public comment no. 2-nfpa 13r-2014 [ global input ] · 2016-02-09 · public comment no. 26-nfpa...

35
Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] In Fig. A.5.4.2(a), there is no mention of the recommended depth of insulation above the pipe. (The insulation under the pipe does not contribute to freeze protection, in fact it hinders it.) The same comment applies to Fig. A.5.4.2(b). The caption for this figure states “For areas having temperatures 0 F (-18 C) or lower…”. There is no mention of the thickness of the added batt. In Fig. A.5.4.2(c), the words “As an alternative” do not make sense. Stuffing insulation in the holes in the joists is not an alternative to drilling holes in the joist. Also, for temperatures of 0 F (-18 C) or lower this figure should also include mention of if an additional batt of insulation over the joists as described in Fig. A.5.4.2(b). In Fig. A.5.4.2(f), there is no mention of the recommended depth of insulation above the tent. Type your content here ... Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment My proposed changes would provide more detailed guidance for freeze protection in Figs. A.5.4.2(a) thru (f) Related Item First Revision No. 13-NFPA 13R-2013 [Section No. 6.4.6.1.3] First Revision No. 1-NFPA 13R-2013 [Section No. 3.3.12 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Richard Reiter Organization: Beach Instrumentation Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Sun Feb 23 22:04:04 EST 2014 Committee Statement Committee Action: Rejected Resolution: No specific Depth was proposed in the PC. A depth would be difficult to specify as it may vary depending on the geographic location. National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... 1 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ]

In Fig. A.5.4.2(a), there is no mention of the recommended depth of insulation above the pipe. (Theinsulation under the pipe does not contribute to freeze protection, in fact it hinders it.)

The same comment applies to Fig. A.5.4.2(b). The caption for this figure states “For areas havingtemperatures 0 F (-18 C) or lower…”. There is no mention of the thickness of the added batt.

In Fig. A.5.4.2(c), the words “As an alternative” do not make sense. Stuffing insulation in the holes in thejoists is not an alternative to drilling holes in the joist. Also, for temperatures of 0 F (-18 C) or lower thisfigure should also include mention of if an additional batt of insulation over the joists as described in Fig.A.5.4.2(b).

In Fig. A.5.4.2(f), there is no mention of the recommended depth of insulation above the tent.Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

My proposed changes would provide more detailed guidance for freeze protection in Figs. A.5.4.2(a) thru (f)

Related Item

First Revision No. 13-NFPA 13R-2013 [Section No. 6.4.6.1.3]

First Revision No. 1-NFPA 13R-2013 [Section No. 3.3.12 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Richard Reiter

Organization: Beach Instrumentation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Feb 23 22:04:04 EST 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: No specific Depth was proposed in the PC. A depth would be difficult to specify as it may varydepending on the geographic location.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 2: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ]

This reformatting addresses the Committee Input #28, and the Committee’s FirstRevision #11 & #12 NFPA 13R-2013 which moved and correlated the relocation of 6.4.7to 6.2.2.5 . There are no technical changes to the existing requirements in the Code.

6.2.2 Outside Dwelling Units.

6.2.2.1 Sprinklers outside the dwelling units shall be quick response, except as permitted by6.2.2.2. The sprinkler design criteria shall be in accordance with Chapter 7. All sprinklers usedoutside of the dwelling units shall be in accordance with 6.2.2.

6.2.2.2 Sprinklers outside the dwelling units shall be quick response, except as allowed by 6.2.2.3and 6.2.2.4. (Deleted because it is now covered in 6.2.2.1)

6.4.7 Use of Residential Sprinklers Outside of Dwelling Units. (Relocating existingSection 6.4.7 which was moved to Section 6.4.2.2.5 and now moving to new Section6.2.2.2 and modified as shown here.) 6.2.2.2 The following types of spaces shall be permittedto be protected by residential sprinklers in accordance with Section 7.1 unless otherwise noted:

(1) Lobbies not in hotels and motels

(2) Foyers

(3) Corridors

(4) Halls

(5) Lounges

(6) Ordinary hazard areas in accordance with Section 7.2.4.1

(7) Garages in accordance in accordance with Sections 7.3.3 and 7.3.3.1(1)

(6 8) Other areas with fire loads similar to residential fire loads

6.2.2.3 Residential sprinklers shall be permitted to be used in garages that are accessible onlyfrom and directly connected to a single dwelling unit. (Deleted because it is already coveredunder 6.2.2.2(7) above, 7.3.3 & 7.3.3.1)

(Move 6.2.2.4 to New 7.2.4.1) 6.2.2.4 Residential sprinklers shall be permitted to be used inordinary hazard areas that meet the following conditions:

(1) The area is compartmented into 500 ft2 (46 m2) or less by 30-minute fire-rated construction.

(2) The sprinklers are spaced at 130 ft2 (12 m2) per sprinkler.

(3) Openings have a lintel at least 8 in. (203 mm) in depth.

(4) The total area of openings, excluding any overhead garage doors that open to the exterior, doesnot exceed 50 ft2 (4.6 m2) for each compartment.

(5) Discharge densities are in accordance with NFPA 13 for ordinary hazard.

7.2* Design Criteria — Outside Dwelling Unit.

7.2.1 Areas outside the dwelling unit shall comply with Section 7.2.

7.2.2 7.2.4 The number of design sprinklers for a corridor or breezeway outside the dwelling unitshall include up to the four most hydraulically demanding adjacent sprinklers.

