quantified self, health apps and medical information ... francesco.pdf · symposium health...

23
Symposium Health I nformation : C hallenges and Strategies | November 5 , 2015 Quantified Self, Health APPs and Medical Information Sociotechnical issues Francesco Panese

Upload: tranminh

Post on 14-Jul-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Symposium Health Information: Challenges and Strategies | November 5, 2015 Quantified Self, Health APPs and Medical Information Sociotechnical issues Francesco Panese

The body as data corpus Science – Clinic – Self-care – Big Data

2

First glucose meter « Ames Reflectance Meter » (ARM, 1970), and followers.

Santorio Santorio, « Weighing chair », 17th Century

3

The measurement of the body has been a common medical practice. But the contemporary time is characterized by a sociotechnical shift:

The computerization of data production and storage devices.

Consequently, the digitization of the body's biometrics and diagnoses (imaging, genetics, laboratory results, preventative test, etc.).

The personalization of the data production, by individuals sick or healthy.

The extension of measurement to self-biometrics, behaviours and lifestyle.

The body as data corpus Science – Clinic – Self-care – Big Data

4

1990’s: Web 1.0. Internet and proliferation of online medical information. BUT the medical web sites were essentially static, offering only few possibilities to exchange singular experiences and data.

Since ca. 2005: Web 2.0 or Social Web: expanding opportunities for users to access and, above all, to share medical and health information (peer-to-peer). Deborah Lupton (2014). Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps. Societies 2014, 4, 606–622.

Since 2010’: Web 3.0 or Web of data.

The rise of e-patient Sociotechnical conditions of possibility

5

Generalization and globalization of standardized communication multi tasks devices (smartphones, tablets, self tracking, etc.).

Ubiquitous availability of data through multitasking technologies in networks within which each singular user could be specifically profiled.

Web market and commodification of data.

Start-Upization of software industry.

The rise of e-health Sociotechnical conditions of possibility

6

The rise of e-health Sociotechnical conditions of possibility

Proliferation of lifestyle and health APPs.

Proliferation of “intelligent captors”

Smart Contact Lens Prototype, Google/Novartis

7

« Yet these [health] APPs have proliferated in recent years as part of a constellation of new digital health technologies that include telehealth and telemedicine, digital gaming technologies, digitised medical education and health promotion materials, wearable devices to monitor and measure bodily functions and activities, electronic patient records and booking systems and the use of large digital data sets (“big data”) to generate knowledge about healthcare, health behaviours and disease patterns. » Deborah Lupton (2014). Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps. Societies 2014, 4, 606–622, p. 608.

The rise of e-health A dense sociotechnical network

8

Health APPs are dynamic nodes between:

Direct or indirect production data on body functions and behaviours.

Algorithms of calculation that (retro)act as norms on user's practices.

Users who self-modulate their body and behaviours (movement, diet, biorythm, medical treatments, etc.).

The rise of Health APPs What Health APPs are?

Contextual Data

9

Health APPs are “Bio-Digital Objects" which make visible dimensions of the body and behaviours that were previously hidden, and expose them to the user in order to orient his/her behaviours (and potentially to share them with others). (see Webster, A (2012). Introduction: Bio-objects: Exploring the boundaries of life. In Bio-Objects: Life in the 21st Century; Vermeulen, N., Tamminen, S., Webster, A., Eds.; Ashgate: Farnham, UK; pp. 1–10.

Physical Activities: Miles, steps, calories, repetitions, sets, Metabolic equivalents

Diet and Nutrition: Calories consumed, carbs, fat, protein, specific ingredients, glycemic index, satiety, portions, supplement doses, tastiness, cost, location

Psychological, Mental, and Cognitive States and Traits: Mood, happiness, irritation, emotion, anxiety, esteem, depression, confidence IQ, alertness, focus, selective/sustained/divided attention, reaction, memory, verbal fluency, patience, creativity, reasoning, psychomotor vigilance

Environmental Variables: Location, architecture, weather, noise, pollution, clutter, light, season

Situational Variables: Context, situation, gratification of situation, time of day, day of week

Social Variables: Influence, trust, charisma, karma, current role/status in the group or social network

Source: http://measuredme.com/2012/10/building-thatperfect-quantified-self-app-notes-to-developers-and-qs-community-html

The rise of Health APPs What Health APPs do?

