

/T,

BORING ^O.

OZSMEET

DRILUNC

START

T1MI

DATE

V-//4

FINISH

TIME

DATE

-fiiO

-I

Uuc

DE

PT

H O

CA

SIN

G

LO

WS

/FT

.S

AM

PL

ER

NU

MB

ER

RING

xt+• u

oz SO

ILG

RA

PH

SURFACE CONDITIONS:

a 0

cs M (T

JSu

OO

4

05

6

7

8

9

' o

1

2

3

/"

f-

.T

1

i1i4i

V1I

of,**i.i!i1

-- -LOCATION OF BORING

DATUM ELEVATION

SA

MP

LE

RT

YP

E

c>M

- '

%////////////////////

/

DE

PT

H O

FC

AS

ING 38 /a /« /

** /A1*V////////////////////

BLO

WS

/FT

.S

AM

PL

ER

NU

MB

ER

OF

RIN

GS _ H

£ UIt •"£"•oz

Zo

1

2

3

4

2s

6

7

8

9

0

1

1

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

' —

-

SO

ILG

RA

PH

£V63S''

JOB NO.

/??7& (

DRILLING ME1

SAMPLING Ml

WATER LEVE!

TIME

DATE

CASING DEPT>

SURFACE CONDITIONS:

A^n ,r. fr.

CUENT LOCATION

:>? F&fto•HOD: BORINC N°

./i\c<jro3SHEET

THOO: " OF «=<

DRILUNG

START FINISH

TIME TIME

DATE DATE

4

?)'o*J?

\\.

\

•

Dames & Moore

'*T''

tif

a

LOCATION OF BORING

DATUM ELEVATION

DRILLING METHOD:

3 vy

SAMPLING METHOD:

3"WATER LEVEL

TIME

DATE

CASING DEPTH

LOCATION

BORING NO.

SHEET

I o, /DRILUNG

START

TIME

DATE

y</ /

FINISH

TIME

DATE

SA

MP

LTY

PE

DE

PT

H O

FC

AS

ING

LO

WS

/FT

SA

MP

LE

R

NU

MB

ER

OF

RIN

GS

DE

PT

HIN

FE

ET

SURFACE CONDITIONS.

C5

j>

iij

$• 10

(*

19

1 -

2

3

4 -

9

/ o

1

2

3

4

/ 5

6

/7

8

9

' ft/, 1 /r

$

C.

A ^;-f £ Avc

; ^ /•

7?- VTf

(7

LOCATION OF BORING

A1U/05

DATUM ELEVATION

JOB NO.

DRILLING METHOD

SAMPLING METHOD:

CUENT LOCATION

CcL

tCi>1/>>tUOU>

5'WATER LEVEL^

TIME

DATE

CASING OEITH

BORING

/ or /DRILLING

TlME

DATE

<J-/2 -^6

TIME

DATE

SA

MP

LE

RTY

PE

DE

PT

H O

FC

AS

ING

LO

WS

/FT

.S

AM

PL

ER

NU

MB

ER

OF

RIN

GS

DE

PT

HIN

FE

ET

SO

ILG

RA

PH

SURFACE CONDITIONS:

i? ^r e ^ i., I'IA , /V\<:r/-?^"

(.£>

a

i1

o-

Z/

to

60

1

2

3

4

cs6

7

8

9

/O -

1 -

2

3

4

/ 5

6

7

8

9

0

IS'

.A .- r

±

\f-f\

^J-

fi.\f~ < /C

r>x

rzE

S.3 { f ^.____3.

/ W^/•• 'h lAJ ^ J 4

«<"?(

LOCATION OF BORING

DATUM

'y ^«<-t So

ELEVATION

JOB NO.

DRILUNG MEJHOO:

LOCATION

^SAMPLING METHOD:

rt>_L^

WATER LEVEl!

TIME

DATE

CASING DEPTH

SHEET

/

OR.LUNC

START

TIME

DATE

FINISH

TIME

DATE

MP

LT

tPE

DE

PTH

OC

AS

ING

LO

WS

/FT

.S

AM

PL

ER

NU

MB

ER

OF

RIN

GS

O Z SO

ILG

RA

PH

SURFACE CONDITIONS:

o- OQ

1

2

3

4

OS

6

7

8

9

I 0

1

2

3

4

IS

6

7

8

9

r?

/'/

IS'

rVl^ <• ' // L^/ i/'tjji'/- ^ OoVi

UA

-Prt » ?,'//(/

-W/

;>'/•}-}/clftj i<j/ tu<*4

>» ' /A j .s<f<,f</

^v^!y^ s'Yj'/-

pfju_'.->

/ <^

ELEVATION

JOB NO

DRILLING I.IETHOO:

CLIENT LOCATION

/S// eto A

SAMPLING METHOD:

5'WATER L E E U

ffcTIME

DATE

CASING DE TH

5 '

BOW1NG N<J

SHEET

/ or /DR.LUNG

START

DATE

FINISM

"ME

DATE

SA

MP

LTY

PE

DE

PT

H O

CA

SIN

G

NUM

BER

OFRI

NGS

Q Z SO

IG

RA

SURFACE CONOinOltljtS:

n

65

10

lo-

8

9

/ o

1

2

3

4

1 5

6

7

8

9

0

7iin»

1$'

At 1 -;^ U

Jln iu. r.. ^-/v

V

iLiJ.-\ TII . /r

l_*:J{_ £\

-ZM ^r^nn.

is'/£'

vi

ii

APPENDIX EWell Construction Diagrams

MONITOR WELL INFORMATION SHEET

GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ,________

TOP OF WELL CASING ELEVATION */*/?• 6JOB NU1BER

BORING NUMBER

DATE

LOCATION .

- OO

- / O f

jMO

OEPJTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL POINT OR SLOTTEDf I PE FEET. *

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SEAL (IF INSTALLED)

OEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL (IF JHSTALULD)

LENGTH OF VELL SCREENSLOT S I Z E £?. Ol O "

FEET.

TOTAL LENGTH OF PIPEINCH DIAMETER.

f "?• 3""

FEET AT

TYPE OF PACK AROUND VCLL POINT Of. SLOTTED

COWRETt CAP. MO ( C I R C L E 0:tt)

H E K M T OF VEU CASING ABOVE GROUNDD.'3 FIET.

3TEC_ PROTECTIVE CASING?JJ HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND

^ LOCKING CAP!

NO (CIRCLE ONE)FEET.HO (C1RCU OHE)

OF UPKK BACKFILL 5.IOH J u

U) BOREHOLE OtAOTER tHCHES.