(Moved existing Section 7.2.4 to new 7.2.2 because it also applies to not only quickresponse sprinkler design, but also residential sprinkler design. Therefore, did notneed to reference in this section of Code [as reference in existing 7.2.2 in 2013 NFPA13 shown below in new 7.2.3] since it applies to both quick-response and residentialsprinklers.)

7.2.2 3 The design discharge and design area criteria for areas protected by quick-responsesprinklers shall comply with NFPA 13 except as allowed by 7.2.2 3.1 and 7.2.4.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

2 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 3: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

7.2.2 3.1 For compartments 500 ft2 (46m2) or less that meet all of the following conditions and areprotected with quick response sprinklers, the design area shall be permitted to be limited to thenumber of sprinklers in the compartment but shall not exceed four sprinklers:

(1) The area is protected with 30 minute–rated construction.

(2) The sprinklers are spaced at 225 ft2 (20.9 m2) maximum for light hazard, 130 ft2(12 m2) maximum for ordinary hazard, or in accordance with their listing.

(3) Openings have a lintel depth at least 8 in. (203 mm) in depth.

(4) The total area of openings, excluding any overhead doors that open to theexterior, does not exceed 50 ft2 (4.6 m2) for each compartment.

(5) Discharge densities are in accordance with NFPA 13.

7.2.3 4 Where residential sprinklers are used outside the dwelling unit as allowed by 6.2.2.2, thedischarge criteria shall be in accordance with Section 7.1, except as modified by 6.2.2.4(5) 7.2.4.1

6.2.2.4 (MOVED FROM 6.2.2.4) 7.2.4.1 .Residential sprinklers shall be permitted to be used inordinary hazard areas that meet the following conditions:

(1) The area is compartmented into 500 ft2 (46 m2) or less by 30-minute fire-ratedconstruction.

(2) The sprinklers are spaced at 130 ft2 (12 m2) per sprinkler.

(3) Openings have a lintel at least 8 in. (203 mm) in depth.

(4) The total area of openings, excluding any overhead garage doors that open to theexterior, does not exceed 50 ft2 (4.6 m2) for each compartment.

(5) Discharge densities are in accordance with NFPA 13 for ordinary hazard.

7.3 Design Criteria — Garages.

7.3.1 Garages that are completely separated from the residential portion of the building byfire-resistive construction sufficient to have them considered separate buildings under the localcode shall be protected in accordance with NFPA 13.

7.3.2 Garages that are accessible by people from more than one dwelling unit, and are not coveredby 7.3.1, shall be considered part of the building and shall be protected in accordance with Section7.2.

7.3.2.1 Garage doors shall not be considered obstructions and shall be permitted to be ignored forplacement and calculation of sprinklers.

7.3.3* Garages that are accessible only from a single dwelling unit shall be considered as part ofthat dwelling unit.

7.3.3.1 Garages that meet the criteria of 7.3.3 shall be protected in accordance with one of thefollowing:

(1) Use of a residential sprinkler in accordance with Section 7.1

(2) Use of an quick response or residential extended coverage sprinkler discharging water not lessthan its listed flow rate for light hazard (Added “quick response or residential” as just aclarification of the existing requirement under Section 6.2.2 that sprinklers outside ofthe dwelling need to be.)

(3) Quick-response spray sprinkler at light hazard spacing in accordance with NFPA 13 designed todischarge at 0.05 gpm/ ft2 (2.04 mm/min) density

7.3.3.2 The system demand shall be permitted to be limited to the number of sprinklers in thecompartment but shall not exceed four sprinklers.

7.3.3.3 Garage doors shall not be considered obstructions and shall be permitted to be ignored forplacement and calculation of sprinklers.

Other section affected by revisions above that need reference revised:

6.3 Quick-Response Sprinklers. Where quick-response sprinklers are installed in accordancewith 6.2.1.3, 6.2.1.4, or 6.2.2.2 1, the maximum allowable spacing, minimum allowable spacing,obstruction criteria, and distance from the ceiling shall be in accordance with NFPA 13.

Type your content here ...

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

3 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 4: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This reformatting addresses the Committee Input #28, and the Committee’s First Revision #11 & #12 NFPA 13R-2013 which moved and correlated the relocation of 6.4.7 to 6.2.2.5. There are no technical changes to the existing requirements in the Code.

Related Item

Committee Input No. 28-NFPA 13R-2013 [Global Input]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marshall Klein

Organization: Marshall A. Klein & Associates

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Mar 10 10:31:48 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-22-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: This reformatting addresses the Committee Input #28, and the Committee’s First Revision #11& #12

NFPA 13R-2013 which moved and correlated the relocation of 6.4.7 to 6.2.2.5. There are notechnical

changes to the existing requirements in the Code.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

4 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 5: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ]

2.3.3 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A 53/A53M , Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded andSeamless, 2010 2012 .

ASTM A 135/A135M , Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe, 2009 09(2014) .

ASTM A 234/A234M , Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel forModerate and High Temperatures, 2010 2013e1 .

ASTM A 795/A795M , Standard Specification for Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Weldedand Seamless Steel Pipe for Fire Protection Use, 2008 2013 .

ASTM B 32, Standard Specification for Solder Metal, 2008.

