psb – linac 4 interfacing

24
PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing Alfred Blas IRF meeting 24/06/2009 1 Summary of discussions held with M.E. Angoletta, P. Baudrenghien, C. Carli, M. Chanel, A. Findlay, F. Pedersen Interfacing scheme under d iscussion Not yet finalized !

Upload: gram

Post on 22-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Summary of discussions held with M.E. Angoletta, P. Baudrenghien, C . Carli, M. Chanel, A. Findlay, F. Pedersen. PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing. Interfacing scheme under discussion Not yet finalized !.  2 μ s. Equipment to be synchronized. Pre-chopper +LEBT. Debuncher. RF Feedforward. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Alfred Blas IRF meeting 24/06/2009 1

Summary of discussions held withM.E. Angoletta, P. Baudrenghien, C. Carli, M. Chanel, A. Findlay, F. Pedersen

Interfacing scheme under discussion

Not yet finalized !

Page 2: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Alfred Blas 2

Equipment to be synchronized

RF feed-forward, energy modulator, debuncher, distributor and rf have to be in phase with the Chopper

Source

Pre-chopper+LEBT

45 keV

Distri

180 m

4*rf

Chopper Amplitude modulatedfor energy modulation (painting)

DebuncherRF Feedforward

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

2μs

From F. Gerigk

Time

High Voltage

< 1.2 ms0.3 ms

0.15

ms

0.15

ms

Beam segment

RF transient

RF ON segment

HV ON segmentfrom P. Baudrenghien

Page 3: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Goal:Fill - as required - the PSB phase space area

Alfred Blas 3

Our Quantum:the L4 bunch• 1.15 * 109 protons

(65mA)• TRF = 2.84 ns • DE = 120 keV (1s)

Hardware limitations:

• Energy modulation slew-rate (last 2 PIM cells): 0.2 MeV/ms

• Minimum Chopper TBeam-OFF = 30 ns?

Chopper repetition rate < 1 MHz?

Aperture of the L4 transfer line(max bucket height = +/-1.25 MeV)

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

+ 1 MeV

- 1 MeV

Page 4: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Actual bucket filling sketch

Alfred Blas 4

Longitudinal painting

L4 beam energy

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Page 5: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Alfred Blas 5

Typical sequence

1. The pre-chopper at 45 keV is in the beam OFF position, Distributor is in the Head dump position.

2. Source, L4 rf and PSB rf are driven to their nominal value

3. Pre-chopper set to Beam-ON (20μs = rise time 1-2μs + LEBT space charge compensation) and Chopper set to beam-OFF

4. After 20 μs, Chopper set to beam-ON for the launching of the first beam synchronously with the distributor targeting the first ring to be injected

5. Chopper activated to fill the rf buckets only

6. Chopper in Beam-OFF position during the distributor transition (500 ns?)

7. Distributor targeting the tail dump, Pre-chopper in beam-OFF state (20 μs rise time) Chopper in beam OFF state for 20 μs,

8. Distributor back to the Head Dump position

N.B.: With the fast beam chopping at low energy, the Tail Dump is not necessary!

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Page 6: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Extreme beam types

Alfred Blas 6

LHC pilot beam:0.05 * 1011 p= 43 L4 bunches= 0.12 PSB revolution

ISOLDE beam:2 * 1013 p= 17.4 k L4 bunches= 49.2 us of 65mA Linac beam= 74 PSB revolutions with an average bucket filling duty cycle of 2/3

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Page 7: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

PSB injection practical values

Alfred Blas IRF meeting 24/06/2009 7

Injection duration (per Ring) k.TREV with k [1 , 100]

Injection Bdot 1.2 Gauss/100μs

ΔR =0 inj. frequency law Þ ΔE = 154 keV/100 μsÞ Δf = 31.6 Hz/0.1Gauss Þ 379 Hz/100μs Þ 19 Hz/5μs (5μs is the foreseen DSP “fast-loop-clock” period).

Δp = 0 inj. frequency law Þ ΔR = -0.8 mm/100 μs

Δf = 0 inj. frequency law (fixed frequency)

Þ ΔE = -14.3 keV/100 μs Þ ΔR = -0.86 mm/100 μs

Page 8: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Preliminary considerations

Alfred Blas IRF meeting 24/06/2009 8

For an accurate injection process, B, fRF and φRF need to be well known. Due the response time of the different interveners, and due to the flight time between Chopper and Ring ( 2μs), they also need to be known in advance (no possible feedback within the limited injection duration)

All rings will wait for the beam at the same initial frequency.

The BdL correctors will be set such as to create a ring to ring field difference depending on dB/dt and number of turns injected per ring such that the field at the time of the first turn injected is equal in all rings (Bdot compensation).

