research on english language development and implications for two-way programs kathryn...

36
Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two- Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University [email protected] Rosa G. Molina, M.A. Executive Director, Two-Way CABE [email protected] TWBI National Conference, San Diego, CA July 2010

Upload: jasmine-kirby

Post on 01-Apr-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs

Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs

Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D.Professor, San Jose State University

[email protected]

Rosa G. Molina, M.A.Executive Director, Two-Way CABE

[email protected]

TWBI National Conference, San Diego, CA July 2010

TWBI National Conference, San Diego, CA July 2010

Page 2: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

PurposePurposePurposePurpose

ResearchResearch: language competence and second : language competence and second language learning – theory and TWI researchlanguage learning – theory and TWI research

Implementation/Best PracticesImplementation/Best Practices: implications : implications of research: research-based strategies for of research: research-based strategies for promoting English language development and promoting English language development and bilingual proficiencybilingual proficiency

Page 3: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Schematic of Language Competence

Schematic of Language Competence

Focus of ELD & ELAFocus of ELD & ELAEmbedded in stories or literature, but rarely taught

Page 4: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

““Academic literacy includes the Academic literacy includes the reading, writing, reading, writing, and oral discourse skillsand oral discourse skills necessary to necessary to participate in a classroom discussion and in participate in a classroom discussion and in assignments. assignments. It may It may vary from subject area to vary from subject area to subject areasubject area and requires knowledge of multiple and requires knowledge of multiple genres of text, purposes of text, and text media. genres of text, purposes of text, and text media. It is influenced by students’ literacies in contexts It is influenced by students’ literacies in contexts outside of school and by students’ personal, outside of school and by students’ personal, social, and cultural experiences” (Short & social, and cultural experiences” (Short & Fitzsimmons, 2007) Fitzsimmons, 2007)

“It is not possible to ‘do’ science, ‘do’ economics, ’do’ mathematics with only ordinary language.” (Scarcella, 2003)

Academic LanguageDefinition

Academic LanguageDefinition

Page 5: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Once in a blue moonOnce in a blue moon

Put your money where your mouth is!

Have your cake & eat it too

Have your cake & eat it too

In hot water

Full of hot airFull of hot air

Cool

Lend a handLend a hand

That takes the cake

That takes the cakeWhat’s UP?What’s UP?

Money talks!Money talks!

2 heads are better than 1

Awesome

You’re full of it!

Monkey see, monkey do!

LOLLOL

Text meText me

Page 6: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com
Page 7: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

HighHigh levels of full proficiency require at levels of full proficiency require at least least 5-7 years5-7 years of instruction - ELs & high of instruction - ELs & high level motivated government stafflevel motivated government staff

Improvement:Improvement:• beginning to middle levels of proficiency beginning to middle levels of proficiency

relatively rapidrelatively rapid• middle to upper levels of proficiency middle to upper levels of proficiency much much

slowerslower

Research1. How Long Does it Take?

Research1. How Long Does it Take?

Page 8: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Most Most second language learners in second language learners in foreign languageforeign language instruction do not instruction do not make it beyond Elementary or make it beyond Elementary or Intermediate levels of proficiencyIntermediate levels of proficiency

State-wide studies of CELDT data: State-wide studies of CELDT data: • Grades 3-6Grades 3-6: 42-47% of EL students Intermediate: 42-47% of EL students Intermediate

Research 2. How Much Oral Proficiency?

Research 2. How Much Oral Proficiency?

Page 9: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

ResearchResearch3. 3. Is More English Better?Is More English Better?

ResearchResearch3. 3. Is More English Better?Is More English Better?

Dual language researchDual language research: More English does : More English does notnot lead to lead to

higher redesignation as R-FEP. higher redesignation as R-FEP. Redesignation rates in 90:10 as high as or higher than Redesignation rates in 90:10 as high as or higher than

50:50. 50:50.

Synthesis researchSynthesis research: ELLs in English-only programs had : ELLs in English-only programs had lowest proficiency in English.lowest proficiency in English.

Dual language and synthesis researchDual language and synthesis research: more Spanish: more Spanish in instructional day in instructional day higher levels of bilingualism, and higher levels of bilingualism, and

students who are more bilingual more likely to be students who are more bilingual more likely to be redesignated as R-FEPredesignated as R-FEP

Time-on-Task Time-on-Task more time spent in instruction in English more time spent in instruction in English more more proficiency in English.proficiency in English.

