record of site condition # 217470 record of site condition under

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217470

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Record of Site Condition Number 217470Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/04/07Certification Date 2014/06/19Current Property Use CommercialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Non-potable Ground Water, for Residentialproperty use

Property Municipal Address 15 LAKE STREET, GRIMSBY, ON, L3M 2G4

1 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name 1671229 ONTARIO INC.

Authorized Person DONATO COLANGELO

Mailing Address 7094 YORK DRIVE, NIAGARA FALLSONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code L3C 7A3

Phone (905) 945-5284

Fax

Email Address [email protected]


RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 15 LAKE STREET, GRIMSBY, ON L3M 2G4

Municipality Grimsby

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

2615010001262000000

Property Identifier Number(s)

46016-0362 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 617,658.00

Northing 4,784,402.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Commercial

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name PATRICK SHRINER

Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act

Practising Member

Membership Number 0407

QP Employer Name AMEC AMERICAS LIMITED

Mailing Address 5, 3300 MERRITTVILLE HIGHWAY, THOROLDONTARIO, L2V 4Y6 CANADA

Phone (905) 687-6616

Fax (905) 687-6620

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Grimsby

Upper-Tier Municipality Niagara

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office

District Office Niagara District Office

District Office Address 9th floor, 301 St. Paul St., St. Catharines ON L2R 3M8


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2015-03-19

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment North End of 15 Lake Street Grimsby, Ontario

2013-08-06 Patrick Shriner, P.Geo., Cassandra Johnston

AMEC AMERICAS LIMITED

P1 ESA Update

Update Phase One Environmental Site Assessment North End of 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, Ontario

2015-03-24 Patrick Shriner, P.Geo., Cassandra Johnston


Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


N/A


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014-06-19

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment North End of 15 Lake Street Grimsby, Ontario

2014-08-06 Patrick Shriner, P.Geo., Kelly Patterson


Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


N/A


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? Yes

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/06/19

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.35000

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

PARACEL LABORATORIES LTD.

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 9

Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/03/10

Upper-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/03/10


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Acenaphthene < 0.02 0.072 µg/g

2 Acenaphthylene 0.03 0.093 µg/g

3 Anthracene 0.03 0.22 µg/g

4 Benz[a]anthracene 0.11 0.36 µg/g

5 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.11 0.3 µg/g

6 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.17 0.47 µg/g

7 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.03 0.68 µg/g

8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.07 0.48 µg/g

9 Chrysene 0.13 2.8 µg/g

10 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.02 0.1 µg/g

11 Fluoranthene 0.2 0.69 µg/g

12 Fluorene < 0.02 0.19 µg/g

13 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene 0.04 0.23 µg/g

14 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.02 0.59 µg/g

15 Naphthalene < 0.02 0.09 µg/g

16 Phenanthrene 0.1 0.69 µg/g

17 Pyrene 0.17 1 µg/g

18 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 7 25 µg/g

19 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 4 10 µg/g



22 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

23 Bromoform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

24 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

25 Benzene < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

26 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

27 Toluene < 0.05 0.2 µg/g

28 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

29 Acetone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

30 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

31 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

32 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

33 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

34 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g


...Continued on next page




Continued from previous page....

