$6.50Vol. 23, No. 7

September 2015

Taxman’s blind eye PAGE 23

PLUS: non-fiction Shawn McCarthy on George Soros’s global ambition + James Miller on China’s political virtues + Mark Sholdice on Leo Strauss, man of peacefiction Robin Roger on The Night Stages by Jane Urquhart + Gail Singer on Under the Visible Life by Kim Echlinpoetry Lucas Crawford + Barry Butson + Michael Johnson

Publications Mail Agreement #40032362Return undeliverable Canadian addresses toLRC, Circulation Dept.PO Box 8, Station KToronto, ON M4P 2G1

ALSO IN THIS ISSUE

Candace SavageWho are the Métis?

Christopher DummittDonald Creighton’s bird’s-eye history

Triadafilos TriadafilopoulosThe tenuous grip of pluralism

Martin Patriquin

Quebec’s Messy MosaicA vague policy stunts newcomers’ integration

Martin Patriquin

Quebec’s Messy MosaicA vague policy stunts newcomers’ integration

September 2015 1reviewcanada.ca

3 Invisible RootsA review of Métis: Race, Recognition and the Struggle for Indigenous Peoplehood, by Chris Andersen, French Canadians, Furs and Indigenous Women in the Making of the Pacific Northwest, by Jean Barman, and Metis and the Medicine Line: Creating a Border and Dividing a People, by Michel HogueCandace Savage

6 Empire ManA review of Donald Creighton: A Life in History, by Donald WrightChristopher Dummitt

8 Scarlet LetterA review of Alice in Shandehland: Scandal and Scorn in the Edelson/Horwitz Murder Case, by Monda HalpernDebra Komar

9 Purchasing PowerA review of Buying a Better World: George Soros and Billionaire Philanthropy, by Anna PorterShawn McCarthy

10 Ties that Bind A review of Interculturalism: A View from Quebec, by Gérard Bouchard, translated by Howard ScottMartin Patriquin

13 Drug DealsA review of Ideas and the Pace of Change: National Pharmaceutical Insurance in Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom, by Katherine BootheDanielle Martin

Bruce Livesey

16 Your Fat Daughter Remembers What You SaidA poemLucas Crawford

17 A Geranium Lives Longer Than ChildhoodA poemBarry Butson

17 LuckyA poemMichael Johnson

18 Love HurtsA review of The Night Stages, by Jane UrquhartRobin Roger

19 Sisters in JazzA review of Under the Visible Life, by Kim EchlinGail Singer

20 Rule by MeritA review of The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy, by Daniel BellJames Miller

23 Shifting FortunesA review of Canada: A New Tax Haven — How the Country That Shaped Caribbean Tax Havens Is Becoming One Itself, by Alain Deneault, translated by Catherine BrowneMichael C. Webb

26 Leo’s WebA review of Leo Strauss: Man of Peace, by Robert HowseMark Sholdice

29 Seeds of HateA review of From Tolerance to Tyranny: A Cautionary Tale from Fifteenth Century Spain, by Erna ParisTriadafilos Triadafilopoulos

31 Letters and ResponsesGeoffrey James

Cover art and pictures throughout the issue by artist.

Jonathan Dyck is an illustrator and designer from southern Manitoba. Now based in Montreal, he is part of the GUTS Magazine editorial collective and has worked with a variety of publications including The Globe and Mail, Briarpatch and Geez.

Vol. 23, No. 7 • September 2015

From time to time, the LRC may allow carefully selected organizations to send mail to subscribers, offering products or services that may be of interest. If you do not wish to receive such correspondence, please contact our Subscriber Service department at literaryreview@yrnet.com,

or call 416-932-5081, or mail P.O. Box 8, Station K, Toronto ON M4P 2G1.

Funding AcknowledgementsWe acknowledge the financial

support of the Government of Canada through the

Canada Periodical Fund of the Department of Canadian

Heritage.