Page 10: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Listening & Speaking Proficiency – CELDT

Grades K-6 Native Spanish Speakers

Listening & Speaking Proficiency – CELDT

Grades K-6 Native Spanish SpeakersTWI ELLs make greater growth in listening/speaking and reading/writing than ELLs in English-only programs. By 6th grade, achieve at similar/superior levels.TWI ELLs make greater growth in listening/speaking and reading/writing than ELLs in English-only programs. By 6th grade, achieve at similar/superior levels.

Listening/SpeakingListening/Speaking Reading/WritingReading/Writing

Page 11: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

English Language Proficiency (CELDT TOTAL)Percent R-FEP or Early Advanced/Advanced

Grades 4-8

English Language Proficiency (CELDT TOTAL)Percent R-FEP or Early Advanced/Advanced

Grades 4-8

Percent of TWI students fluent in English according to CELDT (RFEP, Early Advanced or Advanced):• grade 5, 92% • grade 6, 92% • grade 7, 90% • grade 8, 100%

92%92% 92%92%

36%36%

CELDT Total = listening, CELDT Total = listening, speaking, reading, speaking, reading, writingwriting

Page 12: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Research in TWI - Correlations Literacy & Language Proficiency

Within & Across Languages

Research in TWI - Correlations Literacy & Language Proficiency

Within & Across Languages

Correlations between: ELL EP CST ELA x Aprenda reading = .54*** .71*** CST ELA x CELDT overall = .40*** CST ELA x CELDT reading = .51*** Aprenda reading x Span oral prof = .37*** .57***

Correlations between: ALL English reading x Mandarin reading = .58***

English language proficiency related to English reading; Spanish language proficiency related to Spanish reading

Reading scores in English related to reading scores in Spanish

Page 13: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

These data show – even in a 90:10 program, students can become highly proficient in English

Achievement in Spanish is related to achievement in English

Bilingualism – need to believe in and use Bilingualism – need to believe in and use knowledge of bilingual research to guide knowledge of bilingual research to guide program and curriculum development program and curriculum development around language in TWIaround language in TWI

Taking StockTaking Stock

Page 14: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

ELs in TWI Show Higher Achievement Than ELs in Same School, District & State

ELs in TWI Show Higher Achievement Than ELs in Same School, District & State

By 6By 6thth grade, TWI current grade, TWI current EL students achieve at EL students achieve at higher levels than ELs in higher levels than ELs in English-only mainstream English-only mainstream programs. programs.

By 6By 6thth grade, TWI current grade, TWI current ELs do not reach English-ELs do not reach English-only (EO) students in only (EO) students in percent Proficient or percent Proficient or Advanced, but they score Advanced, but they score as high in percent Basic or as high in percent Basic or above.above.

This EL group does not This EL group does not include R-FEPsinclude R-FEPs

Page 15: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

By 6By 6thth grade, TWI R-FEP grade, TWI R-FEP students achieve at students achieve at higher levels than R-FEPs higher levels than R-FEPs in English mainstream in English mainstream programs. programs.

By 6By 6thth grade, TWI R-FEPs grade, TWI R-FEPs far surpass EOs in far surpass EOs in percent Proficient or percent Proficient or Advanced, and in Advanced, and in percent Basic or above.percent Basic or above.

All R-FEP groups surpass All R-FEP groups surpass EO averages.EO averages.

R-FEPs in TWI Close Achievement Gap in English with English speakers!

R-FEPs in TWI Close Achievement Gap in English with English speakers!

Page 16: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Reading Achievement in EnglishReading Achievement in EnglishBy English Proficiency (CELDT) Level in By English Proficiency (CELDT) Level in

TWITWI

Reading Achievement in EnglishReading Achievement in EnglishBy English Proficiency (CELDT) Level in By English Proficiency (CELDT) Level in

TWITWI

Level of English proficiency has a significant effect on English reading achievement. Each group scores significantly different from other groups (except Early Adv ≈ Advanced & EP, Advanced ≈ RFEP & EP). RFEP>EP

Page 17: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Reading Achievement in Spanish Reading Achievement in Spanish By English Proficiency Level in TWIBy English Proficiency Level in TWIReading Achievement in Spanish Reading Achievement in Spanish

By English Proficiency Level in TWIBy English Proficiency Level in TWI

Level of English proficiency has a significant effect on Spanish reading achievement. However, only RFEP is significantly higher than some other groups. Beginners above average in Spanish reading.

