ranbaxy final

20
RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.

Upload: flame-foundation-for-liberal-and-management-education

Post on 22-Nov-2014

701 views

Category:

Business


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Ranbaxy's journey

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ranbaxy final

RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.

Page 2: Ranbaxy final

2

ContentIntroduction

1. Ranbaxy has the choice of continuing as the manufacturer of imitative generic drugs or becoming the developer of proprietary medicines. Discuss the pros and cons of each strategy. Could it do both?

2. Should Ranbaxy focus its attention on developing markets or the developed markets of the USA and Europe.

3. Does India have a suitable infrastructure for innovation.

Conclusion

Page 3: Ranbaxy final

3

Introduction Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited is India's largest pharmaceutical company.

Ranbaxy was started by Ranbir Singh and Gurbax Singh in 1937 as a distributor for a Japanese company Shionogi.

Headquarters Located in Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Incorporated on 16th June, 1961 at Delhi. Manufacture drugs, medicines, cosmetics and chemical products.

In 2008 acquired by Daiichi Sankyo Japanese co.

Global company, present in 46 countries and manufacturing ,facilities in 6 countries

Page 4: Ranbaxy final

4

1. Ranbaxy has the choice of continuing as the manufacturer of imitative generic drugs or becoming the developer of proprietary medicines. Discuss the pros and cons of each strategy. Could it do both?

Emergent strategy - the decisions that come out from the complex processes in which managers interpret the intended strategy and adapt to changing external situation.

Mintzberg suggests only 10%–30% of intended strategy is realized.

External factors (political situation, production cost, labor cost)

Page 5: Ranbaxy final

5

1. Ranbaxy has the choice of continuing as the manufacturer of imitative generic drugs or becoming the developer of proprietary medicines. Discuss the pros and cons of each strategy. Could it do both?

Patent Act of 1970 (7 years)

WTO accession in 1995

2005 another Patent act (20 years)

Rising production

cost

Stiff competiti

on in generic market

Rapid developme

nts in infrastruct

ure

External Environment

Page 6: Ranbaxy final

6

1. Ranbaxy has the choice of continuing as the manufacturer of imitative generic drugs or becoming the developer of proprietary medicines. Discuss the pros and cons of each strategy. Could it do both? Before a suitable strategy can be found, it is helpful to consider

characteristics of both products: Generic drugs - Product characteristics

low price and high volume patent freetrust unimportant brand unimportant (e.g. asprin, paracetemol, etc.)

Requirement = low –cost production destination Patent drugs – Product characteristics

High cost of R&D Highly skilled R&D Long time R&D (5 years minimum)Trust importantBrand important (e.g. Glaxo, Zeneca, Pfizer, etc.)

Requirement – highly educated, technically advanced, high trust, well connected (with other complimentary pharmaceutical organisations, universities, etc.)

Page 7: Ranbaxy final

7

Ranbaxy’s strategic resources Cheap labour

Continuingly improving level of skills

IT technology

Acquired company and strategic alliances (ex: Germany’s Betapharm Arzneimittel)

Improvements in infrastructure

1. Ranbaxy has the choice of continuing as the manufacturer of imitative generic drugs or becoming the developer of proprietary medicines. Discuss the pros and cons of each strategy. Could it do both?

Page 8: Ranbaxy final

8

1. Ranbaxy has the choice of continuing as the manufacturer of imitative generic drugs or becoming the developer of proprietary medicines. Discuss the pros and cons of each strategy. Could it do both? Generic Drugs Patent medicines

+ low product price

+ high revenue

+ researchers at Datamonitor

predicts that the patent expirations

will be from now till 2016. (pick 2011-

12. ex: clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix),

for the first time)

-Rising production cost in India

compeered to Newly developing

countries (Indonesia, China,

Philippines)

- 20 years patent protection

+ 10 years without taxes on patent

medicines (in India)

+ high potential success as

improving education level, rising IT

technology

+ middle class as potential segment

for sales

- high investment in R&D

- long period to invent and testing

new product

- high cost of advertising

(Chaudhuri, S. 2005)

Page 9: Ranbaxy final

9

1. Ranbaxy has the choice of continuing as the manufacturer of imitative generic drugs or becoming the developer of proprietary medicines. Discuss the pros and cons of each strategy. Could it do both? For an organisation to obtain a sustainable competitive advantage Michael Porter suggested that they should follow either one of three generic strategies.

Strategy 1 Cost Leadership.

