research on tv brands

Upload: vishalvirani

Post on 08-Jul-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    1/52

    CHAPTER 1

    INTRODUCTION

    Page | 1

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    2/52

    Introduction

    The color television industry in India has seen a dramatic change during the past one decade

    as liberalization and globalization showed its original face in full swing in the Indian sub-

    continent, making its market highly competitive and customer driven. A good number of TV

    customers today face a lot of dilemma at the time of taking a purchase decision to choose the

     brand because a number of substitutes available in the market. As a result of this, the

    manufacturers are now forced to behave like price takers rather than price makers. nder the

    circumstances, it is !uite obvious that the companies will have to do more homework to

    respond to the needs and tastes of the customers in order to survive in this competitive

    market. "hen it comes to the purchase decision of the TV customers, it depends on various

     product differentiation attributes such as price, game and goodwill of the company, design

    and appearance, digital function, after sales service, durability and warranty, power 

    efficiency, financial incentives #free gifts, discounts and installments etc.$, easy availability

    and smooth functioning.

    It is an accepted fact that the generation of information plays an important role in the field of 

     policy formation, marketing planning, strategy making and it also bridges the game between

    the buyers and the sellers. This study may provide the TV companies with a launch pad and

    act as a guide that can help same in chalking out strategies to enlarge the market share and

    also enhance the level of awareness among customers. In short, it can be claimed to be an

    accurate and timely report that may help them to gain a competitive edge over their 

    customers.

    Therefore, the present study aims at ascertaining the television customer%s preference over the

    various counts of T.V. brands they use. The study also throws light on the customer%s

     purchase behavior with respect to color television. This study may provide the T.V.

    companies with a launch pad and act as a guide that can help the same in chalking out

    strategies to enlarge market share and also enhance the level of awareness among customers

    and may help them to gain a competitive edge over their competitors.

    Page | 2

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    3/52

    CUSTOMER:

    &ustomers are the most important people for any organization. They are the resource on

    which not only the success, but the entire e'istence of any business depends. A customer, also

    client, buyer or purchaser is usually used to refer to a current or potential buyer or user of the

     products of an individual or organization mostly called the supplier or seller. (owever the

    term customer also includes by e'tension anyone who uses or e'periences the services of 

    another. The word derives from ) custom, ) meaning )habit )* a customer was someone who

    fre!uented a particular shop, who made it a habit to purchase goods of the sort the shop sold

    their rather than elsewhere, and with whom the shopkeeper had to maintain a relationship to

    keep his or her )custom, +meaning e'pected purchases in the future. The clichs )customer is

    king) or )customer is god) or )the customer is always right) are most fre!uently used in themarketing world and also indicate the importance of customers to businesses.

    DEFINITION OF CUSTOMER

    /0I1ITI21 3 According to 4hri. 5ohandas 6aramchand 7andhi, the father of nation,

    +A customer is not an outsider to our business. (e is a definite part of it. A customer is not an

    interruption of our work. (e is the purpose of it. A customer is doing us a favor by letting us

    serve him. "e are not doing him any favor. A customer is not a cold statistic* he is a flesh and blood human being with feelings and emotions like our own. A customer is not someone to

    argue or match wits with. (e deserves courteous and attentive treatment. A customer is not

    dependent on us. "e are dependent on him. A customer brings us his wants. It is our 8ob to

    handle them properly and profitably 9 both to him and us. A customer makes it possible to

     pay our salary, whether we are a driver, plant or an office employee.

    :/0I1ITI21 ;

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    4/52

    MEASURING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

    There are several ways to gather input from customer. The simplest way to find out, how

    customer feel and what they want, is to ask them. If you have only ;@ customers, you can talk 

    to each one personally. The advantage of this approach is that you will get a personal +feel:for each customer. The disadvantage is you will gather different information from each

    customer depending on how the conversation goes. 4ome of ways in which you can approach

    the customer are listed below

    CUSTOMER SURVEY

    &ustomer surveys with standardized survey !uestions insure that you will collect the same

    information from everyone. emember that few of your customers will be interested in

    +filling out a !uestionnaire:. Its work for them, without much reward. By launching acustomer survey as an attempt to find out +how we can serve better: 9 your customers will

    feel less put upon. (ere are few of the possible dimensions you could measure

    CDuality of service

    C4peed of service

    C

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    5/52

    specific !uestions. They enhance your relationship with good customers who become more

    committed to your success. And they can move relationship with prospects ahead

    PROCESS OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:&ustomer 4atisfaction

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    6/52

    CHAPTER

    LITERATURE REVIE!

    Page | 6

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    7/52

    Int"rn"t #or Educ$tion$% T"%"&i'ion: An O((ortunit) or T*r"$t

    The outcome of this study depicts that instead of threats, Internet offers more opportunities

    for educational television. This analysis also leads the researcher to propose promotional

    strategies to use Internet for creating more opportunities for educational television in global

     perspectives

    Author 5isra,

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    8/52

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    9/52

    T"$c*in- +it* T"%"&i'ion: N"+ E&id"nc" Su((ort' $n O%d M"diu2

    =inebarger, eborah =.

     Phi Delta Kappan, vJG nG pN;-NF 1ov ;@33

    Television--public television, in particular--has come to be seen as a great educational

    resource for the home, but it hasnOt been as widely embraced in the classroom. Thanks to a

    number of recent, large-scale research pro8ects, itOs time to put those concerns to rest. 1ot

    only does educational television have powerful effects on childrenOs learning at home, but

    recent evidence documents how it can be a powerful learning resource in school.

    N$rro+ Vi"+in-: T*" Voc$0u%$r) in R"%$t"d T"%"&i'ion Pro-r$2'

    odgers, 5ichael

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    10/52

    P$r"nt$% In#%u"nc" on C*i%dr"n durin- Educ$tion$% T"%"&i'ion Vi"+in- in

    I22i-r$nt F$2i%i"'

    Phao, Euting*

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    11/52

    not on. Both the !uantity and !uality of parent-child interaction decreased in the presence of 

     background television. These findings suggest one way in which early, chronic e'posure to

    television may have a negative impact on development.

