ray · Ïarin update statistics policy activity Ïwsis. seattle may 2005 internet number resource...
TRANSCRIPT
May 2005Seattle
OverviewOverview
NRO Update► Internet Number Statistics► Policy ActivityARIN Update► Statistics► Policy ActivityWSIS
May 2005Seattle
Internet Number Resource Status Internet Number Resource Status ReportReport
As of 31 March 2005As of 31 March 2005
Prepared byPrepared byRegional Internet RegistriesRegional Internet Registries
AFRINIC, APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC and RIPE NCCAFRINIC, APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC and RIPE NCC
May 2005Seattle
IPv4 /8 Address Space Status IPv4 /8 Address Space Status
1
16 20
2
16
94
(*)
AFR
INIC
APN
ICARIN
LACN
ICRIP
E N
CC
Cen
tral
Reg
istr
y
Allocated
73IANAReserved
Available
1
1
16
16
Public Use
Multicast
Not Available
(*) AFRINIC block was allocated on April 11th by IANA
May 2005Seattle
IPv4 Allocations from RIRs to IPv4 Allocations from RIRs to LIRsLIRs/ISPs Yearly Comparison/ISPs Yearly Comparison
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
/8
s
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
AFRINIC
APNIC
ARIN
LACNIC
RIPE NCC
May 2005Seattle
APNIC11.1 34%
AFRINIC0.1
0.4%
LACNIC0.62%
RIPE NCC10.2 31%
ARIN10.9 33%
IPv4 AllocationsIPv4 AllocationsRIRs to RIRs to LIRsLIRs/ISPs/ISPs
Cumulative Total (Jan 1999 Cumulative Total (Jan 1999 –– March 2005)March 2005)
May 2005Seattle
ASN AssignmentsASN AssignmentsRIRs to RIRs to LIRsLIRs/ISPs/ISPs
Yearly ComparisonYearly Comparison
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
AFRINICAPNICARINLACNICRIPE NCC
May 2005Seattle
AFRINIC1141%
LACNIC6453%
APNIC2789 11%
ARIN12331 51%
RIPE NCC8369 34%
ASN AssignmentsASN AssignmentsRIRs to RIRs to LIRsLIRs/ISPs/ISPs
Cumulative Total (Jan 1999 Cumulative Total (Jan 1999 –– March 2005)March 2005)
May 2005Seattle
IANA IPv6 Allocations to RIRs IANA IPv6 Allocations to RIRs (no of /23s)(no of /23s)
28
4
1
34
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
APNIC ARIN LACNIC RIPE NCC
APNIC
ARIN
LACNIC
RIPE NCC
May 2005Seattle
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
AFRINICAPNICARINLACNICRIPE NCC
IPv6 AllocationsIPv6 AllocationsRIRs to RIRs to LIRsLIRs/ISPs/ISPs
Yearly ComparisonYearly Comparison
* new and additional allocations
May 2005Seattle
IPv6 Allocations IPv6 Allocations RIRs to RIRs to LIRsLIRs/ISPs/ISPs
Cumulative Total (Jan 1999 Cumulative Total (Jan 1999 –– March 2005)March 2005)
LACNIC182%
AFRINIC2
0%
ARIN13517%
APNIC19324%
RIPE NCC46157%
May 2005Seattle
Total IPv6 Allocations from RIRs Total IPv6 Allocations from RIRs to to LIRsLIRs/ISPs Top 10 Countries/ISPs Top 10 Countries
114
82
75
49
45
31
30
28
19
19
US
JP
DE
UK
NL
KR
IT
FR
SE
CH
May 2005Seattle
Policy DiscussionsPolicy Discussions
•••
•••
•••
•••
•
Privacy of Privacy of WHOIS dataWHOIS data
IPv6 Policy IPv6 Policy ChangesChanges
IANA IANA Allocation Allocation
IPv6 to RIRsIPv6 to RIRsRIRRIR
May 2005Seattle
IPv6 Policy DiscussionsIPv6 Policy Discussions
••
•••
End UserEnd User/48/48HD RatioHD RatioRIRRIR
May 2005Seattle
Links to RIR StatisticsLinks to RIR Statistics
• Raw Data/Historical RIR Allocations:http://www.aso.icann.org/stats/index.htmlhttp://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
• RIR Stats:http://www.apnic.net/info/reports/index.htmlhttp://www.arin.net/statistics/index.htmlhttp://www.lacnic.net/en/est.htmlhttp://www.ripe.net/info/stats/
May 2005Seattle
ARIN StatisticsARIN Statistics
May 2005Seattle
MembershipMembership
2051
1414
207
1Indonesia1Japan1Guam3Australia6Outside ARIN
