proposal for archuleta county facility ......proposal for archuleta county facility programming...

PROPOSAL FOR ARCHULETA COUNTY FACILITY PROGRAMMING STUDY

July 31, 2015

ANDERSON HALLAS ARCHITECTS, PCC R E AT I N G S PAC E S A N D P L AC E S T H AT D E L I G H T

715 Fourteenth Street, Golden, CO 80401303.278.4378 (v), 303.278.0521 (f)

Nan Anderson, FAIA, LEED AP, [email protected]

Proposal for Archuleta County Facility Programming Study page B

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Firm/Team Overview .........................................................................................1-4

Relevant Experience ......................................................................................5-13

Project Approach .......................................................................................... 14-15

Proposed Schedule .............................................................................................16

Fee Proposal ....................................................................................................17-21

An de r s on H a l l a s Ar c h i t e c t s, p c

715 Fourteenth StreetGolden, Colorado 80401

(o) 303.278.4378 (f ) 303.278.0521

www.andarch.com

July 31, 2015

Bentley HendersonCounty AdministratorArchuleta County398 Lewis StreetPagosa Springs, CO 81147

RE: Proposal for Facility Programming Study

Dear Mr. Henderson:We’re keenly aware of the space challenges Archuleta County experiences in its downtown location, the limitations of your aging buildings and the current momentum for addressing facility needs. Space needs assessments and programming for County Courts and Jail facilities involves analyzing diverse programs, some of which come with inherent challenges and intense public interest. Anderson Hallas has built its reputation for excellence in public sector work through similar community and civic projects throughout the Rocky Mountain Region, and beyond. We offer the following qualifications:• Programming and space planning for millions of square feet of office, public, operations and court-related services• Master planning for governmental entities from Local to County to State and Federal clients• Recently completed and present work on projects of very similar scale and complexity:

1. Huerfano County — Currently testing space needs on four Judicial Center facility concepts, including initial cost estimates.

2. Grand County – programming, site and building assessment and master planning for the County’s administrative and judicial services; design of the new, 25,000 sf Judicial Center 3. Montrose Civic Complex – programming, master planning and rehabilitation of the City’s three, main administration buildings in the City’s core4. CDOT – programming, consolidating, renovating or expanding over 500,000 s.f. of office and maintenance facilities in several regional headquarters around the state5. Facilitation of scores of public meetings involving stakeholders, decision-making, private interests and governmental agencies at all levels6. Included on our team is Ricci Greene Associates - the country’s leading designer of correctional facilities; they’ll focus on evaluating the jail’s projections and needs in the context of current and future “best practices”

Located in Golden, Anderson Hallas has successfully serviced clients throughout Colorado, from Bayfield, Ignacio and Silverton to Weld County. You’ll find ours to be a collaborative team to work with, dedicated to making this project a sustainable, effective example of great civic facility design. We look forward to further discussing your ideas for the project.

Sincerely,

Nan Anderson, FAIA, LEED APPrincipal, Anderson Hallas Architects, PC

Proposal for Archuleta County Facility Programming Study page 1

ANDERSON HALLAS ARCHITECTS, PC

Anderson Hallas’s staff of 15 includes 8 architects, 4 technical staff and 3 marketing/admin staff. Colorado architectural licenses are held by all architects, and 7 of our staff are LEED accredited.

Services Full-service architectural planning and design is provided for new construction and preservation projects for public and private clients throughout Colorado and the West. Our practice is grounded in developing productive relationships with communities that are engaged in and committed to building better places to live and work.

Credentials• AIA Denver 2013 Firm of the Year• AIA Colorado 2011 Firm of the Year• US Green Building Council (USGBC) Member since 2007• Colorado Counties Inc., Supporters since 2004• Colorado Municipal League, Member since 2004• 11 staff are American Institute of Architects (AIA) Members

Experience in Space Planning for County Administration and Judicial FacilitiesCounty Administration, Courts and Judicial facility space planning by the firm includes both new and remodeled facilities that are sensitive to their adjacency, security and public interface issues. Our space planning efforts are collaborative. Working directly with Archuleta County we’ll identify “big picture” goals (community access, image, budget, etc) and then work down to the details of individual spaces, offices and public areas. On the Courts and Jail side of the equation, we’ll also consider the unique security requirements of the project (inmate transport, separation of public from secure areas, effects of technology on record keeping, access, communication, etc.). All assumptions will be reviewed and corroborated with the State Judicial Office.

Montrose County Courthouse, Montrose, CO

Littleton Municipal Courthouse, Littleton, CO

Johnstown Town Hall, Johstwon, CO


License

Professional Architect: Colorado #202498, Arizona, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska,New Mexico, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Wyoming, NCARB

Education

Master of ArchitectureCollege of Design and PlanningHonors Thesis, University of Colorado at DenverMaster of Fine Arts, Washington UniversityBachelor of Arts, Art HistorySenior Scholar, Colby College

Professional Affiliations, Service

American Institute of Architects, AIA/Denver, PresidentColorado Municipal LeagueNational Trust for Historic PreservationColorado Preservation, Inc., Past PresidentColorado Historical Society, Historical Fund Review Committee/Past Member Alpha Rho Chi Award, Denver AIAAIA 2030 Challenge, ParticipantAIA Denver, President’s Award, 2012

NANON ADAIR ANDERSON, FAIA, LEED AP

Principal-in-Charge

Cultivating successful working relationships with clients in the public sector has been Nan’s focus throughout her 30-year career of big picture thinking, programming and architectural design. She is an engaged listener who asks questions of the client that draw out and explore the “what ifs” of a project. She deftly strikes a balance between visioning and reality. Central to her experience is her gift for working with groups, a commitment to clear communication and a genuine enthusiasm for her work.

