released assessment: item-specific rubrics and sample ... · released assessment: item-specific...
TRANSCRIPT
Assessment of Reading, Writing and Mathematics:
Junior Division, 2016
Released Assessment: Item-Specific Rubrics and
Sample Student Responses with Annotations
Student Booklet: English, Junior Reading
EQAO, 2 Carlton Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5B 2M9 • 1-888-327-7377 • Web site: www.eqao.com • © 2016 Queen’s Printer for Ontario
Q.5 How do the details in paragraph 5 show Marilyn’s character? Use specific examples from the text to support your answer.
Code
Descriptor
B
Blank: nothing written or drawn in the space provided
I
Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English
Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question
Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question
Typical responses:
do not attempt to answer the question OR
restate the question (e.g., .)
10
Response attempts to explain how the details in paragraph 5 show Marilyn’s character.
The response either:
answers an aspect of the question OR
does not refer to the reading selection OR
provides inaccurate support
20
Response indicates a partial understanding of how the details in paragraph 5 show Marilyn’s
character. The response provides:
irrelevant support from the reading selection OR
vague support from the reading selection OR
limited support from the reading selection
The response usually requires the reader to connect the support to what it is intended to
prove.
30
Response indicates an understanding by explaining how the details in paragraph 5 show
Marilyn’s character.
The response includes:
some accurate and relevant support and
some vague or underdeveloped support
The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it
is intended to prove.
40
Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how the details in paragraph 5 show
Marilyn’s character and provides specific and relevant support.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Short Narrative Marilyn Bell Q5
How do the details in paragraph 5 show Marilyn’s character? Use specific examples from the
text to support your answer.
Code 10
- Identifies physical attributes only with no supporting details as to how these are evident
- Describes how Marilyn was feeling rather than how the details show her
character
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Short Narrative Marilyn Bell Q5
How do the details in paragraph 5 show Marilyn’s character? Use specific examples from the text to
support your answer.
Code 20
- Indicates a partial understanding of how the details in paragraph 5 are used to
show Marilyn’s character (by telling us what kind of person she is like; gives the reader
an image of what it looked like)
- Provides limited support (“turned exhausted eyes”)
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Short Narrative Marilyn Bell Q5
How do the details in paragraph 5 show Marilyn’s character? Use specific examples from the
text to support your answer.
Code 30
- Identifies trait/attribute: exhausted
- Provides some accurate and relevant support (using detailed words like “exhausted”
and “steady front crawl”)
- Provides some underdeveloped support (she is just a human and she gets tired and
can’t just do it all at once, she needed to take a break.)
- Reader is required to make some connection between the support and how this is used to show Marilyn’s character.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Short Narrative Marilyn Bell Q5
How do the details in paragraph 5 show Marilyn’s character? Use specific examples from the text to
support your answer.
Code 40
- Identifies trait/attribute: Marilyn is strong
- Supporting details are specific and relevant (when she starts something she wants to finish it; she
was going to swim Lake Ontario… she put her heart out on her swim and did her best)
- Explains fully how the details in paragraph 5 show Marilyn’s character (the words the writer
used to descrive what Marilyn did… let us visualize or get an idea of what type of person Marilyn is;
the writer told us what she did, her actions reflect who she really is)
Q.6 Explain why Marilyn Bell could be considered a role model for young people. Use information from the text to support your answer.
Code
Descriptor
B
Blank: nothing written or drawn in the space provided
I
Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English
Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question
Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question
Typical responses:
do not attempt to answer the question OR
restate the question (e.g., .)
10
Response attempts to explain why Marilyn bell could be considered a role model for young
people.
The response either:
answers an aspect of the question OR
does not refer to the reading selection OR
provides inaccurate support
20
Response indicates a partial understanding of why Marilyn bell could be considered a role
model for young people. The response provides:
irrelevant support from the reading selection OR
vague support from the reading selection OR
limited support from the reading selection
The response usually requires the reader to connect the support to what it is intended to
prove.
30
Response indicates an understanding by explaining why Marilyn bell could be considered a
role model for young people.
The response includes:
some accurate and relevant support and
some vague or underdeveloped support
The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it
is intended to prove.
40
Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully why Marilyn bell could be
considered a role model for young people and provides specific and relevant support.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Short Narrative – Marilyn Bell – Q6
Code 10
- Attempts to explain why Marilyn Bell could be considered a role model for young
people.
- Answers an aspect of the question
- This response could be about any role model. There is no connection to the reading
selection. What is “it”?
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Short Narrative – Marilyn Bell – Q6
Code 20
- Indicates a partial understanding of why Marilyn Bell could be considered a role model but does not provide the relevance of her actions to young people
- Provides limited supporting details
- Reader is left with the question, “Why is swimming Lake Ontario a “great” thing?”
(she is the first, she was so young etc.)
