report presentation to board
TRANSCRIPT
Grand Rounds Missing Link Development Study Report
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
Missing Link Citizen’s Advisory CommitteeMay 2008
John Erwin (Chair) George Puzak (Vice Chair)Larry Lamb Suzanne PepinSteve Dziedzic Nancy HyldenJeff Haberer Steve SmelaTony Anastasia Jan MorlackDorothy Bridges Jim FelicettaMichael Rainville Kathy SchwieConnie Sullivan Gavin Watt John Akre Andy MickelDr. Charles Jorgensen Jacqueline Dekker-TravisPastor Craig Pederson Clay Lambert and Mia Lambert
John Erwin (Chair) George Puzak (Vice Chair)Larry Lamb Suzanne PepinSteve Dziedzic Nancy HyldenJeff Haberer Steve SmelaTony Anastasia Jan MorlackDorothy Bridges Jim FelicettaMichael Rainville Kathy SchwieConnie Sullivan Gavin Watt John Akre Andy MickelDr. Charles Jorgensen Jacqueline Dekker-TravisPastor Craig Pederson Clay Lambert and Mia Lambert
Citizen’s Advisory Committee (CAC)
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Representatives from:
City of Minneapolis Public Works
City of Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development
Hennepin County Housing, Transit & Community Works
University of Minnesota
Metropolitan Council
Representatives from:
City of Minneapolis Public Works
City of Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development
Hennepin County Housing, Transit & Community Works
University of Minnesota
Metropolitan Council
MPRB Staff, Nick Eoloff, Project Manager
Consultants Hay Dobbs, Inc., Tom Johnson, Project CoordinatorHNTB Corp., Dick Stehr, Lead EngineerHNTB Corp., Craig ChurchwardHNTB Corp., Karl WeissenbornHKGi, Greg Ingraham, Lead DesignerHKGi, Tyler PedersonHess Roise and Co., Marjorie Pearson, Historical Research
MPRB Staff, Nick Eoloff, Project Manager
Consultants Hay Dobbs, Inc., Tom Johnson, Project CoordinatorHNTB Corp., Dick Stehr, Lead EngineerHNTB Corp., Craig ChurchwardHNTB Corp., Karl WeissenbornHKGi, Greg Ingraham, Lead DesignerHKGi, Tyler PedersonHess Roise and Co., Marjorie Pearson, Historical Research
MPRB Staff and Consultants
To guide and assist staff and consultants in the review and selection of the alternative routes of the Missing Link. The CAC will also review and comment on open space opportunities and recommend site(s) for additional park land. Based upon the analysis and comments, the Committee will recommend a preferred design route for the Missing Link, along with open space recommendations, to the Park Board as part of the Board’s Public Schematic Design approval process.
To guide and assist staff and consultants in the review and selection of the alternative routes of the Missing Link. The CAC will also review and comment on open space opportunities and recommend site(s) for additional park land. Based upon the analysis and comments, the Committee will recommend a preferred design route for the Missing Link, along with open space recommendations, to the Park Board as part of the Board’s Public Schematic Design approval process.
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board’s Directive to the Citizen’s Advisory Committee (CAC)
Missing Link Study Tasks
• Define the Missing Link Parkway Route• Determine Park and Parkway Amenities• Enhance Trail Connections
• Provide parkway system continuity
• Enhance recreational opportunities
• Enhance or protect the environment
• Improve mobility
• Create economic benefits
• Be feasible and compatible
Citizen’s Advisory Committee Goals
MonthlyCitizen
Advisory Committee
Meetings
Study Team and ProcessMinneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB)
MonthlyTechnicalAdvisory
Committee
Public Input
Area StakeholdersRecommended Route
Recommended ParkwayAmenities
Recommended ParkLand Locations
Consultant Team
Minneapolis Park andRecreation Board
(MPRB) for review and adoption
Missing Link Development Study
Goals
Mission
•Connectivity for motorists, bicyclists, transit users and pedestrians. • Public safety. • Provide a signature parkway amenity. • Increase green space.• Positive relationship to LRT. • Create potential for investment in the area. • Compatible with city, neighborhood and U of M plans.
Citizen’s Advisory Committee Evaluation Criteria
Parkway Route SegmentsConsidered
A. Marshall StreetB. University AvenueC. Central AvenueD. Johnson StreetE. Stinson Blvd.F. 15th Avenue G. Industrial Blvd.H. Highway 280I. Oak StreetJ. 27th Avenue
A. Marshall StreetB. University AvenueC. Central AvenueD. Johnson StreetE. Stinson Blvd.F. 15th Avenue G. Industrial Blvd.H. Highway 280I. Oak StreetJ. 27th Avenue
Citizen’sAdvisoryCommitteePreliminaryRoutes
January, 2008
Como Detail
Hennepin Ave
Como Ave
Elm St
University Ave
Hennepin Ave
Como AveElm St
University Ave
35W
Stin
son
Blv
d
27th
Ave
29th
Ave
Ind.
Blv
d
Public Open House Meetings:1. September 18, 2007 – Northeast Recreation Center
2. October 18, 2007 – Windom Recreation Center
3. January 16, 2008 – Luxton Recreation Center
4. January 17, 2008 – Van Cleve Recreation Center
5. January 30, 2008 – Windom Recreation Center
Preferred Missing LinkParkway Route
29th
Ave
Como Ave
Elm St
University Ave
Hennepin Ave
35W
Stin
son
Blv
d
Ind.
Blv
d
Missing LinkPark AmenityOpportunities
Como Detail
Hennepin Ave
Como Ave
Elm St
27th
Ave
29th
Ave
Como Ave
Elm St
University Ave
Hennepin Ave
35W
Stin
son
Blv
d
Ind.
Blv
d
Park and recreation opportunity areas:
1. Ridgway Overlook Park
2. SE Como Community Park
3. Bridal Veil Green Space
4. Kasota Ponds Green Space
5. SEMI North Corridor Green Space
6. Granary Park7. Bridal Veil
Creek Linear Park
IllustrativeSketch ofSE ComoAreaLooking South Over Hennepin Ave.
PLACE HOLDER
Missing Link Parkway
Como Ave.
E. Hennepin Ave.
Eco-Business Park
Preferred Missing LinkPark Locations
29th
Ave
Como Ave
Elm St
University Ave
Hennepin Ave
35W Stin
son
Blv
d
Ind.
Blv
d
Ridgway Overlook Park
SE Como Community Park
Bridal Veil Open Space
Granary Park
Parkway andPark Acquisition Map
Como AveElm St
University Ave
Hennepin Ave
35W
Stin
son
Blv
d
Ind.
Blv
d
280
Phasing
Como Ave
Elm St
University Ave
Hennepin Ave
35W
Stin
son
Blv
d
Ind.
Blv
d
280
North
Central
South