rating sheets

Upload: nov-dyoll-amsedel-nerol

Post on 02-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    1/13

    Republic of the Philippines

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

    Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

    Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013

    Subject Taught: English 6 Date: _____________________________

    Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________

    Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

    Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below

    that corresponds to each item.

    Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory

    94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair

    ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U

    I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.

    B. There was congruence between

    1. Objective and subject matter

    2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching

    3. Objective and formative test/evaluation

    4.Objective assignment

    II. TEACHING METHODS

    A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the

    students.

    B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the

    students capabilities.

    C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.

    D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.

    III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

    A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:

    1. Attendance

    2. Assignment/Homework

    3. Practice Exercise

    4.Group work/Project

    5. Passing in and out of the room

    http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67
  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    2/13

    6. Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

    B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom

    C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her

    teaching.

    IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS

    A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.

    C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers

    skillful questioning.

    D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.

    E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.

    F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was

    legible enough to be read and understood.

    V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY

    A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.

    B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to

    disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.

    The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

    Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

    (Master Teacher II)

    Designation: Cooperating Teacher

  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    3/13

    Republic of the Philippines

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

    Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

    Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013

    Subject Taught: Hekasi 6 Date: _____________________________

    Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________

    Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

    Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below

    that corresponds to each item.

    Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory

    94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair

    ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U

    I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.

    B. There was congruence between

    1. Objective and subject matter

    2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching

    3. Objective and formative test/evaluation

    5.Objective assignment

    II. TEACHING METHODS

    A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the

    students.

    B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the

    students capabilities.

    C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.

    D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.

    III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

    A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:

    7. Attendance

    8. Assignment/Homework

    9. Practice Exercise

    10.Group work/Project

    11.Passing in and out of the room

    http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67
  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    4/13

    12.Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

    B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom

    C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her

    teaching.

    IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS

    A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.

    C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers

    skillful questioning.

    D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.

    E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.

    F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was

    legible enough to be read and understood.

    V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY

    A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.

    B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to

    disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.

    The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

    Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

    (Master Teacher II)

    Designation: Cooperating Teacher

  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    5/13

    Republic of the Philippines

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

    Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

    Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013

    Subject Taught: English 4 Date: _____________________________

    Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________

    Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

    Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below

    that corresponds to each item.

    Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory

    94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair

    ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U

    I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.

    B. There was congruence between

    1. Objective and subject matter

    2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching

    3. Objective and formative test/evaluation

    6.Objective assignment

    II. TEACHING METHODS

    A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the

    students.

    B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the

    students capabilities.

    C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.

    D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.

    III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

    A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:

    13.Attendance

    14.Assignment/Homework

    15.Practice Exercise

    16.Group work/Project

    17.Passing in and out of the room

    http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67
  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    6/13

    18.Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

    B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom

    C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her

    teaching.

    IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS

    A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.

    C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers

    skillful questioning.

    D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.

    E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.

    F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was

    legible enough to be read and understood.

    V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY

    A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.

    B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to

    disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.

    The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

    Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

    (Master Teacher II)

    Designation: Cooperating Teacher

  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    7/13

    Republic of the Philippines

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

    Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

    Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013

    Subject Taught: Science 4 Date: _____________________________

    Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________

    Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

    Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below

    that corresponds to each item.

    Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory

    94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair

    ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U

    I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.

    B. There was congruence between

    1. Objective and subject matter

    2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching

    3. Objective and formative test/evaluation

    7.Objective assignment

    II. TEACHING METHODS

    A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the

    students.

    B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the

    students capabilities.

    C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.

    D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.

    III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

    A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:

    19.Attendance

    20.Assignment/Homework

    21.Practice Exercise

    22.Group work/Project

    23.Passing in and out of the room

    http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67
  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    8/13

    24.Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

    B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom

    C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her

    teaching.

    IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS

    A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.

    C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers

    skillful questioning.

    D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.

    E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.

    F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was

    legible enough to be read and understood.

    V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY

    A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.

    B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to

    disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.

    The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

    Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

    (Master Teacher II)

    Designation: Cooperating Teacher

  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    9/13

    Republic of the Philippines

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

    Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating

    Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013

    Subject Taught: Mathematics 4 Date: _____________________________

    Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________

    Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

    Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below

    that corresponds to each item.

    Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory

    94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair

    ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U

    I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.

    B. There was congruence between

    1. Objective and subject matter

    2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching

    3. Objective and formative test/evaluation

    8.Objective assignment

    II. TEACHING METHODS

    A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the

    students.

