refinement and use of certificates of veterinary …refinement and use of certificates of veterinary...

1
Refinement and Use of Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (Health Certificates) for Optimal Assurance of Disease Freedom in Aquatic Animals David E. Starling 1 , Dušan Palić 2 , and A. David Scarfe 3* 1 Aqueterinary Services P.C.; 2 Center for Food Security and Public Health, The College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University; 3 American Veterinary Medical Association; *Corresponding Author Introduction Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (CVI), generally termed “Health Certificates”, are pivotal for ensuring translocated animals are not diseased or harbour significant pathogens (3, 4) . With modifications tailored to specific purposes, CVIs are also extremely useful for other disease-related purposes requiring evaluation of animal health including specific pathogen-free (SPF) assurance for premises, risk-mitigating (biosecurity practices) assurance necessary for insurance policies, and the assurance of broodstock breeding soundness. While used very successfully with terrestrial animal movement for decades, CVIs for aquatic animals are not well refined, understood or used, despite the availability of several aquatic animal ‘certification processes’, ‘permits’ and ‘health certificates’, including the OIE model health certificates. Correctly designed CVIs provide the single most economical and effective assurance of the disease status (generally freedom from specific diseases or pathogens) for individuals or lots of animals, at any point in time. When issued by a qualified independent third-party (typically a licensed veterinarian, and in come case government accredited) they provide the official level of assurance necessary for intrastate, interstate and international trade. Future Progress for Increasing Efficiency – Electronic CVI (e-CVI) Secured electronic collection and transfer of data between the attending veterinarian, diagnostic laboratories, competent authorities and the source and destination, and for issuing e-CVIs would increase the utility of any CVI system (Fig 2). E-data transfer and e-CVIs would also be in accord with OIE standards (3) . A preliminary trial of an e-CVI system was successfully tested by GlobalVetLink (Ames, Iowa, USA) for moving 15-20 shipments of ornamental (aquarium) finfish per week (7-10K per shipment), from Florida wholesale sources to Virginia pet stores during 2001-2002 (5) . Currently no system for issuing e-CVIs for aquatic animals is fully operational. However, several systems in development (GlobalVetLink e-OCVI; USDA’s VSPS – Fig 3) would be extremely useful for aquatic e-CVIs. A similar approach would be feasible in the European Union by integrating TRACES (TRAde Control and Expert System), CENTAUR (database for export health certificates and transboundary animal disease e-communication) and ANIMO (computerized network for linking veterinary authorities) (6) or in Australia/New Zealand using a modified e-CERTS system (Fig 4). Summary In accord with the OIE Aquatic Animal Standards Commission Work Plan for 2006/2007 to reexamine “Health Certificates”, these elements of a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (Health Certificate) are offered for discussion, comment and refinement. If optimally designed, model CVIs may be of use with electronic systems that are evolving in, for example, Europe, the USA and Australia/New Zealand in accord with governmental initiatives. References 1. Cameron, A (2002). Survey Toolbox for Aquatic Animal Diseases. A Practical Manual and Software Package. ACIAR Monograph No. 94, 375p. Australian Centre for International Research, Canberra. 2. Cummings, D. (2005). VSPS e-Interstate Module: e-CVI Setting the Gold Standard. Presentation, U.S. Animal Health Association Annual Meeting, Greensboro, SC, USA. October 21-27. 3. OIE (2006 a). Aquatic Animal Code – Certification Procedures, Electronic Certification (Chpt. 1.3.2, Article 1.3.2.4 ). World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), Paris. 4. OIE (2006 b). Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals – Requirements for Surveillance for International Recognition of Freedom from Infection (Chpt. 1.1.4). World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), Paris. 5. Scarfe, A.D. (2004). Electronic Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (e-CVI) – A Model Health Assurance Program for U.S. Aquaculture Industries. Proceedings of the International Association for Aquatic Animal Medicine. Galveston, Texas, April 4-8. 6.TRACES, CENTAUR, ANIMO and are currently being examined in response to several EU Council Directives (e.g. 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 97/78/EC, and others). Accessible at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/ Identifies Veterinarian, CVI, Animals, Types and Purpose Legal Declarations Identifies Diagnostics Specifics Identifies Animal Species Identifies Source and Destination Veterinary Authority Endorsement Additional Diagnostics Figure 1. A revised model aquatic CVI. This model CVI has broad potential use for individual operations, states or countries. It is produced for illustration purposes only. Acknowledgements The authors thank many individual from several organization that have contributed to the development of concepts outlined here including: American Veterinary Medical Association; California Department of Fish and Game, University of Florida, Florida Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; GlobalVetLink, L.C.; Maine Departments of Agriculture and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife; National Association of State Aquaculture Coordinators; Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection; USDA, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health. Figure 3. USDA- APHIS “Veterinary Services Process Streamlining” (VSPS) concept. Under an “e-Government Initiative” (also developing in many other countries) the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has proposed integrating multiple electronic data tracking and recording systems, including e-CVIs (2) . VSPS interstate movement module State Regulations VSPS Accredited veterinarian module SAHO NAHLN LIMS1 LIMS2 NAIS prem NAIS animal AHSM/GDB brucellosis tuberculosis PRV EIA Future enhancement (optional): state-defined import protocols drive completion of a CVI 1) Accredited veterinarian module verifies the status of the issuing veterinarian 2) Accredited veterinarian can update personal information 1) Summary information about the planned movement can be reviewed by destination SAHO to determine need/issue permit 2) CVI data are available in ‘real-time’ to origin and destination SAHOs 3) SAHOs are able to access the accredited veterinarian module to confirm status of issuing veterinarian Future enhancement: the test order process is handled by NAHLN system Program data associated with animal movement are pushed to AHSM Origin and destination premises data are verified with NAIS prem Animal ‘sighting’ data are pushed to NAIS animal repository > CVI > test charts > vaccination charts Hardcopy documents are generated Necessary detailed information captured in a CVI for these purposes include (Fig 1): The veterinarian, purpose of the CVI, and the types of animals involved The source and destination (ownership), transportation (if moved) and possible permits needed The identity of animals involved The results of specific validated/ standardized diagnostic tests required by the destination authority, including laboratory test information to determine protocols used, their validity, and to calculate the probability of disease/ pathogen freedom (1,4) Declarations by the veterinarian and owner attesting to inspection, tests performed and biosecurity procedures being implemented In addition, for CVIs to be official government documents that meet an importing country’s requirements according to OIE standards (3) , endorsement by the official veterinary authority (or other competent authority with jurisdiction over aquatic animal health) is required. Figure 2. e-CVI process. A stylized example of how electronic information can be conveyed between individuals and entities (veterinarian, diagnostic laboratory, source and destination owners, and authorities, in developing an electronic Certificate of Veterinary Inspection. Figure 4. e-CVI incorporation into “e-Government Initiatives”. Schematic illustration of how systems may work to incorporate e-CVI. Trader Vet Local Authority (LVU or BIP) Local Authority of destination and crossed states (LVU or BIP) Control on the road 1 2 3 4 5 Trader Source Authority Veterinarian Destination Authority Transport Validation, Control Points, and flow of e-information

