pt bogatama marinusa semester report of seafood savers ... · by the seafood savers membership,...

/

PT Bogatama Marinusa Semester Report of Seafood Savers Membership

Summary of improvement development of PT Bogatama Marinusa November 2017 – April 2018

Idham Malik – Aquaculture Officer

General Information

PT Bogatama Marinusa (Bomar) is a n aquaculture industry player of giant tiger prawn processing and freezing business. PT Bomar processes giant tiger

prawn and whiteleg shrimp in several sizes from its middlemen and fish farmers in South Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi and Central Sulawesi. In a day, PT

Bomar is able to gain 300 – 3000kg/day.

Since April 2017, PT Bomar initiates the contribution in aquaculture improvement in Indonesia. The company which in the beginning ran its business in

shrimp aquaculture and hatchery especially giant tiger prawn and whiteleg shrimp commits to practice a more responsible and sustainable shrimp farming.

Having passed the application stages since January 2015, PT Bomar has officially joined Seafood Savers WWF-Indonesia program submitting ponds owned

by its farmers in 63,45 Ha in Pallameang, Mattirosompe subdistrict, Pinrang district lead by H. Tatang who controls 10 people.

By the Seafood Savers membership, company located in Kima Raya Street 2 Kav. N-4 B1 Makassar will implement the Aquaculture Improvement Program

for shrimp farmers assisted by the aquaculture team of WWF-Indonesia. Improvement covers environmental and social aspects in the operational of PT

Bomar referring to the Aquaculture Stewardship Council standards.

Generally, PT Bomar has monitored the shrimp quality since the harvest season in the pond. The harvested shrimp are stored in cool box/styrofoam box

filled with ice powder maintaining the quality. Besides, this company distributes the products using container/tons with a cooling machine for freezing and

maintaining the quality during the distribution period.

Aquaculture Improvement Program Profile

1. Location of PT. Bogatama Marinusa’s Supply Chain

Location : Pallameang, Mattirosompe sub-district, Pinrang district

Number of Farmers : 11 People

No Name Location of Pond Size of Pond (Ha)

1 Amir Pallameang 2.74

2 Jamal Pallameang 11.08

3 Kadir Pallameang 5.28 (2 ponds)

4 Mansyur Pallameang 4.97

5 Rizal Pallameang 3.76

6 Saka Pallameang 9.91

7 Sultan Pallameang 11.57

8 Tamrin Pallameang 7.02

9 Umar Pallameang 7.13

10 H. Maming Pemimpin Petambak

Note:

- H. Maming is the leader of 9 farmers managing 10 ponds

- Ponds managed by Rizal is no longer owned by H. Tantang because of rent periode. The current size of pond is 59.7 Ha

Map of PT Bomar’s supplier

Map 1. Ponds of PT Bomar

Aquaculture Practices

Commodity : Giant tiger prawn

Farming Method : Tradition cultivation

Price : IDR 80.000 – 150.000/kg

The giant tiger prawn of PT Bomar is managed traditionally while whiteleg shrimp is managed traditionally, semi-intensive and intensive located in

South Sulawesi, Central Sulawesi and Southeast Sulawesi. Ten farms sizing 63,45 Ha use tidal as water sources, without the use of artificial feed and

relying on plankton and klekap as natural feed and phronima (small crustaceans). This company uses saponin and bio pest to kill predaceous fish

and urea SP36 in small number to fertilize the water in ponds. Broodstock is taken from giant tiger prawn hatchery of BPPU Suppa Pinrang and

Puncak Sinunggal Hatchery.

In one cycle, shrimp is stocked with stocking density at 1/m2 or 1 Ha for 10.000 broodstock. Therefore, 1 Ha can produce 100 – 200 kilogram shrimp.

The stocked fry is from nursery from at least 1 week or has reached Post Larvae (PL) 16. The treatment starts from the pond preparation by drying

the pond, cleaning the pond from any pests, water preparation, fry nursing, harvest and post-harvest treatment. It lasts for 2 -4 months until the

size of prawn reaches 40 – 20 prawn/kilogram and is harvested when tide using a set of net near the water gate. Harvesting usually takes 1 week

and in a year there are five cycles of prawn farming.

Giant tiger shrimp farmers of PT Bomar have applied WWF-Indonesia Better Management Practice (BMP)-giant tiger prawn and started

implementing a responsible and sustainable prawn farming based on ASC-Shrimp standard aiming to attain ASC certification. Some actions done by

them are implementing farming logbook record, environment and social and mangrove planting in the farm area.

Farms condition in Pallameang, Mattirosompe, Pinrang, South Sulawesi Province

Picture 1. Farm condition in Pallameang managed by H. Jamal (©WWF-Indonesia/Mushadiq)

Picture 2. The water channel condition in Pallameang (WWF-Indonesia/Mushadiq)

Flowchart of shrimp sales system of PT Bomar

Production capacity of giant tiger shrimp

PT Bomar exports shrimp 10 containers in a month or approximately 300 – 3000 kg shrimp in a day by hiring 800 workers. The first products are in

the form of Head On Shell (HOSO) with variation Block Quick Frozen, Semi individual Quick and Individual Quick Frozen; second products are Head

Less Shell on (HLSO) in Block Quick Frozen and Individual Quick Frozen. The third products are Peeled Deveined Tail on (PDTO) in Semi individual

Quick Frozen and Individual Quick Frozen; The fourth products are Peeled And Deveined (PND) in Block Quick Frozen, Semi Individual Quick Frozen

and Individual Quick Frozen.

Farmer 1

Farmer 2

Farmer 3

Farmer 4

Farmer 5 etc.

