psph 228 assessment in k-12 science education fall 2010

52
PSPH 228 Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010 Dr. RUSSELL G. WRIGHT [email protected] 301-806-7252

Upload: gotzon

Post on 11-Jan-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

PSPH 228 Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010. Dr. RUSSELL G. WRIGHT [email protected] 301-806-7252. Agenda. Introductions Pretest Syllabus and Course Schedule Textbook Distribution. To Know vs. To Understand (Activity) Can We Believe Our Eyes? (Video) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

PSPH 228 Assessment in K-12 Science Education

Fall 2010

Dr. RUSSELL G. WRIGHT

[email protected]

301-806-7252

Page 2: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

2

Agenda

Introductions

Pretest

Syllabus and Course Schedule

Textbook Distribution

To Know vs. To Understand (Activity)

Can We Believe Our Eyes? (Video)

What do you understand well?

How do you know you understand it?

Page 3: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

3

Introductions

Russ Wright Science Teacher Retired from MCPS

Program Coordinator The George Washington University

Award-Winning Author Event-Based Science

Grading and Motivation Guru Success for All: The Median is the Key

Page 4: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

4

Pretest

Page 5: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

5

Textbooks

Understanding by Design

Educative Assessment

Assessment, Equity, and Opportunity to Learn …

Benchmarks for Science Literacy

Page 6: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

6

To Know vs. To Understand

Follow the directions on To Know vs. To Understand

Page 7: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

7

Can We Believe Our Eyes?

Before we see the video, I want you to draw a diagram showing how you could light a bulb with one battery and one wire.

Page 8: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

8

Can We Believe Our Eyes?

Watch video…

Page 9: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

9

Can We Believe Our Eyes?

Work in pairs to summarize any lessons you have learned from watching this video.

Page 10: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

10

What do you really understand?

There must be at least one thing that you really understand.

Select one concept or skill (besides lighting a light bulb) that you understand well…

Page 11: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

11

What do you really understand?

How do you know that you really understand it?

Page 12: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

12

Homework

•Read Chapter 2 in Understanding by Design

•Go to the Annenberg Foundation Web Site and Watch Workshop 1:

http://www.learner.org/resources/series93.html

You will have to register, but the site is free.

Page 13: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

13

Understanding Understanding

Up until now we assumed that we all shared a common understanding of the meaning of the word understanding.

But what are you really aiming for when your goal is understanding?

Page 14: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

14

Understanding Understanding

have a critical g

rasp of

have thorough knowledge ofinternalize knowledge of

grasp the essence of

My students will…

really understand

Page 15: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

15

Understanding Understanding

My students will…

What does understanding really mean?

Page 16: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

16

Understanding Understanding

Teachers want their students to understand the concepts they are

teaching.

…a slippery goal without definitions.

Also, are there different levels of understanding?

Page 17: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

Benjamin Bloom 1913-1999

his Taxonomy of Educational Objectives was

…an attempt to classify different degrees of understanding.

17

Page 18: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

18

Bloom’s Contributions

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Research on early childhood; testified on behalf of Head Start

International influence

Mastery learning

Gifted students; all students have innate potential

Page 19: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

19

Bloom’s BiographyBorn 1913, in Lansford, PA

BA & MS in 1935 from Penn State University

PhD in 1942 from University of Chicago

Lived in Chicago at time of death in 1999

Page 20: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

20

Career Beginnings

Staff member of Board of Examinations at the University of Chicago, 1940-43

Under mentorship of Ralph W. Tyler

Growing interest in organizing educational objectives by cognitive complexity

Became University Examiner in 1943(In this position, he developed tests to determine if undergraduates had mastered material necessary for them to receive their bachelor’s degrees.)

Page 21: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

21

Developing the Taxonomy

Bloom attended the American Psychological Association convention in 1948…

His discussions with other university examiners lead to the

utility of a hierarchical classification system for various educational goals

Page 22: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

22

Developing the Taxonomy

They wanted to:

clarify language about educational objectives

have convenient system for describing test items, exam techniques, and instruments for assessment

be able to compare and study educational programs

show a real order among educational objectives

Page 23: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

23

Developing the Taxonomy

Continued to meet after convention

Defined three “domains” or classifications for educational objectives:

Cognitive

Affective

Psychomotor

Formed committees of study for each

Page 24: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

24

The Cognitive Domain

1956 book, Bloom as editor with Engelhart, Furst, Hill + Krathwohl

Focus on students’ thought processes

Taxonomy:

Hierarchical according to cognitive levels of difficulty

Each level encompasses, builds on and is more difficult than that at the levels below it

Page 25: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

25

The Cognitive Domain

There are three low-level orders: Knowledge

Recognition/recall of information Remember just as learned

Comprehension Organize and arrange information Rephrase (describe in own words)

Application Apply information to find answer to problem Apply rule or process to new situation

Page 26: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

26

The Cognitive Domain

There are three higher-level orders:Analysis

Think critically, in depth; no rule of thoughtIdentify reasons, uncover evidence, make conclusions

SynthesisPerform original and creative thinkingProduce new material, predict, problem-solve

EvaluationJudge merit, offer an opinion, assessNot careless critique: according to a standard

Page 27: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

27

The Cognitive Domain

Source: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm

Page 28: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

28

Using Bloom’sTaxonomy in the Classroom How do you use

Bloom’s Taxonomy?

