recent achievements in hypernuclear...
TRANSCRIPT
Alessandro FelicielloI.N.F.N. - Sezione di Torino
Recent achievementsin hypernuclear physics
The 22nd European Conferenceon Few-Body Problems in Physics
Kraków, Poland, 9 - 13 September 2013
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Outline
The current status of experimental hypernuclear physics
experimental results:search for neutron-rich hypernucleiantimatter hypernuclei2 N induced hypernucleus weak decay
A look to the (next) future:waiting for J-PARC
2
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Spring 2013 scenario3
completedstand-by
in preparation
running
upgrading
completed
running!
running
running
running
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
First hypernuclei @ J-PARC5
+Λ
+ +→+ KCC 1212π
Σ‐q.f.Λ‐q.f.
g.s.(sΛ)
ex(pΛ)
yield (g.s.): ~600 events
H. Sugimura for the E10 Collaboration @ INPC 2013;` @ APPC12.
@ 1.2 GeV/C
Hadron HallK1.8 line
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Fall 2013 scenario6
completedstand-by
in preparation
running
upgrading
completed
running
running
running
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Search for neutron-rich hypernuclei7
central issue in hypernuclear physics
historical paper: R.H. Dalitz and R. Levi Setti, Nuovo Cimento 30 (1963) 489
unique opportunity to study: - effect of 3-body forces (ΛNN )- ΛN- ΣN coupling contribution to binding en.- hyperon behaviour in n-rich environment
1. Pauli effect not effective for Λ2. Λ extra binding energy
existence of hypernuclei withcore nucleus near (or even beyond)the neutron drip line
w/o hyperons→ stiff EoS
w/ hyperons→ soft EoS I. Vidaña et al., EPL 94 (2011) 11002
direct influence onneutron star EoS
prediction of neutron starmain parameters
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
The status of the art (as of 2011) +
Λ− +−→+ π)2(ZZK AAstop
+Λ
− +−→+ KZZ AA )2(π
• K- + p → π0 + Λ, π0 + p → π+ + n: 2-step (S-EX + C-EX)• K- + p → K0 + n, K0 + p → Λ + π+: 2-step (C-EX + S-EX)• K- + p → π+ + Σ-, Σ- + p → Λ + n: 1-step (S-EX)
• π- + p → π0 + n, π0 + p → K+ + Λ: 2-step (C-EX + AP)• π- + p → K0 + Λ, K0 + p → K+ + n: 2-step (AP + C-EX)• π- + p → K+ + Σ-, Σ- + p → Λ + n: 1-step (AP)
srnbddBLi /9.13.11/:)(1010 ±=ΩΛ σ
KEK
−−Λ ⋅=• stopKluBeHe /103.2..:)( 499
−−Λ ⋅=• stopKluCBe /101.6..:)( 51212
−−Λ ⋅=• stopKluOC /102.6..:)( 51616
−−Λ ⋅±=• stopKluLiH /10)4.15.2(..:)( 566
−−Λ ⋅±=• stopKluLiH /10)4.15.4(..:)( 577
−−Λ ⋅±=• stopKluCBe /10)4.00.2(..:)( 51212
experimental results
P.K. Saha et al., PRL 94 (2005) 052502 T.Y. Tretyakova et al., PAT 66 (2003) 1681
theoretical predictions
KEKexperimental results
theoretical predictions
INFN-LNF
K. Kubota et al., NPA 602 (1996) 327 M. Agnello et al., PLB 640 (2006) 145
−−− ÷ stopK/1010 76 T.Y. Tretyakova et al., NPA 691 (2001) 51c
9
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
12
energy 510 MeV
luminosity 5 1032 cm-2 s-1
σx (rms) 2.11 mm
σy (rms) 0.021 mm
σz (rms) 35 mm
bunch length 30 mm
crossing angle 12.5 mrad
frequency (max) 368.25 MHz
bunch/ring up to 120
