proportional reasoning

32
Proportional Reasoning • Strategy 1: Setting up a proportion Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned? • Strategy 2: Coordinating quantities 0 mm 0 mm 16 mm 10 mm 16 mm 10 mm 16 mm 10 mm 32 mm 20 mm 16 mm 10 mm 48 mm 30 mm 8 mm 5 mm 56 mm 35 mm Which strategy demonstrates a conceptual understanding of proportional relationship?

Upload: stian

Post on 09-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Proportional Reasoning. Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm , candle Q had burned 10 mm . When candle Q had burned 35 mm , how many mm would candle P have burned?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proportional Reasoning

Proportional Reasoning

• Strategy 1: Setting up a proportion

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

• Strategy 2: Coordinating quantities0 mm

0 mm

16 mm

10 mm

16 mm

10 mm

16 mm

10 mm

32 mm

20 mm

16 mm

10 mm

48 mm

30 mm

8 mm

5 mm

56 mm

35 mm

Which strategy demonstrates a conceptual understanding of proportional relationship?

Page 2: Proportional Reasoning

Proportion

Objective: Making Connections

a xb d=

What is a proportion?

Page 3: Proportional Reasoning

Proportion

Objective: Making Connections

Beginning Algebra

a xb d= y = mx + b

How can we link these two ideas?

y = mx

Page 4: Proportional Reasoning

Key Ideas• Focus on Co-variation and Invariance

(a) Identify the quantities in this problem.

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

These are values of quantities,

not quantities!

16 35 10

?The length burned for candle P at the first moment. (given)

The length burned for candle Q at the first moment. (given) The length burned for candle Q at the second moment. (given)

The length burned for candle P at the second moment. (unknown)

Identifying quantities that change (i.e. variables)

mm mm mm These are numbers,

not quantities!

Page 5: Proportional Reasoning

Key Ideas• Focus on Co-variation and Invariance

Identifying quantities

(a) Identify the quantities in this problem.

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

that change (i.e. variables)and how those quantities are related

(b) Let p represent the number of mm that candle P had burned when candle Q had burned q mm. Write an equation to relate p and q.

Mentally act out the problem situation.Draw diagrams to represent the problem situation.

Page 6: Proportional Reasoning

Which candle is skinner?a. Candle P b. Candle Qc. The same

P Q

16 mm 10 mm

1st moment

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

Page 7: Proportional Reasoning

P Q

16 mm 10 mm

Which candle is skinner?a. Candle P b. Candle Qc. The same

1st moment

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

Page 8: Proportional Reasoning

P Q

10 mm16 mm

PQ

35 mm?

1st moment 2nd moment

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

Page 9: Proportional Reasoning

P Q

10 mm16 mm

PQ

35 mm?

1st moment 2nd moment

What is invariant in this problem?

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

The burning rate of each candle.

Page 10: Proportional Reasoning

P Q P Q

10 mm16 mm

PQ

35 mm?

Initially 1st moment 2nd moment

What is invariant in this problem?

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

The burning rate of each candle.

Page 11: Proportional Reasoning

Initially2nd moment

What is invariant in this problem?

1st moment

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

The burning rate of each candle.

Page 12: Proportional Reasoning

P Q

Initially

What is invariant in this problem?

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

The burning rate of each candle.

Page 13: Proportional Reasoning

Initially 2nd moment

What is invariant in this problem?

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

The burning rate of each candle.

Page 14: Proportional Reasoning

P Q

Initially

PQ

2nd moment

What else is invariant in this problem? The ratio of 16/10 is invariant.

What does the ratio 16/10, or the value 1.6, represent?

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

Page 15: Proportional Reasoning

What else is invariant in this problem?

Length (mm) Burned by Candle P

0 16 x

Length (mm) Burned by Candle Q

0 10 35

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

The ratio of 16/10 is invariant.

What does the ratio 16/10, or the value 1.6, represent?

Page 16: Proportional Reasoning

Length (mm) Burned by Candle P

0 1.6 16 x

Length (mm) Burned by Candle Q

0 1 10 35

Candle P burned 1.6 mm for every 1mm burned by Candle Q.

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

What else is invariant in this problem? The ratio of 16/10 is invariant.

What does the ratio 16/10, or the value 1.6, represent?

Page 17: Proportional Reasoning

Length (mm) Burned by Candle P

0 1.6 16 x

Length (mm) Burned by Candle Q

0 1 10 35

Length (mm) Burned by Candle P

0 1.6 3.2 4.8 6.4 8 16 32 48 x

Length (mm) Burned by Candle Q

0 1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 35

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

Candle P burned 1.6 mm for every 1mm burned by Candle Q.

What else is invariant in this problem? The ratio of 16/10 is invariant.

What does the ratio 16/10, or the value 1.6, represent?

p

q

q p

(b) Let p represent the number of mm that candle P had burned when candle Q had burned q mm. Write an equation to relate p and q.

= 1.6

Page 18: Proportional Reasoning

Key Ideas

• Focus on Co-variation and Invariance Focusing on quantities and relationships Making connections among various representations

Page 19: Proportional Reasoning

(c) How else can we show the relationship between the variables?