Middlemen

Middlemen

Middlemen

Processing factory

in Makassar Eksporter

Picture 3. Post harvested prawn of H. Tantang (©WWF-Indonesia/Zulkarnain)

Picture 4. HOSO giant tiger prawn. Source: http://www.affish.nl/2017-black-tiger-shrimp-hoso-semi-iqf

Summary of AIP Development

The AIP activities on April – October 2017 are generally recording the farming activity based on principle one and seven of ASC shrimp, completing SOP

(Standard Operational Procedure) documents of responsible giant tiger prawn management, socialization of SOP, Biodiversity Environmental Impact

Assessment (BEIA), Participatory Social Impact Assessment (pSIA) and mangrove planting in the farm area.

The AIP is based on the ASC-Shrimp principles:

PRINCIPLE 1 : COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

1.1: Document of compliance with local and national legal requirements

1. PT Bomar has not hold the legality document of farms from its farmers in Pallameang. PT Bomar has communicated several times

regarding to the legality issue to H Tantang, nevertheless H. Tantang objects to show the documents.

2. Tersedia dokumen SOP – SOP terkait prinsip ASC Shrimp : SOP documents are re-organized and classified based on the standards.

PRINCIPLE 2 : SITE FARMS IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE LOCATIONS WHILE CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND IMPORTANT NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS

Criteria 2.1: Biodiversity Environmental Impact Assessment (B-EIA): PT Bomar already provides BEIA report done by CV Deco. BEIA mentions the

impact of shrimp farming activity such as ecosystem damage, a threat to biodiversity, farm damage and disease. BEIA is written by involving local

people and key stakeholders of Pinrang District to produce a participatory map, list of activity and potential input an alternative solution to

minimalize the impact.

One of BEIA’s recommendation is replanting 60.000 mangrove seeds in 31 Ha.

Criteria 2.2: Conservation of protected areas or critical habitats: the farm is in protected areas and not in critical habitat. It is proven by the BEIA

report. Farm is built before 1999 or before the Ramsar Agreement about protected area used for farming.

Currently, the company conducts a series of improvement activities by planting mangrove seedling as an effort for rehabilitating 30 Ha converted

ponds into mangrove area. It has replanted 12.000 mangroves seedlings meaning that 6 Ha pond area has been converted into mangrove area.

Criteria 2.3: Critically endangered habitat and species consideration: based on BEIA result, no ETP species is found, so this is not a habitat for critical

organisms. However, there are three protected species (based on Constitution Number 7 Year 1999) are found. They are common tern (Sterna

hirundo), great white egret (Egretta alba) and little egret (Egretta gerzetta). There will bbe protection acts towards those three species.

Criteria 2.4: Ecological buffers, barriers and corridors: The buffer data and the ecological coridor are in BEIA document. Mangrove barrier is not

found because there is street along the coastal. Buffer is only located in the Mouth River and coridor is not essential because none of living animals

passes. Even though, mangrove replanting program provides coridor for them.

Criteria 2.5: Prevention of salinization of freshwater and soil resources: salinity data is listed in BEIA document. Workers do not use groundwater in

operating the farm, so the impact of salinity is very small even not influencing.

PRINCIPLE 3 : DEVELOP AND OPERATE FARMS WITH CONSIDERATION FOR SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES

Criteria 3.1: All impacts toward the surrounding community, ecosystem users and landowners need to be taken into account, or invited for a

negotiation in an open and accountable manner: PSIA assessment is already conducted by the third party, CV Deco. The results are ompact of farm

towards the economy of local people and job opportunities. Impact of any possible conflict from an unregulated farm.

criteria 3.2: Resolution of complaitn released by the impacted party: No conflict with local people. SOP of conflict management is available.

A suggestion box is provided in a strategic place and near the ponds area. The suggestion box will be a public space to express any suggestion and

complains about shrimp farming of H. Tantang.

Criteria 3.3. Transparency in providing job opportunities to the local community: all workers are local people living near the farm. So, the worker

recruitment is transparent and open to all people.

Criteria 3.4: Farm management by a transparent and fair contract for workers: farm is a private farm, only one farm is contracted. The management

is fair, but the partnership between PT Bomar and H. Tantang is not in written document.

tambak merupakan milik pribadi, hanya satu petak tambak yang merupakan tambak kontrak. Pengelolaan tambak kontrak dikelola secara adil.

Hubungan antara PT. Bomar dengan H. Tantang belum dalam bentuk kontrak tertulis.

PRINCIPLE 4 : OPERATE FARMS WITH RESPONSIBLE PRACTICES

Criteria 4.1. Child labor and young workers: workers are above 18 years old and proven by their identity card (KTP).

Criteria 4.2. Forced labor, rights and responsibilities: workers are responsible for farm management and no intimidation. Workers may find other

jobs to have additional earning. The activity is only monitoring water traditionaly so that they have quite a lot spare time.

Criteria 4.3: Hostile work environment: discrimination in work environment is not available. All workers are men and local people.

Criteria 4.4: Safe and healthy work environment: generally, workers are healthy, but work safety training and medical facility are not available.

Criteria 4.5: Minimum wage or fair and adequate amount of salary: workers get the salary in a percentage/commission of total farm production

around 10 percent. It is indeed under the standard of local minimum wages, but workers actually can not be considered as full time worker,

traditional workers instead.

Criteria 4.6: Access to workers a freedom to associate and a collective bargain: workers are free to join an association. Since the program started,

workers join the discussion to solve shrimp farming issue and capacity building for workers.

Criteria: 4.7: Disturbance and disciplinary practice within the work environment that may cause temporary or permanent physical and mental

damage: so far there is no indiscipline attitude causing physical or mental damage.

Criteria 4.8. Overtime compensation and work hours: farmers work based on the step in the farming. The major farming activity is preparation,

stocking, maintaining water and harvest season. The spare time of workers is quite a lot because they only monitor one farm which is not

necessarily done by visiting the location.