10

Health APPs produce not only discrete data but, above all, temporal continuous data and correlations between diverse categories of data.

The rise of Health APPs What Health APPs produce?

Melanie Swan (2013). The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery. Big Data,1(2): 85-99.

11

« The Lemanic Center for Personalized Health » (persp. 2030) http://events.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/events/files/JSP%202014/Intranet/Research_PersonalizedHealth_Trono.pdf

The rise of Health APPs How Health APPs are connected to Big Data in biomedicine

12

Melanie Swan (2013). The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery. Big Data,1(2): 85-99.

The rise of Health APPs Health APPs and Big Data in biomedicine

13

Health APPs are behaviours guidance tools. In their way, they are thus “life modifiers” (“Modificateurs de la vie”, as Claude Bernard qualified drugs).

? =

The question could than be: What is the “active ingredient” of Health APPs?

Conceptualizing Health APPs APPs and drugs?

14

The “active ingredient” of Health APPs is the Self itself, mediated by technology:

Health technologies like Health APPs define population groups.

Conversely, population groups use Health APPs to define themselves.

In between, one could hypothesize a “looping effect” (notion proposed by the Canadian philosopher Ian Hacking) according to which, people who are being classified by Health APPs tend to accommodate themselves to the norms embedded in algorithms.

Health APPs have thus a role of “making up people” in inducing new behaviours and, more broadly, a kind of new “technologically assisted selfhood”.

Conceptualizing Health APPs APPs and drugs?

15

Conceptualizing Health APPs APPs and « Making up People »

People

Data gathering Algorithms

Experts/Knowledge

Tools / Knowledge embedded

Normative classification

Knowledgeable data

Interactive elements of the looping effect induced by Health APPs.

16

Health APPs as Bio-Digital Objects act as “biosocial semiotic tools”, i.e. tools producing signs used by users to create meaning, which organizes and shapes human interactions with oneself and with others. This meaning-making process cannot be separated from the social and cultural context.

Conceptualizing Health APPs « Biosocial semiotic tools »

Source: American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) « Our 7 Favorite Apps for Good Health (and Cancer Prevention) ».

17

The scientific validity of integrated data, the collected data and the data produced, that is to say, the whole chain of the data management that lead to the establishment of health standards and norms in respect to which the user is classified by the device.

Regulation norms, accreditation and supervision (FDA, Swissmedic, etc.).

Few critical issues Quality of knowledge embedded in Health APPs

18

Adapting clinical trials protocols for these new tools

Few critical issues Quality of knowledge embedded in Health APPs

19

Few critical issues A shift in public health?

The traditional “contractual model of prevention” works in the mode of

complementarity between 1. the objectivization of health risks done by biomedical research (particularly epidemiology); 2. the movement of subjectivization through which individuals must become actors responsible for their health. Jean-Pierre Dozon," prevention models ", in D. Fassin & JP Dozon, Critical public Health, Paris, Balland, 2001, p. 23-46, p. 41.

Health APPs strengthens the role of individuals in these two levels:

They induce an unprecedented contribution of individuals to the objectivization of their own specific health risks.

They reinforce an the weight and the pace of the subjectification which could lead users to continuous, systematic and maybe frenetic, adaptive behaviours.

20

« Medicine is an information profession, and the underlying basis of investigation must increasingly include data science. There is a need to invest in strengthening the skills of clinical investigators, very few of whom are thoroughly trained in data science. » Harlan M. Krumholz, Big Data And New Knowledge In Medicine: The Thinking, Training, And Tools Needed For A Learning Health System, Health Affairs, 33, no.7 (2014):1163-1170, p. 1167.

http://www.infinithealthcare.com/resource-center/10-ways-technology-boosts-healthcare-services/

Few critical issues A shift in medical training?

21

Few critical issues A shift in health literacy?

Workshop Summary (2015) Workshop Summary (2009)

22

Few critical issues Data, market and politics

European Commision public consultation on the Green Paper on mobile Health. http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/public-consultation-green-paper-mobile-health

Larry Page, Google CEO, TED conference, March 2014.

23

Thank you for your attention [email protected]