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure


37 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

38 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

39 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

40 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

41 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

42 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

43 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

44 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

45 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

46 Hexane (n) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

47 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

48 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

49 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

50 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

51 Styrene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

52 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

53 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

54 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

55 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

56 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

57 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

58 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 0.25 µg/g

59 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

60 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.7 1.5 µg/g

61 Chromium VI 0.4 0.66 µg/g

62 Cyanide (CN-) < 0.05 0.051 µg/g

63 Electrical Conductivity 0.468 0.7 mS/cm

64 Mercury < 0.1 0.27 µg/g

65 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.48 5

66 Antimony 1.3 1.3 µg/g

67 Arsenic 6.9 18 µg/g

68 Selenium < 1 1.5 µg/g

69 Barium 136 220 µg/g

70 Beryllium < 1 2.5 µg/g






ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

71 Boron (total) 13.6 36 µg/g

72 Cadmium 1 1.2 µg/g

73 Chromium Total 32.8 70 µg/g

74 Cobalt 10.6 22 µg/g

75 Copper 46.5 92 µg/g

76 Lead 58.4 120 µg/g

77 Molybdenum < 1 2 µg/g

78 Nickel 22.4 82 µg/g

79 Silver < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

80 Thallium < 1 1 µg/g

81 Uranium < 1 2.5 µg/g

82 Vanadium 34.4 86 µg/g

83 Zinc 245 290 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

1 Bromodichloromethane < 0.5 67000 µg/L

2 Bromoform < 0.5 380 µg/L

3 Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 65000 µg/L

4 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 420 µg/L

5 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L



8 Sodium 762,000 1800000 µg/L

9 Benzene < 0.5 44 µg/L

10 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 1800 µg/L

11 Toluene < 0.5 14000 µg/L

12 Xylene Mixture < 0.5 3300 µg/L

13 Acetone < 5 100000 µg/L

14 Bromomethane < 0.5 5.6 µg/L

15 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L

16 Chlorobenzene < 0.5 500 µg/L

17 Chloroform < 0.5 2.4 µg/L

18 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 4600 µg/L



21 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 3500 µg/L

22 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.5 320 µg/L

23 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

24 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

25 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

26 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

27 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.5 16 µg/L

28 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.5 5.2 µg/L

29 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.25 µg/L

30 Hexane (n) < 1 51 µg/L

31 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 5 470000 µg/L

32 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 5 140000 µg/L

33 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 2 190 µg/L

34 Methylene Chloride < 5 610 µg/L

35 Styrene < 0.5 1300 µg/L



Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water


ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 3.3 µg/L

37 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 3.2 µg/L

38 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

39 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.5 640 µg/L

40 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L

41 Trichloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

42 Trichlorofluoromethane < 1 2000 µg/L

43 Vinyl Chloride < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

44 Barium 613 23000 µg/L

45 Beryllium < 0.5 53 µg/L

46 Boron (total) 534 36000 µg/L

47 Cadmium < 0.1 2.1 µg/L

48 Chromium Total 17 640 µg/L

49 Cobalt 4.2 52 µg/L

50 Copper 2.4 69 µg/L

51 Lead 0.1 20 µg/L

52 Molybdenum 12.8 7300 µg/L

53 Nickel 9 390 µg/L

54 Silver < 0.1 1.2 µg/L

55 Thallium < 0.1 400 µg/L

56 Uranium 4.2 330 µg/L

57 Vanadium 25 200 µg/L

58 Zinc 57 890 µg/L

59 Antimony < 0.5 16000 µg/L

60 Arsenic 25 1500 µg/L

61 Selenium 18 50 µg/L


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

Off-site removal to Niagara Waste Systems Limited, Welland landfill (MOECC licensed) on May 20, 23 and 26, 2014 of 587 m3 of metals, electrical conductivity, available boron and PHC impacted soils.

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 587.0

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

Yes


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2014/06/19, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located.

As of 2014/06/19, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2014/06/19, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer AMEC AMERICAS LIMITEDdoes not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2014/06/19.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, PATRICK SHRINER, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/03/26:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

A copy of No Objection Statement from municipality

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

6.1.2


1

Shriner, Patrick D

From: Bob LeRoux <[email protected]>Sent: March-11-15 9:12 AMTo: Patterson, KellyCc: Wolowidnek, Tracy; Shriner, Patrick DSubject: RE: Non-Potable Ground Water Standards - 15 Lake Street, Grimsby

The Town has no objections to using non potable ground water stds. – subject to clearance by the Region of Niagara. From: Patterson, Kelly [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: March-10-15 1:34 PM To: Bob LeRoux Cc: Wolowidnek, Tracy; Shriner, Patrick D; Patterson, Kelly Subject: Non-Potable Ground Water Standards - 15 Lake Street, Grimsby Hi Bob, We sent a request to the Town on July 31, 2014 to use non‐potable ground water standards at the property located at 15 Lake Street in Grimsby and received a response from the Town August 1, 2014 (attached). The RSC is in the process of being accepted but the notification date in AMEC’s original letter request is greater than 6 months old and therefore the email response needs to be revised (as required by O. Reg. 153/04). Are you able to update the date in the no objections letter and re‐issue? Your earliest response would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Kelly Kelly Patterson, B.Sc. Environmental Scientist Amec Foster Wheeler plc 3300 Merrittville Hwy Unit 5 Thorold, Ontario, L2V 4Y6 Office: 905-687-6616 Cell: 905-329-5925 Email: [email protected] amecfw.com

This message is the property of Amec Foster Wheeler plc and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates and is intended only for the named recipient(s). Its contents (including any attachments) may be confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by law. Unauthorised use, copying, distribution or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful and is strictly prohibited. We assume no responsibility to persons other than the intended named recipient(s) and do not accept liability for any errors or omissions which are a result of email transmission. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email to the sender and confirm that the original message and any attachments and copies have been destroyed and deleted from your system. This disclaimer applies to any and all messages originating from us and set out above. For Canada and the United States: If you believe this is an

Planning and Development Services 2201 St. David’s Road W, PO Box 1042, Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Telephone: 905-685-4225 Toll-free: 1-800-263-7215 Fax: 905-641-5208 www.niagararegion.ca

VIA E-MAIL ONLY March 13, 2015 File: E.03.08.EN-14-033 Ms. Kelly Patterson, B.Sc. Environmental Scientist AMEC Foster Wheeler 3300 Merrittville Hwy., Unit 5 Thorold, ON L2V 4Y6 Dear Ms. Patterson: Re: Intention to Conduct a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Assuming a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition North End of 15 Lake Street

Town of Grimsby

This is in response to your July 31, 2014 notification of the intent to apply non-potable (Table 9) site condition standards in this project (Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment). Please note that there are two criteria upon which the Region can offer input regarding the use of non-potable standards as per O.Reg. 153/04 Sec 35(3) a, b:

(a) the property, and all other properties located, in whole or in part, within 250 metres of the boundaries of the property, are supplied by a municipal drinking water system, as defined in the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002, and have no wells installed for the extraction of ground water;

(b) the property is either,

(i) not located in an area designated in a municipal official plan as a well-head protection area or other designation identified by the municipality for the protection of ground water, or

(ii) if it is located in such a designated area, the municipality has consented in writing

to the application of the non-potable ground water site condition standards in preparing a record of site condition for the property.

