protection against nuclease cleavage of pbr322 dna by the

6
J. Mol. Biol. (1983) 166, 93-98 Protection Against Nuclease Cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the cAMP Receptor Protein of Escherichia coil The effect on nuclease digestion of DNA exerted by the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) of Escherichia coli has been investigated. It is shown that non-specific binding of CRP to double-stranded supercoiled pBR322 DNA protects the DNA against digestion by the restriction endonucleases EcoRI, BamHI and BglI, and the nuclease DNAase I. The cAMP t receptor protein mediates the regulation of a number of catabolite- sensitive operons in Escherichia coli, cAMP acting as an allosteric effector (Zubay et al., 1971; Epstein et al., 1975; de Crombrugghe & Pastan, 1978). The cAMP-CRP complex interacts with specific DNA sites near promoters, stimulating the initiation of messenger RNA synthesis (de Crombrugghe et al., 1971 ; Majors, 1975 ; Taniguchi et al., 1979 ; Odgen et al., 1980). CRP is a dimer of molecular weight 45,000, composed of two apparently identical subunits (Anderson et al., 1971; Riggs et al., 1971). The X-ray crystal structure of the cAMP" CRP complex has been determined at 2.9 A resolution, and shows that each subunit consists of two structural domains: the larger amino-terminal domain contains the cAMP binding site and the smaller carboxy-terminal domain is presumed to contain the DNA binding site (McKay & Steitz, 1981). Electron microscopic studies have shown that co-operative non-specific binding of CRP to double-stranded linear DNA (Takahashi et al., 1979; Saxe & Revzin, 1979) results in DNA condensation and the formation of regularly striated fibres (Chang et al., 1981). We report here that, probably due to the formation of this ordered fibre structure, CRP protects double-stranded supercoiled DNA from cleavage by several restriction endonucleases and DNAase I. Figure 1 shows the results of electrophoresis, after digestion by BglI, BamHI and EcoRI, of pBR322 DNA in the presence and absence of CRP. Although protection against cleavage was not complete (tracks IIb, IIIb and IVb contain a small amount of linearized plasmid DNA), there is a remarkable difference between digestion without (a tracks) and with (b tracks) CRP present. In the absence of CRP we observe that digestion by EcoRI (track IIa) leads to complete linearization of unprotected DNA; digestion by BamHI (track IIIa) leads to almost complete linearization of unprotected DNA, only a small proportion being left as supercoiled dimer; and digestion by BglI (track IVa), however, leads to only a small amount of cleavage product, due to the low Abbreviations used: cAMP, adenosine 3',5'-cyclic phosphate; CRP, cAMP receptor protein of E. coli; DNAaseI, deoxyribonucleate 5'-oligonucleotido-hydrolase (EC 3.1.4.5) from bovine pancreas. 93 0022-2836/83/130093-06 $03.00/0 1983Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd.

Upload: others

Post on 06-Feb-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Protection Against Nuclease Cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the

J. Mol. Biol. (1983) 166, 93-98

Protection Against Nuclease Cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the cAMP Receptor Protein of Escherichia coil

The effect on nuclease digestion of DNA exerted by the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) of Escherichia coli has been investigated. It is shown that non-specific binding of CRP to double-stranded supercoiled pBR322 DNA protects the DNA against digestion by the restriction endonucleases EcoRI, BamHI and BglI, and the nuclease DNAase I.

The cAMP t receptor protein mediates the regulation of a number of catabolite- sensitive operons in Escherichia coli, cAMP acting as an allosteric effector (Zubay et al., 1971; Epstein et al., 1975; de Crombrugghe & Pastan, 1978). The cAMP-CRP complex interacts with specific DNA sites near promoters, stimulating the initiation of messenger RNA synthesis (de Crombrugghe et al., 1971 ; Majors, 1975 ; Taniguchi et al., 1979 ; Odgen et al., 1980). CRP is a dimer of molecular weight 45,000, composed of two apparently identical subunits (Anderson et al., 1971; Riggs et al., 1971). The X-ray crystal structure of the cAMP" CRP complex has been determined at 2.9 A resolution, and shows that each subunit consists of two structural domains: the larger amino-terminal domain contains the cAMP binding site and the smaller carboxy-terminal domain is presumed to contain the DNA binding site (McKay & Steitz, 1981). Electron microscopic studies have shown that co-operative non-specific binding of CRP to double-stranded linear DNA (Takahashi et al., 1979; Saxe & Revzin, 1979) results in DNA condensation and the formation of regularly striated fibres (Chang et al., 1981). We report here that, probably due to the formation of this ordered fibre structure, CRP protects double-stranded supercoiled DNA from cleavage by several restriction endonucleases and DNAase I.

