r&d on fast reactor cycles and role of monju and joyo
TRANSCRIPT
R&D on Fast Reactor Cycles and Role of Monju and Joyo
February 17, 2016
Director General, Advanced Fast Reactor Cycle System Research and Development Center,
Sector of Fast Reactor Research and Development, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA)
Hideki Kamide
International Symposium on “Present Status and Future Perspective for Reducing Radioactive Wastes~ Challenge for the Relief in the Next-generation ~,” Feb. 17, 2016, Tokyo
Today’s significance to hold fast reactor cycle technologies and the role of "Monju" in R&Ds
Future planning of R&Ds Reflection of R&D results into the demonstration and
commercialization R&D on “Monju” Safety enhancement of FBR / FR Development of demonstrated technologies of FBR / FR Development status of separation and transmutation technology that
utilizes FBR / FR Situation for the irradiation test resumption of “Joyo”
Direction of the fast reactor cycle R&Ds should be headed
1 Contents
Today’s significance to hold fast reactor cycle technology
Drastic strengthening of efforts to resolve the SF problem Efforts on final disposal of high-level radioactive wastes Expansion of the storage capacity of the SF Technology development for reducing the
volume and radiotoxicity of radioactive wastes
Promotion of the nuclear fuel cycle policy Promoting such as reprocessing and plutonium-use in LWR Effective use of recovered Pu, etc. (R&D on
Nuclear fuel cycle, Fast reactors, etc.) Monju: aggregation of research results as an
international research center Flexibility of medium- and long-term response (Uncertainty)
Spent fuel (SF) Problem
Japan stores about 17,000 ton of SF.
SF and radioactive wastes are generated continuously by the nuclear power generation and the decommissioning.
Responding to sustainability and uncertainty
The basic policy is to promote the nuclear fuel cycle.
To ensure a wide range of choices for uncertainties in future is also important from the energy security in Japan.
Holdings of fast reactor cycle technology is important. Contribution to Japan's energy security (effective utilization of uranium
resources) Reduction of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) generated (environmental
load reduction) Step-by-step R&D using "Joyo", "Monju", etc. is essential.
2
Efforts to make steadily progress without Postpone
FR Reprocessing (Vitrified waste)
LWR Reprocessing (Vitrified waste)
3
Source:JAEA made by using the Uranium 2009: Resources, Production and Demand.
-100 years
【Effective use of uranium resources】
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
LWR SF
volume decreases to one-seventh
Volu
me
of H
LW p
er u
nit p
ower
ge
nera
tion
(rel
ativ
e va
lue)
【Reduction of environmental impact】
Efficient use of Resources The use of Pu enables Energy Independence without depending on overseas
Uranium resources Deployment of FBR allows the U use of more than a thousand years.
U resource reserves are about 100 years depending on nuclear power generation. A steady R&D of FR Cycle is required. The development takes a long time.
Eco-friendly Reduce the amount of HLW by reprocessing SF and vitrifying HLW. Higher reduction efficiency by Shifting to the FR Cycle
High thermal efficiency of Power Generation Lower heat generation of vitrified wastes by removing Minor Actinides.
Features of the Fast Reactor (FR) Cycle
<Reduction of generated wastes>
In the case of LWR use
In the case of FBR use
Several thousand years
Number of years until used up uranium resources
The role of "Monju" in R&D
Actual scale test is essential for Fuel Assembly. Full-scale irradiation test in “Monju”
The world's first to obtain characteristics of Core with Am* in the entire region.
Monju
Safety Enhancement
Safety technology system of FBR
SDC and SDG of Gen-IV reactors
Accident management measures in Severe Acci.
Comprehensive safety evaluation by PSA
Prevention of re-criticality in CDA
Diversification of stable cooling measures of a damaged reactor core fuel
Implementation of the SA counter measures
R&D outside of “Monju”
R&D in "Monju"
“Monju” is an actual plant to provide R&D field for Safety technology system of the entire FBR
Pu-3
CPF AGF
Fuel development and irradiation tests
Reactor characteristics/ rector system
Fuel Fabrication
Reprocessing
Am*: typical long-lived radionuclides in the waste
Compilation of the R&D results of the FBR technology
Joyo
"Monju“ is a large-scale FBR power plant and aggregation of our country own technology. Know-how obtained by operating our own plant (design, manufacture, construction) is key.