Most Relevant Experience:1. Huerfano County Judicial Center, space planning and programming, Walsenburg, CO2. Grand County Courthouse & New Judicial Center, program planning/ space needs assessment, Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 3. Routt County Courthouse and Annex, space planning and rehabilitation, Steamboat Springs, CO 4. Littleton Municipal Courthouse, rehabilitation, Littleton, CO5. Telluride Town Hall, Marshal’s Building, town offices master plan, programming and conceptual design, Telluride, CO6. South Adams County Water and Sanitation District Administrative Offices, Commerce City, CO7. Steamboat Springs Community Center, LEED Certified, Steamboat Springs, CO; first DOLA-Funded LEED project in northwest Colorado8. Granby Town Hall, design build, Granby, CO9. Johnstown Town Hall, new construction, Johnstown, CO10. Centennial Hall (City Hall), new construction and adaptive reuse, Steamboat Springs, CO11. Civic Campus, development plan and rehabilitation, Montrose, CO12. Silverton School & Gym, rehabilitation, Silverton, CO13. NPS Big Bend Administration Building, life safety and mechanical systems upgrades, Big Bend National Park, TX 14. AH Treehouse, re-invention, LEED Gold, Golden, CO

References:1. Lurline Underbrink Curran, County Manager, Grand County, 970.725.3100, [email protected]. Robert L. Kreiman, District Administrator - 3rd Judicial District, Clerk of Court - Las Animas County, 719.497.8227, bob.kreiman@judicial. state.co.us3. Virgil Turner, Administrative Services Director, City of Montrose, 970.240.1471, [email protected]

Role and Responsibilities:

Nan will act as the primary client contact throughout the Archuleta County Facility Programming Study. She will lead the design team’s presentations and client meetings, maintain the team’s focus on client goals and objectives and will bear ultimate responsibility for the quality of the design team’s work. Li leton Muncicipal Courthouse, LI leton, CO


License

Professional Architect: Colorado #400451,Illinois, Nevada, NCARB Certificate Holder

Education

The University of Florida, College of Design Construction and Planning Master of Architecture, 1998Bachelor of Design in Architecture, 1996


American Institute of ArchitectsAIA, Intern Mentor ProgramAIA, Architectural Registration Exam (ARE) Prep Courses, InstructorCleworth Architectural Legacy (CAL) - Firm Coordinator

WELLS M. SQUIER II, AIA, LEED AP

Project Manager

Wells has over 16 years of professional experience developing successful working relationships with clients in the public realm — the State of Colorado, the City of Denver, the National Park Service and various districts around the State. Wells is currently managing a space planning and programming project for Huerfano County Courts and leading design of the ELK Education Center in Montbello, Colorado.

Most Relevant Experience:1. Huerfano County Judicial Center, space planning and programming, Walsenburg, CO2. South Adams County Water and Sanitation District, new administrative offices, Commerce City, CO 3. Colorado Department of Personnel & Administration and General Assembly Offices, tenant finish and move coordination, Denver, CO4. Denver Public Works, Arts & Venues, tenant finish, McNichols Building,

Denver,CO5. Denver Public Works, Downtown Workforce Center, Denver, CO6. NPS Padre Island Law Enforcement Division Headquarters, Padre Island National Seashore, TX 7. NPS Big Bend Administration Building, life safety and mechanical systems upgrades, Big Bend National Recreation Area, TX8. Fort Lupton Middle School, renovation and addition, Fort Lupton, CO9. Yellowstone Youth Conservation Camp, master plan competition by invitation only, Yellowstone National Park, WY 10. DPS Lincoln & McKinley, systems upgrades, Denver, CO 11. DPS Balarat Outdoor Education Center Classroom Building, new construction, Jamestown, CO12. DPS Grant Middle School, remodel and systems upgrades, Denver, CO13. Platte Valley Medical Center Storage Facility, design/build, Brighton, CO

References:

1. John Sattler, Diversified Consulting Solutions, Inc. (DCS) 303.818.7802, [email protected]. Patrick Riley, Project Manager, City of Denver, Public Works 720.865.3035, [email protected]. Philip Lawrence, Senior Project Manager, National Park Service, Denver Service Center, 303.969.2107, [email protected]


Wells will support Nan in the programming and space planning for the Archuleta County Facility Programming Study. He will participate in client meetings and contribute to the development of presentations and the final study document.

