renal handling of proteins and peptides · renal handling of proteins and peptides ... quantitate...

8
ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, Vol. 8, No. 4 Copyright © 1978, Institute for Clinical Science Renal Handling of Proteins and Peptides F. A. CARONE, M.D. Morrison Professor o f Pathology, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611 ABSTRACT The kidney plays an important role in the metabolism of proteins and peptides. Current evidence indicates that only the proximal tubule posses- ses the mechanisms for absorption, transport and/or degradation of these substances. Large proteins and polypeptide molecules filtered by the glomerulus, are absorbed from proximal tubular fluid by luminal en- docytosis into apical vacuoles which fuse with primary lysosomes where hydrolysis occurs followed by diffusion of metabolites out of the cells and into the blood. Recent evidence indicates that small peptides are handled by a different mechanism. It appears that small peptides are degraded at the luminal surface of the brush-border of proximal tubules, which contains many hydrolytic enzymes, by the process of membrane or contact digestion with reabsorption of the breakdown products. Proximal tubular mecha- nisms for handling of proteins and peptides are probably important biologi- cally to conserve amino acids, inactive toxic substances and help regulate the circulating level of protein and peptide hormones. It is clearly established that the kidney plays an important role in the metabolism of a number of protein, polypeptide and small peptide molecules, including plasma proteins, growth hormone, L-chains of immunoglobulins, /^-micro- globulin, lysozyme, insulin and small vasoactive peptides. Absorption, trans- port and/or degradation of proteins or peptides are properties of the proximal tubules. There is little evidence that other segments of the nephron have the mechanisms for uptake or transport of these substances. Indirect and direct studies indicate that a variety of proteins and polypeptides filtered by the glo- merulus are absorbed by the proximal tubule by luminal endocytosis and hy- drolyzed by lysosomal enzymes. Recent studies suggest that small linear peptides, consisting of eight to ten amino acids, are handled by the proximal tubule by a different mechanism. It has been postulated that small peptides micro- infused into proximal tubules are hy- drolyzed at the luminal surface of the brush border, which is rich in a variety of enzymes, by the process of membrane or contact digestion with reabsorption of most of the breakdown products. 287 0091-7370/78/0700-0287 $01.20 © Institute for Clinical Science, Inc.

Upload: nguyenkiet

Post on 05-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ANNALS O F CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, Vol. 8, No. 4Copyright © 1978, Institute for Clinical Science

Renal Handling of Proteins and Peptides

F. A. CARONE, M.D.

Morrison Professor o f Pathology, Northwestern University School o f Medicine,

Chicago, IL 60611

ABSTRACT

The kidney plays an im portant role in the metabolism of proteins and peptides. C urrent evidence indicates that only the proximal tubule posses­ses the mechanisms for absorption, transport and/or degradation of these substances. Large proteins and polypeptide m olecules filtered by the glomerulus, are absorbed from proximal tubular fluid by luminal en- docytosis into apical vacuoles which fuse with primary lysosomes where hydrolysis occurs followed by diffusion of metabolites out of the cells and into the blood. Recent evidence indicates that small peptides are handled by a different mechanism. It appears that small peptides are degraded at the luminal surface of the brush-border of proximal tubules, which contains many hydrolytic enzymes, by the process of membrane or contact digestion with reabsorption of the breakdown products. Proximal tubular m echa­nisms for handling of proteins and peptides are probably important biologi­cally to conserve amino acids, inactive toxic substances and help regulate the circulating level of protein and peptide hormones.

It is clearly established that the kidney plays an important role in the metabolism of a num ber of protein, polypeptide and sm all p e p tid e m o lecu les , in c lu d in g p lasm a p ro te in s , g row th horm one, L-chains of immunoglobulins, /^-micro- globulin, lysozyme, insulin and small vasoactive peptides. Absorption, trans­port and/or degradation of proteins or peptides are properties of the proximal tubules. T here is little ev idence that other segments of the nephron have the mechanisms for uptake or transport of these substances. In d irec t and d irect studies indicate that a variety of proteins

and po lypep tides filte red by the g lo­merulus are absorbed by the proximal tubule by luminal endocytosis and hy­drolyzed by lysosomal enzymes.

