proposed diesel vehicle emissions national environment
TRANSCRIPT
Proposed Diesel Vehicle EmissionsNational Environment Protection MeasurePreparatory Work
In-Service EmissionsTesting – Pilot Study,Fault Identification andEffect of Maintenance
Appendices
April 2001
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 1
Appendix 1
VEHICLE MATRIX
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 2
Number and type of vehicles tested for emission performance
Vehicle Category1 No of Vehicles to be Testedby Year of Manufacture Total
1980-89 1990-95 1996-00 621 (615)2 Passenger Cars, Off RoadVehicles, & Light Trucks & Buses<3.5 t GVM
53(55) 62(55) 56(55) 171(165)
Rigid Trucks ≥ 3.5-12 t GVM 55(55) 55(55) 55(55) 165(165)
Rigid Trucks & Buses ≥ 12 t < 25 tGVM
55(55) 55(55) 55(55) 165(165)
2 Articulated Trucks ≥ 42.5t GCM 28 (40) 52 (40) 40(40) 120(120)
Notes:GVM = gross vehicle mass; GCM = gross combination mass (vehicle + trailer)
Number anmd type of vehicles submited for diagnosis and repair
Vehicle Category No of Vehicles Diagnosedand Repaired ( ) by age
categoryTotal
1980-89 1990-95 1996-00 120 (53)Passenger Cars, Off RoadVehicles, & Light Trucks & Buses<3.5 t GVM
7 (4) 14 (9) 12 (2) 33 (15)
Rigid Trucks ≥ 3.5-12 t GVM 10 (6) 12 (6) 12 (6) 34 (18)
Rigid Trucks & Buses ≥ 12 t < 25 tGVM
12 (6) 9 (4) 12 (5) 33 (15)
Articulated Trucks ≥ 42.5t GCM 6 (4) 7 (0) 7 (1) 20 (5)
( ) vehicles selected for repair
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
3
Vehi
cle
Man
ufac
ture
r Sum
mar
y
MC
& N
A Ve
hicl
es (<
3.5
t GVM
)
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
Ford
Hol
den
Kia
Maz
daM
itsub
ishi
Nis
san
Toyo
taTo
tal
119
80 -
891
20
20
345
532
1990
- 95
52
00
36
4662
319
96 -
0015
11
14
529
56 171
NB
Vehi
cles
(3.5
t -12
t GVM
)
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
Dai
hats
uFo
rdH
ino
Inte
rnat
iona
lIs
uzu
Ivec
oLe
yland
Maz
daM
erce
des
Benz
Mits
ubis
hiO
KAN
issa
nTo
yota
Tota
l4
1980
- 89
92
41
130
05
09
01
1155
519
90 -
951
45
028
10
10
50
010
556
1996
- 00
12
120
72
12
49
13
1155 16
5M
E &
NC
Veh
icle
s (1
2t -
25t G
VM)
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
Bedf
ord
Ford
Hin
oIn
tern
atio
nal
Isuz
uKe
nwor
thLe
yland
Mac
kM
ANM
erce
des
Benz
Mits
ubis
hiN
issa
nSc
ania
Volv
oTo
tal
719
80 -
892
211
57
01
40
57
00
1155
819
90 -
950
29
610
11
31
29
11
955
919
96 -
000
014
28
00
01
19
83
955 16
5N
CH V
ehic
les
(> 2
5t G
VM)
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
Atki
nson
Ford
Frei
ghtli
ner
Hin
oIn
tern
atio
nal
Isuz
uIv
eco
Kenw
orth
Mac
kM
erce
des
Benz
Mits
ubis
hiN
issa
nSc
ania
Volv
oW
este
rn
Star
Tota
l10
1980
- 89
15
00
90
03
32
20
12
028
1119
90 -
950
105
012
00
52
20
15
82
5212
1996
- 00
02
41
53
53
40
00
121
040 12
0
Tota
l Veh
icle
s62
1
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 4
Appendix 2
VEHICLE GENERAL DETAILS
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
5
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
535
Toyo
taTr
oop
Car
rier H
ZJ75
Toyo
taM
C2
May
-90
3035
2500
1518
926
536
Toyo
taTr
oop
Car
rier
Toyo
taM
C1
Mar
-89
3035
2500
2625
336
537
Maz
daBr
avo
B250
0M
azda
MC
3O
ct-9
827
7014
3047
800
453
9To
yota
Hilu
x LN
106R
Toyo
taM
C2
May
-93
2730
1520
2616
704
540
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
r 80
Serie
sTo
yota
MC
2D
ec-9
029
6018
7017
5195
654
1To
yota
Troo
p H
J75R
VTo
yota
MC
1Ju
l-88
3035
1980
1638
746
542
Toyo
taTr
oop
HJ7
5RV
Toyo
taM
C2
Jun-
9230
3519
8916
4525
654
4To
yota
Land
crui
ser H
ZJ80
RTo
yota
MC
2Ju
n-95
2960
1989
1384
166
545
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
r HZJ
80P
Toyo
taM
C2
May
-91
2960
1989
1437
216
546
Toyo
taH
ilux
LN65
RTo
yota
MC
1M
ay-8
725
2017
9030
6875
454
7To
yota
Land
crui
ser H
J60R
GTo
yota
MC
1Ju
n-83
2845
2400
3818
296
548
Toyo
taH
ilux
LN10
6RTo
yota
MC
2D
ec-9
027
3016
5019
9630
454
9To
yota
Troo
p C
arrie
r HZJ
75R
VTo
yota
MC
2Fe
b-92
3035
1989
3025
906
550
Toyo
ta4
Run
ner L
N13
0RTo
yota
MC
2Ja
n-92
2520
1670
2001
004
551
Toyo
taH
ilux
LN11
1RTo
yota
MC
2M
ay-9
525
2016
5013
2545
455
3To
yota
Land
crui
ser H
J60R
GTo
yota
MC
1O
ct-8
828
1019
8025
9030
655
4To
yota
Land
crui
ser H
ZJ80
RTo
yota
MC
3Ap
r-96
2960
1980
7307
76
555
Toyo
taH
ilux
Q-L
N13
0WTo
yota
MC
3Ap
r-00
2520
1850
6555
24
557
Nis
san
Terr
ano
IIN
issa
nM
C3
Apr-
9828
5019
0066
288
456
0To
yota
Land
crui
ser S
ahar
a H
J61R
GTo
yota
MC
1M
ar-8
829
6023
4026
8158
656
2To
yota
Hilu
x LN
106P
Toyo
taM
C1
Sep-
8927
3016
3043
4446
456
4To
yota
Land
crui
ser H
J60R
GTo
yota
MC
1Ja
n-83
2730
2400
3079
586
801
Nis
san
Patro
lN
issa
nM
C3
Nov
-99
2900
2200
1203
36
802
Nis
san
Turb
o D
iese
lN
issa
nM
C3
Jul-9
829
6023
5053
429
680
3To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C2
Jun-
9129
6023
5098
344
680
4N
issa
nPa
trol S
TN
issa
nM
C3
Mar
-99
2900
2200
1342
36
805
Nis
san
Patro
lN
issa
nM
C2
Oct
-95
2800
2350
1278
326
806
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
r To
yota
MC
3M
ay-9
629
6021
5088
639
680
7To
yota
Troo
pTo
yota
MC
2N
ov-9
330
3523
0017
1000
680
8To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
MC
2N
ov-9
027
3019
5028
7280
480
9To
yota
Troo
pTo
yota
MC
2M
ar-9
030
3523
0021
4262
681
0To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C1
Apr-
8530
3523
0016
9676
681
1N
issa
nPa
trol
Nis
san
MC
2M
ar-9
528
0021
5014
2353
681
4To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C1
Aug-
8930
3523
0023
9694
681
5N
issa
nPa
trol
Nis
san
MC
3Se
p-98
2960
2150
4350
26
817
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taM
C2
May
-90
2730
1650
2350
714
818
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taM
C1
Nov
-85
2520
1405
3150
004
819
Nis
san
Patro
lN
issa
nM
C2
Apr-
9128
0022
0019
8000
6
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
6
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
820
Toyo
ta80
STo
yota
MC
2M
ar-9
329
6021
5014
9600
682
1To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C2
Sep-
9530
3527
0010
6729
682
2To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C1
Jul-8
630
3523
5027
2748
690
9Is
uzu
NPR
492A
Isuz
uN
B5
Apr-
9573
0033
0022
8356
491
1Is
uzu
NPR
300
Isuz
uN
B5
May
-95
6200
3100
4403
54
912
Isuz
uN
QR
450
Isuz
uN
B6
Sep-
9885
0038
0066
117
491
4To
yota
BU91
Toyo
taN
B4
Jan-
8977
0029
0023
2376
491
6H
ino
FGH
ino
NC
9Fe
b-97
1500
078
0071
240
692
5M
erce
des
Benz
LCV2
Mer
cede
sN
B6
Feb-
0044
9025
0012
839
492
6Fo
rdTr
ansi
tFo
rdN
A3
Jul-9
733
0024
5087
578
492
8H
ino
FC3J
Hin
oN
B6
Oct
-97
1000
049
8096
222
693
0H
ino
FC3J
Hin
oN
B6
Jan-
9910
000
5190
7242
96
931
Hin
oFC
3JH
ino
NB
6M
ay-9
910
100
4860
3805
16
933
Hin
oKC
3JH
ino
NB
6Fe
b-00
1000
049
3092
186
936
Hin
oFC
3JH
ino
NB
6Ju
n-98
1010
049
4055
747
693
7H
ino
FC3J
Hin
oN
B6
Jun-
9810
000
4960
7529
66
938
Hin
oFC
3JH
ino
NB
6Ju
l-99
1010
048
8039
807
693
9M
itsub
ishi
FK41
7KS
Mits
ubis
hiN
B5
Sep-
9411
000
6220
1856
656
940
Isuz
uG
VRSM
CIs
uzu
NC
H12
Sep-
9832
000
1120
053
817
694
1H
ino
FC3W
LKA
Hin
oN
B6
Jun-
9697
0038
9412
0205
494
8M
itsub
ishi
Can
ter
Mits
ubis
hiN
B6
Apr-
9763
0035
8086
851
495
0M
itsub
ishi
FK61
7R1V
Mits
ubis
hiN
B6
Nov
-99
1040
053
3422
370
695
1M
itsub
ishi
FE6A
7EV
Mits
ubis
hiN
B6
Feb-
9963
0035
2034
893
495
2Is
uzu
NPR
Isuz
uN
B5
Sep-
9462
0036
3018
5106
495
3M
itsub
ishi
FE6H
7EV
Mits
ubis
hiN
B6
Nov
-98
6300
3500
3503
04
954
Mits
ubis
hiFK
417K
SM
itsub
ishi
NC
8Se
p-93
1210
062
0022
0251
695
5H
ino
FF17
SER
Hin
oN
C8
Aug-
9013
900
7000
2484
616
956
Nis
san
PKB2
10N
issa
nN
C9
Jan-
9813
900
7150
1011
8895
7M
itsub
ishi
FE98
AM
itsub
ishi
NB
6Fe
b-99
6300
3480
4718
34
958
Isuz
uN
PR66
Isuz
uN
B5
Sep-
9249
5034
4018
5380
495
9M
erce
des
Benz
LCV2
Mer
cede
sN
B6
Sep-
9944
9025
0025
726
496
0M
erce
des
Benz
LC29
8AM
erce
des
NB
6M
ar-0
044
9025
0073
734
961
Mer
cede
s Be
nzSp
rinte
rM
erce
des
NB
6Fe
b-00
4490
2500
2383
24
968
Hin
oFF
19H
ino
NC
7M
ay-8
913
900
7460
1759
886
969
Hin
oFG
Hin
oN
C8
Mar
-90
1500
076
0030
0908
697
0H
ino
GS2
21H
ino
NC
8Ap
r-92
2250
089
0021
2141
697
2H
ino
GH
3HJL
DH
ino
NC
9Ja
n-96
1500
066
6015
3701
697
3H
ino
GS2
21Q
3AN
Hin
oN
C8
May
-92
2250
089
0019
6043
6
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
7
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
974
Mits
ubis
hiFE
HH
HFX
Mits
ubis
hiN
B4
Jan-
8780
0030
0052
5052
497
5To
yota
BU85
Toyo
taN
B4
Feb-
8566
0027
2038
9699
497
6To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1Ap
r-89
2580
1500
1516
864
977
Toyo
taD
yna
Toyo
taN
A1
Nov
-87
2750
1800
3650
684
981
Dai
hats
uV1
00D
iaha
tsu
NB
4Ju
n-81
5300
3000
2522
524
982
Dai
hats
uC
abst
ar K
MH
40
Dia
hats
uN
B4
Mar
-86
4040
2050
1830
654
983
Hin
oFD
3WH
ino
NB
5Fe
b-94
9800
4040
3127
386
984
Hin
oFD
3HLL
AH
ino
NB
6Ap
r-96
1040
048
8012
2926
698
5H
ino
FD3W
Hin
oN
B5
Jan-
9398
0040
6031
0672
698
7H
ino
Har
rier G
D3H
JLA
Hin
oN
B6
Feb-
9611
900
4100
1660
576
989
Hin
oG
HH
ino
NC
9Ja
n-96
1500
066
8064
947
699
0N
issa
n-
-N
B6
Apr-
9698
0040
2096
981
699
2M
itsub
ishi
FV 4
58K
-N
C8
Feb-
9322
500
1015
053
329
699
3M
itsub
ishi
FV 4
58K
Mits
ubis
hiN
C8
Jan-
9422
500
1015
036
948
699
8D
aiha
tsu
V48
Dia
hats
uN
B4
Aug-
8257
0024
6057
1776
499
9H
ino
FF19
Hin
oN
C7
Mar
-89
1390
086
5016
4363
610
00M
itsub
ishi
FK41
5M
itsub
ishi
NB
4Se
p-87
1050
049
8020
8233
610
01Is
uzu
FSR
500
Isuz
uN
B5
Apr-
9093
0049
7043
4024
610
05H
ino
FF17
Hin
oN
C7
Apr-
8913
900
5430
1932
126
1007
Toyo
taW
U90
Toyo
taN
B4
May
-88
7000
3050
4691
474
1008
Hin
oG
HH
ino
NC
9Ja
n-96
1500
067
0059
025
610
09Is
uzu
SPR
422
Isuz
uN
B4
May
-82
9000
3940
5695
526
1010
Dai
hats
uD
elta
Dia
hats
uN
B5
Jul-9
237
5016
8013
1545
410
11Is
uzu
NPR
300
Isuz
uN
B5
Jun-
9560
0028
0063
236
410
13M
azda
TH00
0WG
Maz
daN
B5
Jun-
9259
3528
5024
4163
410
14To
yota
Dyn
a To
yota
NB
4N
ov-8
566
0028
8039
7776
410
16Fo
rdTr
ader
Ford
NB
5Ja
n-94
4994
2900
2024
774
1019
Isuz
uN
PR59
L5J
Isuz
uN
B5
Feb-
9160
0028
0032
5016
410
20To
yota
Dyn
a400
Toyo
taN
B4
Apr-
8870
0033
6046
3758
410
21To
yota
Dyn
aTo
yota
NB
5Ja
n-90
7000
3360
2847
274
1022
Hin
oFC
Hin
oN
B5
May
-93
1067
042
2036
2676
610
23H
ino
FCH
ino
NB
5M
ay-9
410
670
4380
2277
356
1025
Toyo
taD
yna
Toyo
taN
B6
Apr-
9870
0035
6028
981
410
26To
yota
Dyn
a300
Toyo
taN
B6
Dec
-98
6000
3380
1302
84
1027
Toyo
taD
yna3
00To
yota
NB
6Fe
b-98
6000
3380
3108
04
1028
Toyo
taD
yna2
00To
yota
NB
5Se
p-94
4450
2140
2198
254
1029
Toyo
taD
yna2
00To
yota
NB
6Ap
r-97
4450
2580
1061
764
1062
Inte
rnat
iona
l90
00C
Inte
rnat
iona
lN
CH
12Fe
b-99
4200
015
080
1305
828
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
8
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1068
Volv
oFL
10Vo
lvo
NC
H11
Oct
-92
2890
010
400
6362
986
1069
Volv
oFL
10Vo
lvo
NC
H11
Oct
-92
2890
010
400
6190
756
1071
Volv
oFL
10Vo
lvo
NC
H11
Oct
-92
2890
010
400
6561
446
1073
Scan
iaPI
I3M
76X4
Scan
iaN
CH
11Ju
n-94
3800
015
100
8178
616
1074
Kenw
orth
K125
CR
Cat
erpi
llar
NC
H10
Mar
-85
3800
014
180
1883
985
610
75In
tern
atio
nal
EF36
CM
7In
tern
atio
nal
NC
H11
Sep-
9442
500
1610
096
4003
610
78Is
uzu
NPR
300
Isuz
uN
B6
Mar
-00
4490
2110
1257
74
1079
Isuz
uN
PR40
0Is
uzu
NB
5Ap
r-94
7300
3430
1305
634
1080
Mits
ubis
hiFK
415F
16A
Mits
ubis
hiN
B4
Feb-
8593
0046
5054
4664
410
82Is
uzu
NPR
250
Isuz
uN
B6
Jan-
9844
9021
1039
814
410
83M
azda
T400
0M
azda
NB
6Ja
n-96
5915
2780
8398
84
1084
Isuz
uN
PR20
0Is
uzu
NB
5Ja
n-95
4490
2590
5579
64
1085
Ford
Trad
er D
409
Maz
daN
B5
May
-93
4495
2110
1682
014
1086
Toyo
taD
yna2
00To
yota
NB
5O
ct-9
344
5020
9012
5210
410
87M
itsub
ishi
FM65
8HM
itsub
ishi
NC
9Ap
r-96
1500
072
0010
4917
610
89To
yota
Dyn
aTo
yota
NB
5N
ov-9
360
0028
8084
176
410
90M
azda
T350
0M
azda
NB
4Ja
n-88
4485
2150
7224
14
1091
Toyo
taD
yna
Toyo
taN
B5
Aug-
9244
5021
3011
5544
410
92Is
uzu
KT26
Isuz
uN
B4
Jul-8
456
0026
8035
1267
410
93M
itsub
ishi
FK41
7HS
Mits
ubis
hiN
B5
Jan-
9597
0052
8018
4632
610
94Is
uzu
FSR
650
Isuz
uN
B4
Nov
-89
1100
052
8095
476
610
96Fo
rdC
argo
131
3Fo
rdN
C7
Feb-
8813
900
6200
2865
856
1097
Scan
iaP1
13M
6X4-
310
Scan
iaN
CH
11Ju
l-94
3800
013
160
8224
316
1099
Mac
kM
HR
6X4
Mac
kN
CH
10M
ay-8
842
500
1610
016
6499
58
1100
Volv
oF1
6Vo
lvo
NC
H11
Jul-9
042
100
1590
011
9117
211
01In
tern
atio
nal
EF36
00In
tern
atio
nal
NC
H11
Aug-
9342
000
1580
070
7309
811
02In
tern
atio
nal
EF36
00C
umm
ins
NC
H11
Jul-9
342
000
1595
092
7493
811
03Ke
nwor
thN
A4Ke
nwor
thN
CH
11M
ay-9
242
500
1605
014
2861
68
1104
Ivec
o-
Ivec
oN
B5
Aug-
9544
9021
5016
0321
411
05Iv
eco
C/C
abIv
eco
NB
6Fe
b-99
4050
1940
5752
94
1109
Isuz
uFS
R55
0Is
uzu
NB
5Ju
n-94
9500
5100
1413
376
1110
Isuz
uFS
R45
0Is
uzu
NB
5M
ay-9
293
0048
0022
3959
611
11N
issa
nPK
C31
0N
issa
nN
C9
Jan-
9626
500
9900
2383
576
1113
Isuz
uFS
R45
0Is
uzu
NB
5M
ay-9
210
230
4640
2260
996
1114
Nis
san
PKC
310
Nis
san
NC
9Ap
r-97
1500
081
0017
8117
611
15Is
uzu
FVR
900T
A-
NC
9M
ar-9
720
400
9650
1704
546
1116
Isuz
uFV
M14
00-
NC
8Ja
n-95
2250
010
890
3047
026
1118
Isuz
uFS
R45
0Is
uzu
NB
5Ju
n-92
9300
4460
2253
866
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
9
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1120
Isuz
uFS
R45
0Is
uzu
NB
5M
ay-9
293
0044
6023
2665
611
21Is
uzu
FSR
450
Isuz
uN
B5
Jun-
9299
0046
3020
1165
611
22Is
uzu
FSR
450
Isuz
uN
B5
May
-92
1023
047
1020
2894
611
23N
issa
nPK
C31
0-
NC
9Ju
l-97
1500
081
0013
3616
611
24Is
uzu
FVR
900T
AIs
uzu
NC
9Ja
n-98
2250
010
110
1226
706
1125
Isuz
uFS
R45
0Is
uzu
NB
5M
ay-9
210
400
4800
2439
686
1126
Isuz
uFS
R50
0Is
uzu
NB
5Fe
b-92
9300
4460
3405
946
1127
Isuz
uFS
R65
0Is
uzu
NB
5O
ct-9
412
000
5200
3847
196
1129
Mer
cede
s Be
nz40
5M
erce
des
Benz
ME
8N
ov-9
317
600
9300
4130
296
1130
Volv
oB1
0MVo
lvo
ME
8M
ay-9
416
500
8740
3627
716
1131
Leyl
and
PMC
Leyl
and
ME
8Fe
b-91
1626
086
1027
9457
611
32M
erce
des
Benz
PMC
-BB8
6M
erce
des
Benz
ME
7Ju
n-86
1600
084
8087
1964
611
33Vo
lvo
B10M
94A
Volv
oM
E9
Jun-
9816
500
8740
1240
296
1134
Volv
oB5
8Vo
lvo
ME
7Ap
r-84
1650
087
4079
2766
611
36M
erce
des
Benz
PMC
-BB8
6M
erce
des
Benz
ME
7M
ar-8
616
000
8480
8151
576
1137
Volv
oB5
8Vo
lvo
ME
7Fe
b-84
1600
084
8072
6200
611
38Vo
lvo
B10M
Volv
oM
E8
Jul-9
117
300
9160
5295
676
1140
Volv
oPM
CVo
lvo
ME
7N
ov-8
816
500
8740
6235
476
1143
Toyo
taD
yna
Toyo
taN
B6
Aug-
9844
9521
5043
195
411
44M
itsub
ishi
Can
ter
Mits
ubis
hiN
B6
Jun-
0044
9529
2924
114
1145
Toyo
taD
yna
Toyo
taN
B6
Jul-9
844
5021
3047
218
411
46To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1N
ov-8
725
5014
8021
6066
411
47To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1Ja
n-87
2550
1480
2256
274
1148
Dai
hats
uD
elta
Dai
hats
uN
B4
May
-89
4450
2130
1483
664
1149
Toyo
taD
yna
Toyo
taN
B5
Jul-9
544
5021
3010
6383
411
51To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2N
ov-9
525
2014
8010
3700
411
52D
aiha
tsu
Del
taD
aiha
tsu
NB
6Ja
n-00
4420
2340
3869
411
53D
aiha
tsu
Dua
lcab
Del
taD
aiha
tsu
NB
4Se
p-89
3750
1980
1088
504
1154
Toyo
taD
yna
200
Toyo
taN
B5
Jun-
9144
5025
5013
7494
411
55H
ino
FCH
ino
NB
4M
ar-8
710
230
4330
3327
616
1156
Hin
oFG
Hin
oN
C7
May
-89
1500
078
0017
9496
611
57H
ino
FFH
ino
NC
7D
ec-8
913
900
5580
1701
716
1158
Hin
oFF
Hin
oN
C7
Oct
-89
1390
065
3016
8852
611
59M
itsub
ishi
Can
ter
Mits
ubis
hiN
B5
Apr-
9060
0031
2021
1797
611
60H
ino
FCH
ino
NB
4Ja
n-88
1023
038
0012
3488
611
61D
aiha
tsu
Del
taD
aiha
tsu
NB
4N
ov-8
766
0028
0016
8799
411
62To
yota
Dyn
a 20
0To
yota
NB
6Fe
b-98
4495
2150
4025
24
1166
Toyo
taD
yna
300
Toyo
taN
B5
Nov
-95
6000
2880
7916
44
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
10
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1167
Mits
ubis
hiC
ante
rM
itsub
ishi
NB
4M
ar-8
745
0021
6017
8853
411
68Is
uzu
FSR
550
Isuz
uN
B5
Jul-9
310
450
4380
2120
116
1170
Maz
daT3
500
Maz
daN
B4
Feb-
8844
8523
3023
1470
411
71M
itsub
ishi
FK61
7M
itsub
ishi
NB
6O
ct-9
798
0050
9078
060
611
72Fo
rdTr
ader
Ford
NB
5Au
g-92
4495
2380
1096
954
1173