    M$,in- S"n'" o# TV #or C*i%dr"n: T*" C$'" o# Portu-$%

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    12/52

    T*" I2($ct o# Int"rn"t $nd T"%"&i'ion U'" on t*" R"$din- H$0it' $nd

    Pr$ctic"' o# Co%%"-" Stud"nt'

    5okhtari, 6ouider* eichard, &arla A.* 7ardner, Anne

     Journal of A!olescent % A!ult Literacy, vF; nK pN@J-N3J April ;@@J

    (ow much time do college students spend reading for recreational and academic purposesM

    o Internet and television use displace or interfere with reading timeM In this study, we used

    an innovative time-diary survey method to e'plore whether the time students spend on the

    Internet or watching television displaces time that would be spent reading for academic or 

    recreational purposes.

    T"%"&i'ion in t*" Sc*oo%': In'truction$% T"%"&i'ion $nd Educ$tion$% M"di$

    R"'ourc"' $t t*" N$tion$% Pu0%ic Bro$dc$'tin- Arc*i&"'

    6ing, 6aren

    TechTren!s: Lining 'esearch an! Practice to "mprove Learning , vF; nH pFJ-NF ul ;@@L

    In 3JNH, in )A 7uide to Instructional Television,) editor obert 5. iamond defined

    )educational television) as a )broad term usually applied to cultural and community

     broadcasting which may include some programs for in-school use) #p. ;KL$. (is definition for 

    instructional television was )television used within the formal classroom conte't on any

    educational level.) esearchers interested in the history of instructional television can e'plore

    many topics from program type to school involvement. In )/ducational Telecommunications)

    #3JKK$, onald 1. "ood and onald 7. "ylie devoted a chapter to e'amining eight levels of 

    school television involvement )single-classroom applications, school-level pro8ects, district

    administration, metropolitan ITV associations, statewide operations, regional activities,

    national programs, and international developments) #3JKK, p. 3JG$. This article summarizes

    many collections and oral history interviews in the 1ational

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    13/52

    !*$t T"%"&i'ion C$n 5$nd C$n6t7 Do to Pro2ot" E$r%) Lit"r$c)

    D"&"%o(2"nt

    5oses, Annie

    (oung #hil!ren, vNH n; pL@-LJ 5ar ;@@J

    5oses discusses research findings about television, young children, and literacy. 4he

    addresses research on a number of topics (ow much and what kind of programming do

    children watchM "hat is the literacy content in popular childrenOs programmingM oes

     programming send positive or negative messages about literacyM "hat is televisionOs impact

    on specific early literacy skillsM "hat can teachers do to make the most of television in

     promoting literacy development in young childrenM The author provides a list #by childrenOs

    ages$ of popular childrenOs programming that supports language and literacy, with brief 

    annotations and relevant "eb sites. 4he supplies a teacher checklist for selecting

     programming for young children.

    T"%"&i'ion Go"' to Sc*oo%: T*" I2($ct o# Vid"o on Stud"nt L"$rnin- in

    For2$% Educ$tion

     E!ucation Development #enter) "nc

    This report focuses on key !uestions concerning the relationship of television to learning, and

     provides e'amples drawn from current television research to demonstrate televisionOs positive

    effect on student achievement. A set of practical recommendations are also provided so that

     broadcasters and educators can ma'imize the effectiveness of video in the classroom. This

    document is organized in the following sections #3$ /'ecutive 4ummary* #;$ eportationale* #G$ A Brief 2verview of the (istory of TV esearch* #H$ "atching Television* #F$

    =earning from TV* #N$ &lassroom ses of Video and Television* #K$ sing &lassroom

    Television to 4upport 4pecific Academic isciplines* #L$ Teaching with Television* #J$

    (elping Teachers Teach with Television* and #J$ =ooking Ahead.

    Page | 13

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    14/52

    T"%"&i'ion $nd Attitud"' to+$rd M"nt$% H"$%t* I''u"': Cu%ti&$tion An$%)'i'

    $nd t*" T*ird3P"r'on E##"ct

    iefenbach, onald =.* "est, 5ark .

     Journal of #ommunity Psychology, vGF n; p3L3-3JF 5ar ;@@K

    A television content analysis and survey of H3J community respondents supports the

    hypothesis that media stereotypes affect public attitudes toward mental health issues. A

    content analysis of network, prime-time television demonstrates that portrayals are violent,

    false, and negative. The mentally disordered are portrayed as 3@ times more likely to be a

    violent criminal than nonmentally disordered television characters. A survey demonstrates

    that as television viewing increases so does the belief among viewers that locating mental

    health services in residential neighbourhoods will endanger the residents. Viewers who watch

    television news are less likely to support living ne't to someone who is mentally ill. The

    survey also tests the third-person effect, and finds that viewers believe television portrayals of 

    mental illness affect others more than themselves.

    P$r"nt $nd Ado%"'c"nt Int"r$ction in T"%"&i'ion Ad&"rti'"2"nt' $'

    Con'u2"r Soci$%i.$tion A-"nt'

    2zmete, /mine

     E!ucation, v3;J nG pGK;-GL3 4pr ;@@J

    This study aimed at determining the interaction between parents and adolescents pertaining to

    television advertisements as a consumer socialization agent and the effects of advertisements

    on the purchasing decisions of adolescents. The effects of age and se' were also investigated.

    The sample included ;H@ high school students in grades J, 3@ and 33 #3@@ girls* 3H@ boys$. A

    scale was used to collect data. The results showed that male adolescents were more heavily

    affected by television advertisements and their parentsO recommendations than female

    adolescents. Also, adolescents aged between 3N-3L en8oyed television advertisements more

    and based their purchasing decisions on them. The age and gender of adolescents affected not

    only their interaction with parents relating to television advertisements but also the way they

     perceived advertisements.