FMF PIE tests
4
Holdings of our own FBR technology (design, construction, operation, decommissioning)
Reducing the waste volume and radio-toxicity
CPF
Evaluation of waste reduction
by FR cycle
Fast Reactor (FR)
Development of test field for R&D “Monju” Early release from the NRA’s order on safety treatment “Joyo” Apply to NRA for permission to restart Pu-3 fuel production facility Commercialization of MOX fuel production facility Hot labo., PIE facilities Response to the new regulatory regulation Test facilities related to Na, etc. Consolidation of sodium test facility
The “third period medium- and long-term planning" of JAEA reflecting “Strategic Energy Plan“ and the "Monju Research Plan”
Promote the R&D on the following issues. R&D on Fast Rectors
R&D on Monju R&D towards the establishment of proven technology of FR Safety enhancement of FBR /FR Demonstration technology development through
ASTRID cooperation R&D on Nuclear fuel cycle
Reprocessing of SF and fuel fabrication Reducing the volume and potential radio-toxicity
of radioactive wastes
ASTRID
Future Planning of R&Ds
“Monju”
“Joyo”
5
AtheNa facility
Reactor
Fuel cycle plants
Commercialized FBR cycle
R&D for reduction of the waste volume and radiotoxicity
Fuel fabrication Fuel development and irradiation test Reprocessing (separation technology) Reactor characteristics and reactor system The entire system evaluation
R&D on “Monju” Core and fuel technology Equipment and systems design technology Sodium handling technology Plant operation and
maintenance technology MA-bearing MOX fuel irradiation test Demonstrate natural circulation decay heat
removal
6
R&D for safety enhancement of FBR/ FR International development of safety
design requirements National development of structural material
specifications and standards and its reflection in international standards
Core damage mitigation technology development Thermal-hydraulics analysis and evaluation methods development ASTRID cooperation
• Certainty of design • Confirmation of the
safety margin
Next reactor design with international safety design requirements Analysis code, design approach Equipment design
Operation of next reactor Operational standards, operation
and inspection procedure Maintenance and repair method
• Operation and maintenance policy (Inspection frequency, etc.)
•Optimum system concept •Establishment of design technology
•Certainty of effectiveness
Feasibility confirmation of reduction of the waste volume and radiotoxicity Burnup theory demonstrated in
the current Am-containing core Demonstration of MA-bearing fuel
irradiation
Reflection of R&D results into the demonstration and commercialization
Establishment of demonstration technology
7 R&D on “Monju”
Aggregate of the fast breeder reactor technology Core and fuel technology Confirmation of higher isotopes of Pu core
characteristics based on the actual reactor data. Equipment and system design technology Plant system design technology Design technology of large sodium equipment
Sodium handling technology Development of in-service-inspection technology
for the reactor vessel, etc. Plant operation and maintenance technology Establishment of a maintenance program in light of
the characteristics of the FBR power plant, etc.
Irradiation test (X-ray CT image)
Core design approach and core management technology
Examples of specific reflections
Reactor kinetic characterization and shielding evaluation methods
Aging characteristics and Integrity of sodium equipment
R&D for reducing the waste volume and radiotoxicity Evaluate of the MA transmutation and the irradiation behavior
by full-scale irradiation tests with MA-bearing MOX fuel, etc.
R&D of enhanced safety Demonstrate the decay heat removal in the actual plant as a
feature of the sodium-cooled FR with natural circulation
◉Aggregate the outcome of the FBR technology development including the technical feasibility of the FBR plant, and Reflect it in the next reactor design by utilizing "Monju“ of our own design, manufacturing, and construction.
Na management techniques of loop-type FR power plant
Global Standards for SFR SDC and SDG 8
SDC
SDG
Safety Fundamentals
Safety Requirements Targets of global standards
Domestic Codes and Standards
Design guides of the Reactor Coolant System and Associated Systems in Nuclear Power Plants
<Hierarchy of Safety Standards>
◉ Japan leads to build safety design requirements (safety design criteria (SDC) / guidelines (SDG)) toward the safety enhancement of SFR in the world.
