recontextualizing the holy spirit baptism
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
1/80
RECONTEXTUALIZING
THE HOLY SPIRIT
BAPTISM
by
John C. Douglas
A paper originally presented in fulfillment of
ST790 Independent Study in Theology to Dr. Gordon Lewis Professor of PhilosophicalTheology at Denver Conservative Baptist Seminary in 1991.
SAGE RESOURCES
PO Box 196, ParaparaumuNew Zealand
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
2/80
2
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
3/80
3
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION: WHY A STUDY?
In recent years Classical Pentecostals1have seen a
growing shift of Biblical emphasis, in their perspectives
relating to what has long been considered, the "Pentecostal
Distinctive".2
Their historic position concerning the baptism
of the Holy Spirit is held as a systematic theology, initiated
through an existential awareness.
The modern or twentieth century Pentecostal
movement has grown from a backroom or downtown operation
to a part of the total evangelical church scene. It is no longer a
minority group in world Christianity.3
It is now seen to be
between David Moberg's third and fourth stages of life cycle4
those of "the stage of maximum efficiency" and "the
institutional stage. This understanding which has emerged
through practices of healthy self-study', leads to seeking an
intellectual basis for actions.5
1This is a term applied to the older established Pentecostal
denominations in America and the United Kingdom. E.g. Assemblies of
God; Pentecostal Holiness Church; Apostolic Church of Great Britain, Elim
Church, etc.2This has been used as "in-house" terminology for the Baptism of
the Holy Spirit.
3Present estimated membership/participation 200,000,000.
"Newsletter of the Society of Pentecostal Studies Fall, 90.
4David Moberg, The Church as a Social Institution (Englewood
Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1962), pp.118-125.
5
Ibid. pp.118-125.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
4/80
4
The Reasons for a Fresh Look
The impacts of a present rapid growth of literate
Pentecostal scholarship, the residual effects of the CharismaticRenewal of the mid nineteen-sixties to seventies, combined
with recent Luke/Acts studies, and the united effects of a shift
of hermeneutics from Existential Biblicism to Biblical
Existentialism. All these influences call for new definitions of
what Holy Spirit Baptism means in fourth generation
Pentecostalism. One of the newer Pentecostal scholars,
Howard M. Ervin, when writing his work on "Spirit Baptism: a
Biblical Investigation" prefaces his study by asking;
"There were, in addition, other pressing considerations. Would this
consistent application of a traditional grammatical-historical
exegesis really support a Pentecostal hermeneutics? Or did the
immediacy of the experience of Spirit-baptism involve subjective
interpretative categories that resisted a consistent application of
contextual exegesis? It was a charge frequently made that the
experience dictated the exegesis. it soon became apparent,however, that while the experience informed the exegesis, it was
the hermeneutics that dictated the exegesis, a fact overlooked by
both sides in the controversy.6
While Ervin was writing partly as a polemical response to the
works of James Dunn7
and others, he voices the fresh attitude
of Biblically investigating the foundational theology of
Pentecostalism.
6Howard M. Ervin, Spirit Baptism: A Biblical Investigation.
(Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1987), pp.viii-ix.
7James D. G. Dunn. Baptism in the Holy Spirit. (Philadelphia:
Westminster Press, 1977). Originally published as, "Baptism in the Holy
Spirit as a Re-examination of the New Testament Teaching on the Gift of
the Spirit in relation to Pentecostalism today. (London: SCM, 1970)
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
5/80
5
The Research Task and Question
The biblical teaching, historic data, current papers, books
and dissertations should be studied in an integrative model todiscern; "what should be the current viable doctrine of
Pentecostals concerning the Holy Spirit baptism?"
Considerations, Methodology and Limitations
In this study special emphasis should be given to; 1)
The questions of consequence and subsequence concerning the
time of reception of Spirit baptism, 2) whether the purpose of
Luke, in Luke 3:16, is primarily soteriology or pneumatology
when recording John the Baptist's statement of the Holy
Spirit's person and work, and 3) the nature of changes Mainline
Pentecostals may need to consider in their stated doctrines and
ensuing practices.
The focus is on those Pentecostals who are eitherdenominationally organised or who have commented on the
subject from the perspective of scholarship, the following
limitations will be applied:
1. Works from groups or persons that are considered asindependent or fringe will not be considered.
2. Non-scholarly works (or opinions) will not be a majorconsideration.
3. Catholic Pentecostalism will not be considered in depth.4. Only published or publicly presented papers will be
considered.
5. No work after 1st January 1991 will be considered.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
6/80
6
6. The biblical data and the doctrinal statements of theClassical Pentecostals and Pentecostally interested scholars
will be the main consideration.
7. Alternative views in the Christian church will beconsidered primarily in the Apologetic section.
8. Lewis and Demarests Integrative Theology Model willbe applied as the studys essential methodology.8
Terms Relating to the Study
The following terms relate to the meanings as applied through
them to the aspects of this study.
TERM BEING USED DEFINITION
BAPTISM
This is based on the model of immersion baptism in water,and refers to immersion into either the agency of water, the
person of the Spirit, or the Body of Christ. Baptism is
always treated as a non-repeatable experience.
COMMUNITY
A group of people who are formed into a body, which hascommon interests or Purposes. Essentially groups ofChristians who experience the `Baptism of the Spirit' in thehistorical accounts in Acts.9
8Gordon Lewis and Bruce Demarest present a theological method that
integrates historical, biblical, systematic, apologetic, and practical perspectives(Integrative Theology in 3 volumes. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996). Theirthoroughly evangelical approach offers a comprehensive approach to doingevangelical theology. The steps of their model are (1) stating the problem, (2)historical hypotheses, (3) biblical teaching, (4) systematic formulation, (5)
apologetic interaction, and (6) relevance for life and ministry
9
Acts 2:1-13; 8:14-19; 10:44-46; 19:1-7.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
7/80
7
TERM BEING USED DEFINITION
EMPOWERINGThe activity of the Spirit in bestowing power and authority
to believers for an end or purpose.
EVIDENCE
Observable data serving as an indication or proof ofsomething, related in this study to the recorded observationsof speaking in tongues or prophecy, by those receiving the
Spirit on three occasions in Acts.10
FULLNESS
The gift of the Spirit. In Pentecostal terminology, "having
the fullness, generally refer to one who has received the"Baptism of the Spirit", with the observable evidences ofspeaking in tongues or prophesying.
FILLING The experience of one's initial reception of the Spirit.
INDIVIDUALA single person and the experiences that are particularly
related to that person.
Figure 1.1 - Terms as used in the study
Review of the Literature
The literature was reviewed as listed in the
bibliography. This covering works on historic data,
denominational systematic theology, biblical studies, current
papers, articles, and dissertations. This was augmented withsystematic theologies and position papers from the major
Pentecostal Denominations in the United States of America
and Great Britain.
10
Acts 2:1-13; 10:44-46; 19:1-7.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
8/80
8
CHAPTER TWO
HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE
AND FORMULATION
Belief in the baptism of the Holy Spirit must not be
understood in a speculative context of existence. For it is
founded in the Scriptures and historic experiences of
Christians. Those who lay claim to this experience see its validroots to be found in the words of Jesus
11. The Scriptures have
been used to exegete the experience and the experience to
exegete the Scriptures. Consequently it has often been the
subject of double context.
The following survey seeks to trace the contextualization
and teaching of the practitioners of the baptism in the HolySpirit from the Apostolic Age, to the twentieth century
Pentecostal movements.
The Experience in the "Apostolic Age"
This rests primarily in the Biblical records of Acts.12
The company of the disciples, while waiting between the
ascension of Jesus and the day of Pentecost of Acts chaptertwo, had been conditioned to act in response to the last
direction given them by Jesus.13
The coming of the Spirit
11John 14:16,26; 15:26; 16:7; cf. 7:39
12Acts 2:1-13; 8:14-19; 10:44-46; 19:1-7.
13
Luke 24:49; Acts 1:4-5; cf. Acts 1:12-26.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
9/80
9
upon them declared by Jesus would "clothe them with power
from on high".14
They would "receive power after the Holy
Spirit had come upon them ... that they would be His witnesses
... from Jerusalem ... to the remotest part of the earth".15 Thepromise was received in the context of the teaching of Jesus in
His last discourse.16
The outpouring of the Spirit upon the disciples in the
second chapter is preceded by the signs of; a violent rushing
wind that filled the house where they were, and tongues as of
fire distributed upon each one of them. Then they were all
filled with the Spirit. This reception of the Spirit was then
accompanied by each individual beginning to speak with other
tongues under the influence of the Spirit.17
The first occurrence of tongues drew the attention of
those who were in Jerusalem, a group composed of native
Hebrews and Proselytes gathered for the festival. The impact
for them was hearing the "Mighty deeds of God, spoken in thenative tongues of their birth".
