quality assurance: the cos ratings and the osep reporting categories

28
1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Upload: sylvie

Post on 13-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories. Revised January 2013. Functioning. Entry. Entry. Exit. Entry. Exit. Key Point. The OSEP categories describe types of progress children can make between entry and exit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

1

Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the

OSEP Reporting Categories

Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Page 2: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 2

Functioning

Page 3: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 3

Entry

Page 4: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 4

Entry Exit

Page 5: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 5

Entry Exit

Page 6: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 6

Key Point

• The OSEP categories describe types of progress children can make between entry and exit

• Two COS ratings (entry and exit) are needed to calculate what OSEP category describes a child progress

Page 7: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

7

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

e. % of children who maintain functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers

• Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND

• Rated 6 or 7 at exit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 8: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 8

Entry Exit

Page 9: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 9

Entry Exit

Page 10: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 10

Entry Exit

Page 11: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

11

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

d. % of children who improve functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers

• Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND

• Rated 6 or 7 at exit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 12: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 12

Entry Exit

Page 13: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

13

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

c. % of children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same aged peers, but did not reach it

• Rated higher at exit than entry; AND

• Rated 5 or below at exit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 14: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 14

Entry Exit

Page 15: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 15

Entry Exit

Page 16: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

b. % of children who improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to same aged peers

• Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND

• Rated the same or lower at exit; AND

• “Yes” on the progress question (b)

16Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 17: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

b. % of children who improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to same aged peers

OR•Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND•Rated 5 or lower at exit; AND•“Yes” on the progress question

17Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 18: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 18

Entry Exit

Page 19: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 19

Entry Exit

Page 20: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 20

Entry Exit

Page 21: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 21

Entry Exit

Page 22: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

a. % of children who did not improve functioning

• Rated lower at exit than entry; OR

• Rated 1 at both entry and exit; AND

• Scored “No” on the progress question (b)

22Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 23: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 23

Entry Exit

Page 24: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 24

Entry Exit

Page 25: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

25

Federal Reporting Categories: Activity

COS Ratings to Progress Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 26: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

ECO Calculator

Page 27: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

27

ECO Calculator (Tutor)

http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/outcomes.cfm

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 28: Quality Assurance:  The COS Ratings and the  OSEP Reporting Categories

The Early Childhood Outcomes Center 28

For more information….

www.the-eco-center.org