    Page | 14

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    15/52

    T"$c*"r' $nd Pu0%ic En-$-"2"nt: An Ar-u2"nt #or R"t*in,in- T"$c*"r

    Pro#"''ion$%i'2 to C*$%%"n-" D"#icit Di'cour'"' in t*" Pu0%ic S(*"r"

    Thomas, 4ue

     Discourse: Stu!ies in the #ultural Politics of E!ucation, vG; nG pGK3-GL; ;@33

    In the conte't of public debates on teacher !uality, both media and education policy te'ts

    construct deficit discourses about teachers, discourses that work together to inform public,

    commonsense understandings of teacher !uality. This paper e'plores the interrelationships

     between discourses on teachers constructed on television and in policies in the Australian

     policy conte't. &ritical discourse analysis was employed to trace the links between the

    discourses on teachers constructed in a television situation comedy and discourses in the

     policy documents that inform the Australian 7overnment Duality Teacher

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    16/52

    T"%"&i'ion8 Vid"o G$2" $nd Soci$% M"di$ U'" $2on- C*i%dr"n +it* ASD

    $nd T)(ic$%%) D"&"%o(in- Si0%in-'

    5azurek, 5icah 2.* "enstrup, &olleen

     Journal of Autism an! Developmental Disor!ers, vHG nN p3;FL-3;K3 un ;@3G

    This study e'amined the nature of television, video game, and social media use in children

    #ages L-3L$ with autism spectrum disorders #A4, n Q ;@;$ compared to typically developing

    siblings #T, n Q 3KJ$, and relative to other activities.

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    17/52

    B$0i"'8 T"%"&i'ion $nd Vid"o': Ho+ Did !" G"t H"r"

    "artella, /llen* ichert, ebekah A.* obb, 5ichael B.

     Developmental 'evie*, vG@ n; p33N-3;K un ;@3@Baby media have e'ploded in the past decade, and children younger than ; are showing

    increased use of these baby media. This paper e'amines the historical evidence of babiesO use

    of television since the 3JF@s as well as the various factors that have given rise to the current

    increase in screen media for babies. "e also consider the ubi!uitous role of television in

    American families, the impact of evidence regarding the educational benefits of educational

    television on preschoolers, and positive parental beliefs about the usefulness of such

    educational media in preparing young children for schooling. 0inally, we e'amine the

    theoretical issues of importance for guiding research into the interactions between media

    e'posure and cognitive development, including the role of media in changing the conte't of 

    childrenOs development and constraints on the kinds of things babies can learn from screen

    media. =astly, we suggest that screen media may indeed be changing the nature of childrenOs

    development.

    Suit$0i%it) o# AIOU T"%"&i'ion $nd It' I2($ct on Stud"nt'6 Ac*i"&"2"nt'

    4ira8, 4yed Abdul

    Online Su+mission, Turkish 2nline ournal of istance /ducation--T2/ vJ nG pJJ-333 ul

    ;@@L

    The re!uirement of television for educational purposes arises when specific educational

    ob8ectives are not achieved through traditional way of teaching. There are a number of things

    television can do better than the average teacher and traditional educational institutions, but

    situations where both teacher and educational institutions are not available, television is the

    answer to obtain educational ob8ectives, =ochte, #3JJG$. This research paper investigates

    relationship between TV broadcast time, day and duration and student achievement. ata was

    collected from 3JK from urban and rural, male and female students of the AllamaI!bal 2pen

    niversity, enrolled in the spring ;@@N 4emester in the selected courses. 1o strong

    relationship was found between =earning from TV and academic achievement in the AI2

    situation. se of television in the AI2 4ituation will be more effective if transmission day,

    Page | 17

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    18/52

    time and duration are ad8usted according to the studentsO demand and when studentsO

    assignments are based on both te'tbook and TV programs.

    B")ond D"2o-r$(*ic': Und"r't$ndin- t*" Co%%"-" E("ri"nc" t*rou-*

    T"%"&i'ion

    Tobolowsky, Barbara 0.

     ,e* Directions for Stu!ent Services, n33H p3K-;N 4um ;@@N

    nderstanding the prime-time television portrait of college helps educators better understand

    the e'pectations our entering students may hold of college life.

    T*" Vi$0i%it) o# En-%i'* T"%"&i'ion Pro-r$2' in'id" o# Sout* ;or"$n

    C%$''roo2'

    6ines, 4cott "ayne

     Journal of "nternational E!ucation 'esearch, vL nG p3LG-3JN ;@3;

    /nglish television programs have been incorporated within public-school classrooms in

    western countries for a long time to capture student interest in various sub8ects. 5any

    researchers favor /nglish programs as a partner inside of classrooms while others hold

    negative perceptions of the concept. (owever, there is little research to provide a better 

    understanding of how /nglish television programs have been accepted within 4outh 6orean

     public-school /0= classrooms by teachers and public administrative professionals. 4ince

    4outh 6oreaOs 5inistry of /ducation is aggressively identifying alternative ways to reduce

    household spending on private /nglish education, this study attempts to determine if /nglish

    television programs can be a viable partner in 4outh 6orean /0= classrooms. 0ifty public-

    school /0= teachers covering schools in 4eoul, Bucheon, 4uwon, and Incheon were surveyed

    to provide better insight. A ma8ority of the participants indicated they instruct their students to

    watch /nglish programs as a part of their lesson plans, but this study also indicates the

    strategy has been applied sparingly.

    Page | 18

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    19/52

    En*$nc"d T"%"&i'ion Str$t"-) Mod"%': A Stud) o# TV !"0 Sit"'/

    (a, =ouisa

     "nternet 'esearch, v3; nG p;GF-HK ;@@;&ompares the use of enhanced television features and television commerce features on the

    "eb sites of cable and broadcast television networks. 4hows differences in strategies and site

    usability* proposes three enhanced television strategy models* and discusses implications on

    television revenue and viewership.

    Page | 19

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    20/52

    CHAPTER <

    RESEARCH OB=ECTIVES

    Page | 20

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    21/52

    O0>"cti&"':

     

    ifferent &ompaniesSbrands are available in the consumer durable market to customers like

    4ony, 4amsung, =7, "cti&"'

    To ascertain the respondents% preference over the different brands of color TV.