M2) OEm TO CMUTO WATER

TOTAL OEPTH OF lOREMOtE

(u) rtn±

(n) t\n

FtET.*

OF LOUtR IACXFILL_

MATERIAL

It) SCREEN MATERIAL

*(OEPTV

MONITOR

FROM CAOUNO SURFACE)

WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS

Damns i Moora

MONITOR WELL INFORMATION SHEET

GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

TOP OF WELL CASING ELEVATION . fS

JOB NUMBER

BORING NUMBER /frlUJ - / O3

V- //-LOCATION . ^f,r"^\

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 0* SLOTTEDPIPE' 3W. 5 FEET.*

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SEAL (IF INSTALLED)

'^-s DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAt (IF INSTALLED)si/ I^'S FEET.*

LEHCm OF WELL SCREENSLOT S I Z E O->O/O

TOUL UHCTH OF PIPEINCH

TYPEPIPt

FEET.~

FEET AT

OF PAOC MOUNO UELL POINT OR SLOTTEDSA/DQ ________.

COWCIETE CAP. CreO w. (CIRCLE o:«e)

HEIGHT 0_F WELL CASING ABOVE GROUNDFEET.

_ PWTECTIVE CAS1KCTT) H E I G H T ABOVE

LOCK NG CAP7

OF UPPER lACXFILL•^^

flT) BOREHOLE PIASTER

MO (CIRCLE OHE)

~NO (CIRCLE ONE)

f { -,

I :DEPTH TO CROUKO WATER 20 FtET.

TOTAC DEPTH OF MREHOLE

CM; TTPE•

(n) PIPI

FtET.*

OFMATERIAL

r^t $ ; /-f

?ucSCHEEH HATtRtAL puc

*(DEPTH

MONITOR

FROM CROUNO SURFACE)

WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS

Dam«« & Moor«

MONITOR WELL INFORMATION SHEET

GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ______

TOP Or WELL CASING ELEVATION CA/A

JOB

60RIHC NUH8ER

DATE

LOCATION . _^»rtL CJ& Alt)

DEPTH TO BOTTOM Or WELL POINT OR SLOTTEDPIPE /5. 7 rEET.

DEPTH TO BOTTOM Or SEAL (ir INSTALLED) Jfixf4.S

JEPTH TO TOP Or SEAL (ir IHSTKLLEO)

®© LENGTH or WELL SCREEN,SLOT

TOTAL LENGTH Or PIPE ff.4___FUT ATINCH OIAMCTER

Or PACK AROUND WELL POINT OR SLOTTEDIPE

7) CONCRETE CAP. m) f« ( C I R C L E OrtE)

HEIGHT Or VCLL CASING ABOVE GROUNDI FUT.

,_ PROTECTIVE CASING? /ftp NO (CIRCU ONE)kj) NEIGHT ABOVE GROUND ^^..^ FEET.

IDaiNG CAP7 ££S> NO (CIRCLE ONE)

jo irp£ or UPPER

||) B3REHOLE DIAMETER INCHES.

\1) DEPTH TO GROUND WATER

I?) TOTAL DEPTH or BOREHOLE /

Q4) TTPE Or UlWtR

T) PIPE MATERIAL

rEET. *

rtET.#

//T

SCREEN MATERIAL

*(OErTH rROM GROUND SURrACE)

MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS

Dam«B& Moor*

MONITOR WELL INFORMMION SHEET

GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

TOP OF WELL CASING ELEVATION */*//. & ff

JOB NUMBEReORIHC NUMBER

DATELOCATION .

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF VELL MINT OR SLOTTEDPIPE »7 FEET. *

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SEAL (IF INSTALLED)«".*DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAt. (IF INSTALLED)

I 9- 3 FEET.*

LENGTH OF VELL SCREEHSLOT SUE O- Ol 6

FEET.

TOIAL LENGTH OF PIPE_INCH DIAMETER.

TOTAL LI_lL__'

FEET AT

TYPE OF PAOC AROUND WELL POINT OR SLOTTEDP l f E

7) COtCRETE CAP. QJTESJ NO (CIRCLE O.'lE)

HEIGHT OF WELL CASING ABOVE GROUNDi'A. *7 FEET.

PRCTECTIVE CASING7HEIGHT ABOVE CROUNOLOCKING CAP?

HO (CIRCLE ONE)?EET.

"HO (CIRCLE ONE)

Qo) TTIE OF UPPER BACKFILL.

fID MIEHOLE PIASTER

T _ .

INCHES.

TlZ) DEPTH TO GROUND WATER 7W) TO^M. OEPTH Of BOREHOLE

>U) TTlt OF UJWtR BACKFILL.

Cl?) P l f l MATERIAL

16) SCIEEN MATERIAL

MONITOR

n FEET.*

ulfl

*(OEPm FROM GROUND SURFACE)

WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS,

Moor«

CROUNO SURFACE ELEVATION

TOP OF VELL CASINC CLCVATION

MONITOR WELL INFORMATION SHEET

JOB N^ER y<7<?y!5-80RINC NUMBER / ICO - /QS~

DATE . * / " / <

LOCATION . E^Ti

I /7

- 70

OEPTM TO BOTTOM OF VELL POINT OR :>LOTTEOPIPE FEET.*

OEPTi TO BOTTOM OF SEAL (IF IHSTAJ.LEO)

OEPTI TO TOP OF SEAL (IF INSTALLED)

SLOT

FEET.*

LENC m OF VELL SCREEHSIZE n.a i c>

FEET.

TOTAL LENGTH OF PIPE 7- 3 FEET AT

TYPEPIPE

I

T\ HEIdlTI J /\

INCH DIAMETER.

OF PACT AROUNO VELL POINT OR SLOTTED

CIRCLE 0:fl7) CONCRETE CAP.

OF VELL CASINC ABOVE CROUNd. 3 FEET.

PKOTICTIVE CASINC7HEICIT ABOVE CROUNOLOa:NCCW7

OF UPPER BACKFILL.

BOREl OLE OIAKETEA

\2) OEPT>

TDTAl

@ TYPE«

? PIPE

M (CIRCLE ONE)~;T.

(CIRCLE ONE)

f

0 INCHES.

TO CROUHO WATER 3 I? FEET.

DEPTH OF BOREHOLE. FEET.*

OF lOUtH BACKFILL^^\

MATER I AC / V C

SCXE1H KATERIAL

* (DEPTH FROM CROUHO SURFACE)

MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS

Dam«B & Mooro

MONITOR WELL INFORM; ,TION SHEET

GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION , ___________

TOP OF WELL CASING ELEVATION Vfr */. 7(3

JOB NUMBER _______

BORING NUMBER /) (Q -

DATE V'/2

LOCATION . fcVc^'/Z (T.

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OFPIPE /«5

POINT OR SLOTTEDFEET.*

DEPTH TO^BOTTOM OF SEAL (IF INSTALLED)

SLOT

TO TOP OF SEAL (IF INSTALLED)£i

LEKCm OF VELL SCREENSIZE ^?. a I

TOTAL LENGTH OF PIP£__INCH DIAMETER.

FEET.

FEET AT

TYPtPIPE

OF PACX AROUND VELL POINT OR SLOTTED<>-AM r>____.7) CONCHETE CAP. IYES/ NO (CIRCLE 0:t£)

HEIOIT OF WELL CASING ABOVE CROIW'J

_ PROTECTIVE CASING? V^YElT) H E I G H T ABOVE CROUNO__-_^ LOa NG CAP?