Page 18: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Level of English Language Proficiencyby Background Characteristics

Level of English Language Proficiencyby Background Characteristics

English Proficiency

Level

Began Program

as:

Percent Male

Percent Low

Income

% Mom Education Low (HS or less) –

High (Coll Grad+)

Percent with Disability

Beginning

ELL

53% 79% 59% - 13% ✓✓ 17%

Early Intermediate 51% 84% 67% - 14% ✓✓ 11%

Intermediate50% 86% 58% - 10% 4%

Early Advanced38% 81% ✓ 51% - 23% 0

Advanced52% ✓ 71% ✓ 47% - 24% 0

RFEP53% ✓ 71% ✓ 35% - 20% ✓ 6%

EPEP 51% ✓ 58% ✓✓ 24% - 34% ✓ 6%

Page 19: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research on ELD Implications of Research on ELD Implications of Research on ELD Implications of Research on ELD

Should my TWI program provide ELD?Should my TWI program provide ELD?

What does providing ELD mean in a bilingual What does providing ELD mean in a bilingual (TWI) program?(TWI) program?

Got benchmarks?Got benchmarks?

Should you have an ELD curriculum in a Should you have an ELD curriculum in a bilingual program?bilingual program?

Grouping during ELDGrouping during ELD

Page 20: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 1. Should my TWI program provide 1. Should my TWI program provide

ELD?ELD?

Implications of Research Implications of Research 1. Should my TWI program provide 1. Should my TWI program provide

ELD?ELD? According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009), in a According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009), in a

synthesis of the research on ELD: synthesis of the research on ELD:

Providing ELD instruction is better than not Providing ELD instruction is better than not providing itproviding it

• However, research basis slim and largely based on foreign However, research basis slim and largely based on foreign language learning with college and adult learnerslanguage learning with college and adult learners

Use a separate, daily block of time for ELD Use a separate, daily block of time for ELD instructioninstruction

• Research based largely on Research based largely on twotwo large studies of students – large studies of students – one in K, and one in grades 2-3.one in K, and one in grades 2-3.

Page 21: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 1. Should my TWI program provide 1. Should my TWI program provide

ELD?ELD?

Implications of Research Implications of Research 1. Should my TWI program provide 1. Should my TWI program provide

ELD?ELD?

Research in immersion – students do not develop Research in immersion – students do not develop HIGH levels of L2 proficiency, and lack vocabulary HIGH levels of L2 proficiency, and lack vocabulary breadth & grammatical accuracybreadth & grammatical accuracy

TWI students stuck at Intermediate TWI students stuck at Intermediate Focus on Focus on language development is too implicit and not language development is too implicit and not sufficiently explicitsufficiently explicit

Suggests need for ELD in TWI programsSuggests need for ELD in TWI programs

Page 22: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 2. What does providing ELD mean 2. What does providing ELD mean

in a bilingual (TWI) program?in a bilingual (TWI) program?

Implications of Research Implications of Research 2. What does providing ELD mean 2. What does providing ELD mean

in a bilingual (TWI) program?in a bilingual (TWI) program?

According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009)According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009)

ELD instruction should ELD instruction should explicitlyexplicitly teach teach elements of English (vocabulary, syntax, elements of English (vocabulary, syntax, grammar, conventions)grammar, conventions)

The ELD block can incorporate reading and The ELD block can incorporate reading and writing, but should writing, but should emphasize listening and emphasize listening and speakingspeaking

ELD instruction should ELD instruction should emphasize academic emphasize academic language as well as conversational languagelanguage as well as conversational language

Page 23: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 2. Providing Language Development 2. Providing Language Development

in a bilingual (TWI) programin a bilingual (TWI) program

Implications of Research Implications of Research 2. Providing Language Development 2. Providing Language Development

in a bilingual (TWI) programin a bilingual (TWI) program

Instruction ensures that learners: Instruction ensures that learners: develop both a develop both a rich repertoire of formulaic rich repertoire of formulaic

expressionsexpressions and a and a rules-based rules-based competencecompetence

focus predominantly on focus predominantly on meaningmeaning and also focus on and also focus on formform

Instruction needs to be predominantly directed atInstruction needs to be predominantly directed at developing implicit knowledgedeveloping implicit knowledge (unconscious, (unconscious, procedural) of the L2 while not neglecting explicit procedural) of the L2 while not neglecting explicit knowledge (rules learners can state)knowledge (rules learners can state)