Time

Length burned (mm)

35

10

16

x

1st Moment 2nd Moment

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different, but constant, rates. When candle P had burned 16 mm, candle Q had burned 10 mm. When candle Q had burned 35 mm, how many mm would candle P have burned?

Candle P

Candle Q

Page 20: Proportional Reasoning

Key Ideas

• Focus on Co-variation and Invariance Focusing on quantities and relationships Making connections among various representations Interpreting slope meaningfully

Page 21: Proportional Reasoning

Time

Length burned (mm)

35

10

16

Candle P

Candle Q

x

1st Moment 2nd Moment

What does the slope represent of each line represent? The burning rate for each candle (value is unknown). How are the slopes related?

1016

T1

Candle P burned 1.6 times as fast as Candle Q. Slope of line for Candle P is 1.6 times that of Candle Q.

16 T1

10 T1

&

16 1.610 1=

16 T1

10 T1

= mP = 1.6mQ

Page 22: Proportional Reasoning

Key Ideas

• Focus on Co-variation and Invariance Focusing on quantities and relationships Making connections among various representations Interpreting slope meaningfully Recognizing that ratio is invariant

16 x10 35= 16 p

10 q=

Page 23: Proportional Reasoning

p = 1.6q

16 x10 35

=

1016

Time

Length burned (mm)

10

16

35

Candle P

Candle Q

x

1st Moment 2nd Moment

x 35= p

q=

pq

16 1.610 1=

x

35pq

Page 24: Proportional Reasoning

Key Ideas

• Focus on Co-variation and Invariance Focusing on quantities and relationships Making connections among various representations Interpreting slope meaningfully Recognizing that ratio is invariant Relating the meaning of ratio to the context of

the problem

16 x10 35= 35 x

10 16=

Page 25: Proportional Reasoning

We can solve this problem by setting up a proportion like .35 x10 16

=

Time 1st Moment 2nd Moment

Length burned (mm)

10

16

35

Candle P

Candle Q

?

The ratio 35/10 is equal to 3.5. What is the significance of 3.5 in terms of the burning candles?

20

30

Page 26: Proportional Reasoning

We can solve this problem by setting up a proportion like .

Time 1st Moment 2nd Moment

Length burned (mm)

10

16

35

Candle P

Candle Q

?

The ratio 35/10 is equal to 3.5. What is the significance of 3.5 in terms of the burning candles?

32

48

35 x10 16

=

Page 27: Proportional Reasoning

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different but constant rates. At 8:00pm candle P had burned 16 mm and candle Q had burned 10 mm. At 8:50pm candle Q had burned 35 mm.

Time 8:00pm 8:50pm

Length burned (mm)

7:40pm

1016

35

a. At what time were the two candles lighted?

b. What is the burning rate for candle Q?

?

200

c. Suppose the original length of candles P and Q are 200 mm. Which candle is skinnier?

Page 28: Proportional Reasoning

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different but constant rates. At 8:00pm candle P had burned 16 mm and candle Q had burned 10 mm. At 8:50pm candle Q had burned 35 mm.

20 700

1016

35

t (min)

200

(mm)

bQ vs t graph

bP vs t graph

Let t be the # of minutes since the lighting of the candles.Let bP be the length of candle P that has burned at time t. Let bQ be the length of candle Q that has burned at time t.

Page 29: Proportional Reasoning

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different but constant rates. At 8:00pm candle P had burned 16 mm and candle Q had burned 10 mm. At 8:50pm candle Q had burned 35 mm.

Let t be the # of minutes since the lighting of the candles. Let bP be the length of candle P that has burned at time t. Let bQ be the length of candle Q that has burned at time t.Let hP be the height in mm of candle P at time t.

t (min)

(mm)

bQ vs t graph

hP vs t graph

bP vs t graph200

0

Page 30: Proportional Reasoning

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different but constant rates. At 8:00pm candle P had burned 16 mm and candle Q had burned 10 mm. At 8:50pm candle Q had burned 35 mm.

t (min)

(mm)

hQ vs t graph

bQ vs t graph

bP vs t graph

Let t be the # of minutes since the lighting of the candles. Let bP be the length of candle P that has burned at time t. Let bQ be the length of candle Q that has burned at time t.Let hP be the height in mm of candle P at time t. Let hQ be the height in mm of candle Q at time t.

hP vs t graph0

200

Page 31: Proportional Reasoning

Two different candles, P and Q, lighted at the same time were burning at different but constant rates. At 8:00pm candle P had burned 16 mm and candle Q had burned 10 mm. At 8:50pm candle Q had burned 35 mm.

t (min)

(mm)

hQ vs t graph

bQ vs t graph

bP vs t graph

Write an equation to relate the variables in each pair and briefly describe the meaning of the slope and y-intercept of your equation. (i) bP and t (ii) bQ and t (iii) hP and t(iv) hQ and t (v) hP and bP (vi) bP and bQ

hP vs t graph0

200

Page 32: Proportional Reasoning

Mathematics Teaching in the Middle SchoolVol. 14, No. 8, April 2009

All the contextualized problems in this presentation are from this article in