Isuz
uFS
R 4
50Is
uzu
NB
5M
ar-9
110
230
5420
1743
156
1174
Mits
ubis
hiFM
515
Mits
ubis
hiN
C7
Dec
-85
1390
063
5015
1228
611
93Is
uzu
FVR
900A
Isuz
uN
C9
Feb-
0016
000
7920
6772
611
94Is
uzu
FVR
900
Isuz
uN
C7
Jul-8
913
900
7640
2772
016
1196
Kenw
orth
T300
Kenw
orth
(CAT
)N
CH
12M
ay-9
842
000
1600
085
615
611
97Is
uzu
FVR
Isuz
uN
C8
Aug-
9413
900
8120
2263
276
1198
Volv
oFL
6Vo
lvo
NC
9M
ay-9
616
900
7960
1898
956
1199
Nis
san
PK25
0N
issa
nN
C9
Apr-
9816
000
8480
5486
912
00H
ino
FGH
ino
NC
9Fe
b-99
1500
079
8035
326
612
03N
issa
nPK
C31
0N
issa
nN
C9
Apr-
9816
000
7700
1060
236
1204
Nis
san
LK18
5N
issa
nN
B6
Nov
-96
1190
053
0010
3111
612
05Is
uzu
FVR
950
Nis
san
NC
9Ap
r-99
1600
081
9070
473
612
06Is
uzu
FVR
900
Isuz
uN
C8
Nov
-93
1390
082
0023
5995
612
10N
issa
nPK
C31
0N
issa
nN
C9
Apr-
9816
000
7885
6445
96
1211
Isuz
uN
PR 3
00Is
uzu
NB
5Ju
l-93
6200
3260
1784
134
1213
Isuz
uFV
R 1
30Is
uzu
NC
8Au
g-94
1600
081
2025
0664
612
14Is
uzu
FVR
900
Turb
oIs
uzu
NC
8Ju
n-91
1390
079
3037
4471
612
15N
issa
nPK
C39
7AN
issa
nN
C9
Apr-
9816
000
7700
8632
76
1217
Isuz
uFV
R90
0TA
Isuz
uN
C9
Mar
-00
1600
080
5042
970
612
18Is
uzu
FSR
32H
NIs
uzu
NB
5O
ct-9
210
430
4970
1618
306
1221
Isuz
uFR
R55
0Is
uzu
NB
6O
ct-9
710
000
5440
1368
186
1222
Hin
oFD
3WH
ino
NB
5Fe
b-94
1080
052
0020
5570
612
23In
tern
atio
nal
Acco
185
0DPe
rkin
sN
C7
Aug-
8713
900
8320
3522
686
1225
Mits
ubis
hiFK
Mits
ubis
hiN
C8
Oct
-90
1390
067
8053
3723
612
26M
itsub
ishi
FK41
7M
itsub
ishi
NB
5Se
p-94
9700
4960
3622
966
1227
Nis
san
CW
450
Nis
san
NC
H11
Apr-
9442
500
1540
025
6015
612
29In
tern
atio
nal
N17
50In
tern
atio
nal
NC
8Fe
b-90
1250
054
0077
1160
612
31M
itsub
ishi
FV41
8KS
Mits
ubis
hiN
C9
May
-96
2540
011
640
1495
876
1232
Volv
oFL
10Vo
lvo
NC
H12
Feb-
9831
600
1248
053
5126
612
33In
tern
atio
nal
Acco
235
0EC
umm
ins
NC
H11
Jun-
9531
000
1441
028
1053
612
34In
tern
atio
nal
Acco
185
0DPe
rkin
sN
C8
Sep-
9116
000
7440
3202
466
1235
Mits
ubis
hiSu
perfr
ame
Mits
ubis
hiN
C9
Sep-
9725
400
1210
010
4112
612
37O
KALT
Ser
ies
Perk
ins
NB
6M
ay-9
660
0031
2046
585
4
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
11
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1239
Maz
daT4
000
Maz
daN
B6
Dec
-97
4495
2620
9146
54
1240
Toyo
taH
iace
Toyo
taN
A3
Feb-
9828
5013
6051
635
412
41To
yota
Hia
ceTo
yota
NA
3Fe
b-97
2850
1360
5163
54
1242
Isuz
uN
KR58
Isuz
uN
B5
May
-93
4400
2110
8191
412
43M
itsub
ishi
FM55
7M
itsub
ishi
NC
8O
ct-9
415
000
7800
8562
36
1244
Isuz
uN
PR 3
00Is
uzu
NB
6Ju
n-98
6000
2880
447
412
45Is
uzu
FSS5
00Is
uzu
NB
5M
ar-9
310
000
5200
8532
86
1246
Isuz
uFT
R85
0Is
uzu
NC
9M
ay-9
713
900
6670
4018
36
1248
Isuz
uN
XR58
Isuz
uN
B5
Jun-
9344
0022
8072
504
1249
Mer
cede
s Be
nzC
argo
UL1
700L
Mer
cede
s Be
nzN
C7
Jun-
8812
600
6240
1001
06
1250
Isuz
uFT
R85
0Is
uzu
NC
9N
ov-9
713
900
7360
2261
36
1251
Isuz
uN
PR20
0Is
uzu
NB
6Ap
r-97
4490
2370
2289
04
1254
Ford
Trad
erFo
rdN
B5
Feb-
9468
5536
3050
263
412
55Is
uzu
FTR
800
Isuz
uN
C8
Jun-
9313
900
7220
8610
56
1256
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A3
Mar
-00
2730
1410
471
412
57Is
uzu
NKR
58Is
uzu
NB
5M
ay-9
344
0023
3077
094
412
58To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
3Ja
n-99
2730
1420
2066
04
1259
Volv
oB1
0MVo
lvo
ME
8Ja
n-94
1730
091
5016
1762
612
60M
itsub
ishi
Expr
ess
SJM
itsub
ishi
NA
3Ju
n-00
2505
1320
1306
412
62To
yota
Dyn
aTo
yota
NB
4Ja
n-86
6600
2900
2255
274
1263
Isuz
uJC
SIs
uzu
NB
4O
ct-8
511
000
5830
3038
16
1264
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
rTo
yota
NA
1Ju
l-81
2730
1310
3942
656
1265
Toyo
taD
yna4
00To
yota
NB
5M
ar-9
377
0035
6024
1868
412
66H
ino
FEH
ino
NC
8Ju
l-93
1390
065
4017
2919
612
67To
yota
Dyn
a400
Toyo
taN
B4
Jan-
8777
0034
0028
8134
412
69Is
uzu
FSR
12FX
Isuz
uN
B4
May
-86
1155
048
5034
9307
612
72Is
uzu
FTR
Isuz
uN
C7
May
-87
1390
059
7033
2146
612
74Le
ylan
d45
Ser
ies
Leyl
and
NB
6N
ov-9
710
000
5300
1008
726
1275
Toyo
taD
yna4
00To
yota
NB
4N
ov-8
777
0034
2032
0151
412
76M
itsub
ishi
Can
ter
Mits
ubis
hiN
B6
Jan-
9875
0039
0059
697
412
77M
itsub
ishi
Can
ter
Mits
ubis
hiN
B6
Jun-
9670
0049
4013
3062
412
78Fo
rdTr
ader
Ford
NB
6O
ct-9
670
7531
4069
055
412
79Fo
rdTr
ader
Ford
NB
6O
ct-9
670
7532
4013
4286
412
81Is
uzu
FSR
500
Isuz
uN
B5
Jan-
9310
400
4870
5531
16
1284
Mits
ubis
hiN
KRM
itsub
ishi
NB
5Au
g-92
6000
3120
8765
24
1288
Isuz
uN
KRIs
uzu
NB
4M
ar-8
743
0022
7039
6448
412
89Is
uzu
FVR
13H
RA
Isuz
uN
C7
Oct
-89
1500
079
3043
8547
612
90N
issa
nM
K235
Nis
san
NB
6Au
g-97
9925
4760
4937
16
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
12
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1295
Mits
ubis
hiFK
H15
Mits
ubis
hiN
B4
Sep-
8793
0049
2022
3894
612
96H
ino
FT3W
FKA
Hin
oN
B6
Jan-
9690
0046
8015
5881
412
97H
ino
UN
K FQ
316
Hin
oN
B4
Feb-
8793
0049
3045
1310
612
98Is
uzu
Forw
ard
JCR
500
Isuz
uN
C7
May
-84
1350
071
5017
8632
612
99Is
uzu
FVR
Isuz
uN
C7
Sep-
8520
800
1102
075
5558
613
00Vo
lvo
F7Vo
lvo
NC
7Se
p-85
1872
099
2091
3963
613
01H
ino
FF19
Hin
oN
C7
Sep-
8513
900
7360
6630
826
1302
Isuz
uFS
R50
0Is
uzu
NB
4O
ct-8
810
230
4950
4242
986
1305
Nis
san
Patro
lN
issa
nM
C2
Sep-
9027
5019
6018
4458
613
06To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C1
Nov
-87
2810
1350
2386
864
1308
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
rTo
yota
MC
3Ja
n-97
2960
1540
1012
976
1309
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
rTo
yota
MC
3M
ar-9
831
5015
1080
787
613
11To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taN
A3
Mar
-97
3150
1510
4984
36
1312
Toyo
taH
ilux
LN16
7RTo
yota
MC
3N
ov-9
727
3012
8064
063
413
14To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taN
A2
Sep-
9330
3515
7014
0108
413
15To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C1
Jun-
8928
1014
6024
1582
413
19H
ino
FG1J
Hin
oN
C9
Jun-
0015
000
7150
2045
613
20H
ino
FG1J
Hin
oN
C9
Apr-
0015
000
7100
3600
613
21H
ino
FG1J
Hin
oN
C9
May
-00
1500
071
0033
726
1323
Hin
oFG
1JH
ino
NC
9M
ay-0
015
000
7080
3034
613
24Is
uzu
FVR
900
Isuz
uN
C8
Nov
-92
1390
069
6033
2144
613
25To
yota
Dyn
a400
Toyo
taN
B6
Jun-
9870
0049
4050
854
413
26H
ino
FB4J
Hin
oN
B6
Feb-
0080
0045
7015
044
1327
Toyo
taD
yna8
6ATo
yota
NB
6Ju
n-99
7000
3640
8636
413
28To
yota
Dyn
a400
Toyo
taN
B5
May
-95
7000
3570
9014
14
1329
Isuz
uFR
R33
LIs
uzu
NB
6Au
g-99
1040
053
6087
206
1330
Toyo
taD
yna4
00To
yota
NB
6O
ct-9
770
0036
0070
834
413
32To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C1
May
-89
2160
1160
2999
564
1333
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taM
C1
Dec
-88
2580
1230
2278
504
1334
Nis
san
D21
Nis
san
MC
1Ja
n-89
2730
1280
2169
354
1336
Maz
daB2
200
Maz
daM
C1
Oct
-86
2470
1160
2202
614
1337
Maz
daB2
200
Maz
daM
C1
Aug-
8824
9511
7018
4874
413
38To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
MC
2Au
g-93
2500
1200
2211
064
1341
Toyo
taH
iace
Toyo
taN
A2
Jan-
9428
0013
1015
5781
413
44Vo
lvo
FL7
Volv
oN
C7
Aug-
8920
460
8040
3131
006
1345
Volv
oFL
7Vo
lvo
NC
9Fe
b-96
2414
011
680
3309
296
1346
Volv
oFL
7Vo
lvo
NC
9Ju
n-96
2414
011
680
3249
076
1347
Volv
oFL
7Vo
lvo
NC
8Ap
r-95
2040
092
5029
2376
6
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
13
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1348
Volv
oFL
7Vo
lvo
NC
9Ap
r-96
2414
011
810
3356
856
1349
Volv
oFL
7Vo
lvo
NC
7Ju
n-89
2414
011
810
6599
266
1351
Scan
iaP1
1M36
X4Sc
ania
NC
H11
Feb-
9542
000
1500
058
2274
613
52Sc
ania
P11M
36X4
Scan
iaN
CH
11Fe
b-95
4200
015
000
7559
096
1354
Ford
L900
0G
MN
CH
11M
ar-9
038
000
1510
010
3262
16
1355
Mer
cede
s Be
nz22
25 V
Ser
ies
Mer
cede
s Be
nzN
CH
11Ju
n-91
3800
015
000
4668
826
1356
Ford
L900
0C
umm
ins
NC
H11
Jun-
9338
000
1500
045
2974
613
58Vo
lvo
FL7
Volv
oN
CH
11O
ct-9
328
900
1200
039
2306
613
60Vo
lvo
FL10
Volv
oN
CH
11M
ar-9
542
000
1580
061
8866
613
62Vo
lvo
FL10
Volv
oN
CH
11N
ov-9
438
000
1580
061
1269
613
64To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
3Ja
n-98
2730
1420
6203
44
1365
Mac
kEc
onod
yne
Mac
kN
C7
Jan-
8424
340
8200
1243
340
613
66M
ack
Econ
odyn
eM
ack
NC
7Ja
n-84
2434
082
0068
5367
613
67M
ack
R68
8RST
Mac
kN
C7
Dec
-88
2434
082
0057
1476
613
68In
tern
atio
nal
2350
EIn
tern
atio
nal
NC
8M
ar-9
324
000
8600
1417
376
1370
Mac
kEc
onod
yne
Mac
kN
CH
10O
ct-8
938
000
1580
012
2837
96
1372
Hol
den
Gem
ini
Isuz
uM
C1
Feb-
8214
0095
070
004
1373
Mits
ubis
hiFM
557M
Mits
ubis
hiN
C8
Feb-
9013
900
1034
022
6029
613
74Vo
lvo
FL7
Volv
oN
C8
Jun-
9027
500
9950
5316
356
1376
Volv
oN
L12
Volv
oN
C8
Sep-
9226
000
9350
5803
106
1377
Inte
rnat
iona
l36
00C
umm
ins
NC
8Fe
b-92
2250
083
4078
7457
613
80In
tern
atio
nal
Acco
Inte
rnat
iona
lN
C7
May
-85
2250
075
0013
5100
06
1381
Volv
oF7
GVo
lvo
NC
7Ja
n-84
2140
082
0052
1414
613
82M
itsub
ishi
FV45
8M
itsub
ishi
NC
7Ja
n-85
2350
085
0047
5883
613
83In
tern
atio
nal
2250
D-
NC
8Ju
n-90
2250
076
9035
2867
613
84Ke
nwor
thT4
80C
atN
C8
Dec
-94
2410
084
1033
0879
613
85In
tern
atio
nal
Acco
235
0GC
umm
ins
NC
9Ap
r-98
2435
079
4021
3330
613
87In
tern
atio
nal
Acco
Cum
min
sN
C7
Jan-
8521
900
7750
5102
408
1388
Ford
Lous
iville
LM
800
GM
NC
7Ja
n-80
2250
078
0060
0000
613
89In
tern
atio
nal
1950
CC
umm
ins
NC
7Au
g-80
2190
073
0080
0000
613
90M
ack
Met
rolin
er 2
Mac
kN
C8
Jul-9
423
770
8500
3164
506
1391
Mac
kEc
onod
yne
Mac
kN
C7
Nov
-84
2434
085
0011
2667
76
1393
Inte
rnat
iona
lT2
700
Cum
min
sN
C8
Dec
-95
2350
085
0023
0000
613
94Ki
aC
eres
97B
Kia
NA
3Ju
l-99
2800
1400
2332
04
1395
Hin
oFF
17H
ino
NC
7O
ct-8
613
900
9120
1120
538
614
01M
erce
des
Benz
1442
V S
erie
sM
erce
des
Benz
NC
8Ju
l-91
2200
081
2026
0502
614
02H
ino
GH
237R
Q3
Hin
oN
C8
Jun-
9215
000
7440
5840
776
1403
Ford
L800
0Fo
rdN
C8
Nov
-94
2040
010
040
3985
476
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
14
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1405
Inte
rnat
iona
lM
etro
liner
Inte
rnat
iona
lM
E7
Mar
-86
1405
073
0027
4009
614
07M
ack
PR10
0R
enau
lt/ M
ack
ME
8O
ct-9
013
819
7320
6649
136
1408
Volv
oB1
0MVo
lvo
ME
7N
ov-8
516
500
8740
7334
306
1409
Hin
oC
MH
ino
ME
8Ju
l-90
1600
076
8060
1553
614
10M
erce
des
Benz
OC
1617
Mer
cede
s Be
nzM
E7
Aug-
8316
000
8320
1301
056
1411
Leyl
and
680
Leyl
and
ME
7Ja
n-82
1346
064
6011
3089
66
1412
Mer
cede
s Be
nzPM
CM
erce
des
Benz
ME
7Fe
b-87
1600
084
8056
0014
614
13Vo
lvo
B10M
Volv
oM
E7
Sep-
8616
500
8410
7108
586
1415
Bedf
ord
YMT
Ford
ME
7Ju
l-81
1219
258
5010
9202
56
1416
Bedf
ord
YMT3
DJ
Ford
ME
7Ju
n-80
1219
258
5010
7606
36
1419
Mac
kPR
100
Mac
kM
E8
Oct
-90
1600
076
8047
9761
614
20Vo
lvo
B10M
Volv
oM
E7
Nov
-85
1650
085
8080
0000
614
21M
erce
des
Benz
310
Mer
cede
s Be
nzM
E9
Jul-9
814
200
7380
9051
66
1423
MAN
SL20
0M
ANM
E8
Feb-
9016
000
8320
4630
476
1424
MAN
1419
0 H
OC
LM
ANM
E9
Apr-
9713
700
7120
1363
006
1426
Hin
oFF
177K
Hin
oN
C7
Jul-8
413
500
7020
8376
806
1427
Hin
oFF
173K
Hin
oN
C7
Oct
-85
1390
067
1048
4771
614
28H
ino
FGH
ino
NC
8Au
g-90
1390
071
5019
3916
614
29Is
uzu
FTR
184A
Isuz
uN
C7
Oct
-85
1350
068
1090
7814
614
30M
itsub
ishi
FMM
itsub
ishi
NC
7Ju
l-89
1500
079
5048
7712
614
32M
itsub
ishi
FM21
5M
itsub
ishi
NC
7Ju
n-81
1390
076
5055
4263
614
34Vo
lvo
F724
Volv
oN
C7
Jan-
8024
000
1128
046
9293
614
36N
issa
nC
PC15
Nis
san
NC
8Ju
l-94
1600
072
5064
4731
614
37Fo
rdTr
ader
Ford
NB
4O
ct-8
859
1530
7017
7960
414
38To
yota
Dyn
aTo
yota
NB
4M
ay-8
844
5023
5023
5885
414
39N
issa
nC
abst
arN
issa
nN
B4
Oct
-88
4500
2160
3116
434
1440
Dai
hats
uD
elta
Dai
hats
uN
B4
Apr-
8444
5023
1030
9760
414
41To
yota
Dyn
a200
Toyo
taN
B4
May
-89
4450
2310
3276
264
1442
Mits
ubis
hiC
ante
rM
itsub
ishi
NB
4Ja
n-84
5500
2530
2037
954
1443
Isuz
uTL
Isuz
uN
B4
Apr-
8450
0026
0070
4500
414
44To
yota
Hia
ceTo
yota
NA
1O
ct-8
424
4611
7043
5162
414
46To
yota
Hia
ceTo
yota
NA
1Ap
r-88
2446
1170
3261
934
1452
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A2
Nov
-93
2580
1480
1355
684
1453
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A2
Nov
-93
2580
1480
1086
614
1454
Toyo
taD
yna
Toyo
taN
B6
Jun-
9644
5023
5095
760
414
58M
itsub
ishi
FM51
86A
Mits
ubis
hiN
C7
Jun-
8513
900
6100
4659
756
1459
Ford
Trad
erFo
rdN
B4
Jul-8
977
4032
8036
1296
414
62M
itsub
ishi
FM55
7JM
itsub
ishi
NC
8Ju
l-90
1390
073
0046
3469
6
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
15
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1463
Mits
ubis
hiFM
557M
AM
itsub
ishi
NC
7Ju
l-89
1399
074
1042
8917
614
64Is
uzu
FVZ1
400A
Isuz
uN
C9
Jun-
9822
500
9020
7874
36
1465
Ivec
oD
aily
Ivec
oN
B6
Oct
-97
4490
2330
5765
04
1468
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
3Ju
l-00
3500
1680
241
414
69Fo
rdTr
ansi
tFo
rdN
A2
Nov
-95
2830
1360
7002
64
1470
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
3Ju
l-98
2830
1360
6003
44
1471
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
3Ju
n-96
2830
1360
1585
674
1472
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
2N
ov-9
528
3013
6018
2948
414
73Fo
rdTr
ansi
tFo
rdN
A3
May
-98
2830
1360
2040
464
1474
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
3M
ay-9
835
0016
8010
8386
414
75Fo
rdTr
ansi
tFo
rdN
A3
Nov
-96
2830
1360
1436
104
1476
Maz
daT3
500
Maz
daN
B4
May
-87
4490
2790
2095
694
1477
Maz
daT3
500
Maz
daN
B4
May
-87
4490
2790
2062
504
1480
Mits
ubis
hiFM
657
Mits
ubis
hiN
C9
May
-96
1500
074
6019
1073
614
82M
itsub
ishi
FM60
0M
itsub
ishi
NC
9Ju
n-96
1500
076
0025
8626
614
83M
itsub
ishi
FM60
0M
itsub
ishi
NC
9Ju
n-96
1500
074
8020
8088
614
84M
itsub
ishi
FM60
0M
itsub
ishi
NC
9Ap
r-96
1500
075
0019
9371
614
85M
itsub
ishi
FM65
7M
itsub
ishi
NC
9Ju
n-96
1500
074
8026
1011
614
86M
itsub
ishi
FM60
0M
itsub
ishi
NC
9Au
g-96
1500
074
8022
3038
614
87M
itsub
ishi
FP41
8FM
itsub
ishi
NC
H10
Feb-
8732
000
1244
019
0166
614
88M
itsub
ishi
FTR
5MF
Isuz
uN
C7
Nov
-88
1350
077
8013
2700
614
90In
tern
atio
nal
ACC
O 2
350G
Cum
min
sN
C9
Sep-
9824
000
9120
7197
06
1491
Mits
ubis
hiFM
5571
7SM
itsub
ishi
NC
8Ap
r-93
1500
087
0026
2260
614
92M
itsub
ishi
FM55
7M
itsub
ishi
NC
8Ap
r-93
1500
087
0021
7342
614
93M
itsub
ishi
FEM
itsub
ishi
NB
4O
ct-8
860
0031
2020
7890
414
95Fo
rdC
ourie
rFo
rdN
A2
Feb-
9524
7012
8014
6973
414
97Fo
rdLo
uisv
illeC
umm
ins
NC
H12
Jun-
9742
000
1590
025
4248
614
98Vo
lvo
FH12
Volv
oN
CH
11Se
p-94
4200
015
800
6077
416
1501
Ford
Aero
max
L90
00C
umm
ins
NC
H11
Sep-
9442
000
1580
012
1514
26
1503
Ford
Aero
max
L S
erie
sC
umm
ins
NC
H11
May
-95
4200
016
000
9888
676
1504
Ford
Aero
max
Cum
min
sN
CH
11Ap
r-95
4250
016
000
1395
582
615
05Fo
rdL
9000
Det
roit
NC
H12
Apr-
9642
500
1600
078
2448
615
07Ke
nwor
thK1
00E
Det
roit
NC
H11
Jun-
9542
400
1610
011
2840
26
1509
Scan
ia11
3M6X
4Sc
ania
NC
H11
Sep-
9442
000
1600
086
7416
615
10Sc
ania
1246
X4Sc
ania
NC
H12
Aug-
9742
500
1610
067
6375
615
11Sc
ania
113M
6X4
Scan
iaN
CH
12O
ct-9
642
000
1600
038
3634
615
12Vo
lvo
F12-
82F
Volv
oN
CH
10Se
p-85
4250
016
100
1251
970
615
13Fo
rd90
00D
etro
itN
CH
10O
ct-8
642
000
1600
013
9079
26
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
16
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1514
Scan
ia14
4LSc
ania
NC
H12
Feb-
9842
500
1610
049
1432
615
16In
tern
atio
nal
S-36
00C
umm
ins
NC
H11
Oct
-95
3800
015
000
9937
176
1517
Inte
rnat
iona
lS-
3600
Cum
min
sN
CH
12Ja
n-96
4250
015
000
8979
066
1519
Mac
kC
HR
92A
Mac
kN
CH
11Ju
l-95
4250
016
100
9809
616
1520
Mac
kM
etro
-line
rC
umm
ins
NC
H12
Feb-
9942
000
1600
078
389
615
21Ke
nwor
thSA
RC
umm
ins
NC
H10
Jun-
8642
000
1600
022
0642
66
1523
Mac
kTi
tan
HD
Mac
kN
CH
12Ja
n-97
4200
016
000
6894
626
1525
Ford
L900
0C
umm
ins
NC
H10
Sep-
8842
000
1600
079
1967
615
27Vo
lvo
FL7
Volv
oN
C8
Apr-
9424
000
1100
019
9306
615
29M
itsub
ishi
FP41
8M
itsub
ishi
NC
H10
Apr-
8932
000
1100
081
7977
615
30Iv
eco
Euro
tech
350
0Iv
eco
NC
H12
Jan-
9642
500
1610
036
4072
615
32M
itsub
ishi
FK41
5M
itsub
ishi
NB
4Au
g-85
1023
044
6026
6167
615
34D
aiha
tsu
Del
taD
aiha
tsu
NB
4D
ec-8
760
0031
