pseudomonas aeruginosa strains and their role in plant growth promotion in medicinal plant
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains and their Role in Plant Growth Promotion in Medicinal Plant
1/7
Global Journal of Applied Agricultural Research.
Volume 1, Number 1 (2011), pp. 49-55
Research India Publications
http://www.ripublication.com/gjaar.htm
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Strains and their Role in
Plant Growth Promotion in Medicinal Plant
Vishal Kumar Deshwal*, M.S. Devi, N. Bhajanka, J. Mistri,
A. Bose and N. Saini
Department of Microbiology, Doon (P.G.) Paramedical College,Dehradun-248001, Uttarakhand, India.
*Correspondence Author E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Total 20 Pseudomonas strains were isolated and characterized on the basis of
gram staining and various biochemicals tests. Further, these Pseudomonas
aeruginosa strains were selected for present study. These strains were screen
on the basis of plant growth activity like IAA, HCN, Siderophore and P-
Solubilization. All strains showed some plant growth activity but only fivePseudomonas aeruginosa strains i.e. MR-2, MR-5, MR-9, MR-15 and MR-18
produced all four Plant growth acivity like siderophore, HCN, IAA and P-
Solubilization. Pot experiment was carried out to analyse the plant growth
activity of these strain in medicinal plant. All bacterized Pseudomonas strains
produced more dry weight and plant height as compared to control treatment.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MR-9 enhanced maximum plant dry weight, plant
height, nodule per plant, nodule fresh weight per plant by 184, 124, 139, 180%
respectively as compared to control.
Keywords: Pseudomonasaeruginosa, medicinal plant, PGPR.
IntroductionThe chemical agriculture affected the soil environment is well known. Biofertilizer
such as microbial inoculant which can promote plant growth and productivity have
internationally been accepted as an alternative source of chemical fertilizer. PGPR
represent a wide variety of soil bacteria which, when grown in association with a host
plant, result in stimulation of growth of their host [1]. Few strains from genera such as
Pseudomonas, Azospirillium, Azotobacter, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Enterobacter,
Rhizobium,Erwinia and Flavobacterium are well known PGPR [2, 3].
-
8/6/2019 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains and their Role in Plant Growth Promotion in Medicinal Plant
2/7
50 Vishal Kumar Deshwal et al
Occurance of species of Pseudomonas in rhizosphere of various crop plants has
been mentioned by [4, 5]. Application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria
increased the leaf number and area as well as number of annual shoot and its diameter
in apple [6]. PGPR inoculation significantly increased the root properties (length,
volume, mass) and shoot growth, the plant height (42-50%), leaf area (128-134%) [7].
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) effectively colonized and enhanced
seed germination, shoot length, root length, fresh seedling weight, dry seedling weight
and nodule number in peanut plant (Arachishypogaea L.) [8].
Mucuna pruriens belongs to the family Fabaceae. It has some medicinal value and
it is also food feed crop. Seeds are astringent, laxative, anthelmentic, alexipharmic
and tonic [9], management of Parkinsons disease [10] and increase male sex
hormones -testosterone levels [11]. So the objective of this study was the evaluate
effect ofPseudomonas aeruginosa strains on plant dry weight, plant height, numberof nodule and nodule fresh weight of medicinal plant.
Materials and MethodsIsolation and purification ofPseudomonas stainsPseudomonas strains were isolated from rhizosphere of Mucuna plant. 1g of
rhizospheric soil dissolved in 9ml sterilized distilled water in test tube and mixed
well. Sample was diluted up to 105. 0.5ml sample of each tube was spread on separate
Kings B Agar plates. Plates were incubated at 37oC for 24hr. Fluorescent colonies on
agar medium were purified.
Characterization ofPseudomonas strains
One hundred isolates strains were characterized on the basis of gram staining and bio-
chemicals tests. Such tests were done according to Bergey's manual of Determinative
Bacteriology [12].
Screening of Plant growth promoting activity ofPseudomonas strains
Twenty Pseudomonasaeruginosa strains were screen and renamed as Pseudomonas
MR-1 to MR-20. These strains were screen on the basis of plant growth promoting
activity such as IAA, HCN, siderophore and P-solubilization.
Indole production testTryptophan, an essential amino acid, is oxidized by some bacteria by the enzyme
tryptophanase resulting in the formation of indole, pyruvic acid and ammonia.
