resource flowspdf.wri.org › resourceflows_bw.pdf · 2018-09-21 · meaningful dematerialization,...
TRANSCRIPT
RESOURCE FLOWST H E M A T E R I A L B A S I S O FI N D U S T R I A L E C O N O M I E S
WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE
NETHERLANDS MINISTRY OF H O U S I N G ,
SPATIAL P L A N N I N G , A N D ENV1RONM
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
RESOURCE FLOWS:THE MATERIAL BASIS OFINDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
ALBERT ADRIAANSESTEFAN BR1NGEZUALLEN HAMMONDY U I C: H I MORIGUCHIERIC RODENBURGDONALD ROGICHHELMUT SCHUTZ
World Resources Institute
Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Wuppertal Institute
Wuppertal, Federal Republic of Germany
Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and Environment
The Hague, Netherlands
National Institute for Environmental Studies
Tsukuba, Japan
April 1997
KATHLEEN COURRIERPUBLICA TIONS DIRECTOR
HYACINTH BILLINGSPRODUCTION MANA CER
MAGGIE POWELLELECTRONIC PUBLISHING MANAGER
Each World Resources Institute Report represents a timely, scholarly treatment of responds to the guidance of advisory panels and expert reviewers. Unless otherwisea suhject of puhlic concern. WRI takes responsibility for choosing the study topics stated, however, all the interpretation and findings set forth in WRI publicationsand guaranteeing its authors and researchers freedom of inquiry. It also solicits and are those of the authors.
Copyright © 1997 World Resources Institute. All rights reserved.
ISBN 1-56973-209-4
Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 97-60566
Printed in the United States of America on Recycled Paper.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
ii
CONTENTS
Preface iv
Acknowledgments vi
Executive Summary 1
1. Introduction 3
2. Accounting for Material Flows. . . . 5
3. Results, Implications, andConclusions 11
4. Next Steps 19
Notes 21
Data Summary 23
Appendix 33
German Material Requirements 34
Japanese Material Requirements 43
Netherlands Material Requirements . . . 51
United States Material Requirements . . 55
About the Authors 64
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
iii
PREFACE
To begin industrial processes, peoplewithdraw natural resources from theenvironment. The industrial system
transforms these natural resources into nearly all ofthe products and services that we use—the food weeat, the clothes we wear, the cars we drive, theelectricity we use to light our homes and power ourcomputers. Virtually all of the natural resources thatsupport this activity ultimately return to theenvironment, often in an altered form. This flow ofmaterials from nature to the economy andback—the materials cycle—is fundamental toindustrial economies.
The sheer scale of the process is remarkable andsurprising, even in the most modern and efficientindustrial economies. As this report documents, sucheconomies require 45,000 to 85,000 kilograms ofnatural resources per person per year—the weeklyper person equivalent of 300 shopping bags filledwith materials, together weighing as much as a largeluxury car.
The 1992 United Nations Earth Summitconference in Rio de Janeiro reached a broadconsensus that the environmental resources of ourplanet are limited. Human activities, such aswithdrawing natural resources, disposing of wastes,and modifying the landscape, can interfere with theplanet's ability to support life. So sustaining a larger
and more prosperous human society and providingfor future generations requires decreasing the impactof economic activity on the environment. Naturalresource use must be made more efficient and thegrowth of industrial economies decoupled fromphysical growth. Eventually, industrial societies'dependence on natural resources must be reducedand our economies "dematerialized" to some degree.
Yet, our ability to track such trends and to calculatethe costs and benefits of industrial activity isn't up tothe task. Conventional national economic accountssimply do not provide the information needed, nordo the prices of natural resources give accuratesignals of the long term costs to society of their use.
This report proposes a way to enlarge ourunderstanding of what sustainable economiesrequire. It constructs a parallel set of nationalaccounts in physical terms using material flowanalysis and proposes new summary measures orindicators that can be used with economicindicators to give a far more accurate sense of thescale and consequences of industrial activity.
This analysis is particularly relevant in consideringthe expected global expansion of industrial activity.As human populations increase and industrialactivity expands, pressures on the environment areintensifying. A four-or-five-fold expansion—the
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
iv
magnitude of expected growth in economic activityover the next half century—will present veryserious environmental difficulties if the human useof natural resources and disposal of wastes growsapace. Yet, as this report shows, meaningfuldematerialization—that is, an absolute reduction inper capita use of natural resources—is not yetoccurring, even though over the past 20 yearsnatural resource use has not risen as fast as
economic activity. The world still has much to do toput itself on track toward a sustainable future.
This report results from a unique and productiveinternational collaboration among our institutions.In such joint work may lie the best hope for findingbroadly acceptable new approaches and powerfulnew insights that can stimulate the globaltransformation our societies need.
JONATHAN LASHP r e s i d e n tW o r l d R e s o u r c e s I n s t i t u t e
ERNST ULRICH VON WEIZSACKERP r e s i d e n tW up p e rt a l I n s t i t u t e
KEES ZOETEMAND e p u t y D i r e d o r - G e n e r a l f o r E n v i r o n m e n tN e t h e r l a n d s M i n i s t r y f o r H o u s i n g , S p a t i a l P l a n n i n g , a n dH n v i r o n m e n !
YOSHINORI ISHIID i r e c t o r - G e n e r a lN a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e for E n v i r o n m e n t a l S t u d i e s
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
V
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The World Resources Institute would like toacknowledge the support of the WallaceGlobal Fund in making possible the WRI
contribution to this joint research effort and thepublication of this report.WRI also acknowledgesthe support of the Swedish InternationalDevelopment Cooperation Agency and the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency for its indicatorresearch.
The authors also wish to thank colleagues whoprovided helpful comments. These include John C.O'Connor, Robert U. Ayres, Peter Winsemius, IddoWernick, David Berry, H. Theodore Heintz,Jr.,
Terry Davies, and Herman E. Daly, and from withinWRI, Walt Reid, Alan Brewster, Daryl Ditz, DanTunstall, and Robert Repetto. Special thanks fortheir contributions to the report are also due to: inGermany, Fritz Hinterberger and FriedrichSchmidt-Bleek;inJapan,M.Yoshida,Y.Kato,T.Nakaguchi, and T. Itoh; and in the Netherlands,RJJ. van Heijningen,J.H.O. Hazewinkel, S. van derVen, HJ. Dijkerman, and SJ. Keuning.
Our special thanks to WRI's Kathleen Courrier forher skillful editing of the report and to MaggiePowell and Hyacinth Billings for their managementof the production process.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
vi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There is a price to be paid for modifying ourenvironment, extracting resources, andemitting pollutants and wastes. But
conventional national economic accounts do notspell out that price. They do not make explicit manyactivities that entail environmental modifications oruses of natural resources with potentialenvironmental impact. For example, measures suchas the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) do notinclude the movement or processing of largequantities of materials that have no (or evennegative) economic value. Concepts such as full-costaccounting attempt to deal with such shortcomings,but trigger contentious debates about how to pricethe so-called externalities involved.
This study suggests an alternative or supplementaryapproach. It develops a parallel set of physical accountsto describe economic activity—accounts that can berelated to national economic accounts—and proposesa new summary measure, the Total MaterialRequirement (TMR) of an industrial economy. TheTMR measures the total use of natural resources thatnational economic activity requires.
National economic accounts fail to capture manyactivities of environmental consequence in partbecause the natural resources involved do notbecome commodities that are bought and sold.These hidden flows, which are associated withextractive activities, harvesting of crops, andinfrastructure development, are immense. In thefour countries studied, this report finds 55 to 75percent of the TMR arises from hidden flows.
National accounts in physical terms, such as thoseproposed here, are required to routinely documentsuch uses of natural resources and their potentialenvironmental effects.
In an ever more global economy, natural resourcesare frequently extracted in one country, transformedinto products in another, and consumed in a third.The result is that a significant portion of the naturalresource use that supports national economicactivity often takes place outside national borders.Except in the United States, which is largelyself-sufficient in natural resources, this report findsthat the foreign proportion of TMR ranges from 35to 70 percent in the countries studied, with thelarger percentages in smaller countries. Thesehigh-income countries gain the benefits ofconsuming imported resources, but theenvironmental cost of producing them falls onothers, often developing countries, that supply them.This disparity may not receive adequateconsideration, because national economic accountsdo not adequately measure the true extent ofnatural resource use and potential environmentalharm. While this report covers only high-incomecountries, the methodology developed here couldbe applied to document international imbalances inthe physical flows required to satisfy globaleconomic demand.
The TMR takes into account both hidden flows andforeign components of natural resource use, as wellas direct inputs of natural resources into theeconomy. The TMRs of even very modern
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
1
industrial economies are enormous. This reportdocuments that such countries now require anannual TMR of 45 to 85 metric tons of naturalresources per person—and Direct Material Inputs(DMI) of 17 to 38 metric tons per person—toproduce their flow of goods and services. This totaldoes not include use of air and water.
This report also analyzes TMR figures over 20 yearsand finds both a general convergence among thecountries studied and, in most, a gradual rise in percapita natural resources use. The implication is thatmeaningful dematerialization, in the sense of anabsolute reduction in natural resources use, is not yettaking place.
A critical question is whether, in modern industrialcountries, economic activity is becoming decoupledfrom natural resource use. Historically, economistshave discussed materials intensity as the ratio ofnatural resource inputs to GDE This report proposesa more comprehensive measure of materialsintensity based on the ratio of TMR to GDP. Theresult shows a clearly declining pattern of materialsintensity, supporting the conclusion that economicactivity is growing somewhat more rapidly thannatural resource use. However, materials intensity astraditionally measured (based on direct materialinputs or DMI to GDP ratio) has leveled off overthe past decade, implying that use of naturalresource commodities may now be growing inparallel with economic growth. And examination ofdetailed material flows in each of the countriesstudied makes it clear that most natural resources arestill being used in an environmentally disruptiveonce-through manner.
Ultimately, sustainable development will require acloser understanding of how the economic andenvironmental aspects of human activity interact, aswell as actions based on such understanding.Conventional economic information, while useful,
provides very little insight into these interactions.But the parallel set of physical accounts illustrated inthis report allows comparison of economic andphysical factors, which can add significantly to theinformation and tools for decision-making.Indicators of these physical flows, such as the TMR,can guide progress toward more efficient use ofnatural resources. For example, the OECD recentlyadopted as a long range goal that industrialcountries should decrease their material intensitiesby a factor of 10—a profound change that is notlikely to occur unless the the target and progresstoward it can be explicitly measured. Using themethodology of this report, that target can beexpressed as 30 kilograms per $100 of GDP,compared to the present value of approximately 300kilograms per $100 of GDP.
Comprehensive physical accounts are also necessaryto develop policies that support more sustainableindustrial economies. Many environmental policieshave focused on wastes and pollution—on the backend of the materials cycle—even though more thanhalf, and as much as three-fourths, of the naturalresource use occurs at the front end of the process,before natural resource commodities enter theeconomy. Since what leaves the industrial system aswastes is closely related to the volume of materialinputs, policies that reduce the use of primary naturalresources not only diminish extraction pressures, butalso wastes and pollution. Similarly, policies that makenatural resource use more efficient or increaserecycling lower requirements and environmentalimpacts over the entire materials cycle.
To gain the full insights from the national materialsflow accounts proposed in this report will requireadditional work and expanded internationalcollaboration. This report suggests specific actionsthat governments and international organizationscan take in the near future.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
INTRODUCTION
The analysis presented in this report derivesfrom a study of the physical basis of fourhigh-income industrial economies—
Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, and the UnitedStates—which together constitute a broadcross-section of the OECD countries. Workingtogether, researchers at four institutions applied acommon methodology to the diverse circumstancesof each country.
The study seeks to provide a quantitative physicaldescription of all the natural resources directly andindirectly used by the economic activity of theseindustrial countries, even when portions of that useoccur outside a country's borders. The materialflows documented here encompass both thecommodities that enter into commerce and all theflows associated with making a commodity availablefor human use. In addition, the study also accountsfor direct and indirect uses of natural resources inconstruction, deliberate alterations of the landscape,and such side effects of human economic activity assoil erosion from cultivated fields. The study focuseson broad categories of materials, not sectors of theeconomy. It traces the material flows for thesecategories over the 20-year period from 1975 to1994 to show how these flows are changing aspopulation and economic activity increase. More
broadly, this study creates an analytical frameworkfor examining the physical basis of industrialeconomies—the beginning of a more completeunderstanding of their environmental impacts. Byillustrating how physical accounts of material flowscan be created, in a manner similar to accountingmethods for economic flows, the study shows hownational accounts can be constructed using physicalmeasures. The study proposes new indicators thatsummarize trends in natural resource use, thatcompare material and economic flows, and thatallow analysts and decision-makers to examine andtrack trends in dematerialization. Thus this studyseeks to add to the information and tools availablefor decision-making.
This report presents the methodology developedand the preliminary results of the study, includingthe major trends evident in the data, a discussion oftheir implications, and summaries of the physicalaccounts. (To facilitate and stimulate further analysis,the Appendix includes disaggregated data sets, alongwith data sources and estimation techniques, foreach country.)
This work stands on the shoulders of many otherresearchers, including early theoretical studies of theimportance of material and energy "throughputs" in
* World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.; Wuppertal Institute, Wuppertal, Germany; Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning,and Environment, the Hague, Netherlands; and the National Institute for Environmental Studies of the japan Environment Agency, Tsukuba,Japan.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
3
industrial economies by Kenneth Boulding andHerman Daly; studies of commodity consumptionby Donald Rogich and others at the U.S. Bureau ofMines;" analyses of trends in material usage by AlanKneese,J Alvin Weinberg, Jesse Ausubel,3 IddoWernick,' and Martin Janicke; and work onmaterials flow analysis by Frederick Schmidt-Bleek,Stefan Bringezu, and colleagues at the WuppertalInstitute and by Marina Fischer-Kowalski. Thisstudy is also related to extensive work by manyauthors on life cycle analysis and industrial
ecology, which charts detailed materials flows forspecific industrial processes or within specific sectorsof industrial economies, and to efforts to develophighly aggregated environmental indicators. Thepresent study goes beyond these earlier efforts byconstructing a coinprehensive (although stillpreliminary) set of physical accounts, assessing therelated material flows at the national level for anumber of countries, refining the methodology ofmaterials flow analysis, and proposing new summaryindicators.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
4
ACCOUNTING FOR MATERIAL FLOWS
Material flow accounting can systematicallytrack the physical flows of naturalresources through extraction, production,
fabrication, use and recycling, and final disposal,accounting for all losses along the way. Thistechnique is motivated by the desire to relate theuse of natural resources to the capacity of theenvironment to provide the materials and absorbthe wastes.
The method is used here to provide acomprehensive overview of the physical basis ofindustrial economies and to derive indicators forsustainability. Although water is an important, and insome countries a limiting, natural resource, waterflows are excluded from the analysis here, as is air,because its use varies widely among regions. Allother natural resources removed from theenvironment to support economic activities areaccounted for, as are materials moved or processed.
On the input side of the economy, agriculture,forestry, fisheries, mining, and oil or gas wells extractor harvest primary materials. Industrial processesthen transform these inputs to produce productsand services. Materials can be tracked through thechain of industrial processes to their use byconsumers and to their ultimate fate, whether
recycling and reuse (as with many metals),deposition as waste, or dispersion into theenvironment (as with fertilizers and pesticides or thecombustion gases released in fuel burning). In thisanalysis, the boundary between nature and theeconomy is defined at the point when humans firstextract or move materials from natural sites.
Extracting or harvesting primary natural resourcesoften requires moving or processing large quantitiesof materials that can modify or damage theenvironment even though they have no economicvalue. For example, to get access to metal deposits,mineral ores, or seams of coal, for example, oftenrequires moving huge amounts of covering materialsor overburden. Often crude ores must be processedor concentrated before they become commercialcommodities, leaving large amounts of processwastes to be disposed. The cultivation and harvest ofcrops often causes soil erosion by wind and water,potentially transporting large amounts of materialand reducing the soil's fertility. Constructing dams,highways, and buildings often requires theexcavating or shifting large amounts of earth andstone. All such flows are part of a country'seconomic activity, but most never enter themonetary economy as commodities. In this report,the flows of materials that do not enter the
* Because practices differ among different countries, especially in metals refining, so does the dividing line between what is a commodity andwhat is not. In Europe, for example, many ore concentrates enter commerce; in the United States, many unified refining operations processores completely, shipping pure metal as the commodity.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL. ECONOMIES
5
BOX 1 QUALITATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MATERIALS FLOWS
The material excavated or moved in the preparation of aconstruction site has a qualitatively different impact on theenvironment than the release of heavy metals or organicchemicals. One way to take account of such differences isto segregate material flows by their long term impact onthe environment, ranking all flows as either major orminor on both the degree of mobilization of the materialand its potential for causing environmental harm.
Mobilization, the spatial domain affected by a flow, reflectsthe ability to reverse impacts caused by the flow; materialsreleased to the atmosphere or dissipated to land and watersystems affect larger areas than controlled landfills ortailings ponds. Materials that are biodegradable or havebeen moved or physically transformed generally have lesspotential to harm the environment than materials that havebeen chemically transformed.
Applying these criteria subjectively to the 21 billion tonsof material flows for the United States in 1991 andcalculating the percentage of the total flow in eachcategory gives the following result:
high mobilization, high potential for harm
high mobilization, low potential for harm
low mobilization, high potential for harm
12%
29%
5 %
54 %low mobilization, low potential for harm
Flows in the first category may be most important from along term national sustainability perspective. Locally,however, the third category of flows may be of greatestconcern. This example illustrates that aggregate materialflows can be disaggregated to give measures of theirqualitative characteristics.
monetary economy are separated from those that do.The former flows are described as the hiddenflows ' associated with the extracted primary naturalresource commodities. " The pressure on theenvironment exerted by hidden flows is oftendifferent from that due to materials that directlyenter the industrial system and are transformed togoods and services. A million tons of earth moved inconstruction is not the same as a million tons oftoxic wastes. But all uses of natural resources causepotentially important environmental alterations. Toprovide insight into measures of quality as well asquantity, materials can be classified in many ways.One is to distinguish those materials associated withconstruction and infrastructure from thoseassociated with production processes (such as soilerosion, removal of mining overburden, and oreprocessing) and those that become commodities.Another possible categorization distinguishes inertmaterials that have little capacity to interact or
combine chemically from those that are chemicallyreactive. Materials can also be classified by theirdegree of mobilization and whether they posemajor environmental hazards. (See Box 1.) Suchqualitative distinctions provide insight into howmaterials are used and into the nature of theenvironmental pressures that their use generates. Sofar, however, no standard method exists formeasuring this environmental pressure.
This analysis asserts that it is not possible to know inadvance what flows will be environmentallydamaging. Determinants include both theperspective of the observer and the characteristics ofthe local environment: Filling in a wetland withearth to construct a highway is not a tragedy from aglobal or even a national perspective, but from alocal perspective, it may be. Accordingly, in this study,flows of materials are recorded in the quantity asthey occur, without additional weighting, eventhough there are clearly substantial differences in
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
6
their character and potential environmental impact.Using the disaggregated accounts in the Appendix,however, researchers could combine data on themagnitude of different flows with additionalweighting factors, should a scientific or politicalconsensus emerge on the relative hazards or risksassociated with any particular type of material ornatural resource use.
Because the market does not place a price on thehidden material flows, economic accounts do notusually include them. The resulting statisticsunderstate the natural resource dependence of anindustrial economy, giving decision-makers adistorted image of the physical scale andconsequences of economic decisions. Under suchcircumstances, it is easy for economic planners ordecision-makers to fail to adequately anticipateenvironmental effects.
For a given product or service, the primary naturalresources and the associated hidden flows requiredto produce it comprise the total materialrequirements associated with that product or service.This quantity is also a measure of the potentialenvironmental pressures attributable to that productor service. In the same way, the total material flowsassociated with a national economy can becalculated. These flows represent the total use ofnatural resources required to generate a nationaleconomy's goods and services.
Materials transported in international trade requireadditional discussion. In today's global economy,materials may originate in one country (rawmaterial), be processed to some point(semi-manufactures) in another, created into finalproducts in a third country, and ultimatelyconsumed by yet a fourth nation. In principle, thehidden flows associated with exported materialscould be assigned to the exporting country on thegrounds that each country should be responsible for
the environmental burden that its exports create. Inpractice, however, that approach overlooks the severeasymmetry between industrial economies—all ofwhich import significant quantities of primarynatural resources—and developing economies, manyof which depend heavily on the export of suchresources and, therefore, suffer from theenvironmental costs of resource extraction. Such aconvention would also understate the actual physicalbasis of most industrial economies and theimportance, from a global environmentalperspective, of using natural resources moreefficiently in these economies. In this analysis, anestimate of the hidden flows associated withimported primary natural resources andsemi-manufactures (such as cast iron) is included ineach national account. Separately, a preliminaryaccount of the exports of each country is alsopresented.