2015
3430
415
35In
tern
atio
nal
N16
30In
tern
atio
nal
NB
4M
ar-8
610
450
5860
2822
716
1536
Isuz
uFo
rwar
dIs
uzu
NB
4Ap
r-84
6400
3390
4067
776
1538
Ford
L900
0C
umm
ins
NC
8Fe
b-93
2350
010
400
1400
000
615
39Is
uzu
Forw
ard
Isuz
uN
C7
Feb-
8112
850
6810
7723
886
1540
Kenw
orth
W92
3C
ater
pilla
rN
CH
10Ju
l-85
4200
016
000
8021
726
1541
Scan
ia11
3MSc
ania
NC
8M
ay-9
122
500
8400
1173
943
615
43Fr
eigh
tline
rFL
112
Det
roit
NC
H11
Oct
-93
4200
016
000
7351
166
1544
Frei
ghtli
ner
FL11
2C
ater
pilla
rN
CH
11M
ar-9
342
000
1600
055
2500
615
45Fr
eigh
tline
rFL
112
Cum
min
sN
CH
11Ju
n-95
4200
016
000
8749
606
1546
Frei
ghtli
ner
FL11
2D
etro
itN
CH
12Se
p-96
4200
016
000
7526
836
1547
Volv
oFL
6Vo
lvo
NC
8O
ct-9
013
900
8260
2309
186
1548
Ford
L900
0D
etro
itN
CH
11Ju
l-91
4200
016
000
5468
846
1550
Frei
ghtli
ner
FL11
2D
etro
itN
CH
11Ju
n-94
4200
016
000
8514
526
1551
Frei
ghtli
ner
FL11
2D
etro
itN
CH
11M
ay-9
442
000
1600
069
7270
615
53Fr
eigh
tline
rFL
112
Cum
min
sN
CH
12Au
g-97
4200
016
000
1181
786
1554
Volv
oFL
6Vo
lvo
NC
8Se
p-90
1600
076
8026
7500
615
56To
yota
Hia
ceTo
yota
NA
1O
ct-8
928
0013
4017
5607
415
57To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
3O
ct-9
827
8013
3041
560
415
58H
ino
FFH
ino
NC
7Ju
n-85
1350
059
6077
7687
615
59To
yota
SR5
Toyo
taN
A1
Oct
-86
2520
1200
2574
624
1561
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A3
Dec
-97
2730
1310
5916
84
1564
Isuz
uN
KRIs
uzu
NB
4M
ar-8
752
0024
9025
6909
415
65To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2D
ec-9
327
3013
1014
3705
415
67To
yota
LN10
6RTo
yota
NA
2M
ar-9
127
3013
1026
7904
415
68To
yota
LN10
7RTo
yota
NA
3D
ec-9
627
3013
1020
7804
4
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
17
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1569
Maz
daT4
100
Maz
daN
B4
Oct
-89
6838
3120
2828
264
1571
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
rTo
yota
NA
2Fe
b-92
3035
1450
1950
076
1572
Ford
Mav
eric
kFo
rdN
A2
May
-91
3150
1510
1184
026
1576
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
rTo
yota
NA
1O
ct-8
430
3514
5021
5000
615
77To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
3M
ar-9
827
3013
1046
550
415
78To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1M
ay-8
224
6011
8036
5442
415
79To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2Ju
l-94
2730
1310
2311
504
1582
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A2
Oct
-91
2580
1240
2005
374
1583
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A3
Jul-9
725
8012
4010
3324
415
84To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2Ju
l-92
2730
1310
2229
774
1585
Toyo
taLN
85R
Toyo
taN
A1
Apr-
8928
0014
4031
9952
415
87To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2M
ar-9
427
3013
1038
3469
415
88To
yota
SR5
Toyo
taN
A1
Jan-
8725
2012
0015
8889
415
90To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
3Au
g-96
2730
1310
2023
054
1591
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
2Au
g-94
3490
1670
1884
344
1592
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A2
Apr-
9527
3013
1099
496
415
93Fo
rdC
ourie
rFo
rdN
A1
Apr-
8824
9511
9726
9745
415
94To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2Se
p-93
2730
1310
1560
694
1595
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A2
Aug-
9427
3013
1016
0422
415
96To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1Ju
n-85
2520
1200
2483
764
1597
Hol
den
Rod
eoH
olde
nN
A1
Sep-
8123
5011
2839
7282
415
98To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1M
ar-8
526
0012
4844
0398
415
99To
yota
Hia
ceTo
yota
NA
1Ju
n-84
3020
1440
2322
714
1600
Mits
ubis
hiC
ante
rM
itsub
ishi
NB
4Ju
n-84
5500
2640
2935
014
1607
Kenw
orth
T480
Cum
min
sN
CH
11Fe
b-95
4200
014
250
7486
226
1610
Hin
oFE
3HH
ino
NC
8Ja
n-94
2040
070
4021
5273
616
11Is
uzu
FTR
800
Isuz
uN
C8
Apr-
9113
500
5450
2629
946
1613
Isuz
uFT
RIs
uzu
NC
8Fe
b-92
1390
055
0082
897
616
14Is
uzu
FVR
900
Isuz
uN
C8
Jul-9
516
000
6690
6531
66
1615
Isuz
uN
KRIs
uzu
NB
4Fe
b-86
4300
2500
4134
464
1616
Mits
ubis
hiEx
pres
sM
itsub
ishi
NA
2Fe
b-90
2505
1550
3381
416
17To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
3Au
g-99
2730
1650
1442
74
1619
Ivec
o45
00C
umm
ins
NC
H12
Apr-
9742
000
1500
021
5461
616
20Fo
rdTr
ansi
tFo
rdN
A3
Feb-
9934
5016
5031
061
416
35To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
3Au
g-99
2730
1650
3278
14
1636
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
3M
ar-9
934
8016
5031
922
416
37To
yota
LN86
RTo
yota
NA
2O
ct-9
225
8015
3014
3439
416
38Fo
rdTr
ansi
tFo
rdN
A3
Mar
-99
3480
1650
2447
54
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
18
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1639
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
3M
ar-9
934
8016
5026
718
416
41To
yota
LH11
3RTo
yota
NA
3Ju
n-00
2800
1720
1623
416
54Vo
lvo
B10B
LEVo
lvo
ME
9Ja
n-99
1633
084
9048
072
616
55Sc
ania
DSC
112
4Sc
ania
ME
9O
ct-9
719
100
9930
1458
236
1656
Scan
iaD
SC 1
124
Scan
iaM
E9
Oct
-97
1910
099
3014
4302
616
57Sc
ania
DSC
112
4Sc
ania
ME
9O
ct-9
719
100
9930
1578
176
1658
Volv
oB1
0BLE
Volv
oM
E9
Sep-
9818
900
9820
1123
746
1659
Volv
oB1
0BLE
Volv
oM
E9
May
-00
1636
084
9023
884
616
60Vo
lvo
B10B
LEVo
lvo
ME
9D
ec-9
718
900
9820
1349
246
1663
Scan
ia12
4LSc
ania
NC
H12
Apr-
9942
000
1600
056
387
616
64Sc
ania
124L
Scan
iaN
CH
12Ja
n-99
4200
016
000
8450
46
1668
Kenw
orth
K100
93A
Cum
min
sN
CH
11Ja
n-93
4200
016
000
7938
296
1669
Kenw
orth
K100
Det
roit
NC
H12
Mar
-96
4200
016
000
2657
686
1670
Kenw
orth
K100
Cum
min
sN
CH
11Ja
n-93
4200
016
000
1105
223
616
71Sc
ania
124L
Scan
iaN
CH
12Ap
r-99
4200
016
000
5228
26
1672
Scan
ia12
4LSc
ania
NC
H12
Mar
-99
4200
016
000
7378
66
1674
Scan
ia12
4LSc
ania
NC
H12
Apr-
9942
000
1600
083
462
616
75Fo
rdL9
000
Cum
min
sN
CH
10M
ay-8
942
000
1600
043
4980
616
76In
tern
atio
nal
S260
0C
umm
ins
NC
H10
Nov
-84
4250
014
500
2089
810
616
77Fo
rdL9
000
Cum
min
sN
CH
10D
ec-8
942
000
1600
048
1642
616
78Sc
ania
124L
Scan
iaN
CH
12M
ar-9
942
000
1600
067
079
616
80At
kins
on48
70C
umm
ins
NC
H10
Mar
-85
4200
016
000
6653
536
1681
Inte
rnat
iona
l36
00C
umm
ins
NC
H11
Jan-
9542
000
1600
086
8856
616
82Sc
ania
124L
Scan
iaN
CH
12D
ec-9
842
000
1600
086
920
616
83Sc
ania
124L
Scan
iaN
CH
12Ja
n-99
4200
016
000
8984
16
1684
Mac
kFR
Cru
isel
iner
Mac
kN
CH
10Se
p-84
4200
016
000
9004
146
1685
Inte
rnat
iona
l44
70 T
urbo
star
Fiat
/ Ive
coN
CH
10Ja
n-89
4200
016
000
7290
126
1686
Mac
kR
688
- Eco
nody
neM
ack
NC
H11
Nov
-90
4200
016
000
8608
236
1687
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A1
Oct
-80
2470
1180
5427
654
1688
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A2
May
-90
2580
1240
1802
944
1689
Ford
LTL9
000
Cat
erpi
llar
NC
H10
Nov
-88
4200
016
000
1135
275
616
90Sc
ania
124L
Scan
iaN
CH
12D
ec-9
842
000
1600
091
545
616
91H
olde
nR
odeo
Isuz
uN
A3
Mar
-98
2740
1315
8349
74
1692
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A1
Aug-
8825
2012
0019
7473
416
93To
yota
Land
crui
ser
Toyo
taM
C2
Oct
-95
3035
1460
1356
386
1694
Toyo
taH
iace
Toyo
taN
A3
Dec
-96
2800
1340
1714
454
1695
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A3
Jan-
9827
3013
1041
554
416
96To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
3Au
g-96
2580
1240
2159
064
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
19
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1698
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
3Ja
n-98
3300
1585
9567
54
1700
Hol
den
Rod
eoIs
uzu
NA
2M
ar-9
527
4013
1011
2077
417
01Fo
rdTr
ansi
tFo
rdN
A3
Jun-
9735
0016
8023
6173
417
03H
ino
FG F
61J
Hin
oN
C9
Mar
-99
1500
071
4039
645
617
04H
ino
FG F
61J
Hin
oN
C9
Mar
-99
1500
071
4039
577
617
05Fo
rdL9
000
Ford
NC
H11
Feb-
9542
500
1478
012
1480
617
06M
itsub
ishi
Expr
ess
Mits
ubis
hiN
A2
Jul-9
425
0514
3028
1294
417
07To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
MC
3Ju
n-99
2600
1420
8809
14
1708
Ford
L900
0Fo
rdN
CH
11M
ar-9
542
500
1514
089
933
617
09M
itsub
ishi
Expr
ess
Mits
ubis
hiN
A3
Feb-
9622
6012
0023
8990
417
10M
itsub
ishi
Expr
ess
Mits
ubis
hiN
A3
Jan-
9626
0014
5017
1556
417
11M
itsub
ishi
Expr
ess
Mits
ubis
hiN
A2
May
-95
2505
1210
2407
604
1712
Hin
oFG
1JH
ino
NC
9Se
p-00
1500
078
0027
316
1713
Hin
oFG
Hin
oN
C9
Feb-
9815
000
6580
8263
617
15H
ino
FGH
ino
NC
9Au
g-99
1500
068
7037
843
617
17To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1Ju
l-89
2730
1310
2642
384
1719
Isuz
uFS
R 1
1FA
Isuz
uN
B4
Jul-8
993
0044
6016
8268
617
22Is
uzu
SBR
478A
Isuz
uN
B4
Aug-
8190
0039
2014
0378
617
23Iv
eco
6500
Pow
erst
arC
umm
ins
NC
H12
Jan-
9942
000
1600
076
765
617
24H
ino
FDH
ino
NB
4M
ay-8
287
7049
2064
2094
617
25H
ino
TFH
ino
NC
H12
Sep-
9842
000
1600
080
247
617
26To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1O
ct-8
725
2012
0032
2812
417
27To
yota
Dyn
aTo
yota
NB
4Fe
b-89
4450
2140
2877
644
1728
Mer
cede
s Be
nzSK
243
5M
erce
des
Benz
NC
H11
Aug-
9542
000
1600
020
1647
817
30To
yota
Hia
ceTo
yota
NA
2Au
g-92
2850
1370
1587
814
1731
Dai
hats
uD
elta
Dai
hats
uN
B4
Jan-
8660
0027
1017
0674
417
32To
yota
Hia
ceTo
yota
NA
1M
ay-8
727
5013
2024
9991
417
33Fo
rdTr
ansi
tFo
rdN
A3
Feb-
9735
0016
8044
278
417
37To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1Ju
l-81
2470
1185
6009
244
1738
Inte
rnat
iona
lS3
600
Cum
min
sN
CH
11Ju
n-94
4200
016
000
4894
476
1739
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A2
Oct
-95
2580
1240
1358
114
1740
Inte
rnat
iona
lTu
rbos
tar -
447
0C
umm
ins
NC
H11
Jan-
9442
000
1600
032
5627
617
41To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2Fe
b-92
2730
1310
2092
154
1743
Toyo
taH
iace
Toyo
taN
A3
Jul-0
028
0013
4478
484
1744
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A1
Dec
-85
2550
1225
2077
974
1746
Toyo
taH
iace
Toyo
taN
A3
Jun-
9828
0013
4429
501
417
47To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2Au
g-92
2580
1240
1036
524
1749
Hol
den
Rod
eoIs
uzu
NA
2Fe
b-92
2730
1310
1433
104
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
20
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylin
ders
1750
Ford
Tran
sit
Ford
NA
3Se
p-97
3300
1580
6724
04
1752
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A3
Jan-
9827
3013
1058
176
417
53To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2M
ay-9
525
2012
0047
365
417
54To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
1Ju
l-87
2520
1200
1104
374
1755
Nis
san
D21
Nis
san
NA
1M
ar-8
625
7012
3018
1890
417
57M
itsub
ishi
Trito
nM
itsub
ishi
NA
3N
ov-9
826
2012
6046
394
417
58To
yota
Hia
ceTo
yota
NA
2Fe
b-94
2800
1340
3849
74
1759
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A3
Oct
-98
2730
1310
5481
94
1760
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A2
Oct
-92
2730
1310
1234
834
1761
Nis
san
Nav
ara
Nis
san
NA
2Ju
l-95
2740
1310
1341
14
1762
Toyo
taTr
oop
Car
rier
Toyo
taN
A2
Mar
-91
3035
1460
3889
06
1765
Inte
rnat
iona
lT2
670
Cum
min
sN
CH
10N
ov-8
442
000
1600
048
7824
617
66In
tern
atio
nal
S260
0C
umm
ins
NC
H10
Apr-
8642
000
1600
050
2790
617
67Is
uzu
GVR
950
Isuz
uN
CH
12M
ar-0
038
000
1600
027
684
617
68In
tern
atio
nal
S360
0C
umm
ins
NC
H12
May
-98
4200
016
000
2308
116
1769
Inte
rnat
iona
lS3
600
Cum
min
sN
CH
12M
ay-9
642
000
1600
098
3143
617
71In
tern
atio
nal
Tran
star
Cum
min
sN
CH
11M
ar-9
042
000
1600
074
2416
617
81Is
uzu
Cus
tom
Exy
Isuz
uN
CH
12Ju
n-00
4200
016
000
1643
617
83Ke
nwor
thK1
04C
umm
ins
NC
H12
Oct
-99
4200
016
000
2919
786
1785
Scan
ia11
2HSc
ania
NC
H10
Jan-
8842
000
1600
064
5470
617
87To
yota
Hilu
xTo
yota
NA
2O
ct-9
127
3013
1019
7006
417
88N
issa
nPa
trol
Nis
san
MC
2Au
g-95
2800
1344
1741
864
1789
Toyo
taH
iace
Toyo
taN
A2
Mar
-94
2800
1344
2638
104
1790
Inte
rnat
iona
l92
00 N
avis
tar
Det
roit
NC
H12
Aug-
9942
000
1600
013
0616
617
91Vo
lvo
N10
Volv
oN
CH
10Fe
b-89
3390
012
000
7190
656
1792
Ivec
oEu
rote
ch 4
500
Cum
min
sN
CH
12M
ay-9
742
000
1600
016
0243
617
93W
este
rn S
tar
4964
FC
ater
pilla
rN
CH
11Ja
n-94
4200
016
000
6429
896
1794
Mer
cede
s Be
nz16
25M
erce
des
Benz
NC
H10
Oct
-86
4200
016
000
4572
496
1796
Wes
tern
Sta
r49
64C
umm
ins
NC
H11
Jan-
9442
000
1600
078
4005
618
00In
tern
atio
nal
S260
0C
umm
ins
NC
H10
May
-89
4200
016
000
5679
266
1801
Inte
rnat
iona
lS2
600
Cum
min
sN
CH
10Ju
n-89
4200
016
000
5880
686
1802
Inte
rnat
iona
lS2
600
Cum
min
sN
CH
10D
ec-8
942
000
1600
052
0348
618
04In
tern
atio
nal
S260
0C
umm
ins
NC
H10
May
-89
4200
016
000
6234
566
1805
Inte
rnat
iona
lS2
600
Cum
min
sN
CH
11Ja
n-90
4200
016
000
5358
646
1813
Ford
Aero
max
Det
roit
NC
H11
Apr-
9542
000
1600
012
5426
16
1814
Inte
rnat
iona
lT2
670
Inte
rnat
iona
lN
CH
10Ap
r-86
3800
014
000
7070
846
1815
Inte
rnat
iona
lT2
670
Cum
min
sN
CH
11Ap
r-93
3800
014
000
9427
286
1820
Mer
cede
s Be
nzV
Serie
sM
erce
des
Benz
NC
H10
May
-89
4200
016
000
1169
619
6
Dies
el V
ehic
le Em
issio
ns –
In-S
ervi
ce E
miss
ions
Tes
ting
– Pi
lot S
tudy
, Fau
lt Id
entif
icat
ion
and
Effec
t of M
aint
enan
ce -
App
endi
ces
Page
21
Gen
eral
Det
ails
Test
No
Vehi
cle
Mak
eVe
hicl
e M
odel
Engi
ne M
ake
Vehi
cle
ADR
C
ateg
ory
Proj
ect
Cat
egor
yC
ompl
ianc
e D
ate
GVM
(k
g)Ta
re W
eigh
t (k
g)O
dom
eter
(km
)N
o of
C
ylind
ers
1821
Ford
L900
0D
etro
itN
CH
11Ju
n-93
4200
016
000
1126
956
618
22In
tern
atio
nal
3600
Det
roit
NC
H11
Oct
-93
4200
016
000
4075
136
1826
Mac
kM
etro
liner
Cum
min
sN
CH
12N
ov-9
942
000
1600
010
3422
618
27M
ack
Met
rolin
erC
umm
ins
NC
H12
Nov
-99
4200
016
000
1132
216
1829
Frei
ghtli
ner
FL11
2C
umm
ins
NC
H12
Aug-
9742
000
1600
070
0674
618
44Iv
eco
4500
Cum
min
sN
CH
12Ap
r-98
4200
016
000
1572
336
1848
Frei
ghtli
ner
FL11
2C
ater
pilla
rN
CH
12Se
p-00
4200
016
000
1643
618
74N
issa
nD
21N
issa
nN
A1
Mar
-88
2730
1310
2378
164
1886
Toyo
taLN
61 4
Run
ner
Toyo
taN
A1
Mar
-86
2520
1210
3466
594
1891
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A1
Nov
-85
2600
1400
3034
204
1896
Toyo
taLa
ndcr
uise
rTo
yota
MC
1Ju
n-89
2810
1980
3194
186
1900
Toyo
taH
ilux
Toyo
taN
A1
Jun-
8324
6011
8034
9435
419
02To
yota
Trou
pcar
rier
Toyo
taM
C1
Nov
-87
3035
1850
3647
726
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 23
Appendix 3
Compliance Date Emission Graphs
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 24
NOx Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.02 R2 = 0.07
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Compliance Date
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t) A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-1
PM Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.19 R2 = 0.04
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Date
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t) A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-2
Average Opacity MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.10
R2 = 0.05
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Compliance Date
Emis
sion
s (%
)
A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-3
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 25
Maximum Opacity MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.03 R2 = 0.01
0
20
40
60
80
100
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Date
Emis
sion
s (%
)A DR 30 A DR 70
Figure A3-4
NOx Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.09 R2 = 0.01
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com plia nce Date
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-5
PM Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.00
R2 = 0.00
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Compliance Date
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-6
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 26
Average Opacity NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.06
R2 = 0.03
0
10
20
30
40
50
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Compliance Date
Emis
sion
s (%
