reliability prediction - array d redundant command receiver

16
Reliability Prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver ATM 981 I PAGI 1 OP 16 DATE 26 Feb. 1971 This Reliability Prediction was prepared by Motorola's Government Electronics Division as required under the Bendix/Motorola subcontract SC-0721 for the ALSEP program. The ALSEP Redundant Conunand Receiver is a solid state receiver with a.ctive that may be used to receive either PM or PM-FM This: receiver includes two identical electrically separate receivers. con,sisting of an rf converter, and IF and Audio Amp, and a power isolator. Each receiver (A and B) is a dual conversion super heterodyne receiver with a center frequency of 2119 MHZ. In addition, the Redundant Command Receiver has an rf power divider referred to as an rf coupler and a selection circuit referred to as an audio combiner .. There was a reliability design goal of 998 for a two-year mission on the ... lunar surface. The predicted reliability (based on the FACI-configuration) is 99795 in format 1 and 99786 in format 2. These predictions were based upon an expected temperature of 45°C. The telemetry was considered non-mission essential and failure modes resulting in only the loss of telemetry were not considered in the reliability calculations. Summarized by: Reviewed by: Approved by: ALSEP Reliability Dept. ALSEP Reliability S. J. Ellison, Manager ALSEP Reliability

Upload: others

Post on 06-Jul-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

Reliability Prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

ATM 981 I PAGI 1 OP 16

DATE 26 Feb. 1971

This Reliability Prediction was prepared by Motorola's Government Electronics Division as required under the Bendix/Motorola subcontract SC-0721 for the ALSEP program.

The ALSEP Redundant Conunand Receiver is a solid state receiver with a.ctive lf~Y that may be used to receive either PM or PM-FM fi')'~e :j:~b... This: receiver includes two identical electrically separate receivers. con,sisting of an rf converter, and IF and Audio Amp, and a power isolator. Each receiver (A and B) is a dual conversion super heterodyne receiver with a center frequency of 2119 MHZ. In addition, the Redundant Command Receiver has an rf power divider referred to as an rf coupler and a selection circuit referred to as an audio combiner •

.. There was a reliability design goal of • 998 for a two-year mission on the ... lunar surface. The predicted reliability (based on the FACI-configuration) is • 99795 in format 1 and • 99786 in format 2. These predictions were based upon an expected temperature of 45°C.

The telemetry was considered non-mission essential and failure modes resulting in only the loss of telemetry were not considered in the reliability calculations.

Summarized by:

Reviewed by:

Approved by:

ALSEP Reliability Dept.

ALSEP Reliability

/L~;~ S. J. Ellison, Manager ALSEP Reliability

Page 2: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

----.

ATM 981 - Page 2 o£ 16 Revised: 30 November 19'70

Document Nos )875/038

Reference: ARD-439, Para 6.13

14 August 1970 r---------- ·----· ·------- ... -· .. --- ·-· -··-·····-··-------···-------------] 1 Reliability Prediction For , ALSEP Redundant ! Command Receiver jl

; BxA Part Number 2345147 L---····-·. ... ... .. . ·- ....... --·- ··-···-···· ·········-----

''Preliminary - The Bendix Corporation Aerospace Systems Division Approval Pending11

~7~~7 Approved by: ~ -'·~~.........,_..,

Curt Ro~ Reliabil ty Coordinator

Approved by:

Approved by: b~&~uc-aeorwPettrcrew Aerospace RF Section ·

Prepared by: (R~ tfd !{~ .. Rona d w. K ng ~ Reliability Engineer

Contract Number: NAS 9-5829

·subcontract Numbt~r: SC-0721

Page 3: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

· APPLICATION •1 EXT ASSEMBLY . USED ON LTR

-·-

A

i

K tV I~ I U 11 'l

DESCRIPTION A'l'M 'jtSl - ~a e .:> OI .LO 4

DATE APPROVED 1 --"Preliminary - The Bendix 8/14/70 Corporation Aerosapce Systems Division Approval Pend ing11

Revised ·to FACI Configuration 11/30/70 '

--·

'

• . .

"•·· ----' -..