Exactly how are the hidden material flowsassociated with imported materials calculated? Theyinclude estimates of the overburden removed inmining as well as materials that are processed butnot sold. Where accurate numbers from the countryof origin are not available, domestic numbers forcomparable processes are used. Erosion ofagricultural and forestry lands in the country oforigin is used to estimate the hidden flows ofimported renewable raw materials. The hidden flowsof imported semi-manufactures are also estimatedfrom calculations for domestic production.Provisionally, imported final products, such asmanufactured goods, are accounted for directly,without hidden flows. Further work on measuringthe hidden flows associated with internationallytraded products is needed to establish consistentconventions for regular reporting. Nonetheless, theapproximate numbers that this methodology yieldsprovide a reliable basis for making preliminaryinternational comparisons.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
7
BOX 2 SOME USEFUL DEFINITIONS
Hidden material (low: This is the portion of the total
in.ili.-ri.il requirement thai never enters the economy, ll is
the n.uur.il resource use that occurs when providing those
commodities that Jo emer ihe economy. 1 he hidden
material flow comprises two components, ancillary flows
and excavated or disturbed flows.
Ancillary material flow: 1 his is the material ih.it must
be removed from the natural environment, along with the
desired material, to obtain the desired material. Some
examples are die portion of an ore tli.it is procesied and
discarded lo concentrate the ore and the plant and forest
hiomass that is removed irom llic land along with the logs
and grain, but is later separated Irom the desired material
he I ore further processing.
(••'or simplicity, both ancillary and excavated or disturbed
material have been combined into the single category ol
hidden material, even though they cm have markedly
different environmental impacts. Hidden flows have been
calculated lor six categories of material flows: fossil fuels,
metals and industrial minerals, construction materials,
renewable natural resources, infrastructure creation and
maintenance, and soil erosion.
Direct Material Input (DMI): I his is the flow oi
natural resource commodities that enter the industrial
economy for further processing. Included in this category
are grains used by a food processor, petroleum sent to a
refinery, metals used by a manufacturer, and logs taken to
a null.
Excavated and/or disturbed material flow: I his ismaterial moved or disturbed to obtain a natural resource,
or to create, and maintain inirastrucrure. Included in this
category is the overburden that must be removed to
permit access to an ore body, the soil erosion from
agriculture, and the material moved in the construction of
infrastructure, such as a highway or a building, or in the
dredgmii of harbors and canals.
Total Material Requirement (TMR): This is the sumof the total material input and the hidden or indirect
material flows, including deliberate landscape alterations. It
is the total material requirement for a national economy,
including all domestic MK\ imported natural resources. ~l he
I \1R gives the best overall estimate for the potential
environmental impact associated with natural resource
extraction and use.
The total physical requirements of a nationaleconomy—the sum of domestic and importedprimary natural resources, together with theirassociated hidden flows—are called the TotalMaterials Requirement (TMR). This number is ameasure of the physical flows, or the magnitude ofeconomic activity measured in physical terms, thatunderpin an industrial economy. The TMRcomplements monetary measures of a nation'seconomic activity such as the GDP. Together,physical and monetary measures provide a morecomplete view of the size and scope of anindustrial economy The TMR can also be
considered an approximate measure of the potentialpressure exerted by an economy on the globalenvironment, though precise measures will dependon the disaggregated components of the TMR andtheir environmental impacts. For purposes ofinternational comparison, the material flowaccounts of the four countries considered in thisreport are presented on a per capita basis, TMR percapita. An economy's use of natural resourcecommodities, the Direct Materials Input (or DMI)per capita, is also calculated; this quantity is theTMR less the domestic and imported hidden flows.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
8
Discussion
As defined here, the TMR is concerned with theinput end of the materials cycle, the total physicalrequirements and throughputs of materials onwhich a nation's economic activity depend.Accordingly, the material flows associated withexports—raw materials, semi-manufactures, orfinished goods and their associated hiddenflows—have not been deducted from TMR. Themeasure is adjusted, however, to take into accountmaterials transfered across a country without beingaltered or stored there. This presents an accuratepicture for countries such as the Netherlands, theentry port for many materials intended for otherEuropean countries.
Exports for each country are reported separately. Inthis preliminary stage of analysis, fully consistentexport figures in physical terms for the fourcountries are not yet available. Nonetheless, theexport figures provided illustrate that comprehensivematerials flow accounts, which compare or"balance" imports and domestic extraction againstexports and outputs to nature, can be constructed.
These national material flow accounts, analogous tonational economic accounts, include the extractionand harvest of materials from the domesticenvironment. Imported materials, with theirassociated hidden flows, are added. Analysis ofhidden flows for imports into Japan, Germany, andthe Netherlands confirm that they are at least aslarge as the hidden flows associated with domesticextraction of primary natural resources; thus theseflows cannot be neglected when considering how anation's economic activity exerts pressure on theenvironment. These inputs can be compared withthe outputs to the domestic environment in theform of wastes, emissions, and dissipative use ofproducts, as well as outputs in the form of exported
products. The result is a set of national material flowaccounts. (See Appendix.)
These accounts provide valuable information on therelationships among flows, such as the ratio betweenrenewable and non-renewable inputs or the amountof food and fiber from agriculture compared to theerosion caused. The balance between inputs andoutputs indicates the net accumulation of materialsin the industrial system. Moreover, such accountslink economic activities to their physicalimplications, which may be particularly important inconsidering sustainable development.
If significant reductions in per capita naturalresource use and in the materials intensity ofindustrial economies are necessary in the long runto make sure that the benefits of industrial systemsare enjoyed by all the world's societies, for example,then such indicators as the TMR will be necessaryto monitor progress toward that goal. Since suchquestions arise not from a fear of resource scarcitybut rather from concern about the environmentalconsequences of resource extraction and use, theTMR is an appropriate indicator for these purposes.Planning and managing more efficient andsustainable industrial economies and developingpolicies to encourage such a transition will requireboth detailed knowledge of the underlying physicalflows and such highly-aggregated indicators as theTMR and the DMI to track overall trends.
Materials intensity has often been discussed as theratio of natural resource inputs, or of pollutionoutputs, to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Thisanalysis extends that concept by including thenatural resource use that does not enter themonetary economy, but is nonetheless a directconsequence of economic activity, the hidden flows.Thus, this analysis makes it possible to moreaccurately characterize the overall material intensity
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
9
of an economy, as defined by the ratio of the TMR associated with domestic economic activities. Into the GDP. addition, the analysis yields other potentially useful
measures, such as the savings in natural resource useThis analysis also makes it possible to report the obtained by recycling iron or other materials. (Morepercentage of TMR associated with imports, which detailed discussion of the methods used to measureindicates the amount of potential burden to the ol- estimate material flows in each country are givenenvironment within other countries that is m m e Appendix.)
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
10
3RESULTS, IMPLICATIONS, AND
CONCLUSIONS
Trends in natural resource use for the fourcountries studied are presented in a seriesof graphs, beginning with trends in TMR.
Per capita figures are used to allow comparisonsamong countries. Subsequent graphs illustrate thecomposition of the T M R by six broad categories ofmaterials, decompose the T M R into direct inputsand associated hidden flows, and show theproportion of domestic and foreign components.Two views of the material intensity in these fourindustrial economies is presented, and the benefitsof recycling materials illustrated.
The four countries analyzed here vary considerably inthe size of their populations, economies, and land area;however, all are highly industrialized countries withhigh standards of living. Perhaps not surprisingly, theyshow very similar overall trends in natural resource use.
Figure 1 gives the TMR in per capita terms for eachof the four countries. In the early portion of theperiod studied, per capita TMR varied considerably,but over time the trends converge. For Germany, theNetherlands, and the United States, per capita naturalresource use as measured by the TMR appears to beleveling off at about 75 to 85 metric tons per year. Thedecline in U.S. TMR per capita in the early years ofthe period was due primarily to major reductions in
soil erosion after the enactment of the ConservationReserve Program—which paid farmers not to farmhighly erodible lands—and the completion of muchof the federal interstate highway system. Japan'sTMR per capita has followed a gradually risingpattern similar to that of Germany and theNetherlands, but at significantly lower levels, about45 metric tons per year. The sharp rise in GermanTMR in 1991 reflects the reunification with theformer East Germany, altering what wouldotherwise have been a relatively constant trend.
Despite the current overall similarity in TMR percapita for three of the four countries studied, thepattern of natural resource use varies significantly, asdoes the composition of the TMR by major categoriesof materials. There is one common factor: fossil fueluse is overwhelmingly the largest contributor to TMRin the United States and Germany and is the secondlargest contribution in Japan and the Netherlands. (SeeFigure 2.) In all of these countries except Japan, highlevels of energy consumption, primarily from fossil fuels,is a major reason for the high overall levels of TMR. Bythe same token, Japan's relatively small per capita use ofenergy is the primary reason that its TMR issignificantly lower than in the other countries. InGermany, heavy use of low-caloric content coal
* The German data in Figure 2 reflect the impact of the 1991 reunification, so that the figures reflect energy and other natural resourceconsumption for a number of facilities that have subsequently been closed.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
11
FIGURE 1
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
M
TOTALMATERIALREQUIREMENTANNUAL FLOWSPER CAPITA
1987 1990
GermanyNetherlands
Japan• United State:
FIGURE 2
40
PRIMARYCONTRIBUTIONSTO TMR, 1991
It i mam Japan Netherlands United State:
^B Metals and industrial minerals Fossil fuels
_=̂ Construction minerals ^^1 Renewables
H Infrastructure excavation Erosion
(lignite) and the accompanying hidden flowsstemming from the large overburden moved inmining coal dominates the fossil fuel contribution.Metals, reflecting strong automobile and steelsectors, and construction also contribute heavily tothe country's total material requirements. In Japanthe metals and industrial materials industry is thelargest contributor. The contribution from domesticerosion is relatively low, reflecting the dominance ofpaddy rice cultivation.
In the Netherlands, renewable materials are the largestcontributor to the country's TMR. Imports of feed forits large livestock operations, such as tapioca fromThailand and grain from Canada, account for most ofthe renewable flows. Fossil fuels, primarily natural gas,and metals are also major contributors. Domesticerosion is negligible, but some foreign erosion isincluded as a hidden flow with the imported livestockfeeds. In the United States, in addition to thecontribution of fossil fuels, continuing high levels of
road building and other infrastructure developmentare major contributors to TMR, as well as erosionfrom agricultural operations.
Hidden material flows dominate the TMR,accounting for between 55 and 75 percent of thetotal in 1991. (See Figure 3.) The Netherlands andJapan are at the low end of this range and theUnited States and Germany are at the high end. Theenormous size of the hidden flows underscore theimportance of taking their environmental impactsinto account.
An examination of trends over the past 20 years inthe United States shows that hidden flows havedecreased slightly and direct inputs have increasedslightly as a proportion of the TMR. Thus, in somesense, the overall efficiency of natural resource usehas improved. That improvement has come largelyfrom the Conservation Reserve Program, evidencethat appropriate policies can reduce hidden flowsand thus diminish their environmental impacts.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
12
FIGURE 3 DIRECT INPUTS
AND HIDDENFLOWS (AS APROPORTIONOF TMR), 1991
Germany Japan
^ | Direct Inputs
Netherlands United States
~ _ Hidden Flows
i
FIGURE 4
100
I 80
1 6()
| 40
5 20
0
DOMESTIC ANDFOREIGNCOMPONENTSOF TMR, 1991
Japan Netherlands United States
| Domestic I Imported
The TMR can also be split into domestic andforeign components. As Figure 4 illustrates, theproportion of natural resources from domesticsources varies considerably among the countries,despite the overall convergence of TMR per capita.Since the United States is largely self-sufficient innatural resources, except for oil, bauxite (the orefrom which aluminum is made), and a few otherindustrial minerals, its material flows are almostentirely internal. In smaller industrial countries, asignificant proportion of the total material flow thatsupports their economies takes place outside theirborders: about 35 percent for Germany, more than50 percent for Japan, and more than 70 percent forthe Netherlands. These large proportions signify thatthe environmental impacts of these country's naturalresource use are only partly borne by, and visible to,the residents of these countries. Indeed, Figure 4suggests a generalization: the smaller an industrialcountry, the larger in proportion its transboundarymaterials flows and the greater the separation of the
environmental effects of its natural resource usefrom their consumption benefits.
A critical question is whether modern industrialeconomies are becoming less material intensive asthey shift, for example, from producing goods toproducing services: Is economic activity becomingdecoupled from natural resource use? Figure 5summarizes trends in overall materials intensity, asmeasured by the TMR/GDP ratio. To preventdistortions caused by currency fluctuations, theintensity is based on a constant monetary unit ineach country and indexed to a 1975 referenceyear. The curves are presented as moving five-yearaverages to smooth fluctuations in the businesscycle. The analysis shows a declining pattern ofmaterials intensity in all countries, supporting theconclusion that a modest decoupling is takingplace. The decoupling trend would be even strongerif the effects of Germany's reunification wereremoved.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
13
FIGURE 5
120
110
[2 90
80
70
6 0 1975 1978
OVERALLMATERIALINTENSITY(TMR/GDP)INDEX
1981 1984 1987 1990 1993
(5 yr. average)• Germany Japan
Netherlands United States
Figure 6, a comparable analysis, includes only thedirect material inputs (natural resourcecommodities). It gives the DMI to GDP ratio, ameasure of the direct input intensity. As above, thisintensity is indexed to a reference year andfluctuations have been smoothed. The resultingpattern shows a modest decline in intensity, followedby a leveling off over the past decade, which impliesthat direct inputs of natural resources are nowgrowing in parallel with economic growth.Improvements in technology and industrial practiceor structural shifts to a more service-intensiveeconomy, which might be expected to reduce thismeasure of material intensity, do not seem to becontinuous.
This analysis makes it possible to characterize therelationship between natural resource use andeconomic activity more comprehensively, usingboth an overall materials intensity and a direct inputintensity. However, the TMR/GDP ratio providesthe best measure of a country's materials intensity oroverall eco-efficiencv, because it includes extractive
FIGURE 6 DIRECT INPUT
MATERIALSINTENSITY(DMI/GDP)INDEX
1978 1981 1984 1987 1990(5 yr. average)
German JapanNetherlands • United States
activities and other hidden flows. This indicator is auseful tool to track progress toward decouplingnatural resource use from economic activity. At thesame time, the DMI/GDP ratio can signal thepresence or absence of technology-related changesor industrial practices that increase the efficiency ofmaterials use.
As an example of how such a tool might be used,the research team calculated the dollar value of the1993 TMR/GDP ratio, using 1993 currencyexchange rates. The results show that the U.S.,German, and Dutch economies require, respectively,3.4, 3.3, and 3.2 kilograms of physical inputs perdollar of GDP. Japan has a distinctly lower intensityof 1.4 kilograms per dollar. Because currenciesfluctuate far more rapidly than do material flows,such figures should be used with caution; in 1985,for example,Japan's TMR/GDP ratio was 3.0kilograms per dollar, with the difference almostentirely due to currency fluctuations. It is the overalltrend, measured in a constant currency unit, that issignificant. Nonetheless, such figures provide a
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
14
bOX .1 SAVINGS FROM RECYCLING
Noi all materials ihiir filter industrial economies are
immediately returned u> ibo emirontnent as wastes or
pollut;nits. Some have semi-permanent economic uses,
such .is buildings or highways. Others, such as iron and
.ilumiiumi, ,ire increasingly recycled and reused. Such
reuse has significant economic: and environnu'iital effects.
To illustrate tliese effect, consider die recycling of iron, (he
hidden portion ol die material flow associated with mining
and processing of primary metals is particularly large. livery
ton of iron recycled not only replaces a ton that would have
been mined, but also avoids several tons of hidden material
flows associated with iron mining and processing. ('I lie
amount diftei's in each country.) The figure below shows
current material flows associated with iron mining in four
countries anil the material flow avoided by current recycling,
efforts. .'.Sir l-'iyitv.i lor example, without recycling, the
iron-related material flow and the associated environmental
Savings from Recycling Materials(Iron)
I.filpilM
I Irnn Mining
I I\L-rhcrl;iiuls Lniu:il Srnri.->M!nmg:iv. mitt!
costs in both the United Slates and the Netherlands would
be more than twice as large.
convenient rule-of-thumb for the material-intensivenature of modern industrial economies: To generate$100 of income at present in Germany, theNetherlands, or the United States, requires about300 kilograms of natural resources, including hiddenflows.
Implications
The results from this study have far-reachingimplications. Consider the sheer size of the naturalresource requirements in the four countries studied.The 45 to 85 metric tons of natural resources perperson per year required in these modern andadvanced industrial economies translates into anenormous amount of extractive activity, landscaperearrangement, soil erosion, and direct consumptionof natural resources to maintain current levels ofindustrial activity and lifestyles. For example, thefood and fiber produced by the U.S. agriculturalsystem causes about 15 metric tons of soil erosion
annually for each U.S. resident; to build highwaysand other infrastructure requires excavating andmoving about 14 metric tons of material per personevery year. To support the Dutch livestock industryrequires imported feeds and associated soil erosioncorresponding to more than 29 metric tons for eachresident, with most of the environmental impactfalling on other countries. To produce theautomobiles and other metal-intensive products forwhich Japan is well known demands the annualremoval or processing of about 14 metric tons ofmetal ores and industrial minerals for each resident,again with much of the environmental impactoccurring outside Japan. And to produce the energyused in a year in Germany requires, quite apart fromthe fuel itself or the pollution caused by itscombustion, removing and replacing more than 29metric tons of coal overburden for each German.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
15
These are staggering volumes of material that createsignificant environmental impacts. Moreover, as theexamples above suggest, the environmental costs arenot borne entirely, in some cases even primarily, bythese industrial countries. Is such amaterials-intensive industrial model sustainable?Can it be replicated by many other countrieswithout serious environmental harm? If much ofthe world were to extract and use natural resourcesat volumes and in patterns comparable to those inthe countries studied in this report, where wouldresource withdrawals take place? And who wouldbear the environmental costs?
Even in the four countries studied here, aside fromthe erosion reductions in the United States, percapita natural resource requirements rose over theperiod analyzed, albeit slowly. The extractivepressures on domestic and foreign environmentsresulting from these industrial economies also rose.The most hopeful finding reported here is thatnatural resource requirements did not rise as rapidlyas economic activity as measured by the GDP, butthis analysis does not support the conclusion thatdirect input materials intensity, which most closelytracks industrial practices, is continuing to decline.For the past decade, at least, direct input materialsintensity has been roughly constant.
Conclusions
These considerations highlight the need for morecomprehensive materials accounts and for indicators,such as those proposed here, that can draw attentionto overall use of natural resources. Indeed, tounderstand the links between economic activity andenvironmental degradation—and to integrateeconomic and environmental planning andpolicy-making—requires a more detailedunderstanding of the material basis of industrialeconomies. Such information is also necessary toformulate policies for improving the efficiency of
natural resource use. What is needed are physicalaccounts, analogous to national economic accounts,that show the origin, use, and deposition of allmaterials associated with industrial economies. Asestablished industrial economies continue to expandand as developing economies move rapidly towardindustrialization, such information becomes evermore critical.
One example of how indicators based on physicalaccounts will be essential in decision-making comesfrom recent efforts to set social goals for decouplingnatural resource use and economic growth, i.e., fordematerializing industrial economies. TheCarnoule Declaration proposes a 30- to 50-yeargoal of "cutting in half of present globalnon-renewable material flows" and argues that toaccomplish this, given the needs of developingcountries, requires industrial countries to decreasetheir material intensity by at least a factor of ten; theOECD Environmental Policy Committee alsorecently adopted this target as a long term goal. Interms of the indicators proposed here, the Carnoulegoal is equivalent to a tenfold reduction of the ratioTMR/GDP, through both decreases in absolutelevels of material requirements and increases ineconomic activity. This translates to materialintensities (as calculated in this report) ofapproximately 30 kilograms per $100 of GDP ratherthan the present 300 kilograms. Such profoundchanges are not likely to occur without an explicitway to formulate the goals and to measure progresstoward such a goal, and without the detailedphysical and economic accounts needed tounderstand how the industrial system must betransformed accordingly. The concept of TMRprovides an important indicator for such purposes.
One more reason why both physical and economicaccounts are needed is to improve economicdecision-making. Because most material flows
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
16
I5OX4 IRREVERSIBLE NATURAL RESOURCE USE
Majiy current uses of nalur.iJ resources an.- wastefulbecause the resources Jiv used in a once through fashion.An iniiustri.il system may ignore potential efficiencies; forexample, when .1 metal is mined, processed into ,1 produce,used, and discarded as waste, instead of being recycled andreused. Mori: c.liicieut industrul professes that reuse andrecycle materials—metals, paper, plastics, evenconstruction materials llius point the way towardreducing the environmental eilects ol natural resource use.mil preserving them for future generations.
Not everything can be recycled, however. Some currentuses of natural resources are inherently dissipative orirreversible, lor example, when coal, petroleum, andnatural ga1- are used as fiiels. they can only he burnt once,
,i;id the resulting carbon dioxide is dispersed ro theatmosphere. Similarly, soil eroded from fields andtransported elsewhere by wind or water. Some CONK:materials, such as those contained in pesticides, aredeliberately dispersed in the course of use.