18In response to their
bewilderment and questioning, Peter declares through a
synopsis of the prophet Joel, and two sections of the Davidic
Psalms, an apologetic connecting the experience they
witnessed with the purpose of God in Jesus Christ.19
He
concludes by charging them with complicity in the death of
14Luke 24:39
15Acts 1:8
16John 14:1-16:26
17Acts 2:4
18Acts 2:11
19
Acts 2:14-36 cf. Joel 2:28-32; Psalm 16:8-11; 110:1
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
10/80
10
Jesus, and calling on them to repent and participate in the
promise of redemption and the gift of the Spirit.20
The second experience of the reception of the Spirit isin the eighth chapter, following Philip's evangelistic preaching
in Samaria. Those who received the message concerning "the
kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ;21
were
baptised in water. This preaching had been accompanied by
signs and great miracles.22
When the Apostles at Jerusalem
heard of the reception of the "word of God", they sent Peter
and John, to pray for them to receive the Spirit.23
When Peter
and John laid their hands on the Samaritan believers they
received the Spirit. This reception was witnesses by Simon
(the sorcerer), and he sought to buy from the apostles the
authority to impart the Spirit by the laying on of his hands.24
The reason the apostles, John and Peter came is, while the
Samaritans had received and been baptised in the name of
Jesus, "He (the Spirit) had not yet fallen upon any of them.25
The third experience is the visit of Peter to the house of
Cornelius in chapter ten. He began his message drawing on
their existing knowledge of Jesus ministry from the baptism of
John, His anointing with the Spirit, preaching and miracles,
death on the cross at Jerusalem, and resurrection of which he
20Acts 2:37-40
21Acts 8:12
22Acts 8:13
23Acts 8:14-15
24Acts 8:17-19
25
Acts 8:16
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
11/80
11
was one of the witnesses.26
He then declared the primary
purpose of his preaching at Jesus command; that they should
through belief, receive the forgiveness of sins.27
While
continuing to speak to the company, the Spirit "fell" on allthose who were listening, and they began to speak in
tongues.28
This was witnessed by some 'orthodox'
(circumcised) believers who had accompanied Peter, who drew
the comparison between their experience, and what was taking
place in these Gentiles. They related this experiential
connection when recounting the incident to the brethren at
Jerusalem.29
The last recorded experience of Acts is in chapter
nineteen, some twenty-one years after the initial events of
chapter two. Paul in Ephesus contacts a group of disciples who
were still following in the prophetic expectations of the
Baptist. Upon questioning them as to their experience of the
reception of the Spirit, state they are unaware that the Spirit
had been given.30
He continues to instruct them throughdrawing the difference between John's baptism as related to
repentance, and Jesus' baptism to belief. They believed the
message concerning Jesus, received baptism in water, and then
Paul laid his hands on them for the reception of the Spirit. This
reception was accompanied by their speaking with tongues and
prophesying.31
2625Acts 10:31-41
2726Acts 10:42-43
28Acts 10:44-46
29Acts 10:47-48 cf. 11:15-18
30Acts 19:1-2
31
Acts 19:6
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
12/80
12
The epistles give neither accounts nor teaching relating
to the reception or baptism of the Spirit. They do give
instructions and exhortations relating to the practice ofspeaking in tongues, prophesying and the laying on of hands
by leaders.32
The "Post Apostolic" Experience
The Post Apostolic period does not major on the
experiences of reception of the Spirit; it gives many records of
the gifts of the Spirit, particularly prophecy, and the prophetic
office. Ignatius said in his farewell epistle to the Philadelphian
church, "although some would have deceived me, yet the
Spirit, being from God, is not deceived ..." as he spoke of the
revelation he had concerning the divisions that would come
among them as a church".33
Justin Martyr in his 'Dialogue
with Trypho the Jew' wrote, "the prophetic gifts remain even to
this day".34
Polycarp was defined as a 'prophetical teacher'whose words were fulfilled.
35Irenaeus testimony is clear
when speaking of expressions associated with the fullness of
the Spirit:
32Romans 12:6; I Corinthians 12:1-11,12-31; 13:1,8: 14;1-33,39-
40; I Thessalonians 5:10-20; I Timothy 4:14; Hebrews 6:2.
33Excerpted from a major Irvingite treatise by Robert Norton,
"Neglected and Controversial Truths, with a Historic Review of Miraculous
Manifestations in the Church of Christ. (London: 1839), p.342. Cited in
"The History of the Charismatic Movements in New Zealand, by James E.
Worsfold. (Bradford: Puritan, 1974), p.1.
34Ibid. pp.342-3.
35
Ibid., p.342
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
13/80
13
"The true disciples of Jesus Christ ( ) receiving favours
from Him, perform works for the benefit of other men, as every
one hath received the gift from Him. For some cast out devils.
Others have the knowledge of things future, and visions, andprophecies. Others are laying hands on the sick, and restore their
health. Also as we have said before, even the dead are raised, and
have continued with us for many years." And again, "And also as
we hear many brethren in the church having prophetical gifts, and
speaking by the Spirit all kinds of tongues, and revealing the
secrets of men for profit, and expounding the mysteries of God".36
Ante Nicean Fathers and writers (before 325AD)
namely, Tertullian, Hippolytus, Novatian, Cyprian, Origen,Dionysis of Alexandria, Eusebius, Pachomius, Athanasius and
Marcius speak of the existence of some or all the following
evidences of the activity of the Spirit. Miracles, healings,
prophecies, tongues, exorcism, interpretation of dreams, or
enumerate lists of the gifts of the Spirit.37
The 'thread' of the manifestations of charismata is seen to
continue throughout history, though often thin and isolated,nevertheless unabated.
38Not all the 'Fathers' encouraged the
expectation of public manifestations accompanying the
reception of the Spirit. Augustine saw tongues and similar
evidences, "adapted to the time", considering them to belong in
the centuries before himself. Though he did teach the
36Ibid., p.343
37Ronald A. Kydd, "Charismata to 320AD, (Doctoral Thesis:
University of St. Andrews), cited in "The Holy Spirit: A Pentecostal
Interpretation" by L. Thomas Holdcraft, (Springfield: GPH, 1979), pp.138-
140.
38L. Thomas Holdcraft, The Holy Spirit: A Pentecostal
Interpretation (Springfield: GPH, 1979), pp.140-142.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
14/80
14
reception of the Spirit was to be an event subsequent to
conversion and baptism with water.39
Some of the Ninetieth Century Experience
The major contributor in the early ninetieth century is
Edward Irving. A Scottish-Presbyterian minister, he became
convinced of he was to function as a prophet and priest. From
his study of the accounts of the early church, he believed the
church having left the ministries of Ephesians chapter four,
was left to its own devices by the Holy Spirit. This belief he
linked to prophetic and apocalyptic views also espoused by
Henry Drummond.40
From the background of his anticipation
of the outpouring of the Spirit, and the restoration of the
`neglected ministry gifts' he embarked on preaching tours in
Scotland in 1828-30. It was during these travels, early in
1830, parishioners near Glasgow began to receive the Spirit
accompanied by speaking with tongues glossolalia).41
The
Catholic Apostolic Church later developed a 'theology of thecharismata' after Irvings' death in 1834.
In the latter half of the century there was an increasing
emphasis placed on the work of the Spirit in the life of
Christians. Holiness and 'deeper-life' teachers not only
preached publicly concerning experiences with the Spirit, they
emphasised the term, Baptism of the Spirit". Some of their
themes are be seen in their writing. A. B. Simpson speaking
39Ibid. p.95.
40"Edward Irving" by David Bundy in "Dictionary of the
Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements" ed. Stanley Burgess, et. al.,
(Grand Rapids: Regency, 1988), p.470-471.
41
Ibid. p.471.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
15/80
15
of, "The Twofold Work of the Spirit in the Life of Christ",
says;
"First, He was born of the Spirit, then He was baptised with theSpirit, and then He went forth to work out His life and ministry in
the power of the Spirit. But 'He that sanctifieth and they that are
sanctified are all of one'; so in like manner we must follow in His
footsteps and relive His life. Born like Him of the Spirit, we, too,
must be baptised with the Spirit, and then go forth to live His life
and reproduce His work."42
R. A. Torrey, on the subject, but now in relationship to
believers;
It is evident that the baptism with the Holy Spirit is an operation
of the Holy Spirit distinct from and additional to His regenerating
work ... A man may be regenerated by the Holy Spirit and still not
be baptised with the Holy Spirit. In regeneration, there is the
impartation of life by the Spirit's power, and the one who receives
it is saved: in the baptism with the Holy Spirit, there is the
impartation of power, and the one who receives it is fitted forservice ..."43
Continuing the theme, Andrew Murray, writes;
"To the disciples, the Baptism with the Spirit was very distinctly
not His first bestowal for regeneration, but the definite
communication of His presence in power of their glorified Lord.