- Reader must make the connection between the support and what it’s intended to prove.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Short Narrative – Marilyn Bell – Q6
Code 30
- Indicates an understanding of why Marilyn Bell could be considered a role model by providing a list of what she did (swam across Lake Ontario…swam the Strait of Juan de Fuca in
British Columbia)
- Provides some accurate and relevant supporting details (at 17 she was the youngest person
ever to swim the English Channel) and some underdeveloped support (She could be a role
model for young people.)
- Reader is required to make some connection between the support and how this makes Marilyn Bell a role model for young people.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Short Narrative – Marilyn Bell – Q6
Code 40
- Identifies a quality of a role model: she herself was young when she did something “historic”
- Explains how Marilyn Bell’s actions showed this quality: Only 16 years old, and at 17
- Supporting details are specific and relevant (She swam “Lake Ontario” and the “English
Channel” being young Marilyn even made a change about opinions about “women’s athletic
abilities”)
- Fully explains connection between actions and how this could make her a role model for young people (It proves that anybody can be a good athlete; proving you can make a difference)
Q.11 Explain why the tree is called “King of the Forest.” Use specific details from the text
to support your answer.
Code
Descriptor
B
Blank: nothing written or drawn in the space provided
I
Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English
Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question
Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question
Typical responses:
do not attempt to answer the question OR
restate the question (e.g., .)
10
Response attempts to explain why the tree is called “King of the Forest”.
The response either:
answers an aspect of the question OR
does not refer to the reading selection OR
provides inaccurate support
20
Response indicates a partial understanding of why the tree is called “King of the Forest”.
The response provides:
irrelevant support from the reading selection OR
vague support from the reading selection OR
limited support from the reading selection
The response usually requires the reader to connect the support to what it is intended to
prove.
30
Response indicates an understanding by explaining why the tree is called “King of the
Forest”.
The response includes:
some accurate and relevant support and
some vague or underdeveloped support
The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it
is intended to prove.
40
Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully why the tree is called “King of the
Forest” and provides specific and relevant support.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Poem
King of the Forest – Q11
Code 10
- Attempts to explain why the tree is called “King of the Forest” by identifying an attribute: been
there for 200 years
- Answers an aspect of the question
- How does having been there 200 years make the tree like a king?
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Poem
King of the Forest – Q11
Code 20
- Indicates a partial understanding of how the tree’s attributes compare to those of a king
- Identifies attributes of the tree only: 200 years old; oldest tree out of all
- Provides limited support (oldest tree out of all the trees that are there) and the reader must make a
connection between the support (oldest) and how they compare to those of a king
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Poem
King of the Forest – Q11
Code 30
- Indicates an understanding of how these attributes compare to those of a king
- Identifies attributes of the tree: old, popular
- Provides some accurate and relevant supporting details (it is old…that despite my 200 years I’m still quite fit; alot of people visit it) and some underdeveloped support (it is popular because…Kings are
popular)
- Reader is required to make some connection between “old” and how this compares to a king
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Poem
King of the Forest – Q11
Code 40
- Identifies attributes of the tree: lived for 200 years, so very tall and animals adore to live in him
- Support is specific and relevant and used to fully explain how these attributes correspond to those
of a king (its his job to care for his people, well by letting the animals live in him and on him…)
Q.12 Explain how the tree feels about the changing seasons. Use specific details from the
text to support your answer.
Code
Descriptor
B
Blank: nothing written or drawn in the space provided
I
Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English
Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question
Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question
Typical responses:
do not attempt to answer the question OR
restate the question (e.g., .)
10
Response attempts to explain how the tree feels about the changing seasons.
The response either:
answers an aspect of the question OR
does not refer to the reading selection OR
provides inaccurate support
20
Response indicates a partial understanding of how the tree feels about the changing seasons.
The response provides:
irrelevant support from the reading selection OR
vague support from the reading selection OR
limited support from the reading selection
The response usually requires the reader to connect the support to what it is intended to
prove.
30
Response indicates an understanding by explaining how the tree feels about the changing
seasons.
The response includes:
some accurate and relevant support and
some vague or underdeveloped support
The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it
is intended to prove.
40
Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how the tree feels about the
changing seasons and provides specific and relevant support.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Poem- King of the Forest Q12
Code 10
- Attempts to explain how the tree is feeling by answering an aspect of the question
- Identifies what the tree does only, not how it feels
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Poem- King of the Forest Q12
Code 20
- Identifies feelings (happy, sad, lonley) and relates each to the corresponding season (summer and
spring, fall, winter)
- Lacks text support for why the tree feels the way it does
- The response requires the reader to connect the feelings to what happens in each season.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Poem- King of the Forest Q12
Code 30
- Identifies one feeling: (happy)
- Relates feeling to one season: summer
- Support is specific and relevant for summer (it has lots of visitors)
- Feeling for winter is missing support so it is underdeveloped. Reader is required to
make some connection between support for winter and how the tree must be feeling.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Poem- King of the Forest Q12
Code 40
- Identifies feelings: happy, sad, happy
- Relates each feeling to its respective season: summer, winter
- Provides evidence that is specific and relevant (a mother robin…longest branch; some of my friends…oak and the pine)
- Response fully explains connection between feelings and seasons
Q.5 Explain the importance of the training and preparation for Baumgartner’s jump. Use information from the text to support your answer.