SACWSD Board Room, Commerce City, CO


License

Professional Architect: Colorado #402693

Education

Bachelor of Arts, 1999, cum laudeWashington UniversityHelsinki University of Technology, 2004Masters of Architecture, 2005, with honors, Washington University


American Institute of ArchitectsDenver Landmarks BoardWashington University Alumni AssociationGhost Summer Internship with Bryan MacKay-Lyons, 2005

ANDY DUCKETT-EMKE, AIA

Associate, Project Architect

Andy has 15 years of professional experience. He is a skilled designer who incorporates multiple client objectives into a single, clearly articulated, design approach - merging his design sensibilities with client goals. Currently a member of the Denver Landmarks Commission, Andy is participating in the board’s process of shaping new guidelines. Equally skilled at design for new construction, Andy has three LEED projects to his credit. Clients include; the National Park Service, City of Steamboat Springs, Historic Boulder and the University of Denver.Relevant Experience:1. Huerfano County Judicial Center, space planning and programming, Walsenburg, CO2. Centennial Hall (City Hall), adaptive reuse and rehabilitation, Steamboat Springs, CO 3. Steamboat Springs, Community Center, Steamboat Springs, CO, LEED Certified4. Silverton School, LEED Gold rehabilitation, Silverton, CO5. Ignacio Library; new construction, Ignacio, CO6. Pine River Senior Center, new construction, Bayfield, CO7. Anderson Hallas Treehouse, studio expansion, Golden, CO, LEED Gold8. ELK Eduction Center, programming and design, Montebello, CO9. University of Denver, Graduate School of Social Work, Craig Hall, remodel and expansion, Denver, CO10. University of Denver, Technology Services Building, Denver, CO11. DPS Dora Moore; heat mitigation, Denver, CO12. Breckenridge Arts District, adaptive reuse, Breckenridge, CO13. Dinosaur Ridge Visitor Center, adaptive reuse, Golden, CO14. Denver Mountain Parks, rehabilitation, Evergreen, CO15. NPS Bright Angel Trailhead, restrooms and picnic shelters, Grand Canyon National Park, AZ16. NPS Light Stations, assessment rehabilitation, Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, WI

References:1. Jenn Cram, Arts District Director, Town of Breckenridge 970.547.3116, [email protected]. Thomas Thorpe, Owner, Townscapes, LLC 303.579.4068, [email protected]


Andy will be responsible for day-to-day communications, project coordination, schedule and budget management for the Archuleta County Facility Programming Study. He will provide quality control for the project deliverables, lead the development of presentation drawings, participate in programming and design and lead the documentation effort. Igncaio Libray, Ignacio, CO


Client ObjectivesEvaluate the space needs for all county departments and courts currently housed in the 1930s courthouse and its 1960s addition. Explore: space reallocation in the existing building; adding a third floor; adding an addition to the end of the building; or building a stand-alone courts facility on an adjacent site.

Project OutcomeAnderson Hallas conducted all the programming and conceptual design for the county administrative departments and courts. Ultimately, the free-standing judicial center was selected as the preferred alternative. The programming document developed by Anderson Hallas was used to inform the renovation of the historic courthouse to serve county administrative offices. Anderson Hallas designed the new judicial center and their local affiliate, Alan Carter Architects, designed the courthouse renovation.

GRAND COUNTY ADMINISTRATION & NEW JUDICIAL CENTERHot Sulphur Springs, CO

Construction Cost: $2,300,000 (historic admin.); $7,300,000 (new judicial center)Size of Structure(s): 16,279 sf (historic courthouse/admin.); 25,000 sf (new judicial center)Date of Completion: 2009Owner’s Representative: Lurline Underbrink-Curran, County Manager, 970.725.3100, [email protected]

SPACE NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Exterior - Historic Courthouse/County Administration

AlternativesPreferred Alternative

Alternative B

Alternative A

Existing Condition


Client ObjectivesStarting with the existing historic courthouse, conduct a master planning effort, to decide where/how to accommodate a district and county courts facility. Design of the new facility and/or expansion should reflect the character of the historic structure.

Project OutcomeAnderson Hallas led the design team from programming through construction administration for the new facility to house county and district courts, associated offices and services and to accommodate the capacity of the county’s court case load for the next 30 years. Programming followed stringent adjacency and security requirements of the state courts. The team met a strict budget, while adhering to the client’s schedule.A CM/GC delivery system was initiated at the design development stage - providing the county with information that helped determine the cost/budget of a basement addition (storage space) that the county is now thrilled to have. The county commissioners took an active role in determining the character of the interiors with lighting selection and the choice of beetle kill wood for courtroom millwork.

JUDICIAL CENTERGrand County, Hot Sulphur Springs, CO

Cost at Completion: $7,300,000Size: 25,000 sf Date of Completion: 2008Owner’s Representative: Lurline Underbrink-Curran, County Manager, 970.725.3100, [email protected]

NEW CONSTRUCTION

Grand County Judicial Center

Stairwell

Main Floor Corridor


UP

UPUP

4' - 6" 4' - 6"

MEDIATION SUITE

PROBATION

1499 SFLOBBY

544 SFMECHANICAL

184 SFVESTIBULE

65 SFELEVATOR

CLERKS

100 SFCOLLECTIONS

155 SFWORK ROOM

80 SF

EVIDENCESTORAGE

87 SFMEETING

109 SFCLERK OF COURT

327 SFBREAK ROOM

56 SFELEVATOR

312 SFSTAIR

214 SFWOMEN'S

29 SFJAN.

212 SFMEN'S

992 SF

JURY SELECTION/ COMMUNITY

ROOM

Department Legend

CIRCULATION

CLERK

MEDIATION

PROBATION

PUBLIC SPACE

RESTROOM

SUPPORT

125 SFELECTRICAL

64 SF

ELEV.MACHINE RM

CHIEFPROBABTION

OFFICEOFFICE 7

OFFICE 6

OFFICE 5

OFFICE 4

OFFICE 2

OFFICE 3

OFFICE 1

MEETING

RECEPTION

Client ObjectivesVerify data from a recent space assessment conducted by the Colorado Judicial Facilities Department to explore the opportunities and constraints of 4 scenarios for a new Judicial Center. (The existing Huerfano County Courthouse, which currently houses the courts, was constructed in 1907 and has serious space limitations and physical deficiencies.)