Just as there was a twofold operation of one Spirit in the Old and
New Testaments, of which the state of the disciples before andafter Pentecost was the striking illustration, so there may be, and in
the majority of Christians is, a corresponding difference of
experience..... When once the distinct recognition of what the
indwelling of the Spirit was meant to bring is brought home to the
soul.... the believer may ask and expect what may be termed a
42Dr. A.B. Simpson. - p.59.
43
Dr. R.A. Torrey. - p.60.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
16/80
16
baptism of the Spirit. Praying to the Father.... he may receive
such an inflow of the Holy Spirit as shall consciously lift him to a
different level from the one on which he had hitherto lived... The
desire is growing among God's people to have nothing less than
what God meant by His promise of a baptism with the Holy Ghost
and with fire."44
This emphasis contributed to the ground-swell of 'seeking'
that emerged in the twentieth century at Topeka, Kansas, and
in the Welsh Revival.
Experience and Formulation in British Pentecostalism
In 1904-5 there was a "visitation of God" known
historically as "the Welsh Revival". During this time
thousands were converted and many evidences were given of
the power of the Holy Spirit.45
Many of its founding leaders of
British pentecostalism were converted to Christ in those
years.46
While the experience of the outpouring of the Spirit
with the evidences of tongues and prophecy had beenevidenced in the United States, was for the first time in the
twentieth century, seen in Great Britain through this revival in
Wales.47
An early opposition to these manifestations came from
orthodox Christianity in this outpouring. Such opposition did
not diminish the spread of healings, speaking in tongues with
their interpretation, and prophesying. Those who were
44Andrew Murray. - p.60-61.
45T. N. Turnbull, What God Hath Wrought. (Bradford: Puritan,
1962), p.13.
46Ibid. p.17 and Pentecostal Dict., p.16, 259-60,882.
47
Pentecostal Dict., p.881-82.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
17/80
17
experiencing these "blessings of the Spirit" saw the opposition
to be based on the ignorance of their opponents concerning the
teaching of the Scriptures in these matters.48
The earlier leaders in the movement of the revival were
more practitioners than teachers and systematic theologians.
The teaching is recorded by those who entered ministry in the
twenties, and having direct contact with the original "Fathers".
W. A. C. Rowe of the Apostolic Church covers the main points
of doctrine.
"What is the nature of the Baptism of the Spirit and what is it
for?"
"It is a special "coming upon" of the Holy Spirit Himself (John
7:39). This does not mean that a true believer who may not have
received the Baptism has not been given some measure of theHoly Spirit. There can be no New Birth, except by the agency of
the Holy Ghost (John 3:5). Also this fact can be seen in John
20:22. Servants of God in the Old Testament enjoyed remarkableexperiences of the Holy Spirit. This "coming upon" or Baptism of
the Spirit was a blazing fire (Matthew 3:11 and Acts 2:3). The
Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Burning. This Baptism was
power..."Ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come
upon you" (Acts 1:8). Power for what? Power to witness for the
Lord. The whole of Acts underscores this. Burning witness and
bold preaching! They key verse of the book, Acts 4:33, sets this
out in marked fashion. Thus the Baptism is for service. As it is a
Baptism of fire, as well as of power, it must have a purifying andsanctifying effect. There is a mistaken idea that only sanctified
believers can qualify for the Baptism and many have stumbles on
seeing immature Christians enjoying the blessing, even though
there may be evidences of the carnal nature in their lives. It must
be remembered that in the instances given, the baptism of the Holy
Spirit was received as a gift at the beginning of their Christian
48
Turnbull. p.13.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
18/80
18
pathway. This blessing was not something earned and a kind of
crown upon a mature, sanctified life when well advanced on the
road with the Lord."49
"What is the clear sign of this event?"
This is, undoubtedly, the most controversial point. We stand
with the majority of the great Holy Ghost Movements and baptised
believers the world over, who, during the last fifty years, have
received this mighty visitation. Of course, every seeker desires
some Scriptural sign that they can be positive that they have
received the promised Gift. We unhesitatingly say, on the basis
of the Word of God, that there is only one answer. The only
definite initial sign, about which there can be no question, is the
sign of speaking with other tongues, as the Spirit
(gives)...utterance" (Acts 2: 4). The pattern case of the initial signof tongues appears to be clinched beyond all reasonable doubt
when Peter was convinced that the Gentiles had received the
Baptism when he declares "For they heard them speak with
tongues, and magnify God" (Acts 10: 46). Evidently "speaking
with tongues" was the implicit sign as far as Peter was concerned.What more absolute authority could be given? We have not said
that there is no other sign of the Baptism. Some say there may be
other initial signs, while others declare that there are such. All
this, however, is a large arena of argument and speculation with no
Scriptural verification. While we do not assert that a person may
not receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit without the initial signof speaking with other tongues; yet we steadfastly maintain that
no one can testify with Scriptural certainty that they have received
the Spirit in this manner unless they can say they have spoken with
"other tongues." Of course we realise that there are other signs of
the Spirit-filled life such as, say, the Fruit of the Spirit may betermed signs or indications of the Spirit's abiding within. Butthere is but one positive, Scriptural, initial sign " speaking with
other tongues" as the Spirit gives utterance."50
49W. A. C. Rowe, One Lord, One Faith, (Bradford: Puritan,
ca1958), p.134.
50
Ibid, p.134-135.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
19/80
19
"Preparation of Power"
Many amongst those who have received this blessing are inclined
to think and testify of the experience as a goal, rather than agateway: in fact, it is a special phase of divine preparation of the
power of the Spirit. It gives the soul the first deep and
overwhelming taste of the supernatural; the Holy Spirit floods
into and overflows the outer court of the body of man. It is the
beginning of an experience of the most intimate nearness of God
in ecstasy and power".51
The Baptism is a special enduement of power to witness
for Christ. He is the believer's courage and boldness (Acts 1:8). We read many times in the Acts, of the Apostles and
disciples speaking boldly for the Lord (Acts 4: 8). They even
rejoiced in persecution (Acts 5: 41), and no matter what
pressure was brought to bear upon them, the were
"incorrigible" in the best sense of the word. The vacillating
Peter at the trials of Jesus became the audacious preacher of
the triumphant Christ. The whole Church shared in thatmarvellous baptism of power".52
Although the Baptism of the Spirit is primarily and
experience of power, rather than sanctification, it does bring its
fiery energisings of desire toward the life of greater holiness.
Also, it provides the warmth of God in drawing out to
fructification the seed potentials of the imparted life of
Christ".53
51Ibid. p. 137.
52Ibid. p. 138.
53
Ibid. p.140.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
20/80
20
Donald Gee of the Assemblies of God, writes concerning the
Baptism of The Holy Spirit;
"To most of us, this has been a perfectly distinct experience fromour conversion, and to this agrees the clear testimony of the
Scriptures - Acts 8: 16; 9: 17; 19:2, etc. The instance of Cornelius
(Acts 10: 44) remains as a blessed proof that it is possible for God
to sweep a new convert instantly into the fullness of the Spirit; but
in actual fact this is the experience of very few. When you are
baptised in the Holy Ghost you know it, and need no one to
acquaint you with the fact; bless God, you will soon be
acquainting them. When you are baptised in the Holy Ghost, God
touches you and for ever after in your life you know God touched
you, and that He lives. In the final analysis, the Baptism in the
Spirit is not a doctrine but an experience, and the rest of whether I
have received is not a cleverly woven doctrine that will include mewithin its borders, but whether I know the experience in burning
fact in heart and life".54
The teaching of the British Pentecostals is homogeneous
in matters concerning the time of believers' reception of the
Spirit to be subsequent to conversion. The definite expectationthat evidences will accompany this reception, the purpose is
empowering for evangelism and world mission, and the
experience does not grant the believer "Entire Sanctification".
Their diversity emerges in the statements of the nature of the
evidence. The Assemblies of God hold to "the initial evidence
of speaking in tongues", while the Apostolics say it is "with
signs following".