. ! ' I

~ I '

. .

I i .

I . l .

. . ..

REV 1-

"')HEET

<EV STATUS REV A A A A A A A AA A A l}F SHEETS SHEET 1 2 3 4 s 6 1 8 9 10 ll Al A2 A3 A4 AS A6 A7 -;nERPRET DRAWING IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS PRESCRIBED BY FOR PARTS LIST SEE

L

UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DR BY((~,.,()~,t )}( l.. ~ MOTOROLA INC. I 8201 EASTI.IcOOWELL ROAD ~ ALL Oli.~ENSJONS ARE IN lflCHES AND END USE. FOR CHKBY (j Government Electronics QivisiOn SCOTISDALE, ARIZONA 85252

TPLERANCESSEENOTE MfG I~S?J

i ---·

Reliability Prediction For .\ATr~IAL: I~%NTR ALSEP Redundant Corrooand Receiver

l~aHcAESE BxA Part N~~ber 2345147 Document No. 3875/038

APPROVED DATE SIZE CODE IDENT NO. DWG. NO.

A 94990 APPROVED DATE

SCALE I . SHEET l OF

V-l·B-199H·lOOA·3/69 OWG fORMAT t

Page 4: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

Section --1.0

2.0

.).0

4.0

4.1

4.2

4 • .3

4.4

Figure

1

2

.3

4

s

Appendix A

ATM 981 - Page 4 Of 16

Table or Contents

Introduction • • • • • • • 0\ • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • 0

Requirements • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Summar,y or Ana~eis and Conclusions •••••e$•••

Analysis Details • • • • • .. • • • .. • • • • • • .. • • ~

Functiona:L Description • • • • • • • ., • • • • .. e ., • ..

Reliability Block Diagram • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • •

Logic Diagraae and Math Model • • • • • • • • o .. o ~ • ~

Multiple Failure Probabili~ •••• • ..... o • @ e •

Functional Block Diagraa • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • e

Reliabili t)" Block Diagram • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • .. •

Simplified Reliability Block Diagram • • • • • • • • • •

Logic Diagram and Math Model • • • • • • " • • • • • • •

Reliability Block Diagram Including Part • • • • • • • ~ Redundancy

I \, '

Failure Mode, Effects; and Criticalit1 Sheets • • 0 • •

-i-

!!I! l

l

2

3

.3

5

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

A-l Thru A·7

Page 5: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

ATM 981 - Page 5o£ 16

1.0 INTRODUCTlON:

A reliability prediction was performed on the ALSEP Redundant Command

Receiver for Bendix Aerospace Systems. The prediction complied with the

requirements of Task 4 of the Reliabilitz Program ~ ~ ~ ALSEP

Redundant Command Receiver (Motorola Document No. 3875/001 Revision A, . dated 30 April 1970).

This report is considered a final reliability prediction submitted to

fulfill the requirements of the CDR. I - -~ . ·- . -- --·---·-- -. - "

~~-·. --····---·- - ·------- ----

The configuration of the design used for this analysis is as detailed in

the Assembly Parts List dated 30 Novo 1970 and the following revisions of

the schematics:

Schematic Scher::.atic Name: Nu:nbc:- Revi~ion

IF and Audio 63-Pll349B D.

RF Converter 6J-Pll377B B.

Interconnection Diagram 63-Pll356B I C..

These revisions of the schematics have been submitted to Bendix under

separate cover and are, therefore, not included in this report·.

2.0 REQUIREMENTS:

The reliability requirement is a design goal of .998 for a 2-year mission

of lunar surface operation. •

Telemetry was considered non-mission essential and failure modes resulting

in only; the loss of telemetry were not considered in· the reliability c;llculations.

1

Page 6: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

ATM 981 - Page 6 of 16

Audio A, Audio B, CSPA, and CSPB were not considered mission essential

except as used within the Command Receiver to provide a selected audio output.

Piecepart drift failure modes were not considered mission essential except

£n critical tolerance circuits.

An environmental K-factor of 1.0 was used for lunar surface operation.

Reliability predictions were based upon an expected temperature of 45°0.

