recidivism among drugged drivers in norway

5
Recidivism among drugged drivers in Norway A. S. Christophersen, K. M. Beylich, S. Skurtveit and J. Mprland National Institute of Forensic Toxicology, P.O. Box 495 Sentrum, 0105 Oslo, Norway INTRODUCTION. The Norwegian Road Traffic Act prohibits driving under the influence of alcohol and/or other psychoactive drugs. The blood alcohol concentration (BAC) legal limit in Norway is 0,05%. During the last years, approximately 5000 and 1400 drivers have been sentenced per year for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, respectively. There has been a marked increase in the number of drivers apprehended by the police suspected to be influenced by drugs, from about 900 cases in 1983 to more the 3000 each year in 1995 and 1996. During the same time period, the number of drivers suspected to be influenced by alcohol only, has decreased from 11000 to approximately 5500 cases. Thus, drugs are now suspected in about 40% of the Norwegian cases apprehended by the police, due to the suspicion of driving under the influence. From several studies, it has been documented that a large proportion of arrested drunken drivers are repeat offenders (Gjerde and Mprland, 1990, Pikkarainen et al, 1995, Christophersen et al, 1996). However, recidivism among drugged drivers has more or less been unknown, due to the lack of follow-up studies covering this group of arrested drivers. From one former Norwegian study, based on minor selected groups, it was shown that the rearrest rate for drivers influenced by diazepam at selection (1983), was higher (>60%) compared to drunken drivers (32%), when followed for five subsequent years (Gjerde et al. 1988). As the number of drugged drivers in Norway has increased three to four times since 1983, it has been of interest to follow the rearrest rates among larger drugged driving groups apprehended during the last years and also to find if the frequency of offences are connected to drivers with specific drugs or drug combination detected at selection. The purpose of the present investigation was to follow suspected drugged drivers arrested during 1992, for the study of rearrest rates compared to a selected group of drunken drivers, selected from the same year. MATERIALS AND METHODS Blood samples from all Norwegian drivers apprehended due to the suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol or other drugged, are analysed at the National Institute of Forensic Toxicology (NIFT) in Oslo. The cases included in this study were selected from 1992. During this year, NIFT received 2718 samples from drivers suspected to drive under the influence of -803-

Upload: trantruc

Post on 01-Jan-2017

227 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Recidivism among drugged drivers in Norway

Recidivism among drugged drivers in Norway

A. S. C h r isto p h ersen , K . M . B e y lich , S. S k u rtv e it a n d J . M p rla n d

N ational Institu te o f Forensic T oxico logy , P.O. B ox 495 S entrum , 0105 O slo, N orw ay

IN T R O D U C T IO N .

T he N orw egian Road Traffic Act prohibits driving under the influence o f alcohol and/or other

psychoactive d rugs. T he b lood alcohol concentration (BAC) legal lim it in N orw ay is 0 ,0 5 % .

D uring the last years, approxim ately 5000 and 1400 drivers have been sentenced per year fo r

driving under the influence o f alcohol or drugs, respectively. There has been a m arked increase

in the num ber o f drivers apprehended by the police suspected to be influenced by d rugs, from

about 900 cases in 1983 to m ore the 3000 each year in 1995 and 1996. D uring the sam e time

period , the num ber o f drivers suspected to be influenced by alcohol only , has decreased from

11000 to approxim ately 5500 cases. T hus, d rugs are now suspected in about 40% o f the

N orw egian cases apprehended by the police, due to the suspicion o f driv ing under the

influence. F rom several studies, it has been docum ented that a large p roportion o f arrested

d runken drivers are repeat offenders (G jerde and M prland, 1990, P ikkarainen et al, 1995,

C hristophersen et al, 1996). H ow ever, recidivism am ong drugged drivers has m ore o r less

been unknow n, due to the lack o f follow -up studies covering this g roup o f arrested drivers.

F rom one form er N orw egian study, based on m inor selected groups, it w as show n that the

rearrest rate fo r drivers influenced by diazepam at selection (1983), w as h igher (>60% )

com pared to drunken drivers (32% ), w hen follow ed for five subsequent years (G jerde et al.

1988). A s the num ber o f drugged drivers in N orw ay has increased three to fo u r tim es since

1983, it has been o f interest to fo llow the rearrest rates am ong larger d rugged driv ing groups

apprehended during the last years and also to find if the frequency o f offences are connected to

drivers w ith specific d rugs o r d rug com bination detected at selection. The purpose o f the

p resent investigation w as to follow suspected drugged drivers arrested during 1992, fo r the

study o f rearrest ra tes com pared to a selected group o f drunken d rivers , selected from the same

year.