Figure 1 shows the results of electrophoresis, after digestion by BglI, B a m H I and EcoRI, of pBR322 DNA in the presence and absence of CRP. Although protection against cleavage was not complete (tracks IIb, I IIb and IVb contain a small amount of linearized plasmid DNA), there is a remarkable difference between digestion without (a tracks) and with (b tracks) CRP present.

In the absence of CRP we observe that digestion by EcoRI (track IIa) leads to complete linearization of unprotected DNA; digestion by B a m H I (track IIIa) leads to almost complete linearization of unprotected DNA, only a small proportion being left as supercoiled dimer; and digestion by BglI (track IVa), however, leads to only a small amount of cleavage product, due to the low

Abbreviations used: cAMP, adenosine 3',5'-cyclic phosphate; CRP, cAMP receptor protein of E. coli; DNAase I, deoxyribonucleate 5'-oligonucleotido-hydrolase (EC 3.1.4.5) from bovine pancreas.

93 0022-2836/83/130093-06 $03.00/0 �9 1983 Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd.

Page 2: Protection Against Nuclease Cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the

J~

�9 ~ ~ �9 I ' �9

Page 3: Protection Against Nuclease Cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 95

a c t i v i t y o f t he BglI e n z y m e e m p l o y e d ; two b a n d s m i g r a t e c o r r e s p o n d i n g to l inea r d o u b l e - s t r a n d e d D N A wi th l eng ths o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y 2700 a n d 1400 ba se -pa i r s ( the smal l f r a g m e n t o f 230 b a s e - p a i r s is n o t v is ib le on th i s 1% aga rose gel).

I n c o n t r a s t to t he la rge a m o u n t o f c l eavage p r o d u c t in the absence of C B P (a t racks ) , t he re is ve ry l i t t l e d iges t ion in the p resence of C R P u n d e r c ond i t i ons where the D N A l a t t i c e is c o m p l e t e l y s a t u r a t e d wi th C R P (b t racks ) . All c i r cu la r D N A forms are st i l l v is ib le and on ly a smal l a m o u n t of l inear ized D N A is d e t e c t a b l e . T h u s i t is c lea r t h a t C R P , upon b i n d i n g to p B R 3 2 2 D N A , p r e v e n t s r e s t r i c t i on e n d o n u c l e a s e s f rom c l eav ing the D N A . T h a t th is p r o t e c t i o n is n o t due to an i r r evers ib le a l t e r a t i o n o f the n o r m a l p B R 3 2 2 D N A s t r u c t u r e can be shown b y c o m p a r i n g the gel p a t t e r n o f p B R 3 2 2 D N A l o a d e d d i r e c t l y on to t he gel ( t r ack V) wi th p B R 3 2 2 D N A t h a t was c o m p l e x e d wi th C R P in the s ame w a y as the D N A in the b t r a cks , b u t n o t i n c u b a t e d wi th r e s t r i c t i on e ndonuc l e a se s ( t r ack I). The p a t t e r n is e x a c t l y the s ame in b o t h cases. F u r t h e r m o r e , i t is poss ib le a f t e r d e p r o t e c t i o n (i.e. r e m o v a l of C R P ) of t he D N A to cu t pBR322 D N A wi th a n y r e s t r i c t i on e n d o n u c l e a s e to y ie ld n o r m a l c l eavage p r o d u c t s .

The a n a l o g o u s e x p e r i m e n t in which D N A a s e I was e m p l o y e d as the nuc lease also shows t h a t C R P p r o t e c t s D N A from be ing d e g r a d e d . I n c u b a t i o n of 0"8/~g o f p B R 3 2 2 D N A for 15 m i n u t e s a t 37~ w i th 0"5 ~g D N A a s e I / m l l eads to c o m p l e t e d e g r a d a t i o n o f the D N A , whi le t he p resence of C R P in suff ic ient a m o u n t s to s a t u r a t e t he D N A c o m p l e t e l y p r e v e n t s th i s (Fig . 2).