Experience and Formulation in American Pentecostalism
The American experience of Pentecostalism comes from
the roots of Charles F. Parhams' experience in Topeka, Kansas
54Donald Gee. Pentecost. (Springfield: GPH, 1932 reprint, 1969),
p.20-21.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
21/80
21
in 1901. Formerly a Methodist preacher, he embraced holiness
teaching and the message of divine healing in 1891, and after a
time of pastoring a Methodist Church founded the Beth-el
Healing Home at Topeka in 1898. A growing conviction of animmanent "Latter Rain" outpouring of the Spirit led him to
found a Bible School in 1899. It was from this milieu one of
the students, Agnes Ozman received the Spirit with the "sign"
of speaking in tongues on January 1, 1901.55
There were other experiences of the reception of the Spirit
evidenced by speaking in tongues, the most prominent is the
'Azusa Street Experience'. In 1906 a black ex-Holiness
preacher, William J. Seymour who had been a student under
Parham, became the leader of a new endeavour, the Azusa
Street Mission in Los Angeles. Seymour and those with him
enjoyed an outpouring of the Spirit that had services
continually for three years. The schedule of services was three
per day. Their focus was worship, prayer and seeking the
baptism of the Spirit, rather than preaching. In America todayat least twenty-six out of approximately forty of the
Pentecostal denominations whose origins are available for
study, trace their roots to Azusa Street.56
The development of Pentecostal churches from that
point gradually led to the formation of the 'denominations' that
joined together to promote evangelism, foreign missions, set
standards for the ordination of ministers, explore the potentialof Sunday School, sponsor Bible Institutes, and establish
common statements of sound doctrine for the preservation of
truth.
5554Pentecostal Dict., p.31-32.
56
Holdcraft, p.105-6.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
22/80
22
Much of their doctrine was common belief, often held by
practice and 'private interpretation' of the Scriptures. Various
streams of thought contributed to the Pentecostal diversity,often leading to doctrinal statements that were 'conflations and
compromises to keep everybody on board' in the new
movements.57
When it comes to the doctrine of the Baptism of the Spirit,
some of those connected with the roots of these movements,
became their systematic theologians. Ernest S. Williams of the
Assemblies of God writes in his three volume work;
"The Baptism with the Holy Spirit is a definite experience. It was
definite in the time of the early Church. It ought to be definite
today. Too much is too often taken for granted. Seekers are told
to take the Spirit by faith. Unfortunately, in too many instances,
all they take is a consent to truth. The Holy Spirit is life and
power".58
57For example: Dennis Leggett writing on `The Assemblies of God
Statement on Sanctification' states; "John Calvin and John Wesley were atthe 1916 General Council of the Assemblies of God. Well, at least some of
their theological `descendants' were. The seventeen point (now sixteen)`Statements of Fundamental Truths' that enunciated the theology of the
Assemblies of God was formulated at that council. The influence of these
two theologians can be recognized throughout the `Statement'. At pointstheir influence is obvious, but there are points where one is hard pressed to
identify either of them with much confidence. Pnuema, Fall 1989, Vol.
11.2, p.113.
58Ernest S. Williams, Systematic Theology. Vol 3, (Springfield:
GPH 1953), p.41.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
23/80
23
Regarding the reception of the Baptism being subsequent to
regeneration;
"If we are to be guided by the record in the News Testament, thebaptism with the Spirit is subsequent to conversion. There is
plentiful evidence that the disciples who received the Spirit at
Pentecost were already in a saved state. This truth cannot be
easily dismissed by saying the days of the ministry of Jesus on
earth were in a transition period between the Old and the New
Testament times. Whatever a person may think concerning this,
the evidence shows that the disciples were not of the world even as
Christ was not of the world (John 17: 14). Their names were
written in heaven (Luke 10: 20). They were spiritually clean(John 15: 3) and were acknowledged by Jesus as united to Him as
a branch is to the vine (John 15: 4,5). Yet they had not received
the baptism with the Holy Spirit. The Baptism came to them
"when the day of Pentecost was fully come" (Acts 2: 1-4).59
With these definite evidences of a baptism with the Spiritsubsequent to regeneration, why should any oppose those who
seek such an experience? We know there has been much talk;
efforts have been made seeking to explain that the Spirit came asrecorded in the Book of Acts in apostolic days, but such
manifestations of the Spirit, and receiving through prayer and
laying on of hands, continued only until God opened the door to
the Gentiles at the home of Cornelius. Since then the
Dispensational plan is that the Holy Spirit is received without
prayer or help from man in the new birth. Such teaching might be
held satisfactory were evidences present similar to the evidences
found in the written Word. But the record does not stop at the
house of Cornelius. According to Biblical chronology those whoreceived the Spirit at Ephesus did so about thirteen years after the
Spirit fell at the home of Cornelius".60
"Adding the teaching of these Scriptures to the time and manner
of the receiving of the Holy Spirit in the Book of Acts, we have
59Ibid. p.42.
60
Ibid. p.43-44.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
24/80
24
certain ground for believing the baptism with the Spirit is an
enduement of power on the cleansed believer".61
On speaking in tongues as "the foremost evidence";
"That which is of first importance is "power from on high." (Acts
1: 8). To be filled with spiritual power is the purpose of the
baptism with the Spirit".62
On the difference between the New Birth and the Baptism with
the Spirit;
"Seeking to distinguish the new birth from the baptism with the
Spirit one has explained as follows: "In the new birth the Holy
Spirit is the Agent, the atoning blood the means, the new birth the
result; in the baptism with the Spirit, Christ is the Agent ("He
shall baptise you with the Holy Spirit and with five"), the Spirit
the means, the endument with power the result." Another says,
"In the new birth the Spirit comes within, in the baptism the Spirit
comes upon." There is some reason in this explanation since so
often in the Old Testament we read "The Spirit came upon him."In the Baptism at Pentecost, however, the Spirit was both upon
and within. The place where the disciples were assembled was
filled, and the disciples themselves were filled".63
The Assemblies of God is the largest of the denominations in
'International Pentecost', spreading its interpretations to many
lands. Much of its teaching is consistent with orthodox
Christianity", and its system of governance lends its self to
regional eclecticism.
61Ibid. p.46.
62Ibid. p.47.
63
Ibid. p.47.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
25/80
25
Another group that has spread its teaching in an influential
way, especially in the last fifteen years is the International
Foursquare Church. A key figure in the acceptance of their
teaching is Jack W. Hayford, Pastor of "The Church on theWay", Van Nuys, California. Their manual of doctrine,
"Foundations of Pentecostal Theology", is explicit on the
subject of Spirit Baptism;
What is Baptism with the Holy Spirit?
1. Negatively:
a). It is not "The Second Definite Work of Grace." This
expression is nowhere used in the Bible, though we hear it a
great deal in certain religious circles. We would not say that
we do not believe in a second work of grace, for we are
anxious to receive all that God has for us; but if there is a
second work of grace, perhaps there is a third, fourth, fifth, etc.
In other words we believe in a continual growth in grace (IIPeter 3:18). This, however, does not describe the Baptism
with the Holy Spirit.
b). It is not "The Second Blessing." Here again, is an
expression not used in Scripture. Undoubtedly God has a
second, and many other blessings for His children; but to call a
definite, spiritual experience by this name is not biblical.
Receive every blessing possible from the Lord, but realise that"The Second Blessing" is not what God calls the outpouring of
the Holy Spirit.
c). It is not "Sanctification." Sanctification is the
scriptural name for something quite different from the Baptism
with the Holy Spirit. This subject has been dealt with under
Soteriology.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
26/80
26
d). It is not "Holiness." Holiness is a blessed scriptural
word, but is describes an attribute of character rather than an
experience. It is developed, not received as a gift of singlesblessing.
2. Positively:
a). "The Baptism with the Holy Spirit." The scriptural;
name for the Holy Spirit coming upon the lives of Christian
men and women is "The Baptism with the Holy Ghost."
Notice the explicit language of the following Scriptures "...he
shall baptise you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire..." (Mt.
3:11); "I indeed have baptised you with water: but he shall
baptise you with the Holy Ghost" (Mark 1: 8); "For John truly
baptised with water: but ye shall be baptised with the Holy
Ghost not many days hence" (Acts 1: 5).
This great experience must be called by its right name.Others, not doubt, have had the same experience in former
days, who have failed to call it by its scriptural name. As a
result, they have failed to pass the truth on to others. To say
that these other names mean the same thing is to confuse God's
blessings, purposes, and provisions for His won.64
What the Baptism with the Holy Spirit Is;
1. Negatively.
a). It is not the New Birth. The Baptism with the Holy
Spirit is subsequent to, and distinct from, His regenerative
64Guy P. Duffield and Nathaniel M. Van Cleave, Foundations of
Pentecostal Theology. (Los Angeles: LIFE Bible College, 1983), p.305.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
27/80
27
Work. A full Christian experience should certainly contain
both; but this distinction must be made, because many are
genuinely saved who have never been filled with the Spirit.65
2. Positively.
The Baptism with the Holy Ghost is a definite experience,
subsequent to salvation, whereby the Third Person of the
Godhead comes upon the believer to anoint and energise him
for special service. This experience is designated, in the New
Testament, as the Spirit "falling upon," "coming upon," or
being "poured out upon" the yielded believer in a sudden and
supernatural manner.66
The Purpose and necessity of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit;
Power for service.