M A T E R IA L S A N D M E T H O D S

Blood sam ples from all N orw egian drivers apprehended due to the suspicion o f driv ing under

the influence o f alcohol o r o ther drugged, are analysed at the N ational Institute o f Forensic

T oxicology (N IFT) in Oslo. The cases included in this study w ere selected from 1992. D uring

th is year, N IF T received 2718 sam ples from drivers suspected to drive under the influence o f

- 8 0 3 -

Page 2: Recidivism among drugged drivers in Norway

drugs alone o r in com bination w ith alcohol. A ll blood sam ples from suspected drugged drivers

with B A C ’s below 0 ,15 % (n=2372) , w ere analysed fo r am phetam ines, benzodiazepines

(B ZD ), opiates, tetrahydrocannabinol (TH C ) and cocaine. D rugs w ere detected in 1415

sam ples, represen ting 1230 d ifferent drivers. T hese, 1230 drugged d rivers w ere included in the

study o f recid iv ism , consisting o f 87,1% (n=1071) m ale and 12,9% (n= 159) fem ale subjects.

The prevalence o f rearrests fo r im paired driving w as fo llow ed prospectively fo r all cases during

the three fo llow ing years from 1992 to 1995. T he selected dm gged drivers w ere registered as a

recid iv ist w hen identified by our data system as a new case received at N IFT for analyses.

F or com parison w ith drunken drivers, 200 subjects from each o f the three fo llow ing BAC

intervals w ere selected random ly from the sam e year (1992): 0 ,0 6 -0 ,0 9 % , 0 ,13 -0 ,16% and

0 ,26 -0 ,2 9 % , o r totally 600 cases (C hristophersen et al 1996), consisting o f 94 ,5% (n=567)

m ale and 5,5% (n=33) fem ale subjects, w ith a m edian age o f 26 years. In 1992, N IF T received

6876 blood sam ples from drivers suspected by the police to be influenced by alcohol only. The

prevalence o f rearrest rates w as follow ed prospectively fo r three years (1992 to 1995). The

drugged and drunken drivers selected from 1992, w ere also traced retrospectively back to 1984,

fo r the registration o f earlier apprehension due to im paired driving.

R E S U L T S

O verall, 54% (n=669) o f the drugged drivers, representing 8,2% fem ale (n=55) and 91 ,8%

m ale (n=614), reappeared in our data system tw ice o r m ore during the 3 -year period , because o f

arrest fo r driv ing under the influence o f d rugs, d rugs com bined w ith alcohol o r alcohol alone.

T he drivers accounted for 1701 rearrests due to drugged or drunken driv ing , o r a m ean o f 2 ,5

reairests per driver. T he rearrest rate w as h igher fo r male drivers (57 ,3% ) com pared to female

(34,6% ). T he age groups m ost frequently rearrested , w ere from 20-29 years (62% ) and from

30-39 years ( 28% ), respectively , w ith a m edian age o f 28 ,0 years. N o significant differences

betw een male and fem ale w ith regard to age distribution w ere recorded . The resu lts are

sum m arised in Table 1.

W hen other offences in addition to driving under the influence w ere traced in our data system

due to blood o r urine sam ples sent to N IFT for analyses, about 60% o f the selected drugged

drivers reappeared.

The m ost com m on d rugs detected am ong drugged drivers in 1992 w ere TF1C (n= 8 4 2 ),

diazepam (n=672), am phetam ine (n=391), flunitrazepam (n=212) and m orphine ( n= 107). F o r

approxim ately 75% o f the selected drivers, tw o or m ore drugs (alcohol included) w ere detected.

N o significant d ifferences in rearrest rates w ere found betw een drivers w ith different d rug(s)

- 8 0 4 -

Page 3: Recidivism among drugged drivers in Norway

detected in their b lood sam ples at selection. The drug(s) detected at rearrest time w ere often

different from the tim e at selection.

The rearrest rate fo r drugged drivers w as about three tim es h igher than fo r drunken drivers

(19% ) arrested during the sam e year (1992) and follow ed prospectively fo r the sam e three

subsequent years to 1995 (Table 1). The rearrest rate fo r drunken drivers increased with

increasing B A C levels (C hristophersen et al, 1996). H ow ever, the frequency o f rearrests

am ong drugged drivers w as tw o tim es h igher com pared drunken drivers selected from the

highest B A C level (27% ).

T ab le 1 : R ea rr ests o f d ru g g ed d r iv ers (n = 1 2 3 0 ) se le c te d in 1 9 9 2

(m a le :n = 1 0 7 1 , fem ale: n = 1 5 9 ) , (m u lti-d r u g u sers: n = 9 1 5 , s in g le -d r u g u se r s:

n = 3 1 5 ), fo llo w e d p r o sp e c tiv e ly (1 9 9 2 -1 9 9 5 ) , co m p a red to rea rrests a m o n g

d ru n k en d r iv ers (n = 6 0 0 ) se le c te d in 1 9 9 2 , fo llo w e d d u rin g th e sa m e tim e

p e r io d .

C ases Frequency (% ) o f

rearrests - total

F requency (%) of

rearrests - m ale

Frequency (% ) o f

rearrests - fem ale

A ge d istri­

bution (%)

D rugged drivers

follow ed

3 years

54 (n=669) 57,3 (n=614) 34,6 (n=55) > 2 0 : 4

20-29: 62

30-39: 28

> 4 0 : 6

Selected with

single drug

47,9 (n=151)

Selected with

tw o/m ore drugs

56,6 (n=518)

D runken drivers

fo llow ed 3 years

19 (n = l 14) 94,5 (n=567) 5,5 (n=33)

W hen the rearrested drugged drivers during 1992-1995, w ere traced retrospectively back to

1984, m ore than 70% had previously been arrested one o r m ore tim es. F o r m ore than 50% o f

the cases, B A C ’s above the legal limit w ere detected. A m ong the rearrested drunken d rivers ,

approxim ately 60% had earlier been arrested during the period from 1984 to 1992.