Criteria 4.9. Transparent and fair work contract: employment contract between workers and the farm owner is not available. Current work

mechanism is based on trust, but in the future, they need to apply a transparent and fair contract.

Criteria 4.10: Transparent employee management system: complain form for workers is available. Frequent discussion once or twice a month

discuss any issue in the farm.

Criteria 4.11: Living condition of workers living at the farm site: workers live in their own house located not too far from the farm. There is a small

house in the pond as a place for taking break.

PRINCIPLE 5 : MANAGE SHRIMP HEALTH AND WELFARE IN A RESPONSIBLE MANNER

Criteria 5.1: Disease prevention:

- SOP of giant tiger prawn disease prevention is available and socialized to farmers. Moreover, BMP-giant tiger prawn training is already

conducted by WWF-Indonesia and PT Bomar.

- The survival rate of giant tiger prawn is not known precisely, a more detail data collection is needed.

- Clear data about the shrimp fry condition and the SPF (Specific Phatogen Free) is not available. Currently, farmer hardly get the good-

quality fry. They get fry from two hatcheries, BBU Suppa and Puncak Sinunggal.

Criteria 5.2: Predator control: The is no harmful action for WTP species listed in IUCN red list. Found predator is only monitor lizard hiding on the

embankment or water channel.

Criteria 5.3: Disease treatment and management:

- Farmers commit not to use probiotics and antibiotics in the shrimp farming. It is informed to farmers in the SOP shrimp disease

management training. However, it is required to be officially stated in a written document.

- Document about chemical product used such as fertilizer and pesticides is available. Some farm still use besnoid to kill clams.

- Farmers do not use probiotics.

PRINCIPLE 6 : MANAGE BROODSTOCK ORIGIN, STOCK SELECTION AND EFFECTS OF STOCK MANAGEMENT

Criteria 6.1: Cultivation of non-native species of Shrimp: The broodstock is an Indonesia local shrimp which is giant tiger prawn. The data of fry

purchasing within months is available. The proof of shrimp origin is seen in Ali Purnomo’s book and other books which are Primavera, SEAFDEC and

FAO.

Do not need shrimp trap cause the shrimp is from Indonesia.

Criteria 6.2. Source/origin of fry or broodstock:

- Letter of broodstock disease-free from the hatchery is not available.

- A complete information about broodstock origin from hatchery is not available. Current information is only from an informal interview

with the hatchery.

- Additional notes: document of broodstock origin in Pinrang is available.

Criteria 6.3: Transgenic shrimp: the shrimp is not transgenic.

PRINCIPLE 7: USE RESOURCES IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY EFFICIENT AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER

Criteria 7.1 – Traceability of feed raw material: do not use artificial feed

Criteria 7.2 – Criteria 7.2 Origin of aquatic and non-aquatic feed: do not use artificial feed

Criteria 7.3 – Criteria 7.3: Usage of Genetically Modified material in feeds: do not use artificial feed

Criteria 7.4: Efficient wild capture fish usage [136] on fish flour and fish oil: do not use artificial feed

Criteria 7.5: Contaminant Concentration in Waste:

- The use of fertilizer in the preliminary treatment in 10 Ha are with 250 kg shrimp during the maintenance to support 25 kg/3 months. So

the total input N is 24.15 gram/ton shrimp/year. Thus, the usage of fertilizer is less than 32.4 kg Nitrogen per ton for P. monodon.

- The use of TSP fertilizer in the beginning process of farming for 10 Ha is 250 kg and during the maintenance 25/3 months. So, the total

input P 18.9 gram/ton shrimp/year. Thus, the usage of fertilizer is less than 5.4 kg Nitrogen per ton for P. monodon.

- There is no wet sediment disposal to general wetland

- Water disposal management, Due to the small amount of water disposal, the management is not available.

- Water DO data in several months is available.

Criteria 7.6: Energy efficiency:

- Energy Consumption [142] of sources [143] throughout 12 months period of time: energy calculation is not complete. Energy usage is only

limited to transportation go back and forth from house to the farm. They do not use electricity in farming.

Criteria 7.7. Handling and Storing of Chemical and Dangerous Substances: SOP of disposal management is available. SOP for disposal management

in farm area should be established.

Summary of Giant Tiger Shrimp AIP of PT Bogatama Marinusa

November 2017

- Coordinating with PPLH Puntondo for developing the multi-stakehohlder’s cooperation in the form of mangrove seedlings management to

be planted in mangrove rehabilitation area of PT BOMAR.

- Deeper analysis in the BEIA document of PT BOMAR’s pond in Pallameang, Pinrang District.

December 2017

- Finalizing the AIP workplan of PT BOMAR towards ASC-Shrimp certificate.

- Replanting 100 mangrove seedlings.

January 2017

- Replanting 100 mangrove seedlings in Pallameang.

February 2017

- Map of mangrove area in Pallameang is available, but not all of the area is able to be planted. The company should remake the

rehabilitation map.



- Replanting 100 mangrove seedlings in the water channel of ponds in Suppa, Pinrang District.

March 2017

- Monitoring the mangrove growth in PPLH Puntondo, Takalar DIstrict.

- Presenting the BEIA and oSIA report from CV Deco to PT BOMAR.

- Conducting a survey on giant tiger shrimp broodstock in Pinrang.

Closing

The compliance of PT BOMAR in implementing AIP during January-October 2017 is 28%. PT BOMAAR starts the improvement program by conducting data

collection, BEIA and pSIA documents, cooperating with WWF-Indonesia in conducting ASC-Shrimp training, BMP of Giant Tiger Shrimp training and

socializations of SOP in the shrimp farming. Based on the BEIA report, PT BOMAR ought to rehabilitate mangrove area for 50% from the total ponds,

approximately 21 Ha. The mangrove replanting activity is the main agenda for the next AIP of PT BOMAR.