HO (CIRCLE ONE)

QO) TYPE

(jj) BOREJfOLE

(I?) DEPTH

OF UPPER BACKFILL__

OlAftTEK ^

CM) TYPE

CJ5) PIPE

"NO (CIRCLE ONE)

__________t KOttS.

TO GROUND WATER ^7 fEET.

II) TOTAI DEPTH OF BOREHOLE. FEET.*

OF LOU£R IACKFILL

MATERIAL

[IS) SCREEN MATERIAL

* (DEPTH

MONITOR

FROH CROUNO SURFACE)

WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS

Dam«« & Moora

MONITOR WELL INFORMATION SHEET

CROUNO SURFACE ELEVATION

TOP OF WELL CASING ELEVATION

JOB - <3080RIKC HUK8ER /I tU - f O ~?

^%/Ho

OEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL POINT OR UOTTEOP I P E l /<5 FEET. *

Oj DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SEAL (IF INSTALLED), 5 FEET. *

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL (IF IHSTALLEJ)

LENGTH OF WELL SCREEH / OSLOT S I Z E f t n f f )

O> TOTAL LENGTH OF PIPEk. " I *"^ I UI»U A I AUf W*'

_INCH OlAMETtR.

FEET.

FEET AT

C\ TYPE OF PAtt AROUND WELL POINT OR SLOTTED£J PIPE' . S A M P _____.

7) CONCRETE CAP. NO (CIRCLE 0:iE)

H E I G H T OF WELL CASING MOVE GROUND_____FEET.

PROTECTIVE CASING?HEIGHT ABOVE CROUNOLOOKING CAP?

W (CIRCLE ONE)FEET.

~

(«) TYPE OF UPPER BACKFILL.

flT) BORIHOLE PIASTER

OA

12) OEFH TO cRouxo WATER

fiT) TOT;L DEPTH OF BOREHOLE / ^ __

OF UJUtR BACKFILL /U /A

IS) PIP1 ' MATERIAL

IS) S C R L E H KAURIAL

MONITOR

HO (CIRCLE ONE)

!_.IMCHES.

FEET. *

FEET.*

Pvc

*(OEPTI FROM GROUND SURFACE)

WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS

Dam««& Moora

APPENDIXGroundwater Field Measurements

i\. Field Personnel

MONITORING WELL FIELD DATA SHEET

Job No.

ro/- 1 f v ~r&

casing)Total Well Depth (from top of

Depth to Water Surface (from top of

Height of Water Column

Volume of Water Column (height x 0.

Location £~c</Tl /H o

Well No. AltxJ -SO'

Date

37. 3 feet

casing) / 8 5 £>'_ feet

£ 7?

163)

feet

gallons

WellVolumesPurged

Units

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

SpecificConductance

&i Crz'.^o^ '

/C(,1.

lit-in7/T

Temper;

*r^3.(

^3.3C(>8

O-o

iture PH

standard units

7.oV7-<=67- 057.07

f

c'\IJ

Field Personnel

t-J T^f, .> x ~K»1

MONITORING WELL FIELfc DATA SHEET

Job No. /?*»</?-

Total Well Depth (from,top of casing]

Depth to Water Surface (from top of <

Location

Well No.

Date

C. /Up

/ O3

I ~7

Height of Water Column

asing)

C,

Volume of Water Column (height x 0.163) I-

WellVolumesPurged

Units

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

SpecificConductance

A-Vrz^o^

<?5£ :

9*/a '5*7 ;

<?5£ :? 5

i

Tempera

o

5V- 1

53'3

5/.J

Sc?- /

53."

i !i:ure

-s

PH

standard units

7-^0

7-37

7- P£

•>• 5

7 3o

feet

feet

feet

gallons

III

Field Personnel

0 KJ

MONITORING WELL FIEID DATA SHEET

Job No.

!.«•>

Total Well Depth (from top of casing)

Depth to Water Surface (from top of casing) f/- 9 2 feet

Height of Water Column

Volume of Water Column (height x 0.153)

WellVolumesPurged

Units

SpecificConductance

Temperature

' 002

Location G

Well No.

Date

C' L

/O

&- feet

feet

/• gallons

^

PH

standard units

7-OO

"7.05

II

ii

Field Personnel

T) D -4L-/- ru/< »* \^g "__

f '• -ioO/f Oio-5__

MONITORING WELL FIELD DATA SHEET

Job No.

Location

Well No.

Date

Total Well Depth (from top of casing

Ap, I l~)

casing)

feet

feet

Height of Water Column

Volume of Water Column (height x 0.1

WellVolumesPurged

Units

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

SpecificConductance

/^< ra^^oi

ta«-/5 :!

'2o3 :

f>c3

Qo5

/9^^i

•

Temperal

°r60 g

58-156-2.

57- /

57.Q

53)

ure

7-^3 fee

/• <^ aa:

PH

standard units

C-8^11- OO

7.o3

7-ocC

,-

F•

iiiiri

Field Personnel

7).

MONITORING WELL FIELD DATA SHEET

Job No.

P*c

Location £e^7L C< i,,

Well No. AVxJ -/OS

Total Well Depth (from top of casing)

Depth to Water Surface (from top of

Height of Water Column

casing) /Q 95 feet

Volume of Water Column (height x 0.163)

WellVolumesPurged

Units

Specif icConductance

Id-13

Temperature

Date Apr. < 1C. 1716

I 7- 3 feet

"?. O5 feet

/ / 5 gallons

. 7

£-5

55^7

pH

standard units

Field Personnel

O rof'.r -n^_

MONITORING WELL FIELD DATA SHEET

Job No.

Location

Well No.

Date

u \ • i

Total Well Depth (from top of casing)

Depth to Water Surface (from top of

Height of Water Column

casing)

Volume of Water Column (height x 0.153)

/7-3 feet

^-•58 feet

7-72 feet

/ _ gallons

11IIIt1|ir ————————————

WellVolumesPurged

Units

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

SpecificConductance

/7.<rrU,.i.

//5J :

t/fc

1221

I 2 Z 1I 2 Z S

Temperature

"F52. /'

52. /

5P-3

52.252. 3t

i -i

pH

standard units

£.£7

£f • £o

£.£o£"-£2

C- £V

11<I1 J

I

t

*

MONITORING WELL FIEI

Field Personnel

T>. ?u,,. 1

Total Well Depth (from top of casing

Depth to Water Surface (from top of

Height of Water Column

Volume of Water Column (height x 0.1

JD DATA SHEET

Job No. /ffVJ- O<OZ

Location 2- !, O/., /lAo' s '

Well No. /lf\ CxJ - /CD

Date Pip,:\ 1C. fJ'ro

) / 7- 3 feet

casing) ^-<53 feet

/^r -Oo feet

63) /• / 7 gallons

*IIII1

WellVolumesPurged

Units

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

SpecificConductance

/)1 1 C' «? <V\ »\ t> i 'I

f £9 '£ /p -x

j> "7 £.

i

Tempera'

»r53..SI. 3SO.?

