reducing risk, increasing certainty… · automation upgrade road map- pre feed readiness for...
TRANSCRIPT
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 1
Automation Cutover Risk Management (ARCM)23/24 Sept 2014Chris Greaves, [email protected]
Reducing Risk, Increasing Certainty…
Poorly executed Cut Over- Consequences?
§ What are the consequences
§ Lost production
§ Losses of containment
§ Loss of control
§ Harms
§ Environment
§ Personnel
§ Business
Carefully considered and robustly executed Cut Over RiskManagement protects investment in both assets and licenseto operate
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 11
Where are the risks
§ Modified processes and equipment
§ Is it what was originally commissioned
§ How robust is the MoC
§ Are changes understood and documented
§ Skills and knowledge- unfamiliar territory
§ Who has been through a cut over?
§ How often restarted?
§ Sophisticated interactions
§ Up and downstreams ops
§ Impact on utilities
§ UPS’s & Backups
§ Optimizers
§ Etc, etc© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 12
Automation Cut Over & Risk Management Process
§ Risk based techniques to identify and mitigate threats to production, safety andcontinuity from cut-over activity
§ Carefully formalized, integrated and tightly controlled task execution andcontrol- “on the day”
§ All stages formalized, visible and support by ‘stakeholders’
§ Integral review stages and processes
Simple concept:
Rigorous and repeatable process to identify risks early & select appropriatetechniques
Risk based techniques to categorize and identify mitigation
Tightly controlled formalized & documented work process, including ‘on the dayof’ work packages
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 14
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 18
It is very important to remember...“Plants are process driven NOT
Engineering driven!” & “Operations isalways King!”
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 22
Feasibility /Migration
study
FEED
Decommissioning
Cut OverProcedures
Detail Design &Enabling work
Detail Design
Pre Shutdownwork
ShutdownInstallation
Test &Commission
UpgradedAutomation
System
Cut Over
Automation Upgrade Road Map- Pre FeedReadiness for
changeRisk
Identification
Readiness for Change
§ Readiness for Cutover Health Check
§ Understanding & Expectations
§ Process Risk (priority & ranking)
§ Operational Risk
§ Resource Risk
§ Alarm Rationalization
§ Management Plan
§ Logistics Plan (timeline)
§ Communication Plan
§ Review of ‘as is’ situation at target unit§ Systems
§ Information
§ Skills & Knowledge© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 23
Risk Management Process Overview
§ Risk Management Plan – define how to conductactivities.
§ Identify Risks – what threats may effect the project.
§ Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis – prioritizing risk &probability of occurrence / impact.
§ Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis – numerically analysisof the effects of identified risk.
§ Risk Mitigation
§ Plan Risk Response – developing actions / options toenhance opportunities & reduce threats.
§ Control Risk – the implementation process.© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 24
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 25
Reviews / Risk Assessment
§ Loop Critically Review
§ Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)Review
§ Risk Analysis Study
§ Implementation Strategy Review
§ Cut-Over Methods Review
§ Hazcom Reviews
§ Training and Validation RequirementReview
§ Detail design reviews
Risk Mitigation
§ Identify risk & mitigation§ For all risks
§ Formalized processes and procedures
§ Communication and training
§ Alignment with existing MoC process
§ Continuous process of review and checking
§ Lower risk
§ Grouping by type
§ Generic job methods developed
§ Each loop still has individual job method and work controls
§ Higher risk
§ Individual consideration
§ Individual bespoke job method and work control
§ End to end assessment of Critical loops
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 26
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 27
Migration study activities
§ Existing Automation system ( & Plant if necessary) issurveyed
§ Options are investigated
§ URS (User Requirements Specification) produced
§ Issued to Automation vendors
§ Tender analysis performed
§ Commercial
§ Technical
§ Recommendation of options
§ Budget estimate of project cost
§ Project programme produced
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 28
FEED stageCommon Activities
§ Chosen migration path validated
§ Site surveyed to validate proposed solution path
§ Documentation gathered & quality assessed
§ Cutover points - confirmed
§ Identification of “How it will be done” with regards the location of the new DCSequipment
§ System rationalisation addressed - graphics, redundant areas
§ Safety – MoC system, Permit to Work, voltages, process hazards
§ Technical issues resolved with Automation Vendor & Installation Contractor
§ Opportunities to harvest critical spares from redundant equipment identified
§ Removal of redundant equipment considered
§ Estimate refinedShutdown Upgrade
§ Identify proposed plant changes during shutdown
§ Is Automation Upgrade part of a bigger project i.e.Control Room Upgrade / relocation
§ Pre shutdown work
§ Implementation strategy/plan – Shutdown planning
On-Line Upgrade§ Critical loops identification - criteria
§ Identify enabling work if required
§ Implementation strategy/plan on-line cutover plan
§ Communication and Training requirements for at linecutover personnel (Ops and Eng)
§ Formalized processes and controls for critical loops
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 30
Shutdown Window (“Cold Cutover”)
§ Advantages§ Potential reduction in time for the control system upgrade§ Perceived simple option
§ Reduced risk & cost§ Plant “buy-in” : “we always make plant modifications this way”
§ Disadvantages§ Process cold/black start up on a new DCS system§ Control system brought on-line immediately!§ DCS will always become the critical path – another reason why
shutdowns get extended!§ No fallback in case of problems§ Plant modifications/projects happening – impact on new DCS§ Shutdowns are for maintenance / overhaul activities
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 31
On-Line (Hot Cutover)
§ Advantages§ No requirement for an shutdown window§ Reduction of risk§ Limited, or no impact on the plants production§ Ability for a phased implementation over a period of time in line with
Business requirements§ The plant does not have to be restarted after an extended shutdown on
a new control system§ Benefit from the new DCS system NOW rather than having to wait for a
shutdown
§ Disadvantages§ Need to plan for an extended period of time compared with a shutdown§ Will have 2 systems running in parallel during cutover§ More sustained effort is required to ensure the cutover is successful§ Perceived more expensive than a shutdown
Hot or Cold Cut?Not necessary the right question!
AutomationCutover
Shutdown(Cold
Cutover)
Combination(Hybrid)
Online(Hot
Cutover)
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 32
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 33
Readinessfor change
Feasibility /Migration
study
FEED
Decommissioning
Cut OverProcedures
Detail Design &Enabling work
Detail Design
Pre Shutdownwork Shutdown
Installation Test &Commission
UpgradedAutomation
System
Cut Over
Automation Upgrade Road Map
HMIUpgradeto ABB800xA
On line Cut Over Route
Shutdown Window Route
Critical Cutover Procedures
§ Formalized agreed assessment of risks(quantitate/qualitative)
§ Risk Mitigation/Management clearly identified
§ Formal written task procedure
§ Training & Competence
§ Defined plant status at start (Go/No Go)
§ Contingency plans if needed
§ Defined status at end (Hand back)
§ Top tip: Beware multi track working- understandinteractions
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 34
© ABB GroupSeptember 24, 2014 | Slide 35
Shutdown / On-line Upgrade - Success factors!Common Factors
§ Business understands inherent risks
§ Operations buy-in to deliver
§ The project process used
§ The review process undertaken
§ The documentation quality
§ Training
Shutdown Upgrade Factors§ Buy-in from shutdown management
team
§ Maximise pre shutdown work§ Use Pre-cutover procedures if
possible
On-line Upgrade Factors§ The implementation strategy for
cut-over
§ The cutover team resource§ The cutover methods developed
§ Cutover methods followed§ Enabling work