quality assurance project plan manager/quality assurance officer ... 10.0 sample handling, ... his...

Title: RIDEM 303(d) Supplemental Monitoring Program (Groups 3 and 4) Revision No.: 1

Revision Date: February 2002

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN

RIDEM�s 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters Supplemental Monitoring Program (Groups 3 and 4)

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

November, 2001

Project Manager/Quality Assurance Officer Wayne Jenkins Date RIDEM, Office of Water Resources 235 Promenade Street Providence, RI 02908 Tel: 401.222.4700 ext. 7272 [email protected]

EPA QA Manager Steve DiMattei, Quality Assurance Chemist Date EPA New England Region 1, Office of Environmental Measurement and Evaluation 11 Technology Drive North Chelmsford, MA 01863-2431 Tel: 617.918.8369 [email protected]

1



1.0 Cover Page ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Document Format ..................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Distribution List and Project Personnel Sign-Off Sheet ........................................... 6 4.0 Project Organization .................................................................................................. 6

4.1 Project Organizational Chart ................................................................................. 7 4.2 Communication Pathways ..................................................................................... 7 4.3 Personnel Responsibilities and Qualifications ...................................................... 8

5.0 Project Planning/Problem Definition........................................................................ 8 5.1 Project Planning Meetings..................................................................................... 8 5.2 Problem Definition/Site History and Background ................................................ 8

6.0 Project Description and Schedule ........................................................................... 11 6.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................. 12 6.2 Project Schedule .................................................................................................. 12

7.0 Project Quality Objectives and Measurement Performance Criteria...................... 13 7.1 Project Quality Objectives................................................................................. 13 7.2 Measurement Performance Criteria..................................................................... 13

8.0 Sampling Process Design...................................................................................... 14 8.1 Sampling Design Rationale ................................................................................. 14

9.0 Sampling Procedures and Requirements ................................................................ 19 9.1 Sampling Procedures ........................................................................................... 19 9.2 Equipment Cleaning ............................................................................................ 20 9.3 Field Equipment Calibration and Maintenance ................................................... 20

10.0 Sample Handling, Tracking, and Custody Requirements....................................... 21 10.1 Sample Collection Documentation...................................................................... 21

10.1.1 Field Notes .................................................................................................... 21 10.2 Sample Handling and Tracking System .............................................................. 21

11.0 Field Analytical Method Requirements .................................................................. 22 12.0 Fixed Laboratory Analytical Method Requirements .............................................. 22

12.1 Fixed Laboratory Analytical................................................................................ 22 13.0 Quality Control Requirements ................................................................................ 24

13.1 Field Quality Control Samples ............................................................................ 24 13.2 Fixed Laboratory Analytical Quality Control Samples....................................... 24

14.0 Data Acquisition Requirements .............................................................................. 24 15.0 Documentation, Records, and Data Management................................................... 26 16.0 Assessments and Response Actions........................................................................ 26 17.0 QA Management Reports ....................................................................................... 27 18.0 Verification and Validation Requirements ............................................................. 28 19.0 Verification and Validation Procedures.................................................................. 28 20.0 Data Usability/Reconciliation with Project Quality Objectives ............................. 29 References......................................................................................................................... 30

2



Attachments

Attachment A EPA Worksheets Attachment B Field Sampling SOPs Attachment C Laboratory Analytical SOPs Attachment D YSI Model 85 Operations Manual Attachment E Blank Field Sheet Attachment F Chain of Custody Forms Attachment G Field Analytical SOPs

List of Tables

Table 1 Required QAPP elements checklist. ...................................................................... 5 Table 2 Distribution List..................................................................................................... 6 Table 3 Group 3 Waterbodies: Waterbodies represented by outdated total metals data. ... 9 Table 4 Group 4 Waterbodies: Waterbodies represented by old data. ............................... 9 Table 5 Proposed project schedule. .................................................................................. 12 Table 6 Group 3 sampling locations and parameters........................................................ 15 Table 7 Group 4 sampling locations and parameters........................................................ 17 Table 8 Sample parameters and characteristics. .............................................................. 19 Table 9 Project sampling SOP references......................................................................... 20 Table 10 Field equipment maintenance, testing, and inspection. .................................... 20 Table 11 Sample handling system .................................................................................... 21 Table 12 Field analytical SOPs......................................................................................... 22 Table 13 Laboratory SOPs................................................................................................ 23 Table 14 The informational sources that caused the listing of the waterbodies into Group

3 or Group 4 of the RIDEM 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters. .......................... 25 Table 15 Project documentation and records.................................................................... 26 Table 16 Project assessment table..................................................................................... 27 Table 17 QA management reports. ................................................................................... 28 Table 18 Data verification process. .................................................................................. 29

List of Figures Figure 1 Organizational Chart ............................................................................................ 7 Figure 2 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters, Group 3 waterbodies.............................. 10 Figure 3 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters, Group 4 waterbodies.............................. 11

3


Revision Date: February 2002 2.0 Document Format A copy of the completed EPA Worksheet No. 2 is provided in Attachment A. The worksheets and/or required information that are not applicable or are in a format other than an EPA worksheet are summarized in Table 1 with a brief explanation.

4



Table 1 Required QAPP elements checklist. EPA Worksheet Section Location Comments

1 1.0 Cover Page 2 2.0 Attachment A 3 3.0 Section 3.0 Table 2 4 3.0 Section 3.0 Narrative 5a 4.0 Section 4.1 Narrative 5b 4.0 Section 4.2 Narrative 6 4.0 Section 4.3 Narrative 7 4.0 Section 4.2 Narrative 8a 5.0 Attachment A 8b 5.0 Section 5.2 Narrative 9a 6.0 Section 5.0 Narrative 9b 6.0 Attachment A 9c 6.0 Section 8.1 Narrative, Table 6 and Table 7 9d 6.0 Attachment A 10 6.0 Section 6.2 Table 3 11a 7.0 Sections 7.1 & 7.2 Narrative 11b 7.0 Attachment A 12a 8.0 Section 8.1 Narrative and Table 4 and 5 12b 8.0 Attachment A 13 9.0 Section 9.1 Table 6 14 9.0 Section 9.3 Table 7 15 9.0 Section 9.3 Table 8 16 10.0 Section 10.2 Table 9 17 11.0 Section 11.0 Table 11 18 11.0 Not Attached Refer to Section 9.3 and Table 9 19 11.0 Not Attached Refer to Section 9.3 and Table 9 20 12.0 Section 12.1 Table 10 21 12.0 Not Attached See lab SOPs Table 10 22a 13.0 Attachment A 22b 13.0 Not Attached Refer to EPA Worksheet 22a 23a 13.0 Not Attached Refer to Appendix D 23b 13.0 Not Attached Refer to Appendix D 24a 13.0 Attachment A 24b 13.0 Section 13 Narrative 25 14.0 Section 14.0 Table 11 26 15.0 Section 15.0 Table 12 27a 16.0 Section 16.0 Narrative 27b 16.0 Section 16.0 Table 13 27c 16.0 NA Project Assessment Plan 28 17.0 Section 17.0 Table 14 29a 19.0 Section 19.0 Table 15 29b 19.0 Attachment A EPA Worksheets 11b, 22a, and 24a29c 19.0 NA Data validation Modifications 30 20.0 Attachment A EPA Worksheets 11b, 22a, and 24a

5


Revision Date: February 2002 3.0 Distribution List and Project Personnel Sign-Off Sheet The distribution list documents to whom copies of the approved QAPP and any subsequent revisions will be sent. The distribution list is provided in Table 2.

Table 2 Distribution List

QAPP Recipient Title Organization Telephone Number

Steve DiMattei

Quality Assurance Chemist

USEPA, NE Region I

(617) 918-8369

Connie Carey

Principal Environmental

Scientist

RIDEM

(401) 222-4700

x 7239

Wayne Jenkins Principal Sanitary Engineer

RIDEM

(401) 222-4700

x 7272

Robert Richardson Senior

Environmental Scientist

RIDEM

(401) 222-4700

x 7240 Doug Cullen Laboratory Manager Microinorganics, Inc. (401) 782-8166 Karen Gavitt Laboratory

Supervisor MITKEM, Inc. (401) 732-3400

Kathleen Feldman Laboratory Manager BAL Laboratory, Inc. (401) 785-0241 Linda Green Director URI Watershed

Watch Program (401) 874-2905

Kevin Braga Laboratory Manager ESS Laboratory (401) 461-7181 In addition to the distribution list, all personnel in the organization chart will receive a copy of the QAPP. A separate Project Personnel Sign-Off Sheet was not developed for this project. 4.0 Project Organization The project organization chart is provided below. This chart identifies reporting relationships between the Lead Organization and other organizations, including contractors and sub-contractors and their contact information.

6



4.1 Project Organizational Chart

Figure 1 Organizational Chart

Lead Organization SupervisorRIDEM

Connie Carey(401) 222-4700 ext. 7239

Contractor OrganizationESS Laboratory

Role: VOC and Chloride AnalysisKevin Braga, (401) 461-7181

Contractor OrganizationBAL Laboratory, Inc.

Role: Pathogens AnalysisKathleen Feldman, (401) 785-0241

Contractor OrganizationURI Watershed Watch Program

Role: Nutrient and Chlorophyll a AnalysisLinda Green, Program Director (401) 874-2905

Sub-contractor OrganizationMITKEM, Inc.

Role: Hardness AnalysisKaren Gavitt, Laboratory Supervisor, (401) 732-3400

Contractor OrganizationMicroinorganics, Inc.Role: Metals Analysis

Doug Cullen, (401) 782-8166

Lead Organization Senior Environmental ScientistRIDEM

Robert Richardson(401) 222-4700 ext. 7240

Lead OrganizationRIDEM

(401) 222-4700

Lead Organization SupervisorRIDEM

Wayne Jenkins(401) 222-4700 ext. 7272

Approval AuthorityEPA NE Region I(617) 918-8369

4.2 Communication Pathways It is anticipated that RIDEM personnel will conduct all sampling activities for this project. The Project Manager will contact all potential sampling personnel via email at least one week before the anticipated sampling date. The Project Manager will be responsible for contacting all laboratories to order all necessary sampling containers and to alert the laboratory to incoming samples. It will be the responsibility of the laboratories to contact any sub-contractors. Sampling personnel will be alerted via email or telephone of the time and date of sampling and a �tailgate meeting� will be conducted at a predetermined location before sampling commences. Decisions to alter the sampling plan will be made jointly by the Project Manager/QA Officer and Supervisor and all changes made in the field will be documented in the field notes. All changes to the QAPP will be reported in each Status Report and the Final Report.

7


Revision Date: February 2002 4.3 Personnel Responsibilities and Qualifications RIDEM personnel with surface water quality and biological sampling experience will conduct all sampling. Resumes of RIDEM personnel are on file at the RIDEM office in Providence, Rhode Island. Doug Cullen, Laboratory Manager for Microinorganics, Inc., will be responsible for the laboratory analysis of the surface water samples for metals and hardness. His resume is on file at the Microinorganics, Inc. laboratory in Narragansett, Rhode Island. The actual laboratory analysis for hardness will be conducted by MITKEM, a sub-contractor to Microinorganics, Inc. The resume for Karen Gavitt, Supervisor at MITKEM, is on file at MITKEM, in Warwick, Rhode Island. Kathleen Feldman, Laboratory Manager at BAL Laboratories, Inc. will be responsible for the laboratory analysis of the surface water samples for bacteria/pathogens. Her resume is on file at BAL Laboratories, Inc. in Cranston, Rhode Island. Linda Green of the URI Watershed Watch Program will be responsible for the laboratory analysis of the surface water samples for nutrients. Her resume is on file at the URI Watershed Watch Program in Kingston, Rhode Island. Kevin Braga, Laboratory Manager for ESS Laboratory (ESS) will be responsible for the analysis of VOCs and chloride and his resume is on file at ESS in Cranston, Rhode Island. 5.0 Project Planning/Problem Definition

5.1 Project Planning Meetings Project scoping meetings were held to define the purpose and expected results of the project, the environmental decisions that need to be made and the sampling, analytical, and data assessment activities that will be performed. Each of the project scoping meetings are documented in EPA Worksheet No. 8a in Attachment A.

5.2 Problem Definition/Site History and Background Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires all states to monitor water quality conditions of the state�s waters, identify and list impaired waters and set priority rankings for all impaired waters included on the 303(d) list. RIDEM utilizes water quality information available from a variety of sources including data collected by state, federal and local agencies; universities; and volunteer monitoring organizations. The monitoring proposed in this QAPP would provide water quality information where data gaps occur. The 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters categorizes impaired water bodies into five groups. Waterbodies in Group 3 of RIDEM�s 303(d) list were assessed with total metals data, however, amendments to the Rhode Island Water Quality Regulations promulgated in 1997 express metals criteria as dissolved metals. Waterbodies in Group 4 consists of waterbodies that were based on insufficient data and/or data that is old. Additional

8


Revision Date: February 2002 sampling of these Group 3 and 4 waterbodies is required to make a more accurate assessment. The waterbodies listed in Group 3 and 4 to be sampled under this QAPP are provided in Tables 3 and 4 and are depicted in Figures 2 and 3. Table 3 Group 3 Waterbodies: Waterbodies represented by outdated total metals data.

Waterbody ID Waterbody Name Impairment RI0006014R-04 Pawtuxet River (North and South Branches) Cd RI0006017R-02 Meshanicut Brook Cu, Pb RI007020E-01A Providence River metals

Table 4 Group 4 Waterbodies: Waterbodies represented by old data. Waterbody ID Waterbody Name Impairment RI0001002L-09 Slatersville Reservoir pathogens, phosphorus RI0006017L-02 Three Ponds pathogens RI0006018R-04 Simmons Brook pathogens RI0006018L-05 Print Works Pond pathogens, TSS, chlorides RI0007035L-03 North Easton Pond (Green End

Pond) biodiversity impacts, excess algal

growth RI0008040R-16C Wood River-Alton Dam to

confluence with the Pawcatuck Riverbiodiversity impacts, unknown toxicity

9



Figure 2 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters, Group 3 waterbodies.

10



Figure 3 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters, Group 4 waterbodies.

11


Revision Date: February 2002 6.0 Project Description and Schedule The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that states assess their water quality for attainment of the fishable and swimmable goals of the CWA. The requirements of the 303(d) process help determine the scope of the Group 3 and 4 supplemental monitoring.

6.1 Project Overview Based on a review of existing studies conducted within Groups 3 and 4 of RIDEM�s 303(d) List of Impaired Waters, water quality data gaps were identified and the need for additional monitoring was established. The objective of this project is to provide additional monitoring data to characterize water quality conditions within these waterbodies. The Department will utilize the results of this sampling program during the water quality assessments for the 2004 cycle. Prior to the initiation of the 2004 assessments, the Department will develop and finalize a Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology (CALM), which will include public participation and EPA approval. This assessment and listing methodology will define the criteria and protocol which must be followed to determine the attainment of the individual designated uses for each waterbody/segment. This information will then be used to place each waterbody/segment into one of the 5 new Listing Categories identified in EPA�s Integrated Report Guidance (EPA, 2001). As EPA has noted the new listing categories are intended to present the water quality standard attainment status for every waterbody and to develop a 303(d) List of waters truly in need of a TMDL. The change over to a new assessment methodology and the use of five new listing categories may result in moving some of the Group 3 and 4 waterbodies/segments from our current 303(d) List (Category 5 under the Integrated Report guidelines) to one of the other Categories. The contaminants of concern and other target analytes are listed in EPA Worksheet No. 9b, provided in Attachment A. Field and quality control samples are summarized in Section 8.1 and Tables 6 and 7 and the laboratory analytical services information are summarized in EPA Worksheet 9d, provided in Attachment A.

6.2 Project Schedule

Table 5 Proposed project schedule.

2001 2002 Task Deliverable O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

QAPP Preparation QAPP Document Sample Collection NA Laboratory Analysis Laboratory Report Final Data Report Final Data Report

12


Revision Date: February 2002 7.0 Project Quality Objectives and Measurement Performance Criteria

7.1 Project Quality Objectives The data generated from this project will be used by RIDEM to assess the current water quality conditions of the State�s 2000 303(d) Group 3 and Group 4 waterbodies for the parameters of concern. All the data quality objectives will be met if the data collected is sufficient to complete the assessments. RIDEM water quality criteria for metals have been adopted as dissolved metals criteria to more closely approximate the bioavailable fraction of metal in the water column. The freshwater acute and chronic criteria for dissolved metals are presented as Freshwater Criteria Equations and Base e Exponential Values in Appendix B, Table 2 of the Water Quality Regulations (RIDEM,1997). Hardness is a component of the equation and must be determined. It should be noted that the minimum hardness value allowed for use in those equations is 25 mg/L, as calcium carbonate, even if the actual ambient hardness is less than 25 mg/L as calcium carbonate. For these reasons, all samples collected for this study will be analyzed for dissolved metals and hardness.