part./bunch 8.9 1010
current/ring 5.2 A (max)
FINUDA @ DAΦNE
−Λ
−
+−+−
+→+
→→+
π
φ
ZZΚΚΚee
AAstop
→Λ ZA
nnZnpZ
Z
A
A
A
++
++−
++
−
−
−
)2(
)2( )1()1( π
OSIM
Be window
beam pipe
ISIM
tofino
targets
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
The background issue15
main
background
+Λ
− +−→+ π)2(ZZK AAstop
background subtraction
+Λ
− +→+ πHLiKstop66
..%90@/10)4.15.2(..:)( 566 lcKluLiH stop−−
Λ ⋅±=
M. Agnello et al., PLB 640 (2006) 145Lint ≈ 220 pb-1
+Λ
− +→+ πHLiKstop77
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
The new NRH search strategy
double C-EXp ~ 252 MeV/c
Lint ≈ 1156 pb-1
n.m. decayp ~ 134 MeV/c
apparatus capabilities:
• selective trigger(based on fast scintillator detectors)
• precise K- vertex identification < 1 mm3
(PID + spatial resolution + K- tagging)• π, K, p, d, … separation (OSIM & LMDC dE/dx)• high momentum resolution
6‰ FWHM π− @ 270 MeV/c6% FWHM π− @ 110 MeV/c(tracker performance + He bag + thin target)
+Λ
− +→+ πHLiKstop66
−Λ +→ πHeH 66
16
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Analysis technique+
Λ− +→+ πHLiKstop
66
−Λ +→ πHeH 66
)ms801)(( 6 ≈Heτ
MeV3.10.203 ±=
)()()()(
)()()(56
6262
Λ−Λ+=
−+
Λ
Λ+
Λ
BMHMHM
HMpHM π
M 2(6He) + p2(π −) − M(6He)
)MeV60withMeV3.2035.203( ÷=÷ ΛB
MeV204202:)()(oncut ÷+ −+ ππ TT
if 6HΛ is a stable system ⇒ 2 independent two-body reactions:
decay at rest
atomicmasstables
17
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Data selection
(out of 27 106 stopped K- events)
5H + Λ
3H + 2n + Λ
4HΛ + 2n
0.0 MeV
-1.7 MeV
-3.74 MeV
250 ÷ 255 MeV/c (σp=1.1 MeV/c)130 ÷ 137 MeV/c (σp=1.2 MeV/c)
selection range fixed by including6HΛ lowest particle stability threshold
pπ+ = 251.9 MeV/cpπ- = 135.6 MeV/c
BΛ = 1.5 ÷ 6 MeV
19
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Production ratebackground sources
• accidentals: π+ (250 ÷ 255 MeV/c) and π- (130 ÷ 137 MeV/c) 0.27 ± 0.27 ev.
end point ~190 MeV/cend point ~282 MeV/c 0.16 ± 0.07 ev.nHeLiKstop +++Σ→+• −+− 46 π
n + π +π -
end point ~252 MeV/cp(π-) = 133 MeV/c negligible
+Λ
− +++→+• πnnHLiKstop46
4He + π -π +
production rate
• total background on 6Li: BGD1 + BGD2 = 0.43 ± 0.28 ev.
• Poisson statistics: 3 events DO NOT belong to pure background @ C.L. = 99%
)]on.)(()(/[)2BGD1BGD3()( 6LiKnBRR stop−+−− −−=∗ πεπεπ
−−− ±=∗ stopKBRR /10)0.29.2()( 6π
−−±= stopKR /10)0.49.5( 6H. Tamura et al., PRC 40 (1989) R479
M. Agnello et al., PLB 640 (2006) 145
49.0)( 4 =Λ− HBR π
−−+− ⋅± stopK/10)5.05.2( 54.0
1.0
FINUDA Coll. and A. Gal, PRL 108 (2012) 042501
21
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Akaishi
Kinematics and binding energy
formation mass valuessystematically higher
than the ones from decay
theoretical predictions
BΛ = 4.2 MeV R.H. Dalitz and R. Levi Setti, NC 30 (1963) 489
BΛ = 4.2 MeV L. Majling, NPA 585 (1995) 211c
nrh prod. rate: ~10-2 hyp. prod. rate in (K-stop, π-)
M = (5801.4 ± 1.1) MeV
(0.98 ± 0.74) MeV
BΛ = (4.0 ± 1.1) MeV (5H + Λ)
BΛ = 5.8 MeV (5H + Λ)ΛNN force ≡ 1.4 MeV
excited statesproduction
3)(/5)(/)( 86 =>>=+ Λ HeZNHZYN
FINUDA Coll. and A. Gal, PRL 108 (2012) 042501FINUDA Coll. and A. Gal, NPA 881 (2012) 269