)A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-7
Maximum Opacity NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.01 R2 = 0.03
0
20
40
60
80
100
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Da te
Emis
sion
s (%
)
A DR 30 A DR 70
Figure A3-8
NOx Emissions ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.00 R2 = 0.03
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Da te
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-9
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 27
PM Emissions ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.11 R2 = 0.03
0
40
80
120
160
200
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Date
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-10
Average Opacity M E & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.11R2 = 0.20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Date
Emis
sion
s (%
)
A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-11
Maximum Opacity ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.08
R2 = 0.15
0
20
40
60
80
100
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com plia nce Date
Emis
sion
s (%
)
A DR 30 A DR 70
Figure A3-12
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 28
NOx Emissions NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.01 R2 = 0.01
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Compliance Date
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-13
PM Emissions NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.16
R2 = 0.01
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Da te
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-14
Average Opacity NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.24 R2 = 0.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Date
Emis
sion
s (%
)
A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-15
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 29
Maximum Opacity NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 2000)
R2 = 0.08 R2 = 0.02
0
20
40
60
80
100
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Com pliance Date
Emis
sion
s (%
)A DR 30
A DR 70
Figure A3-16
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 30
Appendix 4
ODOMETEREMISSION GRAPHS
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 31
NOx Emissions M C & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.03
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000
Odom eter (km)
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
Figure A4-1
NOx Emissions M C & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.04
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
Odom eter (km)
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
Figure A4-2
PM Emissions M C & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.09
0
100
200
300400
500
600
700
800
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
Figure A4-3
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 32
PM Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.04
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
Figure A4-4
Average Opacity M C & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.04
0
5
10
1520
25
30
35
40
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-5
Average Opacity M C & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.05
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-6
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 33
Maximum Opacity MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.00
0102030405060708090
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-7
M aximum Opacity M C & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.06
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-8
NOx Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.02
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
Figure A4-9
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 34
NOx Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.01
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
Figure A4-10
PM Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.00
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
Figure A4-11
PM Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.01
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000
Odometer (km)
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
Figure A4-12
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 35
Average Opacity NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.01
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000
Odometer (km)
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-13
Average Opacity NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000
Odometer (km)
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-14
Maximum Opacity NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.00
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000
Odometer (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-15
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 36
Maximum Opacity NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.01
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000
Odometer (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-16
NOx Emissions ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.01
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000
Odom eter (km)
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
Figure A4-17
NOx Emissions ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.06
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000
Odom eter (km)
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
Figure A4-18
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 37
PM Emissions M E & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.01
020406080
100120140160180
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
Figure A4-19
PM Emissions M E & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.02
0
10
20
3040
50
60
70
80
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000
Odometer (km)
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
Figure A4-20
Average Opacity M E & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000
Odometer (km)
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-21
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 38
Average Opacity ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.00
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000
Odom eter (km)
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-22
Maximum Opacity ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.03
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000
Odometer (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-23
Maximum Opacity ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.08
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000
Odometer (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-24
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 39
NOx Emissions NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.01
0.0
0.20.4
0.6
0.8
1.01.2
1.4
1.6
0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
Figure A4-25
NOx Emissions NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.05
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000
Odometer (km )
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
Figure A4-26
PM Emissions NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.05
0
10
20
3040
50
60
70
80
0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000
Odometer (km )
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
Figure A4-27
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 40
PM Emissions NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.00
05
1015202530354045
0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000
Odometer (km )
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)
Figure A4-28
Average Opacity NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000
Odometer (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-29
Average Opacity NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.01
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000
Odometer (km)
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-30
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 41
Maximum Opacity NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
R2 = 0.09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000
Odom eter (km)
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-31
Maximum Opacity NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
R2 = 0.02
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000
Odom eter (km )
Emis
sion
s (%
)
Figure A4-32
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 42
Appendix 5
CATEGORY AVERAGESGRAPHS & TABLES
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 43
Table A5-1
Vehicle Category AveragesMC & NA Vehicles (< 3.5t GVM)
Category Age GroupNo of
VehiclesNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)Avg Opacity
(%)Max Opacity
(%)1&2 1980 - 95 115 0.87 198.8 14.0 60.9
3 1996 - 00 56 0.92 128.9 10.5 53.3
NB Vehicles (3.5t -12t GVM)
Category Age GroupNo of
VehiclesNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)Avg Opacity
(%)Max Opacity
(%)4&5 1980 - 95 110 0.94 143.2 16.6 55.1
6 1996 - 00 55 0.99 85.9 10.7 45.3
ME & NC Vehicles (12t - 25t GVM)
Category Age GroupNo of
VehiclesNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)Avg Opacity
(%)Max Opacity
(%)7&8 1980 - 95 110 1.07 58.3 12.0 47.4
9 1996 - 00 55 0.81 28.1 4.3 31.9
NCH Vehicles (> 25t GVM)
Category Age GroupNo of
VehiclesNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)Avg Opacity
(%)Max Opacity
(%)10&11 1980 - 95 80 0.74 23.7 7.6 49.5
12 1996 - 00 40 0.56 11.1 3.3 29.9
NOx EmissionsVehicle Category Averages
0.87 0.920.94 0.991.07
0.810.74
0.56
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1980 - 95 1996 - 00
Compliance Date
Emis
sion
s (g
/km
.t)
MC & NANBME & NCNCH
Figure A5-1
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 44
PM EmissionsVehicle Category Averages
199
129143
86
58
282411
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
1980 - 95 1996 - 00
Com pliance Date
Emis
sion
s (m
g/km
.t)MC & NANBME & NCNCH
Figure A5-2
Average OpacityVehicle Category Averages
14
10
17
1112
4
8
3
0
4
8
12
16
20
1980 - 95 1996 - 00
Compliance Da te
Emis
sion
s (%
)
MC & NANBME & NCNCH
Figure A5-3
Maximum OpacityVehicle Category Averages
615355
4547
32
50
30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1980 - 95 1996 - 00
Complia nce Date
Emis
sion
s (%
)
MC & NANBME & NCNCH
Figure A5-4
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 45
Appendix 6
FAULT DIAGNOSISVEHICLE SELECTION
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 46
Table A6-1Categories 1+2 Fault Diagnosis Selection
Test NoNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
NOx Ranking
/115
PM Ranking
/115
NOx (% above average)
PM (% above average)
Sum of NOx & PM Ranking
/115
Average Opacity Ranking
/115
Average Opacity
(% above average)
540 2.9 235 2 37 235 18 1 97 -53.71700 3.0 114 1 80 251 -42 2 97 -53.71372 1.1 522 13 4 29 163 4 16 61.81338 1.1 484 19 6 22 143 6 60 -7.01717 0.7 470 79 9 -22 136 12 8 93.41755 1.1 352 14 16 27 77 13 9 93.21744 1.0 330 32 18 11 66 18 18 52.71592 0.6 404 97 11 -35 103 21 1 162.2546 0.4 415 110 10 -49 109 24 7 93.4
1711 0.9 298 46 20 3 50 26 20 49.51495 0.7 322 73 19 -18 62 31 14 69.21472 1.7 66 5 101 100 -67 34 71 -24.31341 0.9 262 50 26 2 32 35 49 8.41594 0.6 287 85 22 -26 44 39 12 70.91453 0.8 214 55 40 -3 8 44 38 15.91758 1.2 119 10 78 43 -40 48 100 -56.11572 1.1 150 16 67 23 -24 52 81 -36.3976 0.8 206 63 46 -10 4 55 63 -16.5
1469 1.0 135 23 72 19 -32 58 39 15.51306 0.7 208 78 45 -22 5 61 111 -75.2548 0.5 213 103 42 -40 7 64 59 -4.3
Mass Normalised Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
PM Em issions (m g/km .t)
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t) NOx A verage
PM A verage
Figure A6-1
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 47
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Ra nk of Emissions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
geSum of NOx & PM
Figure A6-2
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge NOxSum of NOx & PMPMAverage Opacity
Figure A6-3
Table A6-2Category 3 Fault Diagnosis Selection
Test NoNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
NOx Ranking
/56
PM Ranking
/56
NOx (% above average)
PM (% above average)
Sum of NOx & PM Ranking
/56
Average Opacity Ranking
/56
Average Opacity
(% above average)
1757 0.9 309 30 3 -5 140 3 3 95.61470 1.0 254 20 6 6 97 6 2 142.81590 0.9 250 32 7 -6 94 9 8 73.2926 1.3 164 5 18 46 27 10 48 -50.71309 1.0 202 22 12 4 57 13 14 35.61471 1.7 91 1 30 85 -29 14 22 3.01707 0.8 187 34 14 -8 45 17 11 46.61620 1.5 85 2 32 67 -34 19 25 -0.7802 0.6 171 49 17 -34 32 23 34 -24.7554 1.1 99 16 27 18 -24 24 43 -40.91694 1.2 75 12 37 27 -42 28 46 -47.7806 0.7 116 41 23 -20 -10 32 26 -6.7
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 48
Mass Normalised Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.8
0 100 200 300 400 500
PM Em issions (m g/km .t)
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t) NOx A verage
PM A verage
Figure A6-4
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions M C & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge
Sum of NOx & PM
Figure A6-5
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge NOxSum of NOx & PMPMA verage Opacity
Figure A6-6Table A6-3
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 49
Categories 4+5 Fault Diagnosis Selection
Test NoNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
NOx Ranking
/110
PM Ranking
/110
NOx (% above average)
PM (% above average)
Sum of NOx & PM Ranking
/110
Average Opacity Ranking
/110
Average Opacity
(% above average)
1092 1.2 406 21 7 24 184 5 1 159.91437 0.7 470 91 4 -26 228 6 2 149.61443 0.3 390 108 8 -63 173 9 3 127.01019 0.9 293 57 9 -4 105 10 20 40.3958 1.6 168 4 25 75 18 12 69 -20.81295 1.7 127 2 47 83 -12 13 85 -36.91086 1.1 202 28 16 18 41 15 76 -27.21080 1.1 189 23 19 22 32 18 62 -17.31028 1.1 181 26 22 19 26 21 77 -29.81014 1.2 143 17 35 31 0 24 53 -5.71166 1.1 163 34 27 13 13 28 48 -1.41126 1.2 138 22 42 24 -4 31 33 19.01439 1.5 86 7 76 60 -40 32 93 -43.01085 1.0 140 38 40 12 -2 38 63 -18.2914 1.0 133 46 45 6 -7 43 28 23.61218 1.6 36 5 105 69 -75 47 106 -69.7911 0.8 147 83 33 -20 3 52 23 34.71269 1.0 113 48 58 4 -21 53 45 2.91022 1.0 106 50 65 2 -26 59 70 -21.71093 1.2 63 20 92 27 -56 63 108 -81.61615 0.8 120 72 52 -15 -16 66 46 0.11104 1.1 60 29 94 18 -58 71 109 -83.9
Mass Normalised Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
PM Emissions (mg/km .t)
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
NOx A verage
PM A verage
Figure A6-7
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 50
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
geSum of NOx & PM
Figure A6-8
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge NOxSum of NOx & PMPMAverage Opacity
Figure A6-9
Table A6-4Category 6 Fault Diagnosis Selection
Test NoNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
NOx Ranking
/55
PM Ranking
/55
NOx (% above average)
PM (% above average)
Sum of NOx & PM Ranking
/55
Average Opacity Ranking
/55
Average Opacity
(% above average)
1152 1.8 296 2 1 82 244 1 3 138.51105 1.6 147 3 9 63 71 4 45 -49.81162 1.2 182 13 5 17 112 5 9 55.61026 0.9 195 25 3 -5 127 6 5 83.61239 1.0 147 19 8 3 72 10 11 53.41330 0.8 162 44 7 -23 89 11 2 139.2941 1.0 104 21 15 0 21 15 15 36.6
1244 0.9 110 29 13 -9 28 17 8 62.3960 1.5 54 4 35 46 -37 19 53 -77.3
1221 1.3 45 7 41 34 -48 26 26 -5.1933 1.2 19 8 54 25 -78 40 49 -69.6
1454 0.7 55 45 34 -25 -36 43 21 8.2
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 51
Mass Normalised Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
PM Emissions (mg/km .t)