7.2 Measurement Performance Criteria Collecting high quality data is one of the most important goals of this project. Specific data quality objectives include precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability, and completeness. Measurement performance criteria are briefly presented below and are also found on EPA Worksheet No. 11b in Attachment A. Precision Precision is the degree of agreement among repeated measurements of the same characteristic under the same or similar conditions. The QC sample used to measure overall precision will consist of field duplicates and/or on-going precision and recovery (OPR) samples. Accuracy/Bias Accuracy is the extent of agreement between an observed value (sample result) and the true value of the parameter being measured. Bias describes the systematic or persistent error associated with a measurement process. These terms are used interchangeably in this document. The QC samples used to measure accuracy/bias will consist matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate, standard reference material (SRM), method blanks, and/or reagent blanks. Representiveness The selected stations and sampling frequency were chosen for their representativeness of conditions in the targeted waterbodies. The extent to which the measurements represent actual environmental conditions will be somewhat restricted by the time of year the samples are.

13


Revision Date: February 2002 Comparability To maximize the quality of the data collected, and to collect data that is comparable with other studies, accepted sampling procedures will be used during this study. All samples collected will be sent to laboratories that use standard methods. Sample collection locations will be documented in the field book using narratives, direct measurements using a calibrated tape, and/or global positioning satellites (GPS) to ensure data comparability for repeated sampling events. Completeness If the data collected is sufficient to complete the water quality assessments, then the data is considered to be complete. Measurement performance criteria help determine the completeness of a data set. RIDEM anticipates that 100 percent of the data will be useable for the project goals to be met. 8.0 Sampling Process Design This section describes the sampling system in terms of what media/matrices will be sampled, where the samples will be taken, the number of samples to be taken and the sampling frequency.

8.1 Sampling Design Rationale The media to be sampled will consist of surface water from selected waterbodies that are listed in Group 3 and 4 of the Rhode Island 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters. The objectives of the study are to: 1. To assess compliance with RIDEM water quality criteria for water bodies and

associated parameters listed in Group 4 and to investigate the trophic status of these waterbodies;

2 . To document baseline dissolved metal concentrations in Group 3 waters and assess these results for compliance with RIDEM dissolved metals criteria; and

3. To assist the RIDEM Water Quality Assessments Programs with the total maximum daily load (TMDL) prioritization process by providing them with current monitoring data to either verify the need for TMDL development and provide baseline data or help make the case for de-listing those waters determined to be in compliance with RIDEM ambient water quality criteria.

Sampling of the Group 3 waterbodies will occur quarterly for one year, will begin in the Winter of 2001, and will be conducted during steady state conditions. Sample station locations, number of samples collected, and number of QA/QC samples collected for metals analysis are summarized in Table 6.

14

Titl

e: R

IDEM

303

(d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

o.: 1

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Tab

le 6

Gro

up 3

che

mic

al a

nd b

iolo

gica

l sam

plin

g lo

catio

ns a

nd p

aram

eter

s.

Ana

lyte

(dis

solv

ed)

W

ater

body

St

atio

n

C

ity/T

own

Cu

Pb

Cd

Ni

Ag

Zn

N

o. o

f Sa

mpl

es

X N

o. o

f Su

rvey

s

N

umbe

r of

D

uplic

ate

Sam

ples

*

N

umbe

r of

Fie

ld

Bla

nks*

Tot

al

Num

ber

of

Sam

ples

fo

r th

e St

udy

Rt.

115

[Ptx

.N.[B

io.A

]] **

**

War

wic

k

X

4 Pa

wtu

xet R

iver

N

orth

Bra

nch

R

t. 11

6 [P

tx.N

.[Bio

.B]]*

***

Hop

e

X

4

Sand

y B

otto

m R

oad

[Ptx

.S.[B

io.A

]]**

**

Wes

t War

wic

k

X

4 Pa

wtu

xet R

iver

So

uth

Bra

nch

Rt.

33 [P

tx.S

.[Bio

.B]]

****

W

est W

arw

ick

X

4

Mes

hani

cut

Bro

ok

Wes

t Nat

ick

Roa

d [M

es.B

io.]*

***

War

wic

k X

X

4

Bet

wee

n Sa

bin

Poin

t and

nor

th e

nd o

f br

eakw

all,

in ~

20-2

5 ft.

of w

ater

Ea

st P

rovi

denc

e/

Cra

nsto

n So

uthw

est o

f Can

Num

ber 3

1 in

~6

ft. o

f w

ater

Cra

nsto

n B

etw

een

Gas

pee

poin

t and

Bul

lock

Poi

nt, i

n ~2

5-27

ft. o

f wat

er

War

wic

k/

East

Pro

vide

nce

Pr

ovid

ence

R

iver

***

Bet

wee

n R

ed G

ong

No.

23

and

Gre

en c

an

No.

24,

in a

ppro

xim

atel

y 23

-26

ft. o

f wat

er

W

arw

ick/

B

arrin

gton

X

X

X

X

X

X

28

Woo

d R

iver

**

Cha

rbar

t Pro

perty

[Wd.

Bio

]***

* R

ichm

ond

X

X

X

X

X

X

4

4

4

Tot

al52

4

4

60

** W

ood

Riv

er is

act

ually

list

ed in

Gro

up 4

for �

Unk

now

n To

xici

ty�,

but

the

met

als p

ortio

n of

the

sam

plin

g w

as in

clud

ed w

ith G

roup

3 fo

r thi

s sec

tion

of th

e Q

APP

. **

*For

the

Prov

iden

ce R

iver

, sam

ples

will

be

colle

cted

from

2 d

epth

s (ap

prox

imat

ely

0.5-

1.0

foot

bel

ow w

ater

surf

ace

and

abov

e se

dim

ents

) for

stat

ions

loca

ted

at d

epth

s>6

ft.

****

Bio

logi

cal s

tatio

n lo

catio

ns su

itabl

e fo

r rap

id b

iolo

gica

l ass

essm

ent [

RB

P]

Stat

ion

[Ptx

. N. [

Bio

. A],

Riff

le u

pstre

am a

nd d

owns

tream

of R

T. 1

15 B

dg..

Acc

ess o

n bo

th si

des.

Stat

ion

[Ptx

. N. [

Bio

. B],

Riff

le b

elow

stat

e of

R.I.

acc

ess ,

"Paw

tuxe

t Riv

er F

ishi

ng A

rea"

/ Hop

e D

am.

Stat

ion

[Ptx

. S. [

Bio

. A],

No

riffle

@ S

andy

Btm

..Rd.

./goo

d rif

fle 1

/4 m

ile u

pstre

am a

t Was

hing

ton

[USG

S G

age]

. St

atio

n [P

tx. S

. [B

io. B

.], S

mal

l riff

le b

elow

Bra

dfor

d So

ap W

orks

Dam

[acc

ess b

y B

ike

path

on

old

R.R

. Bdg

. Eas

t of H

ay S

t.]

Stat

ion

[Mes

. Bio

.]

Riff

le u

nder

brid

ge @

par

king

lot f

or B

ed B

ath

and

Bey

ond]

on

Sout

h ba

nk .

Stat

ion

[Wd.

Bio

}

Pro

xim

ate

to th

e C

habe

rt fa

cilit

y.

15



Approximately 52 samples will be collected over the 4 surveys, a duplicate sample will be collected from one of the stations during each of the surveys (4 duplicate samples over the 4 surveys), and a field blank will used during each of the surveys (4 field blanks over the 4 surveys). Including the QA/QC samples, approximately 60 samples will be brought to the laboratory for metals analysis during this study. In addition, each of the samples will be analyzed for hardness.

For those waterbodies listed in Group 4 for pathogens, sampling will be conducted monthly from June to October, inclusive. Sampling for the remaining parameters of the Group 4 waterbodies will be conducted during the Spring and Fall of 2002 to capture turnover events, and during the Summer of 2002 to capture potential stratification events, all during steady state conditions. Sample station locations, number of samples collected, and number of QA/QC samples collected for the Group 4 waterbodies are summarized in Table 7. Table 7 Group 4 sampling locations and parameters.

Waterbody

Station

City/Town

*Total

Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen

Chlorophyll a

Pathogens

Chlorides

Volatile Organic

Compounds (VOCs)

Slatersville Reservoir

Center of Impoundment

Burriville and North Smithfield

X

X

X

Three Ponds

Center of each pond

Warwick

X

Simmons Brook

Atwood Avenue

Johnston X

Print Works

Pond

12-foot deep hole at south end of pond

Cranston

X

X

North Easton Pond (Green End

Pond)

Center of

Pond

Newport

X

X

Wood River- Alton

Dam to confluence

with Pawcatuck

River

Sample from

Charbart Property,

Church Street

Richmond

X

Number of Samples x Number of Surveys 12 6 30 4 4 Number of Duplicate Samples 3 3 5 4 4 Number of Field Blanks 3 3 5 4 4 Total Number of Samples for the Study 18 12 40 12 12

* Total phosphorus and total nitrogen samples will be collected from approximately 0.5-1 foot below the surface and 0.5-1.0 foot above the bottom at each sample station.

17


Revision Date: February 2002 Approximately 12 samples will be collected for nutrient analysis. The two stations will be sampled at the surface of the waterbody and just above the bottom sediments. A duplicate sample will be collected and a field blank will be used during each of the 3 surveys. Two stations will be sampled for chlorophyll a analysis over 3 surveys with a duplicate collected for each of the surveys. Four stations will be sampled for pathogens analysis and a duplicate sample will be collected for each of the 5 surveys. It should be noted that a sample will be collected from each of the ponds making up the Three Ponds complex during each survey. A sample for the analysis of chloride will be collected from the Print Works Pond on a quarterly basis. A duplicate sample will be collected and a field blank used for each of the surveys. Quarterly samples will be collected from the Wood River segment for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and a duplicate sample will be collected and a field blank used for each of the surveys. A brief description of sampling activities is presented below. In addition, the waterbodies listed in Group 4 will be monitored for temperature and dissolved oxygen profiling and secchi depth measurements. A more detailed sampling standard operating procedure (SOP) for the collection of metals is presented in Attachment B and is entitled, "Manual (Grab) Sampling of Ambient Water for Dissolved and/or Total Recoverable Trace Metals at EPA Water Quality Criteria Levels (SOP-FS02)." The SOPs for the collection of the Group 4 waterbody samples are presented in Appendix B and are entitled, �FSOP-1 Nutrient and chloride sampling SOP�, �FSOP-2 Fecal coliform sample collection �SOP� and �FSOP 3 Hand-Dip Sampling for the Collection of Surface Water for the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds�. The laboratories will provide all sample containers. The sample parameters and characteristics are summarized in Table 8.

18


Revision Date: February 2002 Table 8 Sample parameters and characteristics.

Parameter

Matrix

Sample Volume

(container)

Preservation

Maximum Holding

Time

Method

Dissolved

Metals

Surface Water

250 ml LDPE* (cleaned per SOP-C01; refer to Attachment C)

**Stored on

ice (4°C)

24 hours prior to

filtration

EPA Method

1637

Hardness

Surface Water

250 ml LDPE (cleaned per SOP-C01; refer to

Attachment C)

HNO3, pH<2

6 months

EPA Method 200.7

Fecal Coliform

Surface Water

250 ml LDPE Stored on ice (4°C)

6 hours mTEC

Nutrients Surface Water

125-250 ml brown glass bottles

***Stored on ice (4°C)

48 hours prior to

filtration

URIWW SOP SP-1

Chlorophyll a Surface Water

2-500 ml polyethylene ***Stored on ice (4°C)

~6 hours URIWW SOP SP-2

VOCs Surface Water

40 ml glass vial HCl 14 days EPA Method 8260B

Chloride Surface Water

125-250 ml polyethylene

Stored on ice (4°C)

28 days EPA Method 325.2/9251

Biological Sampling

Surface Water

unspecified 90 % ethylalcohol

unlimited RBP

*LDPE = Low Density polyethylene **Dissolved metals will be preserved with nitric acid after the samples are filtered in the laboratory. ***Nutrient and chlorophyll a samples will be filtered in the laboratory. 9.0 Sampling Procedures and Requirements

9.1 Sampling Procedures Standard operating procedures for field sampling are located in Attachment B. Project field sampling SOPs are summarized in Table 9.

19


Revision Date: February 2002 Table 9 Project sampling SOP references.

Reference Number/Title Originating Organization

Equipment Identification

Modified for Work Project

Field Sampling SOP 1 (FS-02) Metals Sampling

Microinorganics Sample bottles No

FSOP-1 Nutrient and Chloride Sampling SOP

RIDEM Sample bottles No

FSOP-2 Fecal Coliform Sampling SOP

RIDEM Sample bottles No

FSOP-3 Hand-Dip Sampling for the

Collection of Surface Water for the Analysis of

Volatile Organic Compounds

RIDEM

Sample bottles

No

FSOP-4 Rapid Bioassessment Protocol

USEPA Sample Containers No

9.2 Equipment Cleaning Samples will be collected using the pre-cleaned bottles provided by the analytical laboratory, and as such, sampling equipment cleaning is not anticipated.

9.3 Field Equipment Calibration and Maintenance The Project Manager will ensure that all field equipment is operating properly.

Table 10 Field equipment maintenance, testing, and inspection.

Equipment Procedure Frequency Acceptance Criteria

Corrective Action

SOP Reference

YSI Model 85

See Operations

Manual

Before sampling

season

See Operations

Manual

Re-calibrate

E-1

Secchi disk and calibrated

weighted line

Check

accuracy

Prior to first sampling run and

throughout monitoring

±1.0 inches

Repair or replace

FASOP-2

Excerpts from the YSI Model 85 Operations Manual are provided in Attachment D.

20


Revision Date: February 2002 10.0 Sample Handling, Tracking, and Custody Requirements

10.1 Sample Collection Documentation This section describes field documentation procedures that will be followed for the project.

10.1.1 Field Notes Sample teams will utilize either field notebooks or field log sheets to record relevant information prior to and during sampling events to include the following minimum information: Time of arrival at site, related site sketches, and general observations/comments. A copy of a blank field sheet is presented in Attachment E. Field notebooks will contain the same information as the field log sheets.

10.2 Sample Handling and Tracking System Immediately prior to collecting each sample, the sample label will be filled out completely using a permanent marker. All samples will be placed in a cooler with ice immediately after the sample is collected. For the metals samples, ice will be packed twice into large ziplock bags sealed further with duct tape. Due to the very low detection limits (sub-ppb) for the metals analysis and the possibility of cross contamination, Microinorganics, Inc. recommends not using labels. Sample identification will be written on the sample bottle and a zip-lock bag using permanent marker. The sample bottle will be placed in the zip-lock bag and sealed, immediately after sampling. Samples will be placed in a cooler with ice immediately after sampling and delivered to the laboratory the same day or within 24-hours of being collected. All bacteria samples will be placed in a cooler with ice immediately after sampling and will be delivered within six hours. If, for unseen circumstances, the samples can not be delivered to the laboratory within six hours, it will be noted on the chain-of-custody. All samples will be transported to the laboratory under proper chain-of-custody protocol. A copy of a blank Microinorganics, Inc., BAL Laboratory, Inc, URI Watershed Watch Program and ESS Laboratory chains-of-custody are presented in Appendix F. The flow of samples from the time of collection, to laboratory delivery, to final sample disposal is summarized in Table 11.

Table 11 Sample handling system

Action Responsible Party Sample Collection RIDEM Sample Delivery RIDEM Sample Analysis Laboratory Sample Archival Not Applicable Sample Disposal Laboratory

21


Revision Date: February 2002 11.0 Field Analytical Method Requirements During sampling of the Group 4 waterbodies, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and secchi depths will be analyzed in the field. The Project Manager shall record in the field notebook the sample location and all the results of field measurements. All field analytical SOPs were originated by RIDEM and will be performed by RIDEM personnel. Biological sampling of the macroinvertebrate communities will be conducted by RIDEM personnel following FASOP-3. Field analytical SOPs are summarized in Table 11 and are provided in Appendix G. Table 12 Field analytical SOPs.

SOP Reference Number

SOP Title

Definitive or

Screening Data

Analytical Parameter

Instrument

Modified

for Project Work Plan

FASOP-1

Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature

Profiling SOP

Definitive

Dissolved

Oxygen and Temperature

YSI Model

85

No

FASOP-2 Secchi Depth SOP

Definitive Water Clarity Secchi Disk No

FASOP-3

Rapid Bioassessment

Protocol

Definitive

Biodiversity

Kick Net or Artificial Substrate

No

12.0 Fixed Laboratory Analytical Method Requirements

12.1 Fixed Laboratory Analytical All samples will be taken to the appropriate laboratory for analysis. These samples will be analyzed according to the attached SOPs from each of the laboratories. The laboratory SOPs are summarized in Table 13.