    B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the

    students capabilities.

    C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.

    D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.

    III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

    A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:

    25.Attendance

    26.Assignment/Homework

    27.Practice Exercise

    28.Group work/Project

    29.Passing in and out of the room

    http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67
  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    10/13

    30.Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers

    B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom

    C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her

    teaching.

    IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS

    A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.

    C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers

    skillful questioning.

    D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.

    E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.

    F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was

    legible enough to be read and understood.

    V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY

    A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.

    B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to

    disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.

    The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

    Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

    (Master Teacher II)

    Designation: Cooperating Teacher

  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    11/13

    Republic of the Philippines

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

    Marking Guide for Instructional Materials

    Pre-service Teacher:Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013

    Cooperating Teacher:Ms. Anife S. Angelo Date:___________Cooperating School:Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School

    Direction:Check the box below that corresponds to each item.

    Legend: 3- Definitely (90100)

    2- Moderately (5189)1- Not at all (050)

    ITEMS TO RATE3

    Definitely

    2

    Moderately

    1

    Not at all1. It is big enough that can be seen by the farthest learner.

    2. Colors of the materials are realistic and pleasant.

    3. It facilitates learning.

    4. It can stand several uses.

    5. It is economical to produce.

    6. It is light and easy to manipulate.

    7. It is up to date.8. It is related to the specific needs, problems and

    experiences of the target learners.

    9. It has originality.

    10. It develops curiosity and sense of discovery in thelearners.

    Comments/Suggestions: (Strengths and suggestions for improvement)

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    Rating: _____________________________

    Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO

    Designation: Master Teacher II

  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    12/13

    Republic of the Philippines

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINESCOLLEGE OF EDUCATION

    Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000

    LESSON PLAN RUBRIC

    Criteria/Performance

    Good(3)

    Fair(2)

    Needs Improvement(1)

    Ratin

    Formulatingobjective

    Defines objectives clearly Adequately definesobjectives

    Objectives are notclearly stated

    Organizationof lessonpresentation

    Clearly links subjectmatter to studentsinterest and experience

    Adequately links subjectmatter to studentsinterest and experience

    Subject does not linksubject matter tostudents interest andexperience

    Clearly identifiessequential developmentof activities

    Adequately identifiessequential development ofactivities

    Does not clearlyidentifies sequentialdevelopment ofactivities

    Uses relevant examples Adequately uses relevantexamples

    Does not use relevantexamples

    Accurately allocates timeto activities inaccordance to objectives

    Adequately allocates timeto activities in accordanceto objectives

    Does not allocate timeto activities inaccordance toobjectives

    Clearly indicatestransition procedure fromone activity to the next

    Adequately indicatestransition procedure fromone activity to the next

    Does not indicatetransition procedurefrom one activity to the

    next Plans a variety of

    teaching strategies Limited variety of

    teaching strategies Does not plan a variety

    of teaching strategies

    Relates subject matterto other knowledge andprior knowledge of thestudents

    Relates subject matter toother knowledge

    Does not relate subjectmatter to otherknowledge

    Use oflearningmaterials

    Uses a wide range ofresources and learningmaterials

    Uses a wide range ofresources and learningmaterials

    Does not use a widerange of resources andlearning materials

    Structure a wide varietyof materials tostimulates students

    interest andachievement

    Uses an appropriatevariety of materials tostimulates students

    interest and achievement

    Does not structure anappropriate variety ofmaterials to stimulates

    students interest andachievement

    Use ofevaluativemeasures

    Devises an appropriateassessment task tomeasure each studentsprogress

    Devises an evaluative ofstudents progress

    Does not deviseappropriate evaluationstudents progress

    Measures studentsprogress accuratelyusing appropriate

    Measures studentsprogress usingappropriate authentic

    Students progress isnot measured usingappropriate authentic

  • 8/10/2019 Rating Sheets

    13/13

    Name of PST:Nurdine C. Salahuddin Subject Area ______________ Date: _____________Legend: 3Good (95%) 2Fair (85%) 1Needs Improvement (75%)

    authentic assessmentmethods

    assessment methods assessment methods

    Uses a rubric fullyreflects the objectives

    Uses a rubric whichpartially reflects theobjectives

    Rubric does not reflectthe objectives

    Total:

    Rated by: MS. ANIFE S. ANGELODesignation: Master Teacher II