    To measure the respondents% degree of satisfaction over the various colors T.V. brands.

    To measure the e'pectation and satisfaction gap between customers and company

    delivering the product.

    S"cond$r) O0>"cti&"'

     Is there any specific feature that a consumer is looking forM

     Is there a substitute for televisionM

    To understand the obsolete features of television for cost cutting.

    Page | 21

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    22/52

    CHAPTER ?

    RESEARCH METHODOLGY

    R"'"$rc* 2"t*odo%o-)

    Page | 22

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    23/52

    esearch methodology is considered as the nerve of the pro8ect. "ithout a proper well-

    organized research plan, it is impossible to complete the pro8ect and reach to any conclusion.

    The pro8ect was based on the survey plan. The main ob8ective of survey was to collect

    appropriate data, which work as a base for drawing conclusion and getting result.

    Therefore, research methodology is the way to systematically solve the research

     problem. esearch methodology not only talks of the methods but also logic behind the

    methods used in the conte't of a research study and it e'plains why a particular method has

     been used in the preference of the other.

    R"'"$rc* d"'i-n

    esearch design is important primarily because of the increased comple'ity in the market as

    well as marketing approaches available to the researchers. In fact, it is the key to the

    evolution of successful marketing strategies and programmers. It is an important tool to study

     buyer%s behavior, consumption pattern, brand loyalty, and focus market changes. A research

    design specifies the methods and procedures for conducting a particular study. According to

    6erlinger, +esearch esign is a plan, conceptual structure, and strategy of investigation

    conceived as to obtain answers to research !uestions and to control variance.

     St$t"2"nt o# t*" (ro0%"2:

     The main aim is to find customer%s satisfaction and preference of color T.V. brands in Anand

    city. It will help in finding out what different customer e'pects from color T.V. they purchase

    and whether they are satisfied with the product or not.

    The 7eneral study was converged as a specific study for different color TV brand. The study

    was initiated to find out the consumer satisfaction and preference towards different color TV

     brand. 2ur approach to the research design tasks went through the following tasks.

    The researcher has adopted escriptive esearch esign for the purpose of this survey.

    D"'cri(ti&" R"'"$rc*

    Page | 23

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    24/52

    This study is conducted using the descriptive research design method. This type of research is

    also a grouping that includes many particular research methodologies and procedures, such as

    observations, surveys, self-reports, and tests. nlike !ualitative research, descriptive research

    may be more analytic. It often focuses on a particular variable or factor the data collection

     procedures used in descriptive research may be very e'plicit.

    M"t*od o# d$t$ co%%"ction:

    To know the consumer switching cost between the different color TV brands, the study would

    done on the consumer variables towards the buying decision process so the appropriate

    Duestionnaire would be done for the data collection on following variables

    3$ Income

    ;$ Brand loyalty

    G$ Benefits

    S$2(%in- D"'i-n:

    ● S$2(%in- unit': &ustomers who own color T.V.

    ● S$2(%" Si.": The survey will be conducted for 3@@ respondents who own color T.V.

    ● S$2(%in- T"c*ni@u":  &onvenient sampling techni!ue will be used for collecting

    information.

    Sourc" o# d$t$ :

    ata will be collected from both the sources primary sources as well as secondary sources.

    ● Pri2$r) d$t$: The primary data will be gathered with the help of well-structured!uestionnaire and with the help of personal interview.

    ● S"cond$r) d$t$:  The secondary data will be gathered from internet, newspaper,

    catalogues and brochures and magazines.

    ● S$2(%" dr$+n #ro2: Anand city

    Too%' $nd T"c*ni@u"' 

    Page | 24

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    25/52

      The data will be collected through !uestionnaire method from the respondents. The

    respondents will be selected through the non random sampling plan. The collected data will

     be analyzed by percentage Analysis method. Bar diagrams will also be used for better 

     pictorial understanding.

    4u"'tionn$ir" D"'i-n :

    Duestionnaire design was the critical issue as the !uestionnaire reflects the survey purpose

    .The !uestionnaire was meticulously prepared by identifying the various variables. The same

    scale of yesSno and very important, important and not so important was used throughout so as

    to make the respondent comfortable.

    0irstly a !uestionnaire was prepared and few people were surveyed. After this survey werealized the flaws in the !uestionnaire and then a modified !uestionnaire was prepared and

     people were surveyed on this modified !uestionnaire.

    D$t$ An$%)'i'

    The data of score of features and score of brand perception was fed in to the e'cel sheet.

    4eparate /'cel sheets were employed for analysis of each brand and also to keep it concise

    and unambiguous. 0or data analysis I use many types of charts

    Pi" c*$rt

    This is very useful diagram to represent data, which are divided into a number of categories.

    This diagram consists of a circle of divided into a number of sectors, which are proportional

    to the values they represent. The total value is represented by the full create. The diagram bar 

    chart can make comparison among the various components or between a part and a whole of 

    data

    B$r c*$rt

    This is another way of representing data graphically. As the name implies, it consist of a

    number of whispered bar, which originate from a common base line and are e!ual widths.

    The lengths of the bards are proportional to the value they represent.

    Page | 25

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    26/52

    CHAPTER

    LIMITATION OF STUDY

    Li2it$tion'

    Page | 26

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    27/52

    R"'(on'" Error' 9

    These may arise when the respondents give inaccurate or incomplete answers. 0or e.g. in our 

    survey a respondent may not mention that he had test driven a TV before purchasing it A

    ma8or problem faced in the survey involved the comparative ratings of various attributes for all the brands of TV. 5any of the respondents were not very willing to rank so many factors

    as they perceived it to be time consuming.

    O("n End"d 4u"'tion'  

    All the !uestions in the !uestionnaire were open-ended to avoid any kind of bias from the

    respondents end. But a drawback of this approach is that there was an incomplete capture of 

    his responses, as the respondent could not always come out with the purchase steps and the

    time taken in them. The reasons for such inaccuracy could be because of unfamiliarity,fatigue, boredom, faulty recall and the Duestion format.