22



Table 13 Laboratory SOPs

Reference Number

Title

Definitive or

Screening Data

Analytical Parameter

Instrument

Modified for

Project

C01

Bottle Cleaning Procedures for use in Collection of Trace Metals at

AWQC* Levels

Not Applicable

Dissolved

Metals

Not Applicable

No

P01

Preconcentration of Dissolved Metals from Aqueous Samples using APDC-cobalt chloride coprecipitation Technique

Not

Applicable

Dissolved Metals

(excluding Zn)

Not

Applicable

No

A01

Graphite Furnace Analysis of Preconcentrated Water Samples

Definitive

Dissolved Metals

(excluding Zn)

GFAAS**

No

A02

Direct Injection of Dissolved and Total Recoverable Trace Elements in Ambient Waters by Stabilized Temperature Graphite Furnace

Absorption

Definitive

Zn

GFAAS**

No

111

Determination of Metals in Water and Wastes by Inductively

Coupled Argon Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry

Definitive

Hardness

(Ca and Mg)

ICP***

No

URIWW SOP SP-1

Total Phosphorus and Total

Nitrogen

Definitive

Total Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen

Alpkem Corp. Model 300

Autoanalyzer

No

URIWW SOP SP-2

URI Watershed Watch Chlorophyll-a Analysis Procedure

Definitive

Chlorophyll-a

Turner Designs Digital

Fluorometer Model TD-

700

No

SOP-5

mTEC Method for Detection of Fecal Coliforms and Escherichia

Coli

Definitive

Fecal Coliform

NA

No

SOP

20_8260B

Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromotography/Mass

Spectrometry (GC/MS): Capillary Column Technique (SW-846

Method 8260)

Definitive

VOCs

GC/MS

No

SOP 40_007L

Chloride Automated Ferricyanide (EPA Method 325.2/9251)

Definitive

Chloride

Flow Injection Analysis

Equipment

No

*AWQC = Ambient Water Quality Criteria ** GFAAS = Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrotometry ***ICP = Inductively Coupled Plasma

23


Revision Date: February 2002 13.0 Quality Control Requirements Quality control (QC) is the system of technical activities that measures the performance of a process. Field sampling and laboratory QC protocols are presented in this section.

13.1 Field Quality Control Samples The types and quantities of field QC samples are summarized in EPA Worksheet No. 22a provided in Attachment A.

13.2 Fixed Laboratory Analytical Quality Control Samples The types and quantities of fixed laboratory QC samples are summarized in EPA Worksheet No. 24a provided in Attachment A. 14.0 Data Acquisition Requirements The listing of the Group 3 and 4 waterbodies on the RIDEM 2000 303(d) List of Impaired waters was based on data that was either old or insufficient. The water quality monitoring data sources that resulted in the listing of the waterbodies into Group 3 or Group 4 of the RIDEM 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters are summarized in Table 14.

24


Revision Date: February 2002 Table 14 The informational sources that caused the listing of the waterbodies into Group 3 or Group 4 of the RIDEM 2000 303(d) List of Impaired Waters.

Waterbody Data Source Data Generator Limitations on Data

Pawtuxet River (North and South Branches)

Water Quality in Rhode Island�s Urban Rivers: Blackstone, Moshasuck,

Pawtuxet, Ten Mile, Woonasquatucket

River Rescue 1990-1995

Data is expressed as total metals.

Meshanicut Brook

Field Measurements of Water Quality in the

Pawtuxet River, Summer 1990

Applied Science Associates,

Narragansett, Rhode Island

Data is extrapolated from Pawtuxet River study.

Slatersville Reservoir 1989 USGS sampling of pond

USGS Insufficient and old data for assessment.

Three Ponds





Nutrient and dissolved oxygen data is extrapolated from Pawtuxet River

study. Pathogen data source is unknown.

Simmons Brook Data source unknown Data source unknown

Simmons Brook was listed in the 1996 and 1998 303(d) lists.

Print Works Pond





Data extrapolated from Pocasset River site

North Easton Pond (Green End Pond)

1998 Chemical Baseline Data

URI Department of Civil and

Environmental Engineering Department

Data extrapolated from Bailey�s Brook

Providence River

Monitoring of the Providence and Seekonk Rivers for Trace Metals

and Associated Parameters

1988

Narragansett Bay Project

Data is expressed as total metals

Wood River-Alton Dam

to confluence with Wood River

Visual inspection by RIDEM for

macroinvertebrates in response to proximity to

hazardous waste site

RIDEM

No instream water quality data

25


Revision Date: February 2002 15.0 Documentation, Records, and Data Management All samplers will be given either a field notebook or log sheets. The monitoring plan will be given out when each sampler collects their equipment and includes specific information on what needs to be recorded on these sheets. All log sheets will be given to the field leaders at the conclusion of sampling. Initials on these sheets will identify the sampler. The Project Manager will review the sheets within three days to identify any possible errors or omissions. The Project manager will try to contact all samplers to identify any problems or additional feedback that would make any future sampling easier. The Project Manager or designee will transport the samples to the appropriate laboratory(ies). The samples and chain of custody forms will be checked at the laboratory during sample check in. A copy of the chain of custody form will be retained by RIDEM when the samples are dropped off at the laboratory. After analysis is complete, the analytical results will be forwarded to RIDEM. After each sampling event, a brief Status Report will be written to document any changes to the Monitoring Plan. All information collected throughout the project will be summarized in the Final Data Report. Information included in the Final Data Report is described in Section 17.0. Table 15 summarizes the records that will be generated and maintained throughout this project.

Table 15 Project documentation and records.

Sample Collection Records

Field Analysis Records

Fixed Laboratory Records

Data Assessment Records

Field Notes/Log Sheets

Field Notes/Log Sheets

Chain of Custody Records

Status Reports

Chain of Custody Records

Not Applicable Tabulated Data Summary Forms:

draft and final

Final Data Report

Monitoring Plan Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 16.0 Assessments and Response Actions The Project Manager or designee will be responsible for each of the project tasks and their associated quality assurance and quality control procedures. The Project Manager will provide consistency between sampling events and sampling teams. Continual reports to the lead agency supervisors concerning the status of sampling, quality assurance, and quality control will highlight any problems that are encountered during sampling. If needed, the Project Manager and lead agency supervisor will halt sampling until problems are remedied.

26


Revision Date: February 2002 Table 16 Project assessment table.

Assessment

Type

Frequency

Internal

or External

Person Responsible for

Performing Assessment and Implementing Corrective

Actions

Person Responsible for Monitoring the

Effectiveness of the Corrective Action

Field Sampling Technical

Systems Audit

Start of

Sampling

I

Wayne Jenkins

RIDEM

Wayne Jenkins

RIDEM

Laboratory Technical

Systems Audit

Prior to Sample Receipt

E

Doug Cullen Microinorganics, Inc.,

Kathleen Feldman, Bal Laboratory, Linda Green, URI Watershed

Watch Program, Kevin Braga, ESS Laboratory

Wayne Jenkins

RIDEM

17.0 QA Management Reports Table 17 lists the QA Management Reports that will be generated throughout this study. As needed during this project, the Project Manager/QA Officer will meet with the lead organization supervisor to discuss any issues related to sampling. These meetings will be verbal status reports. Problems encountered in the field will be discussed and any appropriate actions determined and implemented. Any changes and/or problems will be included in the final report. After each sampling event, the Project Manager will generate a Status Report. This Status Report will be the written record of any changes to the QA Plan. If a station was not sampled, it will be documented here. Issues discussed during the Verbal Status Report can also be included. At the completion of all the sampling surveys, the Project Manager will write a final report summarizing the sampling events. Information in this final report will include the following information: • Brief description of each sampling event; • Data tables of all data collected during the sampling event; and • Attachments − Status Reports − Sampling Logs − Chain of Custody forms − Laboratory data sheets provided by the labs

27


Revision Date: February 2002 Table 17 QA management reports.

Type of Report

Frequency

Person(s) Responsible for Report

Preparation

Report Recipient

Verbal Status Report As needed Wayne Jenkins RIDEM

Connie Carey RIDEM

Written Status Report After two surveys Wayne Jenkins RIDEM

Connie Carey RIDEM

Final Report Completion of sampling

Wayne Jenkins RIDEM

Connie Carey RIDEM

18.0 Verification and Validation Requirements The Project Manager/QA Officer and lead organization supervisors will review all data collected during this study to determine if the data meets QAPP objectives. Decisions to qualify or reject data will be made by the Project Manager and QA Officer. All data collected will be included in the Final Report. To ensure correct interpretation of the data, all problems encountered in the field will be included in an Appendix to the report and discussed in the general text of the report. Problems will also be documented in each survey�s written Status Report. To assist in data interpretation, statistical information on sampling events, including sampling size, sample mean, and sample variance, will be reported, where applicable. A discussion on duplicate precision and accuracy criteria and results will also be discussed in the Final Report. 19.0 Verification and Validation Procedures All data collected during the study will be included in an appendix of the report. Once the data has been collected, it will be entered into Microsoft Excel files. The Project Manager will proofread the data entry for errors and any discrepancies will be corrected. Outliers and inconsistencies will be flagged for further review. The decision to discard data will be made by the Project Manager/QA Officer and supervisors. Problems will be discussed in the Final Report. Table 18 discusses the data verification process.

28


Revision Date: February 2002 Table 18 Data verification process.

Verification Task

Description I/E Responsible for Verification

Field Notes

Field notes will be collected at the end of each survey and reviewed. Any required corrective actions will be addressed with the field samplers prior to further sampling. After the field notes will be entered into Excel, the data will be proofread for any data entry errors. Copies of the field notes will be maintained in the project file.

I

Wayne Jenkins/RIDEM

Chain of

Custody Forms

Chain of custody forms will be reviewed when samples are collected for delivery to the laboratory in the field and at the laboratory. The forms will be maintained in the project file.

I/E Wayne Jenkins /RIDEM and Laboratory Managers

Laboratory Data

All laboratory data packages will be verified internally by the laboratory performing the work for completeness prior to submittal. The data packages will be also reviewed by the sampling organization.

I/E Wayne Jenkins /RIDEM and Laboratory Managers

I=Internal, E=External Data validation will utilize the measurement performance criteria documented in EPA Worksheets 11b, 22a, and 24a of this report. 20.0 Data Usability/Reconciliation with Project Quality Objectives As soon as possible after each sampling event, calculations and determinations for precision, completeness, and accuracy will be made and corrective action implemented if needed. If data quality indicators meet those measurement performance criteria documented throughout this QA Plan, the project will be considered a success. If there are data that do not meet the measurement performance criteria established in this QA Plan, the data may be discarded and sampled again or the data may be used with stipulations written about its accuracy in the Final Report. The cause of the error will be evaluated. If the cause is equipment failure, calibration/maintenance techniques will be reassessed and improved. If the problem is sampling team error, retraining will occur. Any limitations with the data will be documented in the Status Reports and the Final Report.

29

References Applied Science Associates, 1991. Field Measurements of Water Quality in the Pawtuxet River, Summer 1990. Coastal Resources Center, 1996. Water Quality in Rhode Island�s Urban Rivers: Blackstone, Moshassuck, Pawtuxet, Ten Mile, Woonasquatucket, River Rescue Results 1990-1995. University of Rhode Island. EPA, 1999. Region I, EPA- New England Compendium of Quality Assurance Project Plan Requirements and Guidance. Quality Assurance Unit Staff. Office of Environmental Measurement and Evaluation. EPA, 2001. EPA Memorandum from Robert H. Wayland III, November 19, 2001. RIDEM. Office of Water Resources. August 6, 1997. Water Quality Regulations. Shelton, 1997. Field Guide for Collecting Samples for Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Stream Water for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. USGS Open-File Report 97-401. Taglioli, Brandon L., Delzer, G.C., Zogorski, J. S., 2000. Study Design and Analytical Results Used to Evaluate Carry-Over Contamination by Volatile Organic Compounds in Surface- and Ground-Water Sampling Procedures. USGS Open-File Report 00-384.

30

Attachment A � EPA Worksheets

EPA-NE QAPP Worksheet #2 - Rev. 10/99

Site Name/Project Name: RIDEM�s 2000 303(d) Supplemental Monitoring Program (Groups 3 and 4) Site Location: Rhode Island Site Number/Code: various Operable Unit: Contractor Name: Contractor Number: Contract Title: Work Assignment Number: Anticipated date of QAPP Implementation: November 2001

Title: RIDEM�s 2000 303(d) Supplemental Monitoring Program (Groups 3 and 4) Revision Number: 1 Revision Date: February 2002 Page: 1 of 1

1. Identify Guidance used to prepare QAPP: Region I, New England Compendium of Quality Assurance Project Plan Requirements and Guidance October 1999 and Attachment A, EPA-NE QAPP Manual, Draft September 1998 2 . Identify EPA Program: EPA Region I, Quality Assurance Unit Staff, Office of Environmental Measurement and Evaluation 3 . Identify approval entity: EPA-NE or State: EPA-NE or other entity: 4. Indicate whether the QAPP is a generic program QAPP or a project specific QAPP. (underline one) List dates of scoping meetings that were held: 9/11/01, 9/17/01, 10/18/01, 10/30/01

6. List title of QAPP documents and approval dates written for previous site work, if applicable:

7. List organizational partners (stakeholders) and connection with EPA and/or State: RIDEM � Office of Water ResourcesRIDEM- Office of Waste Management RIDEM � Office of Compliance and Inspection 8. List data users: RIDEM, Office of Water Resources 9. If any required QAPP Elements (1-20), Worksheets and/or Required Information are not applicable the project, then circle the omitted QAPP Elements, Worksheets and Required Information on the attached Table. Provide an explanation for their xclusion below: e

Refer to Table 6 Required QAPP elements checklist.

EPA-NE QAPP Worksheet #2 - Rev. 10/99 Site Name/Project Name: RIDEM�s 2000 303(d) Supplemental Monitoring Program (Groups 3 and 4) Site Location: Rhode Island Site Number/Code: various Operable Unit: Contractor Name: Contractor Number: Contract Title: Work Assignment Number: Anticipated date of QAPP Implementation: November 2001

Title: RIDEM�s 2000 303(d) Supplemental Monitoring Program (Groups 3 and 4) Revision Number: 1 Revision Date: February 2002 Page: 1 of 1

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#8a

- R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h pr

ojec

t sco

ping

mee

ting

held

and

incl

ude

in fi

nal

QA

PP d

ocum

ent.

Atta

ch m

eetin

g ag

enda

and

not

es.

(Ref

er to

QA

PP M

anua

l Sec

tion

5.1

for g

uida

nce.

)

T

itle:

RID

EM�s

200

0 30

3(d)

Sup

plem

enta

l M

onito

ring

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

1 o

f 4

Proj

ect S

copi

ng M

eetin

g A

tten

danc

e Sh

eet

E

PA R

egul

atio

n Pr

ogra

m: R

CR

A F

IFR

A T

SCA

C

ER

CL

A D

W

CW

A

CA

A

(und

erlin

e on

e)

Site

Nam

e: v

ario

us

Prog

ram

(Bro

wnf

ield

s, N

PDE

S, e

tc.):

TM

DL

Si

te L

ocat

ion:

Rho

de Is

land

Pr

ojec

t Dat

e(s)

of S

ampl

ing:

Nov

embe

r 200

1-N

ovem

ber 2

002

CE

RC

LA

Site

/Spi

ll Id

entif

ier

No.

: Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

: Way

ne J

enki

ns

Ope

rabl

e U

nit:

Oth

er S

ite N

umbe

r/C

ode:

Ph

ase:

ER

A

SA

/SI

Pre

-RI

RI (

phas

e I,

etc.

) F

S

RD

R

A

pos

t-R

A

(und

erlin

e on

e)

Oth

er p

hase

: D

ate

of M

eetin

g: 9

/11/

01

Mee

ting

Loca

tion:

RID

EM

Nam

ePr

ojec

tRol

eA

ffili

atio

nPh

one

#e-

Mai

lAdd

ress

C

laud

e M

asse

Se

nior

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

e Sp

ecia

list

R

IDEM

(4

01) 2

22-

4700

x 7

244

cm

asse

@de

m.st

ate.

ri.us

W

ayne

Jenk

ins

Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

/Qua

lity

Ass

uran

ce O

ffic

er

R

IDEM

(401

) 222

-47

00 x

727

2

w

jenk

ins@

dem

.stat

e.ri.

us

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#8a

- R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h pr

ojec

t sco

ping

mee

ting

held

and

incl

ude

in fi

nal

QA

PP d

ocum

ent.

Atta

ch m

eetin

g ag

enda

and

not

es.

(Ref

er to

QA

PP M

anua

l Sec

tion

5.1

for g

uida

nce.