ASTM B 43, Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe, 2009.

ASTM B 88, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube, 2009.

ASTM B 251, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube, 2010.

ASTM B 813, Standard Specification for Liquid and Paste Fluxes for Soldering Applications of Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube, 2010.

ASTM F 437, Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009.

ASTM F 438, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 40, 2009.

ASTM F 439, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009.

ASTM F 442, Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic Pipe (SDR-PR),2009.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Update year dates for standards

Related Item

First Revision No. 1-NFPA 13R-2013 [Section No. 3.3.12 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Steve Mawn

Organization: ASTM International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 15 15:07:39 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Accepted

Resolution: SR-2-NFPA 13R-2014

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

5 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 6: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Statement: Update year dates for standards

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

6 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 7: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 7-NFPA 13R-2014 [ New Section after 5.1.1.1 ]

5.1.1.2 Replacing Sprinklers

Where replacing residential sprinklers manufactured prior to 2003, installed using a design density lessthan 0.05 gpm/ft² (204 mm/min), and that are no longer available from the manufacturer, a residentialsprinkler with an equivalent K-factor (± 5%) shall be permitted to be used provided the currently listedcoverage area for the replacement sprinkler is not exceeded.

A.5.1.1.2

It is recognized that the flow and pressure available to the replacement sprinkler might be less than itscurrent flow and pressure requirement.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This language allows some flexibility when replacing sprinklers that may have been painted. Similar language will be submitted to NFPA 13 and NFPA 25. Many AHJ's look back to the installation standard when sprinklers are replaced. This is why it is beneficial to have this language in the installation standards as well as NFPA 25.

Related Item

Public Input No. 6-NFPA 13R-2012 [New Section after 5.1.1.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Mar 17 13:12:45 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-17-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: This language allows some flexibility when replacing sprinklers that may have been painted. Thislanguage correlates with the modifications made to the 2016 edition of NFPA 13D. Many AHJ'slook back to the installation standard when sprinklers are replaced.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

7 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 8: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 14-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 5.1.1.1 ]

5.1.1.1*

Only new listed sprinklers shall be installed in sprinkler systems.

5.1.1.1.1*

Where a sprinkler is removed from a fitting or welded outlet, it shall not be reinstalled except as permittedby 5.1.1.1.1.1.

5.1.1.1.1.1*

Dry sprinklers shall be permitted to be reinstalled, where they are not removed by applying torque at thepoint where the sprinkler is attached to the barrel.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 2 appeared in the First Draft Report as First Revision No. 5, and is also related to Public Input No. 5.

The TC should review the following language that was included as an FR in NFPA 13R. The RSS TC reviewed similar language and chose not to create an FR, however this language was modified to alleviate some of the concerns raised about the original proposed verbiage.

"Where replacing residential sprinklers manufactured prior to 2003 and installed using a design density less than 0.05 gpm/ft2 (204 mm/min), a residential sprinkler with an equivalent K-factor (± 5%) shall be permitted to be used provided the currently listed coverage area for the replacement sprinkler is not exceeded."

Related Item

First Revision No. 5-NFPA 13R-2013 [New Section after 5.1.1.1]

Public Input No. 5-NFPA 13R-2012 [New Section after 5.1.1.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: CC on AUT-AAC

Organization: CC on Automatic Sprinkler Systems

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Apr 29 12:46:15 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-17-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: This language allows some flexibility when replacing sprinklers that may have been painted. Thislanguage correlates with the modifications made to the 2016 edition of NFPA 13D. Many AHJ'slook back to the installation standard when sprinklers are replaced.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

8 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 9: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 5.2.3.2 ]

5.2.3.2 *

When nonmetallic pipe is used in systems utilizing steel pipe internally coated with corrosion inhibitors, thesteel pipe coating shall be listed for compatibility with the nonmetallic pipe materials .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The words "with the nonmetallic pipe materials" has been added to the end of this section in order to correlate with the wording of NFPA 13 section 6.3.7.2. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposed to NFPA 13.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 23-NFPA 13R-2014 [Section No. A.5.2.3.2]

Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after A.5.2.12.2]

Related Item

First Revision No. 34-NFPA 13R-2013 [Sections 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.7, 5...]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 14 10:38:38 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-3-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: The words "with the nonmetallic pipe materials" has been added to the end of this section in orderto correlate with the wording of NFPA 13 section 6.3.7.2. This "compatibility" section was intendedto be consistent with the language proposed to NFPA 13.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

9 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 10: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 13R-2014 [ New Section after 5.2.12.2.1.4 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Other types of fittings investigated for suitability in automatic sprinkler installations andlisted for this service, including but not limited to CPVC and steel, and differing from thatprovided in Table 5.2.9 shall be permitted when installed in accordance with their listinglimitations, including installation instructions.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This section has been has been added to correlate with the proposed wording of NFPA 13 section 6.4.4. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposed to NFPA 13. Annex section corresponding with NFPA 13 section A.6.4.4 should also be added to NFPA 13R.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after A.5.2.12.2]

Public Comment No. 23-NFPA 13R-2014 [Section No. A.5.2.3.2]

Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after A.5.2.12.2]

Related Item

First Revision No. 34-NFPA 13R-2013 [Sections 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.7, 5...]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 14 10:55:09 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-4-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: This section has been has been added to correlate with the proposed wording of NFPA 13 section6.4.4. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposed toNFPA 13. Annex section corresponding with NFPA 13 section A.6.4.4 has also be added to NFPA13R.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

10 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 11: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 27-NFPA 13R-2014 [ New Section after 5.4 ]

Pre-Engineered Systems.