    Non R$ndo2 S$2(%in- Error' 9

    This can occur, as the particular sample elected is an imperfect representation of the

     population of interest. The area covered in the survey was Bangalore region and the customer 

     preferences and tastes in different egions could not be covered.

    Page | 27

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    28/52

    CHAPTER

    DATA ANALYSIS

    AND

    INTERPRATATIONS

    FRE4UENCY:

    Page | 28

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    29/52

    male female Total

    0

    50

    100

    150

    67

    33

    100

    Gender

    Percent

    0rom the above table we can see that the !uestioner filled by 3@@ respondent. Duestioner

    filled by NK male and GG female respondents.

    occupation

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    services   36 36.0 36.0 36.0

    self-employed   8 8.0 8.0 44.0

    student   27 27.0 27.0 71.0

    housewife   13 13.0 13.0 84.0

    businessman   16 16.0 16.0 100.0

    Total   100 100.0 100.0

    010203040

      36

    8

    27

    13   16

    Occupation

    Percent

    Page | 29

    Gender 

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    male   67 67.0 67.0 67.0

    female   33 33.0 33.0 100.0

    Total   100 100.0 100.0

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    30/52

    By seeing the occupation table, we find out that from 3@@ respondent GN are from service

    sector, L are self employed, ;K are students, 3G housewives and3N are businessmen.

    24

    2120

    35

    Annual incomeless than 100000

    100000-200000

    200000-300000

    above 300000

    0rom the above annual income table we got the information that out of 3@@ respondent ;H are

    those whose income less than 3 lakh, ;3 are those whose income is between 3 lakh to ;

    lakh,;@ are those whose income is between ; lakh to G lakh and remaining GF respondents

    income is above G lakh.

    Page | 30

    annual income

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid less than 100000   24 24.0 24.0 24.0

    100000-00000   21 21.0 21.0 45.0

    00000-!00000   20 20.0 20.0 65.0

    above !00000   35 35.0 35.0 100.0

    Total   100 100.0 100.0

     NO OF TV

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid 1   60 60.0 60.0 60.0

      28 28.0 28.0 88.0

    ! or more   12 12.0 12.0 100.0

    Total   100 100.0 100.0

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    31/52

    1 2 3 or more

    0

    20

    40

    60

    8060

    28

    12

    No of TV

    Percent

    Eou can see in the above table and you can find out that N@ respondent have N@ televisions intheir home, ;L respondent having ; televisions and 3; respondents having G or more

    television.

    Latet !rand o" color TV

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid "amsun#   16 16.0 16.0 16.0

    $%   23 23.0 23.0 3#.0

    "ony   25 25.0 25.0 64.0

    &nida   8 8.0 8.0 72.0

    Videocon   12 12.0 12.0 84.0

    others   16 16.0 16.0 100.0

    Total   100 100.0 100.0

    Samsng !" Son# $n%&a '%&eocon others

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    16

    2325

    812

    16

    Latest colour TV

    Percent

    Page | 31

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    32/52

    Above table shows that 3N respondents having 4amsung brand%s TV. ;G,;F,L and 3;

    respondents having =7, 4ony, 2nida, Videocon brand%s TV respectively and remaining 3N

     prefer other brand%s TV. Table also gives information that most favorable brand is 4ony and

    =7. in our research we find out that out of 3@@ respondent ;F and ;G respondents prefer 4onyand =7 respectively.

    Latet t$pe o" colour TV

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid C'T   13 13.0 13.0 13.0

    $C(   31 31.0 31.0 44.0

    $)(   42 42.0 42.0 86.0&thers   14 14.0 14.0 100.0

    Total   100 100.0 100.0

    ()T !(* !+* $thers0

    20

    40

    60

    13

    3142

    14

    Latest type of TV

    Percent

    By seeing the =atest type of color TV table we see that 3G respondent has &T type of TV, G3

    respondent having =& and H; respondent which is highest in our research having =/ type

    of TV and remaining 3H prefer other type of TV.

    Page | 32

    From %&ere $ou come to 'no% a!out t&i !rand

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid advertisement   50 50.0 50.0 50.0

    dealers su##estion   12 12.0 12.0 62.0

    friends * relative   30 30.0 30.0 #2.0

    newspaper    4 4.0 4.0 #6.0

    internet   4 4.0 4.0 100.0

    Total   100 100.0 100.0

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    33/52

    50

    12

    30

    44

    From where you come to know about this branda&vert%sement &ealers sggest%on

    fr%en&s , relat%ve ne-s.a.er

    %nternet

    Above table shows that from where respondent know about the brand. In the above table we

    got the information that F@ respondent came to know about particular brand from advertising

    which is highest in our research and 3G, G@, H, and H respondents know about the particular

     brand from dealer%s suggestion, friends and relatives, news papers and internet respectively.

    %&o in"luence $ou more to purc&ae t&e particular !rand

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

    Percent

    wife+husband   12 12.0 12.0 12.0

    friend +relative   25 25.0 25.0 37.0

    son+dau#hter    1# 1#.0 1#.0 56.0

    parents   4 4.0 4.0 60.0

    my self    40 40.0 40.0 100.0

    Total   100 100.0 100.0

    12

    25

    194

    40

    who infuences you more to purchase the particular brand-%fe/hsban&

    fr%en&s,relat%ve

    son/&aghter.arents

    m# self 

    Page | 33

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    34/52

    Above table shows that who influences respondent more to purchase the particular brand and

    in that we find out that the H@R respondent influence by them self which is highest in our

    research.

    3;R, ;FR, 3JR, and HR respondents are satisfied by their wifeShusband, friends ? relative,sonSdaughter, parents.

