research paper writing guide
TRANSCRIPT
2
Contents
§ Recommended reading & acknowledgments § Scientific paper goals § Document preparation systems § Paper structure § Related research § Paper style Do’s and Dont’s § Reviewing
7
Contents
§ Recommended reading & acknowledgments § Scientific paper goals § Document preparation systems § Paper structure § Related research § Paper style Do’s and Dont’s § Reviewing
8
Paper Goals
The primary goals of a scientific paper are: § maximize the number of readers
§ minimize the time to read your paper
§ maximize the fraction of satisfied readers
§ maximize the number of citations the paper will get
Make life easy and pleasant for your reader
9
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is „the wrongful appropriation, close imitation, or purloining and publication, of another author's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions, and the representation of them as one's own original work”. „within academia … plagiarism is considered academic dishonesty … punished by sanctions ranging from suspension to termination, along with the loss of credibility and integrity”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism, accessed 10.5.11
11
Contents
§ Recommended reading & acknowledgments § Scientific paper goals § Document preparation systems § Paper structure § Related research § Paper style Do’s and Dont’s § Reviewing
13
LaTeX References
Miktex distribution of Latex www.miktex.org
Latex editor WinEdt
www.winedt.com
Latex editor TeXnicCenter www.texniccenter.org
14
Springer LNCS Template
LNCS templates and instructions for: § Word § LaTeX
Link: http://www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-7-72376-0
16
Contents
§ Recommended reading & acknowledgments § Scientific paper goals § Document preparation systems § Paper structure § Related research § Paper style Do’s and Dont’s § Reviewing
17
Paper Title
§ Indicates content and main discoveries § Attracts the reader’s attention
§ Should be simple (7-10 words)
§ Aims at specific audience
§ Should avoid complex grammar
§ Should be catchy
18
Paper Title Examples
§ Symbolic Execution of Acyclic Workflow Graphs § Structuring Acyclic Process Models
§ A Fresh Look at Precision in Process Conformance
§ BPM in Practice: Who Is Doing What?
§ How Novices Model Business Processes
BPM 2010 Proceedings
19
Abstract
§ Reflects the main story of the paper § Explains the findings and main conclusions
§ No citations, tables, graphs, equations
20
Paper Structure § Introduction § Background § Elaboration of Contribution § Related Research § Conclusion § References
21
Paper Structure: Introduction Introduction
§ Problem motivation § Contribution outline § Paper structure § Funnel principle
22
Paper Structure: Background Background
Preliminaries (optional) Illustration (optional) Example (optional)
24
Contents
§ Recommended reading & acknowledgments § Scientific paper goals § Document preparation systems § Paper structure § Related research § Paper style Do’s and Dont’s § Reviewing
26
Chase for Trophy
You are about to write a paper You want to clarify the contribution
You want to assure that you don’t re-invent the wheel You want to appreciate the work of your colleagues
27
Where do you want to publish?
Who publishes in this journal or conference series? What topics are published there?
Who is in the program committee or editorial board? What concepts is the audience familiar with?
Your audience is irritated when you do not relate to seminal work in the respective area.
29
Watch the Grass Grow
§ You work on a set of research topics § You want to keep up with recent developments
§ You want to learn what others work on § You want to plan your future contributions
30
Which outlet matters to me?
§ Which journals do relate to my work? § Which conferences do relate to my work?
§ Which communities and special interest groups are related to my work?
33
Quality Indicators (I)
How is the publication ranked according to: § ISI Web of Knowledge
§ AIS Journal Ranking
§ CORE.edu.au
§ WKWI Ranking (http://www.wirtschaftsinformatik.de/pdf/wi2008_2_155-163_mitteilg-wkwi.pdf)
34
Quality Indicators (II)
What is the reputation of the author? § How many papers and books has s/he
published?
§ How often is s/he member of program committees?
How reputable is the paper itself?
§ How often is it cited?
§ How well is the contribution elaborated?
35
Writing the Related Work Section
§ Organize the section according to topics
§ Discuss, don’t just list related work
§ Don’t exaggerate differences
§ Explain how your work complements the work of others
36
Related Work Checklist
§ What is my contribution? § How does my work relate to other contributions?
§ Have I checked the major outlets? § What is my audience familiar with?
37
Contents
§ Recommended reading & acknowledgments § Scientific paper goals § Document preparation systems § Paper structure § Related research § Paper style Do’s and Dont’s § Reviewing
38
General Do‘s and Don‘ts (I)
Paragraphs: A paragraph containing more than 10 sentences is too long, 2 sentences too short
Spaghetti: Do not continuously refer to earlier pages
Structure: Do not surprise reader with original structure
Length of Sentences: Try to keep sentences short. Replace dependent clause (which, that) with sentence.
39
General Do‘s and Don‘ts (II)
Abstract: Write the abstract last
Introduction: Use the intro to describe the field
Conclusion: A conclusion is not a summary. Sum up what you have found, not what you have done.
References: Citing papers that are not in English is futile
40
General Do‘s and Don‘ts (III)
Absolute statements: Always relate to units
Highlighting: no exclamation mark, use italic
Abbreviations: Do not introduce new abbreviations
41
General Do‘s and Don‘ts (IV)
Every figure, table, and reference gets a unique id number Every citation in the text is included in the reference list and
vice versa
Every figure and table needs to be referenced and described in the text
Latex generates lists and references automatically
42
Footnotes
§ Important things must be put in the text § Footnotes stop readers
§ Footnotes should be used for things that the typical reader genuinely can skip
§ Long lists of references, simple bits of algebra, or other type of documentation are a candidate for footnotes
45
Spelling
Consistency consistent spelling throughout the text
– English spelling is different from American
– use only one sort all over the text
Conventional abbreviations
(i.e. Figure -> Fig.) check these with the journal style
Non-alphabetic characters use and instead of &; at instead of @
46
Talk vs. Paper
What's in a paper?
Evidence
Detail
Proof
Definitions
Formalizations
Statistics
What's in a talk?
Illustration
Visualization
Translation
Animation
Exaggeration
Provocation
47
Contents
§ Recommended reading & acknowledgments § Scientific paper goals § Document preparation systems § Paper structure § Related research § Paper style Do’s and Dont’s § Reviewing
50
Structure of a Review
§ Contribution summary (1 paragraph) § Contribution discussion (1 paragraph) § Paper structure § The use of figures and tables § The use of references § English language § Verdict (summarizing paragraph)
51
Contribution Discussion
§ Flaws § Feasibility of limitations and assumptions
Support your argumentation with
§ facts
§ reasoning
§ related work references
52
Reviewing: Verdict
Conference Strong Accept Weak Accept
Borderline Weak Reject Strong Reject
Seminar 1.0 … … …
5.0