Detail of AIP Development: The detail of AIP development is listed below:

PRINCIPLE AND INDICATOR ACTION LEAD &

PARTNERS

Seafood Savers Stage

AIP

EVALUATION RESULT

FOLLOW UP PLAN/DIFFICULTIES

Inte

rmed

iate

Ad

van

ce

PRINCIPLE 1. COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

1.1.1

Compliance to local and national valid regulations and legislations

Compliance to local and national valid regulations and legislations

Farmer of PT Bomar has attained pond certificate, but could not be accessed due to communication issue

Frequent communication with PT Bomar to have the copy of pond certificate is done

Facilitation of farm operational procedure establishment

SOP is available, there are 14 SOPs of AIP-shrimp implementation. Socialization of BMP-giant tiger prawn and SOP have been conducted. SIUP and TPUPI are not available.

Continuing the forming of 10 additional pond SOPs and additional logbook documents. Socializations of SOP to all fish farmer of PT BOMAR

Facilitating the forming of SIUP and TPUPI to the local government.

1.1.2 Transparency of compliance with legal regulations

Establishment of information board for showing the transparency of compliance to public.

Information board for showing certificate and other documents mentioning the farmer’s compliance with the applicable laws.

Current information board only shows SOP and pond’s policy, but not pond certificate.

Providing logbook and other documents about the environmental and social condition of local communities.

- There are 10 logbooks, but they only cover mere record format and some formats have not been inserted

- Identity card of farmers - Farmers’ profile

Information request form of local communities

Information Request Form of local communities is available.

PRINCIPLE 2. SITE FARMS IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE LOCATIONS WHILE CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND IMPORTANT NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS

Criteria 2.1: Biodiversity Environmental Impact Assessment (B-EIA)

2.1.1

The farm has to conduct a Biodiversity Environmental Impact Assessment (BEIA) and socialize the result for public in an understandable manner of language (the process and BEIA document has to follow the guidelines listed on section I)

Writing BEIA report PT Bomar hires CV Deco to collect and write BEIA report

The writing of BEIA report is challenging because this assessment is new for consultants (in South Sulawesi). The adoption of BEIA adds the methodology horizon for researchers and experts.

Criteria 2.2: Conservation of protected areas or critical habitats

2.2.1 Farm placement on a protected area

Providing a map of ponds with the GPS coordinate

Map of pond location created by WWF-ID is available

Done

2.2.2 Farm placement Coordinate data - BEIA report stating that Completing BEIA

within mangrove ecosystem and other important natural wetlands with crucial ecological values stipulated by BEIA or legitimate regulations.

before 1999 from CV Deco is available

the farms are built before 1999, according to interview and FGD.

- Satellite map of farm area before 1999 is not available

report

Criteria 2.3: Critically endangered habitat and species consideration

2.3.1

Farm constructed within the habitat of critically endangered species or species listed on IUCN Red List, national regulations and other regulations

Completing data from BEIA report compiled by CV Deco

- Data of protected spesies is available

- Conducting socialization to all protected animals

- Socialization on the management of protectced animals

2.3.2

Conservation on critical habitat for endangered species within the area of farm and implementation off protection efforts in the surrounding area.

Completing data from BEIA report compiled by CV Deco.

Waiting the analysis result of BEIA

- Facilitating farmers group to implement the recommendation from BEIA result.

- List of living animal around the ponds area has been distributed to local communities

Criteria 2.4: Ecological buffers, barriers and corridors

2.4.1

Coastal barriers: Minimal permanent beach barrier between the area of farm and sea (could be in form of construction or natural barrier).

- Mangrove satellite data before 1999 in the farm area

- Current mangrove map

- History of farm is mentioned in BEIA report

- Confirmation from local people that the farm was used before 1999

- Mangrove planting in the river mouth and its water channel

- Completing data of pond map before 1999

- Completing history document based on interview with local people

2.4.2

Riparian buffers: Minimum width of untouchable natural vegetation between the farm and water territorial.

- Current mangrove map

- Riparian buffer has been transformed into street infrastructure (done by local government)

- History of farm from BEIA report is available

- Buffer is for the river mouth /water channel cause the coastal buffer is transformed into street infrastructure

Conducting mangrove replanting in the river mouth.

2.4.3

Corridor: minimum width of untouchable natural vegetation in the farm area that provides moving space for people or a crossing for wild species life) to access the

- No wildlife species needs corridor

- Mangrove replanting in the water channel to facilitate marine organisms

Conducting mangrove replanting in the water channel as an alternative corridor for marine organisms.

Conducting mangrove replanting in the water channel as an alternative corridor for marine organisms.

Criteria 2.5: Prevention of salinization of freshwater and soil resources

2.5.1

Loss of water authorized by pearmeation of water from the pond

Conducting compliance based on the BEIA report on water permeation and salinity done by CV Deco.

Waiting the BEIA report Facilitating farmers to do the BEIA’s recommendation

2.5.2 Probability of groundwater usage to reduce farm salinity

Conducting compliance based on the BEIA report done by CV Deco.

- Waiting the BEIA report - farmers do not use

groundwater

Facilitating farmers to do the BEIA’s recommendation

2.5.3

Electricity conductivity (DHL) or chloride concentration of well water used to reduce salinity of farm water; or well located in the farm area and soil water surface closed to the farm area or water waste from the farm.

Conducting compliance based on the BEIA report on water permeation and salinity done by CV Deco

- BEIA report is available - Conducting a regular data

collection of DHL condition or soil chloride

- farmers do not use groundwater


Requirement: DHL waters < 1,500 µmhos/cm or water chloride concentration < 300 mg/L

2.5.4

Electricity conductivity or soil chloride concentration in the existing ecosystem and agriculture farm

Conducting compliance based on the BEIA report on DHL and soil chloride concentration done by CV Deco

Waiting the BEIA report


2.5.5

Electricity conductivity or chloride concentration from the sediment ready to be disposed outside the farm.