)

T

itle:

RID

EM�s

200

0 30

3(d)

Sup

plem

enta

l M

onito

ring

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

1 o

f 4

Proj

ect S

copi

ng M

eetin

g A

tten

danc

e Sh

eet

E

PA R

egul

atio

n Pr

ogra

m: R

CR

A F

IFR

A T

SCA

C

ER

CL

A D

W

CW

A

CA

A

(und

erlin

e on

e)

Site

Nam

e: v

ario

us

Prog

ram

(Bro

wnf

ield

s, N

PDE

S, e

tc.):

TM

DL

Si

te L

ocat

ion:

Rho

de Is

land

Pr

ojec

t Dat

e(s)

of S

ampl

ing:

Nov

embe

r 200

1-N

ovem

ber 2

002

CE

RC

LA

Site

/Spi

ll Id

entif

ier

No.

: Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

: Way

ne J

enki

ns

Ope

rabl

e U

nit:

Oth

er S

ite N

umbe

r/C

ode:

Ph

ase:

ER

A

SA

/SI

Pre

-RI

RI (

phas

e I,

etc.

) F

S

RD

R

A

pos

t-R

A

(und

erlin

e on

e)

Oth

er p

hase

: D

ate

of M

eetin

g: 9

/11/

01

Mee

ting

Loca

tion:

RID

EM

Nam

ePr

ojec

tRol

eA

ffili

atio

nPh

one

#e-

Mai

lAdd

ress

Mee

ting

Purp

ose:

C

omm

ents

and

Act

ion

Item

s:

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#8a

- R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h pr

ojec

t sco

ping

mee

ting

held

and

incl

ude

in fi

nal

QA

PP d

ocum

ent.

Atta

ch m

eetin

g ag

enda

and

not

es.

(Ref

er to

QA

PP M

anua

l Sec

tion

5.1

for g

uida

nce.

)

T

itle:

RID

EM�s

200

0 30

3(d)

Sup

plem

enta

l M

onito

ring

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

2 o

f 4

Pr

ojec

t Sco

ping

Mee

ting

Att

enda

nce

Shee

t

EPA

Reg

ulat

ion

Prog

ram

: RC

RA

FIF

RA

TSC

A

CE

RC

LA

DW

C

WA

C

AA

(u

nder

line

one)

Si

te N

ame:

var

ious

Pr

ogra

m (B

row

nfie

lds,

NPD

ES,

etc

.): T

MD

L

Site

Loc

atio

n: R

hode

Isla

nd

Proj

ect D

ate(

s) o

f Sam

plin

g: N

ovem

ber 2

001-

Nov

embe

r 200

2 C

ER

CL

A S

ite/S

pill

Iden

tifie

r N

o.:

Proj

ect M

anag

er: W

ayne

Jen

kins

O

pera

ble

Uni

t:

O

ther

Site

Num

ber/

Cod

e:

Phas

e: E

RA

S

A/S

I P

re-R

I R

I (ph

ase

I, et

c.)

FS

R

D

RA

p

ost-

RA

(u

nder

line

one)

O

ther

pha

se:

Dat

e of

Mee

ting:

9/1

7/01

M

eetin

g Lo

catio

n: R

IDE

M

N

ame

Proj

ectR

ole

Aff

iliat

ion

Phon

e#

e-M

ailA

ddre

ss

Cla

ude

Mas

se

Seni

or N

atur

al R

esou

rce

Spec

ialis

t

RID

EM

(401

) 222

-47

00 x

724

4

cm

asse

@de

m.st

ate.

ri.us

W

ayne

Jenk

ins

Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

/Qua

lity

Ass

uran

ce O

ffic

er

R

IDEM

(401

) 222

-47

00 x

727

2

w

jenk

ins@

dem

.stat

e.ri.

us

Eliz

abet

h Sc

ott

Dep

uty

Chi

ef o

f Wat

er Q

ualit

y an

d St

anda

rds

RID

EM

(4

01)2

22-

4700

x 7

300

esco

tt@de

m.st

ate.

ri.us

Con

nie

Car

ey

Prin

cipa

l Env

ironm

enta

l Sci

entis

t R

IDEM

(4

01) 2

22-

4700

x 7

239

ccar

ey@

dem

.stat

e.ri.

us

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#8a

- R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h pr

ojec

t sco

ping

mee

ting

held

and

incl

ude

in fi

nal

QA

PP d

ocum

ent.

Atta

ch m

eetin

g ag

enda

and

not

es.

(Ref

er to

QA

PP M

anua

l Sec

tion

5.1

for g

uida

nce.

)

T

itle:

RID

EM�s

200

0 30

3(d)

Sup

plem

enta

l M

onito

ring

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

2 o

f 4

Pr

ojec

t Sco

ping

Mee

ting

Att

enda

nce

Shee

t

EPA

Reg

ulat

ion

Prog

ram

: RC

RA

FIF

RA

TSC

A

CE

RC

LA

DW

C

WA

C

AA

(u

nder

line

one)

Si

te N

ame:

var

ious

Pr

ogra

m (B

row

nfie

lds,

NPD

ES,

etc

.): T

MD

L

Site

Loc

atio

n: R

hode

Isla

nd

Proj

ect D

ate(

s) o

f Sam

plin

g: N

ovem

ber 2

001-

Nov

embe

r 200

2 C

ER

CL

A S

ite/S

pill

Iden

tifie

r N

o.:

Proj

ect M

anag

er: W

ayne

Jen

kins

O

pera

ble

Uni

t:

O

ther

Site

Num

ber/

Cod

e:

Phas

e: E

RA

S

A/S

I P

re-R

I R

I (ph

ase

I, et

c.)

FS

R

D

RA

p

ost-

RA

(u

nder

line

one)

O

ther

pha

se:

Dat

e of

Mee

ting:

9/1

7/01

M

eetin

g Lo

catio

n: R

IDE

M

N

ame

Proj

ectR

ole

Aff

iliat

ion

Phon

e#

e-M

ailA

ddre

ss

Mee

ting

Purp

ose:

C

omm

ents

and

Act

ion

Item

s:

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#8a

- R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h pr

ojec

t sco

ping

mee

ting

held

and

incl

ude

in fi

nal

QA

PP d

ocum

ent.

Atta

ch m

eetin

g ag

enda

and

not

es.

(Ref

er to

QA

PP M

anua

l Sec

tion

5.1

for g

uida

nce.

)

T

itle:

RID

EM�s

200

0 30

3(d)

Sup

plem

enta

l M

onito

ring

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 0

1 R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

3 o

f 4

Proj

ect S

copi

ng M

eetin

g A

tten

danc

e Sh

eet

E

PA R

egul

atio

n Pr

ogra

m: R

CR

A F

IFR

A T

SCA

C

ER

CL

A D

W

CW

A

CA

A

(und

erlin

e on

e)

Site

Nam

e: v

ario

us

Prog

ram

(Bro

wnf

ield

s, N

PDE

S, e

tc.):

TM

DL

Si

te L

ocat

ion:

Rho

de Is

land

Pr

ojec

t Dat

e(s)

of S

ampl

ing:

Nov

embe

r 200

1-N

ovem

ber 2

002

CE

RC

LA

Site

/Spi

ll Id

entif

ier

No.

: Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

: Way

ne J

enki

ns

Ope

rabl

e U

nit:

Oth

er S

ite N

umbe

r/C

ode:

Ph

ase:

ER

A

SA

/SI

Pre

-RI

RI (

phas

e I,

etc.

) F

S

RD

R

A

pos

t-R

A

(und

erlin

e on

e)

Oth

er p

hase

: D

ate

of M

eetin

g: 9

/17/

01

Mee

ting

Loca

tion:

RID

EM

Nam

ePr

ojec

tRol

eA

ffili

atio

nPh

one

#e-

Mai

lAdd

ress

C

laud

e M

asse

Se

nior

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

e Sp

ecia

list

R

IDEM

(4

01) 2

22-

4700

x 7

244

cm

asse

@de

m.st

ate.

ri.us

W

ayne

Jenk

ins

Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

/Qua

lity

Ass

uran

ce O

ffic

er

R

IDEM

(401

) 222

-47

00 x

727

2

w

jenk

ins@

dem

.stat

e.ri.

us

Eliz

abet

h Sc

ott

Dep

uty

Chi

ef o

f Wat

er Q

ualit

y an

d St

anda

rds

RID

EM

(4

01)2

22-

4700

x 7

300

esco

tt@de

m.st

ate.

ri.us

Con

nie

Car

ey

Prin

cipa

l Env

ironm

enta

l Sci

entis

t R

IDEM

(4

01) 2

22-

4700

x 7

239

ccar

eyt@

dem

.stat

e.ri.

us

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#8a

- R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h pr

ojec

t sco

ping

mee

ting

held

and

incl

ude

in fi

nal

QA

PP d

ocum

ent.

Atta

ch m

eetin

g ag

enda

and

not

es.

(Ref

er to

QA

PP M

anua

l Sec

tion

5.1

for g

uida

nce.

)

T

itle:

RID

EM�s

200

0 30

3(d)

Sup

plem

enta

l M

onito

ring

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 0

1 R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Mee

ting

Purp

ose:

C

omm

ents

and

Act

ion

Item

s:

Page

: 3

of

4

Pr

ojec

t Sco

ping

Mee

ting

Att

enda

nce

Shee

t

EPA

Reg

ulat

ion

Prog

ram

: RC

RA

FIF

RA

TSC

A

CE

RC

LA

DW

C

WA

C

AA

(u

nder

line

one)

Si

te N

ame:

var

ious

Pr

ogra

m (B

row

nfie

lds,

NPD

ES,

etc

.): T

MD

L

Site

Loc

atio

n: R

hode

Isla

nd

Proj

ect D

ate(

s) o

f Sam

plin

g: N

ovem

ber 2

001-

Nov

embe

r 200

2 C

ER

CL

A S

ite/S

pill

Iden

tifie

r N

o.:

Proj

ect M

anag

er: W

ayne

Jen

kins

O

pera

ble

Uni

t:

O

ther

Site

Num

ber/

Cod

e:

Phas

e: E

RA

S

A/S

I P

re-R

I R

I (ph

ase

I, et

c.)

FS

R

D

RA

p

ost-

RA

(u

nder

line

one)

O

ther

pha

se:

Dat

e of

Mee

ting:

9/1

7/01

M

eetin

g Lo

catio

n: R

IDE

M

N

ame

Proj

ectR

ole

Aff

iliat

ion

Phon

e#

e-M

ailA

ddre

ss

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#9b

- R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

sepa

rate

tabl

es fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

and

con

cent

ratio

n le

vel.

Lis

t the

ana

lyte

nam

e an

d C

AS

num

bers

of a

ll C

onta

min

ants

of C

once

rn (C

OC

s) a

nd o

ther

targ

et a

naly

tes t

hat w

ill b

e m

easu

red

for t

he p

roje

ct.

Iden

tify

the

CO

Cs

with

an

�*�.

Ide

ntify

the

Proj

ect Q

uant

itatio

n Li

mits

requ

ired

to m

eet p

roje

ct o

bjec

tives

, i.e

., kn

own

regu

lato

ry o

r tec

hnic

al P

roje

ct

Act

ion

Lim

its fo

r eac

h an

alyt

e. L

ist t

he M

DLs

and

QLs

of t

he p

ublis

hed

met

hod

and

the

MD

Ls a

nd Q

Ls a

chie

vabl

e by

the

labo

rato

ry.

Ensu

re th

at th

e ac

hiev

able

labo

rato

ry q

uant

itatio

n lim

its a

re le

ss th

an o

r equ

al to

the

Proj

ect Q

uant

itatio

n Li

mits

and

th

at P

roje

ct Q

uant

itatio

n Li

mits

are

at l

east

thre

e to

ten

times

less

than

the

Proj

ect A

ctio

n Li

mits

. (R

efer

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

n 6.

1 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 3

03(d

) Su

pple

men

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

1 o

f 4

Med

ium

/Mat

rix:

Sur

face

Wat

er

Reg

ion

I Mat

rix

Cod

e (f

rom

EPA

-NE

DQ

O S

umm

ary

Form

): A

naly

tical

Par

amet

er: D

isso

lved

Met

als

Con

cent

ratio

n L

evel

: sub

ppb

- pp

b Fi

eld

Ana

lytic

al o

r Fi

xed

Lab

orat

ory

Met

hod/

SOP1 : F

S01,

A01

, A02

Con

tam

inan

ts o

f Con

cern

and

Oth

er T

arge

t Ana

lyte

s Tab

le (R

efer

ence

Lim

it an

d E

valu

atio

n T

able

)

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d A

chie

vabl

e L

abor

ator

y L

imits

Ana

lyte

CA

S N

umbe

r

Pr

ojec

t Act

ion

Lim

it (U

nits

) *

Pr

ojec

t Q

uant

itatio

n L

imit

(Uni

ts)

**

M

DL

s2

Met

hod

QL

s2

MD

Ls3

Q

Ls3

Dis

solv

ed L

ead

(Pb)

7439

-92-

1

0.54

µg/

L

0.10

µg/

L

0.03

6 µg

/L

0.1µ

g/L

0.03

3 µg

/L

0.10

µg/

L D

isso

lved

Cop

per (

Cu)

7440

-50-

8

3.

47 µ

g/L

0.

17 µ

g/L

0.08

7 µg

/L

0.2

µg/L

0.05

8 µg

/L

0.

17 µ

g/L

Dis

solv

ed C

adm

ium

(Cd)

7440

-43-

9

0.37

µg/

L

0.03

6 µg

/L

0.

0075

µg/

L 0.

02 µ

g/L

0.

012

µg/L

0.03

6 µg

/L

Dis

solv

ed N

icke

l

7440

-02-

0

8.2

µg/L

1.0

µg/L

0.33

µg/

L

1.0

µg/L

0.33

µg/

L

1.0

µg/L

D

isso

lved

Silv

er

74

40-2

2-4

0.

32 µ

g/L

0.

012

µg/L

0.02

9 µg

/L

0.

1 µg

/L

0.

004

µg/L

0.01

2 µg

/L

Dis

solv

ed Z

inc

74

40-6

6-6

32

.29

µg/L

3.8

µg/L

0.14

µg/

L

0.5

µg/L

1.26

µg/

L

3.8

µg/L

To

tal H

ardn

ess

-

-

-

1

mg/

L

-

1 m

g/L

-

*

Low

est E

PA A

WQ

C

** P

QL

= 3

x M

DL

1 Spec

ify a

ppro

pria

te r

efer

ence

num

ber/

lett

er fr

om th

e Fi

eld

and

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

s (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

ets #

17 a

nd

#20)

.2 Ana

lytic

al m

etho

d M

DL

s and

QL

s doc

umen

ted

in v

alid

ated

met

hods

. Q

Ls a

re u

sual

ly 3

-10

times

hig

her

than

the

MD

Ls

3 Ach

ieva

ble

MD

Ls a

nd Q

Ls a

re li

mits

that

an

indi

vidu

al la

bora

tory

can

ach

ieve

whe

n pe

rfor

min

g a

spec

ific

anal

ytic

al m

etho

d.

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#9b

- R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

sepa

rate

tabl

es fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

and

con

cent

ratio

n le

vel.

Lis

t the

ana

lyte

nam

e an

d C

AS

num

bers

of a

ll C

onta

min

ants

of C

once

rn (C

OC

s) a

nd o

ther

targ

et a

naly

tes t

hat w

ill b

e m

easu

red

for t

he p

roje

ct.

Iden

tify

the

CO

Cs

with

an

�*�.

Ide

ntify

the

Proj

ect Q

uant

itatio

n Li

mits

requ

ired

to m

eet p

roje

ct o

bjec

tives

, i.e

., kn

own

regu

lato

ry o

r tec

hnic

al P

roje

ct

Act

ion

Lim

its fo

r eac

h an

alyt

e. L

ist t

he M

DLs

and

QLs

of t

he p

ublis

hed

met

hod

and

the

MD

Ls a

nd Q

Ls a

chie

vabl

e by

the

labo

rato

ry.

Ensu

re th

at th

e ac

hiev

able

labo

rato

ry q

uant

itatio

n lim

its a

re le

ss th

an o

r equ

al to

the

Proj

ect Q

uant

itatio

n Li

mits

and

th

at P

roje

ct Q

uant

itatio

n Li

mits

are

at l

east

thre

e to

ten

times

less

than

the

Proj

ect A

ctio

n Li

mits

. (R

efer

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

n 6.