These examples are not trivial exceptions. Fossil fuels,including their hidden flows, represent between 2(> and 46percent of the I'VIK lor the countries surveyed in thisstudy, r.rusiou contributes 17 percent of the U.S. TMR.To reduce such irre\crsible uses will require policies thatgo beyond recycling to provide incentives to reduce thedemand for fuels or encourage more sustainable methodsof cultivation—policies that influence the front ciu\ of thematerials cvcle.
associated with industrial economies are notcommodities and hence unaccounted for ineconomic terms, many strictly economic indicatorsgive misleading signals. One widely-acknowledgedexample is the tendency to associate GDP growthunambiguously with economic progress, even whenit reflects such activities as cutting forests, erodingsoils, or other forms of natural resource degradationthat may undercut future economic progress.Recent studies also show that productivity measuresare similarly skewed because they fail to take intoaccount the use of materials that are not sold but aredisposed of in the environment. The growinginterest in alternative accounting practices at boththe national level and at the level of the firm, theinterest in industrial metabolism, product life-cycleanalysis, and the development of measures ofeco-efficiency all underscore the need for bothphysical and economic accounts.
A more fundamental rationale for physical accountsis a concern with the sustainability of industrialeconomies. Much of the policy attention to this
issue has focused on wastes and pollution, on theback end of the materials cycle. Yet, if more than half(and as much as three-fourths) of the naturalresources used occur at the front end of the cycle, asthis report documents, then efforts to reduceenvironmental impacts must also focus there. Sincewhat leaves the industrial system as wastes andpollution is closely linked to the volume of materialinputs, policy incentives to reduce use of primarynatural resources not only diminish extractionpressures but also waste and pollution. Similarly,policies that make natural resource use moreefficient or increase recycling lower materialrequirements and environmental impactsthroughout the materials cycle. Comprehensivephysical accounts are needed to support suchpolicies.
In an increasingly global economy that supportsgrowing international trade, the pattern ofeconomic activity is complex and involvesnumerous transborder flows of both money andmaterials. To the extent that the environmental costs
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
17
of each stage in this process are not adequatelycaptured in commodity prices, then an inherentinequity exists between who pays theseenvironmental costs and who gains the benefitsfrom using natural resources. As this studydocuments, large hidden portions of the materialsflows associated with economic activity are notcaptured by economic accounts, making it probablethat commodity prices do not adequately reflectenvironmental costs. Moreover, in all countriesstudied except the United States, very substantialportions of the materials flows, and hence the
environmental costs, associated with nationaleconomic activity take place outside nationalborders. To understand this complex pattern ofinterlinkages, and perhaps eventually to equitablyapportion costs and benefits, will requiredocumenting materials flows, establishing nationalaccounts of materials flows, and working out agreedinternational conventions on how to account fortransboundary flows of materials. This report offerssome preliminary attempts at such an accounting,but additional work is needed.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
18
4NEXT STEPS
The outcomes of this study suggest that amore detailed understanding of thematerial basis of industrial economies is
needed to better understand the links betweeneconomic activity and environmental degradation.We suggest five next steps that would contribute:
1. The Development of AccountsThe present study introduced the concept of TMRas a means of summarizing the physical aspects ofeconomic activity at the input or front end of thematerials cycle. An obvious next step would be todevelop a more complete accounting and someaggregated indicators to summarize the physicalflows at the back end of the material cycle. Such anaccounting would comprehensively measure allhuman-induced materials flows entering theenvironment and would supplement morespecialized indicators of specific pollutants.
Systematic assessments at the front and the back endof the materials cycle would also make possiblecomprehensive national accounts that balancematerials flows by comparing domestic inputs andimports with exports and outflows to theenvironment and additions to infrastructure andother stocks. Such accounts have already beenestablished by the German Federal Statistical Officeas part of its integrated environmental andeconomic accounting procedures. Along withconventional economic accounts, they provide amore complete picture of economic activity and its
environmental consequences and allow scrutiny ofhow outputs are related to inputs, showing wheremore efficient use of primary materials can reducepollution.
2. Focusing on Economic Sectors
This study is materials oriented. It groups physicalflows into six broad categories of materials. Butdecision-making processes at the sectoral levelgenerally can not be based on national aggregatemeasures, such as the TMR, or on broad materialscategories, because they are not specific enough forany sector considered. An obvious next step wouldbe to further disaggregate and regroup the materialflows by economic sectors, for at least the mostimportant sectors. For example, it would be usefulto generate separate numbers for the materials flowsassociated with the production and consumptionsectors. This approach lends itself to developingsector-specific policies.
3. Taking Account of National DifferencesThe globalization of economic activity results in amore intense exchange of economic goods andservices. Since the products generated, the industrialtechnologies applied, and operational practices differfrom one nation to another, as do environmentalconditions, accurate calculations of the hidden flowsassociated with economic activity must also takeaccount of such differences. This will require furtherinternational collaboration. A related question is
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
19
whether and how hidden flows should be attachedto imports of manufactured products and other finalgoods.
4. Qualitative Aspects of Materials FlowsThe present study gives some examples ofcategorizing materials flows by their potential toharm the environment. Further work in thisdirection would seem warranted, including aninvestigation of weighting schemes that allow amore quantitative assessment of environmentalimpacts arising from different materials flows.
5, International CoordinationThis study is limited to the materials flows of fourindustrialized countries. Applying the methodology
to a larger number of countries would expand thephysical database, improve the methodology, and laythe basis for progress toward more sustainableeconomies. Adoption and application by such bodiesas the OECD and by additional nationalgovernments would further this process. The WorldTrade Organization and U.N. agencies such as theU.N. Commission on Trade and Development couldhelp coordinate and harmonize the methodology.Development banks could apply this methodologyon behalf of their client countries, either directly or,where data are lacking, by deriving coefficients fromcomparison of physical and economic flows in thisstudy to estimate the physical flows and potentialenvironmental consequences of development plans.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
20
NOTES
1. K.E.Boulding, "The Economics of the Coming SpaceshipEarth," in H.Jarret, ed., Environmental Quality in a GrowingEconomy (Johns Hopkins University Press,Baltimore, 1966);H.E. Daly, "The Steady-state Economy: Toward a PoliticalEconomy of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth,"in H.E. Daly and K.N. Townsend, eds., Valuing the Earth(MIT Press, Cambridge, U.S., 1992).
2. D.G. Rogich et al., "Materials Use, Economic Growth, andthe Environment,"paper presented at the InternationalRecycling Congress and REC '93 Trade Fair (U.S. Bureauof Mines, Washington, D C , 1993); U.S. Bureau of Mines,Mineral Facts and Problems (U.S. Government PrintingOffice, Washington,D.C., various years).
3. A.V Kneese et al, Economics and the Environment: A MaterialsBalance Approach (Resources for the Future, Washington,D C , 1975).
4. H.E. Goeller and A.M. Wemberg, "The Age ofSubstitutability: What Do We Do When the Mercury RunsOut?", Science, Vol. 191 (1976), pp. 683-389.
5. R. Herman, S. Ardekani, and J. Ausubel,"Dematerialization," in J. Ausubel and H. Sladovich, eds.,Technology and Environment (National Academy Press,Washington D C , 1989), pp. 50-69.
6. I. Wernick and J. Ausubel, "National Materials Flows andthe Environment," Annual Reviews oj'Energy andEnvironmental. 20 (1995),pp. 463-492;I. Wernick el.al.,"Materialization and Dematerialization: Measures andTrends," Daedalus (Vol. 125, No. 3),pp. 171-198; I. Wernick,"Consuming Materials: The American Way," TechnologicalForecasting and Social Change, vol. 53(1996), pp. 111-122.
7. M.Janicke et al., "Green Industrial Policy and the Futureof'Dirty Industries'," paper presented at the conferenceFrom Greening to Sustaining: Transformational Challengesfor the Firm, Copenhagen, 13-15 November, 1994.
8. E Schmidt-Bleek, Wieveil Umwelt Braucht der Mensch?(Brikhauser verlag, Basel, 1994); S. Bringezu, "How tomeasure the total material consumption of regional ornational economies?" Fres. Environmental Bulletin,.Vol.2(1993), pp. 437-442; H. Schiitz, S. Brmgezu, "Major
material flows of Germany," Fres. Environmental Bulletinyol.2 (1993), pp. 443-448; S. Brmgezu et al., "IntegratingSustainability into the System of National Accounts: TheCase of Interregional Materials Flows," in Proceedings ofthe International afcet Symposium: Models of SustainableDevelopment (Paris, March, 1994),pp. 669-680; S.Bringezu, Ed., New Approaches to Environmental Statistics(Birkhauser Verlag,Basel, 1995),in German..
9. M. Fischer-Kowalski et al., Economic-ecological InformationSystem: A Proposal (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin furSozialforschung, Berlin, 1993).
10. See for example R. Frosch and N.E. Gallopoulos,"Strategies for Manufacturing," ScientificAmerican,Vol.260(1989), pp. 144-152; G. Huppes, "Policy Instruments forChain Management: LCA-based Management Informationor SFA-based Taxes?", in Integral Chain Management ofEnergy and Materials: ECN Workshop papers(Energieonderzoek Centrum Nederland, Petten,Netherlands, 1994); R. Frosch, "Towards the End of Waste:Reflections on a New Ecology of Industry," Daedalusyol.125,No. 3 (Summer, 1996);R.U. Ayres and L.W. Ayres,Industrial Ecology: Toward Closing the Materials Cycle (EdwardElgar, Cheltenham, U.K., 1996).
11. A. Adriaanse, Policy Performance Indicators (SDU Publishers,The Hague, 1993); A. Hammond et al., EnvironmentalIndicators (World Resources Institute, Washington,DC,1995).
12. Because practices differ among different countries,especially in metals refining, so does the dividing linebetween what is a commodity and what is not. In Europe,for example, many ore concentrates enter commerce; in theUnited States, many unified refining operations processores completely, shipping pure metal as the commodity. .
13. In some of the literature, the term "ecological rucksacks,"after the German word for backpacks, is used to describehidden flows.
14. Just such weighting procedures are often used in applyingthe technique of Life Cycle Analysis to particular materialsor industrial processes.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
21
15. Organization for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD) "Meeting of OECD EnvironmentPolicy Committee at Ministerial Level" (OECD, Paris,1996).
16. Factor 10 Club, Camoules Declaration (Wuppertal Institute,Wuppertal Germany, 1995) p.ll ; Organization forEconomic Co-operation and Development (OECD),Meeting of the OECD Environmental Policy Committeeat Ministerial Level, February, 1996.
17. Robert Repetto et al., Has Environmental Protection Really
Reduced Productivity Growth? We Need Unbiased Measures.
(World Resources Institute, Washington, D C , 1996).
18. Federal Statistical Oflice of Germany, Integrated
Environmental and Economic Accounting: Material and Energy
Flow Accounts, Series 19, Row 5 (Wiesbaden, Germany,1995), in German; see also, W Radermacher, C. Stahmer,"German Material and Energy Flow Information System,"in P. Bartelmus and K. Uno, Eds., Environmental Accounting in
Theory and Practice (Kluwer Academic Publishers,Dordrecht, Germany, 1997).
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
22
DATA SUMMARY
Based on this study, the material requirementsof industrialized economies were seen tovary significantly in their six main
underlying categories, although very similar in theaggregate. The data presented in this section,particularly in the Summary Table, provide aharmonized view of material requirements for thefour countries in this study. This table was developedas an overview of the detailed time-series data inthe attached Appendix. Data are presented on the
relative importance and nature of exports from eachof the four countries and illustrate the hidden flowsattached to exports in one country, the UnitedStates. Additional data are provided in this sectionfor Germany and the Netherlands to show howcomprehensive physical accounts of an economy(combining material requirements and outputs,including exports and flows into the environment)can be constructed to more completely map thematerial flows through an economy.
TABLE 1 SUMMARY TABLE OVERVIEW
Total domestic commodities
Total foreign commodities
Grand totai commodities
Grand total commodity per capita
Domestic hidden flows
Foreign hidden flows
Total hidden flows
Tot. hidden flows./tot. comm
TMR (commodities + hidden flows)
TMR/capita
U.S.A.
4 ,581
5 6 8
5,149
2 0
1 5 , 4 9 4
5 94
16,088
3
21,237
84
Japan
1,424
7 1 0
2 , 1 3 3
17
1,143
2 ,439
3 ,583
2
5,716
4 6
Germany
1,367
4 0 6
1,773
22
2 ,961
2 ,030
4,991
3
6 ,764
8 6
Netherlands
2 7 1
3 03
5 7 4
3 8
69
6 3 2
7 0 1
1
1,275
84
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
23
TABLE 2 SUMMARY TABLE
DOMESTIC
Material CategoryFossil fuels totalCommodity/capita (domestic and foreign)Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)Metals totalCommodity/capita (domestic and foreign)Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)Industrial minerals totalCommodity/capita (domestic and foreign)Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)Construction material totalCommodity/capita (domestic and foreign)Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)Infrastructure totalTotal/capitaSoil erosion totalRenewable totalCommodity/capita (domestic and foreign)Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)Semi-manufacturesTotal hidden flows/commodity (domestic)Finished goodsSemi-manufactures + finished goods/capitaTotal commodities (domestic)Commodity per capitaTotal hidden flows (domestic)Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)
Commodity Domestic Hidden FlowsNether- Nether-
U.S.A. Japan Germany lands U.S.A. Japan Germany lands
4,581
18
1,684
8
3
185
1
9
105
0
3
1 ,730
7
0
878
4
0
13
3
0
1
1
12
194
2
0
1,10 3
9
0
113
2
0
365
6
6
0
1
1
53
1
1
749
10
0
199
3
0
68
15
0
0
1
N A
7
0
0
5 9
7
(I
I 37
12
0
5,846
1,75(1
312
159
3,473
14
3.7 1(1
244
3
6
21
0
.10 5
9
8
NA
2.33 3
(1
35
1 64
3 0(1
4
129
NA
1
0
1
1 5
5 1
3
i
NA
1,424
11
1 ,367
1 7
2 7 1
18
1 5 , 4 9 4 1 , 1 4 3 2 . *J 6 1 6 9
Total Material RequirementsThe Summary Table, which combines data fromdetailed country specific data sets into a commonformat and for a single year, 1991, illustrates thesimilarities and differences found in the fourindustrialized countries. Data are presented by flowtype (direct or hidden flows), source (domestic orforeign), and material category (fossil fuels, metals,
industrial minerals, construction material,infrastructure, erosion, renewables, and the importsof semi-manufactures and finished goods) for eachof the four countries. The Summary Table Overviewalso contains the summary statistics for each country.
Soine conclusions are straightforward. In all fourcountries, construction materials constitute a major
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
24
TABLE 2 SUMMARY TABLE (continued)
FOREIGN
Material CategoryFossil fuels total
Commodity/capita (domestic and foreign)
Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)
Metals total
Commodity/capita (domestic and foreign)
Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)
Industrial minerals total
Commodity/capita (domestic and foreign)
Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)
Construction material total
Commodity/capita (domestic and foreign)
Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)
Infrastructure total
Total/capita
Soil erosion total
Renewable total
Commodity/capita (domes-tic and foreign)
Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)
Semi-manufactures
Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)
Finished goods
Semi-manufactures + finished goods capita
Total commodities (domestic)
Commodity per capita
Total hidden flows (domestic)
Total hidden flows/commodity (domestic)
CommodityNether-
U.S.A. Japan Germany lands
Foreign Hidden FlowsNether-
U.S.A. Japan Germany lands
412 408 139 157 j 73 1,049 181 155
30 142 4")
17 12
9 26 4;
9 76 23 46
48
7
52
0 .
568
5410
10
1
710
6
124
7
45~>
406
5
1 1
13
34
3
3 03
20
42 662 228 6 1
13
347
594
7 619 (I
(I 10 I (
120 190 179 263
531 814
2.439 2,030
149
632
portion of direct domestic flows of materials into theeconomy. But sand, gravel, and stone also haverelatively small attached hidden flows and are usuallyproduced locally with relatively small foreign sources.
The data for fossil fuels are slightly more complex.Fossil fuels make up a large component of totalrequirements in all four countries, but each country
has a different mix of the relative importance ofdomestic and foreign sources and there is greatvariability in the relative size of hidden flows,depending largely on the amount of coal mined orimported and the mining method used to extractthat coal. For example, the hidden flow (primarilycoal overburden) from fossil fuel production in theUnited States is the single largest category of flow
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
25
TABLE 3 EXPORTS FROM FOUR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES
Commodity Exports
Material Flow CategoryFossil fuels totalCommodity /capita
Metals totalCommodity /capita
Industrial minerals totalCommodity/capita
Construction material totalCommodity/capita
Renewable totalCommodity/capita
Semi-manufacturesFinished goodsSemi-manufactures + finished goodsSemi-manufactures + finished goods/capita
Total commoditiesCommodity per capita
U.S.A.
15 1.960.6 0
10 .870.04
6.9 30 .03
5 .4 00 . 0 2
13 0.440 . 5 2
9 4 .953 0.9 6
12 5.900.5 0
43 1 .501 .71
Japan
7 . 1 5
0 . 0 6
0 . 0 0
0 . 0 0
0 .0 0
0. 0 0
0 .0 0
0 . 0 0
1 . 4 0
0 . 0 1
3 5 . 9 8
3 1 . 2 7
6 7 . 2 5
0 . 5 4
7 5 . 7 9
0 . 6 1
Germany
5 .5 7
0 . 0 7
0 . 3 5
0 . 0 0
5 . 3 6
0 . 0 7
2 5 . 5 0
0 . 3 2
1 4 . 4 5
0 . 1 8
4 7 . 6 4
1 1 2 . 3 9
16 0 . 0 3
2 . 0 0
2 1 1 . 2 5
2 . 6 4
Netherlands
1 2 9 . 7 48.65
3.270.22
•
0. 0 0
2 1 . 5 61 .44
3 0 .052 .00
4 1 . 2 011 .1452 .34
3.49
2 3 6 . 9 515 .80
Notes: Totals are in millions of metric tonnes. Per capita estimates are in metric tonnes.* Industrial minerals exported by the Netherlands are included in construction materials.
for the four countries. The same flow for Germanydominates its accounts.
Every country is different.The United Statesproduces most of its metals while Japan, Germany,and the Netherlands import theirs. Excavation forinfrastructure is very small in Germany and theNetherlands, and is large in Japan and the UnitedStates, which is partly due to the relative maturity ofinfrastructure in the two European countries. But itmight also be because of differences in building
methods and in the lifetimes of features of the builtenvironment. Erosion varies widely among thecountries, reflecting differences in soils, topography,and agricultural systems, but only the United Statesactually surveys erosion on a regular basis. Otherthan for erosion, there are no estimates of hiddenflows for renewable resources.
The summary statistics are surprisingly similar. TheUnited States, Japan, and Germany had almostidentical direct input flows, DMI, per capita. Those
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
26
TABLE 4 EXPORTS AND HIDDEN FLOWS:A UNITED STATES EXAMPLE
Material Flow Category
Fossil fuels totalCommodity /capita
Metals total
Commodity/capita
Industrial minerals totalCommodity/capita
Construction material totalCommodity /capita
Renewable totalCommodity /capita
Semi-manufacturesFinished goodsSemi-manufactures + finished goodsSemi-manufactures + finished goods/capita
Total commoditiesCommodity per capita
DirectCommodi ty
Exports
15 1 .96
0 . 6 0
1 0 . 8 7
0 . 0 4
6 . 9 3
0 . 0 3
5 . 4 0
0 . 0 2
13 0 . 4 4
0 . 5 2
9 4 . 9 5
3 0 . 9 6
1 2 5 . 9 0
0 . 5 0
4 3 1 . 5 0
1 . 71
AssociatedHidden Flows
6 2 4 . 8 1
2 . 4 7
3 5 . 0 5
0 . 1 4
2 7 . 7 2
(t.11
0 . 1 1
0 . 0 0
8 6 8 . 4 8
3 . 4 4
6 9 2 . 8 5
6 9 2 . 8 5
2 . 7 4
2 , 2 4 9 . 0 2
8 . 9 0
Total EffectiveExports
7 7 6 . 7 6
3 . 0 7
4 5 . 9 2
0 . 1 8
3 4 . 6 6
0 . 1 4
5 . 5 1
0 . 0 2
9 9 8 . 9 2
3 . 9 5
7 8 7 . 8 0
3 0 . 9 6
8 1 8 . 7 6
3 . 2 4
2 , 6 8 0 . 5 2
1 0 . 6 1
N o t e : Hidden flows for semi-manufactures are estimated from the aggregate hidden flows of imports.
same flows in the Netherlands were surprisinglyhigh, due to the relatively large flows from foreignsources of materials in all categories. Except forJapan, TMR per capita was also similar. Despite thedifferences in detail, the United States, Germany,and the Netherlands had almost identical figures, allof them much larger than the levels of naturalresource use in Japan. Japan's relatively low figure isdue to much lower levels of energy consumption, aswell as generally smaller rates of resource use andlow rates of soil erosion.