With regard to item (a), Development Services staff notes that municipal water services are available for the subject property and other properties within 250 metres of the subject site. Also, information provided with your request, which was obtained from the Ministry of the Environment’s well records map, indicates that wells in the vicinity of the subject property are monitoring wells installed in December 2013 by Amec and that there are no domestic water wells. With regard to item (b), the Region has not designated well-head protection areas or areas for the protection of ground water in its official plan. We note for your information, however, that

2

the subject property is located within an area identified by the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) through mapping prepared for the Drinking Water Source Protection Plan as a Highly Vulnerable Aquifer. We also note that the property site is adjacent to Foran’s Marine and is located near the lake and Forty Mile Creek, which are identified as Fish Habitat (Critical Type 1 and Fish Spawning Area) on the Regional Official Plan’s Core Natural Heritage Map. As a result, the use of non-potable (ground water) MOE Table 9 SCS is used for the purposes of Section 41 of O.Reg. 153/04 as amended. Accordingly, based on the above, the Region confirms that it does not object to the proposal to use Non-Potable Site Condition Standards for the subject property. If you have any questions or wish to discuss these comments, please contact me at extension 3379 or by e-mail. Sincerely,

Pat Busnello Senior Development Planner c: Jayme Campbell, P.Eng, Hydrogeologist/Engineer, NPCA L:\Michael-Shmulevitch\ City of St-Catharines\ 15 Lake Street (Foran's Marine) - EN \ Regional Comments - 15 Lake Street (Foran's Marine) - EN.docx

Table of Areas of Potential Environmental Concern –15 Lake Street, Grimsby, ON

*Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) described specifically for the Phase One Property with reference to the applicable item number in the Table of PotentiallyContaminating Activities provided in Schedule D of O. Reg. 153/04 as amended, where applicable.

PHCs – Petroleum Hydrocarbons.SAR – Sodium Adsorption Ratio.EC - Electrical Conductivity.VOC – Volatile Organic CompoundsBTEX – Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and XylenesPAHs - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Area of PotentialEnvironmental

Concern (APEC)Location of APEC on Phase

One PropertyPotentially Contaminating

Activity (PCA)Location of PCA (on-

Site or off-Site)Contaminants of

Potential Concern

Media PotentiallyImpacted (GroundWater, Soil and/or

Sediment)

APEC-1: FormerInfilling Activities

Across the entire Phase TwoProperty.

30. Importation of Fill Material ofUnknown Quality.

On-Site(PCA-1)

PHCs, BTEX,VOCs, PAHsMetalsEC, SAR, Cyanide(free)

Soil and Ground Water

APEC-2: BoatMaintenance andRepair Shop

Southwest end of Phase TwoProperty. 10. Commercial Autobody Shops.

Off-Site(PCA-2)

PHCsVOCsBTEX

Soil andGround water

APEC-3:Underground StorageTank

Southwest end of the PhaseTwo Property

#28 – Gasoline and AssociatedProducts Storage in Fixed Tanks

Off-Site(PCA-3)

PHCsVOCsBTEX

Soil andGround water

Table of Current and Past Property Use of Phase One Property – 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, Ontario

Years Name of Owner Description ofProperty Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire

Insurance Plans, etc.

August 10, 1801 Abraham Nelles Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.

March 7, 1881 Samuel Nelles Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.

October 13, 1882 James Doran Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.

March 4, 1891 Elizabeth Webster Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.

March 3, 1902 Osric Neal Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.

September 26, 1905 John Hewitt Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.

April 16, 1920 Edward and Elizabeth Hand Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.

October 21, 1933 Edward Hand Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title and the 1934 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.

May 5, 1938 Edward Hand Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title and the 1934 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.

December 20, 1956 Grimsby Brick and Tile Limited (RoyCooke and Son Limited) Commercial Commercial

Based on the chain of title and the 1954 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.

July 24, 1958 John Charles Park Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1954 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.

June 17, 1963 David Foran and Anne Foran Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1965 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.

Table of Current and Past Property Use of Phase One Property – 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, Ontario

Years Name of Owner Description ofProperty Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire

Insurance Plans, etc.

November 19, 1969 D.I. Foran Marine Limited Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1965 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.

May 11, 1984 Her Majesty the Queen – Canada Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1975 and 1983 air photo,the Phase One Property appeared to be vacant land use.

February 2, 2001 1448124 Ontario Limited Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1994, and 2002 air photo,the Phase One Property appeared to be vacant land use.

January 16, 2006 1671229 Ontario Inc. Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 2010 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.

The Phase Two CSM for 15 Lake Street, Grimsby is provided below:

Regulatory Requirement Phase Two Property Information

i. Areas where potentiallycontaminating activity hasoccurred, areas of potentialenvironmental concern andsubsurface structures andutilities that may affectcontaminant distribution andtransport.

The location of the Phase One and Two Property is shown in Figure 1. Based onthe findings of the Phase One ESA, APECs and PCAs are associated with thePhase Two Property (Figure 8) due to historical infilling across the entire PhaseTwo Property and the maintenance and repair facility with associated UST to thesouth of the Site (approximately 210 m south and associated with Foran’s Marine).