I t shou ld be n o t e d t h a t the i n a b i l i t y o f b o t h t he r e s t r i c t i on endonuc l ea se s a n d D N A a s e I to d iges t the D N A in the p resence o f C R P b o u n d to t he D N A is n o t due to e n z y m e inh ib i t i on b y C R P , as p r o t e c t i o n on ly occurs when suff ic ient C R P is

FI(;. I. Electrol)horesis in a 1% agarose gel of 0"4t~g pBR322 DNA, following digestion with restriction endonucleases in tile pnesence and absence of CRP.

Track 1. pBR322 DNA with CRP: track II, pBR322 DNA digested by EcoRI without (a) and with (b) CRP present: track III, pBB322 DNA digested by BamHI without (a) and with (b) CRP present; track IV. pBR322 DNA digested by BglI without (a) and with (b) CRP present: track V, 0'16~g pBR322 DNA loaded directly onto the gel.

The experiment was carried out as follows: 0"4 ~g of pBR322 DNA (prepared by a modification of the procedure of Clewell & Helinski, 1959) was incubated for l0 min at room temperature with 0"28 ~mol of CRP (prepared as described by Takahashi et al., 1980) in a total volume of l0 ~1 of the appropriate buffer for the subsequent restriction endonuclease reaction. Under these conditions the DNA lattice is completely saturated with CRP (Takahashi et al., 1979). Samples (I0~1) of ! in 100 dilutions of Bffll (a gilt fi'om P. Gilette), BamHI (Boehringer Corp.! or EcoRI (Biolabs), respectively. were added and the mixtures were incubated at 37~ for 30 min. The restriction enzymes were inactivated by heating the samples to 65~ for 30 min. Aftemvards, 40 ~l proteinase K (Sigma) solution (500 ~g/m[) were added to destroy the DNA-CRP complex by degrading the protein, and the mixture was kept at 37~ ` for 30 rain followed by 30 min at 650( '. Omitting the proteinase K step leads to loss of all DNA fi'om the aqueous phase, probably because tile protein is so tightly bound to the DNA that tile protein-DNA complex goes into the phenol phase during tile phenol-extraction step. All samples were extracted twice with phenol, and once with chloroform and the DNA was precipitated with ethanol. The dried pellets were taken up in 10~l-H20. l0 ~l loading buffer containing 30O/o Ficoll and orange G as (lye was added and the mixture was electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel in 40 m~l- Tris, 5 m,~I-sodium acetate, l m,~I-EDTA (pH 7.8) buffer for 2 h at room temperature. The DNA was visualized by staining tile gel with ethidium bromide, which was added to the electrophoresis buffer at 0"5 ~g/ml, and illuminating fl'om below with ultraviolet light. The gel was photographed with a Polaroid MP-4 camera by using a red filter and a Polaroid 55 film. o.c.d., open circle dimer; o.c.m., open circular monomer: s.c.d., supercoi] dimer: I. linear: s.c.m., supercoil monomer.

Page 4: Protection Against Nuclease Cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the

915 A. M. G R O N E N B O R N E T A L .

I H n - r

�9 : -~,~" ~ . . . . �9 , ' :; :::':::!i.~O~

: :?:

>~T',

(?:i~i

: i!)i!i . : . ) i

)i)::ii �9 ~ii~::i:!,i~

i: .> :i!!iii-i

. . : ;-.-: .N , :::::k~%'

,~!i:~i .... }:2i::i: ili'i '~:.~::~!: .: ......

~ ( C ' : , , .:7:..x:,

FIG. 2. Electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel of O'8tzg of pBR322 DNA following t rea tment with DNAase I in the presence of CRP.

Track I, pBR322 DNA loaded directly onto the gel ; track II , pBR322 DNA treated with DNAase I in the absence of CRP ; track I I I , pBR322 DNA treated with DNAase I in the presence of CRP.