Exports and Hidden Flows
Among the physical outputs of an economy are rawmaterials, semi-manufactures, and finished goodsexported to other countries. Data on the quantityand nature of these exports help explain thestructure of a country's material requirements andthe ultimate disposition of some outputs. The ExportTable does not just detail exports, it also showsdifferences between the four countries' economies,and the ultimate fate of the material they mobilizefor that economy.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
27
FIGURE 8 MATERIAL FLOW ACCOUNT OF GERMANY
FRG 1991 - Million tons in Germany
I MaterialAbroad Input Economy
MaterialOutput
Imports
AbioticMaterials
Erosion
433
2183
304
1 billion tons
Abioticraw materials
Erosion
Air (O2,N2)
4027
used:- minerals 8
- ores 0,4- energy carriers 366
unused:- non saleable
extraction 2532- excavation 300
1095
bioticraw materials(fresh weight) 199
Source: S. Bringczu and H. Schiitz, Wuppcrtal Institute,January 1997.
Additional stock
818
Kecycling
Exports 211
Waste disposal(excl. incineration) 2891
- controlled wastedisposal 222
- landfill and minedumping 2669
Erosion 129
Emissionsinto air 11
-CO, 1063- NOx,SO2,CO 20- Andere 33
Emissionsof waterfrom materials 647
dissipative useof products
*** emissionsinto water
37
34
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
28
FIGURE 9 TOTALMATERIALACCOUNT OFGERMANY
6000
Domestic
The Netherlands, for example, is a relatively largeexporter of fossil fuels, natural gas and refinedpetroleum products. Those exports are about 10percent of its TMR. Japan and Germany export trivialamounts of such fuels. The export of renewableresources is also large for the Netherlands, and is largein absolute terms for the United States, which reflectsthese countries' large agricultural sectors.
Germany, on the other hand, exports large amountsof semi-manufactures and finished goods, showingthe importance of its manufacturing sector intransforming material and the importance ofexports to that sector. The Netherlands, however,stands out on a per capita basis as the largestexporter of semi-manufactures and finished goodsamong the four countries. The total material exportsof the Netherlands make up almost 19 percent of itstotal material requirements and dwarfs those of theother countries on a per capita basis, fully six timeslarger than Germany, for example.
Understanding the magnitude and importance ofexports requires comprehending the hidden flows
that support them. In the table Exports and HiddenFlows, hidden flows associated with each category ofexport have been calculated for the United States.These flows can be large (especially in the case offossil fuels and renewables) and are 5.2 times themass of the actual exports of the United States.Exports and their associated flows account for 12.6percent of the TMR of the United States.
Comprehensive Material Accounts
In a complete accounting system, measurements ofTMR would be complemented by measures of totalmaterial outputs, and one of those componentswould be exports. This study did not attempt toprovide this complete accounting, but work on thistopic has begun. Figures 8 and 9 show highlyaggregate data for Germany and the Netherlandsthat provide a preliminary form of such anaccounting. These figures illustrate that requirementsare balanced by outputs, including additions to stock.Tracing flows associated with imports andindigenous resource extraction through theeconomy to outputs as exports and wastes expandsthe understanding of a country's economy beyondwhat is obtainable from economic accounts.
The Wuppertal Institute prepared Figure 8, theMaterial Flow Account of Germany. The Figureprovides information on the location of the flow,flows that cross international boundaries, and flowsinto the environment. Not all the material used bythe German economy ends up as output. Much ofthis material, 818 million tons, is added to the stockof materials use by people (such as buildings,infrastructure, and durable goods). The economycreates many products that are exported for useelsewhere. The hidden flows associated with exportsare shown in Figure 9. The economy also generateslarge amounts of waste in the form of landfills andmining wastes. Emissions into air and water make upa large proportion of all output.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
29
FIGURE 10 MATERIAL FLOW ACCOUNT OF THE NETHERLANDS
Within The Netherlands
Abroad ! Material Input EconomyMaterialOutput
Imports 20.2
Hidden flows 42.1- energy carriers 24.5%- metals ores 9.6%- ind. min/mat's 2.5%- renewables 39.8%- manf. prod 23.8%
Abiotic rawmaterials 12.3
Biotic raw mat'ls 1.1
Air9.S
additional stock/stat diff. 5.7
erosion 0.1
Recycling 2.3
dden flows avoidedby recycling 2.7
* erosion 0.1* * dissipative use 0.7
Exports 15.8
waste disposal 1.7
Emissions Into Air 19.4 '
Hidden flows Export 29.1- energy carriers 15.8%- metals ores 4.5%- ind. min/mat's 1.7%- renewables 49.5%- semi-manf. prod 29.5%/
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
30
Figure 10, the Material Flow Account of the output the hidden flows associated with exports.Netherlands, parallels that of Germany but is Recycling is included (and is relatively largepresented on a per capita basis. Unlike the German compared to that of Germany) and the hidden flowsexample, the Netherlands example includes as avoided by recycling material are accounted for.
RESOURCE PLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
31
APPENDIX
*o international institution or standardmethodology exists for tracking materialflows that support an economy. There is
also no international consensus on what dataconstitutes the minimum to describe those flows.While researchers have developed methods to lookat these flows in a specific country (e.g., Germanyin the case of the Wuppertal Institute), the challengefor this report has been to develop, apply, and testsuch a method in a cooperative internationalcontext. In this study, the authors created a set ofguidelines, based on the initial work of theWuppertal Institute, for use in each of the studycountries. These guidelines were then used todevelop each national data set based on national andinternational sources, academic studies, interpolationand extrapolation from known data, and estimationtechniques. The authors harmonized their efforts byagreeing to common definitions, boundaries, andconventions.
The participants agreed to be as comprehensive aspossible in their accounting of flows that supportnational economies, excluding only air, water, andagricultural tillage. Since the intent of the study inthe first place was to obtain an approximation of theoverall magnitude of the material flows in eachcountry, it was agreed that minor flows could be
excluded even if they might have significantenvironmental implications (e.g. flows of certainheavy metals). The accounting ranges from 1975 to1994. The year 1975 was chosen as the earliest datefrom which a reliable time-series could beconstructed for all four countries. As part ofindicator construction, 1991 was chosen as a basecomparable year, the first year for which reliable dataafter the reunification of Germany were available.
In principle, annual flows are only counted whenthey cross an imaginary boundary between theecosphere and the anthroposphere, essentially whenthey are mobilized to support the industrialeconomy, or to create the infrastructure thatsupports it. Since this study focused only on therequirements of industrial economies, once materialsenter the economy they are no longer counted, evenif they are shifted about several times. Whencalculating the flows, a distinction is maintainedbetween the direct input (e.g., the commodity whenit first enters commerce), and the total material flow,which includes hidden flows (material that does notenter commerce) that had to be mobilized to obtainthe direct input. Whether the flows occur in orexternal to a country is also differentiated. Importsof metals and minerals are problematical since theymay be imported as ore, several different grades ofconcentrated ores, or in a relatively pure form (inthis situation it would be counted as a
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
33
Isemi-manufacture). In all cases the total hiddenflows are harmonized among the four countries.
In each of the four countries, material flowsassociated with infrastructure were estimated by avariety of means. In some cases, annual time seriesdata were available (e.g., dredging in the UnitedStates). In others, such as roadway and generalconstruction, countries calculated material flowsbased on economic data and cost-estimationmethodologies, while others made direct estimatesof the material excavated. Where deemedappropriate, adjustments were made to thecalculated values for consistency.
Flows from renewable resources were estimatedsimilarly to those from non-renewable sources. Soilerosion, the primary hidden flow from agriculturaland forestry activities, is categorized separately.Agricultural and forestry production is counted asthe net weight of all major crops and the associatednon-saleable above ground biomass. A tree, forexample, is counted as the mass of roundwood, andthe hidden flows are the associated limbs, leaves,stumpage, and erosion (if not counted separately).Livestock, fish, and other animal biomass arecounted only when fed from non-agricultural feeds(since in theory human supplied food is counted asan agricultural flow). Fish harvested from wild stockare counted—fish raised in aquaculture are not.
Livestock produced primarily from grazing arecounted, those raised on grain are not.
Domestic semi-manufactures and final productswere not included in this accounting since the flowsof raw materials to produce them are alreadycounted. Imported semi-manufactures, such asPortland cement, are counted along with the hiddenflows of foreign origin associated with them.Participating institutions agreed to a harmonized setof factors for estimating hidden flows associatedwith the importation of semi-manufactured goods.Imported finished goods are counted only as thedirect tonnage involved, primarily due to lack ofdata on actual materials embodied in each product.
Recycled materials (e.g. scrap inetal and paper) arenot counted in these estimates except whenimported. Exports of any kind were not deducted incalculating the material requirements presented inthis report, although export data are presentedseparately.
To permit comparisons of material flows in relationto economic activity, each country's economic dataare harmonized to constant 1985 denominatedmonetary units for each country.
To show what data and methodologies were used bythe participating countries, a separate annex, preparedby each country, is included in this Appendix.
•M\_\! V-TIR h r<\>r 4
The physical basis of the German economyoriginates from both domestic and foreign materialflows. Although commodity imports account foronly 30% of domestic production of raw materials,the hidden flows associated with imports is onlyabout one third smaller than the total domestic
hidden flows. German imports carry on the averagea significantly higher hidden flow than domestic rawmaterials. Domestic extraction from theenvironment provides mainly construction materials,industrial minerals, and fossil fuels, as well asrenewable materials. Ores are usually imported as is
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
34
a significant proportion of total fossil fuels. Since1975, imports of semi-manufactures and finalproducts play an increasing role Germany's totalmaterial requirement. Thus, environmental pressurefrom material flows associated with the Germaneconomy has most probably been shifted to foreigncountries in recent years.
The overburden removed by the surface mining oflignite dominates the domestic hidden flows of rawmaterial production. Together with the non-saleableportion extracted from underground hard-coalmining, it accounts for about 78% of the totaldomestic hidden flows. About 52% of the totalhidden flows associated with imports is associatedwith raw material imports and about 48% associatedwith imported semi-manufactures. A large portionof the hidden flows of imported raw materials islinked to ores, coal, and industrial minerals,especially diamonds and other precious stones. Thehidden flows of imported semi-manufactures ismainly associated with metals.
Fossil fuel materials and their hidden flowsdominate the total material requirement of theGerman economy, contributing about 45% to totalTMR. Construction materials, iron, copper, andindustrial minerals and importedsemi-manufactured metals and their hidden flowsrepresent about 47% of the TMR of the Germaneconomy.
Excavation for infrastructure accounts for about 300million metric tons or roughly 10% of the totaldomestic hidden flows. This number refers to thereunited Germany in 1991. More recent trends inconstruction activities indicate that excavation forinfrastructure may have increased significantly since1991.
Erosion within Germany accounts for about 130million metric tons or roughly 4% of the total
domestic hidden flows. However, in recent years, thetrend is increasing, mainly due to an increasingcultivation of crops with high erosion risks,especially maize for animal feed. On the one hand,the average rate of domestic erosion exceeds the soilregeneration rate by a factor of ten. On the otherhand, erosion associated with imported renewablematerials is higher than domestic erosion if relatedto the absolute quantities of the commodity masses.This is mainly due to imports from regions withsevere erosion problems, such as parts of Africa,Southeast Asia, and Latin America.
Please note that data concerning domestic andimported hidden flows are based upon anorigin-oriented definition, i.e. they refer to thecountry where the materials are extracted from theenvironment. Metal imports are accounted for as theabsolute mass of the ore or the concentrate.
Data Sources and Methodology
General references:
FSOG: Federal Statistical Office Germany, severalofficial publications, especially Production Statistics,Foreign Trade Statistics, Water Statistics, WasteStatistics, Statistics of Economic and EnvironmentalAccounting.
FMEM: Federal Ministry for Economy and MiningAuthorities for the Federal States: mining industryand statistics, annual publication.
FMNAF: Federal Ministry for Nutrition,Agriculture and Forestry, Annual Statistical Yearbook.
FIGR: Federal Institution for Geosciences and RawMaterials, annual reports.
GGSI: Association of the German Gravel and SandIndustry, annual reports
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
35
Material Requirements 1975-1994Federal Republic of Germany (Domestic Requirements 1991 to 1994 for re-united Germany, Imports 1991-94 for Western Germany only)
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 _ 1982_Unit:1000 metric tonsDOMESTIC
Non-renewablesI, Energy CarriersLigniteHard CoalCrude OilCrude Oil GasNatural Gas
II. Metai OresIronLead and ZincPyrite and PyrrhotiteBauxiteUraniumIII. Ind. MineralsPhosphatePotashSaltClayLimestone (industrial)OtherTotalIV. Construction MineralsSand and GravelCrushed Stone (ind. limestone)Clay for bricksV. ExcavationNon-saleable production (ind. overburden gangue)Excavation for infrastructure
RenewablesI. Plant biomassAgricultural HarvestLoggingPlant Biomass from "wild harvest"
II. Animal biomassFishingHunting
Soil Erosion
IMPORTS
Non-renewablesI. Energy CarriersLigniteHard CoalCrude OilNatural Gas
II. Metal OresIronIron-Manganes-meltings and slagsManganeseCopperLeadZincChromiumNickelPyrrhotiteOther Ores and MetalashesBauxite KryolitheIII. Ind. MineralsPhosphate rawPotashOther saltPrecious stones etc.IV. Construction MineralsStones, Clays, and Other Construction Materials
123,37792,393
5.741301
13,406
3,288308492
10
814,5189,3145,2862,816
16,19238,207
389,518173.18721,929
786,615143,802
131,86419,2647,333
43446
70,454
1,6476,248
88,41419,598
44,8281,813
2281,409
209551561
7498669
4,215
2,2700
6422
25,839
134,53589,2695,524
32914,118
2,256302523
00
864,310
11,3145,8632,411
14,20638,190
374.214182,56124,867
851,723147.634
122,64021,1097,398
41548
71,282
1.5655.970
97,66922,575
47.1571,739
2291,505
190601547
14175919
4,092
2,3620
7772
23,058
122.94884.5135,401
28413,886
2,573301531
03
805,953
12.3196.1252,384
13,46040,320
363,508193,09918,908
861,132153,307
137,23821,8337,464
39550
73,101
1,6156,353
96,29025,553
40,0491,529
1531,402
195563416
16154952
4,093
2,6840
7961
21,970
123,58783,5415,059
26115,516
1,601260502
010
06,253
12,6556,0472,615
13,57041,140
378.399188.29021.243
838.634158.935
138,69320,7127,529
35948
74,183
1.4746,565
94,37529,847
42,5141,833
2921,050
170499372
17117896
3,615
2,4350
7002
23,274
130,60885,7994,774
21815,616
1,657266460
00
06,728
15,0866,4792,381
12,43943,113
398,036192,86524,043
978,039170,044
131,06020,1237,594
32346
74,306
1,6067,773
107,35536,117
52,1602,075
2601,107
191503547
1699
1,0743,697
2,5790
9152
23,717
129,86286,5744,631
22613,543
1,948271502
011
06,7777,6316,7062,346
20,75344,212
377,408205,21023,228
1,105,025167,526
125,88622,4437,660
28744
75,255
2,1429,124
96,87636,454
50,1741,791
1491,095
182619329
14133
1,0534,179
2,5600
5992
24,857
130,64987,8644,459
7714,616
1,575253483
00
06,487
13,2976,2572,004
13,35241,397
328,017187,97521,208
1,089,106153,307
138,29821,7267,583
28244
76,374
2,72810,32179,24735,831
44,6121,626
283997215506268
1258
1,2043,913
2,2080
6711
22,522
127,35288,4424,256
20111,714
1,314242508
06
05,241
11,7486,3001,419
17,59642,305
294,758132,85717,159
1,118,201149,955
144.24721,3557,664
27643
77,781
2,68110,63572,54234,627
39,1711,558
133970192557244
1472
9653,535
1,8300
6501
20,233
124,36581,6534,116
17713,414
980256554
00
06,101
10,8676,5101,466
18,48943,433
289,638184,85418,119
1,128,369149,780
119.31919,2357,887
28544
78,446
2.6529,122
65,21334,188
35,8011,377
131533218542247
1280
8943,158
1,9800
6221
20,569
126,70378,8584,055
18113,000
1,060253514
07
06,500
12,2116,6931,454
19,33046,188
280,091163,64916,948
1,087,553149,660
138,20821,5077,995
29345
79,940
2,6158,847
66,93434,497
42,9241,496
180591207594338
12149
1,0054,057
1,9061
6402
21,672
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL HCONOMIES
36
(Domestic Requirements 1991 to 1994 for re-united Germany, Imports 1991-94 for Western Germany only)1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
Material Requirements 1975-1994Federal Republic of Germany
120,71881,8434,105
15411,779
1,034263512
00
06,365
13,0806,1251,805
18,65446,030
254,892174,634
13,202
1,123,916137,429
141,67423,040
7,965
19146
81,532
2,4719,862
64,19335,509
45,3201,159
65597237593385
13187
1,1174,036
1,9110
6881
19,203
114,36080,2624,017
14310,472
717231471
00
05,435
13,1026,2601,924
20,01946,740
271.913177,076
13,014
996,129145,950
141,65521.533
7,856
16147
81,892
2,4939,999
66,56931,757
42,0451,067
61636194621275
11203979
3,660
1,5280
6531
20,325
108,85275,8183,793
20912,331
147226412
04
05,656
13,4666,5321,882
18,60946,144
265,280177,829
13,360
985,881145,538
135.09121,161
7,679
16048
82,118
2,1878,170
63,84035,136
39,910972
52480226664259
13151986
2,881
1,4290
7101
18,426
108,62272,8723,937
20711,486
69162313
16
05,638
12,4477,3331,838
21,25148,508
282,917176,765
13,632
1,070.919151,859
142,14721.777
7,599
14250
81,940
1,9057,172
72,03734,653
45,1701,256
514567235605273
15159921
2,577
1,1570
7241
20,109
109,87670,9993,770
18911,396
106124342
07
05,584
11,7938,5922,101
23,25051,320
309,534218,130
14,161
1,083.771161,754
152,36423,424
7,594
16651
82,192
2,0136,409
66,32738,137
47,1711,236
546630222596344
1265
9572,880
1,2060
6291
20,300
107,58969,7633,606
14011,280
83113302
01
05,633
11,5808,8551,940
24,08652,094
312,678208,191
16,321
1,091,130170,000
137,68049,895
7,708
15456
82,098
2,08010,85772,40039,260
43,7301.304
369505206593246
1184
9933,077
9020
6601
21,632
279,40366,4813,487
21015,434
120105219
05
53,043
362,000364,876
22,579
2,531,631300,233
175,11523,313
30175
128,704
2,76414,07177,97943,964
42,1901,247
252543176625111
11121846
2,544
6710
9291
25,534
241,80565,9063,247
18911,972
120105219
05
53,043
398,000409,731
24,973
2,149,482293,300
175,11523,313
30175
128,704
3,01714,13490,88742,930