Recent studies suggest that small linear peptides, consisting of eight to ten amino acids, are handled by the proximal tubule by a different mechanism. It has been postu lated that small pep tides m icro­infused into proximal tubules are hy­drolyzed at the luminal surface of the brush border, which is rich in a variety of enzymes, by the process of membrane or contact digestion with reabsorption of most of the breakdown products.

2870091-7370/78/0700-0287 $01.20 © Institute for Clinical Science, Inc.

2 8 8 CARONE

Proximal Tubular H andling of Proteins and Large Peptides

Qualitative morphologic and indirect functional stud ies have dem onstrated that proximal tubular cells absorb pro­teins in the. tubular lum inal fluid and have suggested a pathway by which pro­tein undergoes intracellular digestion. These processes have been quantitated directly. Some findings suggest that cer­tain proteins are transported intact across the proximal epithelial cells; however, other studies do not support this conclu­sion. Direct studies on isolated tubular segments indicate that album in and insu­lin are not transported into tubular cells across the peritubular cell m em brane, presumably owing to the absence of an endocytic mechanism on this side of the tubular epithelium.

L u m in a l U p t a k e

M any m orphologic, m icropuncture , m icro in fu sion and m icroperfu sion studies have dem onstrated that a wide variety of proteins are absorbed along the lum inal a sp ec t o f proxim al tu b u la r

F ig u r e 1. The accumulation of iodinated al­bumin as a function of time in proximal convoluted (PCT) proximal straight (PST) and cortical col­lecting (CCT) segments of the rabbit nephron. All tubules were perfused with a 21 mg per dl solution of iodinated rabbit albumin at 18 to 20 nl per min at 37°C.

cells.5,9 In the present author’s laboratory quantitation was performed on the up­take o f1251-labeled rabbit serum album in m icroperfused into isolated segments of the rabbit nephron.2 Proximal convoluted and proximal straight segments accumu­lated 125I-labeled albumin nearly linearly as a function of time (figure 1) whereas cortical collecting segments did not ac­cumulate measurable amounts of protein. The rate of accumulation of albumin in the proximal convoluted tubule was 3.2 x 10~2 ng per mm min which was 2.6 times as great as that in the proximal straight tubule when compared per unit length of tubule. Assuming an album in concentra­tion of 0.3 mg per dl in normal glomerular filtrate,12 it can be calculated that the reabsorptive capacity of the entire proxi­m al tu b u le for a lbum in exceeds the amount of albumin filtered by the normal glomerulus.

The ultrastructural basis for absorption of labeled album in by proximal tubules was investigated autoradiographically by M aunsbach using in vivo microinfusion methods in the rat kidney8 and in our laborato ry in iso la te d rab b it tu b u le s m icroperfused w ith l25I-labeled a lb u ­min.2 Sequential studies revealed that silver grains were initially located over tubular invaginations at the base of the brush border and over small apical vesi­cles and later in larger m em brane-bound apical vacuoles (figure 2). Finally, grains becom e c o n cen tra ted in cy top lasm ic dense bod ies (figure 3) and w ere as­sociated with acid phosphatase positive bodies, indicative of lysosomes. Similar u ltrastructural findings w ere observed with labeled insulin in our laboratory4 and with a num ber of other proteins in several experimental animals.5,9

There is evidence that the first step in endocytosis involves b inding of protein to the luminal plasma membrane.9 There is w ide variation in the affinity of differ­en t proteins to the plasm a m em brane which may be related to the num ber and

RENAL HA N D LIN G O F PRO TEIN S AND PEPT ID E S 289

I ’’’- -xS % • 4

' ^ is

**• é , M•A

F ig u r e 2. E lectron m icroscope radioauto­graph of a proximal tubule perfused 10 min w ith 1251-albumin.Grains are located at the base of the brush border (small arrow), in small apical vesicles (medium arrow) and in apical vacuoles (large arrow), x 33,300.