Where listed pre-engineered systems are installed, they shall be installed within the limitations that havebeen established by the testing laboratories.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Currently NFPA 13D allows pre-engineered systems to be installed as an acceptable alternative. Under the definition of pre-engineered, the systems must have been successfully tested to the appropriate hazard. Allowing alternate systems and new technologies through sections 1.4 and 1.6 of this standard, requires engineering proof that the alternative is equal or better protection than what is in the standard. Often obtaining engineering support or approval can be difficult and expensive. This would open it up to being approved under standard review from an engineer or authority having jurisdiction. I also believe that this is also a correlating issue from 13D.

Related Item

First Revision No. 3-NFPA 13R-2013 [Section No. 4.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Daniel Wake

Organization: Victaulic Company

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri May 16 16:20:10 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The use of new technologies not currently addressed within the standard is adequately coveredby the the new technology and equivalency sections in Chapter 1.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

11 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 12: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 6.2.1.3 [Excluding any

Sub-Sections] ]

Listed quick-response sprinklers shall be permitted to be installed in dwelling units meeting the definition ofa compartment, as defined in Section 3 . 3, where no more than four sprinklers are located in the dwellingunit.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

During the First Draft, the committee refused to remove the allowance to use QR sprinklers in dwelling units (Maximum of 4 per Dwelling Unit total). If the committee feels that QR sprinklers are adequate for protection, there should not be a 4 sprinkler maximum. The QR sprinklers will have a minimum .10 density and the calculations will be in accordance with NFPA 13.

Related Item

Public Input No. 20-NFPA 13R-2012 [Section No. 6.2.1.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Apr 17 11:37:35 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: Residential sprinklers are principally designed and developed for life safety. Commercial sprinklersare principally designed for property protection. Conditions may exist, like roof pitch or ceilingconstruction that present a challenge to residential sprinklers. In those cases, having the option ofusing a limited number of commercial spray sprinklers is desirable. The number of commercialsprinklers is limited to four. This limitation allows calculations to remain more simplistic since we arenot using an area design method and it also allows us to assure that we are using residentialsprinkler, and their inherent life safety characteristics like high wall wetting, as frequently as possible.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

12 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 13: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 13R-2014 [ New Section after 6.4.6.3.2 ]

6.4.6.3.2.1

In closets and compartments enclosed by walls and a door, including those housing mechanicalequipment, that are smaller than 400 ft3 (11.3 m3), pendent, upright and sidewall residentialsprinklers shall be permitted to be installed within 18 inches of the ceiling to avoid obstructions nearthe ceiling.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Computer_Modeling_of_Closet.pdf Computer modeling of closet with residential sprinklers

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Small closets, especially those housing mechanical equipment, frequently contain obstructions that make it difficult to place sprinklers within 12 inches of the ceiling. Allowing residential sprinklers to be located further down would allow adequate sprinkler protection of these small closets while avoiding ceiling level obstructions such as ducts and pipes. Based upon CFAST Computer Fire Model, an analysis was performed comparing the performance of sprinklers located 6 inches down from a ceiling in a small room to the performance of sprinklers 18 inches down from the ceiling in an even smaller closet. Based upon this analysis it appears that residential sprinklers 18 inches down from the ceiling in a closet up to 400 ft3 react to a fire at least as quickly as residential sprinklers 6 inches down from a ceiling in a small room. Using equivalency concepts, residential sprinklers could be allowed to be installed within 18 inches of the ceiling in small closets. This analysis is included in this public comment.

Related Item

First Revision No. 14-NFPA 13R-2013 [Section No. 6.4.6.3.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Associ

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 14 10:27:43 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-14-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: Small closets, especially those housing mechanical equipment, frequently contain obstructions thatmake it difficult to place sprinklers within 12 inches of the ceiling. Allowing residential sprinklers to belocated further down would allow adequate sprinkler protection of these small closets while avoidingceiling level obstructions such as ducts and pipes. Based upon CFAST Computer Fire Model, ananalysis was performed comparing the performance of sprinklers located 6 inches down from aceiling in a small room to the performance of sprinklers 18 inches down from the ceiling in an evensmaller closet. Based upon this analysis it appears that residential sprinklers 18 inches down fromthe ceiling in a closet up to 400 ft3 react to a fire at least as quickly as residential sprinklers 6 inchesdown from a ceiling in a small room. Using equivalency concepts, residential sprinklers could be

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

13 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 14: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

allowed to be installed within 18 inches of the ceiling in small closets.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

14 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 15: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Computer Modeling of Closet with

Residential Sprinkler 18 Inches from Ceiling

This analysis uses the CFAST Computer Fire Model to compare the performance of sprinklers 6

inches down from the ceiling in a small room to the performance of sprinklers 18 inches down

from the ceiling in an even smaller closet.