So 8

ture

3

PH

standard units

?•//7-^^ * f &*

^^ ^f ?G * ~y S

III

^ ™» — ••

'O

J5"5

LSJ

MEMORANDUM

Pote: October 2, 1980

TO: Bob SchreiberI

From: Burt McCuiioughSubject Westlake Landfill

Vestlake Landfill, located in Bridgeton

GCT C 13SD

SCUD'WASTE -Missouri (St. Louis County) has been

regulation. As far as our records showaid-1960's. Fart of the landfill lies

the subject of recent Inquiry. This landfill began operation prior to statethis landfill first opened in the

In an old quarry and part of the land-fill lies in the Missouri River floodplain, approximately 1*3 miles from theriver. Witnesses to this operation, whun the area of the landfill which liesin the floodplain was in operation, not<! that the fill area was often actuallybeneath the level of the water table. According to file materials fronMissouri Geological Survey, it is "highi.y probable that lea chat e from thelandfill is entering the waters of the Missouri River. . . " Leachate fromthe old quarry area of the landfill is collected and hauled to USD treatmentplants. Construction of onsite treatment facilities is underway. About 48,000gallons of leachate per day is currentl;

Aside from normal landfill materials, tradiologically contaminated materials dwastes, that we know of, include aboutof insecticides and herbicides. These >esticide wastes were deposited bChevron Chemical Company. Also includematerials from ink manufacture and from

being collected.

ere are chemical industrial wastes andposited in this landfill. The chemical,000 tons of residues from the production

chemical wastes that we know of in West.Lake Landfill are:

in the chemical wastes are wastethe manufacture of glue. Among the

waste ink pigmentsesters alcoholshalogenated intermediatesoils wastewaterheavy metals asbestos

sluiges

oily sludgesinsecticidesaromatics

herbidices

Besides chemical hazardous wastes, in Westlake Landfill, there are radioactivewastes. During early 1973 Cotter Corporation buried radioactive BariumSulfate Slag material and radiologically contaminated building rubbLf. Thereare approximately 9,000 tons of this material which contain about.'!£&$ tonsof natural Uranium. In October, 1977, an aerial radiological survey was done todetermine the location of the burial of this contaminated material. The reportfrom this survey indicates that there are two burial sites. One is in thecenter of the old quarry area, and the other is on the edge of the floodplainarea which borders adjacent farmland. The U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commissionhas contracted Radiation Management Corporation to do extensive on-site'radiological surveys which include groundwater analysis, core sampling, testboring, and other tests as deemed necessary. The NRC has given DNR verbal

P. Teosdole Governor : Division of Environmental SuciitvLcfser Director Robert J. Schretosr Jr.J>.E. Director

ZO~

IIIII«

IIIIIIIIIIIIII

Vestlake Landfill continuedPage 2October 2, 1980To: Bob Schreiber

permission to utilize the monitoring wellsCorporation will be digging, in order thatchemical hazardous wastes.

There is little known about what went into

which Radiation ManagementDNR may test for the presence of

Westlake Landfill prior to Stateregulation. Analysis needs to be done to determine: 1) what wastes aredeposited in Vestlake Landfill, 2) if any of these pollutants are leavingthe landfill via groundvater, and 3) what threat does Vestlake Landfill pos'eto drinking water supplies.

cc: Fred LafserRon KuceraJim LongRobert RobinsonBob MillerTom Doan

IIIIIIIIII

3.600 St. T-Pui9 CountyLake Demolition Landfill

October 31, 1977

Mr. -..'illian Cannevwest l?>.c La^fill, Inc.P.t. 1, Box f.Brl etoa, V9 63044

Dear Mr. Cenney:

This is tr follw un on the Insnect .

MOV 21977•UttAU C*

Lani'.'ill 4, 1°77, bv ain of t*e T/efit T.«fe« Demolition

of

thp

Missouriirr.noction,

features ir* no£p;l nnc! rftcomer.dationsfor their ccrrcction nre riven.

1. *7on-£er>olitlon landfill wnste including vastes not evenacceptable at sanitary landfills vere belnp, deposited atthe demolition landfill site.

2. Routine techniques of spreadlr.p and corpactin^ the demolitionwastes vere not bein? practiced

COMMF.7TS

dnras had been disposed ofA considerable arount of nslnt sludge In 55 gallon metal

on the site. It appeared thatthe majority of the paint slu'Jie had been nixed with soiland had caused one area todamp. Neither the demolition cr sanitary landfill shouldbe accepting anv quantity of !>aint or other sludftes. Itis understood that a snail

coulr? and should have beenoust be taken to stop all :

be verv odorous and uxtreaely

amount 'nijjht set into the landfillundetected but, it was obv:.ous thnt a ?OCK! nortlnn of the slud£e

•? iv. v. *medi;»te stepsIP. ''enosit'? of utich naterl.ils

and to irrondiatelv remove s-.ich r:atcsrials vhen they some howare Jinped. (Section BO-A^OIO (2) (A) of the Missouri SolidWast<« Rules and Regulations lists the tynes of materials tobe accented at a demolition landfill. Enclosed Is one convof the Rules and Regulations.

I/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

3.600 r=t. T.ouia CountyWest lA'-.e rendition landfill

October 2?-, 1977

Acceptance of non-denotion wastes has been observed it, thepast at the denolition landfill site. It ia felt that it isa combination of an inadequate si«n listing the vaster to beacc»rteJ, ilr.ar'.equsts inspection of leads coMnj? in ami a willingnessto accent such non-der.olition materials 'Then they .ir? on site.c»cticr ""-A. r»l^ (2) (C) 2 raqulr=n that ft list of vautes to beaeccr-te : Lo i! nr?~inentlv nt "V "itc crtr.nnctss. sl?n

3.

Vrrr-vo.: *£ either entrnnce frr tho •l9-»olltlon landfill. Asirr. lirtlr." tV** v^s** to be acca^te-1. r^u^t be erected at allentrance's to tha demolition landfill. A responsible uupervlso?-should he located on site who is willing to thoroughly Inspectevery load th?.t ernes in and to reject all non-denolieion materials.Anyone caught dtr".pir<? non-dersolltlon wastes should be forced to renovesuch wastes to a proper disposal! facilltv. The eersbination ofadvisln-, prospective dinners of jjhat wastes are accepted via thelandfill sir;n alonj with a responsible supervisor '.*ho is knovlei;ableabout: what vastes can and cannot] he accepted should result in agreat reduction in non-demolition wastes being dumped at the demolitionlandfill.