40,5581,178
285600200640231
17104983
2,617
5191
1,1391
29,823
221,80260,2883,051
11713,238
120105219
05
53,043
401,908411,792
27,121
1,971,669295,895
175,11523,313
30175
128,704
2,57512,44894,15442,049
34,8211,177
101514192695204
17105634
2,243
4120
1,0392
24,402
207,07754,3442,936
11113,714
120105219
05
53,043
459,546477,173
34,144
1,840,774342,616
175,11523,313
30175
128,704
2,41714,529
102,19441,426
42,0091,131
1166098
612172
10175790
2,268
2810
1,1321
26,214
UniCIOOO metric tonsDOMESTIC
Non-renewablesI. Energy Carriers
LigniteHard CoalCrude Oil
Crude Oil GasNatural Gas
II. Metal OresIron
Lead and ZincPyrite and Pyrrhotite
BauxiteUranium
III. Ind. MineralsPhosphate
PotashSalt
ClayLimestone (industrial)
OtherTotal
IV. Construction MineralsSand and Gravel
Crushed Stone (incl. limestone)Clay for bricksV. Excavation
Non-saleable production (incl. overburden gangue)Excavation for infrastructure
RenewablesI. Plant biomass
Agricultural HarvestLogging
Plant Biomass from "wild harvest"II. Animal biomass
FishingHunting
Soil Erosion
IMPORTS
Non-renewablesI. Energy Carriers
LigniteHard CoalCrude Oil
Natural GasII. Metal Ores
IronIron-Manganes-meltings and slags
ManganeseCopper
LeadZinc
ChromiumNickel
PyrrhotiteOther Ores and Metalashes
Bauxite KryolitheIII. Ind. MineralsPhosphate raw
PotashOther salt
Precious stones etc.IV. Construction Minerals
Stones, Clays, and Other Construction Materials
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
37
Material Requirements 1975-1994Federal Republic of Germany (Domestic Requirements 1991 to 1994 for re-united Germany, Imports 1991-94 for Western Germany only)
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1933Unit:1000 metric tonsRenewablesI. Plant biomassAgricultural HarvestLoggingNatural Rubber and Gums
II. Animal biomassFishing
Semi-manufacturesTotal
Final ProductsTotal
Hidden Flows from Imported Raw MaterialsEnergy CarriersMetal OresIndustrial MineralsConstruction MineralsPlant Biomass from CultivationTotal
18,6111,861
208
312
79,374
15,680
76,221242,681856,267
7,752104.985
1,287,906
20,9982,273
228
337
89,238
20,588
77,396258,573577,118
6,917113,907
1,033,910
19,2422,298
232
339
91,435
19,246
81,734234,102509.298
6,591109,051940,776
19,6232,445
223
344
104,451
18,473
84,464206,502542,470
6,982114,449954,867
18,9092,482
225
364
105,212
16,931
98,814234,383613,813
7,115116,528
1,070,654
19,3022,367
220
403
102.068
17,559
109,199230,386613,117
7,457120,887
1,081,046
18,3442,123
208
371
95,990
16,937
117,218210,278505,902
6,757116,155956,309
18,5611,844
214
377
95,058
18,626
116,914193,242328,350
6,070123,120767,696
17,6321,861
227
403
103,108
23,413
106,101146,698329,300
6,171117,079705,348
17,1811,703
238
406
104,307
24,375
104,663172,076538,845
6,502111,734933,821
Hidden Flows from Imported Semi-ManufacturesTotal
Social & Economic IndicatorsWestern Germany's PopulationRe-united Germany's PopulationGDP (constant prices 1985) (Millions DM)
Domestic TotalImports without Hidden FlowsHidden Flows of Raw Material ImportsHidden Flows of Imported Semi-manufactures
INDICATORS
TotalTotal Material Requirements (TMR)TMR DM per kilogramTMR(kilogram) per DMPer Capita (metric tons)TMR Per CapitaDomestic TMR Per CapitaImports Per Capita without Hidden FlowsHidden Flows of Raw Material Imports Per CapitaHidden Flows of Semi-manufact. Imports Per Capita
323,955 359,414 357,936 365,779 375,437 419,329 348,676 364,523 369,987 404,474
61,829 61,531 61.400 61,327 61,359 61.566 61,682 61,638 61.423 61,175X X X X X X X X X X
1,471,220 1,549,800 1,593,910 1,641,640 1,709,170 1,727,510 1,730,520 1,714,140 1,740,900 1,789,350
2,021,959 2,088,937 2,100,794 2,098,503 2,278,991 2,391,752 2,305.292 2,240,634 2,264,924 2,216,710315,693 344,807 337,576 355.607 385,916 374,250 341,198 325,290 323,984 336,877
1,287,906 1,033,910 940,776 954,867 1,070,654 1,081,046 956,309 767,696 705,348 933,821323,955 359,414 357,936 365,779 375,437 419,329 348,676 364,523 369,987 404,474
3,949,514 3,827,068 3,737,082 3,774,757 4,110,998 4,266,377 3,951,474 3,698,144 3,664,243 3,891,8820.37 0.40 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.40 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.462.68 2.47 2.34 2.30 2.41 2.47 2.28 2.16 2.10 2.18
6433
521
5
6234
6176
6134
5156
6234
6166
6737
6176
6939
6187
6437
6166
6036
5126
6037
5116
6436
6157
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
38
(Domestic Requirements 1991 to 1994 for re-united Germany, Imports 1991-94 for Western Germany only)_1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
Material Requirements 1975-1994Federal Republic of Germany
20,5271,694
257
432
108,096
24,539
109,981174,967293,959
5,761129,306713,974
19,8111,610
254
476
109,499
30,452
108,950169,530256.349
6,097131,232672.158
20,2541,519
254
433
109,928
29,648
97,496151,795395,793
5,528138,998789,611
19,3351,586
266
473
105,583
33,354
90,544176,244394,010
6,033131,793798,625
19,4321,734
292
527
108,900
34,117
87,987188,344394,163
6,090134,148810,733
19,7061,406
289
614
112,661
40,850
117,004179,719462,194
6,490140,335905,742
20,7211,166
281
659
123,707
45,021
145,090182.513496,142
7,660143,168974,573
20,9371,245
289
670
127,064
49,596
148,689185,508495,516
8,947148,727987,387
20,001893243
635
121,038
38,259
135,407157,868564,621
7,321149,018
1,014,234
19,4791,051
262
710
124,687
46,165
147,780191,221423,917
7,864144,886915,668
Unit:1000 metric tonsRenewables
1. Plant biomassAgricultural Harvest
LoggingNatural Rubber and Gums
II. Animal biomassFishing
Semi-manufacturesTotal
Final ProductsTotal
Hidden Flows from Imported Raw MaterialsEnergy Carriers
Metal OresIndustrial Minerals
Construction MineralsPlant Biomass from Cultivation
Total
433,618 432,330 391,014 685,095 538,972 627,913 652,272 618,659 552,972 596,399
61,024 61,066 61,077 61,450 62,063 63,254 64,100 64,900 65,500 65,800X X X X X X 80,000 80,600 81,100 81,400
1,823,180 1,863,770 1,890,280 1,960,510 2,027,330 2,130,500 2,647,600 2,705,866 2,675,434 2,750,773
2,224,959 2,114.640 2,082,082 2,195,929 2,301,271 2,320,882 4,327,334 3,979,604 3,787,881 3,813,434343,091 345,179 338,530 350,647 354,682 374,436 406,300 429,665 398,853 428,483713,974 672,158 789,611 798,625 810,733 905,742 974,573 987,387 1,014,234 915,668433,618 432,330 391,014 685,095 538,972 627,913 652,272 618,659 552,972 596,399
3,715,642 3,564,307 3,601,237 4,030,295 4,005,658 4,228,973 6,360,478 6,015,314 5,753,941 5,753,9840.49 0.52 0.52 0.49 0.51 0.50 0.42 0.45 0.46 0.482.04 1.91 1.91 2.06 1.98 1.98 2.40 2.22 2.15 2.09
61366
127
5835
6117
5934
6136
66366
1311
6537
6139
67376
1410
8654
61510
8149
71510
77476
158
76477
149
Hidden Flows from Imported Semi-ManufacturesTotal
Social & Economic IndicatorsWestern Germany's Population
Re-unlted Germany's PopulationGDP (constant prices 1985) (Millions DM)
Domestic TotalImports without Hidden Flows
Hidden Flows of Raw Material ImportsHidden Flows of Imported Semi-manufactures
INDICATORS
TotalTotal Material Requirements (TMR)
TMR DM per kilogramTMR(kilogram) per DM
Per Capita (metric tons)TMR Per Capita
Domestic TMR Per CapitaImports Per Capita without Hidden Flows
Hidden Flows of Raw Material Imports Per CapitaHidden Flows of Semi-manutact. Imports Per Capita
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
39
ASCI: Association of the German Stones and ClaysIndustry, annual reports
MAMS: Metal Association (Frankfurt/Main,Germany, metal statistics
SCI: Statistics of the Coal Industry, annual statistics
Fossil Fuels
Liquid (Crude Oil): Domestic production ofcommodity mass and non-saleable extraction wereobtained from FMEM, imports from FSOG. Thehidden flows of imported crude oil was obtainedfrom the database of the Wuppertal Institute,Department of Material Flows and StructuralChange.
Gaseous (Natural Gas and Crude Oil Gas):Domestic production of commodity mass wasobtained from FMEM (natural gas and minorquantities of crude oil gas), imports (natural gasonly) from FSOG. The domestic hidden flows fornatural gas were estimated by accounting for thedifference between crude gas and purified gas onthe basis of average contents of individualsubstances, and taking into account the sulfur whichis recovered from H2S in the crude gas. The hiddenflows of imported natural gas were estimated in asimilar way, by using a number of individualpublications on average crude gas compositionsaccording to locations and quantitative,country-specific information on the amounts offlared or re-injected gas (Annual Survey of EnergyResources).
Solid (Coal): Domestic production of commoditymass and non-saleable extraction (overburden) wereobtained from FMEM (hard coal) and SCI (lignite),imports from FSOG and SCI. Overburden ofimported coal was estimated using country-specificdata from several publications (e.g. Manstein, 1995,Wuppertal Papers No. 51, Wuppertal Institute).
Metals
Aluminum (Al): Domestic production ofcommodity mass and non-saleable extraction wereobtained from FMEM (negligible; e.g., 319 metrictons of commodity mass in 1990), correspondingimports from FIGR. Imported bauxite containsabout 24% net metal (Al). Overburden of importedbauxite was estimated using country-specific datafrom several publications (e.g., Rohn et al,. 1995,Wuppertal Papers No. 37, Wuppertal Institute).
Gold: No domestic production, imports only forsemi-manufactures and final products (FIGR). Thehidden flows for imported gold were estimated byapplying the corresponding hidden flow factor forimports from the United States as reported by WRIin this study, and applying an average hidden flowfactor of 350,000 tons per ton (metric ton of hiddenglow per metric ton of commodity) for all otherimports (Wilmouth et al, 1991).
Copper(Cu): No domestic production, imports fromFIGR. Imported copper concentrate contains about27% net metal (Cu). Hidden flow factors forimported copper were estimated on the basis of0.8% copper content in crude ores and 2 tons ofoverburden per ton of crude ore mined (database ofthe Wuppertal Institute).
Iron ore (Fe): (Domestic production of commoditymass and non-saleable extraction were obtainedfrom FMEM (small quantities of iron andmanganese ores, e.g., 83,473 metric tons of totalproduction in 1990, about 25% Fe content),corresponding imports from FIGR. Imported ironores or concentrates contain about 58% net metal(Fe) on the average. Hidden flows for imported ironwere estimated assuming 1.8 metric ton ofoverburden per metric ton of crude ore mined (at58% Fe content) (data base of the WuppertalInstitute).
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
40
Other: Domestic production of commodity massand non-saleable extraction were obtained fromFMEM (lead and zinc, pyrite and pyrrhotite),corresponding imports (comprising 17 individualcategories) from FIGR. Domestic production issmall, e.g. amounting to 104,726 metric tons of leadand zinc ores and 450,474 metric tons of pyrite andpyrrhotite in 1991. Domestic hidden flow factors in1991 were 2.36 tons per ton and 0.69 tons per tonrespectively. The following hidden flow factors wereattributed to imports (all taken from the data base ofWuppertal Institute): lead 9.9 tons per ton (for 61%metal content in concentrate), zinc 11.5 tons perton (for 61% metal content in concentrate), nickel17.5 tons per ton (for 15% metal content inconcentrate), tin 1,448.9 tons per ton (for 29%metal content in concentrate), manganese 2.3 tonsper ton (for 40% metal content in concentrate) andtungsten 63.1 tons per ton (for 54% metal contentin concentrate). For a number of other importedmetals only preliminary hidden flows numbers wereavailable: chromium 7.9 tons per ton (for 100%metal, imported raw material—i.e.. crudeore—contained 31% metal), mercury 230.6 tons perton (for 100% metal, imported raw materialcontained 50% metal, crude ore was assumed tocontain 0.5% metal content), molybdenum 665.1tons per ton (for 100% metal, imported raw materialcontained 53.9% metal, crude ore was assumed tocontain 0.2% metal content), silver 7,499 tons perton (for 100% metal, imported silver contained100%i metal, crude ore was assumed to contain0.03% metal content), vanadium 127.7 (for 100%metal, imported raw material contained 10.1 %metal, crude ore was assumed to contain 0.95%metal content), antimony 12.6 tons per ton (for100% metal, imported raw material contained 61%metal, crude ore was assumed to contain 9% metalcontent), titanium 232 tons per ton (for 100% metal,imported raw material contained 57% metal, crudeore was assumed to contain 0.52% metal content),
niob 83.6 tons per ton (for 100% metal, importedraw material contained 40.2% metal, crude ore wasassumed to contain 2% metal content), silicium (1.6tons per ton (for 100% metal from SiO2) and Cer39.5 tons per ton (for 100% metal, imported rawmaterial was assumed to contain 38.8% metal, crudeore was assumed to contain 3% metal content). Fora number of other metals, no hidden flow factor wasapplied because they are well characterized as typicalby products of other mining: cobalt, bismuth,cadmium, indium, thallium, circonium, and hafnium,gallium, germanium, magnesium, arsenic, and tellur.No information was obtained about lithium,beryllium, cesium, and strontium. The content ofmetals in corresponding imported ferro-alloys wasassumed to be vanadium 42%, nickel 33%,molybdenum 2%, titanium 30%, chromium 70%,manganese 75%, niob 1%, silicium 52.5%, andtungsten 80%.
Recycling rates were applied for hidden flow factorestimates of imported metals, assuming thefollowing content of secondary material in metals:copper 40%, aluminum 30%, iron 17%, lead 40%,zinc 11%, and nickel 40%. Recycled materials werenot accounted as TMR (Data from the database ofWuppertal Institute, from MAMS, from Gocht orfrom Wilmout e.t al.).
Industrial Minerals
Salt: Domestic production of commodity mass andnon-saleable extraction were obtained from FMEM(rock salt, industrial brine, boiling salt), imports fromFSOG. Domestic hidden flow factors were derivedfrom non-saleable extraction divided by productionof commodity mass and applied to imports as well.
Gypsum: Domestic production of commodity massand non-saleable extraction were obtained fromFMEM, imports from FSOG. Domestic hidden flowfactors were derived from non-saleable extraction
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
41.
divided by production of commodity mass andapplied to imports as well.
Clay: Domestic production of commodity mass andnon-saleable extraction were obtained from FMEM(special clays, slate clay, bentonite, and kaolin),imports from FSOG. Domestic hidden flow factorswere derived from non-saleable extraction dividedby production of commodity mass and applied toimports with the exception of imported kaolin fromthe United Kingdom for which a hidden flowfactor of 8 tons per ton was reported.
Sand and Gravel (industrial): Domestic productionof commodity mass (special sand) and non-saleableextraction were obtained from FMEM (commoditymass also from GGSI), imports from FSOG.Domestic hidden flow factors were derived fromnon-saleable extraction divided by production ofcommodity mass and also applied to imports.
Potash: Domestic production of commodity massand non-saleable extraction were obtained fromFMEM (K2O content from FSOG), imports fromFSOG (negligible amounts, e.g., 346.2 tons in1991). Domestic hidden flow factors were derivedfrom non-saleable extraction divided by productionof commodity mass and also applied to imports.
Phosphate: No domestic production, imports fromFSOG. The hidden flow factors for imports wasobtained from the data base of the WuppertalInstitute. It represents a global average according tothe quantitative distribution of different types ofnatural deposits. P2O5 content of imports wasassumed to be 27%.
Other: Domestic production of commodity massand non-saleable extraction were obtained fromFMEM (altogether about 30 individual categories,varying by number from year to year), imports fromFSOG. Domestic hidden flow factors were derived
from non-saleable extraction divided by productionof commodity mass and applied to imports as wellunless country specific information was available.
Construction Materials
Crushed Stone: Domestic production was obtainedfrom FSOG, ASCI, and FIGR (different kinds ofnatural stones like granite, marble, limestone, anddolomite rock), imports from FSOG. Data for totaldomestic production were checked for consistencyand avoidance of double-counting in cooperationwith FSOG (personal communication). Domestichidden flow factors were obtained from an internalstudy of the Wuppertal Institute and applied toimports as well.
Sand and Gravel (construction): Domesticproduction was obtained from GGSI, imports fromFSOG. Domestic hidden flow factors were obtainedfrom an internal study of the Wuppertal Instituteand applied to imports as well.
Clay for bricks: Total domestic production of claywas obtained from ASCI. The quantity of clay forbricks was estimated by the production of variouskinds of bricks as reported by FSOG. The empiricalbase for this estimate, as well as the hidden flowfactor, was obtained from an internal study of theWuppertal Institute.
Infrastructure
Excavation (excluding dredging): Domesticexcavation of soil in metric tons is reported byFSOG in waste statistics. However, due to limits inreporting of small-sized enterprises, these numbersdo not account for the total. Bridging this gap,GGSI estimates the total amount of soil excavationby construction activities. In order to check thosenumbers, a bottom-up approach was performed inthis study. A range of individual figures aboutspecific soil excavation in metric tons per meter of
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
42
road (different types) constructed and per numberof buildings constructed was applied to estimatetotal annual soil excavation in Germany (WuppertalInstitute, personal communications). The result forsoil excavation obtained from this bottom-upapproach corroborated the numbers reported byGGSI.
Dredging: Dredging is reported by the FederalEnvironmental Agency in metric tons (fresh weight).Their number refers to dredging in harbors,shipping routes, and estuaries in the North Sea.
Erosion
Domestic erosion was estimated using numbersfrom BUND (Friends of the Earth Germany).Erosion associated with imported goods (rawmaterials and semi-manufactures) was taken fromthe database of the Wuppertal Institute. It refers tocountry-specific calculations of the land-use inhectares for imported agricultural goods and averageerosion rates in metric tons per hectare. The latterwere derived from a number of individualpublications (especially by Pimentel and Lai).
RenewablesDomestic production of plant biomass (agricultureand gardening), forestry (logging), and animal
biomass (from fishing and from hunting) wasderived mainly from FMNAF, and correspondingimports also from FMNAF and from FSOG.
Imports
All imports are reported by FSOG foreign tradestatistics in metric tons and by individual counties oforigin. The classification of imports according toraw materials, semi-manufactures and final productsgiven by FSOG was adopted. The reference oncorresponding commodities from domesticproduction or import is provided by FSOG. Due toa very user friendly provision of data, imports ofmetals (raw materials and semi-manufactures) weretaken from FIGR and MAMS, imports of coals fromSCI, and imports of renewables from FMNAF.Hidden flows of imported semi-manufactures wereestimated on the basis of corresponding values forraw materials. Country specific hidden flow factorswere applied for a number of imported materials: 27categories of non-renewable raw materials and 39corresponding semi-manufactures, 35 categories ofrenewable raw materials, and 5 of correspondingsemi-manufactures. Altogether, the German TMR isbased on the accounting of about 450 individualcategories of imported materials (including finalproducts).
• F .
The material flows that support the Japaneseeconomy originate from both domestic and foreignsources, but the economy is highly dependent onthe import of natural resources. Importedcommodities account for about one-third of themass of direct inputs (DMI) to the economy andaccount for about one-half of the total materialrequirements (TMR) including hidden flows.