The chief purpose of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit is
that the believer might have power for Christian service. Itmay well be that the greatest promise given to the Christian is
that given by Jesus to His disciples just prior to His Ascension:
"But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come
upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in
Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the
uttermost part of the earth"(Acts 1: 8). This power for special
service is the distinctive result of having been filled with the
Spirit. Jesus was anointed with the Holy Ghost before Hebegan His public ministry and He performed His mighty works
by the power of the Spirit. He preached and healed under the
anointing of the Holy Spirit.67
65Ibid. p.305.
66Ibid. p.307.
67Ibid. p.308.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
28/80
28
Positively - for all who believe.
The Baptism with the Holy Spirit is for all, in all ages,who believe on Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord and are
children of God through Him. It is intended to be the normal
Divine provision for a fully adequate Christian work and
witness, available to all believers of all stations, all times, all
races, and all callings.68
The teaching, though similar to that of the Assemblies of
God, holds a greater 'strain of Christian praxis' and isinfluenced by modernity. The "Jesus Hermeneutic" of the
modern scholars is seen to emerge in the Foursqaure work,
prior to the "Renewal" and modern Pentecostal scholars.
The other Pentecostal groups, are those of the Holiness
train. They hold to the same general doctrines, but many
originally taught the Baptism of the Spirit as a thirdexperience. It followed regeneration, as a subsequent
experience of sanctification for living, now an empowering for
service. The general "Holiness Pentecostal" emphasis is the
reception of the Spirit, is both sanctification and empowering.
It is in these groups that the "Second Blessing" terminology
has its Pentecostal roots. Some of the more extreme groups
have seen this as the Spirit "eradicating the Old or Adamic
Nature".
The Teaching of the "Renewal Theologians"
The Charismatic Renewal of the mid-sixties to seventies
brought a breath of fresh air through the churches of America.
68
Ibid. p.312-313.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
29/80
29
Many clergy and laity of "Mainline Protestant Churches",
Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Christians experienced
the blessings of Spirit Baptism. One of the features was, the
Pentecostals lost their exclusive distributing rights to SpiritBaptism! Not only did people outside their constituencies
receive the experience, but they stayed in their "communions"
with a renewed pursuit of Christian Spirituality. Then the
inevitable happened, men and woman of proven scholarship
abilities began to argue for the experience on the grounds of
informed exegesis of the texts. This has now gone to the
extent of a fine systematic theology by J. Rodman Williams.
He outlines the traditional Pentecostal theological from his
own comprehensive study, done in the 'wake' of the historical
height of the renewal. Some examples of his treatment of the
subject.
The Coming of The Spirit;
What lies at the heart of the coming of the Holy Spirit - and whatthese terms variously express - is the event/experience of the
dynamic presence of God in the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is
poured out on, falls on, comes on; hence there is movement,
action. As a result people are baptised in and filled with the Holy
Spirit. All this points to a momentous event and experience of the
Holy Spirit. We are to recognise this as the active presence of
God. God, to be sure, is everywhere present; indeed, "in him we
live and move and have our being" (Acts 17: 28). However,
omnipresence is not the same as dynamic presence, namely, Hispresence as event - dynamic event. The heart of Pentecost and its
continuation is dynamic event; it may be expressed as "God has
come."69
69J. Rodman Williams, Renewal Theology, Vol. 2, (Grand Rapids:
Academie, 1990), p.203-204.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
30/80
30
Excursus: The Coming of the Holy Spirit and Salvation;
It is important to reiterate that none of the New Testament
accounts of the coming of the Holy Spirit are concerned withsalvation. The occurrence of salvation was essential backgroundfor the gift of the Holy Spirit, but the Spirit was not given to bring
about salvation.
I stress this because of a frequently expressed view that the gift of
the Spirit was integral to salvation. From this perspective the gift
of the Holy Spirit, for example, is viewed as the gift of saving
grace; or it is the means of inward cleansing; or it is the
application of Christ's "saving benefits." The gift of the HolySpirit, however, as we have observed goes beyond salvation, it is
promised to those who repent and come to faith in Jesus Christ.
None of this concerning the gift of the Holy Spirit denies the prior
operation of the Holy Spirit in salvation. There could be no
repentance and faith without the work of the Holy Spirit making
such possible. As Jesus said about the Holy Spirit, "He, when He
comes, will convict the world concerning sin" (John 16:8NASB).
Hence, on the Day of Pentecost the conviction that resulted inrepentance and faith was due to the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit,
operating through Peter's preaching, produced conviction - and
without such, salvation could not occur. But salvation itself was
not the gift of the Spirit.70
Williams' work is indicative of that of his fellow renewal
scholars, both Protestant and Roman Catholic. The Society
for Pentecostal Studies has been a valuable 'spawning ground'
to bring the Pentecostal and Renewal scholars together with
the lastgroup we will consider. The new generation of
Pentecostal scholars - the "fifth generation".
70
Ibid. p.205-206.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
31/80
31
The "New Generation" Pentecostal Scholars
These are the ones who are asking the hard questions, and
often coming up with solid answers. They do not onlychallenge the traditions, they are committed to change. They
are calling for the renewal of Pentecostalism, if they can be
contained within in! They studied outside of the normal
institutions of higher education for Pentecostals, and held to
their experiential heritage, from the basis of fresh exegesis.
Many are moving into influential professorships, and having
an impact on a new generation of persons training for the
ministry, in the Evangelical world, as well as their Pentecostal
one.
Roland Wessels in a paper presented at the Society of
Pentecostal Studies meeting in Dallas, November, 1990. "How
is the Baptism of the Holy Spirit Distinguished from Receiving
the Spirit at Conversion? A Problem Question for the
Assemblies of God", comes to the following summary ofquestions at the end of the paper.
A Few Modest Observations.
There is evidence that the formulation, "He is with you and shall
be in you" as the promise inviting Christians to be Spirit baptised
and assuring them that the baptism in the Spirit is for them, has
become problematic in the Assemblies of God. The reason is that
their teachers have come to the conclusion the "He is with you" isan untenable description of the Spirit's relationship to those "born
again." None of them has developed a theory of regeneration
which advocates it.
The mainstream of their teaching has affirmed what is considered
among evangelicals as the Pauline teaching, that the Spirit isreceived within at the beginning of the Christian life. Besides
this, a number of teachers in the fellowship are now declaring that
according to John's gospel the promise made in John 14: 15 was
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
32/80
32
fulfilled when Jesus breathed on His disciples and said "Receive
the Holy Spirit" (John 20: 22). This has furthered interpretations
of the baptism in the Spirit which tend to modify the obvious
meaning of the passages in Acts upon which the Pentecostal
doctrine of the Spirit baptism has been built. This paper
documents this ongoing process of modifications.
One may wonder whether the variety of expression used in Acts to
report that the followers of Christ received the Spirit really mean
that the disciples received a particular mode of the Spirit, or mode
of the Spirit's activity, or that He came upon Christians who
already had His indwelling presence, of that they received a
further degree of His indwelling called fullness. Is this the
exegetical price one has to pay to remain Pentecostal?
Furthermore, these terms, as used by Pentecostal teachers, "being
baptised into the Spirit," "receiving the Spirit within," "receiving
the Spirit in His own right," "receiving a special anointing of the
Spirit," and "being filled with the Spirit" are not synonyms. In
fact, a study of these conceptions, I believe, will reveal that there
are a number of patterns of interpretation of what it means to
receive the Spirit according to Acts 2: 4 in Assemblies literature.Though they are not fully developed structures, I suggest that there
are at least these three: 1) It is regarded as receiving a more
intimate sense of the Spirit's presence; 2) It is considered to be a
special anointing of power for Christian service by the Spirit, and
3) it is heralded as the breaking through to complete yieldedness to
the Spirit and so receiving the fullness of His presence. I believe
these are not simply aspects of the same experience. I intend to
lay out the pattern of thought associated with each of these
understandings. But that will have to wait for another paper. This
paper has only opened the door to what Pentecostals in the
Assemblies of God mean when they speak of receiving the
Spirit".71
71Roland Wessels, How is the Baptism in the Holy Spirit
Distinguished from Receiving the Spirit at Conversion? A Problem
Question in the Assemblies of God". In "Continuity and Change, Papers of
the Annual Meeting of the Society for Pentecostal Studies at Dallas, Texas,
November 1990. p. 18-19.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
33/80
33
Wessels is not seeking to attack for attacks sake, he is asking
questions from within the movement for their formal teaching
to be made on the basis of consistent exegesis. Much of the
early Pentecostal teaching was in defence of their positions inthe face of 'Dispensationalist hermeneutics' (see an excellent
article by Gordon Fee in "Pneuma", Fall 1984), Wessels is
touching some of that history.