«a*»**'. Afnr. ■

. %• ' ’ 4 ? ;

» '• £ mu

jf . w «

I r .%

«

% ; f

*

chemical structure of the b ind ing sites and to the net charge on the protein mol­ecules. W hen certain proteins are present in tubular fluid in large amounts, most of the protein appears in endocytic vesicles, u n b o u n d to th e p la sm a m e m b r a n e .9 Thus, endocytosis may be largely specific w hen small amounts of protein are ab­sorbed owing to m em brane b ind ing and less specific w hen large amounts of pro­te in are a b s o rb e d . S ev era l s tu d ie s suggest that the m em brane of apical in­vaginations and vesicles in the endocytic process is replaced by a de novo synthe­sis o f p la s m a m e m b ra n e an d n o t by dow nw ard flow of b rush-border m em ­

brane.9 Most ev idence favors the conclu­sion that protein is transferred to lyso- somes by fusion of endocytic vacuoles and pre-existing lysosomes.

Lysosom es contain many hydro ly tic enzymes which have been shown to di­g e s t a w id e v a r ie ty o f p ro te in s . Lysosomal extracts isolated from renal cortical homogenates have b een used to q u an t i ta te hydro lys is of a lb u m in and other proteins. Hydrolysis of a lbum in is m axim al at a low p H an d th e m ajor labeled product of digestion is monoiodo- tyrosine.10 O ther in vitro s tud ies have dem onstrated hydrolysis of absorbed pro­tein within isolated intact lysosomes or in

290 CARONE

F ig u re 3. Electron microscope radioauto­graph w ith radioactive label in dense bodies (arrows) in cells of the proximal tubu le after 85 min perfusion with 1251-albumin. x 19,000.

lysosomes in intact cells in experiments using k idney slices. Small m olecular weight metabolites, of proteins undergo­ing degradation, diffuse out of lysosomes into the cell cytoplasm and interstitial fluid. T here is no ev idence for non- endocytic absorption of protein on the luminal side of proximal tubular cells or that absorbed protein in lysosomes can be released intact on the contraluminal side of the cells.

S u m m a r y

Absorption of protein from the tubular lum en com m ences with endocytic in­vaginations of cell plasma membrane at

the base of the brush border which pinch off to form small vesicles which, in turn, fuse to form large apical vacuoles. The large vacuoles fuse w ith lysosom es where the protein is digested and the breakdown products diffuse out of the cell and are returned to the blood.

Contraluminal Uptake of Protein

The uptake of proteins from the lumi­nal aspect of the proximal tubule is well established. Studies in intact k idneys provide evidence for contraluminal up­take of certain proteins such as Beta2- m icroglobulin and insulin . Interstitial protein may be in contact with tubular

RENAL HA N D LIN G O F PR O TEIN S AND PEPT ID E S 2 9 1

basilar cell m em branes since W elling and Grantham have dem onstrated that iso la ted p e rfu sed tu b u la r b asem en t membranes are moderately perm eable to albumin.18 The contraluminal uptake of album in was studied in our laboratory di­rectly in isolated perfused segments of proximal, thick ascending limb and corti­cal collecting tubules of the rabbit incu­bated in 125I-labeled albumin.3 After two to 90 m inutes, contraluminal uptake of albumin was negligible in all segments when compared to luminal uptake in the proximal tubule (figure 4).

In a com panion study,4 it was also found that contralum inal uptake of 1251- labe led in su lin was neg lig ib le w hen compared to luminal uptake (figure 5). It is known that album in and insulin ac­cumulate w ithin proximal tubular cells from the luminal side where endocytosis is prominent, but not in cells of collecting tubules, which lack an endocytic mecha­nism . A bsence of s ign ifican t co n tra ­luminal uptake of album in and/or insulin is presumably due to the absence of an endocytic mechanism on the basilar side of tubular cells.