As discussed above, based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, PCAs andAPECs associated with the property are as follows (Figure 8):

- APEC/PCA #1 – Historic infilling;

- APEC/PCA #2 – Boat Maintenance and Repair; and

- APEC/PCA #3 – Current UST.

Subsurface features that may affect contaminant distribution at the Phase TwoProperty include inactive storm and sanitary sewers and an inactive water main atthe southwest end of the Phase Two Property as depicted on Figure 2. The relativewater level elevation ranged from 99.42 (BH/MW2) to 98.55 (BH/MW3) mAAD. Theinferred ground water flow within the native silty clay/clayey silt/sandy silt till isinferred to be to southeasterly (Figure 5).

No previous RSCs have been filed on this Phase Two Property. The RSC #s 45918and 45498 are registered on adjacent properties to the current Phase Two Property.

ii. Description and figuresillustrating the physicalsetting of the propertyincluding, stratigraphy,hydrogeologicalcharacteristics, depth tobedrock, depth to watertable, aspect related toSection 41 or 43.1 that applyto the property, areas wheresoil has been brought ontothe property, location of anyproposed buildings.

The stratigraphy at the Phase Two Property is depicted on the cross sections(Figures 3 and 4) and in general, the subsurface conditions consisted of fill materialconsisting of sand and gravel (BH/MW1) to depths of 0.7 mbgs or granular fill(TP100) to depths of 1.2 mbgs over sandy silt/silty sand with clay or silty clay/clayeysilt fill to depths ranging from 3.7 to 5.8 mbgs overlying native silty clay/clayeysilt/sandy silt till to depth. No deleterious materials were noted in the testpits orboreholes.

Visual or olfactory evidence of environmental impacts were not observed by AMECduring the testpitting and drilling programs.

COV and TOV concentration headspace measurements recorded in the soilsamples collected from the boreholes and testpits ranged from non-detectable to 50ppm.

A small building was present at the northwest end of the Phase Two Propertyoccupied by the Grimsby Auxiliary Marine Rescue Unit as a radio monitoring station.According to the Phase One ESA, no former buildings were present on-site. Theowner will construct residential condominiums but the plan of subdivision is notfinalized. This small rescue building which is not used and is not in the areas withCOCs and therefore, on-Site vapour intrusion is not considered a concern at thePhase Two Property.

The overburden in the vicinity of the Phase Two Property is interpreted to be HaltonTill of the Ontario-Erie Lobe, consisting of predominantly silt to silty clay matrix, highin matrix carbonate content and clast poor. Bedrock in the area is anticipated to beof the Upper Ordovician age, consisting of shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone


of the Queenston Formation. Bedrock in the vicinity of the Phase Two Property isanticipated to be approximately 1 to 7 mbgs inferring bedrock is anticipated to beencountered at approximately 68 to 74 mASL.

The regional ground water flow direction, based on topographic features andknowledge gained from other sites in the area, is expected to be to the north,towards Lake Ontario. Locally, however, the shallow ground water flow may beinfluenced by underground utility trenches, conduits, and structures, variations insoil type, and minor fluctuations in topography. As shown in Figure 5, theinterpreted ground water flow is southeasterly based on hydrogeological testing.

There are areas of natural significance located in the area of the Phase TwoProperty. The land surrounding Forty Mile Creek adjacent to the west of the PhaseTwo Property, as well as the south shoreline of Lake Ontario, are listed in the Townof Grimsby’s Official Plan as Environmental Conservation Area. However, thePhase Two Property is not considered to be an area of natural significance. Thereare no conditions that would apply to the Phase Two Property under Section 41(Environmentally Sensitive Areas).

The water level measurements undertaken in BH/MW1, BH/MW2, and BH/MW3 onFebruary 6, 2014 ranged from 1.82 to 2.21 mbgs. The relative water level elevationranged from 98.42 (BH/MW2) to 98.55 (BH/MW3) mAAD. The inferred groundwater flow within the native silty clay/clayey silt/sandy silt till is inferred to besoutheasterly (Figure 5).

AMEC completed falling head slug tests to assess the hydraulic conductivity of thescreened substrata in BH/MW1, BH/MW2 and BH/MW3. The estimated hydraulicconductivities of BH/MW1, BH/MW2 and BH/MW3 were 2.7x10-6 m/s, 1.3x10-7 m/sand 7.9x10-6 m/s, respectively. The horizontal gradient is 0.024 m/m and the verticalhydraulic gradient was not determined as only one geologic unit was investigated.

The standards used for the identification of COCs were Table 9 SCS for use within30 m of a water body, non potable ground water condition,residential/parkland/institutional and medium and fine textured soils.

iii. Contaminants on the Site The contaminants located on the Phase Two Property and their origin are as follows: Metals (cadmium, lead and/or zinc) and available boron in BH/MW1,

TP109 and TP110 associated with the historical infilling of the Phase TwoProperty.

Metals (antimony, cadmium lead and/or zinc) and EC in BH/MW2, TP105and TP108 associated with the historical infilling of the Phase TwoProperty.