◉ FR development countries intend to reflect them in their safety regulations and safety design. De facto global SDC&SDG
Positioning and the purpose of SDC / SDG Global standardization of the safety design concepts toward the
commercialization (mainly on design basis accidents) Safety improvement of FRs in the world by Japanese initiative
Main results: SDC report (approved by GIF in May 2013) Review is in progress among regulatory bodies/technical support organizations
of FR development countries and by international organizations (IAEA, OCED/NEA/CNRA, etc.) Russia, China, India etc. intend to reflect in the safe design
Major progress Design and R&D on Safety enhancement including severe accident measures
Design: Decay heat removal system, Shutdown system, Seismic isolation R&D: fuel, safety, and plant system
Design and related outputs could be directly incorporated into the Japanese SFR development.
R&D collaborations are on going through experiments and analysis methods.
Status of ASTRID Collaboration
◉ The French President and the Japanese Prime Minster agreed to collaborate on the development of the 4th Generation Reactors.
◉ General Agreement was signed on May 5, 2014. ◉ Implement Agreement was singed on August 7, 2014.
ASTRID technologies
Japanese SFR technologies
Common issues ・Safety design ・Sodium technologies ・Fuel technologies
9
Research projects of FR cycle technologies
Fuel Fabrication
FR
Evaluation of volume reduction, etc. by
utilization of FR cycle Fuel Fabrication: Remote MA-bearing
MOX fuel fabrication technology
Determination of fuel composition range applicable
Reactor Characteristics & Reactor system: Feasibility confirmation of FR plant
technologies Acquisition of characteristics of MA-
containing core
Fuel Development & Irradiation Test: Systematic irradiation tests
of MA-bearing MOX fuel, High Pu-contents MOX fuel
Spent MOX fuel
Monju
Joyo
Pu-3
CPF
◉ Improvement of the flexibility in Pu use, verification of MA partitioning and transmutation technologies, etc. are necessary for obtaining technological perspective on the reduction of the volume and radiotoxicity of radioactive wastes
Reprocessing
Reprocessing: Development of MA partitioning
process and performance evaluation Establishment of feasible process concepts
Comprehensive system evaluation: Integration of information in each area &
narrowing prospective system concepts Verification of effects on reduction of the
volume and radiotoxicity of radioactive wastes
AGF FMF
U, Pu, MA
MA-bearing new MOX fuel
10
11 Status of Technological Development for Partitioning and Transmutation of Long-lived Nuclide Utilizing FRs
Succeeded at absorptive partitioning of more than 99.9 % of MAs in HLW liquid
多孔質シリカ吸着材の 写真(寸法付) とか、、、
Particle diameter about 50μm
SiO2-P Fine cross section
(MA: minor actinide, Am: Americium, Cm: Curium)
Partition MAs from liquid waste
Evaluation of effects of MAs on fuel performance is necessary Effects of re-distribution behavior of MA under irradiation on physical properties (eg. melting point)
Fabricate MA-bearing fuel pellets
Sophistication of fuel fabrication technologies Microstructure and
oxygen content control Acquisition of basic data &
development of technology for fabrication condition optimization
Microstructure
MA-bearing fuel pellet
φ5.4 mm
8 mm
Am co
ncen
tratio
n (re
lative
value
)
High Am concentration at central (Temp. at center: about 2400℃)
1mm
Center
Irradiation tests of-MA bearing fuels at 2000℃ or higher
◉Carry out a series of tests (from partitioning, recovery and conversion to fuel fabrication, irradiation and post irradiation examination) on MAs from spent fuel using existing facilities
LWR FR
Conditioned MA-bearing raw powder
MA fuel for Irradiation Tests
Irradiated MA- bearing fuel
Irradiation Irradiated
MA-bearing fuel
O-arai: AGF
Irradiation Fuel Fabrication
O-arai: FMF
Post Irradiation Experiments
Spent fuel High-radioactive liquid waste (HLLW)
SmART Cycle
Oarai: Joyo
Monju
Tokai: CPF
Partitioning
Pore diameter about 500nm
Outer peripheral part of fuel pellet
12 MA separation technology using extraction chromatography
MA could be separated from genuine HLLW using extraction chromatography method which has been developed at JAEA.
SiO2-P adsorbent Porous silica covered stylene divinyl benzene polymer and impregnated extractant in the pore
Extraction chromatography MA separation is achieved by flowing
the feed with MA and eluent into the packed column of solid adsorbents.