Intercellular and Transcellular Transport o f Intact Proteins

Under normal conditions, m olecules the size of proteins do not pass from the tubular lumen through the cellular junc­tional com plex into th e in te rce llu la r space. Proteins may pass through the junctional complex under certain condi­tions such as increased tubular hydrosta­tic pressure of immaturity of the renal tubule. There is little convincing evi­dence for intercellular transport of pro­teins by m ature renal tubu les during normal functional states.

Transcellular transport of intact protein by renal tubules remains a controversial topic. A num ber of studies provide evi­dence both for and against a mechanism for the transcellular transport of intact proteins.9 This problem may be resolved

F igure 4. Comparison of luminal and contra­luminal accumulation rates of albumin in isolated renal rubules. Luminal uptake data is taken from figure 1.

by d irec t stud ies that q u an tita te and characterize protein and protein catabo- lites absorbed and released by tubular cells.

Tubular Transport of Small Peptides

It has been shown that certain small peptides, such as the octapeptide angio­tensin II, rapidly leave the circulation and that metabolites appear in the urine w ithin m inutes.7 Forty to 70 percent of 14C-labeled angiotensin II ([14C]A-II) in­fused into the renal artery is extracted by

Luminal Contra­luminal

F igure 5. Luminal and contralum inal 1251- labeled insulin accumulation by isolated perfused proximal convoluted tubules.

292 CARONE

the dog kidney, indicating that renal ex­traction of angiotensin II involves more than glom erular filtration and urinary excretion.1 Furthermore, similar studies show th a t 75 pe rcen t of [14C] A-II is m etabolized in a single passage through the kidney and that 98.7 percent of in­jected radioactive material is recovered in renal venous blood, leading to the con­clu sion tha t tissu e se q u es tra tio n o f labeled material does not occur.13 Sup­port for this is the autoradiographic evi­dence that tritium -labeled angiotensin-II localizes in mesangial cells of the rat kid­ney but not in tubular cells.11

Recently, the role of individual neph­rons or isolated tubu lar segm ents has been assessed by us in the reabsorption and/or metabolism of radioactive-labeled angiotensin II, bradykinin or oxytocin. The techniques of in vivo, tracer microin­jection of surface tubules in rats and in vitro microperfusion of isolated segments of rabbit kidneys were employed. Recov­ery of radioactivity in urine or collection fluid was used to calculate the extent of tubular reabsorption of labeled peptide and two-dimensional peptide m apping was employed to identify and quantitate intact peptide and its metabolites in urine or collection fluid. To identify possible pep tide degradation products, labeled pep tid es w ere d ig ested w ith several pu rified enzym es, the p roducts w ere spotted on Whatman 3MM paper, sub­jec ted to descending chrom atography, d rie d and th e n su b je c ted to e le c ­trophoresis in a second dim ension.6,15 Approximately 95 percent of radioactivity applied to the map appeared in identifi­able spots.

When [14C] A-II was infused in vivo, into individual surface proximal or distal tubules in rats,15 recovery of 14 C in the u rine was 11 pe rcen t w hen proxim al tubu les w ere infused and 95 percen t when distal tubules were infused. Fol­low ing proxim al tu b u la r in fusions of [14C] A-II, of the 11 percent of 14C recov­

ered in the urine, most (95 percent) ap­peared as peptide fragments, the princi­pal metabolic product was the Ile5-Phe8 fragment of angio tensin II. Follow ing distal tubular infusion of [14C] A-II, es­sentially a l l 14 C activity in the urine was intact angiotensin II. Similar data were obtained when the renal tubular handl­ing o f3H-labeled bradykinin ([3H] BKN) was studied by the same techniques.6 After microinfusion of [3H] BKN, urinary recovery of 3H labeled was 24 percent when proximal tubules were infused and 98 percent when distal tubules were in ­fused. For proximal tubules, 85 percent of 3H activity in urine consisted of me­tabolites (81 percent Pro and 4 percent A rg^P he5) and 15 percen t was intact BKN. With distal tubules, all 3H activity appeared as intact BKN.