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t) NOx A verage
PM A verage
Figure A6-10
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge
Sum of NOx & PM
Figure A6-11
Ranked M ass Normalised Emissions NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge NOxSum of NOx & PMPMA verage Opacity
Figure A6-12
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 52
Table A6-5Categories 7+8 Fault Diagnosis Selection
Test NoNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
NOx Ranking
/110
PM Ranking
/110
NOx (% above average)
PM (% above average)
Sum of NOx & PM Ranking
/110
Average Opacity Ranking
/110
Average Opacity
(% above average)
1411 2.5 121 1 5 137 108 1 39 10.51427 0.7 157 93 1 -37 169 4 1 176.91408 2.5 48 2 67 134 -18 6 93 -61.51413 1.8 73 7 30 72 26 9 49 -1.51138 1.9 66 5 39 76 13 10 84 -44.61255 1.5 88 18 20 37 51 11 54 -4.81234 2.2 36 3 84 110 -39 16 96 -63.81194 0.9 108 65 9 -16 86 17 22 54.21213 1.1 91 46 15 -2 56 23 19 61.91463 1.1 90 44 16 -1 55 24 9 78.61096 1.0 93 57 13 -10 60 27 46 3.41136 1.2 79 40 23 8 36 29 57 -8.11301 0.5 111 105 8 -50 91 30 28 40.71289 0.6 99 97 12 -39 70 33 12 75.91380 1.3 62 30 41 23 7 34 29 40.6955 0.8 88 81 19 -30 51 38 16 63.6
1206 1.3 50 29 61 26 -13 41 69 -23.01409 1.3 50 31 63 22 -14 44 43 6.51391 1.2 50 36 62 12 -14 48 66 -18.61554 1.4 35 27 86 28 -41 58 53 -2.71436 1.2 44 39 75 9 -24 60 65 -18.2
Mass Normalised Emissions ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
PM Emissions (mg/km.t)
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
NOx A verage
PM A verage
Figure A6-13
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 53
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
geSum of NOx & PM
Figure A6-14
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Ra nk of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge NOxSum of NOx & PMPMA verage Opacity
Figure A6-15
Category 9 Fault Diagnosis Selection
Test NoNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
NOx Ranking
/55
PM Ranking
/55
NOx (% above average)
PM (% above average)
Sum of NOx & PM Ranking
/55
Average Opacity Ranking
/55
Average Opacity
(% above average)
1123 1.0 70 8 1 20 148 1 20 -8.61115 0.9 61 18 4 8 115 3 6 79.31124 0.7 65 41 3 -13 133 4 11 54.4956 0.7 57 45 6 -14 103 6 10 56.5
1008 0.9 43 13 10 13 52 7 13 49.9972 0.9 38 9 13 16 36 9 4 104.6
1133 1.1 24 2 26 40 -14 18 50 -57.21210 0.7 40 47 12 -17 41 19 44 -43.91193 0.5 43 55 9 -33 53 21 37 -35.21323 0.8 29 25 24 1 5 26 31 -23.41660 1.1 15 3 43 33 -48 29 42 -42.21703 0.9 16 10 39 15 -44 31 45 -44.1
Table A6-6
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 54
M ass Normalised Emissions M E & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t (1996 to 2000)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
PM Em issions (m g/km .t)
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t) NOx A verage
PM Average
Figure A6-16
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t (1996 to 2000)
-200-150
-100-50
0
50100
150200
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge
Sum of NOx & PM
Figure A6-17
Ranked M ass Normalised Emissions M E & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t (1996 to 2000)
-200-150-100
-500
50100150200250
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge NOxSum of NOx & PMPMA verage Opacity
Figure A6-18
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 55
Categories 10+11 Fault Diagnosis Selection
Test NoNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
NOx Ranking
/80
PM Ranking
/80
NOx (% above average)
PM (% above average)
Sum of NOx & PM Ranking
/80
Average Opacity Ranking
/80
Average Opacity
(% above average)
1676 0.6 68 58 2 -16 189 2 2 163.01513 0.5 71 68 1 -28 199 3 1 335.01487 0.7 59 56 3 -12 147 5 3 137.31677 0.6 55 57 5 -15 132 7 9 68.11362 0.9 42 12 9 26 76 9 20 32.11685 1.3 18 1 45 81 -23 13 47 -17.71540 0.5 38 71 15 -33 60 17 4 119.51355 0.6 33 67 16 -24 38 25 8 76.51073 0.7 27 52 29 -8 12 29 36 4.01771 0.6 28 61 22 -20 18 34 10 56.41545 0.6 27 62 28 -21 14 37 54 -29.41544 0.8 18 25 47 13 -25 40 51 -25.71686 0.5 29 72 20 -34 22 41 28 12.5
Table A6-7
M ass Normalised Emissions NCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.0
0.20.4
0.6
0.8
1.01.2
1.4
1.6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
PM Emissions (mg/km.t)
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
NOx A verage
PM A verage
Figure A6-19
Ranked M ass Normalised Emissions NCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-200-150
-100-50
0
50100
150200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge
Sum of NOx & PM
Figure A6-20
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 56
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions NCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge NOxSum of NOx & PMPMAverage Opacity
Figure A6-21
Category 12 Fault Diagnosis Selection
Test NoNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
NOx Ranking
/40
PM Ranking
/40
NOx (% above average)
PM (% above average)
Sum of NOx & PM Ranking
/40
Average Opacity Ranking
/40
Average Opacity
(% above average)
1546 0.9 37 3 2 60 230 1 1 287.1940 0.7 38 10 1 26 243 2 7 60.2
1826 0.4 23 32 5 -24 110 5 4 128.71790 1.2 5 1 37 112 -56 9 37 -69.81511 0.5 15 17 8 -7 39 13 10 19.31517 0.8 7 6 26 39 -40 15 30 -48.31505 0.8 6 8 28 35 -42 16 24 -37.8
Table A6-8
Mass Normalised Emissions NCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
PM Em issions (m g/km .t)
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t) NOx A verage
PM A verage
Figure A6-22
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 57
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions NCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
geSum of NOx & PM
Figure A6-23
Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions NCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
gro
up a
vera
ge NOxSum of NOx & PMPMA verage Opacity
Figure A6-24
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 58
Appendix 7
MINOR REPAIR RESULTS
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 59
Table A7-1Category 1 + 2 Minor Repair Results
Before Repair After RepairOriginal Test No Rank
NOx (g/km.t)
PM (mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionTotal Cost
($)
Repair Time
(hours)1338 6 1.1 484 13 3 1.6 330 16 2 $2,619 181717 12 0.7 470 27 3 1.2 385 23 2 $2,007 181755 13 1.1 352 27 3 1.3 117 21 2.5 $772 61744 18 1.0 330 21 3 0.8 367 25 3 $169 11592 21 0.6 404 37 4 0.8 219 22 3 $2,600 191711 26 0.9 298 21 3 0.8 141 17 2 $596 51495 31 0.7 322 24 2 1.0 169 21 2 $350 41341 35 0.9 262 15 3 0.9 57 5 2 $1,797 181594 39 0.6 287 24 2 0.8 28 4 2 $414 41453 44 0.8 214 16 2 0.5 208 16 1.5 $414 41572 52 1.1 150 9 2 1.0 178 13 2 $757 6976 55 0.8 206 12 2 1.0 140 16 2 $518 5
Average 0.8 315 20 2.7 1.0 195 17 2.2 $1,084 9
Cost BenefitAverage of 12 Vehicles Repaired
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.8
315
20
2.71.0
195
17
2.2
$1,084
9
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Me asured
Res
ults
Original T es t
A fter M ino r Repair
C atego ry A verage
Figure A7-1
Cost Bene fitAverage of 12 Vehicle s Repa ire d
MC & NA Vehicle s < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-38.1
-18.2
13.9
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
NO
x(g
/km
.t)
PM(m
g/km
.t)
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Pa ram e te rs Mea sured
% c
hang
e (p
ost/p
re)
$ 1084 - A verage Cost$ 2619 - Max Cost$ 169 - Min Cost
Figure A7-2
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 60
Cost BenefitTest No: 1338 & 1853 - Rank 6 / 115 (High PM & NOx )
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
484
13
31.6
330
16
2
$2,619
18
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
Catego ry A verage
Replaced major pump parts , injector nozz les and air & fuel f ilters
Figure A7-3
Cost BenefitTest No: 1717 & 1842 - Rank 12 / 115 (High PM)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.7
470
27
31.2
385
23
2
$2,007
18
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original T est
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Calibration of f uel pump, repair injectors and replace fuel & air f ilter
Figure A7-4
Cost BenefitTest No: 1755 & 1825 - Rank 13 / 115 (High PM & NOx)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
352
27
31.3
117
21
2.5
$772
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Drain fuel tank, replace injector nozz les & air & f uel f ilters
Figure A7-5
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 61
Cost BenefitTest No: 1744 & 1809 - Rank 18 / 115 (High PM & NOx)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.0
330
21
3
0.8
367
25
3
$169
1
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Replace res tric ted tailpipe and air f ilter
Figure A7-6
Cost BenefitTest No: 1592 & 1875 - Rank 21 / 115 (High PM)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.6
404
37
4
0.8
219
22
3
19
$2,600
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours )
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Replaced pump parts , injector nozzles and fuel f ilter
Figure A7-7
Cost BenefitTest No: 1711 & 1786 - Rank 26 / 115 (High PM)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.9
298
21
3
0.8
141
17
2
$596
5
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original T est
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles & w ashers and air & fuel f ilters replaced
Figure A7-8
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 62
Cost BenefitTest No: 1495 & 1870 - Rank 31 / 115 (High PM)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.7
322
24
21.0
169
21
2
$350
4
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Para meters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozz les & w ashers replaced
Figure A7-9
Cost BenefitTest No: 1341 & 1885 - Rank 35 / 115 (High PM & NOx)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.9
262
15
3
0.9
57
52
$1,797
18
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Replaced pump parts , injector nozzles, f uel & air f ilters and timing belt
Figure A7-10
Cost BenefitTest No: 1594 & 1872 - Rank 39 / 115 (High PM)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.6
287
24
20.8
28
42
$414
4
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles replaced
Figure A7-11
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 63
Cost BenefitTest No: 1453 & 1836 - Rank 44 / 115 (High PM)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.8
214
16
2
0.5
208
16
1.5
$414
4
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) AverageOpacity (%)
Vehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles replaced
Figure A7-12
Cost BenefitTest No: 1572 & 1812 - Rank 52 / 115 (High NOx)
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
150
9
21.0
178
13
2
$757
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t ($) Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original T est
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles & w ashers and air f ilter replaced
Figure A7-13
Cost BenefitTest No: 976 & 1846 - Rank 55 / 115 (High PM)MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.8
206
12
21.0
140
16
2
$518
5
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles and f uel f ilter replaced
Figure A7-14
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 64
Table A7-2Category 3 Minor Repair Results
Before Repair After RepairOriginal Test No Rank
NOx (g/km.t)
PM (mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionTotal Cost
($)
Repair Time
(hours)1757 3 0.9 309 21 2 0.9 191 21 1.5 $132 11590 9 0.9 250 18 3 1.2 287 20 2.5 $1,431 13
Average 0.9 279 19 2.5 1.1 239 21 2.0 $782 7
Cost BenefitAverage of 2 Vehicles Repaired
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.9
279
19
2.51.1
239
21
2.0
$782
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) AverageOpacity (%)
Vehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Pa ram e ters Mea sure d
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
Catego ry A verage
Figure A7-15
Cost Bene fitAverage of 2 Vehicles Repa ired
MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
21.9
-14.5
7.5
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
NO
x(g
/km
.t)
PM(m
g/km
.t)
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Param ete rs Measured
% c
hang
e (p
ost/p
re)
$ 782 - A verage Cost$ 1431 - Max Cost$ 132 - Min Cost
Figure A7-16
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 65
Cost BenefitTest No: 1757 & 1828 - Rank 3 / 56 (High PM)MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.9
309
21
20.9
191
21
1.5
$132
1
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original T est
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Drain fuel and replace air & f uel f ilters
Figure A7-17
Cost BenefitTest No: 1590 & 1819 - Rank 9 / 56 (High PM)MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.9
250
18
31.2
287
20
2.5
$1,431
13
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozz les, air & fuel f ilters replaced. New c lutch plate.
Figure A7-18
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 66
Table A7-3Category 4 + 5 Minor Repair Results
Before Repair After RepairOriginal Test No Rank
NOx (g/km.t)
PM (mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionTotal Cost
($)
Repair Time
(hours)1092 5 1.2 406 43 3 1.9 203 26 2 $945 71437 6 0.7 470 41 3 0.8 213 36 2 $890 61019 10 0.9 293 23 3 0.8 115 21 2 $770 5958 12 1.6 168 13 3 1.3 93 17 2.5 $977 6
1086 15 1.1 202 12 3 1.4 179 18 2 $1,846 171080 18 1.1 189 14 2 1.3 107 11 2 $975 61028 21 1.1 181 12 3 1.0 91 15 2 $284 21439 32 1.5 86 9 3 1.3 73 15 3 $223 21085 38 1.0 140 14 2 0.8 93 16 2 $1,083 13911 52 0.8 147 22 2 0.9 79 19 2 $987 5
1269 53 1.0 113 17 3 1.0 61 15 2.5 $816 71615 66 0.8 120 17 3 0.9 69 13 2.5 $878 10
Average 1.1 210 20 2.8 1.1 115 18 2.2 $890 7
Cost BenefitAverage of 12 Vehicles Repaired
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
210
20
2.81.1
115
18
2.2
$890
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) AverageOpacity (%)
Vehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Figure A7-19
Cost Bene fitAverage of 12 Vehicles Repaired
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
3.8
-45.3
-6.7
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
NO
x(g
/km
.t)
PM(m
g/km
.t)
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Param eters Measured
% c
hang
e (p
ost/p
re)
$ 890 - A verage Cost$ 1846 - Max Cost$ 223 - Min Cost
Figure A7-20
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 67
Cost BenefitTest No: 1092 & 1764 - Rank 5 / 110 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3 .5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.2
406
43
31.9
203
26
2
$945
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours )
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozz les & w ashers and air & fuel f ilters replaced
Figure A7-21
Cost BenefitTest No: 1437 & 1772 - Rank 6 / 110 (High PM)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.7
470
41
3
0.8
213
36
2
$890
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (% )
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozz les and fuel & air f ilter replaced
Figure A7-22
Cost BenefitTest No: 1019 & 1869 - Rank 10 / 110 (High PM)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.9
293
23
3
0.8
115
21
2
$770
5
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (% )
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozz les , w ashers and seals replaced
Figure A7-23
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 68
Cost BenefitTest No: 958 & 1892 - Rank 12 / 110 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.6
168
13
31.3
93
17
2.5
$977
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Para meters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles and fuel f ilter replaced. Tappets adjus ted.