Classify educational objectives

Plan to help students achieve higher levels of mastery

Structure questioning and assessments

Page 29: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

29

Critizing Bloom’s Taxonomy

Synthesis and evaluation are one and the same

Synthesis and evaluation should be switched

No past history or context

Some knowledge is harder to retain; some knowledge is harder to restate in ways that prove comprehension

Page 30: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

30

A New Taxonomy

Source: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm

Page 31: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

31

Using Bloom’sTaxonomy in the Classroom

Practicing Levels of the Cognitive Domain

Remembering: Ask a classmate a question assessing their memory of Bloom.

Page 32: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

32

Using Bloom’sTaxonomy in the Classroom

Understand: Ask a classmate a question assessing their understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Page 33: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

33

Using Bloom’sTaxonomy in the Classroom

Application: What kind of homework might I give to test your ability to apply what you’ve learned today about Bloom’s Taxonomy?

Page 34: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

34

Using Bloom’sTaxonomy in the Classroom

Analysis: Write a question that will require a classmate to analyze Bloom’s Taxonomy?

Page 35: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

35

Using Bloom’sTaxonomy in the Classroom

Evaluation: Based on your knowledge and experience, would you recommend Bloom’s Taxonomy to other teachers? Why or why not?

Page 36: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

36

Using Bloom’sTaxonomy in the Classroom

Creating: Any ideas on how to ask a class to create a product related to Bloom’s Taxonomy?

Page 37: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

37

Benchmark Authors Describe the Problem

On page 312 of Benchmarks for Science Literacy its authors describe the problem they faced in framing benchmarks for science teaching and assessing…

(see page 36 of UBD)

Page 38: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

38

Understanding Understanding

Understanding and Apparent Understanding

What would you find if you dug a hole in the earth? John Dewey (See page 48 of Understanding by Design.)

If students have trouble answering this question, is it the wrong question?

Page 39: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

39

Understanding Understanding

What evidence of understanding is adequate?

Is knowing facts and doing well on a test of knowledge the same thing as understanding?

Page 40: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

40

Understanding Understanding

Apparent Understanding

Delivery of the right word, the right definition, the correct formula.

…using learning in new ways. (Bloom’s Taxonomy)

…the ability to think and act flexibly with what one knows. (David Perkins)

Real Understanding

Page 41: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

41

Understanding is About Transfer

When we understand something we can use it in new settings.

We can take what we know and use it in numerous ways!

Understanding is about

Transfer!

Page 42: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

42

Understanding is Not About Inert Ideas!

What are inert ideas? (p. 41)

Page 43: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

43

To Know vs. To Understand

To Know vs. To Understand

Page 44: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

44

Misunderstanding Provides Insight

Misunderstanding Is Not Ignorance

Misunderstandings are ideas that are mapped on plausible but incorrect frameworks.

It takes a fair amount of knowledge to misunderstand something.

Students often think that experimental error happens because of avoidable mistakes in

procedure and/or measurement.

Page 45: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

45

Misunderstanding Provides Insight

Howard Gardner (1991) sums up the research on misconceptions:

Read quote on page 52 of Understanding by Design.

Page 46: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

46

Misunderstanding Provides Insight

Why is it colder in the winter and warmer in the summer?

Page 47: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

47

Misunderstanding Resist Change

Audrey ChampagneState University of New York, Albany

Difficulty inchanging students’ misconceptions.

Page 48: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

48

Misunderstanding Provides Insight

Conventional testing reveals the problem:

Most US teenagers study and pass Algebra 1. Yet, NAEP results show that only 5 percent of our students perform at a proficient level on tasks that require higher-order use of Algebra 1 knowledge (NAEP, 1988).

Page 49: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

49

Six Facets of Understanding

1. Explanation

2. Interpretation

3. Application

4. Perspective

5. Empathy

6. Self Knowledge

Page 50: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

50

Six Facets of Understanding

Group Activity –

• Fellows will work together in small groups (3 or 4) to develop 10 – 15 minute presentations on one of the six facets of understanding.

• Groups will present their findings using PowerPoint or other visual aid.

• Each group will provide a handout describing one facet of understanding, with examples, and 2 exam questions.

• Groups will divide the task into explicit responsibilities for each person in the group.

Page 51: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

51

Six Facets of Understanding

Page 52: PSPH 228  Assessment in K-12 Science Education Fall 2010

52

Six Facets of Understanding

Group Presentations –

• Groups will have 10 – 15 minutes to present their facet of understanding.

• At the end of each presentation the audience will complete the appropriate section of the Facets of Understanding chart.