Baseline Room:

15 ft x 15 ft x 8 ft

3 sprinkler locations (see Figure 1)

o Sprinkler 1 – 4 ft from south and west walls

o Sprinkler 2 – Centered between east and west walls, 4 ft from south wall

o Sprinkler 3 – 4 inches from south and east walls

All sprinklers 6 inches from ceiling

All sprinklers RTI = 50 (metric units)

Closet:

7 ft x 7 ft x 8 ft (392 ft3)

3 sprinkler locations (see Figure 2)

o Sprinkler 1 – 2 ft from south and west walls

o Sprinkler 2 – Centered between east and west walls, 2 ft from south wall

o Sprinkler 3 – 4 inches from south and east walls

All sprinklers 18 inches down from ceiling

All sprinklers RTI = 50 (metric units)

Fire:

Fairly slow growing fire

Center of the room/closet

See Figure 3

1 2 3

Figure 1 – Baseline Room

1 2 3

Figure 2 – Closet 392 ft3

Page 16: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Figure 3 – Heat Release Rate for Fire

(Note that the first 600 seconds are the only

important parts of the heat release due to sprinkler activation time)

Results

The following table compares the activation time of the sprinklers in the small room to that of

the sprinklers in the even smaller closet:

Sprinkler

Activation Time in

Small Room

(Figure 1)

Activation Time

in Closet

(Figure 2)

1 510 seconds 500 seconds

2 530 seconds 500 seconds

3 510 seconds 500 seconds

Conclusions

Given this fire location and these three sprinkler locations, it would appear that residential

sprinklers 18 inches down from the ceiling in a closet up to 400 ft3 react to a fire at least as

quickly as residential sprinklers 6 inches down from a ceiling in a small room. Using

equivalency concepts, residential sprinklers could be allowed to be installed within 18 inches of

the ceiling in small closets.

Prior to making any final determination, other combinations of fire size, fire location, and

sprinkler location should be analyzed in the same manner.

Page 17: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 16-NFPA 13R-2014 [ New Section after 6.5 ]

New 6.5.4

Sprinkler-Protected Glazing.

Where sprinklers are used in combination with glazing as an alternative to a required fire-rated wall orwindow assembly, the sprinkler-protected assembly shall comply with the following:

(1) Sprinklers shall be listed as specific application window sprinklers.

(2) Sprinklers shall be supplied by a wet-pipe system.

(3) Glazing shall be heat-strengthened or tempered and shall be fixed.

(4) Where the assembly is required to be protected from both sides, sprinklers shall be installed on bothsides of the glazing.

(5) The use of sprinkler-protected glazing shall be limited to non-load-bearing walls.

(6) The glazed wall assembly shall not have any horizontal members that would interfere with uniformdistribution of water over the surface of the glazing, and there shall be no obstructions between sprinklersand glazing that would obstruct water distribution.

Annex

It is not the intent of this section to apply to sprinkler protection of glass atrium enclosures, pedestrianwalkways, which are permitted by NFPA 101, or model building codes to be protected by standard spraysprinklers installed in accordance with the special provisions set forth in those codes for atriumconstruction.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The proposed text was accepted as a First Revision but later removed by the TCC. The language previously approved by the 13R has also been submitted to the 13 committee as a comment.

Related Item

Public Input No. 74-NFPA 13R-2013 [New Section after 6.5.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fessenden

Organization: Tyco Fire Protection Products

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 08 15:23:41 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-5-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: The proposed text was accepted as a First Revision but later removed by the TCC. The languagepreviously approved by the 13R has also been submitted to the 13 committee as a comment.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

15 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 18: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 25-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 6.6.7 ]

6.6.7

Sprinklers shall not be required in closets (regardless of size) on exterior balconies and exteriorbreezeways/corridors,and garages regardless of size, as long as the closet does not have doors orunprotected penetrations directly into the dwelling unit.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

There would be limited difference of items being stored in closets on balconies or garages.

Related Item

Public Input No. 56-NFPA 13R-2013 [Section No. 6.4.6.3.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Phillip Brown

Organization: American Fire Sprinkler Associ

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 15 11:40:55 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: This allowance applies to areas that are normally unprotected where the addition of a wall shouldnot necessitate protection. Since the garage is required to be protected, a closet within the garageshould be protected as well.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

16 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 19: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 6.9.2 ]

6.9.2

The drain pipe shall be at least 1 in. (25 mm) nominal diameter and shall be arranged so that it can drainall portions of the system .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This statement would indicate that you could never have a trapped section of water.

Related Item

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13R-2012 [Section No. 6.9.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Apr 17 11:50:31 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Accepted

Resolution: SR-6-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: This statement would indicate that you could never have a trapped section of water.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

17 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 20: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 12-NFPA 13R-2014 [ New Section after 6.11.5 ]

6.11.6 Fire department connections shall have an approved method to deter unauthorized removalof the FDC.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

NFPA 13R is a design and installation standard and as such does address the security, protection, and assurance that the various components of required sprinkler systems will function properly when needed. This is seen in various sections including: • Sprinklers subject to mechanical injury shall be protected...,• Requiring approved plugs and caps to protect fire department connections from blockage and debris, In order to assure that fire department connections are present and operate properly in the event of fire they must be protected from theft or any unauthorized removal. Since the FDC is located outside of the protected structure they are more susceptible to theft than any other component. Theft of FDC’s has and is occurring nationwide and many times goes undetected until a fire when the fire department discovers they cannot pump into the system. This new section would allow the AHJ to approve different methods of deterring unauthorized removal of the FDC ranging from the use of locking methods to warning signage.