1 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 3

03(d

) Su

pple

men

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(G

roup

s 3 a

nd 4

) R

evis

ion

Num

ber:

1

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Page

: 2

of

4

Med

ium

/Mat

rix:

Sur

face

Wat

er

Reg

ion

I Mat

rix

Cod

e (f

rom

EPA

-NE

DQ

O S

umm

ary

Form

): A

naly

tical

Par

amet

er: N

utrie

nts,

chlo

roph

ylla

, and

feca

l col

iform

C

once

ntra

tion

Lev

el: p

pb

Fiel

d A

naly

tical

or

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P1 : FSO

P-1,

FSO

P-2,

UR

IWW

SO

Ps S

P-1

+ SP

-2, S

OP-

5

Con

tam

inan

ts o

f Con

cern

and

Oth

er T

arge

t Ana

lyte

s Tab

le (R

efer

ence

Lim

it an

d E

valu

atio

n T

able

)

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d

Ach

ieva

ble

Lab

orat

ory

Lim

its

A

naly

te

C

AS

Num

ber

Pr

ojec

t Act

ion

Lim

it (U

nits

) *

Pr

ojec

t Q

uant

itatio

n L

imit

(Uni

ts)

**

M

DL

s2 M

etho

d Q

Ls2

M

DL

s3

QL

s3

To

tal P

hosp

horu

s

7723

-14-

0

25 µ

g/L

4

µg/L

2 µg

/L

4

µg/L

2 µg

/L

4

µg/L

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

7727

-37-

9 --

25

µg/

L

20 µ

g/L

25

µg/

L

20 µ

g/L

25

µg/

L

Chl

orop

hyll

a --

<1

0 µg

/L

2

µg/L

1µg/

L

2 µg

/L

1µ

g/L

2

µg/L

Fe

cal C

olifo

rm

--

G

eom

etric

mea

n 20

-200

M

PN/1

00 m

L

1

MPN

/100

mL

1

MPN

/100

mL

1

MPN

/100

mL

1

MPN

/100

mL

1

MPN

/100

m

L

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n

--

5.

0 m

g/L

0

mg/

L

--

--

--

--

Tem

pera

ture

--

Pr

ofile

Stra

tific

atio

n

± 2°

C

--

--

--

--

1 Sp

ecify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Fiel

d an

d Fi

xed

Lab

orat

ory

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

les (

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

s #17

and

#2

0).2 A

naly

tical

met

hod

MD

Ls a

nd Q

Ls d

ocum

ente

d in

val

idat

ed m

etho

ds.

QL

s are

usu

ally

3-1

0 tim

es h

ighe

r th

an th

e M

DL

s. 3 A

chie

vabl

e M

DL

s and

QL

s are

lim

its th

at a

n in

divi

dual

labo

rato

ry c

an a

chie

ve w

hen

perf

orm

ing

a sp

ecifi

c an

alyt

ical

met

hod.

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#9c

- R

ev. 1

0/99

Su

mm

ariz

e by

mat

rix th

e nu

mbe

r of f

ield

and

QC

sam

ples

that

w

ill b

e co

llect

ed fo

r eac

h an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er a

nd c

once

ntra

tion

leve

l. (R

efer

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

n 6.

1 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal

Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

m (G

roup

s 3 a

nd 4

) R

evis

ion

Num

ber:

1

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Page

: 1

of

2

Fiel

d an

d Q

ualit

y C

ontr

ol S

ampl

e Su

mm

ary

Tab

le

Org

anic

Inor

gani

c

Med

ium

/ M

atri

x

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

Con

c. L

evel

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce1

N

o. o

f Sam

plin

g L

ocat

ions

2

No.

of

Fiel

d D

uplic

ate

Pair

s

No.

of

MS

No.

of

MSD

N

o. o

f D

uplic

ates

N

o. o

f M

S

No.

of T

rip

Bla

nks*

No.

of B

ottle

B

lank

s

N

o. o

f E

quip

. B

lank

s

No.

of P

E

Sam

ples

Tot

al N

o. o

f Sa

mpl

es to

L

ab

SW

D

isso

lved

C

d, C

u, P

b,

Ni,

Ag,

Zn

and

Tota

l H

ardn

ess

Su

b pp

b -

ppb

EP

A M

etho

d 16

37/S

OP

P01

&

A01

and

SW

846

Met

hod

6010

13

sam

ples

x

4

surv

eys=

52

4

4

60

*For

this

pro

ject

, all

QA

/QC

sam

ples

for a

ll an

alyt

ical

met

hods

use

d to

det

erm

ine

that

abs

ence

/pre

senc

e of

con

tam

inat

ion

in th

e fie

ld w

ill b

e re

ferr

ed to

as T

rip B

lank

s

1 C

ompl

ete

the

Fiel

d A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#17

), an

d th

e Fi

xed

Lab

orat

ory

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20) a

nd sp

ecify

the

appr

opri

ate

lett

er/n

umbe

r re

fere

nce

in th

e ab

ove

tabl

e.

2 If sa

mpl

es w

ill b

e co

llect

ed a

t diff

eren

t dep

ths a

t the

sam

e lo

catio

n, c

ount

eac

h di

scre

te sa

mpl

ing

dept

h as

a se

para

te sa

mpl

ing

loca

tion/

stat

ion.

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#9c

- R

ev. 1

0/99

Su

mm

ariz

e by

mat

rix th

e nu

mbe

r of f

ield

and

QC

sam

ples

that

w

ill b

e co

llect

ed fo

r eac

h an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er a

nd c

once

ntra

tion

leve

l. (R

efer

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

n 6.

1 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal

Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

m (G

roup

s 3 a

nd 4

) R

evis

ion

Num

ber:

1

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Page

: 2

of

2

Fiel

d an

d Q

ualit

y C

ontr

ol S

ampl

e Su

mm

ary

Tab

le

Org

anic

Inor

gani

c

Med

ium

/ M

atri

x

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

Con

c. L

evel

A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce1

N

o. o

f Sam

plin

g L

ocat

ions

2

No.

of

Fiel

d D

uplic

ate

Pair

s

No.

of

MS

No.

of

MSD

N

o. o

f D

uplic

ates

N

o. o

f M

S

No.

of T

rip

Bla

nks*

No.

of B

ottle

B

lank

s

N

o. o

f E

quip

. B

lank

s

No.

of P

E

Sam

ples

Tot

al N

o. o

f Sa

mpl

es to

L

ab

SW

To

tal

Phos

phor

us

And

Tot

al

Nitr

ogen

pp

b

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-1

4x

3 su

rvey

s=

12

3

3 18

SW

Chl

orop

hyll

app

bU

RIW

W S

OP

SP-2

2x

3 su

rvey

s=

6 3

1 10

SW

Feca

lC

olifo

rm

1 M

PN/1

00m

L

SO

P-5

6x5

surv

eys=

30

5

5 40

SW

VO

Cs

pp

b

SOP

No.

40-

_826

0B

1x

4 su

rvey

s=

4

4

1

9

SW

chlo

ride

pp

m

SO

P N

o.

40_0

07L

1x

4 su

rvey

s=

4

4

1

9

*For

this

pro

ject

, all

QA

/QC

sam

ples

for a

ll an

alyt

ical

met

hods

use

d to

det

erm

ine

that

abs

ence

/pre

senc

e of

con

tam

inat

ion

in th

e fie

ld w

ill b

e re

ferr

ed to

as T

rip B

lank

s

1 C

ompl

ete

the

Fiel

d A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#17

), an

d th

e Fi

xed

Lab

orat

ory

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20) a

nd sp

ecify

the

appr

opri

ate

lett

er/n

umbe

r re

fere

nce

in th

e ab

ove

tabl

e.

2 If sa

mpl

es w

ill b

e co

llect

ed a

t diff

eren

t dep

ths a

t the

sam

e lo

catio

n, c

ount

eac

h di

scre

te sa

mpl

ing

dept

h as

a se

para

te sa

mpl

ing

loca

tion/

stat

ion.

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#9d

- R

ev.

10/9

9 C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

, and

con

cent

ratio

n le

vel.

Id

entif

y al

l lab

orat

orie

s/or

gani

zatio

ns th

at w

ill p

rovi

de a

naly

tical

serv

ices

for t

he p

roje

ct,

incl

udin

g fie

ld sc

reen

ing,

fiel

d an

alyt

ical

, and

fixe

d la

bora

tory

ana

lytic

al w

ork.

If a

pplic

able

, id

entif

y th

e ba

ckup

labo

rato

ry/o

rgan

izat

ion

that

will

be

used

if th

e pr

imar

y la

bora

tory

/org

aniz

atio

n

cann

ot b

e us

ed.

(Ref

er to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

6.1

, 11.

0 an

d 12

.0 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d)

Supp

lem

enta

l Mon

itorin

g (G

roup

s 3 a

nd 4

) R

evis

ion

Num

ber:

1

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Page

: 1

of

1

A

naly

tical

Ser

vice

s Tab

le

M

ediu

m/M

atri

x

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

C

once

ntra

tion

Lev

el

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P1

Dat

a Pa

ckag

e T

urna

roun

d T

ime

L

abor

ator

y/O

rgan

izat

ion

(Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss: C

onta

ct P

erso

n an

d T

elep

hone

Num

ber)

B

acku

p L

abor

ator

y/O

rgan

izat

ion

(Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss: C

onta

ct

Pers

on a

nd T

elep

hone

N

umbe

r)

SW

Dis

solv

ed P

b,

Cd,

Cu,

Ni,

Ag,

Zn

Su

b pp

b-pp

b EP

A M

etho

d 16

37 /

1638

SO

P P0

1 &

A01

15 d

ays

M

icro

Inor

gani

cs, I

nc.,

D

oug

Cul

len,

16

Rea

ctor

Roa

d, N

arra

gans

ett,

RI

0288

2

Not

App

licab

le

SW

Tota

l Har

dnes

s

ppm

SW84

6 M

etho

d 60

10

15 d

ays

M

ITK

EM

Kar

en G

avitt

, 17

5 M

etro

Cen

ter B

lvd,

War

wic

k, R

I 02

886

Not

App

licab

le

SW

Tota

l Ph

osph

orus

pp

b

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-1

10

day

s

UR

I Wat

ersh

ed W

atch

Pro

gram

N

atur

al R

esou

rces

Sci

ence

Dep

artm

ent

Kin

gsto

n, R

I

Not

App

licab

le

SW

To

tal N

itrog

en

pp

b

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-1

10

day

s

UR

I Wat

ersh

ed W

atch

Pro

gram

N

atur

al R

esou

rces

Sci

ence

Dep

artm

ent

Kin

gsto

n, R

I

Not

App

licab

le

SW

Chl

orop

hyll

a

ppb

U

RIW

W S

OP

SP-2

10 d

ays

U

RI W

ater

shed

Wat

ch P

rogr

am

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es S

cien

ce D

epar

tmen

t K

ings

ton,

RI 0

2881

Not

App

licab

le

SW

Fe

cal C

olifo

rm

<1

FC

/100

mL

SO

P-5

7

days

B

AL

Labo

rato

ry, I

nc.,1

85 F

ranc

is A

ve.,

Cra

nsto

n, R

I 029

10

Not

App

licab

le

SW

Vol

atile

O

rgan

ic

Com

poun

ds

pp

b

SOP

No.

20_

8260

B

7

days

ESS

Labo

rato

ry

185

Fran

cis S

treet

C

rans

ton,

RI 0

2910

N

ot A

pplic

able

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#9d

- R

ev.

10/9

9 C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

, and

con

cent

ratio

n le

vel.

Id

entif

y al

l lab

orat

orie

s/or

gani

zatio

ns th

at w

ill p

rovi

de a

naly

tical

serv

ices

for t

he p

roje

ct,

incl

udin

g fie

ld sc

reen

ing,

fiel

d an

alyt

ical

, and

fixe

d la

bora

tory

ana

lytic

al w

ork.

If a

pplic

able

, id

entif

y th

e ba

ckup

labo

rato

ry/o

rgan

izat

ion

that

will

be

used

if th

e pr

imar

y la

bora

tory

/org

aniz

atio

n

cann

ot b

e us

ed.

(Ref

er to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

6.1

, 11.

0 an

d 12

.0 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d)

Supp

lem

enta

l Mon

itorin

g (G

roup

s 3 a

nd 4

) R

evis

ion

Num

ber:

1

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Page

: 1

of

1

A

naly

tical

Ser

vice

s Tab

le

M

ediu

m/M

atri

x

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

C

once

ntra

tion

Lev

el

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P1

Dat

a Pa

ckag

e T

urna

roun

d T

ime

L

abor

ator

y/O

rgan

izat

ion

(Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss: C

onta

ct P

erso

n an

d T

elep

hone

Num

ber)

B

acku

p L

abor

ator

y/O

rgan

izat

ion

(Nam

e an

d A

ddre

ss: C

onta

ct

Pers

on a

nd T

elep

hone

N

umbe

r)

SW

Chl

orid

e pp

m

SOP

No.

40_

007L

7

days

ES

S La

bora

tory

18

5 Fr

anci

s Stre

et

Cra

nsto

n, R

I 029

10

Not

App

licab

le

1 Spec

ify a

ppro

pria

te re

fere

nce

num

ber/l

ette

r fro

m th

e Fi

eld

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

17) a

nd fr

om th

e Fi

xed

Labo

rato

ry

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#20

).

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#11

b - R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

and

co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

Iden

tify

the

DQ

I, m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia (M

PC),

and

QC

sam

ple

and/

or a

ctiv

ity u

sed

to a

sses

s the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

for

the

sam

plin

g an

d/or

ana

lytic

al p

roce

dure

. U

se a

dditi

onal

wor

kshe

ets i

f nec

essa

ry.

If M

PC fo

r a sp

ecifi

c D

QI v

ary

with

in a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er, i

.e.,

MPC

are

ana

lyte

- sp

ecifi

c, th

en p

rovi

de a

naly

te-s

peci

fic M

PC o

n an

add

ition

al w

orks

heet

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

7.1

and

7.2

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

1 o

f 8

Mea

sure

men

t Per

form

ance

Cri

teri

a T

able

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

Pb

and

Cd

Con

cent

ratio

n L

evel

Su

b pp

b - p

pb

Sam

plin

g Pr

oced

ure1

A

naly

tical

M

etho

d/SO

P2

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(D

QIs

)3

M

easu

rem

ent P

erfo

rman

ce C

rite

ria

Q

C S

ampl

e an

d/or

A

ctiv

ity U

sed

to A

sses

s M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Q

C S

ampl

e A

sses

ses

Err

or fo

r Sa

mpl

ing

(S),

Ana

lytic

al (A

) or

both

(S

&A

)

FS02

SOP

A01

Prec

isio

n - o

vera

ll

<20

% R

PD

Fi

eld

Dup

licat

es

S

& A

FS02

SOP

A01

Prec

isio

n - L

ab

<2

0 %

RPD

MS/

MSD

A

FS

02

SO

P A

01

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s

Rec

over

y 60

-120

%

M

S/M

SD

A

FS02

SOP

A01

Acc

urac

y/B

ias

R

ecov

ery

60-1

20 %

SRM

or C

RM

A

FS

02

SO

P A

01

Se

nsiti

vity

Rec

over

y 60

-120

%

LF

B

S

& A

FS02

SOP

A01

Con

tam

inat

ion

M

DL

� 1/

3 A

WQ

C

Fiel

d &

Met

hod

Bla

nks

A

FS02

SOP

A01

Dat

a C

ompl

eten

ess

-

A

ntic

ipat

e 10

0 %

S &

A

1 Ref

eren

ce S

OP

Num

ber

from

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

. 2 R

efer

ence

ana

lytic

al m

etho

d/SO

P N

umbe

r fr

om E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

ets #

17 a

nd #

20 .

3 Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(a.k

.a. P

AR

CC

par

amet

ers,

i.e.,

prec

isio

n, a

ccur

acy/

bias

, sen

sitiv

ity, d

ata

com

plet

enes

s, co

mpa

rabi

lity)

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#11

b - R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

and

co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

Iden

tify

the

DQ

I, m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia (M

PC),

and

QC

sam

ple

and/

or a

ctiv

ity u

sed

to a

sses

s the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

for

the

sam

plin

g an

d/or

ana

lytic

al p

roce

dure

. U

se a

dditi

onal

wor

kshe

ets i

f nec

essa

ry.

If M

PC fo

r a sp

ecifi

c D

QI v

ary

with

in a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er, i

.e.,

MPC

are

ana

lyte

- sp

ecifi

c, th

en p

rovi

de a

naly

te-s

peci

fic M

PC o

n an

add

ition

al w

orks

heet

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

7.1

and

7.2

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

2 o

f 8

Mea

sure

men

t Per

form

ance

Cri

teri

a T

able

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

Cu

Con

cent

ratio

n L

evel

Su

b pp

b - p

pb

Sam

plin

g Pr

oced

ure1

A

naly

tical

M

etho

d/SO

P2

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(D

QIs

)3

M

easu

rem

ent P

erfo

rman

ce C

rite

ria

Q

C S

ampl

e an

d/or

A

ctiv

ity U

sed

to A

sses

s M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Q

C S

ampl

e A

sses

ses

Err

or fo

r Sa

mpl

ing

(S),

Ana

lytic

al (A

) or

both

(S

&A

)

FS02

SOP

A01

Prec

isio

n - o

vera

ll

<20

% R

PD

Fi

eld

Dup

licat

es

S

& A

FS02

SOP

A01

Prec

isio

n - L

ab

<2

0 %

RPD

MS/

MSD

A

FS

02

SO

P A

01

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s

Rec

over

y 51

-145

%

M

S/M

SD

A

FS02

SOP

A01

Acc

urac

y/B

ias

R

ecov

ery

51-1

45 %

SRM

or C

RM

A

FS

02

SO

P A

01

Se

nsiti

vity

Rec

over

y 51

-145

%

LF

B

S

& A

FS02

SOP

A01

Con

tam

inat

ion

M

DL

� 1/

3 A

WQ

C

Fiel

d &

Met

hod

Bla

nks

A

FS02

SOP

A01

Dat

a C

ompl

eten

ess

-

A

ntic

ipat

e 10

0 %

S &

A

1 Ref

eren

ce S

OP

Num

ber

from

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

. 2 R

efer

ence

ana

lytic

al m

etho

d/SO

P N

umbe

r fr

om E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

ets #

17 a

nd #

20 .