3.0 SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS:

The reliability of the Redundant Command Receiver for a two year

(17520 hours) lunar surface mission is .99795 for for format l and .99786 for

fonnat 2, as canpared with the design goal of .998.

The reliability equation is essentially composed of three ·terms: Probability

of success with 0 failures, probability of success with 1 failure, and the

probability of 2 failures which represents system failure.

For Forma·t; l:

P5

(o) .,. .91709

P5 (1) " ..,o8o87_

PF(2) • ~00204

For Format 2:

p8 (o) • .91489

P8(l) .... o8297

PF(2) • .00214

The predicted reliabilities of .~9980 (format 1) and .9919 (format 2) ~ndicate

that the apportioned design goal of .998 will be met by theRedundant Receiver.

Although some aspects were taken into account, the total effect of the compre­

hensive reliability program cannot be adequately accounted for in a prediction.

The reliability program consists of the following:

1) All pieceparts are screened to the maximum reliability level,

2} All pieceparts are applied in accordance with a conservative

derating guide,

2

Page 7: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

-

ATM 981 - Page 7 of 16

3) A Pll ha.s been performed to assure that no part application

problems remain,

4) An FMECA has been performed to assure that single-point-failure

areas have been recognized and minimized,

5) A closed loop failure reporting and corrective action program,

6) Taking the most severe result into account in the case of questionable

failure modes,

7) Taki.ng special precautions with critioal parts, e.g. in the case or the

RF receptacle, a serial element, a right-angled adaptor has been

incorporated to reduce the necessar,y number of matings, thereby

decreasing the probability of inducing failure modes.

4.0 ANALYSIS DETAILS

4.1 FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTIONs

The ALSEP Redundant Command Receiver is a solid state receiver with active

redundancy that JllS\Y be used to receive either PM (format 1) or PM-PM (foraaat 2)

type signals.

The Redundant Command Receiver includes two identical electrical~ separate

receivers, consisting of an RF converter, an If and Audio Amp, and a power isolator.

Each receiver (A and B) is a dual conversion superheterodyne receiver with a center

frequency of 2119 KHz. In addition, the Redundant Command Receiver has an lU' power

divider referred to as an RF coupler and a selection circuit refeJ•red to as an

audio cOllbiner. The overall block diagram is shown in Figure 1.

The RF input power is provided to the receiver throu.gh a single RF connector

interface and is divided by a power divider and applied to receivers A and B. The

local oscillator injection for each converter ie provided from a crystal oscillator

at 110.9631 MHz. Selectivity is provided by a )-pole preselector preceedtng the

mixer, a )-pole filter in the firS.t IF, and a 5-pole filter following the seoond

mixer. Integrated circuits are used i.n the receiver for most of the IF ~ain

Page 8: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

ATM 981 - Page 8 of 16

and the suboarrier and audio circuitr,y. After amplification and gain

leveling, a limiter and a Travis discriminator circuit are used to

demodulate the receiver signal. After the first discriminator, the signal

is processed in accordance with the format selected and then proceeds to the

active filter output a.plitier, which provides a narrow post detector band­

width to'reduce output audio noise.

A narrow band detector is used to recognize and indicate the presence ot

a 1 KHz synchronizing tone. The fil tar has a noise bandwidth of approximatel7

100 Hz. The output of the detection circuit is a bi-level signal, identified

as a C0111111and Signal Presence Indicator ( CSP). The CSP is used within the

audio combiner circuitr,y to implement th~ redundancy switch for switching .tram

receiver A to receiver B.

The Redundant Command Receiver is designed to receive modulated signals in

either of two types of aodulation designated as format 1 or format 2. The

format is selected b,y means of appropriate connections in the wiring harness

external to the receiver.

The modulating signals are constructed as followsz

Digital data is bi-phase modulated onto a 2 KHz subcarrier and a l KHz

synchronizing tone is added. This combination then constitutes the composite

audio signal and is used in either format. In format 1, the composite audio

signal is phase modulated directly onto the S-b&Dd carrier at 3 radians peak.

In fe;rmat 2, the composite audio signal 18 trequen07 modulated onto a 70 KHs

subcarrier at 5 KHz peak deviation.