It wiis observed that the denolition materials vere being dumped atthe top of the vorldLn* facs of the landfill and for the most partslrrply pushed over the ed«re of the f?.co. Very little compactionwas beinr acconplished. It was understood that some bulky wastessuch as larf.e concrete blocks and tree trunks cannot be compactedhut, the rajority of the other demolition wastes can be spreadand contacted in layers around tvo feet thick on or near a 3 to 1 slope.If possible, it is recowaended that the demolition viistes be durroedat the base of Tynrkln? face. i-Thether t*"» vasten are dunped at thetop or base of the working face[ every effort :sust b>s Bade to spreadand ccr.pnct the demolition wastes in'ilavcrs not to e'.cced two (2)feet as mich as practical fron ':he stn^nnoint of the size and shapeof the nat«.rlals. If a load is observed containing large materialsthat could hinder the oroper corroActien of oth«r demalltion wastes,it shoul'.' he durpcd where it can be r.ore easily handled instead ofwith the other vastes. Sectionwaste handling equipment shall

80-4.010 (12) (C) 1 requires that aolid>e capahlc of :

1. Spreading end coapactinf the solid wastes acceptedin layers no more than tvo feet thick, when, practicalfrom »ire and shape of the waste material, vhila confiningit to the enallest practical area.

2. Conpact the solid waste to the smallest practical volune.

3. Place, spread and contact the cover aaterial as ouch aspractical.

A. An extensive salvage operation was beinp, run at the demolition

IIIIIIIIIIIII

3.630 St. Louis CountyVest Lake Demolition LandfillPane Three

' - October 31, 1977

_»

"landfill mainly for the collection of metallic objects.It was understood that the salvaged materials are hopefully

• removed fron the site the sciie <?av thev are collected. The' landfill rust bo coTar.ended for the extensive salvage opera-

tion but, every effort nust in nn-.!e to remove the salvaged^ . ._. nateriai Jaily or to keep than ncntly stored on sj.te.

_ ..'5. It vcs observtsJ that the req-iirs*. f reive (12) inches of weeklycovar mtarial lu- been atv?1..2-I an4 ha-' been properly contactedany areas t*:.it have been uro'j'.jiit up to final sradu shouldcoat-nin final cover consisting of at least t"o fe«t of compactedsoil anv! ba properly seeded.

If you have any questions concerning the above cornents and recornendations,Reinspectionsplease feel free to ive us a call at our St. Louis Office.

vill ba r.ide to Insure that any non-demolition materials .»re not beinqAccepted and the naterials accepted are being properly compacted,

APPROV

— Earl F. Eolt.ciraewei ?.E." • Regional Aoninistrotor

•St. Louis RERicnal Office.. Dcpartsent of Natural Resource

3ud Stein .Environrieatal Engineer ISt. Louis Regional Officebepartnent of Natural Resources

EEH/BS/lb

--- CC: Earl Breadon2337 Telegraph Road

- ... St. Louis, !10St. Louis County Health Department

I

I

I

MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESDIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

DEMOLITION LANDFILL SURVEILLANCE RECORD

Date: /w-V-77 Days/Week

Name of

Permit No:

Landfill:

County:

i

IAddress:

• I. Special Conditions and Approved Modifications

A. Are there any special conditions or approved modifications or the satisfactory compliance subsections of

I the rules and regulations? (e.g. impermeable barrier, limited excavation, exceptions to weekly cover re-quirements) '

<$+.

Yes

I B. Is the demolition landfill operation incompliance with the special conditions or approved modifications?(If "No." describe violations under "REMARKS.")

• II. Check Types of Waste Accepted

I

I

I

I

I

INDICATED ON REPORTED BYPERMIT 'APPLICATION OPERATOR AS OBSERVED

Demolition and construction waste ......................Brush and untreated wood waste ........................Tires ..................................................Inert Plastics ..........................................

O&ER WASTES (SPECIFY) f l j

1. Remaining Life of Landfill •j

^C."*•>£s<

X

I A. Estimated average volume of compacted solid waste received._______ (tons, yards/day, week)

IB. Estimated volume of remaining landfill covered by approved engineering plans

acre feet

1- 1 1/76

II

IV. Satisfactory Compliance Subsections Regulations 80-4.010• Check all sut .tions: SAT — Satisfactory; UNS — Unsatisfactory. (If necessa

under "RemarKS.")

I

escribe "UNS" violationsv

I

IONR

SATISFACTORY COMPLIANCEOPERATING PROCEDURE SAT UNS

SUBSECTIONNUMBER

SATISFACTORY COMPLIANCEOPERATING PROCEDURE SAT UNS

SOLID WASH ACCEPTEDr (10) KSTHE ICS (continued)

JRlO

Routine sanitary landfill techniques of spreading ind compactingsolid waste shall be used is mucb as practicable ID dispose oftolid MSte in a demolition landfill.A list of wastes to be accepted shall be displayed prominently atthe site ennance.

(10XO4 Salvaged materials remweidaily§r stoitd uf aestbMically accep-table manner. QMlli/V I Li

(11) COVER IIATERIAL(11XO1

WASTE EXCLUDED

tA responsible supervisor shall be present at the disposal area atall times when the area is open to receive waste.Eieluded wastes deposited removed to an approved disposal site.

(11XO2

(12) COUPAC(12XO1A

4TE SELECTION

Twelve (12) inches compacied soil com material applied at leastonce every seven calendar days.Final cover of at least two (2) teet cotniiacted soil applied on allcompleted areas.

IONSolid waste spread in layers not to eicee 1 two (2) feet as much aspracbcal.

Site accessible by all-weather roads. J2SL (12XO1B Solid waste compacted to smallest practical volume.\ QUALITY (12XO1C Cover material compacted as much as practical.

Surface water courses and runoff satisfactorily diverted from thelandfill. Demolition landfill construction and pading torapid surface water runotl without eicessm ermim.

(12)(C)2 Equipment available and operated to spnad and compact the solidwaste as received or at least when the accumulated wa;te reaches200 cubic yards.

Decomposable solid wastes deposited above predicted maiimumwater table.

(12X03

r ALfTT

"1

No solid waste disposed of in water when the water interfered withspreading and compacting or where the water is causing a IMS-quito problem.

No open burning without written permission from the agency hav- •ing jurisdiction.

(13) SAFETY(13KO1 Fire eitnguishers provided on all equipment

AS CONTROL (13X02Decomposition gases adequately vented to prevent danger to occu-pants of adjacent propertyGases vented to prohibit eiplosive v toiic accumulations.

Provisions tor eitinguisnmg fires in waite. equipment or struc-tures.

(13XO3 Scavenging prohibited.U3XC)4 Controlled access limited to operating hnurs.(13KO5 , Traffic control signs provided.

Vector control programs implemented when necessary. (13XO6 Dust control adequate.ISTHETICS (14) RECORDS

i

ri

Litter collected and compacted into cell be utilized daily.Wastes easily moved by wind covered as necessary.On site vegetation and natural windbreaks being utilized for littercontrol and aesthetic appearance.

Sc. (14XO1A Records of complaints and major problems.(14XCHB(UXO1C(14KO1D(UXC)IE(14)(C)2

V. Operation Proceeding in Accordance With Approved Engineer"Remarks.")

Records of dates of cover material application.Records of vector control efforts.Records of dust and litter control efforts.Records of quantity of waste received.Records of location of general types oi wastes ano oepth of fill.

