proton beam measurements in the recycler duncan scott on behalf of the main injector group

21
Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Upload: marcus-glenn

Post on 15-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler

Duncan ScottOn Behalf of the

Main Injector Group

Page 2: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Contents

• Confirm Nova Operations Will Work– Operating the MI8 Injection line at the Recycler energy

• The MI8 line transfers beam from the booster• The RR has a slightly different energy to the MI • MI8 has many permanent magnets

– Stacking in the Recycler• Do we have enough aperture?

– What are the expected tune shifts?• Due to MI Ramp• As Intensity Increases• Due to RF Frequency Changes

• Other Experiment Example– Finding Zero Chromaticity with Schottky and BPMs

Page 3: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Operating MI8 Line at RR Energy

• The RR has a slightly different energy to the MI– Change Booster Energy and RF Frequency, fRF – Try to Inject into MI

• Differences between MI and Recycler – Momentum

• From 8.884 to 8.836 GeV/C– Fix the MI Dipole field at RR value and adjust Booster dipole (B:VIMAX)– Calculated change is ~4 A

– fRF

• From 52 811 400 to 52 809 000 Hz, ∆f=2 400Hz– Change MI fRF and Booster locks to that

Page 5: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

MI8 Orbit

• 1st attempt beam hits MI8 collimators

• Calculate changes to horizontal trims and try again

• 2nd attempt beam is injected into MI

Page 6: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

MI Orbit & Correction Strength• Reasonable injection and closed orbit in MI• Less current used in horizontal trim

magnets

Injection

Vertical

Vertical

Page 8: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Slip-Stacking

• NOVA operations will increase the beam power through the Main Injector by a factor 2

• Previously the beam was stacked in the MI then ramped

• For Nova we will slip-stack beam in the Recycler whilst the MI is ramping– Approximately halves the cycle time

Page 9: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Slip Stacking• Stack Beam in Longitudinal Phase Space

– Two sets of bunches separated in azimuth and energy in 2 RF systems– They “Slip” relative to each other– Apply large voltage RF to capture 2 bunches in 1 bucket

– In the Recycler we plan to do 12 batch slip stacking. • Inject 6 Booster batches at one frequency, • Reduce that frequency• Inject 6 more batches at original frequency• Transfer to MI and Recapture

+∆f

-∆f

Page 10: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Recycler Requirements for 12 Batch Slip Stacking

• Different schemes can affect the amount of momentum aperture required– We could inject on momentum, decelerate, inject, accelerate

• Preferred option, centres beam in magnets, better lifetime, etc.

– Inject off-momentum, with half required ∆f, then decelerate • Requires less momentum aperture

0

-∆f

+∆f

Inject on momentum Inject off momentum

fRF

time

52MeV

40 MeV

Page 11: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Recycler Requirements for 12 Batch Slip Stacking

• The central frequency separation between the two beams is fixed– ∆f = 1260 Hz or ∆p =24 MeV.

• Assume Booster beam has momentum spread of ±8 MeV (95%)– The min. momentum aperture required is 40 MeV or ∆p/p = 0.45%

24 MeV

10.2 MeV

95 KV Bucket

95 KV Bucket

8 MeV

40 MeV

Page 12: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Measured RR Momentum Aperture• Change RF

frequency and measure beam transmission

• This will need to be remeasured– Currently

equipment is being removed, Lambertsons, E-Cool, etc.

– This should only increase the aperture

> 99% Transmission∆p/p =0.45 %

> 95% Transmission∆p/p =0.65 %

Minimum∆p/p required

H Chrom = +3.0V Chrom = -4.6

Page 13: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Tune Change with MI Ramp

• The Ramp of Magnets in MI will affect the RR tune

• Tune measured from BPM data taken after beam is pinged

• Time of ping varied over eventKicker firing at

different time in cycle

Page 14: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Tune Change vs MI Ramp

• Tends to follow rate of change of momentum (pdot)• Faster ramp may increase ∆Q ?

Max ∆Q=0.005

Page 15: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Tune Change with Intensity• Measured tune for different intensity beams in

MI • Line is theory (B. Ng)

• From Batch 1 to 6 Max ∆Q=0.01

ΔQh=−1.1410−4 𝑁𝑏

𝜏+6.91510−6𝑁 𝑏𝑀

ΔQ v=−1.3910− 4 𝑁𝑏

𝜏−7.18410− 6𝑁𝑏𝑀, , , bunch length (ns)

Page 16: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Tune Change with fRF

• Tune measured with Schottky, for low chromaticity, Hchrom=+3, Vchrom=-4.6

• Change at High Chromaticity (-17) measured in MI

Max ∆Q=0.04

Page 17: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Zero Chromaticity Measurementswith Schottky

• Width of Schottky signal measures chromaticity – Minimum width is zero chromaticity

• How does measured 0 Chrom. compare with “Set” 0 Chrom ?

• Saved Scope images whilst changing Chrom

• Extract coordinates

• Fit Gaussian• Find min

width

Page 18: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Zero Chromaticity Measurements with BPMs

• Measured Qv vs ∆fRF for different Vchrom settings

• Plot gradient of each VChrom setting

• Zero gradient = Zero Chromaticity, at Vchrom=-0.38

• (-0.75 from Schottky)

Page 19: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Conclusions

• Successfully Operated MI8 Line at RR Energy– MI8 line works better with RR energy– Energy matching worked second attempt, phase matching first attempt

• Verified the RR has the Min. Aperture Required– Slip stacking requires momentum aperture, between 40 and 52 MeV– Measured aperture is at least 40 MeV– Should only increase after Lambertson E-Cool removal, etc.– Re-measure after shutdown

• Measured Tune Changes that Need Compensating– 0.005 with MI Ramp– 0.01 with intensity, from batch 1 to 6– 0.04 for RF changes (at high chromaticity)

• Other Experiments for Fun and Learning

Page 20: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Thanks

• Ming-Jen Yang• Denton Morris• Ioanis Kourbanis• & Operations

Page 21: Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group