Advantages:Less secondary waste, compact equipment etc.
MA separation results from HLLW (2-step separation)
SiO2-P adsorbent
Organic polymer
Extractant impregnation
Grain size 40-60 μm, Pore size 500-600nm
Column
Feed
MA+RE
1st stage MA+RE separation
(RE:Rare earth elements)
2nd stage
Waste
Eluent
MA
MA+RE
Adsorption and elution
SiO2
Schematic of surface layer on adsorbent
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 280
0.5
1 Sr Pd Ru-106 Sb-125 Cs-137 Ce-144 Eu-155 Am-241 Cm-242 pH
C/C
0
Through Bed Volume
DV Feed 3M HNO3 H2O 50mM DTPA (pH=3)
3
1.5
pH
Chromatographic separation of genuine HLLW by the column with CMPO/SiO2-P adsorbents
Chromatographic separation of real HLLW by the column with BTP/SiO2-P adsorbents
MA+RE recovery
MA recovery
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
C/C
0
Through bed volume
Sr YZr MoBa LaCe NdSm EuGd AmCm
DeadVol.
Feed 1 mol/dm3 HNO3 H2O
Waste
Eluent CMPO BTP
PO O
NN
N N N N
NN
Examples of extractant
MA separation
Adsorption and elution
HLLW : high level liquid waste
13 Unified physical property model for fuel technologies
Basic properties and correlations have been studied, and a fundamental technology to control oxygen content in MA-bearing MOX was obtained.
Development of fuel behavior models in fuel fabrication process and operation conditions based on the property model
Oxygen control technology Sintered MOX pellets
MOX granules
Calculation examples by the correlations
Calculation of oxygen content change in pellets during heat treatment
Apply to sintering condition
Sintering condition for low oxygen content pellets
U/Pu ratio adjustment in nitric acid solution
Products
Microwave heating de-nitration and granulation
Pressing
Sintering and O/M adjustment
Development of an unified physical property model through property measurements, database construction and mechanistic relational equation derivation
Chemical stability Oxygen diffusion
1.96
1.98
2.00
2.02
2.04
500
1000
1500
2000
0 2 4 6 8
FJK
Tem
pera
ture
(o C)
Oxy
gen
cont
ent (
O/M
ratio
)
Heat treatment time(h)
O/M ratio Temperature
ExperimentAverage O/M ratio
CalculationsEquibrium O/M ratioAverage O/M ratio
14 Irradiation performance of MA-bearing MOX fuel
Slight increase in MA (Am) concentration near the center of the fuel pellet due to irradiation was confirmed from the result of the MA-bearing fuel irradiation experiment in Joyo. A computer analysis model was developed which could reproduce this phenomenon.
・Irradiation condition (LHR / period) ~450W/cm / ~24hr
・MA content of fuel pellet Am:~5wt% / Np:~2wt%
Radial profile of Am concentration
Am measurement
Central void
Center Edge
Center Edge
Short-term and high linear heat rate (LHR) irradiation of MA-bearing MOX fuel pins
1mm
Ceramography of irradiated MA-bearing MOX fuel pellet
Change of Am concentration due to irradiation was calculated by using vapor phase and solid phase diffusion analysis models.
Irradiation in Joyo
15 Minor Actinide Transmutation in FRs
Items JSFR (Breeder) Pu-MA burner
Electric output [MWe] 1500 750
Breeding ratio (Conversion ratio) 1.1 0.58
Core height [cm] 100 75
Fuel pin diameter [mm] 10.4 6.5
Fuel lifetime [EFPD] 3200 1295
Fuel burnups [GWd/t] 146 151
MA content in heavy metal [wt%] 3.0 4.6
Basic characteristics of FRs for MA transmutation
① Transmutation of initial MA load ② MA generation from core fuel
Fast reactor core concepts for MA transmutation were developed. When the high-burnup fuel is realized, 50-60% of initial MA load in fuel fabrication can be transmuted before fuel exchange.