We acknowledge the assistance of the OMDC Magazine Fund, an initiative of Ontario Media

Development Corporation.

an Ontario government agencyun organisme du gouvernement de l’Ontario

Literary Review of Canada170 Bloor St West, Suite 710Toronto ON M5S 1T9email: info@reviewcanada.careviewcanada.caT: 416-531-1483 • F: 416-531-1612Charitable number: 848431490RR0001 To donate, visit reviewcanada.ca/support

INTERIM EDITORMark Lovewelleditor@reviewcanada.ca

MANAGING EDITORMichael Stevens

CONTRIBUTING EDITORSMohamed Huque, Molly Peacock, Robin Roger, Anthony Westell

ASSOCIATE EDITORJudy Stoffman

POETRY EDITORMoira MacDougall

COPY EDITORMadeline Koch

ONLINE EDITORSDiana Kuprel, Jack Mitchell, Donald Rickerd, C.M.

PROOFREADERSRebecca Borkowsky, Heather Schultz, Robert Simone, Rob Tilley

RESEARCHRob Tilley

EDITORIAL ASSISTANTEmmett Livingstone

DESIGNJames Harbeck

ADVERTISING/SALESMichael Wileads@reviewcanada.ca

DIRECTOR, SPECIAL PROJECTSMichael Booth

PRODUCERHarrison Lowman

DEVELOPMENT MANAGERElizabeta Liguric

PUBLISHERHelen Walshh.walsh@reviewcanada.ca

BOARD OF DIRECTORSTom Kierans, O.C., Mark Lovewell, Don McCutchan, Jack Mintz, C.M., Trina McQueen, O.C.

ADVISORY COUNCILMichael Adams, Ronald G. Atkey, P.C., Q.C., Alan Broadbent, C.M., Chris Ellis, James Gillies, C.M., Carol Hansell, Donald Macdonald, P.C., C.C., Susan Reisler, Grant Reuber, O.C., Don Rickerd, C.M., Rana Sarkar, Mark Sarner, Bernard Schiff, Reed Scowen

POETRY SUBMISSIONSFor poetry submission guidelines, please see reviewcanada.ca.

LRC design concept by Jackie Young/INK

Founded in 1991 by P.A. DutilThe LRC is published 10 times a year by the Literary Review of Canada Charitable Organization.

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES Individuals in Canada $56/year plus GST/HST. (Libraries and institutions in Canada $68/year plus GST/HST.) Outside Canada, please pay $86/year for individuals, or $98 for libraries and institutions.

SUBSCRIPTIONS AND CIRCULATIONLiterary Review of CanadaP.O. Box 8, Station K, Toronto ON M4P 2G1literaryreview@yrnet.comtel: 416-932-5081 • reviewcanada.ca

©2015 The Literary Review of Canada. All rights, including translation into other languages, are reserved by the publisher in Canada, the United States, Great Britain and all other countries participating in the Universal Copyright Convention, the International Copyright Convention and the Pan-American Copyright Convention. Nothing in this publication may be repro-duced without the written permission of the publisher.

ISSN 1188-7494The Literary Review of Canada is indexed in the Canadian Literary Periodicals Index and the Canadian Index and is distributed by Disticor and Magazines Canada.

September 2015 29reviewcanada.ca

From Tolerance to Tyranny: A Cautionary Tale from Fifteenth Century SpainErna ParisCormorant Books316 pages, softcoverISBN 9781770863972

Author of several influen-tial works on prejudice and human rights, Erna Paris has

republished her 1995 book, The End of Days: A Story of Tolerance, Tyranny and the Expulsion of the Jews from Spain, rightfully convinced that its focus on the fragility of pluralism in multi-ethnic societies remains a resonant theme. From Tolerance to Tyranny: A Cautionary Tale from Fifteenth Century Spain has two objectives. First, it seeks to chart the decline and ultimate collapse of convivencia (coexistence) among Muslims, Christians and Jews in medieval and early modern Spain. Second, it draws on that history to arrive at a more general understanding of why diverse societies are susceptible to “tyranny,” understood as the rejection of pluralism and the marginalization and, in some cases, destruction of minorities by majority groups. A new conclud-ing chapter titled “Echoes and Mirrors” contrasts “twenty-first century events to the twentieth-century parallels that were included in the original edition.”

