rating the learning space rating system (207006890)

23
8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890) http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 1/23 Berkeley’s Experience  LSRS vs. Benchmarking ELI | Jenn Stringer, ACIO Academic Engagement Brenda Farmer | Owen McGrath | Nicole Sattler| Chris Washington

Upload: educause

Post on 04-Jun-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 1/23

Berkeley’s Experience

 LSRS vs.BenchmarkingELI | Jenn Stringer, ACIO Academic Engagement

Brenda Farmer | Owen McGrath | Nicole Sattler| Chris Washington

Page 2: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 2/23

Berkeley Context● Student Population: ~35,000

● Faculty: ~2000

● 218 General Assignment (GA) Classrooms

○ 25 Lecture Halls > 100 seats

○ 4 Lecture Halls > 400 seats

● 1 GA Active Learning Classroom

● 50 Web/screencast Classrooms● 13 Classrooms w/o A/V Technology

 

Page 3: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 3/23

Page 4: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 4/23

Classroom Selection:

● Seminar Room (15 seats)● Small Classroom (22 seats)

● Active Learning Classroom (30 seats)

Learning Spaces Rating System

Page 5: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 5/23

Seminar Room (15)LSRS score: (19/33)

Page 6: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 6/23

Small Classroom (22)LSRS score: (19/33)

Page 7: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 7/23

Active Learning Classroom (30)LSRS score: (23/33)

Page 8: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 8/23

Page 9: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 9/23

● Aligned with our A/V Standards!● Aligned our customer services!

● Made us think partnerships

● Made us think process

● Made us think service● Thorough

Learning Spaces Rating SystemStrengths

Page 10: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 10/23

● Dependencies on departments and/or SMEs

● Topics - Criterion unclear or overlap

● Ratings subjective when trying to compare to

other universities

● Too many ways to “game” the ratings● Innovation hard to quantify w/o feedback from

end-users

Learning Spaces Rating SystemChallenges

Page 11: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 11/23

Ensure UC Berkeley maintains the highest quality services to

support research and teaching by:

● Benchmarking Berkeley technology services with peer

institutions

● Developing a set of recommendations around future

resource realignment and investments● Fostering collaboration and a shared understanding across

domains and service areas

Research & Academic Engagement(RAE) Benchmarking

Page 12: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 12/23

RAE BenchmarkingDefine Research Share

Identify Peer Institutions Gather Benchmarking

Data from UniversityWebsites

Narrative Summary of

Research Findings

Define Service Areas Record Data in

Worksheets

Group Presentation &

Discussion

Assign Researchers Follow-up Phone/EmailInterviews One Page ExecutiveSummary

Page 13: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 13/23

● Examined Learning spaces in classrooms,

libraries and computer facilities● Benchmarked against the following criteria:

○ Program/Portfolio Management

○ Ecosystem Integration

○ Support, Training & Documentation

○ Service Maturity

RAE Benchmarking

Page 14: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 14/23

Page 15: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 15/23

LSRS R E Benchmarking

Consistent tool Self-defined criterion

Internally focused Externally focused

Facility focused Service focused

Construction/Resources Strategic Planning

Lots of work Lots of work

Page 16: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 16/23

Recommendations for LSRS

● Create a peer network for the LSRS

● Define reports and or context for key high levelstakeholders

● Develop a better way to recognize space

characteristics e.g. age, discipline, use

Page 17: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 17/23

Questions/Discussion

Page 18: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 18/23

Field Survey

Wheeler Hall

Page 19: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 19/23

FieldSurvey

BarrowsHall

 ALC

Page 20: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 20/23

FieldSurvey

BarrowsHall

 ALC

Page 21: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 21/23

Field

Survey

WheelerHall

Page 22: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 22/23

Field

Survey

Wheeler

Hall

Page 23: Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

8/13/2019 Rating the Learning Space Rating System (207006890)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rating-the-learning-space-rating-system-207006890 23/23