Conducting compliance based on the BEIA report done by CV Deco on DHL and soil chloride concentration from sediment ready to be disposed outside the farm

- Waiting the BEIA report - There is no activity of

sediment disposal to outside the farm done by farmers of PT Bomar


The amount of electricity conductivity or mud chloride to be disposed should not be higher than soil in mud waste area.

PRINCIPLE 3 : DEVELOP AND OPERATE FARMS WITH CONSIDERATION FOR SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES

Criteria 3.1: All impacts toward the surrounding community, ecosystem users and land owners need to be taken into account, or invited for a negotiation in an open and accountable manner

3.1.1

Farm owner is mandated to do Social Impact Assesssment (pSIA) participatively and spread the reult transparently in native language (which the community speaks and understands). Local goverment and at least one civil NGO which the community singlehandedly chose should have the copy of this document. The document and PSIA process, impact and risks of the analysis will be done participatively with the communicty and other interest groups. Emerging participative factors are included in the repost. Agreed result regarding risk

Writing PSIA report PSIA report written by CV Deco is available, but is not final yet

Asking copy of PSIA report and do the recommendation

management and impacts are also included in the report.

Criteria 3.2: Resolution of complain released by the impacted party

3.2.1

Farm owners shall develop and apply conflict resolution diverification policy for the community. the policy should state how identified conflicts in the pSIA and new complaints will be transparently tracked, mediation for three parties could be a part of the process and explain how to respond complaints well. Complaint box, register complaint, and complaint acceptance using local native language.

Completing data from the PSIA result done by CV Deco

- SOP of conflict resolution is available

- Facilitating farmers to do the PSIAs’ recommendations

- Form of conflict data with local communities is available in the group

- SOP of conflict resolution is available

3.2.2. Conflict area or dispute is recorded and passed to

Completing data from the PSIA result done by CV Deco

pSIA report is available

- Facilitating farmers to do the PSIAs’

farmers, local government, and community representatives. At least 50% from conflict should be resolved within a year from the issued date and total 75% on the period between 2 consecutive audits.

about conflict resolution

recommendations

- Form of conflict data with local communities is available in the group

Completing data from the PSIA result done by CV Deco about conflict resolution

- pSIA report is available - no conflict happens


- Form of conflict data with local communities is available in the

Criteria 3.3. Transaparency in providing job opportunities to the local community

3.3.1

Farm owners should document advertisement evidence showed to workers who have the access to the farm within 1 day of travel and workers who could not travel from and to their homes every day.

Completing data from the pSIA result done by CV Deco about labor

Waiting the pSIA report


- Recruitment form is available

- H. Tantang, supplier of

PT Bomar has 10 workers who are local people

3.3.2

Recruitment process has to be done in accordance to the available job vacancy and to be based open the profile and the ability of the employee (skills, experienced concordant to the CV).

Completing data from the PSIA result done by CV Deco about labor

Waiting the PSIA report



- H. Tantang, supplier of PT Bomar has 10 workers who are local people

3.4.1 Availability of employment agreement


- pSIA report is available - encouraging PT

BOMAR to provide employment agreement



- H. Tantang, supplier of PT Bomar has 10 workers who are local

people.

3.4.2 Requirement of contract

Completing data from the pSIA result done by CV Deco about labor

Providing a platform for employment agreement



- H. Tantang, supplier of PT Bomar has 10 workers who are local people.

3.4.3

Transparency in the negotiation process.


Transparency platform in the negotiation process is available



- H. Tantang, supplier of PT Bomar has 10 workers who are local

people.

PRINCIPLE 4 : OPERATE FARMS WITH RESPONSIBLE LABOR PRACTICES

Criteria 4.1. Child labor and young workers

Group

4.1.1.

Trained workers precentage in the work health and safety standard, and relevant procedure and policy. Provision of functioning safety equipment needs to be maintained

Conduction safety training based on the farm condition

- Safety training is not conducted yet

- Form of accident and medical treatment is available.

Facilitating safety standard training based on the farm condition

Criteria 4.2. Forced labor, rights and responsibilities

4.2.1. Rights for full payment and benefit.

Drafting employment contract for farm workers

Facilitating employment contract for farm workers

- Partnership is informal due to the personal relationship

- Drafting contract according to the local regulation

4.2.2.

Workers have the right to protect their identity document and work permit.

Each workers hold their own documents and none of the documents hold by the farm owner.

Ensuring that there is no forced document saved by the farm owner.

Done

4.2.3.

The employee of the farm have the rights to do their own activity outside the working hours.

A statement about working hours

Facilitating the establishment of working hours statement for farm workers

Done

Criteria 4.3: Hostile work environment

4.3.1

The rights of anti-discrimination in a workplace, which is not limited to the way of anticipating the discrimination in a workplace, but also in the process of achieving the same access in regards to work in relation to gender, age, origin (local vs foreigners), race or religion. A company have a clear and transparent procedure to show their response to address complains.

Establishment of anti-discrimination and child labor statement

Anti-discrimination and child labor statement

Done

4.3.2 Number of reported discrimination

N/A - Workers are from the surrounding area of farm

- So far, there is no discrimination among workers

done

4.3.3

Working opportunity and salary equality. Employee that has been employed by the farm (with the same role and position) received the same salary, there is no difference in regards to gender, origin, race or religion, equal access to promotion, regulation of work safety and the work training opportunity.

Every worker manages one farm and get 10% of the production

done

4.3.4 Respecting maternity rights.

N/A done

Criteria 4.4: Safe and healthy work environment

4.4.1.

