rating sheets
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
1/13
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000
Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating
Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013
Subject Taught: English 6 Date: _____________________________
Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________
Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School
Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory
94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair
ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U
I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
4.Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
1. Attendance
2. Assignment/Homework
3. Practice Exercise
4.Group work/Project
5. Passing in and out of the room
http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67 -
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
2/13
6. Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers
B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.
The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO
(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher
-
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
3/13
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000
Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating
Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013
Subject Taught: Hekasi 6 Date: _____________________________
Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________
Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School
Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory
94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair
ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U
I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
5.Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
7. Attendance
8. Assignment/Homework
9. Practice Exercise
10.Group work/Project
11.Passing in and out of the room
http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67 -
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
4/13
12.Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers
B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.
The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO
(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher
-
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
5/13
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000
Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating
Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013
Subject Taught: English 4 Date: _____________________________
Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________
Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School
Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory
94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair
ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U
I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
6.Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
13.Attendance
14.Assignment/Homework
15.Practice Exercise
16.Group work/Project
17.Passing in and out of the room
http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67 -
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
6/13
18.Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers
B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.
The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO
(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher
-
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
7/13
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000
Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating
Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013
Subject Taught: Science 4 Date: _____________________________
Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________
Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School
Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory
94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair
ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U
I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
7.Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
19.Attendance
20.Assignment/Homework
21.Practice Exercise
22.Group work/Project
23.Passing in and out of the room
http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67 -
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
8/13
24.Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers
B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.
The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO
(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher
-
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
9/13
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000
Pre-service Teachers Actual Teaching Rating
Name: Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013
Subject Taught: Mathematics 4 Date: _____________________________
Topic: ________________________________ Time & Section: ______________________
Cooperating School: Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School
Note: this will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teacher and the TEI Practicum Supervisor inassessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teacher. Check the box below
that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 100-95 Excellent 88-83 Satisfactory 77-72 Unsatisfactory
94-89 Very Satisfactory 82-78 Fair
ITEM TO RATE E VS S F U
I. LESSON PLANNINGA. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
B. There was congruence between
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure/ Strategies of teaching
3. Objective and formative test/evaluation
8.Objective assignment
II. TEACHING METHODS
A. Methods used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
students capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
25.Attendance
26.Assignment/Homework
27.Practice Exercise
28.Group work/Project
29.Passing in and out of the room
http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?q=usep+ced+logo&hl=fil&biw=957&bih=482&tbm=isch&tbnid=sGhXyxRWnVlvrM:&imgrefurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/index.php/about-us&docid=3unkpk2rK1RdsM&imgurl=http://www.usep.edu.ph/Campuses/Obrero/Colleges/CEd/images/CED%20logo.png&w=180&h=180&ei=-aKAUPTnOs_rmAWU_oDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=119&vpy=166&dur=789&hovh=144&hovw=144&tx=105&ty=86&sig=114694302679489708292&page=1&tbnh=121&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:67 -
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
10/13
30.Correcting. Distributing and collecting papers
B. Order and discipline are present in the classroom
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/her
teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
A. The teacher spoke clearly with well-modulated voice.B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teachers
skillful questioning.
D. He/she observed correct pronunciation.
E. The board work of the teacher was free from grammar and spelling.
F. The teachers handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was
legible enough to be read and understood.
V. TEACHERS PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to
disturb students attention.C. The teachers personality is strong enough to command respect andattention.
The pre-service teachers strength are:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Comments/Suggestions for improvement:________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rating (Tick One) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO
(Master Teacher II)
Designation: Cooperating Teacher
-
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
11/13
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONInigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000
Marking Guide for Instructional Materials
Pre-service Teacher:Nurdine C. Salahuddin Sem/SY: 2012-2013
Cooperating Teacher:Ms. Anife S. Angelo Date:___________Cooperating School:Teodoro Palma Gil Elementary School
Direction:Check the box below that corresponds to each item.
Legend: 3- Definitely (90100)
2- Moderately (5189)1- Not at all (050)
ITEMS TO RATE3
Definitely
2
Moderately
1
Not at all1. It is big enough that can be seen by the farthest learner.
2. Colors of the materials are realistic and pleasant.
3. It facilitates learning.
4. It can stand several uses.
5. It is economical to produce.
6. It is light and easy to manipulate.
7. It is up to date.8. It is related to the specific needs, problems and
experiences of the target learners.
9. It has originality.
10. It develops curiosity and sense of discovery in thelearners.
Comments/Suggestions: (Strengths and suggestions for improvement)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Rating: _____________________________
Rated by: MS. ANIFE ANGELO
Designation: Master Teacher II
-
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
12/13
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINESCOLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Inigo St. Obrero, Davao City 8000
LESSON PLAN RUBRIC
Criteria/Performance
Good(3)
Fair(2)
Needs Improvement(1)
Ratin
Formulatingobjective
Defines objectives clearly Adequately definesobjectives
Objectives are notclearly stated
Organizationof lessonpresentation
Clearly links subjectmatter to studentsinterest and experience
Adequately links subjectmatter to studentsinterest and experience
Subject does not linksubject matter tostudents interest andexperience
Clearly identifiessequential developmentof activities
Adequately identifiessequential development ofactivities
Does not clearlyidentifies sequentialdevelopment ofactivities
Uses relevant examples Adequately uses relevantexamples
Does not use relevantexamples
Accurately allocates timeto activities inaccordance to objectives
Adequately allocates timeto activities in accordanceto objectives
Does not allocate timeto activities inaccordance toobjectives
Clearly indicatestransition procedure fromone activity to the next
Adequately indicatestransition procedure fromone activity to the next
Does not indicatetransition procedurefrom one activity to the
next Plans a variety of
teaching strategies Limited variety of
teaching strategies Does not plan a variety
of teaching strategies
Relates subject matterto other knowledge andprior knowledge of thestudents
Relates subject matter toother knowledge
Does not relate subjectmatter to otherknowledge
Use oflearningmaterials
Uses a wide range ofresources and learningmaterials
Uses a wide range ofresources and learningmaterials
Does not use a widerange of resources andlearning materials
Structure a wide varietyof materials tostimulates students
interest andachievement
Uses an appropriatevariety of materials tostimulates students
interest and achievement
Does not structure anappropriate variety ofmaterials to stimulates
students interest andachievement
Use ofevaluativemeasures
Devises an appropriateassessment task tomeasure each studentsprogress
Devises an evaluative ofstudents progress
Does not deviseappropriate evaluationstudents progress
Measures studentsprogress accuratelyusing appropriate
Measures studentsprogress usingappropriate authentic
Students progress isnot measured usingappropriate authentic
-
8/10/2019 Rating Sheets
13/13
Name of PST:Nurdine C. Salahuddin Subject Area ______________ Date: _____________Legend: 3Good (95%) 2Fair (85%) 1Needs Improvement (75%)
authentic assessmentmethods
assessment methods assessment methods
Uses a rubric fullyreflects the objectives
Uses a rubric whichpartially reflects theobjectives
Rubric does not reflectthe objectives
Total:
Rated by: MS. ANIFE S. ANGELODesignation: Master Teacher II