Plans? (If "No," describe violations under

SIGNATURE OF INVLSTIGATOR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1.2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

TABLE I - Results of AnalysiWestlake Landfill,

of Leachate FromIncorporated (1/23/7U)

PARAMETER

pfl (Std. Dnits)

Specific Conductance (pathos/cm)

Alkalinity as CaC03 (ng/1)

Acidity as CaC03 (mg/1)

Total Solids lag/I)

Suspended Solids (mg/1)

Volatile Suspended Solids (mg/1)

Grease (mg/1)

Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/1)

Total Organic Carbon (mg/1)

Phenol (mg/1)

Fluoride (mg/1)

Chloride (mg/1)

Cyanide (mg/1)

Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N (mg/1)

Sulfate (mg/1)

Sulfide (mg/1)

Surfactant (MBAS) (mg/1)

Chromium (mg/1)

Copper (mg/1)

Iron (mg/1)

Lead (mg/1)•*.

Nickel (mg/1)

Zinc (mg/1)

CONCENTRATION

6.0

3170

475

415

4030•

392

223

56

3820

1090

1.02

0.5

330

<0.1

83.2

580

<0.1

0.5

<0.5

1.60

31.0

<0.5

<0.3

10.8

Confirmed Abandoned orUncontrolled HazardousWaste Disposal Sitesin Missouri

January 1,1987

MISSOURIDEPARTMENT OF NATURAL

Annual! Report

ESOURCESDivision of Environmental Quality

5xhib'+ -20-O

WESTLAKE LA1IDFILL

Classification; Class II, Priority 2

Site Name; Westlake Landfill

Address; Bridgeton, MO 63042. Between Old Rock Hill Road and NewRock Hill Road east of Earth C:.tyT 46 N, R 5 E, St. Charles Quadrangle

Waste Type; Organics, inorganics, solvents, pesticides, heavy metals,acids, bases, plating waste:; and radionuclides

Quantity; Unknown

Site Description:

The site is an active landfill on the Missouri River floodplain in St.Louis County. The site has been reduceddescription).

to two areas (see attached legal

Present Owner; William McCullough, President, Westlake Landfill, Inc.,Bridgeton, MO 63042

Environmental Problems Related to Site:

The site is an active permitted landfillunknown quantities of hazardous wastes,past reached the same depth as thehazardous materials have been depositedgroundwater. There is potential forMissouri River which is less than one mi!site.

which in the past acceptedExcavation at the site in the

groundwater. Unknown quantities ofn direct contact with

contamination of groundwater and thee away, directly west of the

Remedial Actions at Site:

The site was surveyed prior to expansiondemolition fill area from the area ident:materials.

Area of Concern Related to Site:

in order to separate the:.fied as containing hazardous

The average natural ground elevation is 'i35 to 440 feet with groundwaterat a shallow depth. The alluvium underlying the river is one of the mostimportant aquifers in the state. Consequently, if contamination isoccuring from the landfill, it is threatening a vital aquifer resource.

General Geologic and Hydrologic Setting:

LOCATION: Longitude 90 26' 45"; latitude 38 46' 15", St. CharlesQuadrangle.

The landfill has been in existance for more than twenty ye.irs. Formost of that time period, landfilling has occurred on the Missouri Riverfloodplain. Landfilling also has taken place in a limestone quarry

47

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

adjoining the floodplain landfill. The quarry is in the St. LouisLimestone which is present along the eastern slopes of the Missouri Riverfloodplain.

The early portion of the landfill operation included excavation andfilling below the floodplain and into the groundwater of the MissouriRiver aquifer. Subsequent landfill operations generally were confined tofilling above the floodplain surface and also in the adjoining limestonequarry. Except where operational procedures cause outbreaks of leachat.eto occur in the quarry or runoff water to drain into the quarry, there wasno evidence of significant amounts of groundwater. from the alluvialaquifer entering the limestone. For the most parit, the recharge, quite;limited to begin with, would be ;from the bedrock adjoining the alluviuminto the Missouri River aquifer rather than the aquifer recharging thesurrounding bedrock.

Groundwater monitoring indicates contaminant movement into thealluvial aquifer in a generally northwesterly direction. However, suchmonitoring to date is-inadequate to verify this indication or toadequately characterize the nature of the alluvial aquifer in the vicinityof the landfill.

The Missouri River floodplain sediments consist of 15 to 20 feet ofsilt loam to very silty clay having moderate to high permeability. Thegroundwater table occurs at depths of 15 to 20 feet below floodplainlevel. Fluctuations of 5 to 15 feet occur during periods of high waterlevels when there are prolonged wet seasons that (affect the MissouriRiver. Local wet or dry periods cause little effect other than rechargedirectly through the landfill. ;This may be the most significant riskposed by the Westlake Landfill,|the poor soil covering procedures thatapparently occurred during landfill operation.

Beneath the silt loam, very:silty clay surface soil of the alluvium,the Missouri River alluvial sediments are characterized by a generalincrease in grain size associated with increasing depth. The sandincrease becomes noticeable at depths of 20 to 3d feet with the percentageof gravel beginning to occur at.depths of 30 to ^0 feet. These coarsesediments, plus the large and perennial rechargealluvium to be one of the major and most important aquifers in the state.Consequently, if contamination is occurring fromthreatening a vital aquifer resource.

Public DrinkinR Water Advisory:

There are no public water systems located in the

of the river, cause the

the landfill, it is

immediate vicinity ofWestlake Landfill. However, the site is less than one mile from theMissouri River, which is the water source for St. Louis County WaterCompany's North Plant. The intake for that planu is about eight milesdownstream from Westlake Landfill. Should contamination from the sitereach the Missouri River, the downstream public water system could beaffected.

Private wells located near the landfill may alsocontamination.

be susceptible to

L

Hea1th Assessment:

The Westlake Landfill site has been found to be contaminated with 4000I

tons of chlordane, trichloroethylene and toluene, and 7000 tons of lowlevel uranium ore wastes.

Chlordane is a broad spectrum insecticide that has been observed to causethe following symptoms: blurred vision, confusion, ataxia, delirium,coughing, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, irritability,tremors, convulsions, anuria, and cancer in laboratory animal:;. Itattacks the central nervous system, eyes, lungs, liver, kidneys, andskin. TCE or trichloroethylene is an animal carcinogen and i:> alsocapable of causing the following symptoms: irritation of the eyes, noseand throat; dermatitis; headache, dizziness, vertigo, tremors, nausea andvomiting, irregular heartbeat, sleepiness, fatigue, blurred vision,unconsciousness, and death. Damage occurs to the respiratory system,heart, liver, kidneys, and central nervous system. Toluene has beenobserved to cause irritation of the eyes, respiratory tract, and skin;dermatitis, headache, dizziness, fatigue, muscular weakness, drowsiness,lack of coordination, staggering gait, «;kin paresthesia, collapse andcoma. :

Uranium is reported to cause adverse health effects in two ways: toxicchemical,effects including damage to the kidney and liver, pneumoconiosis,pronounced changes in the blood and generalized injury; and radiationeffects including lung cancer, osteosarcoma, and lymphoma.

