railway infrastructure charging and state subvention schemes in hungary dr. péter rónai
DESCRIPTION
Railway infrastructure charging and state subvention schemes in Hungary Dr. Péter Rónai MÁV Co., Hungarian State Railways Head of Customer Relations and Sales. 1. Legal background. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Railway infrastructure charging and state subvention schemes in Hungary
Dr. Péter Rónai
MÁV Co., Hungarian State RailwaysHead of Customer Relations and Sales
2
Legal background
• Independent railway undertakings have access to the railway network on a non-discriminatory basis (e.g. telecommunication sector, energy sector)
[Directive 2001/14/EC]
• Non-discriminatory access to service facilities (e.g. transhipment sidings, freight terminals) irrespective of the ownership
• Independence of essential functions of the infrastructure manager: capacity allocation; timetabling; charging
[Directive 2012/34/EU (Recast)]
• Act CLXXXIII of 2005 on rail transport• Charging statute 83/2007 (X.6.) and its modifications• Capacity allocation statute 101/2007 (XII. 22.)
The basic principles of
free access and equal treatment
is defined by law.
3
CM Methodological document of network access charges
– five-year
CDDetailed calculations and data providing the basic of them
– yearly
Charging methodology and Charging Document
• Cost-based allocated unit prices
• Direct and indirect costs of infrastructure services
• Data of actual year costs and state subsidy
• State subsidy is divided based on transport political principles
4
Essential change in the methodology
The base of charge calculation is the total reasonable cost.
Total reasonable cost-based charging
Marginal cost-based charging
The base of calculation is the operational costs directly incurred by an additional train service.
In case of the charges for the minimum access package and for access to station service facilities
„Market can bear test”: full costs only if the segment can bear higher costs than marginal
costs
5
Modalities: from full costs to total direct costs
Step 0: Full costs
Step 1: ./. Cost not related with infrastructure management
Step 2: ./. Costs not related with minimum access package
Step 3: ./. Costs financed by grants
= full costs of infrastructure management
Step 4: ./. Costs that do not vary with an additional train service
= direct costs per year
Step 5: modulation according to types of train
Step 6: averaging against fluctuations of traffic
6
Segments
a) Passenger services
b) Freight services
c) Trains carrying dangerous goods
d) Other freight trains
e) Domestic services
f) International services
g) Combined transport
h) Direct trains;
i) Urban or regional passenger services
j) Interurban passenger services
k) Block trains
l) Single wagon load trains;
m) Regular train services
n) Occasional train services
7
Charge of the use of catenary – 2013/2014 timetable year
Direct costs+ Direct costs to be shared+ Indirect costs
11 181 674 100 848
1 512 649
12 795 172
: Performance indicator = / 65 732 314 =
+ Mark-up- Discount
19500
- State contribution 138
57 HUF/electric train km
CMCD
(Electric train km)
Cost based charge
1 749 871 15 782236 721
2 002 374
/ 10 286 747 =
3100
22
Thousand HUF Thousand RUB
8,9 RUB/electric train km
1 RUB=6,39 HUF (Hungarian National Bank currency rate September 2014)
8
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Traction unit-freight
Traction unit-passenger
Shunting staff-freight
Shunting staff-passenger
Train km-passenger
Train km-freight
Station-pas-senger
Station-freight
Gross ton km
Proportion of State contribution(using mean at group of services)
Th
eori
tic
al r
eve
nu
e m
axim
um
bill
ion
HU
F(p
erfo
rman
ce in
dica
tor
x (c
harg
e+m
ark-
up))
(usi
ng s
um a
t gro
up o
f ser
vice
s)
Transport political map – 2014/2015 timetable year