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jul-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Refinement and Use of Certificates of Veterinary …Refinement and Use of Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (Health Certificates) for Optimal Assurance of Disease Freedom in Aquatic

Refinement and Use of Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (Health Certificates) for Optimal

Assurance of Disease Freedom in Aquatic AnimalsDavid E. Starling1, Dušan Palić2, and A. David Scarfe3*

1Aqueterinary Services P.C.; 2Center for Food Security and Public Health, The College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University; 3American Veterinary Medical Association; *Corresponding Author

IntroductionCertificates of Veterinary Inspection (CVI), generally termed “Health Certificates”, are pivotal for ensuring translocated animals are not diseased or harbour significant pathogens (3, 4). With modifications tailored to specific purposes, CVIs are also extremely useful for other disease-related purposes requiring evaluation of animal health including specific pathogen-free (SPF) assurance for premises, risk-mitigating (biosecurity practices) assurance necessary for insurance policies, and the assurance of broodstock breeding soundness.

While used very successfully with terrestrial animal movement for decades, CVIs for aquatic animals are not well refined, understood or used, despite the availability of several aquatic animal ‘certification processes’, ‘permits’ and ‘health certificates’, including the OIE model health certificates.

Correctly designed CVIs provide the single most economical and effective assurance of the disease status (generally freedom from specific diseases or pathogens) for individuals or lots of animals, at any point in time. When issued by a qualified independent third-party (typically a licensed veterinarian, and in come case government accredited) they provide the official level of assurance necessary for intrastate, interstate and international trade.

Future Progress for Increasing Efficiency – Electronic CVI (e-CVI)Secured electronic collection and transfer of data between the attending veterinarian, diagnostic laboratories, competent authorities and the source and destination, and for issuing e-CVIs would increase the utility of any CVI system (Fig 2). E-data transfer and e-CVIs would also be in accord with OIE standards(3).

A preliminary trial of an e-CVI system was successfully tested by GlobalVetLink (Ames, Iowa, USA) for moving 15-20 shipments of ornamental (aquarium) finfish per week (7-10K per shipment), from Florida wholesale sources to Virginia pet stores during 2001-2002(5).

Currently no system for issuing e-CVIs for aquatic animals is fully operational.

However, several systems in development (GlobalVetLink e-OCVI; USDA’s VSPS – Fig 3) would be extremely useful for aquatic e-CVIs. A similar approach would be feasible in the European Union by integrating TRACES (TRAde Control and Expert System), CENTAUR (database for export health certificates and transboundary animal disease e-communication) and ANIMO (computerized network for linking veterinary authorities)(6) or in Australia/New Zealand using a modified e-CERTS system (Fig 4).