Related Item

Public Input No. 55-NFPA 13R-2013 [New Section after 6.11.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Bill Galloway

Organization: Southern Regional Fire Code De

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Apr 17 12:53:11 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: No new data has been presented to substantiate the added cost that would be incurred byrevising the document as suggested.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

18 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 21: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 6.11.5 ]

6.11.5 *

Fire department connections shall be permitted to connect to the underground piping dedicated to thesprinkler system where the pipe is rated for a pressure of at least 175 psi . Where the underground pipe isnonmetallic, the pressure rating shall be based on a temperature of at least 100 degrees Fahrenheit.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

As NFPA 13R allows the underground piping to be any material acceptable under the plumbing code, when adding a FDC connection to this underground, the piping material must rated for 175 psi.

Related Item

First Revision No. 21-NFPA 13R-2013 [New Section after 6.11]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 12 11:43:34 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-7-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: As NFPA 13R allows the underground piping to be any material acceptable under the plumbingcode, when adding a FDC connection to this underground, the piping material must rated for 175psi.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

19 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 22: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 13-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. A.1.1 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

20 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 23: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

A.1.1

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

21 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 24: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Revisions to paragraph A.1.1 and A.7.2 are proposed as follows:

1. Replace the first 4 paragraphs of the 2013 edition of NFPA 13R Annex Note A.1.1

with new text as indicated below.

A.1.1 NFPA 13R is appropriate for use as an

alternativeoption to NFPA 13 only in those

residential occupancies, as defined in this standard, up to and including four

aboveground stories in height, and limited to buildings that are 60 ft (18 m) or less in

height above grade plane, which is consistent with limits established by model

building codes for buildings of Type V construction. The height of a building above

grade plane is determined by model building codes, which base the height on

the average height of the highest roof surface above grade plane. For further

information on the building height story limits, see model building codes.

Buildings that contain multiple occupancies (either separated or non-separated), accessory occupancies orincidental uses are often subject to special rules that may restrict the use of NFPA 13R. Refer to theadopted building code to determine whether such restrictions are applicable.

A building's height is determined in accordance with the applicable building code,

which will have its own methods for determining building and story heights. Under

the IBC and NFPA 101/5000 Codes, an NFPA 13R sprinkler system is permitted in a

residential occupancy where the building is limited to four stories above grade plane

(See 2012 NFPA 101 Section 30.3.5.2, 2012 NFPA 5000 Section 25.3.5.3 and 2012

IBC Section 903.3.1.2). Also, IBC and NFPA 5000 limit the height of this residential

occupancy to no more than 60 ft (18m) in height above grade plane (See 2012

NFPA 5000 Section 7.5.2 and 2012 IBC Section 504.2). Such buildings sprinklered

in accordance with NFPA 13R are permitted to have basement(s) below the grade

plane. The model building codes do not consider stories below the grade plane in

the determination of a buildings height.

It is the intent of this standard that if NFPA13R is appropriate for use, it be applied as

described in the following paragraphs.

There are model building code provisions, where portions of a structure are above

and below a three hour fire rated horizontal assembly, that consider the buildings

above and below the three hour fire rated horizontal assembly as separate and

distinct buildings (See 2012 NFPA 5000, Section 7.4.3.6.5 and 2012 IBC Section

510.2). In such types of structures (commonly called “pedestal/podium” design),

where the residential occupancy above the three hour fire rated horizontal assembly

is considered as a separated building(s) by the applicable building code, NFPA 13R

is permitted when the residential building(s) are a maximum of 4 stories above the

fire-rated horizontal separation, and such buildings are limited to 60 ft (18 m) or less

in height above the grade plane. See Figure A.1.1 for an example of a

pedestal/podium type structure.

Figure A.1.1 Example of a “pedestal/podium” type structure (Exhibit 7.4 from

Supplement 4 of 2013 Residential Sprinkler System Handbook)

It is recognized that accessory or incidental occupancies, as defined by the

applicable building code, related to the operations of the residential occupancy will

exist within that residential occupancy. Such accessory or incidental occupancies

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

22 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 25: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

would be considered ancillary to the predominant or main occupancy (residential) of

the building and subject to the provisions of the predominant or main occupancy.

For instance see Section 6.1.14.1.3 of the 2012 NFPA 101 and similar provisions in

many local building/model building codes (See 2012 NFPA 5000 Sections 6.2.1.3,

6.2.1.4 & 6.2.1.5, and 2012 IBC Sections 508.2 & Section 509). Use of NFPA13R

throughout the entire building including related accessory or incidental occupancies

such as parking garages/areas, community laundry rooms, clubhouses, exercise

facilities, tenant storage spaces, maintenance rooms, storage rooms, leasing offices,

lobbies, community gathering spaces, small conference rooms, small gift shops, and

so forth would be permitted. Note that for these incidental or accessory

occupancies, it is the intent of NFPA 13R to reference the sprinkler discharge (flow

and pressure), number of design sprinklers, and position of sprinkler (distance from

walls, ceilings, and other sprinklers) requirements of NFPA 13. It is not the intent to

apply other rules from NFPA 13, such as sprinkler coverage of combustible

concealed spaces, hose stream demand, and water supply duration. See section

7.2 and associated annex.