    CROSSTAB:

    Latet !rand o" color TV ( Latet t$pe o" color TV )ro ta!ulation

    Count

    $atest type of color TV

    C'T $C( $)( &thers Total

    $atest brand of color TV "amsun#   0 4 11 1 16

    $%   4 16 3 0 23

    "ony   0 2 23 0 25

    &nida   3 1 4 0 8

    Videocon   0 8 0 4 12

    others   6 0 1 # 16

    Total   13 31 42 14 100

    In the above table we do cross tab of =atest type of color TV and =atest brand of color TV

    and we got the information that respondents of 4ony brand which is ;F among them ;G

    respondent of 4ony prefer =/ and ; prefer =&. In case of 2nida G respondent prefer &T,

    3 respondent prefer =& and H respondents prefer =/.

    "e do

    cross tab in

    the above

    table of  

    4ize of  

    =atest TVand =atest

    Page | 34

    *i+e o" Latet TV ( Latet t$pe o" color TV )ro ta!ulation

    Count

    $atest type of color TV

    C'T $C( $)( &thers Total

    "i,e of $atest TV less than 0   3 4 0 4 11

    0 to .0   10 25 12 6 53

    !0 to .0   0 2 22 4 28

    .0 above   0 0 8 0 8Total   13 31 42 14 100

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    35/52

    type of color TV. By doing this we find out 33 respondents whose size of =atest TV is having

    less than ;@: among them G respondent have G &T type of TV, H respondent have =& and

    @ respondent have =/ and other H respondent prefer other kind of TV. FG respondents

    whose size of =atest TV is having ;@) to H@) among them 3@ respondent have 3@ &T type of 

    TV, ;F respondent have =& and 3; respondents have =/ and other N respondent prefer other kind of TV. ;L respondents whose size of =atest TV is having G@ to H@) among them no

    respondent have &T type of TV, ; respondent have =& and ;; respondents have =/ and

    other H respondent prefer other kind of TV. emaining L respondents whose TV size is H@)

    above all are prefer =/.

    ANOVA FOR AGE GROUP:

    (@ There is no significant difference between satisfaction levels of TV brand among differentage groups.

    (3 There is significant difference between satisfaction levels of TV brand among different

    age groups

    escriptive

    / ean "td (eviation

    satisf ied factor 2price 0-3 years   36 4.08 .604

    3-!0 years   16 4.1# .544

    !0-!3 years   1# 4.21 .41#

    !3 and above years   2# 4.38 .677

    Total   100 4.21 .5#1

    (esi#n of TV 0-3 years   36 4.22 .422

    3-!0 years   16 3.6# 1.078

    !0-!3 years   1# 4.05 .621

    !3 and above years   2# 4.34 .670

    Total   100 4.14 .6#7

    Features 0-3 years   36 4.36 .487

    3-!0 years   16 4.06 1.124

    !0-!3 years   1# 3.58 .76#

    !3 and above years   2# 4.21 .774

    Total   100 4.12 .7#5

    promotional tool 0-3 years   36 3.22 .681

    3-!0 years   16 3.63 1.025

    !0-!3 years   1# 3.47 .#05

    !3 and above years   2# 3.10 1.235

    Total   100 3.30 .#6#

    after sales services 0-3 years   36 3.#2 .874

    Page | 35

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    36/52

    3-!0 years   16 4.00 .816

    !0-!3 years   1# 4.26 .733

    !3 and above years   2# 3.5# 1.181

    Total   100 3.#0 .#5#

    sound quality 0-3 years   36 4.78 .4223-!0 years   16 4.75 .577

    !0-!3 years   1# 4.47 .772

    !3 and above years   2# 4.38 .820

    Total   100 4.60 .667

    picture quality 0-3 years   36 4.78 .422

    3-!0 years   16 4.38 .885

    !0-!3 years   1# 4.32 1.108

    !3 and above years   2# 4.66 .670

    Total   100 4.5# .753#uarantee 0-3 years   36 3.58 .806

    3-!0 years   16 3.88 .806

    !0-!3 years   1# 3.74 .653

    !3 and above years   2# 4.00 .802

    Total   100 3.78 .786

    )4 0-3 years   36 2.83 1.082

    3-!0 years   16 3.06 .680

    !0-!3 years   1# 2.74 .806

    !3 and above years   2# 2.72 .##6Total   100 2.82 .#47

    ,NOV,

    *um o" *-uare d" ean *-uare F *i/. eult

    satisfied factor

    2price

    5etween %roups   1.417 3 .472 1.367 36 4nsi#nifica

    nt

    7ithin %roups   33.173 #6 .346

    Total   34.5#0 ##(esi#n of TV 5etween %roups   4.881 3 1.627 3.61# .016 "i#nificant

    7ithin %roups   43.15# #6 .450

    Total   48.040 ##

    Features 5etween %roups   7.#27 3 2.642 4.643 .004 "i#nificant

    7ithin %roups   54.633 #6 .56#

    Total   62.560 ##

    promotional tool 5etween %roups   3.601 3 1.200 1.28# 6! 4nsi#nifica

    nt

    7ithin %roups   8#.3## #6 .#31Total   #3.000 ##

    Page | 36

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    37/52

    after sales services 5etween %roups   5.531 3 1.844 2.071 108 4nsi#nifica

    nt

    7ithin %roups   85.46# #6 .8#0

    Total   #1.000 ##

    sound quality 5etween %roups   3.213 3 1.071 2.521 09 4nsi#nificant

    7ithin %roups   40.787 #6 .425

    Total   44.000 ##

    picture quality 5etween %roups   3.561 3 1.187 2.165 08: 4nsi#nifica

    nt

    7ithin %roups   52.62# #6 .548

    Total   56.1#0 ##

    #uarantee 5etween %roups   2.#76 3 .##2 1.637 169 4nsi#nifica

    nt7ithin %roups   58.184 #6 .606

    Total   61.160 ##

    )4 5etween %roups   1.345 3 .448 .4#2 966 4nsi#nifica

    nt

    7ithin %roups   87.415 #6 .#11

    Total   88.760 ##

    It is concluded from A12VA test that out of J factors, factors which are design of TV,