Precentage of trained worker in health and safety sector with a set of relevant procedure and policy with work. The accessibility of

Conducting work safety training according to the farm condition

Work safety training is conducted independently by the farm owner to workers.

Facilitating work safety training according to the farm condition

functioning safety equipments.

4.4.2.

Surveillance of accidents and incidents and the corrective actions.

Drafting form of accidents and incidents, and the corrective actions.

Form of accidents and incidents, and the corrective actions is available.

done

4.4.3. Medical bills coverage

N/A Medical treatment for work accident is being the responsibility of farm owner.

done

Criteria 4.5: Minimum wage or fair and adequate amount of sallary

4.5.1

Minimum wage level in accordance with each of employee's specific jobdesk

Have a list of minimum wages applicable in Pinrang

- Workers has 10% of the farm production.

- Minimum wages policy is not applicable cause workers is not fully work for the farm. Workers are free to have other jobs when do not farming.

done

4.5.2

Permanent workers receive fair sallary. In a case where current worker's sallary does not meet the standards of how a 'fair amount of sallary' should be, sallary needs to be improved gradually to a level where the amount of sallary, plus added bonus or pension allowance, can cover the related worker's basic needs.



- Minimum wages policy is not applicable cause workers is not fully work for the farm. Workers are free to have other jobs when do not farming.

done

4.5.3.

Worker penalty hrough rights violation or injustice sallary handling.

4.5.4.

A set of mechanism in stipulating sallary and allowance (including, sallary combination



- Minimum wages policy is

done

and fair distribution of harvest bonus

not applicable cause workers is not fully work for the farm. Workers are free to have other jobs when do not farming

4.5.5.

Repeated working contract scheme to avoid full time placement of a worker (permanent) and worker's access to fair remuneration.



- Minimum wages policy is not applicable cause workers is not fully working for the farm. Workers are free to have other jobs when do not farming

done

Criteria 4.6: Access on workers freedom to associate and collective bargain

4.6.1.

The precentage of workers with access to workers union, organizations, or workers own ability to control one self supported with the ability to participate in a discussion, or to have acess to a representative party chosen by workers without any interruption by the management.

N/A - There is no union cause it is done by themselves

- There is a frequent meeting to discuss issues and environment in the farm.

done

4.6.2

Prohibition of any form of discrimination towards workers union member by the farm owner.

N/A - There is no union cause it is done by themselves

- There is a frequent meeting to discuss issues and environment in the farm.

done

Criteria: 4.7: Disturbance and disciplinary practice within work environment that may cause temporary or permanent physical and mental damage

4.7.1. Justification of disciplinary actions

N/A - There is no disciplinary actions towards workers

- Policy about indiscipline action is available. 1 leader and 9 workers.

done

4.7.2.

Transparent policy and fair disciplinary procedure



done

4.7.3.

Prohibition of

harassment



done

Criteria 4.8. Overtime compensation and working hours

4.8.1.

Maximum numbers of total working hours. Eight hours/day or 48 hours/weel (with maximum average of 17 weeks period), includes "stand-by" hours; with at least full one day off (with two nights off included) in ever seven days.

N/A Workers is not fully working for the farm. Workers are free to have other jobs when do not farming. The scope of working in the farm is smaller. Moreover, so far there is no overtime concept for traditional farmers.

done

4.8.2. Rights to leave the farm when the daily task is done

N/A - Workers are allowed to leave the farm when the task is done

- Work hour is usually in the morning

done

4.8.3. Workers rights to N/A - Not applicable. Workers done

holidays and days off, but leaving the farm site is not compulsari, unless there is a certain agreement between workers and the farm owner that some holidays workers can stay in the farm.

can stay and take a break in the farm depending on the shrimp farm condition.

- Concept of holiday for traditional farmers is not applicable.

4.8.4.

Transportation given for workers (in a case where the farm site is located in a rural area) to allow them to have days off at their recreation sites.

N/A - Workers use their own motorcycle. The distance between their house to the farm is not far

done

4.8.5.

Extrahour is volunteery and does not surpass the 12 hours/week limitation

N/A Concept of overtime for traditional farmers is not applicable.

done

4.8.6.

Extrahour is oluntary and does not surpass the 12 hours/week limitation.

N/A Concept of overtime for traditional farmers is not applicable.

done

4.8.7

Rights of maternal leave, including daily break or working hours reduction to fulfill child perawatan anak.

N/A Not applicable, there is no female workers.

done

Criteria 4.9. Appropriate and Transparent Employment Contract

4.9.1.

Work contract is not repeated frequently by the farm owner to avoid a set of responsibility of rights need to be given to permanent worker

The employment contract is based on the local custom and concept of agreement about the traditional shrimp farm production.

Facilitating drafting of employment contract based on the local custom and concept of agreement about the traditional shrimp farm production.

Facilitating the drafting of employment contract.

4.9.2.

All workers own a legitimate working permit that is valid in the country where the farm is operating.

N/A - Not applicable cause all workers are local people.

- The farm is traditional farm, so it does not require working permit.

Done

4.9.3.

Workers are fully aware the condition and circumstances of their job at the farm and stated their understanding (written or verbal). Policy and procedure of employment needs to be written if there are more than five

Availability of agreement between the farm owner and workers about duties of workers.

Generally, workers understand the mechanism based on the local custom.

Done

ersonels employed at the farm.

4.9.4. Probation period stated on the contract

N/A There is no probation period

for traditional farmers. Done

4.9.5

In a case where sub-contract is applicable and done by a third party, farm owner has to make sure that the contracts are in compliance with every applicable sets of legitimate regulations regarding labor, social insurance in compliance with ILO.

N/A Not applicable cause there is no sub-contract.

Done

Criteria 4.10: Transparant employee management system

4.10.1.