The book’s central claim is pessimistic. The col-lapse of convivencia in 15th-century Spain and the demise of pluralism at other times and in other places can be traced to an essential characteristic of human nature. “Distrust of the Other seems to slumber within us, ready to erupt under certain conditions of xenophobia and violence,” says Paris, citing unforeseen natural catastrophes and periods of economic hardship and political insta-bility, which create opportunities for individuals and groups who stand to benefit from pluralism’s obliteration. Self-interested elites use ideology and propaganda to dehumanize minorities and mobilize popular support for their homogenizing projects. Dehumanization campaigns also dissolve the bonds of empathy that might have otherwise mobilized popular opposition to the persecution of victim groups. Bystanders’ passive complicity fills the space vacated by solidarity and fellow feeling.

The speed at which such shifts in predispositions occur typically leaves victim groups in a state of incredulity, marvelling at how quickly they have been transformed into pariahs.

Tolerance, then, is unnatural and pluralism is always vulnerable, according to Paris—something as true of 15th-century Spain as it was of Nazi Germany or of Rwanda during the 1994 genocide. Recognizing this is key to making sense of where we may be heading: “To glimpse the universality of human emotion, desire, and vice across the cen-turies is to link the past with the future … There is nothing like the study of history to help one under-stand that humankind is not perfectible.”

Paris maintains that the seeds of tyranny in Spain were planted long ago, with the Visigoths’ invasion of the Roman province of Hispania in 409, followed by the persecution of minorities, especially the Jews. The conversion of the Visigoth King Reccared to Catholicism in 587 compounded matters. “Once Catholicism and the political state merged,” she says, “the mere presence of uncon-verted Jews in the land became politically intoler-able … The Jewish challenge to Christianity became a challenge to the government itself.”

Conditions improved with the arrival of the Muslim Moors. Paris describes as “astonish-ing” the world that the Moors crafted. “While Europe embraced ignorance and superstition, the Moors promoted scholarship,” she says, noting that the Moors encouraged general literacy and even allowed for the education of girls. “While Christianity denigrated the senses, the feel of Moorish Spain was nothing short of sensual.”

Perhaps most importantly, the Moors did not force Christians and Jews to convert to Islam, pre-ferring convivencia to enforced uniformity. Paris likens convivencia under the Moors to contempo-rary forms of pluralism and multiculturalism. While this interpretive decision may help readers connect

the world of the Moors to their own, it comes at a cost. The pluralism of the caliphs of the Umayyad dynasty was based on a fundamental distinction between Muslims and non-Muslims; while compulsory conversion was rejected, a strict political hierarchy privileged Muslims and placed restric-tions on non-Muslims. The degree of voice and agency granted to religious minorities was limited and, as Paris notes, discrimination based on religion was built into the system (Christians and Jews were subject to special taxes and prohibitions). In the absence of a common citizenship, there was little to draw members of differing groups together. While non-Muslim subjects who demonstrated talent had some access to positions of influence, in the

absence of conversion these men would always be regarded as inferior to their Muslim superiors. To liken such a system to contemporary multicul-turalism, which is based on equal citizenship in a liberal-democratic state, is misleading.

In any case, pluralism was tenuous even in Muslim Spain. The invasion of the North African Almohads at the end of the twelfth century brought the era of tolerance to an end. Jews and Christians had to convert or emigrate. Those who refused con-version moved to Christian Spain, where, despite continuing intolerance, a pragmatic convivencia based on the satisfaction of mutual interests shaped social interactions: “Before long, educated Jews were co-opted as royal advisors, ambassadors, and physicians,” says Paris, “just as they had been under the Moors. Like the caliphs, the Christian kings of Castile and Aragon became protectors of ‘their Jews’.” This practical pluralism spread with the ideologically driven Reconquista of the lands previously won by the Moors. “Pacification was in everyone’s interest,” Paris notes. “The monarchs of Christian Spain had other things on their minds than abstract notions of religious orthodoxy; they had to settle border territories … and promote the local economy. For this they depended on the skills of their newly incorporated citizens, which meant accepting minority cultures and religions, just as the Moors had done.”