SummaryIn accord with the OIE Aquatic Animal Standards Commission Work Plan for 2006/2007 to reexamine “Health Certificates”, these elements of a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (Health Certificate) are offered for discussion, comment and refinement. If optimally designed, model CVIs may be of use with electronic systems that are evolving in, for example, Europe, the USA and Australia/New Zealand in accord with governmental initiatives.

References1.Cameron, A (2002). Survey Toolbox for Aquatic Animal Diseases. A Practical Manual and Software Package. ACIAR Monograph No. 94, 375p.

Australian Centre for International Research, Canberra.2.Cummings, D. (2005). VSPS e-Interstate Module: e-CVI Setting the Gold Standard. Presentation, U.S. Animal Health Association Annual

Meeting, Greensboro, SC, USA. October 21-27.3.OIE (2006 a). Aquatic Animal Code – Certification Procedures, Electronic Certification (Chpt. 1.3.2, Article 1.3.2.4 ). World Organization for

Animal Health (OIE), Paris.4.OIE (2006 b). Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals – Requirements for Surveillance for International Recognition of Freedom from

Infection (Chpt. 1.1.4). World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), Paris.5.Scarfe, A.D. (2004). Electronic Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (e-CVI) – A Model Health Assurance Program for U.S. Aquaculture

Industries. Proceedings of the International Association for Aquatic Animal Medicine. Galveston, Texas, April 4-8.6.TRACES, CENTAUR, ANIMO and are currently being examined in response to several EU Council Directives (e.g. 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC,

91/496/EEC, 97/78/EC, and others). Accessible at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/

Identifies Veterinarian, CVI, Animals, Types and Purpose

Legal Declarations

Identifies Diagnostics Specifics

Identifies Animal Species

Identifies Source and Destination

Veterinary Authority Endorsement

Additional Diagnostics

Figure 1. A revised model aquatic CVI. This model CVI has broad potential use for individual operations, states or countries. It is produced for illustration purposes only.

AcknowledgementsThe authors thank many individual from several organization that have contributed to the development of concepts outlined here including: American Veterinary Medical Association; California Department of Fish and Game, University of Florida, Florida Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; GlobalVetLink, L.C.; Maine Departments of Agriculture and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife; National Association of State Aquaculture Coordinators; Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection; USDA, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health.

Figure 3. USDA-APHIS “Veterinary Services Process Streamlining” (VSPS) concept. Under an “e-Government Initiative” (also developing in many other countries) the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has proposed integrating multiple electronic data tracking and recording systems, includinge-CVIs(2).

VSPSinterstate

movementmodule

StateRegulations

VSPSAccreditedveterinarian

module

SAHO

NAHLN

LIMS1

LIMS2

NAISprem

NAISanimal

AHSM/GDBbrucellosis

tuberculosisPRVEIA

Future enhancement(optional): state-definedimport protocols drivecompletion of a CVI

1) Accredited veterinarianmodule verifies the status of

the issuing veterinarian2) Accredited veterinarian

can update personalinformation

1) Summary informationabout the planned movement

can be reviewed bydestination SAHO to

determine need/issue permit2) CVI data are available in

‘real-time’ to origin anddestination SAHOs

3) SAHOs are able to accessthe accredited veterinarianmodule to confirm status of

issuing veterinarian

Future enhancement: thetest order process is

handled by NAHLN system

Program data associatedwith animal movement are

pushed to AHSM

Origin and destinationpremises data are verified

with NAIS prem

Animal ‘sighting’ data arepushed to NAIS animal

repository

> CVI> test charts

> vaccination charts

Hardcopy documents aregenerated

Necessary detailed information captured in a CVI for these purposes include (Fig 1):The veterinarian, purpose of the CVI, and the types of animals involvedThe source and destination (ownership), transportation (if moved) and possible permits neededThe identity of animals involvedThe results of specific validated/ standardized diagnostic tests required by the destination authority, including laboratory test information to determine protocols used, their validity, and to calculate the probability of disease/ pathogen freedom (1,4)

Declarations by the veterinarian and owner attesting to inspection, tests performed and biosecurity procedures being implemented

In addition, for CVIs to be official government documents that meet an importing country’s requirements according to OIE standards(3), endorsement by the official veterinary authority (or other competent authority with jurisdiction over aquatic animal health) is required.

Figure 2. e-CVI process. A stylized example of how electronic information can be conveyed between individuals and entities (veterinarian, diagnostic laboratory, source and destination owners, and authorities, in developing an electronic Certificate of Veterinary Inspection.

Figure 4. e-CVI incorporation into “e-Government Initiatives”. Schematic illustration of how systems may work to incorporate e-CVI.

Trader

Vet

Rejected

Local Authority(LVU or BIP)

Pre-validated

Local Authorityof destination and crossed states

(LVU or BIP)

CreateCertificate

Pre-validatecertificate

Validatecertificate

Control atdestination

Validated

Movement Add control

Controlon the road

1

2

3

4

5

Trader

Source Authority

Veterinarian

Destination Authority

Transport

Val

idat

ion

, C

on

tro

l Po

ints

, an

d

flo

w o

f e-

info

rmat

ion