Farm owner has to make sure that all workers have free access to communicate with farm's manager in regards with workers rights and working conditions

N/A Not applicable cause the farm applies traditional farm and labor management.

done

4.10.2.

Execution of bi-annual meeting between the management and the workers based on written agenda, and documented into a written report.

N/A Not applicable cause the farm applies traditional farm and labor management.

done

4.10.3.

Work plan and time scheduling to find a solution to complains and errors

N/A Complains in the farm are solved using traditional mechanism through discussion between workers and the leader.

done

4.10.4

Precentage of numbers of complains resolved in less than three months since the complains were received

N/A There is no complaints from workers within the least three months.

done

Criteria 4.11: Living condition of workers living at the farm site

4.11.1. Proper living conditions of workers living at the farm site

N/A Workers live in their own house.

done

4.11.2. Appropriate facilities for female workers

N/A There is no female workers. done

PRINCIPLE 5 : MANAGE SHRIMP HEALTH AND WELFARE IN A RESPONSIBLE MANNER

Criteria 5.1: Disease prevention Group

5.1.1.

Providing and maintaining operational health plan which covers:

- SOP of giant tiger prawn farming and the disease prevention and its monitoring scheme.

- Giant tiger prawn BMP training. Socialization of disease prevention and its monitoring scheme.

- A more detail SOP introduction.

- Training of disease control is given during the giant tiger prawn farming training.

Monitoring the implementation of SOP and BMP

1) Pathogen originated from the surrounding environment (e.g.: predator control and vector)

2) Pathogen spread to farm from the surrounding environment (e.g.: filtration/sterilization disposal and garbage from various kind of sources such as dead shrimp management)

3) Pathogen spread within the farm site. It is critical to avoid cross contamination, detect, and prevent the pathogen occurrence by monitoring signs of external pathology and wildlife that are in critical condition

5.1.2.

Water filtration process to minimalize patogen from contaminating the farm. ensure that all inlet of the farm has nets, filters, screens or blocks suitable with the size of the net mesh

Using double filter for filtering waters.

All members use double filter. done

5.1.3.

Average yearly survival rate (SR)[86] , revolving around three different systems Requirements

Recording the amount of shrimp during stocking and harvesting period.

Logbook during stocking and harvesting period is available.

done

5.1.4.

PL precentage of Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) [88] or Specific Pathogen Resistant (SPR) [89] towards all important diseases (e.g: whether it's SPF-WSSV, or SPF to several viruses) [90] .

5.2. Predator control

5.2.1

Dispensation on controlling deadly predator listed as protected animals as red list of the International Union of

- Not using any equipment which is harmful for protected animals.

A group’s letter of statement mentioning that they will not use any equipment which is harmful for protected animals.

done

Conservation of Nature (IUCN) [94], national list [95] and other legal lists [96].

- Waiting the BEIA report about protected animals.

5.2.2.

Dispensation on gun and/or chemical substances usage on controlling predators.




done

5.2.3.

Have the deadly method of the predator control occurred, a set of monitoring needs to be executed, providing a documentation of the numbers of predators, species of the predators, numbers of visit’s done by the predators.




done

Criteria 5.3. Disease management and treatment

5.3.1. Dispensation on N/A A group’s letter of statement done

antibiotics or animal food with drugs related effect and function on products labeled with ASC.

mentioning that they will not use antibiotics or other chemical products in the shrimp farming.

5.3.2.

Dispensation on usage of restricted antibiotics listed by WHO, where the national regulation allows.

N/A A group’s letter of statement mentioning that they will not use antibiotics or other chemical products in the shrimp farming.

done

5.3.3.

Provision of storage and usage of chemical substances innformation.


done

5.3.4. Proper chemical usage done by the workers.


done

5.3.5.

Dispensation on pesticides usage on water that is strictly restricted by the Rotterdam Convention regarding the Prior Informed Consent (PIC), or Stockholm Convention regarding Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP), or


done

categorized as very dangerous by WHO.

5.3.6.

Dispensation on the disposal of dangerous chemical waste without passing the nautralization phase.


done

5.3.7.

Strain probiotic bacteria usage, without including the usage of fermented product to produce


done

Principle 6 : MANAGE BROODSTOCK ORIGIN, STOCK SELECTION AND EFFECTS OF STOCK MANAGEMENT

Criteria 6.1. Existence of exotic shrimp species (non-native to the location of the farm)

6.1.1 Cultivation of non-native species of Shrimp [104]

N/A Natural broodstock done

6.1.2.

Preventive actions to prevent cultivated species (native and non native) from escaping throughout harvest and maintanance period.


6.1.3. Preventive actions to prevent escapes from reoccuring.


Criteria 6.2. Origin of fry or broodstock

6.2.1.

PL and parent of PL sports an appropriate disease-free status in accordance with the regional, national and international import guards (e.g: OIE, ICES).

Ensuring that PL and broodstock have a letter of disease-free.

Letter of broodstock disease-free from hatchery.

Requesting the letter of disease free from hatchery regularly.

6.2.2.

Total precentage of PL from closed hatchery (PL parent cultivated within the farm).

N/A Natural broodstock Shrimp fry is from hatchery.

Done

6.2.3. PL source/parent is a natural capture.

Broodstock is from hatchery and natural capture.

Gaining information from fry’s hatchery (BBU and Puncak Sinunggal).

Gaining information from fry’s hatchery (BBU and Puncak Sinunggal).

6.2.4. Naturally captured PL cultivation at the pond system.

Not using natural fry.

Letter from group of non-using natural fry is available.

Drafting letter of non-using natural fry.

6.3.1

Cultivation of transgenic shrimps (including genetically planned PL).

Not using transgenic broodstock

Letter from group of non-using transgenic fry is available.