3 Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(a.k

.a. P

AR

CC

par

amet

ers,

i.e.,

prec

isio

n, a

ccur

acy/

bias

, sen

sitiv

ity, d

ata

com

plet

enes

s, co

mpa

rabi

lity)

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#11

b - R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

and

co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

Iden

tify

the

DQ

I, m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia (M

PC),

and

QC

sam

ple

and/

or a

ctiv

ity u

sed

to a

sses

s the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

for

the

sam

plin

g an

d/or

ana

lytic

al p

roce

dure

. U

se a

dditi

onal

wor

kshe

ets i

f nec

essa

ry.

If M

PC fo

r a sp

ecifi

c D

QI v

ary

with

in a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er, i

.e.,

MPC

are

ana

lyte

- sp

ecifi

c, th

en p

rovi

de a

naly

te-s

peci

fic M

PC o

n an

add

ition

al w

orks

heet

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

7.1

and

7.2

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

3 o

f 8

Mea

sure

men

t Per

form

ance

Cri

teri

a T

able

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

To

tal H

ardn

ess

Con

cent

ratio

n L

evel

pp

m

Sam

plin

g Pr

oced

ure1

A

naly

tical

M

etho

d/SO

P2

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(D

QIs

)3

M

easu

rem

ent P

erfo

rman

ce C

rite

ria

Q

C S

ampl

e an

d/or

A

ctiv

ity U

sed

to A

sses

s M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Q

C S

ampl

e A

sses

ses

Err

or fo

r Sa

mpl

ing

(S),

Ana

lytic

al (A

) or

both

(S

&A

)

FS02

SOP

A03

Prec

isio

n - o

vera

ll

<20

% R

PD

Fi

eld

Dup

licat

es

S

& A

FS02

SOP

A03

Prec

isio

n - L

ab

<2

0 %

RPD

MS/

MSD

A

FS

02

SO

P A

03

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s

Rec

over

y 75

-125

%

M

S/M

SD

A

FS02

SOP

A03

Sens

itivi

ty

R

ecov

ery

80-1

20 %

LFB

S &

A

FS

02

SO

P A

03

C

onta

min

atio

n

MD

L �

1/3

AW

QC

Fi

eld

& M

etho

d B

lank

s

A

FS

02

SO

P A

03

D

ata

Com

plet

enes

s

-

Ant

icip

ate

100

%

S

& A

1 R

efer

ence

SO

P N

umbe

r fr

om E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

13.

2 Ref

eren

ce a

naly

tical

met

hod/

SOP

Num

ber

from

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

s #17

and

#20

. 3 D

ata

Qua

lity

Indi

cato

rs (a

.k.a

. PA

RC

C p

aram

eter

s, i.e

., pr

ecis

ion,

acc

urac

y/bi

as, s

ensi

tivity

, dat

a co

mpl

eten

ess,

com

para

bilit

y)

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#11

b - R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

and

co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

Iden

tify

the

DQ

I, m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia (M

PC),

and

QC

sam

ple

and/

or a

ctiv

ity u

sed

to a

sses

s the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

for

the

sam

plin

g an

d/or

ana

lytic

al p

roce

dure

. U

se a

dditi

onal

wor

kshe

ets i

f nec

essa

ry.

If M

PC fo

r a sp

ecifi

c D

QI v

ary

with

in a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er, i

.e.,

MPC

are

ana

lyte

- sp

ecifi

c, th

en p

rovi

de a

naly

te-s

peci

fic M

PC o

n an

add

ition

al w

orks

heet

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

7.1

and

7.2

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

4 o

f 8

Mea

sure

men

t Per

form

ance

Cri

teri

a T

able

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

Nut

rient

s (To

tal

Phos

phor

us a

nd

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

)

Con

cent

ratio

n L

evel

pp

b

Sam

plin

g Pr

oced

ure1

A

naly

tical

M

etho

d/SO

P2

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(D

QIs

)3

M

easu

rem

ent P

erfo

rman

ce C

rite

ria

Q

C S

ampl

e an

d/or

A

ctiv

ity U

sed

to A

sses

s M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Q

C S

ampl

e A

sses

ses

Err

or fo

r Sa

mpl

ing

(S),

Ana

lytic

al (A

) or

both

(S

&A

)

FS0P

-1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-1

Pr

ecis

ion

<20

% R

PD

Fi

eld

Dup

licat

es

S

& A

FS0P

-1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-1

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s

< 2

ppb

(µg/

L)

M

etho

d B

lank

A

FS

0P-1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-1

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s

+/- 1

0 %

of P

ES tr

ue v

alue

Pe

rfor

man

ce E

valu

atio

n St

anda

rds

(PES

)

A

FS

0P-1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-1

D

ata

Com

plet

enes

s

-

Ant

icip

ate

100

%

S

& A

1 R

efer

ence

SO

P N

umbe

r fr

om E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

13.

2 Ref

eren

ce a

naly

tical

met

hod/

SOP

Num

ber

from

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

s #17

and

#20

. 3 D

ata

Qua

lity

Indi

cato

rs (a

.k.a

. PA

RC

C p

aram

eter

s, i.e

., pr

ecis

ion,

acc

urac

y/bi

as, s

ensi

tivity

, dat

a co

mpl

eten

ess,

com

para

bilit

y)

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#11

b - R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

and

co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

Iden

tify

the

DQ

I, m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia (M

PC),

and

QC

sam

ple

and/

or a

ctiv

ity u

sed

to a

sses

s the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

for

the

sam

plin

g an

d/or

ana

lytic

al p

roce

dure

. U

se a

dditi

onal

wor

kshe

ets i

f nec

essa

ry.

If M

PC fo

r a sp

ecifi

c D

QI v

ary

with

in a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er, i

.e.,

MPC

are

ana

lyte

- sp

ecifi

c, th

en p

rovi

de a

naly

te-s

peci

fic M

PC o

n an

add

ition

al w

orks

heet

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

7.1

and

7.2

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

5 o

f 8

Mea

sure

men

t Per

form

ance

Cri

teri

a T

able

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

C

hlor

ophy

ll a

Con

cent

ratio

n L

evel

pp

b

Sam

plin

g Pr

oced

ure1

A

naly

tical

M

etho

d/SO

P2

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(D

QIs

)3

M

easu

rem

ent P

erfo

rman

ce C

rite

ria

Q

C S

ampl

e an

d/or

A

ctiv

ity U

sed

to A

sses

s M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Q

C S

ampl

e A

sses

ses

Err

or fo

r Sa

mpl

ing

(S),

Ana

lytic

al (A

) or

both

(S

&A

)

FS0P

-1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-2

Pr

ecis

ion

<20

% R

PD

Fi

eld

Dup

licat

es

S

& A

FS0P

-1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-2

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s

< M

DL

M

etho

d B

lank

A

FS

0P-1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-2

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s <2

0% R

PD

Pure

Chl

-a st

anda

rds

Turn

er D

esig

n

A

FS

0P-1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-2

D

ata

Com

plet

enes

s

-

Ant

icip

ate

100

%

S

& A

1 R

efer

ence

SO

P N

umbe

r fr

om E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

13.

2 Ref

eren

ce a

naly

tical

met

hod/

SOP

Num

ber

from

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

s #17

and

#20

. 3 D

ata

Qua

lity

Indi

cato

rs (a

.k.a

. PA

RC

C p

aram

eter

s, i.e

., pr

ecis

ion,

acc

urac

y/bi

as, s

ensi

tivity

, dat

a co

mpl

eten

ess,

com

para

bilit

y)

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#11

b - R

ev. 1

0/99

C

ompl

ete

this

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

and

co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

Iden

tify

the

DQ

I, m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia (M

PC),

and

QC

sam

ple

and/

or a

ctiv

ity u

sed

to a

sses

s the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

for

the

sam

plin

g an

d/or

ana

lytic

al p

roce

dure

. U

se a

dditi

onal

wor

kshe

ets i

f nec

essa

ry.

If M

PC fo

r a sp

ecifi

c D

QI v

ary

with

in a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er, i

.e.,

MPC

are

ana

lyte

- sp

ecifi

c, th

en p

rovi

de a

naly

te-s

peci

fic M

PC o

n an

add

ition

al w

orks

heet

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

7.1

and

7.2

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

6 o

f 8

Mea

sure

men

t Per

form

ance

Cri

teri

a T

able

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

Feca

l Col

iform

Con

cent

ratio

n L

evel

<1

MPN

/100

mL

Sam

plin

g Pr

oced

ure1

A

naly

tical

M

etho

d/SO

P2

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(D

QIs

)3

M

easu

rem

ent P

erfo

rman

ce C

rite

ria

Q

C S

ampl

e an

d/or

A

ctiv

ity U

sed

to A

sses

s M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Q

C S

ampl

e A

sses

ses

Err

or fo

r Sa

mpl

ing

(S),

Ana

lytic

al (A

) or

both

(S

&A

) FS

OP-

2 m

TEC

/SO

P-5

Pr

ecis

ion

W

ithin

95%

Con

fiden

ce In

terv

al

Fi

eld

Dup

licat

es

S

& A

FS

OP-

2 m

TEC

/SO

P-5

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s N

o G

row

th

M

etho

d B

lank

A

FSO

P-2

mTE

C/S

OP-

5

Acc

urac

y/B

ias

No

Gro

wth

R

eage

nt B

lank

A

FSO

P-2

mTE

C/S

OP-

5

Dat

a C

ompl

eten

ess

-

A

ntic

ipat

e 10

0 %

S &

A

1 Ref

eren

ce S

OP

Num

ber

from

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

. 2 R

efer

ence

ana

lytic

al m

etho

d/SO

P N

umbe

r fr

om E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

ets #

17 a

nd #

20 .

3 Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tors

(a.k

.a. P

AR

CC

par

amet

ers,

i.e.,

prec

isio

n, a

ccur

acy/

bias

, sen

sitiv

ity, d

ata

com

plet

enes

s, co

mpa

rabi

lity)

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#12

b - R

ev. 1

0/99

Li

st a

ll si

te lo

catio

ns th

at w

ill b

e sa

mpl

ed a

nd in

clud

e sa

mpl

e lo

catio

n ID

num

ber,

if ap

plic

able

. Sp

ecify

med

ium

/mat

rix a

nd,

if ap

plic

able

dep

th a

t whi

ch sa

mpl

es w

ill b

e ta

ken.

Com

plet

e al

l re

quire

d in

form

atio

n, u

sing

add

ition

al w

orks

heet

s if n

eces

sary

. (R

efer

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

n 8.

1 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal

Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

m (G

roup

s 3 a

nd 4

) R

evis

ion

Num

ber:

1

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Page

: 1

of

2

Sam

plin

g L

ocat

ions

, Sam

plin

g an

d A

naly

sis M

etho

d/SO

P R

equi

rem

ents

Tab

le

Sam

plin

g L

ocat

ion

1,

2

Loc

atio

n ID

N

umbe

r

M

ediu

m/

Mat

rix

D

epth

(U

nits

)

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

C

onc.

L

evel

No.

of S

ampl

es

(Ide

ntify

fiel

d du

plic

ates

and

re

plic

ates

)

Sa

mpl

ing

SOP

3

A

naly

tical

M

etho

d/SO

P 3

Sa

mpl

e V

olum

e

C

onta

iner

s (N

umbe

r, si

ze

and

type

)

Pr

eser

vatio

n R

equi

rem

ents

(c

hem

ical

, te

mpe

ratu

re,

light

pr

otec

ted)

M

axim

um

Hol

ding

Tim

e (p

repa

ratio

n/

anal

ysis

)

vario

us

SW

6

inch

es

belo

w

surf

ace

Dis

solv

ed

Met

als

Sub

ppb

- ppb

36

sam

ples

4

dups

.

SOP

FS02

EP

A M

etho

d 16

37,

1638

, 16

39/S

OP

A01

& A

02

25

0 m

l

LDPE

C

lean

ed v

ia

SOP

C01

4°

C

24 h

ours

prio

r to

filtr

atio

n

SOP

C01

vario

us

SW

6

inch

es

belo

w

surf

ace

To

tal

Har

dnes

s

pp

m

36

sam

ples

4 d

ups.

SOP

FS02

SW84

6 M

etho

d 60

10

25

0 m

l LD

PE

Cle

aned

via

H

NO

3, pH

<2

6

mon

ths

vario

us

SW

6

inch

es

belo

w

surf

ace

V

OC

s

ppb

4

sam

ples

4

dups

.

FS

OP-

3

EPA

Met

hod

8260

B/S

OP

40_8

260B

40

ml

G

lass

w/

pier

ceab

le

Teflo

n Sc

rew

C

ap

10

0 µL

H

CL

14

day

s

vario

us

SW

6 in

ches

be

low

su

rfac

e

C

hlor

ide

pp

m

4

sam

ples

4

dups

FS

OP-

1

EPA

Met

hod

325.

2/92

51

SOP

No.

40

_007

L

12

5-25

0 m

l

poly

ethy

lene

4°

C

28

day

s

1 In

dica

te c

ritic

al fi

eld

sam

plin

g lo

catio

ns w

ith �1

" . 2 In

dica

te b

ackg

roun

d sa

mpl

ing

loca

tions

with

�2" .

3 Com

plet

e th

e Pr

ojec

t Sam

plin

g SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

13),

Fiel

d A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#1

7), a

nd F

ixed

Lab

orat

ory

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#20

) and

spec

ify th

e ap

prop

riat

e le

tter

/num

ber

refe

renc

e in

the

abov

e ta

ble.

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#12

b - R

ev. 1

0/99

Li

st a

ll si

te lo

catio

ns th

at w

ill b

e sa

mpl

ed a

nd in

clud

e sa

mpl

e lo

catio

n ID

num

ber,

if ap

plic

able

. Sp

ecify

med

ium

/mat

rix a

nd,

if ap

plic

able

dep

th a

t whi

ch sa

mpl

es w

ill b

e ta

ken.

Com

plet

e al

l re

quire

d in

form

atio

n, u

sing

add

ition

al w

orks

heet

s if n

eces

sary

. (R

efer

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

n 8.

1 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal

Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

m (G

roup

s 3 a

nd 4

) R

evis

ion

Num

ber:

1

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Page

: 2

of

2

Sam

plin

g L

ocat

ions

, Sam

plin

g an

d A

naly

sis M

etho

d/SO

P R

equi

rem

ents

Tab

le

Sam

plin

g L

ocat

ion1,

2

Loc

atio

n ID

N

umbe

r

M

ediu

m/

Mat

rix

D

epth

(U

nits

)

A

naly

tical

Pa

ram

eter

Con

c.

Lev

el

No.

of S

ampl

es

(Ide

ntify

fiel

d du

plic

ates

and

re

plic

ates

)

Sa

mpl

ing

SOP3

A

naly

tical

M

etho

d/SO

P3

Sa

mpl

e V

olum

e

C

onta

iner

s (N

umbe

r, si

ze a

nd

type

)

Pr

eser

vatio

n R

equi

rem

ents

(c

hem

ical

, te

mpe

ratu

re,

light

pro

tect

ed)

M

axim

um

Hol

ding

Tim

e (p

repa

ratio

n/

anal

ysis

)

va

rious

SW

0.5-

1 fo

ot

belo

w

surf

ace

N

utrie

nts

(tota

l Ph

osph

orus

an

d To

tal

Nitr

ogen

)

pp

b

6 sa

mpl

es

FS

OP-

1 U

RIW

W S

OP

SP-1

125

or 2

50

ml

B

row

n G

lass

4°C

48

hou

rs p

rior

to fi

ltrat

ion

vario

usSW

0.

5-1

foot

abov

e th

e bo

ttom

N

utrie

nts

(tota

l Ph

osph

orus

an

d To

tal

Nitr

ogen

)

pp

b

6 sa

mpl

es

FS

OP-

1 U

RIW

W S

OP

SP-1

125

or 2

50

ml

B

row

n G

lass

4°C

48

hou

rs p

rior

to fi

ltrat

ion

vario

us

SW

0.