After the start of the injection, from this initial rf frequency and during the entire injection process, each ring has the possibility to follow an independent frequency law. This frequency law will be pre-determined!

The phase of the rf in all rings and during the entire injection process will be pre-determined with an acceptable accuracy (1 revolution degree). This requires a revolution reference , an injection synchronization and a predictable frequency program.

Page 9: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Evolution of the rf bucket phase during injection

Alfred Blas IRF meeting 24/06/2009 9

The foreseen PSB Beam Control is activated at the pace of a 200 kHz clock (every 5μs). This interrupt clock or “fast-loop-clock” is asynchronous w.r.t. the injection process.

The rf doesn’t change in between 2 “fast-loop-clock” tics - period corresponding to 5 injected turns.

For a perfect tracking of the rf frequency change, the “fast-loop-clock” should be in phase with the injection process.

• The frequency increase (ΔR =0) during injection creates a parabolic revolution phase deviation from the initial reference of 6.82o after 100 turns (1.7o after 50 turns) and cannot be ignored.

• The phase error caused by the step-by-step frequency program compared with the linear increase is < 54 mo and can be thus ignored.

• The phase error due to the 5μs jitter in the DSP generated frequency program < 1.33o after 100 turns (acceptable)

379 Hz

100 μs

Frequency Updated every 5 μs

AveragedFrequency

Page 10: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Injection at a fixed frequency (100 turns injected)

Alfred Blas IRF meeting 24/06/2009 10

Ramping-up actually slower than shown

Page 11: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Injection in an accelerating bucket (100 turns injected)

Alfred Blas IRF meeting 24/06/2009 11

Ramping-up actually slower than shown

Page 12: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Summary concerning the PSB rf at injection

Alfred Blas 12

Rf synchronized to a single reference (h1 or h2)

The reference will be provided by an independent CO source.

Position of rf buckets predictable (enough) along the entire injection process

Rf of each individual ring set to a convenient initial phase - takes into account the possible acceleration in the previously injected ring and the distributor rise time.

Each ring will receive a start Injection pulse (+ end injection ?)

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Page 13: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Chopper requirements (1/3)

Alfred Blas 13

The role of the chopper is to inhibit the beam in these different cases:

1. During the pre-chopper switching duration (20μs = rise time 1-2μs + LEBT space charge compensation)

2. When the distributor is in the head or tail dump position

3. During the switching duration of the distributor (<500 ns?)

4. During the PSB injection process when the beam is out of the bucket

5. During the PSB injection process within a bucket, when the beam density is required to be low (low duty cycle filling) or for bunch shaping (hollow distribution).

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Page 14: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Chopper requirements (2/3)

Alfred Blas 14

The chopper firing time is a function of:

• rf bucket position in each individual ring

• Distributor timing (number of turns) and its rise time

• L4 energy modulation (flight time change = +/- 3.4 ns over the 180 m separating PIMS and PSB injection Foil )

• Distributor position (negligible flight time change < 0.6 ns)

• Expected rf bucket filling pattern

• Chopper hardware limitationsTBeam-OFF > 30 ns?Repetition rate < 1 MHz?

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Page 15: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Chopper requirements (3/3)

Alfred Blas 15

To be asked for (?):

• Maximum beam-OFF > 20 μs (pre-chopper rise time)

• Minimum beam-ON < 4 Linac bunches = 11 ns ? (spec to be defined)

• Minimum beam-OFF < 4 Linac Bunches = 11 ns ? (spec to be defined)

• Synchronous with the L4 bunches (reproducible result: 4 bunches required doesn’t mean 4 +/- 1)

• Rise time < 2ns (L4 inter-bunch spacing)

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Page 16: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Detailed Chopper timing

Alfred Blas 16

N.B: A Start Injection pulse is required for each injection in each Beam Control; a stop injection pulse may also be required?

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Under

disc

ussio

n

Page 17: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Selection of the fast clock 1/4

Alfred Blas 17

The fast rf train is aimed at creating events within a revolution period

The events are the following:

• L4 energy modulation

• Debuncher phase (debuncher position: 20 m? after end of L4)

• L4 beam chopping

The fast rf train is either synchronous with the L4 rf or not.

If it is a (sub) multiple of the L4 rf, the chopping will be reproducible without a +/- 1 Linac bunch error for EACH micro-pulse (ex: the pilot beam is composed of 43 L4 bunches that could take the form of train of 10 micro pulses of 4 bunches, which would mean +/-10 bunches or 25% uncertainty). There might also be some radio activation issues with half kicked beam within the L4 structure.

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Under

disc

ussio

n

Page 18: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Selection of the fast clock 2/4

Alfred Blas 18

In case the L4 rf is selected as the reference fast clock, the entire PSB injection (worst case 400 μs) would mean 140 k bunches or clock tics (18b counter)

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Under

disc

ussio

n

Timing Value Event Number

Page 19: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Selection of the fast clock 3/4

Alfred Blas 19

During the injection, the timing is critical. The beam is too energetic to be lost.