Project OutcomeAnderson Hallas is in the process of conducting interviews with all Courts departments to verify the current and projected needs of the County and District Courts, Clerks and Mediation. The design team is exploring site alternatives and developing initial space planning diagrams.

JUDICIAL CENTERHuerfano County, Walsenburg, CO

Estimated Construction Cost: TBDAffected Square Footage: 18,000 sf Date of Completion: 2015Owner’s Representative: Robert L. Kreiman, District Administrator - 3rd Judicial District, Clerk of Court - Las Animas County, 719.497.8227

COLLECTIONS

11'-0" 11'-0" 4'-0" 9'-0"

13'-0

"13

'-0"

8'-0

"18

'-0"

6'-0

COPY/WORK

EVIDENCESTORAGE

MEETING

CLERKOF COURT

CLERKSSACTIONNTER

16'-0" 31'-0"

ACCESS TOHOLDING CELLS

ACCESS TOWITNESS WAITING

6" STEP UP

6" RAMP UPIN HALLWAY

PROGRAMMING - SCHEMATIC DESIGN

Space Planning Diagram - Clerk

Space Planning Diagram - County Court

First Floor Plan


NEW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUILDINGSouth Adams County Water and Sanitation District Commerce City, CO

Construction Cost: $2,352,959 Size: 13,000 sf Date of Completion: November 2012 Owner’s Representative: John Sattler, Project Manager, Diversified Consulting Solutions, 303.818.7802, [email protected]

Client ObjectivesDesign a new, 13,000 sf administration building on the site of the District’s current facilities — phased to allow the District administrative functions to remain operational during construction of the new building.Deliver a high-performance facility, specific to the District’s current and future programmatic requirements, in a limited time at an optimal cost.Provide a new Board of Directors public hearing room with 21st century technology, including a dais and seating to accommodate 50 people. Provide a public transaction counter able to accommodate six customer service representatives, with a secure separation from the administrative wing of the building. Provide space for extensive public records storage, conference rooms and a workout room with separate restrooms/changing rooms and showers. Design the site for 50 parking spaces.

Project OutcomeAnderson Hallas’s design team designed a contemporary building which is contextually appropriate and maximizes the use of sustainable design practices, including a high-performance envelope which is 25% more efficient than code requirements, extensive natural daylighting and strategic massing and siting. The building features sunshade devices specific to solar angles to maximize heat gain in winter (heating) months while minimizing heat gain during summer months, and still providing effective natural daylighting.The creative use of on-site resources such as a 500,000 gallon water reservoir to support a highly efficient geo-exchange (geothermal) heating and cooling system minimizes energy costs. Twice the size of the existing, the new building operates at a similar mechanical expense to the old.

Customer Service Lobby

New Administrative Services Building

Board Room

SPACE PLANNING AND NEW CONSTRUCTION


Client ObjectivesReprogram the seven story building for new offices, courtrooms, conference center and secure spaces within a limited budget and time-frame. Existing systems required code updates, adaptation to new layouts and uses while not compromising the existing the LEED EB rating.

Project OutcomeAnderson Hallas worked closely with the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (DPA) and the General Assembly (GA) to program the consolidation of the agencies’ administrative functions into the building. The scope of work included space planning, remodel and move coordination services. The design team led a phased remodel of the building’s seven floors and basement which involved updating restrooms, the re-use of as many fixtures and finishes as possible complimented with new paint, ADA compliance, updated HVAC and the addition of courtrooms with new security and AV. The project was completed on-time and provides new and vibrant work spaces throughout on a very tight budget. All of the systems are updated and concealed above a new lay-in ceiling that also provides maximum daylight into the depths of the building.

STATE SERVICES TENANT FINISH AND MOVE COORDINATIONDenver, CO

Construction Cost: $2,420,668Affected Square Footage: 110,000 sf Date of Completion: 2014Owner’s Representative: Matt Azer, Director, Office of Administrative Courts303.866.2452, [email protected]

SPACE PLANNING AND REMODEL

4th Floor Waiting Area

6th Floor Waiting Area

Courtroom

State Services Building at 1525 Sherman Street


Routt County Administration Building

SPACE PLANNING AND REHABILITATION

Client ObjectivesConduct a complete interior rehabilitation of this historic courthouse and the 1960s annex to accommodate county offices and public functions. Restore the exterior character-defining features to their original condition.

Project OutcomeAnderson Hallas led a design team in space needs assessment and interior space planning, mechanical, electrical and structural upgrades, new fire suppression, reroofing and exterior terra cotta restoration. The building’s feature courtroom, which had been subdivided in an earlier remodel, was reinstated and seamlessly retrofitted with 21st century technology to house the County Commissioners’ Hearing Room.