For a building containing multiple occupancies utilizing the “separated” occupancy

provisions in accordance with the applicable building code, residential occupancies

are within the scope of NFPA 13R provided the building is not more than 4 stories in

height, does not exceeding 60' in height above grade plane, and the residential

occupancy is separated from the other occupancies in accordance with the

“separated” occupancy requirements of the applicable building code (For example

see 2012 NFPA 5000 Sections 6.2.2.3 & 6.2.4, and 2012 IBC Section 508.4). In

such cases, NFPA 13R can be used in the residential occupancies and NFPA 13 is

to be used in the other non-residential occupancies in the building.

A building containing multiple occupancies utilizing the “non-separated” occupancy

provisions of the applicable building code is not within the scope of NFPA 13R. For

such a building, the applicable building code typically requires the use of an NFPA

13 system throughout the building. Residential buildings containing accessory or

incidental occupancies as described above are not considered multiple occupancy

buildings.

Residential occupancies in a building greater than four stories in height, or in a

building exceeding 60 ft (18m) in height above the grade plane, are not within the

scope of NFPA 13R.

A decision to use NFPA 13R in a building containing multiple (mixed) occupancies,

as defined in the model building codes and NFPA 101, can inherently impose

restrictions on the building, which should be made known at the time of design and

construction. Architects, engineers, and code officials are cautioned that the locally

adopted statutes, ordinances and codes that require sprinklers for certain

occupancies or buildings may also provide certain compensatory building features

(commonly called “trade-offs”) for the installation of the fire sprinkler system. If such

“sprinkler trade-offs” are given in these adopted statutes, ordinances and codes for

only buildings sprinklered throughout in accordance with NFPA 13, then to permit

such occupancies or buildings to apply such “trade-offs”, the occupancies or

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

23 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 26: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

buildings would be required to be sprinklered in accordance with NFPA 13, not

NFPA 13R. (For example see 2012 NFPA 5000 Sections 7.6.2.2, 7.4.3.6.5(4b), and

Footnote “†” to Tables 6.2.4.1(a) & (b); and 2012 IBC Sections 504.2, 510.2(6), and

Footnotes “S” and “NS” to Table 508.4).

Decisions to use passive (fire resistive) construction to provide separation between

the residential occupancy having an NFPA 13R sprinkler system and adjacent

occupancies will likely not be permitted to have reductions in the required hourly

rating which would be permitted to be applied for buildings having an NFPA 13

sprinkler system installed throughout all portions of the building, including residential.

In addition, area and height increases above the base (tabular) values defined by the

model building codes for the various occupancies would not be applicable for

buildings having an NFPA 13R sprinkler system in the residential occupancy portion

(s) of the building. These height and area increases are typically limited to buildings

having NFPA 13 sprinkler systems installed throughout in accordance with the model

building code.

In summary, the determination of the applicable sprinkler standard(s) required for the

occupancies in a building will be ultimately determined through the locally adopted

statutes, ordinances and codes.

2. Revise Annex Note A.7.2 as follows:

A.7.2 It is only the intent of NFPA 13R to reference the sprinkler discharge (flow and

pressure), number of design sprinklers, and position of sprinklers (distance from

walls, ceilings, and other sprinklers) requirements of NFPA 13. Other rules from

NFPA 13 such as sprinklering of combustible concealed spaces, hose stream

demand, and water supply duration are not intended to be referenced by Section

7.2. It is also the intent of Section 7.2 to apply to those systems or portions of

systems that are outside the dwelling unit but have been determined to be

considered residential, accessory, or incidental to residential, and within the scope of

this standard. (Also see A.1.1.)

The criteria in this standard are based on full-scale fire tests of rooms containing typical furnishings found inresidential living rooms, kitchens, and bedrooms. The furnishings were arranged as typically found indwelling units in a manner similar to that shown in Figure A.1.1(a) , Figure A.1.1(b) , and Figure A.1.1(c).Sixty full-scale fire tests were conducted in a two-story dwelling in Los Angeles, California, and 16 testswere conducted in a 14 ft (4.3 m) wide mobile home in Charlotte, North Carolina. Sprinkler systemsdesigned and installed according to this standard are expected to prevent flashover within the compartmentof origin where sprinklers are installed in the compartment. A sprinkler system designed and installedaccording to this standard cannot, however, be expected to completely control a fire involving fuel loads

that are significantly higher than average for dwelling units [10 lb/ft2 (49 kg/m2)], configurations of fuelsother than those with typical residential occupancies, or conditions where the interior finish has anunusually high flame spread index (greater than 225).

To be effective, sprinkler systems installed in accordance with this standard need to open the sprinklersclosest to the fire before the fire exceeds the ability of the sprinkler discharge to extinguish or control thefire. Conditions that allow the fire to grow beyond that point before sprinkler activation or that interfere withthe quality of water distribution can produce conditions beyond the capabilities of the sprinkler systemdescribed in this standard. Unusually high ceilings or ceiling configurations that tend to divert the rising hotgases from sprinkler locations or change the sprinkler discharge pattern from its standard pattern canproduce fire conditions that cannot be extinguished or controlled by the systems described in this standard.

NFPA 13R references NFPA 13 in many aspects (hanging and bracing, design densities and spacingoutside of dwelling unit, painting and finish of sprinklers, welding, etc.). If this standard does not specificallyaddress a situation, NFPA 13 is a good resource that can be utilized by the installer and the authority

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

24 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 27: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

having jurisdiction for a solution. It is not the intent of this standard to require compliance with NFPA 13when NFPA 13R is silent on a subject. Only AHJ approval should be required.