M ost o f the biological sam ples taken due to forensic autopsy in N orw ay are also sent to N1FT

for d rugs analyses. W hen the register o f rearrested drugged drivers from 1992-1995, w as

com pared to the reg ister o f autopsy cases received at N IFT during the sam e time period , it w as

found that 6 ,6% (n=44) had died during the three years fo llow -up period and 39 o f these

- 805-

Page 4: Recidivism among drugged drivers in Norway

drivers w ere betw een 20 - 39 years old. These cases w ere all from m edico-legal autopsies

analysed fo r drugs at N IFT and thus representing a selected m inim um num ber o f deaths am ong

this population during this time period. The death rate am ong rearrested drivers age 20 - 39

years, w as thus at least 25 tim es higher com pared to the average death-rate in N orw ay for this

age group (0,02% ), according the official statistics. F or about 50% o f these autopsy cases, 6-

m onoacetylm orphine w as detected in their urine sam ples, indicating a heroin related death.

D I S C U S S I O N

O ur results show that the recidivism am ong drugged drivers in N orw ay , seem s to be

significantly h igher than recidivism am ong drunken drivers, w hich have been show n to have

high recidivism rate (G jerde and M prland, 1990, C hristophersen et a l., 1996). W om en

constitu te a m inority o f the drivers suspected for driving under the influence o f drugs o r alcohol

(Skurtveit et al, 1995). B ased on our results, fem ale drivers has also a low er frequency o f

rearrest rate com pared to m ale drivers.

M ost o f the repeated offenders during the period from 1992-1995, had been arrested earlier,

m ainly due to driving under the influence o f alcohol. The results indicate that repeated drunken

offenders, often continue as a drugged offender in roadside traffic. M ost o f the selected

drugged drivers w ere m ulti-drug users (Table 1). H ow ever, our resu lts give no indication that

drivers selected w ith specific drug(s), e .g . illegal drugs com pared to prescribed drugs, were

rearrested m ore often com pared to drivers using o ther drugs. P rescribed drugs (BZD s or

opiates) are m ost often detected at blood concentrations representing drug use in supra

therapeutic doses, often in com bination w ith illegal d rugs o r alcohol. M ulti-drug use, illegal

drugs com bined w ith prescribed drugs at high blood concentrations and a high death rate am ong

drugged offenders com pared to norm al population, indicate that th is g roup o f drivers are over­

represented by drug addicts.

In accordance to the N orw egian Road T raffic L aw , drunken or drugged drivers are convicted to

fines and conditional o r unconditional im prisonm ent, based on the degree o f influence. F o r all

cases, the driv ing licence is suspended fo r at least tw o years.

In 1992, about 800 drugged drivers w ere sentenced, indicating that a large proportion o f

convicted drugged drivers lost their driving licence fo r at least tw o years o f the study period

after 1992. In N orw ay, there is no follow -up system or treatm ent p rogram s connected to drug

abuse, fo r convicted drugged drivers. O n the basis o f the results from this study, show ing high

frequency o f rearrest ra tes, w e conclude that som e sort o f reactions in addition to fines,

im prisonm ent and loss o f driving licence should be considered as additional m easures.

- 806-

Page 5: Recidivism among drugged drivers in Norway

R E F E R E N C E S

C hristophersen , A. S., Beylich K. M ., B jprneboe, A ., Skurtveit, S. and M prland, J. (1996).

Recidivism am ong drunken and drugged drivers in N orw ay. A lcohol & A lcoholism , 31, 6 ,

609-611.

G jerde, H ., B jprneboe, A ., C hristophersen , A. S ., M prland, J., N orm ann , P .T . and

Sakshaug, J. (1988). A five years prospective study o f rearrest fo r driv ing under influence o f

alcohol o r drugs. In: P roceeding o f the Section on A lcohol, drugs and traffic Safety. 35th Int.

C ongress on Alcohol and D rugs D ependence. (S tew art, K. G ., S w eedler, B. and H ughes

C .C ., eds).IS B N : 0 -9621467-0 -6

G jerde, H . and M prland, J. (1990). R epeat offences am ong arrested drunken drivers. J. o f

T raffic M edicine 18, 175-178.

Skurtveit, S., C hristophersen , A. S. and M prland, J. (1995). Fem ale d rivers suspected for

drunken or drugged driv ing . Forensic Sci. Int. 75, 139-148.

P ikkarainen, J., Pen ttila , A . and Seppa, H . (1995). R ecidivism o f drunken driving in F inland

1972-1994. In: A lcohol, d rugs and Traffic Safety. T ’95, (K loeden C. N. and M cLean A. J .

eds.). pp 591-595. N H M R C . R oad A ccident R esearch U nit. T he U niversity o f A delaide. ISB N

0 908204-21-3 .

- 807-