After the first discriminator in the IF and Audio Module of the receiver,

the signal processing is dependent upon the format. In format 1 operation, an

integrator having a corner frequency of approld...lu.tely 80 Hz is used to restore

the original composite audio form. Thia is necessary because the received PM

signal is demodulated b,y a FM discriJDinator. The output amplifier is ccnbined

4

Page 9: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

with an active filter to provide a narrow post-detection bandwidth to re~uce

the output audio noise.

In format 2 operation, the first discriminator output is the 70 KHz sub­

car~er with ita frequenc1 aodulation. This signal is further processed

through. an Integrator (corner frequenCJ of .)0 KHz), a limiter, and a pulse

counting discriminator. the composite audio' signal from the discriminator

goes to the active filter output amplifier.

The implementation or redundancy in this receiver is a major design charac­

teristic. Figure 2 shows the reliability model for the Redundant Command

Receiver. Both receivers A and B arn operating during the mission. When the ·

CSP tram receiver A indicates the presence of a command signal from the output

of receiver A, receiver A is selected b,y the audio caabiner. When CSP does not

appear,.either due to failure or A or due to no canmand signal, then receiver B

will be selected.

All single point failure modes have been eliminated through the use of part

redundancy, except the RF input receptacle which is a contractually specified

interface. All functions, except telemetry, have redundant pin conr~otions

within the multipin connector.

4.2 RELIABILITY BLOCK DIAGRAM1

A s,ystea summary of the failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis

(Document lfo • .)87$/0.35) is contained in AppendiX A. The subaasembq failure

modes were grouped according to the criticality of those failure modes. The

failure rates (%/1000 hours) are itemized in the Reliability Model Code colUIII'l

for those failure modes considered mission essential and for those included in

the reliabilit,y block diagram. The reliability block diagraa is shown in

Figure 2. Failure rates were obtained from Motorola's B&C Special Meaorandum ·;

Nmnber 188 for each part application (electrical stress) and 'at' 45•c. The

aerial portion of the audio combiner and the multipin connector have a negligible

5

Page 10: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

ATM 981 - Page 10 o£ 16

failure rate due ·to the part and pin redundancy within each.

A simplified reliability block diagram may be constructed by combining the

serial elements of the receiver. That reliability block diagram is shown in . ...._

Figure 3 for each format.

4.3 LOOIC DIAGRAM AND MATH MODEL:

A logic db.gram and a math model are shown in Figure 4. The math model

was based upon a mission time of 17520 hours.

4.4 MULTIPLE FAILURE PROBABILITY:

The reliability of the m~ltipin connector and the serial portion of the

audio combiner were assumed negligible (R = 1.0) due to pin and part redundanc.y

within the block. Figure 5 shows that this assumption is valid for the serial

portion of the audio combiner.

The multiple failure probabilities were calculated as follows:

For Format lt

•• 91709

P8(1) • ~ (1-R2) R3 + R1 R2 (1-R3)

• (.99974) (.04339) (.95894) + (.99974) (.95661) (~04lo6)

• ·.08087

• 1- f!5 <o> + P8 (1IJ • l-.99792

•• 00204

For Format 2:

P8 (0) •• .91489

P8(l) • .o8297

. P F(2) • .00214

6

I

Page 11: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

~

From ~ultip

Connec in tor

From RF

Connec

From Multip Connec

tor

in tor

Power

Isolator

A

RF

Coupler

Power I Isolator ~

I B I

RF IF

Converter and

A - Audio

A

RF IF

Converter and

B Audio

B

Figure 1

ALSEP Redundant Command Receiver

Functional Block Diagram

Command Signal Present

Audio Output

A

Audio Output

B

I Audio I

Combiner

> ....: ~

" ()C ... 't IU

()'Q CD ... ... 0 t+. .... (j'