ROUTT COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING & ANNEXRoutt County, Steamboat Springs, CO

Actual Construction Cost: $3,173,000 (construction cost)Size: 12,700 sf (Administration), 19,900 sf (Annex)Planned Date of Completion: 02.2009 Actual Date of Completion: 01.2009Owner’s Representative: Tim Winter, Purchasing Agent and Property Manager, Routt County Purchasing Department, [email protected], 970.879.0108

Main Entrance

Conference Room

Hallway


REHABILITATION

Client ObjectivesExpose and restore the abandoned Arapahoe County Courthouse to house the City of Littleton’s Municipal Courts. Provide all new HVAC, plumbing, lighting, security, electrical and IT systems.House the courts in a location that will serve to build community and celebrate the town’s colorful history.

Project OutcomeAn efficient floor plan was developed to accommodate 2 courtrooms, an arraignment room, clerks’ office, judges chambers, community room and other support spaces into the existing building.Layers of interior finishes were removed to expose ornate tin ceilings, mosaic floors at the west and south entries and finely-crafted antique wood windows. The restored courthouse, sitting on the hill above downtown, serves as a beacon of community pride.

Courtroom

Prowers County Courthouse, Lamar, CO

Exterior

Lobby

LITTLETON MUNICIPAL COURTHOUSELittleton, CO

Construction Cost: $2,591,000 Size: 21,000 sf Date of Completion: February 2000Client Reference: Phil Cortese, Deputy City Manager, City of Littleton, 303.795.3220, [email protected]: The Daily Journal Historic Renovation Award, First PlaceStephen H. Hart Award, Colorado Historical SocietyDRCOG Local Government, Innovations Award, First Place


Client ObjectivesProvide site planning and design services to explore co-locating municipal offices, Town Council Chambers and the Marshal’s Office on the site of a former library and youth center. Increase efficiency and improve services to residents with a centralized location of services. Design a public building in keeping with the town’s unique, rugged mountain character.

Project OutcomeAnderson Hallas began the project with a survey of all town staff to determine space, adjacency and technology needs. The design team then evaluated four of the town’s existing facilities (administrative and marshal’s offices) to determine general conditions and adaptability for the town’s future growth. The team programmed growth requirements for town services and offices for 15 years. Programming was incorporated into a phased master plan for a vacant town site which considered site constraints and factored in the town’s design guidelines. Cost estimates were provided for future facility needs.

DeliverablesAnderson Hallas developed design presentations for the town to use for garnering public support for funding through bond issues. The final report included a full departmental program which can be utilized to anticipate and accommodate future growth.The Town of Telluride has proceeded with implementation of the first phase of the master plan (relocating the Marshal’s office), using local A/E and construction services to implement Anderson Hallas’s conceptual design.

MARSHALS BUILDING AND TOWN HALL Town of Telluride, CO

Cost at Completion: $5,500,000 (est.) Size of Proposed Structure(s): 18,500 sfDate of Completion: 2006 (Master Plan)Owner’s Representative: Lance McDonald, Town of Telluride, 970.728.2167,[email protected]

MASTER PLAN

Detail of Floor Plan

Conceptual Rendering

Existing Site Conditions


Voorhies Memorial, Denver, CO

Montrose ELks Building Lobby, Montrose, CO

RECOMMENDATIONS

“Thank YOU for all your work on restoring our city’s treasured Civic Center. I know we are not completely done yet, but it has been an absolute pleasure and treat working with you!”

Mark Bernstein, RLA Downtown Area Planner, Parks and RecreationCity and County of Denver

“Patrik asked that I write to let you and your team know what a great job all of you did on the Elks Building/City Hall. I know that I personally am one of many Montrose citizens who enjoy using the renovated building. The interior is very pleasant and receptive to its many uses, plus we get the added pleasure of walking past our old building and knowing it is here to stay. Thank you.”

Karen Dean, Office ManagerPatrik Davis Associates, AIA

“Glacier’s experience with Anderson Hallas has been stellar. They are an excellent firm. If it were my choice we would always work with them because they are so committed to customer satisfaction. They have always met the design milestones established and actually have been very proactive in coming up with great ideas to help us achieve more within the timeframe of the contracts.”

James E. Foster II, P.E.Chief of Facility Management, Glacier National Park

“This building has exceeded our expectations in its beauty and utility. Not one person who enters the building fails to remark on how lovely it is. Having worked here since it was being built I have seen our community impacted by its presence. We have more members than are in our library district. The library is the hub of this community. The study rooms are in constant use, the Community Room booked. Our 40+ computers are in heavy use and we now have the best bandwidth in town. Our Adult reading room is always in use.” -

Christine Robinette, Library DirectorIgnacio Library

Ignacio Library, Ignacio, CO


PROJECT APPROACH

Collaborative ApproachAnderson Hallas proposes an integrated project approach for Archuleta County that will balance the County’s needs with projected funding op-portunities while engaging stakeholders in the project’s success. We start with the basics:

VisioningThis phase will begin with a kick-off meeting with County, Court and Sheriff representatives to establish and review the overall project goals, schedule, process, decision-making methodology and project team roles.