How did this pragmatic pluralism devolve into the terror of the Inquisition and the expulsion first of the Jews and then the Moriscos (Muslim converts to Christianity)? For readers interested in the broader ramifications of Paris’s story, this is one of the most illuminating points in her account. The details are significant, with Catholicism, in its intolerant backward-looking mode, figuring prominently. Ambitious religious leaders rejected the pragmatic pluralism favoured by their political counterparts. Outbreaks of plague and unpredictable climatic

Seeds of HateTracing tyranny back to medieval Spain.triadafiloS triadafilopouloS

Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos is a professor of politi-cal science at the University of Toronto Scarborough and the School of Public Policy and Governance. He is the author of Becoming Multicultural: Immigration and the Politics of Membership in Canada and Germany (UBC Press, 2012).

Literary Review of Canada 30 reviewcanada.ca

changes linked to the Little Ice Age prompted a search for scapegoats, which religious ideologues skillfully exploited using anti-Semitic myths spread from northern Europe as a useful means of framing Jews as the harbingers of woe. These forces came to a head in the late 14th century, instigating a series of pogroms that culminated in the massacre of Jews across Spain in 1391, a fit of violence accompanied by efforts to convert Jews to Christianity en masse by Catholic priests.

Conversion offered Spain’s Jews a way around the strict prohibitions that limited social mobility. Many took this route, leading to the emergence of a large class of “new Christian” converts (conversos). While conversion granted new Christians access to occupations that had hitherto been off limits, their efforts to assimilate into the dominant society was doubly limited. The idea that one could simply leave one’s old life behind was, in many cases, unre-alistic. Paris notes that many conversos continued to effectively live as Jews, as reflected in their main-tenance of Jewish dietary restrictions and other practices. Meanwhile, old Christians typically did not embrace their new co-religionists. Even those conversos who did accept their new religion and made the difficult decision to leave behind their old life were not accepted as true Christians. The idea that Jewishness was immutable was fed by discom-fort at the rapid success of many new Christians.

The fate of the conversos was sealed by the union of the kingdoms of Castile and Aragon under the dual monarchy of Isabella of Castile and Ferdinand of Aragon. Despite his mother’s converso origins, Ferdinand spearheaded an inquisition against new Christians suspected of heresy, then expelled Jews unwilling to join the ranks of the converted. His reasons for doing so, says Paris, were driven less by

religious hatred than by a coldly calculating consid-eration of political interests: “Ferdinand divorced politics from ethics and married government to national interests, making him the first of a modern breed.”

The Inquisition served several purposes, con-solidating and advancing the interests of the crown while satisfying popular anti-Jewish (and later anti-Muslim) sentiment and the Catholic church’s long-standing interest in rooting out heresy among the new Christians.

Conversos suspected of heresy were rounded up  and detained. Their possessions were confis-cated and they were compelled (oftentimes after being subjected to torture) to admit their trans-gressions during a public “act of faith” (auto de fe). Absolution required a range of punishments, including lengthy prison terms, public floggings and forced labour. Those sentenced to death were released to the secular arm of the state and burned at the stake. The first Inquisitor General, Tomàs de Torquemada, ordered some 8,800 such executions.

The decision to expel Spain’s Jews came soon after the end of the Reconquista in 1491. Paris notes that the decision was based on a hard-nosed con-sideration of interests on the part of the Catholic monarchs. Thanks to the Inquisition, it was already possible to appropriate the possessions of con-victed conversos, but other Jewish fortunes could be acquired solely through taxation. “A general expulsion would appropriate entire fortunes in an instant,” and “also cancel all outstanding debts, including those of the beleaguered and danger-ously volatile lower classes.” The edict was signed in the Alhambra palace in Granada in July 1492. Spain’s Jews were forced to leave en masse. By 1502, the remaining Moors were compelled to convert to

Catholicism. Most did but, as with the conversos before them, their Christian status was questioned and they soon “became suspect heretics, new fod-der for the Inquisition.” Their own expulsion ulti-mately came in 1609.