15 April 200515 April 2005Total Total –– 2,2782,278
May 2005Seattle
533,25144,437Templates Processed
16,680
374,218
Total
1,390Phone Calls
31,184E-mail
MonthlyCategory
Registration Services Help DeskRegistration Services Help Desk20042004
Note: ~ 80% of Templates are Processed AutomaticallyNote: ~ 80% of Templates are Processed Automatically
May 2005Seattle
Registry ActivityRegistry Activity
511,7731.272003401,5461.662004
/32 AllocationsASNs Assigned/8 AllocationsYear
TotalTotal
New SubscribersNew Subscribers
0020254020030020206832004
Ex Large> /14
Large> /16 - /14
Medium> /19 - /16
Small/20 - /19
Ex Small/24 - < /20
Year
May 2005Seattle
Last CallLast CallLame Delegations2005-3
DeferredDeferredDirectory Services Overhaul2005-2
DeferredDeferredProvider Independent IPv6 Assignments for End Sites2005-1
Last CallLast CallAllocation of IPv6 Address Space by the IANA to the RIRs2004-8
Last CallLast CallGlobal Addresses for Private NetworkInter-Connection
2004-3
Abandoned: 0Abandoned: 0Deferred: 2Deferred: 2Last Call: 3Last Call: 3
ARIN XV Policy ActivityARIN XV Policy Activity
May 2005Seattle
Policy DecisionPolicy Decision
Formally Recognized Formally Recognized –– 8 April 20058 April 2005NRPM Section 4.8 NRPM Section 4.8 –– Suspended 8 April 2005Suspended 8 April 2005
world summiton the information societyGeneva 2003 – Tunis 2005
May 2005Seattle
WSISWSIS
Statement of PrinciplesPlan of ActionImplementation of the Plan
What is the expected outcome?
Concern for the ad hoc nature of the InternetWhy does it exist?
Define & implement actions for governance of the Internet
What it supposed to do?
A UN Created Activity.What is it?
May 2005Seattle
International Governmental International Governmental RegulationRegulationProposedProposed
Community SelfCommunity Self--regulationregulationNowNow
Governance ModelsGovernance Models
May 2005Seattle
Current ModelCurrent Model
NANOG & ARIN have evolved to provide:Community Based Policy DevelopmentTechnical and Engineering Decisions/control
May 2005Seattle
National Government National Government PowersPowers
Any national government can:►Tax the internet;►Limit public access to some internet content
(e.g., pornography or political dissent);►Protect consumers from fraud;►Regulate who has access to the internet.Government power can be used for good or bad purposes.
May 2005Seattle
TodayToday’’s Government s Government InvolvementInvolvement
In the US –Federal and State agencies prosecute
Internet CrimeIntellectual Property Rights Extended to
InternetFirst Amendment Protections Apply
May 2005Seattle
Community BasedCommunity BasedPolicy DevelopmentPolicy Development
Members direct activity;Open email lists;Open policy meetings;Governing board is elected;Minutes of meetings published;Private, not governmental, technical direction.
May 2005Seattle
Why NotWhy NotThe Current Model?The Current Model?
It’s insufficiently controlled by governmental authority; Doesn’t adequately permit international taxation and regulation;Too capitalistic, too private sector;Allege it insufficiently represents “civil society.”
What this is really about is power.What this is really about is power.
May 2005Seattle
WSIS RisksWSIS Risks
UN Based Governance Body –Political based decisions NOT technology
based decisions;Dismantle or make irrelevant current “bottom
up” policy process;Responsive to politicians not users.
May 2005Seattle
What About the ITU?
WSIS In Your WSIS In Your Future?Future?
May 2005Seattle
What Can You Do?
WSIS In Your WSIS In Your Future?Future?