Analysis of the rates of fetal death, low birth weight, and malformationsfor 1972-1982 showed no rate for the ar<>a significantly higher than thestate average.

A well survey and water sampling has benn completed, and an exposurequestionnaire is presently being administered to selected residents nearthe site. This investigation by the Missouri Department of Health hasfound there are only four wells still i;i use in the area that aredowngradient from the site. One is useiused for potable water at all. None ofamounts of any of the chemicals dispose-residents questioned so far appeared tocaused by materials disposed of at the

1 only occasionally and one is notthe wells sampled had detectablei of at the site. None of thehave any adverse health effectssite.

Based on available information, a healti threat exists due to the toxiceffects of chemicals and low level uranium wastes buried at the site, andthe possibility that off-site migration of these materials might occur.While there is no evidence of past or present exposure, the potential forfuture exposure exists based on the possibility that off-site migrationmight occur. Sampling and corrective containment and diversion shouldcontinue at. this site until risk to thebe determined.

public health can more accurately

Confirmed Abandoned orUncontrolled HazardousWaste Disposal Sipsin Missouri

Fiscal Year 1987Annual Fteport

MISSOURIDEPARTMENT OF NATURALDivision of Environmental Qua

ESOURCESty

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

WESTLAIE LANDFILT,

Classification: Class III, Priority 14

Site Name: Westlake Landfill

Address: Bridgeton, MO 63042. Between Old Rock Hill Road and NewRock Hill Road east of Earth City, St. Louis CountyT 46 N, R 5 E, St. Charles

Waste Type: radionuclides

Quantity: 7000 tons of low level

Site Description:

Quadrangle

aranium ore wastes

The site is part of an active landfill on the Missouri River floodplain inSt. Louis County.

Present Owner: Westlake Landfill, Inc.,Bridgeton, MO 63042

Environmental Problems Related to Site:

The site is an active permitted landfill which in thn pnst accepted 7000tons of low level uranium ore wastes. Excavntion at the s:ite in the pastreached the same depth as the groundwator. There is potential for

Missouri River which :.s less than onecontamination of groundwater and themile away, directly west of the site.

Remedial Actions at Site:

The site was surveyed prior to expansion in order to separate thedemolition fill area f-rom the area identified as containing, hazardousmaterials.

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources is the lead agency for thissite.

Area of Concern Related to Site:

The average natural ground elevationat a shallow depth. The alluvium und

is 435 to 440 foot with groundwatersrlying thn river is one of the most

important: aquifers in the state. Consequently, if contamination isoccuring from the landfill, it is threatening n vital aquifer resource.

General Geologic and Hydrologic Settiiig:

LOCATION: Longitude 90 26' 45"; latiQuadrangle.

ude 38 46' 15", St. Charles

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

The landfill has been in existence for more than twenty yea::s. For mostof that time period, landfilling has occurred on the Missouri Riverfloodplain. Landfilling also has taken place in a limestone quarryadjoining the floodplain landfill. Tie quarry is in the St. LouisLimestone which is present along the eastern slopes of the Missouri Riverfloodplain.

The early portion of the landfill operation included excavation andfilling below the floodplain and into the gronndwater of the: MissouriRiver aquifer. Subsequent landfill operations generally were confined tofilling above the floodplain surface and also in the adjoining limestonequarry. Except where operational procedures cause outbreaks of leachateto occur in the quarry or runoff waterno evidence of significant amounts of

to drain into the quarry, there wasgroundwater from the alluvial

aquifer entering the ,limestone. For tie most part, the recharge, quitelimited to begin with, would be from tie bedrock adjoining the alluviuminto the Missouri River aquifer rathersurrounding bedrock. Near the bedrock

than the aquifer recharging thequarry pit, however, the potential

exists for draining some alluvial water into this sump. Apparently, thepit is dewatered on a continuous basis with the wnter pumped to dischargein the alluvial setting. Groundwater monitoring indicates generalmovement of the alluvial groundwater to the west nnd north.

The Missouri River floodplain sediment! consist of 15 to 20 feet of siltloam to very silty clay having moderate to high permeability Thegroundwater table occurs at depths of 15 to 20 feet below floodplainlevel. Fluctuations of 5 to 15 feet occur during periods of high waterlevels when there are prolonged wet seasons that affect the MissouriRiver. Local wet or dry periods cause little effect other than rechargedirectly through the landfill. This may bo. the most significant riskposed by the Westlake Landfill, the poor soil covering procedures thatapparently occurred during landfill operation.

Beneath the silt loam, very silty clay surface soil of the alluvium, theMissouri River alluvial sediments are characterized by a general increasein grain size associated with increasing depth. The sand increase becomesnoticeable at depths of 20 to 30 feet wjith the percentage of gravelbeginning to occur at depths of 30 to 40 fee.t. These coarse sediments,plus the large and perennial recharge o' the river, c.iusc the alluvium tobe one of the major and most important iquifers in the state.Consequently, if contamination is occur-ing from the landfill, it isthreatening a vital aquifer resource.

Public Drinking Water Advisory:

There are no public water systems located in the immediate vicinity ofWestlake Landfill. However, the site is less thnn one mile f::om theMissouri River, which is the water source for St. Louis County WaterCompany's North Plant. The intake for thnt plant is nbout eight milesdownstream from Westlake Landfill. ShoiId contamination from the sitereach the Missouri River, the downstreanaffected.

142

puhlic water system could be

IIIIIIIIIIII

!

I

I

I

I

I

Private wells located near the landfill mny nl.so ho susceptible tocontamination.

Health Assessment: :

I

Uranium is reported to cause adversechemical effects including damage topronounced changes dn the blood andeffects including lung cancer, osteosarcoma

Analysis of the rates of .fetal deathfor 1972-1982 showed no rate for thestate average.

An exposure assessment including a well survey, water sampling, and anadministrative exposure questionnaire vns completed for thu site. Thisinvestigation by the Missouri Department of Health has found there areonly four wells still in use in the nren that are downgradient from the

health effects in two ways: toxicthe kidney and liver, pneumoconiosis,,eneralized injury; and radiation

and lymphoma.

low birth weight, and malformationsarea significantly higher than the

site. One is used only occasionallyat all. None of the residents questioned appeared to have any adversehealth effects caused by materials disposed of nt the site-

Based on available information, a hefilth threat exists due to the effectsof low level uranium wastes buried at the site, and the possibility thatoff-site migration of these materialevidence of past or present exposure,exists based on the possibility that

and one is not used for potable water

Sampling and corrective containment i nd diversion should continue at thissite until risk to the public health

might occur. While 1:here is nothe potent in 1 for fut.ure exposure

off-sito migration mijjht occur.

can more accurately be determined.