Adapted from Ellis (2004)Adapted from Ellis (2004)

Page 24: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com
Page 25: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Cross-linguistic influences - Cross-linguistic influences - L1 skills and L1 skills and knowledge ELLs use to bootstrap into English knowledge ELLs use to bootstrap into English literacy (Riches & Genesee)literacy (Riches & Genesee)

phonological awareness in L1phonological awareness in L1 phonological phonological awareness in Englishawareness in English

knowledge of L1 soundsknowledge of L1 sounds English decoding & English decoding & spellingspelling

vocabulary skills in L1vocabulary skills in L1 English vocabulary (at least English vocabulary (at least complex vocabulary skills)complex vocabulary skills)

L1 grammarL1 grammar comprehension or production of English comprehension or production of English sentencessentences

Emergent or proficient L1 readers Emergent or proficient L1 readers acquire English acquire English literacy skills faster literacy skills faster

Literacy and Language DevelopmentLiteracy and Language DevelopmentLiteracy and Language DevelopmentLiteracy and Language Development

Page 26: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 2. 2. Providing Language Development Providing Language Development

in a bilingual (TWI) programin a bilingual (TWI) program

Implications of Research Implications of Research 2. 2. Providing Language Development Providing Language Development

in a bilingual (TWI) programin a bilingual (TWI) program

To develop high levels of bilingual proficiency, To develop high levels of bilingual proficiency, students need:students need:

ELD instructionELD instruction

SLD instructionSLD instruction

Not a monolingual approach: help students Not a monolingual approach: help students transfer skills across languagestransfer skills across languages

Page 27: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 3. Got Benchmarks? 3. Got Benchmarks?

Implications of Research Implications of Research 3. Got Benchmarks? 3. Got Benchmarks?

According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009):According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009):

ELD instruction should be planned and ELD instruction should be planned and delivered with specific language objectives in delivered with specific language objectives in mind.mind.

Got benchmarks? scope/sequence for each Got benchmarks? scope/sequence for each grade level in ELD and SLD?grade level in ELD and SLD?

How can you plan and deliver language objectives if How can you plan and deliver language objectives if you don’t know what you expect?you don’t know what you expect?

Page 28: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Promoting ELD/SLD ProficiencyPromoting ELD/SLD ProficiencyStandards & FrameworksStandards & Frameworks

Promoting ELD/SLD ProficiencyPromoting ELD/SLD ProficiencyStandards & FrameworksStandards & Frameworks

Standards/Frameworks provide a way of Standards/Frameworks provide a way of organizing instruction around a set of organizing instruction around a set of learning objectives related to listening, learning objectives related to listening, speaking, reading, writing at different speaking, reading, writing at different proficiency levelsproficiency levels ELD Standards – Look at these and use for planning

ELA Standards

Side by Side Side by Side (San Diego County Office of Education)(San Diego County Office of Education)

Blueprint & Sample CST ELA questions & CELDT Blueprint & Sample CST ELA questions & CELDT questionsquestions

List of vocabulary items (Marzano, Tennessee, Coxhead) List of vocabulary items (Marzano, Tennessee, Coxhead) in English & Spanishin English & Spanish

High frequency word list/Site word listHigh frequency word list/Site word list National Foreign/World Language Standards (ACTFL, National Foreign/World Language Standards (ACTFL,

California)California)

Page 29: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Promoting ELD/SLD/Bilingual Promoting ELD/SLD/Bilingual ProficiencyProficiency

Lesson PlanningLesson Planning

Promoting ELD/SLD/Bilingual Promoting ELD/SLD/Bilingual ProficiencyProficiency

Lesson PlanningLesson Planning

Content standard(s) to be addressed Language instruction

Structures/forms--parts of speech, grammar (word problems in math)

Frames/memorized chunks/formulaic language (“Where is the”, “A mi me gusta…”)

Vocabulary--bricks & mortar; high frequency, specialized vocabulary

Anticipatory set/Link to prior knowledge

Links across languages, where possible

Need more detail in both languages & specific language objectivesNeed more detail in both languages & specific language objectives

Page 30: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com
Page 31: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Language ObjectivesAccessible for Students

Page 32: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 4. 4. Do you need an ELD curriculum?Do you need an ELD curriculum?

Implications of Research Implications of Research 4. 4. Do you need an ELD curriculum?Do you need an ELD curriculum?