Imports provide the Japanese economy withessential materials, including fossil fuels, metal ores,and agricultural and forestry products. Importdependency is particularly high for metal ores andfossil fuels. Recent trends revealed that commoditiesincreasingly tend to be imported in moremanufactured forms, (e.g., refined metals rather thanmetal ores) and imports of semi-manufactured
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
43
Material Requirements 1975-1994Japan
Unit:mi!lion metric tons
TOTAL MATERIAL REQUIREMENT
DOMESTIC TOTAL
DOMESTIC COMMODITIESNon-renewablesEnergy CarriersSolidLiquidGaseous
Metal OresIron OreCopper OreLead and Zinc OreOther Metal Ores
Industrial MineralsLimestoneStone for industrySiliconSilicaDolomiteOther Industrial Minerals
Construction MineralsSand and GravelConstruction Slone
RenewablesPlant Biomass (agriculture)Plant Biomass (forestry)Animal & Fish Biomass
DOMESTIC HIDDEN FLOWS
Total ExcavationNon-saleable productionof fossil fuelsof metalsof minerals
Infrastructure, Surplus SoilsConstruction, Soil ResidueResidential Development, Soil
Soil Erosion
TOTAL FOREIGN FLOWS
IMPORTED COMMODITIES
Non-renewablesEnergy CarriersSolidLiquid (crude oil)Liquid (refined products)
GaseousMetal OreIron OreCopper OreLead and Zinc OreBauxiteNickel OreManganese OreChromium oreOther Metal ores
Industrial MineralsPhosphateSaltOther Industrial Minerals
Construction Minerals
4,186
2,092
1,057
945251916
2.60.70.10.31.416112115945
8
756353403
112792410
4,429
2,142
1,043
932251816
2.30.80.10.31.117112519946
8
733344389
111772510
4,500
2,178
1.142
1,025
251816
2.00.70.10.31.0180134181046
8
819385434
117832410
4,485
2,209
1,255
1,136
251916
1.70.50.10.30.8195146181346
8
914420494
119862310
4,608
2,239
1,282
1,162
231815
1.60.50.10.30.8202151181456
8
935430505
121882310
4,448
2,200
1,272
1,155
231805
1.70.50.10.30.8196144191456
8
934405529
117832410
4,411
2,172
1,236
1,119
231805
2.11.00.00.30.817513951346g
919382537
116842210
4,390
2,094
1,193
1.072
231805
1.40.40.00.30.7176132151345Q
871363508
121892210
4,393
2,025
1,146
1,027
221705
1.40.40.00.30.7176132141444o
827327500
119862211
4,551
2,005
1,151
1,029
221705
1.30.40.00.30.7173130131454o
832322510
122882312
854
1,028
4382213
984414570
1,091
4282113
1,049
423626
1,028
4282014986431556
9474081715
907439468
9494081516
910447463
9213981516882455427
9293981615890458432
8933781414
857461396
8723781415
835464372
8463681415
811467344
094
553
4753156222914101491323153411113610
2,287
574
4883266123320121501343144311102621
2,322
590
4993386124220151501333154311113621
2,276
564
4683275223620191301153153210113621
2,369
614
5103495924523231471303154310123722
2,248
603
5013356822119271521343164310123822
2,238
564
4743227819818271391233144310112722
2,296
555
4613127918519291361224133210102622
2,368
543
4443097518024301221093142210112622
2,546
595
4913388818627371401253143211112722
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
44
1990
4,430
1,986
1,128
1,0052216
1
51.30.30.00.30.6165122
1215
447
817310507
123892311
4,737
2,035
1,154
1,0302116
1
50.90.30.00.30.4
157118
1014
447
851312539
124912211
4,883
2,112
1,204
1,0821913
15
0.90.40.00.20.3
161121
1015
447
902327575
122902211
5,156
2,240
1,274
1,1551611
14
0.60.20.00.20.2173129
1117
457
965333632
119862211
5,344
2,375
1,358
1,2391510
14
0.70.30.00.20.2184137
1317
457
1,039354685
120882111
5,682
2,560
1,476
1,35713
81
40.60.20.00.20.2190143
1218
457
1,154408746
119892110
5,716
2,567
1,424
1,31113815
0.60.20.00.20.1194147
1219
457
1,103370733
1138420
9
5,494
2,509
1,330
1,21713
815
0.50.20.00.20.1
193147
1219
457
1,011350661
1138619
8
5,566
2,504
1,285
1,18213
715
0.40.10.00.20.1190144
1219
457
978338640
1047918
7
5,657
2,490
1,274
1,16412
715
0.20.00.00.10.1191147
1218
446
961341620
1108518
7
908
85060
81140
791470321
87357
81039
817507310
90055
68
41845544301
95957
57
45902582320
1,00957
47
46952619333
1,07632
39
211,044
656387
1,13631
37
211,105
692412
1,17231
37
211,141
729412
1,21235
36
261,177
765412
1,20932
34
261,177
765412
3,122
696 710
3,062 3,167
484331
931712839
139125
3143211
122723
472330
91164
3440
128115
31
3211
1127
K>
3
478338
931614342
124112
3123211
112725
5193641051674844
137123
31
3211
122737
542380106178
5046
142128
3124211
122837
5604001081964650
139125
4223211
122838
570408112205
3852
142127
42
4211
12
839
5323851121922854
126114
42
4111
122839
5353881141952455
127115
4223111
111738
555406118207
2557
128116
4123110
111839
Material Requirements 1975-1994Japan
Unit:million metric tonsTOTAL MATERIAL REQUIREMENT
DOMESTIC TOTAL
DOMESTIC COMMODITIES
Non-renewablesEnergy Carriers
SolidLiquid
GaseousMetal Ores
Iron OreCopper Ore
Lead and Zinc OreOther Metal Ores
industrial MineralsLimestone
Stone for industrySilicon
SilicaDolomite
Other Industrial MineralsConstruction Minerals
Sand and GravelConstruction Stone
RenewablesPlant Biomass (agriculture)
Plant Biomass (forestry)Animal & Fish Biomass
DOMESTIC HIDDEN FLOWS
Total ExcavationNon-saleable production
of fossil fuelsof metals
of mineralsInfrastructure, Surplus SoilsConstruction, Soil Residue
Residential Development, Soil
Soil Erosion
TOTAL FOREIGN FLOWS
IMPORTED COMMODITIES
Non-renewablesEnergy Carriers
SolidLiquid (crude oil)
Liquid (refined products)Gaseous
Metal OreIron Ore
Copper OreLead and Zinc Ore
BauxiteNickel Ore
Manganese OreChromium ore
Other Metal oresIndustrial Minerals
PhosphateSalt
Other Industrial MineralsConstruction Minerals
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
45
Material Requirements 1975-1994Japan
Unit:million metric tonsRenewablesPlant Biomass (agriculture)
Cereals and FodderOil seedsOthers
Plant biomass (forestry)Animal & Fish Biomass
Semi-manufacturesChemical ProductsRefined Metals
Iron & SteelAluminumCopperOthers
Scrap MetalsWood Products (chip, pulp, etc.)Other Semi-manufactures
Final ProductsFertilizerMeats Dairy ProductsPaper and Paper ProductsMachineryOthers
HIDDEN FLOWS OF IMPORTED COMMODITIES
Fossil Fuel (Coal)Metal Ores
CopperIronOthers
Industrial MineralsSoil ErosionPlant Biomass (cut-down forest)Animal Biomass (cattle)
Social ParametersPopulation (10A6)GDP at 1985 constant prices (trillion Yen)
IndicatorsTMS Per Capita (metric tons)Commodity Per Capita (metric tons)
Metal & MineralsFossil FuelsConstruction Minerals
Renewables Per Capita (metric tons)Hidden Flows Per Capita (metric tons)
Metal & MineralsFossil FuelsRenewables
Excavation Per Capita (Infrastructure, metric tons)Soil Erosion Per Capita (metric tons)TMI/GDP (metric tons/ trillion Yen)TMI/GDP1985 Yen (1985 =100)Import/Total including Hidden FlowsImportTTotal excluding Hidden FlowsTMI, Agriculture (metric tons/capita)TMI, Energy (metric tons/capita)TMI, Construction (metric tons/capita)TMI, Others (metric tons/capita)
1983
562821
53
271
182
1.30.60.40.20.1
384
31.50.60.20.60.5
643123
54
311
192
1.70.90.50.20.1
295
41.30.80.20.60.6
673325
54
321
202
1.91.00.60.30.1
295
41.60.80.30.70.7
693526
64
331
223
2.61.40.80.30.1
395
51.60.80.40.90.7
743728
64
351
264
3.92.50.80.40.2
410
5
51.70.90.51.00.8
693828
64
301
274
3.92.41.00.30.2
3124
61.90.80.71.50.9
623727
64
231
234
4.83.11.20.30.2
294
51.50.90.61.40.8
643827
65
252
254
6.04.01.50.40.2
295
51.70.80.81.00.9
664029
75
242
294
6.64.51.60.30.2
495
51.90.90.81.00.9
664130
65
232
325
7.95.81.40.50.2
410
5
61.80.90.81.41.0
1,541 1,713 1,755 1,674 1,742
578538197314
2612
12468
2
111.9215.6
37.414.4
3.03.16.81.6
23.07.05.30.88.81.2
19.4142.0
0.50.32.48.2
17.98.7
648561213319
2910
12786
3
113.1224.3
39.214.3
3.03.16.51.7
24.97.65.91.09.31.2
19.7144.4
0.50.42.48.8
18.39.5
648587239316
3211
14984
3
114.2235
39.415.23.13.27.21.7
24.37.55.80.98.61.4
19.2140.0
0.50.32.78.9
18.39.4
652546240274
3211
12786
3
115.2247.1
38.915.8
3.03.18.01.8
23.27.45.80.97.91.2
18.2132.7
0.50.32.58.7
18.19.5
616592248311
3412
13589
3
116.2260.6
39.716.3
3.23.28.11.8
23.37.85.51.07.81.2
17.7129.3
0.50.32.68.5
18.410.0
512610260319
3212
14276
3
117.1268.8
38.016.0
3.23.18.01.7
22.07.84.60.87.51.3
16.6121.0
0.50.32.67.4
17.99.9
559597271294
3110
11660
3
117.9277.4
37.415.3
2.93.07.81.6
22.27.94.90.77.61.1
15.9116.3
0.50.32.47.7
17.59.8
655601279291
3110
12761
3
118.7287.2
37.014.7
2.82.97.41.7
22.37.55.70.77.21.1
15.3111.8
0.50.32.58.3
16.79.3
753549265261
2411
12957
3
119.5295.8
36.814.1
2.72.86.91.7
22.67.36.50.77.01.1
14.9108.6
0.50.32.59.1
15.99.2
798563240299
2410
13153
3
120.3309.1
37.814.5
2.93.06.91.7
23.37.96.90.76.71.2
14.7107.7
0.60.32.59.6
15.89.7
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
46
Material Requirements 1975-1994Japan
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991Unit:million metric tons
RenewablesPlant Biomass (agriculture)
Cereals and FodderOil seeds
OthersPlant biomass (forestry)Animal & Fish Biomass
Semi-manufacturesChemical Products
Refined MetalsIron & Steel
AluminumCopperOthers
Scrap MetalsWood Products (chip, pulp, etc.)
Other Semi-manufactures
Final ProductsFertilizer
Meat & Dairy ProductsPaper and Paper Products
MachineryOthers
HIDDEN FLOWS OF IMPORTED COMMODITIES
Fossil Fuel (Coal)Metal Ores
CopperIron
OthersIndustrial Minerals
Soil ErosionPlant Biomass (cut-down forest)
Animal Biomass (cattle)
Social ParametersPopulation (10A6)
GDP at 1985 constant prices (trillion Yen)
IndicatorsTMI Per Capita (metric tons)
Commodity Per Capita (metric tons)Metal & Minerals
Fossil FuelsConstruction Minerals
Renewables Per Capita (metric tons)Hidden Flows Per Capita (metric tons)
Metal & MineralsFossil Fuels
RenewablesExcavation Per Capita (Infrastructure, metric tons)
Soil Erosion Per Capita (metric tons)TMI/GDP (metric tons/ trillion Yen)
TMI/GDP1985 Yen (1985 =100)Import/Total including Hidden Flowsimport/Total excluding Hidden FlowsTMI, Agriculture (metric tons/capita)
TMI, Energy (metric tons/capita)TMI, Construction (metric tons/capita)
TMI, Others (metric tons/capita)
68423075242
315
6.74.51.60.40.24105
61.80.90.91.41.1
1,856
7345672352973510132553
121324
36.6
14.2
2.73.06.81.7
22.4
7.86.30.76.51.2
13.7
100.0
0.60.32.59.015.4
9.5
69433175242
336
7.25.21.40.30.24116
61.91.01.01.21.1
2,122
867564252275379
139504
121.7
333.3
38.9
14.3
2.62.97.01.7
24.7
8.77.40.76.71.2
14.2
103.9
0.60.32.610.0
15.8
10.4
74443275282
406
10.0
7.51.90.40.33147
72.41.21.10.91.7
2,172
9225802602675310131575
122.2
349.8
40.0
14.8
2.63.07.41.8
25.2
8.57.80.96.91.1
14.0
102.1
0.60.32.510.5
16.5
10.2
76463476273
517
14.3
11.1
2.40.50.32208
82.51.41.20.92.1
2,261
914604255294558
158516
122.7
370.6
42.0
15.7
2.83.17.91.8
26.3
9.07.70.97.41.4
13.9
101.7
0.60.32.710.5
17.6
10.9
77463376293
507
14.2
10.9
2.40.60.32199
92.41.51.41.22.6
2,291
928636272305597
140556
123.2
387.5
43.4
16.5
3.03.38.51.8
26.9
9.17.81.07.71.2
13.8
100.9
0.60.32.610.7
18.8
11.0
76473377273
507
15.5
11.7
2.70.70.42197
102.41.51.21.73.1
2,426
1,037
629273299587
123486
123.6407.2
46.0
17.6
3.03.49.41.8
28.4
9.38.60.98.41.1
14.0
102.0
0.60.32.411.7
20.3
11.3
76483477253
547
17.9
13.8
2.90.70.41217
102.41.71.31.72.8
2,439
1,049
662298303617
140447
124422
46.1
17.2
3.03.59.01.8
28.9
9.28.70.98.91.2
13.5
99.0
0.60.32.511.9
20.3
11.2
76483577243
467
12.2
8.92.60.40.31
206
102.31.91.21.62.8
2,321
1,055
652320271617
127438
124.5
424.7
44.1
16.0
2.83.38.21.8
28.1
8.38.70.99.21.1
12.9
94.6
0.50.32.411.7
19.5
10.3
76493576243
487
12.6
9.22.70.50.21226
102.41.91.21.52.9
2,392
1,106
665335273586
141428
124.8
423.2
44.6
15.7
2.83.37.91.7
29.0
8.39.10.99.41.2
13.2
96.2
0.60.32.512.1
19.6
10.3
86523778313
498
12.5
9.12.70.50.21226
112.52.11.31.83.3
2,466
1,148
634302277556
154519
125.1
425.3
45.2
15.8
2.83.47.81.8
29.4
8.39.41.09.41.3
13.3
97.3
0.60.42.712.5
19.5
10.4
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
47
goods and final products have been increasing. Largehidden flows are associated with metals (particularlywith copper and iron), coal, as well as agriculturaland forestry products.
Those flows associated with construction activitiesdominate both DMI and TMR from domesticsources, nearly 90% of both in 1991. This may bebecause of a poor stock of modern infrastructure.Domestic limestone, crushed stone, and sand andgravel are used to create and improve buildings,roadways, water reservoirs, and other infrastructure.A large percentage of TMR from foreign sourcescan be identified as serving domestic constructionactivities, as is the case of iron ore and coking coalfor steel production.
Excavation for infrastructure, even in this roughestimate, occupies a high percentage of TMR. Thisis partly because Japan is a mountainous country,where flat areas must be created for such purposes as"new-town" development around existingmetropolitan areas. In such cases, excavated soil isused on site to change the topography. Other publicworks, such as roadway construction and rivermodification, generate large amount of surplus soils.Transporting surplus soil and construction materialsby heavy duty trucks is a major source of pollutionfrom traffic in Japan.
There are no formal statistics on soil erosion fromJapanese agricultural land. The estimates used in thisaccounting are relatively small. Soil erosion is moreimportant as one of the hidden flows attached toimported agricultural products from countries withheavier erosion problems.
The hidden flows that accompany commodities arebased on limited data and might even beunderestimated. Some of these flows, such as thoseassociated with imported metals, are estimated frominformation provided by the U.S. and German
co-authors from their countries' experience, and donot necessarily reflect the actual flows experiencedby Japan's real trading partners for thesecommodities.
Data Sources and Methodology
General references:
JEA (Japan Environment Agency)
"Preliminary Material Flow Balance," prepared forthe Quality of the Environment report. (A preliminarymaterial balance has been compiled by JEA, and hasbeen published since 1992 in the Quality of theEnvironment report (White paper). This balancecovers the mass of domestically produced andimported commodities, as well as amounts of wasteand recycled materials. Data sources and figures forthese preliminary accounts are carefully reviewed,and supplemented and modified whenevernecessary.)
MITI (Ministry of International Trade andIndustry)
Yearbook of Minerals and Non-Ferrous Metals Statistics.
Yearbook of Coal and Coke Statistics
Yearbook of Crushed Stone Statistics
Statistical Compendium of Mining Industry ("Kougyou
Binran")
White Paper of International Trade
MAFF (Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry andFisheries)
Crop Survey
Survey on Production and Shipment of Vegetables
Yearbook of Industrial Crops Statistics
Survey on the Marketing of Lumber
MOC(Ministry of Construction)
Census on By-products of Construction Activities for
1990
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
48
MOF (Ministry of Finance)/Japan TariffAssociation
Japan Export & Import (Trade Statistics)
Fossil Fuels
Domestic coal—Non-saleable production iscalculated as gross production reported in MITIstatistics minus net production.
Imported coal—Hidden flows are mainlyoverburden removed for open-pit mining. They areestimated by applying country specific or worldaverage factors (hidden flows per commodity mass)provided by the Wuppertal Institute and the WorldResources Institute. Country specific factors areapplied to 5 large coal exporters to Japan, Australia12.02 tons per ton, Canada 18.62 tons per ton, theUSA 6.27 tons per ton in 1991 (calculated for eachyear based WRI 's estimates), South Africa 3.13 tonsper ton, Russia 1.216 tons per ton. For otherexporters, 6.03 tons per ton—the estimated worldaverage—is applied.
Liquid—Original figures are converted to weight byapplying the following factors; crude oil 0.87kg/l,gasoline 0.67 kg/1, kerosene 0.81 kg/1, diesel oil0.84 kg/1, and heavy oil 0.89 kg/1. No hidden flowswere calculated for liquid fuels.
Gas—-Japan imports natural gas as LNG (liquefiednatural gas), and while it is known that the energyinput for liquidization is not negligible, suchinterlinked (indirect) material input such asprocessing energy is not included in this paper. Nohidden flows have been calculated for gaseous fuels.
Metals
Domestic production—Data on annual productionfor major metal ores (including gold, silver, copper,lead, zinc, iron, chromium, tungsten, molybdenum,manganese, tin , etc.) are available from MITl's
Statistics,. Estimates in the summary table are on anet weight basis. Ancillary mass is estimated basedon the average grade of proved reserves. (Gradeestimates may be substituted by actual grades ofannual production, which are reported for a limitednumber of metals). Overburden is not includedbecause of limited data availability. This will notseriously influence the TMR given the small totalvolume of metal mining in Japan.
Imported—Figures on the summary table are actualcommodity weights (including ancillary mass)reported in trade statistics. Hidden flows areestimated by applying factors provide by WI and/orWRI as world average or typical figures. Hiddenflows are estimated both for ores and refined metals.In order to avoid double-counting, hidden flows donot include ancillary mass which is actuallyimported as part of a commodity's mass. Factors areapplied as follows (ton-hidden flows per ton-netmetal content): gold 303,030 tons per ton, silver14,265 tons per ton, copper 304 tons per ton-netfor 27% grade ore, 184 tons per ton for refinedmetal with 40% secondary input, lead 16.2 tons perton-net for 61% grade ore, 10.1 tons per ton forrefined metal with 40% secondary input, zinc 18.9tons per ton-net for 61% grade ore, 17.3 tons perton refined metal with 11% secondary input, iron2.39 tons per ton-commodity mass of 60% grade,4.64 tons per ton for crude iron, chromium 3.2 tonsper ton , tungsten 117 tons per ton, molybdenum665 tons per ton, manganese 7.3 tons per ton, tin5002 tons per ton, nickel 117 tons per ton-net for15% grade ore, 73 tons per ton for refined metalwith 40% secondary input, bauxite 0.48 tons perton-commodity mass, aluminum 4.92 tons per ton.
Industrial Minerals
Domestic production—Data on annual productionare available from MITl's Statistics. Data on gradeare available only for limestone and dolomite, for
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
49
which ancillary mass is calculated. Figures for aminimum percentage of overburden (which heremeans mass actually mixed with mined ores) areapplied for estimating hidden flows. Limestone anddolomite for cement production are included in this
Imported data on commodity mass is based on tradestatistics. For estimating hidden flows, 5.1 tons perton is applied for phosphate based on the U.S.estimates by the WRI. The figure of mining wasteper commodity reported in the Global 2000 reportis applied for stones (0.073 tons per ton). The samehidden flow factors are used domestically when anyother appropriate figures are not available.
Construction materials
Domestic production of crushed stone, sand andgravel for construction is reported by MITI'sStatistics. No hidden flow is estimated because thesematerials are usually supplied by surface mining. Theestimate of imported stones for construction isbased on trade statistics.
Infrastructure
Surplus soil—The first comprehensive, nation-widesurvey was conducted in 1990 by MOC. This surveycounted the amount of soil moved from inside tooutside a construction site and did not include soilre-used at the same site. The time series is estimatedassuming that the amount of soil moved isproportional to the total ainount of money (at aconstant price) invested in construction.Considerable earth is used where it is excavated andso the amount of earth moved reported in this timeseries must be smaller than that actually excavated.
Residential area development—Usually, whendeveloping a new residential area, particularly onslopes, the balance of cut and fill is carefullydesigned to minimize the transport of earth to other
sites. Based on Environmental Impact Statements ofseveral actual development projects, and personalcommunication with civil engineers, the averageexcavation factor per unit area developed is set as 3cubic meters per square meter, and 1.75 tons percubic meter.
Erosion
There is no formal nationwide survey of soil erosionon agricultural areas. Rough estimates are made byapplying the universal soil loss equation (USLE)modified by MAFF researchers for Japanesesituations. Parameters for rainfall intensity, slope, soiltype are considered. National average erosion rate ofagricultural field is calculated as 6 tons per hectare.This constant factor is multiplied by the area ofagricultural fields.
Renewables
The commodity mass of domestic production is basedon MAFF's statistics, and imported commodities arebased on trade statistics. The hidden flows of importedagricultural products are estimated, as follows: applyinga productivity factor (yield per area) by type of crops,the total area required to produce products exportedto Japan is calculated. Then the erosion rate (erosionper unit area) is applied to the total area required. Theerosion rate of the U.S. (15 tons per hectare) is used, asthe U.S. is Japan's largest trading partner foragricultural products. Hidden flows of imported meatis estimated by assuming 5.5 tons of feed per ton ofmeat. For timbers and semi-manufactured timberproducts (plywood, wood chips) imported fromtropical South-East Asia, it is assumed that 5.5 times asmuch timber volume is cut down as is traded.
Imported Semi-manufactures and FinalProducts
Individual physical amounts (weight or other unitthat can be converted to weight) of tradedcommodities are reported for about 90% (price
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
50
basis) of total imports. The weight of the remaining10% was estimated assuming that the weight perprice is similar for similar commodities. Hiddenflows of semi-manufactures other than refinedmetals and timber products are roughly estimated byapplying a average factor of 4 tons per ton (derivedfrom German estimates).
