rationale for interoperable metadata

54
GSLIS 2006 Museums and information technologies Muriel Foulonneau ([email protected]) Grainger Engineering Library University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Digital Library Research Lab. May 2006

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jan-2022

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

GSLIS 2006

Museums and information technologies

Muriel Foulonneau ([email protected])

Grainger Engineering LibraryUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Digital Library Research Lab. May 2006

Page 2: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 2

Several topics of interest

Visitors at the center of the museum information system Digitization of sound archives Multilingual access to heritage material Some thoughts about the future?

Page 3: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 3

Participation of museums visitors

Page 4: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 4

Street art exhibition

Page 5: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 5

Experience

http://hiphoponline.fr/http://jpadalbera.free.fr/hiphop/expo.htm

Page 6: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 6

Virtual and real environments

The Pong Mythos exhibition

A set of emulators

Page 7: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 7

User contributions

eStage and the European pupetteers

Community driven museums

Page 8: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 8

The visitor’s experience as a contribution

The CHIMER project A geo-heritage game

Page 9: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 9

Children document their favorite places

Page 10: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 10

Monitoring the user experience

Page 11: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 11

Customer Relationship Management

Subscription-based applications Eg. SCRAN

Following user behaviors on the museums Website National Museum of Australia

=> monitoring list of friends

=> donators

=> information requests / reservations etc Phone orientation systems Various actors of an exhibition / event => predicting future opportunities =>More efficient interactions with visitors and contributors

Page 12: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 12

The visit

Before the visit Discovering Planning

During the visit Navigating (PDA etc) Interacting Creating

After the visit Getting something back Maintaining a relationship?

Page 13: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 13

Planning a vist

Page 14: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 14

User Profiles

Page 15: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 15

Various levels of analysis

Eg. A Closer look

http://www.louvre.fr/llv/dossiers/liste_oal.jsp

Page 16: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 16

Modifying the role of visitors

Customization of The relation to the museum The visit

User is both a user and a contributor Collective experiences Creative experiences Museum is the place of collective memory

collective storytelling

Page 17: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 17

Digitization of sound recordings

Page 18: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 18

Digitization of sound recordings

A strategic report Sound is neglected

A lot of endangered material Costs more to digitize No appropriate inventories No appropriate means of reading them

Ethnography: music and talks, regional or from abroad Museums and regional societies, associations for regional

heritage Sound heritage – music, atmosphere …

Archives Oral history

Radio

Page 19: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 19

Research activities around sound records

Preservation Duration of media

Music composition / retrieval / representation / tagging / advance browsing interfaces

DRM

Automatic indexing

Page 20: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 20

A portal for sound recordings

2000 hours on CD Roms Database access?

How to make sound recordings available?

Page 21: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 21

A portal for sound recordings

In collaboration with IRCAM Issues: availability of the curator and IPR

http://www.archison-culture.fr.eu.org/sdx-ircam/planson/

Page 22: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 22

Partial or total transcription of talk

Page 23: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 23

Documentation of music and instruments

Page 24: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 24

Multiple partitions

Page 25: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 25

Score of one particular instrument

Page 26: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 26

Multilingual access to heritage applications

Page 27: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 27

Some issues

Understanding the query Identifying the language Various alphabets

Representing / storing the content Unicode

Multilingual search 2 strategies for full text Multilingual thesauri

Returning a meaningful snippet Attempt with Babylon for TEL

Returning a meaningful document Better if images Additional comments etc

Page 28: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 28

Querying a system

A single interface to query a multilingual database

An interface to query in a different language if no access to a device to perform query in the target language

The system must identify the language

Page 29: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 29

Thesauri – some difficulties

Cultural concepts How many languages?

?

T

T

T

T

Page 30: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 30

Multilingual thesaurus: a collaborative work

Inventaire in France Catalogo (ICCU) in Italy

Page 31: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 31

MACs: Multilingual search

http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/mrt/numerisation/fr/eeurope/minerva_031003.htm

LCSHSWD

B n F database BL database

RAMEAU L CSH

RAMEAU

MACS

S N L

databaseMACS

D D B database

SWD

Slide Elisabeth Freyre, French National Library

Page 32: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 32

MACs: query expansion

LCSHSWD

B n Fdatabase

B Ldatabase

RAMEAU L CSH

RAMEAU

MACS

MACS

S N Ldatabase

D D Bdatabase

SWD

http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/mrt/numerisation/fr/eeurope/minerva_031003.htmSlide Elisabeth Freyre, French National Library

Page 33: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 33

Towards a terminology service

Amateur theater

Amateur theater

Shadow shows

Street theater

Laienspiel

L iebhabertheater

Schattenspiel

Strassentheater

Base B L

RAMEAU

L CSH

T héâtre d’amateurs

T héâtre d’amateurs

T héâtre d’ombres

T héâtre de rue

MACS

BaseS N L

MACS

Base D D B

SWD

Slide Elisabeth Freyre, French National Library

http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/mrt/numerisation/fr/eeurope/minerva_031003.htm

Page 34: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 34

Searching multilingual information

Full text search is a meta-search Translating documents or query Thesaurus and ontologies