5-1

foot

be

low

su

rfac

e

Fe

cal

Col

iform

<1

25 sa

mpl

es

FSO

P-2

SOP-

5

250

ml

LDPE

4°

C

6

hour

s

vario

us

SW

0.5-

1 fo

ot

belo

w

surf

ace

C

hlor

ophy

ll a

pp

b

6 sa

mpl

es

FS

OP-

1

UR

IWW

SO

P SP

-2

25

0 m

l

poly

ethy

lene

4°C

8 ho

urs p

rior t

o fil

tratio

n

1 In

dica

te c

ritic

al fi

eld

sam

plin

g lo

catio

ns w

ith �1

" . 2 In

dica

te b

ackg

roun

d sa

mpl

ing

loca

tions

with

�2" .

3 Com

plet

e th

e Pr

ojec

t Sam

plin

g SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

13),

Fiel

d A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#1

7), a

nd F

ixed

Lab

orat

ory

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#20

) and

spec

ify th

e ap

prop

riat

e le

tter

/num

ber

refe

renc

e in

the

abov

e ta

ble.

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#22

a - R

ev.

10/9

9 C

ompl

ete

a se

para

te w

orks

heet

for e

ach

sam

plin

g te

chni

que,

med

ium

/mat

rix, a

naly

tical

par

amet

er a

nd

conc

entra

tion

leve

l. If

an

anal

ytic

al p

aram

eter

1 has

mul

tiple

ana

lyte

s, th

en c

ompl

ete

EPA

-NE

QA

PP

Wor

kshe

et #

22b.

Wor

kshe

et #

22b

lists

the

over

all f

ield

and

ana

lytic

al p

reci

sion

and

acc

urac

y/bi

as

expe

cted

for e

ach

anal

yte

whe

n us

ing

the

spec

ified

sam

plin

g an

d an

alyt

ical

tech

niqu

e. I

f met

hod/

SOP

QC

ac

cept

ance

lim

its2 e

xcee

d th

e m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia3 , t

hen

data

may

not

mee

t use

r nee

ds.

(Ref

er to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

13.

0 an

d 13

.1, a

nd T

able

4 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d)

Supp

lem

enta

l Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

m

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

1 o

f 7

Fi

eld

Sam

plin

g Q

C T

able

Sam

plin

g SO

P*

S-

1

M

ediu

m/M

atrix

Surf

ace

Wat

er

Ana

lytic

al P

aram

eter

1

Met

als

Con

cent

ratio

n Le

vel

Su

b pp

b - p

pb

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

EP

A M

etho

ds 1

637

(Pb+

Cd)

, and

163

8 (C

u)

Sam

pler

�s N

ame

St

aff

Fiel

d Sa

mpl

ing

Org

aniz

atio

n

RID

EM

No.

of S

ampl

e Lo

catio

ns

13

Fiel

d Q

C:

Fr

eque

ncy/

Num

ber

M

etho

d/SO

P Q

C

Acc

epta

nce

Lim

its2

C

orre

ctiv

e A

ctio

n (C

A)

Pe

rson

(s) R

espo

nsib

le fo

r C

A

D

ata

Qua

lity

Indi

cato

r (D

QI)

M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Cri

teri

a3 Eq

uipm

ent B

lank

s/

Rin

sate

Bla

nks

Bot

tle B

lank

s 1

N

o m

etal

ion

>1/3

AW

QC

Rec

lean

, ret

est,

resa

mpl

e an

d/or

qu

alify

dat

a

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

Acc

urac

y/B

ias

cont

amin

atio

n

N

o m

etal

ion

>1/3

AW

QC

Trip

Bla

nks

1

per s

urve

y

No

met

al io

n >1

/3 A

WQ

C

R

ecle

an, r

etes

t, re

sam

ple

and/

or

qual

ify d

ata

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

Acc

urac

y/B

ias

cont

amin

atio

n

N

o m

etal

ion

>1/3

AW

QC

Coo

ler T

empe

ratu

re B

lank

s

1 pe

r coo

ler

4°

C

R

esam

ple

and/

or q

ualif

y da

ta

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

Pres

erva

tion

4°

C

Fiel

d D

uplic

ate

Pairs

(D

uplic

ate

Subs

ampl

es)

1

per s

urve

y

<20%

RPD

Res

ampl

e an

d/or

qua

lify

data

Proj

ect M

anag

er/Q

C O

ffic

er

Pr

eser

vatio

n

<20%

RPD

Oth

er:_

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

), Fi

eld

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

17),

and

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#22

a - R

ev.

10/9

9 C

ompl

ete

a se

para

te w

orks

heet

for e

ach

sam

plin

g te

chni

que,

med

ium

/mat

rix, a

naly

tical

par

amet

er a

nd

conc

entra

tion

leve

l. If

an

anal

ytic

al p

aram

eter

1 has

mul

tiple

ana

lyte

s, th

en c

ompl

ete

EPA

-NE

QA

PP

Wor

kshe

et #

22b.

Wor

kshe

et #

22b

lists

the

over

all f

ield

and

ana

lytic

al p

reci

sion

and

acc

urac

y/bi

as

expe

cted

for e

ach

anal

yte

whe

n us

ing

the

spec

ified

sam

plin

g an

d an

alyt

ical

tech

niqu

e. I

f met

hod/

SOP

QC

ac

cept

ance

lim

its2 e

xcee

d th

e m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia3 , t

hen

data

may

not

mee

t use

r nee

ds.

(Ref

er to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

13.

0 an

d 13

.1, a

nd T

able

4 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d)

Supp

lem

enta

l Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

m

(gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

5 o

f 7

Fi

eld

Sam

plin

g Q

C T

able

Sam

plin

g SO

P*

S-

1

M

ediu

m/M

atrix

Surf

ace

Wat

er

Ana

lytic

al P

aram

eter

1

Feca

l Col

iform

C

once

ntra

tion

Leve

l 1

FC/1

00 m

L

A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce

M

TEC

/SO

P 5

Sam

pler

�s N

ame

St

aff

Fiel

d Sa

mpl

ing

Org

aniz

atio

n

RID

EM

No.

of S

ampl

e Lo

catio

ns

5

Fi

eld

QC

:

Freq

uenc

y/N

umbe

r

Met

hod/

SOP

QC

A

ccep

tanc

e L

imits

2

C

orre

ctiv

e A

ctio

n (C

A)

Pe

rson

(s) R

espo

nsib

le fo

r C

A

D

ata

Qua

lity

Indi

cato

r (D

QI)

M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Cri

teri

a3 Eq

uipm

ent B

lank

s/

Rin

sate

Bla

nks

Bot

tle B

lank

s

Trip

Bla

nks

1

per s

urve

y

< 1

FC/1

00m

l

Res

ampl

e an

d/or

qua

lify

data

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er/Q

C O

ffic

er

C

onta

min

atio

n

< 1

FC/1

00m

l C

oole

r Tem

pera

ture

Bla

nks

1

per c

oole

r

4°C

Res

ampl

e an

d/or

qua

lify

data

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er/Q

C O

ffic

er

Pr

eser

vatio

n

4°C

Fi

eld

Dup

licat

e Pa

irs

(Dup

licat

e Su

bsam

ples

)

1

per s

urve

y W

ithin

95

perc

ent

conf

iden

ce in

terv

al

R

eana

lyze

and

/or q

ualif

y da

ta

Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

Pres

erva

tion

W

ithin

95

perc

ent

conf

iden

ce in

terv

al

Oth

er:_

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

), Fi

eld

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

17),

and

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#22

a - R

ev.

10/9

9 C

ompl

ete

a se

para

te w

orks

heet

for e

ach

sam

plin

g te

chni

que,

med

ium

/mat

rix, a

naly

tical

par

amet

er a

nd

conc

entra

tion

leve

l. If

an

anal

ytic

al p

aram

eter

1 has

mul

tiple

ana

lyte

s, th

en c

ompl

ete

EPA

-NE

QA

PP

Wor

kshe

et #

22b.

Wor

kshe

et #

22b

lists

the

over

all f

ield

and

ana

lytic

al p

reci

sion

and

acc

urac

y/bi

as

expe

cted

for e

ach

anal

yte

whe

n us

ing

the

spec

ified

sam

plin

g an

d an

alyt

ical

tech

niqu

e. I

f met

hod/

SOP

QC

ac

cept

ance

lim

its2 e

xcee

d th

e m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia3 , t

hen

data

may

not

mee

t use

r nee

ds.

(Ref

er to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

13.

0 an

d 13

.1, a

nd T

able

4 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d)

Supp

lem

enta

l Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

m

(gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

3 o

f 7

Fi

eld

Sam

plin

g Q

C T

able

Sam

plin

g SO

P*

S-

1

M

ediu

m/M

atrix

Surf

ace

Wat

er

Ana

lytic

al P

aram

eter

1

Chl

orop

hyll

a

C

once

ntra

tion

Leve

l pp

b

A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce

U

RIW

W S

OP

SP-2

Sam

pler

�s N

ame

St

aff

Fiel

d Sa

mpl

ing

Org

aniz

atio

n

RID

EM

No.

of S

ampl

e Lo

catio

ns

2

Fi

eld

QC

:

Freq

uenc

y/N

umbe

r

Met

hod/

SOP

QC

A

ccep

tanc

e L

imits

2

C

orre

ctiv

e A

ctio

n (C

A)

Pe

rson

(s) R

espo

nsib

le fo

r C

A

D

ata

Qua

lity

Indi

cato

r (D

QI)

M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Cri

teri

a3 Eq

uipm

ent B

lank

s/

Rin

sate

Bla

nks

Bot

tle B

lank

s

Trip

Bla

nks

1

per s

urve

y

<QL

R

esam

ple

and/

or q

ualif

y da

ta

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

cont

amin

atio

n

<QL

Coo

ler T

empe

ratu

re B

lank

s

1 pe

r coo

ler

4°

C

R

esam

ple

and/

or q

ualif

y da

ta

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

Pres

erva

tion

4°

C

Fiel

d D

uplic

ate

Pairs

(D

uplic

ate

Subs

ampl

es)

1

per s

urve

y <2

0% R

PD

R

eana

lyze

and

/or q

ualif

y da

ta

Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

Pres

erva

tion

<2

0% R

PD

Oth

er:_

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

), Fi

eld

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

17),

and

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

Sam

plin

g SO

P*

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#22

a - R

ev.

10/9

9 C

ompl

ete

a se

para

te w

orks

heet

for e

ach

sam

plin

g te

chni

que,

med

ium

/mat

rix, a

naly

tical

par

amet

er a

nd

conc

entra

tion

leve

l. If

an

anal

ytic

al p

aram

eter

1 has

mul

tiple

ana

lyte

s, th

en c

ompl

ete

EPA

-NE

QA

PP

Wor

kshe

et #

22b.

Wor

kshe

et #

22b

lists

the

over

all f

ield

and

ana

lytic

al p

reci

sion

and

acc

urac

y/bi

as

expe

cted

for e

ach

anal

yte

whe

n us

ing

the

spec

ified

sam

plin

g an

d an

alyt

ical

tech

niqu

e. I

f met

hod/

SOP

QC

ac

cept

ance

lim

its2 e

xcee

d th

e m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia3 , t

hen

data

may

not

mee

t use

r nee

ds.

(Ref

er to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

13.

0 an

d 13

.1, a

nd T

able

4 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d)

Supp

lem

enta

l Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

m

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

2 of

7

Fi

eld

Sam

plin

g Q

C T

able

S-

1

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

A

naly

tical

Par

amet

er1

H

ardn

ess

C

once

ntra

tion

Leve

l pp

m

A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SOP

Ref

eren

ce

SW 8

46 M

thod

601

0

e

Sam

pler

�s N

ame

St

aff

Fiel

d Sa

mpl

ing

Org

aniz

atio

n

R

IDEM

No.

of S

ampl

e Lo

catio

ns

13

Fi

eld

QC

:

Freq

uenc

y/N

umbe

r

Met

hod/

SOP

QC

A

ccep

tanc

e L

imits

2

C

orre

ctiv

e A

ctio

n (C

A)

Pe

rson

(s) R

espo

nsib

le fo

r C

A

D

ata

Qua

lity

Indi

cato

r (D

QI)

M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Cri

teri

a3 Eq

uipm

ent B

lank

s/

Rin

sate

Bla

nks

Bot

tle B

lank

s

N

o m

etal

ion

>1/3

AW

QC

cont

amin

atio

n

1

Rec

lean

, ret

est,

resa

mpl

e an

d/or

qu

alify

dat

a

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s N

o m

etal

ion

>1/3

AW

QC

Trip

Bla

nks

1

per s

urve

y N

o m

etal

ion

>1/3

AW

QC

R

ecle

an, r

etes

t, re

sam

ple

and/

or

qual

ify d

ata

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

C

onta

min

atio

n N

o m

etal

ion

>1/3

AW

QC

C

oole

r Tem

pera

ture

Bla

nks

1 pe

r coo

ler

4°C

R

esam

ple

and/

or q

ualif

y da

ta

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er/Q

C O

ffic

er

Pr

eser

vatio

n

4°C

Fi

eld

Dup

licat

e Pa

irs

(Dup

licat

e Su

bsam

ples

)

1

per a

naly

te

<2

0% R

PD

R

esam

ple

and/

or q

ualif

y da

ta

Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

/QC

Off

icer

Pres

erva

tion

<2

0% R

PD

Oth

er:_

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

), Fi

eld

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

17),

and

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

/mat

rix, a

naly

tical

par

amet

er

and

conc

entra

tion

leve

l. If

an

anal

ytic

al p

aram

eter

has

mul

tiple

ana

lyte

s, th

en

com

plet

e EP

A-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

24b.

Wor

kshe

et #

24b

lists

the

prec

isio

n an

d ac

cura

cy/b

ias e

xpec

ted

for e

ach

anal

yte

whe

n us

ing

the

spec

ified

ana

lytic

al

met

hod

or S

OP.

If m

etho

d/SO

P Q

C a

ccep

tanc

e lim

its2 e

xcee

d th

e m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia, t

hen

data

may

not

mee

t use

r nee

ds.

(Ref

er

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

ns 1

3.0

and

13.2

, and

Tab

les 3

and

4 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

ary

2002

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#24

a - R

ev. 1

0/99

Com

plet

e a

sepa

rate

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m1

3

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

Page

: 1

of

8

Fi

xed

Lab

orat

ory

Ana

lytic

al Q

C S

ampl

e T

able

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

Sa

mpl

ing

SOP

FS

02

Ana

lytic

al P

aram

eter

1

Har

dnes

s (C

aCO

3)

Con

cent

ratio

n Le

vel

pp

m

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/ S

OP

Ref

eren

ce*

SW

846

Met

hod

6010

Labo

rato

ry N

ame

MIT

KEM

N

o. o

f Sam

ple

Loca

tions

13

M

etho

d/SO

P Q

C A

ccep

tanc

e L

imits

Pe

rfer

ia

Lab

orat

ory

QC

: Fr

eque

ncy/

N

umbe

r

2

Cor

rect

ive

Act

ion

(CA

) Pe

rson

(s)

Res

pons

ible

for

CA

D

ata

Qua

lity

Indi

cato

r (D

QI)

M

easu

rem

ent

orm

ance

Cri

t3

M

etho

d B

lank

1

per 1

0 Sa

mpl

es

No

elem

ent >

QL

Rec

lean

& R

eana

lyze

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s C

onta

min

atio

n Pe

r Met

hod

6010

Inst

rum

ent B

lank

1

per B

atch

N

o el

emen

t > Q

L

Rec

lean

& R

eana

lyze

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Con

tam

inat

ion

Pe

r Met

hod

6010

La

bora

tory

Dup

licat

e 1

per 1

0 Sa

mpl

es

<2

0% R

PD

Qua

lify

data

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

Prec

isio

n

Per M

etho

d 60

10

Labo

rato

ry M

atrix

Spi

ke

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

Rec

over

y 75

-125

%

Qua

lify

data

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

A

ccur

acy

Per M

etho

d 60

10

Mat

rix S

pike

Dup

licat

es

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

<20%

RPD

Qua

lify

data

Prec

isio

n

Per M

etho

d 60

10

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

LF

B

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

Rec

over

y 80

-120

%

D

o no

t pro

ceed

with

an

alys

is u

ntil

acce

ptab

le

LFB

obt

aine

d

A

ccur

acy/

Bia

s Se

nsiti

vity

Pe

r Met

hod

6010

Surr

ogat

es

Oth

er: F

ield

Bla

nk

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

Q

ualif

y da

ta

Labo

rato

ry

Man

ager

/Pro

ject

M

anag

er

Con

tam

inat

ion

N

o el

emen

t > Q

L

Pe

r Met

hod

6010

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

) and

the

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

an

d co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

If a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er1 h

as m

ultip

le a

naly

tes,

then

co

mpl

ete

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#24

b. W

orks

heet

#24

b lis

ts th

e pr

ecis

ion

and

accu

racy

/bia

s exp

ecte

d fo

r eac

h an

alyt

e w

hen

usin

g th

e sp

ecifi

ed a

naly

tical

m

etho

d or

SO

P. I

f met

hod/

SOP

QC

acc

epta

nce

limits

2 exc

eed

the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

crit

eria

3 , the

n da

ta m

ay n

ot m

eet u

ser n

eeds

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

13.