0+ 5800.9 MeV
1+ 5801.9 MeV
22
5802.87
E. Hiyama et al., NPA 908 (2013) 29
A. Gal, D.J. Millener, PLB 725 (2013) 445
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
27
7HeΛ observed
1.5 T
• targets: ~100 mg/cm2
S.N. Nakamura et al., PRL 110 (2013) 012502
large background• q.f. hyperons• accidentals
large background• q.f. hyperons• accidentals
Hall C
HeKeLie ' 77Λ
+−− ++→+
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
28
A=7, T = 1 triplet
S.N. Nakamura et al., PRL 110 (2013) 012502
M. Jurić et al., NPB 52 (1973) 1
Λ
n
nα
p
Λ
n
α
p
Λ
p
α
5.68 ± 0.03 ± 0.25
5.26 ± 0.03
5.16 ± 0.08
M. Jurić et al., NPB 52 (1973) 1
M. Jurić et al., NPB 52 (1973) 1H. Tamura et al., PRL 84 (2000) 5963
BΛ [MeV]He7
Λ
*7 LiΛ
Be7Λ
nb/sr9.91.526dd
±±=⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛
Ωσ
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
MeV020.0050.0B ±=Δ− Λ
29
np n
ΛH4Λ
pnΛpHe4
Λ
I = 0Λ
q = 0Λp = Λn
if the charge symmetryholds exactly
BΛ( ) ≠ BΛ( )H4Λ He4
Λ
Λp more attractive than Λn
possible explanations: • ΛΣ0 mixing• ΛN – ΣN coupling
A.R. Bodmer et al., PRC 31 (4) (1985) 1400
Charge symmetry breaking (?)
np n
Λ pnΛp
M. Bedjidian et al., PLB 83 (1979) 252
Coulomb effect is small: •• MeV015.0025.0B* ±=Δ−
Λ
He4ΛH4
Λ
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
30
Charge symmetry breaking (?)
Λ
nnα
He7Λ
pΛ
nα
*7 LiΛ
pΛ
pα
Be7Λ
S.N. Nakamura et al., PRL 110 (2013) 012502 M. Jurić et al., NPB 52 (1973) 1M. Jurić et al., NPB 52 (1973) 1H. Tamura et al., PRL 84 (2000) 5963
E. Hiyama et al., PRC 80 (2009) 054321
exp.th.th. + CSB
MeV03.068.5)He,1/2( 7 ±=+ΛΛB
MeV36.5)th.( =ΛB
MeV16.5)CSB th.( =+ΛB
MeV28.5)th.( =ΛB
MeV29.5)CSB th.( =+ΛB
MeV03.026.5),1/2Li( *7 ±=+ΛΛB
MeV08.016.5)Be,1/2( 7 ±=+ΛΛB
MeV44.5)CSB th.( =+ΛB
MeV21.5)th.( =ΛB
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
31
Expanding the horizon…H. Tamura
B.I. Abelev et al., Science 328 (2010) 58.
He4
updated from
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
32
Hypernuclei in HI collisions
+Λ
−Λ
+→
+→
π
π
HeH
HeH33
33
TeV76.2@PbPb =+ NNS
topological cuts• cos(pointing angle) > 0.9• DCA π track to PV > 0.4 cm• DCA between tracks < 0.7 cm• pT(3He,π) > 1 GeV/c• cτ > 1 cm
R. Lea, NPA 914 (2013) 415.
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
33
Hypernuclei in HI collisions
R. Lea, NPA 914 (2013) 415.
• μ = 2.990 ± 0.001 GeV/c2
• σ = (3.35 ± 0.70) × 10-3 GeV/c2
• Nraw = 119 ± 35• S/√(S+B) = 4.6
• μ = 2.993 ± 0.001 GeV/c2
• σ = (2.00 ± 1.20) × 10-3 GeV/c2
• Nraw = 77 ± 22• S/√(S+B) = 3.6
~23 × 106 events
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
35
STAR 3HΛ signal
+Λ
−Λ
+→
+→
π
π
HeH
HeH33
33
GeV200@AuAu +
B.I. Abelev et al., Science 328 (2010) 58.
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
36
Hypernuclei in HI collisions
B.I. Abelev et al., Science 328 (2010) 58.
Signal observed from the data(bin-by-bin counting [2.986,2.996] GeV): 602±63, significance: 9.6σ
Background estimation: rotated background
J.H. Chen @ HYP 2012.Y. Zhu, NPA 904-905 (2013) 551c.
