re-evaluation of a flood control project · flood control design; however, it would appear little...

20
Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project Presentation for the Tri-Service Conference By Ferris W. Chamberlin, P.E. August 2005 Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project Presentation for the Tri-Service Conference By Ferris W. Chamberlin, P.E. August 2005

Upload: others

Post on 09-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

Re-Evaluationof a

Flood Control Project

Presentationfor the

Tri-Service ConferenceBy

Ferris W. Chamberlin, P.E.

August 2005

Re-Evaluationof a

Flood Control Project

Presentationfor the

Tri-Service ConferenceBy

Ferris W. Chamberlin, P.E.

August 2005

Page 2: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 2

St. Paul District

Page 3: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 3

Eau Galle Reservoir

Page 4: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 4

Cross Lake Dam

Page 5: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 5

Water Control Manuals

Page 6: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 6

North Dakota

Page 7: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 7

Tools of the Trade

Page 8: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 8

Northeast North Dakota

Page 9: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 9

The Dust Bowl

Page 10: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 10

Homme Reservoir

Page 11: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 11

Park River Basin

Page 12: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 12

Jan Feb Mar Apr

Grafton 0.60 0.44 0.89 1.52Park River 0.61 0.46 0.92 1.66

Average Monthly Rainfall

Page 13: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 13

3.0 inches 2001 0.1 inches 20002.5 inches 1999 3.0 inches 19988.0 inches 1997 2.5 inches 19963.4 inches 1995 1.4 inches 19940.2 inches 1993 1.1 inches 1992

Spring Runoff

Page 14: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 14

Runoff: 8 inches Drawdown: 1064.0 feet

The Pool Rose Accordingly:Date Pool Inflow

13 Apr 1066.97 5414 Apr 1068.37 12615 Apr 1076.25 64116 Apr 1080.90 763 (over spillway)17 Apr 1081.87 1042

Peak Inflow was 3,093 cfs on 21 April.

Flood of 1997

Page 15: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 15

1997 Flood

x x x x x x x x x x

Page 16: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 16

Runoff: 3.0 inches Drawdown: 1072.0 ft

The Pool Rose Accordingly:Date Pool Inflow4 Apr 1073.11 825 Apr 1073.72 926 Apr 1076.71 3317 Apr 1081.22 1060 (over spillway)8 Apr 1082.15 14209 Apr 1082.26 1,540 (peak inflow)

Flood of 2001

Page 17: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 17

2001 Flood

x x x x xx

xx

Page 18: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 18

Runoff: 0.24 inches Drawdown: 1065.3 ftThe Pool Rose Accordingly:Date Pool Inflow6 Apr 1075.01 185 (peak inflow)7 Apr 1077.08 1728 Apr 1078.60 1309 Apr 1079.78 119

10 Apr 1080.23 109 (storage gone)

Peak outflow was 104 cfs on 10 April.

Spring of 1993

Page 19: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 19

Over an Inch of Runoff1. Flood storage is gone days before the

peak inflow arrives.2. Drawdown has no impact on peak

pool or peak discharge.Under an Inch of Runoff

1. Maximum outflow is within channelcapacity with or without drawdown.

Conclusions of Analysis

Page 20: Re-Evaluation of a Flood Control Project · flood control design; however, it would appear little time was spent on the flood control analysis. There was a war going on. How sharp

One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation21 Apr 05 20

Water Supply was primary goal.The Tools of the time were adequate for the

flood control design; however, it wouldappear little time was spent on the floodcontrol analysis.

There was a war going on.How sharp are we now?

We’ve been drawing the reservoir downevery winter since 1950.

What Were The Designers Up To?