Another scholar, Robert P. Menzies, writes on the
prophecy of John the Baptist in Luke 3:16. His work is partly
in a Pentecostal defence of James Dunn's position, and partly
to lay the ground-work to interpret the import of the Baptist's
words as used by Luke (3:16), to speak of the work of the
Spirit in empowering, not the salvation of those who receive
the "Spirit Baptism". He does this from a redactional analysis
of the text in relation to Q. He writes on;
The Use of Interpretation of the Prophecy in the Early Church;
"The omission of "and fire" (), coupled with thereference to "the good news of Jesus Christ" in Mark 1: 1 and the
absence of any mention of judgment or wrath, indicates that Mark
interpreted John's preaching and prophecy largely in positiveterms. The form of Mark's account (Mark 1: 8), so similar to Acts
1: 5 and 11: 16, probably reflects the conviction that the prophecy
was fulfilled, at least in part, at Pentecost. However, Mark's
purpose in relating the Baptist's prophecy is essentially
christological: the prophecy serves to point to the unique status ofJesus as the Spirit-Baptised. Therefore, Mark fails to elaborate
further on the nature of the prophecy's fulfilment. For more
specific information we shall have to turn elsewhere.
Matthew's account of the Baptist's preaching in Matthew 3: 7-12
corresponds more closely to Q than to that of Luke in Luke 3: 7-
18. Although Luke 3: 10-15 cannot be attributed to Luke on
stylistic grounds and likely represents tradition material, it
probably came from a sources other that Q. This judgment is
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
34/80
34
support by Luke's summary of John's preaching recorded in Luke
3: 18, a verse which is clearly from Luke's hand. The phrase, "he
preached good new to the people"(eunggelizeto ton laon, Luke 3:
18), indicates that Luke interpreted John's preaching, particularly
his prophecy concerning the coming baptiser, in a predominantly
positive way. There it is probable that Luke inserted Luke 3: 10-
15, traditional material from another source which emphasised and
illustrated the concept of repentance, into the narrative of Q (Matt.
3: 7-12=Luke 3: 7-9, 16-17) in order to separate the negativepronouncement of judgment in Luke 3: 7-9=Matthew 3: 7-10 from
John's prophecy of the coming baptiser. In this way Luke created
a context appropriate for his positive appraisal of the Baptist's
prophecy. Matthew on the other hand, following the Q version
more closely, retains and possibly heightens the emphasis on thenegative and judgmental aspect of John's preaching. Addressed to
the "Pharisees and Sadducees," the prophecy serves as a warning
against the rejection of Jesus: to reject Jesus is to reject the
Messiah and future judge; it will inevitably result in the judgment
of God and destruction. Therefore we conclude that while
Matthew (following Q) frames the Baptist's prophecy in largely
negative terms, featuring destructive judgment, Luke emphasises
its positive elements: the sifting and purification of the righteous
remnant".72
This particular passage has been the subject of 'primitive
Pentecostal interpretation'. This ranged from seeing it in the
terms of "Spirit Baptism/Sanctification", zeal as a sign of the
reception of the Spirit, of foretaste of future judgement, and at
the hands of some "Modern Alexandrians" - fire on those who
deny the validity of the Pentecostal teaching on Spirit Baptism.
Menzies seeks to lay foundations for a sane exegesis and to
refute the teaching of consequentialsists like Dunn.
7271Menzies, Robert. "The Baptist's Prophecy in Lukan
Perspective: A Redactional Analysis of Luke 3:16 In Continuity and
Change: Papers of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Pentecostal
Studies at Dallas, Texas, November 1990. p.11-12.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
35/80
35
One more scholar in this brief review. Roger Stronstand's
work, "The Charismatic Theology of Saint Luke", gives an
excellent insight to the work of the new Pentecostal scholars,
on Spirit Baptism. He observes sound methodology, andwrites from the field of Biblical Theology/Hermeneutics. The
following is from the chapter on, "The Holy Spirit at
Pentecost: The Charismatic Community".
"This inaugural gift of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost is a
pivotal event in Luke's history-of-salvation theology. Therefore,
it is not surprising to observe the Luke gives a multiplex
description to this transfer of the Spirit. Because of thecharismatic-prophetic dimension of Pentecost, Luke's favourite
phrase, "filled with the Holy Spirit," best approximates the full
meaning of the gift of the Spirit. No single term, however, is
sufficiently comprehensive to adequately convey the meaning of
this event. Therefore in Luke's narrative it is at once a clothing, a
baptising, an empowering, a filling and an outpouring of the Spirit.
As Luke uses these terms, they are essentially synonymous to the
meaning of this complex phenomenon.
Luke also describes the gift of the Spirit from a fourfold
perspective. 1) promise, 2) description, 3) interpretation, and 4)
application. First, Pentecost (Luke 24: 29, Acts 1: 5-8). Next,
Luke describes the signs which attest to the reality of the
outpouring of the Spirit (Acts 2: 1-4). He then records Peter's
interpretation of the gift of the Spirit (Acts 2: 14-21). Finally, he
records Peter's application of the Pentecostal reality to his
audience (Acts 2: 37-39). Following an exposition of these data,
we will also investigate the possible influence of the Sinaitradition upon Luke's narrative, and the meaning of the religious
experience of receiving the Spirit.
Luke parallels the Spirit baptism of the disciples with the
inaugural anointing of Jesus by the Holy Spirit. In his book,
Literary Patterns, Theological Themes and the Genre of Luke-Acts, Charles Talbert outlines Luke's fourfold parallelism between
the two episodes: 1) both Jesus and the disciples are praying, 2)
the Spirit descends after their prayers, 3) there is a physical
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
36/80
36
manifestation of the Spirit, and 4) the ministries of both Jesus and
the disciples begin with a sermon which is thematic of what
follows, appeals to the fulfilment of prophecy, and speaks of the
rejection of Jesus. This parallelism points to the functional
equivalence between the two events. Therefore, since the gift of
the Spirit to Jesus inaugurates and empower His mission,then,
whatever meaning Spirit baptism might have in other contexts, it
has the same primary charismatic meaning for the mission of the
disciples as the anointing by the Spirit had for the charismaticmission of Jesus".
73
He demonstrates the importance of the study of the
doctrine, in New Testament terms, through going back to thelife of Christ. Also the continuity of the Lukan thesis by
reading Luke/Acts as a whole. This lays a better foundation
for the connection to the Pauline teaching on the Charismata.
His emphasis is on empowering, and deals with what is being
defined as a "community hermeneutic".
Summary
The position of the early church concerning Spirit
Baptism comes from an expectation and experience based on
the last words of Jesus to His disciples. The four accounts of
the reception of the Spirit Baptism in Acts are in a post-
conversion/reception of the Gospel context.
The early church Fathers record their experience, andthe practice of supernatural ministry in the church. They hold
to the Spirit being received subsequent to conversion and
baptism/initiation. Their doctrine develops into a formal
acceptance of the experience as time unfolds.
73Roger Stronstad, The Charismatic Theology of St. Luke.
(Peabody: Hendrickson, 1984), p.49-52.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
37/80
37
While charismatic experiences do not fully disappear
from history their occurrence becomes minimal. In the
nineteenth century the reception of Spirit Baptism evidenced
by tongues reappears.
In early twentieth century America and Britain there is
the re-emergence of tongues accompanying a subsequent to
conversion reception of Spirit Baptism. This experience
occurs in the contexts of Holiness Groups, Revivalists in USA,
and Revivalists and Calvinist Methodists in Wales. While
there is Bible teaching on the validity of the experience, the
importance of experience appears to be uppermost in the
emphases of the early practitioners. As a second generation of
leaders and teachers emerges the systematic theology is
established, much in contrast to their Dispensationalist
opponents.
The Charismatic Renewal brings a higher level of
scholarship into the field of systematic formulation andteaching. Now the "modern Pentecostal scholars" are
emerging and asking their questions to establish the doctrines
and practices of the experience on firm Biblical grounds. They
are working to return the teaching to objective empowering for
mission in the context of the Christian Community (Church).
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
38/80
38
CHAPTER THREE
THE BIBLICAL TEACHING OF THE
SIGNIFICANT TEXTS
The teaching and a limited exegesis of the texts that are
held by Pentecostals as significant, will be studied under the
following headings: 1) prophecies of the Spirit's outpouring,
2) Jesus' indications and teaching concerning the gift of the
Spirit, 3) historic accounts of the reception of the Spirit, and 4)
Pauline statements regarding the fullness of the Spirit.
Prophecies of the Spirit's Outpouring
JOEL 2: 28-29 - The prophet speaks from the setting of
Yahweh's restoration blessings that follow the devastations of
the last days (2:1-27). The central importance is theoutpouring of Yahweh's Spirit in prophecy. The audience of
Joel's oracle is Jewish and the "all flesh" speaks of the Spirit
being extended beyond the few74
prophets and statices to
enhance all members of the Jewish community.75
By the
term flesh, distinction is drawn between man as belonging to
an order of being other than God.76
This is against the
background of Joel's statements of the almightiness of
Yahweh.77 The description of the persons, and the diversitiesof the forms of revelation are an expansion of the "all flesh".
