proposal to study the effects of woody and herbaceous

1
Objectives of Proposed Research Compare the effects of woody and her- baceous vegetation on • Stream hydraulics at bankfull discharge • Soil moisture and temperature regimes • Soil strength Collapse of near vertical bank after high flows have scoured the toe of the bank. Acknowledgments: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Science to Achieve Results Program Grant No. 91534101 Proposal to Study the Effects of Woody and Herbaceous Vegetation on Streambank Erosion Tess Wynn, Virginia Tech Justification for Study Streambank erosion can be a large source of sediment, as much as 80% of the total watershed sediment yield [1, 2]. Sediment is the primary pollutant of rivers [3, 4] Streambank erosion also causes • Increased flooding • Increased need for dredging • Undermining of in-stream structures • Degradation of reservoirs References [1] Trimble, S. W., “Contribution of Stream Channel Ero- sion to Sediment Yield from an Urbanizing Watershed,” Science, vol. 278 (1997), pp.1442-1444. [2] Simon, A., A. Curini, S. Darby, and E. J. Langendoen, “Streambank Mechanics and the Role of Bank and Near-Bank Processes in Incised Channels,” in Incised River Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering and Management, ed. by Darby, S. E., and A. Simon (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1999) pp. 123-152. [3] US EPA. National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress (USEPA: Washington, DC.: US EPA, 1990). [4] US EPA, Managing Nonpoint Source Pollution: Fi- nal Report to Congress on Section 319 of the Clean Water Act (Washington, D.C.: US EPA, 1990). [5] Trimble, S. W., “Stream Channel Erosion and Change Resulting from Riparian Forests,” Geology, vol. 25, no. 5 (1997), pp. 467-469. [6] Clifton, C., “Effects of Vegetation and Land Use on Channel Morphology,” in Practical Approaches to Ri- parian Resource Management: An Educational Work- shop, ed. by Gresswell, R. E., B. A. Barton, and J. L. Kershner ( Billings, Montana: USDI/BLM, May 8-11, 1989), pp. 121-129. Methods (1) Perform monitoring at two field loca- tions on a stream near Blacksburg, Vir- ginia. Locations will have sections with herbaceous and wooded riparian buffers. (2) Continuously monitor the following: Air temperature and precipitation Stream stage Soil moisture and temperature (3) Sample the following: Suspended sediment (weekly) Bank material (texture, friction angle, root area ratios) (4) During two storms with 1-2 year re- turn periods, measure the following: Stream velocity and discharge Sediment concentration Bedload Two adjacent stable reaches of Spruce Run, an alluvial stream near Newport, Virginia: (top) riparian buffer of meadow grass; (bottom) buffer dominated by trees and shrubs. Background: Grass Versus Trees Research has shown that streams are significantly narrower with grass buffers than with forested buffers [5, 6]. The pho- tos below support this finding.

Upload: others

Post on 24-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proposal to Study the Effects of Woody and Herbaceous

Objectives of Proposed ResearchCompare the effects of woody and her-baceous vegetation on• Stream hydraulics at bankfull discharge• Soil moisture and temperature regimes• Soil strength

Collapse of near vertical bank after high flows havescoured the toe of the bank.

Acknowledgments:U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyOffice of Research and DevelopmentScience to Achieve Results ProgramGrant No. 91534101

Proposal to Study the Effects of Woody and Herbaceous Vegetation on Streambank ErosionTess Wynn, Virginia Tech

Justification for StudyStreambank erosion can be a large

source of sediment, as much as 80% ofthe total watershed sediment yield [1, 2].

Sediment is the primary pollutant ofrivers [3, 4]

Streambank erosion also causes• Increased flooding• Increased need for dredging• Undermining of in-stream structures• Degradation of reservoirs

References[1] Trimble, S. W., “Contribution of Stream Channel Ero-sion to Sediment Yield from an Urbanizing Watershed,”Science, vol. 278 (1997), pp.1442-1444.[2] Simon, A., A. Curini, S. Darby, and E. J. Langendoen,“Streambank Mechanics and the Role of Bank andNear-Bank Processes in Incised Channels,” in IncisedRiver Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering andManagement, ed. by Darby, S. E., and A. Simon(Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1999) pp. 123-152.[3] US EPA. National Water Quality Inventory: Reportto Congress (USEPA: Washington, DC.: US EPA, 1990).[4] US EPA, Managing Nonpoint Source Pollution: Fi-nal Report to Congress on Section 319 of the CleanWater Act (Washington, D.C.: US EPA, 1990).[5] Trimble, S. W., “Stream Channel Erosion andChange Resulting from Riparian Forests,” Geology,vol. 25, no. 5 (1997), pp. 467-469.[6] Clifton, C., “Effects of Vegetation and Land Use onChannel Morphology,” in Practical Approaches to Ri-parian Resource Management: An Educational Work-shop, ed. by Gresswell, R. E., B. A. Barton, and J. L.Kershner ( Billings, Montana: USDI/BLM, May 8-11,1989), pp. 121-129.

Methods(1) Perform monitoring at two field loca-tions on a stream near Blacksburg, Vir-ginia. Locations will have sections withherbaceous and wooded riparian buffers.(2) Continuously monitor the following:• Air temperature and precipitation• Stream stage• Soil moisture and temperature(3) Sample the following:• Suspended sediment (weekly)• Bank material (texture, friction angle,

root area ratios)(4) During two storms with 1-2 year re-

turn periods, measure the following:• Stream velocity and discharge• Sediment concentration• Bedload

Two adjacent stable reaches of Spruce Run, an alluvialstream near Newport, Virginia: (top) riparian buffer ofmeadow grass; (bottom) buffer dominated by trees andshrubs.

Background: Grass Versus TreesResearch has shown that streams aresignificantly narrower with grass buffersthan with forested buffers [5, 6]. The pho-tos below support this finding.