Requesting the Letter of non-using transgenic fry

PRINCIPLE 7 : USE RESOURCES IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY EFFICIENT AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER

Criteria 7.1 Traceability of raw material of feed

7.1.1

Proof of traceability of animal feed composition, inclusing source, species, country of origin, and capture method needs to be provided by the animal food producer.

Not using artificial feed.

7.1.2

ISEAL membership or certification scheme in compliance with ISO 65 in accountability with the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries from FAO as a chain of responsibilities and feed products traceability needs to be provided.

Criteria 7.2 Origin of aquatic and non aquatic feed

7.2.1a

The timeline to get a 100% mass balance. Fish flour and fish oil as parts of the compositions of the feed have to be supplied from a fisheries company certified by ISEAL member, with specific protocols on promoting ecology sustainability through sustainable feed fisheries.

7.2.1.b

FishSource value [124][125] for fisheries where 80% of the fish flour and fish oil are sourced (see Appendix III, chapter 3 for explanation of FishSource)

a. For Fish Source criteria 4 (spawning biomass assessment)

b. For criteria 1, 2, 3, 5 of Fish source

7.2.2

Precentage of non-marine source of compositions certified by the ISEAL membership scheme.

Criteria 7.3: Usage of Genetically Modified material in feeds

7.3.1

Genetically modified substance usage in feed fisheries composition is permitted ONLY when informations egarding the GM substance usage are made accessible for retailers and consumers, including:

a. Disclosure of audit report regarding the usage of GMO as a part of the feed fisheries compositions fed to shrimps

b. Disclosure of GMO substances usage on shrimps labeled with ASC certification to suppliers to retailers. Full disclosure of the revised audit report is published on ASC website. The database is made accessible upon request for the retailers and consumers

c. Usage of suitable, fast and efficient form of communication as a medium to inform retailers regarding all certified products' informations.

7.3.2 List of (foot note) feed ingredient that does not contain GMO

7.3.3

Traceability of GMO free feeds arranged by producer of the feed and the farm

7.3.4

Extracted random sampling by auditor, with negative result of PCR trial.

Criteria 7.4: Eficient wild capture fish usage [136] on fish flour and fish oil

7.4.1

Feed Fish Equivalence Ratio – FFER [137] L. vannamei P. monodon

7.4.2a Economic Feed Conversion Ratio – eFCR

7.4.2b Protein Retention Efficiency (PRE)

Criteria 7.5: Contaminant Concentration in Waste

7.5.1

Total amount of Nitrogen (N Total) released from the cultivation process of 1 ton of produced shrimps Requirement: < 25.2 kg N total/1 ton L. vannamei shrimp < 32.4 kg N total/ 1 ton P. monodon shrimp

The usage of

fertilizer in the

preliminary

treatment with 10

Ha 250 kg shrimp

during the

maintenance to

support 25 kg/3

months. So the

total input N is

24.15 gram/ton

shrimp/year. Thus,

the usage of

fertilizer is less than

32.4 kg Nitrogen

per ton for P.

monodon.

The usage of fertilizer in the farm is less than 32.4 kg Nitrogen per ton for P. monodon.

Ensuring that the usage of fertilizer in the farm is less than 32.4 kg Nitrogen per ton for P. monodon.

7.5.2

Total amount of Phosphore (Total P) released from the cultivation process of 1 ton of produced shrimps.

The usage of TSP

fertilizer in the

beginning process

of farming for 10 Ha

area is 250 kg and

during the

maintenance 25/3

months. So, the

total input P 18.9

gram/ton

shrimp/year. Thus,

the usage of

fertilizer is less than

5.4 kg Nitrogen per

ton for P. monodon.

Fertilizer in the farm is less than 32.4 kg Nitrogen per ton for P. monodon.

Ensuring that the usage of fertilizer in the farm is less than 32.4 kg Nitrogen per ton for P. monodon.

7.5.3

Correct handling of mud and sedimentation disposal from pond and canal

Monitoring of mud management and disposal and sediment from proper farm and channel SOP of mud management and disposal.

There is no wet sediment

disposal to general wetland.

Ensuring that there is no sediment disposal to general wetland.

7.5.4 Water disposal from aerated pond / IPAL pond

Monitoring of water disposal management. Farm is traditional farm

Due to the small amount of

water disposal, the

management is not available.

DONE

without using artificial feed. So, the disposal is minimum and not requiring IPAL pond.

7.5.5

Precentage of dissolved oxygen change (DO) relative to DO saturation on sea waters located 200m from the location of disposal (on certain temperature and salinity)

Availability of relative DO changes towards saturation DO on sea waters located 200 m from the disposal location (in a specific temperature and salinity)

DO data in several months is available.

Ensuring the availability of DO data collection in the pond and water channel.

Criteria 7.6. Energy Efficiency

7.6.1.

Energy Consumption (142) of sources (142) throughout 12 months period of time

The availability of data on energy usage within 12 months.

Energy calculation is not complete. It is only for transportation go back and forth from their house to the farm using motorcycle. They do not use electricity for ponds operational.

Ensuring energy usage data within 12 months.

7.6.2.

Annual cumulative energy demand (megajoul/ton of produced shrimps) (144) throughout 12 months period of time

Criteria 7.7. Handling and Storing of

Chemical and Dangerous Substances

7.7.1

Safe storing and correct handling of chemical substances and dangerous substances.

Establishment of SOP for chemical and harmful products.

SOP of disposal management is

available.

Monitoring for disposal and harmful product management around the farm area is available.

7.7.2.

Correct handling and responsible disposal of waste based on risk assesment and recycle possibilities.

Establishment of SOP for disposal management.

SOP for disposal management

in farm area should be

established.

Monitoring of responsible disposal management.

pt bogatama marinusa semester report of seafood savers ... · by the seafood savers membership,...

Documents