Figure A7-24
Cost BenefitTest No: 1086 & 1742 - Rank 15 / 110 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
202
12
31.4
179
18
2
$1,846
17
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) AverageOpacity (%)
Vehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Pump parts , injector nozz les & f uel f ilter replaced
Figure A7-25
Cost BenefitTest No: 1080 & 1897 - Rank 18 / 110 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3 .5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
189
14
21.3
107
11
2
$975
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (% )
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozz les, springs, w ashers & seals and fuel & air f ilters replaced
Figure A7-26
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 69
Cost BenefitTest No: 1028 & 1716 - Rank 21 / 110 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
181
12
31.0
91
15
2
$284
2
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (% )
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Inlet air manif old and air & fuel f ilters replaced
Figure A7-27
Cost BenefitTest No: 1439 & 1770 - Rank 32 / 110 (High NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.5
86
93
1.3
73
15
3
$223
2
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Throttle adjustement and air & f uel f ilters replaced
Figure A7-28
Cost BenefitTest No: 1085 & 1714 - Rank 38 / 110 (Average PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.0
140
14
20.8
93
16
2
$1,083
13
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Internal pump parts , Injector w ashers and f uel f ilter replaced
Figure A7-29
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 70
Cost BenefitTest No: 911 & 1884 - Rank 52 / 110 (Average PM)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.8
147
22
20.9
79
19
2
$987
5
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) AverageOpacity (%)
Vehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles and fuel & air f ilters replaced
Figure A7-30
Cost BenefitTest No: 1269 & 1899 - Rank 53 / 110 (High NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.0
113
17
31.0
61
15
2.5
$816
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles & seals and fuel & air f ilters replaced
Figure A7-31
Cost BenefitTest No: 1615 & 1873 - Rank 66 / 110 (Low PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.8
120
17
3
0.9
69
13
2.5
$878
10
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector w ashers, glow plugs, lif t pump parts and fuel & air f ilters replaced
Figure A7-32
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 71
Table A7-4Category 6 Minor Repair Results
Before Repair After RepairOriginal Test No Rank
NOx (g/km.t)
PM (mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionTotal Cost
($)
Repair Time
(hours)1152 1 1.8 296 26 2 1.8 67 12 1 $1,089 151105 4 1.6 147 5 3 1.7 25 0 2 $134 11162 5 1.2 182 17 3 1.2 118 13 2 $98 11026 6 0.9 195 20 1 0.7 150 18 1 $963 141239 10 1.0 147 16 3 1.3 61 12 2 $407 4941 15 1.0 104 15 2 1.2 42 11 2 $1,171 6
Average 1.3 179 16 2.3 1.3 77 11 1.7 $644 7
Cost BenefitAverage of 6 Vehicles Repaired
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
1.3
179
16
2.31.3
77
11
1.7
$644
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Figure A7-33
Cost BenefitAverage of 6 Ve hicles Repa ired
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
4.3
-56.8
-32.9
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
NO
x(g
/km
.t)
PM(m
g/km
.t)
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Param eters Measured
% c
hang
e (p
ost/p
re)
$ 644 - A verage Cost$ 1171 - Max Cos t$ 98 - Min Cos t
Figure A7-34
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 72
Cost BenefitTest No: 1152 & 1898 - Rank 1 / 55 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
1.8
296
26
21.8
67
12
1
$1,089
15
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Para meters Measured
Res
ults
Original T es t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Pump repair kit, injector w ashers and f uel & air f ilters replaced
Figure A7-35
Cost BenefitTest No: 1105 & 1573 - Rank 4 / 55 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
1.6
147
53
1.7
25
0
2
$134
1
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original T es t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Water removed f rom air inlet and air & fuel f ilter replaced
Figure A7-36
Cost BenefitTest No: 1162 & 1570 - Rank 5 / 55 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
1.2
182
17
31.2
118
13
2
$98
1
0
1
10
100
1000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measure d
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Petrol in tank - f ilter replaced
Figure A7-37
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 73
Cost BenefitTest No: 1026 & 1574 - Rank 6 / 55 (High PM)
NB Vehicles 3 .5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.9
195
20
10.7
150
18
1
$963
14
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours )
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector w ashers replaced
Figure A7-38
Cost BenefitTest No: 1239 & 1562 - Rank 10 / 55 (High PM)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
1.0
147
16
31.3
61
12
2
$407
4
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original T es t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injec tor nozz les replaced
Figure A7-39
Cost BenefitTest No: 941 & 1795 - Rank 15 / 55 (High PM & NOx)
NB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
1.0
104
15
21.2
42
11
2
$1,171
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (% )
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Mea sure d
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A fter M ino r Repair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles & w ashers replaced and tappets adjusted
Figure A7-40
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 74
Table A7-5Category 7 + 8 Minor Repair Results
Before Repair After RepairOriginal Test No Rank
NOx (g/km.t)
PM (mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionTotal Cost
($)
Repair Time
(hours)1427 4 0.7 157 33 4 0.7 56 19 2 $915 71194 17 0.9 108 18 2 1.1 57 18 2 $1,043 81213 23 1.1 91 19 2 1.2 96 22 2 $1,224 61463 24 1.1 90 21 2 1.0 41 16 2 $838 71301 30 0.5 111 17 2 0.7 61 10 2 $60 11289 33 0.6 99 21 3 0.8 46 13 2 $1,038 71380 34 1.3 62 17 3 1.2 62 23 2.5 $2,228 24955 38 0.8 88 20 3 0.8 57 18 2.5 $785 6
1206 41 1.3 50 9 1 1.7 27 11 1 $165 31554 58 1.4 35 12 3 1.4 19 7 2 $1,330 7
Average 1.0 89 19 2.5 1.0 52 16 2.0 $963 8
Cost BenefitAverage of 10 Vehicles Repaired
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.0
89
19
31.0
5216
2
$963
8
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Figure A7-41
Cost BenefitAverage of 10 Vehicles Repa ired
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
8.1
-41.5
-16.3
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
NO
x(g
/km
.t)
PM(m
g/km
.t)
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Parameters Measured
% c
hang
e (p
ost/p
re)
$ 963 - A verage Cost$ 2228 - Max Cost$ 60 - Min Cost
Figure A7-42
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 75
Cost BenefitTest No: 1427 & 1642 - Rank 4 / 110 (High PM)ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.7
157
33
4
0.7
5619
2
$915
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) AverageOpacity (%)
Vehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles and air & fuel f ilters replaced
Figure A7-43
Cost BenefitTest No: 1194 & 1876 - Rank 17 / 110 (High PM)ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.9
108
18
21.1
5718
2
$1,043
8
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original T es t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozz les and fuel f ilters replaced, tappets adjusted
Figure A7-44
Cost BenefitTest No: 1213 & 1608 - Rank 23 / 110 (High PM)ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
91
19
21.2
96
22
2
$1,224
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles, w ashers & seals replaced
Figure A7-45
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 76
Cost BenefitTest No: 1463 & 1673 - Rank 24 / 110 (High PM)ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.1
90
21
21.0
4116
2
$838
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Para meters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles & w ashers and fuel f ilter replaced
Figure A7-46
Cost BenefitTest No: 1301 & 1699 - Rank 30 / 110 (High PM)ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.5
111
17
20.7
61
10
2
$60
1
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Me asure d
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Pump to engine timing corrected (w as 6° - 8 ° retarded)
Figure A7-47
Cost BenefitTest No: 1289 & 1589 - Rank 33 / 110 (High PM)ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.6
99
21
3
0.8
4613
2
$1,038
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injec tors repaired and air & fuel f ilters replaced
Figure A7-48
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 77
Cost BenefitTest No: 1380 & 1893 - Rank 34 / 110 (High PM & NOx)
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.3
62
17
31.2
6223
2.5
$2,228
24
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original T es t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injectors nozzles and pump parts replaced
Figure A7-49
Cost BenefitTest No: 955 & 1890 - Rank 38 / 110 (High PM)
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.8
88
20
3
0.8
5718
2.5
$785
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozz les, w ashers & seals replaced
Figure A7-50
Cost BenefitTest No: 1206 & 1888 - Rank 41 / 110 (High NOx)ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.3
50
9
11.7
2711
1
$165
3
0
1
10
100
1000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Pump to engine timing corrected (w as 6° retarded)
Figure A7-51
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 78
Cost BenefitTest No: 1554 & 1662 - Rank 58 / 110 (High NOx)ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.4
3512
31.4
197
2
$1,330
7
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles & springs and air & fuel f ilters replaced
Figure A7-52
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 79
Table A7-6Category 9 Minor Repair Results
Before Repair After RepairOriginal Test No Rank
NOx (g/km.t)
PM (mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionTotal Cost
($)
Repair Time
(hours)1115 3 0.9 61 8 2 0.9 43 7 2 $580 81124 4 0.7 65 7 1 0.7 45 10 1 $2,129 18956 6 0.7 57 7 2 0.6 25 8 1 $60 1
1008 7 0.9 43 6 1 0.9 29 12 1 $211 2972 9 0.9 38 9 2 0.9 24 8 1 $148 1
Average 0.8 53 7 1.6 0.8 33 9 1.2 $626 6
Cost BenefitAverage of 5 Vehicles Repaired
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.8
53
7
1.60.8
33
9
1.2
$626
6
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r Repair
Catego ry A verage
Figure A7-53
Cost BenefitAverage of 5 Vehicles Repa ired
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-37.7
-2.6
29.3
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
NO
x(g
/km
.t)
PM(m
g/km
.t)
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Parameters Measured
% c
hang
e (p
ost/p
re)
$ 626 - A verage Cos t$ 2129 - Max Cost$ 60 - Min Cost
Figure A7-54
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 80
Cost BenefitTest No: 1115 & 1824 - Rank 3 / 55 (High PM)
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.9
61
8
20.9
43
7
2
$580
8
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t ($) Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original T est
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector w ashers replaced & nozzles ultrasonically c leaned
Figure A7-55
Cost BenefitTest No: 1124 & 1808 - Rank 4 / 55 (High PM)
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.7
65
7
10.7
45
10
1
$2,129
18
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t ($) Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injector nozzles & pump gaskets and parts replaced
Figure A7-56
Cost BenefitTest No: 956 & 1782 - Rank 6 / 55 (High PM)
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.7
57
7
2
0.6
25
8
1
$60
1
0
1
10
100
1000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original T est
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Throttle adjusted
Figure A7-57
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 81
Cost BenefitTest No: 1008 & 1806 - Rank 7 / 55 (High PM)
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.9
43
6
10.9
2912
1
$211
2
0
1
10
100
1000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original T est
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Fuel tank drained, f uel & air f ilters replaced
Figure A7-58
Cost BenefitTest No: 972 & 1777 - Rank 9 / 55 (High PM & NOx)
ME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.9
38
9
20.9
248
1
$148
1
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t ($) Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original T est
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Fuel tank drained, f uel & air f ilters replaced
Figure A7-59
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 82
Table A7-7Category 10 + 11 Minor Repair ResultsBefore Repair After Repair
Original Test No Rank
NOx (g/km.t)
PM (mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionTotal Cost
($)
Repair Time
(hours)1676 2 0.6 68 20 4 0.6 65 21 3 $1,617 101513 3 0.5 71 33 4 0.7 56 29 3 $2,771 191677 7 0.6 55 13 4 0.8 54 12 4 $1,524 111685 13 1.3 18 6 2 0.9 19 14 2 $2,380 20
Average 0.8 53 18 3.5 0.8 49 19 3.0 $2,073 15
Cost BenefitAverage of 4 Vehicles Repaired
NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.8
5318
4
0.8
4919
3
15
$2,073
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A fter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Figure A7-60
Cost BenefitAverage of 4 Vehicles Repa ired
NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-3.84.4
-8.5
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
NO
x(g
/km
.t)
PM(m
g/km
.t)
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Parameters Measured
% c
hang
e (p
ost/p
re)
$ 2073 - A verage Cost$ 2771 - Max Cost$ 1524 - Min Cost
Figure A7-61
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 83
Cost BenefitTest No: 1676 & 1830 - Rank 2 / 110 (High PM)
NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.6
68
20
4
0.6
6521
3
$1,617
10
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Test
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injectors replaced
Figure A7-62
Cost BenefitTest No: 1513 & 1831 - Rank 3 / 110 (High PM)
NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.5
7133
4
0.7
5629
3
$2,771
19
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injectors and air & fuel f ilters replaced
Figure A7-63
Cost BenefitTest No: 1677 & 1843 - Rank 7 / 110 (High PM)
NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
0.6
55
134
0.8
54
124
$1,524
11
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t($)
Repair Time(hours)
Parameters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Injectors replaced
Figure A7-64
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 84
Cost BenefitTest No: 1685 & 1857 - Rank 13 / 110 (High PM)
NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
1.3
186
20.9
19 14
2
$2,380
20
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpac ity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cost($)
Repair Time(hours)
Param ete rs Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Pump parts , injec tor nozz les and air f ilter replaced
Figure A7-65
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 85
Table A7-8Category 12 Minor Repair Results
Before Repair After RepairOriginal Test No Rank
NOx (g/km.t)
PM (mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionNOx
(g/km.t)PM
(mg/km.t)
Average Opacity
(%)Vehicle
ConditionTotal Cost
($)
Repair Time
(hours)1511 13 0.5 15 4 1 0.6 13 4 1 $176 1
Average 0.5 15 4 1.0 0.6 13 4 1.0 $176 1
Cost BenefitTest No: 1511 & 1838 - Rank 13 / 40 (High PM)
NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
0.5
15
4
10.6
13
4
1
$176
1
0
1
10
100
1000
NOx (g/km.t) PM (mg/km.t) A verageOpacity (%)
V ehic leCondition
Total Cos t ($) Repair Time(hours)
Param eters Measured
Res
ults
Original Tes t
A f ter M ino r R epair
C atego ry A verage
Outer air f ilter replaced
Figure A7-66
Cost BenefitAverage of 1 Vehicle Repa ired
NCH Vehicles > 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
8.3
-14.3
10.5
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
NO
x(g
/km
.t)
PM(m
g/km
.t)
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Parameters Measured
% c
hang
e (p
ost/p
re)
$176 - A verage Cost
Figure A7-67
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 86
Table A7-9Minor Repair Details
Vehicle Category Items Replaced
Actual Total Parts Costs
Actual Total
Labour Costs
Actual Total Repair Costs
Total Repair Time (hrs)
1 Tailpipe and air filter 124 30 169.4 11 Injector nozzles and plates, air and fuel filters 335 360 771.68 61 Replace pump parts, nozzles and filters 700.44 1080 2007.04 181 Injector nozzles and fuel filter 169.5 300 517.9 52 Air and fuel filters and Injector nozzles and washers 241.81 300 595.99 52 Replace pump parts, fuel filters. Remove crankshaft repair keyway. New clutch plate. 3533.475 2209.995 5743.47 382 Injector nozzles 136.28 240 413.91 42 Injector nozzles and washers, air filter 328.2 360 757.11 62 Replace major pump parts, injector nozzles, air & fuel filters. 1238.52 1080 2618.53 183 Injector nozzles, air & fuel filters, clutch and rear universal joint 730.96 700 1430.96 133 Drain fuel and replaced air & fuel filter 60.31 60 132.34 14 Filters 83.08 120 223.39 24 Injector nozzles and filters 456.6 360 889.86 64 Air and fuel filters, Injector nozzles and washers and water trap 439.5 420 945.45 75 Air + fuel filters, air cleaner hose 137.75 120 283.53 25 Fuel filter, internal pump parts and wahers 204.98 780 1083.48 135 Fuel filter, Fuel pump parts and injector nozzles 714 990 1846.37 176 Air & fuel filters 134.22 16 Injector nozzles and washers 704 360 1171.39 66 1 inj nozzle cleaned 3 cleaned and reset 406.75 46 Fuel filter 97.68 17 Fuel Filters, injector nozzles & washers 418 420 838 77 Air & Fuel Filters 524.08 420 1038.49 77 Air & Fuel Filters, injector nozzles 411.89 420 915.08 78 Air & fuel filters, injecotr nozzles, springs, int. plate 724 420 1330.23 78 Injector nozzles + washers and seals 750 360 1224.37 69 Injector washers, nozzles ultrasonically cleaned 47.7 480 580.47 89 Nozzles, pump parts and gaskets 800.9 1080 2128.54 189 Air and fuel filters 101.9 90 211.09 210 Pump parts, injector nozzles and air filter replaced. 893 1200 2379.68 2010 Injectors 870 600 1617 1010 Injectors 797.5 726 1523.5 1110 Injectors, fuel and air filters 1709.79 1060 2771.14 1912 Outer air filter 146 30 176 1
34 Vehicle repairs 38,974.04$
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 87
Appendix 8
VEHICLE CONDITION GRAPHS
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 88
Vehicle Condition v PM Em issions (120 Vehicles)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Em is s ions (m g/k m .t)
Veh
icle
Con
ditio
n
A verag e
A verag e
A verag e
A verag e
Figure A8-1
Vehicle Condition v Avera ge Opacity (120 Ve hicle s)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Em is s ions (%)
Ve
hic
le C
ond
itio
n
A verage
A verage
A verage
A verag e
Figure A8-2
Vehicle Condition v Compliance Date (120 Vehicles)
0
1
2
3
4
5
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01
Com pliance Date
Veh
icle
Con
ditio
n
Figure A8-3
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 89
Vehicle Condition v Flee t Size (120 vehicles)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Flee t Size
Veh
icle
Con
ditio
n
No of V ehic les at Condition
Fleet A verage
Private (55) Large (38)Medium (21)Small (2)Ow ner/ Driver (4)
12
7
17
12
7
9
5
1
1
2
1
1
4
22
17
2
Figure A8-4
Vehicle Condition v Ma intenance Type / Ow ner (120 vehicles)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Veh
icle
Con
ditio
n
No of V ehic les at Condition
Fleet A verage
A s RequiredMaintenance
(63)
GovernmentOw ner
(15)
Private Ow ner(105)
ScheduledMaintence
(57)
14
35
36
73
28
14
23
17
3
24
22
3
9
3
Figure A8-5
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 90
Appendix 9
REPAIR THRESHOLDGRAPHS AND TABLES
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 91
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsMC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Class Average196 mg/km-t
Repair ThresholdV ehic le 976206 mg/km-t
Figure A9-1
NOx Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsMC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0.0
0.4
0.9
1.3
1.7
2.2
2.6
3.0
3.5
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
Original testA f ter repair
Class A verage0.86 g/km-t
Repair ThresholdV ehic le 15721.07 g/km-t
Figure A9-2
Average Smoke Opacity Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsMC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 20 40 60 80 100 120Ra nk of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
7
14
21
28
35
42
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Original tes tA f ter repair
C las s Average14%
Repair Thres holdVehicle 1469
16.1%
Figure A9-3
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 92
PM Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ra nk of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
64
129
193
258
322
386
451
515
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original testA f ter repair
Class Average128.9 mg/km.t
Repair Threshold
V ehic le 1309206 mg/km.t
Figure A9-4
NOx Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
Original test
A f ter repair
Repair ThresholdV ehic le 16951.07 g/km.t
Class A verage0.92 g/km.t
Figure A9-5
Average Smoke Opacity Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions MC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Class A verage10.5%
Repair ThresholdV ehic le 1752
16.1%
Figure A9-6
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 93
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
72
144
216
288
360
432
504
576
648
720
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Class A verage143 mg/km.t
Repair ThresholdV ehic le 1269113.2 mg/km.t
Figure A9-7
NOx Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0.00
0.47
0.94
1.41
1.88
2.35
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Repair Threshold
Vehic le 10281.06 g/km.t
Class Average0.94 g/km.t
Figure A9-8
Average Smoke Opacity Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Ra nk of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
8
17
25
33
42
50
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Class A verage
17%
Repair Threshold50% above average
25%
Figure A9-9
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 94
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
43
86
129
172
215
258
301
344
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original testA f ter repair
Repair ThresholdTest V ehic le 941
103.7 mg/km.t
Class A verage86 mg/km.t
Figure A9-10
NOx Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ra nk of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Class A verage0.99 g/km.t
Repair ThresholdV ehic le 9331.24 g/km.t
Figure A9-11
Average Smoke Opacity Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss A
vera
ge
0
5
11
16
22
27
32
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Original testA f ter repair
Repair ThresholdTest V ehic le 1244
17%
Class A verage11%
Figure A9-12
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 95
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
29
58
87
117
146
175
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original testA f ter repair
Repair Threshold
V ehic le 142871.8 mg/km.t
Class A verage58 mg/km.t
Figure A9-13
NOx Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0.00
0.54
1.07
1.61
2.14
2.68
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
Original testA f ter repair
Class A verage1.07 g/km.t
Repair Threshold50% A bove Class
A verage1.59 g/km.t
Figure A9-14
Average Smoke Opacity Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Original testA f ter repair
Class A verage12%
Repair Threshold50% A bove Class A verage
18%
Figure A9-15
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 96
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ra nk of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
14
28
42
57
71
85
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original tes tA f ter repairClass A verage
28 mg/km-t
Repair ThresholdTest Vehic le 972
38 mg/km-t
Figure A9-16
NOx Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0.00
0.16
0.32
0.49
0.65
0.81
0.97
1.14
1.30
1.46
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Class A verage0.81 g/km-t
Repair ThresholdV ehicle 16591.03 g/km-t
Figure A9-17
Average Smoke Opacity Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ra nk of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss A
vera
ge
0
2
4
6
9
11
13
15
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Original tes t
A f ter repair
Class A verage
4.3%
Repair Threshold
V ehic le 111511%
Figure A9-18
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 97
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
12
24
36
47
59
71
83
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original tes t
A f ter repair
Class A verage24 mg/km-t
Repair ThresholdV ehic le 123331 mg/km-t
Figure A9-19
NOx Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Ra nk of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0.00
0.15
0.30
0.44
0.59
0.74
0.89
1.04
1.18
1.33
1.48
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
Original testA f ter repair
Repair Threshold
V ehic le 13520.94 g/km-t
Class A verage
0.74 g/km-t
Figure A9-20
Average Smoke Opacity Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
4
8
11
15
19
23
27
30
34
38
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Class A verage7%
Repair Threshold50% A bove Class A verage
11%
Figure A9-21
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 98
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
6
11
17
23
28
34
39
45
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original testA f ter repair
Repair ThresholdVehic le 151115.4 mg/km-t
Class A verage11.13 mg/km-t
Figure A9-22
NOx R anked Mass N ormalised EmissionsNCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0.00
0.28
0.56
0.84
1.12
1.40
NO
x Em
issi
ons
(g/k
m.t)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Class A verage0.56 g/km-t
Repair Threshold50% above Class A verage
0.84 g/km-t
Figure A9-23
Average Smoke Opacity Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Ra nk of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss A
vera
ge
0
2
3
5
7
8
10
12
13
15
Ave
rage
Opa
city
(%)
Original tes tA f ter repair
Repair Threshold50% A bove Class A verage
5.0%
Class Average3.4%
Figure A9-24
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 99
Table A9-1Change In Emissions Due To Exceeding The Nox Repair Threshold
NOx RepairsVehicleClass Repair Threshold
NOxChangeg/km-t
PM Changeg/km-t
AverageOpacity
Change %
1&2 >1.07 g/km-t based on repairof test vehicle 1572 -0.57 +-68 -5
3 >1.07 g/km-t based on repairof test vehicle 1695 -0.18 -50 -8
4&5 >1.06 g/km-t based on repairof test vehicle 1023 -0.23 -26 -3
6 >1.24 g/km-t based on repairof test vehicle 933 -0.34 -84 -6
7&8 >1.59 g/km-t based on 50%above class average -0.33 -9 -1
9 >1.03 g/km-t based on repairof test vehicle 1659 -0.08 -8 -1
10&11 >0.94 g/km-t based on repairof test vehicle 1352 -0.13 -5 0
12 >0.84 g/km-t based on 50%above class average -0.15 -4 -2
Table A9-2Change In Emissions Due To Exceeding The Smoke Repair Threshold
Average Opacity RepairsVehicleClass Repair Threshold
NOxChangeg/km-t
PM Changeg/km-t
AverageOpacity
Change %
1&2 >16% based on repair of testvehicle 1469 +0.25 -193 -6
3 >16% based on repair of testvehicle 1752 -0.07 -38 -4
4&5 >25% based on 50% aboveclass average +0.16 -81 -8
6 >17% based on repair of testvehicle 1244 +0.05 -46 -5
7&8 >18% based on 50% aboveclass average +0.4 -25 -4
9 >11% based on repair of testvehicle 1115 +0.07 +9 -2
10&11 >11% based on 50% aboveclass average +0.24 -20 -5
12 >5% based on 50% above class -0.03 -10.6 -3
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 100
average
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsMC & NA Vehicles < 3.5t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original test
A f ter repair
Log. (A f ter repair)
Class A verage196 mg/km-t
Repair ThresholdVehic le 976206 mg/km-t
Figure A9-25
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Ra nk of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
72
144
216
288
360
432
504
576
648
720
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original test
A f ter repair
Log. (A f ter repair)
Class Average143 mg/km.t
Repair ThresholdV ehic le 1269113.2 mg/km.t
Figure A9-26
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNB Vehicles 3.5t - 12t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
43
86
129
172
215
258
301
344
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original test
A f ter repair
Log. (A f ter repair)
Repair ThresholdTes t V ehic le 941
103.7 mg/km.t
Class A verage86 mg/km.t
Figure A9-27
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 101
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank of Emissions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
29
58
87
117
146
175
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original test
A f ter repair
Log. (A f ter repair)
Repair Threshold
V ehic le 142871.8 mg/km.t
Class A verage58 mg/km.t
Figure A9-28
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsME & NC Vehicles 12t - 25t GVM (1996 to 2000)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
14
28
42
57
71
85
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original tes t
A f ter repair
Log. (A f ter repair)
Class A verage28.15 mg/km-t
Repair ThresholdTes t V ehic le 972
38 mg/km-t
Figure A9-29
PM Ranked Mass Normalised EmissionsNCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
12
24
36
47
59
71
83
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original tes t
A f ter repair
Log. (A f ter repair)
Class A verage23.7 mg/km-t
Repair ThresholdVehicle 123331 mg/km-t
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 102
Figure A9-30PM Ranked Mass Normalised Emissions
NCH Vehicles >25t GVM (1980 to 1995)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Rank of Em issions
% a
bove
Cla
ss a
vera
ge
0
12
24
36
47
59
71
83
PM
Em
issi
ons
(mg/
km.t)
Original tes t
A f ter repair
Log. (A f ter repair)
Class A verage23.7 mg/km-t
Repair ThresholdVehicle 123331 mg/km-t
Figure A9-31
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 103
Appendix 10
EMISSION HISTOGRAMS
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 104
All MC Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 >1.8
NOx (g/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.1
All NA Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 >1.8
NOx (g/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.2
All ME Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 >1.8
NOx (g/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.3
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 105
All NB Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 >1.8
NOx (g/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.4
All NC Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 >1.8
NOx (g/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.5
All NCH Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 >1.8
NOx (g/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.6
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 106
All MC Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 >225
PM (mg/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.7
All NA Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 >225
PM (mg/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.8
All ME Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 >225
PM (mg/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.9
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 107
All NB Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 >225
PM (mg/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.10
All NC Vehicles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 >225
PM (mg/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.11
All NCH Vehicles
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 >225
PM (mg/km.tonne)
% o
f Veh
icle
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
. % V
ehic
les
Figure A10.12
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 108
Appendix 11
VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONWORKSHEET
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 109
Table A11-1
Parsons AustraliaOwnership Details
Name
Contact Number
Type of operation Private use Owner/Driver Small Fleet (less than 10 vehicles) Medium Fleet (10 to 50 vehicles) Large Fleet (50 or more vehicles)
Ownership Status Private Government
Maintenance Regime Scheduled maintenance program Repair as required
Vehicle DetailsRego NumberVehicle ADR CategoryTare Weight kgGVM kgVehicle MakeVehicle Model*Compliance Plate Date / /Vehicle Type Prime mover Rigid truck
Ute Light commercial van Minibus Route service bus Other bus Passenger car Offroad vehicle
*Engine Make*Engine ModelOdometer Reading km (or km since last engine rebuild)*Engine displacement L*No of cylinders 4/ 6/ 8/ 12*Turbocharged Yes No*Intercooled Yes No*Fuel System Direct injection Indirect injection*Air Filter Condition Clean Moderate Needs Replacing* Tampering Yes No
Pre-test Safety ChecksTyres Suitable for testing? Yes NoDrive Line Safe for test Unsafe for testBrakes Safe for test Unsafe for testExhaust system Security - Secure Loose
Leakage - Not leaking LeakingOverall Safety Is the vehicle in satisfactory condition for testing
Yes No
General Comments
Vehicle – on time (min): Vehicle – off time (min):
TEST NO:DATE:
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 111
Appendix 12
RESULTS SHEET
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 113
Table A12-1
PARSONS Parsons Australia Pty Ltd 1 Short Street , Auburn, 2144, NSW Australia
Tel: (+61) 9648 1022 Fax: (+61) 9648 1055
DT 80 (Diesel Short Emissions Test)
Test Date: 1-Jan-01
Test No: 1000
Vehicle Registration No: ABC 123
NOx (g/s)
Particulate Matter (mg/s)
Average Opacity
(%)
Maximum Opacity
(%)DT80 Results 0.021 1.696 3.32 25.10
DT80 Short Test
0
20
40
60
80
100
Vehi
cle
Spee
d (k
m/h
r)
60 second idle
Full throttle acceleration
Full throttleacceleration
Full throttleacceleration
10 second idle
10 second idle
60 second Cruise
Deceleration Deceleration
Emission DescriptionThe vehicles exhaust gases are sampled and analysed during the DT80 Short Test todetermine the level of NOx, PM and Smoke Opacity. The lower the level of each of theseemissions the cleaner the vehicle is.