Bacterial isolates were inoculated into the TSB medium supplemented with
tryptophan (50mg/ml) and inoculated at 28oC for 24hr. Cultures were centrifuged at
7000 rpm for 5 min at 4oC. The supernatant was collected and finally passed through
0.2 m Millipore filter and two drop of ortho-phosphoric acid was added to 2 ml of
supernatant to develop pink colour.
HCN production
The bacterial culture of Pseudomonas was streaked on TSM medium plates
-
8/6/2019 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains and their Role in Plant Growth Promotion in Medicinal Plant
3/7
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Strains and their Role 51
supplemented with 4.4g per litre glycine with simultaneously supplemented filter
paper soaked in a 0.5% picric acid in 1% Na2CO3 in the upper lid of petriplate. The
plates were sealed with paraffin and control plates did not receive any Pseudomonas
inoculum. Plates were incubated at 2810C for 1-2days. Change in colour of the filter
paper from yellow to brown, moderate brown to strong reddish brown indicated HCN
production.
Siderophore production
Pseudomonas strains were spread over tryptic soya agar medium and incubated at 28
10C for 24 h. Thereafter, a thin layer of CAS reagent in 0.7% agar was spread over
the colonies ofPseudomonas and plates were re-incubated at 28 10C for 24-48h.
Observe formation of yellow-orange halo around the colony shows siderophore
production.
P-solubilization test
Characterized Pseudomonas strains were transfer on Pikovskyas Agar medium and
inoculated at 281oC for 3-5days and clear zone around the colony showed P-
solubilization.
Pot experimentSeed bacterization:Mucuna seeds were surface-sterilized with 0.5% NaOCl solution
for 12 min, rinsed in sterilized distilled water and dried under a sterile air stream.
Cells ofPseudomonas strains were grown under continuous shaking condition (150rpm) on KingB broth at 28 1C for 24h. Each culture was separately centrifuged at
7000 rpm for 15 min at 4C. The culture supernatant was discarded and the pellets
were washed with sterile distilled water (SDW) and resuspended in SDW to obtain a
population density of 108
cfu ml-1
. The cell suspension was mixed with 1%
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) solution. The slurry was coated separately on the
surface ofMucuna seeds and allowed to air-dry overnight in aseptic condition. The
seeds coated with 1% CMC slurry without bacterial strains served as control.
Pot size and soil: Sterile earthen pots (24 cm 12 cm 12 cm) were filled with
unsterilized sandy loam soil (0.25% total organic matter, 0.096% total organic C, 38%
water-holding capacity, pH 6.8).
Treatments: Total 06 treatment were prepared and these are Pseudomonas MR-2 +
seed, Pseudomonas MR-5 + seed, Pseudomonas MR-9 + seed, Pseudomonas MR-15
+ seed, Pseudomonas MR-18 + seed and and uninoculated seed (control). Four
bacterized seeds per pot were sown except control (non-bacterized seeds). After 15
days, thinning was done to raise only single healthy plant in each pot. The plants were
irrigated with sterilized water whenever required. Plant data such as plant dry weight,
plant height, number of nodule and nodule fresh weight per plant were recoded after
60 days of sowing. The data were analyzed statistically by using analysis of variance
(ANOVA).
-
8/6/2019 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains and their Role in Plant Growth Promotion in Medicinal Plant
4/7
52 Vishal Kumar Deshwal et al
Results and DiscussionPseudomonas strains were isolated from rhizospheric soil ofMucuna plant. On kings
B agar medium, 20 fluorescent colonieswere separated and characterized on the basis
of various bio-chemicals test and results were compared with Bergeys Manual of
Determinative Bacteriology [12]. These characterized Pseudomonas aeruginosa
strains were selected for further study and renamed as MR-1 to MR-20. PGPR activity
were analysed and found some promising results.
Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) is plant growth hormones. IAA reacts with ortho-
phosphoric acid and produced pink colour. Such observation has been observed in
70% isolated Pseudomonas strains i.e IAA positive strains. In HCN test, all strains
except MR-1, MR-3, MR-7, MR-10, MR-14, MR-16, MR-17, MR-19 showed
changed in colour of filter paper from yellow to brown, which showed that strains
were HCN positive. Siderophore is iron chelating had been shown in 55% strainsPseudomonas strains. In siderophore positive strains showed yellow orange halo
around the colony. Clear zone around the colony of Pseudomonas strains on
Pikovskyas agar medium showed P-solubilization. 60% of isolated Pseudomonas
strains solubilized phosphorous. Only five strains MR-2, MR-5, MR-9, MR-15, MR-
18 produced siderophore, HCN, IAA and solubilised phosphorous (Table 1). Results
suggested that isolated Pseudomonas strains were plant growth promoting bacteria
(PGPB). Some other reports also supported our results. Recently Deshwal and Vig [8]
reported that PGPR strains produced Indole Acetic Acid (IAA), HCN, Siderophore, P-
solubilization. Similar to PGPR (particularly fluorescent pseudomonads) the
symbiotic rhizobacteria enhance plant growth due to IAA production [13] and also
solubilize insoluble inorganic phosphorus [1]. PGPR could directly enhance plantgrowth by phytohormones production and enhanced nutrient uptake [14].
Table 1: Production of IAA, HCN, siderophore and phosphate solubilization by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa IAA HCN Siderophore P-solubilization
Pseudomonas MR-1 + - + +
Pseudomonas MR-2 + + + +
Pseudomonas MR-3 + - - +
Pseudomonas MR-4 - + - +
Pseudomonas MR-5 + + + +
Pseudomonas MR-6 - + + -
Pseudomonas MR-7 + - + -
Pseudomonas MR-8 + + - +
Pseudomonas MR-9 + + + +
Pseudomonas MR-10 + - + -
Pseudomonas MR-11 - + - -
Pseudomonas MR-12 + + - -
Pseudomonas MR-13 - + - -
-
8/6/2019 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains and their Role in Plant Growth Promotion in Medicinal Plant
5/7
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Strains and their Role 53
Pseudomonas MR-14 - - + +
Pseudomonas MR-15 + + + +
Pseudomonas MR-16 + - + -
Pseudomonas MR-17 + - - +
Pseudomonas MR-18 + + + +
Pseudomonas MR-19 + - - -
Pseudomonas MR-20 - + - +
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MR-9 enhanced maximum plant dry weight, plant
height, nodule per plant, nodule fresh weight per plant by 184, 124, 139, 180%
respectively as compared to control. Pseudomonas MR-2, MR-5, MR-15, MR-18
increased plant dry weight, plant height, nodule per plant, nodule fresh weight perplant by 172, 168, 112, 176 % respectively as compared to control. Similarly,
bacterized seeds promoted plant dry weight, plant height, nodule per plant, nodule
fresh weight per plant (Table 2). Nodulation data showed that Pseudomonas strains
improve nodule number and nodule weight. It seems that Pseudomonas strains
improved the Rhizobium population which was present in soil and PGPR activity
enhanced plant growth activity. Similar reports supported our results. PGPR enhanced
plant yield in a wide range of crop plants such as vegetables, rapeseed [15, 16], spring
and winter wheat by 8-16% [15], sugar beet to 7-10% [17] and in radish 60-144%
[18]. Our result suggested that Pseudomonas aeruginosa produce IAA, HCN,
Siderophore and P-Solubilization and as a result increased plant growth and
nodulation in medicinal plant Mucuna.
Table 2: Effect of bacterization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains on plant dry
weight, plant height, nodules per plant and fresh nodule weight of Medicinal plant
(Mucuna pruriens).
Treatment
number
Treatment Plant Nodule
Dry
weight**
(g)
Height**
(cm)
Number per
plant**
Fresh weight
per plant**
Treatment 1 Pseudomonas MR-
2 + Seed
4.3 376 39 1.46
Treatment 2 Pseudomonas MR-
5 + Seed
4.2 363 36 1.29
Treatment 3 Pseudomonas MR-
9 + Seed
4.6 392 46 1.96
Treatment 4 Pseudomonas MR-
15 + Seed
2.8 337 32 0.91
Treatment 5 Pseudomonas MR-
18 + Seed
4.4 374 37 1.47
Treatment 6 Control 2.5 316 33 0.92
-
8/6/2019 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains and their Role in Plant Growth Promotion in Medicinal Plant
6/7
54 Vishal Kumar Deshwal et al
Values are mean of three replicates; ns- non-significant at 0.05 level of ANOVA *-
significant at 0.05 level of ANOVA, **- significant at 0.01levels of ANOVA.