• Collect available existing information about the County’s objectives• Identify project goals and guiding principles• Establish an initial project budget target• Discuss decision-making process • Establish a schedule with the County project team • Identify stakeholder group participants and other partners

Data GatheringFrom both internal and external sources, we will gather data that will begin to shape a clear space and program needs statement. Activities will include:County, Courts, Jail

• Review of recent (past 5-10 years) jail data to create a predictive model of future needs, cross-referenced to the State Demographer’s population prediction for Archuleta County.• On-line and hard copy survey of departmental needs• Evaluation of the various departments’s staff and space needs and growth projections compared to other area and southwestern Colorado cities and towns• On-site confirmation of the above with each department

Nan at Silverton School

Space Planning with Huerfano County


Space Planning with Huerfano County

Collaborative Meeting with the Town of Ouray

PROJECT APPROACH

Space NeedsIn an interactive process with the County’s project team, we’ll develop and refine the final space needs program.

• Diagrams for the County’s office, support, meeting, and public space needs• Jail bed count, support facilities and Sheriff ’s staff• Courts and associated functions and support needs• Adjacency and proximity desires• Public/private interactive needs• Common areas delineated• Growth areas identified and documented• Hierarchies and indoor/outdoor connections will be noted

Report PreparationFinally, we will prepare a Needs Assessment report that will contain all relevant information to document the recommendations, process and products of the plan. Each division’s space needs (County, Sheriff and Jail) will be listed both separately and combined, to facilitate testing both stand alone and combined facilities. The report will concisely summarize the space needs in an easy-to-understand matrix and may be used for briefing the community, public officials and county staff. At the draft level the report will be submitted for project team review. Comments and questions will be resolved in the final.

Products• Meeting summaries• Space needs survey summaries• Inmate composition model• Staffing projections


PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE

Meeting Your Project ScheduleThis chart is a graphic representation of our recommended schedule for the Archuleta County Space Needs Analysis project. The final timeline will be mutually agreed upon by the County and the design team prior to the start of the project. Our principals and project managers create and track all of our project schedules which are tied to a master schedule in our office that predicts human resource needs three to six months out. If individual schedule changes occur for reasons beyond our control, we are quick to reallocate resources to readjust our approach.

*

*

Task Sep/15 Oct/15 Nov/15

1. Contract negotiation/execution/NTP

2. Project set-up/background info

3. Develop survey for County/Courts/Jail

4. Site visit #1 - visioning

5. Data Analysis

6. Draft Report

7. Deliver Draft report

8. Site Visit #2 review draft w/County/Courts/Jail

9. Prepare final report

10. Deliver final report


FEE PROPOSALProposal for Archuleta County Facility Programming Study July 31, 2015

Project Description:Anderson Hallas Architects, PC proposes to provide Needs & Data Evaluation Services for Archuleta County, to assess staffing and space needs for a 25 year planning horizon for the following facilities:

• County Services • Courts • Sheriff/Jail

Project Approach: Refer to the Project Approach w/in the Proposal

Client’s Responsibilities: The Client will be responsible for the following: • Arranging access to the site • Coordinate meetings w/ county officials and project stakeholders

Fee/Terms: For the base services listed within this document, Anderson Hallas Architects, PC proposes a lump sum fee of forty five thou-sand seven hundred and eighty one dollars ($45,781.00). Monthly invoices will bill for the percentage of work completed in the previous month. Payment shall be rendered within 20 days of receipt of the invoice. Unpaid invoice balances will be charged 1% per month (12% per annum) after 20 days.

Space Needs Assessment (County & Courts)/Anderson Hallas $34,580Data Analysis & Space Needs Assessment (Jail)/RicciGreene $7,920Direct Costs (printing, travel, etc) $3,281 TOTAL/Base Services $45,781

Optional Services: Optional services, not included in the above scope of services and deliverables, include:

• Existing Space Survey $1,200 • Site Evaluation $3,520 • Cost estimate $2,720

TOTAL/Optional Services $7,440

Project Schedule: Anderson Hallas Architects, P.C. anticipates a three month schedule, from receipt of a signed contract and retainer to project completion, depending upon Client’s availability to meet, etc. Respectfully submitted,

Nanon Adair Anderson, FAIA, LEED AP Principal


FEE PROPOSALProposal for Archuleta County Facility Programming Study July 31, 2015


Est

imat

ed B

y:D

ate:

Spa

ce N

eeds

/Arc

hite

ctJa

il S

peci

alis

tA

/E N

ame

And

erso

n H

alla

s A

rch.

Ric

ci G

reen

e

Principal -

Project Manager

Architect

CADD Tech -

ADMIN

Clerical -

Data Analysis

Hou

rly R

ate

#######

#######

#######

$ 90.00

$ 45.00

#######

WO

RK

TAS

KS

BA

SE S

ERVI

CES

Spac

e N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent

1.1

Pro

ject

Set

-up/

Bac

kgro

und

Info

11

84

1,44

0.00

$in

cl. S

tate

Dem

ogra

pher

's p

roje

ctio

ns/A

rchu

1.2

Dev

elop

Sur

vey

for C

ount

y/C

ourts

/Jai

l8

960.