PHC F3 and F4 in BH/MW1 and TP100 associated the historical infilling ofthe Phase Two Property.

The Acid, Base, Neutral parameters group was not considered a COC and thereforewas not analyzed. No exceedances of the Table 9 SCS for metals, VOCs and PHCswere noted in ground water in the Phase Two ESA.

Contaminants that exceeded the Table 9 SCS on the Site in soil are depicted onFigures 3, 4 and 6. The COCs in soil are likely attributed to the former infilling of


the Phase Two property. The estimated and actual horizontal and verticaldistribution of the contaminants in each area is indicated on Figures 2, 3 and 4.Based on the soil analytical results from the Phase Two ESA, a SRP was completedat the Site. The horizontal and vertical delineation of COCs and the distribution ofmetals, EC, available boron and PHC F3 and F4 exceeding Table 9 SCS on-Site(Figures 3, 4 and 6) correspond to the locations of the historical infilling on-Site.

Based on the delineation testpitting program completed as part of the Phase TwoESA, the separation distance between boreholes/testpits with no Table 9 SCSexceedances and boreholes/testpits with Table 9 SCS exceedances, AMECestimated the amount of PHC, EC, available boron and metals-impacted soilrequired to be removed for off-Site disposal to be 831 tonnes. Based on actual fieldobservations and lab results, a SRP was completed at the Site and included theremoval of approximately 1,056 tonnes of PHC, EC, available boron and metals-impacted soil to a Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC)licensed landfill (Niagara Waste Systems Limited – Atlas landfill in Welland, ON).Confirmatory soil sampling and soil vapour readings at the limits of the soilremediation excavations were below the Table 9 SCS for the COCs (metals, EC,PHCs and available boron). The location of the confirmatory sampling and soilvapour readings are indicated on Figures 11 and 12. The remedial excavation wasbackfilled with granular material from a local quarry.

The transport of these COCs in the surface would be influenced by seasonalfluctuations in ground water elevation as well as the underground utilities and arenot expected to have had a significant effect on the horizontal and verticaldistribution of contaminants.

iv. Cross-Sections anddistribution of contaminants,depth to water, stratigraphy,subsurface structures orutilities affecting distribution.

For areas of contamination,release mechanisms,transport pathways,receptors, exposure pointsand routes of exposure.

The cross-sections provided on Figures 3 and 4 identify the depth to water (rangedfrom 1.82 to 2.21 mbgs), stratigraphy (fill over native silty clay/clayey silt/sandy silttill) and that there are no significant subsurface features that affect distribution ofcontaminants. The horizontal and vertical distribution of contaminants is indicatedin Figures 3, 4 and 6.

Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the Human Health and Ecological Exposure ConceptualModels. The models are described as follows:

Source:The source of the COCs at the Site (metals, PHC, available boron and EC) is theformer infilling on-Site.

Potential Release Mechanism: Wind Erosion Volatilization (volatiles only) Uptake by Plants and Intake by Prey

Contaminant Transport Pathways (exposure route); Dermal Contact, Stem/Foliar Contact Ingestion Inhalation of airborne particles Inhalation (indoor and outdoor air)


Ingestion by Plants and Prey

Human and Ecological Receptors:Potential human receptors include future residents and visitors and constructionworkers and potential ecological receptors include terrestrial plants, invertebrates,mammals and birds.

Receptor Exposure Points:Human exposure (resident, visitor) to COCs in soil via dermal contact, ingestion,inhalation of indoor and outdoor air. No contaminants were found in ground waterand no complete exposure pathway is present.

Ecological exposure (terrestrial plants) anticipated through root update, inhalationvia wind erosion and volatilization in ambient air. The exposure to COCs byterrestrial invertebrates is expected through soil ingestion, dermal contact andinhalation of volatiles in ambient air. The exposure to COCs of terrestrial mammalsand birds is expected through soil ingestion, dermal contact, ingestion of plans andprey, inhalation via wind erosion, inhalation of volatiles in ambient air. Nocontaminants were found in ground water and no complete exposure pathway ispresent.

The Phase Two CSM is shown in Figure 8.

SITE

L

A

K

E

S

T

R

E

E

T

M

A

P

L

E

A

V

E

N

U

E

Q

E

W

2500 500m

Scale in Metres

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

N

FORAN'S MARINE

DG

PS

NAD 83

UTM Zone 17

AS SHOWN

PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

SITE LOCATION PLAN

A

TG131180

1

Reference: Base Map from First Base Solutions.NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.

a Division of AMEC Americas Limited

3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5

Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure

AUGUST 2014

0 25

Scale in Metres

50m

B

B'

A'

A

BH-8

BH-9

BH-4

BH-5

BH-6

TP-100

TP-101-B

TP-110

TP-111

TP-109

TP-105

TP-103

TP-102

TP-106

TP-107

TP-108

TP-104

BH-7

BH/MW-3

BH/MW-2

BH/MW-1

BH-10

TBM

LEGEND:

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

N

FORAN'S MARINE

DG

PS

NAD 83

UTM Zone 17

1:500


15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

BOREHOLE/MONITORING WELL & TESTPIT

LOCATION PLAN

A

AUGUST 2014

TG131180

2

Reference: Base Map from Niagara Navigator.

NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.



Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


HYD

SITE BOUNDARY

BOREHOLE LOCATION

MONITORING WELL LOCATION

TESTPIT LOCATION

CATCH BASIN

MANHOLE

FIRE HYDRANT

WATERMAIN

SANITARY SEWER

STORM SEWER

CROSS-SECTION

ESTIMATED SOIL

REMEDIATION EXCAVATIONS

ACTUAL SOIL REMEDIATION

EXCAVATIONS (MAY 2014)

TEMPORARY BENCHMARK

TBM

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (m)

15

101

0

A

Southwest

30 45 60 75 90

BH/MW-1

(100.29)

100

99

98

97

96

95

94

93

TP-110

(100.49)

BH-8

(101.01)

BH-9

(101.16)

TP-105

(100.76)

TP-103

(100.63)

TP-104

(100.64)

BH-4

(100.09)

101

A'

Northeast

100

99

98

97

96

95

94

93

BH/MW-2

(100.56)

BH-7

(100.46)

LEGEND:

WELL SCREEN

GROUND WATER ELEVATION,

6 FEBRUARY 2014

FILL

SAND AND GRAVEL

SILTY CLAY TO CLAYEY SILT

SANDY SILT TILL

TEST PIT

BOREHOLE WITH

MONITORING WELL

BOREHOLE

SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR

METALS ANALYSIS IN SOIL


BTEX/VOC ANALYSIS IN SOIL


PHCs ANALYSIS IN SOIL


INORGANICS ANALYSIS IN

SOIL


PAHs ANALYSIS IN SOIL


METALS ANALYSIS IN

GROUND WATER


BTEX/VOC ANALYSIS IN

GROUND WATER


PHCs ANALYSIS IN GROUND

WATER

SAMPLE EXCEEDED TABLE 9

SCS

ESTIMATED SOIL




NOTE

INORGANICS ANALYSIS

INCLUDES EC, SAR, pH AND

CYANIDE FREE. NO GROUND

WATER EXCEEDANCES OF

TABLE 9 SCS.

PROPERTY

BOUNDARY

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

FORAN'S MARINE

ZF

PS

-

-

AS SHOWN


15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

GEOLOGICAL PROFILE A-A'

A

TG131180

3




Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


AUGUST 2014

T

P

-

1

0

7

5

101

0

B

West

100

99

98

97

96

95

94

93

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

101

B'

East

100

99

98

97

96

95

94

93

BH/MW-3

(100.76)

TP-103

(100.63)

BH/MW-2

(100.56)

TP-107

(100.65)

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (m)

LEGEND:

WELL SCREEN

GROUND WATER ELEVATION,

6 FEBRUARY 2014

FILL

SAND AND GRAVEL

SILTY CLAY TO CLAYEY SILT

SANDY SILT TILL

TEST PIT

BOREHOLE WITH

MONITORING WELL

BOREHOLE


METALS ANALYSIS IN SOIL


PHCs ANALYSIS IN SOIL


INORGANICS ANALYSIS IN

SOIL


PAHs ANALYSIS IN SOIL


METALS ANALYSIS IN

GROUND WATER


BTEX/VOC ANALYSIS IN

GROUND WATER


PHCs ANALYSIS IN GROUND

WATER

SAMPLE EXCEEDED TABLE 9

SCS

ESTIMATED SOIL




NOTE

INORGANICS ANALYSIS

INCLUDES EC, SAR, pH AND

CYANIDE FREE. NO GROUND

WATER EXCEEDANCES OF

TABLE 9 SCS.

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

FORAN'S MARINE

ZF

PS

-

-

AS SHOWN


15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

GEOLOGICAL PROFILE B-B'

A

TG131180

4




Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


AUGUST 2014

0 25

Scale in Metres

50m

BH-4

BH/MW-3

98.75

BH-8

BH-9

BH-5

BH-6

TP-100

TP-101-B

TP-110

TP-111

TP-109

TP-105

TP-103

TP-102

TP-106

TP-107

TP-108

TP-104

BH-7

BH/MW-2

98.42

BH/MW-1

98.47

9

8

.

7

BH-10

9

8

.

6

9

8

.

5

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

N

FORAN'S MARINE

DG

PS

NAD 83

UTM Zone 17

1:500


15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

INTERPRETED GROUND WATER CONTOUR PLAN

(FEBRUARY 6, 2014)

A

TG131180

5





Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


LEGEND:

HYD

SITE BOUNDARY

BOREHOLE LOCATION


TESTPIT LOCATION

CATCH BASIN

MANHOLE

FIRE HYDRANT

WATERMAIN

SANITARY SEWER

STORM SEWER

INTERPRETED GROUND

WATER CONTOUR

INFERRED GROUND WATER

FLOW DIRECTION

AUGUST 2014

0 25

Scale in Metres

50m

BH-4

BH/MW-3

BH-8

BH-5

TP-105

TP-103

TP-102

TP-106

TP-107

TP-108

TP-104

BH-7

BH/MW-1

BH-10

BH/MW-2

BH-6

BH-9

TP-100

TP-101-B

TP-109

TP-111

TP-110

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

N

FORAN'S MARINE

ZF

PS

NAD 83

UTM Zone 17

1:500


15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND MOE TABLE 9

EXCEEDANCES

A

TG131180

6





Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


LEGEND:

