refugees and their human rights(1).pdf

Upload: marchellene-caday-atitiw

Post on 27-Feb-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 Refugees and Their Human Rights(1).pdf

    1/5

    Fordham International Law Journal

    Volume18, Issue4 1994 Article1

    Refugees and Their Human Rights

    Louis Henkin

    Copyright c1994 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journalis produced by The Berke-

    ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj

  • 7/25/2019 Refugees and Their Human Rights(1).pdf

    2/5

    Refugees and Their Human Rights

    Louis Henkin

    Abstract

    This Introduction discusses the state of refugees in international law.

  • 7/25/2019 Refugees and Their Human Rights(1).pdf

    3/5

    INTRODUCTION

    REFUGEES

    ND

    THEIR

    HUM N

    RIGHTS

    Louis Henkin

    We

    live in the age of

    human

    rights.

    In half a century

    we

    have

    moved from

    acceptance

    of the idea and commitment to its

    realization,

    to

    universal

    declaration and definition, to covenants

    and conventions, to established

    institutions,

    even to collective

    humanitarian

    intervention

    in response

    to

    gross

    violations.

    If

    the

    condition

    of human

    rights

    in most

    countries

    remains

    always

    less

    than

    cheering, often

    deplorable, it is not because the

    world dis-

    claims

    responsibility:

    the

    human

    rights

    of

    every

    human

    being

    everywhere

    are

    now

    everybody s

    business.

    Ours is

    also

    the age of

    refugees,

    alas. Refugees

    require addi-

    tional

    rights,

    and

    greater

    respect

    for

    their

    human rights. In

    fact,

    refugees enjoy

    fewer

    rights

    and the human

    rights

    condition of

    refugees

    is deplorable, often horrendous.

    The

    Universal Declaration

    of Human Rights

    recognizes:

    Everyone

    has

    the right to seek and to

    enjoy in other countries

    asylum

    from persecution.

    But

    everyone s

    right

    is

    only a

    right

    to

    seek

    asylum, and to enjoy it

    if it

    is granted;

    there

    is

    no

    right to

    be

    granted asylum; there

    is

    no obligation on

    any

    state to

    grant

    it.

    And the

    right recognized by

    the

    Declaration

    is

    only

    a right

    to seek asylum from

    oppression, not

    a right

    to

    seek

    and enjoy

    refuge from grinding

    poverty, from civil war, from natural

    disas-

    ters.

    The International Covenant on Civil

    and Political Rights

    recognizes the

    right of everyone to leave

    any

    country; there is no

    recognized

    right

    to

    be

    admitted

    to any

    country

    (other

    than one s

    own).

    The victim of

    repression,

    then,

    has

    only half a

    right

    a

    right to leave, not

    a

    right to be received,

    to

    enjoy

    a

    haven

    or

    to

    resettle.

    Of

    course,

    the

    refugee from

    oppression, from

    war,

    from floods

    and earthquakes is

    human, and the International

    Covenant

    requires that every state respect

    and ensure

    the

    University Professor Emeritus

    Columbia

    University.

    1079

  • 7/25/2019 Refugees and Their Human Rights(1).pdf

    4/5

    1 8

    FORDHAM 7VTERNATIONALLAWJOURNAL

    [Vol.

    18:1079

    human

    rights

    of all

    persons

    subject

    to

    its

    jurisdiction.

    A

    state

    must

    respect

    and

    ensure

    the

    human

    rights

    of

    refugees

    who come

    within

    its

    jurisdiction

    or whom

    the

    state

    brings

    within

    itsjurisdic-

    tion.

    States, even states

    that

    respect

    human

    rights

    of

    those

    per-

    manently

    within

    its

    jurisdiction,

    have not

    done

    well

    by refugees

    who

    sneak

    or

    stream

    into

    their

    territory,

    or

    who are

    on ships

    that

    their

    navies

    interdict.

    A

    bright

    spot in

    international

    refugee

    law

    is the Convention

    on

    the

    status of

    Refugees

    and

    its Protocol.

    The

    Convention

    and

    the

    Protocol

    do

    not

    promise

    much.

    They

    promise

    some

    eco-

    nomic

    and social

    benefits

    to some

    victims

    from

    oppression,

    and

    only

    to

    those

    whom

    states

    had

    agreed

    to

    admit.

    They

    do

    not

    promise

    asylum,

    or

    even temporary

    haven,

    even to

    refugees

    as

    defined.

    Only

    one

    small

    section, a

    kind

    of

    postscript, almost

    an

    afterthought,

    promised

    non-refoulement,

    not to

    return

    refu-

    gees

    into

    the

    hands

    of

    their oppressors.

    From

    that little

    acorn has

    grown

    the

    modern

    law

    of asylum

    for refugees,

    tended

    by

    the

    heroes

    of

    that

    development,

    Com-

    missioner

    Ogata

    and her

    predecessors

    and their colleagues

    in

    the

    U.N.

    High Commission

    for

    Refugees.

    It

    is

    a sturdy

    growth.

    But

    it is

    not

    sturdy

    enough.

    The

    Refugee

    Convention,

    even with

    its

    non r foul m nt

    clause,

    comes

    from

    the

    time when

    there

    was

    little

    refugee

    law

    and

    that little

    was

    a small

    concession

    by compassionate

    states

    ad-

    dicted

    to

    and fearful

    for

    their

    sovereignty.

    It

    is

    of

    the time

    when

    human

    rights

    law

    itself

    was in

    its

    infancy,

    and

    the iota

    of

    refugee

    law

    was

    not

    part of

    that

    human

    rights

    law

    Since

    then,

    human

    rights

    law

    has

    moved

    from

    a

    declaration

    of

    principles

    to

    binding

    covenants

    and

    conventions,

    to

    political

    concern

    such

    as

    that

    which

    brought

    down

    apartheid

    o

    Security Council

    sanctions

    in response

    to

    ethnic

    cleansing

    and

    Security

    Council

    decisions

    authorizing

    the

    use of

    force

    to

    restore

    democracy

    in

    Haiti.

    It

    is

    time to

    bring the

    international

    law

    of

    refugees

    and

    the

    international

    law

    of

    human

    rights

    together. It

    is

    time

    for

    the

    international

    community

    to

    respond

    to

    the

    plight

    of

    refugees

    not

    only from

    tired compassion

    but from

    political

    responsibility;

    to recognize

    that

    massive

    flows

    of

    refugees

    result from

    massive

    human

    rights

    violations.

    They

    result from

    the failure

    of

    the in-

    ternational

    system

    to prevent,

    deter,

    or

    terminate

    gross violation;

    from failure

    to

    hold

    governments

    that are

    guilty

    of gross

    viola-

  • 7/25/2019 Refugees and Their Human Rights(1).pdf

    5/5

    995 REFUGEES

    ND

    HUM N

    RIGHTS

    8

    tions responsible for the

    floods

    of

    refugees

    they

    unleash;

    from

    failure to assume political responsibility

    for

    refugee

    situations

    that threaten international

    peace and security; from

    failure to

    assume political responsibility to

    prevent

    violations

    that

    unleash

    refugee

    floods

    and collective

    responsibility

    to guarantee

    reme-

    dies including

    temporary protection or

    resettlement.

    In sum and in

    a

    few words:

    Not only

    compassion

    but re-

    sponsibility; not only individual state

    responsibility but collective

    responsibility;

    not only the Refugee Convention

    but the Interna-

    tional Covenants

    and the U.N.

    Charter;

    not

    only

    UNHCR but

    the Human Rights Committee

    and if necessary the U.N.

    Secur-

    ty Council.