00$

1.3

Site

Vis

it #1

- Vi

sion

ing

4040

4015

,200

.00

$in

clud

es d

epar

tmen

tal i

nter

view

s

1.4

Dat

a A

naly

sis

216

420

6,24

0.00

$as

sum

es 5

yrs

of e

lect

roni

c da

ta is

ava

ilabl

e

1.5

Dra

ft R

epor

t2

4024

28

2412

,380

.00

$in

cl. s

pace

nee

ds m

atrix

; spa

ce d

iag.

1.6

Del

iver

Dra

ft R

epor

t1

225

0.00

$

1.7

Site

Vis

it #2

: Rev

iew

Dra

ft w

/ Cou

nty/

Cou

rts/

Jail

1616

4,48

0.00

$

1.8

Pre

pare

Fin

al R

epor

t1

84

1,30

0.00

$fin

aliz

e, b

ased

on

inpu

t

1.9

Del

iver

Fin

al R

epor

t1

225

0.00

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

DIR

ECT

LAB

OR

CO

ST F

OR

EA

CH

A/E

42,5

00.0

0$

42,5

00.0

0$

Prim

e's

Mar

kup

on S

ubco

ntra

ctor

's L

abor

%

(se

e co

ntra

ct fo

r %, t

ypic

ally

0%

)-

$

SUPP

LEM

ENTA

L SE

RVI

CES

Opt

iona

l Ser

vice

s 01

- E

xist

ing

Spa

ce S

urve

y1

28

1,20

0.00

$m

easu

re e

xist

ing/

com

pare

to p

ropo

sed

Opt

iona

l Ser

vice

s 02

- S

ite E

valu

atio

n1

824

3,52

0.00

$"te

st fi

t" sp

ace

need

s to

3-5

site

s

Opt

iona

l Ser

vice

s 03

- C

ost E

stim

ate

88

2,72

0.00

$R

OM

cos

t est

imat

e/pr

efer

red

alte

rnat

ive

DIR

ECT

LAB

OR

CO

ST F

OR

EA

CH

A/E

Prim

e's

Mar

kup

on S

ubco

ntra

ctor

's L

abor

%

(se

e co

ntra

ct fo

r %, t

ypic

ally

0%

)-

$

Tota

l Hou

rs fo

r PD

SD

6412

976

06

1644

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Tota

l Hou

rs fo

r Sup

plem

enta

ry S

erv.

1010

320

00

80

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

PD

HO

UR

S64

##76

06

1644

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

##42

,500

.00

$

S

D H

OU

RS

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0##

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

-$

42,5

00.0

0$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

Arc

hule

ta C

ount

y S

pace

Nee

ds A

sses

smen

t

-$

-$

-$

-$

7.31

.201

5N

an A

nder

son

34,5

80.0

0$

-$

7,92

0.00

$

-$

RES

OU

RC

E H

OU

RS

AN

D A

SSIG

NED

STA

FF W

OR

KSH

EET

- DIR

ECT

LAB

OR

- B

ASE

& O

PTIO

NA

L SE

RVI

CE S

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

1,44

0.00

$

34,5

80.0

0$

7,92

0.00

$

-$

-$

-$

-

$

-$

-$

-$

-

$-

$

-$

-$

-

$

CO

MM

ENTS

& N

OTE

S

-$

TOTA

LD

IREC

TLA

BO

R C

OST

/ TA

SK

-$

-

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

6,00

0.00

$-

$-

$

-$

-

$

-$


Est

imat

ed B

y:N

an A

nder

son

Dat

e:7.

31.2

015

Spa

ce N

eeds

Jail

Spe

cial

ist

A/E

Nam

eA

nder

son

Hal

las

Arc

h.R

icci

Gre

ene

Principal -

Project Manager

Architect

CADD Tech -

Admin

Clerical -

Data Analysis

Site

Vis

it #1

11

1S

ite V

isit

#21

1O

ptio

nal S

ervi

ces

OTH

ER D

IREC

T C

OST

S

BA

SE

SE

RV

ICE

STr

avel

Mile

age

curr

ent C

O S

tate

rate

= $

.52/

mi

Air

Fare

Aut

o re

ntal

Lodg

ing

$100

/nig

htP

er D

iem

$41/

day;

$30

/trav

el d

ayM

isce

llane

ous

TOTA

L / T

RIP

/ P

ER

SO

N

Site

Vis

it #1

30

00

00

00

02,

079.

00$

Trav

elM

ileag

ecu

rren

t CO

Sta

te ra

te =

$.5

2/m

iA

ir Fa

reA

uto

rent

alLo

dgin

g$1

00/n

ight

Per

Die

m$4

1/da

y; $

30/tr

avel

day

Mis

cella

neou

sTO

TAL

/ TR

IP /

PE

RS

ON

Site

Vis

it #2

20

00

01

00

00

862.

00$

Rep

rodu

cibl

es$0

.10

0.00

0.00

-$

Pho

toco

py$0

.10

0.00

0.00

-$

Pho

togr

aph y

$0.1

00.

000.

00-

$P

lotti

ng$2

.50

0.00

0.00

-$

Pos

tage

/Del

iver

ies/

Mes

sage

s$3

5.00

40.

000.

0014

0.00

$P

rintin

g$0

.50

200

0.00

0.00

100.