A brief explanation of each emission is provided below;
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)� Consists of Nitric Oxide (colourless gas) and Nitrogen Dioxide (red/brown gas)� Are created in the engine during the combustion process when the oxygen and nitrogen
in the intake air combine under high temperatures and pressures� Upon entering the atmosphere from the tailpipe they react with hydrocarbons in the
presence of sunlight to form photochemical smog (white haze)� They are known to adversely effect human health including respirative problems
Particulate Matter (PM)• Consists of a carbon (soot) core surrounded by various hydrocarbons compounds� Is created in the engine when there is incomplete combustion of the fuel� Once emitted from the vehicle they remain suspended in the atmosphere contributing to
air pollution in the form of a brown haze� The very small particles (smaller than the eye can see) can be inhaled causing respirative
problems and cancer.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 115
Appendix 13
FAULT DIAGNOSIS &MINOR REPAIR WORKSHEETS
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 117
Table A13-1
Fault Diagnosis & Minor Repair Sheet - Black/ White Smoke
Date: Cook's D&E Job No.Parsons Test No.
Vehicle DetailsRegistration Number: Odo (km):Vehicle Type:Engine Model:Emissions: NOx: PM/ Opacity:
Fault Diagnosis
Checklist
Condition 1-Best
5-Worst
Priority to fix 1-Most 5-Least
Estimated Parts Cost ($Retail)
Estimated Labour Cost
($Retail)
Estimated Time
(hours) Settings1 Engine start2 Exhaust Colour3 Air filter4 Exhaust system5 Fuel filter6 Fuel pump at full throttle7 Glow plug8 Pump to engine timing9 Fuel injectors
10 Check tappetsTotal
Comments
Minor Repair
ChecklistFixed
(yes/ no)Replaced
Items
Actual Parts Cost ($Retail)
Actual Labour Cost
($Retail)
Actual Time
(hours) Settings1 Engine start2 Exhaust Colour3 Air filter4 Exhaust system5 Fuel filter6 Fuel pump at full throttle7 Glow plug8 Pump to engine timing9 Fuel injectors
10 Check tappetsTotal
Comments
Further repairs required & estimated cost ($):
Vehicle condition before repair (1-best 5-worst)
Estimated repair cost ($):
Actual repair cost ($):
Items replaced
Vehicle condition after repair (1-best 5-worst)
Recommended repairs:
Vehicle tampering
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 118
Table A13-2
Fault Diagnosis & Minor Repair Sheet - No Smoke
Date: Cook's D&E Job No.Parsons Test No.
Vehicle DetailsRegistration Number: Odo (km):Vehicle Type:Engine Model:Emissions: NOx: PM/ Opacity:
Fault Diagnosis
Checklist
Condition 1-Best
5-Worst
Priority to fix 1-Most 5-Least
Estimated Parts Cost ($Retail)
Estimated Labour Cost
($Retail)
Estimated Time
(hours) Settings1 Engine start2 Exhaust Colour3 Fuel filter4 Fuel pump at full throttle5 Glow plug6 Pump to engine timing7 Fuel injectors8 Check tappets
TotalComments
Minor Repair
ChecklistFixed
(yes/ no)Replaced
Items
Actual Parts Cost ($Retail)
Actual Labour Cost
($Retail)
Actual Time
(hours) Settings1 Engine start2 Exhaust Colour3 Fuel filter4 Fuel pump at full throttle5 Glow plug6 Pump to engine timing7 Fuel injectors8 Check tappets
TotalComments
Further repairs required & estimated cost ($):
Vehicle condition before repair (1-best 5-worst)
Estimated repair cost ($):
Actual repair cost ($):
Items replaced
Vehicle condition after repair (1-best 5-worst)
Recommended repairs:
Vehicle tampering
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 119
Table A13-3
Fault Diagnosis & Minor Repair Sheet - Blue Smoke
Date: Cook's D&E Job No.Parsons Test No.
Vehicle DetailsRegistration Number: Odo (km):Vehicle Type:Engine Model:Emissions: NOx: PM/ Opacity:
Fault Diagnosis
Checklist
Condition 1-Best
5-Worst
Priority to fix 1-Most 5-Least
Estimated Parts Cost ($Retail)
Estimated Labour Cost
($Retail)
Estimated Time
(hours) Settings1 Engine start2 Exhaust colour3 Compression test
TotalComments
Minor Repair
ChecklistFixed
(yes/ no)Replaced
Items
Actual Parts Cost ($Retail)
Actual Labour Cost
($Retail)
Actual Time
(hours) Settings1 Engine start2 Exhaust colour3 Compression test
TotalComments
Further repairs required & estimated cost ($):
Vehicle condition before repair (1-best 5-worst)
Estimated repair cost ($):
Actual repair cost ($):
Items replaced
Vehicle condition after repair (1-best 5-worst)
Recommended repairs:
Vehicle tampering
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 121
Appendix 14
TESTING QUESTIONARE
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 123
Diesel Vehicle - Emissions Testing - Pilot Project
Thank you for taking part in this project.
The Government is considering a diesel vehicle emissions testing program as one way toreduce air pollution. We want to know whether testing diesel vehicles for pollutantemissions (and then repairing them if needed) is a good way to reduce air pollution.
Please take a few minutes to complete this questionnaire. Your answers are confidentialand will help us to design an effective testing program.
Your vehicle
1. Please indicate (�) each applicable vehicle categoryprivately owned passenger vehicle [ ]employee driver [ ]owner/driver subcontractor (1 truck) [ ]small fleet (2-5 trucks) [ ]medium fleet (6-20 trucks) [ ]large fleet (20-100 trucks) [ ]government fleet [ ]private fleet [ ]
other: …………………………………………
Voluntary testing
2. Would you be prepared to voluntarily bring your vehicle to a facility for anemissions test (and possible repair) if it helped to reduce the amount of pollutantsentering the atmosphere?
(please circle one) Yes No Unsure
3. Would you be prepared to voluntarily bring your vehicle to a facility for an emissionstest (and possible repair) if it could improve your fuel efficiency?
(please circle one) Yes No Unsure
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 124
Compulsory Testing
Convenience factors.
If you were required to bring your vehicle in for testing, which day would be mostconvenient and what time of the day?
4a. Which day(s): ………………………………………………………………………….
4b. What time(s): …………………………….……………………………………………
4c. What would be a reasonable distance or time you would travel to a testing centre?
Distance: ……………………… km or Time: ………………………………
4d. Are there any other things that need to be considered to make it easy for you to bringyour vehicle in for testing? (please list)
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
5. A test facility would need to be at a fixed site - what would be the most convenientlocation for you? (please ���� one)
Near a major arterial road or highways [ ]
Near diesel vehicle service facilities [ ]
Near diesel fuel outlet [ ]
In light industrial areas [ ]
Near a weighbridge station [ ]
At vehicle safety inspection facility [ ]
Other, please specify ………………………………………………………………
6. How often do you think such a vehicle emissions test should be carried out?(please ���� one)
Each year [ ]
Every 2 years [ ]
Every 3 years [ ]
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 125
Cost factors
7. What do you believe to be a reasonable cost for a compulsory vehicle emissions test?
(please ���� one) $30-$50 [ ] $50-$70 [ ] $70-$100 [ ]
8. How much would you be prepared to spend to repair your vehicle to improve its fuelconsumption?
$…………………. or $ ……………… for every litre per 100 km improvement
9. What cost, financial and/or time, have you incurred in participating in this pilotprogramme?
Cost $………………………… Time ……………………. minutes
Testing procedure
10. Is it important that you are informed of the purpose and details of the programmebefore your vehicle is tested?
(please circle one) Yes No
Why? ………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
11. Are you satisfied with the way you and your vehicle have been looked after by thestaff while you were here?
(please circle one) Yes No
(If no) Why not? ………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
12. Were the results from the inspection
a. well explained to you Yes No
b. useful for you? Yes No
Comments: …………………………………………………………………………
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 126
13. Are you satisfied with the time taken to undertake an emissions test of your vehicle?
(please circle one) Yes No
Comments: …………………………………………………………………………
14. Do you see any particular hurdles to introducing an ongoing diesel vehicleemissions testing programme?
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
15. Do you have any other comments or concerns about the vehicle emissions testprocedure?
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
16. If you had to show that your vehicle does not pollute, which of the followingoptions would you prefer, to show that your vehicle is clean?
(please ���� one or more)
Undergo regular vehicle emission testing [ ]
Submit audited records of regular vehicle maintenance [ ]
Retrofit vehicle with pollution control technology [ ]
Undergo training for fuel efficient driving [ ]
Other, please specify ……………………………………
(Optional) For survey verification purposes only, may we have your contact details
Name: ………………………………………… Telephone contact:…………….…...
Thank you for your time in completing this questionnaire. It really is appreciated.If you have any questions about the testing project, or this survey, you may contactMr Marc Thompson at the National Environment Protection Council ServiceCorporation on 08 8419 1202.
Please return your completed questionnaire to the testing facility staff member.
THANK YOU!
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 127
Appendix 15
TEST EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 129
TEST EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
A15.1 DYNAMOMETER
A15.1.1 Dynamometer IdentificationAll dynamometers shall have an identification plate permanently affixed showing, as aminimum, Dynamometer Manufacturer's Name, Production Date, Model Number, SerialNumber, Dynamometer Type, Maximum Axle Mass, Maximum kW Absorbed, RollerDiameter, Roller Width, Base Inertia Mass, Electrical Requirements (including Voltage andAmperage).
A15.1.2 Axle ConfigurationThe dynamometer shall be suitable for testing the following vehicle types:� two-wheel drive (front or rear axle)� dual axle drive vehicles that have a differential lock or equivalent device allowing power
to be transmitted through a single axle without damage to the vehicle.
A15.1.3 Axle Mass and Vehicle GVMThe dynamometer rollers, bearings and other structural components shall accommodatevehicles with a maximum individual axle mass (with the vehicle in the as-tested condition)of 7,000kg and a maximum Gross Vehicle Mass (GVM) or Gross Combination mass (GCM)of 45,000kg..The strength of the dynamometer's structural components shall take full account of anyadditional loads likely to be imposed by vehicles being driven over the rollers; braking,acceleration and restraint forces; or any other externally or internally applied loads arisingfrom reasonably foreseeable test lane operations.
A15.1.4 Track and Wheelbase
� The dynamometer shall have a useable track width of at least 2,500mm.� The dynamometer rollers shall have a minimum overall width of 2,600mm.� The space between split rollers shall not exceed 750mm.� Vehicle restraints and dynamometer structure adjacent to the rollers shall be
configured and located so as to minimise the potential for tyre damage. Tyredamage includes, but is not limited to, excessive scrubbing or cuts to tread orsidewall caused by contact with either the dynamometer or the restraints.
� The dynamometer and any ancillary equipment shall be designed to minimisethe potential for damage to any part of the vehicle during testing, ingress oregress under normal operation.
A15.1.5 Maximum Vehicle SpeedThe dynamometer shall be designed to accommodate vehicle speeds of up to 100km/h.
A15.1.6 Power AbsorptionThe dynamometer's power absorption system shall be capable of accurately applyingsteady-state and transient loads for vehicles with a test mass of up to 45,000kg GVM orGCM when driven on a range of user-defined drive cycles.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 130
A15.1.7 Power Absorption ModesFor vehicles with a test mass of 1,400kg to 30,000kg the dynamometer shall be capable ofapplying loads equivalent to the net sum of:(a) aerodynamic and tyre rolling resistance loads for speeds up to 100km/h;(b) positive acceleration rates up to 1.0 m/sec2
(c) deceleration rates up to the equivalent effect of the fixed mechanical inertia of thedynamometer's rotating components.
Note: The power absorber is not required to provide overrun inertia simulation by "motoring"during periods of deceleration. Deceleration inertia loads will be limited to those incidentallyapplied by the mechanical inertia of the dynamometer rotating components, including the fixedflywheel. Aerodynamic and tyre rolling resistance loads should, however, be partially or completelyremoved, as appropriate, during periods of deceleration in order to maximise the accuracy and effectof the mechanical inertia.
A15.1.8 Power Absorber Resolution & AccuracyThe power absorber control commands shall have a resolution equivalent to increments oftractive effort not exceeding 50N
A15.1.9 Base InertiaThe dynamometer shall be equipped with a mechanical flywheel(s) providing a total baseinertia mass for the dynamometer system of 1,400kg ±40kg (This may be increased to2,500kg if it is intended that the facility shall measure emissions only from medium andheavy duty vehicles with a GVM exceeding 3.5 tonnes). The actual inertia mass ±10kg shallbe marked on the dynamometer ID plate. The principal function of the mechanical inertiais to assist with system stability and to avoid excessive rotational speed loss duringgearchanges.
A15.1.10 Inertia SimulationThe dynamometer shall be capable of applying transient inertia loads, during accelerationphases only, equivalent to an acceleration rate between 0 to 1.0m/sec2 for a vehicle testmass range 3,500 to 30,000kg. This requirement is subject to the total dynamometer loadnot exceeding the power envelope of vehicles under test.For acceleration inertia simulation above the fixed base inertia, mechanical or electricalinertia simulation, or a combination of both, may be used.
A15.1.11 System ResponseThe torque response to a step change (increasing load) shall be at least 90% of the commandvalue within 300 milliseconds. The dynamometer shall be designed to shed residual loadduring step change decelerations as quickly as possible, preferably in less than 100milliseconds. The equipment manufacturer shall state the time required to reduce powerabsorber load from 50% of maximum torque down to 10% of maximum torque.
A15.1.12 RollersSize and Type:
� The dynamometer roller diameter shall be between 250 and 400 mm.
� The dynamometer shall be equipped with twin rollers, which may optionallybe laterally split..
� Laterally split rollers shall be electrically or mechanically coupled such thattheir speed is synchronised to within 0.2km/h.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 131
� The nominal centreline spacing between the front and rear rollers shall bedetermined by the following equation.
Roller Spacing = (620 + D) × Sin 31.52°, ωhere D = Roller Diameter (mm)
� The actual spacing shall be within +12 and -6 mm of the calculated value.
� The front and rear rollers shall be parallel to within 2 mm as measured by thecentreline differential across the maximum roller width.
� Other configurations may be considered by the Client.
Roller Speed MeasurementRoller speed measurement shall be accurate to within 0.2 km/h for speeds between 5km/hand 100km/h.
Roller CharacteristicsThe roller size, surface finish, and hardness shall be such that tyre slippage is minimized,that water removal is maximized, that the specified accuracy of distance and speedmeasurements are maintained, and that tyre wear and noise are minimized.
A15.1.13 Axle Pull-DownThe dynamometer shall have facilities for applying a vertical load of not less than 3.0tonneson the drive axle in order to minimise tyre slippage. The design and materials used shallminimise the potential for damage to hoses or any fittings located on or around the axle.Interlocked control switches for applying the load shall be positioned such that thepotential for injury to operators is also minimised.
A15.1.14 Other RequirementsVehicle RestraintThe dynamometer system shall be equipped with a means or device for restraining vehiclesunder test. Its primary function shall be to limit the vehicle’s side-to-side movement on thedynamometer rollers. The restraint system shall be designed to minimise unintendedvertical and horizontal force on the drive wheels.The restraint system shall allow unobstructed vehicle ingress and egress and shall becapable of safely restraining the vehicle under all reasonable operating conditions.
Level Operation SurfaceVehicles shall be approximately level (not to exceed ±5°) while being tested on thedynamometer.
A15.1.15 Lift Platform and Roller Brakes
� A lift platform situated between the rollers shall be installed
� A roller brake which securely locks the rollers shall be installed.
� When the lift platform is raised and the roller brake is actuated, the vehicleshall enter and leave the dynamometer without causing roller spin.
� Operation of the roller brake shall be independent of the lift platform.
� The lift platform shall be capable of being activated by a driver seated in thevehicle.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 132
� The lift platform shall be operable only when the rollers are not rotating. Aroller speed interlock system shall prevent raising of the lift platform and non-emergency engagement of the roller brakes while the roller(s) are rotating
A15.1.16 Driver’s AidThe dynamometer system shall be equipped with a driver’s aid that shall be clearly visibleto the driver during the loaded-mode test. The aid shall continuously display the requiredspeed, the number of seconds into the test mode, driver’s actual speed/time performance (adisplay showing deviation between set-point and actual drive trace), and necessaryprompts and alerts. The driver’s aid shall also be capable of displaying test and equipmentstatus and other messages as required.Display meters shall be installed to provide simultaneous speed, force and power readingsfor both the vehicle driver and the operator console, viz:• Roller speed (km/h)• Tractive force (N)• Tractive power (kW)
A15.1.17 Driver’s Remote ControlEach dynamometer system shall be equipped with a means of allowing the driver to startthe test, perform an emergency stop, and perform other necessary and convenient functionsrelated to the test, while seated at the driving position inside the vehicle.
A15.1.18 Engine Cooling FanA fan shall be provided for cooling the engine of the vehicle under test. It shall be mobileor positionable in front of the vehicle, and adjustable in such a manner that the catalyst isnot cooled abnormally. The fan shall have a maximum outer diameter of 1,000mm. Thefan must provide at least 10,000m3/h or at least 5 m/s air velocity averaged over the crosssection of the fan, whichever is greater. The fan shall have an on/off switch. In addition,an optional remote control shall be offered which allows the technician to activate the fanfrom the driver's seat. The remote control may use software and/or hardware to activatethe fan.
A15.1.19 Safety ProvisionsThe dynamometer shall provide a means of facilitating the removal of the vehicle in case ofsystem failure or power outage.