74Leslie C. Allen. "Joel". (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1976), p.98.
75c.f. Numbers 11: 29.
76Allen. p.98.
77
Joel 2: 1, 11, 18, 27.30.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
39/80
39
The second, "I will pour out My Spirit", serves as an inclusio
based on verse 29.
EZEKIEL/ JEREMIAH78- Both of these prophets speak of anew covenant, and a new heart in God's people. One that is a
direct reference to a new relationship with the Spirit, they do
not speak prophetically to either reception or empowering by
the spirit in a definite experience.
LUKE 3:16-17 (Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8) - John is reaffirming
the Messianic expectation of his hearers, but in this context
Luke again makes it clear John's mission is preparatory to the
Messiah (cf. Luke 3:3-6). John as a prophet (he is considered
so by Jesus, Luke 7:25-28; Matthew 11:7-14) demonstrates the
characteristic humility shown of him elsewhere in the gospels
(Mark 1:7; Matthew 3:13-15; John 1:6-8,29-37; 3:26-31), and
in doing so emphasises the superiority of the forthcoming
ministry of Jesus (cf. John 3:22-30).
In John's kerygma, water baptism represents a purification of
repentance that anticipates the all-consuming baptism of the
Holy Spirit. The prophecy statement links Jesus as baptiser
with the Spirit and Fire. The fire element is consistent with
John's judgement motif (cf. vipers v:7, axe-root v:9, tree-fire
v:9), now in the next verse it moves on to a "harvest motif"
(v:17). The use of fire in relationship to the process of
winnowing moderates the judgement theme somewhat, asthere is not just the purging (
79= thoroughly to
78Jeremiah 24:7; 31:31-34; Ezekiel 11:19; 36:26; 37:24-28.
79A variant reading in modern texts showing the verb as, infinite
aorist active. This is contrasted with older alternatives of the verb being
singular indicative future active.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
40/80
40
cleanse) the chaff, but the gathering (80
= to gather)
of the wheat before the act of purging. This indicates an
empowerment for harvest/mission that is separated in time
from the purging of the harvest, not the harvesters.
Jesus' Indications and Teaching Concerning the
Gift of the Spirit
These fall into two categories. 1) the Johannine
teaching and it's cross-references in the synoptics, and 2) the
post resurrection statements of Jesus in the Luke/Acts
narratives.
I. The Johannine Teaching
1. THE SPIRIT & THE MESSIAH
A. The "Sign" of The Spirit's abiding given to John theBaptist - 1: 29-34.
John the Baptist was sent to function as a forerunner.81
The very beginnings of his life and ministry had been attended
by, the Spirit and the prophetic.82
John (the author of the
gospel) had been a disciple of the Baptist. The context of this
passage is his own 'transition of call' from that of being a
disciple of the Baptist, to developing as a disciple of Jesus the
Messiah.83
80Ibid.
811:6-8.
82Luke 1:8-23, 67-69.
83
1:35-38.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
41/80
41
The descent and abiding of the Spirit on Jesus had been a
specific sign for the Baptist; "the one on whom you see the
Spirit descending, and remaining".84
At the baptism there is
general agreement with the Jesus' baptism narratives of thesynopsists; that there were two distinctive "baptism elements"
at the Jordan.85
The text here draws a clear distinction
between water baptism and the baptism in the Spirit. Luke
also indicates this distinction.86
The Baptist had objectively
witnessed the descent of the Spirit upon Jesus. Now he
declares: "I have beheld the Spirit descending as a dove out of
heaven; and He remained upon Him".87
The Spirit had come
to stay (dwell, remain, abide, continue).88 In Jesus uniquely
the Spirit took up His permanent abode.89
B. Messiah would baptise with the Spirit - 1:33; 3:34; 7:37-39
John the Baptist goes on to say that the "One who would
come", adding an additional designation; "the Lamb of God,
who takes away the sins of the world", would be the one whobaptises in (with or by)
90the Holy Spirit. This is a contrast
841:33.
85cf. Matthew 3:16; Mark 1:10.
86Luke 3:21-22 "The Greek reads literally, "Jesus, having been
Baptized, and continuing to pray, the heavens opened, and the Holy Spirit
descended. Stanley Horton, "What the Bible says about the Holy Spirit.(Springfield: GPH, 1976), p.91.
871:32 (NASB).
88"". (Bullinger's, Critical Lexicon & Concordance. (London:
Bagster, reprint 1974).
89William Barclay, The Gospel of John. (Edinburgh: Saint Andrew
Press, 1958).
90
1:33 (NASB).
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
42/80
42
with the baptism of John. His had been a baptism of
preparation and dedication through the human action of
repentance.91
The baptism that the Messiah would "bestow"
would not be a human action, but a Divine endument". Jesuswould baptise with water (or at least His disciples would, for
Him)92
but this is not the intent of John's statement. It is
important to note that in the context he refers to the "pre-
existence of the Messiah" through the words; "after me comes
a Man who has a higher rank than I, for He existed before
me".93
This is an implication of deity in relationship to Jesus
as Messiah; also His ability to "bestow/baptize with the
Spirit". John's other statement in this regard follow the
"Nicodemus discourse", when he says; "For He whom God has
sent speaks the words of God; for He gives the Spirit without
measure".94
The last of the "early" statements concerning the future
Spirit baptism, is made by Jesus Himself. In the "pouring out
of the water at the feast" - He makes His call. "If any may isthirsty, let him come to me and drink, he who believes in Me,
as the Scripture said, "from his inner most being shall flow
rivers of living water".95
John notes, "But this He spoke of the
Spirit, who those who believed in Him were to receive; for the
Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified".96
The outcome of the statement (verses 40-44), brought a
91Luke 3:1-6.
924:1-2.
931:30.
943:34.
957:37-38.
96
7:37-38.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
43/80
43
discussion and conflict about was this the prophet, or the
Christ". But, we must be guided by John's interpretation, and
focus on Jesus future role as "Spirit baptiser".
2. THE SPIRIT & REGENERATION/ENTRANCE TO
THE KINGDOM
A. Entrance to the Kingdom through being born of the Spirit.3:5 - 3:6-7
In the discourse with Nicodemus, Jesus states, "...unless
one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God".97 The
tenor of the passage centers around entrance to the kingdom
(as Jesus had come to inaugurate/establish it) and the call "to
be born from above".98
The active personal agent in this
experience is the Spirit.99
It is the Spirit who is the
communicator of life. The statement in verse 5; "...born of
water and the Spirit", has raised divergent opinions (to say
nothing of doctrines!!) amongst scholars. Leon Morrisfavours the weight of interpretation to be put on the meaning
of "born of spiritual seed".100
973:3.
98A "better rendering of the text, regarding "born again.
99Matthew 12:28 - Jesus had already associated the Spirit activitywith the Kingdom of God, by the statement; If I cast out demons by the
Spirit, then the Kingdom has come among you."
100The Greek is pneumatos"(, not "ex
hydatos kai "ex hydatos kai ek pneumatos. The use of only one "ek" and
the absence of the definite article bring the two terms together. The
expression seems to mean "of water-and-spirit" rather than "of water and of
spirit. Leon Morris, Jesus is the Christ. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans/IVP,
1989), p.151.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
44/80
44
B. His work is seen in the lives of those: "born of the Spirit"3:8
Jesus' words to Nicodemus concerning the work of theSpirit in the life of the one "born from above, is compared to
the wind. The thought of the Spirit's invisible presence (not of
human flesh) is to be seen through the manifestation of His
visible power in the life of a regenerated person. (cf.
Nicodemus' introductory remarks in verse one, "for no one can
do these signs which you do unless God is with him.")
C. The indwelling work of the Spirit in the believer suppliesthe abundance of Eternal life. - 4: 13-14
Here Jesus tells the woman He is able to give "water" of
greater effectiveness than the natural water requested from her.
In clarifying her misunderstanding the intention of the
statement Jesus, "that which springs up unto eternal life".101
This is linked with the later statement where John defines,
"this refers to the Spirit who was not yet given" (7:37-39).
D.He is the life giver, as contrasted with the "inadequacy ofthe flesh" (or humanity, independently of Divine life). -
6:63
Jesus' teaching had been stretching the comprehension ofHis followers at the conclusion of the "bread of life
101"hallomai", "to leap = springing up". Figurative of the Holy
Spirit in the believer. W. E. Vine, Expository Dictionary of New Testament
Words. (London: Oliphants, 1970). Water in this narrative of 7:37-39 bears
a relationship to the Spirit's work.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
45/80
45
discourse".102
His comments now confront their difficulty in
comprehending what He is saying, "Does this cause you to
stumble?" and "What then if you should behold the Son of
Man ascending where He was before?"103 - followership ofJesus focused on being their Messiah. Their expectation was
for the "immanent kingdom" to be political and theocratic
centred on the Jewish Messianic hope, His challenge is
illustrated by His use of Son of Man (which means Messiah in
this context). When saying, "if you should see Him ascend to
where He was before, in the Heavens with the Father - where
then will your hope be?" is the setting of His statement; "It is
the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing; the words I
have spoken to you are spirit and are life".104
This indicates a
direct connection between the Spirit and the Kingdom's
establishment.