00$

Tele

phon

e/Fa

csm

ile$0

.10

0.00

0.00

-$

Oth

e r$0

.10

0.00

0.00

100.

00$

340.

00$

OTH

ER D

IREC

T C

OST

FO

R E

AC

H A

/E3,

281.

00$

Prim

e's

Mar

kup

on S

ubco

ntra

ctor

's C

ost

%

(se

e co

ntra

ct fo

r %, t

ypci

ally

0%

)-

$

OP

TIO

NA

L S

ER

VIC

ES

Trav

elO

ptio

nal S

ervi

ces

00

00

00

00

00

-$

Pho

toco

py0.

10.

000.

00-

$P

osta

ge/D

eliv

erie

s/M

essa

ges

350.

000.

00-

$Te

leph

one/

Facs

mile

0.1

0.00

0.00

-$

Oth

e r0.

10.

000.

00-

$-

$

O

THER

DIR

ECT

CO

ST F

OR

EA

CH

A/E

Prim

e's

Mar

kup

on S

ubco

ntra

ctor

's C

ost

%

(se

e co

ntra

ct fo

r %, t

ypci

ally

0%

)-

$

`

0.00

RES

OU

RC

E H

OU

RS

AN

D A

SSIG

NED

STA

FF W

OR

KSH

EET

- OTH

ER D

IREC

T C

OST

S - B

ASE

& O

PTIO

NA

L SE

RVI

CES

TRA

VE

L - #

OF

TRIP

S

FOR

:

00

0

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

00

-$

-

$

-$

-$

-$

-

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

0.00

-$

-$

00

-$

-$

-$

$

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

-$

-$

-$

-$

0.00

She

ets

$ $

0.00

-$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-$

-$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

TRIP

S$

0.00

She

ets

$C

opie

s $

Cop

ies

$

-$

-$

-

$

-$

-$

TRIP

S$

She

ets

$

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

She

ets

$

0.00

TRIP

S$

TRIP

S$

-$

-

$-

$

-$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-

$

-

$

0.00

0.00

TRIP

S$

$$

Cop

ies

$C

opie

s $

She

ets

$

TOTA

LO

THER

DIR

ECT

CO

ST/

TAS K

CO

MM

ENTS

& N

OTE

S

150.

00$

-$

-$

-$

-

$

-

$

-$

-$

-

$

100.

00$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-$

-$

00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

-$

-$

-$

TRIP

S$

TRIP

S$

TRIP

S$

TRIP

S$

Cop

ies

$

0.00

She

ets

$C

opie

s $

0.00

0.00

0.00

0

3,28

1.00

$

0.00

0.00

0.00

She

ets

$C

opie

s $

0.00

140.

00S

heet

s $

She

ets

$ $ $10

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

-$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

0.00

0.00

0.00

-$

-$

71

.00

$

10.0

0$

43

1.00

$

-$

200.

00$

TRIP

S$

TRIP

S$

862

TRIP

S$

TRIP

S$

She

ets

$C

opie

s $

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $

0.00

0.00

She

ets

$C

opie

s $

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $ $ $

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $ $ $

She

ets

$C

opie

s $

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $ $

Cop

ies

$

0.00

Cop

ies

$

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $ $

100.

00

TRIP

S$

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $

Cop

ies

$

0.00

She

ets

$S

heet

s $

She

ets

$S

heet

s $

She

ets

$S

heet

s $

She

ets

$0.

000.

00S

heet

s $

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $ $ $

She

ets

$ $

TRIP

S$

TRIP

S$

Cop

ies

$

She

ets

$

Cop

ies

$C

opie

s $

0.00

Cop

ies

$0.

00

She

ets

$

$0.

00

Cop

ies

$S

heet

s $

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cop

ies

$

$$

0.00

0.00

0.00

Arc

hule

ta C

ount

y S

pace

Nee

ds A

sses

smen

t

$$

$$

$$

Cop

ies

$C

opie

s $

Cop

ies

$C

opie

s $

Cop

ies

$0.

000.

00

-$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-$

400.

00$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-

$

18

3.00

$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-$

10.0

0$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-

$

69

3.00

$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

-$

0TR

IPS

$

0TR

IPS

$

TRIP

S$

TRIP

S$

2079

TRIP

S

$0

TRIP

S

$0

TRIP

S

$0

TRIP

S

$


OPTIONAL SERVICES

Existing Space SurveyEach of the existing spaces (within the Jail, Courts and County) would be measured to determine existing sf/space, for comparison to proposed space needs. The results would be included in the final space needs assessment matrix.

Site Evaluation3-5 County-identified sites would be evaluated for the opportunities and constraints they present as potential sites that could accommodate part or all of the identified facility space needs. This task would include quantifying parking for each and/or a combined facility and a review of the site’s zoning requirements.

Cost EstimateIn collaboration with area General Contractors, this task would include an initial rough order of magnitude cost for constructing a combined facility and associated parking. (Does not include site-specific utility infrastructure, site grading analysis, etc.)

Steamboat Springs City Hall, Steamboat Springs, CO

Johnstown Town Hall, Johnstown, CO

Colorado State House Chambers, Denver, CO

proposal for archuleta county facility ......proposal for archuleta county facility programming...

Documents