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge thecontribution of Mr. Masaya Yoshida of FujiResearch Institute for his extensive data gatheringand editing assistance. Special thanks should be
extended to Dr. Yoshitake Kato (National Institutefor Agro-environmental Research, MAFF) and Mr.Takehiro Nakaguchi for their kind suggestions andassistance estimating Japanese domestic soil erosion;as well as to Mr. Takemi Itoh of Taisei Corporationfor his helpful information about excavation forinfrastructure. Thanks also should be extended to themembers of the Planning and Coordination Bureauof the JEA, and experts and consultants who havebeen supporting the Agency's activities concerningenvironmental accounting and indicatordevelopment. This work is financially supported bythe Global Environmental Research Fund of theJEA.
Data Sources and Methodology
General References:
The majority of the Dutch data has been obtainedfrom a single source: Central Bureau of Statistics(CBS). Only in cases that CBS-data were notavailable have other sources have been used. Thefollowing other sources were used.
• RIVM, Milieubalans van Nederland [NationalEnvironmental Outlook of the Netherlands],1993-2015 (ISBN 90 6092 881 4): for data onemissions into the environment.
• Ontgrondingen [Earth Removal], N&M11, 1978(ISBN 90 70211 07 6): for earlier data ondomestic industrial and construction minerals.
• Ruimtebeslag in Nederland [Land Use and LandCover in the Netherlands]: for more recent dataon domestic extraction.
• POSW data on dredging
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment data on iron scrap
Wherever possible the data are presented with thesame number of significant figures as reported byCBS or the other sources. Missing years wereestimated through interpolation or extrapolation. Inthe case that only indirect information was available,the required data have been calculated using certainassumptions; all data derived this way are presentedin rounded figures.
Mass Flow Categories
The reported mass flows concern four commoditycategories: domestic, import, export, and transit. Inthe data for the Netherlands, these commoditycategories, as well as the connected hidden flows onimports and exports, are presented separately. As theinternational trade and transport functions play animportant role in the Dutch economy, both theexport and the transit flows are relatively large. Theinfluence of export and transit flows on the TMR
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
51
for the Netherlands are shown in the graph, "DutchTMR With and Without Transit Flows." This graphvisually confirms that the Netherlands is anintermediary in international flows and a majorexporter in its own right.
Corrections Applied
The Netherlands serves as the entry point for manyimports into Europe. These transit goods can bedefined into two categories: direct transit flows thatare immediately transhipped to other destinations,and indirect transit, goods that are stored for aperiod prior to shipment. The TMR for theNetherlands is defined as total flows less dii-ecttransit flows.
The import and export figures from CBS alsoinclude direct transit flows. The indirect transitflows, however, which are stored for some timeperiod , are not accounted for by CBS, so thesefigures had to be derived from other sources. In thedata table presented for the Netherlands, theimports and exports are corrected only for thedirect transit flows as reported by the CBS.
Methods Used for Presentation ofDomestic Production
Energy carriers: CBS energy figures were convertedfrom petajoules into metric tons using the followingfactors:
CoalOilNatural gas
29 MJ/kg42 MJ/kg0.8 kg/m3
Excavation necessary for the construction ofbuildings and roads is estimated on the basis of thenumber of houses newly built and the length of theadded road mileage using the following assumptions:
FIGURE
140
'E. 120
v 100
•5 80
t; 60 —
40
20 —1975
11
TilRTMR
DUTCWITHWITHTRAN
H TA N
M RD
O U TS I T
_——
1980 19S5
+ direct transit- indirect transit
- TMR.... TMR-
FLOW
1990
indirect transit -
S
1995
export
per kmhighwayother roads
Conversion
60,000 mJ
8,000 m3
- I T - - 3
1.73 metric tons per m
Excavationper house 72:
Materials from dredging are calculated on the basisof POSW data for the period 1990-95 (obtainedfrom the Dutch Ministry of Waterworks) assuming50% of that value for 1965 and 75% for 1980. Forthe other years a linear interpolation was applied.
Renewables
Soil erosion is taken as 10% gross weight of roottype biomass. In the Netherlands the common typeof soil erosion does not occur due to the flat andcultivated nature of the country. The Netherlandsexist because of erosion by wind and waterelsewhere. Intensive cultivation and subsequentdrainage often leads to compacting soil due to thelower ground water levels, rather than a loss of soil.Foreign erosion is captured in the hidden flows of
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
52
Material Requirements 1965-1994The Netherlands
Unit:1000 metric tonsDOMESTIC
Non-renewablesI,Energy CarriersCoalOilNatural GasTotalII. MetaiOres(none)III.Industrial MineralsMarlCommon saltCarnaliteTotalIV. Construction MineralsGravelSand, indust.Sand, constructionClayTotal
V. ExcavationInfrastructureDredgingTotal
RenewablesI. Plant Biomass (fresh weight)GrassWheatRyeBarleyOatPeasBeanColeseedFlaxPotatoesPotatoes (industrial)Sugar beetsOnionsCorn (for cattle)VegetablesFruit
II. Plant Biomass, Wild HarvestWoodill.Animal Biomass, Wild HarvestFish
Total Renewables
Erosion
Total Domestic
IMPORTS
Non-renewablesI.Energy CarriersSolid fuelsCrude oil and productsNatural Gas
li. Metal OresOres and metal residuesIII. + IV. Industrial & Construction MineralsCrude industrial and building materials
RenewablesAgricultural products including livestockFoodstuffs including fodder and concentrates
1970 1985 1990
11,6092,4001,537
15,546
0
4,0001,707
05,707
11,40024,00025,0006,000
66,400
92,36812,000
104,368
9,500838303452440
539
13114
9,2664,363
14,2921,929
08,4842,585
529
53553,70513,473
70040,232
246.426
4,3911,920
28,08434,396
0
4,0002,871
06,871
11,40024,00025,0006,000
66,400
116,44614,000
130,446
9,500776204399241471426
13513,64610,00018,8442,411
013,3913,190
529
42173,77214,1431.057
59,630312.941
01,570
80,31681,886
0
4,0002,690
06,690
6,70024,00025,0006,000
61,700
54,66716,00070,667
9,500640
76407192
271744
12510,86110,24523,7082,894
14,30115,0932,910
529
51792,08515,103
1,12376,982
314.150
01,643
81,27082,913
0
3,5003,464
06,964
4,50023,00025,000
5,50058,000
38,87818,00056,878
9,8981,069
47313114
187
35119
16,6679,772
23,7243,376
23,16816,4083,050
529
509108,82116,5581,255
92,263314,831
04,143
71,97076,113
0
3,5003,500
5007,500
5,00023,00025,0005,500
58,500
28,28021,00049,280
9,4681,032
23239
70861137
13619,78110,38425,3403,376
30,41118,2282,765
545
840122,77217,0001,383
105,772315.547
04,048
69,32073,368
0
3,0003,500
5007,000
5,00023,00025,000
5,50058,500
27,49524,00051,495
10,2101,304
44265
2074
831
15119,65410,03434,4924,389
36,05722,5882,550
551
767143,18818,9071,611
124,281335.162
03,786
64,62568,411
0
3,0003,500
5007,000
5,00023,00025,0005,500
58,500
27,39124,00051,391
8,9461,144
41288
223911
25135
20,4358,886
28,7564,466
35,66024,9622,100
551
740137,20617,1401,460
120,066323.968
03,405
64.90068,305
0
3,0003,500
5207,020
5,00023,00025,0005,500
58,500
28,76624,00052,766
8,3021,233
42247
2227
91777
22,1989,852
33,0045,527
39,61226,8372,635
551
732150,92317,268
1,642133,656339.156
03,357
66,20069,557
0
3,0003,500
5507,050
5,03222.24624,6325,500
57,410
27,18424,00051,184
8,3001,253
50305
3717
89
10221,36311,12229,9165,845
44,51026,0003,865
551
812154,065
17,5431,578
136,521340.844
0• 4,45262,80067,252
0
2,8003,500
6006,900
6,91425,08635,476
5,00072,476
27,45824,00051,458
8,3001,189
32276
341165
12619,67110,24124,5964,485
41,62626,2973,250
551
750141,44616,7241,370
124,721340,903
7,73454,719
0
9,171
24,617
6,6986,315
4,695105,514
0
11,632
42,076
10,9654,109
4,953127,086
0
13,424
29,251
13,8448,352
10,402127,869
2,650
14,910
30,359
11,74217,472
12,013113,234
1,650
6,304
40,684
13.19423,688
19,621111,416
2,125
10,176
45,637
13,54622.472
22,165134,546
10,157
44,586
14,18931.499
21,643124,986
9,659
45,594
15,38833,581
15,963117,654
5,652
35,195
15,74532,053
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
53
Material Requirements 1965-1994The Netherlands
Unit:1000 metric tons ~~Semi-manufacturesMetalsFertilizers
Final ProductsChemical productsOther final goods
Total Imports
Direct Material Inputs (DMI) Domestic + Import
HIDDEN FLOWS FROM IMPORTS
Non-renewablesI. Energy CarriersII. Metal Ores
III. & iV. Industiai and Construction Minerals
Renewables
Semi-manufactured Products
Total Hidden Flows from Imports
EXPORTS
Non-renewablesI.Energy CarriersSolid fuelsCrude oil and productsNatural gas
II. Metal OresOres and metal residues
III. + IV. Industrial and Construction MineralsCrude industrial and building materialsRenewablesAgricultural products including livestockFoodstuffs including fodder and concentrates
Semi-manufactured ProductsMetalsFertilizersChemical products
Final Products
Totaf Exports
HIDDEN FLOWS WITH EXPORTS
Non-renewablesI. Energy CarriersII. Metal Ores
ill. & IV. Industrial and Construction Minerals
Renewables
Semi-manufactured Products
Total Hidden Flows with ExportsINDICATORSTotal Material Requirement (TMR)TMR adjusted for exports and recyclingAvoided Hidden Flows from recyclingTMR per capita (metric tons)Domestic TMR Per Capita (metric tons)
1975 1980 1985
2,1674,149
3061,080
116,955
363.381
3,0434,106
4,0552,095
192,290
505.231
2,1382,858
3,1972,398
207,502
521,653
3,3324,133
7,8354,924
235,628
550.459
4,3114,244
15,5168,830
243,667
559,214
7,0623,905
17,05412,058
265,073
600,235
7,9193,241
20,25014,013
302,565
626.533
8,4913,180
21,37514,872
298,770
637.926
6,2112,267
16.20115,738
262,679
603.523
55,15955,0238,862
71,567
57,158
247,769
45,05169,78915,147
82,907
71,651
284,546
50,05180,54710,530
122,079
50,211
313.419
83,40389,45810,929
160,679
76,634
421,104
90,52437,82314,646
202,851
93,641
439,485
135,98061,05516,429
198,101
138,165
549,731
154,51560,94416,051
251,287
149,244
632,042
149,85357,95516,414
269,329
158,551
652,102
114,60133,91412,670
262,887
115,674
539,745
275,000
615,903
5,31229,978
32
5,987
13,141
4,7032,824
1.4613.952
603
241
68,232
1,86071,00910,021
6,710
16,666
6,6601,230
2,3743,4605,372
279
125,641
86295,26743,611
6,419
4,678
8,7224,343
2,9973,6545,187
1,229
176,970
3,27987,23339,300
7,797
4,457
6,77910,125
4,4255,017
10.132
2,527
181.071
1,86182,82631,675
(272)
17,992
8,37416,045
5,4835,722
20,731
5,921
196,357
4,02385.06027,025
2,583
21,174
9,87317,433
7,2967,166
23,165
9,373
214,172
8,234121,501
3,267
21,561
10,30019,745
8.0666,318
26,816
11,144
236,952
8,646121,132
2,783
22,612
10,72420,272
8,2906,155
26,131
11,989
238,735
2,071122,629
1,271
19,474
10,39020,317
7,5606,110
26,797
13,251
229,870 230,000
36,67435,9194,599
54,189
36,567
167,948
570,918334,737
7,3254627
24,52540,257
5,833
56,808
44,601
172,024
730,148432,483
9,3245633
29,13638,517
1,637
94,069
52,738
216,097
758,089365,022
15,4985627
41,49446,780
1,560
121,712
75,966
287,511
879,299410,71722,753
6229
30,7511,6336,297
175.817
91,662
306,161
892,927390,41029.510
6227
43,15515,4977,411
196,606
119,733
382,402
1,025,685429,11138,951
6929
68,84219,6047,546
216,328
124,349
436,670
1,138,509464,88739,273
7631
71,25516,6997,914
223,170
126,112
445,151
1,156,372472,48741,713
7631
32,0457,6286,816
221,087
117,486
385,062
1,006,746391,81444,397
6626
400,000
1,031,181401,18146,047
6726
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INL>USTRIAL FICONOMIES
54
imported renewables. Disturbed soil caused byploughing, although a significantly larger quantitythan erosion, is not reported.
Hidden Flows of Imports and Exports
To estimate the hidden flows of imports andexports, the following procedure was adopted.
With respect to import and export data either theaggregated statistical data are in money values or inmass, and are very detailed. The approach chosenhere was to use the existing mass data on transport,including transit traffic in which a change of carrierhas occurred. Next the data were aggregated into 10categories.
1. Agricultural products including livestock
2. Foodstuffs, fodder, and concentrates
3. Solid fuels
4. Crude oil and oil products
5. Ores and metal residues
6. Metals
7. Raw industrial minerals and building materials
8. Fertilizers
9. Chemical products
10. Finished goods
Data were not available for all requested years;Therefore, averages were calculated from theavailable data for both the transit traffic and theaggregated 10 categories mentioned. This gave aconsistent set, indicating that the import and exportpackage of the Netherlands did not change toodrastically in the period taken into consideration.From different statistics a more detailed descriptionwas available for 1985. This was used to calculate thehidden flows for the above categories, with datafrom the Wuppertal Institute for German imports asa basis.
Recycling materials avoids hidden flows. For 1991the avoided hidden flows caused by the reuse ofpaper, scrap, aluminum, copper, and building or roadconstruction wastes were 39.3 million metric tons,which represents about 6% of the total hidden flowsof imports.
Acknowledgments
The Dutch contribution to this report "was onlypossible due to the efforts by Dr. R.J.J. vanHeijningen, Ir J.H.O. Hazewinkel, Drs S van derVen, and the valuable cooperation of Dr. HJ.Dijkerman and Dr. SJ. Keuning of the CentralStatistics Bureau.
UNITED STATES MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
Material flows supporting the United States'economy are almost totally due to domesticactivities—with only about 5% associated with theimports of raw materials, semi-manufactures, orfinished goods. This concentration of materialextraction within its borders means that the bulk ofthe flows necessary to feed and house workers andextract that material (for example, fuel formachinery) are also accounted for. These additional
flows are not included with the hidden flows ofimports; so a country like the United States withlimited imports will show relatively higher materialflows than those countries with a greater share ofimports in their material flow accounts.
One of the largest material flows in the UnitedStates arises from the surface mining of coal.Overburden is removed from above coal seams and,
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
55
Material Requirements 1975-1994United States
Unit:million metric tonsNON-RENEWABLES
Industrial MineralsGypsumDomestic ProductionImportsTotal Hidden FlowsClayDomestic productionGangueOverburdenSand and Gravel (Industrial)Domestic productionOverburdenSaltDomestic productionImports
PotashDomestic productionImportsForeign Hidden FlowsDomestic Hidden RowsPhosphateDomestic production (phosphate rock)Domestic Hidden Flows
Construction MaterialsCrushed StoneTotal productionDomestic overburdenDomestic gangue
Sand and Gravel (Construction)Total productionOverburden
MetalsAluminumBauxite importsAlumina importsForeign overburden bauxiteForeign overburden aluminaForeign gangue aluminaDomestic gangue bauxiteDomestic gangue aluminaTotal Hidden FlowsGoldTotal Gold production (metric tons)GangueOverburdenTotal domestic Hidden FlowsCopperDomestic mine productionDomestic gangueDomestic overburdenDomestic Hidden FlowsCopper importsForeign gangueForeign overburden
Iron OreCrude ore minedProduction usable oreImports usable oreForeign gangueForeign overburdenDomestic gangue from importsDomestic gangueDomestic overburdenTotal Hidden Flows% of supply from secondary scrap
1978 1979 1982
951
472
141
250
383
231018
44228
1161
513
152
271
404
241318
45230
1261
513
154
281
394
251516
47244
1481
553
165
301
395
251517
50257
1371
523
157
301
425
261718
52266
1171
462
137
261
385
251617
54280
1071
422
125
271
354
251517
54276
1061
33299
250
345
241214
37193
1271
382
114
240
305
251415
43219
1381
422
126
271
367
251516
49253
816849
71614
817849
77616
8659
52
81416
9521057
87417
9951060
85817
892954
69214
792848
62513
717743
53811
781847
59312
867952
70014
1246449224
35102737
120528949402332
218804818951816818348252
13464410222
35102737
122031052904157
228814517901717718548749
13564510223
35102737
120528949503955
161563915771412612936145
14575510224
35102737
121129750815071
238823413681318619047043
14575510224
35102737
123232755802636
260873413691320520049950
14575511225
3092332
12022854881
5173
216712610519
17116340454
13464410222
43143751
224734759404056
231742911581118417143445
1045348218
46174662
118125543604867
11236156295898321245
834336113
6239105144
1172242414
15984
11738145275938821850
935337216
652773100
11632293921
5072
16252187356
12912029745
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
56
1987 1993 1994
1391
432
128
271
366
24
1314
51262
1491
422
126
250
346
1
41213
40207
1491
402
121
251
345
24
1214
41211
1591
412
124
261
365
24
1314
45234
1671
432
130
271
366
1
41112
50256
1581
432
129
261
376
24
1314
46238
1471
412
123
230
366
24
1215
48248
1571
402
121
251
365
24
1315
47242
1671
412
123
261
396
24
1314
36183
1791
422
127
271
4010
1
51413
41212
9089
54
72515
9289
56
80016
1,0891165
81216
1,13111
68
83617
1,1001166
81316
1,1081166
83117
9971060
70814
1,0501163
83417
1,1201167
86917
1.2301274
89118
8343361
14
763185
116
1
169221390
04053
1525016
632
6120114278
50
72322
1
12
11651
137187
1172225398
15673
1224017
734
69791
23555
10353372
17
15481
219300
1199291490
1
5669
1484817
634
6118109274
57
10453482
18
201118319437
1223342565
04867
1835820
840
7147132335
58
12464492
21
266156422578
1244429673
04768
1885920
839
7151136340
59
12464492
21
295184497681
2267594862
04579
1815618
7
367
146130325
62
12564592
22
294184496680
2279660940
155
105
18357135
275
147131315
60
11555
Oi
92
21
330220594814
2302592893
165
117
17956135
255
144128307
58
12464492
20
331221596816
2309590898
170
125
18056145
285
145128312
59
11353382
18
326217587804
2316600916
183
150
18858187
356
152134334
55
Material Requirements 1975-1994United States
Unit:million metric tonsNON-RENEWABLES
Industrial MineralsGypsum
Domestic ProductionImports
Total Hidden FlowsClay
Domestic productionGangue
OverburdenSand and Gravel (Industrial)
Domestic productionOverburden
SaltDomestic production
ImportsPotash
Domestic productionImports
Foreign Hidden FlowsDomestic Hidden Flows
PhosphateDomestic production (phosphate rock)
Domestic Hidden Flows
Construction MaterialsCrushed Stone
Total productionDomestic overburden
Domestic gangueSand and Gravel (Construction)
Total productionOverburden
MetalsAluminum
Bauxite importsAlumina imports
Foreign overburden bauxiteForeign overburden alumina
Foreign gangue aluminaDomestic gangue bauxite
Domestic gangue aluminaTotal Hidden Flows
GoldTotal Gold production (metric tons)
GangueOverburden
Total domestic Hidden FlowsCopper
Domestic mine productionDomestic gangue
Domestic overburdenDomestic Hidden Flows
Copper importsForeign gangue
Foreign overburdenIron Ore
Crude ore minedProduction usable ore
Imports usable oreForeign gangue
Foreign overburdenDomestic gangue from imports
Domestic gangueDomestic overburden
Total Hidden Flows% of supply from secondary scrap
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
57
Material Requirements 1975-1994United States
Unit:million metric tonsInfrastructureDredgingHighway ConstructionNew General Construction
Fossil FuelsTotal Fossil Fuels (Net)LiquidDomestic productionDomestic Hidden FlowsImportsForeign Hidden Flows
Natural GasDomestic productionDomestic Hidden FlowsImportsForeign Hidden Flows
CoalDomestic productionDomestic Hidden FlowsImportsForeign Hidden Flows
Total Fossil Fuel Hidden Flows
Soil ErosionSoil Erosion:non-federaJ
RENEWABLES
AgricultureAgricultural ProductionAgricultural Hidden FlowsAgricultural ImportsAgricultural Import Hidden Flows
ForestryForestry (roundwood)Forestry Hidden Flows
Animal BiomassLivestockWild fish harvest
IMPORTS OF SEMI-MANUFACTURES AND FINISHED PRODUCTS
Semi-manufacturesSemi-manufacturesSemi- manufactures Hidden FlowsFinished Products
INDICATORS
Total Material Requirement (TMR)TMR Per Capita (metric tons)Direct Inputs (% of TMR)TMR/GDP (1985 constant $US), Indexed 1985= 100Hidden Flows Per Capita (metric tons)
1980
5602,4271,433
5172,3421.674
5121,9161,796
4901,5241,626
4911,6671,750
5121,8911,485
5971,8321,644
4771,5451,732
4981,4281,819
5791,4441,973
1,935 1,908 2,022
5,420 5,317 5,267 5,167
1,786
4,952
1,946
49740
30124
356107
185
5955,014
112
5,202
48339
36329
353106
185
6235,237
116
5.432
48939
43735
354106
196
6345,816
1
226,024
51041
41533
354106
185
6095,699
340
5.925
50340
42034
364109
237
7105,648
226
5.863
50540
34327
359108
185
7545,889
114
6,084
50540
29824
355106
175
7495,953
1
126,140
50641
25420
3309917
5
7625,818
1
85,991
50941
25120
2988917
5
7115,136
114
5,305
52242
27022
32397165
8155,813
114
5,992
417166
569
223101
893
420167
569
246112
893
440177
569
256116
843
452183
569
286130
833
489199
569
306139
694
442176
570
303138
724
515210
672
297135
734
519211
673
285130
754
371145
568
312142
744
489200
677
338154
775
35120
31
35120
31
35120
31
35120
31
35120
31
35122
27
3512424
31117
31
42176
38
55238
47
21,4639921
13879
22,050101
21135
81
22,370102
22131
80
22,0139923
12377
22,402100
24122
77
21,9829722
12176
22,1519621
12077
20,8889021
11572
20,0568621
10768
21,5269122
10871
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
58
1,904
1987 1989
2,095 2,098
4,339 4,172 4,012 3,858 3,710
1993
3,543
1994
5201,377
1,790
5361,435
1,856
4581,291
1,797
4961,163
1,626
5621,250
1,908
4791,254
1,904
5161,251
1,707
4391,281
1,943
4731,074
1,862
5181,074
1,662
5254225220
30491185
8035,363
220
5,541
5084130925
29789144
8095,552
223
5,733
4933933227
30792185
8355,623
217
5,804
4843936729
31695247
8645,820
221
6,012
4553640032
32096268
8925,903
329
6,104
4423539832
32999288
9355,982
227
6,183
4513637930
327983310
9055,711
333
5,919
4403539231
330994012
9075,718
337
5,932
4263442834
3371014313
8605,630
769
5.881
4153344335
3491054714
9365,864
768
6,119
530218787
332151
775
494201785
351159
775
469189785
364166
786
380148785
370168
776
4711899
113
374170
796
5032059
116
372169
796
4781939
120
349159
805
5582289
123
359163
806
45618010126
359163
826
58623910130
359163
826
5323154
20,623
862410066
5223355
20,868
87249867
5324146
21,095
87259666
5524937
21,196
87259366
3915561
21,906
89259468
4217055
22,145
89259467
4718752
21,237
84249165
5220649
21.968
86259165
5822747
21,472
83258763
6525146
21,947
84268663
Material Requirements 1975-1994United States
Unit:million metric tonsInfrastructure
DredgingHighway Construction
New General Construction
Fossil FuelsTotal Fossil Fuels (Net)
LiquidDomestic production
Domestic Hidden FlowsImports
Foreign Hidden FlowsNatural Gas
Domestic productionDomestic Hidden Flows
ImportsForeign Hidden Flows
CoalDomestic production
Domestic Hidden FlowsImports
Foreign Hidden FlowsTotal Fossil Fuel Hidden Flows
Soil Erosion
Soil Erosion:non-federai
RENEWABLES
AgricultureAgricultural Production
Agricultural Hidden FlowsAgricultural Imports
Agricultural Import Hidden FlowsForestry
Forestry (roundwood)Forestry Hidden Flows
Animal Bio massLivestock
Wild fish harvest
IMPORTS OF SEMI-MANUFACTURES AND FINISHED PRODUCTS
Semi-manufacturesSemi-manufactures
Semi- manufactures Hidden FlowsFinished Products
INDICATORS
Total Material Requirement (TMR)TMR Per Capita (metric tons)
Direct Inputs (% of TMR)TMR/GDP (1985 constant $US), Indexed 1985- 100
Hidden Flows Per Capita (metric tons)
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
59
according to law, is later returned and the areagraded and reclaimed. The impact of thisoverburden removal on environmental qualities alsovaries by the amount, duration of mining,topography of the site, and the hydrologicalsituation. The annual new excavation of thismaterial (almost 6 billion metric tons) makes it amajor human activity on this planet.