3. THE SPIRIT & THE DISCIPLES
A. Promised to them by Jesus - 14:15-16
The background of this passage is vital for the
implications in Jesus words concerning the work of the Spirit
is to "carry on where He left off with the disciples".105
In
John's writing Jesus makes extensive use of the designations
"the Father" and "My Father".106
In this context He says, "I
1026:22-59.
1036:61-62.
1046:62.
10514:1-12.
106The term "The Father" has general reference to the creator and
sustainer, and the Fatherhood of God over all, only as the creator of life
(non-redemptive/relational), whereas the term "My Father, is a favorite
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
46/80
46
will ask the Father"107
saying, "the Spirit will be given to
them". This promise is a definite statement, with the duration
of His presence with them being permanent (c.f. Matthew
28:20"... even to the end of the age).
B. They already had knowledge (experience) of Him throughthe life and ministry of Jesus - 14:17
Jesus proceeded to state they already had knowledge of
the Spirit. The statement of "abides with you" is contrasted
with "will be in you".108
The disciples, (many from the "time
of John the Baptist")109 had lived and ministered with Jesusupon whom the Spirit had descended and remained. The
Spirit had been with them through His empowering of the
person of Jesus. His power had been delegated in the sending
of the twelve.110
Now the future relationship they would
sustain would be "the Spirit's indwelling and empowering of
them."111
The words "they could receive the Spirit of Truth, who
the world could not receive", did not indicate personal
superiority, but their relationship as disciples of the Christ, the
one who gives the Spirit.112
expression of Jesus and implies His personal relationship to deity. E.g. Son
of God.107
14:14.
10814:17.
109Acts 1:22.
110cf. 7:37-39.
11114:17.
112
3:34.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
47/80
47
C. They would have an intimate and internal relationship withHim - 14:17
To understand the 'intimate relationship' - John makesconstant use of personal pronouns regarding the Spirit (e.g. He,
Him). Also the use of (ginosko)113
to contrast the relationship
that the world could not have, but they (the disciples) could
from an internal relationship" - [refer 2:C, page 40-41].
D.He (The Spirit) would continue the "Counsellor"relationship Jesus had already undertaken. - 14:16,25-26;
16:7,13
In various English translations of the Scriptures the noun
(parakletos) has been variously translated; Comforter, Helper,
Guide, Advocate, Intercessor. This variation comes from
etymological meaning of the word, and the understandings of
the interpreters in various contexts. The transitions are from
its use in Classical Greek114
through the LXX,115
to the NewTestament usage where it denotes both a person and a power.
In John's writings the parakletos is the successor of Jesus who
Himself is called parakletos.116
113"ginosko" denotes a personal and true relation between theperson knowing and the object known. Bullinger, p.434.
114The meanings in classical Greek range from call in, send for,
summons, to exhort, comfort, console. G. Braumann "Advocate, Paraclete,
Helper" in Dictionary of N.T. Theology, ed., Colin Brown. (London:
Paternoster 1975), Vol 1, p.88).
115Only LXX use of Job's comforters 16:2. Ibid. p.89.
116
Ibid. p.90.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
48/80
48
Jesus had been the "Counsellor". The disciples will now
have another117
after the pattern of the first one. They are to
respond to Him, through the 'model' of the first.
4. THE TIME OF THE COMING/ SENDING OF THESPIRIT
A. For John the Baptist, this was futuristic in relation to hisown ministry - 1:33; 3:34
The coming of the Spirit to indwell and empower the
people of God (to be later known as believers), was futuristicin relation to the ministry of the Baptist. It was not that the
Spirit had not been previously present and active in the earth.
This would be a different relationship. The Baptist did not
bestow the Spirit. He was the forerunner. A point that John
establishes.118
The Baptist had prepared and looked for the
"Coming One".119
In this context the statements imply, or
establish the coming/impartation of the Spirit, by the Christ to
be physically beyond his ministry.120
B. Not during the "public ministry" of Jesus - 7:9
We have already looked at this passage [see 1.B, pages 38-
39] where John states that "the Spirit was not yet given,
because Jesus was not yet glorified".121
A major aspect of
117"allos" - one beside the one mentioned, denoting a numerical
difference. Bullinger, p.54.
1181:6-8.
1191:27, 30; Matthew 11:3.
120cf. Acts 19:1-7.
121The following Scriptures record both the words of Jesus, and the
understandings of the disciples, in relationship to His "glorification. (1)
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
49/80
49
Johannine theology is the completeness of the work of Jesus,
(death, resurrection, ascension and gifts of the Spirit form a
single theological unity)122
in which one's belief is to be
placed. When the disciples received a personal "breathing ofthe Spirit", it was after Jesus; public ministry, death and
resurrection.123
B. After Jesus had gone away from the disciples through Hisdeath - 16:7; 20:21-23
Jesus had told the Jews He would go where they would
not see Him, the disciples also were given the understanding,this would be by His death, resurrection and ascension.
124For
the disciples the difference is, His going would be "to the
Father".125
Jesus in 16:7 He states the reason for going is, for
the "Counsellor" to come to them, and stressed, "If I go, I will
send Him to you." In 20:21-23 John records Jesus breathing
the Spirit onto the disciples after His resurrection.
D. When Jesus had gone to the Father - 14:16,26; 15:26
These verses further strengthen the mosaic of the Spirit
coming to the disciples, "after He had gone to the Father".
12:16 - Disciples recall the significance of the "triumphal entry", (2) 12: 33
- Jesus words; "the hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified, (3)
13:31ff - After Judas had departed; cf. v:27 hour now ("aorist"), (4) 16:14 -Jesus words; "the Spirit would glorify Him", and, (5) 17: 1 - Jesus prayer;
"Hour has come ... glorify Thou Me".
122Dictionary of N.T. Theo., Vol. 3, p.705.
12320:19ff
1247:34 cf. 13:33.
125They would later join Him through death (6:39 cf. 4:1-6). The
Jews would not be able to join Him in that way.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
50/80
50
They are later supplemented by His words to Mary in the
garden126
are after the resurrection, and before their experience
of the regenerative work of the Spirit in 20:20-23.
5. THE SPIRIT AND THE GODHEAD
A. The Spirit proceeds from the Father and Son - 14:15-16,25-27; 20:21; (Also 15:26).
One of the issues of the early church! While not
discussed here in the 'terms of the Councils',127
the roots of the
concerns are founded in these passages. The context of the
discourses is, Jesus preparing the disciples to continuing
without His physical presence. In these 'Last Discourse"
statements He is promising and commending the Spirit to them
saying, "the Spirit as sent to them from the Father,128
would be
to them what He was to Jesus".129
In 15:26 the intention of
the statement "proceeding from the Father" is to identify the
essence of the Spirit as one with the Father. The Spirit'sprocession on one hand establishes Him as divine in essence,
and on the other confirms His obedient commitment to the
Father. The status of the proceeding Spirit is compared to the
'begotten' Son who cheerfully submits to the divine will (c.f.
Psalm 2:7 40:8).130
12620:17.
127Nicene Creed (325AD); Council of Toledo (598AD).
12814:26.
12914:16-17.
130
Holdcraft. p.55.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
51/80
51
C. The Father sends the Spirit, in response to the Son'srequest - 14:15-16
Jesus' promise of the coming of the Spirit contains twodefinite elements; 1) "I will ask the Father", and 2) "and He
will give..." This is further stressed in subsequent mentions
under the theme of the Spirit coming from the Father in
response to the Son's request.131
The pattern of Jesus asking
from the Father, and receiving are already established in the
disciples' experience.132
When stating, "I will ask", there is an
expectation of being believed.133
D. The Father has given the Son authority to bestow the Spirit3:34; 20:21-22
This authority must be understood along with the other
'aspects of authority' Jesus is given as "Son of Man", from this
authority He bestows the Spirit. The Baptist stated in 3:34,
the Gift of the Spirit would be "without measure", implyingfullness. This is contrasted with his statement in the same
verse, "speaks the words of God".134
In 20:21;22 Jesus not
only speaks declaratively, He "imparts" the Spirit to the
disciples.
13114:16.
13211:22; 12:28.
133This is established by the determined and deliberate nature of
the instructions that follow the discourse of chapters 14-16.
134
Vincent. Vol.2, p.107.
-
7/30/2019 Recontextualizing the Holy Spirit Baptism
52/80
52
E. The Spirit acts in "Divine co-operation", not on His own"Init