Strategy 2: Niche strategiesStrategy 3: Differentiation

Patent product

Focus on manufacturing generic

Generate profit

Recommendation : Ranbaxy is rapidly loosing one of its competitive advantage such as low production cost as India is fast developing country, thus production cost increases, so to be sustainable there is a need to move manufacturing to N.D.Cs.

Haberberg and Rieple, 2008

Page 10: Ranbaxy final

10

1. Ranbaxy has the choice of continuing as the manufacturer of imitative generic drugs or becoming the developer of proprietary medicines. Discuss the pros and cons of each strategy. Could it do both?

If Ranbaxy has the appropriate strategic resources, it is recommended that it:

Continues to produce generic drugs, possibly moving production to a destination where production factors are lower;

Begin developing new patented drugs in India.

Conclusion:

Page 11: Ranbaxy final

11

2.Should Ranbaxy focus its attention on developing markets or the developed markets of the USA and Europe.Potter’s Diamond: Presence of High

quality, Specialized inputs available to Firm: Skilled & Educated work force.

The rules and incentives that govern competition: Government policies and investment programs to encourage innovation

Local availability of supporting industries in clusters than an Isolation The nature and sophistication of local customer needs

Potter (1990)

Page 12: Ranbaxy final

12

2. Should Ranbaxy focus its attention on developing markets or the developed markets of the USA and Europe.Potter’s Diamond: Developing Countries USA and Europe

Firm’s structure, strategy and rivalry

High level of competition in generic market, which is stimulate innovation

High level of competition in generic market, which is stimulate innovation (Merck & Co., Inc)

Factors conditions Low cost of production (Russia, China), increasing infrastructure,

High level of workers skills, Good infrastructure, Participation in International Organization (WTO,NAFTA,EU)

Demand condition Growing demand, middle class

High level of life an demand

Related and supporting industries

Improving level of educations

High level of education and IT technologies

Ranbaxy should consider partnerships in Russia and China because India is geographically, culturally, ideologically and politically closer to Russia and China than to Europe or US.

Page 13: Ranbaxy final

13

2. Should Ranbaxy focus its attention on developing markets or the developed markets of the USA and Europe.

Recommendations:

Merger and Acquisition,

which will give access

to foreign market

and resource.

Partnership and Strategic Alliances

to create synergy effect.

create TRUST and IMAGE of the Ranbaxy company

Page 14: Ranbaxy final

14

3. Does India have a suitable infrastructure for innovation.

India’s Investment for Infrastructure in following sectors (US$ billion)

Page 15: Ranbaxy final

15

3. Does India have a suitable infrastructure for innovation.

India’s Employment scale

Page 16: Ranbaxy final

16

3. Does India have a suitable infrastructure for innovation.Global Competitive Index (GCI) today is portraying mixed picture of

India’s competitiveness as it is constrained by few structural problems simultaneously having rapid economic growth being the world fastest growing economy:

Pro ‘s Con ‘s

• Huge domestic market and rapid growing middleclass boosting investment and consumption.

• Not having very strong groundwork of competitiveness to sustain and accelerate its growth in near future.

• Sophisticated financial markets which is helping business to develops.

• Increasing red tape and corruption in governmental institutions.

• Knack for innovation with high degree of business sophistication .

• Investing in vital areas of competitiveness which will help India when its value chain will move upwards.

Page 17: Ranbaxy final

17

The present infrastructure is improving, especially in some areas (Bangalore, Mumbai and Delhi).

Education Transportation Energy supply institutional and regulatory infrastructure

for trials and pharmaceutical Communications

Heterogeneous Population.

3. Does India have a suitable infrastructure for innovation.

Improving

Page 18: Ranbaxy final

18

3. Does India have a suitable infrastructure for innovation.

Conclusion :

Following key areas efficiently tackles with the problems discussed earlier:

• India does have a suitable infrastructure for innovation when compared in certain areas with its competing countries.

• Also, India is at par with much more advanced economies in the world having vibrant democracy and favorable demographics trends.

THUS, answer is YES India does have suitable infrastructure for innovation also, in Pharmaceutical industry.

Page 19: Ranbaxy final

19

Conclusion

Ranbaxy should consider its production on both products and move its manufacturing to N.D.C because production cost in India is increasing fast (Russia and China).

Company should expand to developing countries as well as to US and Europe.

India is at par with much more advanced economies in the world having vibrant democracy and favorable demographics trends and does have suitable infrastructure for innovation also, in Pharmaceutical industry.

Page 20: Ranbaxy final

20

THANK YOU

Made By:• Shahrukh Taghvaei