quantifying farmers preferences: can it be done? steven franzel use of the bao game for getting...

15
Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine Accuracy, precision, and ability to generalize User-friendliness of participatory research

Upload: buck-gilbert-hines

Post on 12-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done?Steven Franzel

• Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees.

• Combine– Accuracy, precision, and ability to

generalize– User-friendliness of participatory

research

Page 2: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Tools for getting farmer evaluations of technologies

• 1. Scoring questionnaires

– Rating on a ‘1 to x’ basis gives quantitative data, but is problematic in rural, third world setting

Because farmers’ involvement is passive, they become bored

Page 3: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Tools for getting farmer evaluations of technologies

• 2. Matrix ranking: diagram with alternatives on one axis, criteria on the other.

Page 4: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Matrix ranking: Maize varieties

Local INIAP 180 Imported

Yield/ha

Resistance to pests

Mkt. Price

Taste

Prod. Cost

Page 5: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

• Advantages of matrix ranking:

– Farmers control process

– Visual tool, facilitates discussion and correction

But it is not used for collecting quantitative data (Maxwell 1997)

Page 6: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Bao game case study

• Overall research objective: Combine advantages of scoring questionnaires and matrix ranking.

• Case study : Burundi.

• Objective.: Find out how farmers evaluate trees in an on-farm trial.

Page 7: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,
Page 8: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

First you need to get farmers’ criteria

• Tour the farm asking about the uses, advantage and disadvantage of each tree

• List the farmers’ criteria

• Break off a branch of each tree

Page 9: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

• Find a comfortable place for the farmer to use the bao game to score different trees

Page 10: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Watch out, a crowd quickly forms!

Page 11: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Burundi case study

• 45 farmer interviews. • They rated 8 trees for timber and

firewood across 7 criteria

• Ratings from 1(low) to 5 (high)

Page 12: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Farmer criteria

• Tree management and growth– Compatibility with crops– Speed of growth– Resistance to pests

• Use for timber– Wood appearance– Straightness

• Use for firewood– Quick in drying– Durability of fire

Page 13: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Farmers' mean ratings of tree species using bao game

Trees Compatabi-lity

with crops

Speed of growth

Durability of fire

Cedrela serrata 4.6 (0.5) 4.3 (0.7) - Grevillea robusta 4.9 (0.3) 4.6 (0.5) 2.8 (1.2)

Markhamia lutea 3.7 (1.0) 1.9 (0.9) 4.2 (0.7)

Eucalyptus spp 1.1 (0.3) 4.3 (0.8) 5.0 (0.0) (Standard deviation in parentheses)

Page 14: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Burundi case study: Main findings

• Eucalyptus and Grevillea, the most common species, also the highest rated– Grevillea for fast growth and

compatibility– Eucalyptus for fast growth and

firewood

• Two other high-rated species, Cedrela and Maesopsis, not commonly grown due to lack of planting material

Page 15: Quantifying farmers preferences: Can it be done? Steven Franzel Use of the bao game for getting farmers’ assessments of alternative trees. Combine –Accuracy,

Conclusions

• Bao game combines strengths of scoring questionnaires with those of matrix ranking

• Bao game is useful for generating quantitative data– Accurate– Precise– Permits generalization, hypothesis

testing

• Quantitative data on farmer criteria and preferences are key inputs into tree improvement program.