HYD

SITE BOUNDARY

BOREHOLE LOCATION


TESTPIT LOCATION

CATCH BASIN

MANHOLE

FIRE HYDRANT

WATERMAIN

SANITARY SEWER

STORM SEWER

SOIL SAMPLE SUBMITTED

FOR METALS


FOR EC


FOR PHCs


FOR HWS BORON


FOR PAHs


FOR VOCs/BTEX

SOIL SAMPLE EXCEEDED

TABLE 9 SCS

STATION TP109

DEPTH 0.5m

UNIT

µg/g

PARAMETERS

CADMIUM 2.1

ZINC 733

STATION TP110

DEPTH 0.5m

UNIT

µg/g

PARAMETERS

CADMIUM 1.4

LEAD 335

ZINC 565

STATION BH/MW1

DEPTH 0.4m 1.0 m

UNIT

µg/g

PARAMETERS

PHC F3 768 -

PHC F4 2940 -

HWS BORON - 2.2

STATION BH/MW2

DEPTH 0.4m

UNIT

µg/g

PARAMETERS

ANTIMONY 1.6

EC

870 (S/cm)

STATION TP100

DEPTH 1.5m

UNIT

µg/g

PARAMETERS

PHC F4 165

STATION TP105

DEPTH 0.5m

UNIT

µg/g

PARAMETERS

CADMIUM 2.3

LEAD 121

ZINC 646

STATION TP106

DEPTH 0.5m

UNIT

µg/g

PARAMETERS

EC

768 (S/cm)

STATION TP108

DEPTH 0.5m

UNIT

µg/g

PARAMETERS

ZINC 311

AUGUST 2014

0 25

Scale in Metres

50m

BH-4

BH/MW-3

BH-8

BH-9

BH-5

BH-6

TP-100

TP-101-B

TP-110

TP-111

TP-109

TP-105

TP-103

TP-102

TP-106

TP-107

TP-108

TP-104

BH-7

BH/MW-2

BH/MW-1

BH-10

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

N

FORAN'S MARINE

ZF

PS

NAD 83

UTM Zone 17

1:500


15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

GROUND WATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS

A

TG131180

7





Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


LEGEND:

HYD

SITE BOUNDARY

BOREHOLE LOCATION


TESTPIT LOCATION

CATCH BASIN

MANHOLE

FIRE HYDRANT

WATERMAIN

SANITARY SEWER

STORM SEWER

GROUND WATER SAMPLE

SUBMITTED FOR METALS

GROUND WATER SAMPLE

SUBMITTED FOR PHCs

GROUND WATER SAMPLE

SUBMITTED FOR VOCs

AUGUST 2014

1000 200m

Scale in Metres

LAKE ONTARIO

WATER

TREATMENT

PLANT

F

O

R

T

Y

M

IL

E

C

R

E

E

K

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

M

A

R

IN

A

C

H

A

N

N

E

L

435

3

FORAN'S MARINA

& STORE

464

471

E

L

I

Z

A

B

E

T

H

S

T

R

E

E

T

O

N

T

A

R

I

O

S

T

R

E

E

T

M

A

P

L

E

A

V

E

N

U

E

L

A

K

E

S

T

R

E

E

T

F

O

R

T

Y

M

IL

E

C

R

E

E

K

M

AR

IN

A C

HA

NN

EL

5

4

3

1

6

2

7

8

APEC #1

FILL MATERIAL OF

UNKNOWN QUALITY

(PCA #1)

0 20m10

Scale in Metres

2

APEC #2 / PCA #2

BOAT MAINTENANCE & REPAIR

APEC #3 / PCA #3

UST AT MARINA

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

N

FORAN'S MARINE

DG

PS

NAD 83

UTM Zone 17

AS SHOWN


15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

A

AUGUST 2014

TG131180

8





Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


LEGEND:

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

ESTIMATED SOIL REMEDIATION

EXCAVATIONS



CATCH BASIN

MANHOLE

FIRE HYDRANT

WATERMAIN

SANITARY SEWER

STORM SEWER

HYD

1 RADIO BUILDING (NO ACCESS)

2 CATCH BASIN (DRAINS TO

STORMCEPTOR SOUTH OF PHASE ONE

PROPERTY

3 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF

STORMCEPTOR (DRAINS TO CHANNEL

EAST OF PHASE ONE PROPERTY

4 BOAT TRAILER STORAGE, SOME

CONCRETE RUBBLE/STONE

5 CONCRETE BLOCKS, PIPES,

STONES/BOULDERS, ALUMINUM,

GRAVEL PILE, 2 BOAT CRADLES

6 OUTDOOR SHELVES (WOOD, PIPE,

CONTAINER STORAGE {EMPTY

WATER DRUMS})

7 WOODEN SKIDS, METAL, CONCRETE

8 EMPTY ALUMINUM DOCK BOXES

(TEMPORARY STORAGE)

SourceBoat RepairFacility withUST (Off-Site) and

Infilling (On-Site)