143

ORIGIN OF MATERIAL AND HISTORY OF LICENSE

1942-1966 BEUGIN CONGO AND DOMESTIC URANIUM ORES PROCESSED AT MALLINCKRODT, INCORPORATED, ATDESTREHAN STREET FACILITY -ON NORTH SIDE OF ST, LOUIS, AGREEMENT WITH U, S, , BELGIANSWA-'flED ORE RESIDUES (DAUGHTERS) RETURfe, MATERIAL WAS HELD BY U, S,, BUT NOT OMEDBY BELGIAN CONGO,

JANUARY 10, 1964 AEC-QAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE PUT OUT BID PACKAGE TO SELL, AS LISTED IN BIDPACKAGE, TOTAL ORERESIDUES OF 117,050 TONS OF RAFIf TE OR BARIUM SULFATE CAKECONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 191 TONS OF URANIUM, THE 3700 TONS OF R*SO/j (LEACHED)CONTAINING 7 TONS OF URANIUM WAS ITEMIZED AS PART OF THIS PACKAGE,

EARLY 1956 CONTINENTAL MINING AND MILLING COTANY, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, LICENSE NO. SMA-862PURCHASED FROM AEC-ORO, THE ORE RESIDUES WERE STORED AT ST, LOUIS AIRPORT, ORERESIDUES WERE MOVED TO 9200 LATTY AVENUE, IIAZEUm MISSOURI,.

DE(MER 29, 1966 LICENSE NO, SMC-907 WAS ISSUED TO (MERCIAL DISCOUNT CORPORATION, CHICAGO, ILLINOISALLOWING FOR POSSESSION OF RESIDUES, REMOVAL OF MOISTURE, AND SHIPf-BIT TO COTTERCORPORATION IN CANON CITY, COLORADO,

J' ARY 1967 CONTINENTAL MINING AND MILLING TERMINATED BUSINESS, COflERCIAL DISCOUNT CORPORATION OFCHICAGO, ILLINOIS, TOOK PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF TIE FACILITIES AND SOURCE MATERIALSTOCKPILE,

£Txhi'brf

DECEMBER 31, 1969 COTTER CORPORATION, CANON CITY, COLORADO, LICENSE NO. SUB-1022 PURCHASED REMAININGSOURCE MATERIAL AT IATTY AVENUE,

AUGUST TO COTTER TRANSPORTED FROM THE UVTTY AVENUE SITE 10,765,41 TONS OF RESIDUE BY RAIL TO CANONOCTOBER 1973 CITY, COLORADO, 48,544,70 TONS OF RESIDUE AND SOIL CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY SEVEN

TONS OF NATURAL URANILM WERE TRANSPORTED TO THE WEST LAKE LANDFILL SITE,

APRIL 10, 23, AND REGION HI INSPECTION AT HAZELWOOD, MISSOURI SITE AND CANON CITY, COLORADO OFFICE.24, 1974

PAY 10, 1974 LICENSE SUBMITS FINAL SURVEY OF LATTY AVENUE SITE TO AEC LICENSING,

1, 1974 FINDINGS OF APRIL, 1974 INSPECTION BY REGION III ARE SENT BY LETTER FROM AEC HEADQUARTERSTO COTTER CORPORATION ADVISING THAT DILUTION AND DISPOSAL OF ORE RESIDUES ARE NOT INKEEPING WITH INTENT OF PART 20, NO ITEMS OF INCOMPLIANCE,

NOVEMBER 13, 1974 AEC LICENSING TERMINATED LICENSE NO, SU&-10Q2.

INSPECTION HISTORY

IMSMAY 16, 17, AND AUGUST 4,

JANUARY 11, 1967

MARCH 27 AND APRIL 1, 1968

CONTINENTAL MINING & MILLING COMPANYLICENSE NO. SMA-862

CQfERCIAL DISCOUNT CORPORATIONLICENSE NO, SMC-907

COWERCIAL DISCOUNT CORPORATIONLICENSE NO, SMC-907

EIEHUIS5 ITEMS OF fOTCMPLAINCE RE: INADEQUATEPOSTING, INADEQUATE SURVEYS 8 PERMISSIBLELEVEL OF RADIATION IN UNRESTRICTED AREAS

2 ITEMS OF NONCOMPLIANCE RE: PERMISSIBLELEVELS OF RADIATION IN UNRESTRICTED AREASAND INADEQUATE POSTING

2 ITEMS OF NONCOMPLIANCE RE: PERMISSIBLELEVELS OF RADIATION IN UNRESTRICTED AREASAND INADEQUATE SURVEYS

17, 1970

APRIL 10, 23, & 24,

COTTER CORPORATIONLICENSE NO, SUB-1022

COTTER CORPORATIONLICENSE NO, SUB-1022

ONE ITEM OF NONOTLMNCE RE: INADEQUATESURVEYS

DISPOSAL OF URANIUM BY DILUTION ANDBURIAL ARE NOT IN KEEPING WITH INTENTOF AEC REGULATIONS, NOT CITED AS ANONCOMPLIANCE

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

1, THE REWINING ORE RESIDUES AT LADY AVENUE SITE WERE MIXED WITH SOIL

2,

3,

TRANSPORTED TO THE VEST LAKE LANDFILLTHE APRIL 1974 INSPECTION, HOlfcVER,

CONCLUSIONS OF JUNE 22-24, AUGUST 1L 1976 INVESTIGATION

AS REPORTED BY THE LICENSE DURINGTHE RESIDUE-SOIL MDOURE IS

BY APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET OF FILL AT WEST LA!€ LANDFILL INSTtADOF 100 FEET AS REPORTED BY THE LICENSEE,

•

ENVIRONENTAL SOIL SAMPLES INDICATE TIE PRESENCE OF URANIUM ORE PRXESSRESIDUES REMAINING AT THE LATTY AVENU![ SITE, BETA-GAMA SURVEYSBY RIII PERSONNEL AT THAT SITE ON AUGUST 11, 1976 INDICATE LEVELS OFRADIATION IN CERTAIN AREAS THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THENRC FOR DECONTAMINATION OF LAND AREASUSE,

PRIOR TO RELEASE FOR UNRESTRICltD

EASED ON RADIATION IEASUREMENTS OF THK miERIAL PRESENT AT W WEST LAKELANDFILL AND THE LATTY AVENUE SITE NEITHER LJXATION PRESENTS Afl MEDIATERADIOLOGICAL HEALTH HAZARD TO THE PUBlilC,

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

RECCWENDATIQNS

A MORE DETAILS ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE LATTY AVENUE AND THE VESTLAKE LAND FILL SITES SHOULD BE PERFORMED,

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY TO PERFORM THIS EVALUATION, ANY RECOffENDATIONSWILL BE BASED ON THE OAK RIDGE EVALUATION,

Chronology of Radioactive Wasteat West Lake Landfill

United States Government (Manhattan Project)

1942-1945

Mallinckrodt (nuclear processing plant)Destrehan Street, City of St. Louis

- 1966

Nuclear Regulatory Commission(formerly Atomic Energy Commission)

February, 1966

Continental Mining & Milling Co.i1967

Commercial Discount Corp. b

OOa

December, 1969

Cotter Corporation(a subsidiary of Commonwealth Edison)

— i yov'.

B & K Construction Co., Inc.

July-October, 1973

West Lake Landfill

t 23-8