    0eatures, have significant difference among different age groups. The rest of the factors like

     price,

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    38/52

    (eviation

    satisfied factor

    2price

    services   36 4.33 .535

    self-

    employed

    8 4.25 1.035

    student   27 4.11 .6#8housewife   13 4.23 .43#

    businessma

    n

    16 4.06 .250

    Total   100 4.21 .5#1

    (esi#n of TV services   36 4.11 .785

    self-

    employed

    8 4.25 1.035

    student   27 4.30 .465

    housewife   13 4.15 .376businessma

    n

    16 3.88 .806

    Total   100 4.14 .6#7

    Features services   36 4.00 .828

    self-

    employed

    8 4.25 1.035

    student   27 4.37 .4#2

    housewife   13 4.15 .68#

    businessma

    n

    16 3.88 1.025

    Total   100 4.12 .7#5

    promotional tool services   36 3.47 .#41

    self-

    employed

    8 3.00 1.06#

    student   27 2.#6 .587

    housewife   13 3.62 1.387

    businessma

    n

    16 3.38 1.025

    Total   100 3.30 .#6#

    after sales services services   36 3.#4 .715

    self-

    employed

    8 3.88 1.553

    student   27 3.8# 1.013

    housewife   13 3.85 1.345

    businessma

    n

    16 3.88 .71#

    Total   100 3.#0 .#5#sound quality services   36 4.50 .561

    Page | 38

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    39/52

    self-

    employed

    8 4.25 1.035

    student   27 4.81 .3#6

    housewife   13 4.#2 .277

    businessma

    n

    16 4.38 1.025

    Total   100 4.60 .667

    picture quality services   36 4.44 .6#5

    self-

    employed

    8 4.25 1.035

    student   27 4.81 .3#6

    housewife   13 4.#2 .277

    businessma

    n

    16 4.44 1.20#

    Total   100 4.5# .753

    #uarantee services   36 3.64 .867

    self-

    employed

    8 4.63 .518

    student   27 3.44 .751

    housewife   13 4.31 .480

    businessma

    n

    16 3.81 .403

    Total   100 3.78 .786)4 services   36 2.75 .874

    self-

    employed

    8 3.38 .744

    student   27 2.78 1.155

    housewife   13 3.08 1.038

    businessma

    n

    16 2.56 .62#

    Total   100 2.82 .#47

    ,NOV,

    "um of "quares df ean "quare

    satisfied factor 2price 5etween %roups   1.178 4 .2#5

    7ithin %roups   33.412 #5 .352

    Total   34.5#0 ##

    Page | 39

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    40/52

    (esi#n of TV 5etween %roups   1.#13 4 .478

    7ithin %roups   46.127 #5 .486

    Total   48.040 ##

    Features 5etween %roups   3.321 4 .830

    7ithin %roups   5#.23# #5 .624Total   62.560 ##

    promotional tool 5etween %roups   6.238 4 1.55#

    7ithin %roups   86.762 #5 .#13

    Total   #3.000 ##

    after sales services 5etween %roups   .127 4 .032

    7ithin %roups   #0.873 #5 .#57

    Total   #1.000 ##

    sound quality 5etween %roups   4.753 4 1.188

    7ithin %roups   3#.247 #5 .413Total   44.000 ##

    picture quality 5etween %roups   4.866 4 1.217

    7ithin %roups   51.324 #5 .540

    Total   56.1#0 ##

    #uarantee 5etween %roups   13.106 4 3.277

    7ithin %roups   48.054 #5 .506

    Total   61.160 ##

    )4 5etween %roups   4.608 4 1.152

    7ithin %roups   84.152 #5 .886Total   88.760 ##

    ,NOV,

    *um o"

    *-uare

    d" ean *-uare F *i/. eult

    satisf ied factor 2price 5etween

    %roups

    11:6 . 83 6!: 303 4nsi#nificant

    7ithin %roups !!.1 83 !3Total !.380 88

    (esi#n of TV 5etween

    %roups

    181! . .:6 863 .0 4nsi#nificant

    7ithin %roups .91: 83 .69

    Total .60.0 88

    Features 5etween

    %roups

    !!1 . 6!0 1!! 9. 4nsi#nificant

    7ithin %roups 38!8 83 9.

    Total 9390 88promotional tool 5etween 9!6 . 1338 1:06 133 4nsi#nificant

    Page | 40

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    41/52

    %roups

    7ithin %roups 69:9 83 81!

    Total 8!000 88

    after sales services 5etween

    %roups

    1: . 0! 0!! 886 4nsi#nificant

    7ithin %roups 806:! 83 83:

    Total 81000 88

    sound quality 5etween

    %roups

    .:3! . 1166 6:9 0: si#nificant

    7ithin %roups !8.: 83 .1!

    Total ..000 88

    picture quality 5etween

    %roups

    .699 . 11: 3 098 4nsi#nificant

    7ithin %roups 31!. 83 3.0Total 39180 88

    #uarantee 5etween

    %roups

    1!109 . !:: 9.:: 000 si#nificant

    7ithin %roups .603. 83 309

    Total 91190 88

    )4 5etween

    %roups

    .906 . 113 1!00 :3 4nsi#nificant

    7ithin %roups 6.13 83 669

    Total 66:90 88

    It is concluded from A12VA test that following factors #in statement form$ have significance

    difference among different cities

    4ound !uality

      ;7uarantee

    The rest of the factors like esign of TV, price, 0eatures ,

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    42/52

    Page | 42

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    43/52

    CHAPTER

    FINDINGS8 SUGGESTION AND

    CONCLUSION

    SUMMARY

    GNR of respondents are falls under the age ;@-;F years* it clearly says that youngsters have

    too much attraction towards different color TV brands.

      "e found that most of the respondents are students and some of the them are service

    holder, so here company can understand who are their customer so that they can make

    strategy before producing the product and they can also get some information about

    their customer%s preference and their needs.

     

    "e observed that around ;3R respondents are having income of 4 3@@@@@-;@@@@@,

    some respondents having more than that, so it is clear that the customers income is not

    high so they cannot afford costly TV. Before making TV &ompany should consider 

    the income level of the customer and they should produce difference range of color 

    TV, so that everyone can afford it.