Erosion makes up another large component of theU.S. TMR. Although declining in recent years dueto policies that cause farmers to set aside highlyerosible land, soil erosion from crop and grazinglands makes up between 3 and 4 billion metrictons annually. This scale of soil erosion in theUnited States is due in part to its size anddiversity of landscapes. But it is also due to theinherent erosive potential of much of its mostproductive soils and the continued use ofrelatively marginal lands for cropping andintensive grazing.
Road and infrastructure building in the UnitedStates continues on a scale without precedent in theworld. Even though much of the vast highwaysystem is complete, a program of highwayimprovements, infrastructure repair and replacement,and the increasing demand for wider and fasterroadways, requires a high level of landscapemodification and material usage. Unlike countrieswhere dense rail and other public transportinfrastructure minimize demand for roads, transportinfrastructure in the United States reflects thecultural value given to the automobile andindependence of movement.
Of the non-fossil fuel raw materials used in theUnited States, construction materials, copper, gold,and iron dominate all other material flows.
Data Sources and Methodology
General references:
MCS: Mineral Commodity Summaries, and annualreport published by the U.S. Bureau of Mines(USBM), now currently part of the U.S. GeologicalService (USGS).
MIS: Mineral Industry Surveys are commodity specificreports published annually or periodically by theUSBM.
Statistical Compendium: A USBM SpecialPublication, published December 1993.
Annual Energy Review 1994, United States'EnergyInformation Administration.
FAOSTAT, United Nations Food and AgricultureOrganisation.
FISHSTAT, United Nations Food and AgricultureOrganisation.
Personal communication: Unless otherwise noted,this notation indicates that verbal information orestimates were obtained from USBM/USGScommodity specialists. The help of these specialistsfacilitated data gathering and was greatly appreciated.
Industrial Minerals
Gypsum: Apparent consumption, domesticproduction, and imports data were obtained fromcurrent and historical MCS. Overburden andgangue were estimated to total 5% of production(personal communication).
Clay: Apparent consumption and domesticproduction were obtained from the USBMStatistical Compendium, more recent years fromMCS. Negligible amounts of clay are imported.Kaolin is estimated to have 25% gangue and to beabout 20% of all clay mined. Overburden associatedwith clay mining varies from zero to 10 tons perton, 3 tons per ton is considered to be a good
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
60
average (personal communication). Common clay,which is used almost exclusively for constructionpurposes, averaged about 60% of domesticproduction.
Crushed stone, cement rock, lime, agricultural rock:Total domestic stone production was obtained fromthe MIS Annual Review-1994 and StatisticalCompendium. This total includes cement andagricultural limestone. Domestic overburden isestimated to be 1% of production, gangue (stonefines) is estimated to be an additional 6% (personalcommunication).
Sand and gravel (construction): Apparentconsumption data were obtained from the MCS andStatistical Compendium. Overburden is estimated tobe 2% of production (personal communication).
Sand and gravel (industrial): Apparent consumptiondata were obtained from the MCS. This data is notembedded in the construction sand and gravel data.Overburden and gangue were estimated to be 2% ofproduction (personal communication).
Salt: Apparent consumption data were obtainedfrom the MCS and Statistical Compendium. Nooverburden or gangue data were included sincealmost all production is obtained by solution mining.
Potash: Apparent consumption and import data inK2O equivalents were obtained from the MCS. Adomestic ore average grade of 14% K2O was usedbased on a time series obtained from USGSpersonnel. The foreign ore grade, mainly fromCanada, was estimated to be 22% K2O (personalcommunication). Potash is imported at about 66%K2O.
Phosphate: The apparent consumption of P2O5equivalents was obtained from Fertilizer Institutedata. Phosphate rock production data were obtained
from the MCS and Statistical Compendium.Phosphate rock as marketed contains on average27% P2O5, U.S. production is about 5/6 fromFlorida and 1/6 from North Carolina with theFlorida rock grade averaging 10% P2O5 and theNorth Carolina grade 24.5%, (personalcommunication). Additionally, Florida mine slimeswere estimated to be about 6.3 tons per ton ofP2O5, and the mill gypsum waste about 2.7 tons perton of P2O5. For North Carolina, mine sandsaverage 0.41 tons per ton of P2O5 and mill gypsum2.67 tons per ton of P2O5 (personalcommunication). Overburden was calculated basedon estimates of 1 ton per ton of ore for Florida and4 tons per ton of ore for North Carolina (personalcommunication).
Metals
Aluminum: Apparent supply, which includes bothnew and old scrap whereas new scrap is excludedfrom apparent consumption, was obtained from theMCS and Statistical Compendium along withprimary metal production and scrap data. For overallcalculations, an average of 4 tons of bauxite wasconsidered to yield 2 tons of alumina, which yields1 ton of aluminum. All bauxite for primary metalproduction was assumed to be imported (personalcommunication). A worldwide weighted average of0.48 tons of overburden per ton of bauxite wascalculated based on global data contained inInternational Primary Aluminum Institute report"Bauxite Mine Rehabilitation Survey," by PeterMartyn, dated December 1992. Alumina import datafor 1977-90 was not available, but was calculated tobe 35% of the bauxite imports based on an averagefor 1991-95.
Gold: Domestic gold mine production was obtainedfrom the MCS and Statistical Compendium. Thechange in the average ore grade for the U.S. wasobtained from Figure 5 of USBM SP 24-94 "World
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
61
Gold," 1994. The worldwide average grade wasobtained from Table E-3 of the same publication,which provided data for 1983 and 1992, a linearinterpolation was used for the intervening years. Aglobal weighted average of 2.56 tons overburden perton of ore was calculated, based on 1992 data inSP24-94, for the United States, Canada, Australia,and South Africa. The overburden average for theU.S. was taken as 2.7 tons per ton of ore based onSP 24-94 (p. 19).
Copper: Domestic mine production, apparentsupply, imports, and scrap data were obtained fromthe MCS and Statistical Compendium. The U.S. andworld average grade, and overburden to ore ratios,were obtained from the USBM Copper AvailabilityStudy,June, 1993 for the years 1984-95. Figuresequal to 1984 were assumed for the years 1975-83.
Iron ore: Production of useable ore was obtainedfrom the MCS and the Statistical Compendium. Forthe United States, useable ore is considered to havean average grade of about 63% (USBM IC 9128,Iron Ore Availability, 1987, and personalcommunication). U.S. crude ore mined for 1991-95was calculated based on data from 1977-90. Averageworld ore grade was taken to be 43.3%, and averagegrade of imported useable ore was taken as 60%based on data in IC 9128 and personalcommunications. Domestic overburden was assumedto be 2.3 tons per ton of useable ore, and foreignoverburden was taken to be 2 tons per ton ofuseable ore (personal communication). A calculatediron consumption was computed by taking 63% ofthe reported consumption of useable ore for all uses.This figure was used as the commodityconsumption from primary sources. The amountsfurnished from domestic and foreign sources wasobtained using the ratio of domestic to foreignuseable ore. The apparent consumption and steel
from secondary sources were used to calculate thepercent from secondary sources.
Metals recycling rates: Three different terms aresometimes used to describe scrap, secondary supply:old scrap, which is post consumer; new scrap, whichis post fabricator (cuttings and turnings); and homescrap, which never leaves the mill (usually this isonly considered for steel). To give an accuratepicture of recycling whatever is included in supplyor apparent consumption must also be included aspart of secondary supply. In calculating the percentfrom secondary supply both new and old scrap arecounted in the numerator and the denominator.
Infrastructure
Dredging: The dredging time series was obtainedfrom the Dredging and Navigation Branch of theU.S. Corps of Engineers in terms of dollars andcubic yards per year for 1966-1995. Dredging isboth for maintenance and new projects, with themajority being for maintenance. The predominant(about 80%) motive for dredging was harbor andchannel improvement, with the remaining sharebeing used for beach replenishment. All dredginghas been included. In addition to dredging by theCorps, private dredging is permitted in the amountof 50-100 million cubic yards per year. It is notknown exactly how much of the permitted privatedredging is actually done. A time series was notavailable for the private activity, so an average of 75million cubic yards per year was used all years. Insitu density varies from 1,400-2,200 gr./liter, or1.07-1.68 metric tons per cubic yard. An average of1.375 metric tons per cubic yard was used for allconversions.
Highways: All information was obtained fromannual reports of the Federal HighwayAdministration in the Department of Transportation.Obtained for each year was the total mileage of all
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
62
roads (table HM-12), total capital outlay (table .HF-2), and construction costs exclusive of right ofway and engineering for the years 1977-86.Construction costs were estimated to be 83% of totalcapital outlay for the years 1987-94. In 1961 (PublicRoads magazine Vol.31 No. 10) excavationconstituted 34% of the contract cost for all highwayconstruction. Currently this percentage is much lowersince most current activity is road upgrading ratherthan new construction. For estimating purposesexcavation was assumed to be 30% of constructioncost m 1975-77, exclusive of right of way andengineering, declining to 10 % in 1995. A time seriesof current dollar average contract price per cubic yardwas obtained from publication numberFHWA-PD-95-006,1995. The contract price forexcavation was used to estimate total excavation incubic yards. An average density of 3,000 lbs per cubicyard was used to estimate total mass.
New general construction: Current dollarconstruction expenditures were obtained from tableB-53 of the 1994 Economic Report to thePresident. Included were private residential newhousing units and nonresidential construction, andpublic construction less total highway distributions(all segments of highway programs). Site preparationcosts, the earth moving component of a generalconstruction project, were estimated to be 2.13% oftotal project cost based on information fromConstruction Cost Systems Inc. of Fairfax, Virginia.As with highway construction, total constructioncosts were converted to project excavationexpenditures, which were then converted to cubicyard and tonnage estimates. This was done on a yearby year basis using the same conversion time seriesobtained from FHWA. This conversion factor waschecked against current data from ConstructionCost Systems Inc and found to agree with it.
Note: For both general construction and highways,it was not possible to separate estimates of therehandling of material from estimates of initial
excavation. In the interest of harmonizing thismaterial flow category with estimates from othercountries it was assumed that initial excavation andfirst transport constituted 50% of the calculatedmaterial flows for highways and generalconstruction.
Fossil Fuels
Liquid and Gas: Fossil fuel data were obtained fromthe United States' Energy InformationAdministrations report Annual Energy Review 1994.Petroleum was converted to mass units on the basisof .136 metric tons per barrel. Natural gas wasconverted from cubic feet to metric tons on thebasis of the weight of methane at standardtemperature and pressure (653 grams per cubicmeter). The hidden flows for liquid fuels was basedon the Wuppertal Institute's calculation forpetroleum's hidden flows. The hidden flows fornatural gas was taken from the difference betweengross and net production of dry natural gas found inthe Annual Energy Review 1994.
Coal: Coal production can be separated intounderground mining and surface mining. Thehidden flows for underground coal was based onwhat the Wuppertal Institute used forGermany—10% of the coal mined. The hiddenflows associated with surface mining are morecomplicated. Surface mines occur in three verydifferent depth regimes. Eastern services mines tendto be deeper than Midwestern mines which aredeeper than Western mines. Furthermore, the ratioof overburden to coal extraction is kept proprietaryby the mining companies. Based on the one extantpublication that compares four western (averageoverburden ratio 4.8:1) to one eastern surface mine(overburden ratio 26.9:1), the country waspartitioned into 2 zones west (includingmid-western) and east and these ratios were appliedto production in each zone for each year using datafound in the Annual Energy Review 1994.
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
63
Erosion
Erosion is derived from the United States NaturalResource Inventory, which is a physical survey ofnon-federal land resources in the United Statesevery five years. Erosion estimates from federal lands,21% of the total, are explicitly excluded. This is neterosion from wind and water. Intermediate yearswere estimated by interpolation and out years byextrapolation from known rates of change.
Renewables
Agricultural, forestry and livestock data werederived from FAOSTAT 1995, the electroniccompilation of data from the United Nations Foodand Agriculture Organization. Fish production datawas extracted from FISHSTAT 1995. Roundwooddata was used as the basis for estimating forestry's
hidden flows (45% of roundwood mass, ForestryHandbook,}. Wiley New York, 1984, p. 316). Gram,otherwise accounted for in agricultural production,is often fed to cattle before slaughter to improve
their grade. Nonetheless, much of the weight of beefcattle slaughtered in the United States is due tograzing on rangeland and pasture not otherwiseaccounted for in the renewable resource flows.Aquaculture production was not accounted for inthe fishery flows—grain fed to such fish is otherwiseaccounted for in agricultural production.
ImportsImports of renewable raw materials,semi-manufactures, and final products were derivedfrom the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers annualWaterborne Commerce of the United States (Part 5,
National Summaries) (Washington, D.C.). Calculationsof hidden flows for semi-manufactured imports usedparameters supplied by the Wuppertal Institute whichuses these parameters to estimate the same hiddenflows for Germany. Imports of final products includeall imports by air. Imports by land were not included.Such imports by land from Canada and Mexico arecomplicated by the extensive re-import of materialsexported for labor only.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
ALBERT ADRIAANSE
STEFAN BRINGEZU
ALLEN HAMMOND
YUICHI MORIGUCHI
ERIC RODENBURG
DONALD ROGICH
HELMUT SCHUTZ
Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and Environment, Directorate for the Environment,
ipc 650, 8, Rijnstraat, P.O. Box 30945, 2500 GX, The Hague, The Netherlands
Wuppertal Institute, Postfach 100480, Doppcrsberg 19, D-42103, Wuppertal, Germany,
email: [email protected]
World Resources Institute, 1709 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006,
U.S.A., email: [email protected]
National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaragi-ken, 305
Japan, email: [email protected]
World Resources Institute, 1709 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington. D.C. 20006,
U.S.A., email: [email protected]
World Resources Institute, 1709 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, U.S.A.
Wuppertal Institute, Postfach 100480, Doppersberg 19, D-42103, Wuppertal, Germany,
email: MAT_FLOW_DIV@MAIl. WUPPERJNST.ORG
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
64
World Resources Institute
1709 New York Avenue, N . W The World Resources Institute (WRI) is an independent centerWashington. D.C. 20006. U.S.A.
tor policy research and technical assistance on globalWRis Board of Directors: environmental and development issues. WRI's mission is toMaurice F. Strong
chairman move human society to live in ways that protect Earth'sjoinFiror environment and its capacity to provide for the needs andVice LJiairman
joim H.Adams aspirations o f cur ren t and future generat ions.Manuel Arango
Robert O. Blake
Derek Bok Because people are inspired by ideas, e m p o w e r e d by knowledge ,Bert Bohn and moved to change bv greater understanding, the InstituteRobert N. Burt fo / & » '
DavidT.Buzzeiii p rovides—and helps o ther insti tutions provide—objec t iveMichael R. Dciand informat ion and practical proposals for pol icv and insti tutionalSylvia A. Earle r r r r ,
Alice E Emerson change that will foster environmenta l ly sound, socially equitable« h 7 F l t U H™ „, development. WRI's particular concerns are with globallyWilliam M.Haney, III r r ° '
Cymhia R. Helms significant envi ronmenta l problems and their in teract ion w i t ht'l'T^T . economic development and social equitv at all levels.Yolanda Kakabadse * 1 'Jonathan LashJeffrey T.Leeds The Institute's current areas of work include economics, forests,Thomas E.Lovejoy . . . . . . . , • i i • ijane Lubchenco biodiversity chmate change, energy, sustainable agriculture,c.Payne Lucas resource and environmental information, trade, technology,Robert S. McNamara O /
Scott McVay national strategies for environmental and resource management,wiiHam L. Martin business liaison, and human health.Matthew Nimet?
Paulo Nogneira-Ncto
Ronald L.oison i n aH o f its policy research and w o r k w i t h insti tutions, W R I triesFlorence r.Robinson t o bui ld bridges b e t w e e n ideas and action, mesh ing the insightsRoger w.Sant of scientific research, e c o n o m i c and institutional analyses, andSteplun Schmidheinylimce Smart practical exper ience wi th the need for open and part icipatoryjames Cusuve Speth decision-making.MostafaK.Tolba
Alvaro Umana
Victor L. Urquidi
Pieter Wmsemius
Jonathan Lash
Preside,}!
J. Alan Brewster
Senior Vice President
Walter V Reid
Vice President for Prooram
})onm W Wise
Vice President for Policy Affairs
Robert Repctto
Vice President and Senior Economist
Thomas H. Fox
Vice President
Mai'ione Beane
Sccrefrfry-'lreasurcr
RESOURCE FLOWS: THE MATERIAL BASIS OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
65