0 an

d 13

.2, a

nd T

able

s 3 a

nd 4

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y A

naly

tical

QC

Sam

ple

Tab

le

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#24

a - R

ev. 1

0/99

Com

plet

e a

sepa

rate

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Page

: 2

of

8

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Su

rfac

e W

ater

Sam

plin

g SO

P

FS02

A

naly

tical

Par

amet

er1

Pb

+ C

d

C

once

ntra

tion

Leve

l

Sub

ppb

A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SO

P R

efer

ence

*

EP

A M

etho

d 16

37

SOP

A01

Labo

rato

ry N

ame

M

icro

Inor

gani

cs,

Inc.

No.

of S

ampl

e Lo

catio

ns

13

Fr

eque

ncy/

N

umbe

r

M

etho

d/SO

P Q

C A

ccep

tanc

e L

imits

2

Cor

rect

ive

Act

ion

(CA

)

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tor

(DQ

I)

Pe

rfer

ia

Lab

orat

ory

QC

: Pe

rson

(s)

Res

pons

ible

for

CA

Mea

sure

men

tor

man

ce C

rit

3

MD

L 1/

3 A

WQ

C

Re-

prep

Bat

ch

C

onta

min

atio

n Pe

r Met

hod

1637

M

etho

d B

lank

1

per 1

0 Sa

mpl

es

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Rea

gent

Bla

nk

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

C

onta

min

atio

n 1

per B

atch

R

eana

lyze

Pe

r Met

hod

1637

In

stru

men

t Bla

nk

1 pe

r Bat

ch

R

eana

lyze

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Pe

r Met

hod

1637

C

onta

min

atio

n

Labo

rato

ry D

uplic

ate

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

<2

0% R

PD

Re-

prep

Bat

ch

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

Prec

isio

n Pe

r Met

hod

1637

Labo

rato

ry M

atrix

Spi

ke

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

Rec

over

y 60

-120

%

R

e-pr

ep B

atch

Pr

ecis

ion

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

Pe

r Met

hod

1637

M

atrix

Spi

ke D

uplic

ates

1

per 1

0 Sa

mpl

es

R

ecov

ery

60-1

20%

Re-

prep

Bat

ch

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

Pr

ecis

ion

Pe

r Met

hod

1637

LC

S 1

per 1

0 Sa

mpl

es

Rec

over

y 60

-120

%

Re-

prep

Bat

ch

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Acc

urac

y/B

ias

Per M

etho

d 16

37

LFB

1

per 1

0 Sa

mpl

es

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Se

nsiti

vity

Pe

r Met

hod

1637

Rec

over

y 60

-120

%

R

e-pr

ep B

atch

Oth

er: F

ield

Bla

nk

Q

ualif

y da

ta

La

bora

tory

M

anag

er/P

roje

ct

Man

ager

Pe

r Met

hod

1637

1

per 1

0 Sa

mpl

es

< Q

L

Con

tam

inat

ion

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

) and

the

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

/mat

rix, a

naly

tical

par

amet

er

and

conc

entra

tion

leve

l. If

an

anal

ytic

al p

aram

eter

has

mul

tiple

ana

lyte

s, th

en

com

plet

e EP

A-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

24b.

Wor

kshe

et #

24b

lists

the

prec

isio

n an

d ac

cura

cy/b

ias e

xpec

ted

for e

ach

anal

yte

whe

n us

ing

the

spec

ified

ana

lytic

al

met

hod

or S

OP.

If m

etho

d/SO

P Q

C a

ccep

tanc

e lim

its e

xcee

d th

e m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia3 , t

hen

data

may

not

mee

t use

r nee

ds.

(Ref

er

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

ns 1

3.0

and

13.2

, and

Tab

les 3

and

4 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y A

naly

tical

QC

Sam

ple

Tab

le

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#24

a - R

ev. 1

0/99

Com

plet

e a

sepa

rate

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m1

2

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

3 o

f 8

M

ediu

m/M

atrix

Surf

ace

Wat

er

Sam

plin

g SO

P

FS02

A

naly

tical

Par

amet

er

1

Cu

C

once

ntra

tion

Leve

l

Sub

ppb

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/ S

OP

Ref

eren

ce*

EPA

Met

hod

1637

SO

P A

01

Labo

rato

ry N

ame

M

icro

Inor

gani

cs,

Inc.

Not

e: M

etho

d 16

37 d

oes n

ot in

clud

e C

u as

an

anal

yte,

thus

QA

/QC

crit

eria

fr

om M

etho

d 16

38 (I

CP-

MS)

wer

e us

ed a

s a g

uide

line

N

o. o

f Sam

ple

Loca

tions

9

Lab

orat

ory

QC

:

Freq

uenc

y/

Num

ber

M

etho

d/SO

P Q

C A

ccep

tanc

e L

imits

2

Cor

rect

ive

Act

ion

(CA

)

Pers

on(s

) R

espo

nsib

le fo

r C

A

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tor

(DQ

I)

M

easu

rem

ent

Perf

orm

ance

Cri

teri

a3 M

etho

d B

lank

Re-

prep

Bat

ch

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

M

DL

1/3

AW

QC

Con

tam

inat

ion

Pe

r Met

hod

1638

R

eage

nt B

lank

1

per B

atch

Rea

naly

ze

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

Con

tam

inat

ion

Per M

etho

d 16

38

Inst

rum

ent B

lank

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

1

per B

atch

Rea

naly

ze

C

onta

min

atio

n

Per M

etho

d 16

38

Labo

rato

ry D

uplic

ate

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

<20%

RPD

Re-

prep

Bat

ch

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

Pr

ecis

ion

Per M

etho

d 16

38

Labo

rato

ry M

atrix

Spi

ke

1

per 1

0 Sa

mpl

es

Rec

over

y 51

-145

%

R

e-pr

ep B

atch

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Prec

isio

n

Per M

etho

d 16

38

Mat

rix S

pike

Dup

licat

es

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

Rec

over

y 51

-145

%

R

e-pr

ep B

atch

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Prec

isio

n

Per M

etho

d 16

38

LCS

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

R

ecov

ery

51-1

45%

R

e-pr

ep B

atch

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

erA

ccur

acy/

Bia

s Pe

r Met

hod

1638

LF

B

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

Rec

over

y 51

-145

%

R

e-pr

ep B

atch

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Sens

itivi

ty

Pe

r Met

hod

1638

O

ther

: Fie

ld B

lank

1 pe

r 10

Sam

ples

<

QL

Q

ualif

y da

ta

La

bora

tory

M

anag

er/P

roje

ct

Man

ager

C

onta

min

atio

n Pe

r Met

hod

1638

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

) and

the

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

24a

- Rev

. 10/

99C

ompl

ete

a se

para

te w

orks

heet

for e

ach

med

ium

/mat

rix, a

naly

tical

par

amet

er

and

conc

entra

tion

leve

l. If

an

anal

ytic

al p

aram

eter

1 has

mul

tiple

ana

lyte

s, th

en

com

plet

e EP

A-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

24b.

Wor

kshe

et #

24b

lists

the

prec

isio

n an

d ac

cura

cy/b

ias e

xpec

ted

for e

ach

anal

yte

whe

n us

ing

the

spec

ified

ana

lytic

al

met

hod

or S

OP.

If m

etho

d/SO

P Q

C a

ccep

tanc

e lim

its2 e

xcee

d th

e m

easu

rem

ent p

erfo

rman

ce c

riter

ia3 , t

hen

data

may

not

mee

t use

r nee

ds.

(Ref

er

to Q

APP

Man

ual S

ectio

ns 1

3.0

and

13.2

, and

Tab

les 3

and

4 fo

r gui

danc

e.)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

ary

2002

Pa

ge:

4 o

f 8

Fi

xed

Lab

orat

ory

Ana

lytic

al Q

C S

ampl

e T

able

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Surf

ace

Wat

er

Sa

mpl

ing

SOP

FS

OP-

1

A

naly

tical

Par

amet

er1

Nut

rient

s (To

tal

Nitr

ogen

and

Tot

al

Phos

phor

us)

Con

cent

ratio

n Le

vel

Sub

ppb

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/ S

OP

Ref

eren

ce*

U

RIW

W S

OP

SP-1

Labo

rato

ry N

ame

U

RI W

ater

shed

W

atch

Pro

gram

No.

of S

ampl

e Lo

catio

ns

4

L

abor

ator

y Q

C:

Pe

rfer

ia

Freq

uenc

y/

Num

ber

M

etho

d/SO

PQ

C A

ccep

tanc

e L

imits

2

Cor

rect

ive

Act

ion

(CA

)

Pers

on(s

) R

espo

nsib

le fo

r C

A

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tor

(DQ

I)

M

easu

rem

ent

orm

ance

Cri

t3

Met

hod

Bla

nk

2

per s

et o

f 90

sam

ples

<QL

R

e-ru

n La

bora

tory

Man

ager

A

ccur

acy/

Con

tam

inat

ion

<QL

Rea

gent

Bla

nk

2

per s

et o

f 90

sam

ples

<QL

R

e-ru

n La

bora

tory

Man

ager

A

ccur

acy/

Con

tam

inat

ion

<QL

Labo

rato

ry D

uplic

ate

All

sam

ples

are

run

in d

uplic

ate

<2

0% R

PD

R

e-ru

n La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Prec

isio

n <2

0% R

PD

La

bora

tory

Mat

rix S

pike

M

atrix

Spi

ke D

uplic

ates

LCS

Purc

hase

ext

erna

l st

anda

rd

2 pe

r set

of 9

0 sa

mpl

es

15

% c

v

Re-

run

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

A

ccur

acy/

Prec

isio

n

15%

cv

LF

B

Oth

er: F

ield

Bla

nk

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

) and

the

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#24

a - R

ev. 1

0/99

Rev

isio

n D

ate:

Feb

ruar

y 20

02

Com

plet

e a

sepa

rate

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

an

d co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

If a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er1 h

as m

ultip

le a

naly

tes,

then

co

mpl

ete

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#24

b. W

orks

heet

#24

b lis

ts th

e pr

ecis

ion

and

accu

racy

/bia

s exp

ecte

d fo

r eac

h an

alyt

e w

hen

usin

g th

e sp

ecifi

ed a

naly

tical

m

etho

d or

SO

P. I

f met

hod/

SOP

QC

acc

epta

nce

limits

2 exc

eed

the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

crit

eria

3 , the

n da

ta m

ay n

ot m

eet u

ser n

eeds

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

13.

0 an

d 13

.2, a

nd T

able

s 3 a

nd 4

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

Page

: 5

of

8

Fi

xed

Lab

orat

ory

Ana

lytic

al Q

C S

ampl

e T

able

Su

rfac

e W

ater

Med

ium

/Mat

rix

Sam

plin

g SO

P

FSO

P-1

Ana

lytic

al P

aram

eter

l a

1

Chl

orop

hyl

Con

cent

ratio

n Le

vel

pp

b

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d/ S

OP

Ref

eren

ce*

U

RIW

W S

OP

SP-2

Labo

rato

ry N

ame

UR

I Wat

ersh

ed

Wat

ch P

rogr

am

No.

of S

ampl

e Lo

catio

ns

2

L

abor

ator

y Q

C:

M

etho

d/SO

P C

orre

ctiv

e A

ctio

n (C

A)

Pers

on(s

) R

espo

nsib

le fo

r C

A

Mea

sure

men

t Fr

eque

ncy/

N

umbe

r

QC

Acc

epta

nce

Lim

its2

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tor

(DQ

I)

Perf

orm

ance

Cri

teri

a3 M

etho

d B

lank

1 pe

r set

of 4

0 sa

mpl

es

<Q

L

R

e-cl

ean,

Re-

run

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

Acc

urac

y/C

onta

min

atio

n <Q

L

Rea

gent

Bla

nk

1

per s

et o

f 40

sam

ples

<QL

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

A

ccur

acy/

Con

tam

inat

ion

Re-

clea

n, R

e-ru

n

<QL

Labo

rato

ry D

uplic

ate

All

sam

ples

are

run

in d

uplic

ate

Qua

lify

<20%

RPD

<2

0% R

PD

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Prec

isio

n

La

bora

tory

Mat

rix S

pike

M

atrix

Spi

ke D

uplic

ates

LCS

Surr

ogat

es

2 pe

r set

of 4

0

<20%

RPD

Q

ualif

y La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Prec

isio

n

<20%

RPD

O

ther

: ext

erna

l St

anda

rds

2 pe

r set

of 4

0

<20%

RPD

Q

ualif

y La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Prec

isio

n <2

0% R

PD

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

) and

the

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#24

a - R

ev. 1

0/99

ary

2002

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y A

naly

tical

QC

Sam

ple

Tab

le

Com

plet

e a

sepa

rate

wor

kshe

et fo

r eac

h m

ediu

m/m

atrix

, ana

lytic

al p

aram

eter

an

d co

ncen

tratio

n le

vel.

If a

n an

alyt

ical

par

amet

er1 h

as m

ultip

le a

naly

tes,

then

co

mpl

ete

EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#24

b. W

orks

heet

#24

b lis

ts th

e pr

ecis

ion

and

accu

racy

/bia

s exp

ecte

d fo

r eac

h an

alyt

e w

hen

usin

g th

e sp

ecifi

ed a

naly

tical

m

etho

d or

SO

P. I

f met

hod/

SOP

QC

acc

epta

nce

limits

2 exc

eed

the

mea

sure

men

t per

form

ance

crit

eria

3 , the

n da

ta m

ay n

ot m

eet u

ser n

eeds

. (R

efer

to

QAP

P M

anua

l Sec

tions

13.

0 an

d 13

.2, a

nd T

able

s 3 a

nd 4

for g

uida

nce.

)

Titl

e: R

IDEM

�s 2

000

303(

d) S

uppl

emen

tal M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

(Gro

ups 3

and

4)

Rev

isio

n N

umbe

r: 1

R

evis

ion

Dat

e: F

ebru

Page

: 6

of

8

M

ediu

m/M

atrix

Surf

ace

Wat

er

Sam

plin

g SO

P

FSO

P-2

Ana

lytic

al P

aram

eter

1 Fe

cal C

olifo

rm

Con

cent

ratio

n Le

vel

<1 M

PN/1

00 m

L

A

naly

tical

Met

hod/

SO

P R

efer

ence

* SM

921

3D/S

OP-

5

B

AL

Labo

rato

ry,

Inc.

Labo

rato

ry N

ame

N

o. o

f Sam

ple

Loca

tions

5

Lab

orat

ory

QC

:

M

etho

d/SO

P C

orre

ctiv

e A

ctio

n (C

A)

Perf

eria

Fr

eque

ncy/

N

umbe

r Q

C A

ccep

tanc

e L

imits

2 Pe

rson

(s)

Res

pons

ible

for

CA

Dat

a Q

ualit

y In

dica

tor

(DQ

I)

M

easu

rem

ent

orm

ance

Cri

t3

1 pe

r bat

ch

SOP-

5 R

e-pr

epar

e ba

tch

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

M

etho

d B

lank

B

ias/

Con

tam

inat

ion

No

Gro

wth

R

eage

nt B

lank

1 pe

r bat

ch

SOP-

5

La

bora

tory

Man

ager

Bia

s/C

onta

min

atio

n R

e-pr

epar

eba

tch

No

Gro

wth

La

bora

tory

Dup

licat

e

SOP-

5

Re-

anal

yze

Prec

isio

n W

ithin

95%

con

fiden

ce

inte

rval

1

per 1

0 sa

mpl

es

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

Labo

rato

ry M

atrix

Spi

ke

Mat

rix S

pike

Dup

licat

es

LCS

Su

rrog

ates

O

ther

:

*Spe

cify

app

ropr

iate

ref

eren

ce n

umbe

r/le

tter

from

the

Proj

ect S

ampl

ing

SOP

Ref

eren

ce T

able

(EPA

-NE

QA

PP W

orks

heet

#13

) and

the

Fixe

d L

abor

ator

y M

etho

d/SO

P R

efer

ence

Tab

le (E

PA-N

E Q

APP

Wor

kshe

et #

20).

Attachment B � Field Sampling SOPs

Attachment C � Laboratory Analytical SOPs

Attachment D � YSI Model 85 Operations Manuel

Attachment E � Blank Field Data Sheet

Attachment F � Chain of Custody Forms

Attachment G � Field Analytical SOPs

quality assurance project plan manager/quality assurance officer ... 10.0 sample handling, ... his...

Documents