The different timing tables should be well synchronized at the Control level, so that when a parameter change is programmed, the sequence of table reloading is well defined (to be checked with CO crew)

Nevertheless, a security at the chopper control level could be installed to avoid losses due to a mis-programming. If receiving the distributor timing it could veto the beam during a transition or when the position is “dump”.

Another way of avoiding losses even within a ring is to define the timing events within a revolution period (or a pre-determined number of revolutions) so as to avoid the possibility of error integration over the 400 μs of injection.

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Under

disc

ussio

n

Page 20: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Selection of the fast clock 4/4

Alfred Blas 20

Some possible choices:

i) PLL generating 512 or 1024 harmonic of  PSB RF reference followed by L4 RF synchro:  + no PSB RF period boundary problem as high frequency clock and PSB RF reference are synchronized.  + no need to reprogram chopper tables when PSB RF injection reference frequency is changed  - there is a  L4 RF period jitter after resynchronisation to L4 RF, which cause a relatively large intensity jitter on short bunch trains

ii) Count L4 RF from a single PSB/L4 RF master timing reference:    + no PSB RF period boundary problem    + no intensity jitter for short bunch trains    - need to re-compute chopper tables whenever a small change is done in L4 fRF (rare) or PSB fINJ REF (more frequent) and to make sure that these changed CCV's are changed simultaneously in two different FEC's.

iii) For each PSB turn, count L4 RF from beginning of each period of PSB RF master timing reference:     + no need to re-compute chopper tables for small changes in CCV's of L4 fRF or PSB FINJ REF

     -  PSB RF period boundary problem: there is an uncertainty of 1 L4 RF period concerning the number of counts within one period

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Under

disc

ussio

n

Page 21: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Requirements for the application program 1/2

Alfred Blas 21

From a unique start injection event, a revolution reference and a fast clock reference, the application defines:

The sequence of beam ON-OFF along the entire injection (absolute fast clock tics or fast tics within a revolution)

The energy modulation function (w.r.t. the fast clock and possibly the revolution ref)

The debuncher phase function (w.r.t. the fast clock and possibly the revolution ref)

The distributor timing (relatively to the revolution reference)

The beam control timing (relatively to the revolution reference)

The rf frequency law during injection (Δf per 5 μs)

The BdL correction value

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Under

disc

ussio

n

Page 22: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Requirements for the application program 2/2

Alfred Blas 22

The input parameters will be:

• number of turns injected

• Pre-chopper timing

• rf voltage and phase program for h1 and h2

• frequency law during injection

• Type of bucket filling

• Bdot at injection

• Value of the injection reference frequency

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Under

disc

ussio

n

Page 23: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

L4 - PSB rf interfacing

Alfred Blas 23

Beam OFFWindow

Voltage modulation

ΔE Linac, Δφ debuncherTON-OFF Chopper

Rev

BIXi.SDIS

InjectionSequencing

control

Linac rf feed-forward

Application

Source

Pre-chopper+LEBT

45 keV

Distri

180 m

4*rf

Debuncher

Phase modulation

Inj. rf reference (h1 or h2)

Energy modulation

Linac 4

TimingCO

Inj. RefSource

BIXi.SDIS

BIXi.SInjRF + ERF?

RF feed-forward

BIXi.SInjChop

Chopper

h21/2

h1

SP2T

BIXi.RF_PHASE

L4 rf

IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Under

disc

ussio

n

Page 24: PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing

Alfred Blas 24IRF meeting 24/06/2009

Summary

1. The 4 PSB rf will be synchronized at injection to a ppm programmable CO type signal generator (Pentek). This signal will be the reference both for all the L4-PSB interveners.

2. A fast reference clock (to be defined) will provide a reference to the chopper, modulator? and debuncher?

3. The BdL correctors will be used to equalize the dipolar field in all rings during each individual capture process

4. The Linac4 energy will be modulated to adapt to the acceleration during the capture process in each ring

5. The debuncher phase will be modulated to adapt to the Linac4 energy modulation

6. The chopper will be activated taking into account the flight time changes due to the Linac4 energy modulation, taking into account the ramping-up frequency during capture, taking into account the painting scheme and taking into account the switching particularities of the chopper amplifier (if need be?). The chopper will veto the beam during the distributor transition and when the destination is “head dump.

7. An application will calculate all the timing values concerning the chopper, the distributor, the modulator and debuncher.

8. A pick-up sum signal or a fast transformer signal issued from the 4 PSB individual injection lines need to be available for monitoring in the BOR as a diagnostic tool for all the upstream Linac4 system.

9. The Tail dump is not useful anymore (to be communicated to the kicker people if accepted!?)