References
[1] Deshwal, V.K., Dubey, R.C. and Maheshwari, D.K., 2003, Isolation of plantgrowth-promoting strains of Bradyrhizobium (Arachis) sp. with biocontrol
potential against Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot of peanut,
Curr. Sci., 84, pp. 443-448.
[2] Rodriguez, H. and Fraga, R., 1999, Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and theirrole in plant growth promotion, Biotech. Adv., 17, pp. 319-339.
[3] Misko, A.L. and Germida, J.J., 2002, Taxonomic and functional diversity ofpseudomonads isolated from the roots of field -grown canola, FEMSMicrobiol. Ecol., 42, pp. 399-407.
[4] Deshwal, V.K., Kumar, T., Dubey, R.C. and Maheshwari, D.K., 2006, Long-term effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa GRC1 on yield of subsequent crops of
paddy after mustard seed bacterization, Curr. Sci., 91, pp. 423-424.
[5] Gosal, S.K., Karlupia, A., Gosal, S.S. Chhibba, I.M. and Verma, A., 2010,Biotization with piriformospora indica and Pseudomonas fluorescens
improves survival rate, nutrient acquisition, field performance and saponin
content of micropropagated chlorophytum sp., Ind. J. Biotech., 9, pp. 289-297.
[6] Karakut, H. and Aslantas, R., 2010, Effects of some plant growth promotingrhizobacteria (PGPR) strains on plant growth and leaf nutrient content ofApple, J. Fruit and Ornamen. Plant Res., 18(1), pp. 101-110.
[7] Mai, M.A.B., Shamsuddin, Z.H., Wahab, Z. and Marziah, M., 2010, Effect ofplant growth and nitrogen incorporation of tissue-cultured Musa plantlets under
nitrogen free hydroponics condition, Aus. J. Crop Sci., 4(2), pp. 85-90.
[8] Deshwal, V.K. and Vig, K., 2010, Co-inoculation of Pseudomonas-MP3 andRhizobium-GR-23 enhanced plant growth activity of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea
L.), J. plant dev. Sci., 2, pp. 61-62.
[9] Taylor, L., 2005, The Healing Power of Rainforest Herbs: A Guide toUnderstanding and Using Herbal Medicinals, Square One Publishers, NY:
444.
[10] Manyam, B.V., Dhanasekaran, M. and Hare, T.A., 1995, An AlternativeMedicine Treatment for Parkinson's disease: Results of a Multicenter Clinical
Trial, J. Altern. Complement Med., 1(3), pp. 249-255.
[11] Amin, K.M.Y., Khan, M.N. and Zillur-Rehman, S., 1996, Sexual functionimproving effect of Mucuna pruriens in sexually normal male rats, Fitoterapia,
67(nr.1), pp. 53-58.
[12] Holt, J.G., Krieg, N.R., Sneath, P.H.A., Staley, J.T. and Williams, S.T., 1994,In, Bergey's manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Williams and Wilkins
Press, Baltimore, USA.
-
8/6/2019 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains and their Role in Plant Growth Promotion in Medicinal Plant
7/7
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Strains and their Role 55
[13] Gupta, C.P., Sharma, A., Dubey, R.C. and Mahsehwari, D.K., 1999,Pseudomonas aeruginosa GRC1 as strong antagonist of Macrophomina
phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporium, Cytobios., 99, pp. 183-189.
[14] Lippman, B., Leinhos, V. and Bergmann, H., 1995, Influence of auxinproducing rhizobacteria on root morphology and accumulation in maize Zea
mays L. caused by inoculation with Indole-3-acetic acid IAA producing
Pseudomonas and Actinobacter strains or IAA applied exogenously, Angew
Bot., 68, pp. 31-36.
[15] Brown, M.E., 1974, Seed and root bacterization, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 12,pp. 181-197.
[16] Iswandi, A., Bossier, P., Vandenabede, J. and Verstraete, W.,1987, Effect ofseed inoculation with the rhizopseudomonas strain 7NSK2 on the root
microbiota of maize and barley, Biol. Fert. Soil, 3, pp.153-158.[17] Suslow, T.W. and Schroth, M.N., 1982, Rhizobacteria on sugar beet: Effect ofseed application and root colonization on yield, Phytopathol., 72, pp. 199-206.
[18] Schroth, M.N. and Hancock, J.G., 1981, Selected topic in biological control,Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 35, pp. 453-476.