The exper iment was carried out as follows: 0"8/zg of pBR322 DNA was incubated with 0"56/zmol of CRP in 10mM-Tris, 100ml~l-KCl, 10mM-MgSO4, 0-1 m~-EDTA (pH 7-4) for l0 min at room temperature in a total volume of 19 tzl. Under these conditions the DNA lattice is cmnpletely saturated with CRP (Takahashi et al., 1979); 1 t~l of DNAase I (Boehringer Corp.) solution (10 t~g/ml) was added and the solution was incubated for 20 min at 37~ 40tzl of proteinase K solution (500tzg/ml) were added and the mixture kept at 37~ for 50 rain. The samples were subsequently t reated as described in the legend to Fig. I.

Page 5: Protection Against Nuclease Cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 97

employed to sa turate the DNA lattice completely; the use of less CRP leads to cleavage of the DNA by the nucleases, due to incomplete protection.

These experiments show tha t CRP, probably due to its highly co-operative non- specific DNA-binding abili ty (Takahashi et al., 1979; Saxe & Revzin, 1979; Chang et al., 1981), is capable of completely enveloping native double-stranded DNA and thus protect ing it from nuclease at tack. This finding is entirely consistent with the model for non-specific binding of CRP to supercoiled DNA put forward by Salemme (1982), in which CRP envelops a left-handed solenoidal coil of right- handed B DNA, with the two antiparallel F helices of CRP bridging the major grooves of adjacent loops of the coil.

The results reported in this paper may provide a basis for the possibility of using CRP to protect foreign DNA during its introduction into cells in which high internal nucleate act ivi ty leads to rapid degradation of the foreign DNA.

We thank the members of the Division of Biochemistry, National Institute for Medical Research, for kindly allowing us to use some of their facilities. One of us (G.M.C.) is a Lister Institute Research Fellow.

Division of Molecular Pharmacology National Institute for Medical Research Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, U.K.

Institut f'fir Genetik der Universit~t KSln Weyertal 121, D 5000 KSin 41 F.R.G.

ANGELA M. GRONENBORN G. MARIUS CLORE

BRUNO GRO~rENBORN t

Received 19 November 1982

REFERENCES

Anderson, W. B., Schneider, A. B., Emmer, M., Perlman, R. L. & Pastan, I. {1971). J. Biol. Chem. 246, 5923-5937.

Chang, J. J., Dubochet, J., Baudras, A., Blazy, B. & Takahashi, M. (1981). J. Mol. Biol. 150,435-439.

Clewell, D. B. & Helinski, D. R. (1959). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 62, 1159-1166. de Crombrugghe, B. & Pastan, I. (1978). In The Operon {Miller, J. H. & Reznikoff, W. S.,

eds), pp. 303-324, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. de Crombrugghe, B., Chen, B., Anderson, W. B., Nissley, P., Gottesman, M. & Pastan, I.

(1971). Nature New Biol. 231, 139-142. Epstein, W., Rothman-Denes, L. B. & Hesse, J. (1975). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 72,

2300-2304. Majors, J. (1975). Nature (London), 256, 672-674. McKay, D. B. & Steitz, T. A. (1981). Nature (London), 290, 745-749. Odgen, S., Haggarty, D., Stoner, M., Kolodrubetz, D. & Schleif, R. (1980). Proc. Nat. Acad.

Sci., U.S.A. 77, 3346-3350. Riggs, A. D., Reiness, G. & Zubay, G. (1971). Proc. Nat. Aead. Sci., U.S.A. 68, 1222-1225. Salemme, F. R. (1982). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sei., U.S.A. 79, 5263-5267. Saxe, S. A. & Revzin, A. (1979). Biochemistry, 18, 255-263.

t Present address: Friedrich Miescher Institut, Postfaeh 273, CH4002 Basel, Switzerland.

Page 6: Protection Against Nuclease Cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the

98 A.M. GRONENBORN ET AL.

Takahashi, M., Blazy, B. & Baudras, A. (1979). Nucl. Acids Res. 7, 1699-1712. Takahashi, M., Blazy, B. & Baudras, A. (1980). Biochemistry, 19, 5124-5130. Taniguchi, T., O'Neill, M. & de Crombrugghe, B. (1979). ~'oc. Nat. Aead. Sci., U.S.A. 76,

5090-5094. Zubay, G., Schwartz, D. & Beckwith, J. (1971). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 66, 104-ll0.

Edited by S. Brenner