Core layout of a Pu-MA burner
Core height 75 cm
Core equivalent diameter 3.3 m
Fuel sub-assembly Primary control rod Backup control rod
Linear heat rate [W/cm]
16 Development of ODS steel cladding tube
ODS steel cladding tube
• Increasing burnup => High MA transmutation ratio, Reducing nuclear fuel costs
•High power generation efficiency produced by high outlet Na temperature
•Increasing fuel lifetime, Safety enhancement
⇒ Fuel performance improvement in terms of environmental, safety and economical aspects
Evaluated MA transmutation ratio vs neutron dose, burnup
Recent progress:
Substantial swelling resistance
Modified type 316 steel
Ferritic steel, ODS steel
0 50 100 150 Average discharge burnup (GWd/t)
twice
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Neutron dose (x1026 n/m2, E>0.1MeV)
MA tr
ansm
utatio
n rati
o (%
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Modified type 316SS Ferritic steel ODS steel
Swell
ing (
vol.%
) 0
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Fabrication technology development, which can reliably and consistently produce high strengthen ODS steel cladding tube
Excellent mechanical strength at high temperature
JAEA has developed the long lifetime oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) steel cladding tube, which can double MA transmutation ratio compared with existing technology. The fabrication process was successfully developed to reliably produce high performance ODS steel tubes.
Creep strength
17
JAEA promotes SmART cycle project which includes MA separation from irradiated fuels and irradiation of the MA-MOX products in Joyo for the first time. Preparation of HLLW was completed to get MA more than 1g.
SmART cycle (Small Amount of Reuse Fuel Test Cycle)
Fuel fabrication
Irradiation PIE
Separation
LWR, FBR
Irradiated fuel
AGF (Oarai)
Joyo (Oarai)
CPF(Tokai)
SmART cycle
【Objectives】 • Separation and transmutation data of MA etc. • Feasibility of small scale of partitioning and transmutation cycle
Irradiation behavior of MA isotopes in the MOX fuel will be evaluated for the first time in the world.
• Effect of FPs on fuel fabrication and irradiation
• Effect of MA isotopes on transmutation • Material balance of MA through the cycle
【Significance】
【Current status】 Shearing, dissolution and extraction of
irradiated Joyo fuel pins were completed.
MA separation from the raffinate of extraction will be implemented hereafter.
【MA amounts】 • MA more than 1g is separated from
4 pins of irradiated Joyo fuel
MA yields recovered from irradiated fuel are top level in the world
Denitration, conversion
For Restart of Irradiation Test Activities in Experimental FR Joyo
Door valve
Temporary pit cover
Cask
Wire jack
Pull-out work of UCS
R&D for inspection and repair the interior of the reactor vessel at high dose (max. 300 Gy/h) and high temperature (~200 ℃ )
18
Completion of the restoration work on the damaged experimental device
May-Nov. 2014: Completed replacement of the UCS and retrieval of the experimental device
June 2015: Completed the re-installment of the retrieved device; brought Joyo back into normal state
• High radiation resistant fiber-scope, etc. • Replacement of the large in-vessel component:
Upper Core Structure (UCS) (~16.5 ton) • Retrieval by using a remote device
◉ Completed the restoration work on the damaged experimental device that had been in trouble and brought Joyo back into recovered and normal state
◉ Plan to submit an application for permission of changes in reactor installation in FY2016
◉ Plan to conduct irradiation tests, etc. related to R&D for reduction of the volume and radio-toxicity of radioactive wastes and for ASTRID project after the restart
Tem
pora
ry c
radl
e
19 Direction of the fast reactor cycle R&Ds should be headed
At the time the policy towards the commercialization of FR cycle is embodied, the R&D should be steadily promoted in order to present the following achievements. Development of research infrastructure Early improvement and re-start of the test facilities such as Monju," "Joyo” Development and accumulation of human resources and technology platform to
support the FR cycle technology using "Monju," "Joyo,” fuel cycle facilities, etc. R&D Confirmation of the technical feasibility of innovative technology that reflects the
safety enhancement measures in light of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident Establishment of FR reference plant concept incorporating international safety
design requirements (SDC, SDG) Prospect of technical feasibility on reducing waste volume and its radiotoxicity Drawing the path to commercialization (technology roadmap), etc.
In the implementation of the policy, promoting dialogue and information sharing with stakeholders, reflected in the direction of R&D
To that end, along with promoting human resources development and technology transfer specifically, operate test facilities in the highest priority on safety by implementing the response to the new regulatory regulation ASAP.