     

    0rom the study it is revealed that most of the respondents are having 4ony TV and =7

    TV compare to other brand like 2nida etc. This study clear says that most of 

    customers preference to buy 421E TV. 4o we can observe that in the market thedemand of the 421E TV is more than the other.

    Page | 43

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    44/52

    "e found that H;R respondents are using =/ color TV. 4o it is revealed that the

    customers are more likely to purchase =/ rather than &T and =&. By this

    company can understand which type of TV customer would prefer.

    0rom the data we found that ma8ority of the respondents #FGR$ are using ;@%% 9 G@:

    color TV which clearly indicates that customer are more prefer medium size of color 

    TV rather than too much big and too small size.

    N@R and above respondents are having 3 TV in their home but ;LR are having ; TV

    in their home and 3;R are having G or more than G, which shows that some family

     prefer to use TV personally.

    "e found that F@R respondents came to know about the different brand of colour TV

    through advertisement. 4o we can easily observe that advertisement is main source for 

    reaching to the customers. In rural area people are not able to access internet butadvertisement can reach everywhere.

    0rom the data we observed that most of the respondents are influenced by their self 

    friends and relatives. H@R and ;FR are influenced by their own self and friends ?

    relatives respectively.

    0rom the study it is revealed that KL R respondents are agree to recommend to other 

    about the color TV brand which are using. By this company will get get benefit,

     because it us one of product promotion. 4o by giving good service to the customers

    company would get benefit. 0rom the data we observed that FGR respondents are willing change the color TV

     brand which are using presently. 4o we can observe that respondents would like to

     buy another brand of color TV. It will increase the competition in the market among

    the different TV brand. 5ostly the 4amsung users are willing to switch to other brand.

    0rom the above study we found that mostly the respondents are more inclined towards

    the 4ony TV brand about their future purchase decision of color TV. 4o 4ony color 

    TV brand is imposing threat to the other TV brand.

    Page | 44

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    45/52

     

    CONCLUSION

    0rom this study we can conclude that 4ony is the most popular brand of color TV, most of the

    respondents are using 4ony, whereas the popularity of =7 brand of color TV is at least level

    in Anand, 7u8arat. "e can also observe that youngsters are more attracted towards different

    color TV brand as compared to middle age men. The people whose age between the ;@-;F

    and ;F-G@ years they are more attracted. Advertisement is the most popular source for 

    reaching to the customers.

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    46/52

     brand have consulted with their friends or parents before purchased the color TV. iscount

    offer is the most attracted scheme for attracting to the customer. Almost all of respondents are

    satisfied with their present brand of colour TV model and service provided by them. 2nly

    very few of them are not satisfied. 5ost of the VideoconS 2nida users would like to switch to

    other brand, so it%s a big threat for VideoconS 2nida &olour TV brand. 5ost of respondents

    are inclined towards the 4ony colour TV brand for their future purchasing decision.

    SUGGESTIONS

    By this study we came know most of the respondents are having less income and

    some of them are having high income. 4o different color TV Brand &ompany should

    have different price range of TV, 4o that customers can buy the color TV as per their 

    affordability.

    0rom this study we can know that Very less number of respondents is having

    Videocon and 2nida TV

    By this study it is revealed that only very less of customers are using =&S&T TV.

    4o TV company should think about it, how to increase the sales of =&S&T TV.

    They should why customers are not preferred to buy =&S&T TV.

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    47/52

    0rom this study we can observe that advertisement is most important medium for 

    reaching to the customers. 4o 2nida and Videocon color TV brand should spent more

    on advertising to increase the brand awareness and also to show to the customers

    about the features of the color TV and to inform about newly launch product. By this study it is revealed that most of the respondents are preferred to buy !uality

     products with good features. 4o color TV &ompany should improve their !uality of 

    their product and also introduce a new feature in the color TV for competing with the

    other color TV brands.

    CHAPTER

    REFERENCE AND ANNEURE

    Page | 47

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    48/52

    REFERENCES

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    49/52

    Annexure

      !uestionnaire

    "ear respondent#

    "e are the students of G/H/ P$t"% Po't-r$du$t" o# In'titut" o# Bu'in"'' M$n$-"2"nt8

    S$rd$r P$t"% Uni&"r'it). "e are conducting the research on CUSTOMER 

    SATISFACTION AND PREFERENCE OF COLOUR TV BRANDS IN ANAND  for 

    academic purpose. "e assure you that all the information provided by you will be kept

    confidential.

    1 o man# T' set &o #o have %n #or homea 1b 2c 3 o r more

    2 h%ch latest ran& of color T' &o #o have S%ngle (ho%ce:a Samsngb !"c Son#& $n%&ae '%&eocon

    f $thers s.ec %f# :

    3 h%ch latest t#.e of color T' &o #o have s%ngle cho%ce:a ()Tb !(*c !+*& $thers

    4 h%ch s%;e of latest T' &o #o havea !ess than 20<b 20< to 30<c 30< to 40<& 40< above

    F. 0rom where you come to know about th is BrandM

    i$ Advertisement ii$ ealer %s 4uggestion

    iii$ 0riends ? elatives iv$ 1ewspaper

    v$ Internet

    Page | 49

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    50/52

    6 h%ch factors &%& #o cons%&er h%le b#%ng a T' T%c mar a..ro.r%ate

    o.t%on :

    4r 

    no

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    51/52

    no satisfied dissatisfie

    d

    1

  • 8/19/2019 RESEARCH ON TV BRANDS

    52/52

    v$ Videocon vi$ other #specif y$

    PERSONAL INFORMATION:3

    1 Aame

    2 +ma%l *

    3 Bge

    i$ ;@-;F years ii$ ;F- G@ years

    iii$ G@-GFyears iv$ GF and above years

    4 $cc.at %on % Serv%ce

    %% Self-+m.lo#e&

    %%% St&ent%v ose%fev s%nessman

    v% $thersCCCCCCCCCCCC  

    5 hat %s #or Bnnal ncome% !ess than 100000

    %% 100000-200000%%% 200000-300000%v Bbove 300000