railroad company coordination survey aashto subcommittee on construction contract administration...
TRANSCRIPT
Railroad Company Coordination Survey
AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction Contract Administration Section
August 2010
Railroad Survey TeamJohn A. Perry, FHWA-IDAnthony Sarhan, FHWA-
WAJim Hatt, OK DOTCarmen Bakarich, KS DOT
2
Summary of Presentation
Outline Results of STA surveys (36 Responses)
Lessons Learned Recurring Issues
Results of RR Company surveys (12 Responses)
Lessons Learned Recurring Issues
Agreements Revisit existing agreements Comprehensive agreements Requests for frequent updates RR’s are understaffed Consultants work needs approval Slow execution of agreements Need executed agreement prior to
construction
3
Lessons Learned
Design Need separate RR plan sheets Provide RR early review of plan sheets PS&E delayed w/o separate plan sheets Plan sheets need PE stamp No executed agreement w/o approved plan
sheets
4
Lessons Learned
Flagging Estimated flagging hours, too low Including set up and take down costs Improper flagging hours, correcting Flaggers union rules, copies RR projects vs RR flaggers available RR Overpasses, w/o fencing, need RR
flagger Billing receipts may come months later
5
Lessons Learned
Timely Response Processing agreements takes time Need complete / accurate submittals Need guidelines for RR plan reviews RR’s, minimum staff for reviews DOT projects, not a priority for RR’s RR’s lack wisdom of DOT constraints
6
Lessons Learned
7
Agreements Poor timely response Require mediation for approval No direct benefit to Railroads Inconsistent processes = delays Use of outdated RR requirements Disagreement on required work /
compensation Tie up RR funding for a long time
Recurring Issues
Billing Final audits / unacceptable invoices Getting daily labor FA information Pay RR invoices for work promptly Limit questions to RR’s on invoices Helps to keep communication open
8
Recurring Issues
Communication Prioritize improvements together RR’s are for profit, DOT’s are not, conflicts High turnover in RR personnel Unfamiliar with each others processes Long distance communication RR/DOT new personnel need education Need direct communication w/RR engineers Lack of early RR involvement
9
Recurring Issues
Construction Request for funding of RR CN inspectors Cannot start work until RR inspector is on
site RR schedule > DOT schedule RR stops work w/o DOT approval Lack of coordination protocols, agreements /
SP’s
10
Recurring Issues
Flagging Flagging hour billing takes months DOTs, no direct oversight of flaggers, rail
yard Must negotiate # of RR flaggers RR flagger availability vs labor shortages Escalating costs for RR flaggers Fear of releasing flaggers, can’t get them
back
11
Recurring Issues
Late Changes Request for late changes after plan approval Accept late change request to minimize
delays New changes requested at precon meeting Increase in contractor claims, late changes
12
Recurring Issues
Regulations / Requirements RR’s have different insurance requirements Need consistency of insurance requirements 23 CFR 634 gives RR’s too much power Need regulations to limit late changes
13
Recurring Issues
Right-of-Entry / ROW Long approval times for short work windows State law vs RR’s insurance levels don’t
match Negotiate insurance levels w/legal staff Need for streamlined ROW process Lack of RR ROW plan review = CN
conflicts/delays RR’s want overpass’s to span all RR ROW RR’s won’t give longitudinal property rights
14
Recurring Issues
15
Third Party Consultants Work through designated contacts first Delays depend on RR backlog RR could give more approval authority to
TPC’s Delays vary according to which firm is used RR still has to review/approve firm’s work
Recurring Issues
16
QUESTIONS?
Railroad Company Coordination Survey
AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction Contract Administration Section
August 2010
Railroad Survey TeamJohn A. Perry, FHWA-IDAnthony Sarhan, FHWA-
WAJim Hatt, OK DOTCarmen Bakarich, KS DOT
18
Summary of Presentation
Outline Results of RR Company surveys (12
Responses) Railroad Companies Lessons Learned Recurring Issues
19
Railroad Companies Who Replied
Railroad Companies Alaska RR Corporation Burlington Northern Santa Fe Iowa Interstate RR Kansas City Southern RR Lancaster & Chester Railway Montana Rail Link Norfolk Southern Railway Corporation New York, Susquehanna and Western RWC Providence and Worcester RR Union Pacific Railroad (3 Responses)
Agreements Need lots of lead time Very complex Need Master Agreement to get others AG’s Office, frequent standard language
changes Executed agreements sit on shelf for years Update agreements to current conditions /
risks
20
Lessons Learned
Plan / Design Initial plans designed w/o RR involvement Not following RR requirements / guidelines Bridge pier placement on RR ROW w/o input RRs protect properties for future expansion Road profile doesn’t allow for vertical
clearance Widen parallel highways < storage capacity
21
Lessons Learned
Audits / Retention DOT’s slow to audit books, years DOT’s hold retention till audit complete Late audits cause RR record retention issues RR record retention = greater costs
22
Lessons Learned
Flagging Contractors working w/o RR flaggers Resolved by: DOT’s pay for flagging not Contractors RRs participate in Precon Meetings RRs share SP’s for Protection of RR Interests
23
Recurring Issues
Insurance Contractors working w/o approved
insurance Resolved by: Approved RRs insurance requirements Railway Interests SP’s include insurance
req’s RR sends out early insurance renewal
notices
24
Recurring Issues
Communication Local DOT contacts work better Frequent projects = better communication Must work hard to have good partnerships RR need to be considered sole source
contractors Exempt RR from complicated employment
regs Not being invited to pre bid and precon
meetings
25
Recurring Issues
Legislation / Regulation Changes Jointly work together to improve processes Reduce barriers Better understand each others issues Change State laws requiring record retention Treat RR’s like Utility Company / Contractor Update 23 CFR to current standards and risks Need standardization, agreements / processes
26
Recurring Issues
27
QUESTIONS ??
Contact Information:John Perry, FHWA – Idaho Division OfficePhone: 208-334-9180 x116Email: [email protected]