STAR preliminary
~610 × 106 events
• μ = 2.989 ± 0.001 ± 0.002 GeV/c2
• σ ≡ 0.0025 GeV/c2
• significance = 5.2 σ
• μ = 2.991 ± 0.001 ± 0.002 GeV/c2
• σ ≡ 0.0025 GeV/c2
• significance = 4.1 σ
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
39
New 3HΛ τ measurement
STAR 2012 preliminary result:
STAR 2010 + 2012 combined fit:
ps10123 2622 ±±=τ
ps138 2320±=τ
STAR preliminary
H li
fetim
e(ps
)3 Λ
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
PR136,6B(1964)
PRL20,819(1968)
PR180,1307(1969)
NPB16,46(1970)
PRD1,66(1970)
NPB67,269(1973)
STARSCIENCE
328,58(2010)
STARPreliminary
(pdg) Λfree (STAR Preliminary) Λ
STAR 2012 ResultDalitz, 1962
STAR preliminary
J.H. Chen @ HYP 2012.Y. Zhu, NPA 904-905 (2013) 551c.
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
2N induced weak decay
E. Botta, T. Bressani, G. Garbarino, EPJA 48 (2012) 21
several experimental evidences, but indirect
“smoking gun” evidence missing!
relevance first pointed out by: W.M. Alberico et al., PLB 256 (1991) 134
key role in data interpretation many theoretical predictionsE. BauerG. GarbarinoA. ParreñoA. Ramos
importance of the effect: ~20-25% of the total NMWD width
experimental hardness: 3 nucleons emitted from Λ-hypernucleus g.s.4-fold coincidence measurement (π-, p, n, n)
42
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
2N induced decay exp. evidencetriple coincidence: (n + n + p) events
exclusive Λnp → nnp decay event:
pπ- = 276.9 ± 1.2 MeV/cpmiss = 217 ± 44 MeV/cEtot = 178 ± 23 MeVMM = 3710 ± 23 MeV/c2
E(n1) = 110 ± 23 MeVE(n2) = 16.9 ± 1.7 MeVE(p) = 51.11 ± 0.85 MeV
ϑ(n1 n2) = 94.8° ± 3.8°ϑ(n1 p) = 102.2° ± 3.4°ϑ(n2 p) = 154° ± 19°
no n-n or p/n scattering
nnpHeLi +++→Λ47
first, direct experimental evidence
M. Agnello et al., NPA 881 (2012) 322
43
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
2N induced decay exp. evidence
pπ- = 276.5 ± 1.2 MeV/c Pmiss = 447 ± 18 MeV/cEtot = 147.1 ± 4.2 MeVMM = 3720.3 ± 4.7 MeV/c2
E(n1) = 21 ± 2.0 MeVE(n2) = 35.3 ± 3.6 MeVE(p) = 90.83 ± 0.50 MeV
ϑ(n1 n2) = 126.5° ± 5.4°ϑ(n1 p) = 53.5° ± 4.3°ϑ(n2 p) = 124.6° ± 3.9°
no n-n or p/n scattering
triple coincidence: (n + n + p) events
exclusive Λnp → nnp decay event: nnpHeLi +++→Λ47
44
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
2N induced decay exp. evidencetriple coincidence: (n + n + p) events
exclusive Λnp → nnp decay event: nnpHHeBe ++++→Λ339
pπ- = 286.7 ± 1.2 MeV/c Pmiss = 253 ± 18 MeV/cEtot = 123.5 ± 4.9 MeVMM = 5617.3 ± 5.0 MeV/c2
E(n1) = 20.2 ± 2.5 MeVE(n2) = 31.5 ± 4.2 MeVE(p) = 71.77 ± 0.80 MeV
ϑ(n1 n2) = 133.6 °± 7.5°ϑ(n1 p) = 128.5°± 5.5°ϑ(n2 p) = 95.4°± 3.6°
no n-n or p/n scattering
45
Ales
sand
ro F
elic
iello
22nd
Euro
pean
Con
fere
nce
on F
ew-B
ody
Prob
lem
s in
Phys
ics
Krak
ów, P
olan
d, S
epte
mbe
r 9 –
13, 2
013
Summary58
ALICE @ LHCSTAR @ RHIC
FINUDA @ DAΦNE HKS @ CEBAF
E… @ J-PARC
dedicatedfacilities
dedicatedexperiments
a good wealth of interesting and sometimeunexpected hypernuclear physics results
has been recently produced
no longer running ornot dedicated experiments
we are now looking forward fornew and exciting world class results @