Receptor

Chemicalsof Concern(COCs) in

Soil(metals,PHCs,VOCs,HWS

Boron, EC.benzene,PHC F1)

Dermal Contact and Ingestion

Inhalation (airborne particles)

Exposure RouteRelease and Transport

Inhalation (indoor air)

Wind Erosion

Con

stru

ctio

nW

orke

r

Inhalation (outdoor air)Volatilization (volatiles only)

Project No.: TG131180

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5Thorold, Ontario, Canada, L2V 4Y6

Date: August 2014

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

COCs inGround

Water (noimpactsnoted)

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

No No

Yes Yes

Res

iden

ts

Vis

itors

Figure 9: Human Health Conceptual ModelNorth End of 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, ON

Inhalation (indoor andoutdoor air)

Volatilization (volatiles only) NoNo No

Dermal Contact and Ingestion NoNo No

Legend: Yes – complete exposure pathway; No – incomplete exposure pathway (no receptor present); NA – not applicable.

AMEC Earth & Environmental3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5Thorold, Ontario, Canada, L2V 4Y6

Legend: Yes – complete exposure pathway; NA – Not applicable / incomplete exposure pathway.

Figure 10: Ecological Conceptual ModelNorth End of 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, ON

Project No.: TG131180 Date: August 2014

Chemicals ofConcern

(COCs) inSoil (metals,

PHCs, VOCs,HWS Boron,

EC.

Soil Ingestion

Root Uptake/Dermal Contact

Ingestion of Plants and PreyUptake by Plants and Intake by Prey

NA

SourceBoat RepairFacility withUST (Off-Site) and

Infilling (On-Site)

Receptors and Complete ExposurePathways

Exposure RouteRelease and Transport

Ter

rest

rial

Bir

ds

Ter

rest

rial

Mam

mal

s

Ter

rest

rial

Inve

rteb

rate

s

Ter

rest

rial

Plan

ts

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

NA NA Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Aqu

atic

NA

NA

NA

COCs inGroundwater– no impacts

Stem and Foliar Contact

Ingestion of Plants and PreyUptake by Plants and Intake by Prey

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

Dermal / Direct ContactNA NA NA NA NA

Inhalation

Stem and Foliar Contact

Inhalation

Yes NA Yes

NA NA

Yes Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Wind Erosion

Volatilization (volatiles only)Ambient Air

Volatilization (volatiles only)Ambient Air

InhalationNA NA NA NA NA

A

B

CD

A

0.0m

1.5m

0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m 15.2m

ACS-4

145/0

ACS-5+DUP CSZ

180/0

ACS-2

140/1

ACS-6

270/0

75/0 120/0

80/0 75/0

ACS-7

250/0

B

C

0.0m

1.5m

0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m 15m

D

B

0.0m

1.5m

0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12.2m

C

D

0.0m

1.5m

0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m 15.3m

25/0

220/0

A

ACS-11

70/0

50/0 20/0

30/0

ACS-9

220/0

110/0

80/0

90/0

ACS-12

50/0

0/0

50/0

ACS-14

250/0

ACS-13+DUP CSW

270/0 250/0

150/0

140/0

ACS-8

240/0

100/0

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

N

FORAN'S MARINE

ZF

PS

NAD 83

UTM Zone 17

AS SHOWN

SOIL REMEDIATION PROGRAM

15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

CONFIRMATORY SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS -

AREA A

A

JULY 2014

TG131180

11




Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

COV/TOV FIELD VAPOUR READING

(ppm)

SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTED FOR

FIELD VAPOUR READING


FIELD VAPOUR READING AND

SUBMITTED FOR LABORATORY

ANALYSIS

ACS1

140/1

LEGEND:

EXCAVATION LIMIT

FLOOR PLAN

WALL CROSS-SECTION

NORTH WALL EAST WALL

SOUTH WALL WEST WALL

E F

G

H

E

0.0m

1.5m

0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m

BCS-6

0/0

14m17.1m

BCS-1

0/0

BCS-2

10/0

BCS-5

20/0

BCS-4+DUP CSX

0/0

BCS-7

45/0

F

0.0m

1.5m

0m 2m

BCS-8

45/1

F

4m 6m 8m 10m 12m 13.9m

G

G

0.0m

1.5m

0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m

BCS-10

0/0

14m17.1m

BCS-11

0/0

H

0.0m

1.5m

0m 2m

BCS-12

0/0

H

4.3m

E

30/0

0/0

0/0

CLIENT:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:

PROJECTION:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE No.:

N

FORAN'S MARINE

ZF

PS

NAD 83

UTM Zone 17

AS SHOWN

SOIL REMEDIATION PROGRAM

15 LAKE STREET,

GRIMSBY, ONTARIO

CONFIRMATORY SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS -

AREA B

A

JULY 2014

TG131180

12




Thorold, Ontario

L2V 4Y6


SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

COV/TOV FIELD VAPOUR READING

(ppm)


FIELD VAPOUR READING


FIELD VAPOUR READING AND

SUBMITTED FOR LABORATORY

ANALYSIS

BCS1

25/0

LEGEND:

EXCAVATION LIMIT

FLOOR PLAN

WALL CROSS-SECTION

NORTH WALL EAST WALL

SOUTH WALL WEST WALL