No ELD curriculum used in the schools has a research basis demonstrating its effectiveness, especially in a TWI/dual language program.

ELD curricula are designed for English learners in English mainstream/SEI programs, not for students learning through two languages.

However, helpful since most teachers do not However, helpful since most teachers do not have training in linguistics in English or Spanish. have training in linguistics in English or Spanish.

Use as resource AND ADAPT for TWIUse as resource AND ADAPT for TWI

Page 33: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 5. Grouping during ELD5. Grouping during ELDImplications of Research Implications of Research 5. Grouping during ELD5. Grouping during ELD

According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009):According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009): Interactive activities among ELs and between ELs and Interactive activities among ELs and between ELs and

proficient English speakers can be productive, but they proficient English speakers can be productive, but they must be carefully planned outmust be carefully planned out

According to Ellis (2004), successful language According to Ellis (2004), successful language learning requires:learning requires: extensive L2 inputextensive L2 input

opportunities for opportunities for L2 outputL2 output

opportunities to opportunities to interact in the L2interact in the L2

Grouping & opportunities for interaction Grouping & opportunities for interaction ESSENTIAL for language development!ESSENTIAL for language development!

Page 34: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 5. Grouping during ELD5. Grouping during ELDImplications of Research Implications of Research 5. Grouping during ELD5. Grouping during ELD

(Saunders & O’Brien, 2006): With (Saunders & O’Brien, 2006): With increased oral increased oral proficiencyproficiency in L2, students:in L2, students:

use more of L2 use more of L2 gains in L2 oral proficiency gains in L2 oral proficiency

interact more frequently with speakers of L2 interact more frequently with speakers of L2 more opportunity to use L2more opportunity to use L2

use more complex language learning strategies, use more complex language learning strategies, particularly strategies that enable them to interact particularly strategies that enable them to interact with others and monitor their own and others’ with others and monitor their own and others’ language uselanguage use

display wider range of language skills, including display wider range of language skills, including skills associated with academic uses of language skills associated with academic uses of language (e.g., higher level question forms & definitional (e.g., higher level question forms & definitional skills)skills)

Page 35: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Implications of Research Implications of Research 5. Grouping during 5. Grouping during

Differentiated vs. Whole ClassDifferentiated vs. Whole Class

Implications of Research Implications of Research 5. Grouping during 5. Grouping during

Differentiated vs. Whole ClassDifferentiated vs. Whole Class According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009):According to Saunders & Goldenberg (2009):

Group ELs carefully for ELD instruction by language Group ELs carefully for ELD instruction by language proficiency.proficiency.

• However, they note this is a guideline applicable to ELD However, they note this is a guideline applicable to ELD but but grounded in non-EL grounded in non-EL research research

In TWI, if ELs always grouped for ELD, when do they In TWI, if ELs always grouped for ELD, when do they practice English with EOs and get native speaker role practice English with EOs and get native speaker role models? Two-way means they learn from each other.models? Two-way means they learn from each other.

Yet, some differentiated is probably helpful to provide Yet, some differentiated is probably helpful to provide explicit instruction tailored to their level of proficiency.explicit instruction tailored to their level of proficiency.

No research on whether ELs should not be grouped No research on whether ELs should not be grouped with ELs in SEI or English mainstream. Since ELD in with ELs in SEI or English mainstream. Since ELD in TWI should look different (bilingual approach, transfer), TWI should look different (bilingual approach, transfer), might need to have separate groups for students in might need to have separate groups for students in TWI and SEITWI and SEI

Page 36: Research on English Language Development and Implications for Two-Way Programs Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University KLindholmLeary@mac.com

Conclusions Conclusions

Saunders & Goldenberg (2009): “In sum, we have a relatively small corpus of research to draw upon to guide the design and delivery of K-12 ELD instruction.”

Second language learners have a Second language learners have a bilingual reservoir bilingual reservoir they they can draw on to assist with second (and first) language can draw on to assist with second (and first) language development and literacydevelopment and literacy

In TWI and other research, In TWI and other research, bilingual proficiency – not bilingual proficiency – not just English proficiency – just English proficiency – associated with associated with higher levels higher levels of English language development and higher levels of English language development and higher levels of achievementof achievement

Need to design ELD AND SLD for students in Need to design ELD AND SLD for students in bilingual (TWI) programs – taking advantage of and bilingual (TWI) programs – taking advantage of and further developing their bilingual reservoirfurther developing their bilingual reservoir