In another set of experiments [14C] A-II was microperfused, in vitro, in isolated segments o f rabbit tubules.14 Proximal straight tubules reabsorbed about 30 per­cent per mm tubular length of perfused 14 C label and most of the isotope was transported across the tubular cells, since no label was sequestered by the tubules during the perfusion period . E lectro ­phoresis of collected perfusate demon­strated that [14C] A-II was hydrolyzed to [14C] isoleucine.

C ollectively , these stud ies dem on­strate that the proximal tubules of rat and rabb it k idneys can enzym atically hy­drolyze small peptides presented to the luminal aspect of the tubular cells. Fur­thermore, distal segments of the nephron do not appear to possess this mechanism. The concentrations of angiotensin II and bradykinin in the infusates of these ex­perim ents were several thousand times greater than that of normal plasma indi­ca ting an enorm ous capacity of the mammalian proximal tubule to hydrolyze and reabsorb small peptide molecules.

Proximal tubu lar hand ling o f small peptides may be accounted for by (1) hy­drolysis at the luminal cell surface with

RENAL H A N D LIN G O F PR O TEIN S AND PE PT ID E S 2 9 3

reabsorption of most of the m etabolites or (2) c e llu la r up take , in tra ce llu la r h y ­drolysis and absorption of most, but back diffusion of a small portion of metabolites into the tubular fluid. Experim ents were co n d u c ted in rats to d e te rm in e the rap id ity o f the m echan ism for en zy ­matic cleavage of small peptides.6 [3H] bradykinin and [14C] inulin were simul­taneously microinfused into surface prox­imal or distal tubules, urine was collected at 30 second intervals, 3H and 14 C were c o u n te d s im u ltan eo u sly and tu b u la r transit curves were determ ined. The uri­nary concentration-time curves of the 3 H label (of bradykinin origin) did not differ appreciably from [14C] inulin (figure 6) for proximal or distal tubules.

From the foregoing experiments, it is known that the 3H-labeled material re­covered in the urine following distal in­fusions is intact bradykinin, whereas the 3H -label follow ing proxim al infusions largely represents degradation products of bradykinin. Thus, the tubular transit time of the metabolites of bradykinin is essen tia lly as rapid as inu lin (a non­absorbable substance) or intact bradyki­nin. This suggests that enzymatic cleav­age of small peptides by the proximal tubules is a very rapid process and favors the hypothesis that hydrolysis occurs at the lum inal b rush border m em brane. Several biochemical analyses have dem ­onstrated that the brush border of the proximal tubule contains many enzymes capab le of hydro lyz ing p e p tid e s .16 Moreover, a num ber of studies support the co n cep t o f m em brane or con tac t d ig es tio n ,17 w h ich m ain ta in s th a t m embrane bound, functionally oriented enzym es on the surface of in tes tina l m icrovilli rapidly hydrolyze pro teins, peptides and other substances prior to absorption.

Our findings suggests that the brush border of the proximal tubule has a simi­lar mechanism for the rapid hydrolysis of small peptides. This mechanism differs

PROXIMAL DISTAL

Figure 6. Appearance o f3H and 14 C in urine plotted against time. 3H and 14 C are quantified as percents of total excretions of each isotope, respec­tively. Isotopes were simultaneously microinfused into rat tubules as [3H] bradykinin and [14C] inulin.

from that for the proximal tubular handl­ing of proteins and large polypeptides, such as in su lin or grow th horm one, w h ich invo lves endocy to sis and lysosomal digestion, processes which re­quire m inutes to hours for completion. It remains to be determ ined w hether or not proteins and large peptides are partially degraded at the brush border membrane of the proximal tubule by the process of contact digestion prior to endocytic up­take.