Query

Documents

Page 35: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 35

Translation of records or snippets for display

Mostly manual Several services allow on the fly translation

Eg attempt with Babylon for The European Library

Page 36: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 36

A metadata record

<oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">

<title>Raznoshchitsa Kalendarei i Zhurnalov. Une femme vendant des Calendriers et des Journaux. Ein Weib welches Kalender und Journale herumträgt.</title>

<source>Volshebnoi fonar'</source> <description>Image was captured using Epson ### scanner and SilverFast import

utility in Adobe Photoshop 6. Scanned at 42->24 Bit Colour at 300 dpi. No archival images were created, but access images were created as JPEGs with quality of 0.</description>

<rights>Contact the owner of the material for copyright information. If you have comments relating to this record, please contact the Slavic and East European Library, http://www.library.uiuc.edu/spx/.</rights>

<identifier>http://images.library.uiuc.edu:8081/u?/RussianPublics,31</identifier>

</oai:dc>

=> Using xml:lang

Page 37: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 37

Multilingual retrieval

http://dis.shef.ac.uk/mark/demos/Eurovision/Eurovision-church-tree.htm

Page 38: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 38

Translations ambiguities

http://dis.shef.ac.uk/mark/Clarity-flash/space_shuttle.htm

Page 39: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 39

http://dis.shef.ac.uk/mark/demos/CiQuest/eglise.htm

Browsing results

Page 40: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 40

Co-occurences and content-based clustering

Clusters

Page 41: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 41

Localizing a Website

For international audience Eg touristic impact

For minorities Localization is not translation

Cultural elements depend on

Page 42: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 42

Differences

Web exposure effect Bandwidth Richness of hyperlinks

Designer exposure Usage of icons instead of text, usage of sound etc

General complexity of Webpage structure Colors

Red – green and yellow for Spain, Grey – green and blue in France, white and grey in Germany

Work with layers Texts in Spanish tend to be longer than in English

Page 43: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 43

Several issues with multilingual systems

Sometimes term translation is impossible Culture Names

Source language is unknown There is no direct path from source to target language Translation is not equivalent (eg summaries) Maintaining terminology services Information systems to handle multiple alphabets /

transliterations Localization is not translation

“North Street, St. Andrews”

Page 44: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 44

Conclusions

Page 45: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 45

Using heritage to develop technologies

IST program more and more oriented towards Contextualization User experience and involvement Technologies mostly used in the museum domain: GIS, 3D,

virtual environments … Complex and non textual objects

Digicult approach How technologies can be used in the heritage field

=> most of the time, it applies technologies developed in other contexts

=> BUT an illustration, a resource for testing and improving technologies etc

Page 46: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 46

From digital libraries to heritage applications

How do you integrate the experience? Story telling Representation of material Contextualization Interactions with users and user as a contributor: community

building

Page 47: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 47

The future of digital heritage

‘Difficult to answer given that of late there appears to be the tendency to do it like the Americans and let technology lead design, not like Europeans in the past, particularly in Scandinavia, where design lead technology…’, Elizabeth Selandia – Art Historian, Member of VRA, USA

Statements from the DigiCULT online consultation

forum, October/November 2004

Page 48: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 48

Ambient intelligence technologies

‘[…] making a door knob able to compute and communicate does not make it intelligent: the key (and challenge) to really adding wit to the environment lies in the way the system learns and keeps up to date with the needs of the user by itself.’ Jari Ahola

Page 49: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 49

Some examples

The thinking carpet - Infineon Technologies AG (Munich, Germany) The floor could re-organize itself to guide visitors “distributed browser approach” Philips Research

MyLifeBits project by the Microsoft BARC Media Presence Group. I could “meet with my ancestors”

Tourism in space and time: virtual environments

Information pick up eg. in an exhibition

Interfaces to create content: “words can be written in the air and are converted into a document format.” MicroInfinity

Page 50: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 50

Consequences for professionals

Museum curators as scientists They build collections They tell stories based on those collections They attract visitors

Page 51: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 51

Museum informatics

Information system Administration

Collections management Experience

Improve the experience of a visit Discovery

Sharing collections and building a Website Science

Researching museum objects

Page 52: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 52

Particular usage of technologies

The experience Virtual environments Haptic interfaces GIS

=> conveying the experience through entertainment, eg. Video games

Administration Collaboration Including inventories CRM Contributive model (?)

Page 53: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 53

Particular usage of technologies

Discovery Quality: Authentication of information sources Selected pieces Relations to different networks:

Culture, Tourism and Education Content sharing

How do you represent my content? Research

Describing: not for public use Few things to read: particular interest of multilingual technologies Finding relations between works:

Content based analysis is a primary methodology in art history but also in history

=> create my own exhibition

Page 54: Rationale for Interoperable Metadata

May, [email protected] of Illinois at UC 54

References

Chimer http://www.chimer.org

Portal for sound recording http://www.archison-culture.fr.eu.org/sdx-ircam/planson

Digicult info Thematic Issue 7: The Future Digital Heritage Space, December 2004 http://www.digicult.info/pages/Themiss.php

Hip hop online http://hiphoponline.fr/

Seminar on Access to multilingual heritage resourceshttp://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/mrt/numerisation/fr/

eeurope/minerva_031003.htm