A15.2 DYNAMOMETER CONTROL SYSTEM
15.2.1 Drive Cycles.The dynamometer control system shall be supplied with the capability to run an unlimitednumber of user-defined driving cycles, which shall be readily loaded and stored by thesystem manager, through password access.The dynamometer control software shall be designed with a simple and intuitive "userfriendly" interface for setting up load, speed, time, drivers aid and tolerance bandparameters to define alternative test protocols. Proposals should provide graphicalexamples of the operation of the user interface, including screen captures if possible.The dynamometer control software shall be capable of loading an Excel spreadsheet orcomma delimited file containing a speed-time profile (in one second increments) andtranslating this data into a graphical drive trace on the Driver's Aid monitor as well ascontinuously generating, monitoring and correcting dynamometer load commands.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 133
Tolerance bands or "Tramlines" shall clearly show on the Driver's Aid screen the allowablespeed tolerances relative to the nominal drive trace. The error bands (positive andnegative) shall be capable of being inputted, together with the nominal speed-time tracedata, in any of the following forms:
� constant value (km/h)� constant percentage of nominal drive trace speed� mathematical algorithm based on drive trace speed� directly inputted numerical values� any combination of the aboveThe system shall be capable of determining, and recording the distance travelled at anypoint in the test cycle, elapsed time in test cycle, and all errors in the performance of thedriver in following the required drive cycle trace.
A15.2.2 Load Calculations and UpdateThe retardation load applied to the vehicle under test will be continuously monitored andadjusted to provide the correct road load for the type, mass and the speed of the vehicleunder test, when any valid drive trace is driven (see loading and inertia error sections above).The equipment manufacturer shall describe the proposed dynamometer load controlalgorithms and how they take account of:∗ rolling resistance∗ aerodynamic drag (including drag coefficient and vehicle frontal area)∗ air density,and what provisions are made to alter these values.Load commands shall be updated at least ten times per second.Actual dynamometer load and speed shall be recorded in the vehicle test file on the sametime base as the emission measurements (at least once every second).The software shall also provide facilities for the emissions measuring system operator toload vehicle-specific data, including registration number, VIN and other similar data (to bedefined by the Client). Input systems shall be designed to minimise entry time and thepotential for input errors.
A15.3 EXHAUST SAMPLE HANDLING AND PRE-CONDITIONING
A15.3.1 GeneralThe emissions measuring system shall include exhaust sample handling arrangements thatallow accurate measurements to be made of exhaust emissions on a g/km basis (plussmoke opacity of the raw exhaust), for any drive cycle.
The system shall be designed to ensure durable, leak free operation and be easilymaintained.Materials that are in contact with the gases sampled shall not contaminate or change thecharacter of the gases to be analysed.The sample temperature at which particulate matter is be measured must be below 51.7Cand the dew point of the sample shall be at least 10oC less than the temperature of thesample and any surfaces in contact with the sample.The sampling system shall be designed to withstand typical vehicle exhaust temperatureswhen the range of vehicles are driven through the DT80 test cycle.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 134
A15.3.2 Total Mass Flow
CVS System (Optional)If a constant volume sampling (CVS) system is employed, the equipment manufacturershall provide documentary evidence that the total mass flow of exhaust (including thediluent stream) at the point of emission sample take-off is controlled so as to maintain theequipment's nominated volumetric flow rate to within an accuracy of ±3.0% (normalised tostandard temperature and pressure).
Non-CVS Systems (Optional)If a sample handling system other than a CVS is employed, validated methods shall beutilised to convert gaseous and particulate sample instrument readings to determinationsof total exhaust mass emission rates of each pollutant expressed in g/km, g/kWh, g/kgfuel used, or as required by the client. Total exhaust mass flow determinations performedunder this option shall not introduce additional measurement errors greater than 3%.Exhaust flow determinations shall be logged on the same time base as the emissionmeasurements for the duration of the complete drive cycle.
Ambient Condition RecordingHumidityThe humidity measuring device shall have the following minimum characteristics:
� Range: 5% - 95% Relative Humidity� Sensor Accuracy: ±3% of full scale or better� Operating Temperature Range: 2oC- 43oCThe relative humidity reading shall be recorded in the Relative Humidity field of the testrecord.Ambient Temperature MeasurementAmbient temperature shall be measured continuously and shall be recorded in the AmbientTemperature field of the test record. The temperature measuring device shall have thefollowing minimum characteristics:
� Range: 0 - 60oC� Accuracy:±1.7oC
Barometric PressureBarometric pressure shall be measured continuously and shall be recorded in the BarometricPressure field of the test record. The barometric measuring device shall have the followingminimum characteristics:
� Range: 60 - 81 mm. Hg absolute� Accuracy:± 3% of point or better� Operating Temperature Range: 2oC - 43oC
Water Removal and Sample FiltrationThe particulate filter shall be capable of trapping 97% of all particulates and aerosols 5microns or larger from entering the gaseous analysers. Note: The particulate samplingelements of the system shall have no particulate filtration upstream of the particulate measuring sub-system.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 135
The filter element(s) in the gaseous sampling stream shall not absorb or adsorbhydrocarbons.The water trap shall be sized to remove exhaust sample water from vehicles fuelled withdiesel, diesohol, petrol, petrohol, propane/butane (LPG), compressed natural gas (CNG),as well as a combination of fuels such as diesel/CNG. The filter element, bowl and housingshall be inert to these fuels as well as to the exhaust gases from vehicles burning these fuels.Condensed water shall be continuously drained from the water trap's bowl. Sufficientwater shall be trapped, regardless of fuel, to prevent condensation in the sample system orin the optical bench's sample cell.
A15.4 GASEOUS EMISSIONS MEASUREMENTThis section defines the requirements for the equipment needed to determine theconcentrations of the exhaust gases of interest during the tests. It covers theanalysers/sensors, calibration and the sample handling system.
A15.4.1 GeneralThe analyser shall be compatible with all types of Diesel, Petrol and alternative fuelautomotive service operating environments. The necessary hardware and softwareconnectivity details shall be sufficient to allow a seamless interface between the exhaustmeasuring system and the dynamometer control system that meets all of the requirementsof the specification. The system must generate a result, (corrected for atmosphericconditions) in “real time” on a mass flow basis and report, by printout the results in units ofgrams/km-tonne and % opacity.
A15.4.2 Tamper ResistanceExcept for calibration and maintenance, the emission analyser and the sampling systemshall also be made tamper-resistant.System operators shall be prevented from creating or changing any test results, programsor data files contained in the emissions measuring system except as specifically providedfor elsewhere in this specification.Access to the system software and/or hardware shall be controlled via a hierarchy ofpasswords.
A15.4.3 Measured EmissionsGases and other emissions to be measured are:
� total hydrocarbons (THC), parts per million as hexane (ppmh);
� methane (CH4) ppm;
� carbon monoxide (CO), percent;
� carbon dioxide (CO2), percent;
� oxygen (O2), percent;
� nitric oxide (NO), ppm;
� particulate matter less than 2.5 micron nominal diameter(PM2.5), mg,
� smoke opacity, %
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 136
� Oxides of nitrogen are to be calculated from the measured NO concentrationusing sample condition corrections and USEPA specified formulae.
A15.4.4 Emissions AnalyserSRange and AccuracyThe range and accuracy of emission analysers that are used to sample raw gas shall beconsistent with the values in the table below. Where the emissions measuring systemutilises dilution air, the range and accuracy of the analysers shall be selected such that thediluted flow is measured to the same overall degree of accuracy. Equipment manufacturersshall provide calculations and/or test data to verify that this condition is met.
Range and AccuracyGas Range Accuracy,
% of pointAccuracy,absolute
Range Accuracy,% of point
Accuracyabsolute
HC 0-2000ppm
h
±3% 4ppmh 2001-5000ppmh
5001-9999ppmh
±5%±10%
N/AN/A
CO 0-10.00% ±3% 0.02%CO 10.01-14.00% ±5% N/ACO2 0-16% ±3% 0.3%CO2 16.1-18% ±5% N/ANO 0-
4000ppm±4% 35ppm 4001-
5000ppm±8% N/A
O2 0-25% ±5% 0.1%O2 -CH4
Opacity**
0-100% N/A ±2%
PM2.5 0.001~100mg/m3
** Opacity to be measured in raw gas stream, regardless of dilution for other emissions.
Analyser/Sensor Response TimesAnalyser/sensor response times are defined as follows:Rise time: When a gas is introduced to a sensor’s sample cell inlet or inlet port (t0), the timerequired by the sensor’s output to rise from first indication of response to the input gas to agiven percentage of the final stable reading of a gas’s concentration. Two rise times arespecified:T90: The time required to reach 90% of the final gas concentration reading from firstindication of response to the input gas.T95: The time required to reach 95% of the final gas concentration reading from firstindication of response to the input gas.Fall Time: When a gas is removed from a sensor’s sample cell inlet or inlet port (tS), thetime required by the sensor’s output to fall from first indication of withdrawal of the gas toa given percentage of the final stable reading of a gas’s concentration. Two fall times arespecified:T10: The time required to fall to 10% of the stable gas concentration reading from firstindication of withdrawal of the gas.T5: The time required to fall to 5% of the stable gas concentration reading from firstindication of withdrawal of the gas.
RequirementsMaximum Response Time in Seconds For Each Channel
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 137
HC, CO,CO2
NO CH4 Opacity PM
T90 3.5 4.5 3.5 2.0 3.5
T95 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5
T10 3.7 4.7 3.7 3.7
T5 4.7 5.7 4.7 4.7
A15.5 OPACITYThe opacity meter used shall be a partial-flow device, meeting the performancerequirements of ISO 11614, and shall interface seamlessly with the analyser software via anRS232C or Universal serial Bus (USB) port. Adjustments such as electronic signal filteringshall be incorporated so as to correlate with other opacity-measuring devices andstandards. Other methods of measuring opacity may be submitted for consideration. Thedevices shall be calibrated by a method and at a frequency approved by Client.
A15.6 ANALYSER OUTPUTSAnalysers are required to provide a continuous electrical output signal to allow continuousrecording and calculating of the exhaust emissions.
A15.7 TESTING THROUGHPUT CAPABILITYThe emissions analyser shall be designed so that it is capable of performing at least 10 testsper hour for eight consecutive hours without experiencing excessive hangup or otherdeleterious effects.
A15.8 PARTICULATE EMISSIONS MEASUREMENTThe emissions measuring system shall be capable of measuring fine particulate emissions,using a sample stream collected on the same time-base as measurements of other emissionsand system parameters.
A15.8.1 Particulate sizeThe particulate measuring sub-system shall be capable of continuously measuring emissionrates of fine particulate matter with a nominal diameter of less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5).The equipment manufacturer shall also indicate whether the system is capable ofmeasuring other particulate size ranges (ie TSP, PM10, PM1.0).
A15.8.3 Measurement RangeThe particulate measuring sub-system shall be capable of measuring exhaust particulateemission concentrations (normalised to raw exhaust conditions if dilution is employed)over a range of at least 0.01 to 200 mg/m3 (ie, if the exhaust sample is diluted at a nominalratio of 4:1, then the actual measuring range of the system shall be 0.002 to 40 mg/m3.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 138
A15.8.4 Measurement AccuracyThe measurement accuracy of the system shall be validated by back-to back testing with astandard gravimetric filter method (eg. using equipment and sample preconditioningprocedures meeting the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for light duty vehicles, part86.110-94). For this testing, both measuring systems shall measure from the same samplestream simultaneously and over the same period of time. The equipment manufacturershall provide documentary evidence that the system proposed has an overall (R2)correlation of at least 0.85 with the reference filter .
A15.9 SAMPLE PRECONDITIONINGThe particulates sample shall have a temperature not exceeding 51.70C at the point ofmeasurement. The sample shall have a dew point at least 50C below the temperature of thesample or any surfaces with which the sample comes into contact that could causeprecipitation of particulate matter from the sample. If the sample is diluted prior tomeasurement, the dilution gas shall be zero or filtered air or inert gas that will notintroduce measurement errors.
A15.9.1 Calibration & MaintenanceThe particulate measuring sub-system shall be suitable for use in a workshop environmentand for transportation without special handling procedures. Any components requiringroutine replacement, cleaning or adjustment shall be readily accessible. All routinemaintenance, cleaning and consumable replacements shall be capable of being performedby a trained, semi-skilled operator.
A15.10 SYSTEM INTEGRATION, DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE
A15.10.1 System IntegrationThe dynamometer, dynamometer control systems, sample handling, analysers andancillary systems shall operate as a single, integrated system. If more than one controlcomputer or software package are employed, they shall be linked such that lane operationspersonnel have a single, simple interface.All computer systems shall, unless specifically approved by the Client, be IBM PC-compatible and shall have standard input and output interfaces for operator inputs or forcommunicating with external devices. Unless otherwise approved, all software shall rununder MS-DOS or Microsoft Windows operating systems.
A15.10.2 System Inputs
Operator LevelOperator inputs shall be limited to:
� vehicle license plate
� VIN
� make and model
� plated tare mass and GVM, if applicable
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 139
� comments on test report (ie reasons for rejection on safety grounds, etc).To the greatest extent possible, automated or semi-automated responses should beprovided, via touch screens, menu choices, bar-coding and the like.
System Manager LevelUsing a hierarchical password structure, system managers and technical specialists shallhave the capability to modify, update or replace
� calibration settings
� test cycle profiles and error bands
� dynamometer road load algorithms
� lock-out values
� communication protocols and auto-dial numbers, and similar
A15.10.3 Input/Output File FormatsAll test data relating to vehicle identification, test conditions, test results and any operatorcomments shall be stored and exported in Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Access, or commadelimited format, to a structure defined by and agreed with the Client.Calibration data shall be stored in the emissions measuring system using date and time-stamped files of a similar structure to those used for test results.
A15.10.4 Local Data Storage and BackupAll test and calibration data shall be stored locally on the emission measuring system’scomputer and shall be mirrored on a second hard disk. Automatic daily backups shall beperformed and stored off-site in a secure, fire protected environment. Backups may usetape, CD-ROM or other reliable removable media for data storage. Provision shall also bemade for archiving data beyond a pre-determined date.
A15.10.5 CommunicationsExternal communications shall be via standard modem links and protocols (land-line orwireless). The communications system shall also be capable of operating via a local areanetwork (LAN) or wide area network (WAN).
A15.11 ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLY, UTILITIES, SAFETY
A15.11.1 Electric PowerThe test equipment shall operate with the following electrical supply voltages:
� 240 Volt (±10%) 50Hz and/or
� 415 Volt (±10%) 50Hz (three phase, four wire)Installation shall conform to the latest editions of the relevant Australian Standards. Allpower points shall be protected by residual current devices (30 mA protected)The controls at the electronic and display section shall include, as a minimum:
� Emergency stop switch� Operator interface and displays.Two switches shall be accessible from the drivers seat
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 140
� Lift platform switch� Roller brake switchIf these switches are operable from control console a safety interlock or alert to the drivershall be installed.The minimum requirements for controls and instrumentation at the power section are asfollows
� Emergency stop switch (palm push – mechanical release.� Main power switch (lockable in the off position)� Running-time (hour) meter� Fault protection circuit(s)
A15.11.2 SAFETY DEVICES.All safety devices for protection of the equipment shall be as independent of theprocessor as practical.Warning lights on the dynamometer indicating the status of the lift platform and rollerbrakes shall be visible to the driver of the vehicle.The dynamometer shall have the following personnel safety devices:∗ A safety barrier to prevent personal contact with the rollers during vehicle testing and
during dynamometer roller operation without a vehicle. If a twin roller cradle consistsof four roller cylinders, the area between the rollers/cylinders shall be covered toprovide a surface that facilitates personal safety and allows vehicle movement.
∗ Emergency stop switches in the dynamometer test cell, accessible to the driver, and atthe electronic and display cabinet, and also at the power cabinet if it is separate. Theemergency stop function shall cause shutdown (braking) of the dynamometer usingthe electric motor absorber working at the maximum current limits. In the event theelectric motor-absorber is unable to decelerate the rollers to zero, the roller brake maybe used.
All emergency stop switches shall be of the palm operated – mechanical release type.An emergency warning function shall be triggered automatically by the processor whenany of the following limits are detected:
� Dynamometer’s maximum speed (fixed speed).� Vehicle’s maximum speed (value input during calibration).These conditions do not warrant an immediate shutdown of the dynamometer system but rather awarning of a condition that requires immediate attention.An emergency shutdown function shall be triggered automatically by the processor whenany of the following are exceeded:
� Excessive armature or field current of the power absorber� Overheating of the power absorber.� Malfunction of the power transfer system� Power failure� Other conditions needed to protect the dynamometer or personnel.An indicator of the activation of the emergency stop shutdown or warning functions shallbe installed in a position where it is visible to from the driver’s seat and from the operator’sconsole. The indicator(s) shall be operational at all times, including during power failures.
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 141
A15.12 LANE NETWORKING AND DATA COMMUNICATIONSAll test equipment shall have the capability to automatically control and monitor theinspection/testing procedures to ensure compliance with test protocols and to record testresults without human intervention.Using standard commercial networking protocols and hardware, all equipment in atest/inspection lane shall be linked such that the results of each stage of the test/inspectionprocess is automatically recorded and consolidated into a single computer record uniquelyassigned to each vehicle passing through the lane. Any observations or remarks enteredinto the computer system by lane inspectors shall also be merged into the test/inspectionrecord for each vehicle.The computer system shall be capable of automatically applying pass/fail criteria to theresults of each test/inspection element and, based on these criteria, automaticallydetermine an overall pass/fail result. Test records shall be available both as an electronicand printed record, incorporating the numerical results of each test, plus any observationsand remarks and outcomes of visual inspections. The test record shall include an overallpass/fail result that clearly identifies the reason(s) for a failure decision.Using either real-time or agreed batch transmission methods, all data in the lane shall betransmitted to a local data storage computer within the test facility and thence to programheadquarters.
A15.13 BUILDING AND LAND REQUIREMENTS
A15.13.1 BuildingAlthough construction materials and architectural styles will vary, it is important that somekey performance requirements are met if utilisation efficiency and safety requirements areto me achieved.For a high-volume vehicle test lane, it is important to balance the work performed at eachstage of the process, so that vehicles do not spend an inordinately long time at one position,while other vehicles stand idle because the work in that section is completed quickly.Ideally (though not always possible to achieve), the tasks performed at each positionshould take roughly the same time to complete.The total throughput of each test lane is determined by the longest time spent at a singleposition in the lane. It therefore follows that a facility with a larger number of short stageswill deliver a higher throughput than one with a small number of stages, where the vehiclespends a longer time at each stage. These factors are illustrated in the following table
Time Spent at:Number ofPositions in
Lane
Pos 1(min)
Pos 2(min)
Pos 3(min)
Total Timein Lane(min)
LaneThroughp
ut(veh/hr)
1 15 - - 15 4
2 7 8 - 15 7.5
3 4 8 3 15 7.5
3 5 5 5 15 12
In this example, a balanced lane with 3 positions can process three times as many vehiclesas a lane with only one position. Note, however, that a lane that has 3 positions but one of
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 142
which is out of balance (example 3), has only the same through put as a balanced 2 positionlane. In each example, every vehicle spends the same total time in the lane.In the end, decisions on layout and number of lanes will depend on the size and shape ofavailable land, together with the characteristics of any existing buildings which may beadapted for this application.
A15.13.2 Key Building DimensionsRegardless of the detail layout of the building, the following dimensions should be treatedas practical minima for a facility capable of testing any road vehicle (excluding someindividually constructed or "permit-only" vehicles).Lane length (per position) 20mLane width 5.0mClearance Height 5.5mAdditional ceiling height may be required to accommodate fume extraction fans/ductingand acoustic shielding.These dimensions allow safe pedestrian movement alongside or between vehicles in thefacility (all reasonable steps should also be taken to guard or fence machinery and alert lanepersonnel to any vehicle movements).Separate enclosed space is also required for
� Customer waiting areas
� Customer transactions
� Administrative office
� Computer room
� Store rooms (calibration gases, maintenance equipment, general supplies)
� Toilets and locker rooms.Depending on the building location and size of surrounding land, sufficient acousticenclosure or shielding must be provided to meet OH&S and EPA noise regulations.
A15.13.3 Land RequirementsTo satisfy local government requirements and avoid on-site congestion, vehicle emission(and safety) testing facilities tend to have a fairly low plot ratio (ie, the ratio betweenbuilding area and land area).The most significant non-building factors are:
� Queuing space
� Entry and departure alignment
� Parking (customer and personnel)
� Boundary clearance and set-backs
� LandscapingFrom a performance standpoint, the following conditions should be satisfied:
� Queuing space for at least 45 minutes facility throughput (ie, 4 lanes eachoperating at a maximum throughput of 6 vehicles/hour = queuing space for18 vehicles)
Diesel Vehicle Emissions – In-Service Emissions Testing – Pilot Study, Fault Identification and Effect of Maintenance - Appendices
Page 143
� 15m (min) aligned path for entry to and departure from the lane
� Short-term parking spaces for 25% of max throughput for 20 minutes each(ie, for a 24 vehicle/hr max throughput, provide a minimum of 8 truck parkingspaces)
� Long-term parking for employees, unless alternative parking is available(including "bulge" provisions for shift changes, if applicable).
The above factors will then determine the basic area needed, around which any other localauthority requirements for set-backs, clearances and landscaping will need to be added,consistent with the shape and size of the land parcel used for the facility.