Code
Descriptor
B
Blank: nothing written or drawn in the space provided
I
Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English
Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question
Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question
Typical responses:
do not attempt to answer the question OR
restate the question (e.g., .)
10
Response attempts to explain the importance of the training and preparation for
Baumgartner’s jump.
The response either:
answers an aspect of the question OR
does not refer to the reading selection OR
provides inaccurate support
20
Response indicates a partial understanding of the importance of the training and preparation
for Baumgartner’s jump. The response provides:
irrelevant support from the reading selection OR
vague support from the reading selection OR
limited support from the reading selection
The response usually requires the reader to connect the support to what it is intended to
prove.
30
Response indicates an understanding by explaining the importance of the training and
preparation for Baumgartner’s jump.
The response includes:
some accurate and relevant support and
some vague or underdeveloped support
The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it
is intended to prove.
40
Response indicates an understanding by explaining the importance of the training and
preparation for Baumgartner’s jump and provides specific and relevant support.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Questions (2016)
Informational
Rocketman- Q5
Code 10
- Attempts to identify the importance/need for training (knows what to do)
- Does not identify potential problems from the text (if something goes wrong)
- Lacks specific consequences of no training or benefit of having the training
Scoring Guide for Open Response Questions (2016)
Informational
Rocketman- Q5
Code 20
- Identifies the importance/need for training (able to controle it)
- Identifies potential problems (proplemes, glitches)
- Identifies consequences of no training or benefit of having the training (came down safe)
- Provides vague text support
- Reader is required to connect the support and the importance of training and preparation for the jump.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Questions (2016)
Informational
Rocketman- Q5
Code 30
- Identifies the importance/need for training (knew exactly what to do) – vague support
- Identifies potential problems (started to spin and his visor fogged up) – accurate and relevant support
- Consequences of no training or benefit of having the training are underdeveloped
- Reader is required to make some connection between the support and the importance of training and
preparation for the jump.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Questions (2016)
Informational
Rocketman- Q5
Code 40
- Identifies the importance/need for training (wouldn’t have known how to stop these problems)
- Identifies potential problems (visor fogged up and he started spinning)
- Identifies consequences of no training or benefit of having the training (increasing the risk of death)
- Specific and relevant text support and response fully explains importance of training and preparation for
Baumgartner’s jump.
Q.6 Explain the value of Felix Baumgartner’s jump. Use details from the text to support your answer.
Code
Descriptor
B
Blank: nothing written or drawn in the space provided
I
Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English
Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question
Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question
Typical responses:
do not attempt to answer the question OR
restate the question (e.g., .)
10
Response attempts to explain the value of Felix Baumgartner’s jump.
The response either:
answers an aspect of the question OR
does not refer to the reading selection OR
provides inaccurate support
20
Response indicates a partial understanding of the value of Felix Baumgartner’s jump. The
response provides:
irrelevant support from the reading selection OR
vague support from the reading selection OR
limited support from the reading selection
The response usually requires the reader to connect the support to what it is intended to
prove.
30
Response indicates an understanding by explaining the value of Felix Baumgartner’s jump.
The response includes:
some accurate and relevant support and
some vague or underdeveloped support
The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it
is intended to prove.
40
Response indicates an understanding by explaining the value of Felix Baumgartner’s jump
and provides specific and relevant support.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Informational
Rocketman – Q6
Code 10
- Attempts to explain the value of Baumgartner’s jump (a goal the he himself wanted to reach it)
- Does not identify a result of the jump
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Informational
Rocketman – Q6
Code 20
- Identifies a result of the jump (using the info; there wouldnt be that reserch)
- Identifies value to others (the NASA)
- How the information will be used for spacesuits is vague (using the info for spacesuits) What
info? To do what?
- Response requires the reader to make a connection between the support and how this explains the value of the jump.
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Informational
Rocketman – Q6
Code 30
- Identifies a result of the jump (the North American Space agency benefited from it; collected data)
- Identifies value to others (to perfect their spacesuits, help astronauts in outer space) as well as to Felix
(accomplished his goal)
- How the data collected might help astronauts survive is underdeveloped
- Response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and how this
explains the value of the jump
Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2016)
Informational
Rocketman – Q6
Code 40
- Identifies a result of the jump (space agency’s are using information …and also collected data)
- Identifies value (to others) (to help perfect spacesuits, help future astronauts survive in spae)
- Explains how the data collected might help astronauts survive (if they have to bail from a high altitude)
- Provides specific and relevant text support that explains the value of the jump