Page 12: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

r

RF RF

,..;.._ Coupler - Converter

I .001 .094449 i %/1000 Hrs %/1000 Hrs

I

Mu1tipin RF Connector - Coupler

- - - - ---- - -·~- Fi.- T - ---I F1

IF & - Audio IF& .015404

~ Audio %/1000 Hrs .094875

%/1000 Hrs

F2 IF&

I... Audio .022264

%/1000 Hrs -

Audio Combiner .001976 Audio

%/lOOO__l!rs Combiner .045455

%/1000 Hrs

I I I

I I I I I I

F2 Audio

Combiner .001976

%/1000 Hrs - ...... ____ _. .. _ - j

Audio

Negligible .0015 %/1000 Hrs n Combiner

=» I NesU1~1Dle I J - .~ .;..:.:- •• I I • Negligible

F1 - - - - - -,- - -,

Fl IF&

I Audio RF RF IF& .015404

I Coupler Converter Audio %/1000 Hrs ..._ .001

i-.094449

,_ .076042

%/1000 Hrs %/1000 Hrs 1./1000 Hrs

Audio h I Combiner I .001976 Audio

%/1000 Hrs Combiner I .050396 I >

'Z./1000 Hrs ~

I ~ ,· ~

I ()0 .....

F2 IF&

F2 I I

Audio Audio

.022264. %/1000 Hrs L ____ R~ebeLB- __________ _

Combiner I ~ &»

.001976 I OQ

1./1000 Hrs ~

..... ________ ..J N

0 FigurJL! """ .....

ALSE1'lfeaundant Command Receiver Reliability Block Diagram 0'

- ··- .... -- ~ ... ~ - -

Page 13: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

Receiver A 1.L A = ,253159 %/1000 Hrs 1--

* ~ •• 95661

RF Coupler u.. A == .0015 %/1000 Hrs ~

• at = .99974

Receiver B u_

A ... .239267%/1000 Hrs ~ a*

3 •• 95894

FORMAT 1

Receiver A u.. A = .260019%/1000 Ilrs "-

R; • .95546

RF Coupler u. A= .0015 %/1000 Hrs 1-

R{ = .99974

Receiver B ll. A = .• 246127%/1000 Hrs -

* R3 • .95779

FORMAT 2

*R = exp[-A(l7520 Hours)] ,.

Figure 3

Simplified Reliability Block Diagram

9

Page 14: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

Reliability Block Diagram:

Reliability Logic Diagr.am: - R1

Math Model:

FORMAT 1

FORMAT 2

R = Rl R2 R3 + Rl R2 i 3 + R1 i 2 R3

- Rl R2 [R3 + R3] + Rl [2 R3

• R1 {R2 + (1 - R2) R3]

= [.99974] [.95661 + .04339 {.95894)1

= .99195

R = a1 [R2 + (1 - R2) R3]

= [.99974] [.95546 + (.04454) (.95779)1

.... 99786

Figure 4

Logic Diagram and Math Model •

10 •

R • success of nth block n

i = failure of nth block n

c:> = system success

_ • system failure

'

Page 15: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

Lz.. La. .1.6.. Receiver A Q6 R21

.-- >..* = .2532 f- ----- >..* - .000566 !-- ~ A.*-· .. = .00001 .

R • .•95661 R • .999901 R • .9999982 . '

..

u: RF Coupler

>..* - .0015 /

R • .999999 ~ R • .999999 • .

R • .99974

.. ..

. ~ - li [5: LL

Receiver B Q8 R24

....__ >..* -.2393· i- ~ >..* = .000566

f- ·'-->..* = .00001

L

R • .95894'l R = .999901 R "" .9999982

* 1/1000 Hrs FORMAT 1

Figure 5

Reliability Block Diagr~ Including Part Redundancy

.~ .. ~-

- ··- ... -- .. -..-..·

La. C4

1- r--->..* ... 001

R • .99982

!- R • .999999

li. cs

- .._ "-*- .001 .

R • .99982 -

1--

r-

> J-:1

. ' . !7' - .. ~

~ 00 ....

:5' oq t» .... Ul

a. .... 0'-

Page 16: Reliability prediction - Array D Redundant Command Receiver

ATM 981 - Page 16 of 16

APPENDIX A

FMECA Sheets

APPENDIX A IS ON FILE WITH ORIGINAL MOTOROLA DOCUMENT #3875/038