response to prior review and resubmission strategies yuqing li, ph.d division of movement...
DESCRIPTION
Summary Statement Sample Summary statement Sample Summary statement Choosing Study Sections: Choosing Study Sections: based funded projects in your field and member composition. based funded projects in your field and member composition. Talk to program officer Talk to program officer Specify it clearly in cover letter Specify it clearly in cover letter Exclude conflict of interests reviewers Exclude conflict of interests reviewers Contact program office for insight Contact program office for insightTRANSCRIPT
Response to Prior Review Response to Prior Review and Resubmission and Resubmission StrategiesStrategies
Yuqing Li, Ph.DYuqing Li, Ph.DDivision of Movement DisordersDivision of Movement DisordersDepartment of NeurologyDepartment of NeurologyCenter for Movement Disorders and Center for Movement Disorders and NeurorestorationNeurorestorationThe Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain The Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute Institute University of FloridaUniversity of Florida
OutlineOutline Summary statementSummary statement Decision to resubmit or switch to Decision to resubmit or switch to
another project/ideaanother project/idea How to Prepare for ResubmissionHow to Prepare for Resubmission Specific issuesSpecific issues
Summary StatementSummary Statement Sample Summary statementSample Summary statement Choosing Study Sections: Choosing Study Sections:
based funded projects in your field and based funded projects in your field and member composition.member composition.
Talk to program officerTalk to program officer Specify it clearly in cover letterSpecify it clearly in cover letter Exclude conflict of interests reviewersExclude conflict of interests reviewers
Contact program office for Contact program office for insightinsight
Summary StatementSummary Statement Overall impact score and percentileOverall impact score and percentile Five components: Five components:
SignificanceSignificance Investigator(s)Investigator(s) InnovationInnovation ApproachApproach EnvironmentEnvironment
Strengths and weaknessesStrengths and weaknesses Protection for Human SubjectsProtection for Human Subjects Vertebrate SectionsVertebrate Sections
Whether to resubmit or not Whether to resubmit or not Scored application: consult with Scored application: consult with
collaborators and mentorscollaborators and mentors Triaged or unscored application: Triaged or unscored application:
Resubmission will be very difficultResubmission will be very difficult Additional problems not mentioned in the Additional problems not mentioned in the
summary statement present further impedance summary statement present further impedance for successfor success
It is doable as long as you fix all the problems It is doable as long as you fix all the problems Triaged or unscored application: Triaged or unscored application:
Change to another mechanism or another Change to another mechanism or another funding agencyfunding agency
However to resubmitHowever to resubmit SignificanceSignificance
How to pick an important topicHow to pick an important topic You can always change what you do You can always change what you do
after you are fundedafter you are funded Rare disease: to associate it to impact Rare disease: to associate it to impact
beyond your field to major diseasebeyond your field to major disease Disease-focused research but try to Disease-focused research but try to
have impact on basic biological have impact on basic biological processes as wellprocesses as well
However to resubmitHowever to resubmit InvestigatorsInvestigators
Lack of independenceLack of independence Obtain a private foundation grant firstObtain a private foundation grant first Publish or perish Publish or perish Turn any data from postdoc period into your Turn any data from postdoc period into your
own publication, even with your previous own publication, even with your previous mentor as a collaborator. mentor as a collaborator.
Collaborators to cover areas you as a PI Collaborators to cover areas you as a PI lackslacks
Publications with collaborators will Publications with collaborators will strengthen the applicationstrengthen the application
However to resubmitHowever to resubmit InnovationsInnovations
Conceptually, new ideas will advance Conceptually, new ideas will advance fieldfield
Technical innovation, a new tool, a new Technical innovation, a new tool, a new methodmethod
A new approach to a fieldA new approach to a field Cutting edge approaches, effective use Cutting edge approaches, effective use
of the university core facilitiesof the university core facilities
However to resubmitHowever to resubmit ApproachApproach
Logical design of aimsLogical design of aims Central hypothesis tested by 2 to 4 Central hypothesis tested by 2 to 4
complementary aimscomplementary aims Cutting edge approaches, effective use of the Cutting edge approaches, effective use of the
university core facilitiesuniversity core facilities Collaborations to expand the scope of the Collaborations to expand the scope of the
project, you will not penalized for enlisting project, you will not penalized for enlisting more collaborators, with an eye toward more collaborators, with an eye toward promotion and tenure evaluation laterpromotion and tenure evaluation later
Collaborations, publications, preliminary data Collaborations, publications, preliminary data to establish feasibility. to establish feasibility.
However to resubmitHowever to resubmit EnvironmentEnvironment
As one of the 108 Carnegie High Research As one of the 108 Carnegie High Research Activity University, overall university Activity University, overall university environment is excellentenvironment is excellent
Florida State UniversityFlorida State University TallahasseeTallahassee FLFL
University of Central FloridaUniversity of Central Florida OrlandoOrlando FLFL University of FloridaUniversity of Florida GainesvilleGainesville FLFL University of MiamiUniversity of Miami Coral GablesCoral Gables FLFL University of South Florida-TampaUniversity of South Florida-Tampa TampaTampa
FLFL
However to resubmitHowever to resubmit EnvironmentEnvironment
Department Chairman Chair/Division Department Chairman Chair/Division Chief support: seed money; time protect Chief support: seed money; time protect for research; space right now or for research; space right now or promised space if funded.promised space if funded.
Seek out local collaborators: win-win Seek out local collaborators: win-win situationsituation
Get membership in centers and insitutes Get membership in centers and insitutes to package it very differentlyto package it very differently
However to resubmitHowever to resubmit Things will help for the Things will help for the
resubmission:resubmission: More papers published, possibly high More papers published, possibly high
impact papersimpact papers Preliminary data to demonstrate the Preliminary data to demonstrate the
feasibilityfeasibility Preliminary data to support your hypothesisPreliminary data to support your hypothesis Access to new reagent (antibodies, cell Access to new reagent (antibodies, cell
lines, animal models)lines, animal models) Access to new equipment and facilityAccess to new equipment and facility
However to resubmitHowever to resubmit Introduction:Introduction:
Limited to one pageLimited to one page Thank the panel members Thank the panel members Fully address the issues in the Resume Fully address the issues in the Resume
and Summary of Discussionand Summary of Discussion Address most, if not all, of the concerns Address most, if not all, of the concerns
raised by all three reviewersraised by all three reviewers Remember to thank them again near Remember to thank them again near
the endthe end 3 Example:3 Example:
Specific IssuesSpecific Issues Biased reviewer:Biased reviewer:
Try to exclude the reviewerTry to exclude the reviewer Try to switch to another study sectionTry to switch to another study section Address the question head on and follow the Address the question head on and follow the
suggestion of the bias reviewersuggestion of the bias reviewer Proposal went to the wrong reviewer:Proposal went to the wrong reviewer:
Try to write for people outside of the field and Try to write for people outside of the field and get them excited about your workget them excited about your work
Point out the error in a diplomatic way and Point out the error in a diplomatic way and turn the reviewer into an advocate for your turn the reviewer into an advocate for your proposalproposal