Figure A.1.1(a) Bedroom.

Figure A.1.1(b) Manufactured Home Bedroom.

Figure A.1.1(c) Living Room.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

25 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 28: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Accept the Committee Input. Telling the user to simply go to the building code is a disservice. Many Fire Officials are not Building Code experts. This section gives great guidance on when 13R is applicable.

Related Item

Committee Input No. 33-NFPA 13R-2013 [Global Input]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Apr 29 11:00:21 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: Referencing the model building code (in this case in the Annex) provides the reader withadditional information to reference when trying to understand the scope and application of hisstandard.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

26 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 29: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 23-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. A.5.2.3.2 ]

A.5.2.3.2

When fabricating steel pipe for a

system using nonmetallic and steel pipe

combination (CPVC–steel) system , the cutting oil and lubricants

might

can cause performance degradation of the

nonmetallic

CPVC piping. Cutting oils and lubricants found to be compatible are available and should be used.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This section has been has been revised to mirror the proposed wording of NFPA 13 annex section A.6.3.7.4. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposed to NFPA 13.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 13R-2014 [Section No. 5.2.3.2] same concept

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after 5.2.12.2.1.4] same concept

Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after A.5.2.12.2] smae concept

Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after A.5.2.12.2]

Related Item

First Revision No. 34-NFPA 13R-2013 [Sections 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.7, 5...]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 14 11:14:15 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-8-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: This section has been has been revised to mirror the proposed wording of NFPA 13 annex sectionA.6.3.7.4. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposedto NFPA 13.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

27 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 30: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 13R-2014 [ New Section after A.5.2.12.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Rubber-gasketed pipe fittings and couplings should not be installed where ambienttemperatures can be expected to exceed 150°F (66°C) unless listed for this service. Ifthe manufacturer further limits a given gasket compound, those recommendationsshould be followed.

Other construction materials include but are not limited to materials used in fabricationof the sprinkler system, additives to water supplies, cable and wiring, and certaininsecticides and fungicides.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This section has been has been added to correlate with the NFPA 13 section A.6.4.4. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposed to NFPA 13. NFPA 13 section 6.4.4 should also be added to NFPA 13R - See Public comment 21.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after 5.2.12.2.1.4]

Public Comment No. 23-NFPA 13R-2014 [Section No. A.5.2.3.2]

Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after A.5.2.12.2]

Related Item

First Revision No. 34-NFPA 13R-2013 [Sections 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.7, 5...]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 14 11:06:41 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-4-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: This section has been has been added to correlate with the proposed wording of NFPA 13 section6.4.4. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposed toNFPA 13. Annex section corresponding with NFPA 13 section A.6.4.4 has also be added to NFPA13R.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

28 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 31: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 13R-2014 [ New Section after A.5.2.12.2 ]

A.2.12.2.1.2

When fabricating steel pipe for a system using non-metallic and steel pipe, the cutting oil and lubricantscan cause performance degradation of the non-metallic fitting.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This section has been has been revised to mirror the proposed wording of NFPA 13 annex section A.6.4.3.2. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposed to NFPA 13.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 13R-2014 [Section No. 5.2.3.2] smae consept

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after 5.2.12.2.1.4] same concept

Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 13R-2014 [New Section after A.5.2.12.2] same concept

Public Comment No. 23-NFPA 13R-2014 [Section No. A.5.2.3.2] same concept

Related Item

First Revision No. 34-NFPA 13R-2013 [Sections 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.7, 5...]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 14 11:29:04 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-25-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: This section has been has been revised to mirror the proposed wording of NFPA 13 annex sectionA.6.4.3.2. This "compatibility" section was intended to be consistent with the language proposedto NFPA 13.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

29 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 32: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. A.6.6.5 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

30 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 33: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

A.6.6.5

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

31 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 34: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

An example of an open corridor or exterior corridor , stair, or breezeway is one that is exposed to theoutside atmosphere (temperature). Another example is an exterior wraparound corridor that is typical in atwo- to three-story motel. [See Figure A.6.6.5(a) through Figure A.6.6.5(e).]

Figure A.6.6.5(a) Example of Open Corridor or exterior Corridor — Arrangement 1.

Figure A.6.6.5(b) Example of Open Corridor or exterior Corridor — Arrangement 2.

Figure A.6.6.5(c) Example of Open Corridor or exterior Corridor — Arrangement 3.

Figure A.6.6.5(d) Example of Open Corridor or exterior Corridor — Arrangement 4.

Figure A.6.6.5(e) Example of Open or exterior Corridor — Arrangement 5.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

32 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM

Page 35: Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Global Input ] · 2016-02-09 · Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 13R-2014 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The charging language in the body of the standard refers to exterior breezeways/corridors. The annex language should indicate the same terminology.

Related Item

Public Input No. 27-NFPA 13R-2012 [Section No. 6.6.7]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Mar 17 13:31:04 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-11-NFPA 13R-2014

Statement: The charging language in the body of the standard refers to exterior breezeways/corridors. Theannex language should indicate the same terminology. The figure captions were modified to moreaccurately reflect the corridor arrangements that are depicted.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

33 of 33 9/4/2014 8:36 AM