Our studies indicate that the proximal tubules of the mammalian kidney possess a high capacity mechanism for the ra p id . hydrolysis of small linear peptides. This m echanism may be im portant biologi­cally to (1) conserve amino acids, (2) inac­tivate toxic peptides and (3) help regulate the c ircu lating level of small pep tide hormones. There is evidence that the ef­fective serum levels of the latter are de­term ined more by rates of degradation than synthesis.

References1. Ba ilie , M. D., Rector , F. C., Jr ., and Seld in ,

D. W.: Angiotensin II in arterial and renal ven­ous plasma and renal lymph in the dog. J. Clin. Invest. 50:119-126, 1971.

294 CARONE

2. Bourdeau, J. E., Carone, F. A., and Ganote , C. E.: Serum albumin uptake in isolated per­fused renal tubules. J. Cell. Biol. 54:382-398,1972.

3. Bourdeau , J. E. and Carone , F. A.: Contra- luminal serum in albumin uptake in isolated perfused renal tubules. Amer. J. Physiol. 224:399-404, 1973.

4. Bourdeau , J. E., Chen , E. R. Y., and Carone , F. A.: Insulin uptake in the renal proximal tubule. Amer. J. Physiol. 225:1399-1404, 1973.

5. Bourdeau, J. E. and Carone, F. A.: Protein handling by the renal tubule. Nephron 13:22-34, 1974.

6. Carone , F. A., Pullman , T. N., Oparil , S., and NAKAMURA, S.: Micropuncture evidence of rapid hydrolysis of bradykinin by rat proxi­mal tubule. Amer. J. Physiol. 230:1420-1424,1976.

7. H odge , R. L., N g, K. K. F., and Vane, J. R.: Disappearance of angiotensin from the circula­tion of the dog. Nature 215:138-141, 1967.

8. M AUN SBA C H , A. B.: Absorption of I 125- labeled homologous albumin by rat kidney proximal tubu le cells. A study of micro­perfused single proximal tubules by electron microscopic autoradiography and histo­chemistry. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 15:197-241,1966.

9. MAUNSBACH, A. B.: Cellular mechanisms of tubular protein transport. Kidney and Urinary Tract Physiology, II, Vol. 11, Thurau, K., ed. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1976, pp. 145-167.

10. MAUNSBACH, A. B.: Ultrastructure and diges­tive activity of lysosomes from proximal tubu­

lar cells. Proceedings of the 4th Congress on Nephrology, Vol. 1. Stockholm, Basel, Karger,1971, p. 102.

11. Meyer , P., O sborne , M. J., Broz , B., and M orel , F.: Intrarenal localization of angio­tensin II by autoradiograph. Abstract of 5th In­ternational Congress on Nephrology. Mexico City, 1972, p. 117.

12. O aken, D. E., Cotes, S. C., and Men de , C. W.: Micropuncture study of tubular transport of album in in rats w ith am inonucleoside nephrosis. Kidney Intern. 2:3-11, 1972.

13. O paril , S. and Bailie , M. D.: Mechanism of renal handling of angiotensin II in the dog. Circulation Res. 33:500-507, 1973.

14. Peterson, D. R., O paril , S., Flouret , G., and CARONE, F. A.: Handling of angiotensin II and oxytocin by renal tubular segments per­fused in vitro. Amer. J. Physiol. 232:F319- F324, 1977.

15. Pullman , T. N., Oparil , S., and Carone , F.A.: Fate of labeled angiotensin II microinfused into individual nephrons in the rat. Amer. J. Physiol. 228:747-751, 1975.

16. Q uirk , S. J. and Robinson , G. B.: Isolation and characterization of rabbit kidney brush bor­ders. Biochem. J. 128:1319-1328, 1972.

17. Ugolev , A. M. and de Laey, P.: Membrane digestion. A concept of enzymic hydrolysis on cell m em branes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 300:105-128, 1973.

18. Well in g , L. W. and G rantham , J. J.: Physical properties of isolated perfused renal tubules and tubular basement membranes. J. Clin. In­vest. 51:1063-1075, 1972.