9
Basic services – Minimum access package
Services Charge Mark-up Amount to be paid
Charge for ensuring train path (HUF/train path) 92 669 572
Charge for running of trains
Gross ton km based charges 0,27 0,18 0,23
Train km based charges
Passenger trains
CategoryI
131
366
401
CategoryII
141
367
350
CategoryIII
123
300
126
Freight trains
CategoryI
156
439
391
CategoryII
195
454
370
CategoryIII
239
499
200
Loco trains 128
350
357
CD 2014/2015 timetable year, in HUF
10
Basic services – Minimum access package
Services Charge Mark-up Amount to be paid
Charge for ensuring train path (RUB/train path) 14 105 90
Charge for running of trains
Gross ton km based charges 0,04 0,03 0,04
Train km based charges
Passenger trains
CategoryI 21 57 63
CategoryII 22 57 55
CategoryIII 19 47 20
Freight trains
CategoryI 24 69 61
CategoryII 31 71 58
CategoryIII 37 78 31
Loco trains 20 55 56
CD 2014/2015 timetable year, in RUB
11
Supplementary services
Services Charge Mark-up Amount to be paid
Charge for the use of stations by passenger trains for stopping
Category I 1 714 1 663 3 377
Category II 1 201 1 633 2 830
Category III 1 078 1 615 1 899
Category IV 1 010 1 614 1 700
Charge for the use of origin/destination stations by passenger trains
Category I 838 1 486 2 270
Category II 949 1 486 1 810
Category III 780 1 486
905
Category IV 780 1 486
905
Charge for the use of origin/destination stations by freight trains
Category I 9 976 12 030 4 500
Category II 7 603 10 299 2 000
Category III 7 593 10 285 600
Charge for the use of intermediate stations by freight trains
Category I 9 981 19 623 3 400
Category II 8 779 43 427 2 400
Category III 17 823 66 358 1 400
Charge for the use of catenary (HUF/electric train km) 27 82
57
Charge for the access of refuelling facilities (HUF/litre) 41 4
22
Charge for the storage of vehicles 41 78
119
CD 2014/2015 timetable year, in HUF
12
Supplementary services
Services Charge Mark-up Amount to be paid
Charge for the use of stations by passenger trains for stopping
Category I 268 260 528Category II 188 256 443Category III 169 253 297Category IV 158 253 266
Charge for the use of origin/destination stations by passenger trains
Category I 131 233 355Category II 149 233 283Category III 122 233 142Category IV 122 233 142
Charge for the use of origin/destination stations by freight trains
Category I 1 561 1 883 704Category II 1 190 1 612 313Category III 1 188 1 610 94
Charge for the use of intermediate stations by freight trains
Category I 1 562 3 071 532Category II 1 374 6 796 376Category III 2 789 10 385 219
Charge for the use of catenary (RUB/electric train km) 4 13 9
Charge for the access of refuelling facilities (RUB/litre) 6 1 3
Charge for the storage of vehicles 6 12 19
CD 2014/2015 timetable year, in RUB
13
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 September, 20142011
Number of foreign partners: 12
20123 4
6
10
16
24
3132
34
37AWT RAIL HU Zrt.BOBO Kft.boxXpress.de GmbHBSS 2000 Kft.CER Hungary Zrt.CRW, a.s.DB Schenker Rail Hungária Kft.DRT Danubius Rail Transport Kft.Floyd Zrt.FOXrail ZrtG&G Kft.GYSEV Zrt.GYSEV Cargo Zrt.KÁRPÁT Vasút Kft.LTE GmbHMÁV FKG Kft.MÁV Nosztalgia Kft.MÁV-START Zrt.METRANS (Danubia), a.s.MMV Zrt.MTMG Zrt.Magyar Vasúti Áruszállító Kft.PKP Cargo S.A.Petrolsped, s.r.o.PSZ, a.s.Rail Cargo Hungaria Zrt.Rail Cargo Carrier Kft.Railtrans International, a.s.RTS GmbHSwietelsky Vasúttechnika Kft.SZDS, a.s.Szentesi Vasútépítő Kft.Train Hungary Kft.Vasútvill Kft.Wiener Lokalbahnen Cargo GmbHZáhony-Port Zrt.ZSSK Cargo, a.s.
2013
37
MÁV-GÉPÉSZET Zrt.MÁV-TRAKCIÓ Zrt.
MÁV-START Zrt.
Expansion of MÁC Co’s customers having network access contract
14
Incumbent72%
Other RUs
28%
Incumbent’s share in revenue from freight network access charges 2013
Tendency: decreasing
15
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!