Paris sees the end of convivencia in Spain as a harbinger of later tyranny. Like the victims of the Holocaust, for example, the Jews of Spain were subject to racial exclusion, attempted assimila-tion, pogroms and then “a final solution.” And in both cases, the destruction of long-standing Jewish communities was pursued through a program of dehumanization that took advantage of our basic distrust of others. Given this fundamental aspect of human nature, says Paris, spurring racial hatred in diverse societies is “as easy as paint-by-numbers.”

Or is it? Paris maintains that our tendency to reject pluralism persists and has become even sharper of late, a consequence of the end of the Cold War and the anti-Muslim reaction catalyzed by the terror attacks of September  11, 2001. She cites the bloody disintegration of the former Yugoslavia, the Rwandan genocide of 1994, recent bans on the niqab in France and anti-Muslim senti-ment in the United States in support of her claim. Canada stands as a more positive case, with its policy of official multiculturalism, but even here recent events in Quebec raise concerns. Paris’s conclusion regarding the durability of pluralism thus remains bleak: coexistence is always tenuous, subject to political elites’ manipulation of our very human nature. Paris warns that we must temper our optimism about future progress by reflecting on history and carefully guarding against its repetition.

One need not be a wide-eyed optimist to take issue with her conclusion. Contemporary multi-cultural societies differ from 15th-century Spain in fundamental ways. Social life in contemporary liberal-democratic states is structured by institu-tions that developed over time in response to the absolutism of early modern monarchs and the hor-rors of the Second World War and the Holocaust. Modern constitutions bestow rights on all citizens, granting ethnic and religious minorities means through which they can confront and attempt to counter tyranny often through the auspices of courts. While the processes through which rights are validated has been uneven, recent history points to important (if only partial) successes on the part of women, aboriginal peoples, racialized groups, religious minorities and members of the LGBTQ community.

Distrust of the other certainly persists but today’s victims are typically not dispossessed subjects forc-ibly expelled from states’ territories through acts of ethno-religious homogenization. Rather, today’s principal victims are non-citizens denied sanctuary by states’ jealously guarding their sovereignty. The record of liberal-democratic states in this regard is especially damning, pointing to the limits of the post–World War Two rights revolution. That today’s refugee flows have, in many instances, been pro-voked by foreign policies hatched in leading liberal-democratic states underscores this point.

The world of the 21st century thus differs in important ways from Spain under Ferdinand and Isabella or Germany under the Nazis. While coex-istence within liberal-democratic states has been reinforced by the extension of constitutionally enshrined citizenship rights to hitherto exclude minority groups, non-citizen outsiders—even those desperate for sanctuary—are subject to often-brutal barriers. Our relation to diversity may be dif-ferent, but it is marked by its own unique elements of tyranny.

Name Suite/Apt.

Street City

Province or State Country

Postal/Zip Code E-mail

Telephone Fax

Please bill me! My cheque (payable to the Literary Review of Canada) is enclosed. Charge my Visa or MasterCard.

Card number Expiry

Signature

Fax or mail completed form to Literary Review of Canada, PO Box 8, Station KToronto on m4p 2g1 • fax: 1-800-635-5255 • tel: 416-932-5081 email: literaryreview@yrnet.com

To subscribe online, visit www.reviewcanada.ca/sub2015.

If you do not wish to receive correspondence from the LRC or other organizations

unless it pertains directly to your subscription, please check here

Subscribe!

NH1509

1 year (10 issues)(individuals) (libraries and

institutions)Canadian addresses* $56 + tax $68 + taxOutside Canada $86 $98

Prices include shipping and postage.

*Rates including GST/HST by provinceIndividuals ($56 + tax)

Libraries ($68 + tax)

ON, NB, NL (13%) $63.28 $76.84PE (14%) $63.84 $77.52NS (15%) $64.40 $78.20Rest of Canada (5%) $58.80 $71.40